264:
easy to find in physics libraries, and those citations are to reliable sources (they are almost all peer-reviewed publications, many extremely well-known). However, I will admit that many of those citations are primary sources, not secondary. As a scientist, primary sources are preferred. And with so many sources, to such a well-known topic, I thought (and still think) that what I had written was a good addition to
Knowledge. Most of it certainly wasn't original thought - absolute theory goes back to Aristotle. I did get permission from the editor to publish. So I thought all was well. By the way - Knowledge is chock full of other scientific theory, some rather new. Note that I am not writing this to try to argue that it be kept up, as I am OK if you wish to delete it. I just wanted to explain my point of view since a lot of this appears to be a rather grey area to me, even after reading the instructions. Bottom line is that you have the power of deletion and if you choose to use that power I will not pursue this any further.
165:. I will write to the editor to ask if Physics Essays will be willing to take the extra steps needed to release the copyrighted material. Also, note that the introduction of what I uploaded was not copyrighted and that portion (edited to remove the segue to the copyrighted portion) could likely remain as an improvement to the page, although if we go that route several citations should be added to the introduction. (Since I feel the copyrighted work covers this topic excellently, the original upload left the citations as they appeared in the copyrighted material and I did not add them to the introduction.)
110:
27:
263:
OK, thank you for handling this in a most professional manner. I do wish to explain a bit more though. What I wrote was, I believe, a good fleshing out of a stub that was asked to be fleshed out. Everything I wrote was quite verifiable, as the citations in my copyrighted paper go back decades and are
217:
I had already sent the request to the editor, and so I just followed up with a cancellation of the request. Would
Knowledge welcome the intro section (which was entirely new content) with appropriate citations? In addition to publishing my own works, I have also prepared over 100 reviews for Physics
129:
for more information on uploading your material to
Knowledge. For legal reasons, Knowledge cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use
160:
I am the creator of the material. I do not however own the copyright, as it is owned by
Physics Essays Publication. I did get permission from the editor to use the material on Knowledge prior to upload, as I knew that was important. I did not know however about the further requirements found in
232:
No, alas, entirely new content, even with appropriate citations, is not allowed here in this encyclopedia. One of the most basic policies is that everything must be backed by reliable secondary sources—see
48:
71:
122:
162:
126:
138:, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Knowledge takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators
18:
246:
62:
242:
187:. I think you don't need to bother writing to Physics Essays about the copyrights. The content wil not be allowed here—see
58:
234:
192:
141:
183:
Note that this is not only a copyright issue. Knowledge is not the place where we can publish our own work—see
44:
238:
33:
118:
219:
166:
184:
94:
114:
254:
200:
150:
188:
79:
61:, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
247:
Knowledge:What
Knowledge is not#Knowledge is not a publisher of original thought
109:
90:
250:
218:
Essays, so I have a certain level of expertise in this area. Let me know. -
196:
146:
54:
191:. Knowledge is not a collection of essays, and all content needs reliable
125:
from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
258:
227:
204:
174:
154:
98:
53:
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to
26:
78:
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
36:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
25:
69:
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
80:
57:. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can
130:external websites or publications as a source of
117:has been removed, as it appears to have added
8:
121:material to Knowledge without evidence of
88:Thank you for helping improve Knowledge!
163:Knowledge:Donating copyrighted materials
127:Knowledge:Donating copyrighted materials
51:to see how you can improve the article.
245:. Again, please have a careful look at
47:. You may like to take a look at the
43:, which is recorded on the article's
7:
14:
39:The article has been assessed as
108:
1:
259:14:12, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
228:13:35, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
205:12:59, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
175:11:47, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
155:10:23, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
237:, and in a broader context:
285:
134:, but not as a source of
99:04:22, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
223:
170:
81:leaving us some feedback
59:create articles yourself
243:wp:No original research
17:Your submission at AfC
30:
63:Articles for Creation
29:
235:wp:Secondary sources
193:wp:secondary sources
142:blocked from editing
34:The ABC Preon Model
19:The ABC Preon Model
31:
113:Your addition to
276:
239:wp:Verifiability
112:
91:Kevin Rutherford
83:
284:
283:
279:
278:
277:
275:
274:
273:
115:Absolute theory
106:
101:
65:if you prefer.
23:
12:
11:
5:
282:
280:
272:
271:
270:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
261:
210:
209:
208:
207:
178:
177:
105:
104:Spetember 2017
102:
86:
85:
76:
49:grading scheme
38:
24:
22:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
281:
262:
260:
256:
252:
249:. Regards. -
248:
244:
240:
236:
231:
230:
229:
225:
221:
216:
215:
214:
213:
212:
211:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
182:
181:
180:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
159:
158:
157:
156:
152:
148:
144:
143:
137:
133:
128:
124:
120:
116:
111:
103:
100:
96:
92:
89:
82:
77:
74:
73:
68:
67:
66:
64:
60:
56:
50:
46:
42:
37:
35:
28:
20:
16:
139:
135:
131:
107:
87:
70:
52:
40:
32:
21:was accepted
195:. Cheers -
185:WP:NOTESSAY
132:information
119:copyrighted
123:permission
72:help desk
55:Knowledge
45:talk page
220:Delbert7
167:Delbert7
140:will be
136:content
41:C-Class
189:wp:NOR
145:. -
255:talk
251:DVdm
241:and
224:talk
201:talk
197:DVdm
171:talk
151:talk
147:DVdm
95:talk
257:)
226:)
203:)
173:)
153:)
97:)
253:(
222:(
199:(
169:(
149:(
93:(
84:.
75:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
