218:
176:
536:
this article if you dont know much about this battle to begin with. If somebody mentions a lie in an article and cites a non-authoritative source as his reference, removing that is not disruptive editing. Granted I didnt add a reference for what I said but that was because I didnt know how to add it. You can find what I said on other encyclopaedi such as brittanica and oxford or cambridge encyclopaedi of Indian history.
906:
407:
130:
18:
328:
294:
257:
813:
974:
majority view of almost all speakers and a large group of linguists? Sylhetis in
Bangladesh as well as the Indian states of Assam and Tripura, speak this dialect and recognise it as a Bengali dialect and none of them claim it is a language. Sylhetis in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) and Assam fought for Bangla. Why did they do this if Sylheti is not a dialect of Bengali?
1026:
363:
981:
Thirdly, Sylheti nagri is not the script of sylheti. It originated in sylhet byt was used exclusively for religious literature and the standard bengali script was used for everything else. Not only that, but nobody in sylhet whether the bangladeshi districts or the indian districts knows or writes in
977:
Secondly, all indoaryan languages in south asia form a dialect continuum. They are not as clear cut distinct as european languages like english, french, german etc. So dialect and language status is given based on cultural affinity of its speakers. So sylheti is dialect because its spoken by bengalis
1086:
Hi. I read your reply, in which you claimed that the
Satyendra Nath Bose article doesn't state what I stated it does. My question is: are you stupid or are you blind? The first line of the "Early life" section of the page states "Bose was born in Calcutta (now Kolkata), the eldest of seven children
973:
My first issue is that when the article itself states there is a difference of opinion with regards to its status as a dialect or language and quotes both positions, why is the page titled "Sylheti LANGUAGE" as if its an undisputed fact that its a language? Especially when it being a dialect is the
709:
My input was given in my feedback to the article after i edited it. Tegh
Bahadur was executed because he commited treason and revolted against the state as well as engaged in high way robbery and pillagings. For reference, read: Aurangzeb India's Most Controversial King by Audrey Truschke (Stamford
535:
Funny that you mention the talk page for this article. Have you even read it yourself? Because if you did, you would see that other users have brought up similar issues months before I even came across this article and included sources in their responses. I do wonder why you are even commenting on
486:
Not to mention the claim that the
Afghans won a Pyrrhic victory is ridiculous. A pyrrhic victory is where the side looses too many troops than what wouldve been manageable. The Afghans in total lost 600 out of 10000. This isnt a pyrrhic victory, this is standard. If you look at other battles other
471:
I did not disrupt wikipedia, I corrected mistakes in the article. If you read any other historical source or encyclopaedia on this battle besides wikipedia,you would see that they all mention that the majority of the casualties the Afridi and
Orakzai tribes suffered during this battle was from the
780:
When I have university sources that state opposing views, I mention both. Which is what I have done. I posted on the talk page stating a change, showing what the
Truschke source states and what the other 3 sources state. Then I waited for anyone to respond, either for or against the change. Only
504:
If you read any other historical source or encyclopaedia on this battle besides wikipedia,you would see that they all mention that the majority of the casualties the Afridi and
Orakzai tribes suffered during this battle was from the British artillery that came to the fort after the Afghans had
781:
C.Fred commented and on the 26 December I made the change and added a note to explain what the sources state. This is the process we use on
Knowledge, not changing something while ignoring the current sources. That is source misrepresentation and can result in a block.
1087:
in a
Bengali Kayastha family." Secondly, his nationality was not "Indian", India wasn't a country at the time that he was born and was created 53 years into his life. He was a lecturer at Dhaka and Kolkata which are both part of the Bengal region.
710:
University
History Professor specialising in Mughal India). The stories regarding the Kashmiri Pundits are just that; stories. They are only found in very late Sikh sources and not in *any* Persian, Muslim, or Hindu sources from that era.
587:
for reliable sources is just another ploy when you clearly have shown to have no respect for reliable sources. I see no reason to continue a dialogue with someone that contradicts their own "so-called" reverence for reliable sources.
