Knowledge

User talk:DavidPatrick70

Source 📝

286: 112: 555: 531:
Even if I WAS somehow some "troll", WHICH I AM NOT, I've made good constructive edits. They don't seem to care about that at all. I've now been told I should take some sort of "WP:STANDARDOFFER" thing by Nick on IRC and that it is contingent on "admitting to" a whole list of things that trolling liar
458:
Amalthea, care to explain why you out-and-out lied about me? I am here in good faith and I have done my best to show good faith in all my edits. You on the other hand refuse to abide the policies of Knowledge in Assuming Good Faith and you and your fellow liar Deskana are accusing me based on "secret
197:
I believe I should be unblocked because: I am not the person the block was intended for. I am collateral damage from someone trying to block a vandal who caused trouble, and I went through the trouble of confirming my identity just to get an account created, and I do not know why I am being targeted
592:
The Ban Appeals Subcommittee has considered an appeal from this user. Our consensus view firmly supported dismissing the appeal. It was also brought to our attention that this user has been engaged in extremely rude, abrasive, and unpleasant IRC communications with administrators; evidence of this
535:
I've been doing a lot of reading of policies the past couple days. It's not me that's hypocritical, it's those ridiculous people who don't show anyone the benefit of the doubt even when the evidence that they are abusing and hounding an innocent person is slapped in their sad, sorry, sociopathic,
371:
The request remains the same. I have tried to speak with Deskana and been rudely told that there was a "last time we went through this" by Deskana despite never having been able to get so much as a single word response from Deskana before, therefore I am asking for someone uninvolved to review my
480:
Since I can't respond directly to the lies pasted to your talk page: they're lies. I'm not "trolling" you, the trolls are the ones lying about "secret evidence" to cover up their blatant incompetence. All they're doing is damaging the encyclopedia by getting in the way of constructive editing.
527:
It's not right, and both Deskana and Amalthea should be doubly ashamed of their incompetence and their hypocrisy. They've utterly failed to WP:AGF at the urgings of that sociopathic fraud Nick, they've utterly failed to avoid WP:BITE, they've utterly failed to pay attention to
425:
I have evidence to add to my case. While Deskana was being all Inspector Javert, someone else did something very similar to what the person who previously had my IP did, creating an ID of "libtardssuck." I know it wasn't me or from my IP because I was blocked at the time.
198:
yet again. I have not made vandalizing edits nor do I intend to, you can look at my edits and see that I am working constructively and intend to continue doing so. The blocking admin may have acted in good faith but was mistaken and made the block in error.
496:
I can't contradict the CheckUser evidence, not least because I don't have access to it. If it's right, then you should be ashamed of your hypocrisy. If it's really wrong, sorry, but you'll have to find your own way around the block.
550:
As you do not seem to be able to use your talk page without resorting to personal attacks, I've removed access to it. This is currently with BASC, if you have anything further to add, please email arbcom-appeals-en
372:
edits and see that I am constructive and not the person Deskana mistakenly thinks. I believe Deskana is acting in good faith but is overzealously causing collateral damage due to mistakes on his part.
532:
is trying to pin on me. Well, there's no way I admit to things I didn't do, and there's no way I'm going to say anything complimentary about that sociopathic, incompetent, blackmailing boob.
593:
was forwarded to the subcommittee at the time of the appeal. Our recommendation is therefore that this user not be unblocked in the future unless this additional evidence is considered.
383:
Procedural decline. This was a checkuser-based block; therefore, only an admin with access to that tool can properly assess the evidence on which the block was based. —
417:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
245:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
326: 152: 321: 147: 62: 22: 402: 230: 510: 101: 85: 52: 209:
Regrettably, all the evidence I have suggests you are not being truthful. You have one final route of appeal through the
340: 166: 57: 432:
Please consider the evidence and my edits. Deskana is in good faith but blinded by something and is acting mistakenly.
571: 298:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
124:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
299: 125: 97: 293: 119: 43: 38: 537: 482: 460: 433: 304: 268: 130: 561: 388: 73: 29:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: 69: 33: 506: 81: 80:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out 214: 411: 384: 239: 522: 500: 475: 210: 601: 453: 262: 254: 217: 48: 428:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Libtardssuck&action=history
603: 577: 545: 515: 490: 468: 441: 392: 276: 220: 105: 26: 594: 77: 21:
Hello, DavidPatrick70, and welcome to Knowledge! Thank you for
