1492:
you. Regarding the quiz: I'm not sure that we should create versions of it. Firstly, creating your own quiz can be a good exercise for the recruiters as well. Secondly, we don't want the answer key to get out, although I'm sure that if a participant really wanted to cheat and find the answers, he or she could. If we create the quiz, perhaps we can make it available only by request, through email. We could say, "We recommend that you create your own quiz, but if you need assistance and would like a sample quiz, please contact the coordinators through email." I looked at a few other recruiters' quizzes this week, and found a wide variety. My quiz, for example, is fairly easy and is only 7 questions long. I set it up that way because I think all we want to do is to ensure that recruitrees have at least read the GA criteria. Other recruiters had up to 20, but if that's the way they wanted to handle it, that's up to them. Different recruiters will stress different aspects of reviewing articles.
1171:
reviews isn't always very high. Personally, I've had mixed results in my experience in the Centre. Sure, there's been editors who have volunteered to be a recruitee and who haven't followed through, and those who wouldn't be good reviewers no matter what you do. Part of the reason for that, I think, is human nature. People don't always know what they're getting into when they volunteer for such an intensive program, on both sides. This kind of program is perfect for me because I like this kind of mentorship, so I'm willing to put up with my recruitees not responding, or having to remind them that it's going on. It's true that I've experienced the same kind of inconsistency and lack of commitment from some folks, but what made it worth it, for me, were the 2-3 gems that responded well and who seemed to learn from it. Also, I gained some real allies and potential help in my own article writing.
1295:
knowledge of it so me programming a bot is out of the question (we could still probably find another user who can help us it or even integrate it with
Legobot). My biggest concern is training recruiters. How are we going to do that? Sure we can put together several scenarios but that's going to take way to much time (time that I don't have). Also, do you think anything is wrong with "The Process" (on the Recruiter Central page)? Finally, until we figure out a "new" program I've updated the banners on the RC page saying that no further recruitments will happen until we come up with revisions.--
631:
standard so if there is stuff to fix, I give them the chance to fix it up while they can, rather than failing and the nominator having to wait another 3 months before someone reviews it. Also, remember that when the guidelines say the article should only be on hold for 7 days, you don't really have to follow it. If the nominator is actively working on fixing the problems and is making good progress, let them finish...you won't get in trouble for extending the hold. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask! :)--
1884:
line of information, one that I believe is rather important in the timeline of Falcon's Fury and it's delay, which the last line is regarding a statement from April 28th. The information I entered into the article is real and correct and I am in no way trying to vandalize the article in any shape or form. I want to help out in this part of the community. Please respond back to this message, as I believe we can both benefit if we resolve this properly. Thank you. -WikiUO99
1732:
786:
2132:
35:
212:
711:
2028:
1812:
1336:
it's what other projects do, to keep their participants aware of what's happening and to encourage them to continue participating. We can develop the content later, but I'm thinking that it can include "success stories", stats about how many articles are successfully reviewed because of it, and that kind of thing. We wouldn't even need to publish it as regularly as other projects do, at least at first.
1358:
suggestions. For example, one thing I'd like to see included is now that we have some experience under our belts, we can explain to both recruiters and recruitees what to expect, like that it's not always going to be successful. Like I said before, I think that this is the kind of thing that will naturally have mixed results, since it's a mentorship situation, and participants should understand that.
1687:
968:
1087:
how to attract people to participate, etc) isn't easy and setting up each drive did take quite a while to set up. After reviewing the 2 drives I came to the conclusion that the time I spent in running/setting up the drives didn't pay off (in terms that the results weren't the best) and therefore will not be setting up any more drives as I have better things to use my time for. Sorry.--
377:
1137:
1380:
If we try and it doesn't work out, we know that it's not feasible here, but I don't think we're at that point yet. I think that this project is the kind of thing that needs the management of it to be more intense, and I'm willing to help provide it, if you're willing to work with me. Oh, I almost forgot: how did your exams go? ;)
1175:
create a newsletter to help participants feel more involved and informed. I also think that mentors need to be educated about the process, and be trained to expect the kind of mixed results that's natural in this type of thing. Even if we had just a handful of mentors committed to the program, it could be successful.
