User talk:Daniel/Archive/4

319:

Warcaptain and friend critics section. I really don't understand the actual process, if it's allowed to make modification without your approval then we come back to the same state as before. I will not continue this game, if wikipedia allow a group of 2 people to polute an entire article and put defamatory content against individuals and commercial product then wikipedia is not worst helping it and wasting our time on it. If you are allowed to put any content on an article and that content can stay for a week before being removed then when do defamatory finish? When the content is removed because no source are given then someone can just put slightly modified defamatory content and wait for it to be removed one week after and so on... So if i follow this logic anyone can modify the user page of Daniel Bryant, put defamatory content about you and you will have to wait 1 week to remove it until waiting sources? Also to give source i will just have to open a thread on a obscure forum and wait for anonymous people to make comments on you and say how bad you are or anything worst and false about you?

1406:

value your contributions can mean to a user when they're future at a certain place is unsure. I most certainly won't vandalise any pages considering my above pledge, and will hopefully try and keep a cooler head when another issue rears it's ugly head in the future. I actually am quite suprised that you were considering me for the Mop, but I totally understand your reasoning behind delaying this, as I, for one, wouldn't vote for anybody who showed the sort of ill-directed attributes that I did. From now on, Assuming Good Faith and Civility will be my primary goals, and I hope that it will be my civility, not my hostility, which will prevail in the future. Once again, Errant, you are a very good contributor, but not only that - you are a good person, which was exemplified by the time you took to write the above email. I am considering RfA-ing you, and this kind of act makes me even the more encouraged. However, considering my recent history, I think I'll wait, or maybe co-nominate with someone else in maybe a couple of weeks time. Thanks again.

1234:). I don't think you'd get too far with admin abuse there! :) Besides, in retrospect, we probably should have reverted to a version which did not include any of the unsourced criticism. It's better to have it empty and then added in as sources are found rather than the converse, i.e. having it full and removing stuff when sources cannot be found. As far as being upset about Knowledge's actions, that's awfully easy for us to say - we don't have any money at stake here. Say what you will about the GraalOnline management but that may be the source of their entire income we're fighting over. We're just quibbling over the quality of an article - they're worried about whether they'll be able to put food on their kids' table because a bunch of angry rogue teenage users trash their reputation on a highly public web site. We don't exactly have equal amounts in the pot. — 3058:. However, "abusive", in this context, does not have to mean engaging in extremely objectionable personal attacks and using foul language. The behaviour was an abuse of Knowledge policy, and was also an abuse of our trust. That is what "abusive" means, when used about puppets. There are editors who openly take out sockpuppet accounts because they want to keep separate watchlists. The administrator Geni is one such example. Those puppets are not "abusive" ones. (Incidentally, the HK30 account was banned for abusive behaviour — massive edit warring, followed by the reinsertion of links to a website that attacked and gave personal information about editors, after another editor had removed those links.) Just to put you in the picture, 2605:

efforts of other editors who have a long history of harassment against myself and others who oppose them in edit conficts within particular articles relating to Chrstian content. I revert back false accusations aimed to harass me, esp. at banned users who no loner edit here. This is a question of defending my good name. User checks have shown no connection to me. If there is any evidence that I am any of these other users then I'd like to see it, and then let the labels stand on the basis of real evidence. Otherwise, these are just personal attacks against my good name given that I do not have sock puppets!

3077:

that he couldn't edit them anonymously. The reason I removed that particular tag was that he admitted to having created the other puppets, apologized, expressed regret, and promised that that behaviour would not recur. Now, Giovanni pretended not to know BelindaGong until he was caught, and even after he was caught, he insisted that he had done nothing wrong. He has constantly made untrue claims. I won't clog up your page with details, but they're available (with diffs) on request. If he were to say that he did, indeed, knowingly violate our

2064:). All the A-League stuff would be kept and those who only want to work on that could continue there, and we would perhaps be able to attract more people who want to work on just NSL or just the national team to the project. Like I said, I have been meaning to put forward a full proposal to do this at WP:AL but just haven't got around to it yet. And whatever you do don't worry about "taking over the project", I don't see myself as the official (or even unofficial) leader of it, and even if it was so I need all the help I can get! Cheers. – 1249:

of it, there is no solution for this at the moment and it will keep on going on. Restarting the wiki after a decision was made was a bad idea and is causing more problems and getting people more angry. Threats are now being exchanged to players and even Daniel and this should truly be avoided. We are willing to comply to such things but as we stated before there is no citable sources for Graal and it's being used as pure advertisement. I'd love to chat with you more about the situation, but we are not just littering the GO Wiki.—

1274:

not staff) until after his phone conversation. Last I checked, you (daniel) wants to check out graal. That fact alone should be more than enough to prove the article isn't 'that' bad. I personally love the whole idea behind graal. Especially as a development tool (not as much as a great game to play right now, but that's a years of other history, and a situation similar to this. Except that guy just left). Lot's of poeple have had graal on thier resume's and it helped them! One works for microsoft!! It's true. --

1453:

the manner in a way that most of us could not have. Daniel, I've been really impressed with you since I first bumped into you a week or two ago (with the AIV thing). I'd like to encourage you, like Tmorton said, to hang in there. Maybe take a break from some of the inflammatory people and situations (e.g. don't mediate for a little while). I'll be rooting for you, and don't hesitate to drop me a line if you need any help or encouragement. Once again, thanks for the excellent job with the mediation. Best Regards,

2520: 576: 60: 2973:, and accidental signature, see link), not only do Gio's explanations (only presented after having been found out and not changing the fact that both accounts acted as puppets), but there is also a whole bunch of other accounts associated with him, that though not sharing an IP with Gio (though sometimes among each other) have been conclusively shown to be his puppets. 3169:

I'm more used to give than receive! :) Your kind words and your wonderful gesture mean the world to me, and I sincerely hope this is but the beginning of a friendship. You'll always be a welcome face at my Talk page, if you need my help in any possible way, or if you simply feel like talking! With a big hug, your friend,

3082:

do such a thing again, some friendly admin (such as myself) would probably be prepared to remove the tags from the two accounts. And, if he edited honourably from now on, showing respect for other views, and not stooping to unscrupulous means of enforcing his POV, we'd probably, in time, remove the tag from his own page.

3017:, he posted to another admin saying that I was a possible meat puppet for Str1977. (And this was while his account was posting things about double standards, and the BelindaGong account was posting things about not being able to stand hypocrisy and dishonesty! ! !) Just out of interest, I've looked at 3076:

I very recently removed a puppet tag from a page where the alleged puppeteer (who is currently under a one-year ban) denied having created that account. I will add that I was "on the other side" from the banned editor. I was one of the editors who constantly reverted his edits, and protected pages so

3044:

account is similar. There is really no possibility that those accounts have no connection to Giovanni, the way they follow him to unrelated articles, and support him and revert for him, and did so from the very beginning, before he had built up a record as a puppeteer. There is overwhelming evidence,

2801:

Wrong on both counts. BelindaGong is my wife, thus not a socketpuppet. Care to have me prove it? Belinda Gong is her real name. She lives here and shares an IP address. Ofcourse you wont care about that as no one does. But, for those who are interested in truth, the offer still stands. Freethinker is

2525:

Your recent contributions to Knowledge are very much appreciated. However, please take a moment to look over your contributions for spelling, grammatical, and punctuation errors before submitting them in final. This will help lessen the amount of copyediting work that fellow Wikipedians need to do,

1925:

Ok point taken, I will clarify what I mean. If criticism exists of Graal online in verifiable sources it should be noted in the article. Consider the flip side - can the good stuff about Graal be included? Yes if there are verifiable sources. Most good articles here on wikipedia follow the same rough

1902:

Okay, I wasn't trying to re-start the argument. Just trying to have a sanity check here. Daniel.Bryant seems to have good intentions but I fear they are starting to turn ugly when I hear things like "knowledge of the loopholes and precise definitions of policies", etc. This is an on-line game, not

1666:

Thanks for the Zen Garden! :) You always need to keep in mind that there's no pleasing some people here. I can't even figure out what some of the people's motives are with this mess but I think you and I are the only ones trying to do what's best for Knowledge. Just try to keep an even keel! :)

1330:

And I'm glad I was not wrong. You successfully steered the controversies article away from NPOV and then turned your attention to other causes - such as improving australian articles and vandal fighting (which saw impressive results). To each of these things you brought good humor and quality editing

1324:

What i wanted to say is that I am really sorry about how you seem to have lost trust in our community. There are not many editors I remember as both good, friendly and useful - apart from some obvious ones (Kylu, kim other admins etc.) however after our initial dealings on the World Cup Controversies

101:

Fact is the UGCC was formed out of protest against the OGCC, whose rules, their operator and administrator. Fact is the contents of the UGCC don't corresponds with the rules of the OGCC. On the contrary, it permitted expressly topics and contents, reverse to the rules of the OGCC. In the first phase