472:
British artillery that came to the fort after the Afghans had already taken it from the 36th Sikh Brigade of the British Indian Army. Did you seriously think 21 Indians killed 600 on their own? If so, you should watch less movies.
487:
nations fought, they had similar or more losses but it is never considered merely a pyrrhic victory. The editor who slid this word into the article for Battle of Saragarhi is clearly motivated by nationalistic or religious bias.
671:
I already mentioned how these sources are inaccurate as they are based on late sikh sources whereas early persian sources dont state that. I also provided a source you could check to verify. You can read, cant you?
982:
sylheti nagri. Claiming it is the script of sylheti is equivalent to stating ancient norse runes are the scriot for scandinavian languages not the latin alphabet, when nobody today uses or even knows that script.
879:
Do not edit war. The current version of the article (as well as the related ones) was written after multiple discussions and consensus. You can't just change sourced content like that. I've moved your comment in
985:
Unfortunately the wikipedia article on sylheti does not reflect the ground reality of the sylheti dialect nor the views of Sylheti Bengalis, whether from the Bangladeshi side or the Indian side.
749:. The source you provided was used. However, you changed referenced information, leaving the current references. Per BRD, your next step would be to go to the article talk page for Discussion.
653:
I would strongly suggest taking any concerns you have to the article talk page. You have a history of changing articles to state what you want and not what the source(s) state. That is
770:
The stories regarding the Kashmiri Pundits are just that; stories. They are only found in very late Sikh sources and not in *any* Persian, Muslim, or Hindu sources from that era.
516:. Knowledge is written using reliable sources, not personal opinion. And the information you removed and the reference you removed, without any explanation, is the definition of
941:
442:
691:
I would appreciate your input regarding the change you were attempting earlier. If we can gain consensus we can change the wording in the lead of the article. See
371:
61:
60:
225:. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Knowledge without adequate explanation, as you did at
756:
For reference, read: Aurangzeb India's Most Controversial King by Audrey Truschke (Stamford University History Professor specialising in Mughal India).
610:
After five days of unspeakable torture Tegh Bahadur was beheaded on December 19 in Delhi after refusing Aurangzeb's demand that he convert to Islam.
78:! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Knowledge and get help from experienced editors like
824:. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
867:
858:
to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
940:
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Knowledge's
441:
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Knowledge's
1046:
647:
Aurangzeb helped to unite the Sikhs when he beheaded the ninth Guru Tegh Bahadur in 1675 for refusing to convert to Islam.
609:
934:
930:
910:
863:
829:
617:
Guru Tegh Bahadur spoke out amid this persecution. He refused to convert to Islam and in 1675, he was beheaded in Delhi.
435:
431:
411:
268:
222:
180:
347:
283:
241:
1038:
1009:
964:
890:
1088:
986:
711:
673:
537:
488:
473:
953:
873:
454:
333:
317:
299:
262:
230:
194:
150:
1042:
918:
513:
423:
419:
305:
108:
183:. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Knowledge, as you did with
1069:
1000:
Instead of edit warring, changing scholarly sourced content and making personal commentary, you should seek
616:
378:
have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
1077:
1058:
1050:
859:
817:
343:
279:
237:
226:
1005:
960:
922:
886:
881:
796:
700:
662:
593:
525:
462:
636:
Guru Tegh Bahadur refused to accept Islam , and he was beheaded in Chandni Chauk , the main market...
339:
313:
155:
1001:
926:
836:, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
833:
825:
450:
427:
391:
383:
309:
138:
85:
92:
75:
1073:
1054:
1030:
777:
And yet Cambridge University and Rutgers University give a different picture of what happened.
