User talk:Domdeparis/Archive 5

1696:

originally was so non-controversial that no one would object. I've been over this ground several times before with reviewing editors, who have told me in other cases just to remove vandalism, when a statement has nothing close to a legitimate RS, especially if it is being used to instigate a controversy. I am about as cautious as they come when avoiding direct editing, but this appeared to me to be well-within the narrow exception of removing vandalism, which in this case originated from a SPI with an IP address and just this one edit. Editors can get irritated when you ask them to remove vandalism. No RS has reported on this complaint. You have no reliable source yet include a statement that the company may be violating the law, which is a serious matter. Even if it were an actual lawsuit in federal court, instead of just an online letter from a tiny support group for sex offenders, it still couldn't be included on Knowledge (XXG) without a story about it from a RS. You had previously mentioned a secondary source that just stated the policy of Nextdoor not allowing sex offenders and their households as members. If you think this policy should be included in the article, I'd suggest adding it to the platform description, sourced to the RS you found. I would not source to the company website because it is a primary source - policies and URLs change all the time. That said, there is no RS for the complaint from the sex offenders or speculation about a future lawsuit (which would probably be

2084:

case law to the unconstitutionality case the FAC group is making noises about bringing; WP cannot engage in novel legal analysis. WHat I would do is lead with the FAC allegations, which themselves are citing Nextdoor's ToS; that ToS document is also an ABOUTSELF permissible source for what Nextdoor's ToS actually say. An OR problem here is WP leaping from "these ToS say X, Y, and Z" to an implication of "consequently, this group, FAC, is considering a lawsuit". That's an analysis step we can't take, and it's not necessary, since FAC's own statements tell us why they're taking the position they're taking. However, tying this to prior caselaw is going to require a reliable legal source. I know from a decade of daily experience working with civil liberties attorneys as a civil liberties policy analyst (IANAL myself, more like a highly specialized paralegal) that presumptions that caselaw A is applicable to potential case B are often dead wrong, because superficial similarities between the case may have nothing at all to do with the underlying and very particular technical point of the law on a case-by-case basis.

3863:

neutral discussion. You must see that if your actions are OK, and many others followed suit in article after article, it would be obviously unfair and make these votes kangaroo courts. And if that is the case, then it is not OK for any single editor to act us such, especially in situations where there is closely divided opinion and your vote is altering decisions. This is surely not the exception to hounding that the policy envisions -- addressing clear violations of Knowledge (XXG) policy. The hounding policy very sensibly requires that I try to work this out with you on your Talk page. I'll note that Assembled Brands, Ecoscraps, for example, were both AfC approved articles through the normal approval process. So your other objection carries no weight here. Can you really not be convinced to step back in following me from article to article with ongoing discussions, out of a sense of fairness? And preserving Knowledge (XXG)-wide integrity of AfD, RfC and other consensus discussions already underway? I do not want to have an ANI discussion if I can avoid it.

847:

in an edit war without realising it. Wikithons are not the same thing at all as in general they are not aimed at one existing article to ensure that a certain point of view is expressed. I have no idea whether there is a problem between your point of view and that of trentstudent and to be perfectly honest there doesn't seem to be a great difference between what you are both saying. Knowledge (XXG) is supposed to be neutral, if there are sources that suggest one thing and other sources that suggest another and they are reliable then these 2 POV should be expressed in an encyclopedia. What is disruptive is trying to push one or other of these POV. I would suggest that you also spend a bit of time editing articles that have nothing to do with the subjects that you teach or wrote about. This will allow you to better understand how editors work together to find consensus and how articles become balanced and encyclopedic. Happy editing.

2048:

caselaw (from originally only applying to the federal government) to encompass actions also by US state, county, and municipal governments, and may even include private contractors working for them in some circumstances, if a government has delegated some authority or outcome of the exercise of the authority to a third party (e.g. in privatization of prison administration, operation of a government webserver, etc.). So, what that edit says makes no sense. Assuming that the underlying facts and source interpretation are correct otherwise (I haven't checked), it probably means to say that the municipal, county, and/or state governments (including law enforcement) have been accused of imposing unconstitutional restrictions on Nextdoor as a condition of cooperation with them. That's actually to vague a statement even when corrected.

3848:

also legitimate. If your aim is to frighten away editors that !vote delete then it ain't gonna work. I am an experienced editor especially in terms of deletion discussions (you can check out my stats if you like). Let me just remind you that you have not been very wise in asking specific inexperienced editors to review your articles and move them to mainspace this looks like you may be gaming the system. This behaviour has allowed a number of non notable articles to enter main space and the nomination by editors to generate a more in depth scrutiny of these questionable articles is perfectly legitimate. Threatening me with ANI because I have !voted delete is very questionable itself, in my opinion, but please feel free to if you wish to as I may be wrong.

870:

certain votes. Some of his articles were admittedly problematic, but I think a full out indefinite ban was too harsh. I can understand the AfD backlog being annoying, but most of the articles if I'm not mistaken were kept, and AfD was actually positive as the articles improved. All told I think FloridaArmy has some problems but was overall a quality editor who needs some help. Not saying he is blameless but a topic ban is too much. Honestly I think something should be done about the mass AfDers who refuse to perform a BEFORE search, and those that are deadset on deleting certain articles. ~

3831:, and it has already been raised by another editor, can you have a neutral discussion if the same editors keep showing up again and again for the discussion? And if Knowledge (XXG) policy is so clearly being violated, why is it votes on Ecoscraps and Assembled Brands, for example, are divided? How can the exception to hounding apply in these cases, especially where you have already seen other editors weigh in in favor of an article? Do I really need to bring this to ANI when it's obvious Knowledge (XXG) processes for review would stop functioning if others acted like you? 2626: 2620: 3211: 582:

second issue was the "notability". 3)It is mentioned in the notability criteria that "sustained coverage is an indicator of notability, as described by notability of events." total 2400 views in one year for a philosophers is very good indicator of the notability. considering the internet reach and awareness in India I feel this is very good number. it is also important to note that till date the article was orphan and people done specific search for long name and reached the article on Wiki. these are not the random hits. the blog link "

2632: 2638: 2690: 2053:

likely to pass constitutional muster in this country, since they've litigated the vast majority of constitutionality cases that have made it to the federal and state high courts. A side point I hinted at above in how I wrote this: "public entities (law enforcement, municipalities, etc.)" is a nonsensical phrase. Law enforcement does not magically exist separately from city, county, state, and federal governments, but is part of their operations.

3340: 31: 2614: 1837: 1655:. You are an experienced editor and know you cannot create a section, let alone a controversy section, based solely on original research. You should know this section will be removed if anyone challenges it and yet you put it in the article anyway. It would be a sign of good faith if you reverted this obvious mistake, rather than eating up the valuable time of various editors to correct the matter. 1633:

clearly been using techniques that are highly controversial to ensure that the articles you have written for your clients are moved into mainspace without being reviewed by experienced editors it is perfectly normal that once this has been discovered your editing comes under close scrutiny. I would be very careful if I were you about making accusations of this kind because you may find that the

191:

it on your web site were counter productive. The walls of text and the bludgeoning of the company's POV and the removal of negative information is a red rag from those that are trying to keep Knowledge (XXG) free from advocacy and excessive COI. There are enough independent well intentioned editors dealing with this article I believe without you having to get too involved and fall foul of the

2473: 2410: 3462:. My article was moved from published to draft due to conflict of interest. I was hired by Uniworld Business Publications to create their Knowledge (XXG) page, however I am unsure where to disclose this on the draft page. I have also added additional references for notability. Would you be able to edit/ proof read to check whether it meets Knowledge (XXG) standards? Thank you 3197: 3529:

California but it doesn't say how long she lived there it also says she now lives in Canada and as she styles herself as a nomad so I can't really imagine that it really matters which state she is sorted into. Just out of curiosity when a person or other subject is not identified with a state or a city but as being American where do you situate them in delsort?

2079:

sources exists, therefore this is original research, in violation of WP: NOR." Their "solution", to delete the entire section, is obvious PR/CYA. The proper solution is probably to rewrite it all, doing only what can be done with each source type. E.g., the advocacy group's statement can be quoted or paraphrased, with direct attribution, as a

1791:

original reviewer) received the standard, auto-generated message for when another editor has marked an article as unreviewed. I have now rectified that mistake and marked the article as reviewed, but would like to apologize for any offense I may have caused. I am hoping to treat this as a learning experience :).--

3862:

Yes, I could agree if you were the first editor to raise an issue, especially in the type of instance your describe. But where an issue has already been raised, a neutral discussion should follow. The same editors appearing over and over, expressing the same interpretation of NCOPR, interferes with a

3506:

What is the basis for the company being from California? Secondly, people don't necessarily live and work in the same place? The article I cite above says she is living in Montreal (and before that in New Hampshire) and commuting to New York and Boston. Which might answer question in the sentence two

2317:

or GNG. It is a candidate for deletion as it stands. It requires more reviews. The dailybruin is a university paper and the reviewer is not a nationally know film critic as per the criteria so the 2 reviews do not make it past the 1st criteria. I think you need to add a lot more sources to get a pass

2121:

As I wrote on the talk page; it is SYN the way it was done, with the three refs. It would not be SYN if the whole paragraph -- all three sentences -- were sourced to the letter on the advocacy group's website, with that single ref at the end. But that would be PROMO and UNDUE like crazy - we would

2052:

governments are being accused of this? It can't be every single one of them, or we have a conspiracy theory on our hands. And frankly, it's a weak case, but more power to FAC if they think they can win such a case; see whether ACLU has commented on this, as they are the experts in what is and is not

793:

Thank you for protecting the page. Others are editing the page who are experts on Cogewea and Western American Lit. I did not ask for editing on Twitter but support from a vindictive editor who posted on my blog and now here. I did notify scholars that their work is being misrepresented (see the talk

195:

guidelines. I read your web site and it is clear that you wish to respect the guidelines. I supported the topic ban for a short period because I believe that this will allow the storm to die down. A company should not be allowed to unilaterally control the information on a page on Knowledge (XXG). It

190:

I fully understand and sympathise. That said if I were you I would avoid getting too involved with the cleaning up and editing of the page for the moment because it will look like a concerted effort on behalf of Nextdoor. You should realise that maybe the efforts to bulletproof the article as you put

174:

was explicit that he was creating a "PR Nightmare" for the company with his edits, specifically what he did on the lead (if it's still there.) This sockpuppet's edits today should be expunged from the article and Talk. His severely biased and damaging intent of his edits and suggestions was laid bare

3528:

I think you mean Massachusetts don't you? Her linkedin page states Boston so as a business person whose company is based in Massachusetts this would seem the most logical sorting state and not her place of birth, or all the different states that she may have lived in, the source says she was born in

887:

I agree with you on a lot of what you say but like I've said the biggest problem is his not answering legitimate interrogations. He has made !votes on Afd along the lines of "as per the tons of sources the article meets GNG" and when asked which sources he just doesn't reply. That can be a real pain

646:

You're absolutely right, my apologies thanks for the reminder! One of the main reasons that this all went south was because of the bludgeoning on the talk page by this user. I totally understand what you are saying but as the user has spent rather a lot of time complaining about TQP's sockpuppet and

3847:

I believe that it is perfectly legitimate to keep an eye on an editor whose sole aim is to create pages for clients who wish to use Knowledge (XXG) for their own benefit (otherwise why pay for it). Your job is to make these articles look as notable as possible so close scrutiny of these articles is

2153:

you are all absolutely right. My replacement of the subject was in reaction to BC1278's removal. What I should have done is simply replaced the text removed and left it at that rather than trying to address the actual problems with the subject. That said thinking about it more, it may well be a 1st

1674:

guidelines so I replaced and improved the text. There is no original research. I have quoted Nextdoor own web site and a web site and letter that was sent to Nextdoor complaining about this policy. I have sourced and commented on the decision by supreme court that is mentioned on the website of the

1563:

Hi I am actually cleaning up after my own moves from mainspace following community sanctions and once these drafts were moved back to mainspace the redirect became redundant. I presumed it was similar to the deleting of redirects the other way round. I was tagging them myself to avoid others having

846:

I understand your motivation for asking for help and I know it was in good faith but requesting help outside of Knowledge (XXG) can be a bad idea because it brings in a host of well meaning but inexperienced editors. Whilst their edits are in good faith they can become disruptive as they can engage

803:

vindictive attempt to force the content to reflect information that is no longer respected or shared about Mourning Dove or Indigenous literatures (see Daniel Heath Justice Why Indigenous Literatures Matter and Deanna Reader’s and Linda Morra’s Learn Teach Challenge). This page is the victim and so

565:

This page has not been tagged for speedy deletion but it could have been as it is highly promotional in tone. It has been nominated for deletion via a discussion. The sources that have been provided are affiliated and cannot be exclusively used to show notability. The books published by this person

129:

OK but I think you need to step back a bit and see how things pan out. Once you've opened a topic at ANI there's no need to add anything else elsewhere and ask for apologies etc. Just see what happens and regardless of the decision best move on to something else. Knowledge (XXG) is a big playground

3766:

You just flagged me for a COI on an article that I have written about a music professional. I am a student of the music business and there was no page so wanted to create one. I may have inadvertently tagged a photo incorrectly and that may be why you have flagged me. I just want to make sure that

3547:

AFD is there for that reason. There is nothing reliably sourced saying he is from any specific place. Unreliable sources have him working in California and Washington (state). Another thing- Consensus for US Cities notable people sections wouldn't put a per like Phillips in Boston just because she

3084:

needs a policy based reason for both parts and not just the redirect IMHO hence my reply on the AFDs. I saw that you had created a redirect for one of their albums when I was new pages patrolling and that was how I came across the albums and group page. I probably would have just changed them to a

2083:

primary source on what the organization's stance is regarding the app/company and governmental engagement therewith; WP can't advance their unconstitutionality idea as if it's factual, only as their allegation/position. The third part might have to be cut entirely, if no source ties that specific

1987:

No problem I can't either but I use Google Chrome which offers a basic translation of a lot of foreign language web sites which gives an idea of the suitability of the sources. When I do a review of a page that isn't sufficiently well sourced if it has another language page I have a look to see if

1790:

for speedy deletion, but then had second thoughts and declined my own speedy tag. As tagging articles for speedy deletion marks said article as reviewed, I assumed that the "reviewed" checkmark on the article was my own and as such marked it as unreviewed, with no description. This is why you (the

1632:

you may want to read the link more carefully especially the part that says "Correct use of an editor's history includes (but is not limited to) fixing unambiguous errors or violations of Knowledge (XXG) policy, or correcting related problems on multiple articles.". As you are a paid editor who has

1196:

No, and there has been much further conversation in the past hour... after they said that they would prefer it if I didn't explain the guidelines... and to say that they are not getting the points is an understatement. I said on the user's talk page that I'm about to request a block. Most of their

581:

I am trying to address concerns you raised first issue was "notable resource" 1)I have added additional non affiliated links in the reference list to address this issue. 2)It is mentioned in the policy that "An article that currently is without third-party sources should not always be deleted".

403:

has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do

1700:

anyway, even with a RS, unless it was actually filed.) I am fine to chalk this up to just a hasty edit on your part. We shouldn't waste time on it. And BTW, I constantly alter my proposals when asked to do so. I do not dig in to the same position. Look at the top of the original discussion on the

2047:

I'm not sure it's novel synthesis, but it's wrong regardless. It's not possible for a private-sector act to be unconstitutional (under US law, anyway). The entire concept only applies to state action (state in the broad legal sense, not the "US states" sense), and has been broadened further in

2032:

I am afraid I don't agree with you. The way it was written may have needed working on but it is not a violation of SYN. An association wrote to Nextdoor asking them to reconsider their TOS in light of a supreme court decision. I gave the words of the TOS the decision of the supreme court and the

3826:

I'd like to appeal to you again to stop following me from article to article. If your behavior is acceptable, then should others be able to do the same? Would it be OK if the same 4 or 5 editors voted on every RfC or AfD where I was the article creator? If there is an issue with Knowledge (XXG)

2378:

I imagine that this film will eventually meet NFILM and I wouldn't have nominated it anyway but probably would have searched a few more sources (I found one that I has already been added) or tagged as needing more sources. that said it's been out for a week and there aren't a lot of sources out

2176:

Yes, this sort of legal analysis is definitely OR, and is – quite frankly – often wrong. Entities like police departments are on different legal footing when they agree or decline to enter into cooperative agreements with private-sector parties, than when they issue orders or legal threats, or

1126:

keeps editing in that haphazard way, then I think it'd be worth grabbing the attention of an uninvolved Admin just to get their opinion. It's no fun cleaning up after a sloppy editor & you've displayed a lot more patience than I would have! If it continues, the disruptive "I can't hear you"

1074:

helpful corrections. I have noticed that the stylistic edits have been similar to the edits I have made when reviewing / editing their articles, but I was adding or removing content at the time, so rewording is often necessary. I don't think that a block is required quite yet, but I have made a

687:

and cleaning up my citations. The page continues to be edited by editors who are not reading my references before removing information they disagree with, around the editor controversy. Would you have a moment to advise me on how to report such behavior? Or must it simply be undone every time?

2078:

OR. While the person who pointed this out has a CoI, their analysis appears to be correct: "The first source is primary; the second source is a self-published letter on the website of a Florida advocacy group for sex offenders; the third source does not mention Nextdoor. No reliable published

1059:'s talk page, because I don't want to cause a furor at this point. I am trying to remain hopeful, but it's been hard. Although the user has been blocked and sanctioned - and had a number of articles moved to draft mode - they have continued to make unnecessary and unhelpful edits. Applying the 961:

and as such primary sources and not sufficient. As I said I was not concerned so much with the notability of the subject as the sourcing to back up the claims. All attorney generals are considered notable but not all authors so a single source to show he was an attorney general is enough but 2

869:

Honestly, most of the articles you moved to draftspace probably deserved it. My issue is that FloridaArmy really doesn't deserve a ban from writing articles or AfD. I personally have not seen any problems at AfD with him, maybe a few people got their panties on a bunch (I don't mean you) about

2215:

You're probably right but I admit the 1st amendment argument and the potential repercussions for forums and social media seemed a legitimate reason to let it ride a bit. Anyway I have learnt a lot about this issue by reading up and researching so it's been useful. Thanks for the interesting

1695:

The first two sources are primary. The third sources does not mention Nextdoor and is applied as a hypothetical via independent analysis not from a RS. The self-published letter on an advocacy group site has all the weight of Twitter or Facebook post as a RS, which is why I felt removing it

1701:

Racial Profiling section and you'll see I cut it in half at the request of an editor who wanted something less wordy. Editors are always asking me to make modifications (it's my proposal, so they usually want me to do the work) and I do so whenever reasonable within Knowledge (XXG) policy.

549:

Shri manasaheb deshpande page has been taged for speedy deletion. I want to ask a question regarding it. Can The books published by Mamasaheb be considered as notable resource? They are not available online, 20+ books have been published by mamasaheb and are popular all over india.

2122:

need some independent source to show it should be given any WEIGHT at all. I remove shit like this from WP everyday (the IP, btw, geolocates to Florida, where this advocacy organization for sex offenders is located). Lots of people want to abuse WP to amplify their message.

3124:

I started splitting/creating individual season subarticles as a preventive measure against the sizing of main articles getting out of hand with multiple seasons worth of rosters, stats, and match logs in sight. So far I haven't encountered any issues creating these, see:

798:

has not tried to have a constructive discussion, just accuse me of bias and now two other violations. Do you penalize wikithons for fixing misreprentations of BIPOC?Because that’s what’s going on here, this is neither meat puppetry or sock puppetry. This is an editor’s

3910:

standards and would have been accepted at the time. I don't particularly want to trawl through your paid edits to see if they are in violation of the guidelines. Just to remind you, you have directly edited certain articles in contradiction with these same guidelines.

2504:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in 2441:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in 2154:

amendment problem. Nextdoor is claiming that it is the different law enforcement entities that require them to exclude sex offenders and their households from joining maybe by applying some legal decision. The first amendment rights can be extended to private action

1181:

I should remove that template about a wikibreak. If I were you I would stop trying to clean up after this editor and leave them in the mess they made. They are clearly not open to discussion and do not give a flying fuck about what went on here and your efforts.