1591:? We got a good number of reviews done. It did coincide with a drive at AfC, which is why I didn't participate, and perhaps that put a damper on the GAN drive's potential. Nonetheless I for one am still happy to donate, just me know the amount and I'll send it over to the WMF. Thanks for your hard work, Dom497! —
1641:
I'm sorry you feel that way. I suppose it depends on what you'd consider a success. I saw in both drives that you got people to work together toward a common goal, and many submissions were reviewed that otherwise would have idled for months longer. That to me is a success. Sometimes more submissions
1357:
Regarding training recruiters: I think that "The
Process" as you've set it up is one of the best parts of the project; I found it extremely helpful as a recruiter. I think we could tweak it some though, to make it more clear and improve it more. Again, I can go through what's already there and make
1170:
Hey Dom, I've taken a few days to think about "taking over" the Centre from you, but I'm still undecided. I'm such a Libra! ;) Anyway, I think that it's a worthwhile project, with potential to help mentor editors to become better GA reviewers, since as I'm sure you've also noticed, the quality of GA
1883:
To Dom497 In regards to the Falcon's Fury article. Hello, I have noticed that you keep reverting back my changes I have made to the Falcon's Fury article. I understand the first time you did so as I did not properly cite it and you removed it in good faith. However, today I went back and added a new
899:
I nominated it per what has been happening for several years. It's happened with pretty much every roller coaster that has had concept art released. Concept art is uploaded, roller coaster opens and concept art gets deleted. Also, per the deletion criteria: "...illustrates a subject for which a free
876:
Hey Dom, do you know where the push is coming from for deleting track layout images? A photograph of the track doesn't provide a good replacement, as least to me, since the track can be better seen as a drawing that these images provide. Also, the drawings are more compact providing a unique look at
837:
In general, the question would be: Do you have enough information to allow our readers to look up the source? "There once was an FAA file which confirmed this, but you can't see it because it has since been deleted without leaving a trace" is not a good reference. So if it was the electronic version
1919:
Hey WikiUO99! I no way was I trying to say that you were vandalizing the article. I did add information regarding the recent press release in the paragraph above a few days ago and I will admit I didn't word it the best. I've re-worded it to make things a bit more clear. Sorry for the confusion. :)
1421:
I help out with the newsletter (I used to help out with the WP Good
Articles one but then my life got busy), it's just a matter of figuring out the content that would be placed in it (and the ideas for it that you listed are good). I'll go over The Process and see if I can come up with any ideas to
1379:
Anyway, those are my initial ideas/thoughts, which we can discuss. I'm just starting a period of my summer unemployment, so I have the time to develop much of these ideas. I just don't want to see something like this, with its potential to influence WP and to help the GA review process, go away.
1335:
I think that we're definitely going to need assistance with the more technical aspects, like setting up bots and a newsletter. We can ask folks who have done similar bots for other projects; I'll research that in the next couple of days. As far as a newsletter is concerned, I suggested it because
1174:
I have some ideas about how we can improve upon the program and help other mentors have the same kind of experience I did. Maybe we can make it stricter by imposing more deadlines by setting up bots that if there's no movement on a recruitment page in 10 days, it's automatically closed. Or we can
1618:
than what was when we started. There is no way this drive was remotely successful. If you really still feel like you should donate, your donation would be $ 5.30 (US). It's good to see that something I've started is still going on well (I started the AfC backlog drives). And just as an FYI, I will
1491:
I'll ask the folks at WP Good
Articles for assistance, and then go from there. I have some time tomorrow (got bogged down today with errands and such) to look over The Process and see what improvements I can make. If I get to it before you, I'll go ahead and create a sandbox, if that's okay with
1086:
Ok, here we go. You probably haven't noticed what has happened over the past 2 drives. Both were a result of me trying to revive the drives. The first drive was a good success (but still not great) and the 2nd drive was an absolute failure. Setting up a drive and figuring out how to run it (rules,
1444:
Ok, I think one thing I'm going to do is make 2 or 3 versions of the "quiz" that I previously asked recruiters to create. This will make it a bit less stressful on the recruiters side and will ensure consistency. I also think I could make a couple more minor changes. I will create a page under my
1294:
Ok, lets get this thing rolling. First question, what are your ideas? Second question, how exactly would having a newsletter have an impact on participants (sorry, I'm not seeing what your seeing). Other than that, I can see where you stand. I do know coding but only Java and not a very complex
630:
I took a quick look at the article and the review and the review looks pretty good (I don't have time to do a full out review). Whenever I review an article, I always put it on hold rather than just failing it. Hopefully, the nominator actually put some effort into getting the article to the GA
1646:. At any rate, I believe the concept of the AfC/GAN is highly valuable, and I will gladly fill your shoes in organizing future drives. I completely understand if you're on the outs with coordinating them, just know that your efforts did not go unnoticed. Cheers, friend —
877:
the layout – not something that can be easily seen from a photograph. There are a number of other issues with photographs as well that I won't get into here. A comparable drawing would have to be made in CAD, which is not something I would consider "easily replaced". --
1178:
At any rate, I wouldn't want to be the main person coordinating the project, but I would like to work with you or someone else to regenerize the program. I'll definitely need help in setting up bots and how to create a newsletter. Let me know what you think, please!
1201:
I am very busy at school right now so I will address this hopefully in the next week. After a quick read-through, I like your view overall but I will discuss further later. Sorry. (oh, and I'm perfectly fine with being co-coordinators with
457:
Sorry to interrupt, but I'm not sure what this question means. If it is a GA, why would you need to nominate it for GA? Unless you mean "FA", in which case, no, there is no time limit. You might want to do some work on it first though. –
1027:
Hello Dom! I noticed that you reviews GA like me. I want to become a GA recruiter, but I must review 15 articles. Do you think it would be appropriate to do a June/July GAN backlog drive? I'll try and recruit some people if you'd like!
1267:
I'm not shocked at all; I remember reading on your user page that you were still in high school. As my dear departed mother would say, "You're such a remarkable young man." ;) Good luck with all your tests! 06:05, 10 May 2014
225:
1785:
1754:
1642:
come in than can be reviewed, but that's just the utter size of the community we work in. The vandals will never stop vandalizing, and the backlogs will never stop backlogging... it's an endless cycle, and it
2066:
1944:
827:
838:
of some paper document, cite the bibliographical information that allows readers to look up the document: Filing number, name of the organization which filed this document, official title (what
228:! I appreciate your efforts to create and maintain the project pages, and to keep the participants updated on our progress. We wouldn't have successfully reduced the backlog without your help.
70:
If you know what you are looking for, type it in the search box below and type "Search All
Archives". If you don't know, click on one of the archive links below to manually search the archives.
163:
Hey
Figureskatingfan! I wouldn't see that as being a problem. If anything, it would actually help the recruitee as they would understand what they did wrong and how to improve in the future.--
138:
1969:
One of Canada's
Wonderland's Facebook page wall post stated that the Leviathan has the longest single lift hill chains in the world, at approximately 1000 feet. That's pretty cool.
769:
What's the url that has gone dead? The link to the FAA page on
Obstruction Evaluation/Airport Airspace Analysis opens fine for me, but it may be the one you're after is a subpage.
746:
and there are no archives of it. The file had some info that I think would be useful to include in an article so I was wondering if it could be used as a reference.--
1245:
Well if you think that, they get ready for the shocker of your life....I'm in Gr. 11! I actually have a seminar, 2 CPT's due, and 3 test all within the 5 days....--
113:
105:
97:
395:
For your diligent efforts in organizing and maintaing the GAN Backlog Drive. It was a fun experience for us all, and very much of it is owed to you. Cheers! —
101:
93:
2089:
if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
1855:
if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
2076:
1694:
for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
1742:
1422:
improve it. Also, remember I'm in Gr. 11, I don't have exams till June! I just had a lot of assignments to finish in such a short period of time!--
141:
who has a GA in the queue. Would it be untoward if I use the article as my model review? Thanks, especially for all that you do for the project.
900:
image might reasonably be found or created that adequately provides the same information, or which could be adequately covered with text alone".
1842:
911:
The ride experience section describes the layout pretty well in most roller coaster articles that are well-written, therefore, the image isn't
1835:, which you recently created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page
976:
Message added 12:33, 29 April 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can
1681:
2086:
1852:
121:
274:
Thanks for the barnstars! I checked the totals, and it seems that 112 articles were reviewed. Did you arrive at the same conclusion?
815:
744:
730:
1140:
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
606:
2109:
1900:
1224:
I understand, it's that time of year. I'm in no hurry; whenever you can get to this is fine. Good luck with the finals! ;)
117:
89:
2034:
1818:
743:
Is there a way to cite a file from the FAA without using a url? The reason I'm asking is because this url has gone dead:
2055:
2046:
1869:
1691:
1014:
2139:
2090:
2072:
1856:
1838:
1695:
1497:
1385:
1229:
1184:
190:
146:
42:
1666:
1112:
386:
986:
485:
Thanks PeeJay2K3 for replying! RRD13, if your are referring to nominating a GA to FA, there is no timespan. :) --
74:
1904:
21:
1619:
not be planning any further GAN drives...given how the last 2 have turned out, it's just not worth my time.--
1542:
944:
No problem, I was just curious. If this has been the trend, then I won't make a big fuss about it. Thanks! --
1888:
1614:
Well, the point of a backlog drive is to reduce the backlog. By the end of the drive, the backlog was even
2027:
1865:
1830:
1811:
1793:
1765:
1677:
1670:
1123:
1116:
792:
785:
2113:
2039:
2012:
1989:
1959:
1937:
1873:
1823:
1797:
1769:
1718:
1656:
1654:
1636:
1601:
1599:
1562:
1536:
1501:
1493:
1462:
1439:
1416:
1389:
1381:
1312:
1289:
1262:
1240:
1233:
1225:
1219:
1196:
1188:
1180:
1160:
1104:
1072:
1042:
953:
936:
886:
863:
823:
807:
778:
763:
691:
661:
648:
617:
595:
565:
524:
502:
465:
451:
431:
405:
403:
362:
333:
313:
283:
263:
237:
194:
186:
180:
158:
150:
142:
734:
137:
Hi Dom, hope you're having a safe and enjoyable New Year. Here's my question: I have a new recruitee (
1782:
1010:
610:
80:
1643:
851:
1982:
1714:
1156:
1037:
520:
462:
447:
329:
442:
Hi Dom497, after a article has became a GA, is there any timespan before I can nominate it for GA?
2103:
1896:
949:
882:
774:
591:
583:
1731:
1131:
1955:
1789:
1761:
1445:
userspace with an updated "The
Process" within the next few days so we can work on it there.--
2080:
2148:
2004:
1929:
1647:
1628:
1609:
1592:
1554:
1454:
1431:
1304:
1254:
1211:
1096:
1064:
928:
799:
755:
717:
683:
640:
557:
494:
423:
396:
354:
305:
255:
172:
76:
51:
17:
1777:
1006:
843:
279:
233:
1127:
1846:
211:
2060:
1970:
1710:
1705:
1152:
1147:
1081:
1050:
1029:
859:
543:
516:
480:
476:
459:
443:
340:
325:
2069:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page
2099:
1914:
1892:
945:
894:
878:
850:). However, I don't think an FAA filing of that kind would be considered more than a
770:
587:
1951:
1701:
1686:
1143:
996:
658:
625:
614:
78:
710:
1753:
which attracted 8k viewers (DYK?), for reviewing GAs and mentoring, - you are an
2147:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1996:
1921:
1620:
1546:
1446:
1423:
1296:
1246:
1203:
1088:
1056:
920:
747:
675:
632:
549:
486:
415:
346:
297:
247:
164:
50:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
291:
275:
229:
855:
1122:
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
586:
regarding the featured list you created. Figured you'd want to comment! --
376:
1746:
1136:
854:
and probably not the kind of source preferred for a
Featured Article.
185:
I didn't think so, but wanted to make sure. Thanks for the response.
2051:, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was
1750:
973:
Hello, Dom497/Archive. Please check your email; you've got mail!
2126:
2022:
1806:
705:
81:
59:
29:
2067:
Template:Did you know nominations/Skyscraper (roller coaster)
1945:
Template:Did you know nominations/Stony Brook (Fishing Creek)
919:
Again, I did this based off what has been done in the past.--
842:
of filing is this?) and so on. Or try a web archive like the
1995:
I swear at one point this was mentioned in the article....--
966:
830:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
784:
345:
Please see the backlog talk page (I've pinged you there).--
847:
2053:... that at approximately 568 feet (173 m), the proposed
1055:
I will address this sometime this week (hopefully). :) --
320:
Concerning my pledge the the backlog elimination drive...
1588:
978:
722:
609:
and let me know if everything looks ok? I was using a
2065:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
729:, contact the responding user(s) directly on their
657:
Can I change it to a hold now, or is it too late? -
720:has been answered. If you need more help, you can
908:Created...like you said is possible but unlikely
1776:A year ago, you were the 495th recipient of my
548:Why are your sorry? We all make mistakes. :) --
674:It's too late but don't worry about it. :) --
114:User talk:Dom497/Archive/July - December 2014
106:User talk:Dom497/Archive/July - December 2013
98:User talk:Dom497/Archive/July - December 2012
8:
1950:Hi, please see the note on your DYK review.
110:User talk:Dom497/Archive/January - June 2014
102:User talk:Dom497/Archive/January - June 2013
94:User talk:Dom497/Archive/January - June 2012
721:
2043:was updated with a fact from the article
1827:was updated with a fact from the article
791:Hello, Dom497. You have new messages at
374:
905:Like I said, a free image could be found
2145:Do not edit the contents of this page.
515:I am extremely sorry for the mistake.
48:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
977:
2063:in the world when it opens in 2016?
2019:DYK for Skyscraper (roller coaster)
1741:Thank you for quality articles for
605:Hi there. Could you take a look at
246:Thanks for your help as well! :) --
122:User talk:Dom497/Archive/2015-2018
28:
2130:
2026:
1810:
1730:
1685:
1135:
709:
578:List of Kings Island attractions
375:
210:
33:
2059:is expected to be the tallest
1803:DYK for Nitro (Adlabs Imagica)
1:
224:Thank you for organizing the
118:User talk:Dom497/Archive/2015
90:User talk:Dom497/Archive/2011
1583:March 2014 GAN Backlog Drive
1494:Christine (Figureskatingfan)
1382:Christine (Figureskatingfan)
1226:Christine (Figureskatingfan)
1181:Christine (Figureskatingfan)
982:at any time by removing the
432:19:38, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
406:15:46, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
363:15:39, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
334:11:50, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
314:15:32, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
284:05:01, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
187:Christine (Figureskatingfan)
143:Christine (Figureskatingfan)
2047:Skyscraper (roller coaster)
1698:to appear in Did you know.
1692:Talk:Nitro (Adlabs Imagica)
733:, or consider visiting the
613:as a template. Thank you! -
601:Look at my first GA review?
264:14:51, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
238:04:54, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
195:05:01, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
181:03:12, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
151:18:42, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
2168:
1015:12:33, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
961:
954:21:02, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
937:20:54, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
887:19:16, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
872:Proposals to remove images
864:23:10, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
824:21:32, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
779:22:16, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
764:19:52, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
692:18:46, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
662:12:17, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
649:11:27, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
618:00:07, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
596:16:12, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
2114:00:04, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
2085:, and it may be added to
2013:00:46, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
1851:, and it may be added to
1130:-status according to the
793:Knowledge (XXG):Help Desk
611:recent review of Casliber
582:Heads up on a discussion
566:20:37, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
525:04:11, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
503:19:40, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
466:13:06, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
452:12:28, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
381:
209:
1990:00:17, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
1960:23:32, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
1938:00:36, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
1905:00:30, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
1874:05:29, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
1798:07:06, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
1770:07:45, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
1719:01:41, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
1657:14:33, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
1637:00:51, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
1602:15:46, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
1563:11:17, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
1502:22:58, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
1463:20:20, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
1440:20:01, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
1390:16:45, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
1313:23:42, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
1105:23:49, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
1073:00:24, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
1743:project Amusement Parks
1644:will never be completed
1263:23:06, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
1234:23:00, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
1220:22:47, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
1189:20:30, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
1161:01:21, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
1043:01:05, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
848:http://archive.org/web/
133:GA recruitment question
2091:Did you know talk page
1857:Did you know talk page
1831:Nitro (Adlabs Imagica)
1678:Nitro (Adlabs Imagica)
1671:Nitro (Adlabs Imagica)
1541:I've set up a sandbox
1124:Nitro (Adlabs Imagica)
1117:Nitro (Adlabs Imagica)
971:
789:
324:...how much do I owe?
2143:of past discussions.
1700:Message delivered by
1589:consider it a failure
1142:Message delivered by
970:
788:
218:The Original Barnstar
46:of past discussions.
1878:
724:ask another question
2087:the statistics page
1853:the statistics page
1680:you nominated as a
368:A barnstar for you!
203:A barnstar for you!
139:User:ТимофейЛееСуда
1965:A pretty cool fact
1755:awesome Wikipedian
1126:you nominated for
979:remove this notice
972:
828:remove this notice
790:
607:my first GA review
2155:
2154:
2149:current talk page
2097:
2096:
2084:
1908:
1891:comment added by
1866:Materialscientist
1863:
1862:
1850:
1708:
1150:
741:
740:
726:on your talk page
702:Citing a FAA File
411:
410:
243:
242:
226:GAN backlog drive
130:
129:
67:Dom497's Archives
58:
57:
52:current talk page
2159:
2134:
2133:
2127:
2070:
2030:
2023:
2009:
2001:
1987:
1980:
1975:
1934:
1926:
1918:
1907:
1885:
1836:
1814:
1807:
1780:
1734:
1699:
1689:
1633:
1625:
1613:
1559:
1551:
1540:
1537:Figureskatingfan
1459:
1451:
1436:
1428:
1420:
1417:Figureskatingfan
1309:
1301:
1293:
1290:Figureskatingfan
1259:
1251:
1244:
1241:Figureskatingfan
1216:
1208:
1200:
1197:Figureskatingfan
1141:
1139:
1101:
1093:
1085:
1069:
1061:
1054:
1040:
1003:
1001:
995:
991:
985:
981:
969:
962:You've got mail!
933:
925:
898:
831:
818:
810:
802:
798:Message added —
760:
752:
728:
713:
706:
688:
680:
645:
637:
629:
562:
554:
547:
499:
491:
484:
428:
420:
379:
372:
371:
359:
351:
344:
310:
302:
295:
260:
252:
214:
207:
206:
177:
169:
162:
159:Figureskatingfan
82:
60:
37:
36:
30:
18:User talk:Dom497
2167:
2166:
2162:
2161:
2160:
2158:
2157:
2156:
2131:
2021:
2005:
1997:
1983:
1976:
1971:
1967:
1948:
1930:
1922:
1912:
1886:
1881:
1805:
1778:
1774:
1773:
1735:
1726:
1704:, on behalf of
1674:
1629:
1621:
1607:
1585:
1555:
1547:
1534:
1455:
1447:
1432:
1424:
1414:
1305:
1297:
1287:
1255:
1247:
1238:
1212:
1204:
1194:
1168:
1146:, on behalf of
1120:
1097:
1089:
1079:
1065:
1057:
1048:
1038:
1025:
1004:
999:
993:
989:
987:You've got mail
983:
975:
967:
964:
929:
921:
892:
874:
844:Wayback Machine
832:
816:
808:
800:
797:
756:
748:
704:
684:
676:
641:
633:
623:
603:
580:
558:
550:
541:
495:
487:
474:
440:
424:
416:
370:
355:
347:
338:
322:
306:
298:
289:
272:
256:
248:
205:
173:
165:
156:
135:
126:
125:
87:
83:
77:
72:
71:
68:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
2165:
2163:
2153:
2152:
2135:
2124:
2121:
2118:
2095:
2094:
2061:roller coaster
2031:
2020:
2017:
2016:
2015:
1966:
1963:
1947:
1942:
1941:
1940:
1880:
1877:
1861:
1860:
1815:
1804:
1801:
1740:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1725:
1724:Precious again
1722:
1673:
1669:nomination of
1663:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1584:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1442:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1167:
1166:GA recruitment
1164:
1119:
1115:nomination of
1109:
1108:
1107:
1076:
1075:
1024:
1021:
1019:
974:
965:
963:
960:
959:
958:
957:
956:
917:
916:
909:
906:
902:
901:
873:
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
852:primary source
796:
783:
782:
781:
739:
738:
731:user talk page
714:
703:
700:
699:
698:
697:
696:
695:
694:
667:
666:
665:
664:
652:
651:
602:
599:
579:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
508:
507:
506:
505:
469:
468:
439:
436:
435:
434:
409:
408:
392:
391:
382:
380:
369:
366:
321:
318:
317:
316:
296:I count 116.--
271:
268:
267:
266:
241:
240:
221:
220:
215:
204:
201:
200:
199:
198:
197:
134:
131:
128:
127:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
88:
85:
84:
79:
75:
73:
69:
66:
65:
63:
56:
55:
38:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2164:
2150:
2146:
2142:
2141:
2136:
2129:
2128:
2125:
2122:
2119:
2116:
2115:
2111:
2108:
2105:
2101:
2092:
2088:
2082:
2078:
2074:
2068:
2064:
2062:
2058:
2057:
2050:
2049:
2048:
2042:
2041:
2036:
2032:
2029:
2025:
2024:
2018:
2014:
2010:
2008:
2002:
2000:
1994:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1988:
1986:
1981:
1979:
1974:
1964:
1962:
1961:
1957:
1953:
1946:
1943:
1939:
1935:
1933:
1927:
1925:
1916:
1911:
1910:
1909:
1906:
1902:
1898:
1894:
1890:
1879:Falcon's Fury
1876:
1875:
1871:
1867:
1858:
1854:
1848:
1844:
1840:
1834:
1833:
1832:
1826:
1825:
1820:
1816:
1813:
1809:
1808:
1802:
1800:
1799:
1795:
1791:
1787:
1784:
1781:
1772:
1771:
1767:
1763:
1758:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1739:
1733:
1723:
1721:
1720:
1716:
1712:
1707:
1703:
1697:
1693:
1688:
1683:
1679:
1672:
1668:
1664:
1658:
1655:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1645:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1634:
1632:
1626:
1624:
1617:
1611:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1600:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1590:
1582:
1564:
1560:
1558:
1552:
1550:
1544:
1538:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1503:
1499:
1495:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1464:
1460:
1458:
1452:
1450:
1443:
1441:
1437:
1435:
1429:
1427:
1418:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1314:
1310:
1308:
1302:
1300:
1291:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1260:
1258:
1252:
1250:
1242:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1217:
1215:
1209:
1207:
1198:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1176:
1172:
1165:
1163:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1149:
1145:
1138:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1100:
1094:
1092:
1083:
1078:
1077:
1074:
1070:
1068:
1062:
1060:
1052:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1041:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1022:
1020:
1017:
1016:
1012:
1008:
998:
988:
980:
955:
951:
947:
943:
942:
941:
940:
939:
938:
934:
932:
926:
924:
914:
910:
907:
904:
903:
896:
891:
890:
889:
888:
884:
880:
871:
865:
861:
857:
853:
849:
845:
841:
836:
835:
834:
833:
829:
825:
822:
819:
817:contributions
814:
811:
806:
803:
794:
787:
780:
776:
772:
768:
767:
766:
765:
761:
759:
753:
751:
745:
736:
732:
727:
725:
719:
715:
712:
708:
707:
701:
693:
689:
687:
681:
679:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
668:
663:
660:
656:
655:
654:
653:
650:
646:
644:
638:
636:
627:
622:
621:
620:
619:
616:
612:
608:
600:
598:
597:
593:
589:
585:
577:
567:
563:
561:
555:
553:
545:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
526:
522:
518:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
504:
500:
498:
492:
490:
482:
478:
473:
472:
471:
470:
467:
464:
461:
456:
455:
454:
453:
449:
445:
437:
433:
429:
427:
421:
419:
413:
412:
407:
404:
402:
401:
400:
394:
393:
390:
388:
383:
378:
373:
367:
365:
364:
360:
358:
352:
350:
342:
336:
335:
331:
327:
319:
315:
311:
309:
303:
301:
293:
288:
287:
286:
285:
281:
277:
270:backlog drive
269:
265:
261:
259:
253:
251:
245:
244:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
222:
219:
216:
213:
208:
202:
196:
192:
188:
184:
183:
182:
178:
176:
170:
168:
160:
155:
154:
153:
152:
148:
144:
140:
132:
123:
119:
115:
111:
107:
103:
99:
95:
91:
86:Manual Search
64:
62:
61:
53:
49:
45:
44:
39:
32:
31:
23:
19:
2144:
2138:
2123:
2120:
2117:
2106:
2098:
2081:daily totals
2054:
2052:
2045:
2044:
2040:Did you know
2038:
2035:14 June 2014
2006:
1998:
1984:
1977:
1972:
1968:
1949:
1931:
1923:
1887:— Preceding
1882:
1864:
1847:daily totals
1829:
1828:
1824:Did you know
1822:
1790:Gerda Arendt
1775:
1762:Gerda Arendt
1759:
1737:
1736:
1682:good article
1676:The article
1675:
1649:
1648:
1630:
1622:
1615:
1594:
1593:
1586:
1556:
1548:
1456:
1448:
1433:
1425:
1306:
1298:
1256:
1248:
1213:
1205:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1121:
1098:
1090:
1066:
1058:
1031:
1030:
1026:
1018:
1005:
930:
922:
918:
912:
875:
839:
820:
812:
804:
757:
749:
742:
723:
718:help request
685:
677:
642:
634:
604:
581:
559:
551:
496:
488:
441:
425:
417:
398:
397:
387:Good Article
384:
356:
348:
337:
323:
307:
299:
273:
257:
249:
217:
174:
166:
136:
109:
47:
41:
2137:This is an
1819:30 May 2014
1696:nominate it
1684:has passed
1650:MusikAnimal
1610:MusikAnimal
1595:MusikAnimal
1587:Why do you
1039:Talk to me!
913:technically
801:Vchimpanzee
399:MusikAnimal
40:This is an
2077:live views
2073:here's how
2056:Skyscraper
1843:live views
1839:here's how
1745:, such as
1007:Nikkimaria
826:. You can
2100:Cas Liber
1711:BrandonWu
1706:BrandonWu
1153:BrandonWu
1148:BrandonWu
1082:BrandonWu
1051:BrandonWu
1002:template.
544:Royroydeb
481:PeeJay2K3
477:Royroydeb
414:Thanks!--
341:J Milburn
326:J Milburn
2110:contribs
1915:WikiUO99
1901:contribs
1893:WikiUO99
1889:unsigned
1738:sky loop
1132:criteria
946:GoneIn60
895:GoneIn60
879:GoneIn60
771:Euryalus
735:Teahouse
588:GoneIn60
389:Barnstar
20: |
2140:archive
1973:///Euro
1952:Yoninah
1779:Pumpkin
1747:SkyLoop
1702:Legobot
1202:you!)--
1144:Legobot
1032:WooHoo!
915:needed.
659:hugeTim
626:Hugetim
615:hugeTim
43:archive
22:Archive
1999:Dom497
1924:Dom497
1690:; see
1623:Dom497
1616:larger
1549:Dom497
1449:Dom497
1426:Dom497
1299:Dom497
1249:Dom497
1206:Dom497
1091:Dom497
1059:Dom497
923:Dom497
750:Dom497
678:Dom497
635:Dom497
552:Dom497
489:Dom497
418:Dom497
349:Dom497
300:Dom497
250:Dom497
167:Dom497
1786:Prize
1751:Krake
1665:Your
1268:(UTC)
1111:Your
716:This
517:RRD13
444:RRD13
438:Query
292:Edge3
276:Edge3
230:Edge3
16:<
2104:talk
2007:talk
1956:talk
1932:talk
1897:talk
1870:talk
1794:talk
1788:, --
1766:talk
1749:and
1715:talk
1631:talk
1557:talk
1543:here
1498:talk
1457:talk
1434:talk
1386:talk
1307:talk
1257:talk
1230:talk
1214:talk
1185:talk
1157:talk
1099:talk
1067:talk
1011:talk
950:talk
931:talk
883:talk
860:talk
856:Huon
840:kind
809:talk
775:talk
758:talk
686:talk
643:talk
592:talk
584:here
560:talk
521:talk
497:talk
479:and
448:talk
426:talk
385:The
357:talk
330:talk
308:talk
280:talk
258:talk
234:talk
191:talk
175:talk
147:talk
2033:On
1978:Car
1817:On
1783:Sky
1709:--
1545:.--
1151:--
997:ygm
992:or
463:Jay
460:Pee
2112:)
2079:,
2075:,
2037:,
2011:)
1985:GT
1958:)
1936:)
1920:--
1903:)
1899:•
1872:)
1845:,
1841:,
1821:,
1796:)
1768:)
1760:--
1757:!
1717:)
1667:GA
1635:)
1561:)
1500:)
1461:)
1438:)
1388:)
1311:)
1261:)
1232:)
1218:)
1187:)
1159:)
1134:.
1128:GA
1113:GA
1103:)
1071:)
1036:•
1023:GA
1013:)
1000:}}
994:{{
990:}}
984:{{
952:)
935:)
885:)
862:)
777:)
762:)
690:)
647:)
594:)
564:)
523:)
501:)
450:)
430:)
361:)
332:)
312:)
282:)
262:)
236:)
193:)
179:)
149:)
2151:.
2107:·
2102:(
2093:.
2083:)
2071:(
2003:(
1954:(
1928:(
1917::
1913:@
1895:(
1868:(
1859:.
1849:)
1837:(
1792:(
1764:(
1713:(
1627:(
1612::
1608:@
1553:(
1539::
1535:@
1496:(
1453:(
1430:(
1419::
1415:@
1384:(
1303:(
1292::
1288:@
1253:(
1243::
1239:@
1228:(
1210:(
1199::
1195:@
1183:(
1155:(
1095:(
1084::
1080:@
1063:(
1053::
1049:@
1009:(
948:(
927:(
897::
893:@
881:(
858:(
846:(
821:·
813:·
805:·
795:.
773:(
754:(
737:.
682:(
639:(
628::
624:@
590:(
556:(
546::
542:@
519:(
493:(
483::
475:@
446:(
422:(
353:(
343::
339:@
328:(
304:(
294::
290:@
278:(
254:(
232:(
189:(
171:(
161::
157:@
145:(
54:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.