1111:
179:
409:
1478:
1442:
1406:
1370:
1171:
641:
313:
458:
1288:. In that edit you said that The first recorded use of "baby boomer" was by Leslie J. Nason. The cited article does not say, or even imply, that the use in question was the first recorded use, and you did not cite any other source which does say that; thus your claim was unsourced. Again, you are unlikely to be unblocked as long as it seems you do not understand what you were blocked for.
78:
723:
675:
574:
125:
23:
1936:
You didn't "wrong" me per se. Judging by your talk page right now and all the warnings you've received and the amount of cleanup others (including I) have to do after 98% of your edits (unsourced, WP:SYNTH), don't be surprised that your edits need frequent re-checking, not just by me on the articles
615:
template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can
1961:
I'm proposing for the three paragraphs where the gen starts in 1995-1997 to be grouped into one, what do you think? The millennials article had a similar thing going on where sources that ended the generation around 1994-1996 were grouped together. Yes I know it's a different article with different
482:
been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to
Knowledge policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Knowledge
1283:
adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. You are unlikely to be unblocked as long as it seems you do not understand what you were blocked for. Secondly, you give no indication what edit you are referring to, apparently expecting administrators to search through your editing history to find out
803:
organizations. And since they are using the same date ranges, these are combined into one paragraph. Multiple different organizations using the same date ranges is not "overciting"; it's just what they are using. And no, this should not be combined with Pew's paragraph; Pew's paragraph focuses on
1745:
article: dictionary dates, Pew dates, other media dates, Howe dates, non-U.S. dates. This made the section a lean five paragraphs, compared to the current eight paragraphs which seems like overkill to me. Should I first seek consensus on the talk page, or can I go through with the edits piece by
926:
In the LA Times source, when it says "By next year, millennials, born between 1981 and 1996, are projected to outnumber baby boomers," the line "projected to outnumber baby boomers" links to a Pew source. In the PBS source, the first two paragraphs contain links to both Pew and People-Press.org
791:
paragraph focuses on the Pew
Research Center: Pew's definition of millennials is presented, along with the reasons why they chose the date ranges they did, the importance and widespread use of Pew's definition by the various media outlets and statistical organizations that cite Pew's definition
1802:
The way it's organized now is: 1) Dictionary definitions 2) Pew's definition 3) Those that start Gen Z at 1997 (or after 1996, same thing) 4) Those that start Gen Z at 1995 5) Those that start at 1996 6) And definitions that use different names for
Generation Z ("Children of Baby Boomers" and
1787:
you tried to add to these different articles (see that discussion above we just had). But just because one section is organized one way on another article doesn't mean this section should be organized the exact same way. Millennials and
Generation Z are two different articles with completely
1602:
because if you actually read the
Brookings Institution and the Reuters sources, they literally use the phrase "widely accepted" in the articles themselves, hence "widely accepted" is able to be put in the lead of the article. And the lead sentence matches the body of the article
1756:
article? Reason being is that these aren't sociological institutions that give in-depth reasons for their date ranges; rather they're more focused on the business side of things, and create ranges based on marketing. Forbes isn't even consistent with their definition, using
811:
you can probably tell why it's organized that way. Fourth paragraph is basically what other organizations use that are not the widely accepted definition. The fifth paragraph is about the two authors. The sixth paragraph ends the section with information about the cusp.
1788:
different set of sources. And you don't need to start a talk page discussion regarding the changes. Just make your changes edit by edit so people can actually see what you're trying to do. But I grouped a bunch of them together now, so let me know your thoughts here.
888:
It should be noted that, in the third paragraph, the LA Times source and the PBS source actually cite Pew
Research, not just using 1981-1996 on their own whim like the Federal Reserve Board or ABC Australia. Should I move those particular sources up to the second
773:, please do not make massive changes to the section's long standing status quo text and organization without consulting the talk page first. You did this exact same thing back in February and there was already a talk page discussion regarding that.
843:. So now there's a total of 5 paragraphs: First paragraph is the introduction, second is Pew focused, third and fourth are different organizations/news outlets/authors date ranges, and fifth is about the cusp. Let me know your thoughts.
1008:
Not really... Rauch and
Reuters do a great job at introducing the paragraph and section. Oxford starts off with the most general definition of millennial, then Rauch and Reuters gives us the "widely accepted" definition. It flows well.