3087:

For those reasons, I've replaced the original tag on Giovanni's page. I'd consider removing it if he owned up, as it's not my purpose to humiliate anyone. (It's interesting that several admins supported the idea of blocking him indefinitely until he owned up. This is a less drastic measure!) Anyway,

2630:

No, I know this because they reverted it, and the nature of the edit made on their page is negative. That is why they, and I, revert this, which is slanderous in nature. I see other editors, including admins, reverting user talk pages to what that user wanted themseleves. This is common practice and

2435:

Each team page will have a Summary Table added to it, which will provide an at-a-glance look at the results of the team throughout the season. We ask that, at every chance you get, you fill in the results of these Summary Tables – it only takes a few seconds, but it will help keep the uninformed "in

2342:

A Position Ladder will be placed on each team page, which will provide an up-to-date visualization of the current A-League standings. However, problems may occur when Position Ladders aren't updated with the new statistics that don't involve matches of the team whose page the Position Ladder resides

1874:

There is alot of criticism about Graal online and such information has to be included in a fair article on the topic - end of story. On the other hand it shouldnt be the thing that swings the article - fairness is important too. The Graal administration are doing a good job of working around the web

1163:

Basically what happened is we came to an agreement (they all signed), then the user from the corporation decided that they'd push their luck even further and try and get all the criticism removed (which was not agreeded on during mediation), then Danny banned them for a variety of reasons, and since

630:

Hey, I just wanted to apologize for not sticking my head into the mediation and offering my opinion. When you said the time and date, I thought you meant around now. I figured it out in the morning right before work, but I had no time. That being said, I commend you for your excellent job in working

480:

As a mediator, I am required to give my view. I did that. C'mon, if I was really biased, would I have been so lenient in punishing you for what was a violation of procedure. I didn't, because I understood that you may have not have realised the policy. Please, go away, and come back in 6.5 days, and

3168:

Dear Daniel, this is also a great chance to thank you deeply for the beautiful prize you've just gifted me, which has completely melted me in an "awwwww" state :) You don't know me yet, but I always start blushing furiously and looking to the floor when I get so much attention and kindness; I guess

3161:

is finally over, and the support and appreciation that the community has gifted me will stick in my mind as long as I live. I have no way to properly express how grateful I am to you for all you've done for me, and all I can tell you is, I'll try not to disappoint you nor anyone else with my use of

3081:

policy, and that it was hypocritical of him to accuse others of meatpuppetry at a time that he was pretending not to know BelindaGong, and that he regrets it; if he admitted that, say, ten of the twelve suspected puppets are indeed his, but the other two are not, and that he's very sorry, and won't

1839:

and you'd never be able to get the full story on the background of it. That's why Knowledge's policies are the way they are. And what are the loopholes that you're referring to? I'm not going to do anything to stop you but it really seems like you're fighting a battle that isn't worth fighting.

1452:

It's not that hard to get frustrated with Knowledge, especially when you've worked very hard on something and just had your work nullified. You did an amazing job handling the GO dispute. Even though they went above your head with the threats, you still were able to keep a cool head. You dealt with

1273:

This whole situation is completely screwed up. If unixmad really believes the article would draw people away form his game, he would have to be very stupid. I mean, come on, he threatened daniel, and attacked his neutrality? He didn't even know Daniel was a volunteer mediator (staff supported, but

1248:

Wknight, I'd love if you put more research into both sides instead of calling us rogue teenagers. I for one am not a teenager and I'm not here to trash the wiki. I don't see how you can get the perception that equality is being met by legal actions. If they have a problem with the wiki then get rid

392:

I followed the generic mediation process of reverting back to the edit prior to the war. If you have an issue with that, go take it up with the MedCab. I signed up to your forums, and posted around, but I'm not going to reveal my ID because I intend on playing GO and don't want to be banned. I said

3039:

touching an article that Giovanni wasn't editing, whose seventh edit was a vote for something Giovanni wanted at a page which he'd have been unlikely to find as a brand new user (when it wasn't mentioned at the pages he was at, and when he didn't have e-mail enabled and no message had been left on

2976:

So much for confirmed. As for abusive and disruptive, that is a bit subjective. But IMHO Gio's and his puppet's behaviour clearly can only be classified as that: repeatedly violating 3RR by far, extra reverts and extra votes through puppets, edit warring etc. makes him in my book the user with the

2845:

Because they are still blocked for being sockpuppets, and therefore WMF acknowledges it so. Do you want me to fix your template so it doesn't read "abusive". I must agree with you on that one, they certainly aren't abusive. If you want, I'll also fix it so it reads "suspected" in a distinctive way

2027:

Hey mate thanks for the comments. Firstly, yeh the player project should be expanded – in my infinite wisdom thought we would be able to get them all done by the start of the new season, which is obviously not going to happen. I think the page should be split up into seasons, with only new players

1594:

Daniel, thank you very much for your mediation. Even though it was nullified, it still means alot to our community and is encouraging because it shows that there are people out there willing to look into it more and see what we see. I wish you well on your future endeavors on Knowledge, and as the

353:

Your comment on my text saying something like "Unfortunately for you" and "your unwilligness to co-operate is evident" don't show a neutral position for a mediator and i will personaly feel more confortable if you ask another mediator to be in charge of this. Speaking about the sources what is for

3250: 2730:

Oh you have no argument so you go back to false blocks in the past, not even related to this? Did you count the unblocks overturned by other admis who can see the blatant unjust nature of those blocks? Distruption? That is what you are doing with the false accusations and real vandalism of my own

2604:

What I am doing is undoing personal attacks and vandalism to other user talk pages in accords with the wishes of these users. Its not "blanking" it removing a specific edit that they want removed. I am returning the favor and helping them out. This is not considered vandalism. This is against the

1521:

I like that advice "drop the graal article" I'm going to do the same thing. :) Maybe we'll meet up in some other way sometimes. Thanks for all your help no matter what happens. I hate bringing other people into problems that are not thiers, I hope no trouble came for you because of all this. :)

1405:

Thanks for the email Errant. I was most certainly angry, but I've decided that I will never view that article, its current AfD, any user talk pages which specificially regard to the GO article etc., again. Amazingly, it is suprising for me how much a comforting email which shows that people still

1381:

I dont want this to sound degrading or snooty but I was until now considering nominating you for adminship, due to your great contribution. However given the circumstances that will have to go on hold... :P Im hoping that proves at least one person was willing to place trust in you and I believe

973:

Hey, Kuribo from the GraalOnline article here. Sorry to hear about the mediation being disrupted the way it was, but I think the best thing to do now is to keep calm and find some other solution (and if you won't, then we probably will. Don't worry about it). I also hear you've been threatened by

673:

to let them know that the attempts at gathering sources so far are not going well. Hopefully that will help the hive there prepare for the criticism section being removed - or severely watered down - because I predict that's going to be the final outcome. Informal and tainted online polls of 30

499:

I will probably not make a friend of you, and i am really sorry about it, but in my point of view you have not been very good on this mediation, you probably known the wikipedia policy and rules very well but you have not the qualities to make a good mediator. A good mediator is someone completly

2743:

Theres no way will I let abusive false, slanderous lables like that stand to deface my own User page! How dare you stay it should stand?! Take this to arbcom if you feel its true. Its FALSE! Name one confirmed abusive socketpuppet! Name just ONE and prove its confirmed. PLEASE. Otherwise you are

1342:

However I think that the roots of this whole argument is not the Knowledge article but rather the entire Graal community. The fight started on their forums and has moved to other parts of the Internet - such as the wiki article. As such I think the Wikimedia Foundations decision to remove large

871:

Hey Daniel, sorry to butt in (this is James205 from the UGCC). I'm just wondering what is exactly going on with this mediation situation. I know Unixmad threatened you but why even bother? Nothing about Graal Online is legitimately citable so why not just delete the whole wiki? The situation is

2179:

For the record, I am in no way affiliated with Graal and have never even played the game. And based only on their wikipedia behavior, I find the people in charge of it to be childish bullies. However, I just find the politics distracting and think they have nothing to do with creating a good

382:

You are neutral when you subscribe to the UGCC forum, speak with one of the party and not with the other. Neutral again when you give your opinion on something that has nothing to do with the mediation ? Neutral again when you allow the same content to be put again on the main article (article

3012:

policy, and that that policy was brought to their attention in good time which would have allowed them to stop before they were actually caught. (It's also quite possible that he's married to someone called BelindaGong, but that he made the edits and just used her name, with her consent.) The

1370:

Do you really feel Knowledge as a community is at fault here? I can see why you might and in a way yes they are, the openness of the community amounts to no real consensus and so just about anything can happen - many of them bad things. But (and this is the important one) will vandalising and

318:

article is not back to the initiale state created 2 years ago but to the same modified version version made by Warcaptain and friends, so what was the goal of the mediation? You decided that no modification should be applied before asking you but i don't see any discussion about restoring the

3007:

you take away the fact that he has two confirmed puppets. That template gives separate links for the suspected ones and the confirmed ones. The fact that he claims that the confirmed ones are separate people (which would make them meatpuppets) is irrelevant to the fact that they were used in

2004:? I hope it doesn't look like I'm trying to take over this Wikiproject, but I'm just trying to make it more active. My apologies if it appears like what I mentioned previous. Feel free to sign the newsletter (if you approve), as you are the co-ordinator. Any ideas, feel free to post here. 163:

Sorry for not meeting your request, but I was halfway through vandalism stuff. I didn't know why your page was protected in the first place, and didn't feel I should unprotect it without investigating further. The mention of mediation made me wary - I didn't realise you were the mediator!

