User talk:Derek R Bullamore/Archive 8

3518:

before Christmas, and it took me a little time to recognise it for what it was. Probably because it was the last thing I was expecting to find. I think from time to time there are those who write a new article purely to be able to brag to friends etc., "look what I did on Knowledge (XXG)". It's rather stupid, of course, but if half credible, not immediately obvious. I am guessing that is what has happened here, but using a name (perhaps without realising it) that is vaguely notable. Then subsequent editors, in good faith, put two and two together, make five, and away we go. Two more thoughts. I remember that you are related/friendly with/worked with or for/ the Thunderbolts in the past, so probably saw through the 'spoof' quicker than most. The other is the notability of the band(s). I have not explored this fully but, from dim and distant memory, I had difficulty finding much source material for either the Thunderbolts or the Dinosaurs. Which might make writing an article for the 'correct' Mr. Hine fraught with difficulty.

2409:

Secondly, many entertainment professionals and music fans would attest to the fact that management and related relationships are imminently relevant to artists' careers, and consequently are of interest to the public and often quite notable. In this case in particular, the management relationship had a direct and dramatic impact on the direction of a notable artist's career. It was not incidental to his life or career, which is the subject of the article. Your assertion that "one or two" examples of notable managers exist is not based in fact, and a better familiarity with music-based press and history would make this quite evident. As additional sources for the information become available, I will of course add them to the article in order to best comply with Knowledge (XXG)'s mission and guidelines.

2812:

personal correspondence, so really that is not a reliable third-party reference. Also, there are probably plenty of sources via books, newspapers, journals, libraries etc., that could be explored if you had the energy and time. As you are studying hard, perhaps you are expending plenty of both in that pursuit alone ! Nice Christmas here, thank you, and best wishes to you, and yours for the New Year. Don't talk to me about the weather. I believe you had around 18 inches of snow in New York recently, but we have suffered minus temperatures for about six weeks solid now. Minus 15°C the other day here, the coldest I have known it in twenty years in this neck of the woods ! Whatever, my lovely wife and I are alive, safe and warm in our little cave (joke, it's a wooden shack really), so all is well.

2173:

since the group had any relevance. To me, that smacks more of desperation and bitterness than 'fact'. The Bobby Graham article wording over whether he did, or did not, play on the DC5 singles is better balanced than the picture the IP is trying to paint on the DC5 article. Moreover, without exploring the cites, it seems better referenced. I feel that is the way to go, if you want to take it on. To be honest, having battled in vain some time ago, I rather lost the will to bother on this subject matter, when various factions bombarded me with e-mails etc., all fighting for their version of his date of birth to be posted. It rarely stopped just there either (they went on and on, driving home miniscule points that soon lost my interest).

3591:

articles I have tagged {Notability} in recent weeks. I feel there could be hundreds of such cases in the music categories alone. Actually, quite often the easiest way to spot these is to look for any references. Invariably, there are none, which often gives the game away. Either that, or the so-called references are blogs, MySpace, or the artists' own websites (which even your local pub band has). Basically, I am an inclusionist, so I never put articles up for deletion, leaving that to other editors. However, back to Graham Hine, I think you are right that his notability is doubtful/dubious, and it is probably best not to add to the previously mentioned total.

234:. I have a slight concern over points 2. and 11., which may be open to interpretation, but generally the level of 'fame' required is reasonably specific. I am not sure I have the will, or passion, to analyse all the acts within the categories I have mentioned. Equally, I am confident that there will be plenty more categories that will contain similar levels of dross. However, if we both eat away at the fringes, then it should improve the overall situation. Firstly, I need to familiarise myself with the process for AfD ! Just a word of caution - proposing widescale deletion of articles will not make us popular in some quarters. 5666:, who knows everything there is to know about copyright violation issues. Send the case to her, and I suspect she will deal with that side of things promptly. Secondly, depending upon her, or her acolytes actions, there is the article as a whole. I have absolutely no idea who this person is, or their notability. The article is probably written purely from a promotional standpoint (not entirely unusual), and will die a natural death on the copyvio issue alone - unless you know otherwise. Sadly, there are umpteen of these types of articles on Wiki. Ho hum. Anyway, I hope this helps. Bestest fishes, 1398:

more in the history some time later, there are still lotsa missings) We could just change the fact there like most of the songs were Daltrey, Pumer compositions. In that reference you provide, as far as I see the songs are all Daltrey, Pumer compositions though. Just the White Faced Lady are not. But that album was a product of the Fairfield Parlour that was released under the Kaleidoscope name, so yes, the change as most of the band's song would fit the situation, I believe. And, I don't think P.D and R.D were related.. I've been looking but can't seem to find anything. ~

5544:. Plus, whilst the album may well have had coverage in the music press, this is not reflected in the references. Moreover, album notability does not necessarily spill over to the record label itself. It was a bit of a 50/50 call when I placed the tag, so I am not going to argue with your removal. I do think, however, that the article could do with a couple more third party reliable references to fully assert notability, and would benefit from some POV statements either removing or referencing. Am I being fair ? 2860:

spontaneous and creative as he was...he would spend hours working on lyrics. Most lyricists wrote the words, then the music was added. My dad (and I think Yip Harburg) wrote words to songs. So he'd play songs over and over and over and over (also at about 2 am - a really creative time for him). And he'd finesse his lyrics. One of my favorites is "Midnight Mood" - where he had lovely inner rhymes that you don't notice when you hear the song, but, like Shakespeare, work their way in:)

370:

from an inclusionist. I will not push anything towards AfD at the moment; not least because the processes seem to be elaborate and time consuming, and, if undertaken in sufficient numbers, likely to ruffle too many feathers. I'll be optimistic and hope that articles that are tagged will be improved in due course. My general policy is to try to improve/source articles rather than widescale tagging, but the scale of the problem, as I saw it, left me with little choice. Best wishes,

3438: 3683: 5714: 31: 4252: 4207: 3875: 3768: 5354:; another one slipping under the radar again? I have reasoning in the talk page of course. If you look at the previous version, it had no cites, links, or references, and was full of blogese and forum-speak. I may have, in my usual fashion, clipped the style too much to the dry and bare bones. Could you have a look and see if there are any references to anything left in the page, and alter or revert anything you feel fit? 5376:

certainly the label's owner or closely affiliated thereto, hoping to achieve a modicum of fame. My view is that, had it been noticed at the time, it would have been a speedy delete (not my field of knowledge though). Frankly, I would add the {Notability} tag too, for a full house. I rarely venture into record label articles, but I bet this article is not the only one with notability status issues. Root 'em out, old boy !

2499: 354:

Just to let you know that I have quite a few sources covering these areas and some of the articles that you've tagged are on my radar for improvement at some stage (when time permits), so if you come across any that you are inclined to push towards PROD/AFD feel free to let me know beforehand as I may be able to do enough tidying and source-adding to save you the bother of a deletion discussion. Thanks.--

4291: 3944: 5207: 4055: 2758:

Allmusic.com, Discogs.com or even Billboard.com - although I do not generally find that the latter is much use (all froth, no substance). You may find other sources too. Within reason, it is almost impossible to over reference anything. Books, of course, can be a good source too. Jaques Cattell's work, or your local library, or Google.books are worth trying. They may be more obits as well as

2287:

approved content in the same entry regarding past managers and their work with Mr. Hammond. It is very common on artist pages for management relationships to be discussed as they are relevant to the person's career. If you have any further suggestions about how to keep this content a part of the public record while respecting the Knowledge (XXG) standards, I welcome your input.

3957: 2434:

2010 are unaware of the discussion, because the link on the talk page is not very informative. (The discussion should have been conducted there.) If it appears there is any significant interest in moving to footnote references, then I will certainly weigh in and defend the current position. At the moment, I am just watching the (slow) progress of the discussion. Regards,

1513: 1057: 918: 5323:, particularly where these appear to be non-notable. Maybe the reunions should be covered under just one heading. However, overall it is in far better shape as an article than it was before your timely intervention, so that is a big step in the right direction. I am not personally aware of this band, so do not feel comfortable editing this one any further. Regards, 3707: 4019: 4952: 1949:

course many cases where different song titles have been used for different versions of the same song at different times - it's not a question of deciding that one is "right" and the others are "wrong", it's a question of referring to the differences in the article, and naming the article on the basis of the version most commonly used and understood.

5300:'s page, so I have added a bunch of references and some info regarding the 1986-1989 re-unions. Regarding the 1988 New Year's Eve reunion, the referenced article states that they played in Wichita for NYE, but it doesn't name the venue and I've not been able to find any other sources that state what the venue was, so I've left it amiguous for now. 2544: 1548: 1091: 949: 1210:

there is on Knowledge (XXG), that clearly never got anything like the scrutiny that DYKs do, is a much more serious problem to me. The fact is that Knowledge (XXG) is growing at such a rate, that the 'powers that be' have long since lost any real editorial grip. Closing the stable door... etc. Hope you are well, by the way. Regards,

5635:. How on earth has no-one picked-up on this in the last two years, especially as its got to be a copyright "crime" against Warner Music. Do I wipe the whole page and leave it with the intro sentence? Should it be reported to an administrator? Should there be a delete on it? Be grateful for your, or any of your reader's, advice. 3491:) was born in 1949 in South London and was brought up in Crawley, and was a founder member of Brett Marvin In 1966ish, (and aka Terry Dactyl in 1970), and still is a member of that extant band. Also he never had or has cancer. Now, either this article is a spoof, or red link user KeefReef had a post Christmas brainstorm :) 5431:

That should be sufficient; although sometimes you may find that the affiliated articles (ie. those reached via the blue links in the article) may need some work. Follow that through to its infinite conclusion, and you spend five years here making almost 36,000 edits. If you are daft enough !?! Very

3590:

Hello again. Glad to see the matter has been speedily dealt with, and a sock puppet exposed into the bargain. On the question of notability, you are quite right that there are others with articles here that do not seemingly pass any of the criteria for inclusion. I have lost count of the number of

3550:

Hi Derek. Thanks for responding. The stuff I copied to you I also sent at the same time to those who edited the article subsequent to its creation. By the time you saw this message, one of them must have got the article speedily deleted as the link was blue when I posted. Its nice to be effective :)

2767:

Of course it all takes time, and what with your school work (I am assuming you are the teacher not the pupil ?!) and the looming Christmas period, perhaps you are busy enough at this juncture. There is no rush - feel free to return if you are stuck. Your dad's Wiki article is now on my 'watchlist',

2641:

Without going into fine detail, the blue wikilinks in 'citations blurb' box will lead you towards guidelines, explaining how to add in-line citations etc. So, for example, there is a sentence that states - "Feyne continued to write lyrics for black composers such as Erskine Hawkins, Bill Johnson, Dud

2178:

You may be aware the the 1960s pop arena threw up all sorts of bickering over royalties, accreditation, belittling other's efforts etc., which has rumbled on for years. Invariably it is someone's word against someone elses - bearing in mind those most directly involved are in their seventies now (if

2166:

and those out to disparage him. This manifests itself in various ways - his year of birth is constantly changed; the DC5 songwriting credits are questioned form time to time; and Clark's recording contributions are belittled. The number of edits on the article(s) are totally disporportionate to the

1948:

That's all very well, but it is unreferenced, and the original 1960 single (image now linked from the article itself) clearly shows the title as "Wondrous Place". If the question of the use of two different titles is sufficiently interesting it could be mentioned in the article itself. There are of

115:

Mainly I can find little proof anywhere that the band is even still active and when you analyse the hard content hidden in the guff they have really achieved nothing of note. Recorded a couple of singles with their own money, self released on their 'own label' and sold so poorly there is no record of

5425:

Hello again. There is no real reason to keep the 'Citations' tag now, so you can safely remove it. Perhaps three areas I would pick out. Firstly, there is no direct citation for the birth name, birth date nor birth place, which should be easily rectified (presumably one source for all). Secondly,

2811:

Yes, Stephanie, you are doing very well. I think I stated before that more references are always helpful, and theoretically every sentence should have one - although you would be hard pressed to find many Wiki articles that are at that level. A couple of thoughts - I assume that no one can check his

2757:

You're welcome. A link to his website (as near as possible to the list of songs etc.,) is fine. It is reasonable to assume that anyone interested enough can scroll/navigate from there. Actually, do not overdo links to the primary source. It may be preferable to also use secondary sources, such as

2227:

Oh, I see, thank you for this well-written explanation. It's been not long that I watch the page. And as you've noticed I did undo the edit about the drummer at first place anyways, since it was not sourced. And, yes, Allmusic sometimes fails, too. I did experience it failing very well in one of the

2187:

If you want my further opinion, I think that whatever you edited in, and however well referenced and neutral in tone, it would not last more than a few hours/days before someone reverted it. This all sounds rather negative, but, just in case you were intending to wade in somewhat naively, you might

2172:

Frankly, I do not have any real allegiance. Plus 99.999% of the Wiki readership is probably totally disinterested in the subject matter, almost half a century on from their glory days. It is curious to me that a lot of these 'revelations' have sprung up in the last decade or so, an awful long time

1929:

A Wondrous Place and Collette (as opposed to Wondrous Place and Colette) are the song titles registered with the MCPS, and therefore the ones that record labels (such as my own) should be using. I know this because these are the corrected titles notified to me on my licence when I wrongly submitted

1397:

Oh, I am so aware of not to trust any article no matter in a book or in the internet about 60s after an experience I had with one of the articles. So, the source used sure could be wrong. (Please do not hesitate to edit if you think somethings are inaccurate and missing, though I will keep on adding

1264:

I agree with you - to my mind there is insignificant difference to maintain two separate entities, and, assuming the merge is correctly facilitated, then anyone typing in 'Fairfield Parlour' would be redirected to Kaleidoscope (UK band). The rationale, guidelines and procedures are all covered under

353:

Hello Derek. First off, apologies for not looking at more of those copyvio issues above - have been sidetracked into other areas. I notice that you've been tagging quite a few articles in punk/alternative rock/etc. categories - I have no problems with that, and can't disagree with the vast majority.

187:

I am sorry but doing a few gigs in your immediate vicinity, two or three support gigs in London (or even doting parents stumping up the £15,000 - £20,000 to buy your band onto a UK tour as a bottom of the bill support band) and self releasing a few singles or an album (that you sell at gigs - or end

136:

This is quite uncanny. Within the last fortnight or so, I saw your username around, and nearly contacted you about the overall scenerio on countless of these bands. In the end, I read your own user page and figured your real interests lie primarily elsewhere. I am aware of your general input, and

5481:. Weather fantastic there - 30C plus every day. Got off the plane in London at 7 degrees, which is relatively mild here for here in early February, but what a difference ! Feyne's article now looks pretty good to me; you have done really well, Stephanie. Your dad would have been so proud of you ! 2863:

As for the weather, I did have to warm up to snow - we'd been having 7degree F windchill - so I feel a bit entitled to whine, especially since I grew up in LA - 80 degree christmases. Since my dreaded ARRGGGHHHchaeology class is over (yay - passed with A-...so I don't have to take it ever again) I

1763:

is right, both 250 and 220px settings give lines that appear/disappear depending on the window width. That's the problem with composing pages, I forget that it may suit my browser, skin and window width, but look totally different in other combinations. I'll see if there is a known fix to the line

1711:

I've seen the line thing happen before and I think it's just a weird browser thing. Also, it depends on the exact size of the browser window so not everyone will see it, i.e. if you drag your window wider and narrower it appears and disappears. When I preview the previous version I can get the line

3126:

Yes, a really good effort from you. You've got the article from around D- to B+ (in school report terminology), which given the sparcity of information, is fine work. I've tweaked the article further, mainly cosmetic formatting and styling changes. Frankly, I've seen much worse articles for far

2692:

Do not get down-hearted - it can be immensely rewarding to try to get an article moving towards a better Knowledge (XXG) encyclopedic status, but it takes a little time, practice and patience. A bit like life itself ! As far as articles go, your dad definitely deserves a "good 'un", as we say in

2408:

With all due respect to you, several of your assertions are wrong. First, many articles reference management. Duffy's in fact is one axample. There are too many other to list, but a diligent search would bear you many results regarding artist's management information included in their articles.

3494:

The links to a website (as references) (at Jan 5th) are not recognized. When user EoGuy changed the website link to that above, user Shaky Spades returned it to the dead link. No references or external links are viable as of this date, and I cannot find any reference to this Graham Hine under the

3264:

Whilst Knowledge (XXG) welcomes edits from new editors with a passion for their subject matter, it is important to understand that there are guidelines and protocols to follow. Doing so will assist your editing, and is likely to avoid conflict with others. Never a bad thing, but particularly at

2787:

Hi Derek - Hope I'm doing this right. I added a bunch of citations - please tell me if I need more. And I was the student!! I've taught for decades but going back to school - linguistic anthro - challenging but fun (except for my last class which almost killed me:) Hope you had good holidays and

2433:

Hi Derek, thanks for your message. I am aware of this discussion, however, it appears to be no more at present than a sole admin. coming in and telling us what we are allegedly doing wrong. The topic appears to have almost died through lack of interest. I think that most contributors to Deaths in

1248:

should be merged under the first. I am actually not so sure since the latter is also notable enough to have their own article but it's the same band same members, just the name is different. I wanted to know what you think about these two articles. And if they need to be merged, what procedure to

369:

Hi, Michig - no need to apologise to me. As far as I am concerned you are a good egg for all you have done. I note your comments regarding punk/alt rock categories - I am appalled just how many articles are way below sub-standard, and a fair proportion struggle in the notability stakes. That's

3604:

On the wider issue, I think it is way too easy for editors to create new articles. The number of new article watchers, and admins, can not keep up with the many thousands of articles on Wiki these days, and many non-notables simply fall under the radar and sit here for ever. The spoof article I

3517:

Happy New Year to you too. I am struggling a bit here, because the above link to Graham Hine is a red link, so I do not know what I am supposed to be commenting upon. Accepting that I, finally, after five years writing abject rubbish here, came across a completely unrelated 'spoof article' just

2061:

Why not, there is plenty of rubbish about, and several gullible souls are bound to fall for it !? I presume you have your next article half written then. Although you might need to move fast before the DYK criteria deadline applies (I notice they are backtracking on this somewhat). I don't see

1209:

Looks like it - although I have seen these sorts of discussions go round, and round, in circles for weeks and nothing ends up being decided, so I won't hold my breath. Good job I just got my '50' certificate ! It's funny to me that the whole interest is around DYK articles. The amount of crap

142:

I have been taking a look recently at categories such as , , , and even on to . I am astonished, nay embarassed, how many of the articles within these categories deal with bands that seem to be barely noteworthy. As an inclusionist, I must confess that I am alarmed that on face value (25-35%)

5566:

absolutely - and you are correct, my apologies. the focus group is the project of julian house, co-founder of ghost box records - and this collaboration is the only focus group release not to appear on the ghost box label. anyway, there's plenty of coverage of this label (off the top of my head

272:

I guess they have slipped through because, unlike well known bands' names, nobody is actually looking for them or at them. If they are not picked up by the new change patrollers when first created (or by someone idly trawling through the categories like you did) they have just hovered under the

3498:

I think that the Graham Hine I refer to above is probably worth an article, but I do not think I should edit this article around him as I am too closely associated with him. However, I shall pass this on to a Wiki editor who has an extensive British music knowledge base for him to pass better

3069:

Just wanted to drop a note thanking you for tagging this article for improvement. It was one of my first major wikipedia edits a few years ago now, and I haven't really paid it much attention in the meantime even though its on my watchlist. But prompted by your tag I just had a proper look and

2449:

Yes, fair enough. I would agree that the link from the Deaths talk page to the discussion elsewhere is not very clear, and that might be at least part of the reason for the snail like progress. It would be interesting to see someone post a differing opinion though - well, any opinion for that

2286:

Thank you for the constructive information. I am not attempting promotion by adding factual information to this entry. I have limited the content, per your recommended site usage guidelines, to what is factual (as was always the case with my additions), public record, and in line with other

5375:

I can not argue with anything you have done. A record label of no stature, releasing next to nothing, from non-notable groups of nobodies, is the cruel way of viewing it. I fail to see anything notable at all. I notice that the article was created from a 'single contribution' editor, almost

2859:

Yes, my dad did him and sing all the time. He'd harmonize with the birds outside our home. He said "Life is a series of song cues" - and he would sing to me at the drop of a hat. As he got older, I'd sing to him and play his songs. He would wake up at 2 am and hear music in his head. And as

5426:

the paragraph beginning "In the 1960s" appears to lack an in-line referenced source for all but the last sentence. Finally, I feel the 'Songs used in films' section needs a citation adding to verify the usage - one general one would suffice rather than trying to find one for each film !

3070:

realised how poor quality it was, you can definitely see that it was an early effort! I've now gone through the article and put in proper refs, including re-writing large chunks in light of newer refs I've now found. I'll wikify the album list at some point too. Cheers for the pointer.--

2161:

Hello again. I do not know how aware you are of the Knowledge (XXG) editing history surrounding this group (and it's leader), but I can tell you that there has been an ongoing, ding-dong battle royale, for months and months. It all boils down, as far as I can see, to those who support

1598: 1904:

Well done. 'Browser', 'skin', 'window width', 'code', etc., are notions that I have trouble grappling with. Incidentally, is 'window width' why I can not see my front lawn (a loose expression, meaning very small expanse of weeds and tufts of green stuff), due to the build up of ice ?

1688:

Gosh, it's amazing what powers I have ! I have absolutely no idea about formatting in this case; particularly as the line does not appear on my screen. Well, not through the piccie anyway. Revert it back if you wish, it's certainly not a big deal to me. I have left myself a note -

3487:"I notice that this article was flagged for speedy deletion by userWuhwuzdat which was then Criterion A7 declined. The assertion that this Hine was with Brett Marvin and the Thunderbolts and was associated with Jona Lewie and Keef Trouble is completely false. The Brett Marvin Hine ( 2821:

Incidentally, did your dad sing and hum all day long ? I am always intrigued as to how/why/where songwriters get their inspiration. I have envied their talent for decades. I love music, I have all my life, but I can't hold a note in a bucket (if you understand the expression). Keep

1273:), I will type my agreement. It is unlikely it will draw much response, but it is prudent to leave the matter a couple of weeks to be certain that there is no viable opposition. Then, you can safely effect the merger as explained fully at Knowledge (XXG):Merging. Is this clear ? 4000: 3751:

Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 8,665 last month to 8,678 on December 13th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 63 is just ahead of

2179:

still alive), and memory ain't all it used to be. Also, if these various factions had such a strong case, it would logically have been sorted in the courts decades ago. Far easier to air one's own perceived grievances on the Knowledge (XXG) stage. You may not have seen this

5194:

Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect

2732:

Yeah- my dad was wonderful and I am very proud of him. So thanks for letting me share him with the world through this site. I'll try to get it up to snuff or standards or whatever it's called soon. Am in school again (so will get most of it done after finals).

3103:

Hi again. I've finished cleaning up the article. If you have time would you mind taking a quick look and giving me any feedback. I don't do a huge amount of wikipedia editing and would be grateful for the benefits of your extensive experience. Thanks,

2602:

I'm not sure what more citations are needed. Could you guide me specifically - what you suggest needs citations? I have listed info that is clearly available from the obit and from his website, and from other sites - so I'm not sure what more to do.

1671:

The relevant change you made was from "img_size=250" to "img_size=220px" which gives a bigger picture as well as the line (although the line may not appear in your browser). Do you know how to format this to avoid the line? or should I just revert to

2182:. I ask myself why does Graham deny involvement for decades and then suddenly 'spills the beans' ? Anything to do with the fact that he is an alcoholic, unwell, close to death, short of money, and sees an opportunity - call me cynical if you will. 2142:. I don't have the book that is used as a reference in the article, namely "Weinberg, Max, foreword by Bruce Springsteen, The Big Beat: Conversations with Rock's Great Drummers, Billboard Books" but I was curious and looked for an online reference, 178:, but last week I actually nominated two similar pages to AfD regarding two 'indie' bands from Caerphilly that also came to my attention last week. Even a cursory glance at a few pages in the categories you mention above sends shivers down my neck. 2654:, with you filling in the 'blanks'. It is entirely likely that one citation could be used several times to source various sentences in the article. In which case, name the start of that reference block with, say, <ref name="Independent": --> 2728:

Unfortunately, his site no longer has separate pages, but has a nav bar - so I'd have to link it either to the basic site or to the exact page with the list. Would that work? ASCAP and the other sites are too difficult to trace song by song.

3567:

You are quite right, Graham is not that notable in Wiki terms - couple of records on Blue Goose, and with Jona Lewie forming Terry Dactyl for their one hit... mind you, I've seen others on Wiki with even less notability :) All the best

197:

Is there any kind of minimum standard for bands that marks a line in the sand over which a band does become notable? Signed by a recognised label/distributor? Record appearing in a national chart? Television appearances? National media

3246:"The threshold for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) is verifiability, not truth; that is, whether readers can check that material in Knowledge (XXG) has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true." 2639:"The threshold for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) is verifiability, not truth. That is, whether readers can check that material in Knowledge (XXG) has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true". 111:

and oddly I was only looking at that article myself just last week, with a sense of disbelief. Apart from the fact it contains overblown flowery language it seems to have been self written from the inside (and with no references).

