Knowledge

User talk:Daniel/Archive/28

Source 📝

565:
the same situation. There are some things I have said that I would most definitely word differently or retract. But, I came to a point where I had to take what I felt were the principles of Knowledge with me as I ascended what appeared to be the mountain of insanity and yell at the top of my lungs from it. Calmly, rationally trying to work things out with people while doling out infinitesimally small amounts of social currency simply wasn't going to work. I had to
704: 60: 163:
of further debate/discussion. One would thus be led to believe that the most likely reason for this is that you bear some sort of grudge/bias against Mr Keith for some reason or another. I apologise if this is not the case, but your personal deletion of this article would appear to run contrary to both official wikipedia policy and the precedents of 2 votes for "keep". 8 March 2007
908: 3119: 2686: 2194: 1864: 1806: 1760: 873:
Great job on opening the InShaneee RfAr, and thanks for your help during your busy season. One minor thing (that I also should have caught), there is one arbitrator who recused in this case, so you should adjust accordingly at /Proposed decision. (We've also been including lists of the arbitrators on
569:
before people would be willing to shake out of their molds and address the issue. This is not to say that I was absolutely dead certain I was right. But, I had tried other methods and they were not working. I had to try this method. If it failed, it failed. That it had a modicum of success is good in
162:
said article. I am fully aware that that article was a popular target for vandals, but nonetheless, having survived two previous attempts by some person or people to have the article deleted, it is more than a little unusual that you should take it upon yourself to delete the article without any sort
1999:
There was really no need to be acting as a pronounced clerk, and it would probably be better if you didn't - it could be considered passing a judgement. However, as a normal editor acting not in any form of clerk capacity, I see nothing wrong with your actions. Actually, it's better not to pronounce
564:
Being self deprecating in response to (a), a gibbering idiot is equally capable of sustaining themselves under a barrage of assault. :) Whether it was wise or not...*shrug*. Honestly, I acted too sharply in a number of my posts. Yet, I am uncertain if I would do substantially different if faced with
920:
in which I withdrew because the oppose votes were almost equalling the supporters. I then decided to leave my account (Tellyaddict) and start fresh under a new username, however I quickly decided to reconsider after another user persuaded me not to leave the account - I am now glad I did reconsider
1743:
Wow, very nice :) My apologies for the delay in doing this - per below, and because I wanted to double-check with a couple of my more template-savvy friends whether this will break anything. All I've recieved is positive feedback, so I'm about to go incorporate the changes now. Cheers, and great
1015:" in front of the name when filling in the template. Such drastic measures! Maybe it's better to block all the people whom the system allowed to register such names! We can't ask others to type two extra characters to process them! Or, um, well, um, maybe we should ask just that. 573:
The thanks is sincere. I have had and still have doubts that people will find any measure of satisfaction in having thanks from what could be a gibbering idiot. I'm heartened that you're taking something good from it, because it is sincere even if I am completely off my rocker :)
1003:, and you'll appreciate the painful irony of my wanting to fulminate against the fool who couldn't write a template properly, so that now innocent people might get blocked to protect his inadequate code from breaking. What sort of moral priorities have we set here? 1207:
If "Example" appears as the username because it's entered into the template, it appears normally. If "Example" appears as the username because no name was entered at all, it is italicized. This way there's a hint whether someone really meant to report poor
1769:, in part. I'm awaiting clarification about point 5 in your notes from Luna Santin, in case I need to do anything further. Otherwise, see the history of the four templates to check my changes (which were linked here in an oldid). Cheers, and thanks again, 1142:
how either "User=Billbailey=legend" or "1=Billbailey=legend" will let the template handle the username without breaking. I can keep updating all the username templates I find and have access to edit, but there are some that require the admin bit. So....
1965:
case in the block summary. The case was then incomplete, and later the closing CheckUser (Uninvited Company) passed judgement of "No comment for IPs"; this in essence made a block on the grounds of that CheckUser case (ie the block in question) unfair.
1782:
Yeah, unfortunately I'm not aware of any cleaner solution to the issue. Looks like the two of you have worked this out pretty well. Will see if I can pester a few people, just in case, but I don't anticipate anything more we'll figure out. :) –
765:
Of course you can! At present, however, there is no cases to archive, because they are all done (cases need to be archived not before three days after a checkuser responds to them (unless a checkuser asks otherwise); so, for example,
2295: 1219:, because in the first save the examples will have transcluded the previous version of the template; the changes will not show up in the examples until the second save (when the changed version is on record and can be transcluded). 3030:(as well as that RfAr, where I am the clerk of the case), but I'm out of my account creation tokens (we all get six, at present) for this 24 hours. I can't wait for the new bugzilla patch which gives sysops unlimited... Cheers, 2475: 1006:
In fact, all the templates that process usernames would have the same problem and there's no technical fix for it... but to simply urlencode the name ("Billbailey=legend" → "Billbailey%3Dlegend")... or even more simply, as
382:*sigh* I give up. Thanks for the note, Bishonen - glad to see someone extends such a courtesy these days. I'll defer to your stronger judgement (given mine was purely procedural, RfC number-counting) on this issue. Cheers, 1018:
VectorP, clearly an intelligent and sensible person with whom I'm sure either of us would enjoy having long dinner conversations, also suggested adding a named variable, with some easily remembered name like, say, "User"
261:
Oh yeah, Daniel, massive rewrite. I meant to contact the denizens of the waiting list but I'm already late somewhere. I will later, or you can, or just figure if they reall care (like Anthony) they will already know.
279:. Refer to it as often as possible. Also, if you are unsure what to do in a certain situation, don't just invent a new method; ask an experienced clerk (Thatcher, myself or Luna Santin), or post to the noticeboard. 3090:
Neither of these will have affected most users; the first is just an example, not active code; the second just keeps the "rfcu" link from appearing when an RFCU subpage exists, and most people don't get those. --
198:, as even suggesting I would use my administrator powers to push a POV about a person is extremely uncalled-for. You are correct, however, that if I deleted this article without an AfD discussion that it would 1146:
Would you please look these over, and, if you approve, copy them from edit mode here to edit mode there, making whatever further adjustments you deem necessary? If not, please just let me know. Thanks! --
157:
about a week or so ago.... I assume that you are/were unaware that there were 2 separate "deletion" discussions concerning the Scott Keith article, and on both occassions it was decided near-unanimously to
540:
Thanks - although Thatcher did the rewrite, we as a pair did a lot of discussing via private means as to what we could do to "fix" the process. In the end, Dan made it very easy with his concept model at
2150: 2041:
On an unrelated note - if I wanted to go about finding the historical text of the "hook" from past articles created that were DYKs on the main page, is there a non-tedious way to go about doing that?