3025:

reverts to Str1977. That doesn't include the numerous edits I make to project space, which Str1977 doesn't come near. The proportion would be higher except that on a recent occasion when Giovanni was unblocked, he was warned to stay away from the Christianity articles, but it would

1064:

which we are inviting a few selected Wikipedians to participate in, and we would be extremely appreciative if you would take the time to complete it. As a token of our gratitude, we would like to present you with a PARC research star upon completion. Thank you for your time.

2646:

Yes, but I've done no such thing. I've removed no warnings for vandalism. I've removed a false socket-puppet label that alleges a claim that I know is false and directed against my good name. Because this is not a warning for vandalism your quote of this policy is not relevant

1926:

outline (especially when describing an organisation or community). They contain an objective overview of the subject, verified 3rd party praise for hte subject and verified 3rd party criticism of the subject. However for those last 2 it can only really be presented as opinion (

393:

that this has nothing to do with the mediation, and merely gave an observation. If you are alluding to the fact that I am not capable of remaining neutral, that is a personal attack, and you will be banned for it. I spoke on both forums, yet you only know one of my accounts.

1127:

I'm not divulging personal information of any email unless anyone of Danny's status and above wants it. He's dealing with this, and the last thing I want is to fall into the trap that someone has set, to try and get me banned because I published personal info. Sorry.

1595:

original writer of the controversial peice, I can't help but feel responsible for this mess. I am truly sorry; not for what I wrote, but that you had to suffer for it, and I am sure that an overwhelming majority of people on Knowledge will appreciate your presense.

2051:

Secondly, I like the newsletter (the idea, and what you've done), we certainly need some help getting everything more active. Further to this though (and something I've been meaning to bring up for a while), someone mentioned that it would be a good idea to expand

3013:

Arbitration Committee has ruled that, "for the purpose of dispute resolution, when there is uncertainty whether a party is one user with sock puppets, or several users acting as meatpuppets, they may be treated as one individual." It's also worth noting that

2754:

Well, you've been blocked twice for sockpuppetry. That's enough to have that template on the page. You've also been blocked 10+ times for 3RR, and that makes the sockpuppeteer message even more justified, as more-often-than-not sockpuppets are used for 3RR.

2169:

Figured I should discuss further here instead of on the AFD. I apologize since I didn't realize that the WMF had talked to you. But just to clarify, you have express permission to post a personal question about being blocked on Graal in the AFD?

1164:

the corporation has run up threating Knowledge and a number of its' users of criminal proceedings if they don't remove the whole article. Knowledge legal experts have since removed the whole section, deeming the whole mediation exercise useless.

460:

If Knowledge administrator think that someone saying "Unfortunately for you" and "your unwilligness to co-operate is evident" is neutral then i will have to put this case on public forum so everyone make appreciation on wikipedia administration

3070:

is what a third checkuser admin said. Other administors who believe that Giovanni33 has engaged in sockpuppetry include (but are not limited to) Tom harrison, Deskana, MONGO, Proto, SlimVirgin, KillerChihuahua, Jossi, Wikibofh, Guettarda, and

2060:, which would mean it could include the largely neglected areas such as the NSL, NSL teams, state leagues, national teams (mens womens olyroos etc) and one huge thing I was looking at: summaries of seasons in Australian football (similar to 1336:

Turning your attention to mediation seemed like a good idea (at least to me) and you handled the Graal case excellently! Sadly I guess you became angry at the apparent disregard of your mediation attempts. I can totally agree with how you

102:

the UGCC breached the copyrights of Linux Cyberjouneurs in several points. The UGCC contains insulting contents towards staff members of the OGCC, as well as severe vulgarity which do not fit with the age class Graal Online want outreach.

1215:

So did the legal team let you know why they did that? I really don't think that having a critical article about the game can be illegal!! In fact if that was the legal precedings they threatened then there is a reverse case of supression

329:

Unfortunately for you, editing user pages is generally prohibited, and so is defamation to an individual. Criticism isn't, however, and your unwilligness to co-operate is evident. If they cannot cite it within 7 days, it will be removed

872:

getting out of hand and I don't really see why he is trying to take legal actions (which is unrealistic really) over such a ridiculous issue. Maybe some professional source should write about this so its citable? Just my 2 cents. --

1907:

to be included on Knowledge that doesn't follow Knowledge's own policies. My uneducated guess is that that is part of what fueled legal arguments here - the article did not even follow WP's own clear written "official" policies.

1857:

Actually, I would like an answer to that also. Do you have any idea who Viper is, and what he has done to Graalonline over the years? Obviously you do not. Viper has been very distructive to Graal for years now, as well as a few

669:'s continuing complaints, don't sweat that either. I don't think s/he was going to be 100% happy no matter what your decision was going to be - unless it was 100% in his or her favor. I've tried to throw in some comments in 664:

Hey, you did a great job in a completely volunteer effort - very commendable. The result of mediation doesn't have to be that everyone is happy. Two bans could be exactly the shock to the system that was needed. As far as

349:

I will add that your don't reply to my all my question but only to a small part of it where you don't take my point as it (as example) but to the wikipedia rule to not modify User page what is clearly not the point on what i

2580:

Blanking the user pages of other uses is considered vandalism. Unless you are going to claim that they are your user pages, and therefore be banned for being a sock puppeteir, you have no right to blank other users' pages.

3030:

be possible to find 100 consecutive edits that have absolutely nothing to do with Str1977, and to find examples of my being online and not reverting to Str1977 when an article was in the "wrong" version. Compare that with

1348:

Mediation is a hard cop, and requires both sides to accept the mediators non-authority. I think in this case that was never going to happen - which is a shame but something that is bound to happen given the very nature of

974:

Unixmad/Stephane (or it could be Stefan) even though you're a neutral party. That is outright wrong. I also frequent the UGCC forums but have changed my name here to keep somewhat anonymous, what with the possible bans.--

1354:

As I said on the articles talk page it is important to remember that compared to the rest of Knowledge the Graal article is a tiny part - not that is any less important, just that there is so much more out there to

2702:

No-one, because all the facts point to you having no "good name". How many times have you been blocked? 18, at least count. One more removal that violates Knowledge policy, and you will be blocked for disruption.

1485:

Thanks for all the support. Yep, I'll heed your intelligent advice, and stay away from things that cause tense situations (so no CVU or MEDCAB work) until next weekend. By the way, I love your new signature :D

2180:

encyclopedia, so I would prefer if they were left out and the AFD focus solely on whether or not Graal is notable enough for an article, and whether reliable sources can be found to document that notability.

470:

But i think a good part of wikipedia administration is making a real good work and i am sure some other mediator and administrator will have a look at it and take some distance before deciding anything.

1861:

I suggest that you do a lot of research, and know what you are getting into. Viper is looking for ::revenge, and he is using the wiki to get it. Are you really going to help him? Ugh...how frustrating.

1152:

What exactly happened over that mediation case- as I read it did an admin step in and remove all the dispute material (even the stuff you had managed to get them to agree on) and then protect the page?

2962:

I have seen that after much lobbying from that user you have removed the words "confirmed" and "abusive" from the tag. Since Gio misrepresents the history of that case, I must point you to the folling

2836:

Disprove what? I already explained my connection to these two users. The pertinent fact is that they were NOT abusive--so why does your label on my talk page allege I have confirmed "abusive" puppets?

1303:

After Daniels recent comments on talk pages as well as his user page I woul like to extend a hand of friendship. I know he feels angry over what happened after his Graal mediation got (in his words)

3166:

and give me a good yell! :) Seriously, tho, if you ever need my help, either for admin-related stuff or in any other way, you'll always be welcome to message me, and I promise I'll try my very best.

2655:

This is against the efforts of other editors who have a long history of harassment against myself and others who oppose them in edit conficts within particular articles relating to Chrstian content.

2122:

and that I appreciated them; I find the whole idea of an award where the receipient has to accept the nomination, and where there are oppose votes, to be a bit odd. I think I'll stick to barnstars.

2802:

a friend, but a real, different person. These make both people NOT socketpuppets. Also, neither of them has ever been abusive in any way. So your label which alleges abusive socketpuppets is false.

