Knowledge

User talk:Deftera

Source 📝

393:
itself. Other video game company's articles have information about how the heads started working and I don't see why it shouldn't be allowed here. Would removing the section about the staff listings and trimming off the access info about each game (The plot summaries and such) be enough? I can always create pages specific to each game to avoid that extra info bleeding into the company's
586: 21: 292:
importantly advice about travelling there (do's and don'ts e.t.c, cultural considerations, what situations to avoid) which I felt was essential to anyone reading the wikipedia page and wishing to travel there. The information on it I have not seen anywhere else, and I think is relevant to any reader of the page. What exactly is your issue? David
539:
a decent sized plot that was suitable for Knowledge. I didn't know enough to do that but couldn't just leave it as it was either so I did the best I could. As I remember you were allowed to do the CLs in any order and didn't have to play through the good/evil cutscene, not sure if it's changed since then.
538:
I only played AQW for a short time and can't say I ever really got into it so I may have made a couple of mistakes. The plot section was a little ameteurish and ridiculously long with a paragraph devoted to each CL, I only really intended my description to be used as a placeholder until someone wrote
291:
The webpage that I linked to has an excellent resource for people wishing to learn about Tajikistan (you also appear to have removed links from Kyrgyzstan) It has an overview, detailed information about its history and culture, information about its climate, information about its geography, and most
371:
Hi Stratos, and thanks for your edits. The reason I edited the page was because it had a few irrelevant details (such as Adam's hopes on creating AdventureQuest or the Battle Bar, etc); Knowledge aims to provide only a summary of the article in question rather than details on game storylines, etc.
392:
Thanks for the quick response. I personally feel this article is extremely sparse and could do with more information about the company itself, hence my addition of many of the staff names and some info of the company's beginnings, which felt like vital information to an article about the company
355:
Hi, I was the one who was attempting to rewrite the Artix Entertainment section. I don't understand what was inherently wrong with the section. If you could please explain the specifics and how I can better expand the section, that would be great. All I did was expand and clarify aspects of the
233:
hi i did not edit the other user's post, i just change the heading because it was false and misleading. he call his heading "FINAL WARNING" but it was not a final warning because i got another "final warning" right below it, so it will make readers of my talk page think that i had received two
333:
links to sites that exist only to sell an item or service; links to these sorts of sites unless they are relevant to the topic are usually considered spam. Also if you want to sign your comment use four tildes (~) at the end of your post. Thanks for your message and if you need anything don't
441:
as it is being discussed with the user. Please note that UAA is only for blatant violations, and if a report has been removed or moved into the holding pen it is because it is not felt to be a blatant violation warranting immediate action. The user appears to be making constructive edits and
407:
Good idea. It's not that I don't think a description on how the company got started should be displayed on the page, I just felt the current description failed to properly document the founding (such as focusing on Adam's motivation and hopes instead of the basic who, what and where).
218:
You placed a clean up tag on my first page I created on here. Can you please take a look at it again and let me know if it looks better of what I could do to inprove it??? I am just learning how to do the coding on here so it is interesting learning it on the fly.
193:
Thank you for your work on the article in question, however a full blanking without giving a valid CSD reason or challange of content could be considered vandalasm. I have restored the content and subsequently put the article up for a CSD:A7 nomination.
376:
and included a lot of AE jargon such as staff nicknames which might confuse some readers. Again, thanks for your contributions and if you haven't already I suggest you read the policies to learn what is and isn't accepted on Knowledge.
627:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 320:
Hi David, and welcome to Knowledge! There are a number of reasons for my removal. First of all, Knowledge aims to provide encyclopedic information on the countries such as politics, religion, etc. from a
513:
When was it explicitly said the player was actually hunting down the Chaos Lords? And the player is not doing it "one by one", it's just that Drakath only seems to have one Chaos Lord at a time.
92: 100: 72: 48: 356:
company and its workings. I understood the need to avoid advertisement and took that into consideration. If you can please help me with this article, I'd be deeply appreciative.
40: 56: 442:
co-operating with suggestions to change their username, so that is likely to resolve the issue. If they do not agree to change their username the report should be taken to
325:. The website you linked doesn't seem to be neutral, and seems to be aimed at tourists rather than providing encyclopedic content. Second, the source has to be known to be 507:
I think the plot may have been a bit over shortened. Not that it was at a perfect size before, but one paragraph seems overly short. Also, there are some inaccuracies.
28: 80: 64: 558:
I don't remember being allowed to skip the good/evil thing. Unless you do all the stuff in the wrong order, but in which case, you're not doing the plot right,
479:(especially as they've indicated that they will change their username if necessary), since the user's edits so far have been consistent anti-vandalism work. 329:, especially for large articles like well known countries (such as a well known media source or scientific journal). Third and probably foremost, Knowledge 373: 326: 131: 143: 652: 562:. While I'm not sure if you're forced to do it in a certain order, its clear that they're designed to do each CLord in a certain order. 113: 590: 126: 523:
to choose one side. There is no "may" about it. Your faction choice hasn't, as of yet, actually had any effect on the storyline. -
308: 648: 322: 510:
The plot revolves around the player hunting down thirteen "lords of chaos" one by one, a group controlled by the antagonist.
446:
for comment; feel free to take it there if you can't make progress discussing it with the user. Thanks for following up.
121: 639:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
644: 265: 239: 491: 458: 330: 137: 482: 449: 567: 528: 501: 235: 220: 20: 93:
Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Knowledge editors
41:
Courts order Knowledge to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"
434: 304: 300: 296: 234:
legitimate final warning, when this is not the case, because the first one was just an opinion. thx--
640: 398: 361: 169: 272: 158: 49:
Indian courts order Knowledge to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus
616: 607: 596: 199: 187: 636: 620: 563: 524: 438: 635:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 467:
Note that I've just left a follow-up note on the user's talk page. I think for the sake of
516:
The player may also choose to side with two other factions, known simply as Good or Evil.
173: 632: 624: 476: 468: 443: 394: 357: 260: 172:) but I'm unconvinced it's vandalism. I've reverted you (recognising your good faith). 165: 628: 472: 209: 475:
it's definitely worth trying to follow it up with the user rather than taking it to
540: 409: 378: 335: 195: 255: 656: 601: 571: 549: 532: 494: 461: 418: 402: 387: 365: 344: 312: 280: 243: 223: 203: 181: 623:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
559: 164:
Hi Deftera! You reverted an editor on this talk page, citing
168:. I'm not totally sold on their post (it's arguably 615:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 433:Hi, I noticed that you filed a repeat report of 8: 154:What have I done wrong? Leave a post below. 589:You are invited to join the discussion at 15: 101:Jump in the line, rock your body in time 253:which is also a final warning. Cheers! 18: 7: 85:tes defending the English Knowledge? 57:A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics 594: 437:, but the report is already in the 591:Knowledge talk:Wikipediholism test 73:Are you ready for admin elections? 14: 641:review the candidates' statements 584: 19: 372:Also, the article had a slight 647:. For the Election committee, 617:Arbitration Committee election 608:ArbCom elections are now open! 419:13:13, 24 September 2010 (UTC) 403:22:59, 23 September 2010 (UTC) 388:22:39, 23 September 2010 (UTC) 366:22:10, 23 September 2010 (UTC) 345:13:25, 20 September 2010 (UTC) 313:12:49, 20 September 2010 (UTC) 281:20:55, 19 September 2010 (UTC) 244:20:54, 19 September 2010 (UTC) 224:09:51, 17 September 2010 (UTC) 204:15:41, 17 September 2010 (UTC) 1: 657:13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 572:21:59, 13 November 2010 (UTC) 550:19:52, 13 November 2010 (UTC) 533:19:19, 13 November 2010 (UTC) 495:22:50, 16 October 2010 (UTC) 462:22:42, 16 October 2010 (UTC) 643:and submit your choices on 287:Removal of an external link 182:19:09, 14 August 2010 (UTC) 65:asilvering's RfA debriefing 672: 649:MediaWiki message delivery 374:promotional/informal tone 602:05:00, 23 May 2015 (UTC) 621:Arbitration Committee 502:AdventureQuest Worlds 323:neutral point of view 351:AE article rescinded 625:arbitration process 637:arbitration policy 159:Talk:Steven Slater 334:hesitate to ask! 316: 299:comment added by 249:The first was an 152: 151: 91:Recent research: 29:26 September 2024 663: 600: 588: 587: 545: 493: 488: 487: 460: 455: 454: 414: 383: 340: 315: 293: 276: 269: 263: 258: 236:Bad edits r dumb 140: 99:Traffic report: 71:News and notes: 47:Community view: 23: 16: 671: 670: 666: 665: 664: 662: 661: 660: 645:the voting page 611: 585: 582: 541: 517: 511: 505: 485: 483: 480: 452: 450: 447: 435:User:Ewe Fokker 431: 410: 379: 353: 336: 331:looks down upon 294: 289: 277: 274: 270: 267: 261: 256: 231: 213: 191: 162: 148: 136: 106: 105: 12: 11: 5: 669: 667: 614: 610: 605: 581: 578: 577: 576: 575: 574: 553: 552: 519:The player is 515: 509: 504: 499: 498: 497: 430: 427: 426: 425: 424: 423: 422: 421: 352: 349: 348: 347: 288: 285: 284: 283: 273: 266: 230: 227: 212: 207: 190: 185: 161: 156: 150: 149: 147: 146: 141: 134: 129: 124: 118: 117: 116: 108: 107: 104: 103: 96: 95: 88: 87: 76: 75: 68: 67: 60: 59: 52: 51: 44: 43: 39:In the media: 36: 35: 32: 31: 25: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 668: 659: 658: 654: 650: 646: 642: 638: 634: 630: 626: 622: 618: 609: 606: 604: 603: 598: 593:. Thanks. — 592: 580:Quixotic plea 579: 573: 569: 565: 561: 557: 556: 555: 554: 551: 548: 546: 544: 537: 536: 535: 534: 530: 526: 522: 514: 508: 503: 500: 496: 492: 490: 489: 478: 474: 470: 466: 465: 464: 463: 459: 457: 456: 445: 440: 436: 428: 420: 417: 415: 413: 406: 405: 404: 400: 396: 391: 390: 389: 386: 384: 382: 375: 370: 369: 368: 367: 363: 359: 350: 346: 343: 341: 339: 332: 328: 324: 319: 318: 317: 314: 310: 306: 302: 298: 286: 282: 279: 278: 271: 264: 259: 252: 248: 247: 246: 245: 241: 237: 228: 226: 225: 222: 216: 211: 210:Gary J. Alter 208: 206: 205: 201: 197: 189: 186: 184: 183: 180: 179: 176: 171: 167: 160: 157: 155: 145: 142: 139: 135: 133: 130: 128: 125: 123: 120: 119: 115: 112: 111: 110: 109: 102: 98: 97: 94: 90: 89: 86: 84: 78: 77: 74: 70: 69: 66: 62: 61: 58: 55:Serendipity: 54: 53: 50: 46: 45: 42: 38: 37: 34: 33: 30: 27: 26: 22: 17: 612: 597:Technical 13 583: 547: 542: 520: 518: 512: 506: 481: 448: 432: 416: 411: 385: 380: 354: 342: 337: 290: 254: 251:only warning 250: 232: 217: 215:Hi Deftera, 214: 192: 177: 174: 163: 153: 82: 564:Harry Blue5 525:Harry Blue5 439:holding pen 295:—Preceding 229:explanation 221:Janemillert 138:Suggestions 114:Single page 633:topic bans 429:UAA report 301:David07905 122:Front page 629:site bans 395:Stratos40 358:Stratos40 170:off topic 166:vandalism 132:Subscribe 79:Gallery: 63:Opinion: 484:Giftiger 451:Giftiger 327:reliable 309:contribs 297:unsigned 144:Archives 81:Are Ludd 543:Deftera 477:WP:RFCN 469:WP:BITE 444:WP:RFCN 412:Deftera 381:Deftera 338:Deftera 196:Hasteur 188:T.s.p.e 619:. The 521:forced 486:Wunsch 473:WP:AGF 453:Wunsch 127:About 653:talk 595:{{U| 568:talk 560:dood 529:talk 471:and 399:talk 362:talk 305:talk 240:talk 200:talk 175:TFOW 613:Hi, 599:}} 655:) 631:, 570:) 531:) 401:) 364:) 311:) 307:• 242:) 202:) 83:ai 651:( 566:( 527:( 397:( 360:( 303:( 275:4 268:9 262:J 257:M 238:( 198:( 178:R

Index

The Signpost
26 September 2024
Courts order Knowledge to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"
Indian courts order Knowledge to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus
A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics
asilvering's RfA debriefing
Are you ready for admin elections?
Are Luddaites defending the English Knowledge?
Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Knowledge editors
Jump in the line, rock your body in time
Single page
Front page
About
Subscribe
Suggestions
Archives
Talk:Steven Slater
vandalism
off topic
TFOWR
19:09, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
T.s.p.e
Hasteur
talk
15:41, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Gary J. Alter
Janemillert
09:51, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Bad edits r dumb
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.