Knowledge

User talk:Daniel/Archive/27

Source 📝

2831:, and I had a quick question to ask, as a first-time initiator of an RFM. Given the inactivity of W. B. Wilson and Wandalstouring, and the fact that I would generally consider them more "minor" participants in this dispute, would it be appropriate/acceptable for me to remove them from the list of parties, so that the mediation can still go forward if they are not active in time to agree? Obviously we'd still need the agreement of the two editors who have been active since the request was filed, but I have hopes that they will be deciding what actions to take soon. Thanks in advance for your help, and for your expressed interest in this case. — 2900:
trust mechanism still exists -- if I do not trust a user who wishes to help, I will tell him so, give reasons why, and ask him to move on. (All this applies as well to any bureaucrat who helps with the process, of course, and not only to me.) We have merely replaced institutional trust with personal trust. I trust you to do this job effectively, and I must admit I can't see much sense in withdrawing your own name out of fear that someone else might not be as good at it as you.
1002: 2988:
every right to put (not the 1st time he has done something like that in addition to all the "regular" edit-warring he does). He was falsely accusing me of PA, repeatedly and again. And all after he had promised to make changes to his behavior. But yes, I perhaps shoulda/coulda have foregone that ES. If you have another complaint about my behavior it would be my pleasure to address it at this time with you. I doubt that RfC will ever go live. --
2910:
large; it ought to cut as low a profile as possible and work as simply as possible. It ought, most of all, to be easily ignored. To staff it with titled users opens it to politicking and status-seeking; I have no interest in creating further opportunity for would-be satraps to exercise authority for its own sake. My reasoning is not identical to Durin's (which I cannot discern very well anyway), but he is pleased with the outcome and so am I.
1358: 1100: 1414: 60: 1386: 1667:. Aside from the necessary WHOIS link replacement, I was trying only to make the links look and work right whether invoked or not, including ucfirsts to catch and fix uncapped usernames, and popup titles that briefly and clearly described the links' functions. Everything seemed to look and work right when I was done, and for the life of me I can't guess what went wrong. 2290:! Given how you experienced it, the whole page full of links gone wonky, you'd have been justified in a much angrier response than you actually made. I'm indebted to you for letting me try again, so that I could get it right, rather than sternly ordering me to go and never darken RFCU's door again. Thanks again! -- 2909:
I detest bureaucracy. I did not make these changes exclusively in response to Durin's urging, the appearance of which seems to have contributed to your disagreement with them; nor have I betrayed my principles in making them. This is a dull process with little relevance to the goals of the project at
2899:
I'm very sorry to see you go, and I won't beg you to change your mind. However, I think the changes are much more superficial than you have taken them to be. The idea is that, as long as I have a handle on who is doing the work, it doesn't really matter whether there's a title associated with it. The
1678:
was wrong? These were tested formulae, already used in other templates without problem. Could you give me some idea of what they showed, under what circumstances? May I try again to get these other features working right? Or should I just slink off quietly into the night, having already caused enough
336:
Thanks for your support in my recent RfA which passed unanimously - thus proving that you can indeed fool some of the people some of the time. I'm still coming to terms with the new functionality I have, but so far nothing bad has happened. As always, if there's anything you need to let me know, just
1670:
Certainly feel free to do away with the SSP/socklists subtemplate -- its coding was designed to not even show any links in the display unless an outstanding SSP subpage or sock category actually exists for that user, at which point all the links need do is alert the readers to an already established
2997:
Given that the two certifiers already exist (as needed by RfC guidelines), I'll remove my certification until this is more developed. I still think the edit summary was not appropriate, regardless of the history between you two, but in light of your recent comments I figure that I'll let you have a
1802:
over to my userspace for safe testing, removing the SSP subtemplate, the ucfirsts (I had no idea any real usernames had eluded that requirement), and for the moment I've made the default username "Example"; and I've copied Durova's RFCU entries re MyWikiBiz as live field data (2 usernames, 2 IPs).
2794:
Wow, extremely interesting! However, due to certain circumstances involving this article, I'm not comfortable with nominating it - I don't consider it stable, at all. It's frustrating - so much so that I added my endorsement to the RfC - but, as I said, I'm not sure it would be appropriate for DYK
2987:
Well, I could certainly see how an external party not familiar with how much grief this guy has given me would not appreciate that edit summary. So for that reason alone it was ill-advised. But everything I scream in that ES was true. He was edit-warring with me over a POV-section tag that I have
2904:
If you are willing to ask someone to "move on" when they consistantly make mistakes/overstep their bounds as a non-beaurecrat, you have restored most of my faith in that people could still be of assistance in helping at CHU. However, it poses an interesting question: will you automatically trust
774:
Yes, I saw it - to be perfectly honest, I'm not sure which way I wish to vote yet, and I wish to see my fellow MedCommers' opinions prior to making a decision either way. I appreciate your hard work, however there were a number of valid objections raised in your recent RfA, and I'm wondering how
2285:
The "production" versions are updated. I wasn't really worried about the credit, this was all just building on what others had built first anyway; I just wanted it to work right -- which is why it so distressed me to learn that somehow I'd accomplished the opposite for a while, and why I'm so
2877:
Yes, don't remove them. I will still push for the mediation to be accepted by the chair even if these two users don't respond (and stay inactive). Of course, if the other two fail that are active don't assent to mediation, then this becomes all moot. I would suggest that don't worry with the
3055:
Hi. I made a (fairly) succinct summary of my response. Please take a look at at and see if you endorse it. It is not mutually exclusive of your endorsement of FoO's summary, IMO. If you cannot endorse it I would be curious as to why as I really think that I acknowledged what most might find
2973:
is a prime example, and one amongst many. Although Smeelgova was nearly as bad in some instances, that doesn't give you license to run around yelling at other people in edit summaries with such blatant assumptions of bad faith. I endorse the suggestion that you actions would benefit from a
2681:
Just to touch bases: both Brad Patrick and Jimbo replied to me via e-mail. Neither addressed the checkuser question directly but neither message seems to imply any reason for not running the check. I'm willing to share the correspondence with you. Where do we take things from here?
104:"Do not, under any circumstances, remove posts from this page without my permission. Non-vandalism posts, regardless of merit, should not be removed or reverted; anyone observing the removal of information from this page by anyone other than myself should blanket revert on sight" 2694:
I'd rather not accept discussions that involve the Wikimedia Counsel, unless they are totally "boring" as such. The other email you sent was free of any sort of social restrictions, however emails from BP/JW sometimes carry such restrictions. Better to be safe than sorry, I
2914:
That be it so, I am happy with what happened at CHU, although I still disapprove that there will be no safety netting for users who continually become more of a hindrance than a help at CHU. However, my anger is from Durin's last comment, where he says he is coming after
2624:). I gather those three names are very old, from before anyone realized the need to tweak the account creation process. It turns out that one literally cannot look at their contribution histories or logs because the software returns results only on the capped name: 868:
time); I've been on for hours, mainly waiting on something to happen at the MedCom, so I happened to come across your user page, and noticed you've still got Essjay's edit count up. The tool has been taken down, so you might want to link back to the old count.
2172:
The only real difference at this point should be that hovering your cursor over the links gives you a shorter clearer popup title. The default name only matters if no name or IP is provided when the template is invoked, as on the template pages themselves.
2565:
No problems. Note to others that I will not be forwarding this to anyone else, as it would totally contradict my actions at ANI. Jeffrey O. Gustafson knew everything already, and given he was a major party to the whole thing, I felt it appropriate. Cheers,
2286:
relieved now that everything does work. I certainly was not and am not offended by your reaction.... more horrified to think of how much trouble I caused, or worse yet might have caused if it hadn't been caught and reverted quickly. So thank you for doing
2937:, of course) with users who cross their bounds/make mistakes after being "warned". The fear of all the helpers being ignored because of a couple of ring-ins who continually act in error is one which was the initial motivation for having a select body. 1546:
Many discussions that potentially have far reaching impact for the whole project are carried out on the project's talk page. However, only a fraction of our active contributors actually engage in those discussions. If you add the project page to your
3065:
I endorsed the second part of it; the first I am not sure about (attacking the validity of the RfC). I for one appreciate that you can admit that your editing occasionally has flaws due to your temper, and this is a good step to managing it. Cheers,
1551:
and keep an eye on discussions there to monitor upcoming changes, even if you don't participate in those discussions it would help both yourself and the project as a whole. For instance, at the moment the primary infobox templates such as
2650:
Of course, you can only log into it once, because the Special:Login page would convert it to capitals upon manually typing it in. I am not sure how it would work if it was set to "Remember me", and it probably isn't an intelligent idea
1577:
and got sidetracked with other things. I didn't add the users to the log like I was supposed to, but lucky for me, you did! Thanks again for covering for me, and keep up the good work! If you have any questions, please contact me at
237:
Golly, thanks. I was just reading up on the stuff and figuring out that's what you had probably been doing. If need be the checkusers can review my e-mails with Brian Bergstein, who was the journalist who wrote January's AP story.
2848:
Daniel doesn't appear to have answered, so I'll provide a response in passing, in the hope he doesn't mind. If the party is minor, but expresses and interest in participating in mediation, then it's best to await their reply - see
2628:
Could the original owners even login with these names? Surely the login process would long ago have forced them to use the capped versions instead. Accounts can't be deleted, but is there any reason these three names should
3020:
Hello again. Just to let you know, out of courtesy, that he did take it live but it has not been upgraded from candidate and I think I make a good case that it should not be. At least I think it is live as he listed it here
2513:... could you email me a copy of the email you sent arbcom. I'd reckon I might find myself a party to an arbcom decision, so if its not out of line I'd like to see the initial email. I trust your judgment either way. -- 1737:
I encourage you to continue testing with the templates. However, really, the defaultpagename function isn't probably needed, as is the ucfirst. I appreciate the effort, but I can't see what forseeable benefit it could
2646:
However, I do know someone who knows how you can avoid this trap when creating an account. For BEANS reasons, it would be stupid for me to explain how to, given your correct statement that it breaks a lot of the user
2808:
Thanks for the positive sentiments about the article itself. I am not sure what I would write as a selfnom for the "hook", and how to include the public domain image, much as I would not be opposed to a selfnom...
410:
In light of the Essjay firestorm I'll throw a question your way: this project has only 11 active bureaucrats. Do you think it would be beneficial to add one more? And what would you think if I requested it?
2698:
In relation to the status of the check, I saw your note on the case page, and it has been responded to by Uninvited Company. I presume that the emails made no difference to the method used in answering the
390:
to do with my discussion initiation on CN regarding semi-protection...although rouge is good, better to be safe than sorry in this case, I felt. Meh, thanks for brightening up my day slightly, and cheers,
2658:
As I noted, I will refer your message to someone, to see if we should just rename these users for usability. However, on that note, will they be able to rename them due to this technical issue? I don't
1751:
and others, and I see that the defaultpagename and ucfirst did have a substantial benefit. However, in the case of RFCU templates, they aren't really needed. On that note, I appreciate the creation of
1151: 423:
I would !vote support; however, given I don't believe I've ever actually seen a successful RfB, I don't know how you'd go. Better to ask someone who's been around longer than I have :) Cheers,
2420: 2432: 2776: 2427: 2415: 2230:
They look fine - the only thing is, can you remove the garish blue from the spanclass links; the pale blue should be fine. Other than that, I see no objections. Great work! Cheers,
2958:
I found Justanother's actions on List of groups referred to as cults in government reports (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) deplorable. Daniel Bryant 03:27, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
1052: 1044: 1010: 2272:
for putting up with what could have been considered a terse comment by me initially - my apologies if you were in any way offended. Again, thanks for all your help! Cheers,
1026:
when it was just off the southern coast of Madagascar, but rapidly intensified soon after to its peak with 185 km/h (115 mph) winds. Favio turned to the northwest and hit
3011:
Thanks. The two certifiers must have each made a good-faith effort to handle the specific dispute, I believe. Since that has not occurred, it is not really good-to-go. --
2340: 2462: 2408: 750:
Keep your chin up - now the community needs to plug a terrible gap in our ranks, and together is the only way we can. Business as usual - don't let the trolls succeed.
2633:
be changed to something else, perhaps merely prefixed with "Old:_", to resolve the only three discrepancies in a database rapidly approaching four million entries? --
2752:, making this probably not suitable. The reason is that the DYK part of the main page is transcluded many places in userspace, and to have a FU image would violate 1123:. She has also put serious work into many of our Pacific hurricane articles since she joined the project as one of its founding members. Recently she has worked on 221: 2400: 1663:
I am dismayed and aghast to learn that what I thought to be an ordinary cleanup and polishing, with only one template actually added, turned out to have "broken"
3107: 2828: 811: 592: 1671:
case... possibly saving some time from being wasted on reinventing the wheel. If people don't need or want that flag waved, I surely won't impose it on them!
2857:. Removing them outright without consulting or gaining consensus could be seen as eliminating the opposition, so the final word is to use your common sense. 2795:
given the current events. By all means, maybe I'm being conservative here, and feel free to nominate it yourself or get someone else to, but I won't. Sorry,
986:
activity. If you wish to change how you receive this newsletter, or no longer wish to receive it, please add your username to the appropriate section on the
715:
Your recent behaviour towards me does not make your request for information high on my priority list. I can suggest that you actually edit articles, though.
3022: 2492: 2466: 1247: 1243: 1155: 1622:
was making before being blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of MagicKirin. This new account hasn't edited any articles yet (edits restricted to
2933:
I have rejoined on the comment you made in the first paragraph. However, I would appreciate it if you will be more strict than lenient (within
2919:
I do not mind your quitting out of disagreement with my actions; it is, however, frustrating to find myself apparently misunderstood. Regards —
2303:
wrong, and I guess we never will :| Thank you for all your help, and you're always welcome to "darken RFCU's door" whenever you like :) Cheers,
1927: 1836: 224:, as that's what the checkusers generally prefer - I wouldn't want to be claiming credit in the history for your great detective work! Cheers, 2783:
a public domain image (produced by U.S. federal government in 1979), that might be good for main page DYK suggestion... What do you think?
1649:
Can it be fixed somehow or I should re-apply. I asked some admin to check it but it seems he is busy. Could you do me a favor of fixing it.--
2458: 2454: 1167: 1116: 34: 2220:
None of these are huge glaring remarkable changes. They're just intended to be a tiny bit more user-friendly. Do they accomplish that? --
1644: 2643:
That is correct. I do note that your suggestion is probably sensible, and will contact a rogue B'crat to have a look at this proposal.
2383: 2094: 2011: 1984: 1893: 3030: 169:
Guys - let's cool it here. We're all volunteers here, and disputes don't help the encyclopedia. Hopefully you two can get along now.
2853:
for a useful essay. However, if they have not expressed interest, seek the consensus of the rest of the parties, via email or their
2552: 2519: 156:
is an essay, and in this case Essjay's wishes trump yours. And don't caution me about reverting, because it is you in the wrong.
1920: 1829: 141: 747:
request for promotion for ages (I even used my watchlist - a first :) so I was wondering if you would start the ball rolling?
740:
time); might I just say how much I agree with your userpage comment? The trolls have won the battle, they shan't win the war.
2557: 2524: 1310: 1251: 1217: 1194: 1001: 2616:. (We aren't talking about all the usernames starting with non-alphabetic characters, since uppercasing those does nothing: 2598:; I know of a couple of requests where your template would have made it impossible for the checkusers to perform the check." 1721:; I know of a couple of requests where your template would have made it impossible for the checkusers to perform the check. 1461: 1124: 1120: 831: 122: 2742:
Unfortunately, no, as it is preferable to have a freely-licensed image for the main page. Naturally, the image in CoU is
2449: 1574: 1482: 612: 125:
policy. I did not know there was a comment on Essjay's user talk page; again please be careful when reverting. Thanks!
1314: 1306: 1186: 90: 80: 2339: 1960: 1869: 3136: 2722: 2125: 2042: 1556: 1419: 1363: 840: 621: 546: 1803:
Here's a comparison display of the current "production" checkuser/checkip followed by my "development" versions:
1629:
Note: if this account comes from 65.96.132.149, like Giza D, I'd recommend blocking both the IP and the account.
1440: 1391: 2998:
response to the initial RfC allegations (if it ever goes live, as you note) before making a statement. Cheers,
2547: 2514: 1357: 1213: 48: 21: 2082: 1947: 1856: 1255: 1235: 1209: 1174: 693: 3106: 1999: 1295: 1205: 1159: 1147: 810: 591: 3135:. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1908: 839:. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 620:. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 3113: 2878:
talk/email thing, but don't remove them. My notes should cover the fact that they are inactive. Cheers,
1562:
are in the process of being deprecated and replaced by new versions which do the role more effectively.
1291: 1239: 1201: 1182: 1099: 1031: 913: 817: 598: 3056:
objectionable, my allowing my temper to influence my edit summaries and talk page postings. Thanks. --
1646:
but it seems I forgot to put my username in the title. Anyway, it does not show on Assistance listing
513: 446: 1283: 912:
This is Giza D you bolcked me claiming I am a sock puppet, please see my discussion page and unblock.
2810: 2784: 2732: 1626:, but I am still very suspicious. If it isn't too much trouble, could you run CheckUser? Thanks. 1385: 1034:
already occurring in the country. Favio claimed at least 4 lives and destroyed thousands of homes.
558: 127: 2850: 2106: 2023: 1817: 1713:, with no supplement information (the brackets links). As funny as it may sound, not all usernames 1623: 1302: 1056: 987: 355: 134: 1077:
Cyclone Gamede was an unusually large storm that prompted the highest level of cyclone warning on
784: 3068: 3044: 3000: 2976: 2939: 2924: 2880: 2797: 2758: 2746: 2704: 2664: 2568: 2535: 2472: 2305: 2274: 2245: 2232: 2184: 1783: 1766: 1745: 1693: 1650: 1594: 1579: 1108: 938: 895: 789: 717: 704: 698: 670: 570: 524: 500: 425: 393: 319: 275: 251: 226: 185: 158: 110: 2974:
comment/(s) from the community, which is why I endorsed that RfC (in its' provisional format).
1647: 317:
I really should know that...ah well, shouldn't edit whilst half-asleep :) Cheers for the note,
59: 3150: 3127: 3095: 2837: 2727: 2595: 1728: 1718: 1630: 1548: 1178: 1067: 550: 3057: 3042:
You are correct, and I moved it when you left me this note. Sorry for the delayed response.
3034: 3012: 2989: 2962: 2859: 2199: 1795: 1703: 1321: 1163: 1022:
and moved to the southwest as it developed. The storm did not significantly intensify until
983: 930: 878: 759: 744: 730: 654: 630: 342: 183:
I'm pretty sure it's one of the least of all the current worries on Knowledge at present...
170: 70: 44: 17: 47:. No further edits should be made to this page. For a list of archives for this user, see 2652: 1608: 1279: 1088:
Neither Enok towards the start of the month or Humba near its end, had any impact on land.
852: 308: 249:
I can't see why it'd hurt. I've sent you an email regarding what to do with them. Cheers,
2498:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 568:
Religion, Inc. is probably too short for DYK. Added one for Cults of Unreason :) Cheers,
116: 2533:
I see no reason why I shouldn't send you the email. Sent via Special:Emailuser. Cheers,
2854: 2476: 1724:
For some reason - beyond me - the changes you made to the two templates also broke the
1664: 1317: 975: 1047:
during February. Five of these, including Favio, were in the South West Indian Ocean.
2934: 2920: 2259:
Make free with them, at your leisure.... and thank you for your patience with me! --
1755: 1583: 1263: 1128: 778: 688: 554: 376: 370: 153: 2588:
Not to reopen the ucfirst question, but I was intrigued by what you'd said earlier:
3146: 2832: 2753: 1615: 1143: 1112: 3154: 3074: 3060: 3050: 3037: 3015: 3006: 2992: 2982: 2965: 2945: 2927: 2886: 2868: 2842: 2813: 2803: 2787: 2764: 2735: 2710: 2688: 2670: 2637: 2574: 2560: 2541: 2527: 2502: 2311: 2294: 2280: 2263: 2251: 2238: 2224: 1772: 1683: 1653: 1633: 1600: 1586: 944: 916: 901: 887: 855: 795: 768: 723: 709: 676: 662: 633: 576: 561: 530: 517: 506: 450: 431: 417: 399: 381: 345: 325: 311: 281: 268: 257: 244: 232: 214: 191: 178: 164: 147: 208:
Could you explain why you speedy deleted the request for checkuser on MyWikiBiz?
2683: 2499: 2112: 2029: 1619: 1190: 1082: 1023: 1019: 687:
What do you think I would need to do to get past the 'little tsar' connotation?
438: 412: 362: 338: 263: 239: 209: 1287: 1078: 1071: 1060: 1027: 1015: 849: 305: 982:
aims to give a summary, both of the activities of the WikiProject and global
926:. Fellow administrators, as I noted in that comment, feel free to review the 3132: 2138: 2055: 1710: 1259: 836: 617: 444:
Did you usurp this account bud? It only has a few contribs so I'm confused!
2118: 2035: 354: 69:. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any comments to the 3033:. It is already getting comments though so it probably should be moved. -- 3131:, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the 2634: 2291: 2260: 2221: 1680: 835:, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the 616:, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the 511:
Ah, nice :) I've just applied to usurp Glen - been meaning to for awhile
3118: 2373: 2268:
You deserve the GFDL credit, so feel free to copy them yourself. Thank
959: 822: 603: 100:
I reverted your revert, because Essjay's user talk page clearly states:
783:, however they do share some similarities). I hope you will excuse my 2077: 1994: 2603:
and found exactly three usernames starting with lowercase letters:
2491:
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the
3122: 2376: 1903: 1812: 963: 826: 607: 2626:
the log request for "shannon" gives a report on "Shannon", etc.
1066:
Cyclone Dora was active in January and reached its peak as an
865: 737: 643: 2396: 2338: 1734:
template on the main RFCU page. I have no idea why, however.
1152:
Effects of Hurricane Isabel in Maryland and Washington, D.C.
1098: 1000: 545:
Sorry to bug you, but any ideas on the 2 new potentials for
2731:, could a book cover image be used as well for the entry? 2439: 2358: 2334: 1614:
I hate to bother you with this, but we have a new account,
1334: 2777:
List of groups referred to as cults in government reports
1111:. Miss Madeline is responsible for many of the projects 3026: 2970: 2625: 2602: 2149: 2145: 2132: 2100: 2088: 2066: 2062: 2049: 2017: 2005: 1978: 1971: 1967: 1954: 1940: 1934: 1914: 1887: 1880: 1876: 1863: 1849: 1843: 1823: 923: 775:
applicable they are to the MC nomination (as it reads,
743:
By the way, I've been up for hours with my eye on this
487: 477: 301: 3029:) but did not know to move it out of his user space, 1761:
and related templates - they will be extremely handy.
1618:, making exactly the same POV-pushing statements as 1778:Okay, I've copied my (later reverted) versions of 1051:The only other storm in the Australian region was 557:?? Thanks again so much for your time and help. 273:Clerk note added regarding second source. Cheers, 108:Please respect his wishes on this matter. Cheers, 1043:There were a total of 6 tropical cyclones in the 646:time); everything sorted now? Hope you're well. 3031:User:Anynobody/Requests for comment/Justanother 2905:people, or will that trust have to be built up? 2416:News and notes: Picture of the Year, milestones 222:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/MyWikiBiz 2829:Knowledge:Requests for mediation/World War II 2590:"As funny as it may sound, not all usernames 1127:, bringing it from a stub-class article to a 8: 2428:Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 951:Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #10 368:On the readng list for all rouge admins... 33:The following discussion is preserved as an 3023:Knowledge:Requests for comment/User conduct 121:Sorry, i had to revert it according to the 3101: 1081:and brought strong winds to the island on 1055:which formed at the end of January in the 805: 586: 54: 2585:Usernames starting with lowercase letters 2404:correction dogs arbitrator into departure 1248:Effects of Hurricane Wilma in the Bahamas 1244:Meteorological history of Hurricane Wilma 1156:Meteorological history of Hurricane Wilma 2756:in relation to userspace usage. Cheers, 2390: 1355: 3145:Thank you for making the nomination! — 1383: 1014:developed well to the east of northern 1643:I have requested assistance while ago 43:Subsequent comments should be made on 2955:Hi. Would you kind enough to explain? 1168:List of Florida hurricanes (pre-1900) 1117:List of Category 5 Pacific hurricanes 493:after the account was moved to Daniel 7: 1709:template didn't work - it linked to 1413: 1411: 1273:New articles and improvements wanted 1107:The February member of the month is 351:Some essential light reading for you 300:Psstt... February only has 28 days, 2827:Greetings! I saw your comments on 1741:However, I did see your work with 974:This is the monthly newsletter of 522:Cheers - and good luck with that! 498:I hope that clears it up; cheers, 456:Basically, here's how it worked:- 28: 668:Yep, thanks for the well-wishes. 365:, the legendary Little Rouge Book 3105: 2433:The Report on Lengthy Litigation 1412: 1384: 1356: 809: 590: 337:drop me a line on my Talk page. 58: 2208:{{User:Ben/Template:Checkuser}} 1544:Comments wanted on project talk 1085:, causing a bridge to collapse. 1040:Other tropical cyclone activity 2779:, with 18 reputable citations 1311:Intertropical Convergence Zone 1252:Tropical Depression One (1992) 1218:Tropical Depression One (1992) 1195:1983 Atlantic hurricane season 1074:with 185 km/h (115 mph) winds. 787:for the time being :) Cheers, 1: 2409:WikiWorld comic: "The Rutles" 2214:{{User:Ben/Template:Checkip}} 1125:1996 Pacific hurricane season 1121:List of California hurricanes 1005:Cyclone Favio near Madagascar 976:WikiProject Tropical Cyclones 893:Thanks for the note. Cheers, 832:Scientology: The Now Religion 694: 123:Knowledge:No personal attacks 2771:New DYK suggestion potential 2371: 2331:updated for March 5th, 2007. 1639:help with assistance request 1575:Knowledge:Request an account 705: 699: 689: 613:Leo J. Ryan Federal Building 466:(main account) didn't change 2470: 2381: 1517: 1500: 1479: 1458: 1437: 1409: 1381: 1353: 1315:1919 Florida Keys Hurricane 1307:Japan Meteorological Agency 1301:Improvements are wanted to 1187:1939 Pacific typhoon season 3172: 3125:, a fact from the article 3075:00:59, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 3051:00:59, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 2723:Template talk:Did you know 2447: 2366: 1569:Thanks for covering for me 829:, a fact from the article 777:"MC nominations are not a 610:, a fact from the article 357:File:Little rouge book.jpg 3155:05:23, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 3137:"Did you know?" talk page 3061:14:03, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 3038:06:04, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 3016:04:01, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 3007:03:57, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 2993:03:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 2983:03:44, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 2966:03:40, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 2946:03:08, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 2928:21:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 2887:03:16, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 2869:20:30, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 2843:19:19, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 2814:03:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 2804:03:30, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 2788:14:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 2765:10:57, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 2736:02:31, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 2711:11:03, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 2689:17:25, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 2671:11:01, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 2653:discussing it here either 2638:16:38, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 2575:08:46, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 2561:08:45, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 2542:08:43, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 2528:08:42, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 2503:06:12, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 2483: 2442: 2431: 2426: 2419: 2414: 2407: 2399: 2361: 2312:07:36, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 2295:07:34, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 2281:07:08, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 2264:07:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 2252:07:03, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 2239:06:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 2225:06:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 1773:06:12, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 1684:06:01, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 1654:21:46, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1634:17:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1601:06:01, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1587:05:41, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1513: 1510: 1507: 1504: 1501: 1349: 1346: 1343: 1340: 1337: 1234:Entries from 6 articles: 1137:New and improved articles 945:05:18, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 917:20:34, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 902:05:18, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 888:19:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 856:10:23, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 841:"Did you know?" talk page 796:06:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 785:sitting-on-the-fence-ness 769:04:01, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 724:02:59, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 710:22:48, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 677:02:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 663:14:35, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 634:12:43, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 622:"Did you know?" talk page 577:02:49, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 562:10:57, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 531:02:36, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 518:02:35, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 507:02:32, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 451:02:30, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 432:02:28, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 418:20:29, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 400:02:27, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 382:14:09, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 346:10:41, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 326:02:25, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 312:10:02, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 282:02:25, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 269:04:47, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 258:04:08, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 245:04:08, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 233:04:05, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 220:I history-merged it with 215:04:03, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 192:02:24, 3 March 2007 (UTC) 179:21:50, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 165:03:36, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 148:03:34, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 117:01:10, 2 March 2007 (UTC) 2299:I still don't know what 1689:What happened was every 1607:Possible sock-puppet of 1573:I totally spaced out on 1331:Storm article statistics 1214:Hurricane Alberto (1982) 476:(secondary account) was 49:User talk:Daniel/Archive 40:Please do not modify it. 3098:on DYK for 8 March 2007 2775:Newly created article, 2159:Development templates: 1278:Articles are wanted on 1266:column during February. 1256:Tropical cyclone basins 1236:Hurricane Flossy (1956) 1210:Hurricane Adolph (2001) 2960: 2594:capital letters - see 2344: 2343:The Knowledge Signpost 2243:Or, 002BB8 is fine :) 1806:Production templates: 1717:capital letters - see 1296:Central dense overcast 1206:Hurricane Debby (1982) 1160:2000 Sri Lanka Cyclone 1148:Hurricane Erika (1997) 1129:Good article candidate 1104: 1006: 366: 107: 2956: 2342: 1659:Checkuser and Checkip 1592:No problems! Cheers, 1292:Outflow (meteorology) 1240:Hurricane Able (1951) 1202:Hurricane Isis (1998) 1200:New articles include 1183:Hurricane Isis (1998) 1102: 1004: 970:The Hurricane Herald 360: 101: 2606:behnaz@wikipedia.com 2548:Jeffrey O. Gustafson 2515:Jeffrey O. Gustafson 1284:North Indian cyclone 980:The Hurricane Herald 262:It's in your hands. 