User talk:EGMichaels - Knowledge (XXG)

2356:

very heart of their religious celebrations. These stories about Ninurta and Asag, Marduk and Tiamat, Baal and Yamm, did not serve to entertain the people, nor did they serve merely to explain how the creation originated. The adherents of these myths believed that by myth (word) and by ritual (act) they could reenact these myths in order to sustain the creation. Life, order, and society, depended on the faithful celebration of the ritual connected with the myth. ... The Near East creation myths are stories about numerous gods and goddesses personifying cosmic spaces or forces in nature. They are nature deities. The "pagan" mind did not distinguish spirit from matter. For them all of nature consisted of personalities combining divine spirit and cosmic matter in an eternal coexistence. Thus the sun was a god and the moon was a god. Even Akhenaten, the so-called first monotheist, never conceived of Aten, the sun god, any differently. He distinguished himself by selecting only one force of nature and, of course, never could find a following. ... Yahweh, the God of Israel, did not consist of the forces of nature but stood majestically transcendent above them. He fought for Israel. He compelled these high gods of Canaan to hide their faces at noonday.

2016:"Genesis creation myth" is not an article, it's one of Knowledge (XXG)'s most famous propaganda pieces, that is dominated by a few editors with a strong POV to push. Knowledge (XXG) sure isn't a democracy, in fact it looks more like an oligarchy since members of this cadre have repeatedly stated that any proportion of editors opposing them would make no difference to them imposing their philosophy. Obviously I would be confortable with any of the proposed alternatives since "myth" has a lengthy documented history of being applied by various governments as a polemical attack word, particularly by Marxists, against ideas they wish to suppress, or wish would suddenly go way. But rather than accomplish this on wikipedia, it just gets a lot of people's blood boiling, which must be their intent since it gives them so much obvious satisfaction. It's a pity wikipedia had to be used for something so far from its intended purpose and stated goals. But they will eventually have to come to terms with the fact that they must always share wikipedia with people of all stripes, and can never impose some artificial unity of pov that only exists in their own minds. 2339:. It isn't unreasonable for a reader uninformed about the formal definition of creation myth to conclude that if Genesis is a myth, then so is the rest of the Hebrew Bible, the Christian New Testament, the Logos, etc. To me, this greatly increases the significance of this whole discussion and debate. I think of the number of school children who, from the time that they're able to read, either browse Knowledge (XXG) or are assigned research on Knowledge (XXG) for a graded project. Does anyone genuinely expect them to know the formal definition of creation myth? Even if they do, is it reasonable to expect elementary and middle school kids to cognitively process this distinction correctly, and incorporate into their reading paradigm, this technicality? For those from religious families, how are they likely to be affected by myth? 2278:

literary/technical definition of a creation myth. While I personally regret the choice of words "creation myth," there's nothing I can do about that. I just don't want that phrase to overwhelm the reader either at the title level, or the first paragraph level. I hardly need to tell you that there is considerable scholarly literature which acknowledges that the first and most prominent definition of the word "myth" is fictitious, imaginary, fable. The literature clearly acknowledges that the term is therefore offensive to people who take their Judeo-Christian heritage or convictions seriously. There is no need to enshroud "myth" in red flashing neon lights in the title and lead paragraph before more gently and diplomatically introducing the phrase "creation myth." But I do concur that it needs to be introduced.

2123:"Story" seems neutral. "Account" seems neutral. Even "account" is in the first sentence! Instead of "the Genesis myth is an account that" why not just say, "the Genesis account says that..."? Why not? Because "myth" is really NOT intended to mean "account." I'll go on the record (again) and say that "myth" doesn't personally bother me at all. But it does concern me as a Knowledge (XXG) editor. We should make our articles accessible to other editors and readers alike. While there is certainly a need to present the scholastic views of this account as "myth", it is inappropriate to make the entire article into that one detail. 590: 2389:

should be replaced. My PERSONAL sensibilities aren't offended in the least. I like all narratives to be mythically constructed, and strive to do so in my own writing. But as a Knowledge (XXG) editor, I know when to show consideration to audiences. I'm well aware that I like "myth" because I'm a bit of a loon that way. Joseph Campbell is a bit fringe in his bliss about the word, and I've caught some of that infection. But that's not what anyone else here means by "myth" and I'm no idiot :-). So... "story" perhaps. We'll see what we all come up with (we includes the "myth" folks too).

2332:, which is hardly NPOV, and more like POV pushing. Another sentence I edited in and was immediately reverted: "Jews and Christians consider the text religious authority in varying degrees, and interpretations range from figurative or metaphorical to it being reliably literal." Genesis does contain the creation story that forms the basis of the Judeo-Christian tradition. There is considerable continuity between Genesis creation and the remainder of the Hebrew Bible, and also in multiple places in the New Testament, including the words of Jesus and the 2035:

of consensus. I really have no way of knowing what everyone wants if one "side" is gagging the other. I'm thinking that the behavior is more concerning than the title itself. This is really not the way to collaborate, and it's sad that it's been going on. But only concerned editors like yourself can stop it -- and only if there is a consensus of what is needed. Hopefully we'll hear from a few other folks here soon. I've posted notes for a number of other people, and let Ben know I was researching what people needed.

148: 3749: 3266: 3211: 3025: 1212: 1840:

include the additional revelation thing as a form of rebuttal of their claimed restorationist status. Perhaps like: "the Later Day Saint Movement is a Christian Restorationist sect formed in the United States by Joseph Smith who claimed that through access to additional revelation he had formed the Christian Church as Jesus of Nazareth had intended it to be, prior to a great apostasy which allegedly occurred sometime after the Apostolic age."

3250:, changes to policy pages "may be made if there are no objections, or if discussion shows that there is consensus for the change". It would seem as though there has been objection. As I'd mentioned earlier, the language you used is a little obscure. Can you perhaps try to describe in really mundane terms the issue you are trying to correct, and your proposed solutions? If you do, I will be more than happy to help make the changes needed. 5402: 5167:. You come along waving your highly unorthodox rule book over references and "who's supposed to do what when" and condescend all over editors who aren't following it. It's an uphill getting any real work done in the article to begin with. There are strong opinions about how it should be written. But please-just focus on the quality of the edits themselves. Leave all the extra "baggage" behind. It only distorts the conversation. 1269: 3356:

into the Book of Genesis article, and even went so far as to change the story of Noah's Ark to "deluge myth" before they were finally stopped. As I have said on the Book of Genesis talk page, I am not a religious man, but militant athesists can be as bad as religious fundamentalists. I gave my opinion on the whole "myth" subject on a previous RfA, but if this debate is going to be reopened, please let me know. All the best-

5356:

You accused others of laziness, of ulterior motives, of not understanding or abiding to NPOV, of refusing to collaborate, of creating a strawman, etc. When I tried to nail down your strange notion that "horrible" sources can only be "upgraded", not "removed", you tried to justify its "necessity" with a frame-up-blame-game on PiCo. ? . This isn't collaboration, it's crazy-making. I've never had a strong opinion about

4888:

held. Just like Alastair, you have a skewed and incorrect view of how Knowledge (XXG)'s policies actually work. It's arbitration in that the results are binding upon the parties. If you think that you and Alastair are being treated fundamentally wrong, I suggest you file a complaint with the Audit Subcommittee (fair warning, I am a member, and as such will obviously recuse), or with Knowledge (XXG)'s ombudsmen.

3480: 2407:

they can. Nevertheless, if we are not open to persuasion, then we are no better than someone else who isn't open. Sometimes we have to lead by example. But... sometimes we "win" by getting a change in another person, and sometimes we "win" even more by learning something in ourselves. Be open, be persistent, be fair, and assume good will even when the verbage doesn't feel good on the recieving end.

5010:

discussion is no longer relevant to ongoing editing issues. In addition, if Alastair Haines so requests, his username (and hence the username associated with his edits in page histories) may be changed to another appropriate username other than his real name. Editors who have been in conflict with Alastair Haines are strongly urged to make no further reference to him on-wiki following his departure.

1172: 1152: 550: 530: 111: 101: 91: 81: 71: 4057:

highlighters to distinguish the various participants. This is more about whether the article is progressing, how things have gone since he appeared, and whether his objections to sources, etc. are legitimate. On that article the current discussion was 52 printed pages, where he was involved. And there were several archived pages. The article was still a mess. Thanks for looking at this.--

2301:

was born a bastard on August 19, 1946." Most readers will believe that calling the narrative a myth in the opening sentence is making an assertion that the narrative is false, because the most common usage of "myth" suggests falsehood. Certainly, at later points in the text, the term "myth" can be used if it is properly identified as an attributed point of view. See:

5322:

claims that were misworded or otherwise unsupported in the references given to them; 6 revisions to the creationism section (still intact); 6 vandalism reverts and copy edits; 1 controversial "summon" edit, no edit war to keep it; 4 uncontroversial word tightening "tweaks"; and 8 edits to remove all the Big Bang nonsense refs-each and every one of those edits leaving

5210:. (Relating to your edit summary, Wenham was the very last in line, submerged under a dozen refs consisting of Big Bang devotees, one NT translation, and two 2000 year old primary source refs. It's impossible to fault someone for unintentionally slighting Wenham here. Which we can assume happened in this case because PiCo had recommended Wenham specifically earlier.) 1500: 826: 5495: 2069:

goes. But if I hear froma few more folks, if there is some kind of consensus, and if we do agree that one side has been squelched, then there will be another step. As I said, right now I'm trying trying to find out what the heck is going on. But neither side should squelch the other. Knowledge (XXG) is about people working together, not being stepped on.

3844: 1261: 1523: 849: 26: 2863: 1804:. As far as I have been able to determine only one volume of this translation exists (Genesis), which makes it not very relevant compared with the many hundreds of complete translations, and probably not worth a mention in our article. If I have mistaken the translation for something else, please can you give more information about it? Thanks. 2205:

indicates no preference as to validity. If the first sentence is "The account of Creation according to Genesis is the description of the supernatural occurrences surrounding the creation of the world, also referreed to as a creation or cosmogonic myth. The account is contained in the first two chapters of Genesis…" --

2139:

now, however the title is complete POV. BTW has anyone noticed that most of those who was POV pushing and harassing those who they disagreed with. Labeled themselves atheists in their user boxes? Then to have the nerve to tell us we "religionist" are pushing an agenda? Academic term or not it is pure POV in the title.

5360:-I have a strong objection to the use of totally ridiculous references and falsely sourced claims. And I will continue to object to them, and continue to object to crazy-making dust clouds obscuring the issues on the talk page. If it's still not clear to you where I'm coming from, it never will be, so enough said. 1331:, and you can choose which one you would like to use.. Remember: barnstars are for rewarding users who are doing good work on the project or on Judaism, Jewish History, or Kabbalah articles, and anyone can give anyone else a barnstar. If you see a user who you thinks deserves a thank you, give them a barnstar! 2395:

a desire to follow the best mandates of Knowledge (XXG). There are competing goods here. The good of "myth" is consistency with other articles; the term "myth" is certainly allowed in the subject matter. I think the concern I'm hearing here is that "myth" is being pushed beyond a neutral proportion.

5036:

You recently made a very constructive comment on the talk page. I really blieve in compromise, but I also believe in policy, and I think you did a fine job of pinpointing the issue. In the spirit of compromise I just made an edit which puts "relkigion" back in the lead, but with a few other items.

4694:

Jeffro, take a deep breath. It WILL be okay. Look, this is the kind of back and forth Alastair's been going through as well, where a person can't even AGREE without an argument. All I said was "I'm rubbing off on you." I wasn't accusing you of anything, nor was I claiming some great sea change or

3608:

to see what is not vandalism. Misinformation, unsourced edits, personal attacks, even disruptive edits are not considered vandalism. Vandalism is a very specific thing, and none of the regular editors of the page have engaged in it. Some may have been disruptive, but none have vandalised. You need to

3355:

While I'm here, let me also state that I am in agreement with you regarding the use of the word "myth". The term "myth" was added many years after the article was created, without consensus, or even discussion. These people continued to make these kinds of changes, including inserting the word "myth"

3129:

In general, yes, one should not delete sourced material. But merely being sourced isn't enough - a statement with a dozen refences is over-sourced, for example. And more than that, sources need to be relevant and reliable - Robert Jastow, as a theoretical physicist, for example, just doesn't have the

2394:

Going forward we'll have to compress this summary, move it to the article talk page, and endorse those statements attributed to us. After that we'll have to reach out to the "myth" folks and be patient. They're pretty... religious... about their POV. Remember to be patient, fair, but consistent in

2382:

Thanks everyone! I'll try to put the summary in a better format and incorporate what I see from the other side's POV on the chart. I think that most people (here) are concerned with creating a NPOV title. That's a good thing. Collaboration is tough enough when you have two sides that won't budge,

2138:

I agree with every thing written above, i do think that the proper way would be "creation according to genesis." its neutral as can be. I would say the way to proceed would be to also see about other articles that use "creation myth" and try and reword it in other titles. I think the intro looks good

2084:

I've supported "Genesis creation story" on the page, which actually has far more academic ghits than "myth" (see Dab's stats), and is neutral. There are other possibilities. "Myth" here is POV and provocative. Just to be clear, I'm entirely sure myself the Genesis story is not "factual", but see no

2068:

Not sure what the best way to proceed is. Right now I'm just trying to find out what the interest is. I'm only seeing one side presented in the article, and if there isn't very much interest here on my talk page (I posted a note to all those who supported the title change) then this is as far as it

1977:

Being a latecomer to the article, I'm unclear exactly who is committed to the article and what they are committed to. I've heard a good deal from those in favor of the "myth" title, but not so much from those opposed. Eactly WHAT would be needed for a consensus title before you would be comfortable

5512:

Hello EGMichaels. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Knowledge (XXG), in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience.

