41:
quality? It would be nice to get it there as it's a "top importance" article in its field, and the Higgs boson is of considerable popular interest.
37:
Now that the article is stable, relatively consistent, comprehensive, easy to read, and balanced, I wondered what more you think it needs to get to
52:
48:
and linked a few others to the post. Thorough review, fixes, and comments appreciated, and - shall we go for it :)
79:
75:
68:
45:
38:
21:
31:
17:
59:
83:
62:
74:
Thanks for your comment on the photo of Lothse, have now fixed it.
8:
44:I've summed up the points I can think of
7:
14:
30:You recently contributed to the
1:
84:14:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
63:09:47, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
99:
90:
69:Eight-thousander
51:GA criteria are
46:on its talk page
98:
97:
93:
92:
91:
89:
88:
87:
72:
25:
12:
11:
5:
96:
94:
76:Britishfinance
71:
66:
58:
24:
20:nominated for
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
95:
86:
85:
81:
77:
70:
67:
65:
64:
61:
56:
54:
49:
47:
42:
40:
35:
33:
28:
23:
19:
16:
73:
57:
50:
43:
39:Good Article
36:
29:
26:
32:Higgs boson
18:Higgs boson
34:article.
80:talk
53:here
27:Hi,
60:FT2
82:)
55:.
22:GA
78:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.