User talk:Calltech - Knowledge (XXG)

1662:

demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt that Brian K. West and Bret McDanel (Trixter) are two different people living on two different continents. They've been extremely active on the Asterisk users mailing list over the past 4+ years. There simply is no reason to believe that one person is responsible for nearly 2500 different posts to that list under two different names for the past 4 years. That being said, there is still the issue of who said what to Calltech. I can see why there is confusion about Brian possibly being the anonymous poster from 86.92.134.171 - the anonymous poster did speak in first person in what would seem like a direct response to a message directed specifically to Brian, making it seem like the anonymous poster was Brian himself. Calltech drew the conclusion that Brian and the anonymous poster were the same person. Given the available information at the time of the inference it was a reasonable conclusion. Unfortunately it just happened not to be correct. Calltech, if you'd be willing to consider the possibility that there are indeed two different people here, Brian and Bret, that would make a lot of people in the OSS telephony community breath a little easier. I'm sure either or both of them would be willing to have a direct conversation or even a conference call with all parties, just to make sure that everyone knows that there are living, breathing persons behind the electronic monikers we all use. Bret, if you made personal attacks against Calltech, would you be willing to apologize for those? Please at least be willing to consider it. Brian, I don't see where you did anything other than express your viewpoint and why you felt that way and then got dragged into a heated discussion that you really didn't start. Would you be willing just to let it go and move on? That, too, would make a lot of us breath easier. In the end I'd like to see all three of you shake hands, as it were, and move forward. We still have the issue of what should be posted on WP and I'd like to see energy directed there. Last thing: any of you have explicit permission to contact me at my place of employment. In the US you can call toll-free 800-540-9011. Sorry Bret, we don't have a toll-free number that works outside of North America. You can still call me at 559-733-7550. I am extension 1160. I appreciate your willingness to consider my proposition. I will respect whatever decisions you make and I will not pass judgment on any of you. You have my word.

2909:“Welcome to Knowledge (XXG). Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Web conferencing do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Knowledge (XXG) is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Knowledge (XXG) uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Calltech (talk) 12:48, 23 June 2009 (UTC)” 1529:™ article keeps getting tagged as an advert and it clearly isn't. It talks about an Open Source voip project. I see that you also have requested removal of Call Weaver and contributed to Asterisk and other project articles. You are clearly not showing objectivity if you favor one project over another. I would accept recommendations on why you feel this is an advert, this entire article was rewritten by a third party back in july and I feel its very neutral. If this is considered and Advert then the one for Asterisk PBX should be also. 1012:

wrote, in my opinion, a very good chargeback article and I added the link to the chargeback page. My opinion about the link if that it's good, it stays, if it's bad, it's removed by an unbiased editor. This link, unlike all the others was removed (btw, the link remained for all my other articles for a long time (months), until you deleted all of them). I investigated the person that removed my link to see if he's unbiased, and it he seemed to be the person owning the website that has the only link on that page

1897:

According to the link you provided "A company, corporation, organization, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of coverage in secondary sources." Below are just a few such references. So, if you compare the original content to those of similar Knowledge (XXG) articles, and follow the notability guidelines as described above, I don't see why the article should be deleted. Once again, I welcome your thoughts on the subject so I can begin restoring the content.

505:- "A website that you own or maintain, even if the guidelines above imply that it should be linked to. This is because of neutrality and point-of-view concerns; neutrality is an important objective at Knowledge (XXG), and a difficult one. If it is relevant and informative, mention it on the talk page and let other — neutral — Knowledge (XXG) editors decide whether to add the link.". This was pretty much left intact until the recent proposed changes which actually puts this under its own heading now. 799:

guidelines, especially since WP is cut and dry when it comes to linking to commercial websites as I mentioned on your talk page. No COI determination is required nor reliable source verification. It simply says avoid "Links to sites that primarily exist to sell products or services." Yet the guidelines don't say avoid links to self-publishing websites with the same content. Doesn't make sense to me and wanted to let you know my thoughts. Again, thanks for your comments.

1736:, which you tagged for speedy deletion with the reason "It is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article", I wanted you to know that I have removed the speedy deletion tag. This article does not qualify for speedy deletion because it is not an advert but is an expandable stub. If you still want the article to be deleted, please use the 3479: 720:"Due to the rising profile of Knowledge (XXG) and the amount of extra traffic it can bring a site, there is a great temptation to use Knowledge (XXG) to advertise or promote links. This includes both commercial and non-commercial sites. Use of Knowledge (XXG) to link to a website that you own, maintain or are acting as an agent for is strongly recommended against, even if the guidelines otherwise imply that it should be linked to. 1016:(John Conde). Feeling that my link was dishonestly removed by an unbiased editor, I replaced his link with my link telling him the following: "If you keep on removing the link I added I will keep on removing yours. Apparently you're a link farmer (I've looked at your other "contributions") and thus you have no right whatsoever. Persisting on doing so I *will* report you and ask for all your links to be removed." 2238: 1023:

for adding external links, yet I think my links are really good, look at the one for the CVV for example, the CVV page never had an external link and this link fully explained the benefit and the advantage over the AVS. I don't have a lot of people I know in wikipedia so that I can get admin status to add/remove links the way I want. I just want to be fair and treated fairly.

1626:

FreeSWITCH project. As I said the three core developers including me are not allowed to post on Knowledge (XXG) as we have made a policy internally to never do so. We let the community do the writing as I already know its a Conflict of Interest for me or anyone directly involved with the project to post anything because we can't provide the objectivity needed.

818:) readded a handful of links to EoE articles that you removed. I've looked at the EoE articles for these topics, and they all seem to add more information than we have in the corresponding Knowledge (XXG) article. That's just the sort of resource we'd normally provide for readers in an External links section, so I think it's fine to link in these cases. 2321:

Should I just go ahead and add these and make the article more Adaptive Audio product specific, without sounding sales oriented? I can keep the tone neutral - I just wanted to makes sure there is no COI here with me editing this article under those circumstances. Also, do I need to run this by the other people that edited my article so far?

3246:. This article has been around for almost a year, has been worked on by multiple editors, and it has some value to the project in my opinion. Speedy deletion is only for entirely uncontroversial deletions where nobody could be expected to object. I don't think that's the case here, because, for a start, I object ;). Cheers! 2913:

have video conferencing software available. From the information I have had back in reply to an email addressing this problem with the wikipedia information team it sounds to me like wikipedia allow certain companies to monopolise the enclopedia and "advertise" as you call it, whilst prohibiting others from doing the same.

1803:. I appreciate the work you're doing in trying to ensure that it remains neutral and that editors with a conflict of interest are not allowed to take over the article. However, in doing so, you've become quite rude and are now probably doing more harm than good. This is especially true in the case of your thread on 161:

without posting a notice on the article talk page. I'm sure you can appreciate what Knowledge (XXG) would become if everyone started adding links to their own sites or to sites promoting themselves and their services. This is probably the number one contention among Knowledge (XXG) contributors and editors.

2959:

My post was modified due to containing external link in the article Desktop Notes. After editing a few articles and getting some paragraphs removed, I have learnt more about what should and should not be included in wikipedia. However, the link to Notes Agent is really worth including in the article.

2876:

The listing of notable web conferencing vendor articles is a major reason why people visit the web conferencing article. If you disagree, a link should be created to a new article of notable web conferencing vendors. Note the "comparison" document has been tagged as in conflict and unreliable, with

1661:

May I suggest a reasonable compromise? Before I go any further, just let me state for the record that I would very much like to see this situation resolved peaceably. If I am overstepping any boundaries then please let me know, and I will step back. With that said, let's continue: I think it can be

1603:

I suggest you stop making threats you cant back up. You arent special you dont have the ability to ban me. You do go around getting any non-asterisk project delisted though. Callweaver and OpenSER were both delisted based on your activities. Others have complaned about you removing links to other

1434:

The CallWeaver removal stuff is out of bounds. The project has been going on for two years, and it is active indeed. You have commented on my person in the project, and I have accidently registerd myself twice at wikipedia, as Rkarlsba and Royk. Please remove the former. As you may see from the logs,

133:

Calltech, as you know, external links are allowed. Knowledge (XXG) also encourages edits, but discourages back and forth disagreements, interference, and "wars". Regarding the Medical Assistant links, neither external linked website is commercial. If anything, there ARE commercial links RIGHT NOW in

3427:

The whole article was only stating facts, and also so in a neutral, non-promotional way. The article will be recreated. Please provide feedback about specific problems (references, structure, text quality, phrasing) for constructive feedback on proper recreation, on my talk page, or provide feedback

2320:

Calltech - I want to write a specific article for Adaptive Audio - the product, just like Microsoft Outlook, with references to the official web site, like velcro. I have read the notability guidelines and believe I have enough independent references in magazine articles etc to meet these standards.

2160:

Also, I think it's odd that you keep removing these links. Do you work for a paid conference call company or something? Can we find a link or links that are acceptable to you that will inform people about free conference calling? There are several vendors out there, and numerous articles about them.

1022:

I don't see what I did as vandalism, maybe I went over the edge a bit with my reaction, but this was based on his action. Apparently, ever since all the links (that were there for months) were removed, stating that I'm link spamming (while in reality I had only about 8 links). I know there are rules

986:

It's surprising how such a great place like Knowledge (XXG) could have such issues like this. The link added as you stated spam was a valid link that represented the type of quality that Knowledge (XXG) looks for. What gives you the right to displace valid and otherwise relevant links that are in no

152:

Specifically, Knowledge (XXG) discourages links to: "A page that you own or maintain, even if the guidelines above imply that it should be linked. This is because of neutrality and point-of-view concerns; neutrality is an important and difficult objective at Knowledge (XXG). If your page is relevant

2987:

I understand the reason behind the removal of my paragraph in Desktop Notes due to its promotional nature. However, the external link is relevant to the article and people do follow the links to the review article on the website (hence proving that they are interested in the subject). I have also

2665:

Could you kindly let me know where am I going wrong? I am not editing this article anymore. Two admins have edited it already and the second one finds that it does not have any conflict of interest (Kindly refer to the last entry on the discussion page of the article). I have researched some of the

2273:

As you mentioned in Mehndi section, external links are bad and are not always. In case of Mehndi, there is nothing related to knowing more on it, but its collection of pictures and materials which has more value. Linking with such materials are not spam and hope you understand and agree with me.

1265:

When you delete content and call people vandals without helping others by answering their questions on your talk page it looks like you are not neutral, and do not represent the true spirit of Knowledge (XXG). Is this true? This makes it very difficult to understand what good reasons you have for

688:

The link on the VLIW article was not added by me. It was added years ago by someone else. All my pages have moved from the cs.utah.edu domain to the siliconintelligence.com domain because the University of Utah is shutting down alumni accounts. I thought I was doing Knowledge (XXG) a little service

651:

I am new to Knowledge (XXG) and I don't know much about editing on it. So if I am doing this wrong, I apologize beforehand. I believe this message was about the Stream Processor external link. I have seen the call for help on that page, but don't have the time to write stuff at the moment. The book

2912:

Could you please tell me why my contribution to the article has been removed, when in all due respect the information I added was no different from the information that’s already up about other companies software. It wasn’t intended to be used as an advertisement, just to simply state that we also

2338:

I added ((request edit)) to the top and bottom of the Adaptive Audio article. There were some edits, though not many. Unlike Outlook, which has millions of pro/con sided users out there, Adaptive Audio does not have that sized knowledge base to work from. As you are one of the few that has edited

2104:

Place a comment on the article's discussion page and let other editors make that judgement about whether listing these commercial companies adds to the article. Because these companies are small (not notable in WP terminology) and don't have articles and because they are commercial will raise red

1938:

I am confused as to why you are removing what I've added to the Conference Call entry. If you go back and read what I put in, I carefully referenced an article about a legal matter between Qwest and FreeConferenceCall.com. I don't see how this is commercial content. I believe it is good and useful

1625:

Calltech I want you to review the comments I made on the spam entry you made about me. I would like you to retract those comments ASAP as you made comments that reflect badly on me and that are false. I am not the person from ip 86.92.134.171. Its a defamation of charater directed at me and the

1011:

Hi! Apparently you're a web programmer so you know if an e-com article is good or bad, I think the articles on itoctopus.com are all good, including the ones on job interviews, project management, and e-com, not because I wrote them myself, but because people tell me that. The thing started when I

177:

Absolutely! It was a worthwhile learning experience for me. Didn't turn out as originally intended, but well worth going through the pains. I have always enjoyed and supported Knowledge (XXG) and will continue to do so. I know you feel the same. Keep up the good work. And thanks for the support to

160:

That is why I recommended getting a editorial consensus, or RFc, which lets the community comment on whether or not links should be added. In general, once other editors remove a link, it is difficult to get it overidden by Knowledge (XXG) Admin, especially if the link was added to one's own site

2830:

I wrote an article on CallWave Inc. and you put a tag on it saying it's an advertisement. Please look at the article again and let me know what part looks like advertisement to you. It's a public company and I think public need to know about it (think about all the people who have a stake in that

998:

guidelines. Don't take it personally. If you think your links are valuable, put an entry in the article's Talk page and let another, unbiased editor add it. If others feel like you that it is a valuable resource, it can be added in that manner. Also, please sign your comments using four tildes

307:

If you are holding the view that "see also" should not contain anything that is not strictly an Asterisk distribution or an Asterisk add-on, a view which I would disagree with and which is not common practise on Knowledge (XXG) looking at other pages, then at the very least you would have to also

2834:

To your point that the article was deleted in past, it might be a good idea to look at how the previous articles were written. Maybe they got deleted for a different reason. I just don't think that it's fair to delete an article just because it was deleted in past. Before I write anything on the

2642:

I have said this earlier and I am saying it again. I am not a spammer. There are thousand ways to spam and using one's real identity is certainly not one of them. I do not have any negative intent for my presence here. My article had been marked as "Orphaned" and I was told to introduce links in

1325:

I know someone that goes to USAFA from my high school. She said the math and engineering courses are extremely difficult (not to mention the physical aspect of the service academies), but I think she's surviving. That's what kind of scares me about the USMA, since I'll probably do very poorly in

303:

Please provide justification why a link to the GNU Bayonne and sipX pages under "see also" are appropriate while links to other such pages such as Freeswitch and Yate are not. Likewise, why is a link to trixbox page appropriate while a link to the FreePBX page is not, especially considering that

3148:

article. This article is not spam or an advert. Some people keep editing the article to make it look like spam so it will be deleted again. I worked very hard to keep this article from being spam and do not like the advert tag. Please help me improve the article by removing what is viewed as

2446:

Caltech, based on the talk history and your change history it is clear that you have a bias in favor of paid telecom services -- perhaps you are an owner or shareholder in such a company. That does not give you the right to remove relevant, timely, and useful information regarding free telecom

2082:

Unlike, AT&T, MCI, etc. the companies do not have their own individual articles to link to. I did run multiple searches on this niche using Google, Yahoo, and MSN, then compared the top results and found the mentioned companies to consistently show up. I looked for other business longevity

1896:

Hi Calltech. I agree that the content I put back after the original was removed was not as complete as it should have been, but I fully intended to replace the original content gradually - perhaps there is an easier way to restore the original content? As for notability, thanks for the link.

777:

that had made its way in. Everybody has their own concerns, but each one was a bullet point, the guideline would be too long to be of use. The external links rules must walk the delicate line of maintaining simplicity, flexibility, and robustness. If your concern is over unreliable websites and

2937:

1849:

I wanted to put the "hangon" tag on the Text2it article but it seems to have already been deleted. I added back some basic content after I noticed it had been deleted the first time which was admittedly sparse. However, I don't see the difference between the Text2it content and other similar

1557:

If you look closely, you'll also see that I had the Digium article removed as well (tagged as advertisement and subsequently merged into Asterisk), so please don't suggest bias here. If an article is written such that it appears to be promoting a product or a project, it should be tagged as an

689:

by updating that link. But you had to go and revert that too. None of this is my original research, just surveys I wrote which took months of reading and understanding years of other peoples research. So I don't have any motivation to get self citations or something. I was just trying to help.

529:

Thanks again for your comments. I agree that the mass reverting of all links is probably not in order here, but I think the author of this site needs to refrain from continuing this process of just linking and his most recent edits were just that. I think he had his hand slapped by two other

1476:

I clarified the comment to accurately reflect the events as they occured. Her open solicitation on the article talk page resulted in your (re)adding the link, as supported by your inline comment. She did not directly solicit the first link addition, but did so for subsequent link requests.

971:

You call it spam but I have added valid and legitimate articles whereas the article I removed you put back. I can understand if you want to keep this article to yourself but the reality is the link I added much in fact much higher in value than the link you added back. Stop removing my valid

798:

The second part of your comment, however, is what I was looking for. As I mentioned, I've watched the recent brawl over WP EL guidelines and didn't like the addition/revert process. I thought the arguments pro/con on Youtube and other self-publishing websites seriously exposed a hole in WP

1675:

and I consider that issue resolved. I believe I have made comments on all of the given talk pages of his admission, but also have expressed displeasure in users who have posted using multiple identities because of resulting confusion and appearance of deception, specifically by Trixter.

2877:

orignal research and it has 0 facts. This is why notable vendors who have proven their worth ahould be included in the article (as they have been for years) or in a section of notable vendors. As such, I undid your revision. Feel free to post to my talk page for further discussion. --

3179:

What I don't understand is that the link to the online demo (demo.unblu.com) has been removed as well. The demo has been built to illustrate co-browsing from a non-commercal point of view. It can be used absolutely anonymously and is separated from the commercial web-site of unblu inc.

3358:

Clairm, I went ahead and removed the EL per your request. Thanks for observing the COI guideline - making small, non-controversial edits is acceptable. It would be best to suggest other changes on the article's talk page and let another editor (without a COI) make the actual change.

769:

Hi. I'm sorry you didn't like the reason I gave for removing your addition to the guideline. I actually have several concerns with it. First, as I noted, nobody commented on your suggestion on the talk page. A lack of discussion should not be mistaken for an endorsement or consensus.

3301:

Hi Calltech, I saw you marked as promotional the page about Mirial. What I was actually trying to do was to remove promotional content and add third-party resources. I'm quite new as wiki contributor so I might have done it the wrong way. Anyway that was the intention of changes.

652:

chapter I linked to is something I wrote last year and I think it is a comprehensive introduction to the topic. I was a postdoc with the Stanford group that worked on stream processors. So I think I can vouch that the article itself summarizes the Stanford and MIT work honestly.

975:

You have the wrong user. Check the article's history. Your contributions are spam, however, because you continuously are adding the same link to multiple articles and because the link points to a forum website requiring registration and probably one you are affiliated with.

489:- "A website that you own or maintain (unless it is the official site of the subject of the article). If it is relevant and informative, mention it as a possible link on the talk page and wait for someone else to include it, or include the information directly in the article." 1107:

Encyclopedias use thousands of examples that reference organizations or companies as references for users to better understand a subject. In addition to the Knowledge (XXG) guidelines you cite, do you have any other rules that would help contributers avoid your deletions?

3457:

that simply promotes a single company that likes to refer to itself by this name. Since WP is a dictionary and not a means to promote a product or service, this article was removed. If you re-create it as a representation of a company or product, it will be deleted again.

2131:

Calltech, thank you very much. I will heed your advice moving forward. I appreciate that you've explained this in a friendly manner--I've seen a few fairly rude responses from guides/editors in passing (granted they probably deserve the right to get a bit grumpy at times).

2156:

I removed the "Free" part from the section on Conference calls. This is because you systematically remove any reference to US Free Conference vendors. The article, in fact, has zero mention of free conference calling whatsoever. So, the "Free" in the title is misleading.

885:, so I consider myself a neutral party. When your edit to the page came up I was surprised to see that you think that the University of California Digital Library is a spam site. It seems pretty legit to me. You might have an argument about accessibility to the paper per 2447:

services and methods for users to opt-out of such services. This is a warning to you, based on the WikiPedia rules that any further vanadalism (removal of said information) from the Robocalls articles will be grounds for blocking your account. Please behave yourself.

2536:

Could you give some specific pointers on how to avoid advertisement style? I've read the WP article but can't pick out the advertismemtn style (likely because my own writing) but I would appreciate any specific pointers because I'd be very glad to remove the style on

3374:

Thank you. I sure will. Last week I jumped in with little knowledge of Wiki policies and guidlines and I realized too late I was doing something "wrong". I hope with some changes made in the correct way the article will be restored as "non written like an ad".

1575:™ page. If you feel one is and the two pages were written similarly then both should be. Although you may have removed the commercial components of asterisk, you dont seem to feel the same way about asterisk as you do to competitors, such as removing the 2643:

order to connect it to other write ups that are related to it. I thought this was one way to do it. As for my credentials as a writer you can google "Raj Machhan" and see for yourself whether I have engaged in any activity that you can term as "spamming"

1351:

Yes I experienced that same problem. I was going to check on another computer in case it was a browser error on mine, but as it didn't work for you, I'll remove it. I was not the one who originally included the link, I just made some edits to the page. --

472:

Back then, pretty simple guideline with no section headings - "Knowledge (XXG) disapproves strongly of links that are added for advertising purposes. Adding links to one's own page is discouraged. The mass adding of links to any website is also strongly

1570:

I dont feel like tagging other projects because I am confident in who I am as a person. Although the types of things that you have done based on this page does seem to lend a bit of bias towards asterisk considering that was the template used for the

729:

If it is a relevant and informative link that should otherwise be included, please consider mentioning it on the talk page and let neutral and independent Knowledge (XXG) editors decide whether to add it. This is in line with the conflict of interests

3074:

with the following edit summary 'together with the Article in ZDNET and in Linux Mag France, can this notification to be deleted removed? ZDNET is also listed at Knowledge (XXG):RS. see also http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Openmeetings'. Please consider

2418:

within paragraph 'applications'. Please note that most of that paragraph does not make any sense now because the reader cannot find the mentioned cloud application any more. This was the citation, the source of the information. So if you still feel

2339:

the article, I wanted to invite you to make any changes you see fit. Can you do this please? I do not want the article to be dismissed simply because it is a new technology that so few know about, very few edit it and it gets deleted as a result.

1811:, being civil, etc. Other people will watch the article to try to keep it neutral, and Knowledge (XXG) won't fail if the article isn't immediately perfect. Taking a small break will hopefully allow you to focus on the positive when you return. 137:

Let's settle this once and for all in a fair manner. What is your definition of a commercial site? And then let's take it from there to see which links belong, and which ones don't. I am adamant about this... as nobody actually OWNS the article.

1274:

From reading other peoples responses, on one side, it seems to provoke and push away many excellent contributors. On the other side, it looks like you may have done a good job because of some glory (The Editor's Barnstar) and recognition (Satori

907:

I was tempted to simply revert rather than bring it up to you on your talk page; and I imagine a number of editors did simply revert what seemed like the removal of a legitimate external link. Anyway, sorry to have troubled you. Have a great day!

1861:

I noticed that your comment for the original removal was "rm non-notables" - so it was not that the original content was not comparable to other material in this category, it is that in your opinion Text2it is not notable enough to be included.

760:

I do not want to receive any more traffic from Knowledge (XXG) or pay bandwidth charges for that and on top of that deal with unreasonable types. So consider this a request to never link from wikipedia to any of my content. Thanks and Good Bye!

2300:

I was following Josh's instructions to create a good article and yet it was deleted anyway when projects like Elastix, a fork or trixbox, are allowed to remain. I really don't understand how ours is listed as advertising but theirs is not.

1292:

I feel like a little more kindness and conservative editing would be better for Knowledge (XXG) and everyone. I believe this is not easy. Nevertheless, I wonder if you believe this would improve the value of Knowledge (XXG)? Sincerely,

2938:

article. It is the world first desktop notes with built in Artificial Intelligent notes. The review in the website is the most up-to-date. Please re-consider the option of letting my paragraph be restored. Hope to hear from you soon.

275:

Sorry about that random IP readding the external links back, he is going all over Knowledge (XXG) and reverting anything I changed lately or agree with it seems. I assume he knows nothing about Asterisk and is just trying to piss me off.

2105:

flags with most editors that this is an attempt to get attention to these companies rather than presenting a neutral article about Conference calls. Also, WP is not a list of websites or providers of products or services. Please read

1435:

that registration was not made during the callweaver dispute, but a year before that or more. Please do not remove the CallWeaver entry. That project has lots of people, and although it hasn't got too much press yet, it will in time

899:

Thanks for your reply on my talk page. Your explanation makes good sense. I know it's probably too late in this instance, but it might save trouble to be more clear as to what you're doing in the edit summary. Maybe something like,

1256:

Dear Calltech, I am sorry about deleting your page. I will not do that again. I did not know how else to prompt you to answer. Obviously, you misunderstood because you thought you had already answered my question, when you did

737:

This link as well as several others added during the last few days to this same website constitutes conflict of interest. Also, the fact that the articles now are surrounded by Adsense adds on your website presents even further

2960:

It is the world first desktop notes with built in Artificial Intelligent notes. The review in the website is the most up-to-date. Please re-consider the option of letting my paragraph be restored. Hope to hear from you soon.

3039:

I've created a draft of an article I'd like to post after receiving feedback from seasoned Knowledge (XXG) editors. If you could review the article at your convenience I'd appreciate it. User:Voice99/Tech Operators Draft.

2800:

I wrote the Knowledge (XXG) article just to let it to be known by people who can benefit from it. MizuTech is hosting the service only from good intention (this is not a product, just a free service without any advertisment)

2792:

should be keept, because it is a reputable software used by more than 24000 users and this ~1 year old article is objective and very useful. Please tell me what should I do (if any) to keep this article on Knowledge (XXG)?

552:

Thanks, agree about cut the knots. I feel a bit less guilty given the other remarks. I think getting WP:EL official and also some spam guidelines official would help. I think my most recent run of criminality may have been

134:

the medical assistant article itself, that you have tolerated from the beginning, such as the one to the AAMA. AMAA IS a business. Medical Assistant Net (hyperlink removed) and MA Exam Help at (hyperlink removed), are NOT.

2693:

apparently disagree about this article, judging from the edit summaries. It wouldn't bother me at all if you want to take this to AfD. I speedied the related article which involved a product they were selling. - Dan

1604:

projects. Wouldnt the same guidelines apply to you where you are obviously not an unbiased 3rd party but strongly trying to ensure that pages that do VoIP/telphony that arent asterisk removed be against some policy?

788:

Thanks and I appreciate your response, EurekaLott. I stated in my "Edit summary" that I had placed a comment on the talk page over a week ago because I wanted to make it clear that this was not a knee jerk addition

1463:

It is inaccurate to the point of being misleading as it implies that my initial edit was solicited. As you are well aware, it is simply not true. Please consider wording your complaints more carefully. Thank you.

2988:

seen large amount of external links in large number of articles on Knowledge (XXG). Could you please advise how I can add an external link to Knowledge (XXG) but make sure that it is not promotional in nature?

3579:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 3340:

Hi, I see you removed some old references with EL form Mirial s.u.r.l. I would like to remove as well the EL in the last sentence of History section. I would do it myself but I am not sure it's fine if I do.

2471:

It is obvious you know little to nothing about WP and its guidelines so go post your thinly disguised partisan, biased and unwanted commentary elsewhere. WP is NOT a forum for promoting your personal agenda.

1187:"Bad Company" is a song from Bad Company's album Bad Company. It is notable as one of the few songs, where the artist, album and song names are the same. Other examples include Black Sabbath and Iron Maiden. 1283:

As a whole, do those reviews sound like your actions genuinely represent the true intent of Knowledge (XXG)? Or do they demonstrate an example that injures Knowledge (XXG) and leave the community in a poor

444:

you left me a note which i saw before someone deleted. if pos could you tell me where the policy on self links etc is? I have read wp:el but i think that's not policy yet. I am feeling pangs of guilt about

1121:

Courier companies are a spin-off from freight forwarders. There are various types of courier companies, such as airfreight courier companies (FedEx, Skynet, Crossflight) or road couriers (Circle Express).

595:

I was being figurative with the word "your" and in no way was referring to any of your links and apologize if it appeared that way. I was smiling at your "guilt" comments. BTW, I was very impressed with

756:

The link to www.cs.utah.edu/~mbinu/coursework/... will merely redirect you to my siliconintelligence.com domain. I have removed that link from the VLIW article -- though the link there existed for years.

1326:

math. Berkeley seems easier (since my major will be psychology and there are no required engineering classes), but I'll be stuck with lots of anti-war kids that will undoubtedly bag on the ROTC kids. ;)

522:- "Use of Knowledge (XXG) to link to a website that you own, maintain or are acting as an agent for is strongly recommended against, even if the guidelines otherwise imply that it should be linked to." 415: 3141:

article or let me know what is considered adverts so I can edit and fix up this article. If no good reason is given why this article is considered an advert then please remove the Advert status.

1019:

That was his response: "Please do not vandalize wikipedia entries. Other editors have also removed your content. If you are here to contribute why not sign up and use a name instead of your IP?"

2666:

other company specific articles on Knowledge (XXG), and some of them indeed are balatant advertisements for the companies, and still these are there? Am I paying the price for being honest?

2014:

cited as references that show this organization is noteworthy (in WP terms) over the millions of other companies and organizations that want to appear in WP but don't meet WP requirements.

1704:

Calltech I AM not the anon person... I can tell you that Trixter and the anon person are ONE IN THE same and he will not own up to it. I request you withdraw your comments ASAP about me.

1459:

Most of the EL's she's added have already been removed but on Inter-Asterisk eXchange‎, she has solicited another WP user User:Apankrat to assist her and we are currently at the 3RR level.

102: 98: 87: 3079:

with 91.89.1.35 before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to

2506: 1970: 2211:

Several vendors in the US now offer free conference calling services. Such services generally require users to dial a long-distance phone number to be connected to their conference.

2083:

metrics, like domain registrant information and these companies have been around for many years. Can you suggest how an editor would mention such new companies in an evolving niche?

2034:

Calltech: Should I have created an Internal Links section at the bottom of the article to include the providers raher than adding them directly into the body of the content I added?

2167:

Suggestion: Can we add a topic called "Free Conference Calling" and put into that some mention of some articles regarding the topic -- only from high quality publishers naturally.

2721:, but I'd like for the people in the AfD discussion to be able to see the content of both articles and both talkpages. Let me know if you need help getting the AfD started. - Dan 2780:) After reading trough your posts, i can agree with your AfD. These are very new software and it is better if we wait for a thirdparty to write a better article about them if so. 773:

Also, the wording of your clause was broad enough as to make it nearly opaque to most contributors. The entire guideline was recently rewritten to simplify it and cut back on the

215:(the edit where I put the Ext Link back that refers to another encyclopedia). It came out as unfriendly but was not meant to be. I should not have used the word "again". Sorry! - 1596:. Abusive comments do not win consensus nor support, are not tolerated, and are a sure path to getting your editing privileges revoked along with the articles you are promoting. 2796:

One more thing about the Mizu WebPhone: this could be a very useful free service for people who are using VOIP. You can convince about it if you take a quick look on this page

696:(struck because its already in the history and I don't want the link here). If you should care to keep it that is. The cs.utah.edu redirection will stop working any day now. 1558:

advertisement until its re-written in a neutral fashion. FreeSWITCH is still written in this fashion. If you feel Asterisk is written as such, feel free to tag it as well.

1231: 920: 665:

Let's continue discussion in one place on your talk page where this was originally posted. No need to make entries on both Talk pages. I'll watch for any postings there.

2164:

As it stands, I believe you are (possibly purposely) preventing readers from finding out about free conference calling in the US. I cannot understand why. Let's fix this!

244:

Hey, thanks for the heads up, appreciate the feedback - I'm new and didnt realize how Knowledge (XXG) worked... I'll go get to know the editors on the relevant talk pages.

3117:

guidelines. Also, when your removed the references, you did not remove the claims, added an alternate reference or even add a 'cite reference' tag to the statements. --

2580:

Hi, I'm the author of articles about flaphone. Could you explain where in my article was the advertising? Article I is similar to other SIP phones. Thanks in advance.

2372:

I went ahead and removed the tag (added by D3innovation) from my talk page as I think you've requested - hopefully that will help clean out the requested edit entries.

2736: 145:

Hi Danni and thanks for adding a discussion rather than just reverting your links. Here is where Knowledge (XXG) defines the do's don't of adding external links .

3508:, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at 3242:

promotional", which is what you are doing by tagging it with g11. If you feel strongly that the article doesn't belong on Knowledge (XXG), I suggest taking it to

648:

Mbinu, please review WP:EL before adding any more links to your articles. What you are doing is considered link spamming. Calltech 18:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

1308:

I'm glad you added your name in. I will hopefully be joining the military when I go to college (USMA or ROTC at Berkeley) in July or August. How was USAFA? =)

3390: 2804:

I just want to ask you to take a look at it, and think one more time about the deletion, than delete it if you still consider it as a "Blatant advertising".

1901: 105:

page and add more and specific information to assist the mediator in understanding the situation, please feel free to do so in the proper sections. Thanks!

1104:

I love Knowledge (XXG) would like to understand how to participate. I am not sure if this is the right place to post a question to you, but here goes.

1898: 311: 65: 449:

which was pre discussed in wp space, and when afd kept it but still is a bit "me myself i". ps sorry for no caps baby has my other hand at present. --

25:

to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

793:

and that I had looked for comments. No assumption on my part that there was a consensus nor (by itself) should it be a justification for removal.

1865:

If you disagree on my statement on how the original content compares to similar topics, I would be very happy to make modifications you suggest.

1397:, I'm not sure if thats what you meant to do or only remove the ohter link. I think that that link is quite important and usefull, you reference 288:

Thanks for the update. I did look through the history of this IP and noticed some of his comments to that effect. Keep up the good work on WP!

2596: 3604: 1054:

Was trying to prevent spam on this article. Didn't know what else to do than put the spam notices on the article. Is there another option?

335:

Please review my comments on your talk page. Lets keep the discussion over there rather than going back and forth between our talk pages.

2945: 2669: 2218: 2174: 2133: 2090: 2047: 1652:

I stand by my comments 100% and the dialog from this talk page section demonstrate the clear association of your User ID with the anon.

1611: 1370:

If you click continue, it does link to a webpage, but as a security warning is issued, I think its prudent that the link be removed. --

3183:

Please let me know, what we need to do to provide this demo unter WP:EL. It should just show what co-browsing is to anyone for free...

2514: 1770:

Thanks for following up to let me know where you are in the process. Sorry I could not get to it right away when you messaged me. Best,

2454: 2281: 1954: 1829:

You are absolutely correct - I got too wrapped up in this issue and lost objectivity and will definitely be taking a break here.

2929: 2250: 1641: 1544: 254: 49: 3600: 2354:

Hi. While i can't see you doing so, do you have any objection to me de-transcluding the above tag, i'm attempting to clean out

1380: 1362: 2513:. Anyone interested in discussing the fate of Open Directory Project (DMOZ) search links is invited to join the discussion at 1904: 34: 22: 3524: 597: 446: 68:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out

2902:

I have just received a message whilst logging in to wikipedia stating that a contribution made by myself on this article (

1494:

Just to let you know that most cleanup templates, like "unreferenced", "fact", "cleanup"etc., are best not "subst"ed. See

3004: 2976: 2242: 1902:

http://www.hotelcondoresort.com/2007/05/23/text2it-enables-dophin-hotel-to-offer-guests-easy-and-affordable-long-distance/

374:

A list sounds like a good idea. There are several that simply don't meet the notability criteria for their own article.

3421:

Please respond with reason why this article was marked for speedy deletion as promotional? I quote from the definition:

1204: 927: 408: 395: 3591:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

3528: 3494: 1045:

Thanks for your quick answer, the reason I added the article on CVV and AVS is that it's related to both. Thanks again

54: 3596: 3441: 2653: 323: 153:

and informative, mention it on the talk page and let unbiased Knowledge (XXG) editors decide whether to add the link."

1899:

http://businessvoip.tmcnet.com/topics/applications/articles/7539-text2it-voip-solution-bridge-mobile-landline-gap.htm

557:

back in early 2005 but about half the links were added by other people and I think they are probably mainly legit. --

1713:

Brian, I am now fully aware that you are not the anonymous poster. As I mentioned above, Trixter did own up to it.

1592:

I strongly suggest that you read the guidelines for WP before posting comments such as the ones above, particularly

355: 257:. I've done my best to represent your position accurately, but I may have it wrong, or you may want to elaborate. - 2838:

Also, I am fairly new to Knowledge (XXG) and expect support from seasoned users like yourself in getting to speed.

580:"I believe there has been a guideline against links to your own site for at least a year (went back into history)." 3501: 1807:. Please consider taking a break from editing this article, and when you return, keep in mind the basic ideas of 2592: 1503: 101:

has been opened, though as of this writing a mediator has not yet selected the case. If you wish to stop by the

29: 2355: 411:, it still needs lots of layout changes and to include a few more distributions. I have also started a AfD for 1804: 536: 61: 3423:

Note that simply having a company or product as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion.

2949: 2673: 2222: 3544: 3107: 2848: 2306: 2193:. If you notice there is no mention of ANY conference call companies in this article for this very reason. 2178: 2137: 2094: 2051: 1615: 1037: 924: 351: 2992: 2964: 2941: 2917: 2854: 2584: 2450: 2430: 2277: 2214: 2170: 2086: 2043: 1942: 1915: 1910: 1881: 1629: 1607: 1532: 1192: 3509: 3325:

and that was what i did on the page. I am still learning how wikipedia works and i did it in good faith.

3076: 2649: 2588: 2458: 2344: 2329: 2285: 3592: 3490: 3261:

FYI, this was my first speedy deletion tag, not my second - the first one you removed was from an admin.

1452: 1046: 69: 3088: 1950: 1580: 1027: 362:) because I don't think we need a page for the 3-5 notable distributions. What do you think about this? 226: 3493:

on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a

2340: 2325: 245: 44: 1981: 1946: 3407: 3397: 3071: 2925: 2921: 2781: 2773: 2565: 2546: 2010:

Article appeared to be nothing more than a promotion for this organization. No reliable sources per

1705: 1637: 1633: 1540: 1536: 1500: 948: 778:

conflicts of interest, I feel that the existing guidelines already address the issue sufficiently. -

3568: 3559: 3534:

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

3187: 3021: 2498: 2423:

is not notable enough I also need to delete the mentioned paragraph of information from wikipedia! (

2161:

I thought TechCrunch would be considered a valid reference, and non promotional, but obviously not.

684:

When you are simply adding links to the same website, particularly when it's to one you own or : -->

3505: 3191: 3025: 2882: 2785: 2777: 2718: 2710: 2627: 2609: 2410:

Calltech - I appreciate your efforts in cleaning up but this time you missed something: You marked

2000: 1378: 1360: 1327: 1309: 1235: 179: 3588: 3572: 3322:

4. Reverting or removing their own COI edits. Cleaning up your own mess is allowed and encouraged.

3235: 3225: 2996: 2968: 2821: 2807: 753:

Adsense exists on some pages because the state of Utah is not paying my bandwidth fees now. I am.

94: 3535: 3376: 3344: 3326: 3305: 3284: 3251: 2391: 2363: 2302: 1294: 1196: 555:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special%3ALinksearch&target=*.john-leech-archive.org.uk

2831:

company) - and no I am not affiliated with the company, I do use some of their products though.

2557: 2538: 1495: 659: 315: 76:

on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --

2835:

deletion talk page I wanted to discuss with you here and resolve any confusions that you have.

2789: 2714: 2683: 2062:

Listing commercial providers in this article appears like spamming and should be avoided on WP

1919: 1871: 1671:

Michael, I appreciate your efforts here and Trixter admitted being the anonymous posted on the

1345: 3159: 3045: 3000: 2972: 2844: 2811: 2258: 2208:

Ok well then can we add a sentence simply telling people such alternatives exist? Suggestion:

1733: 3584: 3576: 3516: 2502: 2114: 815: 3380: 3348: 3330: 3309: 3084: 3063: 2867: 2758: 2726: 2699: 2241:

In support of Operation COOKIE MONSTER (OCM) I'm presenting WikiCookies in appreciation for

2189:

WP is not a forum to promote individual companies and the references you cited do just that

1818: 1745: 1200: 819: 774: 262: 230: 216: 3587:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3580: 3520: 3243: 3202: 3080: 2473: 2420: 2411: 2190: 2106: 1905:

http://www.telappliant.com/news/18170223/VoIP+used+to+transfer+between+landline+and+mobile/

1808: 1737: 1593: 1080: 923:

as there does not seem to be agreement as to whether these links should have been removed.

790: 739: 195:

I just thought you removed it because it was broken, I didn't even bother to read over it.

3478: 3437: 3403: 2561: 2542: 2522: 2414:

for speedy deletion, and after the page was deleted very quickly, you removed the link in

1686: 1672: 1663: 882: 779: 625: 561: 453: 319: 3206: 3114: 3113:

The references that were removed have been reinstated on this article as they are within

2110: 2063: 2011: 1416: 1402: 1398: 1076: 995: 921:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Hundreds_of_links..._to_a_good_site

886: 711: 515: 2878: 2541:. I do appreciate your other suggestions and am new to WP so I may be a little "dense" 1996: 1923: 1875: 1394: 1371: 1353: 1055: 874: 115: 3176:

I understand that the links to the Live Look product has been removed based on WP:EL.

2797: 3459: 3360: 3280: 3262: 3247: 3210: 3097: 2740: 2613: 2510: 2476: 2387: 2373: 2359: 2246: 2194: 2118: 2067: 2015: 1830: 1756: 1714: 1677: 1653: 1559: 1478: 1465: 1000: 977: 936: 909: 890: 859: 846:

I've expanded the article & made some comments on the Spam December archive page.

832: 800: 743: 666: 601: 540: 399: 375: 336: 289: 162: 77: 39: 3155: 3067: 3056: 3041: 2424: 2415: 2254: 1420: 1406: 955: 577:

I just re-read the posts here and on the WPSPAM and wanted to clarify my statement

419: 384: 363: 277: 196: 3279:

Ah, then he should have known better ;) Your tag was more appropriate than his.

2754: 2722: 2695: 2690: 2237: 1995:

Hi, i tried to be neutral in the writing. let me know how can i make it better?

1977: 1815: 1771: 1741: 878: 462:

Hi BozMo, training a future wiki, eh :-)! Here's a few links to the old WP:ELs.

258: 3523:, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see 685:

maintain, it is considered promotion and that is how WP defines link spamming.

3433: 2518: 1800: 1576: 1572: 1526: 1088: 1075:

article, but please note that footnote-linked sources are not governed by the

622: 558: 450: 3504:

to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only

1129:

Companies identified The list of eighteen companies identified as visionary:

2505:. I'm sending you this notice because of your previous participation in the 1508: 1439: 1217: 530:

editors - perhaps harshly, but hopefully this simple link posting will stop.

109: 3144:

Please read the comments made by Jimbo Whales on the discution page of the

2772:

Hi. Probably i was wrong when i have made 2 more articles about MizuTech (

2560:. Can you review to see if removing advertisement style would be in order? 1579:™ link on the asterisk page. So there is a pattern of bias in this issue. 1013: 699:

See you again in a few years when I have the time to update my web pages!

1971:

Knowledge (XXG):Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_December_15#Template:Dmoz

1230:

Your user page notes that attended the USAFA, so please add your name to

848: 1911:

http://forum.rebtel.com/wordpress/2007/04/24/mobile-operators-lock-voip/

3575:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

3234:

Just to let you know that I removed your second speedy deletion tag on

412: 359: 255:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:External links#Help sought at .5B.5BVoiceXML.5D.5D

212: 3608: 3553: 3467: 3445: 3411: 3384: 3368: 3352: 3334: 3313: 3288: 3270: 3255: 3218: 3195: 3163: 3121: 3092: 3049: 3029: 3008: 2980: 2953: 2886: 2858: 2815: 2762: 2748: 2730: 2703: 2677: 2657: 2621: 2600: 2569: 2550: 2526: 2484: 2462: 2434: 2395: 2381: 2367: 2348: 2333: 2310: 2289: 2262: 2226: 2202: 2182: 2141: 2126: 2098: 2075: 2055: 2023: 2004: 1985: 1958: 1927: 1885: 1833: 1821: 1786: 1759: 1749: 1717: 1708: 1689: 1680: 1666: 1656: 1645: 1619: 1583: 1562: 1548: 1481: 1468: 1442: 1423: 1409: 1382: 1364: 1337: 1319: 1297: 1245: 1220: 1091: 1058: 1049: 1030: 1003: 980: 958: 939: 930: 912: 893: 877:'s on my watchlist is because I added a citation to it about it being 862: 852: 835: 825: 803: 782: 746: 669: 628: 604: 564: 543: 456: 424: 402: 389: 378: 368: 339: 327: 292: 282: 265: 248: 233: 219: 201: 182: 165: 123: 80: 1851: 2903: 1939:

for Knowledge (XXG) to have information about this dispute in it.

1907: 3145: 3138: 2236: 1079:

guideline as long as they are considered reliable sources per the

1072: 1065: 178:

me, other fellow Wikipedian, the general public, and the world. --

3515:

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious

1026:

Thanks and I really hope that you look further into this matter.

1511: 1455:

on Knowledge (XXG) Spam page includes the following sentence -

858:

Thanks and I left a message on the article talk page as well.

3477: 3238:

too. I think you are stretching to say that the article is "

3527:). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found 2427:). Otherwise please take action to get the page restored. 383:

What do you think the name for the new article should be?

3319:

Just find out on WP:COI that a non controversial edit is

2841:

Thank you for your help. Really appreciate your support

1114:

Here is a few of many Knowledge (XXG) company examples:

1084: 1071:

Hello. Thank you for cleaning up external links on the

554: 499: 483: 470: 3169:

Removal of "Useful links" from the Co-Browsing Article

1232:

Knowledge (XXG):List of Wikipedians by military branch

994:

What gives me (and any other editor) the right is the

3500:

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not

3453:

The article appears to be a hijack of a generic term

3417:

Speedy Deletion of telecommunication software article

2515:

Knowledge (XXG):Templates for deletion#Template:Dmoz2

2501:

is being considered for deletion because it violates

1419:. My mistake, disregard my comment above. Thank you-- 1855: 1755:Article was removed through AfD by Admin. Thanks. 2798:

http://www.mizu-softphone.com/Home/PublicPhone.aspx

1799:I've been taking a look at the dispute surrounding 889:, but I really don't think it qualifies as spam. -- 3062:Hello Calltech, this is an automated message from 2442:WP 3RR Warning -- Biased and inappropriate removal 1401:as the reason, can you please quote which part of 3567:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 3137:Could you please remove the advert status on the 2735:Thanks Dank55. I opened an Afd on Mizu WebPhone 1083:policy. In particular, I would like to point out 3391:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/ISL Online 1685:Thanks for listening. I'm glad this is settled. 902:"Rv persistent spam linking, see <user x: --> 2906:) has been removed. The message is as follows: 1415:Sorry I now see why, it has to do with item 12 1405:has to do with removing that link? Thank you.-- 3066:to inform you the PROD template you added to 2717:didn't exist, I probably would have speedied 2358:. Also, is this edit at all doable?. Cheers-- 211:Apologies for the tone of my Edit Summary on 8: 535:Went ahead and added back our comments here 516:WP:EL#Advertising and conflicts of interest 3485:Hello. Your account has been granted the " 60:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 3396:Please take a look at the message I left 1852:http://en.wikipedia.org/Windows_Live_Call 2904:http://en.wikipedia.org/Web_conferencing 1393:You removed the voip-info.org link from 1014:http://www.merchant-account-services.org 814:Hi, I though I should explain why I've ( 641:Mbinu message (moved from my user page) 308:propose a removal of Bayonne and sipX. 3098:Learn how to opt out of these messages 919:By the way, you may want to check out 742:under Financial Conflict Of Interest. 706:Mbinu, here is the specific guideline 3083:for community discussion. Thank you, 2784:is already deleted and please delete 987:way spam. I guess it takes all kinds. 708:Advertising and conflicts of interest 692:The new address for that document is 645:This is about the following message: 520:Advertising and conflicts of interest 358:and merge all articles into it (e.g. 253:You will probably want to comment at 7: 3149:advert and removing the advert tag. 3070:has been removed. It was removed by 2556:I've done quite a bit of editing to 3428:on the article talk page later on. 2493:Open Directory Project (DMOZ) Links 1036:I responded on your talk page here 304:FreePBX is a component of trixbox. 72:, ask me on my talk page, or place 30:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 2753:Thanks. I notified Istvan. - Dan 409:List of Asterisk PBX distributions 396:List of Asterisk PBX distributions 14: 3593:review the candidates' statements 3525:Knowledge (XXG):Reviewing process 3497:scheduled to end 15 August 2010. 598:2006 Knowledge (XXG) CD Selection 447:2006 Knowledge (XXG) CD Selection 3400:on the deletion of the article. 1908:http://voip-buzz.com/2007/06/06/ 1868:I look forward to your opinion. 1097:Why are you deleting SOME Links? 702:18:16, 16 December 2006 (UTC)~ 3599:. For the Election committee, 3569:Arbitration Committee election 3560:ArbCom elections are now open! 3102:19:40, 27 November 2009 (UTC) 3050:16:25, 28 September 2009 (UTC) 2435:11:46, 27 September 2008 (UTC) 1969:Hello. I see your vote at the 1750:12:43, 23 September 2007 (UTC) 1620:19:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC) 1584:17:33, 24 September 2007 (UTC) 1563:14:06, 21 September 2007 (UTC) 1549:21:35, 20 September 2007 (UTC) 356:List of Asterisk distributions 191:Re: voip-info.org link removal 81:03:01, 17 September 2006 (UTC) 1: 3609:16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 3489:" userright, allowing you to 3164:21:39, 24 December 2009 (UTC) 3122:14:48, 14 December 2009 (UTC) 3093:19:40, 27 November 2009 (UTC) 2678:15:00, 26 February 2009 (UTC) 2658:13:23, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 2570:01:23, 26 November 2008 (UTC) 2551:01:30, 25 November 2008 (UTC) 2527:07:14, 10 November 2008 (UTC) 2349:19:42, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 2334:23:02, 3 September 2008 (UTC) 2024:11:44, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 2005:01:32, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 1959:22:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC) 1928:21:42, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 1886:03:32, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 1856:http://en.wikipedia.org/Jajah 1171:Philip Morris (now Altria), 954:Cool, thanks for the memo. -- 804:19:29, 17 December 2006 (UTC) 783:16:42, 17 December 2006 (UTC) 747:12:18, 17 December 2006 (UTC) 670:04:44, 16 December 2006 (UTC) 658:02:42, 16 December 2006 (UTC) 629:12:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 605:12:08, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 565:12:01, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 544:11:28, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 457:08:42, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 418:as I have merged it already. 293:19:54, 29 November 2006 (UTC) 283:19:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC) 266:05:10, 23 November 2006 (UTC) 234:09:00, 22 November 2006 (UTC) 220:20:56, 21 November 2006 (UTC) 202:18:42, 13 November 2006 (UTC) 3020:What languages do you know? 2622:13:40, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 2601:08:08, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 2499:DMOZ search template (Dmoz2) 2485:23:04, 26 October 2008 (UTC) 2463:14:33, 26 October 2008 (UTC) 2396:22:14, 14 October 2008 (UTC) 2382:21:55, 14 October 2008 (UTC) 2368:21:40, 13 October 2008 (UTC) 1986:12:48, 5 February 2008 (UTC) 1760:16:36, 14 October 2007 (UTC) 1004:13:33, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 981:02:43, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 904:& <contributions: --> 503:Links normally to be avoided 487:What Should Not Be Linked To 425:22:46, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 403:22:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 390:22:14, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 379:22:08, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 369:21:23, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 340:12:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 328:12:32, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 183:14:43, 8 November 2006 (UTC) 166:22:42, 6 November 2006 (UTC) 50:How to write a great article 3595:and submit your choices on 3030:10:01, 31 August 2009 (UTC) 3009:01:20, 14 August 2009 (UTC) 2981:13:46, 13 August 2009 (UTC) 2954:13:44, 13 August 2009 (UTC) 2311:17:33, 28 August 2008 (UTC) 1834:11:41, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 1822:03:30, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 1787:19:38, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 1718:03:10, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 1709:02:41, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 1690:08:46, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 1681:03:10, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 1667:01:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 1657:02:36, 7 October 2007 (UTC) 1646:18:21, 6 October 2007 (UTC) 1498:for more details. Regards, 1482:13:46, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 1469:05:12, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 1216:Good job with the links! -- 1138:Citicorp (now Citigroup), 959:02:15, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 940:00:11, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 931:20:49, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 913:21:49, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 894:21:16, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 863:18:00, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 853:17:05, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 836:17:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 826:17:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 518:Current, under the heading 350:I think we should create a 124:16:20, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 3624: 3601:MediaWiki message delivery 3506:a small number of articles 3455:Telecommunication software 2859:17:44, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 2816:08:05, 03 March 2009 (UTC) 2626:Please answer my comments 2076:14:11, 28 March 2008 (UTC) 2056:23:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC) 1934:Conference calling removal 1338:19:52, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 1320:19:37, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 1298:22:40, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 1246:05:19, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 1221:23:56, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 1092:01:50, 26 March 2007 (UTC) 1059:15:26, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 1050:02:00, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 1031:22:11, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 873:Hi there. The only reason 249:23:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 3554:09:31, 19 June 2010 (UTC) 3491:review other users' edits 3468:14:38, 10 June 2010 (UTC) 3219:13:16, 3 March 2010 (UTC) 3196:09:06, 3 March 2010 (UTC) 3016:Programming (7 languages) 2892:Video Conference revision 2763:22:51, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 2749:22:11, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 2731:21:34, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 2704:21:24, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 2142:18:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC) 2127:13:01, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 2099:18:36, 1 April 2008 (UTC) 1521:FreeSWITCH advert tagging 1443:21:19, 14 July 2007 (UTC) 831:Thanks for the heads up. 70:Knowledge (XXG):Questions 3510:Special:OldReviewedPages 3463: 3446:20:34, 7 June 2010 (UTC) 3412:08:53, 1 June 2010 (UTC) 3385:12:23, 31 May 2010 (UTC) 3369:11:57, 31 May 2010 (UTC) 3364: 3353:10:52, 31 May 2010 (UTC) 3335:15:26, 28 May 2010 (UTC) 3314:11:38, 28 May 2010 (UTC) 3289:11:49, 18 May 2010 (UTC) 3271:11:44, 18 May 2010 (UTC) 3266: 3256:11:29, 18 May 2010 (UTC) 3214: 3077:discussing your concerns 2744: 2689:Hiya Calltech. You and 2617: 2480: 2377: 2356:Category:Requested edits 2290:19:01, 6 July 2008 (UTC) 2263:01:01, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 2233:Operation COOKIE MONSTER 2227:00:06, 28 May 2008 (UTC) 2203:12:18, 27 May 2008 (UTC) 2198: 2183:00:23, 27 May 2008 (UTC) 2152:Conference Call / "Free" 2122: 2071: 2019: 1424:02:48, 1 July 2007 (UTC) 1410:02:45, 1 July 2007 (UTC) 1156:Johnson & Johnson, 1132:3M, American Express, 2887:19:33, 9 May 2009 (UTC) 1383:05:55, 3 May 2007 (UTC) 1365:05:52, 3 May 2007 (UTC) 1174:Proctor & Gamble, 1038:User talk:70.55.141.129 680:This is "Mbinu" again. 