5062:

bit of talk for a sample. He just reverted the change I made, which was a good-faith compromise and citing the Jewish Encyclopedia, the standard Jewish reference. He insists on using regular dictionary definitions over sources by Jewish scholars. I suspect he has a general agenda reflected in his

5005:

Should Alastair Haines wish to return to editing Knowledge (XXG) after one year, he shall first communicate with the Arbitration Committee and provide a satisfactory assurance that he will refrain from making any further legal threats against other editors or against the Wikimedia Foundation. Should

4075:

Thanks Hammy. I'll do some digging. As I said, my experiences have been positive. He supports sourced material and seeks to move controversial statements from titles and ledes into the body of an article. That's pretty much my own approach. He DOES sometimes give people the impression that he's

3172:

I have no objection to Philo's philosophical theories, nor the theory of creatio ex nihilo, being included in the article, but it should be done in a reasonable manner - a whole section devoted to Philo is out of place, and creatio ex nihilo is probably not what the original authors of Genesis 1 had

2355:

To all other peoples of the ancient Near East, creation was the work of gods and goddesses. The forces of nature, personalized as gods and goddesses, were mutually interrelated and often locked in conflict. Moreover, their myths about the role of these gods and goddesses in creation were at the

2204:

Concur with most statements above. The term "myth" should not be in the title due to the connotations it suggests (falshood, etc.) I still think "Creation according to Genesis" is completely neutral, whether one believes that Genesis is fact, fiction, allegory, or myth, it is completely accurate and

2156:

I think the overall best title is "Genesis creation story." I think almost as good is "Genesis chapters one and two." "Story" is the most natural word to be used in that place. By the way I have no "personal" interest in any of this. I am not in the least bit "personally offended." "Genesis creation

1946:

on the right way and the wrong way to use the word "myth" in Wiki articles. We shouldn't use the word to imply a falsehood; we should only use it in the formal sense of a story of a culture or religion of which the truth is indeterminable. Whether or not Cush thinks the story false or not is his own

5355:

about what the references say, the discussion derails as you retreated from the substance of the issue -poor quality of sources- back into second-guessing others' supposed motives and reassigning everyone editing duties according to "EGMichaels Rulz" again. Nobody was discourteous there--but you.

5009:

To assist Alastair Haines in disengaging from Knowledge (XXG), the case pages relating to this arbitration and all related pages have been courtesy blanked. As appropriate, other pages reflecting controversies to which Alastair Haines was a party may also be courtesy-blanked, particularly where the

4887:

Claiming that the Arbitration Committee requires all parties to consent to entering arbitration is to reuse a word, balderdash. If what you were claiming was correct, then every user who has ever been blocked or banned would have a case that they didn't specifically consent to the arbitration being

4528:

Okay, so you weren't accidentally correct. You were... correct in spite of your best efforts. Got it. I'm amazed at how much offense you took at "hey, I'm rubbing off on you." Am I THAT heinous that any agreement, even accidental, is offensive to you? If that's the case, I'll try to steer clear

3392:

is often used colloquially to refer to "a false story", this article uses the term "creation myth" in the formal sense, common in academic literature, meaning the symbolic literary structure of "a religious or supernatural story or explanation that describes the beginnings of humanity, earth, life,

3153:

I have no objection to anything about Philo's theology and Creation ex nihilo theology going in the former section and anything about the scientific accuracy of Creation ex nihilo going in the latter section. Hopefully that will help you and PiCo to accommodate your differences'. I hope this helps.

3008:

I see that you've been pretty consistent in reverting wholesale section deletes and other good faith / sourced contributions. If it seems like it's starting to get out of hand I'd suggest an AN/I posting asking for 1RR to be instated for a month or so just so you or other editors don't get dragged

2511:(after we get all the options down, I'd like a bona fide pro AND con from each person for each option. If you are unable to see the positive in the opposing side or the negative in yours, please sit back until others can jog your thinking. We need a civil discussion seeing the merit in all views) 2406:

And, finally, we need to be open to persuasion. The truth is that they could be right and all of us wrong. Myth COULD BE the perfect word. Again, as a writer I try not to be married to ANY single word, but not everyone is a writer, and some editors have to muddle through with whatever vocabulary

2400:

Remember also that the "myth" side really has a blind spot and needs our help, just as we have our blind spots and need their help. We can't have a collaborative article without them, and they can't have one without us. If they lash out, be persistent and continue to offer to help them. The goal

2320:

Knowing that "myth" riles many readers (on and off Knowledge (XXG)) and starts them off with a negative predisposition, why must "myth" appear in the very first sentence? Why in the very first paragraph? Should we trade self-avowed liberal or atheistic preference for true neutrality in a really

2034:

Thanks you two. I'm hoping that we can have enough clarity here to figure out what each side wants. The "myth" side has made itself clear (and is certainly welcome on my talk page as well -- in their own section). My biggest concern is that the squelching of discussion only creates a false sense

646:

A new class on the importance scale has been added- C Class- which covers articles better than start but not quite to B Class yet. It is up to the WikiProjects to decide whether to adopt them or not. Currently, there has been little discussion within our Projects, so if you feel strongly either way

5321:

You just keep telling yourself that-that's what you want to believe, but that's not at all how I've edited there. This is the sum total of my edits to the article: 28 cleanup edits to footnotes and bibliography; 8 uncontroversial cleanup edits for copyright infringements, refs that aren't RS, and

4317:

Hey, I've been consistent. A religion is a set, and a denomination is a subset. A religion stands on its own; a denomination doesn't -- because if it did, it would be a religion. Hence, "We're a denomination" begs the question of "a denomination of what religion?" But "we're a religion" can be

2876:

Your statement "King -- prove me wrong. If you REALLY mean some harmless neutral thing, then please give me your second choice of title" is a blatant declaration that you do not assume good faith. This has moved into the territory of issuing warnings and, if necessary, asking an admin to block you

2300:

Referring to the Genesis narrative as a "myth" in the first sentence is definitely POV and a failure to maintain an impartial tone. Though there is a definition of myth where this is an accurate statement, one could say the same to justify opening the Bill Clinton article saying, "Bill Clinton

5269:

is not, after all, the prevailing view. And guess what. Before you insisted it was, the article described them both simply, evenly. Now the issue is so buried in gobble-dee-gook nobody unfamiliar with the theological debate will have a clue what's what. Thankfully, after 3 or 4 dozen needless

5256:

contested claims as replacements prior to removing bogus ones? How much space on the talk page is consumed with absurd attacks and diversions? That you dismiss those who don't agree to abide by these fictious rulz as "unwilling to do any real work" while I find example after example where it's

5162:

The histrionics, hasty conclusions, and the constant fault finding and finger wagging against your fellow editors is disruptive. It also serves to "poison the well" and embroil editors into "clique" wars. I wouldn't be be so pointed on this issue now--this happened months ago. But the problem

4903:

Sir Fozzie -- thanks for your note. But it's not balderdash to use a word by its defined meaning. The Arbitration Committee was established to end disputes, not presume sides in them. Most of the problem with disputes is not the content of those disputes, but rather the failure of one or more

3789:

Mediation is a process where a group of editors in disagreement over matters of article content are guided through discussing the issues of the dispute (and towards developing a resolution) by an uninvolved editor experienced with handling disputes (the mediator). The process is voluntary and is

2427:

The actual usage stats results provided by Dab on the talk page really need to be made into a table. The "myth" people have constantly asserted that "myth" is the correct term as used in scholarship, but looking at the stats shows this is simply not true. "Creation myth" is certainly the general

2277:

I'm fully cognizant of the technical and literary meaning of "creation myth," and agree that somewhere early in the article it needs to be acknowledged that in many respects, the Genesis creation account (I could also accept "narrative," "ancient text," or even "theory of origins") fits the

705:

WikiProject Christianity is considering running a monthly drive wherein two or three top importance articles from English Knowledge (XXG) are simplified and moved over to S.E. They have extended an offer to work with us in creating a similar project for Judaism related articles. For questions or

2388:

Will the article be changed? We could do everything perfectly and see no positive change. Sometimes the right thing doesn't happen. And, as I said on the article page -- myth COULD BE the best word, but there's no way to know that without true collaboration. My personal opinion is that myth

1854:

We can all get a little frustrated on articles sometimes, it happens to us all! Your arguments are valid and there is no reason not to include the LDS use of additional revelation, provided it isn't done in an attempt to discredit their restorationist methods- which clearly is not what you want

4914:

In any case, trust me, this should have never gotten to this point. It can still be de-escalated with no harm done. And if Alastair were dealt with on a low level and we end up in another ArbCom through correct escalation process, then you will have proven me wrong, wouldn't you? There's no

2122:

I agree. From what I can tell, the "myth" side seems to be insisting that "myth" just means "story" in some scholarly sense -- and yet refuses to exchange "myth" for this supposed synonym. Generally, if you are dead set against using a synonym, then you do NOT really regard it as a synonym.

2001:

argument. The fact that scholars who share the POV use the POV term is also unpersuasive. I've given up contributing there, as there's too much shouting down by the "everyone who disagrees with me is a mad Creationist" POV pushers. Frankly, the process has been a sham. What is needed is a well

1839:

I accept your argument, yet I still feel that they ARE restorationist in that they are attempting to restore the original gospel. Including the fact that to do this they use additional revelation does seem to have a tinge of POV though. The sentence would have to be very matter of fact and not

5410:

Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, peoples rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of

4056:

Hi, I saw on your comment on Alistair's page and wanted to give you some background on how to look at Alistair's discussions. The appearance of fairness and impartiality is a careful and consistent part of his obstruction. When I began working here, I printed the current discussion and used

2269:

a creation myth found in Genesis 1 and 2...." I argued for keeping the title the same, but not introducing "creation myth" until the second paragraph. More than once I edited it that way, and received not only immediate reversion but crude, sarcastic comments from some strident myth-ers.

1921:

along those lines might I suggest you self edit and just cut/paste your edit into the requested move section and just remove the other section all together. There's no need for any more comment on that section and your points are more apt to be seen on the main discussion thread IMO. Thanks

5085:

Thanks. The lead was the result of a lot of collaboration and consensus among diverse editors and has been stable for a long time. Weall know that "Knowledge (XXG) is not a dictionary;" I really am offended that someone thinks a dictionary trumps using works by major scholars in the field!

5067:

points out that a disruptive editor often evades detection because the disruptive edits are spread out among different articles. I think there may be just such a pattern here. Would you mind watching the Judaism page and see how he has been altering a consensus-version text without any

5251:

that you won't let anyone get rid of without going through this labyrinth of rules you've invented in your mind about preserving "placeholder" pseudo-references, contacting editors individually for ok's to make changes, and requiring editors to go to the library to find new sources that

5231:- and what do you do? First you restore all the garbage, and second you travel to the talk page to give PiCo's proposal a total brush-off, sending him off with a lecture to contact those "other guys" responsible for the remaining content you restored to seek their consensus to remove it. 2256:

for your very significant and bold contributions to this fray. You are very articulate as a writer, have been more than generous with your time and energies, and keep your cool very well (far better than this writer). You have persevered in the face of abasement as well as courtesy.

3948:, etc.) that I want to address in the RfAr. He seems to have a particular vendetta on that issue. The only reason the Jehovah's Witness people were even included is because Alastair somehow got involved in a war there this week, so I thought it would be weird to leave them out. 2316:

Forcing the word "myth"—as if everyone knows that we are using a much lesser-known definition of the term (which they don't)—doesn't seem to equate to NPOV. Over and over, the overwhelming message seems to be, "Don't confuse me with the facts. My mind is entirely made up."

4695:

profound breakthrough. Lighten up. It's this kind of chronic disagreableness that's plaguing the talk pages now. Seriously -- Jeffro -- this encyclopedia shouldn't be about our disagreements or our positions. All we're here to do is to record OTHER PEOPLE'S disagreements.

3457:

There is no excuse for that. You do not own the page, so edits while you are gone are not "cheap shots." If you don't assume good faith to those who deserve it you can end up blocked. It's a tense enough page without personal attacks, so please reconsider your approach here.

3805:

If you would be willing to participate in the mediation of this dispute but wish for its scope to be adjusted then you may propose on the case talk page amendments or additions to the list of issues to be mediated. Any queries or concerns that you have may be directed to an

4867:

I'll be in training over the next few weeks and will probably not participate much (or at all) during that time. If you try to contact me and I don't respond right away, please understand that I'm not ignoring you. I'll get back to you as soon as I get back :-)

1485:

We get a lot of articles that are being created and not announced! By announcing new articles, you attract attention to them, and the more people looking and editing the better they will get. If you would like your new article to appear in the newsletter, add it

4130:

Whilst fixing a reply that I made on Lisa's talk page, I believe that I accidentally removed your comment. As there has been a successive edit, I was unable to restore it. Although completely accidental, this was entirely my fault, and I do apologise. All the

5309:

You-"As for rules... I have better things to do with my life than to be insulted when I suggest we be courteous. You really have a need to delete any view you don't agree with, by hook or crook, and I don't have time to sit around while you try to justify

2342:

One final point (I promise). What about the premise that Genesis is just another creation myth and must be treated exactly the same way that we treat the myths of all the other religions. The answer may lie in what some authors have called the marked

5163:

continues. You continue to rely on this kind of historic revisionism to push your weight around and prevail in talk page debate. I'm guessing it probably had a great deal to do with PiCo removing himself. Most editors there are trying to focus on the

4775: 4957:

contains some advice and relevant information for you... it has been removed from the ArbCom page, probably because it is unacceptably truthful / accurate. I advise considering my words before responding to the impending threat to perma-ban you too.

5037:

Do you think that it still complies with policy or should I undo my (or Debresser's) edit? If you are content with the lad as it curently stands I am fine with that, but I want to make sure it takes into account the important point you just made.

5223:

off the page altogether. The worst that can be said of it is that it's the reverse of the one-sided claim you made--only PiCo's was more accurate in stating current scholarly opinion than yours. Even this one edit of PiCo's was followed within

2179:

Use of the term "myth" in the title passes judgement on the content. If this is not resolved, the title needs to be tagged for NPOV problems. Religious material should be treated fairly and openly, even those who do not fully support that view.

2428:

scholarly term, but in the specific case of Genesis other terms are actually far more often used by scholars. I think Hans Adler admits as much in the talk page, but blames it on "systemic bias" in the English language. He may be right, but per

169:

sports fans, and welcome to the first of what I hope will be a monthly newsletter with the need-to-know information about our fair WikiProject. If you have any questions or comments, or would like to recommend a story for the newsletter, click

2821:

Propose that we finish the discussion here (to satisfy Ben) and then move the summary to the article talk page when it's clean and tidy, and each resign our positions on the move (to satisfy Hand) -- threading the needle between those two.

3429:

Professor marginalia engaged in discussion on the talk page about the sources he considered illegitimate and gave valid reasons for removing them. No one, not even you defended the sources on the talk page. He did not deserve to have his

681:

is beginning a project of creating and improving articles related to religion, including Judaism. At the present time, volunteers are needed to propose our most important subjects for articles to be created. The official working list is

4843:

As you are neither an Arbitrator nor a party to this case, you should be commenting in the "Others" section, and as such I have moved a number of your comments which were incorrectly placed. For more information, please refer to the

3497:

prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the

2264:

the phrase "Creation myth." I was very comfortable with the previous title, "Creation according to Genesis," but very uncomfortable with their insistence on putting the phrase "creation myth" in the very first sentence like this:

3660:

I repeat: IT IS NOT VANDALISM TO EDIT BOLDLY. Unless you say you understand this is not vandalism, I will have to report this. I've tried to enlighten you but you are just not getting it. Please understand, I'm trying to help. Read

2052:

The promotion of discussion through WikiProjects (and elsewhere maybe, VP? Signpost?) will be essential to discovering true consensus. Otherwise, all you get is the same few people with a watchlist listing recycling their opinions.

2527:

EGMichaels: conformity with other similar article titles. Would create minor problems if renamed and mismatched with similar religious creation stories (and major problems if ALL are thus renamed). Certainly gets the reader's

5006:

Alastair Haines, after being permitted to return, again make a legal threat or a statement that may reasonably be construed as a legal threat, he may be blocked for an appropriate period of time by any uninvolved administrator.

5513:

The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.

2544:

EGMichaels: WP guidelines prohibit the use as synonym for "falsehood." The refusal of some editors to substitute this word indicates that they are using it in this way. It taints the article and turns away other editors and

185: 2366:

Thanks for asking for my opinion. That is very "new and different" in this matter. It's so interesting that you wrote today, for just last evening I thought of writing you a thank-you note, and then came your inquiry.

2273:

So in answer to your question, the previous paragraph sums up what I believe would be needed for a consensus title before I would be comfortable making improvements to the article. However, there's more than title.

2459:

Excellent point, John! I'm also planning to make a table out of our pros and cons, after I research the stated objections of the "myth" side of the discussion. I want all aspects of this fairly and fully (and clearly)

4076:"on their side", and they get disappointed when he won't support their elimination of an opposing POV (which he is also encouraging of in discussion). It's possible I missed something, so I'll be glad to look further. 1823:

Why do you believe the LDS are not restorationist? How does the inclusion of a New Revelation change the fact that they believe they are restoring Christianity to how Christ meant it to be, pre some great apostasy.

236:

In the right column you will see a listing of our most popular articles. All of these articles got 170,000+ page hits in the past month, and they should be on everyone's watchlist so we can keep them vandalism-free.

2383:

but it looks like there's some flexibility on at least one side of this. And there ARE other words in the universe than "myth." To require that one singular word with no dissent is probably not a stable position.

2531:

Auntie E: the article Genesis creation myth does use the word in the proper scholarly manner as our guidelines advise... in the formal sense of a story of a culture or religion of which the truth is indeterminable

5618:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 4529:

of you in real articles. Unfortunately, we're stuck in this distraction for the time being. Be very careful about what you say. I might (boo!) agree with something... and we wouldn't want that, now would we?

3541:

In answer to your question, I placed a 3RR warning on the talk page of the only user who had made three reversions on the page in question in a recent 24 hour period. I didn't see any other warnings warranted.

717:

WikiProject Kabbalah is in dire need of an article rating system for quality and importance. If you are familiar with that system and have some time on your hands, please create one. It could also use some

4015: 4011: 3096:

1 In the beginning of God's preparing the heavens and the earth - 2 the earth hath existed waste and void, and darkness on the face of the deep, and the Spirit of God fluttering on the face of the waters,

1491: 3854: 5261:

who is consistently "otherwise engaged" when confronted to follow your own prescription is tendentious in itself. But after two months of needless edit warring and baseless accusations, it is now

3130:

authority to be referenced as a source on biblical scholarship. (I'm not too happy about sources that date from 1899, either, but I'm letting that one stand for now - I'm making enough enemies).

3075:

I think we overlapped whilst editing the narrative section. I just wanted to check your intention. I suspect we're both trying to achieve NPOV by indicating the two different interpretations. --

1706: 1027: 400: 3560:

You did not warn me for 3rr (which I did not violate), but for edit warring. Was I edit warring against myself? Hardly. People edit war WITH SOMEONE ELSE. You warn both parties. Try again.

1741:

This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from

1062:

This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from

4829:

You may not be aware of the correct way in which to comment on the Workshop page. Each proposed Principle, Finding of Fact, or Remedy has a distinct section for three categories of people:

2305:. When using "myth" to describe a religious narrative, it must be clear that it is being used in the formal sense. Usage in the opening sentence is ambiguous, and thus prohibited by the 5572: 1558: 879: 121: 2894:

Hand, give it a rest. I don't think any objective observer would spend more than five minutes reading through the actual talk page before telling you to show a bit of... collaboration.

4989: 4007: 4000: 695: 5151:(the original, more balanced prologue wasn't removed as you alleged in the edit summary, btw, it was simply moved) gets completely mischaracterized as an attempt to get rid of 1902:, not a problem. I kind of lost track with what happened in the surrounding threads but whether you support or oppose the current title you should register your opinion in the 2926: 632:

they aren't being anti-semitic. Anti-semitic is a very charged word, and it's important only to use it when you're absolutely sure it applies, lest it become the subject of a

4611:(which you didn't), but that you implied that I hold a point of view that I don't, and then said you agreed with that. You simply agree with your own strawman. Please stop.-- 1631: 952: 2986: 5583:

during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

2281:"A creation myth is a cosmogony, a narrative that describes the original ordering of the universe" (one of the scholarly article quotes). I have opted for substituting 4102:

without restoring it, as my comment made your assumption redundant and the repeated edit conflicts were driving me insane. It should be evident when you read my comment.--

5330:

revert and for what? Yes, that's right, for your restoration of the Big Bang references. So this is just more of the same from you, argumentative historical revisionism.

1643: 1637: 964: 958: 5202:

supplied shortly prior, Orlinksky. Orlinsky says much same thing--he leans to the "no ex nihilo" view himself. PiCo replaced it with a source more readily available,

3807: 1553: 874: 115: 611:

WikiProject Kabbalah. In the future, I may split them, but for now I think we'll be just fine with one. As always, any questions or comments should be directed to me,

184:

WikiProject Good Articles is doing sweeps over all our current good articles to ensure they still meet criteria. For more information and how you can help, check out

2731:

Comment: there seems to be a theme so far against an assumption of either truth or falsehood. At least the first two entries here are attempting a neutral wording.

2640:

Avi: completely neutral, whether one believes that Genesis is fact, fiction, allegory, or myth, it is completely accurate and indicates no preference as to validity

3091:

The differences between the NIV and Young's Literal Translation of Gen 1:1-2 at least raise some questions about assumptions currently made in the current article.

1563: 884: 230: 1362:

need some assistance from someone familiar with both the Hebrew calendar and language to help them figure out the subject's birthday. If you can help, please see

195:

has been put on hold pending a few minor revisions. A list of things that need to be done to return this top importance article to its proper status can be found

249:

I'm talking about inviting knowledgeable users to join the project. You can proclaim your undying love of WikiProject Judaism in methods mild to wild, check the

5529:

You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated

4845: 1487: 1242:

has generously offered us use of his bot to generate lists that show which articles of ours are tagged for cleanup. You can read more about this service here:

3924:

Personally, I see little wrong with Alastair's edits regarding religious topics. It's his continued belligerence and edit-warring at gender-related articles (

589: 4240:

Actually I was using your more technical use of the word "religion" rather than a colloquial use. A religion is a stand-alone unit, which they clearly are.

1211: 5185:. You'll note that there is no remaining support for the view, no mention of ANY scholar holding it, and merely two statements that it's not in the text." 4709:

Stop pretending I took offence at you 'agreeing' with something. You pretended I agreed with you, misrepresenting my views in the process. Nothing more.--

94: 250: 3627:

Aunt -- let's say I go around deleting all your hard researched refs without discussing it with you? What term would you call it? I'll use that term.

5002:

is banned from editing Knowledge (XXG) for a period of one year, and thereafter pending further direction of the Arbitration Committee under remedy 2.

5247:

This is a good illustration how distorted things get when "EGMichael's rulz" get mixed into the equation. How many hours have been wasted defending

683: 3790:

designed for parties who disagree in good faith and who share a common desire to resolve their differences. Further information on the MedCom is at

691: 1577: 898: 286: 254: 3860: 3783: 3795: 3585:--this is well-meaning advice, I'm not trying to get a dig in. But ... seriously. You have been warned again and again. You need to put away the 1618: 939: 3059:

Agreed, it's getting out of hand. Let's all make an effort to be cooperative - I'll start explaining myself more fully on Talk, for a starter.

1304:. If you have sourced information linking either of these people to Kabbalah, please add it so the articles can be returned to the WikiProject. 3609:

understand: there are few worse things to be called here at Knowledge (XXG). It does not help your case at all to insist upon using the term.

1181: 559: 5530: 5068:

consideration to points made by editors who have been working on the article for years? We need your sane perspective, seriously!! Thanks.

4348:

in a colloquial manner to refer simply to 'a religious group of some kind', having explicitly stated the manner in which I intend it, please

3762: 3279: 3224: 3173:

in mind, according to modern scholars. (And we should use biblical scholars for our references, not theoretical physicists and astronomers).

3038: 4936: 3913: 3409:

Thanks :-). Don't know if readers will notice it, care, or (more to the point) buy it -- but at least we're claiming the whopper somewhere.

1227: 1144: 522: 104: 74: 5643: 4959: 1590: 911: 299: 2347:

between "pagan" (oops) cosmogonies and the Genesis accounts. While there are some obvious points of continuity between Genesis and the

1243: 3850: 2432:

that is not our concern. All sorts of things have a different specific name from the general term for the kind of thing they are. The

4041: 2401:

is not to beat them. The goal is to see what they have to offer and see if we can offer something to them so that the ARTICLE "wins."

1602: 1596: 923: 917: 311: 305: 1225:

There is an interesting discussion currently taking place regarding whether or not it is acceptable to censor (i.e. G-d, HaShem-: -->

3103:

A. Whether verse 1 indisputably says that Heaven & Earth were created from nothing rather than 'prepared' from 'waste and void'?

1801: 1292:

WikiProject Kabbalah's only Featured and Good articles have been removed from the WikiProject, on the grounds that neither article (

3503: 1659: 1184: 1175: 980: 562: 553: 5206:, which I think pretty accurately describes Orlinsky's view. But nevermind, you completely unraveled the whole thing, preferring 3589:

accusation until you understand what it means. Nobody vandalized here. Slow down and Think! before you use phrase it that way.

1755: 3106:

B. Whether it is indisputably accurate to call Verse 2 'the result' of Verse 1 rather than a description of the primordial state?

1325: 3907: 3903: 3791: 3779: 3217: 3210: 1705: 1497:

There are some 40 odd standing requests for Judaism related articles. Please make them! I would, but I'm too busy writing this.

1026: 823:

There are some 40 odd standing requests for Judaism related articles. Please make them! I would, but I'm too busy writing this.

607:

Yes, folks, we're moving on up. This newsletter is now the newsletter for both WikiProject Judaism, WikiProject Jewish History,

399: 5639: 5344: 3817:

Please indicate on the case page your agreement to participate in the mediation within seven days of the request's submission.

2328:

IMO (without the "H"), some editors have an interest in using Knowledge (XXG) to attempt to discredit the scriptures of two

687: 3799: 624:

Just a note, not aimed at anyone in particular. By order of the administrative cabal, it is officially not cool (and possibly

5365: 5296: 5172: 3700: 3594: 3547: 3531: 3145:

In an attempt to reconcile differences I have put this note on Deadtotruth's talk page: 'There are now two sections entitled

3499: 3494: 2867: 4935:

Hi. This is a message to let you know that the proposed decision in the Alastair Haines 2 case has been posted. Please see

439:

because you are a member of the WikiProject. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from

5518: 4014:. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, 4909:

Interesting that you say you will obviously recuse. Why is your recusal obvious and my requests for recusal balderdash?

1315: 5630:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

3684:"(Pico, I don't think even the Professor will agree with wiping out Wenham -- (now you're stepping on my own edits))" 3521: 5635: 1742: 1351:

there are quite a few sources easily available, you can contact him if you have questions. Be sure to nominate it for

1063: 440: 5198:

by some as meaning "from nothing", but it doesn't say it. PiCo's statement there is 100% in accord with the source

4790: 3786:

and then indicate in the "Party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate in the mediation or not.

2871: 2609:

EGMichaels: although a synonym for "story" (and indirect synonym for "myth"), it implies an objectively true event.

2021: 1903: 1425: 1268: 1226:

YodHey) names of G-d in articles to protect Jews who may be reading or editing the article. You can weigh in here:

5361: 5292: 5168: 4099: 3755: 3748: 3738: 3696: 3590: 3543: 3527: 2483:

So far these are the options I've seen above (please add any I'm leaving out -- this is a brainstorming section)

2325:

continue reading the article just because the word "myth" does not appear in the title or first sentence or so?

