User talk:Earthianyogi - Knowledge (XXG)

3774:, but I was suggested to add citation by other reviewers (WP:PROF: "The most typical way of satisfying Criterion 1 is to show that the academic has been an author of highly cited academic work – either several extremely highly cited scholarly publications or a substantial number of scholarly publications with significant citation rates. Reviews of the person's work, published in selective academic publications, can be considered together with ordinary citations here. Differences in typical citation and publication rates and in publication conventions between different academic disciplines should be taken into account. "), also they meet the awards criteria, and edited many books, or chief-editors as explained in the WP:PROF and WP:BIO. Also, I have seen many articles on Wiki, which are much weaker than these I have created. Should I start nominating these for deletion? How can I do that? Also, to be Wiki notable, do people need to do what is not expected of them - isn't this odd? 3722: 1562: 5556: 4610: 290:. In that case, once you finish 7, wait until it's approved. If it's not approved, see 8a (read the reason for rejection and try to fix those problems if possible). Once/if the article is approved and moved from draft space into article space, you should not edit it directly and should ignore step 8 in the regular directions. Instead, you go to the article's talk page, and make a post starting with " 5416: 5181: 4282: 3375: 2923: 2708: 2085: 1023: 672: 624: 4754: 4697: 4527: 4445: 4388: 4110:, Thanks for explaining it in detail. I am fairly new to Wiki and still have a lot to learn. I was about to leave a comment for you. I am interested in the subject but do not understand why this person is notable? Is it the ] or ]. I mean that a person could write several books, but when can they be considered notable? It may be due to my lack of knowledge in the area of theology. Cheers. 1863: 4837: 3609: 3529: 343: 5524: 5325: 5071: 4961: 4919: 4174: 3898: 3073: 2670: 2563: 2525: 1977: 1756: 1282: 1174: 729: 529: 298:" followed with "please add the following material to the article" along with the material you would have added in step 8. That way, another editor without a conflict of interest will either carry out the edits or else explain how to what problems prevent them from being carried out in their current form. 155:

3) Focus on just the ones that are not dependent upon or affiliated with the subject, but still specifically about the subject and providing in-depth coverage (not passing mentions). If you do not have at least three such sources, the subject is not yet notable and trying to write an article at this

4128:

requires multiple reviews on multiple books -- say, 4 reviews, not all on the same book. We've got 2 reviews, plus a "critical response" (which appears much more substantive than a review). So that's a little weak, but since he was working pre-internet, it's likely that we're missing some reviews

3825:

I think I did like it when you said, "Knowledge (XXG) hasn't determined if 300 is high impact. We don't have objective numbers. Maybe that's a lot; maybe it's not. Maybe it varies by field. I don't know. Ultimately, you think the subject is notable and you refuse to admit that N:PROF doesn't support

2767:

It does not matter how many total publications or total citations; notability is from publishing papers which make an influence on the field, as shown by their very hgih citations: list them, with the individual values. h index discriminates between the weak and the medium level, not the medium and

2408:

2. The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor (e.g., Fellow of the Institute

5349:

Thank you once again. I made all changes you suggested accept "Please remove all inline external links from body text." As I recall from my previous posts, this was highly encouraged or may be I just got it wrong, not sure? My question is why/how removing inline external links from body text could

4091:

An additional comment on your edits to that article. I'm not sure it adds very much to have a book in the list of books, and also in the references. I'd suggest cutting out the citation there. (As long as you include the ISBN number, the book is self-verifying.) As it's also not doing any harm,

3866:

I will check other articles and submissions of yours, and also any academic bio articles that have been deleted or declined by some of the other people in the discussion. If any of your work is challenged on these grounds please let me know--if I think the notability is clear enough I will try to

3755:

Many/most of the articles you have created about academics suffer the same weaknesses at the one for Rhodes. Even though most have been accepted, in my opinion they do not confirm notability, and if I was in a mean mood I would nominate all of them for deletion. How much a professor was awarded in

1914:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

3862:

That said, it is not wise to submit articles on academic people or on anything else that meet onl the bare minimum. There should be some attempt to do what an encyclopedia is supposed to do, which is to provide information. .One-sentence bios are more suitable for a bigraphical dictionary than an

4087:

In a case where someone is mainly notable for a few works, and you don't have another assertion to notability in the article, then I'd suggest including in the article text something like "This work has been cited over 100 times", with a citation to their Google Scholar (or in a pinch, to the GS

3841:

I hope you read David notMD ideas, which I beg to differ with, as the other people meet the awards criteria, or the chief-editor criteria, or edited books that are used in university criteria within WP:PROF. If you negate the whole WP:PROF guidelines itself, then I am left with nothing to talk.