96: 2421:Features and admins 2139:cross-wiki contribs 2056:cross-wiki contribs 1624:Talk:United Nations 1303:Subtropical cyclone 1095:Member of the month 1057:Gulf of Carpentaria 1045:southern hemisphere 406:Asking your opinion 386:I presume this has 304:;-) Happy editing, 2717:Quick DYK question 2601:So I did go look, 2384:About the Signpost 2368:Volume 3, Issue 10 2345: 1674:But what on Earth 1105: 1007: 997:Storm of the month 367: 94: 3143: 3142: 3128:Cults of Unreason 3096:Cults of Unreason 2971:This edit summary 2895:Username changing 2841: 2728:Cults of Unreason 2596:Special:Listusers 2505: 2488: 2487: 2479: 2438: 2437: 2395: 2394: 2354: 2353: 1719:Special:Listusers 1557:Infobox hurricane 1539: 1538: 1229:Main Page content 1179:Hurricane Pauline 847: 846: 628: 627: 380: 146: 78: 77: 76: 71:current talk page 3163: 3117:was updated. On 3109: 3102: 3071: 3047: 3003: 2979: 2942: 2883: 2867: 2865: 2862: 2835: 2800: 2761: 2751: 2745: 2707: 2686: 2667: 2571: 2538: 2490: 2471: 2467:Single-Page View 2440: 2397: 2359: 2350: 2335: 2308: 2277: 2248: 2235: 2204: 2198: 2194: 2189: 2183: 2179: 2155: 2153: 2128: 2080: 2072: 2070: 2045: 1997: 1989: 1987: 1950: 1930: 1928:deleted contribs 1906: 1898: 1896: 1859: 1839: 1837:deleted contribs 1815: 1800: 1794: 1788: 1782: 1769: 1760: 1754: 1750: 1744: 1733: 1727: 1708: 1702: 1698: 1692: 1597: 1561: 1555: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1389: 1388: 1361: 1360: 1335: 1322:Hurricane Andrew 1258:appeared on the 1164:Hurricane Isabel 1144:featured content 1103:Cyclone barnstar 984:tropical cyclone 941: 935: 929: 898: 886: 884: 881: 821:was updated. On 813: 806: 792: 767: 765: 762: 720: 707: 701: 696: 691: 673: 660: 657: 602:was updated. On 594: 587: 573: 527: 503: 473: 463: 428: 415: 396: 374: 361:The Thoughts of 358: 322: 278: 266: 254: 242: 229: 212: 204:Speedy Deletion? 188: 176: 173: 161: 144: 139: 132: 126: 113: 65:This page is an 62: 55: 45:User talk:Daniel 42: 18:User talk:Daniel 3171: 3170: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3162: 3161: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3100: 3069: 3045: 3001: 2977: 2954: 2940: 2897: 2881: 2863: 2860: 2858: 2825: 2798: 2773: 2759: 2749: 2743: 2719: 2705: 2684: 2679: 2665: 2618:{{uc:123`-@$ }} 2587: 2569: 2536: 2511: 2348:Weekly Delivery 2346: 2333: 2306: 2275: 2246: 2233: 2202: 2196: 2192: 2187: 2181: 2177: 2141: 2121: 2076: 2075: 2058: 2038: 1993: 1992: 1963: 1943: 1923: 1902: 1901: 1872: 1852: 1832: 1811: 1810: 1798: 1792: 1786: 1780: 1767: 1758: 1752: 1748: 1742: 1731: 1725: 1706: 1700: 1696: 1690: 1661: 1641: 1612: 1609:User:MagicKirin 1595: 1571: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1559: 1553: 1540: 1327: 1280:Pacific typhoon 1269: 1224: 1223: 1133: 1091: 1068:annular cyclone 1036: 992: 972: 967: 953: 939: 933: 927: 910: 896: 882: 879: 877: 862: 804: 790: 763: 760: 758: 754:Kindest regards 734: 718: 685: 671: 658: 655: 640: 585: 571: 547:DYK suggestions 543: 525: 501: 471: 461: 442: 426: 413: 408: 394: 356: 353: 343:Schreit mich an 334: 320: 298: 276: 264: 252: 240: 227: 210: 206: 186: 174: 171: 159: 142: 135: 128: 111: 99: 38: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 3169: 3167: 3141: 3140: 3110: 3099: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3077: 2953: 2950: 2949: 2948: 2917: 2916: 2907: 2906: 2896: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2889: 2872: 2871: 2824: 2823:WWII Mediation 2821: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2772: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2718: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2700: 2696: 2678: 2677:MyWikiBiz RFCU 2675: 2674: 2673: 2660: 2656: 2648: 2644: 2586: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2510: 2509:If possible... 2507: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2481: 2480: 2469: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2436: 2435: 2430: 2424: 2423: 2418: 2412: 2411: 2406: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2388: 2387: 2380: 2370: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2356: 2352: 2351: 2332: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2218: 2217: 2215: 2211: 2209: 2205: 2190: 2170: 2169: 2167: 2165: 2163: 2157: 2156: 2073: 1990: 1899: 1776: 1775: 1762: 1739: 1735: 1722: 1660: 1657: 1640: 1637: 1611: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1570: 1567: 1541: 1537: 1536: 1533: 1530: 1527: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1515: 1512: 1509: 1506: 1503: 1499: 1498: 1495: 1492: 1489: 1486: 1478: 1477: 1474: 1471: 1468: 1465: 1457: 1456: 1453: 1450: 1447: 1444: 1436: 1435: 1432: 1429: 1426: 1423: 1408: 1407: 1404: 1401: 1398: 1395: 1380: 1379: 1376: 1373: 1370: 1367: 1352: 1351: 1348: 1345: 1342: 1339: 1328: 1326: 1325: 1318:Hurricane Ivan 1299: 1270: 1268: 1267: 1226: 1225: 1222: 1221: 1198: 1171: 1134: 1113:featured lists 1092: 1090: 1089: 1086: 1075: 1064: 1059:before it hit 1053:Cyclone Nelson 1042: 1037: 1030:worsening the 994: 993: 968: 956: 955: 954: 952: 949: 948: 947: 909: 906: 905: 904: 876: 864:Good evening ( 861: 858: 845: 844: 814: 803: 800: 799: 798: 757: 736:Good morning ( 733: 728: 727: 726: 684: 681: 680: 679: 653: 642:Good evening ( 639: 636: 626: 625: 595: 584: 581: 580: 579: 542: 539: 538: 537: 536: 535: 534: 533: 496: 495: 494: 484: 467: 441: 436: 435: 434: 407: 404: 403: 402: 352: 349: 333: 330: 329: 328: 297: 294: 293: 292: 291: 290: 289: 288: 287: 286: 285: 284: 205: 202: 201: 200: 199: 198: 197: 196: 195: 194: 152:Actually, no, 98: 95: 75: 74: 63: 53: 52: 30: 29: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3168: 3157: 3156: 3152: 3148: 3138: 3134: 3130: 3129: 3124: 3120: 3116: 3115: 3114:Did you know? 3111: 3108: 3104: 3103: 3097: 3094: 3076: 3073: 3072: 3070:Daniel Bryant 3064: 3063: 3062: 3059: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3049: 3048: 3046:Daniel Bryant 3041: 3040: 3039: 3036: 3032: 3028: 3024: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3014: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3005: 