1371:

attacking the community - whilst probably making you feel better - really help? Rather can you not learn from this experience and try and help the rest of us become a more caring and helpful place.

1871:

Heyhey keep it calm, don't drag up the whole discussion. However you might want to think about your claims Moon Goddess, alot of what Viper has brought to the table is factual - there are sources.

280:

If you have opposition to this please let me know and I will not, but I would rather start with the version that was not modified by Unixmad/Bingo and Stefan first and begin citing my sources.

2865:

I did it anyways. Lets just end this, OK? If you managed to get the two "confirmed" sockpuppets cleared, consult with an administrator, or even better, a Wikimedia Foundation member (looks at

3050:

The other point about your change is that it removes the word "abusive". Now, I see that you agree with him that the puppets were not abusive, and I'd certainly agree that they weren't like

1156:

If so it should probably get reported at the admin's abuse board - Medcab discussions are highly unstable at the best of times and for an admin to undermine that process is not on at all!!

1903:

some political or religious topic. It's not worth it. Also, tmorton166's idea that "such information has to be included in a fair article on the topic" is a total fallacy. Nothing

1878:

Regarding the posting of that IP and personal information in their forums this is illegal and I am going to remind them as such. It's a shame they feel so threatenend by criticism. --

784:

has offered to talk to them by phone. He works at the Wikimedia Foundation. Unless you're somehow affiliated as well, I can't imagine it's your problem. Pass on the e-mail to

2363:

Please only update the Position Ladder at the end of a match, and if there is any large dispute about the result, do not add it, but instead wait for an official report by the

2057: 1971:

Hey, I was just wondering whether we should change the "2005-06 Player Project" to the "A-League Player Project", and continuallu update it. I'm currently re-organising the

1056:(formerly known as Xerox PARC) studying how conflicts occur and resolve on Knowledge. Due to your experience in conflict resolution on Knowledge (e.g., as a member of the 918:

basically describes the sort of mood I'm in at the moment. I can't believe that a big corporation would bow down and take orders from some ****ed-up little **** in France.

2996:

Hi Daniel. I concur with what Str1977 says. I appreciate your efforts to help in this, and the time that you've taken. Two problems with your version are that by changing

1159:

Oh and don't worry too much about the legal threats, even if they do try and carry them through you have broken no law and done nothing wrong - they won't get anywhere!!

1307:, and it is the sad fact that Knowledge has failed him as a community. I am not laying the blame at all but I think we ahould show him he can place trust in us again. 2970: 2096:

Yep sure, it will be quite useful when we need to promote new collaborations or changes etc. Perhaps you could also make a template similar to what is used for the

765:

It was unsigned. If anyone wants the email, I'll give it to them, but I don't want to violate any policies by posting emails up here, no matter what they email me.

1365:

I cant make you trust the community again, I'm not even going to try and convince you not to take action on those threats rather I want to ask you some questions.

363:

I was neutral, until you started undermining my efforts to sort this problem out. And it is general etiquette to attack the claims, not the person, as stated in

1392:

Sorry if I have been patronizing (that was not my intention) and sorry if this email doesnt help. But I hope you do appreciate this extended hand of friendship.

3040:

his talk page asking him to vote), when his IP shows him to be in the same area as Giovanni33, and when he has some of the same linguistic idiosyncrasies. The

1942:). I don't think I explained that well but the point is there is normally 2 sides to a story and both should be neutrally analysed by the wikipedia article. -- 3158: 2977:

greated disdain of wiki-rules (except when he tries to use them in his favour) and surrounds him with an aura of untrustworthiness that makes it hard to

1629:

from deletion. It's my first barnstar in my year and 6 days as a Knowledge user, so naturally I'm quite thrilled to be its recipient. Thanks again. --

856:

Ah well, the death of the Mediation Cabal has arrived, as Knowledge has faltered in its resolve to remain NPOV when threatened with legal implications.

2526:

and will help improve the overall appearance of Knowledge. This is not meant to be a disciplinary message, but merely a friendly request. Thank you!

2445:

With the crowd figures, please only place a comma if the attendance is over 10,000 people (eg. use 8648 instead of 8,468 and 11,482 instead of 11482).

528:

article. If you can find one or more well known mediator or admin to replace you i will accept to leave the article managed by this group of people.

819:

It's too obvious to need to mention. Sorry you got involved? Your just a volunteer trying to help, you didn't do anything wrong. :) You rock. --

743:"If you do not back down on the GraalOnline case, and have us unbanned, we will sue. Make sure you tell Knowledge this, as they will be sued too." 1875:

protecting their baby, fair enough I suppose it is their income. I'm not a huge fan of the idea but I admire their efforts if not their methods.

674:

people in a user base of anywhere from thousands to hundreds of thousands (depending on who you ask) are feeble attempts at reliable sources. —

2912: 2330:

can create. This new season also means a lot of (currently-open) tasks that require completion throughout the course of the next 21 weeks.

34: 1010: 2969:

Not only have the two accounts of Belinda Gong and Freethinker99 been confirmed as Gio's puppets through technical means (usercheck, see

1079:

I will do it, but I am able to wait 5 days, as at the moment I currently have slightly more pressing issues - is doing it Sat/Sun fine?

604: 2659:

I couldn't care less what happened with a content dispute. The fact of the matter, as stated above in policy, is that it is vandalism.

1382:

many other Wikipeidans would too - including many of the participants in the Graal mediation. Can you put that trust back in Knowledge.

1951: 1887: 1434: 792:. That's my suggestion anyway... I'll bet you $ 1 this isn't the first time someone at WP has been threatened with legal action! :) 383:

written 2 years ago) when it will have been easy and logic to discuss the issue on the discussion before putting back on the article?

3141: 1836: 1626: 1425:

Im glad my email helped and glad you made a positive decision. Thanks for your kind words back too, its nice to be appreciated :D --

1387:

As I have said many times - to quote Jimbo Wales himself - we are here to build an encyclopedia, I just hope you can help us again.

1231: 2463:? Feel free to reward them with this barnstar. Simply copy the following text, replacing the capitals with the appropriate text: 1222:

As far as admin abuse, the removal was done by the "General Counsel and interim Executive Director at the Wikimedia Foundation",

2357: 2344: 706:

Can't you do something about that type of senseless and anti-community-spirt comment? Surely we shouldn't allow that to go on?

2319: 2053: 1376:

All I am saying is please consider joining in again, drop the Graal article, start again and put all this down to experience.

2343:

on. To remedy this, a base Position Ladder will be created, which will be located at {{2006-07 A-League Position Ladder}} (

1824: 2254: 2119: 2347:). Please update this as soon as possible after the match has ended, as this will keep the Knowledge community informed. 2202:

potential in you. The way you conducted yourself on the AfD was commendable, and I'll be sure to keep an eye on you (not

524:

I just want other mediator or admins to be involved on this, i will not accept to leave until someone neutral manage the

3285: 3228: 3118: 2963: 2942: 2877: 2854: 2823: 2790: 2763: 2711: 2682: 2589: 2548: 2493: 2284: 2218: 2097: 2083: 2012: 2001: 1983: 1806: 1771: 1736: 1649: 1559: 1494: 408:

after reading your reply I am now officialy asking that you stop managing this mediation and ask someone else to do it.

2104:) which is updated with the major points from each newsletter, so people can put it on their userpages or something. – 3045:

technical, behavioural, and linguistic, and I have been in touch with bureaucrats and ArbCom members about this issue.

441:

Because you violated wikipedia policy by making personal attacks against someone's integrity, and per the ruling of a

1179:

Did you ever get the report about the sockpuppet? It seems obvious to the rest of us, but evidence is always nice. --

3268: 3092: 2101: 90: 80: 3107: 2262: 1068: 1057: 692:. S/he needs to get the last word in so let it happen. For the love of all that is holy, just let it go! :) — 1753:

I've been reading and hanging out around this part of the net anonymously since about (DD/MM/YYYY) 12.10.2005.

1118: 48: 21: 2239:

going?!?!? I'm glad I didn't take that MedCab case leading to it. (I was going to, but you beat me to it.) :o

1014: 600: 3234: 2916: 496:

I have not spent my complete week-end on this and i will not give up until wikipedia rules are enforced.

3089: 1250: 1227: 915: 873: 666: 529: 501: 472: 462: 442: 433: 409: 384: 355: 320: 236: 203: 2670:

Otherwise, these are just personal attacks against my good name given that I do not have sock puppets!

1719: 1523: 1275: 1180: 820: 670: 2643:

I quote policy: "Removing warnings for vandalism from one's talk page is also considered vandalism."

639: 3249: 3035:, who has 40 reverts to Giovanni out of a total of 45 edits, who was editing for four months before 1310:

I wrote him this email (which I hope he gets) and which I hope you will all agree with and mirror.

