Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Chedorlaomer

Source 📝

488:
dismiss him as a mythical hero. To me, however, the account of Chedorlaomer and the battle has more elements of historical reality than most myth. The detailed listing of each of the kings involved, the lame but realistic cause of difficulty (bitumen pits), and precise, un-magical number (318) of warriors sent to recover Lot... this story seems more an excerpt from a genuine chronicle than a fantastic piece of myth or speculation. The thinking, then, is that if Chedorlaomer could be identified, then so could Abraham be placed in history (assuming he wasn't inserted into the story for unspecified reasons). Unfortunately, Chedorlaomer is a mystery too. I admit: this thinking isn't very original (hence the numerous attempts to identify him), but nevertheless it happened to be my thinking back on the wonderful summer day I made the account to stomp on some shameless self-promotion/advertising.
1405:
editing to my IP address, since this compromises anonymity. So, I edited the topic on IP for months afterward, and eventually started an account restricted to those topics edited by IP to make the editing easier and so that people would stop calling me anon. Under IP and its associated account, I generally stuck to the original topic but occasionally entered into other topics either upon request or because it not make sense for me to use Chedorlaomer, and I have always tried to avoid making the connection obvious because that would connect the IP to this account. The restriction of the IP-associated editing to just a few topics preserves anonymity by giving the IP a less distinctive appearance while still allowing me to edit on the topic. The separation between the two accounts is nearly absolute, without overlap on any article that I can see.
1409:
the basis; the separation originates in security concerns, and I do not use multiple accounts to get around blocks (I do not have any blocks anyway until the fishing incident) or play around with different sides of a dispute or whatever else might be called "bad hand." I do get in disputes, with both accounts, but these are content disputes without relation to each other. The real question about this block is whether or not I employ multiple accounts in an abusive manner, and I say confidently that I do not. I do not know why I was Checked without any due process or even reason for suspicion (which the documentation strongly recommends) but it has damaged my attempt to continue my editing in relative anonymity.
714:
coverage. The finger is pointed at violent video games, and also to some extent similar movies. Anyway, I created the category in hopes that the cases where "played video games" was noted or even blamed by the media could be looked at side-by-side for research purposes. Maybe you will look at all of the cases and decide that there was no element of causation behind the causation. I'm not trying to say that video games caused it; the category is designed to help better understand the debate. Should I, perhaps, change it to "violent video games" to be fair on puzzle players? Or does this still seem unreasonable to you?
813: 1191:
deliberately keep the topics separate (in hopes of preventing an obvious connection between this account and the other because the other is linked to my IP). I do not think that there has been overlap on even a single article. Second, and perhaps more significantly, this edit is not "one to revert" while the other is "for normal editing." Both accounts have had a share of mundane edits, reverts, talk page discussion, &c. This account edits a broader range of topics than the other, but it is certainly not a "revert" "bad hand" of the other account. Simply put, there was no
1302:
accounts, and I would like another review, preferably by an admin who is willing to look through the block log to figure out the name of the other account, which I do not want to state openly because it is connected to my IP. It may also be better to move this whole situation to a higher board of discussion as it has dragged out without fair resolution, and also because there appears to be no good reason to use Checkuser privilege against my account; it lacked due process.
1608: 542: 615: 1216: 857: 1477: 190: 1366:
be "clean" by this definition as well. The accounts did not, however, edit on the same articles at all, so there was no attempt to play with a dispute in different ways as might be expected for the GHBH accounts. As for the SCRUTINY, the desire to conceal connection to IP is "security," and security is identified as a legitimate use.
