110:“green” was a colour that, at that time, had strong sexual connotations. When they discuss the song “Greensleeves” in their book "Women's Roles in the Renaissance, Meg Lota Brown & Kari Boyd McBride make this point citing, as an example, the use of the phase “a green gown”. In fact there are even stronger associations that have not been included in the article. James T. Henke says in his book “Courtesans and Cuckolds: a Glossary of Renaissance Dramatic Bawdy” that “green was a colour long associated with prostitution”. Finally (and at last moving into the area of fashion!) you may be interested to know that in a few countries around that time – France was one – prostitutes were required by law to wear bands / ties on their sleeves so that they could be identified. However, while it’s clearly within a similar area of reference nobody has yet made a direct link between this and “Greensleeves”.
445:
think it's ridiculous that the government has accused him of anti-trust, when people are perfecty free to use alternatives like Apple, Linux, Unix, etc. It's also ridicluous that the government thinks it's wrong that he gives his web browser away for free, when all the other companies that give their web browsers away for free, such as
Firefox, don't get criticized for it. I don't have anything against Bill Gates at all. I think he's a great guy, and I wish there were thousands more entrepreneurs who were like him. I put the mugshot there as a joke, and nothing more. There was no ill will intended.
79:
case in the 16th/17th century as class was king and the suggestion of nobility would not be throw around carelessly. "Sleeves" as it were, do not mean "green gown" as stated in the article in the original article. The reader currently believes that the song is referring to a whore-ish courtesan when in fact and yes, it is fact, that by referring to her sleeves does not refer to her gown the two were NOT inter changable as they are now described in the article. Fashion was largely dominated by the upper classes ONLY. (
402:, I think, that of the two, "myth" appears to be the better fit. However, I don't have any reference works, nor does there appear to be anything that would be classified as reliable on Google, about Greensleaves to indicate or source either one. There is a reference at the end of that section and it may be able to clear it up. Having said that, I really don't think that either word fits properly. I think that the word "belief" would be more correct in the sentence.
760:
seem that some form of editorial decision had been made prior to inclusion, which always smacks of personal slant. I am a believer in letting the reader make their mind up, having been able to read all the available and accurately sourced material. It is after all not a printed encyclopaedia, but a living, organic, work-in-progress. But I will happily stop titivating with the article, if you want. Incidentally, the pap photos that are referred to can be seen at
1071:
readers who read the page in that state. But writing a
Knowledge (XXG) article is not as simple as throwing information onto the page as quickly as you can find it. The difference between a Knowledge (XXG) article and a blog or ragtop magazine article is that we take pride in asserting the verifiability of the information we provide: readers should know that the information we provide is correct not just 'because we say so', but because we can show that
2108:
116:
valid is the use of the word to describe a woman with whom a man is romantically or sexually involved. Invariably the use is done by the man himself - i.e. "my lady". Given that the first lines of the song are “Alas, my love” it's clear that it's this final meaning that is being used. If she existed "Lady
Greensleeves" may have been noble - we'll never know - but the song is actually about love and it's various complications, not nobility.
2013:
1925:
1850:
1777:
1704:
1608:
1038:
My own view is that the area you are dealing with will be extremely well policed by many fans and any errors / vandalism will be corrected very quickly. Can I suggest you monitor the edits you've just removed and if they subsequently prove to be correct you amend your approach to more of a careful watching brief? Better still do what you did with me - query where the information came from. Thanks
899:
650:"the team are fighting among themselves" (notional agreement) refers to the team as individuals." I would argue that the batting team here is referred to more as a collective whole than as the sum of its parts. Certainly you're the native speaker of British English here and I'm not trying to impose my view. I'm simply pointing out what I perceive as being inconsistencies.
1058:, this is a fundamental content policy. To quote from that policy, the required threshold for inclusion is "verifiability, not truth". It makes absolutely no difference whether the information is correct, accidentally wrong or a deliberate misconstruction, it matters only that a reliable secondary source can be found to support it. It is within the discression of
645:. Specifically you changed "When the team that is batting has used all its available overs" back to "When the team that are batting have used all its available overs". First of all, assuming the latter is the correct use, it should probably be "their available overs" rather than "its available overs". Secondly the Knowledge (XXG) page on
857:: If I agree and you agree and TeaHot agrees with some tweaking and Mark7144 perhaps having some concerns, but not disagreeing; that is not just one editor, is it? :-) The point of the section is to pull together the common ground identified in the RfC and so if constructed with that in mind, it will not ever be a single editor. --
1066:
What you have done, by readding those of the facts that can be verified by reliable sources, is exactly correct. Those facts can now be verified: there is a link to an external source that supports the statement. If someone wants to change the fact in the article, they are now required to provide an
1037:
Hi. I appreciate you're an
Administrator etc. and verifiability is obviously important. However, our previous conversation has already proved to me that you're not as in touch with this subject as others (not a criticism, just a statement of fact) and what you see fit to remove may well be correct.
759:
Hi, I understand where you are coming from, but I am merely following on the line of the originator of the article (User:Andreasegde) who I have been in extensive correspondence with. My personal view is that I would far rather have too much (accurate) information than too little, which would make it
743:
This edit is characteristic of those you have been making recently and I am concerned at the extent to which you have been including very specialised detail within this article. If you haven't already done so, I would advise you to read WP:DIRECTORY #6. My own view is that the article should present
739:
Hi - thanks for the note, I've actually been meaning to contact you myself regarding some of your recent edits on the
Heather Mills page. As I explained (briefly) I undid your edit simply because there was no reference in either of the two listed references (158, 195) to the paparazzi. I appreciate
669:
However, it's all somewhat academic as I see that another user has since changed the structure of the sentence and in so doing, reverted back to the singular, rather than the plural. So, it would appear that your original approach has been adopted. Given your post here, I won't revert again; I sense
665:
Thanks for the post
Elostirion. I made the change based on information from the Cambridge Dictionaries, which, fortunately, gave an example actually using the word "team" ("The team are playing in the test matches next week."), and outlined the differences between American English and British English
573:
Allow me to point out the obvious: that link has got nothing whatsoever to do with Cilla Black. At no point in the article does it even mention Cilla Black's name, let alone the fact that she might have been the previous record holder!! It's fine in an article about
Alexandra Burke but it serves no
491:
should follow whatever the agreement was about stating that in the lead. I saw something on it somewhere but I forget. Again, should probably be cited and the awards listed. If I was to assume bad faith I would think that it may be someone who didn't like what the consensus was with listing awards in
1493:
Thanks for contacting me. The edits I made (however many years ago) are all from historical authorities. There are others that I could have called on to substantiate the point even further. I'm not sure where the other editor is coming from, particularly with the "defamatory" charge which I don't
1062:
editor, not just administrators, to rewrite articles such that they do not make such unsupported claims. When I saw the dances being added, it was against my better judgement that I left them there at all without supporting sources. When I saw them being edited back and forth their position became
778:
Thanks for the reply, much appreciated. Although I personally would prefer more summary, less detail - it is just a personal viewpoint. My best advice is if others start to say the same thing then maybe a different approach is required. In the meantime, you're the one editing it. Thanks again.
698:
I see there is an IP editor reverting as well; although I AGF, neither do I rule out this being
Xerocrist logging out to evade scrutiny and/or the 3RR rule, and have left a not to this effect on the IP's talk page. Meanwhile you are nowhere near 3RR yourself, and can safely revert for now until this
649:
states that "In
British English, it is generally accepted that collective nouns can take either singular or plural verb forms depending on the context and the metonymic shift that it implies. For example, "the team is in the dressing room" (formal agreement) refers to the team as an ensemble, whilst
78:
As a fashion major at
Parsons New School - I am unclear as to why you undid my post. The current article is calling "lady greensleeves" promiscuous and it is clearly evident that she was not a common whore. mainly because she is referred to as "Lady". Be she a prostitute that would have not been the
1111:
I could not tell truth from fiction in the bottom and top dif. What I could see amounted to very little that someone who knows about SCD could not simply reinstate (as you did) and my edit summary was clear. The style violation takes some time to resolve and on this occasion only it seemed sensible
817:
2.1 Knowledge (XXG) is not a dictionary ... 2.3 Knowledge (XXG) is not a soapbox 2.4 Knowledge (XXG) is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files 2.5 Knowledge (XXG) is not a blog, webspace provider, social networking, or memorial site 2.6 Knowledge (XXG) is not a directory
579:
Secondly, contrary to what you're saying here, I didn't replace the source (BBC vs fan site). I did include a link in my explanation as further supporting evidence that there was at least one other single that had outsold Cilla Black - but I limited it to just that; it's not included on the page. I
559:
Firstly, this was the "unsourced comment" on the page I removed. "Establishing a record that is unlikely to be broken, Cilla's version of the song remained the top selling single of all time by a British female artist for 45 years until January 2009, when it was overtaken by Alexandra Burke's chart
531:
It's interesting that you removed an unsourced comment from the Cilla Black page. Originally, there was a source for this note, taken from the BBC News. However, YOU deleted that source! You replaced it with a quote from some fan Internet site. BBC vs Fan Internet. Mmmmmmm. I know which one I think
103:
Your post tried to do two things. Firstly, it tried to refute some of the content that was already on the page – and yet the particular content you chose to question was already verified by references to existing academic works. Secondly, your post tried to put forward an alternative explanation
444:
Hi. I wasn't trying to embarrass or humiliate anyone. Gates had a sense of humor to use that photo in the ad. I appreacite humor like that. And for the record, I'm a libertarian, and I think Bill Gates is a hero of entrepreneurship, capitalism, wealth creation, job creation, and private charity. I
115:
The second point that concerns you is the use of the word “lady”. This is easier to explain. While “lady” definitely means someone of nobility / superior social position, it’s not the only meaning. Equally common is the use of the word as a formal term to describe a woman (any woman). Just as
1446:
Thanks for the information on the two international Emmys. Shocked at the BBC having wrong information (though now that i look at the page it hasn't been updated in a while). Just remove the two international Emmys from the lede. My username is in homage to the general.. alas someone had already
1107:
before you ridicule other editors actions. This style guide is violated many times a week by flyby Ips and others. Perhaps if other editors considered the whole article instead of just entering unsourced details about this week’s upcoming dances, there would be no need for such radical measures.
1070:
So it is not a question of my approach assuming that the facts were erroneous, and hence that it can be proved wrong if they can be proved right. I will be delighted if the original facts prove correct, as it means that Knowledge (XXG)'s verifiability and accuracy was not compromised to the many
1053:
If by "not as in touch... as others" you mean I watch the show a day late because I'm busy on Saturday nights, then yes. If you mean that I am lacking a psychic power that others have to make details of future shows common knowledge, then that is not good enough. All material on Knowledge (XXG)
296:
David, not sure what we can do about this without wider community involvement. I have not seen the book so I don't know how reliable it is, but we certainly have a number of IPs (probably the same person or group of people) intent on keeping the book as a reference. As we seem to be at an impasse
244:
Well, that certainly put the HOF in their place - personally I would have thought they might have trusted the content of their website to someone other than a summer temp but obviously you know better. I'm still troubled by the (relatively) bad English in what is such a famous quote so I'll dig
192:). Their argument is, that this is an original research, which I do not agree. Such table was published in many yournals and on many web pages. I doubt, that (original research) is even their real reason for deletion. I belive, they just dont whant to see a table without their country on the top.