878:
I agree that the U.S. PIRG source doesn't seem notable enough to include. It's outdated, and as you said, just for a transportation report, not an in-depth sociological study on millennials. Would it be alright with you if I removed
955:
I'd also like to move the
Jonathan Rauch source into the second paragraph, as it directly cites Pew, while the Reuters source can go in the third paragraph, as it uses 1981-1996 seemingly on its own whim. Would that be alright with
911:
Yes, I'm alright with that; and regarding LA Times and PBS, ctrl-F "Pew" on those two articles doesn't show anything for Pew. How'd you know they are citing Pew? (Let's keep the discussion on your talk page and no need to ping.)
1751:
My other question: since sources by Forbes, Business
Insider, and Goldman Sachs were removed from the "Date and range definition" section of the Millennials article, should they also be removed from that section of the
1256:
How was the information I added incorrect/unsourced? In the second source on the very sentence I edited, it cites "Nason, Leslie J." as the author of that 1963 Daily Press article. In fact it's a direct link to the
1817:
I like your restructuring. Now, should the date ranges from Forbes, Business
Insider, and Goldman Sachs be kept or can they be removed? As I've said before I feel their definitions are more business-oriented than
1672:
Alright, I understand your points. However, don't "most often understood", "most experts", and "usually defined" have similar connotations to "widely accepted"? It's not the exact wording, but the meaning is
1284:
what you are referring to. It is entirely likely that that is one of the reasons your unblock request has not been dealt with before. Thirdly, you appear to be referring to an edit you made in the article
1037:) 00:18, 1 July 2020 (UTC) Actually, scratch that, I don't think Business Insider belongs in there because they are not on the same level as Time, BBC, New York Times, etc. etc. that's why I removed it.
1921:
Sure, that's fine. I wanted to be courteous since I felt like I had wronged you before, and felt like I needed your permission to fully proceed with the edits. But if namedropping is weird to you, I do
478:, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Knowledge administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you
1962:
sources, but I think this new grouping would make things tight and compact; the 1996 start dates paragraph in particular looks rather stubby and could easily be merged into another.--
1720:
Before making massive changes to the structure and organization of the section, please do it edit by edit so editors can actually see what you're trying to change. The diff view
861:
Unrelated to the above, but do you think the 2014 US Pirg report is notable enough to be included? 2014 seems a bit outdated and it's only used once in a transportation report.
1128:
743:
695:
1077:
Also, shouldn't Jean Twenge's definition be mentioned too? She's mentioned so many times in the article in other sections. I can't seem to find a source for her, though.
475:
1873:
1322:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
784:
paragraph of the section introduces Oxford Living Dictionaries' general definition of Millennials and what the widely accepted definition of Millennials is.
471:
1211:
1741:
When it comes to the restructure, no sources were removed. Rather they were regrouped in a way similar to that of the Date and age range section of the
373:
470:
by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Knowledge account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at
1869:
1279:
Firstly, you appear to be referring to one incident, apparently not having taken in the fact that the block was not for one incident: it was for
369:
1723:
is not that great for trying decipher and compare the old vs the new version, especially when sentences are being moved around or changed.
593:
does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Knowledge, this is supplied at minimum in an
244:
1758:
1307:
1206:
1139:
578:
431:, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the
203:
191:
133:
1937:
I edit myself, but by others who also edit the other articles you edit. Hopefully you'll heed the advice of others given to you above.
1833:
1555:
and/or administrators viewing this talk page, a complaint about recent edits was created, and declined without any action for now, at
617:
208:
43:
432:
1556:
474:, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with
1762:
652:
239:
1622:
in the article and nor did the three sources you added in that same edit support the use of "widely accepted." Hence, the
1588:"Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources"
284:
to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here!
224:
1726:
Also copy and paste the message you left on my talk page here so we can discuss those changes on your talk page instead.
229:
1225:
656:
1183:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
735:
687:
518:
35:
1483:
1447:
1411:
1375:
1335:
1184:
1119:
646:
359:
318:
94:
1854:(unlike the Millennials Business Insider source where Business Insider was listed only because they cited Pew).
1489:
1453:
1417:
1381:
1178:
739:
691:
233:
82:
39:
467:
90:
1132:
198:
187:
86:
1024:
664:
332:
267:
259:
620:. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. —
1868:
Can Goldman Sachs be removed? They did imply a Gen Z range of 1995-2005 in 2018, as they called them
1505:
1469:
1433:
755:
747:
590:
418:
363:
346:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
263:
108:
61:
47:
1493:
731:
514:
492:
275:
151:
194:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
1963:
1923:
1877:
1819:
1766:
1674:
1654:
1564:
1552:
1258:
1189:
1159:
971:
957:
928:
890:
707:
699:
355:
214:
178:
274:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
655:
by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at
1537:
1394:
1354:
625:
605:. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted
594:
558:
389:
163:
147:
1316:
1145:
840:
two sentences that were originally separate paragraphs up, and further moved another one up
660:
328:
297:
289:
1942:
1912:
1895:
1859:
1841:
1808:
1793:
1784:
1731:
1703:
1688:
1662:
1631:
1623:
1615:
1599:
1583:
1498:
1462:
1426:
1110:
1082:
1042:
1034:
1014:
946:
917:
866:
848:
825:
817:
799:
paragraph lists different organizations and news outlets and what they use. These are all
751:
727:
683:
609:
143:
99:
52:
27:
776:
The current version of the section is organized the way it is for the following reasons:
506:
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
146:—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
366:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.
1023:
Business Insider isn't as important as the other outlets listed (and it's yellow here:
488:
323:
the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at
1876:, which I think indicates they change date ranges on a whim for marketing purposes.--
1560:
1518:
1293:
1155:
703:
679:
586:
510:
380:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
1753:
1635:
1611:
1533:
1529:
1389:
1385:
1350:
1346:
1285:
738:. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
690:. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
621:
554:
550:
541:
437:
385:
381:
249:
220:
155:
129:
38:. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
1890:
I have no strong feelings about Goldman Sachs either way, so do what you prefer.
1742:
1595:
1457:
582:
426:
408:
400:
347:
293:
285:
31:
1851:
1477:
1441:
1405:
1369:
640:
312:
1938:
1908:
1891:
1855:
1837:
1804:
1789:
1727:
1699:
1658:
1339:
1078:
1038:
1030:
1010:
942:
913:
862:
844:
821:
813:
351:
324:
1971:
1946:
1931:
1916:
1899:
1885:
1863:
1850:
The Business Insider source is actually decent on this Gen Z article, since
1845:
1827:
1812:
1797:
1774:
1735:
1707:
1682:
1666:
1568:
1541:
1507:
1471:
1435:
1421:
1399:
1358:
1297:
1266:
1163:
1086:
1046:
1018:
979:
965:
950:
936:
921:
898:
870:
852:
829:
759:
711:
668:
629:
598:
562:
496:
443:
393:
336:
301:
168:
118:
71:
1693:"not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion
589:. While you are welcome to re-use Knowledge's content, here or elsewhere,
1289:
1138:
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
597:
at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
537:
1142:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:
722:
674:
573:
124:
22:
533:
1650:, and were reverted every single time by multiple different editors.
1904:
Can you not use my username in edits in the future, such as this?
525:
271:
177:
46:, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
1522:
1517:
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
1334:
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
1028:
But if you disagree, feel free to add Business Insider back in.
746:. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
698:. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
150:. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
1783:
I understand that you want consistency considering all of the
792:(secondary sources), and ends with Pew's general observations.
603:
copied content from ]; see that page's history for attribution
529:
730:. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
682:. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
211:(a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
30:. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
1169:
1109:
837:
Taking some of your suggestions into consideration, I moved
581:
to Knowledge. It appears that you copied or moved text from
456:
1304:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
1872:, yet in a June 2020 report they defined Millennials as
1653:
Also, please take the time to familiarize yourself with
1324:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
742:
and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the
694:
and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the
42:
and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the
1905:
1721:
1647:
1643:
1639:
1607:
1579:
1521:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
1338:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
1239:
1235:
1229:
1220:
1216:
1202:
1198:
1194:
841:
838:
770:
350:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
280:
138:
1634:
to articles; you did the exact same thing over at the
1177:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
970:
Also, why was the Business Insider source removed?--
423:was updated with an item that involved the article
1761:in a September 2019 article but then switching to
1131:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
132:. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
941:Good catch. I'm fine with your proposed changes.
