551:
the slightest about my name. Not in the least. And why would they? The slang donkey punch comes from the phrase donkey punch which comes from people who grew up around donkeys and lived in fear of a spine snapping backwards donkey kick (also known as a donkey punch). I can say donkey punch in church back home no problem. The name is a childhood joke that had nothing untoward associated with it till I was instabanished. The only time when a username can be instabanished per
Knowledge:Usernames for administrator attention is for obvious and serious violations only. Furthermore wiki policy is to "Give constructive users a chance. Except in extreme cases, when an editor has an obvious username violation but is otherwise constructive, give them a chance to change or abandon their name before blocking. We do not want to drive promising editors away." I came home drunk one night and made a few stupid edits and apologized and the other user said it was ok but maybe don't do that and I thanked the user and that was that. One time. Other than that I contributed. Citations, typos, I had even started doing a few edits patrolling the recent changes page and was trying to get more involved doing the not so much fun work. But I shouldn't have made those edits. I'm sorry. I can apologize to the other user again if you'd like. Anyways, back to the WP:BADNAME we don't consider leaving well enough alone. We don't talk to the user. We don't request a comment. We don't assume the slightest of glimpses of good faith, and in fact we act very much in bad faith, and we not only banish the user but we block his ip from so much as creating a new account for a week. So I make a new account. The other accounts have a total of one main space edit and it was fine. And clearly I should've revealed that I was in fact DPR (btw the initial RFC I did on Trump/Demagogue is a great example about how no one cared or even noticed that username ... other great examples include everything else ever related to that account) but I was a little bit salty and having learned the rules are actually pretty bendy I couldn't resist taking my shiny new username out for a spin. And I didn't do anything that shouldn't have happened anyways. Today is a perfect example of a growing problem in wikiworld. Increasingly admins and long time editors are using wikipedia in destructive ways. Obliterating potential contributors and anyone else who can't hang with their writings on reality. All leading to a more insular project with less diversity and Dunning-Krugered consensuses. User:Srich32977, an all time top tier editor, is called out for an egregious policy violation, he then lays out some of that sweet sweet sanctimonious duplicity about the importance of following wikipedia policy. Tasty. He doubles down on the violation, boldly going for the coverup and shuts down the investigation. Parties over kids. You'll just have to find another way. So anyways I spend a few hours putting together an RFC and comment as thoughtfully as I can and no sooner do I finish than I find out User:Srich32977 put the secret police on me and I've been banned again. These Sanctimonious. Duplicitous. Biters. DonkeyPunchResin (talk) 21:03, 24 January 2021 (UTC)talk]]
654:
never been an issue. The alleged offensive or disruptive (i'm not sure what category of banned names this falls under nor am I aware of the logic that would tie my name to that category) aspect of the username is not clear on the face of the username but rather is only understood if one is aware of a certain dirty joke which is only known to a small percentage of the population. That same population being nearly completely comprised of people who also do not take offense from that joke. Probably why there had never been an issue. Anyways, I'd simply suggest we do this the proper way. I'd suggest we've all wasted enough time stemming from that admin's rash decision. Thank you for your consideration.
102:
66:
294:
714:
453:
23:
327:
650:? I'd be happy to provide some more insight on that but not in public. I think I know the basics of what Checkuser does but I'm confused as to why it matters in the way you mean it in your response. I was trying to explain the (in my mind) absurdity of the sockpuppetry block and I read your response as right ... you're blocked because of sockpuppetry
653:
The decline reason was because I didn't address the username issue that got me blocked originally. Would you agree that my username shouldn't have been blocked without affording me any opportunity to reply? "UAA is for obvious and serious violations only." My account was 2+ years old and there had
609:
In other words I was forced to get another account and now the same rule enforcement organization that made me get a new account are accusing me of having made that new account for sockpuppetry. I’m banned over allegations an account I did not want to create is a sockpuppet by the very same people
550:
I am blown away. Hear me out. DonkeyPunchResin was my account. The name didn't fit into any of the categories of disruptive or offensive usernames when I made it and years later it still didn't as evidenced by that fact that in the two or three years I had that account not a single editor cared in
356:
account (unless approved for such purposes)); be offensive or otherwise disruptive. However, a username that contains the name of a organization and also identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at
WidgetsUSA", or “FoobarFan87" is allowed, though, among others, the
344:
You are welcome to continue editing after you have selected a new username that meets the username policy guidelines, which are summarized below.Per the username policy, a username should represent an
686:. I doubt very much that such a request would be successful given that you stated socking shortly after your block, and created a number of sleeper accounts as soon as your sock was taken to ANI.
682:. The name issue is now irrelevant. And yes, when you are indefinitely blocked on an account you are not allowed to create new account. If you want to request an unblock you must do so on
402:
below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" from their talk page.
249:
Let me refresh you. Upon noticing that I made a small mistake, BMK started name calling, addressing me, as if I was a naughty kid and even proceeded with threats of banning me: "
606:
DPR was instabanned for name so I made SDB. SDB was instabanned for sockpuppetry. I appealed the SDB ban and it was denied on the grounds that I needed to appeal this ban.