109:
There are two points that obviously concern you - the first of which is the gown/sleeves issue. Nobody is confusing a gown with sleeves – they’re obviously different things. The reference to a “gown” in the article is not used in connection with fashion – it’s used in regard to the claim that
1477:
Many years ago you added some referenced content and cites about the origin/meaning of this color. Today, another editor has stated that it is not valid WP content and instead replaced it with different (unreferenced but logically explained) content. Would be great if you could comment on this
324:
I'm sorry but Experts have said can't prove Henry VIII didn't write it and since Henry VIII is the only name they have as the composers name and its been known by most people for 500 years that Henry VIII wrote it which is longdetivity. The story goes that Henry wrote it to woo Anne Boleyn so
1716:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
740:
what you're saying above, but that's an assumption; the photo might have been taken by a member of the public and mailed in. Additionally, I should point out that neither of the two listed references talk about a photographer or have a picture of Heather Mills and Mark Sinden together.
1862:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1789:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
157:
Hi Krefts, thanks for your post. I deleted it for two reasons - firstly it gave the impression that was an official way of counting Olympic medals. This was because of the way you had written the post - "The alternative approach to measure the succes of respective nation is to
913:
lot of attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help us get this project off the ground and a few progressive rock music pages into the front ranks of Knowledge (XXG) articles. Thanks!
24:
includes a very similar example: "Ex- (and former): be careful. A Communist ex-member has lost his seat; an ex-Communist member has lost his party." An American ex-skater is an American who no longer skates; but an ex-American skater is a skater who is no longer American.
172:. Hopefully some other people will then add other unofficial tables which could be of interest - Total medals won, points by medal, GDP, Athletes at Games etc. I think someone even created a medal table based on Human Rights (I bet that wouldn't stay up for long...)
104:
for the song, but failed to support that explanation with external references. Unfortunately the whole post came across very much as personal opinion. If that is the case, then the best place to have posted it would have been in the discussion section of the article.
1419:. Their edits can be reverted as many times as you want as 3RR doesn't apply, although it would be easier to ask for semi-protection and/or the IP blocking obviously. Any Spanish/Irish IPs that turn up making the same edits are the same editor also. Thanks.
1321:
Hi, David T Tokyo! There is a category which is being discussed for deletion which I see great use in. It is: Category:Musicians who have served in the military. I wonder if you would check it out, and offer your opinion, either way, "Keep" or "Delete",
187:
I am glad, that you have no objecton to this table bein in Knowledge (XXG), and I can agree wiht your suggestions how to put it. On the other hand, thare are many other people on wikipedia, who will always delete such table (see discussion in my page:
1620:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
595:
Sigh. Yes it must be exhausting for you having to patronise and belittle other wiki editors. The agony for you must be extreme. And if you want to post to my talk page and remove MY deletes from MY page, I would expect the same courtesy in return.
141:
I agree, that calculating the number of olimpic medal of respective nation per million of inhabitants is not an official way of counting. But I can not understand why you think, that there is no place for such calculation anywhere in wikipedia?
1134:
I have a suggestion for you to consider. In future, rather than reverting edits on the assumption that if they're not verified they must be wrong, why not do what it took me all of 5 minutes to do - see if you can find the necessary references
328:
It would be a Myth if they had no idea who wrote it, but they have the idea that Henry VIII wrote it although they may not be able to prove it. The long affiliation with Henry VIII I say would count it as a Legend and not a myth
1075:
say so. That's why the countless blogs around the internet are just countless, while we are the world's most popular source of information. The goal of every editor, admin or not, is to protect and build upon that reputation.
2056:
1968:
1890:
1817:
1744:
1648:
1166:? There may be some leeway, though not much, on a talk page, but as none of the comments in that section had any sources to support them, I think they are inappropriate. I made the edit in response to a message at
1530:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
1063:
untenable: one or other of the set of 'facts' is manifestly incorrect, but without citations it is impossible to say which one. As such, the only acceptable course of action is to remove the content entirely.
167:
I have no objections to this table being in Knowledge (XXG) - it is of interest to some - but on reflection I think it should just be a link at the bottom of the main table without any supporting text i.e.
162:". By using the word "The" (rather than "An") at the start it gave undue emphasis and status to this way of measuring. Second, as I pointed out, this is just one of many ways of measuring the medal count.
69:
Yet, David won't accept the fact that Jethro Tull do qualify as an LGBT musical group despite Dee Palmer's leaving of the band as an official member. She has still worked with them for years. Go figure.
1341:
The decision of the discussion was delete, which I'm totally fine with. I am sorry it got nasty there with the accusations. But it was a healthy debate on your part. Thanks for your contributions. :-)
2040:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1952:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1874:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1801:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1728:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1632:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
39:
Hi, David! I see that Jennifer won the GLAAD media award. But she's not known for her LGBT activism at all, and the GLAAD award is the only mention in the article. The category is for people like
218:
The link you give brings up notes that could have been written by an intern or someone with a summer job. This is such a famous quote that THE BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN READER and the Springsteen database
2026:
1938:
1323:
212:
1478:
situation. My talkpage has his explanation of his changes and also my response to them, but we could just as well copy that to the article talk page if you prefer to centralize it.
1167:
966:
Are you sure? I was taught that an 'and' was a comma and should always be treated as such. (Not that this is going to cure cancer or end world poverty, but it's interesting!)
532:
is more reliable. It's a bit rich to be deleting reliable sources and replacing them with unreliable ones. I'll probably be banned now for daring to cross you. C'est la vie.
