430:- you can see that Kit Bigelow is named as recipient of the 2011 Religious Freedom Award. We thought such citations were welcomed by Knowledge (XXG) to substantiate material. Ms. Bigelow is currently under consideration by the White House for a top religious freedom commission and a Knowledge (XXG) page had been suggested. Her website is www.krbigelow.com and all links and citations that were to be posted on Knowledge (XXG). May I ask ... what's the problem? —
732:, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Knowledge (XXG) takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is your last and only warning. Thank you.
507:
There was no copyright violation but rather a link for citation purposes to a press release of a religious rights organization. This practice is used thousands of times on
Knowledge (XXG) to provide citations. Even someone like you could understand it. Please have someone explain it to you. On a personal note, hope you enjoy the story about you that is now online and making the social media rounds:
717:
274:
148:
23:
757:
300:
by alleging at David E. Henderson that the link you have not posted is a possible violation of copyright is absurd and untrue. I wrote that article for an online newsletter, and it is completely unrelated to
Knowledge (XXG). Personally, I think your action reveals an inability to grasp facts and context.
577:
Come on
Haworth aka Theroadislong ... this crap from you has gone on long enough. Prove ... SHOW ... indicate precisely what you allege is copyright infringement. I demand that you do so immediately or retract all of your self-righteous and amateurish gibberish. What are you talking about? What link,
506:
is not a copyvio because "Kit is named as recipient …" What sort of Alice-in-Wonderland logic is that? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:29, 30 March 2012 (UTC)" will be used by me in a subsequent blog posting that specifically targets you just as today's did. You clearly are an uneducated troglodyte.
299:
Is it possible to have a civil exchange with you. I am not attacking you but rather stating the facts, according to U.S. law. I know you live in a village south of London and may not be familiar what you have posted is, indeed, very serious and a complaint against you will be initiated. Furthermore,
746:
If you are referring to David E. Henderson, I wrote the material in question for an online magazine as I do regularly for many magazines. Furthermore, it was not mentioned or linked to in my bio. Rather, one of your administrators incorrectly assumed and alleged that it was a copyright infraction.
570:
Nothing was "copied and pasted" from anywhere else other than a Word document. That is a reckless accusation, and you are now beginning to make up things. I challenge you to prove it because you are venturing farther out on thin ice legally. I believe you have already posted potentially slanderous
45:
content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about
387:
It is bad enough that you submit a blatant autobiography but you then start to attack
Knowledge (XXG) editors. I have applied a brief block to show that we mean business. If you resume the same behaviour when the block expires, you are likely to be blocked for longer. I would be interested to know
253:
I'm sorry but I don't understand what you think I posted that could be slanderous? That is a VERY serious accusation. Please assume good faith and stop attacking me. I am here to improve
Knowledge (XXG)'s articles which do HAVE to be correctly referenced. Feel free to file any complaint about my
212:
Actually, I am correct and you are ill-informed. If you don't like it, remove the post, and I will file a complaint against your self-righteous behavior with
Knowledge (XXG). Additionally, I demand that you remove immediately the false, misleading and possibly slanderous language that you posted
501:
Listen
Haworth, you are not a writer or published so consider your words wisely. I suspect this conversation will be reviewed by others at Knowledge (XXG). Your quote above, "I am amazed. You are an author and reporter yet you seem to have no idea of copyright law. You say that using text from
652:
So by your own admission it's material written by Kit
Bigelow, and therefore copyrighted by her. Unless she explicitly licenses it for reproduction under one of the broad copyleft licenses we accept here, we cannot allow that language in Knowledge (XXG), because it is copyrighted content.
784:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you.
648:." It was a hyperlink, and nothing was copy and pasted. KIT BIGELOW WROTE THOSE WORDS. IT'S TAKEN FROM HER BIO, AND THE ORGANIZATION INCLUDED IT IN THEIR PRESS RELEASE, AS I HAVE JUST EMAILED TO YOU. NOW, TAKE DOWN THE MISINFORMATION.
554:
Knowledge (XXG) does not accept content copied and pasted from elsewhere. I am sure that both articles can be recreated as long as they use neutral tone and are correctly referenced to reliable third party references. Kind
216:"This page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference. 14:14, 29 March 2012 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page Kit Bigelow (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of
417:
This page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference. 14:14, 29 March 2012 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page Kit
Bigelow (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of
375:
I followed those instructions on the 29 as you suggest. I wrote the material and am the copyright holder. It was an article for an online magazine. Why, then, is this matter still being questioned by
Knowledge (XXG)?
482:
which in a nutshell states "Do not add content to Knowledge (XXG) if you think that doing so may be a copyright violation. Contributors should take steps to remove any copyright violations that they find."
640:
After Haworth refused, I have just emailed Jimmy Wales to ask that this false, inaccurate and potentially libel Knowledge (XXG) language be removed immediately: "deleted the article on
230:
deleted the article and the text above is just the standard Knowledge (XXG) content that is automatically left behind after a copyright violation. I have no way of deleting that for you.
193:
Now, Theroadislong, you have become biased and irrational by requesting such specific citations. That is no call for you acting in such an unreasonable manner. You are just being nasty.
618:
The deleted material was not, as you claim, merely a link to that other page, but rather a word-for-word duplication of the content thereof. Deh343, are you claiming that the website
571:
statements, and now you are just making matters worst by contriving excuses based on nothing. I refer you to how the law regarding hyperlinks is interpreted by Stanford University:
704:
327:
Circle the wagons time, huh? Both you and User:Stuartyeates are wrong. The article was written by Steve Kayser, publisher of ExpertAccess, and he backs me up. Here is his email:
671:
175:). Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see:
413:
Re "Kit Bigelow," I appreciate this opportunity to contact you directly because the reason for the deletion was clearly in error. The following is posted:
844:
700:
167:. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for
197:
I'm afraid you are incorrect, Knowledge (XXG) is based entirely on reliable third party references and the article currently has none whatsoever.
285:
to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you.
508:
176:
277:
Welcome to Knowledge (XXG). Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to
172:
549:
338:
780:
774:
747:
If you are referring to Kit Bigelow, she is the author of all material in question. So, what's your problem? Please be more specific?
854:
served. Did you follow the link that you created? It pointed to a disambiguation page listing eighteen people none of whom is you. —
95:
71:
42:
26:
Hello Deh343. We welcome your contributions to Knowledge (XXG), but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
358:
and look at the section titled "Can you help resolve this issue?" it has three options for you to resolve the problem. Kind regards
35:
775:
781:
278:
67:
815:
865:
829:
738:
463:
399:
110:
47:
448:
I am amazed. You are an author and reporter yet you seem to have no idea of copyright law. You say that using text from
441:
60:
articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
27:
247:
Well, at least now we know you are neither an honest nor truthful person. But, then, I suspect you already know that.
388:
how you can possibly think that noting that an article was a copyright violation could be considered slanderous. —
156:
103:
99:
572:
282:
790:
607:
560:
509:
http://www.davidhenderson.com/2012/03/30/looking-behind-the-veil-of-wikipedia-and-who-is-pulling-the-levers/
487:
363:
345:
315:
290:
259:
235:
202:
184:
137:
118:
765:
729:
725:
721:
179:, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you.
213:
regarding Kit Bigelow. You clearly did not read the citation, and we demand it to be removed immediately:
94:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to
761:
550:
http://expertaccess.cincom.com/2011/06/brand-journalism-connects-the-next-era-of-business-communications/
452:
is not a copyvio because "Kit is named as recipient …" What sort of Alice-in-Wonderland logic is that? —
109:
For information on how to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) when you have a conflict of interest, please see
681:
660:
629:
805:
479:
164:
809:
168:
859:
823:
786:
733:
641:
603:
587:
556:
545:
531:
519:
483:
457:
431:
393:
359:
355:
341:
311:
286:
255:
231:
198:
180:
152:
133:
114:
31:
46:
that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by
541:
334:
307:
81:
599:
53:
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
675:
654:
623:
281:
other editors. Please comment on the content and not the contributors. Take a look at the
845:
Baby boomers grew up with Encyclopedia Britannica, and Knowledge (XXG) is poor substitute
379:
Please feel free to delete the page, David E. Henderson. I have no objection. Thank you.
699:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
80:
to the Knowledge (XXG) article or website of your organization in other articles (see
855:
819:
595:
583:
527:
515:
453:
389:
227:
337:
is suggesting that the content of the article has been copied and pasted from here
772:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
328:
716:
171:, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see
573:
http://fairuse.stanford.edu/Copyright_and_Fair_Use_Overview/chapter6/6-c.html
90:
so that you do not accidentally breach Knowledge (XXG)'s content policies.
703:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "
151:
Please do not write an article about yourself, as you apparently did at
340:, and Knowledge (XXG) cannot accept content which is copied in that way.
622:
contains a copyright waiver that none of us noticed? Please clarify. --
74:, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
869:
833:
794:
743:
686:
665:
634:
611:
564:
491:
467:
403:
367:
349:
319:
294:
263:
239:
206:
188:
141:
122:
769:
764:
and Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion, you should
582:
I was just trying to explain to you what happened? Namely that
132:
You keep removing citation requests without adding citations?
645:
619:
591:
535:
503:
449:
427:
419:
217:
41:
All editors are required to comply with Knowledge (XXG)'s
426:
There is no copyright infringement because at the link -
760:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
644:
because it was an unambiguous copyright infringement of
590:
because it was an unambiguous copyright infringement of
544:
added the copyright violation notice to the article on
534:
because it was an unambiguous copyright infringement of
58:
Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating
851:
728:
fully and make sure you understand what they mean. For
578:
what information, what material? Prove it or retract.
548:
because it was a direct copy of the content from here
66:. Everyone is welcome to provide information about
672:our boilerplate consent form for just this purpose
111:our frequently asked questions for organizations
50:and writing with as little bias as possible.
701:Knowledge (XXG):Dispute resolution noticeboard
674:, which the original author must fill out. --
8:
843:You failed to mention above your blog post:
538:(It was copied and pasted from that website)
522:are two different users, I am not an admin.
670:I've sent you an e-mail, referring you to
333:I think you may be misunderstanding us
64:Be cautious about deletion discussions
38:or close connection to the subject.
7:
306:The copyright violation was added by
163:discouraged – see our guideline on
14:
779:
773:
755:
715:
272:
146:
21:
705:David E. Henderson, Kit Bigelow
1:
804:What is your relationship to
514:You are confusing two users.
478:It may help if you read this
169:articles about living people
850:Please explain what purpose
100:verifiability of information
602:who has investigated this.
885:
744:21:46, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
726:Knowledge (XXG):Plagiarism
722:Knowledge (XXG):Copyrights
687:22:39, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
666:22:28, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
635:21:58, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
612:20:49, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
565:12:36, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
492:15:26, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
468:10:29, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
404:23:11, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
368:22:40, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
350:22:25, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
320:22:00, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
295:21:46, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
264:21:41, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
240:22:46, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
207:19:49, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
189:16:07, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
142:15:38, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
123:13:06, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
795:19:55, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
354:If you visit the article
173:Wikipedians with articles
870:22:38, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
834:11:31, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
177:Why was my page deleted?
165:writing autobiographies
646:http://irla.org/436.htm
620:http://irla.org/436.htm
592:http://irla.org/436.htm
586:deleted the article on
536:http://irla.org/436.htm
530:deleted the article on
504:http://irla.org/436.htm
450:http://irla.org/436.htm
428:http://irla.org/436.htm
420:http://irla.org/436.htm
218:http://irla.org/436.htm
839:Also making the rounds
594:I suggest you contact
88:Exercise great caution
28:you have written about
96:neutral point of view
43:neutral point of view
254:behaviour. Regards.
82:Knowledge (XXG):Spam
72:deletion discussions
36:conflict of interest
68:independent sources
695:Dispute resolution
546:David E. Henderson
356:David E. Henderson
153:David E. Henderson
742:
542:User:Stuartyeates
335:User:Stuartyeates
308:User:Stuartyeates
34:, you may have a
876:
783:
777:
759:
758:
736:
719:
711:Copyright issues
684:
678:
663:
657:
632:
626:
600:User:Jimbo Wales
276:
275:
150:
149:
48:reliable sources
25:
24:
884:
883:
879:
878:
877:
875:
874:
873:
841:
802:
768:by typing four
766:sign your posts
756:
753:
713:
697:
682:
676:
661:
655:
630:
624:
411:
385:
273:
147:
130:
104:autobiographies
30:in the article
22:
19:
12:
11:
5:
882:
880:
840:
837:
801:
798:
752:
749:
712:
709:
707:". Thank you.
696:
693:
692:
691:
690:
689:
638:
637:
615:
614:
568:
567:
552:
539:
524:
523:
499:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
471:
470:
424:
423:
410:
407:
384:
381:
373:
372:
371:
370:
325:
324:
323:
322:
271:
269:
268:
267:
266:
245:
244:
243:
242:
210:
209:
155:. Creating an
129:
126:
113:. Thank you.
92:
91:
85:
75:
61:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
881:
872:
871:
867:
864:
861:
857:
853:
848:
846:
838:
836:
835:
831:
828:
825:
821:
817:
814:
811:
807:
799:
797:
796:
792:
788:
787:Theroadislong
782:
776:
771:
767:
763:
750:
748:
745:
740:
735:
731:
730:legal reasons
727:
723:
718:
710:
708:
706:
702:
694:
688:
685:
679:
673:
669:
668:
667:
664:
658:
651:
650:
649:
647:
643:
636:
633:
627:
621:
617:
616:
613:
609:
605:
604:Theroadislong
601:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
580:
579:
575:
574:
566:
562:
558:
557:Theroadislong
553:
551:
547:
543:
540:
537:
533:
529:
526:
525:
521:
520:Theroadislong
517:
513:
512:
511:
510:
505:
493:
489:
485:
484:Theroadislong
481:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
469:
465:
462:
459:
455:
451:
447:
446:
445:
444:) via e-mail
443:
440:
437:
433:
429:
421:
416:
415:
414:
408:
406:
405:
401:
398:
395:
391:
382:
380:
377:
369:
365:
361:
360:Theroadislong
357:
353:
352:
351:
347:
343:
342:Theroadislong
339:
336:
332:
331:
330:
329:
321:
317:
313:
312:Theroadislong
309:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
297:
296:
292:
288:
287:Theroadislong
284:
280:
265:
261:
257:
256:Theroadislong
252:
251:
250:
249:
248:
241:
237:
233:
232:Theroadislong
229:
228:User:RHaworth
225:
224:
223:
222:
221:
219:
214:
208:
204:
200:
199:Theroadislong
196:
195:
194:
191:
190:
186:
182:
181:Theroadislong
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
157:autobiography
154:
144:
143:
139:
135:
134:Theroadislong
127:
125:
124:
120:
116:
115:Theroadislong
112:
107:
105:
101:
97:
89:
86:
83:
79:
78:Avoid linking
76:
73:
69:
65:
62:
59:
56:
55:
54:
51:
49:
44:
39:
37:
33:
29:
16:
862:
849:
842:
826:
812:
803:
754:
720:Please read
714:
698:
639:
576:
569:
500:
460:
438:
435:
425:
412:
396:
386:
378:
374:
326:
298:
283:welcome page
270:
246:
215:
211:
192:
160:
145:
131:
108:
93:
87:
77:
63:
57:
52:
40:
20:
677:Orange Mike
656:Orange Mike
642:Kit Bigelow
625:Orange Mike
588:Kit Bigelow
532:Kit Bigelow
518:and myself
383:Have a care
32:Kit Bigelow
762:talk pages
751:April 2012
480:WP:COPYVIO
17:March 2012
852:this edit
806:B nikusha
128:Citations
866:contribs
856:RHaworth
830:contribs
820:RHaworth
816:contribs
739:contribs
734:Whenaxis
596:RHaworth
584:RHaworth
555:regards.
528:RHaworth
516:RHaworth
464:contribs
454:RHaworth
442:contribs
400:contribs
390:RHaworth
161:strongly
409:Bigelow
310:not me?
770:tildes
432:Deh343
279:attack
102:, and
818:)? —
800:Sock?
226:Admin
860:talk
824:talk
810:talk
791:talk
724:and
683:Talk
662:Talk
631:Talk
608:talk
561:talk
488:talk
458:talk
436:talk
394:talk
364:talk
346:talk
316:talk
291:talk
260:talk
236:talk
203:talk
185:talk
138:talk
119:talk
778:or
598:or
220:)"
159:is
70:in
868:)
847:.
832:)
793:)
680:|
659:|
653:--
628:|
610:)
563:)
490:)
466:)
402:)
366:)
348:)
318:)
293:)
262:)
238:)
205:)
187:)
140:)
121:)
106:.
98:,
84:).
863:·
858:(
827:·
822:(
813:·
808:(
789:(
741:)
737:(
606:(
559:(
486:(
461:·
456:(
439:·
434:(
422:)
397:·
392:(
362:(
344:(
314:(
289:(
258:(
234:(
201:(
183:(
136:(
117:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.