43:
302:
298:
603:
To maybe help put in context how irregular this is - this will be the first (and maybe the only) time I have had an opportunity to speak on any of these issues.
750:
493:
145:
596:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
144:
169:
168:
because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion
801:
793:
745:
541:
After insulting and red herringing me the admin told me to make my request from this account as this saga takes a turn towards the
Kafkaesque.
488:
788:
581:
425:
352:
represent a group or organization; be promotional; be misleading (such as indicating possession of special user rights or being a
538:
Can you plead entrapment to a charge of sockpuppetry if you only have a new account due to having been improperly instabanished?
764:
507:
311:
106:
265:" And all this fuss instead of a simple, friendly remark and maybe even a peaceful explanation of my error. After all:
429:
381:
465:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
74:
35:
466:
366:
337:
118:
260:
721:
683:
460:
371:
110:
78:
39:
376:
278:
408:
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use. Therefore, please check the list
655:
611:
567:
471:
405:
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a change of name request.
647:
626:
409:
393:
256:
212:
274:
157:
126:
86:
55:
47:
625:
Right... this is a CU block. Just to save anyone else from having to check this, the master is
679:
547:
For continuities sake I’m copying and pasting my response from the account I made after this.
165:
741:
691:
634:
590:
563:
435:
282:
646:
thank you for replying. Was I banned from editing
Knowledge for the rest of my life after
362:
353:
208:
172:. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to
101:
787:
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the
358:
306:
252:
202:
196:
122:
82:
51:
27:
38:. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
185:
65:
813:
695:
687:
663:
643:
638:
630:
619:
571:
446:
315:
243:
out and instead of making funny(?), unrelated comments, please, get back to the
216:
130:
90:
59:
31:
810:
671:
443:
365:
are relevant.You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our
332:
Your account has been blocked from editing
Knowledge because your username,
251:
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to
Knowledge, as you did at
259:
and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your
81:
and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --
629:, and that account was created more than two years before this one was.
301:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
263:. Repeated vandalism may result in the of editing privileges. Thank you.
22:
724:
has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.
562:
Doesn't address the username issue that got you blocked originally. —
114:
70:
191:
46:. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
670:
You are wasting your time and our time. The original block by
269:. So, think deep, if it is really I, who has a problem with a
791:, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the
30:. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
712:
451:
325:
804:
that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
720:
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an
578:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
598:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
42:
and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the
778:
774:
768:
759:
755:
737:
733:
729:
544:
Check my edits please. That’s all I ask. I contribute.
521:
517:
511:
502:
498:
484:
480:
476:
379:
to carry over under a new name, then you may request a
174:
199:. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
459:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
428:
you believe you were blocked in error, then you may
342:
Your username is the principal reason for the block.
69:Please do not add or change content, as you did at
800:Please note that there could be appeals to the
299:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
173:
8:
189:, and this notification was delivered by
375:. Alternatively, if you wish for your
161:
7:
297:There is currently a discussion at
273:. Best wishes, always yours, etc.
255:. Your edits appear to constitute
77:. Please review the guidelines at
14:
239:Thank you. Now you take your own
676:but it is now a check user block
292:
156:! The thread you created at the
143:
100:
64:
21:
416:to requesting a change of name.
235:Your comment on BMK's user page
610:who made me get that account.
1:
802:unblock ticket request system
794:Unblock Ticket Request System
447:17:35, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
316:16:52, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
283:13:30, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
207:here on your user talk page.
136:Your thread has been archived
814:21:33, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
696:21:27, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
664:14:16, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
639:05:11, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
620:04:43, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
572:07:46, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
363:paid-contribution disclosure
217:19:00, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
463:, who declined the request.
372:create the account yourself
131:23:52, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
111:unsourced or poorly sourced
34:, but you didn't provide a
829:
674:was for a name violation,
412:to see if a name is taken
141:
44:tutorial on citing sources
789:guide to appealing blocks
582:guide to appealing blocks
426:guide to appealing blocks
234:
183:The archival was done by
109:. If you continue to add
91:14:31, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
708:Talk page access revoked
684:User talk:SammySmith8765
659:
615:
79:Knowledge:Citing sources
60:22:00, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
113:content, as you did at
717:
456:
424:If, after reading the
398:your new username here
377:existing contributions
330:
186:Lowercase sigmabot III
765:change block settings
716:
508:change block settings
455:
329:
303:User:DonkeyPunchResin
359:conflict of interest
336:, does not meet our
119:blocked from editing
648:user:SammySmith8765
627:user:SammySmith8765
440:below this notice.
438:|Your reason here}}
267:Errare humanum est!
175:create a new thread
73:, without citing a
718:
680:user: TonyBallioni
457:
382:change in username
361:and the policy of
331:
197:automated accounts
158:Knowledge:Teahouse
107:disruptive editing
40:include a citation
805:
430:appeal this block
229:
228:
223:
219:
205:|deny=Muninnbot}}
162:Blue edit history
105:Please stop your
820:
799:
784:
782:
771:
756:abuse filter log
753:
751:deleted contribs
715:
656:DonkeyPunchResin
612:DonkeyPunchResin
595:
589:
527:
525:
514:
496:
494:deleted contribs
472:DonkeyPunchResin
454:
439:
401:
334:DonkeyPunchResin
328:
296:
295:
222:
206:
194:
188:
182:
177:
154:DonkeyPunchResin
147:
140:
139:
104:
68:
50:. Thank you. --
25:
828:
827:
823:
822:
821:
819:
818:
817:
808:
772:
762:
748:
727:
713:
710:
601:
593:
587:
586:, then use the
575:
553:
515:
505:
491:
474:
467:blocking policy
452:
441:
433:
391:
369:guidelines and
367:username policy
338:username policy
326:
323:
314:
293:
290:
237:
225:
224:
200:
190:
184:
138:
98:
75:reliable source
36:reliable source
19:
12:
11:
5:
826:
824:
798:
786:
711:
709:
706:
705:
704:
703:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
651:
576:
560:
556:Decline reason
536:
532:Request reason
529:
450:
420:
419:
418:
417:
406:
403:
324:
322:
319:
310:
289:
286:
248:
245:original issue
236:
233:
231:
227:
226:
221:
181:
150:
148:
137:
134:
97:
94:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
825:
816:
815:
812:
807:
803:
796:
795:
790:
785:
780:
776:
770:
766:
761:
757:
752:
747:
743:
739:
738:global blocks
735:
734:active blocks
731:
725:
723:
722:administrator
707:
697:
693:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
669:
668:
667:
666:
665:
661:
657:
652:
649:
645:
642:
641:
640:
636:
632:
628:
624:
623:
622:
621:
617:
613:
607:
604:
600:
599:
592:
585:
583:
574:
573:
569:
565:
559:
557:
552:
548:
545:
542:
539:
535:
533:
528:
523:
519:
513:
509:
504:
500:
495:
490:
486:
485:global blocks
482:
481:active blocks
478:
473:
468:
464:
462:
461:administrator
449:
448:
445:
437:
431:
427:
423:
415:
411:
407:
404:
399:
395:
389:
388:
387:
386:
384:
383:
378:
374:
373:
368:
364:
360:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
321:December 2020
320:
318:
317:
313:
308:
305:. Thank you.
304:
300:
287:
285:
284:
280:
276:
275:Space Veteran
272:
268:
264:
262:
258:
254:
253:German Empire
246:
242:
232:
220:
218:
214:
210:
204:
198:
193:
187:
179:
176:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
149:
146:
142:
135:
133:
132:
128:
124:
120:
117:, you may be
116:
112:
108:
103:
95:
93:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
67:
62:
61:
57:
53:
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
29:
24:
16:
809:
806:
792:
760:creation log
726:
719:
675:
608:
605:
602:
597:
579:
577:
561:
555:
554:
549:
546:
543:
540:
537:
531:
530:
503:creation log
470:
458:
442:
421:
413:
397:
380:
370:
357:guidance on
349:
345:
341:
333:
291:
270:
266:
250:
244:
240:
238:
230:
180:
153:
151:
99:
96:October 2020
63:
48:my talk page
20:
564:Daniel Case
350:should not:
164:, has been
32:Nihal Sarin
26:Hello, I'm
742:autoblocks
672:user: El C
499:filter log
432:by adding
394:unblock-un
346:individual
775:checkuser
730:block log
580:read the
518:checkuser
477:block log
257:vandalism
209:Muninnbot
192:Muninnbot
17:July 2020
746:contribs
489:contribs
422:Appeals:
307:Levivich
166:archived
123:SubSeven
83:SubSeven
52:SubSeven
28:SubSeven
769:unblock
591:unblock
512:unblock
436:unblock
390:Adding
271:tampoon
261:sandbox
241:tampoon
195:, both
688:Meters
644:Meters
631:Meters
115:NHL 94
71:NHL 94
584:first
414:prior
354:”Bot"
312:hound
121:. --
811:El_C
692:talk
660:talk
635:talk
616:talk
568:talk
444:El_C
410:here
385:by:
348:and
279:talk
213:talk
203:bots
170:here
127:talk
87:talk
56:talk
779:log
678:by
522:log
469:).
288:ANI
152:Hi
797:.
783:)
773:•
767:•
763:•
758:•
754:•
749:•
744:•
740:•
736:•
732:•
694:)
662:)
637:)
618:)
594:}}
588:{{
570:)
558::
534::
516:•
510:•
506:•
501:•
497:•
492:•
487:•
483:•
479:•
434:{{
400:}}
392:{{
340:.
281:)
247:.
215:)
201:{{
178:.
160:,
129:)
89:)
58:)
781:)
777:(
728:(
690:(
658:(
633:(
614:(
566:(
526:)
524:)
520:(
475:(
396:|
309:/
277:(
211:(
125:(
85:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