3833:

Also, concerning Kawal's draft, I found a few media-articles talking about him, which I have referenced within the article. Please note that I do not care if the article gets in or not, but I struggle with situations when an article appears to meets the criteria, but I am told that it does not.

3041:

The best way to get an article accepted through AfC is by sourcing every sentence with a citation from a reliable source and expanding the article so that the sourcing is adequate. Also on a side note please do NOT use extra headers at the bottom for notifying the reviewers that you improved the

2424:

6. The person has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area. --She is an editor to various scientific national and international journals, for example, Journal of Biomaterials Application (Associate editor), Journal of Tissue Science &

3857:

FWIW, let me clarify that i my opinion, Earthianyogi, your view is generally in accord with long standing and consistent consensus here. Every few years, there's an attempt to deprecate WP:PROF, by those who either consider GNG policy without exceptions --a view repeatedly rejected by the

3837:

IN regards to WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS, I am not saying that include this article on the basis that other non-sense exits on Wiki. On the contrary, I am saying, if this draft is non-sense, it should go, and so do the other articles that are one-liners, and not satisfy the Wiki notability criteria.

775:

I do not work for the British Nuclear Medicine Society. I am not paid to write this article about British Nuclear Medicine Society. I am not a member of the British Nuclear Medicine Society. I have published peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts in the Nuclear Medicine Communication journal.

1651:

be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Knowledge (XXG). Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable,

3564: 2416:

4. The person has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research, or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon. --She is a Professor at King's Collge London.

2404:

1. The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources. --She has 7 patents, published more than 162 scientific documents with 2487 citations, and an h-index of 26

2412:

3. The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions. --She has published more than 162 scientific documents with 2487 citations, and an h-index of 26

1895:, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read 1710:

Also note that Knowledge (XXG) articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Knowledge (XXG) project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in

2420:

5. The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society. --Ex-president: UK Society of Biomaterials. --Secretary: UK Society for Biomaterials.

272:, Thank you for such a fantastic response. You just simplified all the policy jargon in simple words I could understand in no time. However, I am still struggling to get my head around 8a? Could you kindly elaborate? 5601: 4653: 151:

is a good resource for this. Also, while search engine results are not sources, they are where you can find sources. Just remember that they need to be professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic

3858:

community -- or who do not realize WP:PROF has a different status than some of the other Special notability guidelines--It is an alternate to the GNG of equal standing, not just a guide to what might be presumed

3796:

don't see it that way. Some of this is subjective. Some admins even choose to keep articles ignoring what our guidelines say. You won't always get a single answer on these questions. Please also avoid making a

790:

OK thanks for that. You are certainly dedicated to the task of editing their page. I would make these suggestions: when adding links and text, avoid promotion. Stay with neutral language. Seek out independent

3440:. Stuff the subject wrote doesn't count for notability. Websites from the subject's employer don't count. Most people are never notable and those that become notable aren't written about until after they die. 211:

8) Expand the article using sources you put aside in step 3 (but make sure they don't make up more than half the sources for the article, and make sure that affiliated sources don't make up more than half of

1565:

Hello Earthianyogi, and welcome to Knowledge (XXG). While we appreciate your contributions to Knowledge (XXG), there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid

5585:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4637:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 5101: 4991: 4204: 3103: 2593: 2007: 1786: 1312: 1204: 555: 3756:

grants, how many grad student degrees they oversaw, their articles being cited - none of that conveys notability. Academics doing what is expected of academics is not Knowledge (XXG) notability.

3830:

I have been discussing the ideas with others on the notability's talk page, and feel that maybe I can present a slightly less biased view of the two sides, which I will as soon as I get time.

5570: 4623: 1127: 3788:

Anyone in academia should be focused upon being a good academic. That an encyclopedia writes about them should not be their goal. You might be misled by folks like Eppstein who are

3412: 2745: 2122: 5447:

of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Knowledge (XXG), please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

5212:

of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Knowledge (XXG), please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

2338:, what about other criteria from 1 to 8? Did you read those? "Academics meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable." 2958:

I intend to accept this in the future, but if possible could you expand the sections “books edited”, “chapters edited” and “publications”? Also try to add more refs. Thanks.