2260:

As you probably have observed, there is a core of editors who seem irrevocably committed to all they can do to

5131:

is an example of a very measured, sensible, open-handed offer to discuss the removal of the Philo section. And

5119:

represents a very measured, sensible, supportable, balanced handling of it. And here is what you offer instead.

2818:

Propose that no statements be considered for the article unless stated on the article page (Hand that feeds you)

2302: 1713: 1034: 813: 407: 258: 5022: 4853: 3811: 2321:

good article that we want people to be able to read with an open mind? Or to ask it another way: will anyone

4963: 4423:

Hey, I didn't say you MEANT to use it correctly. I just found it humorous that you were accidentally correct.

3714:

Maybe they'll change the title on the Genesis Creation Myth page for your birthday to something that is NPOV?

5219:

prevails" edit of yours, and this is the only one from PiCo which can even remotely be accused of "pushing"

3195: 3159: 3114: 3080: 2185: 1672: 1247: 993: 5571:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 1998: 1860: 1845: 1829: 1777: 5580: 5564: 5558: 5540: 5242:

being pushed off the page because I know how hard I've worked to find even one other one. Exaggerate much?

5091: 5073: 5042: 4035: 3670: 3651:

If you do not want your writing to be edited, used, and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.

3614: 3463: 3447: 3398: 3331: 3306: 3231: 3049: 3031: 3024: 3014: 2955: 2706: 1956: 1927: 1809: 1409: 1278: 5631: 3507: 2826:-Sorry, I've messed up your table formatting somehow. It is hard to edit. Can you sort? Apologies again. 2490:

Genesis creation story (Bus Stop, Johnbod, EGMichaels, Weaponbb7,Michelle cannon, Masterhomer, Afaprof01)

1749:, offers of help, and angry all-caps anti-semitic rants to my talk page. Thanks, and have a great month. 690:. If you are unsure of proper topics, you might try checking our lists of top importance level articles: 651: 636:. Remember Hanlon's Razor: never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. 5382:

assume you havent edited recently due to you baby (congrats btw), if and when you do return drop a line

3719: 3490: 3382:

The note you're looking for is the first superscript link in the article. It says "note", and links to

3191: 3155: 3110: 3076: 2994: 2310: 2293: 2017: 1967: 1948: 1911: 1882: 1116: 662: 494: 45: 3485: 3247: 1141: 777: 745: 519: 335: 5401: 5287:. This is about a mindset, a pattern of engagement and disruption that is interfering with process. 3715: 2990: 1907: 1878: 1856: 1841: 1825: 1459: 5588: 5111:

didn't happen. It didn't happen. Instead there was a very concerted effort on your part to present

4999: 4062: 3734: 3341:

Birth announcements do not belong on an article's talk page. That having been said, congratulations!!

2336: 1543: 1401: 869: 5607: 5598: 5383: 4794: 3963:

The disputes on those articles (except for Hijra) go back over a year so there's a lot to dig thru.

3821: 3662: 3605: 2929: 2763: 2551:

Avi: The term "myth" should not be in the title due to the connotations it suggests (falshood, etc.)

2140: 1161: 652:

Wikipedia_talk:NPOV#Religion section - Disputes between historians or scientists and religious_views

539: 147: 5387: 5018: 4944: 4893: 4849: 4798: 3937: 3882: 3825: 2933: 2899: 2767: 2372: 2329: 2144: 380: 5627: 5611: 5416:

Alastair has had a son, Felix, born this Holiday Season. I'm sure he would enjoy hearing from you.

3442:, and is not something I would expect from someone who has been around here as long as you have. 2429: 1877:

Thanks for the heads up about the deleted refs. I have asked the individual to explain themselves.

1343:

If you have some spare time on your hands, we could use an article about a Kabbalah scholar named

773: 737: 4723: 4625: 4467: 4370: 4272: 4203: 4116: 3991: 3945: 3899: 2881: 2181: 2162: 1720: 1239: 1171: 1151: 1041: 549: 529: 414: 330: 222: 110: 100: 90: 80: 70: 4254:

That being the case, and in view of your stated opinion here, you are using the term in a quite

4098:

After contending with several edit conflicts in quick succession, I overwrote your last edit at

2333: 2104:

Btw, I would not object at all to the use of "creation myth" elsewhere in the first para, etc.

1750: 1260: 612: 5535: 5451: 5087: 5069: 5051: 5038: 4029: 4010:. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, 3968: 3953: 3666: 3610: 3459: 3443: 3302: 3045: 3010: 2951: 2831: 2702: 2449: 2210: 2109: 2090: 2058: 2007: 1952: 1923: 1805: 1417: 1363: 1286: 749: 457: 241: 5623: 5615: 2306: 1997:

For me, the word "myth" is an absolute POV no-no. The fact that other pages include it is an

625: 206: 4136: 3361: 3346: 3292: 3255: 1463: 1445: 1433: 1397: 1389: 769: 765: 707: 375: 5626:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 5619: 5576: 5568: 3439: 3431: 3109:

My suspicion is that the Hebrew does not make the matter or the temporal sequence clear. --

1943: 1352: 1135: 650:

There is a proposal to reword the section on NPOV regarding religious articles. Please see

513: 64: 5584: 4974: 4916: 4869: 4811: 4696: 4530: 4424: 4319: 4241: 4168: 4077: 4058: 3628: 3561: 3410: 3317: 3272: 3265: 2966: 2908: 2842: 2785: 2732: 2461: 2413: 2232: 2157:

myth" is commentary. "Story" replaces "commentary" with normal, run-of-the-mill language.

2124: 2070: 2036: 1983: 1475: 1471: 325: 5064: 3695:

match between you and Pico. In particular, leave me out of it and focus on the content.

3515: 3511: 2412:

Ugh... I hate religious articles. I really need to stick with stock market articles. ;-)

1282: 1164: 1155: 542: 533: 4940: 4889: 3878: 3782:(MedCom). You have been named as a party in this request. Please review the request at 3178: 3135: 3064: 2895: 2499:

Genesis Chapters 1 and 2 (Bus Stop, EGMichaels,Weaponbb7, Michelle cannon, Masterhomer)

2368: 1538: 1393: 864: 733: 488: 84: 3479: 4710: 4612: 4454: 4357: 4259: 4190: 4103: 3988: 3941: 3933: 2672:

Weaponbb7: Creation according Genesis Chapters 1 and 2: personal favorite but to long

2158: 1548: 1479: 1467: 1429: 1297: 999: 753: 741: 633: 365: 226: 2496:

Creation according to Genesis (Weaponbb7, Avi, Masterhomer, Templeknight, Afaprof01)

5443: 3964: 3949: 3929: 3798:; further information on Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on resolving disagreements is at 2827: 2445: 2206: 2105: 2086: 2054: 2003: 1769: 1499: 1421: 1381: 1359: 1293: 1076: 1005: 825: 817: 757: 678: 658: 447: 436: 2548:

Grantmidnight: Use of the term "myth" in the title passes judgement on the content

1522: 848: 25: 4995:

This arbitration case has been closed. The following remedies have been enacted:

4774: 4132: 3873: 3843: 3357: 3342: 3251: 2841:

I'll give it a shot when I get back from the bank. Catch you in an hour or two.

2433: 2348: 1437: 1405: 789: 781: 761: 5326:

intact in the article with its other refs. Zero edit warring on my part; just

3925: 2441: 1385: 1344: 1110: 340: 4453:

I so desire. Your interjection here was unnecessary and counterproductive.--

3582:"You'll appreciate it when it's your turn to be vandalized by someone else" 3174: 3131: 3060: 2351:

for example, Genesis 1 is distinctive from virtually all origins stories.

1906:

thread. If nothing else to encourage others to stick to one thread. Cheers,

202: 4939:

for the proposed decision and to view the arbitrator's votes on this case.

4006:

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located

3794:; the policy the Committee will work by whilst handling your dispute is at 2722:

EGMichaels: unfortunately, could be taken as assumptive of objective truth.

1951:

does use the word in the proper scholarly manner as our guidelines advise.

221:

One new Judaism-related article was created this month, the long requested

5215:

I've tried to view every revision following the very heavily weighted to "

3510:

among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek

3692: 1301: 196: 5647: 5592: 5546: 5391: 5369: 5300: 5176: 5094: 5076: 5045: 5026: 4982: 4967: 4948: 4924: 4897: 4877: 4857: 4819: 4802: 4727: 4704: 4629: 4538: 4471: 4432: 4374: 4327: 4276: 4249: 4207: 4176: 4140: 4120: 4085: 4066: 4050: 3994: 3972: 3957: 3886: 3742: 3723: 3704: 3674: 3636: 3618: 3598: 3569: 3551: 3535: 3467: 3451: 3418: 3403: 3365: 3350: 3336: 3325: 3310: 3259: 3236: 3199: 3182: 3163: 3151:

6 Commentaries, Criticism, Controversies and non Judaeo-Christian views.

3139: 3118: 3084: 3068: 3053: 3018: 2998: 2974: 2959: 2937: 2903: 2888: 2862: 2850: 2835: 2793: 2771: 2740: 2710: 2469: 2453: 2421: 2376: 2240: 2214: 2189: 2166: 2148: 2132: 2113: 2094: 2078: 2062: 2044: 2025: 2011: 1991: 1960: 1931: 1915: 1886: 1864: 1849: 1833: 1813: 1215:

Sir Moses Montefore, a Jewish activist who died 123 years ago this month

1084: 466: 5614:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

5494: 5055: 3438:

without any discussion as you did. This is considered a pretty blatant

1979: 1348: 370: 257:

for examples. We also now have a flashy advertisement, to use it add {{

152: 5159:

discussion had in fact remained there in the article the whole time.

5135:

is an example of an editor the door slamming shut. And returning to

2815:

Propose to keep status quo on article for at least three months (Ben)

2437: 2002:

publicised RfC, with relevant WikiProjects invited to participate. --

1285:

status. For information about how you can help, see the talk page or

360: 5182:

You-"As for elimination of ex nihilo, this was a typical PiCo edit:

4016:

Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case/Alastair Haines 2/Workshop

4012:

Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case/Alastair Haines 2/Evidence

3987:

since normally threaded comments are not done on the Requests page.

3810:

of the Committee or by e-mailing the MedCom's private mailing list (

3190:

See the various notes on wholesale deletions on PiCo's talk page. --

4973:

Thanks -- I had not considered that. But you do offer sage advice.

661:, a new navbox has come into being featuring Halakha topics. See: 233:, so whenever you get the opportunity make sure to go create a few. 5567:, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for 2570:

EGMichaels: neutral, direct synonym for "myth" and good substitute

1246:

and if you would like to take him up on his offer, contact him on

146: 40: 5107:

The "annihilation" that you allege has been taking place against

4449:

I also aware of how to use a more strict application of the term

2701:

That is what the article is about and what the reader expects. --

2987:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#EGMichaels

2296:, incidentally an MIT doctoral graduate, wrote some weeks ago: 1938:

Regarding the word "myth" and how it should be used in wikipedia

1300:, respectively) actually mention the subject's affiliation with 2487:

Genesis creation myth (Auntie E, EGMichaels, Ben, Nefariousski)

5579:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

5194:

isn't in the text. Everyone knows it isn't in the text. It's

5059: 3502:. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to 2493:

Genesis creation account (EGMichaels, Templeknight, Afaprof01)

1745:. As always, please direct all questions, comments, requests, 665:

to join in the conversation about how it can best be improved.

192: 5573:

Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/User:EGMichaels/temp

174:

to leave a message on the Newsletter Coordinator's talk page.

5493: 5400: 5339:

What pushed my button is watching the pattern repeat itself

3861:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for mediation/Genesis Creation Myth

3784:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for mediation/Genesis Creation Myth

3765:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

3747: 3282:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

3264: 3227:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

3209: 3041:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

3023: 2580:

EGmichaels: perhaps too innocuous. Doesn't grab the reader.

2252:

Sorry to come in late. First and foremost, I want to thank

1521: 1267: 1259: 1210: 847: 588: 24: 5238:

how hard you must have looked to find this one example of "

4990:

Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case/Alastair Haines 2

4001:

Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case/Alastair Haines 2

2637:

Weaponbb7: Seems the most NPOV, this is exactly what it is.

2231:

Thanks, Avi. I'll quote your positions in the lists below.

698:. (WikiProject Kabbalah currently doesn't have such a list) 5143:

we see how the edits to get rid of the Big Bang refs, the

2921:

Issue with reguading our discussion on creation myth stuff

205:

is a Featured Article Candidate! Go forth, my people, and

5291:

what I'm after. I'm asking you to stop kicking up dust.

3774:

A request for formal mediation of the dispute concerning

2925:

TempleKnight has been banned for being a sock puppet see

2870:

when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on

5147:

repetitions of "ex nihilo", and your own very one sided

1978:

making improvements to the article? Please let me know

352: 5524:

Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.

5311: 5232: 5229: 5207: 5203: 5183: 5148: 5140: 5132: 5128: 5126: 5124: 5122: 5120: 5116: 4954: 3984: 3685: 3583: 3435: 2927:

Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/Bischof-Ralph

2599:

EGMichaels: somewhat neutral (but less so than "story")

1900: 798: 229:

for creating it. Remember, folks, there are over forty

171: 3388: 2504:

Genesis Creation Discussion of Options (pros and cons)

3514:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 2950:

All the best, get some sleep, you're gonna need it!

