User talk:Dobbyelf62 - Knowledge (XXG)

805: 294: 34: 584: 489: 269:

back then. Seeing that the article is in stable condition right now (it has not experienced significant revisions since mid December), it's certainly worthwhile to submit it for GA review now. If the article falls short, then there will be opportunities to take that feedback and make additional improvements. I agree that the article should be reviewed with a set of fresh eyes.

1133: 244:

that, for the ALT3 hook which mentions the miner's strike, if it were as I suggested to run on March 6, the 40th anniversary of the miner's strike beginning, which as I said will probably generate some coverage in the British media and thus increase interest in the hook, it might be better to take it

268:

It's nice to hear from you again! I was on a wikibreak over the past week, so I'm just getting to this message now. My experiences with GA nominations are largely confined to a failed attempt of an article I significantly contributed back to 2019, and the article was quickly reviewed (and rejected)

252:

Do you think there's time to nominate it, get it reviewed and promoted, and then through DYK? I don't know what the turnover is with song GA noms ... it seems that noms about, say, Taylor Swift or Meghan Trainor songs are getting reviewed quickly, but I don't know about 40-year-old Sting songs. And

195:

page, and the rules do not prohibit editors of the articles from assessing unless the rating is GA status or higher. If a dispute arises over an assessment, then the details can be hashed out in the talk page, but this has yet to happen to me. I generally base my ratings on other articles with

248:

I admit I'm thinking about this more and more since no one's reviewed the nom in the almost-month since I made it. As I indicated, back in December it mattered less since I had plenty of hooks, but now, with that date just over two months away ... it might have just enough time to work.

1039:

Thanks for reaching out. Generally, user-generated content is discouraged on Knowledge (XXG), so none of the aforementioned sources would work. If you can find a professional music review that highlights the optimistic lyrics, I would be willing to look at it.

836:

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant

321: 79: 1005:

Thanks for the feedback. I looked at Popcornfud's essay for the rationale behind removing false titles and found it reasonable enough. For all future articles I create, I'll attempt to abide by this rule.

548: 1031:

I feel that if the previous paragraph discusses former husband John McVie didn't know Christine McVie's lyrics were about him, some lyrics should be included to illustrate the song's direction. Thanks.

1160:

error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (

63:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 48: 608:

backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing 14,300 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – –

532: 272:

As for the DYK queue, I have yet to make any submissions, but it appears that March 6th is the best chance for the ALT3 hook to be featured given the timeliness of the miner's strike.

328: 826: 551:

after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

214:

Nevertheless, I still feel editors who contribute most of the content to an article should leave the assessment beyond start-class to others. It just looks better.

601: 298: 176:. I work under the general understanding, the custom it seems, that if you create an article you can't—and shouldn't—really rate it any higher than start-class. 526: 990:

I appreciate your contribution here. I think a lot of editors would just reinstate the false title, but you managed to find an improvement there. Thank you.

1028:

There are several sources for song lyrics, other than YouTube. Can you suggest one? I see lyrics.com , azlyrics.com , musixmatch.com , genius.com

400: 496: 102: 453: 862: 825:. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been 1022: 669: 98: 430: 192: 72: 1061: 984: 21: 17: 1157: 821:

to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the

866: 830: 876: 340: 635: 84: 846: 253:

I'd like it to be reviewed by someone with the freshest eyes possible, i.e., who hasn't worked on it even a little.

552: 538: 344: 818: 1095: 1185: 1149: 1125: 838: 415:

Hi Dobbyelf, nice work on your new article. I would recommend including it in relevant Wikiprojects. Good job!

60: 1145: 873: 535:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 336: 995: 892: 858: 829:

on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of

521: 508: 233: 197: 200:" was more comparable to C class and even B class, but I instead opted for the more conservative option. 616: 501: 258: 219: 181: 513:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 923: 822: 565: 1049: 869:

yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

42: 1181: 1137: 737: 850: 56: 917: 353: 861:

can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Knowledge (XXG)'s

605: 600:

This award is given in recognition to Dobbyelf62 for collecting more than 25 points during the

1114: 1080: 991: 974: 940: 854: 790: 756: 722: 688: 654: 472: 385: 159: 123: 842: 68: 609: 516: 366: 306: 254: 215: 177: 91: 408: 71:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 64: 1041: 1007: 771: 561: 273: 201: 888:

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

119:

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

804: 245:

out of the DYK queue and nominate it for GA since that way it would be fresher by then.

1173: 703: 136: 1099: 959: 902: 349: 1110: 1106: 1076: 1072: 970: 966: 936: 932: 906: 786: 782: 752: 748: 718: 714: 684: 680: 650: 646: 468: 464: 381: 377: 155: 151: 525:" because he felt that "the case for coal was never put to the nation" during the 33: 488: 437: 404: 302: 129: 583: 1172:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

955: 910: 898: 673: 542: 1065: 872:

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing!

1189: 1118: 1084: 1015: 999: 978: 944: 878: 794: 760: 726: 692: 658: 621: 569: 476: 442: 389: 320:

Welcome, welcome, welcome Dobbyelf62! I'm glad that you are joining the

310: 281: 262: 223: 209: 185: 163: 106: 75:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

370: 301:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

52:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

575:

February 2024 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award

457: 142: 853:

to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as

775: 707: 1094: