505:
VIII: 620 -- 24; IX: 601 --2. This set of footnotes comes out of Peter's translation on the 1917 Code of Canon Law, translated by Edward Peters. His copy also includees references to
English lanuage JCD disertations on the canons that were written in the various ecclesial univ. around the world. The closest I can find (and it is on Orders generally) is: Distinction between the Episcopate and the Presbyterate in the Decretals (MS no 2848, Gregorian University, 1957, printed version number 1543, 1957). I neither flatter myself that I can read the midieval Latin particularly well that this guy did, nor have I yet actually read the disertation, but it is out there if you are interested in reading it.
456:
thousand years, going back at least as far as Moses -- longe before catholicism. Biblical definition, historical jewish, as well as current jewish law, and laws no longer in force, as well as laws theoretically still in force define it as non-symmetric. That is anyone having sexual intercourse with a married woman is adultery. A married man having sex outside of marriage has not historically been adultery. Infidelity is a different issue.
885:
500:
First, and as always, thanks for all the work you. I wish I had 1/2 your computer skill. As to the 1917 Code, I know it a bit, but it isn't my area of expertise, except as it relates to the CIC 1983. I am also not the world's greatest
Latinist, though I am still plowing through it, hence why I am
455:
Sorry, I removed your adultery definition. First, the article is about fornication, and the long section on the catholic view of adultery seemed to distract from that. This has been a long topic on the adultery article itself. The definition of adultery precededs the council of trent, by over two
504:
I don't know if you have copies (or access to copies) of Canon Law Digest. I have them at my schoool lib, but I have to admit that I haven't read (yet) the articles that I am about to send your way. LOL, when I have the time one day I will. Anyway, they are: Canon Law Digest, V: 452, VII: 688,
390:
Thank you for telling me this! I did do it intentionally, though. I was trying to explain something. I think it's still on the sandbox. Trying to say that our rights are being taken away due to a lack of religious support. I simply say that there is religious persecution in our own country, and by
214:
article. I rechecked my research and realized that, although I think one could make a case for assembly participation as being a ministerial participation under c. 1345 (cf. assisting at mass c. 917), there really is no primary or secondary source material backing it up. This would make the view
650:
Cat, I'm not trying to be dismissive of you, I'm just noting (perhaps too forcefully) that choosing to respond or not respond is up to you. (Also, I just looked at the page again and realised that you created the proposed intro, so I can see why you were upset). But, as noted above I was not
391:
trying to take religion out of everything, is stripping us of our rights. Now, it's like removing Gay flags or Gay Pride
Parades because it hurts someone's feelings. We can't do that, it strips them of their rights, right? Same thing, just religion. I'm sorry for leaving a long note. -
534:
The present canon states the present Church's practice, and does not consider whether the Pope can grant to a presbyter the faculty to ordain priests and deacons. For a brief discussion of this question, cf
Stanislaus Woywod, OFM and Callistus Smith, OFM,
397:
I'm sorry you disagree, Cat
Whisperer. I know that if I change the minds of just a few people, that I could start a anti-persecution thing that will re-shape America. That is my dream in life, just as it was to the Founding Fathers of America.
101:; I did this because the site itself was a cut-and-paste from another article given on a plain text html site. In other words, anyone could make that sort of page up no problem - it would be like referencing a message board. The page
297:
Alas in conflict there are innocent victims; if it happens again, please excuse me. And as far as "cookie" is concerned, non-Christians don't know what the "host" is. Some factual and non-religious description is, I believe,
651:
dismissing the editor, just the proposal. Hey, I've had proposed edits torn to shreds, and I've just moved on to another attempt at a better edit. I'll add an addendum to my response so you know what my criticism is.
948:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
508:
As to this specific Canon, the CLSA commentary and
Woesterman are both silent about the indult question, and neither takes it up as a history question. It would seem a glaring ommission, but there you are.
720:
vandalize another page now, I hope he or she will be blocked permanently as a vandalism-only account. However, it takes an administrator to perform the block, so if you see further vandalism by
469:
It is the definition still in current law in
Minnesota, Current Jewish law, and historically correct through most of the Roman empire, as well as before that all the way back to Moses.
483:
I think I answered your question, on the discussion page (I hope). BTW, thanks for all the great work you do, esp for idiots like me who can't make the footnotes appear!
631:
As for whether you choose to respond or not, as it was a general comment and not directed at anyone, I don't really care if you respond. That's your choice. Cheers.
105:
looks a lot better, though it would be best to source the actual document in question, i.e. the Greek synod cannon whatever. Thanks for the contributions,
248:
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Cat
Whisperer! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply
465:
I'm fine with not talking about adultery at all in the fornication article. However, as previously stated, the one given is not incorrect at all.
65:
431:. Neither Apostle claims to be bishop. This is not a contemporary document, but it records an early tradition to which the Orthodox still refer.
25:
to
Knowledge! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
672:
Just an FYI - the debate about the lead is moving again, with the original one from last month (which I thought we had moved on from) still
973:
882:. The membership is constituted by a user who's going to be a priest and yours truely. You are most welcome to join. Thanks and God bless!
284:. My edit comment was not directed towards you. The article appears to need a complete re-writing; that is appropriately referenced.
97:
Greetings CW, to respond to your question: there is nothing wrong with using internet articles as sources. The one I omitted was:
155:
Please do not vandalize any further articles for the purpose of inserting your personal views in them. Thank you, and good day.
969:
313:
I just want to say thanks for all the references and discussion. Im no expert in this area so i appreciate it. keep it up. --
441:
216:
102:
68:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
910:
249:
49:
768:
758:
34:
22:
960:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
965:
721:
717:
700:
564:
Hi, I have finished updating the article on fetal pain, as you suggested. There continues to be discussion at the
261:
253:
241:
913:, where I believe some input from someone directly knowledgable about canon law would be appreciated. Thank you.
257:
54:
895:
767:
Anytime! I don't get to do too much on WP, but I like to help out when I can. You know, "helping people..."
744:
673:
879:
868:
98:
819:
I saw your note on this user's talk page. You may want to look at his contribution list. Thanks...Ron --
29:
790:
918:
786:
703:
405:
399:
392:
61:
569:
568:
regarding how the fetal pain article should be summarized. Your input would be appreciated. Thanks.
526:
Back to the famous canon I just mentioned. The following block quote comes from Wm. Woestman's book
106:
820:
961:
889:
551:
539:, New York, Joseph F Wagner, 1957, pp 559 -- 560. For longer treatment, cf. Felix M Cappello, SI,
513:
484:
69:
834:
805:
729:
438:
376:
352:
324:
230:
196:
176:
141:
116:
87:
44:
76:
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
937:
928:
858:
166:
957:
941:
914:
797:
281:
274:
265:
956:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
716:
my final warning (by one minute), so unfortunately it doesn't qualify for a block. Should
423:
would be the first Bishop of Rome. ("Pope here is an anachronism, of course.) See also the
351:
just fyi, i'm only trying to provide a neutral pov, and i'm actually pro-choice myself. --
743:
thank you for the invitation to talk, and for the advice; I look forward to the dialogue.
625:
603:
583:
366:
345:
339:
314:
211:
103:
http://www.americamagazine.org/gettext.cfm?articleTypeID=1&textID=3997&issueID=517
884:
424:
416:
175:. Please indicate which of those edits you consider to be vandalism, and why. Thanks,
953:
945:
428:
299:
288:
949:
830:
725:
652:
632:
607:
591:
470:
457:
433:
131:
39:
854:
220:
911:
TalK:Catholic sex abuse cases#Canon law prevented laicization of abusive priests?
677:
186:
156:
427:
which record Paul as having consecrated Linus, and Peter as having consecrated
724:(or by any other user after a final warning), please append a notification to
420:
977:
922:
899:
875:
862:
837:
823:
808:
793:
771:
761:
747:
732:
706:
684:
663:
643:
618:
572:
554:
516:
487:
473:
460:
445:
379:
369:
355:
327:
317:
302:
291:
268:
233:
223:
199:
189:
179:
159:
144:
134:
119:
109:
90:
80:
77:
699:
Can you block this user? He vandalized a page after the media bias one.
252:. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other
185:
My mistake. Your username was one off from the one I intended to click.
99:
http://maillists.uci.edu/mailman/public/mgsa-l/2005-February/004824.html
944:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
878:
articles quite frequently and so I wanted to invite you to join
565:
547:, vol 4, Turin, Marietti, 1951, pp 191 -- 209, nos 284 -- 312.
287:
Feel free to re-edit the article; just include your sources.--
757:
Good to see someone (you) using Vorgrimler for DV. Thanks!
365:
I think I have it properly moved to userspace now. Thanks!
833:
and the IP has been blocked for vandalism for a week. --
782:
467:
It is one of several correct current usage definitions.
415:
So Ware, but not universally and not historically. See
173:
170:
587:
338:
i answered you state ment chekc it out at my talk -
936:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
851:Your edits reduced the accuracy of the material.
140:Nice name, WikiCats! Thanks for the welcome. --
829:Thanks for the update! I reported the user to
602:19:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC) BTW, have you read
537:A Practical Commentaryon the Code of Canon Law
528:The Sacrament of Orders and the Clerical State
115:Thanks for the reply, and the information! --
501:trusting Dr Peter's translation over my own.
260:and please note this is VP 1.3 not 1.2.2 see
8:
874:Hi Cat Whisperer! I noticed that you edit
130:Hi Cat Whisperer. Welcome to Knowledge. --
60:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
905:Canon law and clergy sexual abuse matters
606:yourself? Damned if I can see any vio.
530:St Paul Univ. Press Ottawa: 2006 pg 19.
404:Oh, and thanks for your last message. -
844:Ordination of Women - Dissenting Views
624:In other words, you found nothing in
7:
676:. Your vote would be appreciated.
375:Thanks for taking care of this! --
72:, ask me on my talk page, or place
417:The Patriarchal Encyclical of 1895
14:
962:review the candidates' statements
86:Thanks for the warm welcome! --
883:
250:download and install VandalProof
195:Thanks for clearing this up! --
256:, or you can post a message on
968:. For the Election committee,
938:Arbitration Committee election
929:ArbCom elections are now open!
923:16:03, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
848:See Discussion page at above.
815:64.237.2.98 is at it again....
280:I read your concern regarding
234:17:36, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
224:17:31, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
1:
978:16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
474:22:54, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
461:22:50, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
328:22:00, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
318:21:50, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
303:00:22, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
292:12:59, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
145:02:15, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
135:02:39, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
30:The five pillars of Knowledge
838:23:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
824:16:41, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
522:opps, found the ref I missed
380:04:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
370:04:27, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
356:21:05, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
269:17:55, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
219:, which isn't encyclopedic.
50:How to write a great article
964:and submit your choices on
900:22:07, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
809:19:19, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
804:Thanks for the pointer! --
794:16:50, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
446:05:54, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
120:01:55, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
110:09:28, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
91:19:10, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
81:15:21, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
993:
970:MediaWiki message delivery
701:User_talk:Twistedchidl1066
685:20:13, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
664:20:17, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
644:19:53, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
619:19:41, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
573:23:01, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
555:17:20, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
517:17:10, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
488:21:35, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
21:Hello, Cat Whisperer, and
772:01:44, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
762:12:54, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
748:21:36, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
733:23:34, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
707:20:35, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
863:11:18, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
712:That vandalism occurred
200:02:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
190:02:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
180:10:47, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
160:05:10, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
769:The.helping.people.tick
759:The.helping.people.tick
425:Apostolic Constitutions
264:for the approved list.
165:I have only edited the
549:
206:Excommunicants at mass
942:Arbitration Committee
880:WikiProject Canon Law
869:WikiProject Canon Law
628:to back up your post.
532:
479:ordination/presbyters
419:. By that reasoning,
541:De Sacra Ordinatione
946:arbitration process
258:the discussion page
70:Knowledge:Questions
958:arbitration policy
745:Sanctum Cor Leonis
35:How to edit a page
688:
444:
217:original research
210:Good call on the
167:Kathleen Sebelius
151:Kathleen Sebelius
984:
898:
892:
890:Canon Law Junkie
887:
722:Twistedchidl1066
718:Twistedchidl1066
682:
680:
674:under discussion
661:
658:
655:
641:
638:
635:
616:
613:
610:
600:
597:
594:
566:abortion article
437:
282:Host desecration
275:Host desecration
75:
992:
991:
987:
986:
985:
983:
982:
981:
966:the voting page
932:
907:
894:
888:
872:
846:
817:
780:
755:
741:
697:
678:
659:
656:
653:
639:
636:
633:
614:
611:
608:
598:
595:
592:
580:
562:
524:
495:
481:
453:
413:
388:
363:
349:
346:abortion debate
336:
311:
278:
246:
212:excommunication
208:
169:article twice:
153:
128:
73:
55:Manual of Style
12:
11:
5:
990:
988:
935:
931:
926:
906:
903:
871:
866:
845:
842:
841:
840:
816:
813:
812:
811:
791:72.174.145.104
783:More vandalism
779:
778:More vandalism
776:
775:
774:
754:
751:
740:
737:
736:
735:
696:
693:
692:
691:
690:
689:
667:
666:
660:sch•
654:•Jim
647:
646:
640:sch•
634:•Jim
629:
615:sch•
609:•Jim
599:sch•
593:•Jim
579:
576:
561:
558:
545:De Sacramentis
523:
520:
497:Cat Whisperer
494:
491:
480:
477:
452:
449:
429:Pope Clement I
412:
409:
387:
384:
383:
382:
362:
361:User:Jvfletchr
359:
348:
343:
335:
332:
331:
330:
310:
307:
306:
305:
277:
272:
245:
238:
237:
236:
207:
204:
203:
202:
183:
182:
152:
149:
148:
147:
127:
124:
123:
122:
96:
94:
93:
66:sign your name
58:
57:
52:
47:
42:
37:
32:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
989:
980:
979:
975:
971:
967:
963:
959:
955:
951:
947:
943:
939:
930:
927:
925:
924:
920:
916:
912:
904:
902:
901:
897:
891:
886:
881:
877:
870:
867:
865:
864:
860:
856:
852:
849:
843:
839:
836:
835:Cat Whisperer
832:
828:
827:
826:
825:
822:
814:
810:
807:
806:Cat Whisperer
803:
802:
801:
799:
795:
792:
788:
784:
777:
773:
770:
766:
765:
764:
763:
760:
752:
750:
749:
746:
738:
734:
731:
730:Cat Whisperer
727:
723:
719:
715:
711:
710:
709:
708:
705:
704:171.71.37.103
702:
694:
687:
686:
681:
675:
671:
670:
669:
668:
665:
662:
649:
648:
645:
642:
630:
627:
623:
622:
621:
620:
617:
605:
601:
589:
585:
577:
575:
574:
571:
567:
559:
557:
556:
553:
548:
546:
543:, 3rd rev ed,
542:
538:
531:
529:
521:
519:
518:
515:
510:
506:
502:
498:
492:
490:
489:
486:
478:
476:
475:
472:
468:
463:
462:
459:
450:
448:
447:
443:
440:
436:
435:
430:
426:
422:
418:
410:
408:
407:
406:66.218.13.198
402:
401:
400:66.218.13.198
395:
394:
393:66.218.13.198
385:
381:
378:
377:Cat Whisperer
374:
373:
372:
371:
368:
360:
358:
357:
354:
353:Chris Pickett
347:
344:
342:
341:
334:hey hey lisin
333:
329:
326:
325:Cat Whisperer
322:
321:
320:
319:
316:
308:
304:
301:
296:
295:
294:
293:
290:
285:
283:
276:
273:
271:
270:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
243:
239:
235:
232:
231:Cat Whisperer
228:
227:
226:
225:
222:
218:
213:
205:
201:
198:
197:Cat Whisperer
194:
193:
192:
191:
188:
181:
178:
177:Cat Whisperer
174:
171:
168:
164:
163:
162:
161:
158:
150:
146:
143:
142:Cat Whisperer
139:
138:
137:
136:
133:
125:
121:
118:
117:Cat Whisperer
114:
113:
112:
111:
108:
104:
100:
92:
89:
88:Cat Whisperer
85:
84:
83:
82:
79:
71:
67:
63:
56:
53:
51:
48:
46:
43:
41:
38:
36:
33:
31:
28:
27:
26:
24:
19:
18:
933:
908:
873:
853:
850:
847:
818:
781:
756:
742:
713:
698:
683:
588:Not censored
581:
563:
550:
544:
540:
536:
533:
527:
525:
511:
507:
503:
499:
496:
493:1917 CIC ref
482:
466:
464:
454:
432:
414:
403:
396:
389:
364:
350:
337:
312:
309:Appreciation
286:
279:
247:
242:VandalProof!
209:
184:
154:
129:
95:
59:
20:
16:
15:
915:John Carter
909:Please see
798:Pianohacker
728:. Thanks,
590:. Thanks.
451:fornication
323:Thanks! --
266:Betacommand
240:Welcome to
229:Thanks! --
954:topic bans
753:Dei verbum
695:User block
570:Ferrylodge
560:Fetal Pain
442:(contribs)
421:Pope Linus
411:First Pope
367:NawlinWiki
340:lazer john
315:Blckavnger
107:Lostcaesar
74:{{helpme}}
62:Wikipedian
40:Help pages
950:site bans
876:Canon Law
821:Rhopkins8
298:needed.--
254:moderator
64:! Please
787:this IP.
626:WP:CIVIL
604:WP:CIVIL
584:WP:SPADE
552:DaveTroy
514:DaveTroy
485:DaveTroy
132:WikiCats
45:Tutorial
17:Welcome!
855:Wimania
221:Pmadrid
126:Welcome
23:welcome
940:. The
831:WP:AIV
726:WP:AIV
714:before
679:Morphh
439:(talk)
386:Hello!
187:Jsnruf
157:Jsnruf
796:(aka
785:from
578:Blunt
512:Peace
300:Lance
289:Lance
974:talk
919:talk
896:Talk
893:§§§
859:talk
586:and
582:See
471:Atom
458:Atom
262:this
172:and
78:Alai
934:Hi,
434:TCC
244:1.3
976:)
952:,
921:)
861:)
800:)
789:--
739:ty
657:62
637:62
612:62
596:62
972:(
917:(
857:(
398:-
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.