2612:

Weaponbb7: Again it makes imply it is absolutley true

4607:

I don't agree with you. The problem is not that you

3330:

Indeed, all other things aside, congratulations. --

3009:into edit wars or accusations of supression etc... 4332:You've missed the point. The point is this: please 3859:You can find more information on the case subpage, 3665:. And please don't respond to this until you have. 2725:

Weaponbb7: seems ok but misses the artilce entirley

2541:

Weaponbb7: implies that the religion is just a myth

5606:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 3506:to work towards wording and content that gains a 3223:Message added 20:46, 3 March 2010 (UTC). You can 3100:Can you tell me, in light of the original Hebrew: 2361:Bruce Walke. Bibliotheca Sacra 132 (1975) 327-42. 1197: 575: 133: 5270:reverts, the parade of Big Bang references have 4146:Irrelevant responses moved from unrelated ArbCom 1307:After a rather heated discussion, there are now 155:celebrates Moses receiving the Ten Commandments. 5407: 4189:rather than its more strict technical sense.)-- 2353: 2298: 1947:opinion, and everyone has one. But the article 435:This newsletter was automatically delivered by 3733:And a belated happy birthday from me too! :)) 3147:5 Theology and Judaeo-Christian interpretation 2289:in the title. That was immediately shot down. 1311:barnstars for use by the Jewish WikiProjects, 3912:If you have questions about this bot, please 3754:Hello, EGMichaels. You have new messages at 3271:Hello, EGMichaels. You have new messages at 3216:Hello, EGMichaels. You have new messages at 3030:Hello, EGMichaels. You have new messages at 2650:EGMichaels: implies an objectively true event 8: 4883:Taking issue with some "evidence" you posted 4441:. I am well aware of the colloquial usage I 2508:mythologizers and non-mythologizers welcome 2480:mythologizers and non-mythologizers welcome 2440:, but that does not mean we have to call it 4021:On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, ~ 3838: 3796:Knowledge (XXG):Mediation Committee/Policy 3489:according to the reverts you have made on 1700: 1097: 1021: 475: 394: 20: 4772: 3483:You currently appear to be engaged in an 1228:Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Judaism#Yahweh 1100: 478: 23: 3914:contact the Mediation Committee directly 3649:Please read below the edit summary box: 3518:. Please stop the disruption, otherwise 2085:need to use the title to proclaim this. 706:volunteer opportunities, please contact 5190:His edit is exactly correct, isn't it? 4915:downside in this for you. None at all. 4825:RFAR: commenting in the correct section 3301:Congrats on the baby boy. Best wishes 2634:EGMichaels: could be taken as innocuous 5347:unfolded about using good sources for 5019:-- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) 4850:-- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) 2965:Thanks Nef! You're right on that one! 2807:Genesis Creation Discussion of Actions 1277:There is a collaboration drive to get 231:standing requests for Judaism articles 3983:Hi, just want to let you know that I 3291:dude uhm..... are you aware of this? 3004:Edit Warring at Genesis Creation Myth 2941:Note Singed properly at later time... 2476:Genesis Creation Options (brainstorm) 7: 5228:with this of his on the talk page: " 5149:pro-nihilo section titled "Prologue" 1355:if the finished article is eligible. 4126:Inadvertant removal of your posting 3792:Knowledge (XXG):Mediation Committee 3218:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Words to avoid 2811:(need to list actions of all POVs) 1244:User:B._Wolterding/Cleanup_listings 647:be sure to note so at your Project. 4356:mean it in the sense you prefer.-- 3985:moved your comment to your section 3853:to which you were are a party was 3835:Request for mediation not accepted 3800:Knowledge (XXG):Resolving disputes 281:On the date of publish, we had... 34:The WikiProject Judaism Newsletter 14: 5632:review the candidates' statements 5397:Magi: Lost Kings or Aliens w/ GPS 5278:less embarrassing to the project. 2750:(moved to the article talk page) 1974:(non-mythologizers only, please) 1802:English translations of the Bible 657:Thanks largely to the efforts of 628:) to call someone an anti-semite 5489: 5411:serenity without social tension. 5115:as the standard interpretation. 5063:POV pushing in other articles. 4789:For Excellent Arguments in the 4773: 3842: 3478: 2861: 1704: 1611:WikiProject Jewish History Stats 1498: 1170: 1150: 1025: 932:WikiProject Jewish History Stats 824: 548: 528: 398: 186:WikiProject Good Articles Sweeps 109: 99: 89: 79: 69: 5541: 5536: 4181:(EGMichael's here refers to my 2267:Creation according to Genesis, 5638:. For the Election committee, 5608:Arbitration Committee election 5599:ArbCom elections are now open! 5534: 4793:over the past almost 5 months 679:Simple English Knowledge (XXG) 472:WikiProject Judaism Newsletter 17:WikiProject Judaism Newsletter 1: 5648:13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 5208:ex nihilo and the astronomers 5054:has been trolling around the 5015:For the Arbitration Committee 4904:parties to agree to disagree. 3604:I echo PM above. Please read 3504:discuss controversial changes 2999:13:32, 26 February 2010 (UTC) 2975:00:39, 25 February 2010 (UTC) 2960:00:34, 25 February 2010 (UTC) 2938:01:11, 25 February 2010 (UTC) 2904:23:37, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 2889:21:00, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 2851:20:56, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 2836:20:42, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 2794:18:56, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 2772:18:51, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 2759:Creation according to Genesis 2741:16:45, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 2711:10:42, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 2689:Creation according to Genesis 2682:EGMichaels: well -- INNOCUOUS 2619:Creation according to Genesis 2470:15:55, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 2454:15:38, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 2422:05:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 2377:00:13, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 2241:17:27, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 2215:17:23, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 2190:17:02, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 2167:16:12, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 2149:14:22, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 2133:14:09, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 2114:14:32, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 2095:14:02, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 2079:13:23, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 2063:13:09, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 2045:12:56, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 2026:12:43, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 2012:12:40, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 1992:12:24, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 1961:01:21, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 1932:00:09, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 1916:00:04, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 1896:(mythologizers only, please) 1490:for Judaism and Kabbalah and 239:Spread the word! No, not the 3870:For the Mediation Committee, 3125:deletion of sourced material 1887:15:49, 8 February 2010 (UTC) 1221:"Censorship" of names of G-d 686:and a more extended list is 5634:and submit your choices on 4167:??? I'm rubbing off on you! 3910:to perform case management. 3902:, an automated bot account 3756:Alastair Haines's talk page 1796:You added a mention of the 1778:21:11, 31 August 2008 (UTC) 1756:20:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC) 261:|ad=148}} to your userpage. 247:(well, you can do that too) 5663: 5640:MediaWiki message delivery 4820:13:49, 28 April 2010 (UTC) 4803:02:10, 28 April 2010 (UTC) 4791:Genesis creation narrative 4728:10:52, 29 April 2010 (UTC) 4705:14:40, 27 April 2010 (UTC) 4630:13:30, 27 April 2010 (UTC) 4539:12:15, 27 April 2010 (UTC) 4472:12:08, 27 April 2010 (UTC) 4433:11:53, 27 April 2010 (UTC) 4375:08:59, 27 April 2010 (UTC) 4328:21:02, 26 April 2010 (UTC) 4277:01:37, 25 April 2010 (UTC) 4250:01:18, 25 April 2010 (UTC) 4208:01:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC) 4177:00:56, 25 April 2010 (UTC) 4141:03:14, 20 April 2010 (UTC) 4121:14:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 4086:14:33, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 4067:14:24, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 4051:01:35, 18 April 2010 (UTC) 3995:00:11, 15 April 2010 (UTC) 3973:16:38, 14 April 2010 (UTC) 3958:16:08, 14 April 2010 (UTC) 3898:This message delivered by 3887:09:55, 12 April 2010 (UTC) 3419:16:01, 17 March 2010 (UTC) 3404:15:47, 17 March 2010 (UTC) 3366:06:32, 24 March 2010 (UTC) 3351:06:02, 24 March 2010 (UTC) 3337:13:22, 16 March 2010 (UTC) 3326:21:24, 15 March 2010 (UTC) 3311:21:22, 15 March 2010 (UTC) 2946:Best of luck with the baby 2872:Talk:Genesis creation myth 1652:WikiProject Kabbalah Stats 1515: 1426:User:Yosef.garibaldi.gmail 1364:Talk:Shimon_Peres#Birthday 1204: 1157:WikiProject Jewish History 1085:02:32, 3 August 2008 (UTC) 973:WikiProject Kabbalah Stats 841: 814:Habib ben Elisha Faturechi 593:Worship of the Golden Calf 582: 535:WikiProject Jewish History 270: 191:GA status for the article 140: 5593:08:48, 28 June 2012 (UTC) 5547:12:02, 5 April 2012 (UTC) 5486:Dispute resolution survey 4779: 4603:doing it. I was correct, 3743:19:13, 7 April 2010 (UTC) 3724:02:27, 6 April 2010 (UTC) 3705:16:56, 2 April 2010 (UTC) 3675:17:13, 2 April 2010 (UTC) 3637:05:33, 2 April 2010 (UTC) 3619:05:30, 2 April 2010 (UTC) 3599:04:51, 2 April 2010 (UTC) 3570:05:08, 2 April 2010 (UTC) 3552:04:59, 2 April 2010 (UTC) 3536:00:52, 2 April 2010 (UTC) 3468:16:54, 1 April 2010 (UTC) 3452:06:08, 1 April 2010 (UTC) 3260:22:29, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 3237:20:46, 3 March 2010 (UTC) 3200:13:11, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 3183:09:23, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 3164:12:47, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 3140:07:14, 3 March 2010 (UTC) 3119:19:55, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 3085:19:29, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 3069:07:15, 3 March 2010 (UTC) 3054:18:12, 2 March 2010 (UTC) 3019:17:47, 2 March 2010 (UTC) 2330:Abrahamic world religions 1703: 1570:WikiProject Judaism Stats 1200: 1024: 891:WikiProject Judaism Stats 578: 397: 136: 5392:13:52, 8 July 2010 (UTC) 5370:16:09, 13 May 2010 (UTC) 5301:05:42, 13 May 2010 (UTC) 5177:01:44, 13 May 2010 (UTC) 5095:01:02, 10 May 2010 (UTC) 5077:00:48, 10 May 2010 (UTC) 4978: 4920: 4873: 4815: 4334:don't presume to tell me 4100:Talk:Jehovah's Witnesses 4081: 3778:has been filed with the 3632: 3565: 3414: 3321: 3032:Nefariousski's talk page 2970: 2846: 2789: 2736: 2657:Genesis Chapters 1 and 2 2587:Genesis creation account 2465: 2417: 2236: 2128: 2074: 2040: 1987: 1966:Needed Consensus on the 1865:01:19, 14 May 2009 (UTC) 1850:00:46, 14 May 2009 (UTC) 1834:15:31, 13 May 2009 (UTC) 1814:13:36, 11 May 2009 (UTC) 467:04:25, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 5283:This issue isn't about 5274:been removed making it 5046:23:28, 9 May 2010 (UTC) 5027:11:50, 8 May 2010 (UTC) 4983:16:41, 6 May 2010 (UTC) 4968:16:24, 6 May 2010 (UTC) 4949:05:12, 6 May 2010 (UTC) 4925:22:41, 5 May 2010 (UTC) 4898:21:24, 5 May 2010 (UTC) 4878:18:42, 4 May 2010 (UTC) 4858:19:41, 3 May 2010 (UTC) 4344:happen to use the word 2883:The Hand That Feeds You 1768:Newsletter delivery by 1326:The New Jewish Barnstar 1272:The New Jewish Barnstar 1075:Newsletter delivery by 5575:and please be sure to 5498: 5459:25 December 2011 (UTC) 5414: 5405: 4340:the use of a word. If 4318:used with a full stop. 3857:and has been delisted. 