3482: 3474:You are now a Reviewer 3108:Betamax (VoIP company) 2511:DMOZ category template 2316:Adaptive Audio article 2265: 1792:Please take a breather 1732:Regarding the article 1087:. Have a nice day. -- 967:RE: chargeback article 352:Asterisk distributions 346:Asterisk distributions 103:2006-10-01 Call centre 99:2006-10-01 Call centre 88:2006-10-01 Call centre 3573:Arbitration Committee 3481: 3055:Removal of PROD from 2932:) 11:53, 23 June 2009 2433:comment was added at 2406:Neither fish nor fowl 2386:Thats great, cheers-- 2240: 1389:Asterisk link removal 1195:comment was added by 903:'s <talk page: --> 314:comment was added by 21:Hello, Calltech, and 2788:if you have so. But 1973:. I agree with you. 1212:List of SIP software 949:Air Force Pararescue 3577:arbitration process 3297:Promotional content 1991:yor voice reference 1809:assuming good faith 1147:General Electric, 1111:Sincerely, Michael 225:Please have a look 3589:arbitration policy 3483: 2266: 1918:comment added by ( 1687:Michael S. Collins 1664:Michael S. Collins 1430:CallWeaver removal 1150:Hewlett Packard, 1064:External links on 925:Christopher Parham 35:How to edit a page 3449: 3101: 3012: 2995:comment added by 2984: 2967:comment added by 2944:comment added by 2934: 2920:comment added by 2650:Raj Kumar Machhan 2604: 2587:comment added by 2453:comment added by 2292: 2280:comment added by 2229: 2217:comment added by 2185: 2173:comment added by 2101: 2089:comment added by 2058: 2046:comment added by 1961: 1945:comment added by 1930: 1888: 1850:postings such as 1740:process. Thanks! 1648: 1632:comment added by 1622: 1610:comment added by 1551: 1535:comment added by 1490:Cleanup templates 1448:Complaint Wording 1208: 823: 775:instruction creep 423: 388: 367: 331: 281: 200: 129:Medical Assistant 3615: 3551: 3542: 3488: 3448: 3431: 3173:Hello Calltech, 3120: 3106:Changes made to 3095: 3011: 2989: 2983: 2961: 2956: 2933: 2914: 2868:Web Conferencing 2862: 2608:See my comments 2603: 2581: 2465: 2438: 2275: 2251:Independence Day 2212: 2168: 2084: 2041: 1940: 1913: 1879: 1783: 1781: 1779: 1627: 1605: 1530: 1375: 1357: 1335: 1334: 1331: 1317: 1316: 1313: 1251:Value or Injury? 1243: 1242: 1239: 1190: 1101:Dear Calltech: 821: 498:September, 2006 422: 387: 366: 309: 280: 231:Adrian Pingstone 217:Adrian Pingstone 199: 118: 112: 75: 3623: 3622: 3618: 3617: 3616: 3614: 3613: 3612: 3597:the voting page 3563: 3545: 3536: 3495:two-month trial 3486: 3476: 3432: 3419: 3394: 3299: 3229: 3171: 3132: 3118: 3111: 3060: 3037: 3018: 2990: 2962: 2939: 2915: 2894: 2871: 2852: 2825: 2782:Mizu Softswitch 2774:Mizu Softswitch 2687: 2637: 2589:Sergey Poroshin 2582: 2578: 2534: 2495: 2448: 2444: 2428: 2408: 2318: 2298: 2271: 2245:service to the 2235: 2154: 2032: 2030:Conference Call 1993: 1967: 1936: 1894: 1892:Text2it removal 1844: 1794: 1777: 1775: 1773: 1768: 1730: 1728:Speedy deletion 1673:Talk:FreeSWITCH 1523: 1492: 1450: 1432: 1391: 1373: 1355: 1349: 1332: 1329: 1328: 1314: 1311: 1310: 1306: 1253: 1240: 1237: 1236: 1228: 1214: 1191:—The preceding 1099: 1069: 983: 969: 952: 883:state shellfish 871: 844: 812: 767: 678: 643: 514:December, 2006 442: 407:I have started 348: 310:—The preceding 301: 273: 242: 209: 193: 131: 116: 110: 95:Mediation Cabal 91: 73: 55:Manual of Style 12: 11: 5: 3621: 3619: 3566: 3562: 3557: 3521:BLP violations 3475: 3472: 3471: 3470: 3418: 3415: 3393: 3388: 3372: 3371: 3338: 3337: 3323: 3320: 3298: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3292: 3291: 3274: 3273: 3228: 3223: 3222: 3221: 3170: 3167: 3131: 3128: 3126: 3110: 3104: 3059: 3053: 3036: 3035:Tech Operators 3033: 3017: 3014: 2899: 2893: 2890: 2870: 2864: 2857:comment added 2824: 2819: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2686: 2681: 2636: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2624: 2577: 2574: 2533: 2530: 2507:TfD discussion 2494: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2443: 2440: 2407: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2324: 2317: 2314: 2297: 2294: 2270: 2267: 2234: 2231: 2206: 2205: 2153: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2079: 2078: 2031: 2028: 2027: 2026: 1992: 1989: 1976:Best regards, 1966: 1963: 1935: 1932: 1893: 1890: 1843: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1793: 1790: 1767: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1729: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1602: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1522: 1519: 1517: 1491: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1466:Alex Pankratov 1461: 1460: 1449: 1446: 1431: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1395:Asterisk (PBX) 1390: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1348: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1305: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1288: 1286: 1285: 1279: 1277: 1276: 1270: 1268: 1267: 1266:these actions. 1261: 1259: 1258: 1252: 1249: 1227: 1224: 1213: 1210: 1183: 1125: 1117: 1098: 1095: 1068: 1062: 1047:69.159.186.113 1044: 1042: 1041: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 989: 988: 974: 968: 965: 963: 951: 946: 945: 944: 943: 942: 916: 915: 875:Eastern oyster 870: 869:Eastern Oyster 867: 866: 865: 843: 840: 839: 838: 811: 808: 807: 806: 795: 794: 766: 763: 752: 750: 749: 734: 733: 732: 731: 724: 723: 722: 721: 715: 714: 677: 674: 673: 672: 642: 639: 638: 637: 636: 635: 634: 633: 632: 631: 612: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 588: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 582: 581: 570: 569: 568: 567: 547: 546: 532: 531: 526: 525: 524: 523: 509: 508: 507: 506: 501:Under heading 493: 492: 491: 490: 485:Under heading 482:January, 2006 477: 476: 475: 474: 469:January, 2005 464: 463: 441: 438: 436: 434: 433: 432: 431: 430: 429: 428: 427: 347: 344: 343: 342: 300: 297: 296: 295: 272: 269: 241: 240:External links 238: 237: 236: 208: 205: 192: 189: 188: 187: 186: 185: 171: 169: 168: 157: 156: 155: 154: 147: 146: 130: 127: 90: 84: 66:sign your name 58: 57: 52: 47: 42: 37: 32: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3620: 3611: 3610: 3606: 3602: 3598: 3594: 3590: 3586: 3582: 3578: 3574: 3570: 3561: 3558: 3556: 3555: 3552: 3550: 3549: 3543: 3541: 3540: 3532: 3530: 3526: 3522: 3518: 3513: 3511: 3507: 3503: 3502:autoconfirmed 3498: 3496: 3492: 3480: 3473: 3469: 3465: 3461: 3456: 3452: 3451: 3450: 3447: 3443: 3439: 3435: 3429: 3425: 3424: 3416: 3414: 3413: 3409: 3405: 3401: 3399: 3392: 3389: 3387: 3386: 3382: 3378: 3370: 3366: 3362: 3357: 3356: 3355: 3354: 3350: 3346: 3342: 3336: 3332: 3328: 3324: 3321: 3318: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3311: 3307: 3303: 3296: 3290: 3286: 3282: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3272: 3268: 3264: 3260: 3259: 3258: 3257: 3253: 3249: 3245: 3241: 3237: 3232: 3227: 3224: 3220: 3216: 3212: 3208: 3204: 3200: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3193: 3189: 3184: 3181: 3177: 3174: 3168: 3166: 3165: 3161: 3157: 3153: 3150: 3147: 3142: 3140: 3135: 3129: 3127: 3124: 3123: 3116: 3109: 3105: 3103: 3099: 3094: 3090: 3086: 3082: 3078: 3073: 3069: 3065: 3058: 3054: 3052: 3051: 3047: 3043: 3034: 3032: 3031: 3027: 3023: 3015: 3013: 3010: 3006: 3002: 2998: 2994: 2985: 2982: 2978: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2957: 2955: 2951: 2947: 2946:124.169.28.40 2943: 2935: 2931: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2910: 2907: 2905: 2900: 2897: 2891: 2889: 2888: 2884: 2880: 2874: 2873:Hi Calltech. 2869: 2865: 2863: 2860: 2856: 2850: 2846: 2842: 2839: 2836: 2832: 2828: 2827:Hi CallTech, 2823: 2820: 2818: 2817: 2813: 2809: 2805: 2802: 2799: 2794: 2791: 2787: 2786:Mizu WebPhone 2783: 2779: 2778:Mizu WebPhone 2775: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2746: 2742: 2738: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2728: 2724: 2720: 2719:Mizu WebPhone 2716: 2712: 2711:Mizu WebPhone 2708: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2701: 2697: 2692: 2685: 2682: 2680: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2670:59.161.75.121 2667: 2663: 2660: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2644: 2640: 2635:Link spamming 2634: 2629: 2625: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2606: 2605: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2575: 2573: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2554: 2552: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2531: 2529: 2528: 2524: 2520: 2517:. Thank you. 2516: 2512: 2508: 2504: 2500: 2492: 2486: 2482: 2478: 2475: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2441: 2439: 2436: 2432: 2426: 2422: 2417: 2413: 2405: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2346: 2342: 2336: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2322: 2315: 2313: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2303:Kerrygarrison 2295: 2293: 2291: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2248: 2247:United States 2244: 2239: 2232: 2230: 2228: 2224: 2220: 2219:75.103.48.174 2216: 2209: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2184: 2180: 2176: 2175:67.169.21.227 2172: 2165: 2162: 2158: 2151: 2143: 2139: 2135: 2134:66.125.29.166 2130: 2129: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2103: 2102: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2091:66.125.29.166 2088: 2081: 2080: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2057: 2053: 2049: 2048:66.125.29.166 2045: 2040:MillionEric 2038: 2035: 2029: 2025: 2021: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1990: 1988: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1974: 1972: 1965:Template:Dmoz 1964: 1962: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1933: 1931: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1912: 1909: 1906: 1903: 1900: 1891: 1889: 1887: 1884:was added at 1883: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1866: 1863: 1859: 1857: 1853: 1847: 1846:Hi Calltech, 1841: 1835: 1832: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1820: 1817: 1812: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1797: 1791: 1789: 1788: 1785: 1784: 1765: 1761: 1758: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1735: 1727: 1719: 1716: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1707: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1691: 1688: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1679: 1674: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1665: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1655: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1623: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1612:86.92.134.171 1609: 1595: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1585: 1582: 1581:86.92.134.171 1578: 1574: 1564: 1561: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1528: 1520: 1518: 1515: 1513: 1510: 1506: 1505: 1502: 1497: 1489: 1483: 1480: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1467: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1454: 1447: 1445: 1444: 1441: 1436: 1429: 1425: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1388: 1384: 1381: 1379: 1377: 1376: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1363: 1361: 1359: 1358: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1336: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1318: 1303: 1299: 1296: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1255: 1254: 1250: 1248: 1247: 1244: 1233: 1225: 1223: 1222: 1219: 1211: 1209: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1188: 1185: 1181: 1178: 1175: 1172: 1169: 1166: 1163: 1160: 1157: 1154: 1151: 1148: 1145: 1142: 1139: 1136: 1133: 1130: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1112: 1109: 1105: 1102: 1096: 1094: 1093: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1067: 1063: 1061: 1060: 1057: 1052: 1051: 1048: 1039: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1029: 1028:65.94.124.188 1024: 1020: 1017: 1015: 1005: 1002: 997: 993: 992: 991: 990: 985: 984: 982: 979: 973: 972:submissions. 