3206: 3163: 2519: 2181: 2171: 2061: 1913: 1845: 1700: 1682: 1672: 1264: 1239: 780:

Well, we could try to get them banned ---- oh wait, they're already banned. As far as the e-mail,

697: 679: 2190:

Hmmm, I really don't know exactly why I was given permission to do it - I'm guessing a variant of

354:

you acceptable sources? Is anonymous post created on a obscure forum and afterward a good source?

3279: 3222: 3112: 2936: 2871: 2848: 2817: 2784: 2779: 2757: 2705: 2676: 2583: 2542: 2487: 2278: 2212: 2077: 2006: 1977: 1800: 1765: 1730: 1643: 1633: 1553: 1488: 1409: 1343:

sections of the article are probably the safest move, not only to protect them but you as a user.

1191: 1167: 1131: 1099: 1082: 975: 921: 859: 768: 709: 652: 525: 512: 484: 448: 420: 396: 370: 337: 315: 296: 255: 215: 176: 151: 112: 2984:

I am sorry if I to bother you with this, but have to ask you to reconsider the changes. Cheers,

2360:

the Position Ladder template on the team pages, as it won’t get automatically updated if you do.

1219:

Anyway I really feel for you Daniel it's very disheartening when something like that happens...

3157:

Dear Daniel, thank you so much for your beautiful words, your kidness and your trust in me. My

1259:- and that's from the creator of one of the rival forums. What's next - "nyah nyah nyah..."? — 59: 2988: 2481: 2327: 2246: 2105: 2065: 1863: 613: 592: 1551:

No problems that are too severe, except my email inbox is filled with complaint-like emails.

2775: 2323: 2191: 2155: 2134: 1689: 1223: 232: 199: 70: 44: 17: 1319:

Before I begin (just in case you didnt realise) I am Errant (or Tmorton166) from Knowledge.

277:

I would like to revert to Di4gram and I's last edit and begin fixing things you requested.

47:. No further edits should be made to this page. For a list of archives for this user, see 3220:

No problems, you certainly deserve every award you get and more. By the way, nice card :D

2837: 2803: 2745: 2732: 2694: 2631:

its helpful. I appreciate it when other do so for my page, and I happily return the favor.

2606: 2571: 2203: 2199: 1947: 1883: 1454: 1430: 1121: 789: 649:

No problem - the end result was two bans, so mediation clearly wasn't all that effective.

632: 284: 1788:

Thank you very much for nice award. I am trying to do what I can do with stub-sorting. -

3264:

Thank you for assisting me with the basics of Knowledge! Your help is much appreciated.

3015:

at the time when he was carrying on this pretence of having no connection to BelindaGong

3173: 3078: 3009: 2195: 1909: 1841: 1696: 1668: 1260: 1235: 693: 675: 135: 2911: 2978: 2460: 2207: 2037: 1972: 1789: 1630: 1023: 596: 591:

You have met all of the membership requirements. Any concerns should be directed to

586: 364: 165: 139: 1325:

article I felt you would shape up to be a good addition to the WIkipedian community.

1255:

Sorry if I offended but hopefully you can understand my perception after edits like

631:

to resolve the conflict and contacting Danny. Hat's off to you, my friend. Regards,

3265: 2985: 2240: 2033: 1596: 1061: 332:

and nothing remotely similar will be re-added unless a citation is provided with it

131: 3062:

is what David Gerard (the most experienced checkuser admin) has to say about him.

2154:.... for the thanks on the CCM table. Great work in getting that table started. -- 1060:) we’re extremely interested in your insights on this topic. We have a survey at 575: 3291: 3124: 3097: 2990: 2948: 2927: 2883: 2860: 2840: 2829: 2806: 2796: 2769: 2748: 2735: 2717: 2697: 2688: 2609: 2595: 2574: 2554: 2413:

Make sure you repeat this process for both teams – not just the team you follow!

2290: 2270: 2224: 2184: 2174: 2158: 2144: 2127: 2108: 2089: 2068: 2041: 2029: 2018: 1989: 1956: 1917: 1892: 1866: 1849: 1812: 1792: 1777: 1757: 1742: 1722: 1704: 1676: 1655: 1635: 1599: 1565: 1526: 1500: 1468: 1439: 1416: 1278: 1268: 1243: 1198: 1183: 1174: 1138: 1106: 1089: 1071: 1041: 1009: 978: 928: 866: 823: 775: 716: 701: 683: 659: 643: 620: 532: 519: 504: 491: 475: 465: 455: 436: 427: 412: 403: 387: 377: 358: 344: 323: 303: 293:

Revert to the last edit before this big debarcle started. I will do it for you.

287: 262: 239: 222: 206: 183: 168: 158: 142: 119: 3041: 3032: 2866: 1754: 1331:(if a little hotheadednes at times - which is not necessairily a bad thing!!). 1032: 785: 781: 2459:

Notice someone doing some awesome work on improving an article associated to

1625:

Dear Daniel, thank you for awarding me a barnstar for contributing to saving

2045: 2075:::Do you want me to distribute the newsletter to all involved with WP:A-L? 1013:

For everything you do to the Esperanza, I, Minun, award you this barnstar —

612:

Thanks for joining. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me.

69:. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any comments to the 3140: 2399:

field – either add 3 points (win), 1 point (draw) or leave the same (loss)

1360:

I also see from your user page threats to vandalise the Knowledge Project.

2815:

and therefore unblocked, I dismiss your claims, and the template stands.

1695:

message on their talk page! LOL. Just shake your head and move on... —

231:

Heh, it looks like Longhair and I both hopped on it at the same time. --

2639:"Its not "blanking" it removing a specific edit that they want removed." 1975:

page for you, and hopefully we can make this a very active Wikiproject.

1798:

You're welcome. You're doing an awesome job at the moment - keep it up!

500:

neutral and you are by far not neutral with the comments you have made.

2915:

I award you this barnstar for having one of the best userpages ever! -

2693:

If it is not for me to defend my own good name then who will, pretell?!

1928:

there has been much praise of x among the community, most notably by...

2662:

The above policy is you quotes is not talking about what I'm removing.

721:

Update: I just checked my emails, and I have a very threatening email:

2934:

Wow, thanks *adds to Awards* - yours isn't looking too bad either :P

2869:) and work out what to do next. Agreed? If it is, I'll archive this. 2438:

As with the Position Ladders, a few notes about the Summary Tables:-

1685:

is a nice example of how people can be. Yelling at me for leaving a

2910: 2627:

The only way you'd know that is is you are one user and the same.

603:

to see any new announcements concerning the committee. Remember,

3106:

You guys do that. I want no further part in this saga. I have my

2206:, just an eye :P) to see if you hang around. If you do, well, an 2442:

Please place the winner in bold text (using '''winning team''').

1932:

some apsects of the system such as x have been criticised by....

1117:

Can we see that Menacing E-mail, please? Complete with headers.

2118:

Just wanted you to know that I saw the nice things you said at

599:

to see our userbox and the Birthday Message Templates. Go to

2424: 2370:

When updating, make sure to adjust all of the below fields:-

2364: 2307: 417:

You will be blocked in the next 15mins per danny's decision.

3139: 2744:

engaged in a personal attack that is defmation of character.

2570:

What are you talking about? I never engage in any vandalism.

2518: 2436:

the loop" – it is an encyclopedia we’re writing, after all.

509:

We'll agree to disagree. Will you accept the 6.5 day truce?

109:

Thanks for that. I may take it into account when mediating.

1763:

No problems...I'm happy to do my bit to welcome new users.

130:

I'm in the middle of something. Can you leave request on

2326:

will bring the usual enjoyment and fanaticism that only

1188:

Nope, I just followed up about it. Awaiting a response.

3067: 3063: 3059: 3055: 3051: 3018: 1832: 1828: 1256: 689: 1053: 481:

any material that hasn't been cited, you can delete.