1132:
To slakr: The other account can be found by looking through the blocking administrator's log. You might notice that I am trying to prevent a connection between my main account (this account) and my IP address (which the other account is openly connected to). This fishing block has, of course, damaged
942:
This is not a "bad hand" account, but rather my main account. The other account (which I would like to avoid mentioned by name if possible) was created later because I had made some IP edits on a certain topic back in September, and I felt nervous about connecting my main account to my IP (because my
204:
from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under
1408:
Basically, then, the other account restricts only to the IP editing topics, while this account is open to everything else but will not edit on the topics of the other account. In the end, I cannot see anything about the accounts that can suggest that I am abusing multiple accounts. I just do not see
1365:
I have reviewed these already. I argued against these allegations. Your response does not address my case. There is nothing abusive about my use of multiple accounts. Apparently getting involved in disputes makes an account unclean, and the other account has been involved in disputes, so it must not
697:
I am struggling to see how this is relevant. Perhaps the young man was influenced by video games to some degree or another, but you must ask the question: who under the age of about 20 these days has NOT played a video game at least once in his or her life? Should we also add that he watched movies,
97:
You missed the point i think. In Akbar's reign people of Hindoo race were forced to wear yellow patches or in local language "tukda" for easy identification. Hitler's reign had the same thing happen to jewish community. No claim is made one influenced the other rather just pointed out the similarity
1404:
This account I started in August editing things in general. In September I edited a topic on the IP address. I felt that it would not be best to connect my main account to the IP address because the IP address seems revealing. I didn't (and still do not) feel comfortable connecting my full range of
1387:
if you want but I doubt they would consider your case. Anyway, I've reviewed your two accounts, and while I don't think this is a "bad hand" account, exactly, I do not see the kind of separation between these accounts that would indicate your use of these accounts is appropriate. Normally, if you
943:
IP is revealing), so I left the IP to almost exclusively edit that topic, and in December created an account just to do the IP's editing. Chedorlaomer has remained my account for everything else. The two accounts did not edit any articles in common, leave alone engage in abuse of multiple accounts.
713:
The item is relevant because, wrong or right, the possible connection between violent video games and spree shootings is often brought up by press, notable voices, politicians, etc. after some kid goes crazy and shoots up the school. I wouldn't even be able to create the category without that media
446:
hi , sorry for the delay in replying. I cannot devote much time to WP any longer due to other commitments and may have to take time off for a couple of months. I did not check the books in themselves but followed the references from the article and found that they were mostly limited previews from
487:
I'm not particularly into Biblical Studies or anything. One day I was thinking about the mystery of Abraham. The irony of Abraham is that he has been such a significant historical figure to many peoples, yet it is difficult to actually place him in history. Perhaps some would be inclined to simply
134:
If you read the source it is clear that Hindoo race was made to wear a patch on their clothes so that they could be identified. Same was the requirement on Jewish race when they were asked to wear a patch so that they could be identified by the nazis. Just identical facts from two different times.
1301:
The block, allegedly for abuse of multiple accounts, does not prevent disruption because there was no "abuse" of multiple accounts in the first place. I've explained my case in greater detail on this page, with responses to the blocking admin. I assert that the blocking admin is mistaken about my
421:
Ah, another AGF-violating accusation of "vandalism." You are plugging in material from a primary source. You aren't supposed to farm quotes like this. These quotes are often used by Hindu nationalists, communalists, and perhaps some Marxists to support the image of Mughal emperors as anti-Hindu
1190:
YellowMonkey has recently commented of me: "He has two accounts. He cannot use one to revert, and another for normal editing in the same zone. Teh other account is not longer blocked. Not all the edits reverted are by Hkelkar." First of all, these accounts do not edit in "the same zone" as I
246:
deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Knowledge (XXG) guidelines.
1388:
have a concern that certain contributions are in a sensitive area, you could have a second account to keep those contributions separate. But your other account looks like a main account. Could you explain the purpose of your two accounts more precisely?
557:
prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
1039:
Note that I have restored the Request for unblock category. Sandstein placed the block on hold but apparently stopped following this case even after the blocking administrator responded. Can someone please contact Sandstein if that is needed?
1175:
Sorry, I added that because it hadn't been taken off hold at that time. I don't see why slakr "declined" even while admitting that he cannot figure out enough about the case. I guess I'll have to add the unblock request again.
1562:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1423:
What I was trying to get at is that I don't understand what the "restricted topic" is. You pretty much appear to have two main accounts. You can email me if you want to be so careful about your anonymity.
167:
I do not understand your assertion. The word Persecution is widely used in describing endangered animals. Using hyenas as baiting animals or hunting them by roping them out of their dens is not extermination.
1369:
At this point, I would like to move this case to a higher board where a wider audience of experienced users may consider the substance of my defense against the accusation of multiple account abuse.
1133:
this attempt, but I would really damage it by stating openly the account's name on this page. If you see the other account, you will notice that the two do not edit on the same topics whatsoever.
1491:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also 422:
jihadis, but scholars generally are hesitant to take them at face value because there is great potential that the degree of ideological motivation is exaggerated to make the king look pious.
771: 1502:
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to
1025:
sock puppets. The other account might appear more "serene" simply because I restrict the topics edited by that account, and overall it does not see as much editing.
