Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:DeVerm

Source 📝

443:
of serious sources from his biographers and other serious works on Albanian history regarding that time period. They have been already used in the article. If we go around picking short unanalyzed, unreferenced and not RS sentences in 600 years of publication we might find out weird results. Eg that Scanderbeg died in 1466(Barletius and others who follow him claims January 1466) but later historians have put his death on January 1468 (ottoman chronicles, Venice, Ragusian, Papal documents etc ) which is the correct date. Or we may find out that his brother were killed by the sultan (Barletius and others who follow him claims that) in fact one of his brothers (Konstandin) probably died in Turkey, one (Reposh) died in 1430's in todays Macedonia and the other (Stanisha) helped Scanderbeg in his uprise and was still alive in 1445. That's why Scanderbeg biographers and works on Albanian history of that time period are more RS that cherry picking short sentences with no references at all, moreover from the books which are not on the topic or sometimes old newspapers or magazines.
263:
should go GA because it is avery well written, concise and to the point article, leading to others (the see alsos and mains in the heads of sections) so it is certainly worth a GA (to declare an interest, one of my friends at school in Cairo was called Kim Dijkstra and was adopted by Dutch parents from Indomnesia, but that is neither here nor there except he couldn't say S without making it SH, by English transliteration of course; thirty years later I have a Hungarian wife for whom S is (in English transliterartion) SH and SZ is S; I should learn by now, eh?
1570:
recommend you take your distance: you have done what you can to get it deleted, now let editors !vote and an admin come in to close it. Drop the stick, let it go. I am not with the project to argue and in my edit history you can not only see that I have many article space edits, but also that my AfD !votes are very accurate. Even the ones where I vote against the consensus and delete-close, in most cases the article is back and survived AfD within a year. I also !vote for delete often enough to not be an inclusionist.
740:
articles, and put all their info into one article. On the other hand, there are a dozen years worth of results (although only 3 have WP articles), and every year there will be another race, with another huge results table. They cannot all fit into the main article. So, considering all that, my recommendation is to leave them all alone, as separate articles, and work on finding more commentary on the individual years (e.g. interviews from the winners, etc) and add that (as prose) into the per-year articles. --
1725: 1652: 1246: 890: 1296: 1451: 1050: 1574:
editors know them well and thus must interpret them differently in cases where they don't agree with me. Dropping guidelines on established editors is also considered rude by many incl. me. Please don't confuse me countering you in AfD with me disliking you because I don't; we just don't share the same point of view. Without that, AfD would not work.
538: 1071:
is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us
754:
Comment - good to see that this isn't a simple case because it had me puzzled. From what I read about it, I understand that starting in 2010 this championship has become an recognized step-up to the Indy series. This also explains the huge pile of references since 2010. May be it would be wise to put
457:
I don't think you understand my intentions... I do not plan to become an editor of the Skanderbeg article and I know all I'll ever want to know about him already. For me, he is an interesting person, but not so much that I would start reading biographies, let alone research his family origins. During
355:
Hi Simon, I'm on holiday and brought my iPad... I can't even reply to you on this talk page with it :-( I can read and check your changes though and they look good to me... but I have more to check. I need to find a PC somewhere to reply like I'm doing now and that might take a bit time... very happy
262:
and try to sort out the references? I have done as best I can but my Dutch is not very good so have had to guess. I would rather pass than fail, but at the moment it is a fail, because the references are all over the place, though I have checked as many as I can and re-reffed them as best I can. This
662:
I recently PRODed these, which triggered an editing spree but I still very much doubt if these articles belong in WP. I don't see much more than race results and rankings and when I study the guidelines, that does not seem enough. However, when I see how much work the involved editor puts into this,
442:
We have his contemporaneous (Barletius, Muzaka, Francus) and his XXth century biographers (his main biographer being Noli but also others used in the article Hodgkinson, Frasheri etc) who claim this. The origin of family is thoroughly discussed in their books. Please read them. I mean, we have a lot
402:
Sorry to interrupt DeVerm no disrespect but would you read some more on the topic before you move forward, since your lack of knowledge might lead to problems in this topic. Books already used for this article are a good start and please look through talk page archives, to old editors of Scanderbeg
422:
Since I have done the latest GA review, I recognize that it is very annoying to repeat the same arguments over and over, which is the reason I proposed to include a FAQ on the talk page. However, information in the FAQ will need to be based on sources, not the opinion of editors. This means that it
1569:
I'm very up to date with not only the guidelines, but all the essays as well, thank you. I also have a suggestion for you: sit back and observe that Croptracker AfD. There are mostly Keep !votes and you are all over them with so many posts that it completely overshadows it: you are too involved. I
1349:
and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion
599:
2. The concept was launched in the Latin American world 15 years ago; it spreads very quickly in Spanish ("Bibliodiversidad") and in French (Bibliodiversité). The articles on Bibliodiversity exist in these 2 languages, and as far as I know, there was no problem to publish them. The english version
303:
I am spending some time gnoming it to polish it for grammar and refs etc, before I then do the formal GA review. Basically I am trying to do the gnoming rather than have you do it, cos it deserves good article but needs a lot of polishing. Five hours gnoming now, but certainly it will be GA by the
714:
as a general topic is not covered by secondary sources is telling. But considering that the 2010 and 2011 championships are well-sourced, I bet there are general sources for the event generally. The 2009 event has two independent reliable sources, so I probably would keep that, even if it's not
112:
Thanks for your mail. I have often looked at the New NL article and thougt about doing some work on it, but it is such a mess it looked too overwhelming. I will continue to look for your edits and help where I can. FYI, I am originally from NYC (native Englsih speaker) & live in Amsterdam (en
1573:
You should also try to use less Knowledge (XXG) links on discussions and people. You come here to my talk page and drop three links on me in one line. Look at my answer: not a single one. Don't confuse that with there not being any I could bring up; the reason is that I assume that established
417:
Hi Aigest, I think I know more about the subject than the average reader of the article; point is that the article must be able to give readers a clear, complete and neutral picture about Skanderbeg before it can ever pass a GA review. It means that the questions I asked on the talk page are a
739:
is rather small. And the three "season results" articles are really just tabulations with little narrative. The tabulations (the finishing results) are available online via external links .. although the WP presentation is much more colorful. It is tempting to just eliminate the per-year
1121:
I agree on your explanation on the removal of the «refimprove» template, though I do still stand by the «cleanup-reorganize». The article has been expanded so much the last few weeks that the current setup of sections is becoming unreadable and has created a huge index. I think it should be
595:
1. You said the main problem is that Wiki is not a dictionnary. You are right, but it is really an encyclopedia, presenting useful concepts. For example, the article BIODIVERSITY exists - and thousand of other. This is not about vocabulary: it's about CONCEPT. I really don't understand why
1737:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
240:
issues anywhere in the current article (will be happy to work on any if pointed to them, regardless of who contributed the content), think the references are sufficient and consider requesting a new rating review. It earns it's B-class rating now and I even hope for a little more.
922:
deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines.
603:
3. All the people involved in the "promotion and protection" of the Bibliodiversity are NGO, publishers, librarians, authors, etc. The aim of this promotion is totaly non commercial; it's an intelectual and "political" (independence vs. conglomerates) involvment.
1622: 912:) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the 1664:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
666:
Also, compare these three to the 2010 and 2011 articles... If all those references make those notable, what is the impact for these previous years of the same race? Or, would you bring these to AfD too, for failing the guidelines?
591:
If I understood well, you asked for the deletion of my article on the concept of "Bibliodiversity". I stopped the process, as I am fully convinced there is a misunderstanding there. Please, let me explain my point of view.
1765: 1692: 219:
Tnx for all comments. I know it can come as a bit of a shock when an editor like me shows up on an article the way I did. I don't avoid confrontation but I also think I always work within WP policy... albeit on the
1205:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 907:
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion
1749:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1676:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 197:
as background, but not to the detail it's provided. That sort of detail belongs on the VOC page. Anyway, I'm not sure the page can really be expanded that much more. Maybe sub articles are better.
1433:
thank you :) it's a lot of tinkering with cameras and the software to merge all the pictures. It is a 180 degree panorama with 3 pictures per section for HDR processing; 24 total I think :)
1374: 1145:
Yes, there has been some activity :) I will go and have a look at the French and Russian lists to get an idea of what you mean; if things can get improved then we should :) Thanks!