647:

how much it has caused him problems on this particular talk page it would be useful if you make the same reminder to him. He seems to be using the talk page as a way of defending himself in the eyes of his client so I let myself get swept along I suppose.

169:

sent to the CEO of Nextdoor, demanding I be fired and threatening a "PR Nightmare." I had to deal with directly by e-mail with ArbCom since the threatening e-mail had confidential user info and personal e-mail of the CEO. It was very disturbing and

3548:

worked there. Lots of people commute to work, and the nomad article hints she may have done so from New Hampshire (Which many Massachuettans do for tax reasons) BTW a person who has lived in multiple states can be put at multiple deletion sortings.

1069:

tag when it is not appropriate, adding content not in the cited source, using a non-reliable source, changing the meaning of sentences (although I believe in good faith), and making a rash of essentially stylistic edits - although there have been a

443:

There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the

2294:

lol no. It was released on June 8. It is being searched a lot on internet (and I loved that film very much too). If the article gets reviewed, the people will get the result of the article on search engines, thats why i want it to be reviewed.

2017:. Normally I would ask someone who made an edit like that, if they have a connection with Florida Action Committee, as it is so blatantly promotional with respect to what that organization is advocating for. Surprisingly bad edit from you. 924:

Hey I'm not saying there is a vendetta, perhaps FloridaArmy deserved some shot in the arm but not an AfD ban. Can't say that I haven't posted a lazy AfD vote something along the lines of "Meets GNG". But be careful when moving to draftspace.

2033:

Harvard law review analysis of that decision I added the complaint of the association. This information was so quickly removed by BC1278 in clear violation of good practice claiming it was vandalism that I replaced it and improved the text.

2701:

and monitoring new articles, for fighting unsourced facts (demanding references), and promotional or not notable topics (mantra: "creating deletion discussion page"), for help in French and English, - Dom from Bristol and Paris, you are an

1499:

I dont know, most seem fine I guess. I might have had a problem with one but I havent fone through them all. My biggest issue is there seem to be some that havent been listed in a cental place like his talk page. Maybe a third edtors work.

3156:

I can only assume the reason your opinion differed is because I hadn't added the transaction notes yet, which is were the references/notability comes from. Slightly confused either way, so if you could elaborate I would appreciate it.

3878:

Ok let's try and see if there are any other problem articles. Can you give me a list of the articles that you have created and had reviewed by asking a specific editor to review rather than going through AFC as you are supposed to?

1144:

I just found out that the user is more motivated by their common sense than guidelines / common practice. (I previously had other thoughts about what was happening.) Banning and sanctioning seems to have made no impact on that

744:

TrentProf also wrote on my talk page that "scholars have been notified" and are "watching the page closely" so I assume she has called her friends. Is there such thing as a meat puppet investigation? Thank you for your time!

3049:- I understand your concern. What I am trying to say, is that I do NOT object to the article being kept. However, if it can not be kept, it should be redirected with history, but should definitely not be deleted. Please 2198:

A better way to deal with BC278's bad behavior would have been to revert the removal calling out the bogus rationale and COI violation, and then immediately repeat the removal yourself with an appropriate justification: :)

1236:

My opinion is that FA will come round at some point, because continued arguing and insults on his/her part will only result in a further block. If necessary, some of these articles can be protected to prevent edit-warring.

1962:

Sorry, i cant read norwegian so I did an only cursory glance at the refs and the one seemed alright. Additionally, there was an article in the Norwegian wikipedia. I will keep your ideas in mind and look for new sources.

586:" which discusses his philosophy , given in reference list, have 31,000 views till date. I have also given detailed view on talk page of Shri mamasaheb deshpande. can you please kindly go through this. Regards 3481:

Reads at the top of the page- "This is a high level category for deletion sorting. It is strongly recommended you do not add discussions directly to it. Instead, please add them to a more specific category,

1401:

Yes, that is making sense since the total of new pages is much above 500, like you said, closer to 1000... and I compared the two lists and that does seem to be the difference. One redirect must have snuck

1608:

can lead to being blocked. Cautioning here, as this is becoming a clear pattern with you following me from article to article, and I'd request that you please review the policy and adjust your behavior

2500:

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2437:

1300:

Also you guys may not have noticed but all the articles I moved were created in May. FA's creation spree has been going on for a while. There may well be a lot of articles dating from before May.

2703: 741:

It is the same, but I do not believe they are ALL sockpuppets, as TrentProf has called on her Twitter followers to help her edit this page. At least one person responded they would. Tweet is here

3218:

For completing over 100 reviews during the 2018 June Backlog Drive, please accept this Special Edition Barnstar. Thank you for helping out at New Page Patrol and keep up the good work. Cheers! —

511:

Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.

2903:

it states "The foregoing licenses are in addition to any license you may decide to grant (e.g., a Creative Commons license)" but I cannot see any creative commons license on the video's page.

2177:

arrest someone. The latter types of actions can raise 1A concerns, the former rarely do. Anyway, it's looks like there's now a clear roadmap for resolving the issues raised on the talk page.

888:

in the arse especially when there are few voters as that can end up with a no consensus on a clearly non notable article. And just to show itsinot a vendetta on my part have a look at afd on

3080:!voting keep or redirect and not objecting to an article being kept is not really the same thing. I would have understood you !voting redirect with the reason that you gave but I think a 1542:

be left in place as a record. Certainly leaving such redirects is harmless. Your contributions are welcomed but please find something more useful to do than tagging these redirects. —

3900:

did you see my last message? If you give me a list of the articles that you asked to be reviewed by inexperienced editors rather than going through AFC as should be done according to

3747:

No it’s fine, I will look for alternative ways to make myself happy. But I should delete my account now. I’ve been here for 4 years though. Thanks for everything. Goodbye (sad face)

3010: 2655: 2125:

This question is not interesting or subtle. It is unacceptable content. If and when some independent source ties Nextdoor's ToU to the court case, we can have some content about it.

526: 3937:

I should not have brought up perceived conduct issues in a deletion discussion at all, and only did so in the heat of debate. Please accept my apology, so this issue can be closed.

3611: 3586: 2349:

This is a problem that will fix itself probably before an AfD could run its course. The film's been publicly released for 5 days now, so there will be mainstream-press reviews.

299: 414:

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

111: 1675:

association. There may be a lack of reporting about this complaint but it most certainly is not original research. Would you mind explaining where this section contravenes

497:

A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with

1149:. If that's the way things continue, I agree, I don't see a bright future, either. So far, I have not had any issues with trying to edit while I have the "in use" tag on.– 3418: 3006: 345: 350: 3002: 3676:

Please? :( You edit the article for yourself. So that it will not be removed again. :(, Please? :( Even If i read the threads, I will still not make me understand.

2798:

Sure it would be a pleasure. I may need a few days as I'm a bit busy and I'll need to to do a bit of research to make sure I'm using the correct terminology though.

2158:

by state constitution. This case has been used to question the right to free speech on internet. But obviously making any reference to this would most definitely de

3357: 3803: 433:: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing. 256: 3488:

So your addition is wrong on two grounds- First of all you say her company is in Massachusetts. If you're using that grounds, then she goes at Massachusetts DS.

1988:

any of the sources there can be added but I don't take it's existence as being a proof of notability. The notability criteria are not always as strict as here.

2494: 2431: 280: 3614:. I am only posting this to make you aware of the discussion, because the user has removed the notice from their talk page right before you commented there. 376: 3180: 3318:

that's fine I had just restored it as the article creator had removed it himself but I don't think he makes notabilty anyway so I will nominate. cheers.

616:

Article talk pages are for discussing content. It will be helpful if everyone (including you) stops making comments about other behavior's there. Please

1122:

It's very annoying when someone is working against you & refuses to listen. If you pop an "in use" tag on the article while you're editing and FA

2505: 2442: 1784:- Sorry Dom, I don't think I received your ping and was unaware of the situation until another editor mentioned it to me today. Anyways, I tagged 1423:

just so you know Carole I'm still moving pages, I've been through numbers 487 to 434 and moved 13 which is nearly 25% that are not up to scratch.

3121:: "redirecting to main article. There is nothing that shows that the individual seasons are sufficiently notable to warrant a seperate article" 3691: 957:

and that one was a mistake. But when I moved Lizzie Doron there were not the sources neccessary to show she definately passed GNG as both were

2625: 2513: 2450: 3013:

is "Keep or redirect", I do not need a reason for "Keep". If there is no higher use for a search term, it should probably be redirected. --

2619: 1075:

comment that I would post a warning on their talk page if the behavior continues. Does this make sense as a course of action at this time?–

703: 535: 2509: 2446: 1812:

not offended at all just curious to see if there was something I had missed that I should take into account when reviewing pages. Cheers

2155: 805: 2876:

This link's video is licensed under Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0), but it does not matter if you take a screenshot Is not it? --

249: 3782: 3245:

song) was removed/taken down since it hasn't "released yet" even though it has already officially Released: May 25, 2018 under ℗ 2018

1889: 520:

has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.

3717:

Still sad here, but thanks, I think I should go a clean/fresh start, I might forgetting all of you. It’s kinda depressing to me. :(

3374: 3346: 3339: 2360: 2188: 2111: 2064: 292: 2637: 2631: 2613: 2535:

Hello, Thank you for your message. The reason for the redirect was because that form of name existed as a red link in the article

2489:, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge (XXG) is acceptable. Please go to 2426:, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge (XXG) is acceptable. Please go to 3268: 2501: 2438: 601: 369: 2970: 311: 306: 268: 1888:. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to 833: 531: 287: 273: 263: 3386:

Why was Glory to the Republic reviewed and removed? All other proto-states of Europe have a page for their anthem, including

1553: 97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 3804:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Deletion sorting § WikiProject Deletion sorting/United States of America guideline proposal

3032:. It's perfectly normal to ask why someone !votes if they give no reason. The redirect !vote had a reason but not the keep. 2980:

Btw, I'm relatively new to editing so you taking the time to direct me to relevant resources was helpful and encouraging :)

1892:. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status 1484:

I saw that too I had taken a break from it. I haven't looked at his moves to see if I agree or not. Do you have an opinion?