3004: 3002:Daniel Bryant 2996: 2995: 2994: 2991: 2986: 2985: 2984: 2981: 2980: 2978:Daniel Bryant 2972: 2969: 2968: 2967: 2964: 2959: 2951: 2947: 2944: 2943: 2941:Daniel Bryant 2936: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2926: 2922: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2894: 2888: 2885: 2884: 2882:Daniel Bryant 2876: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2870: 2866: 2856: 2852: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2839: 2834: 2830: 2822: 2815: 2812: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2802: 2801: 2799:Daniel Bryant 2793: 2792: 2791: 2789: 2786: 2782: 2778: 2770: 2766: 2763: 2762: 2760:Daniel Bryant 2755: 2748: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2737: 2734: 2730: 2729: 2724: 2716: 2712: 2709: 2708: 2706:Daniel Bryant 2701: 2697: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2687: 2676: 2672: 2669: 2668: 2666:Daniel Bryant 2661: 2657: 2654: 2649: 2645: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2636: 2632: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2604: 2599: 2597: 2593: 2584: 2576: 2573: 2572: 2570:Daniel Bryant 2564: 2563: 2562: 2559: 2555: 2554: 2549: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2540: 2539: 2537:Daniel Bryant 2532: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2526: 2522: 2521: 2516: 2508: 2506: 2504: 2501: 2497: 2495: 2482: 2478: 2474: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2451: 2446: 2441: 2434: 2429: 2425: 2422: 2417: 2413: 2410: 2405: 2403: 2398: 2389: 2386: 2385: 2379: 2378: 2375: 2369: 2365: 2360: 2357: 2349: 2341: 2337: 2336: 2330: 2327: 2313: 2310: 2309: 2307:Daniel Bryant 2302: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2293: 2289: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2279: 2278: 2276:Daniel Bryant 2271: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2262: 2258: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2250: 2249: 2247:Daniel Bryant 2242: 2241: 2240: 2237: 2236: 2234:Daniel Bryant 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2223: 2213: 2212: 2207: 2206: 2201: 2191: 2186: 2178:{{checkuser}} 2176: 2175: 2174: 2168: 2166: 2164: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2151: 2147: 2144: 2140: 2137: 2134: 2131: 2127: 2124: 2120: 2117: 2114: 2111: 2108: 2105: 2102: 2099: 2096: 2093: 2090: 2087: 2084: 2079: 2074: 2068: 2064: 2061: 2057: 2054: 2051: 2048: 2044: 2041: 2037: 2034: 2031: 2028: 2025: 2022: 2019: 2016: 2013: 2010: 2007: 2004: 2001: 1996: 1991: 1986: 1983: 1980: 1977: 1973: 1969: 1966: 1962: 1959: 1956: 1953: 1949: 1946: 1942: 1939: 1936: 1933: 1929: 1926: 1922: 1919: 1916: 1913: 1910: 1905: 1900: 1895: 1892: 1889: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1875: 1871: 1868: 1865: 1862: 1858: 1855: 1851: 1848: 1845: 1842: 1838: 1835: 1831: 1828: 1825: 1822: 1819: 1814: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1804: 1801: 1797: 1789: 1785: 1774: 1771: 1770: 1768:Daniel Bryant 1763: 1757: 1747: 1740: 1736: 1730: 1723: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1705: 1695: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1682: 1677: 1672: 1668: 1666: 1658: 1656: 1655: 1652: 1648: 1645: 1638: 1636: 1635: 1632: 1627: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1599: 1598: 1596:Daniel Bryant 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1585: 1581: 1576: 1568: 1563: 1558: 1550: 1545: 1534: 1531: 1528: 1525: 1523: 1518: 1496: 1493: 1490: 1487: 1485: 1484: 1480: 1475: 1472: 1469: 1466: 1464: 1463: 1459: 1454: 1451: 1448: 1445: 1443: 1442: 1438: 1433: 1430: 1427: 1424: 1422: 1421: 1410: 1405: 1402: 1399: 1396: 1394: 1393: 1387: 1382: 1377: 1374: 1371: 1368: 1366: 1365: 1359: 1354: 1336: 1333: 1332: 1323: 1319: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1175:Good articles 1172: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1132: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1109:Miss Madeline 1101: 1097: 1096: 1087: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1046: 1041: 1035: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1012: 1011:Cyclone Favio 1003: 999: 998: 991: 989: 985: 981: 977: 971: 966: 965: 961: 950: 946: 943: 942: 940:Daniel Bryant 932: 925: 924:this response 921: 920: 919: 918: 915: 914:65.96.132.149 907: 903: 900: 899: 897:Daniel Bryant 892: 891: 890: 889: 885: 874: 870: 867: 859: 857: 854: 851: 842: 838: 834: 833: 828: 824: 820: 819: 818:Did you know? 815: 812: 808: 807: 801: 797: 794: 793: 791:Daniel Bryant 786: 782: 780: 773: 772: 771: 770: 766: 755: 751: 748: 746: 741: 739: 732: 729: 725: 722: 721: 719:Daniel Bryant 714: 713: 712: 711: 708: 702: 697: 692: 682: 678: 675: 674: 672:Daniel Bryant 667: 666: 665: 664: 661: 651: 647: 645: 637: 635: 632: 623: 619: 615: 614: 609: 605: 601: 600: 599:Did you know? 596: 593: 589: 588: 582: 578: 575: 574: 572:Daniel Bryant 567: 566: 565: 563: 560: 556: 552: 548: 540: 532: 529: 528: 526:Daniel Bryant 521: 520: 519: 516: 515: 510: 509: 508: 505: 504: 502:Daniel Bryant 497: 492: 491:Daniel-Bryant 489: 488:re-registered 485: 483: 479: 475: 468: 465: 458: 457: 455: 454: 453: 452: 449: 448: 440: 437: 433: 430: 429: 427:Daniel Bryant 422: 421: 420: 419: 416: 405: 401: 398: 397: 395:Daniel Bryant 389: 385: 384: 383: 378: 373: 372: 364: 359: 350: 348: 347: 344: 340: 331: 327: 324: 323: 321:Daniel Bryant 316: 315: 314: 313: 310: 307: 303: 295: 283: 280: 279: 277:Daniel Bryant 272: 271: 270: 267: 261: 260: 259: 256: 255: 253:Daniel Bryant 248: 247: 246: 243: 236: 235: 234: 231: 230: 228:Daniel Bryant 223: 219: 218: 217: 216: 213: 203: 193: 190: 189: 187:Daniel Bryant 182: 181: 180: 177: 168: 167: 166: 163: 162: 160:Daniel Bryant 155: 151: 150: 149: 145: 140: 138: 133: 131: 124: 120: 119: 118: 115: 114: 112:Daniel Bryant 106: 105: 97:Essjay's talk 92: 89: 85: 82: 72: 68: 64: 61: 57: 56: 50: 46: 41: 36: 32: 31: 23: 19: 3144: 3126: 3112: 3067: 3043: 2999: 2975: 2957: 2938: 2918: 2908: 2898: 2879: 2851:WP:NEHAMFTAY 2826: 2796: 2780: 2774: 2757: 2726: 2720: 2703: 2680: 2663: 2630: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2600: 2591: 2589: 2567: 2551: 2534: 2518: 2512: 2493: 2489: 2448: 2401: 2382: 2372: 2367: 2355: 2347: 2328: 2304: 2300: 2287: 2273: 2269: 2256: 2244: 2231: 2219: 2171: 2158: 2142: 2135: 2129: 2122: 2115: 2109: 2103: 2097: 2091: 2085: 2078:72.94.158.49 2059: 2052: 2046: 2039: 2032: 2026: 2020: 2014: 2008: 2002: 1995:72.94.152.27 1981: 1975: 1964: 1957: 1951: 1944: 1937: 1931: 1924: 1917: 1911: 1890: 1884: 1873: 1866: 1860: 1853: 1846: 1840: 1833: 1826: 1820: 1805: 1791: 1779: 1777: 1765: 1714: 1679:trouble? -- 1675: 1673: 1669: 1662: 1642: 1631:Michaelbusch 1628: 1616:User:Arankar 1613: 1593: 1580:my talk page 1572: 1543: 1542: 1521: 1481: 1460: 1439: 1418: 1390: 1362: 1330: 1329: 1272: 1271: 1264:Did you know 1228: 1227: 1136: 1135: 1106: 1094: 1093: 1039: 1038: 1009: 1008: 996: 995: 988:mailing list 979: 973: 969: 957: 937: 911: 894: 873:Kind regards 872: 871: 863: 860:Edit Counter 830: 816: 788: 776: 753: 752: 749: 742: 735: 716: 686: 669: 650:Kind regards 649: 648: 641: 611: 597: 569: 544: 541:DYK ideas... 