400:
there, and in the NPOV issues page. A JustinOlypen has been using the Kilmer page as a podium for his anti-Israel activism in violation of
Knowledge (XXG)'s NPOV standards and has responded to any attempt to reign the text back into acceptable, neutral language by replacing it with his original diatribe. Recently an NPOV banner showed up on the article, which was encouraging; but no action was taken, so I waved a red flag in hope of getting some action. My solution to his (and there may be a second user with a similar bias, or he is using another computer) is the text below. If that is not acceptable, replace it with something that is approved but act on this problem. Again, go to the Eric Kilmer talk page and get involved, or get someone with editorial authority to step in. As for being blocked, I will probably live another week happily enough. If Knowledge (XXG) will address the NPOV issue I will be satisfied; now that I have your attention I will stop vandalizing the article, but I will not accept the inappropriate political activism you have been allowing on Eric Kilmer's article and will respond by replacing it with the neutral language below (the "complicated" line was JustinOlypen's contribution, which I retained): Through his cosponsorship of the United States-Israel Strategic Partnership Act of 2013 ?UNIQ6af2d4b6eb810a83-nowiki-0000001B-QINU?1?UNIQ6af2d4b6eb810a83-nowiki-0000001C-QINU?, Rep. Kilmer supports I increased US taxpayer funding of Israel's military, and to provide assistance for cooperation in the fields of energy, water, homeland security, agriculture, and alternative fuel technologies. Kilmer has visited Israel with special-interest lobby groups working to increase funding for Israel. He describes situation as "complicated."?UNIQ6af2d4b6eb810a83-nowiki-0000001E-QINU?2?UNIQ6af2d4b6eb810a83-nowiki-0000001F-QINU? On January 13, 2014 Representative Kilmer was to address the AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) Technology Division invitation-only luncheon; this meeting was deleted from the AIPAC calendar.?UNIQ6af2d4b6eb810a83-nowiki-00000021-QINU?3?UNIQ6af2d4b6eb810a83-nowiki-00000022-QINU?
16:"Matt S." Has deleted my fully researched, cited, accurate and pertinent section titled "controversy on the grounds that it argues against the existence of the article itself. It does not; it questions the validity of assertions within that article, and does so justifiably. I am the only contributor to this article who has researched and cited their contributions in accordance with documented history and Andeanist scholarship. A lot of work went into researching and citing this; it should not be removed prejudicially. If "Matt S." favors the original assertions, he should provide them support and citations.
464:
I try to fix it. My first revise was the word "Inca" to the word "Olmec," in context of wheeled toys. The Olmecs made them, the Incas did not. No controversy there among academic authorities. If I live another couple years, and
Knowledge (XXG) does as well, and learn the rules of this system, I may found an article. As for the Kilmer imbroglio, that's an anomaly - Representative Kilmer seems like a nice guy, well educated, well intentioned, and whose politics are kind. He didn't deserve that sort of eczema on his article.
255:
33:
314:
64:
484:
188:
23:
clarify and inform. In fact, the "chakana" appears to be a modern convention and to have few or no roots in pre-columbian cultures. This is something the reader may wish to know. If evidence to support the contention of the article as it read before this amendment exists, please present it here or within the text. Please do not reflexively revert valid modifications.
463:
7-12-14 OhNoitsJamie - You're right, I'm not here to build an encyclopedia, not yet, I don't have the expertise in any field, although I'm gaining ground in pre-contact Andean history - I am here to preserve and maintain an encyclopedia; where I see clear and unequivocal violation of established fact
93:
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit
22:
I have edited the article "Chakana" to qualify its categorical presentation as fact a highly questionable assertion: that the "chakana" design is an ancient and traditional motif in Andean culture and that it represents an identifiable symbology. This is not done to be mean-spirited; it is done to
399:
BGWhite, or any other administrator: Good. I have finally got the attention of some (I dare hope) adult supervision on this issue. Go the to Eric Kilmer talk page: I have been trying to get the attention of any
Knowledge (XXG) administrator about the NPOV problems with this page for over a year;
151:
and is specifically prohibited. I hope you realise the underlying principle behind this rule. If everyone were free to add their own original stuff to this encyclopedia, and without expert and reliable published sources to back it up, Knowledge (XXG) would be full of unverifiable and basically
217:
223:
230:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
192:
169:. If you want to discuss this further click on it and then press "save" to leave your message at the article talkpage if you think you want to discuss this issue further.
419:
to build an encyclopedia. POV issues should be resolved on article talk pages; unblock requests are not for the sole purpose of getting attention for your cause.
455:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
147:
Unfortunately citations are the bread and butter of
Knowledge (XXG). Without them you cannot add your own research into an article because it is called
45:
354:
110:
440:
295:
136:
Is this not the relevant talk page? From where I stand it is you, not I, who has gone to war. You have left the reader deceived. Good work.
222:
216:
349:
531:
102:
543:
499:
118:
547:
279:
122:
148:
553:
327:
262:
81:
321:
49:
326:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
41:
368:
539:
511:
491:
275:
114:
86:
75:
200:
427:
535:
503:
495:
267:
199:
and
Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
196:
106:
416:
299:
274:. You edits have crossed the line into vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
142:
506:
rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
421:
303:
239:
465:
449:
332:
285:
254:
587:
563:
90:
214:
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
578:
271:
235:
32:
101:
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's
98:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
63:
170:
153:
126:
53:
582:
558:
278:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may
594:
570:
473:
430:
307:
243:
175:
158:
131:
58:
534:
to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents
187:
519:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made
71:
52:
and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
37:
113:
for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant
208:
89:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
530:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
482:
312:
253:
62:
546:. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
437:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
457:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
412:
382:
378:
372:
363:
359:
345:
341:
337:
166:
80:
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being
538:
among editors. You can post a request for help at an
581:. Please respond there before I take other action.
320:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
121:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
36:Please do not add or change content, as you did to
525:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
282:by adding the following text below this notice:
105:to work toward making a version that represents
96:even if you don't violate the three-revert rule
8:
74:shows that you are currently engaged in an
490:You currently appear to be engaged in an
203:. There are two ways to do this. Either:
512:Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on edit warring
211:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
7:
550:. If you engage in an edit war, you
165:The link to the article talkpage is
510:Please be particularly aware that
48:. Please review the guidelines at
14:
226:) located above the edit window.
221:
215:
186:
31:
294:. However, you should read the
85:—especially if you violate the
70:Your recent editing history at
498:with others, to avoid editing
50:Knowledge (XXG):Citing sources
1:
244:22:17, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
595:00:10, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
573:
571:00:10, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
324:, who declined the request.
176:07:31, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
159:07:28, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
132:06:55, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
59:06:55, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
611:
577:I've left a discussion at
266:one week from editing for
195:. When you add content to
193:welcome to Knowledge (XXG)
474:16:30, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
441:guide to appealing blocks
308:06:57, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
296:guide to appealing blocks
276:make useful contributions
504:try to reach a consensus
494:. Users are expected to
469:
431:23:57, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
540:appropriate noticeboard
152:worthless information.
487:
317:
258:
67:
486:
415:suggest that you are
369:change block settings
316:
290:Your reason here ~~~~
257:
66:
479:Edit warring resumed
82:blocked from editing
149:WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH
109:among editors. See
544:dispute resolution
488:
318:
259:
119:dispute resolution
68:
280:appeal this block
182:Your recent edits
174:
157:
146:
130:
87:three-revert rule
57:
602:
592:
585:
568:
561:
485:
454:
448:
425:
388:
386:
375:
357:
355:deleted contribs
315:
293:
270:, as you did at
225:
219:
190:
173:
156:
140:
129:
56:
35:
610:
609:
605:
604:
603:
601:
600:
599:
588:
583:
564:
559:
548:page protection
483:
481:
460:
452:
446:
445:, then use the
434:
423:
402:
376:
366:
352:
335:
328:blocking policy
313:
310:
283:
251:
201:sign your posts
184:
123:page protection
46:reliable source
44:it by citing a
29:
12:
11:
5:
608:
606:
598:
597:
528:
527:
522:
507:
480:
477:
462:
435:
409:
405:Decline reason
397:
393:Request reason
390:
311:
260:You have been
252:
250:
247:
228:
227:
212:
183:
180:
179:
178:
162:
161:
28:
25:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
607:
596:
593:
591:
586:
580:
576:
575:
574:
572:
569:
567:
562:
557:
556:from editing.
555:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
526:
523:
520:
517:
516:
515:
513:
508:
505:
501:
497:
493:
478:
476:
475:
471:
467:
459:
458:
451:
444:
442:
433:
432:
429:
428:
426:
418:
414:
408:
406:
401:
396:
394:
389:
384:
380:
374:
370:
365:
361:
356:
351:
347:
346:global blocks
343:
342:active blocks
339:
334:
329:
325:
323:
322:administrator
309:
305:
301:
297:
291:
287:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
264:
256:
248:
246:
245:
241:
237:
234:Thank you. --
232:
224:
218:
213:
210:
206:
205:
204:
202:
198:
194:
189:
181:
177:
172:
168:
164:
163:
160:
155:
150:
144:
143:edit conflict
139:
138:
137:
134:
133:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
104:
99:
97:
92:
88:
84:
83:
77:
73:
65:
61:
60:
55:
51:
47:
43:
39:
34:
26:
24:
20:
17:
589:
579:Talk:Chakana
565:
551:
529:
524:
518:
509:
500:disruptively
489:
461:
456:
438:
436:
420:
410:
404:
403:
398:
392:
391:
364:creation log
331:
319:
289:
272:Derek Kilmer
261:
233:
229:
185:
135:
100:
95:
79:
69:
30:
27:January 2014
21:
19:czypcamayoc
18:
15:
496:collaborate
466:Czypcamayoc
333:Czypcamayoc
115:noticeboard
360:filter log
197:talk pages
191:Hello and
40:, without
536:consensus
532:talk page
502:, and to
439:read the
413:like this
379:checkuser
338:block log
268:vandalism
207:Add four
107:consensus
103:talk page
42:verifying
542:or seek
514:states:
492:edit war
424:itsJamie
417:not here
350:contribs
298:first.
288:|reason=
117:or seek
94:warring—
76:edit war
554:blocked
552:may be
450:unblock
373:unblock
300:Bgwhite
286:unblock
263:blocked
249:Blocked
236:SineBot
91:reverts
72:Chakana
38:Chakana
590:(talk)
566:(talk)
411:Edits
209:tildes
443:first
171:Δρ.Κ.
154:Δρ.Κ.
127:Δρ.Κ.
54:Δρ.Κ.
584:Kuru
560:Kuru
470:talk
422:OhNo
304:talk
240:talk
167:this
383:log
330:).
220:or
125:.
111:BRD
472:)
453:}}
447:{{
407::
395::
377:•
371:•
367:•
362:•
358:•
353:•
348:•
344:•
340:•
306:)
292:}}
284:{{
242:)
78:.
521:.
468:(
387:)
385:)
381:(
336:(
302:(
238:(
145:)
141:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