340: 3543:

Yes I meant California. If there is no way of identifying where an American if found, US deletion sorting is the fallback.

3138: 1269:

I hope you are right, Deb. Protection might be the ticket in the short run in some cases. I won't work on any more drafts.–

3459: 3451: 1908: 1538:

Policy is that if an article has been moved from draft: space to mainspace, the redirect in draft: space created thereby

318: 3364: 3142: 196:

is not supposed to be a means for them to communicate with the general public and maybe you were a little heavy-handed.

3491: 3249:, S.L.U. How is that possible? if all the correct information has been added such as release date and links to either 1903: 1352: 458:

Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator

335: 3287: 3280: 3222: 2662: 566:

are not sufficient to show notability there should be third party non affiliated sources that talk about this person.

476:

The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant

362: 3150: 2899:

on the link that you add above there is nothing that says that the video is licensed or I may have missed it. In the

1915:

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing!

621: 3130: 3118: 3752: 3722: 3687: 3210: 3126: 2974: 2962: 2521: 2490: 2481: 2458: 38: 3146: 1877: 1854: 1437:

Oh, good. I thought I might start looking at the list in about a week, but it's good to know you're on the job!!!–

2812:

That sounds great! Take your time, - I just nominated for the German Main page, which usually takes 6 weeks ;) --

2781: 1853:" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and 3134: 515: 3942: 784: 750: 699: 119: 3029: 954: 719: 715: 501:. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential. 3544: 1348: 448:' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace. 3639: 3600: 2548: 2427: 2418: 2299: 2258: 1940: 809: 555: 445: 3770: 3748: 3718: 3683: 3679: 3256: 1893: 1873: 1869: 958: 821: 804:

is Mourning Dove who is being misrepresented. I would much rather discuss the content and reach consensus.

691: 589: 239: 232: 225: 3778: 3395: 2831: 2817: 2789: 2757: 2716: 1920: 1587: 1442: 1407: 1360: 1324: 1274: 1227: 1197:

edits have issues, but they want to argue about it, rather than try to understand. Very, very frustrating.

1172: 1154: 1110: 1080: 2080: 1634: 3808: 3625: 3616: 3391: 2517: 2454: 2357: 2185: 2108: 2061: 1885: 1056: 551: 483:

Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for

153: 3828: 3774: 3422: 2966: 1862: 1858: 1605: 426: 192: 3028:

Hi in Afd discussions a !vote that is not based on any kind of policy is not taken into account it is

2608:

As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.

2565:

Ah I thought there had to be a logical reason! I should have asked first, thanks for the explanation.

620:. If you have issues with someone else's behavior please raise them on that person's talk page. See 466:

if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

3916: 3884: 3853: 3737: 3707: 3653: 3566: 3534: 3387: 3323: 3264: 3260: 3098: 3037: 2926: 2908: 2845: 2803: 2771: 2739: 2644:

Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we

2570: 2384: 2379:

there. Not a good sign for the film I think. It would be interesting to know the box office figures.

2340: 2323: 2285: 2221: 2167: 2095: 2038: 1993: 1982: 1966: 1817: 1768: 1684: 1642: 1569: 1521: 1503: 1489: 1454: 1428: 1392: 1378: 1338: 1305: 1260: 1252: 1251:

One way would be for everyone just to stop working on the draft articles. That would have to include

1187: 1132: 1022: 1008: 967: 936: 911: 897: 873: 852: 767: 731: 652: 597: 593: 571: 400: 201: 135: 47: 17: 3673: 2611:

Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar:

1697: 825: 3938: 3672:

I will not stop unless you bring it back just to you to add certain things that I miss to pass the

3553: 3512: 3498: 3463: 2251: 829: 800: 795: 780: 746: 695: 171: 166: 115: 3183:, anyway I can put the updated reply? My thoughts came across pretty jumbled in the initial reply. 3158: 3090: 477: 3467: 3064: 3018: 2894: 2877: 2560: 2544: 2275: 1796: 1745: 1735: 1547: 2689: 2314: 498: 396: 1105:, I just noticed that Domdeparis is on a short wikibreak. Do you have any thoughts about this?– 3440: 3162: 2987: 2948: 2827: 2813: 2785: 2753: 2729: 2712: 1916: 1583: 1438: 1418: 1403: 1356: 1320: 1270: 1223: 1168: 1150: 1119: 1106: 1076: 2486: 2423: 1671: 1516:

I'll have a look and remind the editor to make the omnibus notification as per the decision.

762:

What we can do is ask for the page to protected to avoid this kind of thing. I will do that.

742: 463: 3868: 3836: 2881: 2540: 2536: 2373: 2352: 2204: 2180: 2144: 2130: 2103: 2056: 2022: 1706: 1660: 1614: 1063: 980: 926: 666: 629: 180: 148: 3907: 3426: 2872:

Hi, You said that you should not take a screenshot of a video other than a CC license, but

2749: 2512:

and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the

2449:

and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the

2014: 2004: 1933: 723: 617: 484: 3912: 3880: 3849: 3733: 3703: 3649: 3562: 3530: 3413: 3406: 3319: 3300: 3246: 3174: 3094: 3033: 2944: 2922: 2904: 2841: 2799: 2767: 2735: 2566: 2380: 2336: 2332: 2319: 2281: 2217: 2163: 2034: 1989: 1813: 1779: 1764: 1680: 1638: 1565: 1517: 1485: 1424: 1388: 1374: 1334: 1301: 1256: 1183: 1141: 1128: 1092: 1018: 1004: 963: 907: 893: 848: 763: 727: 648: 567: 197: 165:

I have also been dealing all day with an extremely threatening and disturbing e-mail that

131: 3901: 3430: 2280:

sure no problem but do you have a COI with the subject is that why you want it reviewed?

2159: 1676: 1564:

to do but if they are ok to stay I'll be more than happy to stop! It was very tedious!!!

1222:

Well, I am working on one last draft - and about done with it. I won't work on any more.–

722:. Is their editing along the same lines as Trentprof? If so it might be worth opening an 112:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Proposal:_topic_ban_for_user_BC1278

3549: 3523: 3508: 3494: 2965:, Domdeparis! Per you suggestion, I added a few additional written sources. As for the 1637:

effect more difficult to deal with than legitimate close scrutiny of your COI editing.

889: 3946: 3920: 3888: 3872: 3857: 3840: 3812: 3786: 3756: 3741: 3726: 3711: 3695: 3657: 3643: 3620: 3604: 3570: 3556: 3538: 3515: 3501: 3471: 3444: 3376: 3353: 3327: 3305: 3292:(co)creating and writing notable works of fiction is a credible claim of significance. 3272: 3228: 3166: 3102: 3068: 3041: 3022: 2991: 2951: 2930: 2912: 2885: 2849: 2835: 2821: 2807: 2793: 2775: 2761: 2743: 2720: 2668: 2574: 2552: 2525: 2462: 2388: 2365: 2344: 2327: 2308: 2289: 2267: 2225: 2208: 2193: 2171: 2148: 2134: 2116: 2069: 2042: 2026: 1997: 1974: 1949: 1924: 1821: 1800: 1772: 1749: 1710: 1688: 1664: 1646: 1618: 1591: 1573: 1557: 1525: 1511: 1493: 1462: 1446: 1432: 1411: 1396: 1382: 1364: 1342: 1328: 1309: 1278: 1264: 1246: 1231: 1191: 1176: 1158: 1136: 1114: 1084: 1040: 1026: 1012: 995: 971: 944: 933:

is an internationally acclaimed writer who has articles in several other Wikipedias. ~

915: 901: 881: 856: 837: 813: 788: 771: 754: 735: 707: 670: 656: 633: 605: 575: 559: 539: 205: 184: 156: 139: 123: 3242: 3075: 3060: 3053: 3014: 1807: 1792: 1758: 1741: 1579: 1543: 1370: 1242: 1036: 991: 3412:

Hello Domdeparis. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of

3286:

Hello Domdeparis. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of

1836: 425:

A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at

3436: 2983: 1002: 930: 1880:

and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when

1127:

nonsense I mean, then I don't see a bright future for FA here at Knowledge (XXG).

3085:

redirect myself but there had been quite a lot of editors involved. I agree with

2617:. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: 1670:

This was a part of the article that you removed in direct contradiction with the

3895: 3864: 3832: 3635: 3596: 2200: 2140: 2126: 2091: 2087: 2018: 1702: 1656: 1627: 1610: 1100: 662: 641: 625: 176: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1734:, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on 3313: 3295: 2318:

on GNG or move it back to draft space to wait for it to receive more reviews.

3732:

Do not take this personally editing on wikipedia has a steep learning curve.

2100:

pinging prior participants in the related threads at the article title page.

1730:

Hi, I'm SamHolt6. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed,

1451:

Are you still moving the pages? I see another editor has taken on the task. ~

3630: 3629: 3591: 3590: 3196: 2977:

he has received for his work in bringing stop-motion video to woodworking?

818:

Please excuse me, the above comment is mine. I’m still learning the ropes.

3416:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: 3290:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: 1653:

Nextdoor#Denial_of_service_to_sex_offenders_and_members_of_their_households

1031:

Ah, okay. I was puzzled that I couldn't find any kind of obituary for him.

3767:

there won't be any issues with the page and apologize for any confusion.

3181:

Wikipedia_talk:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers#E_sports_seasons_walled_gardens

3086: 1787: 1731: 1652: 1238: 1096: 1032: 987: 2918: 684: 3250: 2485:. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under 2422:. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under 3827:

policy clearly being violated, as you have noted is an exception to

2589:

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently

3628:

We were trying to post the same thing at the same time. Ha ha. --

2900: 2313:

To be perfectly honest the article does not meet the criteria for

1932:

hey. Welcome to the cabal. Also, kindly look for Andy's script on

583: 3802:

for the U.S. deletion sorting page. The discussion is located at

2658:

to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —

906:

Ah I just saw you !voted keep already on the Bloody Spring page.

3648:

Thanks guys for the heads up and the ping I have just replied.

2784:

to French? I did German. - Can't ask my friend LouisAlain ;) --

2748:

You are welcome, - hope you don't over-estimate the prize from

2586:

Hello Domdeparis, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

529:

to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

220:

Hello Domdeparis, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

2873: 1333:

I think that it's closer to 1000 pages if we include redirects

25: 3425:

was created 09:27, June 7, 2018. I guess this is now more a

3360:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

3338: 2471: 2408: 1857:. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a 1835: 3011:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Riders of the Plague‎

2943:

Thank you Domdeparis for so promptly reviewing new article

175:

in this threatening, disturbing e-mail to the Nextdoor CEO.

3490:

My basis for California DS was a easily found article here

1351:

says 488, 57 deleted. At least one of them is a redirect,

3421:

was closed as delete 01:45, 11 February 2018 (UTC). This

1315:

I think that there were more than 500 pages created (see

3433:

candidate. If someone else thinks otherwise, fine by me.

2697: 2333:

http://www.thatmomentin.com/2036-origin-unknown-review/

2010: 1845: 1785: 1316: 1164: 714:

I wonder a little about these new accounts that may be

3089:

there is a strong chance that the group does not meet

3007:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/From Your Grave‎

1874:

the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect

1055:

I wanted to check in with someone and not post on the

3419:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Rochester Kings

3003:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Enemy Unbound‎

2508:. If the file is already gone, you can still make a 2468:

Non-free rationale for File:Screen shot mae west.jpg

2445:. If the file is already gone, you can still make a 2250:

I usually dont do this, but would you please review

1872:

for more information on this user right, especially

1369:

I'm almost sure most are not redirects. For example

953:

I agree for Murphy the attorney general post passes

130:

and there are lots of slides and swings to play on!