523: 512: 499: 490: 481: 469: 459: 445: 443: 424: 409: 392: 387: 369: 363:Chairman Jim 335: 318: 299: 274: 250: 225: 207: 184: 157: 136: 129: 109: 103: 102: 87: 83: 66: 39: 3058:Justanother 3035:Justanother 3013:Justanother 2990:Justanother 2963:Justanother 2725:listing of 2546:Thanks. -- 2193:{{checkip}} 2119:proxy check 2036:proxy check 1979:investigate 1888:investigate 1620:User:Giza D 1522:Less than B 1191:Typhoon Tip 1083:February 27 1024:February 19 1020:February 12 958:Number 10, 638:Controversy 631:Carabinieri 439:User:Daniel 86:Archive 27 2647:interface. 2558:<*: --> 2525:<*: --> 2402:New Yorker 2126:block user 2101:filter log 2043:block user 2018:filter log 1948:block user 1941:filter log 1857:block user 1850:filter log 1519:percentage 1288:diffluence 1072:February 3 1061:Queensland 1028:Mozambique 1016:Madagascar 936:. Cheers, 908:(Untitled) 706:Talk to me 555:Second one 91:Archive 28 81:Archive 26 3133:Main Page 2961:Thanks -- 2855:talk page 2747:bookcover 2185:checkuser 2146:CheckUser 2133:block log 2063:CheckUser 2050:block log 1968:CheckUser 1955:block log 1904:Ray Regan 1877:CheckUser 1864:block log 1813:MyWikiBiz 1784:checkuser 1746:userlinks 1711:Checkuser 1694:checkuser 1584:Ian Manka 1549:Watchlist 1260:Main Page 837:Main Page 731:WP:MEDCOM 618:Main Page 551:First one 388:something 2952:Question 2721:For the 2702:Cheers, 2699:request. 2695:think :) 2662:Cheers, 2622:123`-@$ 2553:Shazaam! 2520:Shazaam! 2496:spamlist 2494:Signpost 2473:Shortcut 2463:Tip Line 2459:Newsroom 2455:Archives 2329:Signpost 2095:contribs 2012:contribs 1921:contribs 1830:contribs 1764:Cheers, 1729:rfcu box 1177:include 1115:such as 296:February 20:‎ | 3147:ERcheck 3119:8 March 2861:anthony 2833:Krellis 2659:know :) 2614:shannon 2477:WP:POST 2374:5 March 2200:checkip 1796:checkip 1704:checkip 1665:WP:RFCU 1262:in the 1079:Réunion 960:March 4 931:unblock 880:anthony 823:4 March 761:anthony 683:Message 656:Anthony 604:3 March 486:I then 478:renamed 172:Anthony 67:archive 35:archive 22:Archive 2935:reason 2685:Durova 2612:, and 2500:Ralbot 1985:cuwiki 1894:cuwiki 1651:Dacy69 1502:Total 1338:Grade 1032:floods 853:(Talk) 745:MedCom 482:Daniel 474:Bryant 470:Daniel 464:Bryant 460:Daniel 414:Durova 339:BigHaz 332:My RfA 302:not 30 265:Durova 241:Durova 211:Durova 2915:RFCU. 2257:Done! 2107:WHOIS 2024:WHOIS 1738:have. 1535:52.8 1462:Start 850:ALoan 377:Help! 306:Kusma 137:oroid 16:< 3151:talk 3123:2007 3027:diff 2925:talk 2838:Talk 2811:Smee 2785:Smee 2733:Smee 2450:Home 2377:2007 2288:that 2113:RBLs 2083:talk 2030:RBLs 2000:talk 1935:logs 1909:talk 1844:logs 1818:talk 1790:and 1756:Rfcu 1699:and 1676:else 1532:54.2 1529:55.1 1526:57.3 1514:398 1511:389 1508:379 1505:375 1483:Stub 1476:194 1350:Mar 1347:Feb 1344:Jan 1341:Dec 1320:and 1294:and 1254:and 1216:and 1193:and 1173:New 1166:and 1142:New 1119:and 964:2007 922:See 827:2007 608:2007 559:Smee 553:and 514:Glen 447:Glen 309:(討論) 130:Mete 2921:Dan 2864:cfc 2781:and 2635:Ben 2631:not 2610:che 2592:are 2465:| 2461:| 2457:| 2453:| 2301:was 2292:Ben 2270:you 2261:Ben 2222:Ben 2150:log 2089:tag 2067:log 2006:tag 1972:log 1915:tag 1881:log 1824:tag 1715:are 1681:Ben 1497:16 1473:195 1470:193 1467:200 1455:78 1434:80 1378:28 1070:on 1018:on 883:cfc 866:GMT 802:DYK 779:RFA 764:cfc 738:GMT 659:cfc 644:GMT 583:DYK 549:? 480:to 371:Guy 175:cfc 154:RPA 3153:) 3139:. 3121:, 2923:| 2790:. 2754:FU 2750:}} 2744:{{ 2738:. 2655::) 2620:→ 2608:, 2556:- 2550:- 2523:- 2517:- 2475:: 2203:}} 2197:{{ 2195:→ 2188:}} 2182:{{ 2180:→ 1974:) 1961:CA 1883:) 1870:CA 1799:}} 1793:{{ 1787:}} 1781:{{ 1759:}} 1753:{{ 1749:}} 1743:{{ 1732:}} 1726:{{ 1707:}} 1701:{{ 1697:}} 1691:{{ 1582:. 1560:}} 1554:{{ 1494:16 1491:16 1488:15 1452:76 1449:71 1446:78 1431:75 1428:74 1425:57 1420:GA 1406:2 1375:25 1372:23 1369:19 1364:FA 1313:, 1309:, 1305:, 1290:, 1286:, 1282:, 1250:, 1246:, 1242:, 1238:, 1212:, 1208:, 1204:, 1189:, 1185:, 1181:, 1162:, 1158:, 1154:, 1150:, 1146:: 1131:. 990:. 978:. 962:, 934:}} 928:{{ 848:-- 843:. 825:, 703:. 629:-- 624:. 606:, 564:. 341:- 143:» 79:← 73:. 37:. 3149:( 3025:( 2840:) 2836:( 2816:. 2216:→ 2210:→ 2154:) 2152:) 2148:( 2143:· 2136:· 2130:· 2123:· 2116:· 2110:· 2104:· 2098:· 2092:· 2086:· 2081:( 2071:) 2069:) 2065:( 2060:· 2053:· 2047:· 2040:· 2033:· 2027:· 2021:· 2015:· 2009:· 2003:· 1998:( 1988:) 1982:· 1976:· 1970:( 1965:· 1958:· 1952:· 1945:· 1938:· 1932:· 1925:· 1918:· 1912:· 1907:( 1897:) 1891:· 1885:· 1879:( 1874:· 1867:· 1861:· 1854:· 1847:· 1841:· 1834:· 1827:· 1821:· 1816:( 1441:B 1403:2 1400:2 1397:6 1392:A 1324:. 1298:. 1220:. 1197:. 1170:. 1063:. 875:, 781:" 756:, 700:o 695:e 690:G 652:, 472:- 462:. 379:) 375:( 93:→ 88:· 84:· 51:.

Index

User talk:Daniel
Archive
archive
User talk:Daniel
User talk:Daniel/Archive
Archive
current talk page
Archive 26
Archive 28
Daniel Bryant
01:10, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Knowledge:No personal attacks
 Mete
oroid 
» 
03:34, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
RPA
Daniel Bryant
03:36, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Anthonycfc
21:50, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Daniel Bryant
02:24, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Durova
04:03, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/MyWikiBiz
Daniel Bryant
04:05, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Durova
04:08, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.