732:

Yeah well, they are Yanks so that explains a lot. Color and license for a start - but it takes a certain amount of lunacy to misspell two words in a short headline. Mind you, this is the nation that elected a b-movie actor as

3239:

The problem with the 'I don't care' attitude is that Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia, not a fansite, and is expected to report what reliable sources state, not the personal preferences of any editor. I refer you again to

421:" in a three card trick. Aorta were obviously carrying the life blood of 'the Chicago sound' and .... goodness knows what was in the mushroom stroganoff that I had for tea, but I am going to have another portion tomorrow ?! 3523:

British blues boys are few in number, and I am a fan of blues music.... BUT the sourcing of references is perhaps an issue. You can probably tell I am swimming without a rubber ring here. Throw me a lifebuoy! I'm off to

2327:"The threshold for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) is verifiability, not truth—whether readers can check that material in Knowledge (XXG) has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true". 2199:"The threshold for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) is verifiability, not truth—whether readers can check that material in Knowledge (XXG) has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true". 5182: 4046: 787:

Looking at it again, I think I may have added the wrong tag to the wrong page. There are one or two formatting issues, which I will rectify, and remove the tag. Sorry, I reckon I must have got cross-eyed on this

1448:". Still shows the Kaleidoscope but I am not sure. Was it how it was supposed to be? If you only look for the Kaleidoscope page in google search, it gives the the latest version of the page very well, though.. ~ 5318:

Hello Rob. You have done a great job finding all those references and, in the process, expanding the article. Well done. I do feel some of the smaller detail on support bands and venues etc., may border on

3377:

Circa 1943 is about as close as I can get. Good article, by the way. One day you and I must get stuck into the Hot Rods article. It hasn't recovered from the copyvio (my fault) revision from months back.

2377:

etc., and do those articles make reference to them ? I have picked the names purely at random, and have no idea whether their articles do mention managers, but I will confidently guess that they do not.

5206: 2345:? - without their own Knowledge (XXG) articles, I would guess not very much. 3. Why the obsession with his management - whilst one or two notable examples of influential managers do exist, such as for 2325:

simply do not comply to these doctrines. The point you made about supplying factual information, is best countered by stating Knowledge (XXG) policy wording from the Verifiability section. I quote -

2250:

On a more general note, please do not let my age old cynicism put you off. I know you are trying hard to add edits of worth and quality - it easily beats some of the f##king idiots here. Sleep well.

3605:

spotted had been on Wiki for four and a half years ! Good on you for unearthing this spoof though. Belated thanks also for the heads up on this one. Keep up the good work. With best wishes for 2011.

3248:

In this case the current reliable source is the book I quoted - album/single covers are notorious for misprints, misspellings etc. Can I suggest that another reliable source is inserted in both the

2526:

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --

2333:

The other points I would make are 1. The earlier reference in the article to Hammond's previous management is equally unsourced, contains a point of view, and is not 'approved content'. 2. How

5536:

Hello Kaini. Actually, I am a little confused. Firstly, the album you mention is not in Ghost Box article's discography. In addition, according to the album's own article, it was issued on

1463:

Hello; it looks fine to me. I am not very technically minded, (ie. hopeless) but I do not see a problem as things stand. Don't worry - some Wiki computer nerd will probably 'un-glue' things

3710: 5225: 3918: 3914: 2167:

present day importance of the act, and invariably are simply edit wars. Also, interestingly, these are nearly always made as unreferenced edits, and by IPs with no/little input elsewhere.

1734:

Woooo, it's like Halloween. Some computer nerdy (sorry, expert) may know the answer, but it's way beyond little old me. It takes me all my time to log on, or in, or whatever it's called.

1189: 3484:, and am hoping, with your extensive knowledge of music, you could shed light on a possible, or not possible, musician. Out of courtesy, I have consulted other editors of the page thus: 147:, may be the tip of the iceberg. I am really loathe to put dozens of articles forward to RFD, but I would really appreciate your considered opinion, over and above this particular case. 5454:

Thanks so much for everything. I followed your advice. It looks good and hope it's up to the standards. Best to you for 2011 - and hope you're warmer than we are here in NYC - brrrr.

207:

This has to be addressed, but I am not sure I have the stamina or time to tackle it as a dedicated project. I will however have a quiet nibble at it whenever the opportunity arises.

3451: 2909:

A seriously grand effort by you. Well done. It must have taken ages to put together - do I assume that you own all three copies ? Anyhow, the obvious, rather dull one, is ...that

2474:

Just a reminder to be careful when changing "British" to "English" for biographical articles, especially when there is no evidence anywhere that the subject identifies as English.

2108:

The DYK proposals are just plain daft, as they say up your way. Shame that my carefully considered prose won't make it to the front page any more, but I expect I'll get over it!

2653:{{cite web|url=add url address here|title=add title here|publisher=add publisher here|date=add article date here|accessdate=add the date you access the article here}}</ref: --> 5406:

I was wondering if there are enough citations to remove the box from his page? If I still need to add more, could you suggest specifically what you'd like to see? Thanks again!

2323:"Hammond met Kasaan Steigen of Los-Angeles based Trigger Management who became his personal manager, leading to Hammond's collaborations with British singer Duffy and others." 2382:

I still feel this is an attempt to promote the said management concern, without any justifiable reason, to date, for them to be included. That is my opinion. However, the

417:

is clearly a has-been, whilst Dondelinger, Cetera, Hoagland and Nyeholt comprise an anagram for some sexual deviation. Then there is "Ode to Missy Mxyzosptlk" which beats "

481:

Yes. The reason that page was deleted was because it was a copy-paste of a commercial website, so the page was a copyright violation. If you avoid that, then you'll be ok.

1635:

Thanks Ghmyrtle for your thoughts - actually I was about to give up on the article but Yoninah has kindly expanded it, rather as you suggested ! All's well that .... -

1317:

I'll look into the merge article a bit later. Thank you, Derek. Hi, Ghmyrtle. I'll propose to keep the "Kaleidoscope" name and merge the "Fairfield Parlour" under it. ~

815:

claims that the band were at that time all 16, and refers to "their home area of Wood Green and Tottenham" - casting some doubt on the "born in Matlock in 1946" info.

653: 4145:

The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.

2520: 152:

My feeling is that many of these articles are created as bands are trying to 'make their mark'. A variant of 'as mentioned on Knowledge (XXG)' will look good on the

675:, I can confirm the validity of the 'first week of issue' statement, but clearly this will not pass muster for Knowledge (XXG) purposes. Having said all that, the 137:

know you are one of the few that edits with some gravitas on pop music matters, but not really 'knowing' you.... Anyhow, enough respect and pussy footing around.

3902: 3009:

By the way, do you have any info on album charts? I'm trying to find out whether the ZE Christmas album ever made any of the album charts - possibly in 1982?

2512:. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the 4915: 2719:

Thanks Derek. And no, this was not "teaching grandma to suck eggs" grin. I appreciate your guidance and will try to get the citations up as soon as possible.

2930:

On a separate note, I am now gleefully informed by my beloved that "there are plenty of Fanny's in your family". But you've probably guessed that already !

2180: 5201:

Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...

4177: 4698: 4663: 4547: 4518: 4187: 4182: 4172: 3882: 3194:

Many thanks ! The 'five star general' bit was a trifle over the top, but I am chuffed with my modest achievement. Maybe, I should be more modest !?! -

5689: 2983:

Oh yeah, I suspect not many will have achieved that feat. Well, get them in while you can. The 'review other's work' bogeyman lurks in the wings ! -

4634: 4192: 4605: 143:

probably fail the notability criteria altogether. Not to mention the quality of text within those that appear to barely make the grade. Honestly,

156:. Whatever, I agree totally with your comments on Weapons. If you feel you have the time and energy, please delve further on this issue. Regards, 4410: 5146: 4968: 3495:

entries in Discography. What we are left with is: Graham Hine was born in Southampton 1944 and is a cancer survivor… stub for cancer survivors?

5777: 5769: 5350:

Sorry to bother you again. I have just gone to work with an enthusiastic scythe on this article for what I think is not a particularly notable

4576: 4483: 4448: 3227: 2925:

included a desciption of Satan's Christmas as 'There’s no angels or wise men, and certainly no virgins.' ? It's the atheist in me, of course !

94: 86: 707: 5764: 5752: 5747: 5742: 3211:

I don't care what the British Hit Singles & Albums book cites. It says on the single and on Boomtown Rats' album "Lookin' After No. 1"

81: 69: 64: 59: 1810: 4735: 4296: 4257: 4212: 3898: 1467:

they is something terribly amiss. You have done a great job. Incidentally, I think the {Refimprove} tag can be safely removed. Regards,

5114: 4802: 4706: 4372: 4334: 3992: 3978:

There are now 84 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! A warm welcome to the new members that have joined us since the December newsletter:

3906: 3787: 5043:

The January 2011 articles selected below are the editors choice as no one came up with any other suggestions on the project talk page.

4812: 4807: 4797: 4716: 4711: 4678: 4673: 1989:" article has been further updated and referenced by me. Incidentally, one of the co-writers of that song (Bill Giant) also co-penned 688:

Which is a very long way round to saying well done on the source, and one I will not dare to challenge - let a fool try ! Best wishes,

4817: 4721: 4683: 4561: 4532: 3859: 2957:

Hopefully, a new first for me later today - two quite separate articles of mine in the same queue for DYK. Will the excitement never

1147:

Because I was trying to edit three pages at once, never a good idea; and I've overdosed on wine gums. Said link now restored - sorry.

1070: 659: 4648: 4421: 3743: 3692: 3668: 2509: 2314: 1526: 4619: 4491: 4456: 4431: 4426: 4416: 4771: 4501: 4496: 4466: 4461: 2628:! I know you have not been editing Knowledge (XXG) for too long, but apologies in advance if I am "teaching grandma to suck eggs". 2318: 931: 5173:

which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.

5164: 4778: 4590: 4307: 4223: 4746: 4383: 4345: 4317: 4312: 4302: 4272: 4267: 4233: 4228: 4218: 3922: 3910: 683:, and so is a genuine cite. It will need something equally definitive to contradict it, which I certainly do not believe exists. 4393: 4388: 4378: 4355: 4350: 4340: 2310: 977:

Heh, I didn't even look at the Talk page. :) But, yeah, it was in pretty poor shape when I just happened to stumble upon it.

3886: 3819: 1994: 279: 213: 125: 5027:

Wishing all project members a Happy New Year and thanks for all the work you have put in to the project over the last year.

3894: 3890: 587: 427: 4992: 2667: 672: 2146:

tells it was Bobby Graham who played in Dave Clark Five and that it was revealed in 2004. What to do? Thanks in advance. ~

892:- which I use a lot and find very reliable, has not got him listed as having died. I'm not much use this time, I'm afraid. 3803: 1524:

has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

1068:

has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

929:

has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

454: 450: 5185:

to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.

2643: 2228:

articles I initiated. I'd prefer just to leave the area to more experienced ones, then ; ) Have a nice evening, Derek. ~

4884: 3827: 3153:

Cheers, and thanks for the cleanup, always good to see how to make articles better in the future. Have a good holiday!--

838:" all over again. What the hell - tried my best - but definitely no DYK this time. Many thanks for your input (again). 2513: 680: 174:

Yeuch what a nest of worms I/you/we appear to have opened. I only tripped over the Weapons via my old hometown page of

5730: 5675: 5602: 5553: 5498: 5441: 5385: 5332: 3622: 3556: 3537: 3426: 3391: 3274: 3199: 3144: 3094: 3044: 2988: 2944: 2835: 2777: 2706: 2556: 2459: 2395: 2267: 2214: 2083: 2010: 1912: 1751: 1702: 1640: 1560: 1476: 1372: 1282: 1270: 1223: 1156: 1103: 1038: 961: 901: 847: 797: 750: 697: 576: 533: 499: 466: 379: 330: 251: 165: 47: 17: 2680: 1712:

to appear and disappear too if I drag my window border. I don't know how to fix it or anything, I'm just sayin'. :)

1004:

Hi Derek. One of the DYK reviewers has an issue or question regarding your nomination; can you take a look? Thanks,

598: 5721: 5168: 3947: 3223: 2856:

For info about his birth name only his website would have it - which I created. Not many books get that personal.

637:

statement. Equally, I can not find anything specific to the contrary. It was not the first live album to top the

517: 431: 274: 208: 120: 38: 4999: 3241: 2634: 2306: 2194: 5137: 5078: 2762:

to explore. Then there is the good old internet, full of absolute rubbish and nuggets of gold in equal measure !

864:

Any idea of the DoB (or possibly death?) of Cuddly Dudley "Britain's first Black Rock N Roller", who appeared on

606:

I just wonder what the NYT knows about British charts? Given your extensive reference library, are they correct?

273:

radar. I have dipped a toe in the murky water with a speedy delete on the Weapons - lets see how that rolls out.

1669:, which (in my browser/skin at least) leaves the section line under Biography running right through the picture. 5096: 4206: 4139: 4087: 3874: 3783: 3767: 3642: 2419: 2305:

With all due respect to you, and whilst not doubting your integrity, your edits do not address the question of

2295: 557: 4823: 4727: 4689: 4567: 4538: 5265:. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage. 4844: 4654: 4026:

to all the editors who labour away quietly and help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed.

2357:

of Knowledge (XXG)'s music based articles make no reference to artists managers. 4. Who are the managers for

4858: 4851: 4837: 4625: 4251: 3986: 3823: 3231: 3158: 3109: 3075: 2479: 986: 5239: 4865: 4439: 3722: 3219: 3215: 2687:

amongst others; most are helpful, particularly towards those who are trying to genuinely improve articles.

2334: 5671: 5659: 5598: 5549: 5494: 5459: 5437: 5414: 5381: 5328: 5278: 5101: 4784: 4596: 4509: 4474: 3618: 3552: 3533: 3422: 3387: 3296: 3270: 3195: 3140: 3090: 3040: 2984: 2940: 2875: 2831: 2798: 2773: 2768:

so I can keep an eye on it if necessary. Best wishes, but beware of a fat man dressed in red and white !!

2746: 2702: 2613: 2552: 2455: 2391: 2263: 2210: 2079: 2006: 1908: 1851:

I reverted the code, I now don't think it's the solution. Wiser suggestion from Ghmyrtle, see above ; ) ~

1747: 1698: 1636: 1556: 1472: 1368: 1278: 1241: 1219: 1152: 1099: 1034: 957: 897: 843: 793: 746: 693: 572: 529: 495: 462: 375: 326: 247: 161: 2679:

Try not to run before you can walk. You are more than welcome to come back to me for comment, or ask an

2415: 2291: 119:

My gut feeling is that we should be considering an RFD more than a rewrite. What are your thoughts here?

4754: 4325: 4280: 4241: 2358: 2342: 2163: 1346:

indicates that not all Kaleidoscope songs were Daltrey, Pumer compositions. Incidentally were Peter and

835: 647: 5455: 5410: 5320: 4401: 4363: 2871: 2794: 2742: 2609: 706:

Thanks Derek - although I'm not sure any newspaper that can make two spelling mistakes in one headline

3253: 2583: 3791: 2624:

Hello Stephanie. You must have been so very proud of your dad. What a contribution he made towards

2579: 5629: 3127:

higher profile outfits, so you can be pleased with what you have achieved. Onto the next one then !

2338: 1266: 305:

Yes, you are probably right. As you say, let's see how Weapons fares and progress slowly from there.

116:

them anywhere. Their only media appearance was on a local radio programme near their home in Wales.

5663: 4127: 4040:

To the football and rugby editors who have done stirling work in keeping abreast of the top clubs.

3815: 3411: 3184: 2670:, and it may give you a feel of what is ultimately desirable from Knowledge (XXG)'s point of view. 2652:

obituary perhaps ? In which case, the sentence should finish with something like this <ref: -->

2505: 2490: 2233: 2151: 1856: 1800: 1494: 1453: 1403: 1322: 1254: 865: 553: 436: 1583:

Can you take another look? It appears it's only 1232 characters long. Perhaps it can be expanded?

5697: 5643: 5365: 5308: 5005:

To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive (See this month's feature below)

4095: 3982: 3847: 3649: 3573: 3525: 3507: 3481: 3365: 3154: 3105: 3071: 3014: 2966: 2921: 2911: 2899: 2891: 2684: 2656:); and you can use this elsewhere in the simpler format style of <ref name="Independent"/: --> 2475: 2113: 2040: 1972: 1954: 1937: 1818: 1717: 1610: 1420: 1300: 1197: 1024: 979: 820: 777: 403: 5235: 3372:'s middle name is Lewis. Not that any of this helps - but shows I have no aversion to Lewis's ! 3085:

You are more than welcome - glad to see some good editing has resulted from my tagging. Cheers,

871: 5701: 5679: 5647: 5606: 5584: 5557: 5530: 5502: 5463: 5445: 5418: 5389: 5369: 5336: 5312: 5282: 3653: 3626: 3577: 3541: 3511: 3467: 3430: 3415: 3395: 3314: 3278: 3188: 3162: 3148: 3113: 3098: 3079: 3048: 3018: 2992: 2970: 2948: 2903: 2879: 2839: 2802: 2781: 2750: 2710: 2617: 2560: 2535: 2483: 2463: 2443: 2423: 2399: 2299: 2271: 2237: 2218: 2155: 2143: 2117: 2087: 2044: 2014: 1976: 1958: 1941: 1916: 1884: 1860: 1822: 1804: 1774: 1755: 1721: 1706: 1682: 1644: 1614: 1592: 1578: 1564: 1539: 1498: 1480: 1457: 1424: 1407: 1376: 1326: 1304: 1286: 1258: 1227: 1201: 1175: 1160: 1141: 1107: 1083: 1042: 1028: 1013: 994: 965: 941: 905: 883: 851: 824: 801: 781: 754: 719: 701: 616: 580: 561: 537: 503: 488: 470: 426:

Seriously - I am struggling like you. What might work is developing the link/connection with "

407: 383: 363: 334: 284: 255: 218: 169: 130: 5632:. This one's been in this state since Nov 2009. A complete copy from a web article from 2004: 5297: 3839: 3321: 3310: 3249: 3063: 2915:

was described as "the first-ever alternative Christmas album" ? But I particularly liked the

2366: 1880: 1770: 1678: 1588: 1574: 1535: 1521: 1441: 1245: 1171: 1137: 1079: 1065: 1009: 926: 879: 715: 612: 418: 1269:. Once you have made the proposal on the proposed destination article's discussion page (ie. 4032: 3843: 3831: 3799: 3499:

judgement. Provisionally, I feel that userWuhwuzdat had the right idea regarding deletion."

2633:

Part of the problem with the article is that there are whole paragraphs without a citation.

2531: 1666: 1344: 359: 153: 1873: 5580: 5541: 5526: 5518: 4115: 4103: 3867: 3682: 3357: 3257: 2671: 2648: 2575: 2132: 1964: 638: 3757: 3753: 1795:

Well, I don't see any line there but did add some code. Now do you still see the line? ~

3039:

If you are talking UK only, then yes I do and no it didn't (in any version). Cheers, -

2890:...and compliments of the season to you too! Any ideas for a good Christmassy hook for 5119: 4872: 4123: 3851: 3795: 3463: 3444: 3437: 3407: 3341: 3180: 2439: 2229: 2147: 2031:, apparently. Shall we start a wiki-hoax that he had a Zimmerman cousin who became an 1986: 1852: 1796: 1490: 1449: 1399: 1318: 1250: 1061: 633: 144: 108: 1019:

I did try to think of a better hook but haven't been inspired yet..... sorry, Derek!

5693: 5639: 5361: 5351: 5304: 5273: 5269:→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. 5260: 3811: 3645: 3569: 3503: 3361: 3349: 3010: 2962: 2895: 2625: 2362: 2346: 2109: 2036: 1990: 1968: 1950: 1933: 1869: 1814: 1760: 1713: 1606: 1517: 1416: 1347: 1296: 1193: 1020: 816: 773: 766: 399: 2193:

Finally, the question of reliable, third party references is, of course, vital. As

2028: 1530:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

1074:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

935:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

812: 5575:'s top 100 tracks of 2010). leave it with me, and i'll do a bit of housekeeping :) 5568: 5537: 5216: 3807: 3329: 3306: 2725:

Would links to his website with the list of songs and co-composers be acceptable?

2523:

until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

2139: 1876: 1766: 1674: 1584: 1570: 1531: 1167: 1165:

Oh! failing to multitask? Try a sex change. (Aaagh the PC police have got me......)

1133: 1075: 1005: 875: 711: 642: 608: 414: 395: 232: 1605:- although it may be "speculation", it's speculation from a reliable researcher. 1412: 4998:

To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least

4045:

To all the WikiProkject Yorkshire editors who have been busy on vandal patrol at

890: 772:

Could you be more specific? in what way does the page require more wikification?

5729:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

5662:

issue is most pertinent, and there is an ultra efficient and methodical editor,

5083: 4981:

To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles (See below)

4091: 3775: 3353: 3337: 3333: 3325: 3300: 2916: 2590: 2527: 2350: 937: 922: 482: 446: 355: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4942:(Some new and additional article talk pages may still require a banner however) 188:

up in packing crates in daddy's loft) does not make for any kind of notability.

5576: 5522: 5478: 5220: 3960: 3863: 3855: 3369: 3345: 1512: 1131:, but to keep her name on the page, but completely remove the link, seems odd. 1056: 971: 917: 831: 513: 5633: 5572: 5132: 4988: 4135: 4119: 4111: 4054: 3706: 3459: 3292: 2694: 2663: 2435: 2032: 664: 631:

Oddly enough, I can not find another direct reference to fully back up the

622:

Hello again - hope you are well. Had a great holiday, thank you, based in

2599:

I think you've added a need citations blurb on my dad's page: Buddy Feyne

4083: 2202: 870:

I know these requests get increasingly obscure but all Allmusic will say

5163: 2642:

Bascomb, Bobby Plater, Tiny Bradshaw and Edward Johnson". Where is the

3835: 3779: 3760:

also has the lead in FAs at 49 out of a total number of 2,304 articles.

1866: 1295:

I agree. But which name should the article be under? A tricky one...

175: 2309:. All edits should follow the Knowledge (XXG) guidelines outlined at 5517:

Hi Derek - just a heads up that I've reverted your notability tag on

2450:

matter. We are a long way from consensus, that's for sure. Regards,

2370: 1602: 1128: 1122: 1113: 623: 231:

There is a set of criteria used to establish notability for bands at

5658:

You don't half find them, don't you !?! Two thoughts from me. The

5624:

Just want to pick your brains as I don't know how to deal with this

3406:

Happy new year to the general! Thanks for the guidance all along. ~

1445: 889:

Hello again. Sorry, I have not got this one. Although this site -

5688:

I was going to suggest deletion as non-notable, until I discovered

4107: 4099: 2374: 2138:

Hi Derek. I see the IP address user is insisting on adding about

1930:"Wondrous Place" and "Colette" in connection with a new release. 834:

article in glowing Bullycolour. I have a horrible feeling it's "

604:

was the first live album to go to No1 in its first week of issue.

4131: 1597:

If it were me, Derek, I'd try squeezing a few more words out of

3421:

The same to you. You are always welcome here. Best wishes. -

2205:

is very good, but certainly not infallible. Rather like me !?!

5708: 3999:

No members left the project this month: though the number of

25: 494:

Thank you for the swift response. I'll do my best. Thanks,

5205: 5016:

article improvement drive/collaboration is being organised.

3681: 3488: 3454:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

3436: 3256:, so that readers can check the validity of the title. This 2697:. I hope all this helps you a little bit. With best wishes, 1444:, it goes to Kaleidoscope article but the link shows up as " 1350:

related ? Neither article makes any reference to the matter.

5477:

I have just returned from two absolutely glorious weeks in

5008:

To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members

3772:

Currently we have twenty four Yorkshire featured articles:

2657:

at the end of sentences/paragraphs for ease of duplication.

2508:, which you created or to which you contributed, should be 1446:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Fairfield_Parlour#Fairfield_Parlour

520:. You will notice that he was short in more ways than one! 4031:

To members who have added suggestions to the ToDo list at

394:

I cannot think of anything remotely DYK hook-worthy about

3919:

List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Cleveland

3915:

List of awards and nominations received by Arctic Monkeys

5038:

WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project

3551:

There are responses to what now appears to be a hoax on

2386:

are not my opinion - and that is what is paramount here.

1440:

Hi, Derek. I completed the merge. Now when you click on

1489:

Thanks for the feedback, then. Have a great evening. ~

550: 5303:

Please check it out when you have a chance. Thanks.

3443:Hello, Derek R Bullamore. You have new messages at 5692:....! (Sorry for butting in............ again!!) 5145:Please nominate future articles for improvement at 4154: 4079:that have been identified to date are as follows - 3480:I am rather perplexed with this bizarre article on 2521:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Adam Crosland

567:

Tee hee. You see, I do have my uses! Best wishes,

1691:must stop fiddling with things I do not understand 3458:. And a very happy new year to you too. Regards, 2504:A discussion has begun about whether the article 1415:suggests they are not related - answer to q.10. 654:Get Yer Ya-Yas Out! The Rolling Stones in Concert 597:I have added a statement from the New York Times 5234:Would you like to write the next newsletter for 4984:To recruit more active editors (See Member News) 1963:However, "Collette" does indeed have two "L"s - 3659:WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - January 2011 3179:Congratulations to our five star general ; ) ~ 1985:Thank you for all that - I appreciate it. The " 1343:I hate to be pedantic, but ... this reference 830:Yes well, for better or for worse, here is my 4155:Yorkshire articles by quality and importance 3903:List of York City F.C. records and statistics 2788:that you're warmer there than we are in NYC. 2666:article. Simply because it is a gold star / 8: 5521:- see talk page of the article for details. 3956: 2321:amongst others. Unreferenced edits such as 1033:No problem - you win some, you lose some. - 4920: 1127:I agree it would be better as a piped link 5147:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Yorkshire 4969:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Yorkshire 4151: 3883:List of York City F.C. Clubmen of the Year 3662: 2850:I"ll keep trying! Hope soon to have it ok. 4924:As of 30 November 2010, we have assessed 2791:Thanks for your help! Have a great 2011! 2062:myself as an article reviewer - et vous ? 5045: 4204: 3872: 3765: 2736:I may hit you up for more advice later. 1872:'s suggestion, question is now also at 1811:Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (technical) 4930:of all articles with a project banner. 4186: 4181: 4176: 4171: 2894:? (I'm quite pleased with it myself!) 5727:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3879:There are also eleven featured lists: 516:article is now up and running, and at 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4249: 4191: 3244:which, amongst other things, states, 2315:Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view 1865:I originally asked at the Help Desk. 7: 4290: 4288: 3943: 3899:List of Bradford City A.F.C. seasons 2739:Happy Holidays and happy Yorkshire! 2662:I usually point editors towards the 2655:(instead of the plainer <ref: --> 2319:Knowledge (XXG):No original research 1192:? It could change things a bit.... 709:is necessarily a reliable source ;-) 5115:John Fowler (agricultural engineer) 3907:List of Leeds United A.F.C. seasons 3788:George Calvert, 1st Baron Baltimore 2311:Knowledge (XXG):Third-party sources 5403:Hope you've had a great holiday. 5064: 3860:Yorkshire captaincy affair of 1927 2935:Best wishes, Chrimbo or otherwise, 2384:Knowledge (XXG) editing guidelines 24: 5242:! New editors are always welcome! 5059: 2919:lyrics. Something like ... that 2683:for more technical stuff. I use 2519:The article will be discussed at 2429:Discussion at the BLP Noticeboard 868:more times than any other artist? 641:though. Earlier examples include 5712: 5162: 4950: 4931: 4289: 4250: 4205: 4053: 4017: 3955: 3942: 3923:List of Hull City A.F.C. seasons 3911:List of Scarborough F.C. seasons 3873: 3766: 3705: 3291:Do you have a Date of Birth for 2542: 2497: 1546: 1511: 1240:Hi Derek, I believe the article 1089: 1055: 1051:DYK nomination of Duke Henderson 947: 916: 29: 5238:?? Please nominate yourself at 5167:The project is subscribed to a 4987:To bring our top level article 3887:List of York City F.C. managers 3820:History of Bradford City A.F.C. 1569:Another try... (see DYK page). 1507:DYK nomination of Bessie Tucker 1121:Why did you remove the link to 3931:to all those who contributed. 3895:List of York City F.C. seasons 3891:List of York City F.C. players 3477:Hi Derek, and Happy New Year, 1995:(You're the) Devil in Disguise 755:10:32, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 720:08:26, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 702:19:32, 25 September 2010 (UTC) 617:16:42, 25 September 2010 (UTC) 588:Stupidity (Dr. Feelgood album) 581:09:46, 12 September 2010 (UTC) 562:00:17, 12 September 2010 (UTC) 107:I spotted your recent edit at 1: 5357:Many thanks and best wishes, 3804:Stocksbridge Park Steels F.C. 3431:20:23, 30 December 2010 (UTC) 3416:20:12, 30 December 2010 (UTC) 3396:17:48, 29 December 2010 (UTC) 3382:Sorry I can't help this time. 3315:17:08, 29 December 2010 (UTC) 3279:12:54, 24 December 2010 (UTC) 3242:Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability 3232:03:36, 24 December 2010 (UTC) 3189:11:18, 23 December 2010 (UTC) 3163:13:28, 22 December 2010 (UTC) 3149:13:19, 22 December 2010 (UTC) 3114:09:05, 22 December 2010 (UTC) 3099:16:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC) 3080:15:56, 21 December 2010 (UTC) 3049:10:26, 16 December 2010 (UTC) 3019:09:17, 16 December 2010 (UTC) 2993:16:39, 15 December 2010 (UTC) 2971:16:29, 15 December 2010 (UTC) 2949:15:15, 15 December 2010 (UTC) 2904:14:16, 15 December 2010 (UTC) 2880:21:15, 31 December 2010 (UTC) 2840:00:28, 30 December 2010 (UTC) 2803:23:31, 29 December 2010 (UTC) 2782:13:28, 11 December 2010 (UTC) 2635:Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability 2195:Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability 2118:00:01, 28 November 2010 (UTC) 2088:16:56, 27 November 2010 (UTC) 2045:15:20, 27 November 2010 (UTC) 2015:11:30, 27 November 2010 (UTC) 1977:10:59, 27 November 2010 (UTC) 1959:08:23, 27 November 2010 (UTC) 1942:17:31, 26 November 2010 (UTC) 1917:11:07, 26 November 2010 (UTC) 1885:10:54, 26 November 2010 (UTC) 1861:10:33, 26 November 2010 (UTC) 1823:10:19, 26 November 2010 (UTC) 1805:10:02, 26 November 2010 (UTC) 1775:08:54, 26 November 2010 (UTC) 1756:19:01, 25 November 2010 (UTC) 1722:18:52, 25 November 2010 (UTC) 1707:18:42, 25 November 2010 (UTC) 1683:18:25, 25 November 2010 (UTC) 1645:16:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC) 1615:15:19, 24 November 2010 (UTC) 1593:14:42, 24 November 2010 (UTC) 1579:00:26, 24 November 2010 (UTC) 1565:23:27, 23 November 2010 (UTC) 1540:22:07, 23 November 2010 (UTC) 1522:Did You Know nominations page 1499:15:37, 11 December 2010 (UTC) 1481:12:55, 11 December 2010 (UTC) 1458:11:44, 11 December 2010 (UTC) 1425:17:55, 19 November 2010 (UTC) 1408:16:11, 19 November 2010 (UTC) 1377:15:46, 19 November 2010 (UTC) 1327:14:31, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 1305:14:09, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 1287:12:20, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 1259:11:29, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 1249:follow? Thanks in advance. ~ 1228:19:51, 11 November 2010 (UTC) 1202:17:45, 11 November 2010 (UTC) 1176:14:01, 10 November 2010 (UTC) 1161:13:50, 10 November 2010 (UTC) 1142:13:42, 10 November 2010 (UTC) 1066:Did You Know nominations page 927:Did You Know nominations page 912:DYK nomination of Johnny Dyer 457:- we're real giddy gadabouts. 5702:08:39, 14 January 2011 (UTC) 5680:01:38, 14 January 2011 (UTC) 5648:00:51, 14 January 2011 (UTC) 5607:17:46, 13 January 2011 (UTC) 5585:17:22, 13 January 2011 (UTC) 5558:13:16, 13 January 2011 (UTC) 5531:04:26, 13 January 2011 (UTC) 5503:04:16, 4 February 2011 (UTC) 5464:23:38, 17 January 2011 (UTC) 5129:Jan 01, 2011 ~ Jan 31, 2011 5124: 5111:Dec 01, 2010 ~ Dec 31, 2010 5106: 5093:Nov 01, 2010 ~ Nov 30, 2010 5088: 5075:Oct 01, 2010 ~ Oct 31, 2010 5070: 5058: 5047: 4923: 3828:Ealdred (archbishop of York) 3742:Welcome to the thirty third 3637:Stuck in the Middle With You 3320:Nope. I do have Ken Lewis ( 2864:will look for more sources. 2751:23:15, 8 December 2010 (UTC) 2711:22:29, 7 December 2010 (UTC) 2618:21:03, 7 December 2010 (UTC) 2584:22:14, 5 December 2010 (UTC) 2561:20:23, 5 December 2010 (UTC) 2536:20:13, 5 December 2010 (UTC) 2484:01:29, 5 December 2010 (UTC) 2464:13:14, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 2444:12:15, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 2424:19:38, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 2400:14:41, 2 December 2010 (UTC) 2300:01:53, 2 December 2010 (UTC) 2272:23:14, 1 December 2010 (UTC) 2238:23:00, 1 December 2010 (UTC) 2219:22:03, 1 December 2010 (UTC) 2156:20:26, 1 December 2010 (UTC) 1108:21:33, 9 November 2010 (UTC) 1084:21:25, 9 November 2010 (UTC) 1043:14:37, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 1029:07:43, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 1014:03:18, 8 November 2010 (UTC) 995:23:49, 29 October 2010 (UTC) 966:07:19, 27 October 2010 (UTC) 942:18:05, 23 October 2010 (UTC) 906:16:09, 23 October 2010 (UTC) 884:14:33, 23 October 2010 (UTC) 5446:17:33, 9 January 2011 (UTC) 5419:13:01, 9 January 2011 (UTC) 5390:22:49, 7 January 2011 (UTC) 5370:22:00, 7 January 2011 (UTC) 5337:15:49, 7 January 2011 (UTC) 5313:19:07, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 5292:Hi Derek, you had placed a 5283:08:13, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 5012:and apropos of the above a 3654:00:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 3627:13:59, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 3578:00:11, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 3557:User talk:WereSpielChequers 3542:23:23, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 3512:21:35, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 3468:13:42, 1 January 2011 (UTC) 3368:), and I can tell you that 3340:(John Lewis), Wayne Lewis ( 3259:might be a good one to try. 2033:even more famous songwriter 1922:COLLETTE / A WONDROUS PLACE 1271:Talk:Kaleidoscope (UK band) 1125:Blake from Roy Dyke's page? 852:23:46, 7 October 2010 (UTC) 825:12:36, 5 October 2010 (UTC) 802:14:18, 4 October 2010 (UTC) 782:10:42, 4 October 2010 (UTC) 595:Hope you had a good holiday 538:00:01, 30 August 2010 (UTC) 504:19:25, 29 August 2010 (UTC) 489:19:13, 29 August 2010 (UTC) 471:22:20, 24 August 2010 (UTC) 455:Hants SpongeBob SquarePants 440:- but it is a bit nebulous. 408:21:29, 24 August 2010 (UTC) 384:11:41, 24 August 2010 (UTC) 364:11:23, 24 August 2010 (UTC) 335:13:02, 21 August 2010 (UTC) 285:12:59, 21 August 2010 (UTC) 256:11:39, 21 August 2010 (UTC) 219:01:12, 21 August 2010 (UTC) 170:00:26, 21 August 2010 (UTC) 131:22:21, 20 August 2010 (UTC) 18:User talk:Derek R Bullamore 5796: 5597:Très bien - best wishes - 5271:→ Newsletter delivered by 5259:Delivered January 2011 by 3948:Aire and Calder Navigation 3206: 1926:Thanks for your comments. 1516:Hello! Your submission of 1060:Hello! Your submission of 921:Hello! Your submission of 679:is obviously a rock solid 669:We All Had Doctor's Papers 518:Template talk:Did you know 432:Max Frost and the Troopers 5138:Joe Simpson (mountaineer) 5079:Leeds and Liverpool Canal 5054: 5051: 5048: 4899: 4891: 4879: 4164: 4159: 3489:http://www.grahamhine.com 2867:Thanks for your support. 1809:Have you tried asking at 765:Your comment on the page 445:My wife and I are off to 5097:Yorkshire Engine Company 4140:Yorkshire and the Humber 4088:East Riding of Yorkshire 4003:is still currently low. 3963:was nominated for GA on 3784:Sheffield Wednesday F.C. 3699:Issue 33 - January 2011 1665:You did some tidying on 5628:. Please look at this: 5178:Monitoring is essential 3929:Thank you and well done 3824:Last of the Summer Wine 1527:your nomination's entry 1267:Knowledge (XXG):Merging 1071:your nomination's entry 1000:Dan Sane DYK nomination 932:your nomination's entry 551:"... so shall ye weep!" 428:Shape of Things to Come 5210: 5157:Please bear in mind... 5102:Morley, West Yorkshire 4977:for the project are:- 3950:was promoted to GA on 3686: 3553:User talk:Shaky Spades 3441: 3297:Eddie and the Hot Rods 3265:this time of the year. 1242:Kaleidoscope (UK band) 671:(1975). Using my own 660:Concert for Bangladesh 5725:of past discussions. 5209: 4077:top priority articles 3744:WikiProject Yorkshire 3693:WikiProject Yorkshire 3685: 3669:Yorkshire WikiProject 3440: 3328:(Terence Lee Lewis), 2637:states, and I quote, 836:Need Your Love So Bad 626:- highly recommended. 398:. Any suggestions? 42:of past discussions. 4967:After discussion at 3792:History of Sheffield 3717:Got any suggestions? 3299:and associated with 2646:for that claim ? In 2566: 2188:as well be prepared. 5664:User:Moonriddengirl 4128:William Wilberforce 3816:William Wilberforce 3746:monthly newsletter. 3207:Lookin' After No. 1 2674:is another example. 1868:but have now taken 866:Oh Boy! (TV series) 546:As shall ye "woah!" 437:Wild in the Streets 5396:Is Buddy Feyne Ok? 5211: 5066:Start class choice 4096:Kingston upon Hull 3848:Cottingley Fairies 3687: 3526:Test Match Special 3452:remove this notice 3442: 3285:DoB for Lew Lewis? 3254:song's own article 2922:A Christmas Record 2912:A Christmas Record 2685:User:Rodhullandemu 2343:Trigger Management 5783: 5782: 5737: 5736: 5731:current talk page 5672:Derek R Bullamore 5599:Derek R Bullamore 5550:Derek R Bullamore 5495:Derek R Bullamore 5438:Derek R Bullamore 5382:Derek R Bullamore 5329:Derek R Bullamore 5298:The Embarrassment 5288:The Embarrassment 5266: 5256: 5255: 5252: 5251: 5229: 5143: 5142: 4947: 4946: 4943: 4940: 4939: 4916:Assess and review 4907: 4906: 4070:Priority Articles 3840:Cosmo Gordon Lang 3728: 3619:Derek R Bullamore 3534:Derek R Bullamore 3423:Derek R Bullamore 3388:Derek R Bullamore 3271:Derek R Bullamore 3250:The Boomtown Rats 3235: 3218:comment added by 3196:Derek R Bullamore 3141:Derek R Bullamore 3091:Derek R Bullamore 3064:The Four Horsemen 3041:Derek R Bullamore 2985:Derek R Bullamore 2941:Derek R Bullamore 2832:Derek R Bullamore 2774:Derek R Bullamore 2703:Derek R Bullamore 2553:Derek R Bullamore 2456:Derek R Bullamore 2392:Derek R Bullamore 2367:Bruce Springstein 2264:Derek R Bullamore 2211:Derek R Bullamore 2201:I would say that 2080:Derek R Bullamore 2007:Derek R Bullamore 1944:Harry Whitehouse 1909:Derek R Bullamore 1748:Derek R Bullamore 1699:Derek R Bullamore 1637:Derek R Bullamore 1557:Derek R Bullamore 1473:Derek R Bullamore 1442:Fairfield Parlour 1369:Derek R Bullamore 1279:Derek R Bullamore 1246:Fairfield Parlour 1220:Derek R Bullamore 1153:Derek R Bullamore 1100:Derek R Bullamore 1035:Derek R Bullamore 958:Derek R Bullamore 898:Derek R Bullamore 844:Derek R Bullamore 813:This 1972 article 794:Derek R Bullamore 747:Derek R Bullamore 694:Derek R Bullamore 673:original research 663:(1972); and even 645:half live effort 573:Derek R Bullamore 530:Derek R Bullamore 496:Derek R Bullamore 463:Derek R Bullamore 419:Ode to Billie Joe 376:Derek R Bullamore 327:Derek R Bullamore 248:Derek R Bullamore 162:Derek R Bullamore 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5787: 5761: 5739: 5738: 5716: 5715: 5709: 5347:Hi again Derek, 5258: 5226:Single-Page View 5214: 5170:clean-up listing 5166: 5046: 4993:Featured article 4954: 4953: 4941: 4932: 4921: 4896: 4887: 4881:WikiWork factors 4294: 4293: 4292: 4255: 4254: 4210: 4209: 4152: 4057: 4033:Yorkshire Portal 4025: 4021: 4020: 3959: 3958: 3946: 3945: 3938:Article Activity 3878: 3877: 3844:Thomas of Bayeux 3832:Paulinus of York 3800:Joseph Priestley 3771: 3770: 3725: 3716: 3709: 3678: 3677: 3663: 3641:Any thoughts on 3455: 3445:WWGB's talk page 3252:article and the 3234: 3220:LongLivePunkRock 3212: 2870:Happy New Year! 2668:featured article 2606:Thanks so much! 2567:Belinda O'Hooley 2550: 2546: 2545: 2501: 2500: 2290:Sophia Michaels 2029:Harvey Zimmerman 1667:Henry McCullough 1659:Henry McCullough 1554: 1550: 1549: 1515: 1097: 1093: 1092: 1059: 993: 989: 982: 955: 951: 950: 920: 486: 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5795: 5794: 5790: 5789: 5788: 5786: 5785: 5784: 5757: 5713: 5653:Hello Acabashi, 5619: 5542:Ghost Box Music 5519:Ghost Box Music 5515: 5513:Ghost Box music 5398: 5345: 5290: 5267: 4971:in April 2008. 4951: 4929: 4908: 4894: 4885: 4116:South Yorkshire 4104:North Yorkshire 4018: 4016: 3868:George Macaulay 3730: 3723: 3697: 3661: 3639: 3475: 3456: 3449: 3404: 3358:Jerry Lee Lewis 3287: 3213: 3209: 3177: 3067: 2888: 2760:The Independent 2672:Bix Beiderbecke 2649:The Independent 2644:reliable source 2594: 2569: 2543: 2541: 2514:deletion policy 2502: 2498: 2495: 2472: 2431: 2284: 2136: 2133:Dave Clark Five 1924: 1661: 1547: 1545: 1509: 1238: 1190:this discussion 1186: 1117: 1090: 1088: 1053: 1002: 992: 987: 980: 978: 975: 948: 946: 914: 860: 810: 770: 681:reliable source 639:UK Albums Chart 591: 548: 484: 479: 392: 351: 349:Article tagging 105: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5793: 5791: 5781: 5780: 5775: 5772: 5767: 5762: 5755: 5750: 5745: 5735: 5734: 5717: 5707: 5706: 5705: 5704: 5683: 5682: 5668: 5667: 5655: 5654: 5638:Best wishes, 5630:Pido Lalimarmo 5618: 5617:Pido Lalimarmo 5615: 5614: 5613: 5612: 5611: 5610: 5609: 5590: 5589: 5588: 5587: 5561: 5560: 5546: 5545: 5514: 5511: 5510: 5509: 5508: 5507: 5506: 5505: 5487: 5486: 5485: 5484: 5483: 5482: 5470: 5469: 5468: 5467: 5449: 5448: 5434: 5433: 5428: 5427: 5397: 5394: 5393: 5392: 5378: 5377: 5344: 5341: 5340: 5339: 5325: 5324: 5289: 5286: 5270: 5257: 5254: 5253: 5250: 5249: 5247: 5245: 5231: 5219:• Template by 5212: 5204: 5203: 5197: 5196: 5193: 5187: 5186: 5180: 5160: 5159: 5152: 5141: 5140: 5135: 5130: 5127: 5123: 5122: 5120:Scampston Hall 5117: 5112: 5109: 5105: 5104: 5099: 5094: 5091: 5087: 5086: 5081: 5076: 5073: 5069: 5068: 5063: 5061:B class choice 5057: 5056: 5053: 5050: 5041: 5040: 5033: 5030: 5025: 5024: 5023:Happy New Year 5019: 5010: 5009: 5006: 5003: 4996: 4985: 4982: 4965: 4964: 4959: 4949: 4945: 4944: 4938: 4937: 4935: 4925: 4919: 4918: 4914: 4905: 4904: 4898: 4890: 4877: 4876: 4869: 4862: 4855: 4848: 4841: 4834: 4828: 4827: 4820: 4815: 4810: 4805: 4800: 4795: 4789: 4788: 4781: 4776: 4774: 4769: 4767: 4765: 4759: 4758: 4751: 4749: 4744: 4742: 4740: 4738: 4732: 4731: 4724: 4719: 4714: 4709: 4704: 4702: 4694: 4693: 4686: 4681: 4676: 4671: 4669: 4667: 4659: 4658: 4651: 4646: 4644: 4642: 4640: 4638: 4630: 4629: 4622: 4617: 4615: 4613: 4611: 4609: 4601: 4600: 4593: 4588: 4586: 4584: 4582: 4580: 4572: 4571: 4564: 4559: 4557: 4555: 4553: 4551: 4543: 4542: 4535: 4530: 4528: 4526: 4524: 4522: 4514: 4513: 4506: 4504: 4499: 4494: 4489: 4487: 4479: 4478: 4471: 4469: 4464: 4459: 4454: 4452: 4444: 4443: 4436: 4434: 4429: 4424: 4419: 4414: 4406: 4405: 4398: 4396: 4391: 4386: 4381: 4376: 4368: 4367: 4360: 4358: 4353: 4348: 4343: 4338: 4330: 4329: 4322: 4320: 4315: 4310: 4305: 4300: 4285: 4284: 4277: 4275: 4270: 4265: 4263: 4261: 4246: 4245: 4238: 4236: 4231: 4226: 4221: 4216: 4201: 4200: 4195: 4190: 4185: 4180: 4175: 4169: 4168: 4163: 4157: 4156: 4150: 4148: 4143: 4142: 4124:West Yorkshire 4073: 4072: 4065: 4051: 4050: 4042: 4041: 4037: 4036: 4028: 4027: 4012: 4011: 4006: 4001:active members 3997: 3996: 3976: 3975: 3970: 3967: 3954: 3940: 3939: 3934: 3927: 3852:Wilfred Rhodes 3796:York City F.C. 3764: 3762: 3761: 3748: 3747: 3739: 3738: 3732: 3731: 3729: 3718: 3715: 3714: 3711:December issue 3702: 3700: 3698: 3689: 3674: 3673: 3660: 3657: 3638: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3631: 3630: 3629: 3611: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3607: 3606: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3594: 3593: 3592: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3562: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3545: 3544: 3530: 3529: 3520: 3519: 3474: 3471: 3448: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3403: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3384: 3383: 3379: 3378: 3374: 3373: 3348:, Cass Lewis ( 3342:Atlantic Starr 3305: 3303: 3290: 3286: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3267: 3266: 3261: 3260: 3208: 3205: 3204: 3203: 3176: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3129: 3128: 3119: 3118: 3117: 3116: 3087: 3086: 3066: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3021: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2976: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2952: 2951: 2937: 2936: 2932: 2931: 2927: 2926: 2887: 2884: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2851: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2823: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2785: 2784: 2770: 2769: 2764: 2763: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2714: 2713: 2699: 2698: 2689: 2688: 2676: 2675: 2659: 2658: 2630: 2629: 2593: 2587: 2571:Thanks, Derek 2568: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2496: 2494: 2489:Nomination of 2487: 2471: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2452: 2451: 2430: 2427: 2416:Sophiamichaels 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2403: 2402: 2388: 2387: 2379: 2378: 2339:Kasaan Steigen 2330: 2329: 2292:Sophiamichaels 2283: 2282:Albert Hammond 2280: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2222: 2221: 2207: 2206: 2197:aptly states; 2190: 2189: 2184: 2183: 2175: 2174: 2169: 2168: 2135: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1987:Wondrous Place 1980: 1979: 1961: 1923: 1920: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1875: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1765: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1695: 1694: 1673: 1670: 1664: 1660: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1508: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1484: 1483: 1469: 1468: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1290: 1289: 1275: 1274: 1237: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1185: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1166: 1149: 1148: 1132: 1126: 1120: 1116: 1111: 1062:Duke Henderson 1052: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1001: 998: 984: 974: 969: 913: 910: 909: 908: 894: 893: 874: 869: 863: 859: 856: 855: 854: 840: 839: 809: 806: 805: 804: 790: 789: 769: 763: 762: 761: 760: 759: 758: 757: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 725: 724: 723: 722: 710: 690: 689: 685: 684: 634:New York Times 628: 627: 607: 605: 596: 594: 590: 585: 584: 583: 569: 568: 554:LessHeard vanU 547: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 524: 523: 522: 521: 507: 506: 478: 475: 474: 473: 459: 458: 451:Yorkie Porkies 449:tomorrow, for 442: 441: 423: 422: 391: 388: 387: 386: 372: 371: 350: 347: 346: 345: 344: 343: 342: 341: 340: 339: 338: 337: 315: 314: 313: 312: 311: 310: 309: 308: 307: 306: 294: 293: 292: 291: 290: 289: 288: 287: 263: 262: 261: 260: 259: 258: 240: 239: 238: 237: 236: 235: 224: 223: 222: 221: 202: 201: 200: 199: 192: 191: 190: 189: 182: 181: 180: 179: 158: 157: 149: 148: 139: 138: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5792: 5779: 5776: 5773: 5771: 5768: 5766: 5763: 5760: 5756: 5754: 5751: 5749: 5746: 5744: 5741: 5740: 5732: 5728: 5724: 5723: 5718: 5711: 5710: 5703: 5699: 5695: 5691: 5687: 5686: 5685: 5684: 5681: 5677: 5673: 5670: 5669: 5665: 5661: 5657: 5656: 5652: 5651: 5650: 5649: 5645: 5641: 5636: 5634: 5631: 5627: 5622: 5616: 5608: 5604: 5600: 5596: 5595: 5594: 5593: 5592: 5591: 5586: 5582: 5578: 5574: 5570: 5565: 5564: 5563: 5562: 5559: 5555: 5551: 5548: 5547: 5543: 5539: 5535: 5534: 5533: 5532: 5528: 5524: 5520: 5512: 5504: 5500: 5496: 5493: 5492: 5491: 5490: 5489: 5488: 5480: 5476: 5475: 5474: 5473: 5472: 5471: 5465: 5461: 5457: 5453: 5452: 5451: 5450: 5447: 5443: 5439: 5436: 5435: 5430: 5429: 5424: 5423: 5422: 5420: 5416: 5412: 5407: 5404: 5401: 5395: 5391: 5387: 5383: 5380: 5379: 5374: 5373: 5372: 5371: 5367: 5363: 5358: 5355: 5353: 5352:Sonar Records 5348: 5343:Sonar Records 5342: 5338: 5334: 5330: 5327: 5326: 5322: 5317: 5316: 5315: 5314: 5310: 5306: 5301: 5299: 5295: 5287: 5285: 5284: 5280: 5276: 5275: 5264: 5263: 5248: 5244: 5243: 5241: 5237: 5230: 5228: 5227: 5222: 5218: 5208: 5202: 5199: 5198: 5192: 5189: 5188: 5184: 5179: 5176: 5175: 5174: 5172: 5171: 5165: 5158: 5155: 5154: 5153: 5150: 5148: 5139: 5136: 5134: 5131: 5128: 5125: 5121: 5118: 5116: 5113: 5110: 5107: 5103: 5100: 5098: 5095: 5092: 5089: 5085: 5082: 5080: 5077: 5074: 5071: 5067: 5062: 5044: 5039: 5036: 5035: 5034: 5031: 5028: 5022: 5021: 5020: 5017: 5015: 5014:2010 New Year 5007: 5004: 5001: 4997: 4994: 4990: 4986: 4983: 4980: 4979: 4978: 4976: 4975:Specific aims 4972: 4970: 4962: 4961: 4960: 4958: 4957: 4936: 4934: 4933: 4928: 4922: 4917: 4913: 4910: 4909: 4903: 4897: 4888: 4882: 4878: 4875: 4874: 4870: 4868: 4867: 4863: 4861: 4860: 4856: 4854: 4853: 4849: 4847: 4846: 4842: 4840: 4839: 4835: 4833: 4830: 4829: 4826: 4825: 4821: 4819: 4816: 4814: 4811: 4809: 4806: 4804: 4801: 4799: 4796: 4794: 4791: 4790: 4787: 4786: 4782: 4780: 4777: 4775: 4773: 4770: 4768: 4766: 4764: 4761: 4760: 4757: 4756: 4752: 4750: 4748: 4745: 4743: 4741: 4739: 4737: 4734: 4733: 4730: 4729: 4725: 4723: 4720: 4718: 4715: 4713: 4710: 4708: 4705: 4703: 4701: 4700: 4696: 4695: 4692: 4691: 4687: 4685: 4682: 4680: 4677: 4675: 4672: 4670: 4668: 4666: 4665: 4661: 4660: 4657: 4656: 4652: 4650: 4647: 4645: 4643: 4641: 4639: 4637: 4636: 4632: 4631: 4628: 4627: 4623: 4621: 4618: 4616: 4614: 4612: 4610: 4608: 4607: 4603: 4602: 4599: 4598: 4594: 4592: 4589: 4587: 4585: 4583: 4581: 4579: 4578: 4574: 4573: 4570: 4569: 4565: 4563: 4560: 4558: 4556: 4554: 4552: 4550: 4549: 4545: 4544: 4541: 4540: 4536: 4534: 4531: 4529: 4527: 4525: 4523: 4521: 4520: 4516: 4515: 4512: 4511: 4507: 4505: 4503: 4500: 4498: 4495: 4493: 4490: 4488: 4486: 4485: 4481: 4480: 4477: 4476: 4472: 4470: 4468: 4465: 4463: 4460: 4458: 4455: 4453: 4451: 4450: 4446: 4445: 4442: 4441: 4437: 4435: 4433: 4430: 4428: 4425: 4423: 4420: 4418: 4415: 4413: 4412: 4408: 4407: 4404: 4403: 4399: 4397: 4395: 4392: 4390: 4387: 4385: 4382: 4380: 4377: 4375: 4374: 4370: 4369: 4366: 4365: 4361: 4359: 4357: 4354: 4352: 4349: 4347: 4344: 4342: 4339: 4337: 4336: 4332: 4331: 4328: 4327: 4323: 4321: 4319: 4316: 4314: 4311: 4309: 4306: 4304: 4301: 4299: 4298: 4287: 4286: 4283: 4282: 4278: 4276: 4274: 4271: 4269: 4266: 4264: 4262: 4260: 4259: 4253: 4248: 4247: 4244: 4243: 4239: 4237: 4235: 4232: 4230: 4227: 4225: 4222: 4220: 4217: 4215: 4214: 4208: 4203: 4202: 4199: 4196: 4194: 4189: 4184: 4179: 4174: 4170: 4167: 4162: 4158: 4153: 4149: 4146: 4141: 4137: 4133: 4129: 4125: 4121: 4117: 4113: 4109: 4105: 4101: 4097: 4093: 4089: 4085: 4082: 4081: 4080: 4078: 4071: 4068: 4067: 4066: 4063: 4062: 4061: 4056: 4048: 4044: 4043: 4039: 4038: 4034: 4030: 4029: 4024: 4014: 4013: 4009: 4008: 4007: 4004: 4002: 3994: 3991: 3988: 3984: 3983:Crouch, Swale 3981: 3980: 3979: 3973: 3972: 3971: 3968: 3966: 3962: 3953: 3952:November 29th 3949: 3937: 3936: 3935: 3932: 3930: 3925: 3924: 3920: 3916: 3912: 3908: 3904: 3900: 3896: 3892: 3888: 3884: 3880: 3876: 3870: 3869: 3865: 3861: 3857: 3853: 3849: 3845: 3841: 3837: 3833: 3829: 3825: 3821: 3817: 3813: 3812:Valley Parade 3809: 3805: 3801: 3797: 3793: 3789: 3785: 3781: 3777: 3773: 3769: 3759: 3756:who have 61. 3755: 3750: 3749: 3745: 3741: 3740: 3736: 3735: 3734: 3733: 3727: 3726: 3713: 3712: 3708: 3703: 3701: 3696: 3694: 3684: 3680: 3679: 3676: 3675: 3672: 3670: 3665: 3664: 3658: 3656: 3655: 3651: 3647: 3644: 3636: 3628: 3624: 3620: 3617: 3616: 3615: 3614: 3613: 3612: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3598: 3589: 3588: 3587: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3579: 3575: 3571: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3563: 3558: 3554: 3549: 3548: 3547: 3546: 3543: 3539: 3535: 3532: 3531: 3527: 3522: 3521: 3516: 3515: 3514: 3513: 3509: 3505: 3502:best wishes, 3500: 3496: 3492: 3490: 3485: 3483: 3478: 3472: 3470: 3469: 3465: 3461: 3453: 3446: 3439: 3432: 3428: 3424: 3420: 3419: 3418: 3417: 3413: 3409: 3401: 3397: 3393: 3389: 3386: 3385: 3381: 3380: 3376: 3375: 3371: 3367: 3363: 3362:Shaznay Lewis 3359: 3355: 3351: 3350:Skunk Anansie 3347: 3343: 3339: 3335: 3331: 3327: 3323: 3319: 3318: 3317: 3316: 3312: 3308: 3302: 3298: 3294: 3284: 3280: 3276: 3272: 3269: 3268: 3263: 3262: 3258: 3255: 3251: 3247: 3243: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3233: 3229: 3225: 3221: 3217: 3201: 3197: 3193: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3174: 3164: 3160: 3156: 3155:ThePaintedOne 3152: 3151: 3150: 3146: 3142: 3139: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3135: 3134: 3125: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3120: 3115: 3111: 3107: 3106:ThePaintedOne 3102: 3101: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3089: 3088: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3077: 3073: 3072:ThePaintedOne 3065: 3062: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3029: 3020: 3016: 3012: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3003: 3002: 3001: 2994: 2990: 2986: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2960: 2956: 2955: 2954: 2953: 2950: 2946: 2942: 2939: 2938: 2934: 2933: 2929: 2928: 2924: 2923: 2918: 2914: 2913: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2901: 2897: 2893: 2885: 2883: 2881: 2877: 2873: 2868: 2865: 2861: 2857: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2841: 2837: 2833: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2804: 2800: 2796: 2792: 2789: 2783: 2779: 2775: 2772: 2771: 2766: 2765: 2761: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2752: 2748: 2744: 2740: 2737: 2734: 2730: 2726: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2701: 2700: 2696: 2691: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2681:administrator 2678: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2665: 2661: 2660: 2651: 2650: 2645: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2631: 2627: 2626:popular music 2623: 2622: 2621: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2604: 2600: 2597: 2592: 2588: 2586: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2572: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2549: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2524: 2522: 2517: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2506:Adam crosland 2492: 2491:Adam crosland 2488: 2486: 2485: 2481: 2477: 2476:Bretonbanquet 2469: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2454: 2453: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2441: 2437: 2428: 2426: 2425: 2421: 2417: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2390: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2380: 2376: 2372: 2368: 2364: 2360: 2356: 2355:vast majority 2352: 2348: 2347:Elvis Presley 2344: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2331: 2328: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2307:verifiability 2304: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2288: 2281: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2220: 2216: 2212: 2209: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2191: 2186: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2176: 2171: 2170: 2165: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2134: 2131: 2119: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2089: 2085: 2081: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 1996: 1992: 1991:Elvis Presley 1988: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1978: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1921: 1919: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1871: 1867: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1762: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1753: 1749: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1697: 1696: 1692: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1680: 1676: 1668: 1658: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1553: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1528: 1523: 1519: 1518:Bessie Tucker 1514: 1506: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1471: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1367:The pedantic 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1349: 1348:Roger Daltrey 1345: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1277: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1247: 1243: 1235: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1183: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1151: 1150: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1130: 1124: 1115: 1112: 1110: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1096: 1086: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1072: 1067: 1063: 1058: 1050: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1011: 1007: 999: 997: 996: 991: 990: 983: 981:Corvus cornix 973: 970: 968: 967: 963: 959: 954: 944: 943: 940: 939: 934: 933: 928: 924: 919: 911: 907: 903: 899: 896: 895: 891: 888: 887: 886: 885: 881: 877: 873:is the 1930's 872: 867: 858:Cuddly Dudley 857: 853: 849: 845: 842: 841: 837: 833: 829: 828: 827: 826: 822: 818: 814: 808:Hello (again) 807: 803: 799: 795: 792: 791: 786: 785: 784: 783: 779: 775: 768: 767:Cauda Pavonis 764: 756: 752: 748: 745: 744: 743: 742: 741: 740: 731: 730: 729: 728: 727: 726: 721: 717: 713: 708: 705: 704: 703: 699: 695: 692: 691: 687: 686: 682: 678: 674: 670: 666: 662: 661: 656: 655: 650: 649: 644: 640: 636: 635: 630: 629: 625: 621: 620: 619: 618: 614: 610: 603: 599: 589: 586: 582: 578: 574: 571: 570: 566: 565: 564: 563: 559: 555: 552: 545: 539: 535: 531: 528: 527: 526: 525: 519: 515: 511: 510: 509: 508: 505: 501: 497: 493: 492: 491: 490: 487: 476: 472: 468: 464: 461: 460: 456: 452: 448: 444: 443: 439: 438: 433: 429: 425: 424: 420: 416: 412: 411: 410: 409: 405: 401: 397: 389: 385: 381: 377: 374: 373: 368: 367: 366: 365: 361: 357: 348: 336: 332: 328: 325: 324: 323: 322: 321: 320: 319: 318: 317: 316: 304: 303: 302: 301: 300: 299: 298: 297: 296: 295: 286: 283: 282: 278: 277: 271: 270: 269: 268: 267: 266: 265: 264: 257: 253: 249: 246: 245: 244: 243: 242: 241: 233: 230: 229: 228: 227: 226: 225: 220: 217: 216: 212: 211: 206: 205: 204: 203: 196: 195: 194: 193: 186: 185: 184: 183: 177: 173: 172: 171: 167: 163: 160: 159: 155: 151: 150: 146: 141: 140: 135: 134: 133: 132: 129: 128: 124: 123: 117: 113: 110: 102: 96: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5758: 5726: 5720: 5637: 5625: 5623: 5620: 5571:featured in 5569:Belbury Poly 5538:Warp Records 5516: 5456:Itwasthelark 5432:best wishes, 5411:Itwasthelark 5408: 5405: 5402: 5399: 5359: 5356: 5349: 5346: 5302: 5293: 5291: 5272: 5268: 5261: 5246: 5233: 5232: 5224: 5213: 5200: 5190: 5177: 5169: 5161: 5156: 5151: 5144: 5065: 5060: 5042: 5037: 5032: 5029: 5026: 5018: 5013: 5011: 5000:Good article 4974: 4973: 4966: 4955: 4948: 4926: 4911: 4901: 4893: 4880: 4871: 4864: 4857: 4850: 4843: 4836: 4831: 4822: 4792: 4783: 4762: 4753: 4726: 4697: 4688: 4662: 4653: 4633: 4624: 4604: 4595: 4575: 4566: 4546: 4537: 4517: 4508: 4482: 4473: 4447: 4438: 4409: 4400: 4371: 4362: 4333: 4324: 4295: 4279: 4256: 4240: 4211: 4197: 4165: 4160: 4147: 4144: 4076: 4074: 4069: 4064: 4059: 4058: 4052: 4022: 4005: 3998: 3989: 3977: 3969: 3965:December 7th 3964: 3951: 3941: 3933: 3928: 3926: 3881: 3871: 3808:M62 motorway 3774: 3763: 3737:Project News 3720: 3704: 3690: 3688: 3666: 3640: 3501: 3497: 3493: 3486: 3479: 3476: 3457: 3405: 3330:Graham Lewis 3295:formerly of 3288: 3245: 3214:— Preceding 3210: 3178: 3068: 2958: 2920: 2910: 2892:this article 2889: 2872:Itwasthelark 2869: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2855: 2795:Itwasthelark 2793: 2790: 2786: 2759: 2743:Itwasthelark 2741: 2738: 2735: 2731: 2727: 2724: 2647: 2638: 2610:Itwasthelark 2608: 2605: 2601: 2598: 2595: 2574:Best wishes 2573: 2570: 2547: 2525: 2518: 2503: 2493:for deletion 2473: 2432: 2414: 2383: 2354: 2326: 2322: 2289: 2285: 2198: 2140:Bobby Graham 2137: 1932: 1928: 1925: 1907: 1903: 1690: 1662: 1551: 1525: 1510: 1464: 1439: 1239: 1187: 1129:Stacia Blake 1118: 1094: 1087: 1069: 1054: 1003: 985: 976: 952: 945: 936: 930: 915: 861: 811: 771: 676: 668: 658: 652: 646: 632: 601: 592: 549: 480: 435: 393: 352: 280: 276:21st CENTURY 275: 214: 210:21st CENTURY 209: 126: 122:21st CENTURY 121: 118: 114: 106: 75: 43: 37: 5719:This is an 5215:Written by 5084:Bridlington 5055:Article(s) 4092:Henry Moore 4015:A very big 3974:Member News 3776:Henry Moore 3482:Graham Hine 3473:Graham Hine 3402:Happy happy 3354:Linda Lewis 3338:Jonah Lewie 3326:Mark Wynter 3301:Dr Feelgood 2917:James White 2591:Buddy Feyne 2470:Nationality 2351:The Beatles 1601:as well as 923:Johnny Dyer 447:Scarborough 36:This is an 5778:Archive 15 5770:Archive 10 5621:Hi Derek, 5479:Costa Rica 5421:Stephanie 5400:Hi Derek, 5294:Refimprove 4912:Assessment 4166:Importance 3961:River Hull 3864:Roy Kilner 3856:Guy Fawkes 3695:Newsletter 3671:Newsletter 3370:Glenn Frey 3366:All Saints 3346:Huey Lewis 3322:Ivy League 2886:Greetings! 2882:Stephanie 2805:Stephanie 2753:Stephanie 2620:Stephanie 2596:Hi Derek, 2576:Headhitter 2027:Real name 1693:. Cheers, 972:Sleep Room 832:Jeff Allen 733:president. 514:J.D. Short 477:J.D. Short 281:GREENSTUFF 215:GREENSTUFF 127:GREENSTUFF 95:Archive 15 87:Archive 10 5765:Archive 9 5759:Archive 8 5753:Archive 7 5748:Archive 6 5743:Archive 5 5573:Bleep.com 5466:Stephanie 5183:watchlist 5133:Yorkshire 4989:Yorkshire 4136:Yorkshire 4120:Wakefield 4112:Sheffield 4047:watchlist 4023:Thank you 3721:Add them 3528:. Cheers, 3408:Elitropia 3293:Lew Lewis 3181:Elitropia 3175:Congrats! 2961:start... 2695:Yorkshire 2664:Bob Dylan 2589:Help for 2230:Elitropia 2148:Elitropia 2035:..... ? 1853:Elitropia 1797:Elitropia 1491:Elitropia 1450:Elitropia 1400:Elitropia 1319:Elitropia 1251:Elitropia 788:article ! 665:Max Boyce 602:Stupidity 198:articles? 82:Archive 9 76:Archive 8 70:Archive 7 65:Archive 6 60:Archive 5 5694:Ghmyrtle 5640:Acabashi 5362:Acabashi 5321:fancruft 5305:Robman94 5274:ENewsBot 5262:ENewsBot 5240:WT:YORKS 5236:WP:YORKS 5181:Use the 4793:Assessed 4699:Template 4664:Redirect 4548:Disambig 4519:Category 4084:Bradford 3993:contribs 3646:Ghmyrtle 3570:Acabashi 3504:Acabashi 3450:You can 3228:contribs 3216:unsigned 3011:Ghmyrtle 2963:Ghmyrtle 2896:Ghmyrtle 2203:Allmusic 2144:Allmusic 2110:Ghmyrtle 2037:Ghmyrtle 1969:Ghmyrtle 1951:Ghmyrtle 1934:Peaksoft 1870:Ghmyrtle 1815:Ghmyrtle 1764:problem. 1761:Franamax 1714:Franamax 1607:Ghmyrtle 1417:Ghmyrtle 1297:Ghmyrtle 1194:Ghmyrtle 1021:Ghmyrtle 862:Hi Derek 817:Ghmyrtle 774:Darqmann 657:(1970); 651:(1969); 453:against 400:Ghmyrtle 396:this lot 5722:archive 5660:copyvio 5296:tag on 5217:Keith D 4635:Project 4161:Quality 3836:Wilfrid 3780:Caedmon 3307:Arjayay 2959:cease?! 2510:deleted 2359:Madonna 2335:notable 1877:Arjayay 1767:Arjayay 1675:Arjayay 1585:28bytes 1571:Yoninah 1532:Yoninah 1520:at the 1168:Arjayay 1134:Arjayay 1076:Yoninah 1064:at the 1006:28bytes 925:at the 876:Arjayay 712:Arjayay 648:Goodbye 643:Cream's 609:Arjayay 176:Penarth 145:Weapons 109:Weapons 103:Weapons 39:archive 5626:horror 5409:Best, 5052:Dates 5049:Month 5002:status 4995:status 4991:up to 4956:Thanks 4895:96,496 4873:26,242 4859:17,908 4824:26,242 4813:17,908 4606:Portal 4440:10,112 4060:Great! 4010:Thanks 3304:Thanks 2528:Anneyh 2371:Eminem 2353:, the 1123:Stacia 1114:Stacia 938:Allen3 624:Bruges 413:Well, 356:Michig 5577:Kaini 5523:Kaini 5281:) · 5221:Jza84 5191:Moves 5126:XIII 4866:5,743 4852:2,093 4832:Total 4818:5,743 4808:2,093 4763:Other 4690:1,541 4684:1,348 4539:3,850 4533:3,850 4475:6,042 4467:5,672 4432:8,631 4427:1,242 4411:Start 4402:1,918 4394:1,481 4198:Total 4108:Ripon 4100:Leeds 3758:WP:GM 3754:WP:GM 3643:this? 3289:Derek 2822:safe, 2375:Duffy 2164:Clark 1663:Derek 1236:Merge 1188:Seen 1119:Derek 600:that 593:Derek 390:Help! 16:< 5698:talk 5690:this 5676:talk 5644:talk 5603:talk 5581:talk 5554:talk 5540:not 5527:talk 5499:talk 5460:talk 5442:talk 5415:talk 5386:talk 5366:talk 5333:talk 5309:talk 5279:info 5195:FUR. 5108:XII 4963:Aims 4927:100% 4902:5.10 4900:Ω = 4892:ω = 4577:File 4484:List 4449:Stub 4178:High 4132:York 4075:The 3987:talk 3724:here 3691:The 3667:The 3650:talk 3623:talk 3574:talk 3555:and 3538:talk 3508:talk 3464:talk 3460:WWGB 3427:talk 3412:talk 3392:talk 3334:Wire 3311:talk 3275:talk 3224:talk 3200:talk 3185:talk 3159:talk 3145:talk 3110:talk 3095:talk 3076:talk 3045:talk 3015:talk 2989:talk 2967:talk 2945:talk 2900:talk 2876:talk 2836:talk 2799:talk 2778:talk 2747:talk 2707:talk 2614:talk 2580:talk 2557:talk 2548:Done 2532:talk 2480:talk 2460:talk 2440:talk 2436:WWGB 2420:talk 2396:talk 2363:Pink 2349:and 2341:and 2337:are 2317:and 2296:talk 2268:talk 2234:talk 2215:talk 2152:talk 2114:talk 2084:talk 2041:talk 2011:talk 1993:'s " 1973:talk 1965:here 1955:talk 1938:talk 1913:talk 1881:talk 1857:talk 1819:talk 1801:talk 1771:talk 1752:talk 1718:talk 1703:talk 1679:talk 1672:250? 1641:talk 1611:talk 1603:this 1599:this 1589:talk 1575:talk 1561:talk 1552:Done 1536:talk 1495:talk 1477:talk 1454:talk 1421:talk 1413:This 1404:talk 1373:talk 1323:talk 1301:talk 1283:talk 1255:talk 1244:and 1224:talk 1198:talk 1172:talk 1157:talk 1138:talk 1104:talk 1095:Done 1080:talk 1039:talk 1025:talk 1010:talk 988:talk 962:talk 953:Done 902:talk 880:talk 848:talk 821:talk 798:talk 778:talk 751:talk 716:talk 698:talk 613:talk 577:talk 558:talk 534:talk 512:The 500:talk 483:Tito 467:talk 434:and 415:Been 404:talk 380:talk 360:talk 331:talk 252:talk 166:talk 5090:XI 4845:480 4803:480 4728:611 4722:171 4717:431 4679:190 4655:224 4649:224 4510:914 4502:898 4462:350 4422:238 4389:290 4384:143 4364:556 4356:346 4351:135 4326:218 4318:173 4188:Low 4183:Mid 4173:Top 3352:), 3344:), 3336:), 3324:), 1967:. 1813:? 1184:DYK 677:NYT 667:'s 430:", 5774:→ 5700:) 5678:) 5646:) 5605:) 5583:) 5556:) 5529:) 5501:) 5462:) 5444:) 5417:) 5388:) 5368:) 5360:-- 5335:) 5311:) 5223:| 5149:. 5072:X 4889:) 4838:18 4798:18 4785:12 4779:11 4755:10 4747:10 4736:NA 4626:95 4620:95 4597:23 4591:23 4568:21 4562:21 4497:12 4457:20 4346:66 4313:36 4297:GA 4281:17 4273:16 4258:FL 4242:78 4234:60 4229:15 4213:FA 4193:NA 4138:• 4134:• 4130:• 4126:• 4122:• 4118:• 4114:• 4110:• 4106:• 4102:• 4098:• 4094:• 4090:• 4086:• 3921:• 3917:• 3913:• 3909:• 3905:• 3901:• 3897:• 3893:• 3889:• 3885:• 3866:• 3862:• 3858:• 3854:• 3850:• 3846:• 3842:• 3838:• 3834:• 3830:• 3826:• 3822:• 3818:• 3814:• 3810:• 3806:• 3802:• 3798:• 3794:• 3790:• 3786:• 3782:• 3778:• 3719:— 3652:) 3625:) 3576:) 3540:) 3510:) 3466:) 3429:) 3414:) 3394:) 3360:, 3356:, 3313:) 3277:) 3230:) 3226:• 3187:) 3161:) 3147:) 3112:) 3104:-- 3097:) 3078:) 3047:) 3017:) 2991:) 2969:) 2947:) 2902:) 2878:) 2838:) 2801:) 2780:) 2749:) 2709:) 2616:) 2582:) 2559:) 2551:- 2534:) 2516:. 2482:) 2462:) 2442:) 2422:) 2398:) 2373:, 2369:, 2365:, 2361:, 2313:, 2298:) 2270:) 2236:) 2217:) 2154:) 2116:) 2086:) 2043:) 2013:) 1997:". 1975:) 1957:) 1940:) 1915:) 1883:) 1859:) 1821:) 1803:) 1773:) 1754:) 1720:) 1705:) 1681:) 1643:) 1613:) 1591:) 1577:) 1563:) 1555:- 1538:) 1497:) 1479:) 1465:IF 1456:) 1423:) 1406:) 1375:) 1325:) 1303:) 1285:) 1257:) 1226:) 1200:) 1174:) 1159:) 1140:) 1106:) 1098:- 1082:) 1041:) 1027:) 1012:) 964:) 956:- 904:) 882:) 850:) 823:) 800:) 780:) 753:) 718:) 700:) 615:) 579:) 560:) 536:) 502:) 485:xd 469:) 406:) 382:) 362:) 333:) 254:) 168:) 154:CV 91:→ 5733:. 5696:( 5674:( 5642:( 5601:( 5579:( 5552:( 5525:( 5497:( 5458:( 5440:( 5413:( 5384:( 5364:( 5331:( 5307:( 5277:( 4886:? 4883:( 4772:1 4712:8 4707:1 4674:3 4492:4 4417:1 4379:4 4373:C 4341:9 4335:B 4308:7 4303:2 4268:1 4224:1 4219:2 4049:. 4035:. 3995:) 3990:· 3985:( 3648:( 3621:( 3572:( 3536:( 3506:( 3462:( 3447:. 3425:( 3410:( 3390:( 3364:( 3332:( 3309:( 3273:( 3222:( 3202:) 3198:( 3183:( 3157:( 3143:( 3108:( 3093:( 3074:( 3043:( 3013:( 2987:( 2965:( 2943:( 2898:( 2874:( 2834:( 2797:( 2776:( 2745:( 2705:( 2612:( 2578:( 2555:( 2530:( 2478:( 2458:( 2438:( 2418:( 2394:( 2294:( 2266:( 2232:( 2213:( 2150:( 2112:( 2082:( 2039:( 2009:( 1971:( 1953:( 1936:( 1911:( 1879:( 1855:( 1817:( 1799:( 1769:( 1750:( 1716:( 1701:( 1677:( 1639:( 1609:( 1587:( 1573:( 1559:( 1534:( 1493:( 1475:( 1452:( 1419:( 1402:( 1371:( 1321:( 1299:( 1281:( 1253:( 1222:( 1196:( 1170:( 1155:( 1136:( 1102:( 1078:( 1037:( 1023:( 1008:( 960:( 900:( 878:( 846:( 819:( 796:( 776:( 749:( 714:( 696:( 611:( 575:( 556:( 532:( 498:( 465:( 402:( 378:( 358:( 329:( 250:( 164:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index