4076:

article. As I said in the edit summary, one reason is that they don't help establish notability in this case. As areas in the humanities tend to have low citation rates,

4088:

identifier of the article). Note that you're not supposed to include references to searches in Knowledge (XXG) articles, but I think looking an article up by ID is ok.

3425: 2758: 2135: 1125:! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the 1948:

after reading some content written by yourself as well. You appear to be a very experienced editor. Could you suggest improvements so that the page is not deleted? Thx

286:

That's if you're writing about yourself, or someone or something you are connected with (such as a friend, family member, or business) -- in other words, if you have a

2409:

of Electrical and Electronics Engineers). --Fellow of Academy of Dental Materials (FADM). --Chair: Royal Society of Chemistry: Biomaterials Chemistry interest group.

4806:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

4579:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

4497:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

5471: 5449:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

5240: 5218:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

4337: 4298:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

3442:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

2960:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

2775:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

2140:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

1036:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

1664:

copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See

4722:, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at 4413:, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at 247:

8b) If the article is rejected, there will be a reason given. Read it carefully and closely. If there are links in the reason, open them and read those pages.

3981: 3274: 3178: 1469: 1115: 922: 826: 392: 3980: 3273: 3177: 1468: 921: 825: 391: 4005: 3298: 3202: 1493: 946: 850: 483:

Hi, I was trying to send you the Zoom link for today's meetup but it seems you don't have email enabled on Knowledge (XXG). Can you get in touch with me at

416: 4844:, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for 1665: 346:

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Knowledge (XXG). This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to

5296:. If you still think it does not satisfy the criteria then please provide specific examples from the text to improve the article for acceptance. thanks 4779:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply 4552:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply 4470:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply 4927:

I see this has already been revised by an expert. I think the merge will be best done after the material is in mainspace, and so I intend to accept it.

2765:

What needs to be listed is the books she edited, and the peer-reviewed journal papers that have the highest citation figures. Chapters are secondary

554:. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the 5464: 5233: 5201: 4330: 3474: 3399: 2992: 2807: 2732: 2172: 2109: 1892: 1852: 1068: 4129:

c theology has 308 worldcat copies , it is in many or most theological seminary libraries and a good number of other medium and academic libraries

39: 4312:

If you now believe the draft cannot meet Knowledge (XXG)'s standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to

4004:

because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion

3537: 3456:

If you now believe the draft cannot meet Knowledge (XXG)'s standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to

3297:

because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion

3201:

because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion

2974:

If you now believe the draft cannot meet Knowledge (XXG)'s standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to

2789:

If you now believe the draft cannot meet Knowledge (XXG)'s standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to

2154:

If you now believe the draft cannot meet Knowledge (XXG)'s standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to

1492:

because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion

1050:

If you now believe the draft cannot meet Knowledge (XXG)'s standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to

945:

because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion

849:

because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion

1716: 5439:, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Knowledge (XXG)'s 5204:, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Knowledge (XXG)'s 63: 71: 735: 720: 1684: 1723:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be

5624: 4675: 3911:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge (XXG)! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

183:

Writer. Make sure this summary is just bare statement of facts, phrased in a way that even someone who hates the subject can agree with.

5084:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge (XXG)! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

4974:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge (XXG)! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

4775:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge (XXG) is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

4718:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge (XXG) is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

4548:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge (XXG) is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

4466:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge (XXG) is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

4409:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge (XXG) is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

4187:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge (XXG)! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

3086:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge (XXG)! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

2576:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge (XXG)! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

1990:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge (XXG)! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

1769:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge (XXG)! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

1295:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge (XXG)! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

1187:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge (XXG)! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

542:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge (XXG)! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

2750: 4910: 4403: 4381: 3613: 3533: 2238: 22: 5432: 5422: 5403: 5197: 5187: 5168: 5133: 5112: 5058: 5023: 5002: 4948: 4288: 4269: 4236: 4215: 4161: 3940: 3919: 3885: 3381: 3362: 3135: 3114: 3060: 2929: 2910: 2714: 2695: 2625: 2604: 2550: 2091: 2072: 2039: 2018: 1964: 1919:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 1818: 1797: 1743: 1344: 1323: 1269: 1236: 1215: 1161: 1029: 1010: 587: 566: 516: 4983: 4769: 4747: 3405: 2738: 2115: 1626: 1618: 364:

submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on

5491: 5260: 5097: 4987: 4357: 4200: 3652: 3497: 3417: 3099: 3015: 2830: 2589: 2195: 2127: 2003: 1782: 1308: 1200: 1091: 53: 5620: 5387: 5280: 4671: 1945: 1911: 1888: 1856: 1051: 1044: 1014: 5594: 5129: 5108: 5019: 4998: 4646: 4232: 4211: 3936: 3915: 3131: 3110: 2873: 2621: 2600: 2035: 2014: 1872: 1814: 1793: 1614: 1418: 1340: 1319: 1232: 1211: 1141:, a friendly space on Knowledge (XXG) where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 583: 562: 3421: 2754: 2131: 1595: 1196: 696: 1900: 4084:. I don't think exact numbers belong anyway, since they're likely to be out-of-date. And the counts were not referenced. 1727:

from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —

5436: 1916: 1591: 4967: 4952: 3798: 1724: 5606: 4658: 2951: 2869: 1879: 205: 3651:. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The 1703:

confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see

4841: 4829: 4313: 4306: 4273: 2676: 2661: 687: 639: 347: 5440: 5205: 4542: 4520: 3705:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a

1661: 1622: 221:

about yourself, or someone or something you are connected with (such as a friend, family member, or your business)

216:

Doing something besides those steps typically results in the article not being approved, or even in its deletion.

5093: 4818: 4591: 4509: 2684: 1180: 1165: 551: 4291:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Synoman Barris was:

3428:

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Knowledge (XXG).

3384:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:

2932:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eternal Shadow was:

2761:

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Knowledge (XXG).

2138:

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Knowledge (XXG).

2094:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eternal Shadow was:

44: 30: 4368: 4097: 3809: 3738: 3595: 3510: 3158: 3048: 3026: 2500: 2448: 2381: 2361: 2325: 2268: 2206: 796: 762: 647: 5582: 4634: 4072:

Hi! I wanted to take a moment and explain at a little more length why I removed the citation counts from the

1712: 5425:

has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul Vaurie was:

1032:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Atlantic306 was:

231:. If you do not want other people to write about you, then starting an article about yourself is a bad idea. 229:

articles are owned by the Knowledge (XXG) community as a whole, not the article subject or the article author

5339: 5128:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

5018:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

4231:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

3935:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

3663: 3130:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

2647: 2620:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

2539: 2442:

I am also concerned that some parts sound like a resume. Please turn the list like sections into sentences.

2262:

A large part of the article is a list and it just seems to be a resume, not a notable biographical subject.

2034:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

1813:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

1339:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

1231:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

743: 582:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

58: 5444: 5209: 5190:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

4863: 4807: 4723: 4580: 4498: 4460: 4438: 4414: 3387: 2720: 2097: 1704: 1637: 1633: 82: 4712: 4690: 3644: 2313:

The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level.

812:

It was never about them. I wanted to know what was I doing wrong? I think it takes time to learn anything.

115: 4845: 4776: 4719: 4549: 4467: 4410: 2894:, thanks for pointing out and introducing me to the guidelines. I will read and try to follow. Thank you 2372: 2309: 2284: 2221: 1688: 94: 5501: 4196: 4143:

I conclude he's an important writer of academc books in theology.I consider this enough for notability.

4107: 3761: 3668: 3545: 3544:

button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up

2220:

Hello, The article was submitted based on Knowledge (XXG):Notability (academics). Please see guidelines

1258: 1146: 1101: 303: 293: 255: 74:, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Knowledge (XXG). You can visit the 5365: 4329:

If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and

4293:

Reads like an auto-biography, declining until author can explain their connection with the subject per

4136:

The second coming : a Wesleyan approach to the doctrine of last things has 73 holdings, similar mixture

3993: 3473:

If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and

3286: 3190: 2991:

If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and

2806:

If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and

2171:

If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and

1692: 1481: 1137: 1067:

If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and

934: 838: 679: 671: 631: 623: 404: 75: 4862:

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

25:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: 5530: 5515: 5457: 5407: 5331: 5316: 5293: 5226: 5172: 5077: 5062: 4874: 4814: 4587: 4505: 4258: 3688: 2717:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

2680: 2061: 1930: 535: 520: 34: 5564: 5193: 4617: 4125: 4077: 4001: 3706: 3294: 3198: 1944:, I see that you have added a speedy deletion tag to this page. I have removed advert material from 1489: 942: 846: 412: 259: 198: 5381: 5274: 4363: 4093: 4048: 3803: 3732: 3715: 3711: 3589: 3583:

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the

3504: 3341: 3245: 3153: 3043: 3021: 2495: 2477: 2460: 2443: 2397: 2376: 2356: 2320: 2280: 2263: 2239:

https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/persons/sanjukta-deb(e9fa9bf9-d206-43c1-ac21-ce33fbef273a).html

2217: 2201: 1999: 1536: 1304: 989: 893: 809: 792: 772: 758: 643: 459: 373: 365: 5578: 4856: 4810:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 4765: 4726:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 4708: 4630: 4583:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 4538: 4501:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 4456: 4417:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 4399: 3560:

button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

357: 5335: 5096:. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they 4986:. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they 4199:. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they 3962: 3553: 3098:. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they 2881: 2643: 2588:. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they 2535: 2531: 2516: 2155: 2148: 2076: 2002:. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they 1841: 1781:. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they 1307:. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they 1199:. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they 739: 694: 609: 160: 5369: 4081: 3617: 3433: 187: 93:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out 5351: 5297: 4111: 3843: 3775: 3698: 3648: 3632: 3624: 3576: 3549: 3541: 3457: 3450: 3420:). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see 3366: 2895: 2753:). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see 2585: 2481: 2464: 2428: 2339: 2292: 2245: 2130:). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see 1949: 1732: 1446: 777: 701: 501: 490: 322: 273: 168: 5590: 5428: 4642: 4326:" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit. 3470:" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit. 2988:" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit. 2947: 2803:" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit. 2288: 2225: 2168:" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit. 1896: 1064:" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit. 239: 227:

0) If the subject really was notable, you wouldn't need to write the article. Remember that

164: 5613: 5536: 5497: 4665: 4180: 4165: 3771: 3757: 3693: 2425:

Engineering (Associate editor), and Journal of the American Ceramic Society (Guest editor).

1778: 1401:

Consider adding a "Selected publications" section with his 5 most highly cited papers/books.

1254: 1142: 1097: 651: 316: 299: 267: 251: 5593:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 5586: 5511: 5312: 4906: 4852: 4761: 4704: 4645:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4638: 4534: 4452: 4395: 4294: 4032: 3721: 3683: 3437: 3325: 3229: 2868:, and others. Categorization on English Knowledge (XXG) is governed by several guidelines: 2657: 2512: 1520: 1394: 973: 877: 716: 443: 415:

because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion

361: 287: 228: 124: 4870: 4254: 3563: 2975: 2968: 2914: 2790: 2783: 2699: 2057: 1941: 1926: 1610: 1429: 1366: 86: 4855:. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request 3584: 2935: 1621:.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to 1587: 757:

Hi! Do you work for, or have some association with the British Nuclear Medicine Society?

235: 167:

at the end of them. You'll want to do this in a program with little/no formatting, like

144: 5463:

If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and

5232:

If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and

1891:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under 1647:

own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you

5373: 5266: 5141: 5031: 4320: 4244: 4073: 4044: 4008:. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to 3948: 3673: 3464: 3337: 3301:. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to 3241: 3205:. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to 3143: 3095: 2982: 2861: 2797: 2633: 2162: 2047: 1983: 1968: 1826: 1583: 1532: 1496:. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to 1384: 1352: 1288: 1273: 1244: 1058: 985: 949:. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to 889: 853:. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to 595: 455: 419:. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to 369: 176: 2943: 2480:, Updated! I am sure you can make the nessasary edits, if there is something missing. 1582:

amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double

133: 5529:

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

5330:

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

5157: 5047: 4937: 4893: 4150: 4038: 3958: 3874: 3789: 3331: 3235: 2891: 2877: 2842: 2675:

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

2530:

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

1836: 1657: 1526: 979: 883: 734:

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

691: 606: 449: 3793: 2865: 2569: 2554: 1728: 939:

I find an editor particularly rude. I am trying to ignore, but what else can I do?