616:read more about the procedure and the reasons at
1513:Disambiguation link notification for August 15
1330:Disambiguation link notification for August 8
568:Copying within Knowledge requires attribution
342:Disambiguation link notification for April 10
8:
502:Disambiguation link notification for June 3
472:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Q788771
466:An editor has opened an investigation into
279:
1852:they are doing their own research on Gen Z
258:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
1630:And this is not the first time you added
476:the guide to responding to investigations
240:How to add those all-important references
1870:"today's teenagers through 23-year olds"
1618:, because "widely accepted" is not used
93:. If you continue to do so, you may be
1492:material to Knowledge, as you did at
1456:material to Knowledge, as you did at
1420:material to Knowledge, as you did at
1384:material to Knowledge, as you did at
651:the next time you violate Knowledge's
820:) 21:19, 30 June 2020 (UTC) (Edited:
7:
1129:unsourced or poorly sourced content
91:Knowledge's policy on verifiability
618:Knowledge:Copying within Knowledge
14:
1832:Forbes can be removed. They also
1836:on a different article in 2020.
1574:Additional explanation... again.
1476:
1440:
1404:
1368:
721:
673:
639:
572:
407:
311:
230:How to create your first article
182:A cup of hot tea to welcome you!
123:
76:
21:
1:
1765:in an October 2019 article.--
1123:from editing for a period of
199:The five pillars of Knowledge
169:09:25, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
119:01:05, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
72:01:04, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
292:) 20:15, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
217:(a user-friendly help forum)
190:to Knowledge! Thank you for
1972:06:26, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
1947:12:11, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
1932:06:26, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
1917:05:55, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
1900:05:49, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
1886:05:46, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
1864:05:38, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
1846:05:29, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
1828:05:25, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
1813:05:19, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
1798:05:16, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
1775:05:05, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
1736:04:57, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
1708:01:43, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
1683:01:37, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
1667:01:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
1569:18:40, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
1557:Special:Permalink/973700878
1542:06:18, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
1508:17:11, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
1472:16:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
1436:03:21, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
1400:00:00, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
1181:, who declined the request.
734:, but you didn't provide a
686:, but you didn't provide a
657:Bouncing Off the Satellites
653:no original research policy
97:from editing Knowledge. -
83:unsourced or poorly sourced
34:, but you didn't provide a
1992:
1582:and regarding your use of
1359:06:21, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
744:tutorial on citing sources
696:tutorial on citing sources
601:to the copied page, e.g.,
497:15:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
444:21:50, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
394:12:58, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
245:Simplified Manual of Style
186:Hello, CherokeeJack1, and
165:Do you have any questions?
44:tutorial on citing sources
1598:article does not contain
1336:Calling All Stations Tour
1308:guide to appealing blocks
1298:19:17, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
1267:02:06, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
1164:18:08, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
1140:guide to appealing blocks
1133:make useful contributions
937:23:59, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
927:(which is part of Pew).--
922:23:55, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
899:23:51, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
871:23:40, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
853:23:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
830:21:40, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
760:19:54, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
712:08:13, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
669:05:11, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
337:18:31, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
302:20:15, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
204:Contributing to Knowledge
134:your recent contributions
1967:
1927:
1881:
1823:
1803:"Homeland Generation").
1770:
1678:
1262:
1127:for persistently adding
1087:00:28, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
1047:00:26, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
1019:00:18, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
980:00:15, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
975:
966:00:09, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
961:
951:00:00, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
932:
630:14:47, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
563:08:04, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
524:added links pointing to
451:Sockpuppet investigation
1697:by any of the sources."
1486:without further warning
1450:without further warning
1414:without further warning
1378:without further warning
649:without further warning
321:without further warning
225:How to develop articles
209:The Knowledge Adventure
85:content, as you did on
1547:Complaint notification
1488:the next time you add
1452:the next time you add
1416:the next time you add
1380:the next time you add
1174:
1114:
765:Additional explanation
461:
183:
87:Template:NeXT Computer
1695:not explicitly stated
1226:change block settings
1173:
1150:Your reason here ~~~~
1113:
591:Knowledge's licensing
460:
181:
1530:Opt-out instructions
1484:blocked from editing
1448:blocked from editing
1412:blocked from editing
1376:blocked from editing
1347:Opt-out instructions
769:Regarding your edit
647:blocked from editing
551:Opt-out instructions
399:ITN recognition for
382:opt-out instructions
319:blocked from editing
1907:That's just weird.
1494:Bis (Scottish band)
732:Atomic Age (design)
519:fix with Dab solver
360:fix with Dab solver
276:Knowledge:Questions
81:Please stop adding
1175:
1115:
740:include a citation
717:June, 2020 Comment
692:include a citation
579:your contributions
462:
415:On 20 April 2020,
372:• Join us at the
362:). Such links are
221:How to edit a page
215:Knowledge Teahouse
192:your contributions
184:
40:include a citation
1614:article contains
1398:
804:Pew's definition.
377:
364:usually incorrect
266:your messages on
166:
116:
69:
1983:
1608:edit to the lead
1594:The lead of the
1559:. Best regards,
1480:
1444:
1408:
1392:
1372:
1321:
1315:
1245:
1243:
1232:
1214:
1212:deleted contribs
1172:
1153:
725:
677:
643:
614:
608:
604:
576:
515:check to confirm
459:
440:
411:
367:
356:check to confirm
315:
283:
254:, our newspaper.
164:
161:
158:
141:
127:
117:
113:
106:
104:
89:. This violates
80:
79:
70:
66:
59:
57:
50:. Thank you. -
25:
1991:
1990:
1986:
1985:
1984:
1982:
1981:
1980:
1818:sociological.--
1718:
1576:
1549:
1515:
1382:bogusly sourced
1366:
1332:
1327:
1319:
1313:
1312:, then use the
1301:
1270:
1233:
1223:
1209:
1192:
1185:blocking policy
1170:
1167:
1166:
1143:
1136:
1107:
767:
736:reliable source
719:
688:reliable source
684:Blockbuster LLC
637:
612:
606:
602:
570:
504:
486:
485:
463:
457:
453:
448:
447:
438:
433:candidates page
412:
404:
374:DPL WikiProject
344:
309:
176:
159:
156:
144:M. A. Wetherell
137:
109:
100:
98:
77:
62:
53:
51:
36:reliable source
19:
12:
11:
5:
1989:
1987:
1979:
1978:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1974:
1959:
1958:
1957:
1956:
1955:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1902:
1848:
1800:
1778:
1777:
1748:
1747:
1717:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1628:
1627:
1604:
1578:As a reply to
1575:
1572:
1548:
1545:
1514:
1511:
1365:
1362:
1331:
1328:
1302:
1277:
1273:Decline reason
1254:
1250:Request reason
1247:
1168:
1137:
1117:You have been
1116:
1108:
1106:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1021:
993:
992:
991:
990:
989:
988:
987:
986:
985:
984:
983:
982:
968:
904:
903:
902:
901:
883:
882:
881:
880:
856:
855:
834:
833:
805:
793:
785:
766:
763:
750:. Thank you.
718:
715:
702:. Thank you.
636:
633:
577:Thank you for
569:
566:
547:
546:
545:
544:
503:
500:
464:
455:
454:
452:
449:
413:
406:
405:
403:
397:
343:
340:
308:
305:
278:, or you can
256:
255:
247:
242:
237:
234:Article Wizard
227:
218:
212:
206:
201:
175:
172:
136:—specifically
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1988:
1973:
1969:
1965:
1964:CherokeeJack1
1960:
1948:
1944:
1940:
1935:
1934:
1933:
1929:
1925:
1924:CherokeeJack1
1922:understand.--
1920:
1919:
1918:
1914:
1910:
1906:
1903:
1901:
1897:
1893:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1883:
1879:
1878:CherokeeJack1
1875:
1871:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1861:
1857:
1853:
1849:
1847:
1843:
1839:
1835:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1820:CherokeeJack1
1816:
1815:
1814:
1810:
1806:
1801:
1799:
1795:
1791:
1786:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1776:
1772:
1768:
1767:CherokeeJack1
1764:
1760:
1755:
1750:
1749:
1744:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1737:
1733:
1729:
1724:
1722:
1715:
1709:
1705:
1701:
1698:
1696:
1690:
1686:
1685:
1684:
1680:
1676:
1675:CherokeeJack1
1671:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1651:
1649:
1645:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1613:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1589:
1585:
1581:
1580:your question
1573:
1571:
1570:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1553:CherokeeJack1
1546:
1544:
1543:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1526:
1524:
1520:
1519:Hip hop music
1512:
1510:
1509:
1506:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1485:
1479:
1474:
1473:
1470:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1449:
1443:
1438:
1437:
1434:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1413:
1407:
1402:
1401:
1396:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1377:
1371:
1363:
1361:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1343:
1341:
1337:
1329:
1326:
1325:
1318:
1311:
1309:
1300:
1299:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1282:
1276:
1274:
1269:
1268:
1264:
1260:
1259:CherokeeJack1
1253:
1251:
1246:
1241:
1237:
1231:
1227:
1222:
1218:
1213:
1208:
1204:
1203:global blocks
1200:
1199:active blocks
1196:
1191:
1190:CherokeeJack1
1186:
1182:
1180:
1179:administrator
1165:
1161:
1157:
1151:
1147:
1141:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1121:
1112:
1104:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1029:
1025:
1022:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
996:
995:
994:
981:
977:
973:
972:CherokeeJack1
969:
967:
963:
959:
958:CherokeeJack1
954:
953:
952:
948:
944:
940:
939:
938:
934:
930:
929:CherokeeJack1
925:
924:
923:
919:
915:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
905:
900:
896:
892:
891:CherokeeJack1
887:
886:
885:
884:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
868:
864:
859:
854:
850:
846:
842:
839:
836:
835:
831:
827:
823:
819:
815:
810:
806:
802:
798:
794:
790:
786:
783:
779:
778:
777:
774:
772:
764:
762:
761:
757:
753:
749:
745:
741:
737:
733:
729:
724:
716:
714:
713:
709:
705:
701:
697:
693:
689:
685:
681:
676:
671:
670:
666:
662:
658:
654:
650:
648:
642:
634:
632:
631:
627:
623:
619:
611:
600:
596:
592:
588:
587:Hip hop music
584:
580:
575:
567:
565:
564:
560:
556:
552:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
523:
522:
520:
516:
512:
511:Hip hop music
509:
508:
507:
501:
499:
498:
494:
490:
484:
481:
477:
473:
469:
450:
446:
445:
442:
441:
434:
430:
429:
428:
422:
421:
420:
410:
402:
398:
396:
395:
391:
387:
383:
378:
375:
371:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
341:
339:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
320:
314:
306:
304:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
282:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
253:
252:
248:
246:
243:
241:
238:
235:
231:
228:
226:
222:
219:
216:
213:
210:
207:
205:
202:
200:
197:
196:
195:
193:
189:
180:
173:
171:
170:
167:
162:
153:
149:
145:
140:
135:
131:
126:
121:
120:
114:
112:
105:
103:
96:
92:
88:
84:
74:
73:
67:
65:
58:
56:
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
29:
24:
17:February 2020
16:
1754:Generation Z
1725:
1719:
1694:
1692:
1652:
1636:Generation X
1629:
1619:
1612:Generation Z
1587:
1577:
1550:
1527:
1516:
1500:
1497:
1482:
1475:
1464:
1461:
1446:
1439:
1428:
1425:
1410:
1403:
1386:Baby boomers
1374:
1367:
1344:
1333:
1323:
1305:
1303:
1286:Baby boomers
1281:persistently
1280:
1278:
1272:
1271:
1255:
1249:
1248:
1221:creation log
1188:
1176:
1149:
1124:
1118:
1027:
894:
889:paragraph?--
860:
857:
808:
800:
796:
788:
781:
775:
768:
748:my talk page
720:
700:my talk page
672:
645:
638:
595:edit summary
571:
548:
542:Terror Squad
505:
487:
479:
468:sockpuppetry
465:
436:
425:
424:
417:
416:
414:
379:
345:
317:
310:
257:
251:The Signpost
250:
236:if you wish)
185:
122:
111:open channel
110:
101:
75:
64:open channel
63:
54:
48:my talk page
20:
1743:Millennials
1687:Maybe, but
1655:WP:BAREURLS
1596:Millennials
1481:You may be
1458:Retro style
1445:You may be
1409:You may be
1373:You may be
1364:August 2020
726:Hello, I'm
678:Hello, I'm
661:Binksternet
644:You may be
583:Gangsta rap
483:community.
427:Gene Deitch
419:In the news
401:Gene Deitch
348:Retro style
329:Binksternet
316:You may be
270:using four
232:(using the
128:Hello, I'm
32:Rush (band)
26:Hello, I'm
1673:similar.--
1561:~ ToBeFree
1340:Tony Banks
1217:filter log
1156:~ ToBeFree
752:Netherzone
728:Netherzone
384:. Thanks,
368:(Read the
352:Paul Davis
325:Trap Queen
307:March 2020
281:click here
268:talk pages
262:! Please
260:Wikipedian
154:. Thanks.
102:FlightTime
55:FlightTime
28:FlightTime
1874:1980-1999
1763:1995-2007
1759:1996-2010
1638:article:
1490:unsourced
1454:unsourced
1422:Neon sign
1418:unsourced
1306:read the
1236:checkuser
1195:block log
1105:July 2020
801:different
635:June 2020
489:PKHilliam
152:Help desk
139:this edit
1834:cite Pew
1785:WP:SYNTH
1691:says to
1689:WP:SYNTH
1632:WP:SYNTH
1624:WP:SYNTH
1620:anywhere
1616:WP:SYNTH
1600:WP:SYNTH
1584:WP:SYNTH
1257:article.
1207:contribs
1148:|reason=
704:GoneIn60
680:GoneIn60
538:The Game
174:Welcome!
1610:of the
1603:itself.
1534:DPL bot
1390:Toddst1
1351:DPL bot
1317:unblock
1230:unblock
1146:unblock
1125:2 weeks
1120:blocked
622:Diannaa
599:linking
555:DPL bot
534:Ashanti
439:Spencer
386:DPL bot
188:welcome
148:sandbox
130:Tymon.r
95:blocked
1746:piece?
1716:Again.
1646:, and
956:you?--
789:second
610:copied
294:Sm8900
286:Sm8900
272:tildes
157:Tymon.
1939:Some1
1909:Some1
1892:Some1
1856:Some1
1838:Some1
1805:Some1
1790:Some1
1728:Some1
1700:Some1
1659:Some1
1606:Your
1532:.) --
1501:Flash
1499:Solar
1465:Flash
1463:Solar
1429:Flash
1427:Solar
1349:.) --
1310:first
1079:Some1
1039:Some1
1031:Some1
1011:Some1
943:Some1
914:Some1
863:Some1
845:Some1
822:Some1
814:Some1
797:third
782:first
585:into
553:.) --
526:Usher
1968:talk
1943:talk
1928:talk
1913:talk
1896:talk
1882:talk
1860:talk
1842:talk
1824:talk
1809:talk
1794:talk
1771:talk
1732:talk
1704:talk
1679:talk
1663:talk
1648:here
1644:here
1640:here
1565:talk
1538:talk
1523:Snap
1395:talk
1355:talk
1294:talk
1263:talk
1160:talk
1083:talk
1043:talk
1035:talk
1015:talk
976:talk
962:talk
947:talk
933:talk
918:talk
895:talk
867:talk
858:---
849:talk
826:talk
818:talk
809:rest
807:The
795:The
787:The
780:The
771:here
756:talk
708:talk
665:talk
626:talk
559:talk
540:and
493:talk
480:have
390:talk
333:talk
298:talk
290:talk
264:sign
223:and
1590:):
1551:Hi
1525:.
1496:.
1460:.
1424:.
1388:.
1342:.
1290:JBW
1240:log
1187:).
1154:.
1026:).
879:it?
659:.
530:TLC
370:FAQ
327:.
142:to
1970:)
1945:)
1930:)
1915:)
1898:)
1884:)
1862:)
1844:)
1826:)
1811:)
1796:)
1773:)
1734:)
1706:)
1681:)
1665:)
1657:.
1642:,
1567:)
1540:)
1357:)
1320:}}
1314:{{
1296:)
1275::
1265:)
1252::
1234:•
1228:•
1224:•
1219:•
1215:•
1210:•
1205:•
1201:•
1197:•
1162:)
1152:}}
1144:{{
1135:.
1085:)
1045:)
1017:)
978:)
964:)
949:)
935:)
920:)
897:)
869:)
851:)
828:)
758:)
710:)
667:)
628:)
613:}}
607:{{
561:)
536:,
532:,
528:,
521:)
517:|
495:)
435:.
392:)
376:.)
358:|
335:)
300:)
1966:(
1941:(
1926:(
1911:(
1894:(
1880:(
1858:(
1840:(
1822:(
1807:(
1792:(
1769:(
1730:(
1702:(
1677:(
1661:(
1626:.
1586:(
1563:(
1536:(
1528:(
1397:)
1393:(
1353:(
1345:(
1292:(
1261:(
1244:)
1242:)
1238:(
1193:(
1158:(
1081:(
1041:(
1033:(
1013:(
974:(
960:(
945:(
931:(
916:(
893:(
865:(
847:(
832:)
824:(
816:(
754:(
706:(
663:(
624:(
557:(
549:(
513:(
491:(
388:(
354:(
331:(
296:(
288:(
160:r
115:)
107:(
68:)
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