284: 110: 213:; see that page for information on how to contact them. -- 399:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
227:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
419:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
247:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
427: 354: 350: 344: 335: 331: 317: 313: 309: 180: 176: 170: 161: 157: 143: 139: 135: 292:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
118:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
88:, or ask your question on this page and then place 8: 96:before the question. Again, welcome! — 7: 459:evidence" that is purely made up. 14: 553: 58:How to create your first article 25:, especially what you did for 1: 267:under this by QueenOfFrance. 44:The five pillars of Knowledge 578:15:53, 5 February 2014 (UTC) 546:15:41, 5 February 2014 (UTC) 516:15:35, 5 February 2014 (UTC) 491:15:25, 5 February 2014 (UTC) 469:15:23, 5 February 2014 (UTC) 442:19:32, 4 February 2014 (UTC) 393:19:53, 4 February 2014 (UTC) 277:18:31, 4 February 2014 (UTC) 221:18:42, 4 February 2014 (UTC) 106:14:55, 4 February 2014 (UTC) 296:, who declined the request. 122:, who declined the request. 619: 604:09:24, 10 March 2014 (UTC) 63:Simplified Manual of Style 554: 403:guide to appealing blocks 231:guide to appealing blocks 39:Introduction to Knowledge 541: 486: 464: 437: 272: 259:I was instructed to put 211:Ban Appeals Subcommittee 53:How to develop articles 289: 115: 341:change block settings 288: 167:change block settings 114: 560:lists.wikimedia.org 98:alf laylah wa laylah 536:incompetent faces. 82:Knowledge:Questions 68:Please remember to 290: 116: 49:How to edit a page 23:your contributions 72:your messages on 610: 599: 574: 568: 559: 558: 557: 556: 526: 514: 503: 479: 457: 416: 410: 360: 358: 347: 329: 327:deleted contribs 287: 266: 258: 244: 238: 186: 184: 173: 155: 153:deleted contribs 113: 94: 93: 618: 617: 613: 612: 611: 609: 608: 607: 595: 590: 572: 562: 552: 551: 520: 501: 498: 473: 451: 449: 422: 414: 408: 407:, then use the 396: 374: 348: 338: 324: 307: 300:blocking policy 285: 260: 252: 250: 242: 236: 235:, then use the 224: 200: 174: 164: 150: 133: 126:blocking policy 111: 91: 90: 76:by typing four 34:Getting Started 19: 12: 11: 5: 616: 614: 589: 586: 585: 584: 583: 582: 581: 580: 538:DavidPatrick70 533: 529: 483:DavidPatrick70 461:DavidPatrick70 448: 445: 434:DavidPatrick70 424: 397: 381: 377:Decline reason 369: 365:Request reason 362: 305:DavidPatrick70 283: 281: 269:DavidPatrick70 225: 207: 203:Decline reason 195: 191:Request reason 188: 131:DavidPatrick70 109: 66: 65: 60: 55: 46: 41: 36: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 615: 606: 605: 602: 600: 598: 588:BASC decision 587: 579: 575: 569: 567: 566: 549: 548: 547: 543: 539: 534: 530: 524: 519: 518: 517: 512: 508: 504: 495: 494: 493: 492: 488: 484: 477: 471: 470: 466: 462: 455: 446: 444: 443: 439: 435: 430: 429: 421: 420: 413: 406: 404: 395: 394: 390: 386: 380: 378: 373: 368: 366: 361: 356: 352: 346: 342: 337: 333: 328: 323: 319: 318:global blocks 315: 314:active blocks 311: 306: 301: 297: 295: 294:administrator 282: 279: 278: 274: 270: 264: 256: 249: 248: 241: 234: 232: 223: 222: 219: 216: 212: 206: 204: 199: 194: 192: 187: 182: 178: 172: 168: 163: 159: 154: 149: 145: 144:global blocks 141: 140:active blocks 137: 132: 127: 123: 121: 120:administrator 108: 107: 103: 99: 95: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 64: 61: 59: 56: 54: 50: 47: 45: 42: 40: 37: 35: 32: 31: 30: 28: 24: 16: 596: 591: 564: 563: 472: 450: 431: 423: 418: 400: 398: 382: 376: 375: 370: 364: 363: 336:creation log 303: 291: 280: 251: 246: 228: 226: 208: 202: 201: 196: 190: 189: 162:creation log 129: 117: 89: 86:my talk page 84:, ask me on 67: 20: 385:Daniel Case 92:{{Help me}} 332:filter log 158:filter log 74:talk pages 523:Nihiltres 502:Nihiltres 476:Nihiltres 401:read the 351:checkuser 310:block log 229:read the 177:checkuser 136:block log 27:Redlining 454:Amalthea 447:Amalthea 322:contribs 148:contribs 17:Welcome! 528:proces. 412:unblock 345:unblock 263:Deskana 255:Deskana 240:unblock 218:ɐuɐʞsǝp 171:unblock 215:(ʞɿɐʇ) 78:tildes 511:edits 405:first 233:first 573:talk 565:Worm 542:talk 507:talk 487:talk 465:talk 438:talk 389:talk 273:talk 102:talk 70:sign 51:and 597:AGK 355:log 302:). 181:log 128:). 576:) 544:) 513:}} 499:{{ 489:) 467:) 440:) 415:}} 409:{{ 391:) 379:: 367:: 349:• 343:• 339:• 334:• 330:• 325:• 320:• 316:• 312:• 275:) 243:}} 237:{{ 205:: 193:: 175:• 169:• 165:• 160:• 156:• 151:• 146:• 142:• 138:• 104:) 570:( 540:( 525:: 521:@ 509:| 505:| 485:( 478:: 474:@ 463:( 456:: 452:@ 436:( 387:( 359:) 357:) 353:( 308:( 271:( 265:: 261:@ 257:: 253:@ 185:) 183:) 179:( 134:( 100:(

Index

your contributions
Redlining
Getting Started
Introduction to Knowledge
The five pillars of Knowledge
How to edit a page
How to develop articles
How to create your first article
Simplified Manual of Style
sign
talk pages
tildes
Knowledge:Questions
my talk page
alf laylah wa laylah
talk
14:55, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
administrator
blocking policy
DavidPatrick70
block log
active blocks
global blocks
contribs
deleted contribs
filter log
creation log
change block settings
unblock
checkuser

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.