954:
Until I know what the other account is, there's really no effective way for me to review this. However, if your main concern is that you edited while logged out,
1503: 698:
swore occasionally, and perhaps picked his nose? The killer was obviously deranged, and had other problems in his life much bigger than a few general hobbies.
1355:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
991:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
673:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
1256: 897: 1669: 678: 201: 410: 368: 151: 123: 461: 1340: 976: 394:
Excuse me? No framing quotes. Copying from the book gven in citations. Please stop your vandalism. Consider this your last warning. Thanks.
1587: 647: 756: 748: 643: 1251: 1159:
request. I will mention your argument to YellowMonkey, but you should post a new unblock request if you still want to be considered.
1073: 892: 26: 1466: 682: 739: 731: 457:
Ok I checked it and it seems like it has been archived. Maybe the oly option left is to watch the article and keep out the trash. --
1673: 637:. Not notable as a politician. That he was possibly racist on top of wanting to be a politician doesn't make him any more notable. 1648: 1428: 1392: 1163: 251: 48: 1583: 575: 214: 43: 1661: 1619: 1615: 1601: 1597: 622: 559: 554: 812: 451: 1665: 1484: 582: 406: 364: 147: 119: 1574:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
1229: 870: 770:
for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
651: 565: 380:
Right, and farming quotes to push an obvious agenda isn't. And using sources very selectively to push an agenda isn't.
53: 1579: 1223: 864: 999:
I generally believe that it is unadvisable to use one account mainly for reverting and another for serene purposes.
1270: 1228:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
911: 869:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
472:
Just curious - why did you choose this nick? (Hope you approve of the edits being done on your namesake's article)
550: 570:. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a 33: 22: 629:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern: 60: 779: 402: 360: 209:, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please 143: 115: 1492: 447:
which he drew his own conclusions. I cant promise anything due to lack of time but Ill see what I can do.--
398: 356: 210: 139: 111: 64: 1067: 1009: 1677: 1575: 686: 571: 76: 68: 335: 1527:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 1061: 546: 220:
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding
38: 1149:
I've removed "]" from this page; you should never include the category directly but rather post a new
458: 448: 285:
La dee da. What on earth could the sockpuppet who keeps going on about including the painting expect?
1695: 1532: 821: 667: 271: 238: 172: 88: 1551: 1542: 703: 659: 1571: 1555: 1384: 666:
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
339: 101:
Two facts: 1) Akbar's realm had targeting of individuals by making them wear a small cloth piece.
1326: 838: 775: 579: 521: 320: 305: 290: 29:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: 1488: 1470: 626: 197: 183: 75:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out 1685: 1644: 1441: 1410: 1370: 1234: 1196: 1177: 1134: 1090: 1079: 1041: 1026: 1001: 875: 790: 715: 595: 489: 423: 381: 343: 1567: 1559: 1318: 1314: 674: 263: 259: 1513:
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the
1349: 1153: 985: 585: 1631: 1570:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1563: 1524: 1514: 1507: 1496: 955: 255: 206: 1691: 1528: 1425: 1389: 1160: 1021:
I guess there is need for clarification. The recent flurry of reverts were against banned
267: 225: 168: 84: 634: 1110: 1086: 699: 507: 477: 1630:
While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be
1483:
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for
642:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge (XXG)'s
541: 1517:
template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
1323: 831: 517: 316: 301: 286: 250:
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria
614: 1055: 1022: 266:. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 1476: 189: 959: 1054:
Also, in case this takes some time, I have identified another sockpuppet of
825: 503: 473: 213:. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the 1699: 1591: 1536: 1449: 1435: 1418: 1399: 1378: 1330: 1204: 1185: 1170: 1142: 1119: 1098: 1049: 1034: 1016: 966: 958:
is usually willing to zap those edits in order to hide that information. --
845: 798: 783: 723: 707: 603: 588: 525: 511: 497: 481: 431: 414: 389: 372: 347: 324: 309: 294: 275: 176: 155: 127: 98:
of treatment of Hindoos and Jews. There is nothing original research here.
92: 79:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place 236:
the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
1684:
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the
1717: 1558:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
300:
Done. Feel free to edit or expand what I placed at the Lee page. Best,
594:
Thanks, I've been working out a talk page post that I will post soon.
516:
I was wondering, too. Thanks for the very interesting explanation.
72: 817: 352:
Please do not undo large edits. It is considered vandalism.
1606: 1475: 1214: 855: 677:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the 613: 242:
explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for
211:
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
188: 654:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the 1337:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
973:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
1357:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
1321:. Neither of these are legitimate uses of sockpuppetry. 993:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
646:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " 1672:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
1654:
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing
1284: 1280: 1274: 1265: 1261: 1247: 1243: 1239: 925: 921: 915: 906: 902: 888: 884: 880: 764: 760: 752: 744: 1637:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
1107:
I've taken this off hold for someone else to review.
1222:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
863:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
107:Why can't both things be said in the same article? 334:Thanks for the advice on how to do the refs on the 1089:, an administrator who is familiar with the case. 104:2) Nazis had a similar thing done in there realm. 1550:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 1504:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Doug Hanks 740:Category:Spree shooters who played video games 732:Category:Spree shooters who played video games 135:This is not in realm of original research. 8: 549:according to the reverts you have made on 59:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 1714:Panjāb Under the Great Mughals, 1526-1707 545:You currently appear to be engaged in an 811: 1704: 1643:notice, but please explain why in your 1523:This is an automatic notification by a 625:template has been added to the article 1616:File:Indian Shipping - Les Hindous.jpg 1602:File:Indian Shipping - Les Hindous.jpg 83:before the question. Again, welcome! 7: 1688:of each individual file for details. 574:among editors. If necessary, pursue 215:guide to writing your first article 34:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 1632:deleted for any of several reasons 1622:because of the following concern: 25:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for 14: 1657:{{proposed deletion/dated files}} 1640:{{proposed deletion/dated files}} 1576:review the candidates' statements 693:Murderers who played video games? 652:Knowledge (XXG)'s deletion policy 1712:Nijjar, Bakhshish Singh (1968). 540: 1626:unused, low-res, no obvious use 610:Proposed deletion of Doug Hanks 1582:. For the Election committee, 1552:Arbitration Committee election 1543:ArbCom elections are now open! 1: 1592:13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 685:, where it may be deleted if 512:03:35, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 498:01:59, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 482:23:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC) 462:09:55, 21 December 2008 (UTC) 452:09:40, 21 December 2008 (UTC) 432:20:04, 15 December 2008 (UTC) 415:10:56, 15 December 2008 (UTC) 390:19:40, 14 December 2008 (UTC) 373:11:57, 14 December 2008 (UTC) 1700:01:02, 24 January 2020 (UTC) 789:Thanks for letting me know. 348:13:11, 1 November 2008 (UTC) 325:22:08, 16 October 2008 (UTC) 310:17:10, 14 October 2008 (UTC) 295:16:01, 14 October 2008 (UTC) 276:04:16, 13 October 2008 (UTC) 207:criteria for speedy deletion 177:15:13, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 156:11:48, 9 November 2008 (UTC) 49:How to write a great article 1676:allows discussion to reach 1578:and submit your choices on 1497:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 1487:. The nominated article is 1226:, who declined the request. 867:, who declined the request. 648:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 232:to the top of the article ( 128:09:58, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 93:22:27, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 1738: 1668:exist. In particular, the 1584:MediaWiki message delivery 1493:Knowledge (XXG):Notability 1450:05:37, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 1436:12:10, 22 April 2009 (UTC) 1419:07:15, 22 April 2009 (UTC) 1400:03:07, 22 April 2009 (UTC) 1379:07:25, 21 April 2009 (UTC) 1331:05:23, 21 April 2009 (UTC) 1205:03:08, 21 April 2009 (UTC) 1186:18:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC) 1171:13:56, 20 April 2009 (UTC) 1143:01:45, 20 April 2009 (UTC) 1120:20:16, 18 April 2009 (UTC) 1099:07:05, 18 April 2009 (UTC) 1050:07:00, 18 April 2009 (UTC) 1035:08:07, 14 April 2009 (UTC) 1017:00:41, 14 April 2009 (UTC) 967:00:35, 20 April 2009 (UTC) 846:20:16, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 799:17:39, 14 March 2009 (UTC) 784:01:21, 14 March 2009 (UTC) 724:00:17, 14 March 2009 (UTC) 708:23:31, 13 March 2009 (UTC) 604:00:31, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 589:00:28, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 526:02:42, 14 March 2009 (UTC) 315:ישו לפעמים גורם לנו לחייך 1662:proposed deletion process 1537:01:09, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 1510:with four tildes (~~~~). 1341:guide to appealing blocks 977:guide to appealing blocks 675:proposed deletion process 551:Winnenden school shooting 196:A tag has been placed on 77:Knowledge (XXG):Questions 21:Hello, Chedorlaomer, and 1445: 1414: 1383:You're welcome to email 1374: 1200: 1181: 1138: 1094: 1045: 1030: 794: 719: 679:speedy deletion criteria 599: 493: 427: 385: 239:the article's talk page 1628: 1611: 1480: 1219: 1195:of multiple accounts. 1011:cricket calendar poll! 860: 828: 689:to delete is reached. 644:criteria for inclusion 618: 200:requesting that it be 193: 1624: 1620:proposed for deletion 1610: 1556:Arbitration Committee 1515:articles for deletion 1479: 1271:change block settings 1218: 912:change block settings 859: 815: 683:Articles for Deletion 681:or it can be sent to 617: 336:List of UFO sightings 192: 1674:files for discussion 1649:the file's talk page 1506:. Please be sure to 1560:arbitration process 1440:I have sent email. 772:the discussion page 562:. If you continue, 1666:deletion processes 1612: 1572:arbitration policy 1508:sign your comments 1481: 1220: 861: 829: 730:CfD nomination of 619: 576:dispute resolution 403:More random musing 361:More random musing 194: 144:More random musing 116:More random musing 44:How to edit a page 27:your contributions 1598:Proposed deletion 1118: 965: 737:I have nominated 623:proposed deletion 560:three-revert rule 555:three-revert rule 418: 401:comment added by 376: 359:comment added by 159: 142:comment added by 131: 114:comment added by 67:your messages on 1729: 1722: 1721: 1709: 1689: 1659: 1658: 1642: 1641: 1609: 1433: 1397: 1354: 1348: 1329: 1315:WP:SOCK#SCRUTINY 1290: 1288: 1277: 1259: 1257:deleted contribs 1217: 1168: 1158: 1152: 1117: 1115: 1108: 1085:. Please notify 1084: 1083: 1064: 1012: 1004: 990: 984: 964: 962: 931: 929: 918: 900: 898:deleted contribs 858: 842: 835: 769: 768: 665: 664: 658: 553:. Note that the 544: 417: 395: 375: 353: 231: 230: 224: 202:speedily deleted 158: 136: 130: 108: 82: 69:discussion pages 1737: 1736: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1711: 1710: 1706: 1683: 1670:speedy deletion 1656: 1655: 1639: 1638: 1607: 1605: 1580:the voting page 1546: 1474: 1429: 1393: 1360: 1352: 1346: 1345:, then use the 1334: 1322: 1304: 1278: 1268: 1254: 1237: 1230:blocking policy 1215: 1164: 1156: 1150: 1111: 1109: 1065: 1060: 1059: 1010: 1002: 996: 988: 982: 981:, then use the 970: 960: 945: 919: 909: 895: 878: 871:blocking policy 856: 853: 840: 833: 807: 742: 738: 735: 695: 662: 656: 655: 612: 538: 470: 444: 442:Akbar at WP#ANI 396: 354: 332: 283: 252:for biographies 228: 222: 221: 187: 165: 137: 109: 80: 54:Manual of Style 12: 11: 5: 1735: 1733: 1724: 1723: 1703: 1680:for deletion. 1660:will stop the 1604: 1595: 1549: 1545: 1540: 1473: 1469:nomination of 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1406: 1367: 1335: 1313:Please review 1311: 1307:Decline reason 1299: 1295:Request reason 1292: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1146: 1145: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1102: 1101: 1087:User:Nishkid64 1052: 971: 952: 948:Decline reason 940: 936:Request reason 933: 854: 852: 849: 806: 803: 802: 801: 734: 728: 727: 726: 694: 691: 640: 639: 611: 608: 607: 606: 537: 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 529: 528: 469: 466: 465: 464: 459:Deepak D'Souza 449:Deepak D'Souza 443: 440: 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 331: 328: 313: 312: 282: 279: 186: 182:Notability of 180: 164: 161: 57: 56: 51: 46: 41: 36: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1734: 1719: 1715: 1708: 1705: 1702: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1687: 1681: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1652: 1650: 1646: 1635: 1633: 1627: 1623: 1621: 1617: 1603: 1599: 1596: 1594: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1544: 1541: 1539: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1516: 1511: 1509: 1505: 1500: 1498: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1478: 1472: 1468: 1465: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1434: 1432: 1427: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1407: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1398: 1396: 1391: 1386: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1359: 1358: 1351: 1344: 1342: 1333: 1332: 1328: 1325: 1320: 1316: 1310: 1308: 1303: 1298: 1296: 1291: 1286: 1282: 1276: 1272: 1267: 1263: 1258: 1253: 1249: 1248:global blocks 1245: 1244:active blocks 1241: 1236: 1231: 1227: 1225: 1224:administrator 1206: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1169: 1167: 1162: 1155: 1148: 1147: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1131: 1130: 1121: 1116: 1114: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1081: 1078: 1075: 1072: 1069: 1063: 1057: 1053: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1014: 1013: 1006: 1005: 998: 997: 995: 994: 987: 980: 978: 969: 968: 963: 957: 951: 949: 944: 939: 937: 932: 927: 923: 917: 913: 908: 904: 899: 894: 890: 889:global blocks 886: 885:active blocks 882: 877: 872: 868: 866: 865:administrator 850: 848: 847: 844: 843: 837: 836: 827: 823: 819: 814: 810: 804: 800: 796: 792: 788: 787: 786: 785: 781: 777: 776:Wildhartlivie 774:. Thank you. 773: 766: 762: 758: 754: 750: 746: 741: 733: 729: 725: 721: 717: 712: 711: 710: 709: 705: 701: 692: 690: 688: 684: 680: 676: 671: 669: 668:its talk page 661: 653: 649: 645: 638: 636: 632: 631: 630: 628: 624: 616: 609: 605: 601: 597: 593: 592: 591: 590: 587: 584: 581: 577: 573: 569: 567: 561: 556: 552: 548: 543: 535: 527: 523: 519: 515: 514: 513: 509: 505: 502:Thank you :) 501: 500: 499: 495: 491: 486: 485: 484: 483: 479: 475: 467: 463: 460: 456: 455: 454: 453: 450: 441: 433: 429: 425: 420: 419: 416: 412: 408: 404: 400: 393: 392: 391: 387: 383: 379: 378: 377: 374: 370: 366: 362: 358: 350: 349: 345: 341: 337: 329: 327: 326: 322: 318: 311: 307: 303: 299: 298: 297: 296: 292: 288: 280: 278: 277: 273: 269: 265: 264:for companies 261: 257: 256:for web sites 253: 248: 245: 241: 240: 235: 227: 218: 216: 212: 208: 203: 199: 191: 185: 181: 179: 178: 174: 170: 162: 160: 157: 153: 149: 145: 141: 132: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 105: 102: 99: 95: 94: 90: 86: 78: 74: 70: 66: 62: 55: 52: 50: 47: 45: 42: 40: 37: 35: 32: 31: 30: 28: 24: 19: 18: 1713: 1707: 1686:page history 1682: 1664:, but other 1653: 1645:edit summary 1636: 1629: 1625: 1613: 1547: 1521:Please note: 1520: 1519: 1512: 1501: 1482: 1442:Chedorlaomer 1430: 1411:Chedorlaomer 1394: 1371:Chedorlaomer 1356: 1338: 1336: 1312: 1306: 1305: 1300: 1294: 1293: 1266:creation log 1235:Chedorlaomer 1233: 1221: 1197:Chedorlaomer 1192: 1178:Chedorlaomer 1165: 1135:Chedorlaomer 