1127: 862:
I am not changing your article... just replacing the AfD template. As you can read on your talk page, you are invited to discuss this on the AfD discussion page. Thanks --
1022:
I renominated. The two sources you turned up don't look reliable, and the Google Books link had only false positives. I've been completely unable to verify through
423:
doesn't really help to state "His father was Albanian and nothing else". For that to be in the FAQ, you will have to 1) bring forward RS that shows he was Albanian
715:
ideal coverage. The 2008 and 2007 are weaker, for sure. I would probably merge those two into the main article, unless suitable coverage of them can be found.
1160: 517:
Give us your impressions of sources presented there. Also, it would be wise to tell us exactly which source really cannot be used, if any. Thanks in advance. --
560: 542: 157:
Sorry I beg to differ - you are reverting edits without discussion (edit summaries as you change the tenor of an article is hardly what can be considered
770:
I've added significantly more exposition and references to the 2008 article. Next I will tackle the 2007 article and the article for the series itself. -
944:
Yes I messed up with those cached pages from Commons; wouldn't mind a big red banner warning. I updated the category there now so we're good, thanks --
1123: 1480: 1285: 879: 403:
article it is becoming very frustrating keep telling the same things over and over again. Thank you for your effort anyway, I really appreciate it.
1115: 1108: 224:
side of it. Back to the article, I actually think it is now complete (background section was the biggest gap) and only needs detail work. I see no
626: 204:. "Discussion" is not stating your case on a talk page and then immediately reverting to your preferred change. But, that's just my opinion. -- 847: 1779: 1706: 1230: 1031: 1097: 1146: 656: 651: 646: 1541:. What I am seeing is a lack of familiarity with these guidelines and policy, a knowledge of which is helpful during AfD discussions. 462:
has become impossible and I decided to try and guide the editors on a path to break through that stalemate towards progress again. --
304:
time you and I are done with it. I should like you to look over my changes to correct any obvious mistakes, then we go to GA formal.
193:
In my opinion, I don't think we need a two paragraph rundown of the Dutch motivations for setting up the VOC - sure, the VOC needs a
556: 988: 1775: 1702: 1226: 897: 883: 1758: 1685: 1253: 1245: 904:, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image. 796:, but feel free to merge it if you would like. A merge does not require a deletion discussion or a PROD, and can be done per 1327: 1311: 755:
all pre-2010 years into one article, as a prelude to the big years starting in 2010. I'll think it over a bit more, tnx! --
914: 600:
aims to explain the concept in the english world. The article should be translated soon in Arabic, Farsi and Portuguese.
1351: 1217:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
1770: 1697: 1222: 488: 392: 119:
series Have done lot's ont this series. Wonder if you'd be interested to have a look and see if you have suggestions
418:
minimum set that needs to be answered in the article (the average reader will have more questions after reading it).
1261: 622: 98:
Have done some serious overhaul on New Netherland article and would appreciate you feedback and help with clean-up
931: 851: 1346: 1303: 1289: 1269: 1130:. Perhaps the template «condense» is more specific to the problem in the article? I'd appreciate your opinion! 1746: 1673: 1150: 1076:
If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
736: 711: 976: 843: 614: 1391: 1096:
You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see
484: 388: 1315: 1218: 1600: 1552: 1135: 721: 618: 569: 550: 514: 89: 519: 984: 980: 924: 1733: 1660: 1642: 1335: 1194: 1185: 1079:
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.