1002:
1678:
I don't usually worry about the big picture, preferring to remove unsourced or unexplained changes on sight. By the time the implications come in I am usually playing
699:
is sorted out. It's the 4th revert in 24 hours that makes 3RR kick in, although that doesn't rule out sanctions for edit-warring- on that, you are OK for now. Cheers.
1189:
Do you actually believe that removing an irreplaceable, historically valuable image from an article (based on your own opinion) is warranted? Explain, please...
344:
You just need to look at the article for proof that Greensleaves is 500 years old and also enclosed in that article is no composer name except for Henry VIII
98:
Hi Stilettoarmy. The reason I undid your post on the “Greensleeves” page was (as I stated) because it didn’t include any references – i.e. it was unsourced.
1452:
724:
and if you look at the shots taken of them they are most certainly "unaware"... I think that this warrants the inclusion of the word paparazzi, don't you?
1383:
1203:
Jimi was arrested on May, 3, 1969 in Toronto, Canada - and this official booking photo verifies it. Your choice to delete this image (because he was
496:
425:
406:
378:
906:
213:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0142003549/ref=sib_dp_srch_pop?v=search-inside&keywords=rock+and+roll+future&go.x=14&go.y=9&go=Go%21#
2099:
1226:
Greetings ... there seems to be some disagreement on whether there should be a section of references to previous Disney films in the article for
1448:
1067:
equally good source for the new statement; the expectation is that if the original fact is correct, it will not be possible for them to do so.
1104:
2079:
1990:
1904:
1831:
1758:
1662:
1555:
1103:
I noted your oblique edit summary attack on my reverting several edits in order to get back to a safe version. You should be aware of this
1207:
of the charges?!?) may demonstrate a fundamental lack of understanding of the purpose of WP's educational goal in general. Good luck...
512:
I have written an email to the french consultate in L.A. and so far I did not receive any answer. Even not a receipt acknowledgment. --
21:
The point you're missing is that "former" modifies only "figure skater", not "Tonya Harding", or "American". The Economist's style guide
1129:
Thanks for leaving the note on my page. My edit comment wasn't aimed at you specifically, but was certainly written out of frustration.
641:
This may sound like quibbling over details (and I suppose it is) but I have some reservations about a recent reversion you have made on
1377:
1260:
487:
for instance is odd. It's true that long-running is an opinion but it's not very controversial. Probably should be cited. Others like
1300:
603:
539:
995:
169:
159:
245:
around more. In the meantime I'll reverse my previous edits based on your full-blooded faith in THE BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN READER.
2131:
2075:
1986:
1900:
1827:
1754:
1658:
1551:
1347:
1331:
2049:
1961:
1883:
1810:
1737:
1641:
1428:
1233:
948:
924:
371:
574:
purpose whatsoever in an article about Cilla Black. That being the case, I therefore removed both the link and the comment.
347:
I'm not asking for Henry VII to be officially recognised as the composer, I'm just asking for it to be classed as a legend
499:
428:
409:
381:
58:
278:
1542:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
2061:
1973:
1895:
1822:
1749:
1653:
1547:
820:" etc. is equivilent to "We cannot be everything to everyone". It seemed as if you were being purposefully obtuse.--
761:
211:
I was dubious and checked many. Here's how it appears in RACING IN THE STREETS: THE BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN READER (2004):
1569:
When you added a comment to Jerome Kohl's you removed a comment, - I guess that may have been not your intention? --
1407:
1343:
1327:
370:
shows that you both have made three reverts to the article. Either stop or you you may be blocked for violation of
2123:
1421:
1389:
1228:
858:
821:
493:
422:
403:
375:
2037:
1949:
1871:
1798:
1725:
1629:
1395:
1140:
Deleting accurate information is every bit as much a problem as deleting false information. JMO, of course
1118:
705:
673:
Once again, thanks for contacting me and pointing out what you perceived as (and what were) inconsistencies.
271:
84:
1458:
599:
535:
2139:
1588:
1574:
1371:
1264:
985:
971:
799:
768:
729:
1543:
666:
on this issue. You're absolutely correct on the issue of "their" and "its", it should have been "their".
2115:
1304:
1085:
1030:
1014:
607:
543:
469:
450:
888:
80:
1494:
get at all, but he/she is flat-out wrong. Either that or all the historical authorities are wrong.
1241:
655:
352:
334:
22:
2020:
1932:
1858:
1785:
1712:
1616:
1598:
1519:
1510:
874:
878:
670:
this is a grammatically grey area and those kinds of edits invariably lead to trouble here on Wiki.
2033:
1945:
1867:
1794:
1721:
1625:
1539:
1523:
1208:
1190:
1495:
1278:
1141:
1113:
1039:
946:
922:
780:
745:
700:
674:
627:
581:
517:
246:
222:
193:
173:
143:
122:
2134:): "and I hope that they have met again in the beyond and are making joyous music together" --
2135:
1687:
1584:
1570:
1296:
1256:
1212:
1194:
1175:
981:
967:
795:
764:
725:
720:
Hi, may I take issue you with you on your recent 'undo'. I refer you to Wikis own definition:
310:
54:
2045:
1957:
1879:
1806:
1733:
1637:
1535:
1527:
1236:
so that we can discuss instead of revert over and over. Thanks, and hope you can join in! --
2068:
1980:
1483:
1077:
1006:
909:. There are a lot of progressive rock-related articles on Knowledge (XXG) that could use a
646:
465:
446:
226:
197:
147:
2107:
2048:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
2041:
1960:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1953:
1882:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1875:
1809:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1802:
1736:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1729:
1640:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1633:
1538:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1531:
1163:
816:
809:
298:
1237:
1232:. I was wondering if you would like to offer your opinions on the matter on the article's
651:
348:
330:
302:
1112:
to get back to a sound version given the intervening vandalism and unsourced additions.
