223:
34:
123:
article. Your dislike of content that connects to commercial topics is noted, but irrelevant. Highly-reliable sources state that this has been used as one of the standard names of this topic. As such, it is worthy of mention in the lead and content of the article, and not for removal to
268:
77:
153:
Claims such as that a certain phrase was used to name a certain topic need published reliable sources. Google ngrams is not a published reliable source and relying on it instead of what the sources actually say is
124:
leftover-topic trivia sections. In general, we mention commonly used alternative names in leads, and I see no reason for an exception in this case. Your dislike of commerce is not a valid reason for this removal. —
252:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
61:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
182:
And regardless of the fact that the literature contains a minor reference to this truly negligible usage, that does not justify 5 (!) mentions in a short article. Can we at least agree on that?
237:
47:
176:
291:
100:
287:
96:
261:
70:
273:
82:
163:
129:
249:
58:
231:
41:
159:
125:
245:
54:
257:
66:
280:
89:
260:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
253:
69:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
62:
120:
155:
197:
183:
140:
222:
172:
In what sense is Google ngrams not a "published reliable source? Is that a policy?
33:
264:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
73:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
295:
241:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
205:
191:
167:
148:
133:
104:
51:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
119:
Please stop your disruptive removal of "Ballantine rings" from the
139:
Did you look at the ngram I provide, which disproves your claim?
277:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
86:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
267:
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
235:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All
76:
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
45:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
248:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
57:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
21:
I do not often check this page. Email is preferred.
8:
28:
7:
232:2023 Arbitration Committee elections
42:2021 Arbitration Committee elections
250:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
216:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
175:Here is the persistent URL for the
59:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
25:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
14:
221:
196:I am still awaiting a response.
32:
271:and submit your choices on the
80:and submit your choices on the
192:17:17, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
1:
296:00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
168:19:39, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
149:17:51, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
134:20:10, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
105:00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
314:
288:MediaWiki message delivery
97:MediaWiki message delivery
206:15:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
285:to your user talk page.
201:
187:
144:
94:to your user talk page.
246:Arbitration Committee
229:Hello! Voting in the
55:Arbitration Committee
39:Hello! Voting in the
262:arbitration policy
71:arbitration policy
298:
156:original research
112:
111:
107:
305:
286:
284:
225:
115:Ballantine rings
95:
93:
36:
29:
313:
312:
308:
307:
306:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:
278:
226:
218:
121:Borromean rings
117:
87:
27:
19:
12:
11:
5:
311:
309:
269:the candidates
238:eligible users
227:
220:
219:
217:
214:
213:
212:
211:
210:
209:
208:
194:
180:
173:
160:David Eppstein
126:David Eppstein
116:
113:
110:
109:
78:the candidates
48:eligible users
37:
26:
23:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
310:
299:
297:
293:
289:
282:
276:
275:
270:
265:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
242:
240:
239:
234:
233:
224:
215:
207:
203:
199:
195:
193:
189:
185:
181:
178:
174:
171:
170:
169:
165:
161:
157:
152:
151:
150:
146:
142:
138:
137:
136:
135:
131:
127:
122:
114:
108:
106:
102:
98:
91:
85:
84:
79:
74:
72:
68:
64:
60:
56:
50:
49:
44:
43:
38:
35:
31:
30:
24:
22:
16:
272:
266:
243:
236:
230:
228:
118:
81:
75:
52:
46:
40:
20:
274:voting page
83:voting page
258:topic bans
177:comparison
67:topic bans
254:site bans
63:site bans
198:Cerberus
184:Cerberus
141:Cerberus
281:NoACEMM
90:NoACEMM
292:talk
244:The
202:talk
188:talk
164:talk
145:talk
130:talk
101:talk
53:The
17:Note
158:. —
294:)
283:}}
279:{{
256:,
204:)
190:)
166:)
147:)
132:)
103:)
92:}}
88:{{
65:,
290:(
200:(
186:(
179:.
162:(
143:(
128:(
99:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