1529:
With all due respect, it seems to me that it would be helpful for you to become more familiar with
1487: 1265: 745: 334: 286: 1742: 1669: 1506:
thank you, I built a little piece of the Internet a long time ago when frame relay was hi-tech :)
1214: 1198: 775: 184: 147: 1538: 1631: 1359: 1072:
in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
458:
the GA review I did, I realized the Skanderbeg article is at a point where progress towards a
259: 209: 139: 1754: 1681: 1210: 1202: 797: 225: 1596: 1564: 1548: 1131: 805: 716: 564: 546: 448: 408: 124: 103: 85: 49: 1757:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1750: 1684:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1677: 1534: 1530: 1307: 1213:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1206: 1068: 901: 800:. We would want a redirect from polyacid anyways, since it is a valid search term. Thanks! 725: 573: 201: 162: 1171: 113:
spreek wat Nederlands). Look forward to seeing what can happen to improve article. djflem
459: 233: 229: 174: 170: 1623:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Kinetic degradation fluxion media (2nd nomination)
1501: 1484: 1460: 1414: 1388: 1378: 1323: 741: 330: 282: 116: 81: 1306:
requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under
900:
requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under
237: 178: 1319: 771: 695: 607:
I wish I was able to convince you. Let me know if you have further questions. Best,
181: 143: 1626: 1355: 205: 1724: 1651: 1590: 1575: 1507: 1434: 1350:
tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
1000: 945: 863: 818: 801: 756: 671: 463: 444: 428: 404: 357: 242: 120: 99: 62: 1377:, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on 1164: 670:
Thanks for your guidance; please reply here in this section of my talk page --
384: 1456: 1428: 1410: 1382: 1331: 596:
BIBLIODIVERSITY shouldn't be in there - just because it's a "new" concept?
1636: 1373:
Hi, I'm CFCF. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed,
1085: 966: 793: 690: 513:
Hello! :) You have been mentioned several times, so please come and see.
1761:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1688:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1049: 537: 1201:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
427:
show that all the sources that state something different are not RS. --
1341:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may
1783: 1710: 1604: 1583: 1556: 1515: 1493: 1464: 1442: 1418: 1395: 1363: 1273: 1234: 1176: 1154: 1139: 1035: 1008: 953: 938: 871: 855: 826: 809: 779: 764: 749: 730: 699: 679: 630: 578: 523: 492: 471: 452: 436: 412: 396: 365: 356:
you decided to do the fixes yourself now that I'm away - thanks! --
338: 290: 250: 213: 187: 151: 128: 107: 93: 70: 1091:
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.
480: 387:
article. I really appreciate your effort. Thank you very much.--
166: 1764:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
1691:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
173:- note that some of the statements you are making as close to 15: 1544:
As an aside, I agree with DVdm that this picture is stunning
1280:
at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
1545: 1406: 1294: 1244: 1048: 888: 735:
I concur with much of what IJethroBot says. The top level
642:
I am asking editors/admins for guidance on these articles:
663:
I start to doubt if I should bring these articles to AfD.
1375:
Comparison of programming languages (types, type system)
918:
to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for
1745:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1672:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1618: 1277: 1252:
Hello, DeVerm. Your question has been answered at the
1026:
sources that Dennis recorded for Decca or Parlophone.
1128:
Timeline of Russian inventions and technology records
1621:
has been reopened. You may be interested in seeing
638:
Guidance on these articles: Keep or Delete or Merge?
1483:; I appreciate what is very likely expert advice. — 1479:Hi DeVerm, thanks for the clarifications over at 1193:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 1122:reorganised on topic or by era, see for example 559:). You are invited to comment on the discussion 1595:Well, we can agree to disagree. Good luck! --- 1264:after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by 688:this is what AfD is for--be BOLD and use it. 1308:section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion 1114:Hi DeVerm, I noticed you undid my revision of 972:--D.P.S 14:38, 4 August 2011 (UTC)Danilomath 902:section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion 532:RFC/N discussion of the username "I Jethrobot" 165:territory as well - and making assertions and 44:talk page, so please add it to your watchlist. 8: 1481:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/FRF.12 1447:It is very, very well done. Congratulations 50:Please click here to leave me a new message. 545:has been filed concerning the username of 1352:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 1124:List of French inventions and discoveries 161:- also your changes are getting close to 1163:of this article. Serious work required. 1116:List of Dutch inventions and discoveries 1109:List of Dutch inventions and discoveries 1260:Please note that all old questions are 584:deletion of the BIBLIODIVERSITY article 142:, keep up the good work. Dank je wel. ( 258:Devere, A.U.B, can you have a look at 177:without any citations to back up for 7: 1734:2017 Arbitration Committee elections 1661:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 1448: 1369:I have unreviewed a page you curated 1310:, because it is a redirect from the 1747:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 1674:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 840:DO not change my Article,go away! 657:2009 Star Mazda Championship season 652:2008 Star Mazda Championship season 647:2007 Star Mazda Championship season 1718:ArbCom 2017 election voter message 138:Good job on expanding the article 14: 1219:review the candidates' statements 836:DO not change my Article,go away! 481:on Skanderbeg's article talk page 1723: 1650: 1449: 1044: 536: 1768:and submit your choices on the 898:File:Vanellus-chilensis-001.jpg 884:File:Vanellus-chilensis-001.jpg 80:Kindly continue to work on the 32:talk page, as I am watching it. 1225:. For the Election committee, 1195:Arbitration Committee election 1186:ArbCom elections are now open! 965:Thank you for fusion the page 71:07:31, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 1: 1731:Hello, DeVerm. Voting in the 1711:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 1658:Hello, DeVerm. Voting in the 1475:Thanks for the clarifications 1235:13:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 1159:Hi, please see my comment at 999:You're welcome, thanks :-) -- 915:the page's talk page directly 479:Hi, I wrote a message to you 24:If I have left you a message: 1784:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 1177:08:11, 25 January 2014 (UTC) 472:04:17, 4 February 2011 (UTC) 453:15:11, 3 February 2011 (UTC) 437:13:51, 3 February 2011 (UTC) 413:11:12, 3 February 2011 (UTC) 397:22:44, 28 January 2011 (UTC) 383:Thank you for the review of 251:03:55, 21 January 2011 (UTC) 214:05:02, 18 January 2011 (UTC) 188:04:42, 18 January 2011 (UTC) 152:17:40, 17 January 2011 (UTC) 108:22:23, 4 December 2008 (UTC) 94:20:20, 31 October 2008 (UTC) 1695:and submit your choices on 1256:. Feel free to reply there! 