367:- comment on the contributions, not the contributor. 2040:

and then ==2006-07== would only contain people like

2028:

listed at each season (eg ==2005-06== would contain

3088:thanks for getting involved in this issue. Cheers. 173:No problems. We're all busy some time or another. 2349:A few notes regarding the base Position Ladder:- 3240: 1718:Thanks for welcome, man. It's great to be here. 1062:http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=400792384029 1835:are really wise? We don't know anything about 3162:the buttons... and if I mess up, make sure to 2392:field, depending on the result for that team. 8: 2623:"in accords with the wishes of these users." 1052:Hello, I am a member of a research group at 688:Ugh... Just breeeeeathe over comments like 33:The following discussion is preserved as an 1837:the claim which Unixmad made on GraalOnline 3066:is what another checkuser admin said. And 2276:Nope, it's over, and it got deleted. Yay. 2058:WikiProject Football (soccer) in Australia 570: 54: 2846:until you can get it totally cleared up. 104:Regards, Sam, Super Moderator of the OGCC 1641:No problems - you certainly deserve it. 1008: 3280: 3241:Here's a Barnstar for helpin' me out :) 3223: 3113: 2937: 2872: 2849: 2818: 2785: 2758: 2706: 2677: 2584: 2543: 2532:I'll make sure I check all my comments 2488: 2279: 2213: 2078: 2007: 1978: 1801: 1766: 1731: 1644: 1554: 1489: 580: 3247: 3132: 43:Subsequent comments should be made on 3286: 3229: 3119: 2943: 2878: 2855: 2824: 2791: 2764: 2712: 2683: 2590: 2549: 2494: 2285: 2219: 2084: 2013: 1984: 1825:User:Daniel.Bryant/GraalOnlineSandbox 1823:Hey, do you really think things like 1807: 1772: 1737: 1650: 1560: 1495: 7: 3258:The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar 2120:Knowledge:Wikihalo nomination/Essjay 1299:Of Knowledge, Anger and Resolutions 1075:PARC User Interface Research Group 567:Welcome to the Birthday Committee! 28: 2536:in future, just for you. Traget. 1627:2006 FIFA World Cup controversies 1048:Knowledge Research Survey Request 3248: 2782:, established by linking edits. 2778:, established by Checkuser, and 2377:field – add one (eg. 13→14 etc.) 2000:Oh, and what do you think about 1033: 574: 138:? Or I will look at when I can. 58: 2135: 597:Birthday Committee Project Page 310:All this mediation for nothing 1: 2674:That's not for you to state. 2534:in the #wikipedia IRC channel 2453:Wikiproject A-League Barnstar 2303: 2300:A-League 2006-07 Newsletter I 2100:(see an example of it in use 588:Knowledge Birthday Committee! 273:Repairing and Beggining Fixes 3133:You've got a Thank you card! 2998:It is suspected or confirmed 2774:Oh, and here's two of them: 2501: 573: 252:Yes, it does look that way. 2210:might be coming up soon :D 2062:Seasons in English football 432:And why can you block me ? 3310: 3292:06:24, 6 August 2006 (UTC) 3269:05:59, 6 August 2006 (UTC) 3235:06:24, 6 August 2006 (UTC) 3125:01:50, 6 August 2006 (UTC) 3098:16:30, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 3019:my last 1000 article edits 2991:13:21, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2949:12:13, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2928:12:12, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2884:08:57, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2861:08:52, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2841:08:51, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2830:08:38, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2807:08:33, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2797:08:12, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2770:08:10, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2749:08:06, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2736:08:08, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2718:08:05, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2698:08:00, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2689:07:54, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2610:07:49, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2596:07:45, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2575:07:44, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2555:06:28, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2502:03:46, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2478:Yours in football/soccer, 2291:06:07, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2271:18:31, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 2235:Damn, the whole GO AFD is 2231:I feel sorry for you, bro. 2225:06:09, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2185:14:42, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 2175:14:12, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 2165:GraalOnline AFD Discussion 2159:09:22, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 2145:01:47, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 2109:03:40, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2090:03:15, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2069:03:13, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 2019:11:58, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 1990:08:25, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 1965:Re: 2005-06 player project 1957:13:45, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 1918:12:59, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 1893:12:40, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 1867:12:33, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 1850:11:29, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 1831:in reaction to edits like 1813:06:21, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 1793:07:22, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 1778:12:53, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 1758:12:43, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 1743:12:52, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 1723:13:58, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 1621:Thank you for the Barnstar 3254: 1705:20:01, 30 July 2006 (UTC) 1677:15:17, 30 July 2006 (UTC) 1656:08:31, 30 July 2006 (UTC) 1636:06:46, 30 July 2006 (UTC) 1600:18:13, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 1566:13:37, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 1527:13:34, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 1501:12:44, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 1469:12:42, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 1440:12:06, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 1417:11:59, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 1279:00:19, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 1269:00:29, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 1244:16:01, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 1199:11:56, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 1184:11:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 1175:08:54, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 1139:06:29, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 1122:17:16, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 1107:10:01, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 1096:Edit: Just completed it. 1090:06:21, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 1072:23:50, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 1054:Palo Alto Research Center 1042:10:38, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 979:10:12, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 929:08:43, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 867:08:21, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 824:20:23, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 776:06:26, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 717:06:19, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 702:13:49, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 684:11:18, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 660:07:49, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 644:05:22, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 621:23:40, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 533:11:03, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 520:10:50, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 505:10:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 492:10:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 476:10:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 466:10:21, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 456:10:15, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 437:10:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 428:10:10, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 413:10:10, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 404:10:07, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 388:10:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 378:09:58, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 359:09:56, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 345:09:48, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 324:09:45, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 304:03:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 288:03:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 263:01:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 240:01:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 223:00:57, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 207:00:55, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 184:01:38, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 169:01:37, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 159:00:57, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 143:00:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 120:00:58, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 2322:newsletter is here! The 1827:coupled with edits like 1749:Thanks for welcoming me! 876:1:38, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 49:User talk:Daniel/Archive 40:Please do not modify it. 3021:, and find that I have 2566:Archived per agreement. 