838:
566:
1055:
940:
916:
623:
513:
394:
request I looked to see which word would be a better fit. After reading through both
1683:
1471:
1171:
1156:
689:
306:
49:
40:
26:
2012:
1924:
1849:
1776:
1703:
1607:
1326:. (I hope you'll let me know whether you find my request inappropriate. Cheers!)--
898:
762:
http://www.celebmad.com/GossipGirl/photos/index.cfm/Heather-Mills-and-Marc/thumbs/
2127:
1679:
1479:
818:
2.7 Knowledge (XXG) is not a manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal
580:
used the first one I found - if you care to look you'll find many, many more.
2143:
2083:
1994:
1908:
1835:
1762:
1691:
1666:
1592:
1578:
1559:
1503:
1487:
1462:
1436:
1351:
1335:
1308:
1286:
1268:
1245:
1216:
1198:
1179:
1149:
1123:
1092:
1047:
1021:
989:
975:
953:
929:
882:
863:
843:
826:
803:
788:
772:
753:
733:
721:
710:
682:
659:
631:
611:
589:
547:
521:
502:
473:
454:
431:
412:
399:
384:
356:
338:
314:
286:
254:
230:
219:
201:
181:
151:
130:
88:
64:
29:
1447:
stolen the latter part of the great mans phrase hence my elongated version.
1275:
2052:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1964:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1886:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1813:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1740:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1644:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
2030:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1942:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1526:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
1365:
642:
554:(sigh) Did you even bother to read the link and comment that I removed?
1299:(it was accidental). Anyway, my IP has changed now but it is still me
1168:
Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#John Fogerty
395:
1362:
Just a heads up that this IP is a known sockpuppet of banned editor
189:
1583:
ps: your safest way to add is to click on "new section" on top. --
897:
794:
Nice to know that you are keeping a beady-eye out though! Cheers.
2065:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
1977:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
2055:
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
1967:
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
1889:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
1816:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
1743:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
1647:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
2024:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
1936:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
1259:, perhaps you could explain what was meant in further detail?
873:
Hi! Just wanted to say thanks for digging up that TAAB quote!
938:
Saw you contributions and figured you might be interested. -
836:
Hi David. Yes, that wouldn't surprise me! All the best. --
744:
a summary of the facts, not as many of the facts as possible.
1105:
Talk:Strictly_Come_Dancing_(series_7)#Low_score_notation
2036:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1948:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1870:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1797:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1724:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1628:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1413:
1401:
854:
488:
484:
391:
367:
1054:
that makes challengeable statements of fact should be
221:
would be completely discredited if they got it wrong.
121:
Thanks for the post - I hope this is helpful to you!
567:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/7820786.stm
2114:
815:
I am sorry if it is difficult for you to see how "
565:This was the link that was attached to that quote.
421:As both of you agreed, I made the change. Thanks.
1518:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
1255:I've responded to your enigmatic comment on the
905:I'd like to invite you to join the newly-formed
269:Please see the article's talk page. Thanks. ---
492:the opening and logged out to make the edits.
8:
2098:
303:commence other dispute resolution procedures
1001:Where are you getting your information for
137:2004 Summer Olympics medal count per capita
47:their activism. Thanks for your input! --
2106:
2097:
2007:
1919:
1317:Category for deletion: Your opinion needed
893:
1170:so please feel free to comment there. –
1164:Knowledge (XXG):BLP#Criticism and praise
849:Murray attempt to identify common ground
190:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Krefts
483:Some of them seem OK but a little odd.
7:
2021:2021 Arbitration Committee elections
1933:2020 Arbitration Committee elections
1859:2018 Arbitration Committee elections
1856:Hello, David T Tokyo. Voting in the
1786:2018 Arbitration Committee elections
1783:Hello, David T Tokyo. Voting in the
1713:2017 Arbitration Committee elections
1710:Hello, David T Tokyo. Voting in the
1617:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
1614:Hello, David T Tokyo. Voting in the
2038:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
2004:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
1950:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
1916:ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
1872:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
1799:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
1726:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
1630:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
637:Collective Nouns in British English
1843:ArbCom 2018 election voter message
1770:ArbCom 2018 election voter message
1697:ArbCom 2017 election voter message
1162:Thanks for the message. How about
907:Progressive Rock music WikiProject
14:
1544:review the candidates' statements
1449:Rise before Zod, Kneel before Zod
1099:regarding you edit summary on SCD
372:Knowledge (XXG):Three-revert rule
2011:
1923:
1848:
1775:
1702:
1606:
1295:I've responded to your point on
996:Strictly Come Dancing (series 7)
2059:and submit your choices on the
1971:and submit your choices on the
1893:and submit your choices on the
1820:and submit your choices on the
1747:and submit your choices on the
1550:. For the Election committee,
1520:Arbitration Committee election
1511:ArbCom elections are now open!
366:A look at the edit history of
1:
2144:16:42, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
2084:00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
1995:01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
1909:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
1836:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
1667:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
1560:16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
1309:13:53, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
1287:06:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
1269:23:01, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
1246:05:39, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
1180:18:26, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
990:17:42, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
976:14:54, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
622:Not a problem. Glad to help.
432:14:19, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
413:22:21, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
385:19:48, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
357:12:36, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
339:11:08, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
315:15:28, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
255:21:42, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
231:21:15, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
1763:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
1437:14:27, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
1352:09:26, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
1336:01:35, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
1274:I've replied to you on your
1257:Alesha Dixon discussion page
1217:13:07, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
1199:12:37, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
1150:21:43, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
1124:17:46, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
1093:23:44, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
1048:22:46, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
1022:21:49, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
497:waits for audience applause,
426:waits for audience applause,
407:waits for audience applause,
379:waits for audience applause,
287:14:23, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
1651:and submit your choices on
1546:and submit your choices on
1442:Thanks for clearing that up
954:15:12, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
930:15:12, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
883:20:55, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
202:17:04, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
182:09:21, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
152:23:56, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
131:05:57, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
89:03:49, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
43:who are known specifically
2159:
2076:MediaWiki message delivery
1987:MediaWiki message delivery
1901:MediaWiki message delivery
1828:MediaWiki message delivery
1755:MediaWiki message delivery
1659:MediaWiki message delivery
1649:the candidates' statements
1593:11:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
1579:11:24, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
1552:MediaWiki message delivery
711:21:49, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
683:03:36, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
660:00:29, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
632:11:26, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
612:17:14, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
590:01:45, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
548:22:45, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
522:14:45, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
494:Enter CambridgeBayWeather,
474:20:46, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
464:Just being a vigilante...
455:11:19, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
423:Enter CambridgeBayWeather,
404:Enter CambridgeBayWeather,
376:Enter CambridgeBayWeather,
299:make a request for comment
65:17:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
30:02:42, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
2105:
1692:12:44, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
1504:09:14, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
1488:07:00, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
1463:18:36, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
1229:The Princess and the Frog
1222:The Princess and the Frog
864:19:36, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
844:18:44, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
827:03:56, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
503:23:10, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
325:henceforth its a Legend.
170:Medals won per Population
2073:to your user talk page.
1985:to your user talk page.
1499:
1282:
1145:
804:11:19, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
789:11:11, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
784:
773:10:19, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
754:05:49, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
749:
734:19:27, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
678:
585:
250:
177:
126:
962:,and coma from a comma,
1470:Meaning of "green" in
902:
2034:Arbitration Committee
2018:Hello! Voting in the
1946:Arbitration Committee
1930:Hello! Voting in the
1868:Arbitration Committee
1795:Arbitration Committee
1722:Arbitration Committee
1626:Arbitration Committee
1599:ArbCom Elections 2016
1524:Arbitration Committee
1344:Abie the Fish Peddler
1328:Abie the Fish Peddler
1185:Jimi Hendrix Mug Shot
1031:User talk:happy-melon
901:
560:topper "Hallelujah"."
362:Greensleaves edit war
297:perhaps it's time to
853:In response to your
265:Greensleeves (again)
2102:
1528:arbitration process
860:The Red Pen of Doom
823:The Red Pen of Doom
2050:arbitration policy
1962:arbitration policy
1884:arbitration policy
1811:arbitration policy
1738:arbitration policy
1642:arbitration policy
1601:: Voting now open!
1540:arbitration policy
903:
440:Bill Gates mugshot
292:Mary Hopkin et al.
273:RepublicanJacobite
2121:
2120:
2091:
2090:
2086:
2001:
2000:
1297:Talk:Alesha Dixon
936:
935:
602:comment added by
538:comment added by
35:Jennifer Anniston
2150:
2110:
2103:
2074:
2072:
2015:
2008:
1984:
1927:
1920:
1852:
1779:
1706:
1682:somewhere else.
1610:
1466:
1435:
1431:
1424:
1418:
1417:
1384:deleted contribs
1368:
1121:
1116:
1090:
1082:
1019:
1011:
943:
919:
894:
861:
824:
708:
703:
647:Collective nouns
614:
550:
320:Re: Greensleaves
285:
281:
274:
160:count per capita
63:
62:
2158:
2157:
2153:
2152:
2151:
2149:
2148:
2147:
2132:In Freundschaft
2096:
2066:
2006:
1978:
1918:
1913:
1912:
1853:
1845:
1840:
1839:
1780:
1772:
1767:
1766:
1707:
1699:
1676:
1671:
1670:
1654:the voting page
1611:
1603:
1567:
1548:the voting page
1514:
1475:
1456:
1444:
1434:
1429:
1422:
1420:
1369:
1364:
1363:
1360:
1319:
1276:user talk page.
1253:
1224:
1187:
1160:
1119:
1114:
1101:
1086:
1078:
1015:
1007:
999:
964:
951:
941:
927:
917:
892:
871:
859:
851:
834:
822:
813:
718:
706:
701:
696:
639:
620:
618:Re: Cilla Black
597:
533:
529:
510:
508:Charles Durning
481:
462:
442:
364:
322:
294:
284:
279:
272:
270:
267:
209:
139:
76:
52:
48:
37:
19:
17:Adjective order
12:
11:
5:
2156:
2154:
2126:: in memoriam
2119:
2118:
2116:my story today
2112:
2111:
2100:November songs
2095:
2092:
2089:
2088:
2057:the candidates
2027:eligible users
2016:
2005:
2002:
1999:
1998:
1969:the candidates
1939:eligible users
1928:
1917:
1914:
1891:the candidates
1854:
1847:
1846:
1844:
1841:
1818:the candidates
1781:
1774:
1773:
1771:
1768:
1745:the candidates
1708:
1701:
1700:
1698:
1695:
1675:
1672:
1612:
1605:
1604:
1602:
1596:
1566:
1563:
1517:
1513:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1474:
1468:
1461:comment added
1443:
1440:
1426:
1359:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1342:
1318:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1290:
1289:
1252:
1249:
1223:
1220:
1186:
1183:
1159:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1137:
1136:
1131:
1130:
1100:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1068:
1064:
1035:
1034:
1025:
998:
993:
980:Reply posted!
963:
960:
958:
949:
934:
933:
925:
891:
886:
870:
867:
850:
847:
833:
830:
812:
807:
792:
791:
757:
756:
741:
717:
714:
695:
687:
686:
685:
671:
667:
638:
635:
619:
616:
593:
592:
576:
575:
570:
569:
562:
561:
556:
555:
528:
525:
509:
506:
480:
477:
461:
460:Hey no problem
458:
441:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
416:
415:
363:
360:
343:
321:
318:
293:
290:
280:The'FortyFive'
276:
266:
263:
262:
261:
260:
259:
258:
257:
236:
234:
233:
208:
205:
185:
184:
164:
163:
138:
135:
134:
133:
118:
117:
112:
111:
106:
105:
100:
99:
94:
75:
72:
36:
33:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2155:
2146:
2145:
2141:
2137:
2133:
2129:
2125:
2117:
2113:
2109:
2104:
2101:
2093:
2087:
2085:
2081:
2077:
2070:
2064:
2063:
2058:
2053:
2051:
2047:
2043:
2039:
2035:
2029:
2028:
2023:
2022:
2017:
2014:
2010:
2009:
2003:
1997:
1996:
1992:
1988:
1982:
1976:
1975:
1970:
1965:
1963:
1959:
1955:
1951:
1947:
1941:
1940:
1935:
1934:
1929:
1926:
1922:
1921:
1915:
1911:
1910:
1906:
1902:
1898:
1897:
1892:
1887:
1885:
1881:
1877:
1873:
1869:
1864:
1861:
1860:
1851:
1842:
1838:
1837:
1833:
1829:
1825:
1824:
1819:
1814:
1812:
1808:
1804:
1800:
1796:
1791:
1788:
1787:
1778:
1769:
1765:
1764:
1760:
1756:
1752:
1751:
1746:
1741:
1739:
1735:
1731:
1727:
1723:
1718:
1715:
1714:
1705:
1696:
1694:
1693:
1689:
1685:
1681:
1674:Heather Mills
1673:
1669:
1668:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1655:
1650:
1645:
1643:
1639:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1622:
1619:
1618:
1609:
1600:
1597:
1595:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1581:
1580:
1576:
1572:
1564:
1562:
1561:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1537:
1533:
1529:
1525:
1521:
1512:
1509:
1505:
1501:
1497:
1496:David T Tokyo
1492:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1473:
1469:
1467:
1464:
1460:
1454:
1450:
1441:
1439:
1438:
1433:
1432:
1425:
1415:
1412:
1409:
1406:
1403:
1400:
1397:
1394:
1391:
1390:nuke contribs
1388:
1385:
1382:
1379:
1376:
1373:
1367:
1358:194.179.120.4
1357:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1316:
1310:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1288:
1284:
1280:
1279:David T Tokyo
1277:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1258:
1250:
1248:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1230:
1221:
1219:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1201:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1184:
1182:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1158:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1142:David T Tokyo
1139:
1138:
1133:
1132:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1122:
1117:
1109:
1106:
1098:
1094:
1091:
1089:
1083:
1081:
1074:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1040:David T Tokyo
1033:
1032:
1027:
1026:
1024:
1023:
1020:
1018:
1012:
1010:
1004:
997:
994:
992:
991:
987:
983:
978:
977:
973:
969:
961:
959:
956:
955:
952:
947:
945:
944:
932:
931:
928:
923:
921:
920:
912:
908:
900:
896:
895:
890:
887:
885:
884:
880:
876:
868:
866:
865:
862:
856:
848:
846:
845:
842:
840:
831:
829:
828:
825:
819:
811:
808:
806:
805:
801:
797:
790:
786:
782:
781:David T Tokyo
777:
776:
775:
774:
770:
766:
763:
755:
751:
747:
746:David T Tokyo
742:
738:
737:
736:
735:
731:
727:
723:
716:Heather Mills
715:
713:
712:
709:
704:
694:
691:
688:
684:
680:
676:
675:David T Tokyo
672:
668:
664:
663:
662:
661:
657:
653:
648:
644:
636:
634:
633:
629:
625:
617:
615:
613:
609:
605:
601:
591:
587:
583:
582:David T Tokyo
578:
577:
572:
571:
568:
564:
563:
558:
557:
553:
552:
551:
549:
545:
541:
537:
526:
524:
523:
519:
515:
507:
505:
504:
501:
500:not a sausage
498:
495:
490:
486:
478:
476:
475:
471:
467:
459:
457:
456:
452:
448:
439:
433:
430:
429:not a sausage
427:
424:
420:
419:
418:
417:
414:
411:
410:not a sausage
408:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
388:
387:
386:
383:
382:not a sausage
380:
377:
373:
369:
361:
359:
358:
354:
350:
345:
341:
340:
336:
332:
326:
319:
317:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
291:
289:
288:
283:
282:
275:
264:
256:
252:
248:
247:David T Tokyo
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
238:
237:
232:
228:
224:
220:
217:
216:
215:
214:
206:
204:
203:
199:
195:
191:
183:
179:
175:
174:David T Tokyo
171:
166:
165:
161:
156:
155:
154:
153:
149:
145:
136:
132:
128:
124:
123:David T Tokyo
120:
119:
114:
113:
108:
107:
102:
101:
97:
96:
95:
92:
90:
86:
82:
74:Greensleeves.
73:
71:
67:
66:
60:
56:
51:
46:
42:
34:
32:
31:
28:
23:
16:
2136:Gerda Arendt
2122:
2060:
2054:
2031:
2025:
2019:
1972:
1966:
1943:
1937:
1931:
1894:
1888:
1865:
1857:
1855:
1821:
1815:
1792:
1784:
1782:
1748:
1742:
1719:
1711:
1709:
1677:
1652:
1646:
1623:
1615:
1613:
1585:Gerda Arendt
1582:
1571:Gerda Arendt
1568:
1515:
1476:
1472:Greensleeves
1445:
1427:
1423:2 lines of K
1410:
1404:
1398:
1392:
1386:
1380:
1374:
1361:
1320:
1261:79.78.32.168
1254:
1251:Alesha Dixon
1227:
1225:
1204:
1202:
1188:
1161:
1157:John Fogerty
1110:
1102:
1087:
1079:
1072:
1059:
1043:
1036:
1029:Copied from
1028:
1016:
1008:
1000:
982:Captainclegg
979:
968:Captainclegg
965:
957:
939:
937:
915:
910:
904:
872:
855:edit summary
852:
837:
835:
832:Cricket lead
814:
796:Captainclegg
793:
765:Captainclegg
758:
726:Captainclegg
719:
697:
692:
690:Greensleeves
640:
621:
594:
530:
511:
482:
479:69.208.77.69
463:
443:
368:Greensleaves
365:
346:
342:
327:
323:
295:
277:
268:
235:
210:
186:
140:
93:
81:Stilettoarmy
77:
68:
44:
41:Urvashi Vaid
38:
20:
2128:Jerome Kohl
2062:voting page
1974:voting page
1896:voting page
1823:voting page
1750:voting page
1680:Whac-A-Mole
1457:—Preceding
1301:79.78.78.92
889:WP:PROGROCK
604:76.29.36.78
598:—Preceding
540:76.29.36.78
534:—Preceding
527:Cilla Black
466:Wysprgr2005
447:Grundle2600
2130:who said (
2046:topic bans
1958:topic bans
1880:topic bans
1807:topic bans
1734:topic bans
1638:topic bans
1536:topic bans
1408:block user
1402:filter log
1238:McDoobAU93
1056:verifiable
652:Elostirion
349:The C of E
331:The C of E
2094:In memory
2042:site bans
1954:site bans
1876:site bans
1803:site bans
1730:site bans
1634:site bans
1532:site bans
1414:block log
1366:Wikipéire
1234:talk page
1205:acquitted
1135:yourself?
875:Luminifer
722:Paparazzi
400:mythology
1378:contribs
942:Ę„ÉoĘŹÉ—iaɲ
918:Ę„ÉoĘŹÉ—iaɲ
624:TravisAF
600:unsigned
536:unsigned
514:Lebob-BE
59:contribs
2069:NoACEMM
1981:NoACEMM
1684:Britmax
1459:undated
1209:Doc9871
1191:Doc9871
1172:ukexpat
1120:Caldron
702:Rodhull
643:Cricket
390:As per
307:ukexpat
50:SatyrTN
27:Dr.frog
1522:. The
1480:DMacks
1115:Leaky
1073:others
1005:edit?
911:little
810:WP:NOT
707:andemu
396:legend
223:Pepso2
207:Landau
194:Krefts
144:Krefts
2124:Today
1088:melon
1080:Happy
1017:melon
1009:Happy
693:redux
2140:talk
2080:talk
2032:The
1991:talk
1944:The
1905:talk
1866:The
1832:talk
1793:The
1759:talk
1720:The
1688:talk
1663:talk
1624:The
1589:talk
1575:talk
1565:Mind
1556:talk
1500:talk
1484:talk
1453:talk
1396:logs
1372:talk
1348:talk
1332:talk
1324:here
1305:talk
1283:talk
1265:talk
1242:talk
1213:talk
1195:talk
1176:talk
1146:talk
1044:talk
1003:this
986:talk
972:talk
879:talk
869:Tull
839:Jack
800:talk
785:talk
769:talk
750:talk
730:talk
679:talk
656:talk
628:talk
608:talk
586:talk
544:talk
518:talk
489:this
485:This
470:talk
451:talk
398:and
392:this
353:talk
335:talk
311:talk
305:. –
251:talk
227:talk
198:talk
178:talk
148:talk
127:talk
85:talk
55:talk
1516:Hi,
1455:)
1430:303
1060:any
301:or
45:for
2142:)
2082:)
2071:}}
2067:{{
2044:,
1993:)
1983:}}
1979:{{
1956:,
1907:)
1899:.
1878:,
1834:)
1826:.
1805:,
1761:)
1753:.
1732:,
1690:)
1665:)
1657:.
1636:,
1591:)
1577:)
1558:)
1534:,
1502:)
1486:)
1350:)
1334:)
1307:)
1285:)
1267:)
1244:)
1215:)
1197:)
1178:)
1148:)
1046:)
988:)
974:)
881:)
841:|
802:)
787:)
771:)
752:)
732:)
681:)
658:)
630:)
610:)
588:)
546:)
520:)
472:)
453:)
374:.
355:)
337:)
313:)
253:)
229:)
200:)
180:)
150:)
129:)
91:)
87:)
57:|
2138:(
2078:(
1989:(
1903:(
1830:(
1757:(
1686:(
1661:(
1587:(
1573:(
1554:(
1498:(
1482:(
1465:.
1451:(
1416:)
1411:·
1405:·
1399:·
1393:·
1387:·
1381:·
1375:·
1370:(
1346:(
1330:(
1303:(
1281:(
1263:(
1240:(
1211:(
1193:(
1174:(
1144:(
1084:‑
1042:(
1013:‑
984:(
970:(
950:¢
926:¢
877:(
798:(
783:(
767:(
748:(
728:(
677:(
654:(
626:(
606:(
584:(
542:(
516:(
468:(
449:(
351:(
333:(
309:(
249:(
225:(
196:(
176:(
146:(
125:(
83:(
61:)
53:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.