3752: 3395: 3269: 3214: 3028: 2558:Genesis creation story 2364: 2314: 2311:User:Michael Courtney 2294:User:Michael Courtney 1527: 1279:Holocaust in Lithuania 1273: 1265: 1216: 1103:The Judaism Newsletter 1094:The Judaism Newsletter 853: 594: 481:The Judaism Newsletter 157: 30: 5612:Arbitration Committee 5503:Dispute Resolution – 5497: 5404: 4783:The Socratic Barnstar 3851:Request for Mediation 3776:Genesis Creation Myth 3751: 3578:I mean this sincerely 3491:Genesis creation myth 3436:reverted as vandalism 3384: 3268: 3213: 3027: 2669:EGMichaels: innocuous 2631:EGMichaels: innocuous 2515:Genesis creation myth 2337:Logos (Christianity) 1968:Genesis creation myth 1949:Genesis creation myth 1892:Genesis creation myth 1686:of which are Featured 1554:Articles for Deletion 1525: 1271: 1263: 1235:Article Cleanup Lists 1214: 875:Articles for Deletion 851: 663:Template talk:Halakha 592: 347:Most Popular Articles 251:project template page 150: 28: 5581:User:EGMichaels/temp 5565:User:EGMichaels/temp 5559:User:EGMichaels/temp 5362:Professor marginalia 5293:Professor marginalia 5169:Professor marginalia 5155:altogether--when an 5000:User:Alastair Haines 4846:Guide to arbitration 4810:Wow! Thanks Weapon! 4439:accidentally correct 4336:the manner in which 3920:Alastair Haines RfAr 3697:Professor marginalia 3591:Professor marginalia 3544:Maher-shalal-hashbaz 3528:Maher-shalal-hashbaz 2784:Good catch. Thanks. 2254:User talk:EGMichaels 1287:contact User:Piotrus 1177:WikiProject Kabbalah 555:WikiProject Kabbalah 5616:arbitration process 3938:Gender and religion 3908:Mediation Committee 3780:Mediation Committee 2866:Please remember to 1715:Knowledge (XXG) ads 1559:Request for Comment 1494:for Jewish History. 1337:To Do/Help Requests 1316:The Jewish Barnstar 1264:The Jewish Barnstar 1137:WikiProject Judaism 1036:Knowledge (XXG) ads 880:Request for Comment 515:WikiProject Judaism 409:Knowledge (XXG) ads 381:Ark of the Covenant 259:Knowledge (XXG) ads 5628:arbitration policy 5577:sign your comments 5557:MfD nomination of 5499: 5442:Happy Holidays..-- 5417: 5406: 3946:Hijra (South Asia) 3763:remove this notice 3753: 3512:dispute resolution 3393:and the universe." 3280:remove this notice 3270: 3225:remove this notice 3215: 3039:remove this notice 3029: 2756:why are there to " 1589:2356 of which are 1528: 1274: 1266: 1240:User:B. Wolterding 1217: 910:2342 of which are 854: 620:A Special Dispatch 595: 298:2341 of which are 223:Hebrew Punctuation 158: 31: 5554: 5553: 5549: 5458: 5415: 5052:User:Wikiwatcher1 4931:Courtesy notice.. 4808: 4807: 4048: 3896: 3895: 3500:three-revert rule 3495:three-revert rule 3273:Atama's talk page 3246:Hey Dude, As per 2916: 2868:assume good faith 1780: 1759: 1758: 1737: 1736: 1733: 1732: 1729: 1728: 1699: 1698: 1695: 1694: 1680:of which are Good 1630:244 of which are 1513: 1512: 1196: 1195: 1087: 1068: 1067: 1058: 1057: 1054: 1053: 1050: 1049: 1020: 1019: 1016: 1015: 951:241 of which are 839: 838: 574: 573: 463: 445: 444: 431: 430: 427: 426: 423: 422: 393: 392: 389: 388: 356: 268: 267: 248: 156: 132: 131: 66:Main Project Page 5654: 5545: 5543: 5538: 5528: 5490: 5450: 4777: 4770: 4769: 4720: 4715: 4622: 4617: 4464: 4459: 4367: 4362: 4269: 4264: 4200: 4195: 4185:use of the word 4161:Other Christian 4113: 4108: 4049: 4044: 4038: 4032: 4026: 4024: 3846: 3839: 3766: 3493:. Note that the 3482: 3401: 3334: 3283: 3248:wikipedia policy 3234: 3228: 3042: 2906: 2884: 2865: 2362: 2018:Til Eulenspiegel 1775: 1767: 1740: 1739: 1723: 1716: 1708: 1701: 1671:87 of which are 1642:10 of which are 1636:10 of which are 1595:18 of which are 1564:Article Requests 1517: 1516: 1502: 1460:Bezalel Rudinsky 1330: 1324: 1320: 1314: 1206: 1205: 1202: 1201: 1198: 1178: 1174: 1158: 1154: 1138: 1127: 1126: 1119: 1113: 1109: 1098: 1082: 1074: 1061: 1060: 1044: 1037: 1029: 1022: 992:87 of which are 963:10 of which are 957:10 of which are 916:15 of which are 885:Article Requests 843: 842: 828: 797:None. Won't you 708:User:John Carter 634:Godwin-esque law 584: 583: 580: 579: 576: 556: 552: 536: 532: 516: 505: 504: 497: 491: 487: 476: 460: 455: 452: 434: 433: 417: 410: 402: 395: 376:Ten Commandments 350: 304:15 of which are 272: 271: 246: 151: 142: 141: 138: 137: 134: 124: 118: 113: 107: 103: 97: 93: 87: 83: 77: 73: 67: 56: 55: 48: 44: 21: 5662: 5661: 5657: 5656: 5655: 5653: 5652: 5651: 5636:the voting page 5602: 5562: 5521:to participate. 5508: 5488: 5399: 5380: 5105: 5034: 4993: 4933: 4885: 4865: 4827: 4768: 4716: 4711: 4618: 4613: 4460: 4455: 4363: 4358: 4265: 4260: 4196: 4191: 4148: 4128: 4109: 4104: 4096: 4042: 4036: 4030: 4025: 4022: 4004: 3981: 3922: 3917: 3837: 3808:active mediator 3772: 3767: 3760: 3735:Alastair Haines 3731: 3712: 3687:The article is 3682: 3580: 3516:page protection 3476: 3440:personal attack 3427: 3425:Personal attack 3399: 3386:While the term 3380: 3332: 3299: 3289: 3284: 3277: 3244: 3232: 3229: 3222: 3207: 3127: 3043: 3036: 3006: 2983: 2948: 2923: 2909:User:EGMichaels 2896:SkyWriter (Tim) 2882: 2877:for disruption. 2859: 2809: 2748: 2506: 2478: 2363: 2360: 2303:WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV 1972: 1940: 1894: 1875: 1873:source deletion 1821: 1791: 1770: 1721: 1714: 1691: 1660:Project Members 1619:Project Members 1601:6 of which are 1578:Project Members 1544:Kabbalah Portal 1509: 1476:Hebrew spelling 1455: 1415:Jewish History: 1410:yehoshuafriedla 1374: 1347:. According to 1339: 1328: 1322: 1318: 1312: 1257: 1237: 1223: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1187: 1176: 1167: 1156: 1147: 1136: 1121: 1117: 1111: 1107: 1105: 1096: 1077: 1042: 1035: 1012: 981:Project Members 940:Project Members 922:8 of which are 899:Project Members 870:Kabbalah Portal 835: 809: 787:Jewish History: 726: 673: 642: 622: 605: 570: 569: 568: 565: 554: 545: 534: 525: 514: 499: 495: 489: 485: 483: 474: 458: 448: 415: 408: 385: 310:8 of which are 287:Project Members 264: 217: 180: 167:Shalom aleichem 164: 128: 127: 126: 122: 116: 105: 95: 85: 75: 65: 50: 46: 38: 36: 19: 12: 11: 5: 5660: 5658: 5605: 5601: 5596: 5561: 5555: 5552: 5551: 5526: 5523: 5510: 5501: 5487: 5484: 5483: 5482: 5481: 5480: 5479: 5478: 5477: 5476: 5475: 5474: 5473: 5472: 5471: 5470: 5469: 5468: 5467: 5466: 5465: 5464: 5463: 5462: 5461: 5460: 5455: 5447: 5398: 5395: 5379: 5376: 5375: 5374: 5373: 5372: 5334: 5333: 5332: 5331: 5316: 5315: 5314: 5313: 5304: 5303: 5280: 5279: 5244: 5243: 5212: 5211: 5187: 5186: 5104: 5101: 5100: 5099: 5098: 5097: 5080: 5079: 5033: 5030: 5012: 5011: 5007: 5003: 4992: 4987: 4986: 4985: 4960:138.130.123.17 4932: 4929: 4928: 4927: 4911: 4910: 4906: 4905: 4884: 4881: 4864: 4861: 4841: 4840: 4837: 4834: 4826: 4823: 4806: 4805: 4786: 4785: 4780: 4778: 4767: 4764: 4763: 4762: 4761: 4760: 4759: 4758: 4757: 4756: 4755: 4754: 4753: 4752: 4751: 4750: 4749: 4748: 4747: 4746: 4745: 4744: 4743: 4742: 4741: 4740: 4739: 4738: 4737: 4736: 4735: 4734: 4733: 4732: 4731: 4730: 4661: 4660: 4659: 4658: 4657: 4656: 4655: 4654: 4653: 4652: 4651: 4650: 4649: 4648: 4647: 4646: 4645: 4644: 4643: 4642: 4641: 4640: 4639: 4638: 4637: 4636: 4635: 4634: 4633: 4632: 4568: 4567: 4566: 4565: 4564: 4563: 4562: 4561: 4560: 4559: 4558: 4557: 4556: 4555: 4554: 4553: 4552: 4551: 4550: 4549: 4548: 4547: 4546: 4545: 4544: 4543: 4542: 4541: 4499: 4498: 4497: 4496: 4495: 4494: 4493: 4492: 4491: 4490: 4489: 4488: 4487: 4486: 4485: 4484: 4483: 4482: 4481: 4480: 4479: 4478: 4477: 4476: 4475: 4474: 4398: 4397: 4396: 4395: 4394: 4393: 4392: 4391: 4390: 4389: 4388: 4387: 4386: 4385: 4384: 4383: 4382: 4381: 4380: 4379: 4378: 4377: 4296: 4295: 4294: 4293: 4292: 4291: 4290: 4289: 4288: 4287: 4286: 4285: 4284: 4283: 4282: 4281: 4280: 4279: 4258:sense to me.-- 4223: 4222: 4221: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4217: 4216: 4215: 4214: 4213: 4212: 4211: 4210: 4147: 4144: 4127: 4124: 4095: 4092: 4091: 4090: 4089: 4088: 4070: 4069: 4003: 3998: 3980: 3977: 3976: 3975: 3921: 3918: 3911: 3897: 3894: 3893: 3892: 3891: 3890: 3889: 3864: 3858: 3847: 3836: 3833: 3831: 3814:for details). 3771: 3770:Mediation Case 3768: 3759: 3746: 3730: 3727: 3711: 3710:Happy Birthday 3708: 3681: 3678: 3658: 3657: 3656: 3655: 3654: 3653: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3622: 3621: 3579: 3576: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3555: 3554: 3475: 3472: 3471: 3470: 3426: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3379: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3371: 3370: 3369: 3368: 3298: 3297:Congrats Eric! 3295: 3288: 3285: 3276: 3263: 3243: 3240: 3221: 3208: 3206: 3203: 3188: 3187: 3186: 3185: 3167: 3166: 3126: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3107: 3104: 3101: 3098: 3092: 3088: 3087: 3072: 3071: 3035: 3022: 3005: 3002: 2982: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2947: 2944: 2922: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2858: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2824: 2823: 2819: 2816: 2808: 2805: 2803: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2747: 2744: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2723: 2719: 2718: 2714: 2713: 2698: 2697: 2691: 2690: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2679: 2678: 2674: 2673: 2670: 2666: 2665: 2659: 2658: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2647: 2646: 2642: 2641: 2638: 2635: 2632: 2628: 2627: 2621: 2620: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2610: 2606: 2605: 2601: 2600: 2596: 2595: 2589: 2588: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2577: 2576: 2572: 2571: 2567: 2566: 2560: 2559: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2549: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2537: 2533: 2532: 2529: 2524: 2523: 2517: 2516: 2505: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2497: 2494: 2491: 2488: 2477: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2425: 2424: 2409: 2408: 2403: 2402: 2397: 2396: 2391: 2390: 2385: 2384: 2358: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2136: 2135: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2082: 2081: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2029: 2028: 2014: 1971: 1964: 1939: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1904:requested move 1893: 1890: 1874: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1820: 1817: 1790: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1735: 1734: 1731: 1730: 1727: 1726: 1718: 1710: 1709: 1697: 1696: 1693: 1692: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1681: 1675: 1666: 1665: 1662: 1654: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1640: 1634: 1625: 1624: 1621: 1613: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1599: 1593: 1584: 1583: 1580: 1572: 1567: 1566: 1561: 1556: 1551: 1546: 1541: 1539:Judaism Portal 1534: 1529: 1520: 1514: 1511: 1510: 1507: 1505: 1504: 1495: 1483: 1451: 1449: 1448: 1440: 1412: 1370: 1368: 1367: 1356: 1335: 1333: 1332: 1305: 1290: 1253: 1238: 1233: 1224: 