399:
editor, another one will do it to you. Eventually? You'll say something incivil and get blocked or banned yourself, or get on the wrong side of the wrong popular member and suddenly you're being called a sockpuppet or a troll. I don't have much reason to take up for AoT, I don't have much reason not to, but trust me when I can safely say AGF is a weapon and whenever it or CIVIL gets bandied about, it's always safest to make very, very sure you are being absolutely civil yourself. You'd be astonished at how much stuff comes back later on. My advice, you can take it or feel free to revert all I've written on your userpage, it's yours. --
203:
I have now provided at least 10 sources on Xidan, two from official government entities (the
Dongcheng District People's Government has a big article on the history of Xidan). This proves that the area is indeed notable, and it definitely exists. I believe the article now proves that it should remain
308:
OK, in addition to government materials about Xidan (it's China we are talking about, the media is state-controlled, sorry), There is a section on Page 222 in a travel book published by the
Discovery Channel on Beijing that talks about Xidan. There are now two concrete source that supports the place
398:
I've been here , off and on, under a handful of names, since 2004. I've seen at least a dozen editors like you. Been here a handful of days, get caught up in a big argument, and suddenly you've been insulted. It really doesn't matter to me, but if you get insulted and worked up and agitated by one
328:
It doesn't matter that the media is state controlled it is still independent of the subject, and it is accepted for wikipedia, this is a fact, not an argument nor my opinion. The gov't materials are bias and the book entry by your own admition is nominal, find a book with a chapter on xidan not a
285:
that Xidan is not notable, that I disagree with (or don't like) the rationale and sourcing for it. Nationality is irrelevant, and since when am I from Chile!? You are a very strange individual, and I am consistently amazed by your ludicrous statements. What I have and have not edited is entirely
260:
And no, I am not the one who has lost credibility. You are the one who has proven that you have some hidden agenda that, for some reason, you do not want the world to know. Otherwise, why do you have such a vested interest in the deletion of this article, mindful of the fact that you have never
348:
I would like to apologize for an unfortunate lapse in good judgment on my part, and allowing passion to turn into overzealotry. However, my opinion on the fact that Xidan is notable still holds, and the mountains of sources that I have now provided proves that very point.
179:
I'm going to recommend you take a step back before you get too caught up in his edit war. There are other editors involved now and some of us will be taking a look at the article. Don't end up being collatoral damage when he buries himself. Keep in mind
448:
I have decided to do a non-admin close of the debate. This is carried out in accordance to
Knowledge (XXG)'s Snowball Clause, which states that in order for the Snowball Clause to be invoked, the debate must fulfill the following criterion, as follows:
309:
as a notable area in
Beijing: one from China, and one from America. That would certainly attests to the area's notability, and why the AfD was not needed. If you do not believe in what I am saying, go to your nearest bookstore and find that book.
456:
No editor other than the nominator has opposed keeping the page or even supported another outcome, left a comment, or asked a question which could be interpreted as hesitation to support keeping the article (You are the only vote for
548:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
363:
100 reliable sources is a mountain. Your opinion is your own, my opinion is that this is not even close to an apology and whatever it is it is hardly sincere, you have been rude not overzealous.
25:
251:? You know what, I am through dealing with you. You have proven to me your intentions: you are hell bent in getting this article deleted for the satisfaction of some unknown agenda.
463:
The nominator has not added a lot of comments and is not still attempting to make his/her case. (Besides your statement of the deletion rationale, you have not said anything else.)
442:
460:
The process has gone on for at least a full day (The debate began on the 20th of
September at 1754 hrs. Debate was closed on 21st of September at 2149 hrs)
72:
103:
29:
573:
56:
569:
46:
513:
you proded that article you need to provide a reason for the prod if you wish please take to afd then readding a prod thanks
227:
560:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
61:
565:
427:
After pondering about the events of last week, I believe I have acted inappropriately, and I would like to apologize.
98:
83:
41:
36:
472:
432:
354:
314:
266:
248:
209:
68:
223:
184:
when editing this article which you may or may not have violated already..there is a slew of edits here.--
93:
561:
79:
364:
330:
287:
231:
499:
407:
388:
143:
126:
537:
528:
468:
428:
350:
310:
262:
205:
557:
541:
32:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
75:
on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
189:
553:
545:
518:
556:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
549:
230:. I don't believe so and I will not withdraw the AfD, sorry. You have lost all credibility.
181:
160:
I moved your comments from my talk page to talk of template:sex and put my response there.
119:
Thanks for the feedback. I'll look into tackling your image requests when the time permits.
495:
165:
139:
122:
138:
Like to be fed seed? Good for you! Not all of us can be honest about our desires... --
51:
185:
467:
Thank you for your continued contribution to
Knowledge (XXG), and happy editing!
577:
522:
514:
503:
476:
453:
Six or more participants have supported keeping the page (9 have stated to keep)
436:
412:
393:
372:
358:
338:
318:
295:
270:
239:
213:
193:
169:
147:
130:
109:
161:
491:
487:
329:
page or part of one. also two sources is not multiple, you need about 5.
544:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Knowledge (XXG)
486:
I have created a new image. I created the image specifically for the
261:
edited any
Chinese-related articles, AND that you are a Chilean?
218:
Well I don't like the sources very much and I am not convinced.