1112: 1091:Chedorlaomer 1076: 1070: 1062:72.179.41.93 1056:User:Hkelkar 1042:Chedorlaomer 1027:Chedorlaomer 1023:user:Hkelkar 1008: 1003:YellowMonkey 1000: 992: 974: 972: 953: 947: 946: 941: 935: 934: 907:creation log 876:Chedorlaomer 874: 862: 839: 832: 830: 808: 791:Chedorlaomer 736: 716:Chedorlaomer 696: 672: 641: 633: 620: 596:Chedorlaomer 568:from editing 563: 539: 490:Chedorlaomer 471: 468:Chedorlaomer 445: 424:Chedorlaomer 382:Chedorlaomer 351: 333: 314: 284: 249: 243: 237: 233: 219: 195: 166: 133: 106: 103: 100: 96: 58: 20: 16: 15: 816:A Hereford 564:you may be 397:—Preceding 355:—Preceding 138:—Preceding 110:—Preceding 71:using four 1692:FastilyBot 1568:topic bans 1529:Erwin85Bot 1489:Doug Hanks 1471:Doug Hanks 1262:filter log 1113:Sandstein 903:filter log 660:dated prod 627:Doug Hanks 536:March 2009 268:Truthanado 234:just below 198:Doug Hanks 184:Doug Hanks 169:Dark hyena 85:Ism schism 81:{{helpme}} 61:Wikipedian 1720:. p. 128. 1678:consensus 1618:has been 1614:The file 1564:site bans 1385:WP:ARBCOM 1339:read the 1281:checkuser 1240:block log 975:read the 956:oversight 922:checkuser 881:block log 826:Australia 809:try this 700:Hayden120 687:consensus 572:consensus 281:Oh, Jesus 260:for bands 63:! Please 1690:Thanks, 1485:deletion 1252:contribs 1074:contribs 893:contribs 822:Victoria 547:edit war 518:Cgingold 411:contribs 399:unsigned 369:contribs 357:unsigned 317:A Sniper 302:A Sniper 287:A Sniper 152:contribs 140:unsigned 124:contribs 112:unsigned 39:Tutorial 17:Welcome! 1718:Thacker 1350:unblock 1319:WP:GHBH 1275:unblock 1154:unblock 986:unblock 916:unblock 753:history 566:blocked 340:Anarwan 23:welcome 1647:or on 1554:. The 650:" and 580:Onorem 338:page. 330:Thanks 244:speedy 226:hangon 163:hyenas 73:tildes 1495:and " 1431:juice 1426:Mango 1395:juice 1390:Mango 1343:first 1193:abuse 1166:juice 1161:Mango 1080:WHOIS 979:first 961:slakr 851:Block 761:watch 757:links 635:WP:1E 262:, or 1696:talk 1588:talk 1533:talk 1499:"). 1446:talk 1415:talk 1375:talk 1327:khoi 1324:Khoi 1317:and 1201:talk 1182:talk 1139:talk 1095:talk 1068:talk 1046:talk 1031:talk 841:Ford 834:Here 818:calf 795:talk 780:talk 765:logs 749:talk 745:edit 720:talk 704:talk 600:talk 522:talk 508:talk 504:PiCo 494:talk 478:talk 474:PiCo 428:talk 407:talk 386:talk 365:talk 344:talk 321:talk 306:talk 291:talk 272:talk 205:the 173:talk 148:talk 120:talk 89:talk 65:sign 1600:of 1548:Hi, 1525:bot 1467:AfD 1285:log 1232:). 926:log 873:). 820:in 805:RE: 586:Dil 578:. 1716:. 1698:) 1651:. 1634:. 1590:) 1566:, 1535:) 1448:) 1417:) 1377:) 1353:}} 1347:{{ 1309:: 1297:: 1279:• 1273:• 1269:• 1264:• 1260:• 1255:• 1250:• 1246:• 1242:• 1203:) 1184:) 1157:}} 1151:{{ 1141:) 1097:) 1058:, 1048:) 1033:) 1015:) 989:}} 983:{{ 950:: 938:: 920:• 914:• 910:• 905:• 901:• 896:• 891:• 887:• 883:• 824:, 797:) 782:) 763:| 759:| 755:| 751:| 747:| 722:) 706:) 670:. 663:}} 657:{{ 621:A 602:) 524:) 510:) 496:) 480:) 430:) 413:) 409:• 388:) 371:) 367:• 346:) 323:) 308:) 293:) 274:) 258:, 254:, 229:}} 223:{{ 217:. 175:) 154:) 150:• 126:) 122:• 91:) 1694:( 1586:( 1531:( 1444:( 1413:( 1373:( 1289:) 1287:) 1283:( 1238:( 1199:( 1180:( 1137:( 1093:( 1082:) 1077:· 1071:· 1066:( 1044:( 1029:( 1007:( 930:) 928:) 924:( 879:( 793:( 778:( 767:) 743:( 718:( 702:( 598:( 583:♠ 520:( 506:( 492:( 476:( 426:( 405:( 384:( 363:( 342:( 319:( 304:( 289:( 270:( 171:( 146:( 118:( 87:(

Index

welcome
your contributions
The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
Tutorial
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Wikipedian
sign
discussion pages
tildes
Knowledge (XXG):Questions
Ism schism
talk
22:27, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
unsigned
More random musing
talk
contribs
09:58, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
unsigned
More random musing
talk
contribs
11:48, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Dark hyena
talk
15:13, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Doug Hanks

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.