2775:
Although there is no time frame specifically, four-or-so days - with that latest comment made just one hour ago - is probably nowhere near enough. Generally, discussions like this would go for
2319: 2182:
Please adjust the majority in the InShaneee case to reflect that SimonP is active again. (It turns out he was never inactive in the first place.) I'm doing the rest of the cases now. Thanks,
104:
Hi, can you resolve this debate before it gets even more serious? I really don't want this to escalate any further since its causing a great deal of stress to all parties involved. Thank You.
2331: 2326: 1204:
The default usernames differ among templates, some having "Example" and others "Example User". As {{Signatures}} uses "Example", I'm taking that as the standard and editing accordingly.
544:
Two minor "issues" with your post: a) your fight, where you came under a barrage from many people (including me, at one stage) took a hell of a lot of courage to do and sustain; and b)
2302: 486: 2314: 1894:
Yeah, thanks for handling those requests! By the way, I was wandering what you thought of the idea of changing the username-is-too-similar-to-existing-account message to point to
2290: 767: 711: 2580:
Of course that's OK - I don't own your DYK nominations, or anything :) Both hooks are great, especially the former for Lottick. Cheers, and keep up the great article-writing,
2230: 731:
Again, my apologies if I was a little too strong, but being a clerk requires stepping a very fine line with word choices, especially when acting in a clerk capacity (ie.
2361: 2307: 814: 331:
I'm sorry to trouble you, I saw the note about you being busy in real life so please get to this whenever time allows. The RfC was deleted by an admin at the request of
1222:
Since the changes installing "User=" haven't been made even once yet, the examples below that feature it will of course look "broken" until their templates are updated.
2124: 1646: 1600: 925:
and that there were no negative feelings caused. Again, thanks for your support even though you opposed and I withdrew it, your vote is much appreciated! Regards -
191: 2132: 504: 2506:
I just got this award, and since you were the impetus that started me on this DYK path, I feel it is only fair to share it with you. Thank you so much! Yours,
2868:
Thanks! I remember I was the first person to add that to a userpage (my own, 10mins after Essjay uploaded it - a benefit of knowing Essjay on IRC prior to his
2643:
A category created by you or to which you have significantly contributed is being considered for deletion, rename, move or merge in accordance with Knowledge's
2417: 1501: 1201:
To keep the "Usage" headers from cluttering your talkpage TOC, I've put colons-and-comments in front of them which need to be deleted once on the template page.
1022:-- and here I have to mutter to myself "for those who have trouble remembering the number 1", but would never be so indiscreet as to go on record saying that -- 955:
templates and their documentation, when some are fully protected and I can't edit them, and I turn to you in the hope you'll once again be kind enough to help.
917: 1929:
I would agree with that. It seems that it has been done during my delay in responding; if it counts for anything, my support is with that proposal :) Cheers,
810: 793: 503:
No, not really. The only time they do is the parties can disagree to have a non-appointed Mediator if one offers to. However, you cannot have a say in which
2391: 614:. Let me know if you can think of any cool facts to pull out of there for a nom. It already got me a barnstar! Tee hee. Hope you're doing well... 2844:*sigh* Some people just have too much time on their hands and malicious intent on their minds. Thanks for notifying me (I didn't see it), and cheers, 2365: 2982:
The above template was just created as a redirect, some of the unblock requests you just denied were six months old. But good calls in any case ;).
2670: 2665: 2567: 1640: 1594: 1535: 1340: 1320: 570:
that it wasn't wasted. But, the higher purpose is the success of the project, regardless of the manner (in this case at least) in which we reach it.
507:
you get; by accepting the mediation with "Agree", you will take whatever formal mediator you get (within respectable limits of recusal, of course).
3074:
Since to handle equal-signs we specified "1=" in the username, we also need to specify "2=" in the next field, near the end of the template proper:
2031:(I think it looks kinda cool, succinct, hehe.) Thanks for all of your help and encouragement on the project, it is as always most appreciated... 166: 2760:. Not sure how long they should go, and I figure a neutral party could help sort things out. Let me know if this process is incorrect. Thanks. -- 237:
Secondly, I was wondering if you have any words of advice to offer? I respect your opinion and I'd love any words of wisdom regarding the above.
848:
You can discuss the preliminary statements (ie. those added whilst the ArbCom were still deciding whether to accept the case) on the talk page.
2540:. There are probably a bunch of different interesting facts that could be pulled out of there, but the best probably is simply something like 874:
the Proposed decision talk page to avoid confusion with the new arbitrators being appointed, but that may not be necessary any more.) Regards,
635:
Lovely - yet another great article for DYK! Unfortunately, as I mentioned before, the picture can't be used as it is a fair use image. Cheers,
2113:
I noticed you were an admin (I've seen you on IRC sometimes). I think you tried several times. Congradulations. How long have you been admin?
921:
because leaving that account and creating a new one was too hasty so I've decided to improve rather than starting again! I hope we can remain
2357: 2353: 2951:
often (namely every week). I have two articles on my watchlist, one userpage (my own), as well as three Knowledge namespace pages. Cheers,
2550: 335:. I noticed you had moved the RfC from my user space to the RfC board, were you also the one who had placed it as an approved RfC? Thanks, 170: 34: 1916:
but that discussion seems to have been abandoned. Do you think it would be a good idea, and if so, what should the message be changed to?
1652: 1606: 2493:, hearby award you with this DYK medal for your plethora of excellent contributions to the Do you know section. Keep up the good work. 227:
time); I've been finding Knowledge a little repetitive of late, and I was glad to see an new opportunity come up in the form of above.
2644: 2273: 1913: 1529: 1281: 672:? I am relatively new to this process, and I thought I was acting in a correct manner in linking the two cases together. Thanks. 1658: 1612: 2756:
Hi. As a member of the mediation committee, I'm hoping you have the expertise to help close/decide/whatever the RFC I started at
2075:
Firstly, sorry for not responding before now - busy with school (it's finally the weekend). Secondly, to answer your questions:-
124: 301: 2517:
No problems! You do all the hard work, really, and I just feed off your brilliant article creations. Thanks again, and cheers,
546:"Thanks from me may no longer mean anything to you. But if it does, consider this a very heartfelt thank you for your actions" 959: 566: 548:- I can't imagine any rational-acting person not considering your thanks to mean anything, and I am certainly humbled by it. 1977: 1705: 1474: 1255: 3067:
The last line before {{Signatures}} needs to end in a double-bracket }} rather than a single bracket, so just adding one
3016: 2983: 2348: 1909: 1634: 1588: 1541: 1438: 1424: 1334: 1314: 799:
Looks like several statements, including mine, were removed from this arbitration case? I assume this was accidental? -
90: 80: 2829: 2229: 97: 2446: 1873:; tagged as a blocked sockpuppet. I've unprotected the user page since the warring will now stop due to the block. 692:, but you have to be really careful about you say, and what you infer. Although the main space doesn't like them, 648:
Oh, the pic isn't a problem, just that it makes the article a little more dynamic looking when they get there...
120: 3104: 1547: 1160: 2927:
Actually it just so happened I clicked my watchlist and this came up first. I never clear ye olde watchlist.----
2081:
b) Unfortunately, I don't know of any easy way to look for the historical hooks other than the way you did it :(
754:
Can I at least help in some capacity? Like, for example, archiving old cases? I want to be of help. Really.
174: 48: 21: 2000:
yourself a clerk outside of RFCU, really; clerks aren't meant to be spokespeople for the checkusers. Cheers,
1178:
These all terminate just above the {{Signatures}} line, so as to include the updated documentation... except
1629: 1583: 1434: 1420: 1330: 1310: 963: 715: 688:, was inferring that it was retaliatory (by using the language "is in response"). My apologies if it seemed 2416: 1189: 1000: 118: 2445:. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 678: 2945:"You have 6 pages on your watchlist (excluding talk pages); you can display and edit the complete list." 2423: 2052: 2051:
If there's no easy answer to that second question, no worries, I'm going to sift through the history at
1944: 1793: 1719: 1523: 1488: 1391: 1275: 930: 263: 839:
I don't get that at all. Where are editors supposed to discuss the statements, if not on the talk page?
2797: 2765: 714:; see the list of confirmed users at the bottom. Further comments that may also be applicable are at 107: 2066: 2056: 2042: 2032: 649: 626: 615: 2154: 2114: 1920: 1853: 1849: 950: 3134: 3032: 3000: 2953: 2916: 2874: 2846: 2808: 2781: 2725: 2697: 2624: 2582: 2519: 2371: 2205: 2165: 2137: 2088: 2002: 1931: 1875: 1817: 1771: 1746: 1680: 1182: 1132: 993: 886: 850: 819: 776: 771: 743: 735: 720: 637: 589: 553: 509: 442: 384: 361: 316: 281: 276: 204: 154: 147: 134: 2078:
a) I now know that "this user" has reformatted their userpage, and I must say it's very cool! :)
59: 2933: 2901: 1699: 1470: 1371: 1249: 2467:...on the Do you know section, and I think you deserve a long overdue medal for your duties. 817:. This is the current practice, as approved by the Arbitration Committee, for cases. Cheers, 2973: 2757: 2750: 2613: 2606: 2602: 2455: 2183: 1984: 1970: 1903: 1841: 1785: 1518: 1387: 1271: 926: 875: 840: 693: 481:
2. Are you guaranteed to be the WWII mediator or is there a chance it will be someone else?
332: 246: 70: 44: 17: 2872:), and I am glad to see some other users agree with the message. Thanks again, and cheers, 1954:
time); hope you're well. I'd appreciate your advice regarding the above post, concerning a
947:
Daniel, I'm becoming a gibbering idiot myself by now, dealing with a needed upgrade to the
526:
Thatcher informed me that you were part and parcel of the recent changes there. Therefore,
230:
First let me congratulate you on depreciating the standby list, etc.. - it was rather anti-
47:. No further edits should be made to this page. For a list of archives for this user, see 2793: 2761: 2737: 2714: 1980:
if you wish to give a response without passing negative comments about other Wikipedians.
1122: 1112: 1102: 983: 970: 922: 493:
3. Do parties interested in joining a mediation have any say in who the mediator will be?
2397:. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. 3057: 2859: 2834: 2375: 1962: 1955: 1453: 1355: 1092: 1082: 1072: 1062: 1052: 1042: 1032: 689: 412: 336: 305: 217: 3011:
Yeah I was watching how quickly new unblock requests were being reviewed after making
3027: 2675: 2437: 2128: 2020: 1895: 1888: 1233: 611: 357: 195: 2929: 2897: 2758:
Talk:Cow_tipping#Request_for_Comment:_Inclusion_of_image_of_cow_.26_related_caption
2647: 2544: 2537: 1690: 1463: 1365: 1243: 1209: 1008: 962:, the proposal's been made to forbid usernames that have equal signs in them, like 831: 800: 703: 3140: 3111: 3038: 3006: 2959: 2939: 2922: 2907: 2880: 2863: 2852: 2838: 2814: 2801: 2787: 2769: 2740: 2731: 2717: 2703: 2678: 2630: 2616: 2588: 2574: 2559: 2525: 2510: 2497: 2458: 2401: 2211: 2186: 2171: 2157: 2143: 2117: 2094: 2069: 2059: 2045: 2035: 2008: 1993: 1937: 1923: 1881: 1856: 1823: 1798: 1777: 1752: 1167: 934: 892: 878: 856: 843: 834: 825: 803: 782: 760: 749: 652: 643: 629: 618: 595: 578: 559: 534: 515: 497: 448: 415: 390: 364: 339: 322: 308: 287: 266: 255: 210: 178: 140: 126: 2570:. Please let me know if you think the "hooks" are okay. Thanks for your time. 999:, and that (not counting your toning down the blue or Quarl's adding a tt class) 2913:
Who's stalking my edits :) Cheers - it's the first time it's been blank in : -->
2610: 2398: 2123:
Thank you :) I have been an administrator since January 30, 2007 as a result of
1899: 755: 673: 1969:
I took it upon myself to say "this isn't right" and requested unblocking; as a
477:
A private matter which has now been sorted; explaining it will achieve nothing.
575: 531: 494: 2571: 2556: 2507: 2494: 2490: 2442: 2024: 1914:
Knowledge talk:Request an account#Usernames too similar to existing accounts
770:
will be archived tomorrow , which is three days after March 8). Please read
2895:
your talk page aint blank anymore! (in reference to your edit summary).----
69:. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any comments to the 3053:
Daniel, sorry to bother you again so soon. Just two tiny things needed in
907: 3092: 2609:). Once it does, we shouldn't hit the 6 accounts per IP limit anymore. 2441:, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the 2428: 2263: 2019:... that this user has re-formatted the user's userpage to look like the 1917: 1148: 2779:
five days, or until all possible discussion has been exhausted. Cheers,
2713:
The trainwreck has already happened. I'm just admiring the damage. ,)
2474: 2149:
Oh and because of your name, I think you should be the admin to close
884:
I should have caught it, as well; fixed. Thanks for the note. Cheers,
774:
thorougly - a couple of times, at least - before you dive in, though.
190:, there was a discussion to delete it, which resulted in "delete", at 2661:
in the category will be deleted. They may, however, be recategorized.
684:
Saying a check was "in response" to another, and suggesting that the
2857:
No worries, was only a couple hours before I saw and reverted it :)
1480: 551:
Thanks for also notifying those on the old "Standby list". Cheers,
2390:
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the
2203:. You probably could have done that yourself, you know :) Cheers, 132:
OK, glad to hear it was reolved, and sorry for the delayed reply.
2549:
suicide was profiled in the award-winning TIME Magazine article:
2432: 2266: 1025:
and I'm taking all these excellent ideas and running with them.
1001:
its last big revision came from the fevered brain of yours truly
275:
Durin notified them. My words of advice form a simple shortcut:
231: 2832:
what some cheeky bugger did to your (and others') user page(s)
2151:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Daniel Brandt (13th nomination)
1961:
Basically, an administrator blocked too IP addresses, citing a
3015:
in and RfAr. Darn it if someone was acting promptly today ;).
1951: 224: 1215:
Each template with examples will need to be edited and saved
2286: 2228: 2566:
Hope it's okay, I decided to do a self nom, in addition to
2338: 2248: 2224: 625:
Okay, now it also has a handy dandy image, screenshot.
300:
I'd like to thank you for taking time to comment on the
3129: 3012: 2995: 2723:
I'm not going to have Knowledge put up with that crap.
1845: 1725: 1711: 1664: 1618: 1553: 1494: 1194: 669: 527: 470: 187: 108: 3093: 1149: 353: 2622:
Yeah, it gets slightly annoying as it is at present.
2296:
Essay tries to clarify misconceptions about Knowledge
2303:
Blog aggregator launched for Wikimedia-related posts
1561:
Names with (or without) equal signs can be given as
1398:
Names with (or without) equal signs can be given as
1288:
Names with (or without) equal signs can be given as
768:
Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Afrika paprika
712:
Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pens withdrawn
583:
Many of Knowledge's greatest essays were written by
202:; however, in this instance, this was not the case. 2736:I was gonna share my popcorn with you, too. *sigh* 966:, because the equal sign "breaks templates such as 699:If I was in the same situation, I would have said: 2125:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Daniel.Bryant 2 1138:to incorporate the variable "User" and document 2605:gets applied to en.wp soon (we're currently on 200:"run contrary to ... official wikipedia policy" 192:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Scott Keith (2) 2133:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Daniel.Bryant 1475: 2291:Report of diploma mill offering pay for edits 943:Templates handling usernames with equal signs 8: 2663:Please share your thoughts on the matter at 2327:Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 794:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/InShaneee 234:spirit, and I'm glad to see the back of it. 33:The following discussion is preserved as an 2998:. Thanks for the note anyways, and cheers, 2996:this decline at 12:16, March 16, 2007 (UTC) 1481: 2536:Let me know what you think of the article 2411: 2315:News and notes: Wikimania 2007, milestones 1489: 718:, which pertain to this relation. Cheers, 696:are your best friend when you are a clerk. 302:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Justanother 54: 1495: 489:, there is a very good chance it will be. 2568:Gandhi Memorial International Foundation 2280: 1815:in leui of Luna's "pestering". Cheers, 530:equally applies to you. Nicely done! -- 153:I noticed that you deleted the article 3083:&#32;• rfcu|cond=n}}</span: --> 2472: 2131:/3/3. I tried twice (the other was at 1844:(since you protected it). He has been 960:talk page of Knowledge:Username policy 43:Subsequent comments should be made on 1840:Could please do the relevant edit on 1691: 411:Thanks anyway, sorry to trouble you. 304:, I really appreciate your input. :) 7: 2551:The Thriving Cult of Greed and Power 815:talk page of the arbitration request 813:to the proceedings are moved to the 663: 487:an appointed member of the Committee 1011:already suggested there, to put a " 2645:Categories for Discussion policies 2308:WikiWorld comic: "Cartoon Physics" 28: 3071:at the end will fix that example. 3117: 2684: 2473: 2415: 2332:The Report on Lengthy Litigation 2192: 1862: 1804: 1758: 1626:{{User5|User=Billbailey=legend}} 1431:{{User0|User=Billbailey=legend}} 906: 809:Comments from users who are not 702: 58: 2994:I figured as such, as noted in 1945:User talk:Anthony cfc#Checkuser 1327:{{User|User=Billbailey=legend}} 98:User talk:Rajkumar Kanagasingam 2914:7 days, due to my busy-ness - 2671:User categories for discussion 1726: 1712: 1: 3017: 2984: 2601:I'm crossing my fingers that 2221:updated for March 12th, 2007. 1580:{{User5|1=Billbailey=legend}} 1417:{{User0|1=Billbailey=legend}} 2637:User Category for Discussion 2261: 1307:{{User|1=Billbailey=legend}} 686:"nature of this check user " 664:I don't understand this edit 3023:12:29, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2990:12:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2463:I noticed your good work... 2369: 2271: 710:This request is related to 567:essentially immolate myself 485:Basically, yes; given I am 465:Some questions re:mediation 352:Hi, Daniel, please compare 296:Thank you for participating 3160: 3141:21:46, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 3112:21:00, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 3039:12:31, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 3007:12:22, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2960:09:22, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2940:09:21, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2923:09:18, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2908:09:17, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2881:08:28, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2864:08:26, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2853:08:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2839:08:22, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2815:07:54, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2802:06:14, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2788:05:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2770:05:49, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2741:03:32, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2732:03:30, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2718:03:28, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2704:08:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2679:21:54, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 2631:03:57, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2617:20:46, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 2589:08:16, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2575:21:35, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 2560:08:49, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 2555:Keep me posted ... Yours, 2526:08:15, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2511:21:42, 13 March 2007 (UTC) 2498:21:42, 13 March 2007 (UTC) 2459:13:11, 13 March 2007 (UTC) 2435:, a fact from the article 2402:05:14, 13 March 2007 (UTC) 2346: 2256: 2212:07:15, 13 March 2007 (UTC) 2187:16:34, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 2172:08:14, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2158:20:17, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 2144:08:14, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2118:20:17, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 2095:07:57, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 2070:03:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 2060:22:11, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 2046:22:02, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 2036:19:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 2009:05:32, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 1994:16:36, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 1973:, was this inappropriate? 1938:05:26, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 1924:14:17, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 1882:05:25, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 1857:13:02, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 1824:08:56, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 1799:08:23, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 1778:08:13, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 1753:08:01, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 1195:and I've already edited it 1168:13:01, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 935:20:01, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 893:09:31, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 879:16:19, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 857:09:32, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 844:06:35, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 835:04:53, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 826:01:46, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 804:01:44, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 783:01:52, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 761:01:47, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 750:01:30, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 726:01:30, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 679:01:25, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 653:02:12, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 644:01:05, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 596:01:01, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 449:08:14, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 416:22:28, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 391:11:19, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 365:12:48, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 340:04:42, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 323:01:00, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 288:00:54, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 2709:Oh foo. What fun are you? 2479: 2447:"Did you know?" talk page 2382: 2341: 2330: 2325: 2318: 2313: 2306: 2301: 2294: 2289: 2251: 2086:Cheers, and sorry again, 1898:? I've discussed it with 1020: 630:18:00, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 619:16:54, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 579:22:38, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 560:22:03, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 535:15:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 516:21:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 498:13:18, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 314:No problems - see above. 309:02:30, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 267:00:55, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 256:00:48, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 211:10:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 179:10:45, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 141:22:07, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 127:09:38, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 1803:Yep, thanks Luna. Fully 916:for your comments on my 49:User talk:Daniel/Archive 40:Please do not modify it. 2135:, on August 12, 2006). 1140:on each template's page 716:User talk:Fear the Fire 2947:I clear mine probably 2234: 2233:The Knowledge Signpost 964:User:Billbailey=legend 728: 2666:this category's entry 2657:mean that any of the 2232: 2163:No thanks :) Cheers, 2053:Template:Did you know 1515:{{User5|Jimbo Wales}} 1384:{{User0|Jimbo Wales}} 700: 194:. Please remember to 169:comment was added by 2532:New DYK potential... 1848:as a sock-puppet of 1846:blocked indefinitely 1268:{{User|Jimbo Wales}} 1028:So far I've updated 3084:)<noinclude: --> 2320:Features and admins 1850:User:Afrika paprika 670:offering an opinion 606:New article created 3132:is there. Cheers, 3049:User5 ...sorry... 2542:Did you know that 2274:About the Signpost 2258:Volume 3, Issue 11 2235: 2127:, which closed at 585:"gibbering idiots" 94: 3110: 3026:Normally I haunt 2938: 2906: 2504: 2503: 2453: 2452: 2404: 2387: 2386: 2378: 2337: 2336: 2285: 2284: 2244: 2243: 1630:Billbailey=legend 1584:Billbailey=legend 1435:Billbailey=legend 1421:Billbailey=legend 1331:Billbailey=legend 1311:Billbailey=legend 1254: 1166: 940: 939: 668:Why is this edit 522:Changes at RFCU/C 196:assume good faith 182: 122: 78: 77: 76: 71:current talk page 3151: 3137: 3124: 3121: 3120: 3101: 3099: 3062: 3056: 3035: 3021: 3003: 2988: 2978: 2972: 2956: 2928: 2919: 2896: 2877: 2849: 2811: 2784: 2751:Talk:Cow tipping 2728: 2700: 2691: 2688: 2687: 2627: 2597:Account creation 2585: 2522: 2477: 2470: 2469: 2427:was updated. On 2419: 2412: 2389: 2370: 2366:Single-Page View 2339: 2287: 2249: 2240: 2225: 2208: 2199: 2196: 2195: 2168: 2140: 2091: 2005: 1992: 1990: 1987: 1934: 1878: 1869: 1866: 1865: 1820: 1811: 1808: 1807: 1797: 1790: 1774: 1765: 1762: 1761: 1749: 1730: 1728: 1714: 1685: 1679: 1668: 1647:deleted contribs 1622: 1601:deleted contribs 1557: 1536:deleted contribs 1516: 1504: 1499: 1498: 1491: 1485: 1484: 1477: 1458: 1452: 1385: 1360: 1354: 1269: 1252: 1238: 1232: 1197: 1187: 1181: 1157: 1155: 1137: 1131: 1127: 1121: 1117: 1111: 1107: 1101: 1097: 1091: 1087: 1081: 1077: 1071: 1067: 1061: 1057: 1051: 1047: 1041: 1037: 1031: 1024: 998: 992: 988: 982: 979:Now recall that 975: 969: 910: 903: 902: 889: 853: 822: 779: 746: 740: 734: 723: 706: 640: 592: 556: 512: 445: 387: 333:User:Justanother 319: 284: 254: 252: 249: 207: 188:deletion summary 186:As noted in the 164: 137: 121: 116: 65:This page is an 62: 55: 45:User talk:Daniel 42: 18:User talk:Daniel 3159: 3158: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3146: 3135: 3122: 3118: 3109: 3060: 3054: 3051: 3033: 3001: 2980: 2976: 2970: 2954: 2936: 2917: 2904: 2893: 2875: 2847: 2827: 2809: 2782: 2754: 2726: 2711: 2698: 2689: 2685: 2682: 2639: 2625: 2599: 2583: 2534: 2520: 2465: 2410: 2238:Weekly Delivery 2236: 2223: 2206: 2197: 2193: 2180: 2166: 2138: 2111: 2089: 2023:section of the 2021:Did you know... 2017: 2015:Did you know... 2003: 1988: 1985: 1983: 1948: 1932: 1892: 1876: 1867: 1863: 1838: 1818: 1809: 1805: 1786: 1784: 1772: 1763: 1759: 1747: 1739: 1698: 1687: 1683: 1677: 1632: 1586: 1521: 1514: 1496: 1482: 1469: 1460: 1456: 1450: 1383: 1362: 1358: 1352: 1267: 1240: 1236: 1230: 1193: 1185: 1179: 1165: 1135: 1129: 1125: 1119: 1115: 1109: 1105: 1099: 1095: 1089: 1085: 1079: 1075: 1069: 1065: 1059: 1055: 1049: 1045: 1039: 1035: 1029: 1009:VectorPotential 996: 990: 989:is an alias of 986: 980: 973: 967: 945: 901: 887: 871: 851: 820: 797: 777: 744: 738: 732: 721: 666: 638: 608: 590: 554: 524: 510: 467: 443: 385: 354:this ANI thread 317: 298: 282: 250: 247: 245: 221: 205: 165:—The preceding 151: 135: 101: 38: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 3157: 3155: 3145: 3144: 3143: 3103: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3075: 3072: 3050: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3044: 3043: 3042: 3041: 2979: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2932: 2900: 2892: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2826: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2753: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2710: 2707: 2674: 2662: 2640: 2638: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2598: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2533: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2502: 2501: 2486: 2485: 2480: 2478: 2464: 2461: 2451: 2450: 2420: 2409: 2406: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2380: 2379: 2368: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2335: 2334: 2329: 2323: 2322: 2317: 2311: 2310: 2305: 2299: 2298: 2293: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2278: 2277: 2270: 2260: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2246: 2242: 2241: 2222: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2179: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2155:SakotGrimshine 2147: 2146: 2115:SakotGrimshine 2110: 2109:hi / adminship 2107: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2079: 2016: 2013: 2012: 2011: 1950:Good evening ( 1947: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1891: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1854:PaxEquilibrium 1837: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1735: 1734: 1695: 1675: 1672: 1670: 1669: 1627: 1623: 1581: 1559: 1558: 1511: 1510: 1448: 1445: 1443: 1442: 1432: 1428: 1418: 1396: 1395: 1380: 1379: 1350: 1347: 1345: 1344: 1328: 1324: 1308: 1286: 1285: 1264: 1263: 1228: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1220: 1213: 1205: 1202: 1199: 1159: 944: 941: 938: 937: 911: 900: 897: 896: 895: 870: 869:InShaneee RfAr 867: 866: 865: 864: 863: 862: 861: 860: 859: 830:OK, thanks. - 796: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 729: 697: 665: 662: 661: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 607: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 571: 549: 542: 528:this thank you 523: 520: 519: 518: 491: 490: 479: 478: 466: 463: 462: 461: 460: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 452: 451: 427: 426: 425: 424: 423: 422: 421: 420: 419: 418: 400: 399: 398: 397: 396: 395: 394: 393: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 368: 345: 344: 343: 342: 326: 325: 297: 294: 293: 292: 291: 290: 270: 269: 244: 223:Good evening ( 220: 215: 214: 213: 171:155.232.128.10 150: 145: 144: 143: 100: 95: 75: 74: 63: 53: 52: 30: 29: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3156: 3142: 3139: 3138: 3136:Daniel Bryant 3131: 3127: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3113: 3108: 3107: 3100: 3098: 3097: 3088: 3082: 3081: 3076: 3073: 3070: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3059: 3048: 3040: 3037: 3036: 3034:Daniel Bryant 3029: 3025: 3024: 3022: 3020: 3014: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3005: 3004: 3002:Daniel Bryant 2997: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2989: 2987: 2975: 2969: 2961: 2958: 2957: 2955:Daniel Bryant 2950: 2946: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2935: 2931: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2921: 2920: 2918:Daniel Bryant 2912: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2903: 2899: 2890: 2882: 2879: 2878: 2876:Daniel Bryant 2871: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2862: 2861: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2851: 2850: 2848:Daniel Bryant 2843: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2837: 2836: 2831: 2824: 2816: 2813: 2812: 2810:Daniel Bryant 2806:No problems. 