1219: 1209: 1194: 1193: 1185: 1165: 1145: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1130: 1123: 1122: 1106: 1101: 1095: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1056: 1055: 1052: 1051: 1048: 1047: 1039: 1031: 1030: 1018: 1017: 1014: 1013: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1004:1 of which is 1002: 998:1 of which is 996: 987: 986: 983: 975: 970: 969: 968: 967: 961: 955: 946: 945: 942: 934: 929: 928: 927: 926: 920: 914: 905: 904: 901: 893: 888: 887: 882: 877: 872: 867: 865:Judaism Portal 860: 855: 846: 840: 837: 836: 833: 831: 830: 821: 805: 803: 802: 792: 784: 722: 720: 719: 714: 713: 712: 711: 700: 699: 696:Jewish History 669: 667: 666: 655: 648: 638: 637: 623: 618: 606: 599:Now with 200% 597: 587: 572: 571: 563: 543: 523: 512: 511: 510: 508: 501: 500: 484: 479: 473: 470: 429: 428: 425: 424: 421: 420: 412: 404: 403: 391: 390: 387: 386: 384: 383: 378: 373: 368: 363: 351:By page hits. 349: 344: 343: 338: 333: 328: 317: 316: 315: 314: 308: 302: 293: 292: 289: 280: 275: 269: 266: 265: 263: 262: 237: 234: 213: 211: 210: 200: 189: 176: 175: 165: 160: 145: 130: 129: 86:Judaism Portal 63: 62: 61: 59: 52: 51: 37: 32: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5659: 5650: 5649: 5645: 5641: 5637: 5633: 5629: 5625: 5621: 5617: 5613: 5609: 5600: 5597: 5595: 5594: 5590: 5586: 5582: 5578: 5574: 5570: 5566: 5560: 5556: 5550: 5548: 5544: 5539: 5532: 5531:research page 5525: 5522: 5520: 5517:Please click 5514: 5509: 5507: 5506: 5505:Survey Invite 5496: 5492: 5491: 5485: 5457: 5456: 5453: 5449: 5448: 5445: 5441: 5440: 5439: 5438: 5437: 5436: 5435: 5434: 5433: 5432: 5431: 5430: 5429: 5428: 5427: 5426: 5425: 5424: 5423: 5422: 5421: 5420: 5419: 5418: 5413: 5412: 5403: 5396: 5394: 5393: 5389: 5385: 5377: 5371: 5367: 5363: 5359: 5354: 5350: 5346: 5342: 5338: 5337: 5336: 5335: 5329: 5325: 5320: 5319: 5318: 5317: 5312: 5308: 5307: 5306: 5305: 5302: 5298: 5294: 5290: 5286: 5282: 5281: 5277: 5273: 5268: 5265:who concedes 5264: 5260: 5255: 5250: 5246: 5245: 5241: 5237: 5233: 5230: 5227: 5222: 5218: 5214: 5213: 5209: 5205: 5201: 5197: 5193: 5189: 5188: 5184: 5181: 5180: 5179: 5178: 5174: 5170: 5166: 5160: 5158: 5154: 5150: 5146: 5142: 5138: 5134: 5130: 5127: 5125: 5123: 5121: 5118: 5114: 5110: 5102: 5096: 5093: 5089: 5084: 5083: 5082: 5081: 5078: 5075: 5071: 5066: 5061: 5057: 5053: 5050: 5049: 5048: 5047: 5044: 5040: 5031: 5029: 5028: 5024: 5020: 5016: 5008: 5004: 5001: 4998: 4997: 4996: 4991: 4988: 4984: 4980: 4976: 4972: 4971: 4970: 4969: 4965: 4961: 4956: 4951: 4950: 4946: 4942: 4938: 4930: 4926: 4922: 4918: 4913: 4912: 4908: 4907: 4902: 4901: 4900: 4899: 4895: 4891: 4882: 4880: 4879: 4875: 4871: 4862: 4860: 4859: 4855: 4851: 4848:. Thank you. 4847: 4838: 4835: 4832: 4831: 4830: 4824: 4822: 4821: 4817: 4813: 4804: 4800: 4796: 4792: 4788: 4787: 4784: 4781: 4776: 4771: 4765: 4729: 4725: 4721: 4719: 4714: 4708: 4707: 4706: 4702: 4698: 4693: 4692: 4691: 4690: 4689: 4688: 4687: 4686: 4685: 4684: 4683: 4682: 4681: 4680: 4679: 4678: 4677: 4676: 4675: 4674: 4673: 4672: 4671: 4670: 4669: 4668: 4667: 4666: 4665: 4664: 4663: 4662: 4631: 4627: 4623: 4621: 4616: 4610: 4606: 4602: 4598: 4597: 4596: 4595: 4594: 4593: 4592: 4591: 4590: 4589: 4588: 4587: 4586: 4585: 4584: 4583: 4582: 4581: 4580: 4579: 4578: 4577: 4576: 4575: 4574: 4573: 4572: 4571: 4570: 4569: 4540: 4536: 4532: 4527: 4526: 4525: 4524: 4523: 4522: 4521: 4520: 4519: 4518: 4517: 4516: 4515: 4514: 4513: 4512: 4511: 4510: 4509: 4508: 4507: 4506: 4505: 4504: 4503: 4502: 4501: 4500: 4473: 4469: 4465: 4463: 4458: 4452: 4448: 4444: 4440: 4436: 4435: 4434: 4430: 4426: 4422: 4421: 4420: 4419: 4418: 4417: 4416: 4415: 4414: 4413: 4412: 4411: 4410: 4409: 4408: 4407: 4406: 4405: 4404: 4403: 4402: 4401: 4400: 4399: 4376: 4372: 4368: 4366: 4361: 4355: 4352:tell me that 4351: 4347: 4343: 4339: 4335: 4331: 4330: 4329: 4325: 4321: 4316: 4315: 4314: 4313: 4312: 4311: 4310: 4309: 4308: 4307: 4306: 4305: 4304: 4303: 4302: 4301: 4300: 4299: 4298: 4297: 4278: 4274: 4270: 4268: 4263: 4257: 4253: 4252: 4251: 4247: 4243: 4239: 4238: 4237: 4236: 4235: 4234: 4233: 4232: 4231: 4230: 4229: 4228: 4227: 4226: 4225: 4224: 4209: 4205: 4201: 4199: 4194: 4188: 4184: 4180: 4179: 4178: 4174: 4170: 4166: 4165: 4160: 4159: 4158: 4157: 4156: 4155: 4154: 4153: 4152: 4151: 4150: 4149: 4145: 4143: 4142: 4138: 4134: 4125: 4123: 4122: 4118: 4114: 4112: 4107: 4101: 4094:Edit conflict 4093: 4087: 4083: 4079: 4074: 4073: 4072: 4071: 4068: 4064: 4060: 4055: 4054: 4053: 4052: 4047: 4045: 4039: 4033: 4019: 4017: 4013: 4009: 4002: 3999: 3997: 3996: 3993: 3990: 3986: 3979:RFArb comment 3978: 3974: 3970: 3966: 3962: 3961: 3960: 3959: 3955: 3951: 3947: 3943: 3942:Singular they 3939: 3935: 3934:Gender of God 3931: 3927: 3919: 3915: 3909: 3905: 3901: 3888: 3884: 3880: 3876: 3875: 3871: 3868: 3867: 3866: 3865: 3862: 3856: 3852: 3848: 3845: 3841: 3840: 3834: 3832: 3829: 3827: 3823: 3818: 3815: 3813: 3809: 3803: 3801: 3797: 3793: 3787: 3785: 3781: 3777: 3769: 3764: 3757: 3750: 3745: 3744: 3740: 3736: 3728: 3726: 3725: 3721: 3717: 3709: 3707: 3706: 3702: 3698: 3694: 3690: 3686: 3679: 3677: 3676: 3672: 3668: 3664: 3652: 3648: 3647: 3646: 3645: 3644: 3643: 3638: 3634: 3630: 3626: 3625: 3624: 3623: 3620: 3616: 3612: 3607: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3596: 3592: 3588: 3584: 3577: 3571: 3567: 3563: 3559: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3553: 3549: 3545: 3540: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3533: 3529: 3525: 3523: 3517: 3513: 3509: 3505: 3501: 3496: 3492: 3488: 3487: 3481: 3473: 3469: 3465: 3461: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3449: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3433: 3424: 3420: 3416: 3412: 3408: 3407: 3406: 3405: 3402: 3394: 3391: 3390: 3383: 3377: 3367: 3363: 3359: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3348: 3344: 3340: 3339: 3338: 3335: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3323: 3319: 3315: 3314: 3313: 3312: 3308: 3304: 3296: 3294: 3293: 3286: 3281: 3274: 3267: 3262: 3261: 3257: 3253: 3249: 3241: 3239: 3238: 3235: 3226: 3219: 3212: 3204: 3202: 3201: 3197: 3193: 3192:Tediouspedant 3184: 3180: 3176: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3165: 3161: 3157: 3156:Tediouspedant 3152: 3148: 3144: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3137: 3133: 3124: 3120: 3116: 3112: 3111:Tediouspedant 3108: 3105: 3102: 3099: 3097: 3093: 3090: 3089: 3086: 3082: 3078: 3077:Tediouspedant 3074: 3073: 3070: 3066: 3062: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3051: 3047: 3040: 3033: 3026: 3021: 3020: 3016: 3012: 3003: 3001: 3000: 2996: 2992: 2988: 2980: 2976: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2957: 2953: 2945: 2943: 2942: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2928: 2920: 2914: 2910: 2905: 2901: 2897: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2887: 2885: 2878: 2874:. Thank you. 2873: 2869: 2864: 2857:February 2010 2856: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2833: 2829: 2820: 2817: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2806: 2804: 2795: 2791: 2787: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2773: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2760: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2746:Summary Table 2745: 2743: 2742: 2738: 2734: 2724: 2721: 2720: 2716: 2715: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2699: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2688: 2687: 2681: 2680: 2676: 2675: 2671: 2668: 2667: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2656: 2655: 2649: 2648: 2644: 2643: 2639: 2636: 2633: 2630: 2629: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2618: 2617: 2611: 2608: 2607: 2603: 2602: 2598: 2597: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2586: 2585: 2579: 2578: 2574: 2573: 2569: 2568: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2557: 2556: 2550: 2547: 2543: 2540: 2539: 2535: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2525: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2509: 2503: 2498: 2495: 2492: 2489: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2481: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2435: 2431: 2423: 2419: 2415: 2411: 2410: 2405: 2404: 2399: 2398: 2393: 2392: 2387: 2386: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2357: 2352: 2350: 2346: 2345:discontinuity 2340: 2338: 2335: 2331: 2326: 2324: 2318: 2313: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2297: 2295: 2290: 2288: 2284: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2268: 2263: 2258: 2255: 2242: 2238: 2234: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2216: 2212: 2208: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2182:Grantmidnight 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2121: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2000: 1999:WP:OTHERSTUFF 1996: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1975: 1969: 1965: 1963: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1945: 1937: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1897: 1891: 1889: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1872: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1831: 1827: 1818: 1816: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1799: 1794: 1788: 1779: 1776: 1773: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1757: 1754: 1753: 1748: 1744: 1724: 1719: 1717: 1712: 1711: 1707: 1702: 1685: 1682: 1679: 1676: 1674: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1663: 1661: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1653: 1645: 1641: 1639: 1635: 1633: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1623:1141 articles 1622: 1620: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1612: 1604: 1600: 1598: 1594: 1592: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1582:6248 articles 1581: 1579: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1571: 1565: 1562: 1560: 1557: 1555: 1552: 1550: 1549:Israel Portal 1547: 1545: 1542: 1540: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1533: 1524: 1519: 1518: 1508: 1501: 1496: 1493: 1489: 1484: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1468:Jewish tartan 1465: 1461: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1454: 1447: 1444: 1441: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1416: 1413: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1380: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1373: 1365: 1361: 1358:The folks at 1357: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1338: 1327: 1317: 1310: 1306: 1303: 1299: 1298:David Beckham 1295: 1291: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1275: 1270: 1262: 1258: 1256: 1251: 1249: 1248:his talk page 1245: 1241: 1236: 1231: 1229: 1222: 1213: 1208: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1188: 1182: 1179: 1173: 1169:) 1168: 1162: 1159: 1153: 1148: 1142: 1139: 1131: 1129: 1128: 1125: 1124: 1120: 1114: 1108:Issue III -- 1104: 1099: 1093: 1086: 1083: 1080: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1065: 1045: 1040: 1038: 1033: 1032: 1028: 1023: 1007: 1003: 1001: 997: 995: 991: 990: 989: 988: 984: 982: 978: 977: 976: 974: 966: 962: 960: 956: 954: 950: 949: 948: 947: 944:1124 articles 943: 941: 937: 936: 935: 933: 925: 921: 919: 915: 913: 909: 908: 907: 906: 903:6155 articles 902: 900: 896: 895: 894: 892: 886: 883: 881: 878: 876: 873: 871: 868: 866: 863: 862: 861: 859: 850: 845: 844: 834: 827: 822: 819: 815: 812: 811: 810: 808: 800: 796: 793: 791: 