487: 148: 49: 5555: 5431:

than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a

5196:

than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a

4609: 4021: 3314: 3218: 1509: 1114: 962: 866: 432: 500:

Hi, Accept my appologies, I could not attend. Hope the meeting went well. Cheers

172: 4851:

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

3904: 3889: 2857: 1915:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

1762: 1747: 484: 180: 5415: 5180: 4281: 3374: 2922: 2707: 2084: 1022: 2291:. It is a notable biographical subject. I think you may be missing something. 1606: 1571: 1440: 1425: 1390: 1362: 194: 2355:, yes I’m familiar with them (which is a requirement to be an AfC reviewer). 5107:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

4997:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

4210:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

4124:

I didn't !vote keep on this one, but I also didn't vote delete. Generally,

3914:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

3678: 3109:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

3079: 3064: 2599:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

2233: 2013:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

1792:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

1699:

be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you

1567: 1318:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

1210:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

561:

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

5628: 5543: 5505: 5393: 5359: 5343: 5305: 5286: 5161: 5051: 4941: 4897: 4878: 4840:

Hello, Earthianyogi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that

4822: 4760:

Hello, Earthianyogi. It has been over six months since you last edited the

4740: 4703:

Hello, Earthianyogi. It has been over six months since you last edited the

4679: 4595: 4533:

Hello, Earthianyogi. It has been over six months since you last edited the

4513: 4451:

Hello, Earthianyogi. It has been over six months since you last edited the

4431: 4394:

Hello, Earthianyogi. It has been over six months since you last edited the

4374: 4262: 4154: 4119: 4101: 4052: 3966: 3878: 3851: 3816: 3783: 3765: 3745: 3602: 3517: 3345: 3249: 3163: 3053: 3031: 2903: 2885: 2846: 2688: 2651: 2543: 2505: 2489: 2472: 2453: 2436: 2386: 2366: 2347: 2330: 2300: 2273: 2253: 2211: 2065: 1957: 1934: 1846: 1736: 1540: 1454: 1433: 1370: 1262: 1150: 1105: 993: 897: 800: 785: 766: 747: 612: 509: 495: 463: 377: 330: 307: 281: 2856:

Hello, please do not add very broad categories to articles, as you did at

5152: 5042: 4932: 4888: 4731: 4422: 4145: 3869: 2837: 1871:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

5597:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

5111:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

5001:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

4836: 4649:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

4214:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

3918:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

3528: 3113:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

2603:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

2017:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

1796:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

1322:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

1214:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

565:

without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to

342: 5574:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

4627:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2371:

Also, It fails most of the rest of the criteria as well. Please reread

1617:. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, 2400:, How does the following fails most of the criteria? Please elaborate. 1906:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

1135:

questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the

5523: 5324: 5070: 4960: 4918: 4173: 3897: 3072: 2771:

President of a national society matters, but not in-house service.

2669: 2562: 2524: 1976: 1755: 1281: 1173: 728: 528: 234:

8a) If the article is accepted, never edit it again. Instead, make

145:

professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources

5140:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

5030:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

4729:

Thanks for your submission to Knowledge (XXG), and happy editing.

4420:

Thanks for your submission to Knowledge (XXG), and happy editing.

4243:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

3947:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

3709:

you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting

3142:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

2632:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

2046:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

1825:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

1351:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

1243:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

594:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

21:

Hello, Earthianyogi, and welcome to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for

3562: 90: 5080:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 4970:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 4183:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 3907:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 3082:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 2572:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 1986:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 1765:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 1291:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 1183:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 538:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 5610:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 4662:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 4027: 3320: 3224: 1515: 968: 872: 438: 5600:

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

5568:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All

5456:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

5225:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

4925:

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission:

4652:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

4305:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

3449:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

2967:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

2782:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

2147:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

1043:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

5492:

Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors

5261:

Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors

4780: 4621:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

4358:

Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors

3498:

Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors

3016:

Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors

2831:

Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors

2196:

Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors

1092:

Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors

5474:

associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the

5243:

associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the

4340:

associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the

1675:(that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it 708:

at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

658:

at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

188:

arriving at new statements that no individual source supports

121:

If you're going to write an article about anyone or anything

5522: 5414: 5323: 5179: 5069: 4959: 4917: 4752: 4695: 4525: 4443: 4386: 4280: 4172: 3896: 3373: 3071: 2921: 2706: 2668: 2561: 2523: 2083: 1975: 1921: 1861: 1754: 1695:

before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources

1280: 1172: 1021: 727: 678:

Hello, Earthianyogi. Your question has been answered at the

670: 630:

Hello, Earthianyogi. Your question has been answered at the

622: 527: 1625:

the information and to demonstrate that the content is not

1601:

Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information

103:, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 3655:

are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

3394:

coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in

3386:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

2727:

coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in

2719:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

2104:

coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in

2096:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

1679:

be possible to include greater portions of a source text.

5118: