Knowledge

User talk:DaveZeltserman

Source 📝

427: 288: 552: 482: 348:
promotional, which wasn't my intent). I understand taking it down if it's because the book hasn't been released yet (although ARCs have been sent out), but you should be consistent and then remove the other novels that haven't been released yet, like the one due out in 2013. Anyway, I do appreciate your more civilized response than what I received earlier.
237: 115: 367:
as you are the author. I'll take a look at that list. People often add unsuitable examples to popular culture sections. When the book does come out, and if there's an independent source you can cite, you can always re-add, although you might find someone else does it before you get a chance. Regards,
133:
content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about
220:
As far as I'm concerned what I added was factual and not at all promotional. 'Monster: A Novel of Frankenstein' is being published by Overlook Press this August, and what I provided was a short description and not a promotional piece with blurbs or quotes. And the fact is my book is an important
456:
get some people inserting promotional or non-neutral information into articles about themselves or a subject they are closely related to, sometimes the subject themselves are able to easily find materials and links and really help out. If you have any material or links such as interviews about
347:
OohBunnies, thanks for responding and giving me actual reasons. I added the reference because I thought it was needed for verification, since my first attempt without a reference was taken down. Again, what I added was purely factual, and not promotional (unless you consider the reference link
362:
I'm sorry if you found earlier responses uncivil. It was factual, yes, although the description of the book added could've been toned down I think. We tend to use a very bored, factual tone when describing things around here. I think the tone was why it was considered promoting, that and the
326:
Hi there. Okay, there are a couple of reasons it was removed. a) The reference is to a press release and they are not generally suited for use as reliable sources as they are promotional in their very nature. b) the book is not released yet, so it can't really qualify as a notable example of
404:
Thanks to the links you added it's no longer tagged as not meeting notability so it won't be deleted. I've formatted them and done some minor copyediting. Thanks for adding those links, nice job.
320:
while I'm the author of the book, what I wrote was factual and I included a reference, so I don't understand why it was removed. It's not as if I added blurbs or quotes}</nowiki: -->
582:
Kindly stop editing about yourself on Knowledge - your self promotion is an abuse of the encyclopedia. You've been warned about this before, please take it to heart this time.
440: 386:
Removed two examples of novels not yet released, and added the article to my watchlist. It can be yet another thing for me to keep my eye on! :)
35: 69: 265: 119: 30: 264:
tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the
118:
Hello DaveZeltserman. We welcome your contributions to Knowledge, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
307: 89:! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the 564: 556: 490: 253: 245: 183: 159: 130: 502: 123: 155: 148:
articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
74: 54: 26: 527: 198: 45:
and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
610:
How do I request that you or someone else at Knowledge add a factual entry for Monster as a Frankenstein derivative?
494: 452:
It's no problem at all. If anything it's a good example of why conflict of interest editing isn't so bad. While we
135: 64: 273: 202: 98: 79: 498: 249: 241: 221:
contribution to the popular culture of Frankenstein. But I'm not going to waste any more time with Knowledge.
191: 187: 327:
Frankenstein in popular culture. If you have further questions, feel free to ask, here or on my talk page.
33:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the 457:
writing, background etc, you can always fire them my way and I can see about expanding the article a bit.
182:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to
94: 49: 611: 597: 536: 349: 240:
Welcome to Knowledge. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the
222: 465: 433: 426: 412: 394: 376: 335: 86: 514: 506: 197:
For information on how to contribute to Knowledge when you have a conflict of interest, please see
311: 59: 134:
that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by
629: 587: 572: 269: 458: 405: 387: 369: 328: 294: 260:
or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Knowledge uses
141:
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
524:
Hi Waxworker: if I'm able to figure out how to add citations, will this one be sufficient?
510: 486: 257: 214: 169: 90: 39:, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type 364: 272:
to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --
625: 583: 568: 528:
https://www.booklistonline.com/Top-10-Horror-Fiction-2013-Hooper-Brad/pid%3D6279145
497:. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to 551: 287: 168:
to the Knowledge article or website of your organization in other articles (see
633: 619: 605: 591: 576: 544: 518: 470: 417: 399: 381: 357: 340: 278: 230: 207: 103: 261: 481: 162:, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors. 178:
so that you do not accidentally breach Knowledge's content policies.
505:. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on 282: 489:. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 443:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
425: 559:
about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services
555:
Please do not add promotional material to Knowledge. While
146:
Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating
299: 501:
and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
154:. Everyone is welcome to provide information about 129:
All editors are required to comply with Knowledge's
306:, contact the responding user(s) directly on their 565:a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion 297:has been answered. If you need more help, you can 596:What I added was factual and not self-promotion. 432:Hello, DaveZeltserman. You have new messages at 268:before reinserting it. Please take a look at the 199:our frequently asked questions for organizations 138:and writing with as little bias as possible. 97:or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- 8: 624:You've made such a request, and I decline. 298: 85:We hope you enjoy editing here and being a 256:; nor should it be used as a platform for 254:Knowledge is not a collection of links 152:Be cautious about deletion discussions 126:or close connection to the subject. 7: 215:promotional platform for your novel 14: 550: 480: 286: 235: 113: 491:Frankenstein in popular culture 246:Frankenstein in popular culture 634:15:42, 30 September 2024 (UTC) 620:15:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC) 606:15:24, 30 September 2024 (UTC) 592:14:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC) 577:14:52, 30 September 2024 (UTC) 545:03:14, 30 September 2024 (UTC) 519:02:47, 30 September 2024 (UTC) 109:Potential conflict of interest 1: 563:acceptable, Knowledge is not 250:guidelines for external links 122:on Knowledge, you may have a 50:The Five Pillars of Knowledge 188:verifiability of information 70:How to write a great article 29:to Knowledge. Thank you for 493:, but you didn't provide a 310:, or consider visiting the 36:New contributors' help page 654: 471:16:19, 20 April 2012 (UTC) 418:15:50, 20 April 2012 (UTC) 400:00:32, 20 April 2012 (UTC) 382:00:16, 20 April 2012 (UTC) 358:23:59, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 341:23:50, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 279:20:56, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 231:23:49, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 208:16:49, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 104:16:49, 19 April 2012 (UTC) 503:referencing for beginners 615: 601: 540: 353: 226: 93:, add a question to the 434:OohBunnies!'s talk page 252:and have been removed. 248:do not comply with our 430: 244:you added to the page 176:Exercise great caution 120:you have written about 429: 184:neutral point of view 131:neutral point of view 365:conflict of interest 301:ask another question 160:deletion discussions 124:conflict of interest 275:The Red Pen of Doom 266:article's talk page 213:Knowledge is not a 204:The Red Pen of Doom 156:independent sources 100:The Red Pen of Doom 499:include a citation 441:remove this notice 431: 75:Naming conventions 55:How to edit a page 31:your contributions 469: 416: 398: 380: 339: 318: 317: 303:on your talk page 201:. Thank you. -- 645: 554: 535:Dave Zeltserman 484: 468: 463: 461: 444: 415: 410: 408: 397: 392: 390: 379: 374: 372: 338: 333: 331: 305: 290: 283: 276: 239: 238: 205: 136:reliable sources 117: 116: 101: 65:Picture tutorial 60:Editing tutorial 43: 653: 652: 648: 647: 646: 644: 643: 642: 557:objective prose 495:reliable source 478: 466:Leave a message 464: 459: 450: 445: 438: 413:Leave a message 411: 406: 395:Leave a message 393: 388: 377:Leave a message 375: 370: 336:Leave a message 334: 329: 274: 236: 218: 203: 192:autobiographies 114: 111: 99: 80:Manual of Style 41: 19: 12: 11: 5: 651: 649: 641: 640: 639: 638: 637: 636: 612:DaveZeltserman 608: 598:DaveZeltserman 548: 547: 537:DaveZeltserman 533: 530: 525: 509:. Thank you. 477: 476:September 2024 474: 449: 446: 437: 424: 423: 422: 421: 420: 402: 384: 350:DaveZeltserman 344: 343: 316: 315: 308:user talk page 291: 242:external links 223:DaveZeltserman 217: 211: 180: 179: 173: 170:Knowledge:Spam 163: 149: 110: 107: 83: 82: 77: 72: 67: 62: 57: 52: 23:DaveZeltserman 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 650: 635: 631: 627: 623: 622: 621: 617: 613: 609: 607: 603: 599: 595: 594: 593: 589: 585: 581: 580: 579: 578: 574: 570: 567:. Thank you. 566: 562: 558: 553: 546: 542: 538: 534: 531: 529: 526: 523: 522: 521: 520: 516: 512: 508: 504: 500: 496: 492: 488: 483: 475: 473: 472: 467: 462: 455: 447: 442: 435: 428: 419: 414: 409: 403: 401: 396: 391: 385: 383: 378: 373: 366: 361: 360: 359: 355: 351: 346: 345: 342: 337: 332: 325: 324: 323: 322: 313: 309: 304: 302: 296: 292: 289: 285: 284: 281: 280: 277: 271: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 243: 233: 232: 228: 224: 216: 212: 210: 209: 206: 200: 195: 193: 189: 185: 177: 174: 171: 167: 166:Avoid linking 164: 161: 157: 153: 150: 147: 144: 143: 142: 139: 137: 132: 127: 125: 121: 108: 106: 105: 102: 96: 92: 88: 81: 78: 76: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 56: 53: 51: 48: 47: 46: 44: 38: 37: 32: 28: 24: 16: 560: 549: 507:my talk page 479: 453: 451: 321: 319: 300: 295:help request 270:welcome page 234: 219: 196: 181: 175: 165: 151: 145: 140: 128: 112: 95:village pump 84: 40: 34: 22: 20: 485:Hello, I'm 258:advertising 448:No problem 91:help pages 87:Wikipedian 42:{{helpme}} 511:Waxworker 487:Waxworker 460:Bunnies! 439:You can 407:Bunnies! 389:Bunnies! 371:Bunnies! 330:Bunnies! 312:Teahouse 262:nofollow 626:MrOllie 584:MrOllie 569:MrOllie 532:thanks, 27:welcome 21:Hello, 17:Welcome 190:, and 25:, and 293:This 630:talk 616:talk 602:talk 588:talk 573:talk 541:talk 515:talk 354:talk 227:talk 158:in 632:) 618:) 604:) 590:) 575:) 561:is 543:) 517:) 454:do 356:) 229:) 194:. 186:, 172:). 628:( 614:( 600:( 586:( 571:( 539:( 513:( 436:. 352:( 314:. 225:(

Index

welcome
your contributions
New contributors' help page
The Five Pillars of Knowledge
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Wikipedian
help pages
village pump
The Red Pen of Doom
16:49, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
you have written about
conflict of interest
neutral point of view
reliable sources
independent sources
deletion discussions
Knowledge:Spam
neutral point of view
verifiability of information
autobiographies
our frequently asked questions for organizations
The Red Pen of Doom
16:49, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
promotional platform for your novel
DaveZeltserman

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.