Knowledge

User talk:Dankim1180

Source 📝

23: 70: 550: 187: 447: 569:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 300:
The references that I had been using came from the primary source of information available about the industry, other websites talking about web hosting. Some have been directories, some have been blog/article site covering the web hosting industries. Occasionally there might be a regional newspaper
304:
As a model of which companies to include on the pages of Knowledge, I used as a reference some of the existing entries (Hostgator, Bluehost, 1&1, etc). They all primarily use other web hosting directory sites as their references, some even referencing their own site or blogs by people directly
332:
which says "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources." The sources in the article are mostly directory-type sites and these have less weight (not much in fact) then say a well-known newspaper when
87:
status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient
361:
Hello. Thank you for your response. But I think I have to reiterate again that we are dealing with an industry that is not covered in mainstream media, and is only regularly covered by other websites. And should website directories be so readily discounted? Dmoz is a highly referenced source
385:
Web hosting may not be as advanced an industry to be widely covered in other media, but I'd like to think it is important enough that not only the top web hosting company deserves a listing. And if you'll allow another example. In the soft drink industry, of course
296:
Hello. I had been adding content to increase the relevance of the web hosting industry within the pages of Knowledge, which has been under represented. And perhaps as an extreme example, without web hosting Knowledge probably wouldn't exist.
308:
I am interested in continuing to add and update the content on the different web hosting entries, but I am hoping that you will provide me with a more detailed and specific explanation of WP:ORG as it relates to the web hosting industry. Thank
91:
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the
301:
writing an article, or some other trade publication, but the majority of information about web hosting will be other websites writing about web hosting. So I do feel that these can be credible references.
362:
among Knowledge pages. And again, with no specific guidelines for web hosting companies, I can only use other existing web hosting companies on Knowledge as a guide. I will readily acknowledge that
402:
is allowed a Knowledge page, so should these smaller web hosting companies. I can't say that the Knowledge pages for these smaller hosting companies will become as relevant as a
341:
process. You're free to remove this tag and give a reason why the company is notable (though this is not compulsory). The article will then have to be deleted via the
464:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 382:. All three of those Knowledge pages are primarily referenced by websites about web hosting, directory sites, or some site directly affiliated with the company. 398:, whom I would like to point out gets over half of their references from their own website. So in terms of market scale, if a proportionally smaller company like 461: 305:
affiliate with the company. I have avoided the latter when adding content. So I have tried to include companies that have an actual history and longevity.
129:
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created
410:. They are works in progress that will grow in significance with time, and should be allowed an existence on Knowledge beyond the deletion date of the 604: 142: 581: 266: 138: 54: 36: 337:. Also, the coverage does not appear to be "substantial" as they merely list product plans and such. The article is currently under the 158: 88:
information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
612: 525: 435: 270: 123: 119: 113: 472: 350: 282: 565:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 258: 198: 176: 570: 366:
deserves a Knowledge page because of the extensive coverage that it receives. But I cannot reconcile your view of
262: 107: 457: 49: 69: 561: 468: 346: 278: 460:. I do not think that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at 79: 533: 239: 83:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 505: 482: 44: 616: 453: 439: 367: 325: 274: 250: 227: 194: 180: 166: 146: 96: 620: 529: 235: 608: 589: 518: 494: 418: 310: 210:. Spams are simple listings and do not constitute substantial coverage needed to pass ORG. 379: 411: 338: 29: 22: 342: 329: 216: 207: 162: 152: 186: 566: 215:
While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be
334: 135:
Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged
446: 585: 399: 395: 245:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
514: 490: 403: 387: 371: 84: 394:
deserve a Knowledge page. But you also have a page for the much smaller
375: 623: 593: 537: 476: 426: 354: 318: 286: 170: 59: 407: 370:
with the other hosting companies pages who I have also contributed to:
363: 324:
There is no specific guideline for web-hosting companies. The article
65:
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:BlueHostlogo.jpg
467:
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.
391: 103: 548: 185: 68: 39:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
21: 524:
You are receiving this message because you are a member of
43:
I replied to your request for feedback. Hope it's helpful.
417:
Thank you again, for reading and considering my rationale.
30:
WP:FEED#http:.2F.2Fen.wikipedia.org.2Fwiki.2FOmnis_Network
615:
whether we can keep it running, or mark it as inactive.–
510: 486: 130: 506:
Talk:Hard diskdrive#RFC on the use of the IEC prefixes
222:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
126:
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
521:
to describe storage capacity. We welcome your input
157:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 580:will be deleted after seven days, as described in 106:. If you believe the media meets the criteria at 269:can result in deletion without discussion, and 582:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion 576:Note that any non-free images not used in any 543:Orphaned non-free image File:HostGatorlogo.jpg 462:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Omnis Network 28:Hello, Dankim1180. You have new messages at 8: 603:Hi! I was directed to your talk page by the 102:tag can be used to release it under the 234:notice, but please explain why in your 120:Knowledge:Image copyright tags#Fair use 141:. If the file is copyrighted under a 7: 599:Mark WikiProject Linux as inactive? 456:, an article that you created, for 118:or one of the other tags listed at 503:An RFC is being conducted here at 217:deleted for any of several reasons 201:because of the following concern: 14: 513:which includes columns comparing 445: 206:Non-notable organisation. Fails 155:after 00:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC) 594:17:20, 17 September 2017 (UTC) 159:Media copyright questions page 124:Knowledge:Image copyright tags 1: 571:our policy for non-free media 624:06:14, 28 October 2020 (UTC) 139:criteria for speedy deletion 477:02:04, 11 August 2010 (UTC) 273:allows discussion to reach 639: 538:18:30, 10 April 2011 (UTC) 427:00:41, 7 August 2010 (UTC) 355:18:12, 6 August 2010 (UTC) 328:falls under the guideline 319:17:34, 5 August 2010 (UTC) 287:04:33, 4 August 2010 (UTC) 171:00:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC) 108:Knowledge:Non-free content 60:08:15, 1 August 2010 (UTC) 549: 259:proposed deletion process 151:the file will be deleted 267:speedy deletion process 240:the article's talk page 562:File:HostGatorlogo.jpg 554: 509:. The debate concerns 485:on the inclusion of a 190: 74: 73:File Copyright problem 26: 559:Thanks for uploading 552: 526:WikiProject Computing 436:Articles for deletion 343:Articles for deletion 271:articles for deletion 199:proposed for deletion 189: 80:File:BlueHostlogo.jpg 77:Thanks for uploading 72: 25: 292:Web Hosting Industry 114:non-free fair use in 110:, use a tag such as 555: 469:Christopher Connor 347:Christopher Connor 279:Christopher Connor 263:deletion processes 191: 147:Knowledge:Fair use 137:, as described on 131:in your upload log 75: 37:remove this notice 27: 611:. I've started a 609:WikiProject Linux 605:participants list 567:claim of fair use 452:I have nominated 177:Proposed deletion 630: 557: 551: 449: 380:1&1 Internet 256: 255: 249: 233: 232: 226: 143:non-free license 117: 101: 95: 57: 52: 47: 40: 638: 637: 633: 632: 631: 629: 628: 627: 601: 584:. Thank you. -- 546: 545: 519:Binary prefixes 498: 495:Binary prefixes 450: 443: 294: 253: 247: 246: 230: 224: 223: 184: 116:|article name}} 111: 99: 93: 67: 55: 50: 45: 41: 34: 19: 12: 11: 5: 636: 634: 600: 597: 544: 541: 497: 480: 444: 442: 438:nomination of 433: 431: 360: 358: 357: 293: 290: 277:for deletion. 257:will stop the 213: 212: 183: 174: 66: 63: 33: 20: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 635: 626: 625: 622: 618: 614: 610: 606: 598: 596: 595: 591: 587: 583: 579: 574: 572: 568: 564: 563: 556: 542: 540: 539: 535: 531: 527: 522: 520: 516: 512: 508: 507: 502: 496: 492: 488: 484: 481: 479: 478: 474: 470: 465: 463: 459: 455: 454:Omnis Network 448: 441: 440:Omnis Network 437: 434: 432: 429: 428: 424: 420: 415: 413: 409: 405: 401: 397: 393: 389: 383: 381: 377: 373: 369: 368:Omnis Network 365: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 336: 331: 327: 326:Omnis Network 323: 322: 321: 320: 316: 312: 306: 302: 298: 291: 289: 288: 284: 280: 276: 272: 268: 264: 260: 252: 243: 241: 237: 229: 220: 218: 211: 209: 204: 203: 202: 200: 196: 195:Omnis Network 188: 182: 181:Omnis Network 178: 175: 173: 172: 168: 164: 161:. Thank you. 160: 156: 154: 148: 144: 140: 136: 132: 127: 125: 121: 115: 109: 105: 98: 89: 86: 82: 81: 71: 64: 62: 61: 58: 53: 48: 38: 31: 24: 16: 602: 577: 575: 560: 558: 547: 530:RaptorHunter 523: 504: 500: 499: 466: 451: 430: 422: 416: 384: 359: 333:considering 314: 307: 303: 299: 295: 265:exist. The 261:, but other 244: 236:edit summary 221: 214: 205: 193:The article 192: 150: 134: 128: 90: 78: 76: 42: 613:discussion 511:this table 489:comparing 419:Dankim1180 414:process. 406:or even a 400:Jones Soda 396:Jones Soda 335:notability 311:Dankim1180 251:dated prod 228:dated prod 617:Abuluntu 404:Coca-Cola 388:Coca-Cola 372:Hostgator 345:process. 275:consensus 197:has been 97:GFDL-self 85:copyright 578:articles 491:SI units 458:deletion 376:Bluehost 163:Eeekster 153:48 hours 35:You can 17:Talkback 501:Notice: 412:WP:PROD 408:GoDaddy 364:GoDaddy 339:WP:PROD 149:) then 378:, and 330:WP:ORG 238:or on 208:WP:ORG 122:. See 586:B-bot 487:table 392:Pepsi 145:(per 56:carlo 51:monte 46:Chevy 621:talk 590:talk 534:talk 517:and 493:and 473:talk 423:talk 390:and 351:talk 315:talk 309:you. 283:talk 167:talk 104:GFDL 607:on 573:). 483:RFC 179:of 592:) 536:) 528:-- 515:SI 475:) 425:) 374:, 353:) 317:) 285:) 254:}} 248:{{ 242:. 231:}} 225:{{ 219:. 169:) 133:. 112:{{ 100:}} 94:{{ 619:( 588:( 553:⚠ 532:( 471:( 421:( 349:( 313:( 281:( 165:( 32:.

Index


WP:FEED#http:.2F.2Fen.wikipedia.org.2Fwiki.2FOmnis_Network
remove this notice
Chevy
monte
carlo
08:15, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
File Copyright problem
File:BlueHostlogo.jpg
copyright
GFDL-self
GFDL
Knowledge:Non-free content
non-free fair use in
Knowledge:Image copyright tags#Fair use
Knowledge:Image copyright tags
in your upload log
criteria for speedy deletion
non-free license
Knowledge:Fair use
48 hours
Media copyright questions page
Eeekster
talk
00:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Proposed deletion
Omnis Network

Omnis Network
proposed for deletion

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.