379:
202:
146:
134:
42:
34:
26:
949:
821:
792:
696:
658:
589:
521:
458:
272:
791:
to let them know of this discussion and reason why I was seeking the change in the lead. --
338:
the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Knowledge, as you did at
1096:
1081:
1062:
1013:
994:
968:
894:
855:
800:
719:
704:
681:
666:
597:
545:
529:
496:
481:
466:
395:
351:
321:
287:
245:
206:
164:
46:
22:
387:
367:
142:
30:
217:
175:
746:
1041:. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
921:
with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the
738:
654:
555:
you are with what reliable sources state. When you remove, without any explanation:
517:
422:
with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the
198:
38:
1004:
at the talk page where you should also bring scholarly sources in your support. -
129:
17:
561:
Oxford Dictionary:Oxford University Press & Syracuse University Press sources
21:
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Knowledge, as you did to
786:
742:
327:
293:
256:
730:
I also provided a source you could check to verify. You can read, cant you?
133:
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Knowledge, as you did at
692:
978:
in sylhet and they all consider it a dialect and themselves as Bengalis.
1072:. You should take further discussions to the article talk page, please.
1025:
844:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
763:
And your reason for ignoring the other 2 university sources, would be???
362:
505:
already taken it from the 36th Sikh Brigade of the British Indian Army.
29:. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
1034:
190:
375:
80:
1049:. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
643:
The Many Colors of Hinduism: A Thematic-historical Introduction
382:. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
884:
to a new section. Perhaps bring newer scholarly sources there?
854:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
103:
1033:. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
512:
Then I would suggest you bring your sources, if any, to the
52:
CorrectionalFacility101, you are invited to the Teahouse!
33:. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
604:
Changing of referenced information on Guru Gobind Singh
575:
570:
565:
560:
185:
25:, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
1045:
and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
737:
Yes I can, thanks for asking. You might want to read
948:
If you continue to disrupt Knowledge, as you did at
449:
If you continue to disrupt Knowledge, as you did at
929:with them. Alternatively you can read Knowledge's
849:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
430:with them. Alternatively you can read Knowledge's
145:. If you would like to experiment, please use the
933:page, and ask for independent help at one of the
434:page, and ask for independent help at one of the
370:. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
1068:Thank you for the message. I have replied at
277:Don't lie and saying fixing typos or grammar.
8:
551:Funny, I can tell by your editing just how
866:. In some cases, it may be appropriate to
820:according to the reverts you have made on
958:Stop POV modification of sourced content.
816:You currently appear to be engaged in an
72:! Thanks for contributing to Knowledge.
149:. Repeated vandalism can result in the
308:material to Knowledge, as you did at
942:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
443:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
7:
870:. If you engage in an edit war, you
235:Don't lie and saying fixing typos.
137:. Your edits appear to constitute
14:
917:If you are engaged in an article
868:request temporary page protection
571:The Encyclopaedia of Islam source
418:If you are engaged in an article
1024:
904:
811:
566:Syracuse University Press source
405:
361:
326:
292:
255:
216:
174:
128:
59:
16:
608:Per Jenkins source, page 200, "
576:Harvard University Press source
828:with others, to avoid editing
1:
801:00:56, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
720:21:03, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
705:07:44, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
682:21:00, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
667:02:55, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
657:and can result in a block. --
598:05:53, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
546:04:24, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
530:01:54, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
497:00:11, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
482:00:04, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
467:20:47, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
246:00:21, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
114:20:02, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
47:17:44, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
1097:18:02, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
1082:17:19, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
1063:20:53, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
687:Discussion Guru Gobind Singh
352:14:00, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
207:07:43, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
165:15:40, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
90:
1037:, but you didn't provide a
322:16:37, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
288:12:49, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
1115:
1014:09:39, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
895:10:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
271:Knowledge, as you did at
151:loss of editing privileges
98:We hope to see you there!
57:
1047:referencing for beginners
995:22:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
969:13:08, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
634:- Volumes 2-3, page 72, "
396:03:15, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
372:your recent contributions
1092:
990:
834:try to reach a consensus
715:
677:
541:
492:
477:
1089:CorrectionalFacility101
1070:Special:Diff/1180119036
987:CorrectionalFacility101
860:appropriate noticeboard
712:CorrectionalFacility101
674:CorrectionalFacility101
632:The Sikhs of the Punjab
538:CorrectionalFacility101
489:CorrectionalFacility101
474:CorrectionalFacility101
336:without further warning
302:without further warning
265:without further warning
70:CorrectionalFacility101
37:for that. Thank you. -
436:relevant notice boards
304:the next time you add
227:Succession to Muhammad
935:relevant noticeboards
882:Talk:Sylheti language
954:blocked from editing
455:blocked from editing
340:Rape in Saudi Arabia
334:blocked from editing
300:blocked from editing
263:blocked from editing
231:blocked from editing
195:blocked from editing
923:article's talk page
451:Battle of Saragarhi
424:article's talk page
310:Khalid ibn al-Walid
1043:include a citation
931:dispute resolution
911:disruptive editing
864:dispute resolution
655:disruptive editing
518:disruptive editing
432:dispute resolution
412:disruptive editing
267:the next time you
223:disruptive editing
181:disruptive editing
93:Visit the Teahouse
909:Please stop your
615:Per BBC source, "
514:article talk page
410:Please stop your
344:Emir of Knowledge
280:Emir of Knowledge
273:Verse of Wilayah
238:Emir of Knowledge
221:Please stop your
179:Please stop your
135:Battle of Yarmouk
121:
120:
115:
111:
107:on behalf of the
1106:
1028:
1006:Fylindfotberserk
961:Fylindfotberserk
950:Sylheti language
908:
907:
887:Fylindfotberserk
839:Points to note:
822:Sylheti language
815:
814:
790:
626:effort I found:
409:
408:
365:
330:
296:
259:
220:
188:
178:
163:
161:
132:
113:
106:
100:
95:
83:
74:Be our guest at
63:
56:
55:
20:
1114:
1113:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1039:reliable source
1022:
919:content dispute
905:
902:
812:
809:
784:
689:
606:
420:content dispute
406:
403:
359:
314:Darkness Shines
253:
214:
184:
172:
156:
154:
126:
117:
116:
102:
96:
91:
79:
54:
23:Salafi movement
12:
11:
5:
1112:
1110:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1053:. Thank you.
1021:
1018:
1017:
1016:
946:
945:
938:
901:
898:
852:
851:
846:
808:
805:
804:
803:
782:
778:
774:
773:
765:
764:
760:
759:
751:
750:
734:
733:
724:
688:
685:
651:
650:
639:
630:J. S. Grewal,
605:
602:
601:
600:
580:
579:
578:
573:
568:
563:
557:
556:
533:
532:
509:
508:
447:
446:
439:
402:
399:
358:
355:
252:
249:
213:
210:
171:
168:
141:and have been
125:
122:
119:
118:
109:Teahouse hosts
97:
73:
66:
64:
53:
50:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1111:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1027:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
998:
997:
996:
992:
988:
983:
979:
975:
971:
970:
966:
962:
959:
955:
952:, you may be
951:
943:
939:
936:
932:
928:
924:
920:
916:
915:
914:
912:
899:
897:
896:
892:
888:
885:
883:
877:
876:from editing.
875:
869:
865:
861:
857:
850:
847:
845:
842:
841:
840:
837:
835:
831:
827:
823:
819:
806:
802:
798:
794:
788:
783:
779:
776:
775:
771:
767:
766:
762:
761:
757:
753:
752:
748:
744:
740:
736:
735:
731:
727:
726:
725:
722:
721:
717:
713:
707:
706:
702:
698:
694:
686:
684:
683:
679:
675:
669:
668:
664:
660:
656:
648:
644:
640:
637:
633:
629:
628:
627:
625:
620:
618:
613:
611:
603:
599:
595:
591:
586:
582:
581:
577:
574:
572:
569:
567:
564:
562:
559:
558:
554:
550:
549:
548:
547:
543:
539:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
510:
506:
501:
500:
499:
498:
494:
490:
484:
483:
479:
475:
469:
468:
464:
460:
456:
453:, you may be
452:
444:
440:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
416:
415:
413:
400:
398:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
364:
356:
354:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
335:
329:
324:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
301:
295:
290:
289:
285:
281:
278:
274:
270:
266:
264:
258:
250:
248:
247:
243:
239:
236:
232:
229:, you may be
228:
224:
219:
212:December 2017
211:
209:
208:
204:
200:
196:
193:, you may be
192:
187:
182:
177:
170:November 2017
169:
167:
166:
162:
160:
153:. Thank you.