2324:2006-07 A-League season 1934:) rahter than as fact ( 1411:Killfest2|Daniel.Bryant 1193:Killfest2|Daniel.Bryant 1169:Killfest2|Daniel.Bryant 1133:Killfest2|Daniel.Bryant 1112: 1101:Killfest2|Daniel.Bryant 1084:Killfest2|Daniel.Bryant 923:Killfest2|Daniel.Bryant 861:Killfest2|Daniel.Bryant 770:Killfest2|Daniel.Bryant 711:Killfest2|Daniel.Bryant 654:Killfest2|Daniel.Bryant 514:Killfest2|Daniel.Bryant 486:Killfest2|Daniel.Bryant 450:Killfest2|Daniel.Bryant 422:Killfest2|Daniel.Bryant 398:Killfest2|Daniel.Bryant 372:Killfest2|Daniel.Bryant 339:Killfest2|Daniel.Bryant 298:Killfest2|Daniel.Bryant 257:Killfest2|Daniel.Bryant 217:Killfest2|Daniel.Bryant 178:Killfest2|Daniel.Bryant 153:Killfest2|Daniel.Bryant 114:Killfest2|Daniel.Bryant 3144: 2930: 2523: 2367:confirming the result. 1044: 3159:Request for Adminship 3143: 3108:problems to deal with 2914: 2538:(Kinda internal joke) 2522: 1012: 2461:Wikiproject A-League 2320:Wikiproject A-League 2054:WikiProject A-League 1069:Parc wiki researcher 2194:maybe. Anyways, as 1662:GraalOnline methods 3213: 3147: 3145: 2931: 2907:Fantastic Userpage 2780:User:Freethinker99 2524: 2098:Knowledge Signpost 1940:the system sis bad 1936:the system is good 1045: 667:User:Graal unixmad 601:the bulletin board 583:Daniel/Archive/4, 94: 3274: 3273: 3211: 3171: 3153: 3137: 3008:violation of the 2511: 2510: 2507: 2506: 2421: 2420: 2268: 2264:E-Support Options 2257: 2251: 2139: 2044:, Alessandro and 1955: 1891: 1438: 610: 609: 78: 77: 76: 71:current talk page 3301: 3288: 3282: 3252: 3245: 3244: 3231: 3225: 3209: 3205: 3204: 3200: 3197: 3194: 3191: 3188: 3185: 3182: 3179: 3176: 3151: 3121: 3115: 3005: 2945: 2939: 2925: 2922: 2919: 2880: 2874: 2857: 2851: 2826: 2820: 2793: 2787: 2776:User:BelindaGong 2766: 2760: 2714: 2708: 2685: 2679: 2592: 2586: 2551: 2545: 2496: 2490: 2425: 2308: 2304: 2287: 2281: 2265: 2261: 2256:My support calls 2255: 2249: 2244: 2221: 2215: 2143: 2141: 2137: 2132: 2125: 2086: 2080: 2015: 2009: 1986: 1980: 1946: 1882: 1809: 1803: 1774: 1768: 1739: 1733: 1728:You're welcome. 1694: 1688: 1652: 1646: 1562: 1556: 1497: 1491: 1466: 1459: 1429: 1414: 1412: 1251:Brandon Mitchell 1196: 1194: 1172: 1170: 1136: 1134: 1104: 1102: 1087: 1085: 1039: 1030: 1021: 926: 924: 874:Brandon Mitchell 864: 862: 773: 771: 714: 712: 671:Talk:GraalOnline 657: 655: 637: 618: 589: 578: 571: 517: 515: 489: 487: 453: 451: 425: 423: 401: 399: 375: 373: 342: 340: 301: 299: 283:Thanks, David -- 260: 258: 220: 218: 181: 179: 156: 154: 117: 115: 65:This page is an 62: 55: 45:User talk:Daniel 42: 18:User talk:Daniel 3309: 3308: 3304: 3303: 3302: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3243: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3207: 3202: 3198: 3195: 3192: 3189: 3186: 3183: 3180: 3177: 3174: 3154: 3152:Open your card! 3146: 3135: 3003: 2957: 2955:Giovanni 33 tag 2923: 2920: 2917: 2909: 2811:Until both are 2568: 2563: 2529: 2516: 2503: 2473: 2454: 2430: 2337: 2336:Position Ladder 2328:football/soccer 2318:The first ever 2313: 2302: 2269: 2263: 2259: 2252: 2247: 2233: 2200:admininstration 2167: 2152: 2128: 2126: 2123: 2116: 1967: 1821: 1786: 1751: 1716: 1692: 1686: 1664: 1623: 1460: 1455: 1410: 1408: 1301: 1216:advertising.... 1192: 1190: 1168: 1166: 1147: 1132: 1130: 1115: 1100: 1098: 1083: 1081: 1058:Mediation Cabal 1050: 1024: 1015: 1007: 922: 920: 860: 858: 769: 767: 710: 708: 653: 651: 633: 628: 614: 587: 569: 513: 511: 485: 483: 449: 447: 421: 419: 397: 395: 371: 369: 338: 336: 312: 297: 295: 275: 256: 254: 216: 214: 196: 177: 175: 152: 150: 128: 113: 111: 99: 38: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 3307: 3305: 3295: 3294: 3272: 3271: 3261: 3260: 3255: 3253: 3242: 3239: 3238: 3237: 3167: 3155: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3138: 3136: 3134: 3131: 3130: 3129: 3128: 3127: 3101: 3100: 3084: 3083: 3073: 3072: 3071:FeloniousMonk. 3047: 3046: 2956: 2953: 2952: 2951: 2908: 2905: 2903: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2599: 2598: 2564: 2562: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2528: 2527: 2517: 2515: 2512: 2509: 2508: 2505: 2504: 2500: 2499: 2484: 2475: 2474: 2471: 2468: 2467: 2456: 2455: 2452: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2443: 2432: 2431: 2429:Summary Tables 2428: 2422: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2411: 2400: 2393: 2378: 2368: 2361: 2339: 2338: 2335: 2332: 2331: 2315: 2314: 2311: 2301: 2298: 2296: 2294: 2293: 2260: 2253: 2243: 2232: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2166: 2163: 2151: 2148: 2115: 2112: 2094: 2093: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 1994: 1993: 1966: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1876: 1872: 1859: 1820: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1785: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1750: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1715: 1712: 1710: 1708: 1707: 1663: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1622: 1619: 1617: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1420: 1419: 1300: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1217: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1146: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1114: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1093: 1092: 1074: 1049: 1046: 1006: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 996: 995: 994: 993: 992: 991: 990: 989: 988: 987: 986: 985: 984: 983: 982: 981: 950: 949: 948: 947: 946: 945: 944: 943: 942: 941: 940: 939: 938: 937: 936: 935: 934: 933: 932: 931: 894: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 888: 887: 886: 885: 884: 883: 882: 881: 880: 879: 878: 877: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 830: 829: 828: 827: 826: 804: 803: 802: 801: 800: 799: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 793: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 745: 731: 730: 729: 728: 727: 726: 725: 724: 723: 722: 627: 624: 608: 607: 579: 568: 565: 564: 563: 562: 561: 560: 559: 558: 557: 556: 555: 554: 553: 552: 551: 550: 549: 548: 547: 546: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 539: 538: 537: 536: 535: 468: 351: 311: 308: 307: 306: 274: 271: 270: 269: 268: 267: 266: 265: 245: 244: 243: 242: 226: 225: 195: 192: 191: 190: 189: 188: 187: 186: 127: 124: 123: 122: 98: 95: 75: 74: 63: 53: 52: 30: 29: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3306: 3293: 3290: 3289: 3287:Daniel.Bryant 3283: 3276: 3275: 3270: 3267: 3263: 3262: 3259: 3256: 3251: 3246: 3236: 3233: 3232: 3230:Daniel.Bryant 3226: 3219: 3218: 3212: 3210: 3201: 3170: 3165: 3160: 3142: 3126: 3123: 3122: 3120:Daniel.Bryant 3116: 3109: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3099: 3096: 3095: 3091: 3086: 3085: 3080: 3075: 3074: 3069: 3065: 3061: 3057: 3053: 3049: 3048: 3043: 3038: 3034: 3029: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3011: 3006: 2999: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2989: 2987: 2982: 2980: 2974: 2972: 2967: 2965: 2960: 2959:Dear Daniel, 2954: 2950: 2947: 2946: 2944:Daniel.Bryant 2940: 2933: 2932: 2929: 2926: 2913: 2906: 2904: 2885: 2882: 2881: 2879:Daniel.Bryant 2875: 2868: 2864: 2863: 2862: 2859: 2858: 2856:Daniel.Bryant 2852: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2839: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2828: 2827: 2825:Daniel.Bryant 2821: 2814: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2805: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2795: 2794: 2792:Daniel.Bryant 2788: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2768: 2767: 2765:Daniel.Bryant 2761: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2747: 2737: 2734: 2729: 2719: 2716: 2715: 2713:Daniel.Bryant 2709: 2701: 2700: 2699: 2696: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2687: 2686: 2684:Daniel.Bryant 2680: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2668: 2661: 2660: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2653: 2645: 2644: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2637: 2629: 2628: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2621: 2620: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2616: 2611: 2608: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2597: 2594: 2593: 2591:Daniel.Bryant 2587: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2573: 2567: 2560: 2556: 2553: 2552: 2550:Daniel.Bryant 2546: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2530: 2521: 2513: 2498: 2497: 2495:Daniel.Bryant 2491: 2485: 2483: 2480: 2479: 2477: 2476: 2470: 2469: 2466: 2462: 2458: 2457: 2451: 2450: 2444: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2434: 2433: 2427: 2426: 2423: 2412: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2398: 2394: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2376: 2372: 2371: 2369: 2366: 2362: 2359: 2356: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2346: 2341: 2340: 2334: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2321: 2317: 2316: 2310: 2309: 2306: 2305: 2299: 2297: 2292: 2289: 2288: 