2805: 2804: 2803: 2799: 2795: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2786: 2785: 2783:Daniel Bryant 2778: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2759: 2752: 2748: 2742: 2739: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2730: 2729: 2727:Daniel Bryant 2722: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2716: 2708: 2706: 2705: 2702: 2701: 2699:Daniel Bryant 2694: 2681: 2680: 2677: 2672: 2668: 2667: 2660: 2656: 2655: 2650: 2649: 2646: 2636: 2632: 2629: 2628: 2626:Daniel Bryant 2621: 2620: 2619: 2618: 2615: 2612: 2608: 2604: 2596: 2590: 2587: 2586: 2584:Daniel Bryant 2579: 2578: 2576: 2573: 2569: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2561: 2558: 2554: 2552: 2548: 2546: 2539: 2531: 2527: 2524: 2523: 2521:Daniel Bryant 2516: 2515: 2514: 2512: 2509: 2499: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2487: 2484: 2483:The DYK Medal 2481: 2476: 2471: 2468: 2462: 2460: 2457: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2439: 2438:Scieno Sitter 2434: 2430: 2426: 2425: 2424:Did you know? 2421: 2418: 2414: 2413: 2407: 2405: 2403: 2400: 2396: 2394: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2367: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2350: 2345: 2340: 2333: 2328: 2324: 2321: 2316: 2312: 2309: 2304: 2300: 2297: 2292: 2288: 2279: 2276: 2275: 2269: 2268: 2265: 2259: 2255: 2250: 2247: 2239: 2231: 2227: 2226: 2220: 2217: 2213: 2210: 2209: 2207:Daniel Bryant 2202: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2185: 2177: 2173: 2170: 2169: 2167:Daniel Bryant 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2156: 2152: 2145: 2142: 2141: 2139:Daniel Bryant 2134: 2130: 2126: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2116: 2108: 2096: 2093: 2092: 2090:Daniel Bryant 2085: 2080: 2077: 2076: 2074: 2073: 2071: 2068: 2064: 2063: 2061: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2049: 2047: 2044: 2040: 2039: 2037: 2034: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2026: 2022: 2014: 2010: 2007: 2006: 2004:Daniel Bryant 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1991: 1981: 1979: 1976:Feel free to 1974: 1972: 1967: 1964: 1959: 1957: 1953: 1946: 1943: 1939: 1936: 1935: 1933:Daniel Bryant 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1922: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1908: 1905: 1901: 1897: 1890: 1887: 1883: 1880: 1879: 1877:Daniel Bryant 1872: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1842:his user page 1835: 1825: 1822: 1821: 1819:Daniel Bryant 1814: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1795: 1791: 1789: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1776: 1775: 1773:Daniel Bryant 1768: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1751: 1750: 1748:Daniel Bryant 1742: 1741: 1740: 1738: 1732: 1729: 1724: 1721: 1718: 1715: 1710: 1707: 1704: 1701: 1696: 1694: 1688: 1686: 1682: 1673: 1666: 1663: 1660: 1657: 1654: 1651: 1648: 1645: 1642: 1639: 1636: 1631: 1625: 1624: 1620: 1617: 1614: 1611: 1608: 1605: 1602: 1599: 1596: 1593: 1590: 1585: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1574: 1571: 1567: 1564: 1555: 1552: 1549: 1546: 1543: 1540: 1537: 1534: 1531: 1528: 1525: 1520: 1513: 1512: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1503: 1500: 1492: 1486: 1478: 1472: 1467: 1466: 1461: 1459: 1455: 1446: 1440: 1436: 1430: 1429: 1426: 1422: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1411: 1408: 1404: 1401: 1393: 1389: 1382: 1381: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1373: 1369: 1368: 1363: 1361: 1357: 1348: 1342: 1339: 1336: 1332: 1326: 1325: 1322: 1319: 1316: 1312: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1301: 1298: 1294: 1291: 1283: 1280: 1277: 1273: 1266: 1265: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1257: 1251: 1247: 1246: 1241: 1239: 1235: 1221: 1218: 1214: 1211: 1206: 1203: 1200: 1196: 1192:is separate ( 1191: 1190:documentation 1184: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1164: 1163: 1156: 1154: 1153: 1144: 1141: 1134: 1124: 1114: 1104: 1094: 1084: 1074: 1064: 1054: 1044: 1034: 1026: 1023: 1016: 1014: 1010: 1004: 1002: 995: 985: 977: 972: 965: 961: 956: 954: 952: 942: 936: 932: 928: 924: 919: 918:my recent RfA 915: 912: 909: 905: 904: 898: 894: 891: 890: 888:Daniel Bryant 883: 882: 881: 880: 877: 868: 858: 855: 854: 852:Daniel Bryant 847: 846: 845: 842: 838: 837: 836: 833: 829: 828: 827: 824: 823: 821:Daniel Bryant 816: 812: 808: 807: 806: 805: 802: 795: 792: 784: 781: 780: 778:Daniel Bryant 773: 769: 764: 763: 762: 759: 758: 753: 752: 751: 748: 747: 745:Daniel Bryant 737: 730: 727: 725: 724: 722:Daniel Bryant 717: 713: 709: 705: 698: 695: 691: 687: 683: 682: 681: 680: 677: 676: 671: 654: 651: 647: 646: 645: 642: 641: 639:Daniel Bryant 634: 633: 631: 628: 624: 623: 622: 620: 617: 613: 612:Scieno Sitter 605: 597: 594: 593: 591:Daniel Bryant 586: 582: 581: 580: 577: 572: 568: 563: 562: 561: 558: 557: 555:Daniel Bryant 550: 547: 543: 539: 538: 537: 536: 533: 529: 521: 517: 514: 513: 511:Daniel Bryant 506: 502: 501: 500: 499: 496: 488: 484: 483: 482: 476: 475: 474: 472: 464: 450: 447: 446: 444:Daniel Bryant 440:No problems. 