162:
23:
56:
In this article, it seems that you have claimed ownership. You dominate the article and post poorly sourced opinions and immediately remove edits that may be challenging to your strong opinion. In this case - you went ahead and returned some material that supports your strong opinion but deliberately
191:
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit
72:
I've repeatedly explained to you why your edits cannot appear in the article in their current form. Since you do not yet understand how
Knowledge policy works, please educate yourself about it using the many resources available to new users. Do not continue to edit-war your personal opinion into the
119:! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Knowledge and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there!
169:
102:
101:
82:
47:
31:
27:
216:
124:
212:
120:
36:
As well, you must immediately stop plagiarizing the sources. Use your own words rather than copying.
204:
78:
43:
131:
116:
58:
224:
173:
142:
188:
179:
200:
74:
39:
208:
184:
220:
138:
199:
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's
196:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
161:
228:
146:
86:
66:
51:
22:
34:
and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
211:
for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant
187:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
137:
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend,
160:
178:
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being
30:
to
Knowledge articles. Doing so violates Knowledge's
170:Sexual abuse cases in Brooklyn's Haredi community
203:to work toward making a version that represents
194:even if you don't violate the three-revert rule
93:Civil Rights5, you are invited to the Teahouse
8:
172:shows that you are currently engaged in an
26:Please do not add commentary or your own
113:! Thanks for contributing to Knowledge.
7:
14:
100:
21:
183:—especially if you violate the
168:Your recent editing history at
1:
129:
32:neutral point of view policy
244:
229:15:13, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
147:01:15, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
98:
87:15:05, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
67:05:04, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
52:22:15, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
62:
165:
164:
180:blocked from editing
207:among editors. See
125:I'm a Teahouse host
217:dispute resolution
166:
132:Visit the Teahouse
185:three-revert rule
154:
153:
149:
57:left out others.
28:personal analysis
235:
136:
134:
115:Be our guest at
104:
97:
96:
25:
243:
242:
238:
237:
236:
234:
233:
232:
159:
150:
135:
130:
95:
19:
12:
11:
5:
241:
239:
158:
155:
152:
151:
114:
107:
105:
94:
91:
90:
89:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
240:
231:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
197:
195:
190:
186:
182:
181:
175:
171:
163:
156:
148:
144:
140:
133:
128:
126:
122:
118:
112:
111:Civil Rights5
106:
103:
99:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
71:
70:
69:
68:
64:
60:
59:Civil Rights5
54:
53:
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
29:
24:
16:
198:
193:
177:
167:
157:Edit warring
117:the Teahouse
110:
108:
55:
35:
20:
213:noticeboard
121:Theopolisme
17:August 2013
73:article. –
205:consensus
201:talk page
75:Roscelese
40:Roscelese
215:or seek
192:warring—
174:edit war
83:contribs
48:contribs
221:Diannaa
189:reverts
139:HostBot
219:. --
225:talk
143:talk
79:talk
63:talk
44:talk
209:BRD
109:Hi
227:)
176:.
145:)
127:)
85:)
81:â‹…
65:)
50:)
46:â‹…
223:(
141:(
123:(
77:(
61:(
42:(
38:–
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