2286:Daniel.Bryant 2282: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2266: 2258: 2250: 2248:Ding my phone 2242: 2238: 2230: 2226: 2223: 2222: 2220:Daniel.Bryant 2216: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2183: 2177: 2176: 2173: 2164: 2162: 2160: 2157: 2149: 2147: 2146: 2142: 2133: 2131: 2121: 2113: 2111: 2110: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2092: 2091: 2088: 2087: 2085:Daniel.Bryant 2081: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2049: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2038:Danny Vukovic 2035: 2031: 2021: 2020: 2017: 2016: 2014:Daniel.Bryant 2010: 2003: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1992: 1991: 1988: 1987: 1985:Daniel.Bryant 1981: 1974: 1969: 1968: 1964: 1958: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1929: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1906: 1894: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1865: 1860: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1838: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1818: 1814: 1811: 1810: 1808:Daniel.Bryant 1804: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1791: 1783: 1779: 1776: 1775: 1773:Daniel.Bryant 1769: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1756: 1748: 1744: 1741: 1740: 1738:Daniel.Bryant 1734: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1721: 1713: 1711: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1691: 1684: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1661: 1657: 1654: 1653: 1651:Daniel.Bryant 1647: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1634: 1632: 1628: 1620: 1618: 1601: 1598: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1567: 1564: 1563: 1561:Daniel.Bryant 1557: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1528: 1525: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1502: 1499: 1498: 1496:Daniel.Bryant 1492: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1470: 1467: 1465: 1464: 1458: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1441: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1418: 1415: 1413: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1398: 1394: 1393: 1389: 1388: 1384: 1383: 1378: 1377: 1373: 1372: 1367: 1366: 1362: 1361: 1357: 1356: 1351: 1350: 1345: 1344: 1339: 1338: 1333: 1332: 1327: 1326: 1321: 1320: 1316: 1315: 1311: 1308: 1306: 1298: 1280: 1277: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1220: 1218: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1200: 1197: 1195: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1182: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1173: 1171: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1157: 1154: 1150: 1144: 1140: 1137: 1135: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1120: 1113:Let's see it? 1108: 1105: 1103: 1095: 1094: 1091: 1088: 1086: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1073: 1070: 1066: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1047: 1043: 1040: 1038: 1037: 1031: 1029: 1028: 1022: 1020: 1019: 1011: 1004: 980: 977: 972: 971: 970: 969: 968: 967: 966: 965: 964: 963: 962: 961: 960: 959: 958: 957: 956: 955: 954: 953: 952: 951: 930: 927: 925: 917: 914: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 908: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 896: 895: 875: 870: 869: 868: 865: 863: 855: 854: 853: 852: 851: 850: 849: 848: 847: 846: 845: 844: 843: 842: 841: 840: 825: 822: 818: 817: 816: 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 810: 809: 808: 807: 806: 805: 791: 787: 783: 779: 778: 777: 774: 772: 764: 763: 762: 761: 760: 759: 758: 757: 756: 755: 744: 741: 740: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 720: 719: 718: 715: 713: 705: 704: 703: 699: 695: 691: 687: 686: 685: 681: 677: 672: 668: 663: 662: 661: 658: 656: 648: 647: 646: 645: 642: 641: 638: 636: 625: 623: 622: 619: 617: 606: 602: 598: 594: 590: 584: 577: 572: 566: 534: 531: 530:Graal unixmad 527: 523: 522: 521: 518: 516: 508: 507: 506: 503: 502:Graal unixmad 498: 497: 495: 494: 493: 490: 488: 479: 478: 477: 474: 473:Graal unixmad 469: 467: 464: 463:Graal unixmad 459: 458: 457: 454: 452: 444: 440: 439: 438: 435: 434:Graal unixmad 431: 430: 429: 426: 424: 416: 415: 414: 411: 410:Graal unixmad 407: 406: 405: 402: 400: 391: 390: 389: 386: 385:Graal unixmad 381: 380: 379: 376: 374: 366: 362: 361: 360: 357: 356:Graal unixmad 352: 348: 347: 346: 343: 341: 333: 328: 327: 326: 325: 322: 321:Graal unixmad 317: 309: 305: 302: 300: 292: 291: 290: 289: 286: 281: 278: 272: 264: 261: 259: 251: 250: 249: 248: 247: 246: 241: 238: 234: 230: 229: 228: 227: 224: 221: 219: 211: 210: 209: 208: 205: 201: 193: 185: 182: 180: 172: 171: 170: 167: 162: 161: 160: 157: 155: 148:No problems. 147: 146: 145: 144: 141: 137: 133: 125: 121: 118: 116: 108: 107: 106: 105: 96: 92: 89: 85: 82: 72: 68: 64: 61: 57: 56: 50: 46: 41: 36: 32: 31: 23: 19: 3278: 3257: 3221: 3172: 3156: 3111: 3093: 3036: 3027: 3022: 3014: 3001: 2997: 2983: 2975: 2968: 2961: 2958: 2935: 2902: 2870: 2847: 2816: 2812: 2783: 2756: 2742: 2704: 2675: 2669: 2654: 2638: 2622: 2582: 2569: 2565: 2541: 2537: 2533: 2486: 2482:AlbinoMonkey 2464: 2437: 2407: 2403: 2396: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2374: 2354: 2348: 2312:Introduction 2295: 2277: 2236: 2234: 2211: 2198:said, I see 2178: 2168: 2161:Boltonfan22 2153: 2129: 2117: 2106:AlbinoMonkey 2095: 2076: 2074: 2066:AlbinoMonkey 2050: 2034:Dwight Yorke 2026: 2005: 1999: 1976: 1970: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1904: 1901: 1879: 1864:Moon Goddess 1822: 1819:Still going? 1799: 1787: 1764: 1752: 1729: 1717: 1709: 1665: 1642: 1624: 1616: 1552: 1487: 1462: 1461: 1456: 1426: 1407: 1399: 1396: 1395: 1391: 1390: 1386: 1385: 1380: 1379: 1375: 1374: 1369: 1368: 1364: 1363: 1359: 1358: 1353: 1352: 1347: 1346: 1341: 1340: 1335: 1334: 1329: 1328: 1323: 1322: 1318: 1317: 1313: 1312: 1309: 1304: 1302: 1189: 1165: 1158: 1155: 1151: 1149:Hey Daniel, 1148: 1129: 1116: 1097: 1080: 1067: 1051: 1035: 1034: 1026: 1025: 1017: 1016: 919: 857: 766: 742: 707: 650: 640: 634: 629: 616:Mr. Turcotte 615: 611: 595:. See the 582: 510: 482: 446: 418: 394: 368: 335: 331: 313: 294: 282: 279: 276: 253: 213: 197: 194:Unprotection 174: 149: 129: 110: 103: 100: 87: 83: 66: 39: 2380:Either the 2156:Boltonfan22 2042:Tony Vidmar 2030:Brian Deane 1720:Casper Raid 1524:RogueShadow 1314:Hey Daniel, 1305:undermained 1276:RogueShadow 1224:BradPatrick 1181:RogueShadow 821:RogueShadow 526:GraalOnline 316:GraalOnline 233:Merovingian 200:Merovingian 2867:User:Danny 2838:Giovanni33 2804:Giovanni33 2746:Giovanni33 2733:Giovanni33 2731:user page! 2695:Giovanni33 2607:Giovanni33 2572:Giovanni33 2561:vandalism? 2358:substitute 1948:Tmorton166 1884:Tmorton166 1431:Tmorton166 786:User:Danny 782:User:Danny 635:Alphachimp 443:beauracrat 285:Warcaptain 86:Archive 4 3281:Killfest2 3224:Killfest2 3164:come here 3114:Killfest2 3004:suspected 2938:Killfest2 2873:Killfest2 2850:Killfest2 2819:Killfest2 2813:disproven 2786:Killfest2 2759:Killfest2 2707:Killfest2 2678:Killfest2 2585:Killfest2 2544:Killfest2 2489:Killfest2 2280:Killfest2 2214:Killfest2 2196:Wknight94 2192:WP:OFFICE 2079:Killfest2 2056:to (say) 2046:Paul Okon 2008:Killfest2 1979:Killfest2 1952:Review me 1910:Wknight94 1888:Review me 1842:Wknight94 1802:Killfest2 1767:Killfest2 1732:Killfest2 1697:Wknight94 1669:Wknight94 1645:Killfest2 1555:Killfest2 1490:Killfest2 1435:Review me 1261:Wknight94 1236:Wknight94 694:Wknight94 676:Wknight94 626:Mediation 581:Welcome, 198:Done. -- 126:Unprotect 91:Archive 5 81:Archive 3 3277:Thanks! 2406:and the 2365:A-League 2182:JoshWook 2172:JoshWook 1790:Darwinek 1784:Barnstar 1631:Mareklug 1232:contribs 1005:Barnstar 790:WP:LEGAL 788:. Read 605:Be Bold! 212:Thanks. 166:Tyrenius 140:Tyrenius 20:‎ | 3266:Jauffre 3208:tell me 3079:WP:SOCK 3010:WP:SOCK 2986:Str1977 2472:Signed: 2410:section 2408:against 2353:Please 2241:Torinir 2204:staking 1858:others. 1690:welcome 1597:Di4gram 1397:Cheers, 1349:Medcab. 593:Steveo2 585:to the 136:WP:AN/I 67:archive 35:archive 22:Archive 3028:always 3002:It is 2979:WP:AGF 2397:points 2375:played 2355:do not 2150:thanks 2130:Essjay 2114:Thanks 1973:WP:A-L 1944:Errant 1880:Errant 1427:Errant 1145:Medcab 976:Kuribo 365:WP:NPA 97:Re:Hey 3042:MikaM 3033:Kecik 3023:three 2924:Idiot 2918:Abstr 2647:here. 2237:still 1755:MrCEO 1463:Chimp 1337:feel. 132:WP:AN 16:< 3090:AnnH 3068:this 3064:This 3060:this 3056:this 3052:this 3037:ever 2971:here 2964:link 2402:The 2395:The 2390:draw 2386:loss 2373:The 2345:link 2138:Talk 2102:here 2002:this 1914:talk 1846:talk 1833:this 1829:this 1701:talk 1683:Here 1673:talk 1265:talk 1257:this 1240:talk 1228:talk 916:This 698:talk 690:this 680:talk 350:say. 314:The 237:Talk 204:Talk 3054:or 3000:to 2981:. 2921:act 2514:Hey 2404:for 2388:or 2382:win 2208:RfA 2048:). 1938:or 1930:or 1905:has 1714:Hey 1400:Tom 1355:do. 134:or 3110:. 2966:. 2540:. 2465:] 2384:, 2245:( 2124::) 2036:, 2032:, 1916:) 1862:-- 1848:) 1703:) 1693:}} 1687:{{ 1675:) 1522:-- 1267:) 1242:) 1230:• 1119:DS 1036:un 1027:in 700:) 682:) 445:. 334:. 235:- 202:- 79:← 73:. 37:. 3284:— 3227:— 3203:♥ 3199:l 3196:e 3193:i 3190:r 3187:d 3184:e 3181:a 3178:h 3175:P 3117:— 3094:♫ 2941:— 2876:— 2853:— 2822:— 2789:— 2762:— 2710:— 2681:— 2588:— 2547:— 2492:— 2283:— 2267:) 2217:— 2140:) 2136:( 2082:— 2011:— 1982:— 1954:) 1950:( 1912:( 1908:— 1890:) 1886:( 1844:( 1840:— 1805:— 1770:— 1735:— 1699:( 1671:( 1667:— 1648:— 1558:— 1493:— 1457:α 1437:) 1433:( 1263:( 1238:( 1226:( 1018:M 696:( 678:( 93:→ 88:· 84:· 51:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index