1221:and submit your choices on 1036:02:58, 18 August 2011 (UTC) 780:01:53, 10 August 2011 (UTC) 366:08:35, 17 August 2011 (UTC) 339:17:09, 16 August 2011 (UTC) 291:16:53, 16 August 2011 (UTC) 129:23:24, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 1801: 1776:MediaWiki message delivery 1703:MediaWiki message delivery 1693:the candidates' statements 1304:Motorcycle safety/Workpage 1290:Motorcycle safety/Workpage 1227:MediaWiki message delivery 1155:22:03, 12 April 2013 (UTC) 1140:07:48, 12 April 2013 (UTC) 1009:21:03, 4 August 2011 (UTC) 954:13:00, 2 August 2011 (UTC) 939:03:32, 2 August 2011 (UTC) 872:23:56, 1 August 2011 (UTC) 856:21:56, 1 August 2011 (UTC) 827:23:55, 1 August 2011 (UTC) 810:20:39, 1 August 2011 (UTC) 493:12:12, 16 March 2011 (UTC) 84:article. Yours sincerely, 36:If you leave me a message: 1637:17:34, 28 June 2016 (UTC) 1605:19:57, 26 June 2016 (UTC) 1584:14:49, 24 June 2016 (UTC) 1557:01:38, 24 June 2016 (UTC) 1516:15:01, 18 June 2016 (UTC) 1494:04:07, 18 June 2016 (UTC) 1465:19:02, 12 June 2016 (UTC) 1443:18:58, 12 June 2016 (UTC) 1419:17:51, 12 June 2016 (UTC) 1302:A tag has been placed on 896:A tag has been placed on 792:I contested your PROD on 765:22:17, 30 July 2011 (UTC) 750:21:52, 30 July 2011 (UTC) 731:19:24, 30 July 2011 (UTC) 700:19:03, 30 July 2011 (UTC) 680:18:15, 30 July 2011 (UTC) 631:13:06, 23 July 2011 (UTC) 579:22:12, 18 July 2011 (UTC) 524:16:13, 6 April 2011 (UTC) 169:generalisations with no 1579: 1511: 1438: 1405:... is just phenomenal, 1396:10:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC) 1364:10:37, 11 May 2016 (UTC) 1274:07:38, 10 May 2016 (UTC) 1004: 949: 867: 822: 760: 675: 467: 432: 361: 246: 200:You should also consult 66: 737:Star Mazda Championship 272:My sincere best wishes. 1343:contest the nomination 1299: 1254:Teahouse Q&A board 1249: 1053: 1041:New Page Patrol survey 893: 317:My sincere best wishes 1743:Arbitration Committee 1670:Arbitration Committee 1643:ArbCom Elections 2016 1298: 1248: 1199:Arbitration Committee 1052: 892: 610:Mr Étienne Galliand 1612: 1537:(for products), and 1203:arbitration process 712:Championship itself 543:request for comment 1759:arbitration policy 1686:arbitration policy 1645:: Voting now open! 1300: 1278:remove this notice 1250: 1215:arbitration policy 1067:Hello DeVerm! The 1058:New page patrol – 1054: 1034:and a clue-bat • 894: 710:The fact that the 281:S. (Or SH or SZ). 1635: 1347:visiting the page 1312:article namespace 1105: 1104: 1100: 1060:Survey Invitation 993: 979:comment added by 846:comment added by 729: 634: 617:comment added by 577: 485:Antidiskriminator 389:Antidiskriminator 260:Dutch East Indies 140:Dutch East Indies 134:Dutch East Indies 59: 58: 38:I will answer on 26:please answer on 1792: 1727: 1654: 1629: 1619:you commented on 1594: 1568: 1505: 1492: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1432: 1394: 1385: 1297: 1281: 1174: 1169: 1095: 1045: 1029: 1028:Ten Pound Hammer 992: 973: 936: 929: 911: 891: 858: 817:Done, thanks! -- 723: 633: 619:Etienne GALLIAND 611: 571: 540: 522: 53: 16: 1800: 1799: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1728: 1720: 1715: 1714: 1698:the voting page 1655: 1647: 1615: 1588: 1562: 1524: 1522:AfD discussions 1499: 1490: 1477: 1450: 1426: 1403: 1387: 1383: 1371: 1328:Knowledge (XXG) 1314:to a different 1295: 1293: 1286:Speedy deletion 1282: 1259: 1242: 1223:the voting page 1189: 1172: 1165: 1112: 1063: 1043: 1027: 1020: 974: 963: 932: 925: 909: 889: 887: 880:Speedy deletion 848:115.199.127.226 841: 838: 790: 640: 612: 588:Hello DeVerm. 586: 534: 518: 511: 381: 136: 78: 47: 12: 11: 5: 1798: 1796: 1766:the candidates 1729: 1722: 1721: 1719: 1716: 1656: 1649: 1648: 1646: 1640: 1614: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1571: 1547:. Regards, --- 1523: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1476: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1409:. Stunning! - 1402: 1399: 1370: 1367: 1292: 1288:nomination of 1283: 1266:Cordless Larry 1258: 1243: 1241: 1240:Teahouse reply 1238: 1192: 1188: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1111: 1106: 1103: 1102: 1093: 1090: 1088:to take part. 1081: 1080: 1077: 1065: 1056: 1042: 1039: 1019: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 962: 959: 958: 957: 886: 882:nomination of 877: 876: 875: 837: 834: 833: 832: 831: 830: 789: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 768: 752: 733: 705: 704: 703: 702: 660: 659: 654: 649: 639: 636: 585: 582: 533: 530: 528: 510: 507: 506: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 499: 498: 497: 496: 495: 420: 419: 380: 377: 376: 375: 374: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 346: 345: 344: 343: 342: 341: 323: 322: 321: 320: 319: 318: 310: 309: 308: 307: 306: 305: 296: 295: 294: 293: 276: 275: 274: 273: 267: 266: 265: 264: 217: 216: 198: 135: 132: 117:New Netherland 82:New Netherland 77: 76:New Netherland 74: 57: 56: 55: 54: 45: 33: 19: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1797: 1786: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1772: 1767: 1762: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1739: 1736: 1735: 1726: 1717: 1713: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1699: 1694: 1689: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1666: 1663: 1662: 1653: 1644: 1641: 1639: 1638: 1633: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1592: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1572: 1566: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1527: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1503: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1489: 1486: 1482: 1474: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1430: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1400: 1398: 1397: 1393: 1390: 1386: 1381:. Thank you. 1380: 1376: 1368: 1366: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1348: 1344: 1339: 1338:namespaces. 1337: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1305: 1291: 1287: 1284: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1257: 1255: 1247: 1239: 1237: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1187: 1184: 1178: 1175: 1170: 1168: 1162: 1161:the talk page 1158: 1157: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1147:190.34.220.26 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1119: 1117: 1110: 1107: 1101: 1099: 1092: 1089: 1087: 1084:Please click 1078: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1070: 1064: 1062: 1061: 1051: 1047: 1046: 1040: 1038: 1037: 1033: 1025: 1017: 1010: 1006: 1002: 998: 997: 996: 995: 994: 990: 986: 982: 978: 970: 968: 960: 955: 951: 947: 943: 942: 941: 940: 937: 935: 930: 928: 921: 917: 916: 905: 903: 899: 885: 881: 878: 873: 869: 865: 861: 860: 859: 857: 853: 849: 845: 835: 828: 824: 820: 816: 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 807: 803: 799: 795: 787: 781: 777: 773: 769: 766: 762: 758: 753: 751: 747: 743: 738: 734: 732: 727: 724:(note: not a 722: 720: 719: 713: 709: 708: 707: 706: 701: 697: 693: 692: 687: 686: 685: 684: 683: 681: 677: 673: 668: 664: 658: 655: 653: 650: 648: 645: 644: 643: 637: 635: 632: 628: 624: 620: 616: 608: 605: 601: 597: 593: 589: 583: 581: 580: 575: 572:(note: not a 570: 568: 567: 562: 558: 555: 552: 548: 544: 539: 531: 529: 526: 525: 521: 516: 508: 494: 490: 486: 482: 478: 477: 476: 475: 473: 469: 465: 461: 456: 455: 454: 450: 446: 441: 440: 438: 434: 430: 426: 421: 416: 415: 414: 410: 406: 401: 400: 399: 398: 394: 390: 386: 378: 367: 363: 359: 354: 353: 352: 351: 350: 349: 348: 347: 340: 336: 332: 329: 328: 327: 326: 325: 324: 316: 315: 314: 313: 312: 311: 302: 301: 300: 299: 298: 297: 292: 288: 284: 280: 279: 278: 277: 271: 270: 269: 268: 261: 257: 256: 255: 254: 253: 252: 248: 244: 239: 235: 231: 227: 223: 215: 211: 207: 203: 199: 196: 192: 191: 190: 189: 186: 183: 180: 176: 172: 168: 164: 160: 155: 153: 149: 145: 141: 133: 131: 130: 126: 122: 118: 114: 110: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 91: 87: 83: 75: 73: 72: 68: 64: 52: 51: 46: 43: 42: 37: 34: 31: 30: 25: 22: 21: 20: 18: 17: 1769: 1763: 1740: 1732: 1730: 1696: 1690: 1667: 1659: 1657: 1616: 1543: 1528: 1525: 1478: 1404: 1379:my talk page 1372: 1342: 1340: 1301: 1251: 1190: 1166: 1120: 1113: 1094: 1083: 1082: 1066: 1059: 1057: 1055: 1023: 1021: 975:— Preceding 971: 964: 933: 926: 919: 913: 906: 895: 842:— Preceding 839: 791: 718:I, Jethrobot 717: 689: 669: 665: 661: 641: 613:— Preceding 609: 606: 602: 598: 594: 590: 587: 566:I, Jethrobot 565: 553: 535: 527: 520:WhiteWriter 512: 460:Good Article 424: 382: 221: 218: 194: 158: 156: 137: 115: 111: 97: 79: 60: 48: 40: 39: 35: 28: 27: 23: 1771:voting page 1597:Steve Quinn 1565:Steve Quinn 1549:Steve Quinn 1384:Carl Fredik 1318:except the 1276:. (You can 1132:Marjoleinkl 1018:Dennis Hale 547:I Jethrobot 86:GeorgeLouis 1755:topic bans 1682:topic bans 1211:topic bans 1098:NPP Survey 1032:his otters 981:Danilomath 910:{{db-...}} 509:Please see 385:Skanderbeg 379:Skanderbeg 1751:site bans 1678:site bans 1613:It's back 1502:Prhartcom 1316:namespace 1207:site bans 742:Noleander 159:discussed 1617:The AFD 1539:WP:ISNOT 1401:This ... 1324:Template 1320:Category 1262:archived 1024:reliable 989:contribs 977:unsigned 967:Polyacid 961:Polyacid 934:Qwertyus 844:unsigned 794:Polyacid 788:Polyacid 772:Drdisque 627:contribs 615:unsigned 557:contribs 144:Gunkarta 1627:Toddst1 1526:Hello, 1356:Stefan2 1173:(talk) 798:WP:BOLD 331:Si Trew 283:Si Trew 226:WP:NPOV 206:Merbabu 195:mention 1591:DeVerm 1576:DeVerm 1535:WP:ORG 1531:WP:GNG 1508:DeVerm 1485:Prhart 1435:DeVerm 1336:Portal 1197:. The 1001:DeVerm 946:DeVerm 927:Marcus 920:speedy 864:DeVerm 819:DeVerm 802:VQuakr 757:DeVerm 672:DeVerm 464:DeVerm 445:Aigest 429:DeVerm 405:Aigest 358:DeVerm 243:DeVerm 202:WP:BRD 163:WP:3RR 121:Djflem 100:Djflem 63:DeVerm 1334:, or 696:talk 234:WP:OR 230:WP:RS 175:WP:OR 171:WP:RS 61:yes? 1780:talk 1741:The 1707:talk 1668:The 1632:talk 1625:. 1601:talk 1580:talk 1553:talk 1512:talk 1461:talk 1457:DVdm 1455:. - 1439:talk 1429:DVdm 1415:talk 1411:DVdm 1407:this 1360:talk 1354:. 1332:Help 1270:talk 1231:talk 1167:Tony 1151:talk 1136:talk 1086:HERE 1005:talk 985:talk 950:talk 868:talk 852:talk 823:talk 806:talk 776:talk 761:talk 746:talk 676:talk 623:talk 561:here 551:talk 515:LINK 489:talk 468:talk 449:talk 433:talk 425:plus 409:talk 393:talk 362:talk 335:talk 287:talk 247:talk 238:WP:V 222:bold 210:talk 185:Suro 182:Satu 179:WP:V 167:NPOV 148:talk 125:talk 104:talk 90:talk 67:talk 29:your 1488:com 1345:by 1191:Hi, 1126:or 1118:. 1069:WMF 726:bot 691:DGG 574:bot 483:.-- 236:or 1782:) 1774:. 1753:, 1709:) 1701:. 1680:, 1603:) 1582:) 1555:) 1533:, 1514:) 1463:) 1441:) 1417:) 1392:📧 1389:💌 1362:) 1330:, 1326:, 1322:, 1272:) 1233:) 1209:, 1153:) 1138:) 1030:, 1007:) 991:) 987:• 969:. 952:) 870:) 854:) 825:) 808:) 778:) 763:) 748:) 728:!) 698:) 682:. 678:) 629:) 625:• 576:!) 563:. 541:A 491:) 474:. 470:) 451:) 439:. 435:) 411:) 395:) 364:) 337:) 289:) 249:) 232:, 228:, 212:) 154:) 150:) 127:) 106:) 92:) 69:) 41:my 1778:( 1705:( 1634:) 1630:( 1599:( 1593:: 1589:@ 1578:( 1567:: 1563:@ 1551:( 1510:( 1504:: 1500:@ 1491:♥ 1459:( 1437:( 1431:: 1427:@ 1413:( 1358:( 1268:( 1229:( 1149:( 1134:( 1011:. 1003:( 983:( 956:. 948:( 908:( 874:. 866:( 850:( 829:. 821:( 804:( 774:( 767:. 759:( 744:( 694:( 674:( 621:( 554:· 549:( 487:( 466:( 447:( 431:( 407:( 391:( 368:. 360:( 333:( 285:( 245:( 208:( 146:( 123:( 102:( 88:( 65:(

Index

Please click here to leave me a new message.
DeVerm
talk
07:31, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
New Netherland
GeorgeLouis
talk
20:20, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Djflem
talk
22:23, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
New Netherland
Djflem
talk
23:24, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Dutch East Indies
Gunkarta
talk
17:40, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
WP:3RR
NPOV
WP:RS
WP:OR
WP:V
Satu
Suro
04:42, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
WP:BRD
Merbabu
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.