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 433: 432: 431: 430: 429: 428: 417: 414: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 403: 402: 401: 392: 389: 388: 386:Daniel Bryant 381: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 366: 363: 359: 355: 351: 350: 349: 348: 347: 346: 341: 338: 334: 330: 329: 328: 327: 324: 321: 320: 318:Daniel Bryant 313: 312: 311: 310: 307: 303: 295: 289: 286: 285: 283:Daniel Bryant 278: 274: 273: 272: 271: 268: 265: 260: 259: 258: 257: 253: 242: 238: 235: 233: 228: 226: 219: 216: 212: 209: 208: 206:Daniel Bryant 201: 197: 193: 189: 185: 184: 183: 180: 176: 172: 168: 161: 156: 149: 146: 142: 139: 138: 136:Daniel Bryant 131: 130: 129: 128: 125: 123: 119: 117: 115: 114: 113: 105: 99: 96: 92: 89: 85: 82: 72: 68: 64: 61: 57: 56: 50: 46: 41: 36: 32: 31: 23: 19: 3133: 3125: 3105: 3095: 3094: 3089: 3079: 3078: 3068: 3052: 3031: 3018: 3013:this comment 2999: 2985: 2981: 2952: 2948: 2944: 2915: 2894: 2873: 2869: 2858: 2845: 2833: 2828: 2807: 2780: 2776: 2755: 2724: 2712: 2696: 2692: 2683: 2664: 2658: 2653: 2652: 2642: 2641: 2623: 2600: 2581: 2545:Noah Lottick 2543: 2541: 2538:Noah Lottick 2535: 2518: 2505: 2482: 2466: 2436: 2422: 2392: 2388: 2347: 2272: 2262: 2257: 2245: 2237: 2218: 2204: 2200: 2181: 2164: 2148: 2136: 2112: 2087: 2018: 2001: 1982: 1975: 1968: 1960: 1949: 1930: 1906: 1893: 1874: 1870: 1852:. Thanks. -- 1839: 1816: 1812: 1787: 1770: 1766: 1745: 1736: 1733: 1722: 1716: 1708: 1702: 1692: 1689: 1676: 1674: 1671: 1661: 1655: 1649: 1643: 1637: 1615: 1609: 1603: 1597: 1591: 1572: 1569: 1565: 1562: 1560: 1550: 1544: 1538: 1532: 1526: 1464: 1462: 1449: 1447: 1444: 1409: 1406: 1402: 1399: 1397: 1366: 1364: 1351: 1349: 1346: 1337: 1317: 1299: 1296: 1292: 1289: 1287: 1278: 1244: 1242: 1229: 1227: 1216: 1210:User:Example 1173: 1161: 1151: 1150: 1145: 1139: 1027: 1021: 1017: 1012: 1005: 978: 957: 948: 946: 913: 885: 872: 849: 818: 798: 775: 756: 742: 719: 707: 701: 694:weasel words 685: 674: 667: 636: 609: 588: 584: 552: 545: 525: 508: 492: 480: 468: 441: 383: 315: 299: 280: 241:Kind regards 240: 239: 236: 229: 222: 203: 199: 159: 152: 133: 111: 110: 109: 103: 102: 87: 83: 66: 39: 3019:NoSeptember 2986:NoSeptember 2891:not anymore 2456:Carabinieri 2184:Newyorkbrad 2055:anyway... 1836:Tar-Elenion 1788:Luna Santin 1737:end of list 1519:Jimbo Wales 1509:== Usage == 1388:Jimbo Wales 1378:== Usage == 1272:Jimbo Wales 1262:== Usage == 927:Tellyaddict 876:Newyorkbrad 841:Proabivouac 772:WP:RFCU/C/P 741:). Cheers, 708:Clerk note: 587::) Cheers, 505:MC mediator 277:WP:RFCU/C/P 264:Thatcher131 155:Scott Keith 148:Scott Keith 86:Archive 28 2794:ZimZalaBim 2792:Thanks. -- 2762:ZimZalaBim 2738:HalfShadow 2715:HalfShadow 2695:, CSD G7. 2651:This does 1720:block user 1659:block user 1653:page moves 1613:block user 1607:page moves 1548:block user 1542:page moves 1490:block user 1483:page moves 469:1. What's 106:Resolved-- 91:Archive 29 81:Archive 27 2830:Check out 2825:Vandalism 2659:userpages 2443:Main Page 2025:Main Page 1727:block log 1681:userlinks 1665:block log 1619:block log 1554:block log 1497:block log 1183:userlinks 1133:Usercheck 994:userlinks 914:Thank you 736:clerknote 413:Anynobody 337:Anynobody 306:Anynobody 2870:depature 2777:at least 2676:VegaDark 2429:13 March 2395:spamlist 2393:Signpost 2372:Shortcut 2362:Tip Line 2358:Newsroom 2354:Archives 2264:12 March 2219:Signpost 1978:email me 1910:contribs 1706:contribs 1641:contribs 1595:contribs 1573:Username 1566:Username 1530:contribs 1476:contribs 1410:Username 1403:Username 1341:contribs 1321:contribs 1300:Username 1293:Username 1282:contribs 1256:contribs 1188:, whose 358:Bishonen 167:unsigned 20:‎ | 2974:UNBLOCK 2930:Hamedog 2898:Hamedog 2749:RFC at 2669:on the 2376:WP:POST 2065:Done. 1986:anthony 1963:WP:RFCU 1956:WP:RFCU 1744:work!, 1693:Example 1465:Example 1367:Example 1245:Example 958:On the 832:Merzbow 811:parties 801:Merzbow 473:about? 248:anthony 218:WP:RFCU 67:archive 35:archive 22:Archive 3128:both. 3028:WP:ACC 2673:page. 2611:Ral315 2607:r20145 2603:r20158 2399:Ralbot 1958:case. 1921:(Talk) 1900:Ral315 1896:WP:ACC 1889:WP:ACC 1502:• rfcu 1174:Notes: 1128:, and 1123:User12 1113:User11 1103:User10 984:vandal 971:vandal 951:user__ 899:My RfA 757:Real96 675:Real96 3058:User5 1971:clerk 1912:) at 1570:User= 1454:user5 1407:User= 1356:user0 1297:User= 1217:twice 1093:User9 1083:User8 1073:User7 1063:User6 1053:User4 1043:User3 1033:User2 923:civil 690:bitey 576:Durin 532:Durin 495:Haber 16:< 3130:Edit 3126:Done 3106:HIST 2934:Talk 2902:Talk 2860:Glen 2835:Glen 2798:talk 2766:talk 2693:Done 2572:Smee 2557:Smee 2508:Smee 2495:Smee 2491:Smee 2433:2007 2349:Home 2267:2007 2201:Done 2178:RfAr 2067:Smee 2057:Smee 2043:Smee 2033:Smee 2027:? 1904:talk 1871:Done 1813:Done 1794:talk 1767:Done 1757:OK, 1713:logs 1700:talk 1635:talk 1589:talk 1524:talk 1471:talk 1439:talk 1425:talk 1392:talk 1372:talk 1335:talk 1315:talk 1276:talk 1250:talk 1234:user 1162:HIST 931:Talk 650:Smee 627:Smee 616:Smee 541:CHU. 471:this 362:talk 232:Wiki 175:talk 160:keep 3096:Ben 2949:too 2654:not 2489:I, 2408:DYK 2364:| 2360:| 2356:| 2352:| 2129:233 1989:cfc 1952:GMT 1918:Tra 1568:or 1505:) 1405:or 1295:or 1152:Ben 976:". 610:At 251:cfc 225:GMT 3080:2= 3063:: 3061:}} 3055:{{ 2977:}} 2971:{{ 2800:) 2768:) 2577:. 2562:. 2547:'s 2513:. 2500:. 2454:-- 2449:. 2431:, 2374:: 2153:. 2072:. 2062:. 2048:. 2038:. 1731:) 1684:}} 1678:{{ 1628:→ 1582:→ 1575:: 1563:1= 1517:→ 1493:• 1487:• 1479:• 1473:• 1457:}} 1451:{{ 1433:→ 1419:→ 1412:: 1400:1= 1386:→ 1374:) 1359:}} 1353:{{ 1329:→ 1309:→ 1302:: 1290:1= 1270:→ 1258:) 1237:}} 1231:{{ 1198:). 1186:}} 1180:{{ 1136:}} 1130:{{ 1126:}} 1120:{{ 1118:, 1116:}} 1110:{{ 1108:, 1106:}} 1100:{{ 1098:, 1096:}} 1090:{{ 1088:, 1086:}} 1080:{{ 1078:, 1076:}} 1070:{{ 1068:, 1066:}} 1060:{{ 1058:, 1056:}} 1050:{{ 1048:, 1046:}} 1040:{{ 1038:, 1036:}} 1030:{{ 1013:1= 997:}} 991:{{ 987:}} 981:{{ 974:}} 968:{{ 953:}} 949:{{ 933:) 739:}} 733:{{ 632:. 621:. 574:-- 360:| 356:. 177:) 112:KZ 79:← 73:. 37:. 3123:Y 3102:/ 3077:| 3069:} 2937:| 2905:| 2796:( 2764:( 2690:Y 2648:. 2614:» 2553:? 2198:Y 1907:· 1902:( 1868:Y 1810:Y 1796:) 1792:( 1764:Y 1723:· 1717:· 1709:· 1703:· 1697:( 1667:) 1662:· 1656:· 1650:· 1644:· 1638:· 1633:( 1621:) 1616:· 1610:· 1604:· 1598:· 1592:· 1587:( 1556:) 1551:· 1545:· 1539:· 1533:· 1527:· 1522:( 1468:( 1441:) 1437:( 1427:) 1423:( 1394:) 1390:( 1370:( 1343:) 1338:· 1333:( 1323:) 1318:· 1313:( 1284:) 1279:· 1274:( 1253:• 1248:( 1212:. 1158:/ 929:( 655:. 367:. 243:, 181:. 173:( 158:' 93:→ 88:· 84:· 51:.

Index

User talk:Daniel
Archive
archive
User talk:Daniel
User talk:Daniel/Archive
Archive
current talk page
Archive 27
Archive 29
User talk:Rajkumar Kanagasingam
KZ



09:38, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Daniel Bryant
22:07, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Scott Keith
Scott Keith
unsigned
155.232.128.10
talk
10:45, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
deletion summary
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Scott Keith (2)
assume good faith
Daniel Bryant
10:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
WP:RFCU
GMT

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.