Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Corporal Tunnel

Source 📝

396:. After I recently saw an AfD where six people voted for speedy delete on grounds that the second line of the nomination explained to be inapplicable, a thoughtful and articulate approach was more than slightly refreshing. It was particularily to your credit (sadly enough) that you considered the applicability of the rules and the end results of their use. One of our larger problems with fiction is probably an overreliance on rules, a tendency to build rigid, all-encompassing rulesets instead of flexible ones -- when the latter is what they have originally been and indeed have to be in an environment this large and chaotic. Trying to legislate away the need for thought beyond the core principles would be madness. (Of course I have a defiant streak a mile wide, but that doesn't necessarily make me wrong.) -- 128:
that she had kept in over time. We know she signed, and I'm not happy with ascribing any intent to her. As I said on your Talk page, the "embroidering" bit was not meant to be directed at you. It was meant more as a response to your comment that it was notable, if anything - the two earlier edits, however, were the typical foaming sorts. I was looking at the arc of the page, not at your individual contribution. -
358: 144:"petition" that has as its goal to get women who have had abortions "to declare they are unashamed of the choice they made" seems to me to be "supported" by any such woman who signs. I don't see how this involves any interpretation. Surely you aren't suggesting that a woman would, say, sign the petition, but then explain that she 179:
don't think what I did was "vandalism". If I re-added something that had been removed it was because I thought I must have not applied my changes. I've made an account now to make it easier to see what changes I have made. I noted on the talk page what I edited. There is no page more suited to this information because
441:
The term "British-born" connotes birth on the British Isles, even if it doesn't actually mean precisely that. All English citizens in the English colonies were English, including those born in the New World and those who married into English families. I prefer the use of "British-born" here because
436:
Hello, Kiril. Sorry I'm late answering your post, I was out of town for a few days. The notability of John Harvard's stay in the Colonies, as you know, is that he was here long enough to found a university that went on to become one of the greatest in the world - so it's very pertinent where he was
178:
I edited the article for Lolita with the intention of adding a fully referenced paragraph on how the novel has influenced popular culture, even if just through the creation of the term. I cited my sources along with the paragraph and when I went back to fix the citation it had been reverted. I really
148:
ashamed and thus does not support the project. It seems to me to be a tautology to say that "The petition-signer supported the petition she signed." As for the inclusion of "public," I said she had "publicly" disclosed the fact to make sure that readers didn't think that this bit of salacious-seeming
127:
Hi DCM - I left a note on your page as you were leaving this one on mine. I left in "public" simply because you had it in yours. We do not know why she signed; I know Amy to be a complex and thoughtful person, and for all I know she just wanted the matter up for debate, or wanted to let out a fact
578:
and is still here today (and you seem have no problem with it). So I take it u don't like to see the link appear in the introduction? If my addition of the country link in the intro resulted in more than one link in the article, you should consider to remove the second link and those after it, not
569:
I added ONE link in the introduction. I think you are misinterpreting the guideline. It is a musical festival in USA, it makes perfect sense to mention the name of the country in the introduction at least once. Being an American music fest, it clearly fulfils the requirement of being "particularly
446:
to us that he was born in England, and came to the Colonies, where he died; the truth of the matter, in a very few words. Calling Harvard an "Englishman" makes the American reader, or me anyway, stop for a moment to consider the whole "not yet the USA" issue. The word is correct, but it's not as
158:
As Amy is a living person, I do not believe it is proper to assume anything about her reasons or intentions. Also, New York State has an unfortunate libel law which could be construed to apply in this case. While I understand what you're saying, I'll note only that I myself have signed petitions
116:
project? The fact of the matter is, she did "support" the project by lending one of the few celebrity names on the petition (so far, anyway). I'm not sure what your addition of "public" means in this context, either. After all, wouldn't you agree that most petitions are "public," i.e. "open " to
162:
Since neither of us knows for certain the verifiable truth of Amy's intent, it is not proper for us to place it into her Wiki entry. The fact is that she signed the petition; that's what we know, and that's what it says. There is no need for anyone's opinion to follow. When Amy speaks on the
143:
supported by anyone who signs it. I mean, a ballot access petition says, "We the undersigned do hereby request that Candidate X be included on the General Election ballot on 7 November 2006." Signing the petition means that you support the candidate's ballot access in that race, period. Now, a
420:
Hello, Corporal Tunnelw. Please, can you tell me what is the notability of Harvard's stay in the colonies. He moved in 1637, and died in 1638. Could expound, what "British-born" refers to? Is it American, when USA did not exist, or maybe a kind of combination of the British expatriates in the
523:
I bet you don't know all the prefectures in Japan and the main islands in Indonesia. So don't assume the whole world know something just because u know, and prevent that basic info being added. We all know London is in UK but we don't remove that info from the
623:
that's an perfect example such bias, and we should combat this. How exactly you have become the full representative of the diversity of the world? If you are done with this, please retrain from removing the country link in the intro when I put it back.
93:
I'm sorry if my entry about purple urine was seen as "infantile" but my genuine intentions were to give a detailed description on how to achieve purple urine and the science behind it. I hope you realise this and we can put this matter behind us.
117:
those who fall within the class which the petition purports to represent? Please elaborate on your objection to the language I used, which seemed to me to be more factually informative than the terse prose that you replaced it with.
206:
Generally, the Wiki is open to shaping. In this case, regardless of the state of other pages, the page about the Nabokov novel is no place for that information. It's pretty simple to unlink a redirect - instruction
551:: "Unless they are particularly relevant to the topic of the article, avoid linking terms whose meaning can be understood by most readers of the English Knowledge (XXG), including plain English words, the names of 211:- and if you're prepared to create a page on the Lolita Complex I'll be happy to help you structure it (hint: start small and very true, and then elaborate). Otherwise you might wish to open a new section on the 666:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 615:: English Knowledge (XXG) is dominated by native English-speaking editors from Anglophone countries. These Anglophone countries tend to be in the global North, thereby accentuating the encyclopedia's 159:
that I don't entirely support; there have been other reasons for my actions, in those cases. That I stand by them does not necessarily mean I support them. The ground simply is not black and white.
270:; I don't have the resources or expertise (or the time, really) to figure out if it's the same person. What am I to do? I have left the literary epistle above as is for now, for reference. - 393: 555:, ...". As I said, Texas is immediately identifiable as a state in the United States of America, and providing a link to the USA in an article on a music festival is inappropriate. - 201:
page. I completely understand what you mean about adding something; as I guess you see now, it's useful to check the edit record to see what happened, but no worries on that account.
112:
I'm not sure what you mean in your edit summary when you say, "Plenty wrong with embroidering them." Did you feel that I was somehow "sexing up" her involvement with the
476: 580: 501: 335:
I agree with the removal, but not for the same reason. See, now a lot of its features are free. BUT, the link isn't appropriate for the NYC article; we already have
310:
HEY FUCKWAD. I ADDED A NEW COMMUNIST TO THE PAGE AND YOU CALLED IT VANDALISM. YOU HAVE SOMETHING AGAINST FREE SPEECH. GO BCAK TO LICKING GEORGE BUSHES FAT TEXAN ASS.
149:
information was simply dirt that had been uncovered, and was rather made public by a willful act on her part to associate herself with a particular class of women.
380: 65: 25:
to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
259:, I noted a Blatant Vandal warning on the anon's Talk page; I added another. The edit in question was nonsense about Sonic the Hedgehog on the 336: 691: 547:
You have not added relevant information to a geography page, you have overlinked to an article on a music festival. Please refer to
49: 687: 305:
Thanks, that's pretty much what I figured. I'll keep my fan mail for giggles for a time, I think, though I've moved it here:
34: 22: 68:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
611:
Oh, that's actually the project link which doesn't particularly address the issue in question here, what I meant is this:
472: 678:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
54: 683: 426: 405: 376: 479:). More often than not they're commercial links, but you can usually get enough of a preview for a citable source. 255:
In general, I revert a great deal of vandalism. Yesterday, after fixing up a few vandalizing edits from anon user
612: 484: 29: 292: 267: 370: 252:
Hello Helpers: I found the above charming message on my Talk page on login. What is my proper Wiki response?
61: 256: 222:
I'm pleased to see that you are pursuing this and obviously making quick work of the learning curve here. -
422: 95: 679: 69: 548: 208: 44: 598: 556: 480: 448: 315: 297: 271: 223: 164: 129: 655: 646: 597:
You should really read the link you cited, and learn from it. In any case, I am done with this. -
494: 150: 118: 675: 659: 629: 588: 537: 572:"Texas is immediately identifiable in the USA, and providing a link to the USA is inappropriate" 285: 281: 99: 76:
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
671: 663: 509: 340: 674:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 667: 235:
to hopefully arrange information more clearly, and allow for non-book specific information.
471:. Go into Google News, click Advanced News Search, then Archive Search, which gets you to 400: 392:
Allow me to shake the virtual equivalent of your hand following your elaborate comment in
289: 625: 584: 533: 232: 39: 574:
argument falls apart in millisecond considering the USA country link has been there
236: 188: 505: 384: 80: 695: 633: 606: 592: 564: 541: 513: 488: 456: 430: 410: 343: 318: 300: 274: 239: 226: 191: 167: 153: 132: 121: 83: 397: 260: 197:
Hi Jseipel - glad to see you've registered, and I've responded over on the
447:
helpful as one that speaks to what we already know, and amplifies it. -
662:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
437:
when he died. I don't really know a lot about what else he did here.
212: 184: 525: 364: 198: 373:
to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of topics related to the band.
619:
to contributions from First World countries. For someone who think
475:
where you can search historical newspaper archives (for instance,
519:
The whole world knows (insert knowledge that u took for granted)
187:
and there is no page for the term lolita rather than the novel.
139:
I guess my point would be that a petition project by definition
163:
subject, there will be no reason not to revisit the subject. -
394:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Codex of Ultimate Wisdom
352: 468: 467:
Nothing mysterious! I used one of the obscure options in
284:, so simply remove the message, and leave an appropriate 575: 331: 502:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Sandeep Kamal
375:If you're interested, please express interest for 654:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 442:it gives the reader a shorthand specificity. It 621:"the whole world knows that Texas is in the US" 363:I see that you've made edits in articles about 8: 60:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 231:As per your suggestion, I created a page 288:on the perpetrator's talk page. Cheers, 553:major geographic features and locations 280:Hi, it's never a good idea to feed the 579:the first one. Please try to adopt a 337:New York City Department of Education 7: 72:, ask me on my talk page, or place 30:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 463:Regina Spektor and the Butterflies 314:And they say education is dead. - 219:is just that: a page on the novel. 14: 680:review the candidates' statements 528:page just because you assume the 215:page. But the page on Nabokov's 356: 686:. For the Election committee, 656:Arbitration Committee election 647:ArbCom elections are now open! 581:Knowledge (XXG):Worldwide view 1: 696:16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 613:Knowledge (XXG):Systemic bias 514:04:08, 22 February 2010 (UTC) 489:21:43, 17 February 2010 (UTC) 457:17:52, 16 February 2010 (UTC) 431:18:18, 11 February 2010 (UTC) 411:04:54, 26 January 2008 (UTC) 344:23:13, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 319:15:45, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 301:15:12, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 275:15:06, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 240:22:11, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 227:17:57, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 192:17:27, 17 October 2006 (UTC) 50:How to write a great article 21:Hello, Corporal Tunnel, and 682:and submit your choices on 168:21:48, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 154:21:37, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 133:21:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 122:21:27, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 84:00:30, 15 August 2006 (UTC) 711: 688:MediaWiki message delivery 634:19:59, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 607:15:51, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 593:07:01, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 565:16:43, 15 March 2010 (UTC) 542:12:54, 13 March 2010 (UTC) 421:colonies? Best regards.-- 70:Knowledge (XXG):Questions 602: 560: 452: 266:This response is from a 248:Good Morning, Mr. Vandal 369:I'm trying to create a 576:since as early as 2006 477:spektor butterfly farm 313: 660:Arbitration Committee 307: 664:arbitration process 268:different anon user 676:arbitration policy 377:WikiProject Guster 349:WikiProject Guster 35:How to edit a page 530:whole world knows 423:Kiril Simeonovski 389: 388: 702: 570:relevant". Your 408: 403: 360: 359: 353: 295: 102: 75: 710: 709: 705: 704: 703: 701: 700: 699: 684:the voting page 650: 599:Corporal Tunnel 557:Corporal Tunnel 521: 498: 481:Gordonofcartoon 465: 449:Corporal Tunnel 418: 406: 401: 357: 351: 329: 316:Corporal Tunnel 293: 286:warning message 272:Corporal Tunnel 250: 224:Corporal Tunnel 176: 165:Corporal Tunnel 130:Corporal Tunnel 110: 100: 91: 86: 73: 55:Manual of Style 12: 11: 5: 708: 706: 653: 649: 644: 643: 642: 641: 640: 639: 638: 637: 636: 520: 517: 497: 492: 464: 461: 460: 459: 439: 438: 417: 414: 390: 387: 386: 374: 368: 361: 350: 347: 328: 325: 324: 323: 322: 321: 306: 249: 246: 245: 244: 243: 242: 220: 203: 202: 181:lolita complex 175: 172: 171: 170: 160: 156: 151:DickClarkMises 136: 135: 119:DickClarkMises 109: 106: 90: 87: 78: 66:sign your name 58: 57: 52: 47: 42: 37: 32: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 707: 698: 697: 693: 689: 685: 681: 677: 673: 669: 665: 661: 657: 648: 645: 635: 631: 627: 622: 618: 614: 610: 609: 608: 604: 600: 596: 595: 594: 590: 586: 582: 577: 573: 568: 567: 566: 562: 558: 554: 550: 546: 545: 544: 543: 539: 535: 531: 527: 518: 516: 515: 511: 507: 504:. Thank you. 503: 496: 495:Sandeep Kamal 493: 491: 490: 486: 482: 478: 474: 470: 462: 458: 454: 450: 445: 440: 435: 434: 433: 432: 428: 424: 415: 413: 412: 409: 404: 399: 395: 385: 382: 381:proposal page 378: 372: 366: 362: 355: 354: 348: 346: 345: 342: 338: 333: 332: 326: 320: 317: 312: 311: 304: 303: 302: 299: 296: 291: 287: 283: 279: 278: 277: 276: 273: 269: 264: 262: 258: 257:67.172.18.139 253: 247: 241: 238: 234: 233:Lolita (term) 230: 229: 228: 225: 221: 218: 214: 210: 205: 204: 200: 196: 195: 194: 193: 190: 186: 183:redirects to 182: 173: 169: 166: 161: 157: 155: 152: 147: 142: 138: 137: 134: 131: 126: 125: 124: 123: 120: 115: 108:Amy Brenneman 107: 105: 104: 103: 97: 88: 85: 82: 77: 71: 67: 63: 56: 53: 51: 48: 46: 43: 41: 38: 36: 33: 31: 28: 27: 26: 24: 19: 18: 651: 620: 616: 571: 552: 529: 522: 499: 466: 443: 419: 416:John Harvard 391: 383:. Thanks! - 334: 330: 327:Greatschools 309: 308: 265: 254: 251: 216: 180: 177: 145: 140: 114:Ms. Magazine 113: 111: 98: 92: 89:Purple Urine 81:clearthought 59: 20: 16: 15: 549:WP:OVERLINK 500:Please see 469:Google News 371:WikiProject 341:WhisperToMe 672:topic bans 532:. Please. 74:{{helpme}} 62:Wikipedian 40:Help pages 668:site bans 473:this page 261:Communism 64:! Please 626:Da Vynci 585:Da Vynci 534:Da Vynci 444:suggests 263:page. 45:Tutorial 17:Welcome! 379:on the 237:Jseipel 213:lolicon 189:Jseipel 185:lolicon 23:welcome 658:. The 526:London 506:Drmies 365:Guster 290:Tangot 282:trolls 217:Lolita 199:Lolita 174:Lolita 101:Darren 692:talk 630:talk 617:bias 603:talk 589:talk 561:talk 538:talk 510:talk 485:talk 453:talk 427:talk 209:here 652:Hi, 398:Kiz 298:ngo 694:) 670:, 632:) 605:) 591:) 583:. 563:) 540:) 512:) 487:) 455:) 429:) 339:. 146:is 141:is 96:➨ 79:~ 690:( 628:( 601:( 587:( 559:( 536:( 508:( 483:( 451:( 425:( 407:r 402:o 367:. 294:a

Index

welcome
The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Wikipedian
sign your name
Knowledge (XXG):Questions
clearthought
00:30, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Darren
DickClarkMises
21:27, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Corporal Tunnel
21:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
DickClarkMises
21:37, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Corporal Tunnel
21:48, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
lolicon
Jseipel
17:27, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Lolita
here
lolicon
Corporal Tunnel
17:57, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.