966: 964: 961: 960: 957: 950: 947: 941: 938: 934: 933: 932: 929: 926: 922: 918: 917: 914: 911: 906: 898: 897: 896: 895: 892: 888: 884: 880: 876: 868: 864: 861: 857: 856: 855: 854: 851: 850: 841: 837: 834: 830: 829: 828: 827: 824: 817: 809: 805: 802: 797: 796: 792: 787: 786: 785: 784: 781: 776: 771: 764: 762: 758: 754: 748: 745: 741: 736: 735: 728: 727: 726: 725: 719: 718: 717: 716: 713: 709: 705: 704: 703: 700: 697: 695: 690: 686: 681: 675: 671: 668: 664: 663: 662: 661: 656: 653: 649: 646: 640: 630: 627: 624: 620: 619: 618: 617: 616: 615: 614: 613: 606: 603: 599: 594: 593: 592: 591: 590: 589: 579: 578: 576: 575: 574: 573: 572: 571: 566: 563: 560: 556: 551: 550: 549: 548: 545: 542: 538: 534: 533: 528: 527: 521: 517: 513: 512: 511: 510: 504: 500: 497: 496: 495: 494: 488: 484: 481: 480: 479: 478: 471: 468: 467: 466: 465: 461: 460: 459: 458: 455: 452: 448: 439: 437: 426: 421: 417: 414: 410: 406: 405: 404: 401: 397: 393: 392: 391: 386: 382: 381: 380: 377: 373: 372: 371: 370: 365: 361: 357: 353: 345: 341: 338: 334: 333: 332: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 305: 298: 294: 291: 287: 286: 285: 284: 279: 270: 268: 267: 264: 260: 256: 251: 250: 247: 239: 235: 232: 228: 224: 223: 222: 221: 218: 214: 206: 204: 203: 198: 190: 184: 181: 176: 175: 174: 173: 172: 167: 164: 159: 158: 151: 150: 149: 148: 144: 143: 142: 139: 135: 128: 126: 125: 122: 121: 119: 113: 104: 100: 96: 89: 86:MedCab Case: 85: 83: 82: 79: 71: 67: 63: 56: 53: 51: 48: 46: 43: 41: 38: 36: 33: 31: 28: 27: 26: 24: 19: 18: 3564: 3547: 3546: 3538: 3537: 3533: 3514: 3499: 3484: 3454: 3430: 3426: 3422: 3420: 3402: 3395: 3373: 3343: 3339: 3304: 3300: 3239: 3236:VoiceChatter 3233: 3230: 3226:VoiceChatter 3201:Please read 3185: 3182: 3178: 3175: 3172: 3154: 3151: 3143: 3136: 3133: 3125: 3119:ErnestVoice 3112: 3068:Openmeetings 3061: 3057:Openmeetings 3038: 3019: 2986: 2958: 2936: 2911: 2908: 2901: 2898: 2895: 2875: 2872: 2866:Re: Edit to 2845:FabulosWorld 2843: 2840: 2837: 2833: 2829: 2826: 2822:Callwave Inc 2806: 2803: 2795: 2771: 2759:push to talk 2727:push to talk 2700:push to talk 2688: 2668: 2664: 2661: 2648: 2645: 2641: 2638: 2579: 2555: 2535: 2496: 2455:119.42.85.16 2445: 2425:User:Techy71 2416:Asterisk PBX 2409: 2341:D3innovation 2337: 2326:D3innovation 2323: 2319: 2299: 2282:59.92.32.129 2272: 2210: 2207: 2166: 2163: 2159: 2155: 2117:. Thanks. 2039: 2036: 2033: 1994: 1975: 1968: 1937: 1895: 1870: 1867: 1864: 1860: 1848: 1845: 1842:Text2it link 1813: 1798: 1795: 1772: 1769: 1731: 1624: 1601: 1569: 1524: 1516: 1499: 1493: 1462: 1453:Your comment 1451: 1437: 1433: 1392: 1372: 1354: 1350: 1307: 1287: 1278: 1269: 1260: 1229: 1215: 1189: 1186: 1182: 1179: 1176: 1173: 1170: 1168:Nordstrom, 1167: 1164: 1161: 1158: 1155: 1152: 1149: 1146: 1143: 1140: 1137: 1134: 1131: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1113: 1110: 1106: 1103: 1100: 1070: 1053: 1043: 1025: 1021: 1018: 1010: 970: 962: 953: 901: 872: 847: 845: 813: 772: 768: 759: 755: 751: 730:guidelines." 707: 701: 698: 693: 691: 687: 682: 679: 676:VLIW Article 657: 655:Still spam? 654: 650: 647: 644: 519: 502: 486: 473:discouraged" 443: 435: 349: 306: 302: 299:Asterisk PBX 274: 252: 246:Davesarchive 243: 210: 194: 170: 140: 136: 132: 107: 106: 92: 59: 20: 16: 15: 3240:exclusively 3085:SDPatrolBot 3064:SDPatrolBot 2991:—Preceding 2963:—Preceding 2940:—Preceding 2916:—Preceding 2896:Calltech, 2853:—Preceding 2691:User:Triwbe 2583:—Preceding 2572:mattlandis 2553:mattlandis 2449:—Preceding 2429:—Preceding 2276:—Preceding 2213:—Preceding 2169:—Preceding 2085:—Preceding 2042:—Preceding 1947:Deanvesuvio 1941:—Preceding 1914:—Preceding 1880:—Preceding 1814:Thanks! :) 1628:—Preceding 1606:—Preceding 1531:—Preceding 1180:Wal*Mart. 1177:Sony, and 1165:Motorola, 1159:Marriott, 1081:attribution 879:Connecticut 621:Thanks :)-- 229:. Thanks - 3585:topic bans 3404:Jure pompe 3072:91.89.1.35 2922:ICU Global 2562:Mattlandis 2558:3CX IP PBX 2543:Mattlandis 2539:3CX IP PBX 2532:3CX IP PBX 2503:WP:ELNO #9 1801:FreeSWITCH 1706:Briankwest 1634:Briankwest 1586:anonymous 1577:FreeSWITCH 1573:FreeSWITCH 1537:Briankwest 1527:FreeSWITCH 1504:Farmbrough 1304:No Problem 1056:Joekucker| 780:EurekaLott 74:{{helpme}} 62:Wikipedian 40:Help pages 3581:site bans 3517:vandalism 3188:Haldimann 3134:Hi there 3022:Sipexpert 2879:DustyRain 2790:Mizuphone 2715:Mizuphone 2709:Same for 2684:Mizuphone 2630:. Thanks. 2249:. Happy 1997:Voip4ever 1805:WT:WPSPAM 1509:14 August 1374:Lima Golf 1356:Lima Golf 1346:GPeriodic 1141:Disney, 1135:Boeing, 1085:this edit 810:EoE links 537:WT:WPSPAM 394:Probably 141:Danni R. 64:! Please 3487:reviewer 3460:Calltech 3442:contribs 3361:Calltech 3281:Thparkth 3263:Calltech 3248:Thparkth 3211:Calltech 3005:contribs 2993:unsigned 2977:contribs 2965:unsigned 2942:unsigned 2930:contribs 2918:unsigned 2741:Calltech 2614:Calltech 2597:contribs 2585:unsigned 2576:Flaphone 2509:for the 2477:Calltech 2451:unsigned 2388:Jac16888 2374:Calltech 2360:Jac16888 2278:unsigned 2243:military 2215:unsigned 2195:Calltech 2171:unsigned 2119:Calltech 2087:unsigned 2068:Calltech 2044:unsigned 2037:Thanks! 2016:Calltech 1955:contribs 1943:unsigned 1926:)udic]) 1916:unsigned 1831:Calltech 1757:Calltech 1734:is-phone 1715:Calltech 1678:Calltech 1654:Calltech 1642:contribs 1630:unsigned 1608:unsigned 1560:Calltech 1545:contribs 1533:unsigned 1507:, 21:32 1496:WP:SUBST 1479:Calltech 1205:contribs 1193:unsigned 1162:Merck, 1001:Calltech 978:Calltech 937:Calltech 910:Elipongo 891:Elipongo 860:Calltech 833:Calltech 801:Calltech 765:Re:WP:EL 744:Calltech 667:Calltech 602:Calltech 541:Calltech 400:Calltech 376:Calltech 337:Calltech 324:contribs 312:unsigned 290:Calltech 271:Asterisk 180:Danni R. 163:Calltech 78:Ghewgill 45:Tutorial 17:Welcome! 3231:Hello, 3156:Goplett 3042:Voice99 2997:Cwchong 2969:Cwchong 2855:undated 2808:Istvan3 2431:undated 2296:trixbox 2255:Ndunruh 2115:WP:SPAM 1882:comment 1878:)udic 1796:Hello, 1514:(GMT). 1421:Shmaltz 1407:Shmaltz 1330:Jumping 1312:Jumping 1238:Jumping 1144:Ford, 956:Gpohara 935:Thanks 820:— Matt 413:trixbox 360:Trixbox 213:Glacier 207:Glacier 108:~Kylu ( 23:welcome 3571:. The 3548:Waters 3539:Calmer 3377:Clairm 3345:Clairm 3327:Mirial 3306:Mirial 3244:WP:AFD 3203:WP:COI 3152:Thanx 2776:, and 2755:Dank55 2723:Dank55 2713:. If 2696:Dank55 2474:WP:NOT 2191:WP:NOT 2107:WP:NOT 1978:nejron 1819:(talk) 1816:kmccoy 1766:Thanks 1742:Stifle 1738:WP:AFD 1594:WP:NPA 1333:cheese 1315:cheese 1295:Mrybin 1284:state? 1241:cheese 1197:Mrybin 1184:THREE 1153:IBM, 928:(talk) 822:Crypto 816:BOLDly 791:WP:BRD 740:WP:COI 259:Jmabel 97:case, 3434:Pnetz 3207:WP:EL 3146:fring 3139:fring 3130:fring 3115:WP:EL 2646:Best 2519:Qazin 2421:PBXes 2412:PBXes 2111:WP:EL 2064:WP:EL 2012:WP:RS 1403:WP:EL 1399:WP:EL 1275:Son). 1234:. =) 1089:intgr 1077:WP:EL 1073:MySQL 1066:MySQL 999:(~). 996:WP:EL 887:WP:EL 712:WP:EL 683:: --> 660:Mbinu 623:BozMo 559:BozMo 451:BozMo 440:wp sp 316:Stswp 93:Your 3605:talk 3529:here 3464:talk 3438:talk 3408:talk 3398:here 3381:talk 3365:talk 3349:talk 3331:talk 3310:talk 3285:talk 3267:talk 3252:talk 3215:talk 3205:and 3192:talk 3160:talk 3089:talk 3046:talk 3026:talk 3001:talk 2973:talk 2950:talk 2926:talk 2883:talk 2849:talk 2812:talk 2745:talk 2737:here 2674:talk 2662:Hi, 2654:talk 2639:Hi, 2628:here 2618:talk 2610:here 2593:talk 2566:talk 2547:talk 2523:talk 2497:The 2481:talk 2459:talk 2392:talk 2378:talk 2364:talk 2345:talk 2330:talk 2307:talk 2286:talk 2269:Spam 2259:talk 2223:talk 2199:talk 2179:talk 2138:talk 2123:talk 2113:and 2095:talk 2072:talk 2052:talk 2020:talk 2001:talk 1982:talk 1951:talk 1924:talk 1920:Udic 1876:talk 1872:Udic 1858:. 1746:talk 1638:talk 1616:talk 1541:talk 1525:The 1512:2007 1501:Rich 1440:RoyK 1438:roy 1417:here 1344:RE: 1257:not. 1226:Hey! 1218:Ronz 1201:talk 1126:TWO 1118:ONE 842:BONA 694:link 626:talk 562:talk 454:talk 416:here 320:talk 263:Talk 227:here 3565:Hi, 3519:or 3081:AfD 2851:) 2066:. 1854:or 881:'s 849:DGG 710:in 354:or 3607:) 3583:, 3531:. 3512:. 3466:) 3444:) 3440:• 3410:) 3383:) 3367:) 3351:) 3333:) 3312:) 3287:) 3269:) 3254:) 3217:) 3209:. 3194:) 3186:-- 3162:) 3091:) 3048:) 3028:) 3007:) 3003:• 2979:) 2975:• 2952:) 2928:• 2885:) 2814:) 2761:) 2747:) 2739:. 2729:) 2702:) 2676:) 2656:) 2620:) 2612:. 2599:) 2595:• 2568:) 2549:) 2525:) 2483:) 2461:) 2394:) 2380:) 2366:) 2347:) 2332:) 2309:) 2288:) 2261:) 2253:! 2225:) 2201:) 2181:) 2140:) 2125:) 2109:, 2097:) 2074:) 2054:) 2022:) 2003:) 1984:) 1957:) 1953:• 1782:ni 1748:) 1644:) 1640:• 1618:) 1547:) 1543:• 1293:-- 1207:). 1203:• 908:-- 905:." 600:! 539:- 420:BJ 398:. 385:BJ 364:BJ 326:) 322:• 278:BJ 261:| 197:BJ 120:) 3603:( 3462:( 3436:( 3406:( 3379:( 3363:( 3347:( 3329:( 3308:( 3283:( 3265:( 3250:( 3213:( 3190:( 3158:( 3100:) 3096:( 3087:( 3044:( 3024:( 2999:( 2971:( 2948:( 2924:( 2881:( 2861:. 2847:( 2810:( 2757:( 2743:( 2725:( 2698:( 2672:( 2652:( 2616:( 2591:( 2564:( 2545:( 2521:( 2479:( 2457:( 2437:. 2390:( 2376:( 2362:( 2343:( 2328:( 2305:( 2284:( 2257:( 2221:( 2197:( 2177:( 2136:( 2121:( 2093:( 2070:( 2050:( 2018:( 1999:( 1980:( 1949:( 1922:( 1874:( 1780:i 1778:k 1776:u 1774:K 1744:( 1636:( 1614:( 1539:( 1199:( 1040:. 330:. 318:( 117:t 114:| 111:u

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index