788: 785: 783: 779: 775: 771: 767: 763: 759: 755: 751: 747: 743: 739: 735: 732: 729: 728: 727: 725: 716: 715: 709: 704: 703: 702: 701: 697: 693: 689: 685: 680: 676: 675: 674: 672: 664: 660: 656: 653: 649: 645: 644: 643: 641: 635: 631: 627: 621: 616: 614: 610: 604: 602: 591: 586: 585: 581: 577: 566: 560: 557: 551: 547:) 546: 540: 537: 531: 526: 520: 517: 509: 507: 506: 503: 502: 498: 492: 482: 477: 471: 469: 468: 464: 461: 453: 451: 446:Delivered by 442: 438: 418: 413: 411: 406: 405: 401: 396: 382: 379: 377: 374: 372: 369: 367: 366:The Holocaust 364: 362: 359: 358: 357: 354: 348: 342: 339: 337: 334: 332: 331:Bernstein2291 329: 327: 324: 323: 322: 321: 313: 309: 307: 303: 301: 297: 296: 295: 294: 291:6152 articles 290: 288: 284: 283: 282: 279: 274: 273: 260: 256: 252: 244: 243: 238: 235: 232: 228: 224: 220: 219: 218: 216: 208: 204: 201: 198: 194: 190: 187: 183: 182: 181: 179: 173: 168: 163: 154: 149: 144: 143: 139: 135: 125: 119: 112: 108: 102: 98: 92: 88: 82: 78: 72: 68: 60: 58: 57: 54: 53: 49: 42: 35: 27: 22: 16: 5603: 5563: 5527: 5516: 5515: 5511: 5504: 5502: 5500: 5452: 5446:Buster Seven 5444: 5409: 5408: 5381: 5357: 5352: 5348: 5340: 5327: 5323: 5288: 5284: 5275: 5271: 5266: 5262: 5258: 5253: 5248: 5239: 5235: 5225: 5220: 5216: 5199: 5195: 5191: 5164: 5161: 5156: 5152: 5144: 5136: 5112: 5108: 5106: 5088:Slrubenstein 5070:Slrubenstein 5039:Slrubenstein 5035: 5014: 5013: 4994: 4952: 4934: 4886: 4866: 4842: 4828: 4809: 4782: 4717: 4712: 4700: 4619: 4614: 4608: 4604: 4600: 4534: 4461: 4456: 4450: 4446: 4443:deliberately 4442: 4438: 4428: 4364: 4359: 4353: 4349: 4345: 4341: 4337: 4333: 4323: 4266: 4261: 4255: 4245: 4197: 4192: 4186: 4182: 4172: 4163: 4162: 4129: 4110: 4105: 4097: 4027: 4020: 4005: 3982: 3930:Why Men Rule 3923: 3900:MediationBot 3872: 3869: 3855:not accepted 3830: 3819: 3816: 3804: 3788: 3775: 3773: 3732: 3713: 3688: 3683: 3659: 3650: 3586: 3581: 3524:from editing 3519: 3484: 3477: 3428: 3396: 3387: 3385: 3381: 3303:Nefariousski 3300: 3290: 3287:sock puppet? 3245: 3230: 3189: 3150: 3146: 3128: 3095: 3046:Nefariousski 3044: 3011:Nefariousski 3007: 2984: 2952:Nefariousski 2949: 2940: 2924: 2912: 2880: 2875: 2860: 2825: 2822:(EGMichaels) 2810: 2802: 2758: 2757: 2749: 2730: 2703:Templeknight 2510: 2507: 2482: 2479: 2426: 2365: 2354: 2344: 2341: 2327: 2322: 2319: 2315: 2299: 2292:I like what 2291: 2286: 2282: 2280: 2276: 2272: 2266: 2261: 2259: 2253: 2251: 2137: 2083: 2051: 1976: 1973: 1944:this section 1942:Please read 1941: 1924:Nefariousski 1898: 1895: 1876: 1822: 1806:DJ Clayworth 1798:Anchor Bible 1797: 1795: 1792: 1789:Anchor Bible 1771: 1751: 1746: 1738: 1683: 1677: 1664:165 articles 1651: 1650: 1610: 1609: 1569: 1568: 1531: 1530: 1506: 1453:New Articles 1452: 1450: 1442: 1418:5768altalena 1414: 1378: 1371: 1369: 1360:Shimon Peres 1336: 1334: 1308: 1294:Diane Keaton 1283:good article 1254: 1252: 1234: 1232: 1220: 1218: 1102: 1078: 1059: 985:165 articles 972: 971: 931: 930: 890: 889: 857: 856: 832: 807:New Articles 806: 804: 794: 786: 778:Joseph.mahal 750:Joshua Weiss 746:Joseph.mahal 730: 723: 721: 718:infoboxes... 670: 668: 654:to weigh in. 639: 629: 619: 617: 608: 600: 598: 596: 486:Issue II -- 480: 454: 449: 432: 346: 345: 336:Shevashalosh 319: 318: 277: 276: 240: 225:. Thanks to 214: 212: 177: 166: 162:What's This? 161: 159: 33: 5196:interpreted 5103:Revisionism 4833:Arbitrators 3820:Thank you, 3716:Deadtotruth 3680:Please stop 3520:you may be 2985:Please see 2762:" sections? 2434:Isle of Man 2349:Enuma elish 1879:Deadtotruth 1752:L'Aquatique 1532:Quick Links 1464:Shirulashem 1446:Shuliavrumi 1434:Shirulashem 1398:Shirulashem 1390:CheskiChips 1372:New Members 1255:In the News 858:Quick Links 770:Agent204.15 724:New Members 640:In the News 613:L'Aquatique 603:Jewishness! 320:New Members 278:Quick Stats 255:member list 178:In the News 39:Issue I -- 5624:topic bans 5585:Dougweller 5351:and being 5345:discussion 5343:. Once a 5058:page; see 4975:EGMichaels 4917:EGMichaels 4870:EGMichaels 4812:EGMichaels 4697:EGMichaels 4531:EGMichaels 4445:employed, 4437:I was not 4425:EGMichaels 4320:EGMichaels 4242:EGMichaels 4183:colloquial 4169:EGMichaels 4078:EGMichaels 4059:Hammy64000 3926:Patriarchy 3812:click here 3729:Thank you! 3663:WP:NOTVAND 3629:EGMichaels 3606:WP:NOTVAND 3562:EGMichaels 3474:April 2010 3432:good faith 3411:EGMichaels 3400:King Öomie 3333:King Öomie 3318:EGMichaels 3316:Thanks! :) 3233:King Öomie 3094:YTL reads 2989:. Cheers, 2981:ANI Thread 2967:EGMichaels 2843:EGMichaels 2786:EGMichaels 2733:EGMichaels 2528:attention! 2462:EGMichaels 2460:presented. 2442:Man Island 2414:EGMichaels 2369:AFA Prof01 2233:EGMichaels 2125:EGMichaels 2071:EGMichaels 2037:EGMichaels 1984:EGMichaels 1982:. Thanks. 1899:Regarding 1472:Briangotts 1402:TaliaNadel 1345:Moshe Idel 326:Benignuman 96:Categories 5620:site bans 5384:Weaponbb7 5358:ex nihilo 5349:ex nihilo 5324:ex nihilo 5285:ex nihilo 5267:ex nihilo 5240:ex nihilo 5221:ex nihilo 5217:ex nihilo 5192:Ex nihilo 5157:ex nihilo 5153:ex nihilo 5145:redundant 5137:ex nihilo 5113:ex nihilo 5109:ex nihilo 4955:this link 4941:SirFozzie 4937:this link 4890:SirFozzie 4863:Wikibreak 4795:Weaponbb7 4256:different 4187:religions 4164:religions 3879:Xavexgoem 3822:Weaponbb7 3667:Auntie E. 3611:Auntie E. 3587:vandalism 3508:consensus 3460:Auntie E. 3444:Auntie E. 2930:Weaponbb7 2764:Weaponbb7 2545:audience. 2430:WP:COMMON 2309:policy. ─ 2283:cosmogony 2262:emphasize 2141:Weaponbb7 1953:Auntie E. 1747:barnstars 1743:this list 1722:file info 1443:Kabbalah: 1394:Pini00001 1064:this list 1043:file info 795:Kabbalah: 734:Big maybe 441:this list 416:file info 203:Jerusalem 76:Talk Page 5569:deletion 5353:accurate 5276:slightly 4766:BarnStar 4346:religion 4338:I intend 3989:FloNight 3904:operated 3761:You can 3693:jousting 3486:edit war 3278:You can 3205:Talkback 3037:You can 2334:John 1:1 2159:Bus stop 1855:either. 1644:Featured 1603:Featured 1480:Epson291 1478:(thanks 1470:(thanks 1462:(thanks 1430:Pinnecco 1379:Judaism: 1302:Kabbalah 1006:Featured 965:Featured 924:Featured 816:(Thanks 754:LisaLiel 742:Jfdwolff 731:Judaism: 312:Featured 227:Epson291 114:Judaism 5272:finally 5254:confirm 5226:minutes 5165:content 5056:Judaism 5032:Judaism 4836:Parties 4599:You're 3965:Kaldari 3950:Kaldari 3906:by the 3522:blocked 2828:Johnbod 2446:Johnbod 2307:WP:NPOV 2106:Johnbod 2087:Johnbod 2055:Dweller 2004:Dweller 1526:Menorah 1422:AniMate 1382:Arigont 1149:) 852:Menorah 818:PhatJew 774:Gilad73 758:Rcjavid 738:Janirai 692:Judaism 659:Xyz7890 626:dickish 527:) 459:Disable 450:§hepBot 437:ShepBot 371:Judaism 153:Shavuot 29:Menorah 5610:. The 5537:Steven 5289:That's 5234:And I 4839:Others 4713:Jeffro 4615:Jeffro 4609:agreed 4457:Jeffro 4360:Jeffro 4262:Jeffro 4193:Jeffro 4133:Mk5384 4106:Jeffro 3874:Seddon 3358:Mk5384 3343:Mk5384 3252:NickCT 2438:island 2436:is an 1793:Hi EG 1725:– #148 1438:Tyciol 1406:Tyciol 1046:– #148 790:Noah03 782:Noah03 762:Yehudi 490:Tammuz 419:– #148 361:Israel 353:Source 5542:Zhang 5341:again 5065:WP:DE 4953:EGM, 4601:still 4350:don't 4131:best- 4023:Amory 3434:edit 1857:Gavin 1842:Gavin 1826:Gavin 1673:Stubs 1632:Stubs 1591:Stubs 1186:to do 1166:to do 1146:to do 994:Stubs 953:Stubs 912:Stubs 671:To Do 564:to do 544:to do 524:to do 341:Yudel 300:Stubs 215:To Do 207:!vote 106:To Do 41:Sivan 5644:talk 5589:talk 5519:HERE 5454:Talk 5388:talk 5366:talk 5310:it." 5297:talk 5249:junk 5236:know 5204:this 5173:talk 5141:here 5133:this 5129:Here 5117:Here 5092:Talk 5074:Talk 5060:this 5043:Talk 5023:talk 5017:, -- 4979:talk 4964:talk 4945:talk 4921:talk 4894:talk 4874:talk 4854:talk 4816:talk 4799:talk 4724:talk 4701:talk 4626:talk 4535:talk 4468:talk 4451:when 4429:talk 4371:talk 4324:talk 4273:talk 4246:talk 4204:talk 4173:talk 4137:talk 4117:talk 4082:talk 4063:talk 4008:here 3992:♥♥♥♥ 3969:talk 3954:talk 3883:talk 3877:and 3826:talk 3739:talk 3720:talk 3701:talk 3671:talk 3633:talk 3615:talk 3595:talk 3566:talk 3548:talk 3532:talk 3464:talk 3448:talk 3415:talk 3389:myth 3378:Note 3362:talk 3347:talk 3322:talk 3307:talk 3256:talk 3242:Myth 3196:talk 3179:talk 3175:PiCo 3160:talk 3149:and 3136:talk 3132:PiCo 3115:talk 3081:talk 3065:talk 3061:PiCo 3050:talk 3015:talk 2995:talk 2971:talk 2956:talk 2934:talk 2913:talk 2907:aka 2900:talk 2847:talk 2832:talk 2790:talk 2768:talk 2737:talk 2707:talk 2466:talk 2450:talk 2418:talk 2373:talk 2287:myth 2285:for 2237:talk 2211:talk 2186:talk 2163:talk 2145:talk 2129:talk 2110:talk 2091:talk 2075:talk 2059:talk 2041:talk 2022:talk 2008:talk 1988:talk 1980:here 1970:page 1957:talk 1928:talk 1912:talk 1883:talk 1861:talk 1846:talk 1830:talk 1810:talk 1772:xeno 1638:Good 1597:Good 1576:291 1492:here 1488:here 1474:!), 1466:!}, 1321:and 1296:and 1118:5768 1079:xeno 1000:Good 959:Good 918:Good 897:281 799:join 694:and 688:here 684:here 677:The 630:when 601:more 496:5768 306:Good 285:275 253:and 245:... 242:Word 197:here 172:here 47:5768 5604:Hi, 5378:EGM 5328:one 5263:you 5259:you 5200:you 5090:| 5072:| 5041:| 4605:and 4447:and 3689:not 3526:. 2991:Ben 2717:Con 2696:Pro 2677:Con 2664:Pro 2645:Con 2626:Pro 2604:Con 2594:Pro 2575:Con 2565:Pro 2536:Con 2522:Pro 2323:not 2207:Avi 1908:Ben 1819:LDS 1800:to 1774:bot 1658:13 1617:77 1386:Avi 1353:DYK 1309:two 1281:to 1081:bot 979:12 938:69 609:and 465:on 193:Jew 123:RFC 117:AFD 5646:) 5622:, 5591:) 5533:. 5390:) 5368:) 5299:) 5175:) 5139:, 5025:) 4981:) 4966:) 4947:) 4923:) 4896:) 4876:) 4856:) 4818:) 4801:) 4726:) 4718:77 4703:) 4628:) 4620:77 4537:) 4470:) 4462:77 4431:) 4373:) 4365:77 4326:) 4275:) 4267:77 4248:) 4206:) 4198:77 4175:) 4139:) 4119:) 4111:77 4084:) 4065:) 4040:• 4034:• 4018:. 3971:) 3956:) 3944:, 3940:, 3936:, 3932:, 3928:, 3885:) 3849:A 3828:) 3802:. 3741:) 3722:) 3703:) 3691:a 3673:) 3635:) 3617:) 3597:) 3568:) 3550:) 3534:) 3466:) 3450:) 3417:) 3397:-- 3364:) 3349:) 3324:) 3309:) 3258:) 3198:) 3181:) 3162:) 3154:-- 3138:) 3117:) 3083:) 3067:) 3052:) 3017:) 2997:) 2973:) 2958:) 2936:) 2902:) 2879:— 2849:) 2834:) 2792:) 2770:) 2739:) 2709:) 2468:) 2452:) 2444:. 2420:) 2375:) 2359:— 2239:) 2213:) 2188:) 2165:) 2147:) 2131:) 2112:) 2093:) 2077:) 2061:) 2053:-- 2043:) 2024:) 2010:) 1990:) 1959:) 1930:) 1914:) 1885:) 1863:) 1848:) 1832:) 1812:) 1436:, 1432:, 1428:, 1424:, 1420:, 1408:, 1404:, 1400:, 1396:, 1392:, 1388:, 1384:, 1349:HG 1329:}} 1323:{{ 1319:}} 1313:{{ 1250:. 1230:. 1115:, 1112:Av 820:!) 780:, 776:, 772:, 768:, 766:YY 764:, 760:, 756:, 752:, 748:, 744:, 740:, 736:, 615:. 493:, 5642:( 5587:( 5386:( 5364:( 5295:( 5171:( 5021:( 4977:( 4962:( 4943:( 4919:( 4892:( 4872:( 4852:( 4814:( 4797:( 4722:( 4699:( 4624:( 4533:( 4466:( 4427:( 4369:( 4354:I 4342:I 4322:( 4271:( 4244:( 4202:( 4171:( 4135:( 4115:( 4080:( 4061:( 4046:) 4043:c 4037:t 4031:u 4028:( 3967:( 3952:( 3916:. 3881:( 3863:. 3824:( 3758:. 3737:( 3718:( 3699:( 3669:( 3631:( 3613:( 3593:( 3564:( 3546:( 3530:( 3462:( 3446:( 3413:( 3360:( 3345:( 3320:( 3305:( 3275:. 3254:( 3220:. 3194:( 3177:( 3158:( 3134:( 3113:( 3079:( 3063:( 3048:( 3034:. 3013:( 2993:( 2969:( 2954:( 2932:( 2915:) 2911:( 2898:( 2886:: 2845:( 2830:( 2788:( 2766:( 2735:( 2705:( 2464:( 2448:( 2416:( 2371:( 2367:─ 2265:" 2235:( 2209:( 2184:( 2161:( 2143:( 2127:( 2108:( 2089:( 2073:( 2057:( 2039:( 2020:( 2006:( 1986:( 1955:( 1926:( 1910:( 1881:( 1859:( 1844:( 1828:( 1808:( 1684:0 1678:0 1503:. 1482:) 1366:. 1289:. 1189:) 1183:/ 1180:( 1163:/ 1160:( 1143:/ 1140:( 1066:. 829:. 801:? 710:. 567:) 561:/ 558:( 541:/ 538:( 521:/ 518:( 462:) 456:( 443:. 355:. 209:! 199:. 188:. 120:/ 43:,

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index