490:
article, but it can be applied to a number of related articles.
90:
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
222:
source does not prove notability. Please bother to read
344:
Apology for
Allowing Passion to Turn into Overzealotry
443:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/HonestReporting
204:
here, and I think it is time that we remove the AfD.
536:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
492:http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:Wiki-gangbang.png
8:
67:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
7:
380:Nice of you to assume good faith. --
42:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
14:
562:review the candidates' statements
228:Knowledge (XXG):Reliable Sources
121:p.s. Glad you like the name. --
568:. For the Election committee,
538:Arbitration Committee election
529:ArbCom elections are now open!
477:05:01, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
437:23:27, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
413:03:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
394:03:00, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
373:20:18, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
359:16:49, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
339:22:42, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
319:21:55, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
296:20:05, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
271:04:10, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
240:23:56, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
214:04:22, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
194:03:46, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
170:20:10, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
148:09:53, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
131:08:30, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
110:08:00, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
1:
578:13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
24:Hello, Chuletadechancho, and
523:21:46, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
504:11:15, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
78:If you need help, check out
57:How to write a great article
564:and submit your choices on
115:Image requests and comments
26:welcome to Knowledge (XXG)!
593:
570:MediaWiki message delivery
247:Haven't you just violated
224:Knowledge (XXG):Notability
281:I have no agenda, I felt
80:Knowledge (XXG):Questions
368:
334:
291:
235:
365:CdC—Chuleta de Chancho
331:CdC—Chuleta de Chancho
288:CdC—Chuleta de Chancho
232:CdC—Chuleta de Chancho
542:Arbitration Committee
546:arbitration process
558:arbitration policy
47:How to edit a page
30:your contributions
423:A Sincere Apology
584:
411:
404:
392:
385:
175:Take a step back
106:
101:
96:
89:
592:
591:
587:
586:
585:
583:
582:
581:
566:the voting page
532:
511:
509:Galaxy Desserts
484:
446:
425:
405:
400:
386:
381:
346:
201:
199:Update on Xidan
177:
158:
117:
112:
104:
99:
94:
87:
62:Manual of Style
21:
12:
11:
5:
590:
588:
535:
531:
526:
510:
507:
483:
480:
469:Arbiteroftruth
465:
464:
461:
458:
454:
445:
440:
429:Arbiteroftruth
424:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
351:Arbiteroftruth
345:
342:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
311:Arbiteroftruth
301:
300:
299:
298:
283:and still feel
276:
275:
274:
273:
263:Arbiteroftruth
255:
254:
253:
252:
249:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
206:Arbiteroftruth
200:
197:
176:
173:
157:
154:
153:
152:
151:
150:
120:
116:
113:
73:sign your name
65:
64:
59:
54:
49:
44:
39:
28:Thank you for
17:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
589:
580:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
547:
543:
539:
530:
527:
525:
524:
520:
516:
508:
506:
505:
501:
497:
493:
489:
481:
479:
478:
474:
470:
462:
459:
455:
452:
451:
450:
444:
441:
439:
438:
434:
430:
422:
414:
410:
409:
403:
397:
396:
395:
391:
390:
384:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
370:
366:
361:
360:
356:
352:
343:
341:
340:
336:
332:
320:
316:
312:
307:
306:
305:
304:
303:
302:
297:
293:
289:
284:
280:
279:
278:
277:
272:
268:
264:
259:
258:
257:
256:
250:
246:
245:
244:
243:
242:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
216:
215:
211:
207:
198:
196:
195:
191:
187:
183:
174:
172:
171:
167:
163:
155:
149:
145:
141:
137:
136:
135:
134:
133:
132:
128:
124:
114:
111:
108:
107:
102:
97:
91:
85:
81:
76:
74:
70:
63:
60:
58:
55:
53:
50:
48:
45:
43:
40:
38:
35:
34:
33:
31:
27:
22:
20:
533:
512:
485:
466:
447:
426:
406:
401:
387:
382:
362:
347:
327:
282:
219:
217:
202:
178:
159:
118:
92:
84:my talk page
82:, ask me on
77:
66:
37:Introduction
23:
18:
16:
286:irrelevant.
86:, or place
554:topic bans
496:SeedFeeder
140:SeedFeeder
123:SeedFeeder
88:{{helpme}}
69:Wikipedian
52:Help pages
550:site bans
488:gang bang
482:New Image
457:deletion)
156:irrumatio
71:! Please
105:Chequers
19:Welcome!
408:Premise
402:Logical
389:Premise
383:Logical
186:Crossmr
540:. The
515:Oo7565
182:WP:3RR
162:Zodon
100:Spiel
574:talk
519:talk
500:talk
473:talk
433:talk
369:talk
355:talk
335:talk
315:talk
292:talk
267:talk
236:talk
226:and
210:talk
190:talk
166:talk
144:talk
127:talk
95:Ϣere
534:Hi,
220:One
576:)
552:,
521:)
502:)
494:--
475:)
435:)
371:)
357:)
337:)
317:)
294:)
269:)
238:)
212:)
192:)
168:)
146:)
129:)
572:(
517:(
498:(
471:(
431:(
367:(
353:(
333:(
313:(
290:(
265:(
234:(
208:(
188:(
164:(
142:(
125:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.