152:
148:
144:
140:
136:
131:
123:
112:
110:
105:
101:Delivered by
94:
89:
87:
82:
77:
71:
65:
62:
58:
51:
49:
48:
44:
40:
36:
32:
28:
24:
19:
1074:MichaelMaggs
1055:MichaelMaggs
1051:my talk page
1031:MichaelMaggs
1023:
1020:October 2023
1002:WP:CONSENSUS
984:
980:
976:
972:
957:
947:
903:
878:
871:
853:
848:
843:
838:
830:disruptively
810:
769:
755:
729:
723:
708:
690:
670:
652:
646:
645:, page 23, "
642:
641:Carl Olson,
635:
631:
623:
621:
614:
607:
584:
552:
534:
503:
485:
470:
448:
404:
401:Last warning
360:
332:
325:
298:
291:
276:
261:
254:
251:January 2018
234:
215:
173:
158:
127:
124:October 2017
99:
76:the Teahouse
69:
67:
27:edit summary
15:
1029:Hello, I'm
925:, and seek
826:collaborate
793:Kansas Bear
697:Kansas Bear
659:Kansas Bear
622:And with a
590:Kansas Bear
522:Kansas Bear
459:Kansas Bear
426:, and seek
386:. Thanks.--
366:Hello, I'm
331:You may be
297:You may be
260:You may be
900:April 2022
807:March 2022
583:Yes, your
927:consensus
856:talk page
832:, and to
553:concerned
428:consensus
388:Ermenrich
384:help desk
368:Ermenrich
357:June 2019
306:unsourced
186:this edit
139:vandalism
81:Cullen328
862:or seek
818:edit war
157:General
143:reverted
31:reverted
874:blocked
872:may be
585:concern
380:sandbox
269:disrupt
199:Jim1138
159:Ization
147:sandbox
104:HostBot
39:Arjayay
35:sandbox
787:C.Fred
747:WP:NOR
624:little
1035:Boson
739:WP:RS
457:. --
191:Aisha
1093:talk
1078:talk
1059:talk
1010:talk
991:talk
965:talk
891:talk
797:talk
743:WP:V
716:talk
701:talk
695:. --
693:here
678:talk
663:talk
594:talk
542:talk
526:talk
520:. --
493:talk
478:talk
463:talk
392:talk
376:Jinn
348:talk
318:talk
284:talk
242:talk
203:talk
86:talk
43:talk
619:"
374:to
342:.
312:.
189:to
88:).
68:Hi
1095:)
1080:)
1061:)
1012:)
993:)
967:)
956:.
913:.
893:)
799:)
745:,
741:,
718:)
703:)
680:)
665:)
612:"
596:)
588:--
544:)
528:)
495:)
480:)
465:)
414:.
394:)
350:)
320:)
286:)
275:.
244:)
233:.
205:)
197:.
45:)
1091:(
1076:(
1057:(
1008:(
989:(
963:(
944:.
937:.
889:(
795:(
789::
785:@
772:"
768:"
758:"
754:"
732:"
728:"
714:(
699:(
676:(
661:(
649:"
638:"
592:(
540:(
524:(
507:"
502:"
491:(
476:(
461:(
445:.
438:.
390:(
346:(
316:(
282:(
240:(
201:(
84:(
41:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