3458:Hello and thank you for getting in touch regarding 3450:Hello and thank you for getting in touch regarding 147:Mordake blocked as a sock of The Quixotic Potato. 3906:then I can have a look and see if they are up to 3113:Overwatch League: 2017–18 team season subarticles 3612:WP:ANEW § User:WilliamJE reported by User:Hhkohh 2074:Looked into it more, and this probably actually 1911:, for article renaming requests awaiting action. 1373:isn't in that list but it is one they created. 2957:RE: Ways to improve Frank Howarth (woodworker) 2506:section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion 2443:section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion 2405:Non-free rationale for File:Todpostersmall.jpg 1387:The list's parameters says exclude redirects. 3702:Best to take this to your talk page I think. 3345:Hello, Domdeparis. You have new messages at 3205:Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar 2917:You are right my bad I have just checked out 370: 8: 2766:No risk of that, but thanks all the same!!! 1578:I nominated some of them for deletion, too, 683:Hello Domdeparis, thanks for jumping in on 661:Wonderful, thanks. (and i have already) :) 3768: 3677: 3589:. He keep removing link to that thread -- 3254: 1763:can you tell why you unreviewed the page? 1319:), but many of those were redirect pages.– 819: 689: 587: 377: 363: 221: 3668:The article that you reviewed and deleted 2969:criteria, do you think Howarth satisfies 2602:Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive! 2139:btw BC1278 should not have removed that. 1843:Hello, Domdeparis. Your account has been 1255:though, who has the patience of a Saint. 962:interviews is not enough hence the move. 404:not get automatically indexed for Google. 3798:Nb. I have drafted a proposal to create 3552:, is the complaint department really on 3511:, is the complaint department really on 3497:, is the complaint department really on 2543:article might be edited at that point.-- 2479:Thanks for uploading or contributing to 2416:Thanks for uploading or contributing to 3093:anyway so redirects are of little use. 2961:Thank you for offering ways to improve 2826:... but not this time: it's today ;) -- 2780:Could you do me a favour and translate 1651:I'd also advise you voluntarily remove 679:Edits to Cogewea and Request for Advice 327: 238: 231: 224: 3390:for the Luhansk People's Republic and 3241:the song Knowledge (XXG) page Desire ( 929:was an Arkansas attorney general, and 471:Subject-specific notability guidelines 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3493:that says she was born in California. 2919:https://vimeo.com/134916452#more_info 7: 3460:Draft:Uniworld_Business_Publications 3452:Draft:Uniworld_Business_Publications 1726:I have unreviewed a page you curated 3587:edit warring complain for WilliamJE 3382:Re: Review of Glory to the Republic 3347:Winged Blades of Godric's talk page 2156:Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins 1582:. I won't do it any longer either.– 480:nominating an article for deletion. 3903:paid editing behavioral guidelines 2734:I shall treasure this preciously! 2539:. Perhaps it is redundant and the 399:has been implemented. The flow at 24: 2683:creating deletion discussion page 3585:You may wish to know there is a 3394:for the Republic of Artsakh and 3209: 3195: 2688: 2636: 2630: 2624: 2618: 2612: 1884:is used. This can be done using 1865:when moving the parent page(s). 216:NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018 29: 3486:and/or relevant subject area." 2901:https://vimeo.com/terms#license 1904:Knowledge (XXG):Requested moves 1868:Please take a moment to review 584:http://sadgurubodh.blogspot.in/ 142:p.s. the metaphor applies to me 3477:Deletion sorting United States 3188:NPP Backlog Drive Appreciation 3119:2017–18 Boston Uprising season 2840:Sorry I'll see what I can do! 2514:Media copyright questions page 2451:Media copyright questions page 1: 3581:WilliamJE Edit warring thread 2868:Licence of video screen shots 2581:NPP Backlog Elimination Drive 2482:File:Screen shot mae west.jpg 2350: 2178: 2101: 2054: 2013:is a very clear violation of 1909:Category:Articles to be moved 545:Shri mamasaheb deshpande page 3561:OK thanks for the pointers. 2254:? Thanks a lot in advance. — 1878:post-move cleanup procedures 1876:. Please remember to follow 1534:Redirects draft: → mainspace 233:General notability guideline 3288:Alex Epstein (screenwriter) 3281:Alex Epstein (screenwriter) 3237:Desire (Paulina Rubio song) 2874:https://vimeo.com/134916452 2493:, and edit it to include a 2430:, and edit it to include a 1347:It doesn't make sense, but 485:organisations and companies 351:Why was my article deleted? 300:Organizations and companies 240:Subject-specific guidelines 3962: 3405:Speedy deletion declined: 3279:Speedy deletion declined: 2963:Frank Howarth (woodworker) 2646:focus on quality reviewing 1870:Knowledge (XXG):Page mover 532:MediaWiki message delivery 462:, and submit the issue to 3947:10:43, 16 July 2018 (UTC) 3921:16:31, 17 July 2018 (UTC) 3889:22:58, 13 July 2018 (UTC) 3873:15:06, 13 July 2018 (UTC) 3858:00:02, 13 July 2018 (UTC) 3841:20:04, 12 July 2018 (UTC) 3813:05:40, 11 July 2018 (UTC) 3787:16:26, 10 July 2018 (UTC) 3757:15:29, 10 July 2018 (UTC) 3742:15:25, 10 July 2018 (UTC) 3727:15:21, 10 July 2018 (UTC) 3712:14:09, 10 July 2018 (UTC) 3696:14:05, 10 July 2018 (UTC) 3658:12:10, 10 July 2018 (UTC) 3644:12:01, 10 July 2018 (UTC) 3621:11:58, 10 July 2018 (UTC) 3605:11:56, 10 July 2018 (UTC) 3208: 3201: 3194: 3167:18:19, 28 June 2018 (UTC) 3103:15:39, 27 June 2018 (UTC) 3069:15:15, 27 June 2018 (UTC) 3042:15:10, 27 June 2018 (UTC) 3023:15:04, 27 June 2018 (UTC) 2992:05:23, 26 June 2018 (UTC) 2952:22:56, 25 June 2018 (UTC) 2931:17:19, 25 June 2018 (UTC) 2913:17:12, 25 June 2018 (UTC) 2886:17:00, 25 June 2018 (UTC) 2850:10:10, 22 June 2018 (UTC) 2836:08:45, 22 June 2018 (UTC) 2782:Messe solennelle (Vierne) 2750:the cabal of the outcasts 2669:06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC) 2593:unreviewed articles, and 2575:16:38, 15 June 2018 (UTC) 2553:16:32, 15 June 2018 (UTC) 2526:18:43, 13 June 2018 (UTC) 2491:the file description page 2487:non-free content criteria 2463:17:49, 13 June 2018 (UTC) 2428:the file description page 2424:non-free content criteria 2389:10:10, 15 June 2018 (UTC) 2366:23:18, 13 June 2018 (UTC) 2345:06:35, 12 June 2018 (UTC) 2328:05:05, 12 June 2018 (UTC) 2309:04:49, 12 June 2018 (UTC) 2290:04:45, 12 June 2018 (UTC) 2268:03:24, 12 June 2018 (UTC) 2226:06:20, 15 June 2018 (UTC) 2209:01:43, 15 June 2018 (UTC) 2194:01:03, 15 June 2018 (UTC) 2172:03:34, 14 June 2018 (UTC) 2149:01:21, 14 June 2018 (UTC) 2135:01:19, 14 June 2018 (UTC) 2117:00:25, 14 June 2018 (UTC) 2070:23:34, 13 June 2018 (UTC) 2043:04:45, 11 June 2018 (UTC) 2027:21:06, 10 June 2018 (UTC) 1998:17:11, 10 June 2018 (UTC) 1975:15:12, 10 June 2018 (UTC) 1822:03:45, 14 June 2018 (UTC) 1801:01:52, 14 June 2018 (UTC) 453:Paid editing - new policy 3571:14:37, 9 July 2018 (UTC) 3557:14:25, 9 July 2018 (UTC) 3539:14:16, 9 July 2018 (UTC) 3516:14:03, 9 July 2018 (UTC) 3502:13:53, 9 July 2018 (UTC) 3472:11:59, 9 July 2018 (UTC) 3445:10:12, 8 July 2018 (UTC) 3377:15:36, 7 July 2018 (UTC) 3354:15:36, 7 July 2018 (UTC) 3328:15:07, 3 July 2018 (UTC) 3306:14:57, 3 July 2018 (UTC) 3273:21:19, 1 July 2018 (UTC) 3229:01:59, 1 July 2018 (UTC) 2947:...much appreciated!--- 2822:15:47, 1 June 2018 (UTC) 2808:09:47, 1 June 2018 (UTC) 2794:09:42, 1 June 2018 (UTC) 2776:08:48, 1 June 2018 (UTC) 2762:22:46, 29 May 2018 (UTC) 2744:22:43, 29 May 2018 (UTC) 2721:09:34, 28 May 2018 (UTC) 1950:00:41, 9 June 2018 (UTC) 1925:23:01, 8 June 2018 (UTC) 1773:17:40, 8 June 2018 (UTC) 1750:16:45, 8 June 2018 (UTC) 1711:20:33, 7 June 2018 (UTC) 1689:04:54, 7 June 2018 (UTC) 1665:04:41, 7 June 2018 (UTC) 1647:04:14, 7 June 2018 (UTC) 1619:03:55, 7 June 2018 (UTC) 1592:21:18, 5 June 2018 (UTC) 1574:21:14, 5 June 2018 (UTC) 1558:21:09, 5 June 2018 (UTC) 1526:14:35, 8 June 2018 (UTC) 1512:14:33, 8 June 2018 (UTC) 1494:05:11, 8 June 2018 (UTC) 1463:02:54, 8 June 2018 (UTC) 1447:17:23, 4 June 2018 (UTC) 1433:17:16, 4 June 2018 (UTC) 1412:18:02, 3 June 2018 (UTC) 1397:11:07, 3 June 2018 (UTC) 1383:11:05, 3 June 2018 (UTC) 1365:09:48, 3 June 2018 (UTC) 1343:09:44, 3 June 2018 (UTC) 1329:09:37, 3 June 2018 (UTC) 1310:09:28, 3 June 2018 (UTC) 1279:08:28, 3 June 2018 (UTC) 1265:08:25, 3 June 2018 (UTC) 1247:08:07, 3 June 2018 (UTC) 1232:01:06, 3 June 2018 (UTC) 1192:01:01, 3 June 2018 (UTC) 1177:23:20, 2 June 2018 (UTC) 1159:22:16, 2 June 2018 (UTC) 1137:22:06, 2 June 2018 (UTC) 1115:19:51, 2 June 2018 (UTC) 1085:18:57, 2 June 2018 (UTC) 1041:17:35, 1 June 2018 (UTC) 1027:15:29, 1 June 2018 (UTC) 1017:But not a RS of course. 1013:15:27, 1 June 2018 (UTC) 1001:According to this he is 996:15:25, 1 June 2018 (UTC) 972:16:04, 1 June 2018 (UTC) 945:15:53, 1 June 2018 (UTC) 916:07:49, 1 June 2018 (UTC) 902:05:41, 1 June 2018 (UTC) 882:03:31, 1 June 2018 (UTC) 857:10:17, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 838:00:24, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 814:00:13, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 794:page). How could I not? 789:23:04, 29 May 2018 (UTC) 772:22:56, 29 May 2018 (UTC) 755:22:51, 29 May 2018 (UTC) 736:22:46, 29 May 2018 (UTC) 708:22:42, 29 May 2018 (UTC) 671:14:52, 25 May 2018 (UTC) 657:14:51, 25 May 2018 (UTC) 634:14:39, 25 May 2018 (UTC) 606:18:58, 18 May 2018 (UTC) 576:08:07, 14 May 2018 (UTC) 560:06:43, 14 May 2018 (UTC) 540:20:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC) 346:Common deletion outcomes 206:08:23, 24 May 2018 (UTC) 185:07:44, 24 May 2018 (UTC) 157:07:17, 24 May 2018 (UTC) 140:22:15, 23 May 2018 (UTC) 124:20:42, 23 May 2018 (UTC) 3545:Michael Barrier (actor) 2597:unreviewed redirects. 2419:File:Todpostersmall.jpg 3396:Anthem of Transnistria 3343: 3223:Insertcleverphrasehere 2663:Insertcleverphrasehere 2510:request for undeletion 2476: 2447:request for undeletion 2413: 1840: 3793:U.S. Deletion sorting 3392:Azat u ankakh Artsakh 3342: 3247:Universal Music Spain 3059:me when you reply. -- 2475: 2412: 1886:Special:WhatLinksHere 1839: 1353:Dennis "Copper" Barth 42:of past discussions. 3507:above from this one. 3388:Live and Shine, LNR! 1890:secure your password 1600:WP: Hounding caution 1253:User:Editorofthewiki 1167:. Not looking good.– 257:Astronomical objects 18:User talk:Domdeparis 2252:2036 Origin Unknown 1936:. See you around. — 312:Sports and athletes 281:Geographic features 3398:for Transnistria. 3358:remove this notice 3344: 2704:awesome Wikipedian 2495:non-free rationale 2477: 2432:non-free rationale 2414: 1841: 1832:Page mover granted 612:Article talk pages 514:The next issue of 429:for more details. 3789: 3773:comment added by 3698: 3682:comment added by 3429:candidate than a 3275: 3259:comment added by 3253:page store etc. 3234: 3233: 3225: 2671: 2665: 2335:this might help. 2216:discussion guys. 1165:this conversation 986:So - is he dead? 840: 824:comment added by 710: 694:comment added by 622:WP:CONDUCTDISPUTE 608: 592:comment added by 530: 387: 386: 341:Guide to deletion 336:Notability essays 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3953: 3899: 3811: 3749:Joshguevarra2001 3719:Joshguevarra2001 3684:Joshguevarra2001 3640:✍️ Contributions 3626:Northamerica1000 3619: 3601:✍️ Contributions 3527: 3372: 3367: 3361: 3317: 3221: 3213: 3199: 3192: 3191: 3178: 3082:Keep or redirect 3079: 3058: 3052: 2973:considering the 2898: 2733: 2700: 2698:adding precision 2692: 2661: 2653: 2640: 2634: 2628: 2622: 2616: 2564: 2541:Baron Grimthorpe 2537:Baron Grimthorpe 2531:Baron Grimthorpe 2518:ShakespeareFan00 2502:my contributions 2474: 2455:ShakespeareFan00 2439:my contributions 2411: 2377: 2364: 2307: 2306: 2304: 2279: 2266: 2265: 2263: 2192: 2115: 2099: 2068: 1986: 1969: 1958:Re:Magnus Devold 1948: 1947: 1945: 1883: 1882:suppressredirect 1852: 1848: 1811: 1783: 1762: 1631: 1506: 1457: 1422: 1104: 1068: 1062: 981:Clarence L. Mohr 939: 927:George W. Murphy 876: 645: 524: 379: 372: 365: 222: 151: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3961: 3960: 3956: 3955: 3954: 3952: 3951: 3950: 3935: 3893: 3821: 3807: 3795: 3764: 3670: 3615: 3583: 3521: 3484:such as a state 3479: 3456: 3414:Rochester Kings 3410: 3407:Rochester Kings 3401:- AquaWolf9461 3384: 3368: 3365: 3362: 3351: 3336: 3311: 3284: 3239: 3190: 3172: 3115: 3073: 3056: 3050: 2999: 2975:media attention 2959: 2945:Peter Moeschlin 2941: 2892: 2870: 2727: 2709: 2708: 2696: 2693: 2678: 2673: 2604: 2583: 2558: 2533: 2472: 2470: 2409: 2407: 2371: 2300: 2297: 2296: 2273: 2259: 2256: 2255: 2248: 2096:Dennis Bratland 2085: 2050:Which, exactly, 2008: 1983:Editorofthewiki 1980: 1967: 1960: 1941: 1938: 1937: 1881: 1850: 1844: 1834: 1805: 1777: 1756: 1728: 1625: 1602: 1536: 1504: 1455: 1416: 1090: 1066: 1060: 1053: 984: 937: 874: 867: 726:investigation. 688:Thanks again! 681: 639: 614: 547: 542: 383: 323: 218: 149: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3959: 3957: 3939:Modernponderer 3934: 3931: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3927: 3926: 3925: 3924: 3923: 3913:Dom from Paris 3881:Dom from Paris 3850:Dom from Paris 3820: 3817: 3816: 3815: 3794: 3791: 3763: 3760: 3745: 3744: 3734:Dom from Paris 3715: 3714: 3704:Dom from Paris 3669: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3660: 3650:Dom from Paris 3636:🗣️ Talk to me 3597:🗣️ Talk to me 3582: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3576: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3563:Dom from Paris 3531:Dom from Paris 3478: 3475: 3455: 3448: 3409: 3403: 3383: 3380: 3352:Message added 3350: 3337: 3335: 3332: 3331: 3330: 3320:Dom from Paris 3283: 3277: 3238: 3235: 3232: 3231: 3215: 3214: 3207: 3202: 3200: 3189: 3186: 3185: 3184: 3114: 3111: 3110: 3109: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3095:Dom from Paris 3034:Dom from Paris 3030:WP:IJUSTLIKEIT 3001:If my vote at 2998: 2995: 2958: 2955: 2940: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2923:Dom from Paris 2905:Dom from Paris 2869: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2842:Dom from Paris 2824: 2800:Dom from Paris 2768:Dom from Paris 2736:Dom from Paris 2695:Thank you for 2687: 2685: 2680: 2679: 2677: 2674: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2642: 2609: 2600: 2584: 2582: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2567:Dom from Paris 2532: 2529: 2469: 2466: 2406: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2381:Dom from Paris 2337:Dom from Paris 2320:Dom from Paris 2282:Dom from Paris 2247: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2218:Dom from Paris 2196: 2164:Dom from Paris 2137: 2123: 2077: 2051: 2035:Dom from Paris 2007: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1990:Dom from Paris 1959: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1913: 1912: 1906: 1899:Useful links: 1894:can be revoked 1833: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1814:Dom from Paris 1765:Dom from Paris 1738:. Thank you. 1727: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1681:Dom from Paris 1639:Dom from Paris 1601: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1566:Dom from Paris 1535: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1518:Dom from Paris 1486:Dom from Paris 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1425:Dom from Paris 1389:Dom from Paris 1375:Dom from Paris 1335:Dom from Paris 1302:Dom from Paris 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1257:Dom from Paris 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1184:Dom from Paris 1147:modus operandi 1052: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1019:Dom from Paris 1005:Dom from Paris 983: 978: 977: 976: 975: 974: 964:Dom from Paris 955:WP:POLOUTCOMES 948: 947: 921: 920: 919: 918: 908:Dom from Paris 894:Dom from Paris 890:Bloody Springs 866: 865:Re:FloridaArmy 863: 862: 861: 860: 859: 849:Dom from Paris 801:TrentStudent20 796:TrentStudent20 781:TrentStudent20 777: 776: 775: 774: 764:Dom from Paris 747:TrentStudent20 739: 738: 728:Dom from Paris 720:WP:MEATPUPPETS 716:WP:SOCKPUPPETS 696:TrentStudent20 680: 677: 676: 675: 674: 673: 649:Dom from Paris 613: 610: 579: 578: 568:Dom from Paris 546: 543: 523: 522: 521: 512: 503: 502: 489: 488: 481: 468: 467: 460:if appropriate 450: 449: 435: 434: 416: 415: 406: 405: 385: 384: 382: 381: 374: 367: 359: 356: 355: 354: 353: 348: 343: 338: 330: 329: 325: 324: 322: 321: 315: 314: 309: 303: 302: 296: 295: 290: 284: 283: 277: 276: 271: 266: 260: 259: 253: 252: 246: 243: 242: 236: 235: 229: 228: 219: 217: 214: 213: 212: 211: 210: 209: 208: 198:Dom from Paris 172:Edward Mordake 167:Edward Mordake 160: 159: 144: 143: 132:Dom from Paris 116:Edward Mordake 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3958: 3949: 3948: 3944: 3940: 3932: 3922: 3918: 3914: 3909: 3905: 3904: 3897: 3892: 3891: 3890: 3886: 3882: 3877: 3876: 3874: 3870: 3866: 3861: 3860: 3859: 3855: 3851: 3846: 3845: 3844: 3842: 3838: 3834: 3830: 3824: 3818: 3814: 3810: 3809:North America 3805: 3801: 3797: 3796: 3792: 3790: 3788: 3784: 3780: 3776: 3772: 3761: 3759: 3758: 3754: 3750: 3743: 3739: 3735: 3731: 3730: 3729: 3728: 3724: 3720: 3713: 3709: 3705: 3701: 3700: 3699: 3697: 3693: 3689: 3685: 3681: 3675: 3667: 3659: 3655: 3651: 3647: 3646: 3645: 3641: 3637: 3633: 3632: 3627: 3624: 3623: 3622: 3618: 3617:North America 3613: 3610:(ec) Nb. See 3609: 3608: 3607: 3606: 3602: 3598: 3594: 3593: 3588: 3580: 3572: 3568: 3564: 3560: 3559: 3558: 3555: 3551: 3546: 3542: 3541: 3540: 3536: 3532: 3525: 3520: 3519: 3518: 3517: 3514: 3510: 3504: 3503: 3500: 3496: 3492: 3489: 3485: 3476: 3474: 3473: 3469: 3465: 3461: 3453: 3449: 3447: 3446: 3442: 3438: 3434: 3432: 3428: 3424: 3420: 3415: 3408: 3404: 3402: 3399: 3397: 3393: 3389: 3381: 3379: 3378: 3375: 3373: 3371: 3359: 3355: 3348: 3341: 3333: 3329: 3325: 3321: 3315: 3310: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3304: 3303: 3299: 3298: 3293: 3289: 3282: 3278: 3276: 3274: 3270: 3266: 3262: 3258: 3252: 3248: 3244: 3243:Paulina Rubio 3236: 3230: 3227: 3226: 3224: 3217: 3216: 3212: 3206: 3203: 3198: 3193: 3187: 3182: 3176: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3164: 3160: 3154: 3152: 3148: 3144: 3140: 3136: 3132: 3128: 3122: 3120: 3112: 3104: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3083: 3077: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3066: 3062: 3055: 3048: 3045: 3044: 3043: 3039: 3035: 3031: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3012: 3008: 3004: 2996: 2994: 2993: 2989: 2985: 2981: 2978: 2976: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2956: 2954: 2953: 2950: 2946: 2938: 2932: 2928: 2924: 2920: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2896: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2867: 2851: 2847: 2843: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2833: 2829: 2825: 2823: 2819: 2815: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2791: 2787: 2783: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2773: 2769: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2741: 2737: 2731: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2718: 2714: 2707: 2705: 2699: 2691: 2686: 2684: 2675: 2672: 2670: 2667: 2666: 2664: 2657: 2647: 2643: 2639: 2633: 2627: 2621: 2615: 2610: 2607: 2606: 2605: 2603: 2598: 2596: 2592: 2587: 2580: 2576: 2572: 2568: 2562: 2561:Johnsoniensis 2557: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2550: 2546: 2545:Johnsoniensis 2542: 2538: 2530: 2528: 2527: 2523: 2519: 2516:. Thank you. 2515: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2498: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2483: 2467: 2465: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2453:. Thank you. 2452: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2435: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2421: 2420: 2404: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2375: 2370:I agree with 2369: 2368: 2367: 2362: 2359: 2356: 2355: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2342: 2338: 2334: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2325: 2321: 2316: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2305: 2303: 2298:usernamekiran 2293: 2292: 2291: 2287: 2283: 2277: 2276:Usernamekiran 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2264: 2262: 2257:usernamekiran 2253: 2245: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2197: 2195: 2190: 2187: 2184: 2183: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2113: 2110: 2107: 2106: 2097: 2093: 2089: 2082: 2075: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2066: 2063: 2060: 2059: 2049: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2040: 2036: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2006: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1984: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1957: 1951: 1946: 1944: 1939:usernamekiran 1935: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1910: 1907: 1905: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1897: 1895: 1891: 1887: 1879: 1875: 1871: 1866: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1851:extendedmover 1847: 1838: 1831: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1809: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1789: 1786: 1781: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1760: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1737: 1733: 1725: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1699: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1673: 1669: 1668: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1629: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1609:accordingly.- 1607: 1599: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1571: 1567: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1555: 1552: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1533: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1464: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1420: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1371:Newell Spicer 1368: 1367: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1143: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1125: 1121: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1073: 1065: 1058: 1050: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1003: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 993: 989: 982: 979: 973: 969: 965: 960: 959:WP:INTERVIEWS 956: 952: 951: 950: 949: 946: 942: 941: 940: 932: 928: 923: 922: 917: 913: 909: 905: 904: 903: 899: 895: 891: 886: 885: 884: 883: 879: 878: 877: 864: 858: 854: 850: 845: 844: 843: 842: 841: 839: 835: 831: 827: 823: 816: 815: 811: 807: 806:209.52.88.135 802: 797: 791: 790: 786: 782: 773: 769: 765: 761: 760: 759: 758: 757: 756: 752: 748: 743: 737: 733: 729: 725: 721: 717: 713: 712: 711: 709: 705: 701: 697: 693: 686: 678: 672: 668: 664: 660: 659: 658: 654: 650: 643: 638: 637: 636: 635: 631: 627: 623: 619: 611: 609: 607: 603: 599: 595: 591: 585: 577: 573: 569: 564: 563: 562: 561: 557: 553: 552:Rohanupalekar 544: 541: 537: 533: 528: 519: 518: 513: 510: 509: 508: 507: 500: 496: 495: 494: 493: 486: 482: 479: 475: 474: 473: 472: 465: 461: 457: 456: 455: 454: 447: 446:move to draft 442: 441: 440: 439: 432: 428: 424: 423: 422: 420: 419:Backlog drive 413: 412: 411: 410: 409:Deletion tags 402: 398: 395: 394: 393: 391: 380: 375: 373: 368: 366: 361: 360: 358: 357: 352: 349: 347: 344: 342: 339: 337: 334: 333: 332: 331: 326: 320: 317: 316: 313: 310: 308: 305: 304: 301: 298: 297: 294: 291: 289: 286: 285: 282: 279: 278: 275: 272: 270: 267: 265: 262: 261: 258: 255: 254: 251: 248: 247: 245: 244: 241: 237: 234: 230: 227: 223: 215: 207: 203: 199: 194: 189: 188: 186: 182: 178: 173: 168: 164: 163: 162: 161: 158: 155: 152: 146: 145: 141: 137: 133: 128: 127: 126: 125: 121: 117: 113: 105: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3936: 3902: 3829:WP: Hounding 3825: 3822: 3799: 3775:Renee Glover 3769:— Preceding 3765: 3746: 3716: 3678:— Preceding 3671: 3584: 3505: 3487: 3483: 3480: 3457: 3435:Thank you. 3417: 3411: 3400: 3385: 3369: 3363: 3301: 3296: 3291: 3285: 3255:— Preceding 3240: 3220: 3219: 3204: 3155: 3123: 3117:In regards: 3116: 3081: 3046: 3000: 2982: 2979: 2960: 2949:Jamesmcardle 2942: 2871: 2828:Gerda Arendt 2814:Gerda Arendt 2786:Gerda Arendt 2754:Gerda Arendt 2730:Gerda Arendt 2713:Gerda Arendt 2710: 2694: 2682: 2681: 2660: 2659: 2652: 2645: 2601: 2599: 2594: 2590: 2588: 2585: 2534: 2499: 2480: 2478: 2436: 2417: 2415: 2353: 2301: 2260: 2249: 2181: 2104: 2081:WP:ABOUTSELF 2057: 2009: 1965: 1964: 1961: 1942: 1917:TonyBallioni 1914: 1898: 1867: 1855:moving pages 1842: 1740: 1736:my talk page 1729: 1635:WP:BOOMERANG 1606:WP: Hounding 1604:Please note 1603: 1584:CaroleHenson 1550: 1539: 1537: 1502: 1501: 1483: 1453: 1452: 1439:CaroleHenson 1419:CaroleHenson 1404:CaroleHenson 1357:CaroleHenson 1321:CaroleHenson 1299: 1271:CaroleHenson 1224:CaroleHenson 1169:CaroleHenson 1151:CaroleHenson 1146: 1123: 1120:CaroleHenson 1107:CaroleHenson 1077:CaroleHenson 1071: 1054: 985: 935: 934: 931:Lizzie Doron 872: 871: 868: 820:— Preceding 817: 792: 778: 740: 690:— Preceding 682: 615: 588:— Preceding 580: 548: 517:The Signpost 516: 505: 504: 491: 490: 470: 469: 459: 452: 451: 437: 436: 430: 418: 417: 408: 407: 389: 388: 109: 78: 43: 37: 3423:WP:REDIRECT 3294:Thank you. 3179:In regards: 2967:WP:CREATIVE 2374:SMcCandlish 2354:SMcCandlish 2182:SMcCandlish 2105:SMcCandlish 2058:SMcCandlish 1861:, and move 1698:WP: CRYSTAL 779:Thank you! 624:. Thanks. 492:Not English 319:Web content 193:WP:PAIDTALK 150:Doug Weller 36:This is an 3933:An apology 3800:guidelines 3674:WP:GEOFEAT 3550:...William 3509:...William 3495:...William 3356:. You can 3261:PauPower21 3175:Domdeparis 3139:Gladiators 2726:Thank you 1780:Domdeparis 1142:Exemplo347 1129:Exemplo347 1093:Exemplo347 594:Yogesh dol 438:Editathons 226:Notability 3554:the roof? 3524:WilliamJE 3513:the roof? 3499:the roof? 3091:WP:NMUSIC 2939:Thank you 2246:a request 2011:This edit 1402:through.– 1349:this list 826:Trentprof 250:Academics 98:Archive 9 90:Archive 7 85:Archive 6 79:Archive 5 73:Archive 4 68:Archive 3 60:Archive 1 3819:Hounding 3783:contribs 3771:unsigned 3692:contribs 3680:unsigned 3464:BHoepner 3334:Talkback 3269:contribs 3257:unsigned 3087:User:Deb 3076:Jax 0677 3061:Jax 0677 3015:Jax 0677 2676:Precious 2315:WP:NFILM 1863:subpages 1859:redirect 1808:SamHolt6 1793:SamHolt6 1788:20 Weeks 1759:SamHolt6 1742:SamHolt6 1732:20 Weeks 1580:RHaworth 1554:contribs 1544:RHaworth 1051:FA edits 834:contribs 822:unsigned 704:contribs 692:unsigned 602:contribs 590:unsigned 499:WP:NPPNE 401:the feed 397:WP:ACREQ 328:See also 3875:BC1278 3843:BC1278 3437:Shirt58 3159:Wiki nV 3151:Dragons 3147:Dynasty 3131:Outlaws 2984:Stussll 2094:, and 1846:granted 1672:WP:PAID 1667:BC1278 1621:BC1278 1099:, and 1064:dubious 685:Cogewea 464:WP:COIN 390:ACTRIAL 293:Numbers 187:BC1278 39:archive 3908:WP:AFC 3896:BC1278 3865:BC1278 3833:BC1278 3427:WP:RFD 3251:iTunes 3149:, and 3127:Mayhem 3047:Reply 2895:JongHN 2878:JongHN 2302:(talk) 2261:(talk) 2201:Jytdog 2141:Jytdog 2127:Jytdog 2092:BC1278 2088:Jytdog 2019:Jytdog 2015:WP:SYN 2005:WP:SYN 1943:(talk) 1934:WP:PGM 1713:BC1278 1703:BC1278 1657:BC1278 1628:BC1278 1611:BC1278 1540:should 1101:Sitush 724:WP:SPI 663:Jytdog 642:Jytdog 626:Jytdog 618:WP:FOC 478:BEFORE 427:WT:NPR 307:People 269:Events 177:BC1278 3431:WP:G4 3314:SoWhy 3143:Shock 2752:;) -- 2160:WP:OR 1849:the " 1677:WP:OR 1163:FYI, 1124:still 288:Music 274:Films 264:Books 16:< 3943:talk 3917:talk 3885:talk 3869:talk 3854:talk 3837:talk 3823:Hi, 3779:talk 3753:talk 3738:talk 3723:talk 3708:talk 3688:talk 3654:talk 3631:Tyw7 3592:Tyw7 3567:talk 3535:talk 3468:talk 3441:talk 3324:talk 3265:talk 3163:talk 3135:Fuel 3099:talk 3065:talk 3054:ping 3038:talk 3019:talk 3009:and 2988:talk 2927:talk 2909:talk 2882:talk 2846:talk 2832:talk 2818:talk 2804:talk 2790:talk 2772:talk 2758:talk 2740:talk 2717:talk 2656:here 2595:4000 2591:2900 2571:talk 2549:talk 2522:talk 2459:talk 2385:talk 2341:talk 2324:talk 2286:talk 2222:talk 2205:talk 2168:talk 2145:talk 2131:talk 2039:talk 2023:talk 1994:talk 1968:EDDY 1921:talk 1818:talk 1797:talk 1769:talk 1746:talk 1707:talk 1685:talk 1661:talk 1643:talk 1615:talk 1588:talk 1570:talk 1548:talk 1522:talk 1505:EDDY 1490:talk 1456:EDDY 1443:talk 1429:talk 1408:talk 1393:talk 1379:talk 1361:talk 1339:talk 1325:talk 1317:this 1306:talk 1275:talk 1261:talk 1243:talk 1228:talk 1188:talk 1173:talk 1155:talk 1133:talk 1111:talk 1081:talk 1057:user 1037:talk 1023:talk 1009:talk 992:talk 968:talk 938:EDDY 912:talk 898:talk 875:EDDY 853:talk 830:talk 810:talk 785:talk 768:talk 751:talk 732:talk 700:talk 667:talk 653:talk 630:talk 598:talk 572:talk 556:talk 536:talk 527:here 506:News 431:NOTE 202:talk 181:talk 154:talk 136:talk 120:talk 110:See 3762:COI 3370:WBG 3302:Why 2997:AFD 2891:Hi 2654:Go 2363:😼 2191:😼 2114:😼 2067:😼 1755:Hi 1239:Deb 1097:Deb 1072:few 1033:Deb 988:Deb 718:or 525:Go 421:: 106:ANI 3945:) 3919:) 3887:) 3871:) 3856:) 3839:) 3806:. 3785:) 3781:• 3755:) 3740:) 3725:) 3710:) 3694:) 3690:• 3656:) 3642:) 3638:• 3603:) 3599:• 3569:) 3537:) 3470:) 3443:) 3326:) 3297:So 3271:) 3267:• 3165:) 3153:. 3145:, 3141:, 3137:, 3133:, 3129:, 3101:) 3067:) 3057:}} 3051:{{ 3040:) 3021:) 3005:, 2990:) 2971:2) 2929:) 2921:. 2911:) 2884:) 2848:) 2834:) 2820:) 2806:) 2792:) 2774:) 2760:) 2742:) 2719:) 2711:-- 2706:! 2635:, 2629:, 2623:, 2573:) 2551:) 2524:) 2497:. 2461:) 2434:. 2387:) 2351:— 2343:) 2326:) 2288:) 2224:) 2207:) 2179:— 2170:) 2162:. 2147:) 2133:) 2102:— 2090:, 2076:is 2055:— 2041:) 2025:) 1996:) 1973:~ 1923:) 1896:. 1820:) 1799:) 1771:) 1748:) 1709:) 1687:) 1679:? 1663:) 1645:) 1617:) 1590:) 1572:) 1556:) 1524:) 1510:~ 1492:) 1461:~ 1445:) 1431:) 1410:) 1395:) 1381:) 1363:) 1355:.– 1341:) 1327:) 1308:) 1277:) 1263:) 1245:) 1230:) 1190:) 1175:) 1157:) 1135:) 1113:) 1095:, 1083:) 1067:}} 1061:{{ 1039:) 1025:) 1011:) 994:) 970:) 943:~ 914:) 900:) 892:. 880:~ 855:) 836:) 832:• 812:) 787:) 770:) 753:) 734:) 706:) 702:• 669:) 655:) 632:) 604:) 600:• 574:) 558:) 538:) 392:: 204:) 183:) 138:) 122:) 114:. 94:→ 64:← 3941:( 3915:( 3898:: 3894:@ 3883:( 3867:( 3852:( 3835:( 3777:( 3751:( 3736:( 3721:( 3706:( 3686:( 3652:( 3634:( 3595:( 3565:( 3533:( 3526:: 3522:@ 3466:( 3454:. 3439:( 3366:∯ 3349:. 3322:( 3316:: 3312:@ 3263:( 3177:: 3173:@ 3161:( 3097:( 3078:: 3074:@ 3063:( 3036:( 3017:( 2986:( 2925:( 2907:( 2897:: 2893:@ 2880:( 2844:( 2830:( 2816:( 2802:( 2788:( 2770:( 2756:( 2738:( 2732:: 2728:@ 2715:( 2648:. 2641:. 2569:( 2563:: 2559:@ 2547:( 2520:( 2457:( 2383:( 2376:: 2372:@ 2361:¢ 2358:☏ 2339:( 2322:( 2295:— 2284:( 2278:: 2274:@ 2220:( 2203:( 2189:¢ 2186:☏ 2166:( 2143:( 2129:( 2112:¢ 2109:☏ 2098:: 2086:@ 2065:¢ 2062:☏ 2037:( 2021:( 1992:( 1985:: 1981:@ 1963:~ 1919:( 1816:( 1810:: 1806:@ 1795:( 1782:: 1778:@ 1767:( 1761:: 1757:@ 1744:( 1705:( 1683:( 1659:( 1641:( 1630:: 1626:@ 1613:( 1586:( 1568:( 1551:· 1546:( 1520:( 1500:~ 1488:( 1441:( 1427:( 1421:: 1417:@ 1406:( 1391:( 1377:( 1359:( 1337:( 1323:( 1304:( 1273:( 1259:( 1241:( 1226:( 1186:( 1171:( 1153:( 1131:( 1109:( 1103:: 1091:@ 1079:( 1035:( 1021:( 1007:( 990:( 966:( 910:( 896:( 851:( 828:( 808:( 783:( 766:( 749:( 730:( 698:( 665:( 651:( 644:: 640:@ 628:( 596:( 570:( 554:( 534:( 487:. 444:' 378:e 371:t 364:v 200:( 179:( 134:( 118:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index