User talk:ElinorD - Knowledge (XXG)

3163:

I do agree that it's unfortunate that Slim didn't submit evidence until just before the case closed, though I can understand her reasons. But consider that she knew ArbCom had the diff that showed the "evidence" that I was Crum" (my revert of vandalism/trolling from his page!!), that ArbCom had the logs showing that Lar checked Crum 38 minutes after finding out that I was Wikitumnus, why should she be criticized for not submitting that? Consider also that her statements that Lar was making up the counselling relationship and prior involvement were based on what I had told her. She could of course have submitted emails from me to her as evidence, where I told her that I had never had never addressed or sent messages to Lar's wife (nor she to me), but she knew that I had made those statements to ArbCom myself, and that I had submitted to ArbCom the relevant emails between Lar and me. So what would be the point? It would have come across as petty and sarcastic if she had submitted to ArbCom copies of what they had received from me, as evidence that I don't know Lar's wife. They knew she knew I had myself said that to them.

3079:

quite bizarre that Wikitumnus had removed a sock notice from Crum375's page while attempting to make it look like routine vandalism patrol, but in a way that could only have done by an involved user; this was one of a few issues with the account. Disregarding anything else, Crum375 had also just been blocked for behavior in an arbitration case quite peculiar for an administrator. A number of controversies have existed around this which could have justified a CU in looking into it. I'm personally reluctant to discuss all of it because I don't think anyone knows where a full public discussion would go, but as I said I do know that if you considered that you needed Lar's evidence in order to present your own, then that suggests the evidence in your possession did not in your view support an arbitration case. And I believe that supports, and indeed calls for ArbCom's findings insofar as they were offered.

3231:

of this without explaining why the point is relevant. The only point I see is this: if you knew that Lar had previously discussed your situation with his wife and you had not objected to it ("Your wife is right...") then this would explain the background for why Lar would have said something to his wife. The most important point I can see coming from this is a lack of any bad faith on his part. Whether or not you were close friends, on the other hand, is as far as I am aware simply not relevant, and may even have been an aggravating factor if true. Honestly I can see how you would have been offended if you thought that he mischaracterized something, but it continues to baffle me that you make so much of this as if it would be any basis for an arbitration case or anything similar.

397:

as such (probably because it had been uploaded before such tags existed), the description should have been there or the rationale should have been completely obvious. If you weren't going to take the time to examine whether it should stay or not, you could have at least made the effort to contact people involved with the page or who uploaded the file. Not doing so is a complete waste of time for everyone involved. If the image can be undeleted, please do so, and please revert your removal of the image from the article. If that is not possible, maybe you'd like to go back to Amazon, find the full size image, download it, and reupload it with the correct tag and put it back in the article. It only seems fair that you take your time to undo what you did improperly.

1699:

a wikipedia expert. I've navigated the labyrinth of licensing tag information on wikipedia and inasmuch as it made any sense to me I've tried to choose the right tags that reflect this situation (where the subject herself has taken a picture of herself and provided that for free for anyone to use). I dont know if I got the tags right, but that is the situation. If I didnt get the tags right, please help me get the tags right, rather than removing the pic altogether via 'speedy deletion'. I have to say its a bit frustrating to have to continuously fix this page for the picture or to navigate the labyrinth of legal mumbo jumbo just to put a free picture up on a free page... ;) Anyhow if the situation is wrong now, please help me get get it right. thanks.

3214:

I walked away from the tools when I erred; it's not a big deal. SlimVirgin will get hers back soon enough and my best wishes go out to her for success. Here's what's worrisome, though. When this thread got started it was as if SV reformulated my question into something I hadn't asked--something perhaps more comfortable to address--and went on at length without supplying any of the requested information. That's the behavior pattern of people who prioritize justification over reflection and improvement. And such people, no matter how intelligent and sincere and usually right they are, also usually encounter a lot of frustration. If I've missed something please set me straight. And thank you again for your long and thoughtful answer.

2924:. Nor does there appear to be any synonymous phrase. The findings that mention her specify shortcomings in her manner of raising the complaint, but remain silent on the merits (or lack thereof) of the complaint itself. You are in a far better position than I am to understand how much merit was there. Yet the way she raised the matter really doesn't appear to have furthered her best interests or yours: the public mailing list she chose was unequipped to resolve those sensitive issues and when another venue opened she was unprepared to back up the assertions. Or at least, much more tardy than customary. That is what, to my eye, the decision appears to be saying. Have I misread? 3147:

people!), Slim made what I'll call a snide remark on the noticeboard. No time to look for diffs now. She basically told him to back off, and said she had had enough of his illicit use of checkuser and his wild spinning when caught. There was no reference whatsoever to me. Even so, I don't think I'd have made that remark, but I've been trolled much less than Slim, so I may have higher endurance levels before I tell someone to get stuffed! :-) What she said could easily have been just ignored, but another CU, privy to the discussion on the list, turned up to scold her, and then another, and more little bits slipped out, though not from Slim. Then David Katz

3152:

that Lar had told his wife. (Again, he had got that from me - no leaking of confidential discussion on his part.) Lar turned up and told a whole pile of tall stories about his wife's role in offering me "advice and counsel" (despite the fact that we've never encountered each other or sent each other message), and about her "prior involvement" in the case, based on statements I had supposedly previously made to both of them. I saw it and gasped, but stayed out of it. Maybe I should have come forward then. But I didn't, and Slim got more abuse, and finally the RfAr was filed.

3254:

Anyway it doesn't explain why Lar's wife should be privy to CU results, which should be confidential i.e. not shared with anyone who's not specifically mentioned as allowed to know in policy. Arbcom discussed this on the findings or proposed decision page, that the policy had been breached, I don't think any of them denied it had at least been 'technically' breached but didn't mention it directly in the final writeup, as someone said they'd come up with a different wording they could consider, but they didn't get around to it or vote much on it.

382:. Also Mattisse doesn't seem to have used any sockpuppets for about a year. There is another RfC about her so it's not like she would be whitewashed, but "In order to remain listed at Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. " In this case they were the same user and proven to be so. I know that she feels that this RfC hangs over her head. So is there anything an admin could do? Such as delete/delist/permanently archive this rather invalid RfC? 3235:

less than polite, when he said that people who admit posting on WR should be treated like the pieces of shit they are. You then say that SV commented with more truthfulness than sweetness, when she made disparaging and unsupported comments about editor after editor that you are not possibly in a position to evaluate. Setting aside SV's actions, I must wonder how you feel justified in making these kinds of comments, and if you have considered whether you should take more care as you so sharply criticize others.

3048:

case. I could look it up, but that is the basis for my comments above. As far as the claims that you made, I know some are false because they are about me, others because I was involved, or based on information that has now been shared. I wouldn't criticize you for that alone, but I can criticize you for making accusations even as you clearly knew that you did not have enough evidence to support them. I believe this is a point that Sam Blacketer also made.

656: 2951:

ArbCom, they decided not only to hear the case in private, but not to allow any of the parties to see the evidence either. I declined to provide evidence in an atmosphere of such extreme secrecy. The ArbCom responded that they had to hear it in secret to protect the people who were checkusered — at which point those people publicly waived their right to privacy, but of course it made no difference.

1485: 21: 2617:

than original. |other_information = Intellectual property owned by {{#if: Sierra Entertainment | Sierra Entertainment | http://www.sierra.com/ }}. }} == Fair use rationale == {{Non-free image rationale |Article = The Time Warp of Dr. Brain |Purpose = Used for purposes of illustration in an educational article about the entity represented by the image.<br: -->

1885: 2005: 1966: 1013: 3530: 733:

with dozens, or even hundreds, of others. I deleted it on 5 October, when I was working my way through images waiting to be deleted. I'm rather busy at the moment, so I can't help you much, but if you want to upload it again, or if you'd like me to undelete it, just say so. But in that case, you'll need to put the correct tag (probably

3299: 3210:

gave a rationale that was syntactically impossible to parse. Was she objecting to the IRC arbitration case and its discretionary sanctions, or did she believe the November blocks were tainted by administrative contact on the IRC channel? That went unanswered for nearly 22 hours before she posted again.

3275:

affect the way he approached the situation, and I can see why he would have said as much. I don't know what he should have said, or whether it violated the privacy policy (I recall some questions on the point), but basically I trust the committee to evaluate that because 1.) if there was a breach it

3230:

I apologize if this is not the point raised by Durova, but I would like to clarify that to say Lar invented a relationship between you (ElinorD) and his wife is just not correct, if you acknowledge that you and he had indeed discussed her views about your situation. You've also continued to make hay

3213:

It's not always enough to be correct on the merits. Communication also counts. Communication is especially important for Wikipedians who take decisive action in tough situations. Very few of the editors who do are spot-on about communication every time. I haven't always been and neither has FT2.

3205:

Now here's an odd thing: if any one member of the Arbitration Committee is most equipped to see through Poetlister's shenanigans and their effect, that would be FT2. Ousting Poetlister & Co. this year was in large measure his doing. I'm no apologist for him or the Committee. You can see at the

3180:

That is what I've heard happens- people submit evidence but then they're asked 'where is the evidence'? so they assume people don't think they evidence they are giving is enough, and stuff like that. Anyway Elinor I think you're flogging a dead horse- people aren't adressing the counselling bit which

3162:

flimsy evidence, that he checked Crum on the pretext of being Wikitumnus when he knew for a fact that he wasn't, that he passed on my identity to his wife, and that he invented a completely non-existent "counselling" relationship between his wife and me to justify his violation of the privacy policy.

3151:

brought it up on the enwiki mailing list, saying that someone must have leaked logs to Slim and suggesting that she be indefinitely blocked until she said how she got the information. (She got it from me.) Slim replied on the list, defending herself. People attacked her and sneered at her. Jayjg said

2956:

Later, when the ArbCom ruled that I had behaved inappropriately by mentioning it on the mailing list without first going trying other avenues, and when I argued that I had indeed tried other avenues — which included asking Anthere to look at allowing the Ombudsmen to examine alleged checkuser misuse,

721:

an hour later. The bot also left a note on your talk page, telling you where to look for information about appropriate copyright tags, and where to ask for help if you were stuck, but you seem not to have been on Knowledge (XXG) since then, so you missed the message until it was too late. Images that

710:

Hi, I've looked into it. You uploaded the image on 27 September, but didn't add a copyright tag. We need the correct templates to show that an image is in the public domain, or released under a free licence, or that a good case can be made for invoking "fair use" for it. A bot came and marked it with

3464:

that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so

3270:

That's fair, yes, although I could speculate on similar wordings that could have been slightly more reasonable. Nevertheless, I think it is a misunderstanding, primarily because I think it is only reasonable to believe that the previous communication through Lar, or passing of words or whatever one

3234:

I would also compare: the other day you said that in the Mantanmoreland case I tried to get SlimVirgin sanctioned. This is categorically untrue, and cannot be drawn from anything I said in the case; it is however a direct copy of a claim made by SV. In your above statement you say Tony Sidaway was

3104:

Excuse me; this thread seeks to cover specific pertinent questions that have not been addressed directly in other venues. The general narrative is not in need of reiteration. I would like an answer to the query I actually posted. Mackan79 and SV, if neither of you wish to answer it could you move

3078:

If so, I'm forced to rely on the arbitration committee to evaluate it. However, some of the claims were incorrect, particularly about me, but also that Lar had no basis whatsoever for checking Wikitumnus. I posted my basis for inquiring on the mailing list, which showed in the absence of something

2988:

Of course there is an alternate view of these events, generally that despite lacking support for their suspicions and an inability to obtain such support, SV nevertheless went public with inflammatory accusations as if they did, including numerous highly inaccurate claims. I have just posted a list

1698:

hi Elinor, Susham bedi is an author, she has a wikipedia page. The picture of her on that page was provided by the author (susham bedi) herself to be used freely by anyone. That is the image I uploaded to her wikipedia page. That picture has been deleted numerous times and I dont know why. I'm not

396:

Hey, the deletion log for this file says you deleted this file. Can you please make an effort to not just delete things willy nilly, here, as there was no valid reason to remove this file. It was the cover of a book, used in an article about that book, for clear Fair Use reasons. If it wasn't tagged

3157:

So she didn't "choose" the public mailing list. She was criticized and attacked there after someone else brought it to that forum, and she defended herself with more truthfulness than sweetness. As for being unprepared to back up the assertions - she had already made it clear what the issues were -

686:

Hi Elinor, I did a short article on Leeds International School back in October and checked it just now to find you (I think) had removed the picture that goes with it. It's no big deal, but I was just wondering why you did it? Is it a standard policy to remove pictures from rarely visited pages?

444:

is a sock of another editor. I don't usually comment to someone as reprehensible as Ferrylodge, but given the sock, and the false accusation of another highly respected admin as a sock, it deserved a comment. You should have given me more good faith on this point, and quite possibly asked me what

3209:

Yet to read over the events of the last few days I keep getting stuck at one point. Suppose for the sake of discussion that her unblock was exactly correct. And suppose everything she posted at the clarification request was correct reasoning and true. What's left is this: when she unblocked she

3197:

Thank you very much for that reply, Elinor. It does make more sense in the context of someone else raising the issue on the mailing list first. That mailing list rarely merits serious attention. When drama threads were running fast and thick about me over there a year ago I simply left the list

2616:

and add to it the following rationale: == Fair use image data == {{Non-free image data |Description = Cover of ] |Source = http://www.sierra.com/ |Portion = Game cover only. |Low_resolution = Sufficient resolution for illustration, but considerably lower resolution

2350:

The first person to start the article is mentioned in the next newsletter. This month's article is Leslie Ann Moore's first book in her fantasy 'Griffin's Daughter' trilogy, which was named by the Independent Book Publishers Association as the 2008 Ben Franklin Award winner for Best First Fiction,

2261:

With the Newsletter being almost three months overdue, I have decided to take on the position of Editor to make sure it reaches you regularly on time each month. The Newsletter is meant to inspire and encourage our team of Editors and so my goal shall be to make it informative and interesting each

3253:

Lar passed on his wife's views on the situation to Elnor that is not the same as saying his wife 'counselled' her, as Elinor had no direct conversation with her. If she did not do so, to say Mrs.Lar 'counselled' her was to give an impression whch could be misleading (intentionally or not) IMHO.

3047:

I've seen your responses, in which I recall you saying that they eventually gave you more time, and at that point when prepared you again asked to see Lar's evidence so that you could write a response. I recall you saying that you were denied this request, and accordingly that you gave up on the

3010:

In all of this I think it may be pointed out that many of us have beliefs that perhaps we do not have enough evidence to publicly announce. Should everyone go ahead? I believe the consensus is no. If they went ahead without even acknowledging what was known and what was conjecture, then surely

2719:

I actually missed your post, until Giano linked it to me. I'd like to respond to what you said here. Yes, some people were making a fuss about FT2 not knowing whether or not he should recuse. For the record, I agree with such a fuss. I would have given him an earful if he hadn't recused. But some

732:

on them go into a queue for automatic deletion, after an appropriate amount of time has passed to allow the uploader or another interested party to supply the missing information and remove the template. If that doesn't happen, and administrator, working through the backlog, will delete it, along

3146:

Regarding the forum she chose, Slim went through the proper channels, but despite her best efforts, no progress was made. Then, in a moment of frustration, when Lar turned up to endorse a block against Tony Sidaway, who had been defending her (though not in a manner full of politeness towards WR

2992:

SV then continued to say that she was not given enough information to make a case, despite the accusations she continued to make. She then complained that she was not given enough time to present a case, but was given such time, and still did not provide evidence until a decision was proposed.

585:

As I look back on the situation, I think that what happened was that the user's talk page that was notified about the copyright problems was an inactive user, and posting a message to the article's talk page in addition to that user's talk page would have prevented the whole situation. But alas,

3064:

I can't argue about this here, but I can assure you that I do have evidence for everything I've said, and that's why we all waived our privacy so that we could explain it all in public. But to no avail. Please don't criticize the parties who wanted transparency; if you have to criticize anyone,

284:

article. I haven't been able to find any history of the file being questioned nor any inquiry on my talk page asking about the status of the file. If I forgot to note the ownership of the file, OK, I can do that as I did with all my other images - but there was no warning given that I can find.

2950:

to pursue it because they're only allowed to examine privacy policy violations; and that, although we could technically go to ArbCom, they were the same people who were saying, wearing their other hats, that they didn't care about it, so there was little point. When someone else did take it to

1848:

You seem very up on this. I wonder what the deal is with images on Wp. It's so frustrating. For the sake an ideological stance on fair use, literally of masses of stuff has not photo. This is absurd. It seems Jimbo's idea, that we need to change the game and get images on free use, has totally

3201:

Regarding trolling levels, that's an area where you could say I'm not unfamiliar. I was one of the reasons Poetlister got banned from en:wiki in spring 2007 and afterward he went on pretty much the same vendetta against me that he did against SV. There have been other unrelated harassments

2908:

These issues are rather thick and sensitive, but recently you've been asking people to discuss them. So before forming an opinion may I raise a few questions and concerns? Posting here so as not to divert any other thread. Foremost, your very difficult position has my utmost respect.

555:

I considered not spamming talk pages but not saying "thanks" just isn't me. The support was remarkable and appreciated. I only hope that I am able to help a little on here. Please let me know if I can help you or equally if you find any of my actions questionable. Thanks & regards

3120:

Durova, sorry for ignoring you. I've been busy today, and will probably be offline for at least a day. I endorse Slim's version. Yes, we both tried. We did raise the matter privately. The RfAr case may not have the word "unwarranted", but it repeatedly named Slim, using active voice,

1530:- I notice that no warning was left on the page - with the first warning people who were watching the page got of any problems was the photo actually being deleted. Please consider giving the editors of articles a chance to fix problems in future rather than just drive by deletion. 892:

Heya Elinor! Just stumbled upon your page and saw that you have a penchant for making fresh bread. Nomnomnom.... I've been in a bit of a baking mood as of late and was wondering if you had any recipes to share? So far I'm up to banana bread in fanciness level ;) All the best,

466:

One of the most damaging aspects of a disruptive editor — second only to how they burn out constructive editors — is that they often succeed in turning editors who would otherwise work very well together against each other. As the saying goes, "United we stand, divided we

2965:

a formal approach apparently mattered not. The upshot was that my failure to trigger dispute resolution also meant that I hadn't tried to. I was therefore told off in the ArbCom's final decision. When I tried to post a defence of myself, it was deleted and the page was

3402:

I just saw a message that said that my IP address was flagged as the source of unhelpful comments/vandalism on the Stanford Prison Experiment page - for what it's worth, it wasn't me (I understand that there might not be any way to verify this from your perspective).

478:

in the the past 11 months, something which the topic ban ArbCom currently seems to be leaning toward won't address in the least (nor will it address the POINT-ish edits, really, because they haven't been limited to just abortion- and pregnancy-related articles:

3198:

and went back to editing. It's a remarkably effective response. Twice since then people have given the heads up about new nonsense and it was easy to nip in the bud. To toss a salad of metaphors: just call a spade a spade and don't return a foul ball.

2688:

Yes, you are correct. I see they closed the page immediatly after you posted, and are now prepearing to excute the sentence. How bizarre it all is; I have a very grave feeling about it. I hope they know what they are doing. I rather suspect they do not.

3033:

What you write is not correct. Given that the correspondence was private, and that you had no access to it, how do you purport to know who was given enough time or not, who was given enough information or not, which claims were accurate and which not?

305:

I've seen you edit some of the copyright tag articles. Do you know what the tag for a public-domain UK/GB image is? This one is labelled US PD, but is inappropriate (both the author and jurisdiction would be UK). Please reply on my talk page. Thanks,

487:). The point is that, given the current situation, Ferrylodge should be treading a lot more carefully, but he's still coming on just as strong as ever. He doesn't know when to let things go, pushing Andrew c to the point of retreat yet again just 3206:

Matthew Hoffman clarification request how sharply FT2 and I disagree sometimes. You can check the top thread of my user talk for a chat with another arbitrator which is--well--not warm and fuzzy. I'm the editor who took the RFC on ArbCom live.

582:, and my calls for desysopping. In retrospect, I went a bit too far here (like, WAY too far), and I was wrong, and I apologize about that. I see now that you do quite good work on Knowledge (XXG), and hope you continue that work in the future. 192:

Hello, I couldn't find a statement anywhere that it had been provided for public usage so removed the tagging. I had believed the uploader of the image just did not know how to tag the image so I tried to help. Sorry about the confusion.

923:

Bishapod go splat, little 'shonen locked in cellar, but STILL happiest day of Zilla life! (see Zilla page for details, don't tell gullible stewards!) Already done block! Considering standing for bureaucrat, little El support (HINT HINT)?

2784:(It would be very interesting to trace "It's not over till the fat lady sings" back through time, too.) Your rapidly archived input on the RFAR page was brilliant, Elinor. I have posted a minor thought on FloNight's page, below MONGO. 1823: 1815: 497:

instead of just owning up to his own pattern of ideologically-motivated editing and trying to move past it. I think Andrew c was correct in his observation that Ferrylodge responds to criticism by pointing the finger right back at the

2618:

The image is used as the primary means of visual identification of this article topic. |Replaceability = Image is protected by copyright, therefore a free use alternative won't exist. }} == Licensing: == {{Non-free game cover}}

1735:

of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

1397:

1214:

Welcome to the Twenty Third issue of the Novels WikiProject's newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do.

1369:, who helped fend off Nleobold's last attack. If you could join in keeping an eye on these articles, and be ready with any warnings or blocks that may be appropriate, that would be great. Thanks for any help you can give! 3352: 262: 743:

on it, and to explain why you feel that the use of it in that article is fair use. The information the bot left on your talk page should help you in finding where to find out more and where to ask questions. Cheers.

411:

RE: 07:39, 23 October 2007 ElinorD (Talk | contribs) deleted "Image:Vonbraun-portrait.jpg" ‎ (Speedy deleted per (CSD I4), was an image lacking sources or licensing information for more than seven days. using TW)

2936:

Durova, it's hard to explain what happened, in part because there are certain things we're apparently not allowed to say (and if we try to, the posts are deleted), and in part because the experience was somewhat

1074:, has announced he is not standing as a candidate for another term in that capacity. We would like to take this opportunity to express our gratitude to him for the extraordinary work he has done for this project. 265:

which has been going for 7 days and has already run once and was overturned at deletion review/ I think ones like that leave those involved in a misery of tenterhooks;) Hope you can help, or know someone who

3537: 1045:

Elections are now taking place for coordinators of the project for the next six months. Any editors interested in seeking a coordinator position, or who want a say in who is selected, should indicate as much

3181:

is either true or untrue, isn't it, it can't be a misunderstanding if E hadn't had anything to do with Lar's wife at all. So it's another instance where people seem to be turning a blind eye to something.

2946:

In brief, Elinor and I complained to various people about a checkuser that we felt was a misuse of the tool. We were told other checkusers weren't interested in pursuing it; that the Ombudsmen weren't

1122: 2772:

Thanks for that interesting info. I remember searching unsuccessfully for that quotation in Kipling. I came across it in an Agatha Christie book, where one of the characters attributes it to Kipling.

1731: 2521:. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from 2473:. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from 2422:. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from 1994: 1393: 1002: 622: 3430:

i have recieved a message apparently from you saying that i (or my IP address) have innappropriately edited the article 'Custard'. Can you please note that i have never edited this page.

1654:, where I pointed out the pages to which SV had recently followed me. Was there a reason for omitting this one, or have I missed it? I believe it was February 2007. Thanks and regards, 2222: 1548:

If you think you can tag the image appropriately, either to show that it's public domain (or otherwise has a free licence) or to claim a valid fair use for it, I'll be happy to undelete.

1126: 471: 82:

If you disagree with an edit I have just made to an article, it's quite likely that I'm in the process of typing a post on the article talk page, so please wait before complaining here!

2265:

We now have many positions vacant in our Project Team, so we are looking for members who have the time and interest to take on the various roles, details of which can be found at the

2048: 422:

photograph. NASA, the National Aeronautics & Space Administration is an agency of the Federal Government, and as such holds no copyright over the image (as are all NASA images)

2376: 2052: 3578: 1047: 3573: 865:

Hey, someone from IP address 216.159.27.1 is becoming a problem again. They have been vandalizing again. You have written to this user before in October 2007. Their latest was

2917: 2068: 2676:

Thank you, Giano. There are times when the price of living with oneself after keeping silent seems higher than the price of speaking out, regardless of the consequences.

2128: 1898:, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active within the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:Novels editor, please add your name back to the 219: 2235:

aims to help editors with the coordination of articles within the thousands of media franchises which exist and has requested input from our members. They are currently

2532:

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our

2484:

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our

2435:

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our

440:

quite rude. However, let me assume some good faith that you did not give me, and explain why I did what I did. I know for a fact that the anonymous editor who posted

1818:. Given that many of the issues that have been raised are essentially the same as those on the article on which you commented earlier, you may have a view on whether 501:

If Ferrylodge won't even admit, let alone work to address, all the issues surrounding his conduct on Knowledge (XXG), I don't see the ArbCom case as achieving much.

2803: 2236: 2522: 2474: 2423: 2318: 2303: 1252: 1923: 1669: 1189: 2760:. It would be nice to trace this quote back through time; it's such an important concept. No doubt it will have roots into another language, like Latin. 2525:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an

2477:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an

2426:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an

1494: 791: 2239:

for franchise articles. Since this may affect one or more articles in our Novel project, they would like to get opinions before implimenting any changes.

2526: 2478: 2427: 2124: 375: 2533: 2485: 2436: 2267: 2232: 1912: 814:. I'd glady be able to put the source information and proper copyright/fair-use tags on it if the image were un-deleted. If you can't, that's ok. :) 1998: 1990: 1313: 1006: 998: 2225:

has a series of discussions about whether to categorize certain specific types of fictional characters: double agents, dictators, characters with

2102: 2090: 1899: 1895: 1100: 378:

was invalid as the two people who supposedly had tried to resolve a dispute were in fact one user, and the whole RfC was set up by the notorious

2271:. Shortly a Coordinator nominations notice shall also be sent out to all members, which will commence the annual Coordinator selection process. 1489: 2537: 2489: 2440: 3141:

have occurred. I think it was FT2, who, in filing the new motion against Slim, used the word "unwarranted", paraphrasing the earlier rulings.

794:. Though it was not successful, your support was still very much appreciated. Let me know if there is anything I can do for you. Thank you!-- 971: 3276:

was without any conceivable illegitimate intent, and 2.) I don't see any other reason why it should have been a central issue of the case.

2753:, but it would be nice to see when he used it; it is so often attributed to him. A quick look around shows it is oft attributed to Lincoln 1158: 3137:

choice of forum was unhelpful. This was followed by a passive voice mention of the privacy policy, which didn't name the agent - a breach

970:

A request for arbitration has been made on a matter in which you were involved. You may add yourself as a party and comment if desired at

310: 2517:. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Knowledge (XXG) may not meet the criteria required by 2469:. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Knowledge (XXG) may not meet the criteria required by 2418:. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Knowledge (XXG) may not meet the criteria required by 1940: 1788: 849: 825: 3202:

including one serious enough that the FBI opened an investigation. So yes, I've walked a few miles in moccasins from the same cobbler.

3049: 35:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. 3437: 3416: 2587: 2570: 2558: 1167: 640: 208: 2056: 574:

I know it's a bit late as of now, but I never actually apologized to you about my accusations regarding your actions in deleting the

1926:

selection process. We hope to have more involvement and input this time around! More news will be forthcoming. Thanks, everyone!

702: 280:

Can you please hlep me understand why a photo I took and uploaded was removed? The filename was Brianba20.JPG. It was linked to the

2754: 2857: 1807: 1377: 1093: 350:

I see you restored my question that got lost from the Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents page a little while ago. Thank you.

54: 3506: 3457: 2864:. Lovely. Thanks for the help in finding it; the text is all uploaded now, in case you also want to help proofreading it. :-) 27: 2075: 2362:

Note: This article was previously deleted due to lack of notability, but that now can be established since winning this award.

2255: 2106: 2013: 1973: 1905: 1208: 1021: 2830: 2529:; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. 2481:; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. 2430:; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. 2188:

movies and even battled addiction to alcohol and cigars. The book is not published until October 1, but judges for the 2008

1650:

Hi Elinor, I see you have replaced some more of SlimVirgin's talk page. Unfortunately I see one edit is missing, which was

353:

Looking through the history, there seem to be several such events today. Does this disappearance of material happen often?

3406:

Sorry to hear about that though - folks that can't contribute anything useful should pipe down and try to learn something.

1312:

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section

57: 374:

was found to have used some sock puppets years ago. However I feel something should happen to acknowledge the fact that

321: 2518: 2470: 2419: 811: 804: 2184:

as the oldest recorded non-human primate at the age of 76. He has appeared in various movie roles which included twelve

908: 79:

If I post on your page, I will notice any reply you leave for me there, but if you prefer to respond here, that's fine.

1714: 1346: 142: 138: 134: 126: 122: 118: 114: 110: 2586:

FWIW I have no interest in this page and have NOT knowingly edited it, yet alone edited it in an unnecessary manner?

2158:

fastest selling hardcover fiction title. It is the latest installment in the book series about British secret agent

1520: 50: 3385: 2724:

they were doing that. But I appreciate your concerns. I hope this makes you feel a bit better about what I said. --

1171: 1129:

have been created. People interested in the aforementioned subjects are encouraged to support the new task forces.

2961:, not formally, and that therefore it didn't count. That the informal approaches resulted in the Ombudsmen saying 494:

and last week accusing me of "soapbox and propagandiz" for an unintentional error in formatting I made in January,

333:

I think I probably caught you just as you logged out - you'll see that discussion has continued at the talk page.

158: 2465: 2189: 1403: 1349:. Anyway, this user is back, as an anon, making the same completely improper edits to the same target articles, 174: 170: 166: 162: 150: 146: 1365:). I've rolled him back, but I'm not an admin and can't do any more than patrol the articles. I'll also alert 614: 2396: 1819: 1811: 1799: 1684: 1628: 533:

Pardon the lack of format but I'm still new to much of the markup language for wikipedia. The following user (

2912:

Regarding the SlimVirgin-Lar case and SlimVirgin's conduct there, your statement says the Committee found her

2720:

people really were just jumping on the bangwagon and going "OMG FT2!!!", evidently without really being sure

3260: 3187: 2805:

used to describe a view of Gladstone, though without saying that he had actually used those words. It's in

2513: 1934: 1784: 845: 821: 591: 3433: 3412: 1776: 1702: 1418: 1345:-- I forget whether it was only for a day or if there was a permanent ban involved. Some discussion is at 690: 628: 196: 3550: 3513: 3441: 3420: 2591: 2574: 2562: 2202:

as one of its 100 most influential people of 2008, has decided not to continue with writing her draft for

2181: 2146: 1624: 1084: 878: 737: 636: 281: 204: 1756: 324:

asking about the rationale for the removal of links to the subject's blog - could you take a quick look?

3381: 3364: 2757: 2613: 2609: 2602: 2354: 2063: 1780: 1327: 1295: 1230: 1227: 1078: 698: 484: 299: 874: 2957:

and several e-mails to and from Jimbo — I was told (by FT2) that we had only approached the Ombudsmen

1831: 694: 2545: 2497: 2448: 2310: 2204: 2192:

were sent a early version and were so impressed that they have included it on the 10-strong longlist.

1676: 1609: 1399: 1374: 1132: 763: 1218:

We would encourage all members to get more involved and if you are wondering what with, please ask.

836:

Actually, i could find the sources for the images on the following link if they were re-uploaded...

3307: 2994: 2751: 2392: 2127:

task force has been proposed. Comments are welcomed on that proposal since we already have our own

1680: 1636: 1581: 1535: 1342: 1288:

The first person to start the article is mentioned in the next newsletter. This month's article is

939: 334: 325: 2098: 1894:

is currently holding a roll call, which we hope to have annually. Your username is listed on the

1891: 1870: 1104: 76:

I will normally respond here, but if you'd like me to reply on your talk page, please let me know.

3281: 3255: 3240: 3182: 3084: 3055: 3016: 2789: 2694: 2666: 2627: 2275: 1928: 1859: 1827: 1764: 1741: 1659: 1257: 1188:

There is a discussion regarding further task forces for other genres of fiction now taking place

870: 841: 817: 587: 480: 307: 3461: 2089:

The members list is currently under review so we have moved all past active member's name to a

1060:

The project has currently 381 members, 69 joined & 0 leavers since the start of March 2008.

3546: 3509: 3323: 2729: 866: 726: 715: 632: 446: 200: 2993:

Since then SV and ElinorD have sought to have the case in effect retried, while appealing to

3489: 3360: 2278:, who will introduce herself and speak on our forthcoming elections for extra Coordinators. 2151: 1453: 1426: 1323: 1289: 1221: 1151: 1071: 979: 901: 517: 3466: 2707:

fully realise what they are doing, but I rather suspect they do - most of them anyway. :-(

576: 3066: 3035: 2998: 2972: 2880: 2845: 2818: 2541: 2493: 2444: 2414: 2285: 2195: 2038: 1710: 1370: 557: 423: 383: 357: 267: 3470: 1089: 772:

Yes, thanks. Just very caught up with real life commitments. Hope all is well with you.

3378: 3356: 3303: 2814: 2343: 2226: 2043: 1632: 1631:. If it is, could you restore it as I have necessary source information for the image. 1567: 1531: 1350: 1281: 925: 660: 289: 248: 93: 655: 247:

I wouldn't want anyone to actually visit my ass, then take a left. That might hurt.--

3567: 3277: 3236: 3080: 3051: 3012: 3011:

that is a bigger problem. I believe this is largely what the SV-Lar case was about.

2785: 2690: 2662: 2623: 2337: 2199: 2155: 1855: 1760: 1738: 1655: 1527: 1366: 1358: 1163: 505: 398: 371: 233: 2914:

quick to make unwarranted accusations, and yet again reminded to use proper process.

3475: 3169: 2773: 2725: 2708: 2677: 2638: 2375:

To unsubscribe from further issues of this newsletter please remove your name from

1822:

should be kept or deleted. If you wish to contribute to the discussion, please see

1549: 1507: 1463: 1437: 773: 745: 670: 542: 379: 89: 3168:

That's all I can manage for now, and I may not be editing in the next day or two.

2229:, etc. Advice from any Novels project members would be valuable in assisting them. 1488:

I am awarding you this WikiCookie for your constructive edits on Knowledge (XXG)--

2703:

I'll have to disagree with you there, and say the exact opposite. I hope they do

1824:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (fifth nomination)

445:

was my reasoning at a minimum. Threatening me with a block was just not right.

3215: 3106: 2925: 2866: 2835: 2762: 2173: 2163: 1484: 1449: 1422: 975: 894: 586:

that's just my observation. I trust your judgment in dealing with these issues.

541:

after you warned him. Just letting you know if you want to take action. Thanks.

538: 512: 2317:

The next collaboration is due for selection on 14 September, 2008 so cast your

1526:

You have recently deleted this image, which was the lead image for the article

534: 3332: 2281: 2159: 2004: 1965: 1884: 1706: 1276: 1012: 795: 606: 470:

While I don't condone discourteous remarks to Ferrylodge, Ferrylodge has been

20: 2162:

and was released to coincide with the 100th anniversary of late Bond creator

972:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration#Appeal_of_commuity_ban_of_Iantresman

3529: 2208:

after 12 chapters of the unfinished manuscript were leaked on the internet.

263:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Psychiatric abuse (second nomination)

2916:

I ran a search for that phrase and couldn't find it anywhere on the page

100: 1566:

Little El suddenly all over zilla watchlist, hooray! Hold on tight!

2637:

Done. Sorry about the delay. I haven't looked in very much recently.

2185: 2177: 1436:

Done. Please add the complete rationale as soon as possible. Thanks.

610: 3554: 3517: 3493: 3481: 3445: 3424: 3389: 3368: 3359:. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. 3351:

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the

3335: 3326: 3311: 3285: 3265: 3244: 3220: 3192: 3175: 3111: 3088: 3073: 3059: 3042: 3020: 2979: 2971:

That's just a small part of what happened, but it gives the flavor.

2930: 2887: 2870: 2852: 2839: 2825: 2792: 2779: 2766: 2733: 2714: 2698: 2683: 2670: 2644: 2631: 2595: 2578: 2549: 2501: 2452: 2400: 2274:

Next month's Newsletter will include a message from our Coordinator

1947: 1863: 1835: 1806:

Some time ago, you participated in a deletion discussion concerning

1792: 1768: 1745: 1718: 1688: 1663: 1640: 1612: 1601: 1555: 1539: 1513: 1499: 1469: 1457: 1443: 1430: 1407: 1381: 1331: 983: 959: 910: 882: 854: 830: 798: 779: 766: 751: 676: 663: 644: 595: 564: 545: 522: 460: 426: 401: 386: 360: 337: 328: 292: 270: 251: 237: 212: 3298: 3345: 3297: 2612:

because it lacked a fair use rationale. Could you please restore

1483: 669:

Thanks. I'm a bit late to say the same thing, but Happy New Year!

654: 2756:, but the earliest verified printing of it is 1888, in a book by 621:

the selling point, a first for a Bangladeshi, is up for deletion

3065:

direct it to the ones who insisted you all be kept in the dark.

2459:

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Fontaninifigurines.jpg

419: 85:

I normally archive my talk page when it has about fifty threads.

2346:, who also provided us with tipline news for this newsletter. 2051:

on June 29 and then appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s Main Page as

810:

Hiya! I was wondering if you'd be willing to restore the image

2879:" Excellent! And thank you for your, um, kind invitation. :-) 15: 2833:- it is on page 64 I believe; the text is being uploaded ... 261:

hi could you possibly, or ask someone else to, close the AfD

2003: 1964: 1883: 1810:. I thought you might like to know that the parent article, 1011: 989:

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXIII - April 2008

570:

My earlier accusations against you and calls for desysopping

2507:

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Fontaninicrib.jpg

392:

Speedy deletion of "Image:Portrait of a Killer cover.jpg" ‎

1121:

Two inactive projects were converted into task forces, so

52: 51: 2583:

What am I alleged to have vandalised on the butter page?

1773:

How can I ensure that the Ultra Dj entry isn't deleted?

1725:

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXV - June 2008

1387:

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXIV - May 2008

2105:. You may also wish to add your name to any of our many 1545:

The person who uploaded the image was warned a week ago.

2990: 2918:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/SlimVirgin-Lar

2659: 1651: 1546: 1362: 1354: 921: 837: 509: 504:

While we're at it, though, I do hope someone calls out

499: 495: 492: 441: 437: 3133:

was quick to make allegations but tardy in follow up.

2055:

on August 26. It is the first article created through

1495: 1421:

as it's clearly fair use and will at the tag as such

229:

You may refer to the case page to view the decision.

220:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Attack sites

2536:. If you have any questions, please ask them at the 2488:. If you have any questions, please ask them at the 2439:. If you have any questions, please ask them at the 2407:

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Lladro.jpg

3536: 3456:Hello. You are receiving this message because of a 2750:

Hi, I'm pretty sure it isnt originally from Kipling

1490: 3355:. I have found some concerns which you can see at 1347:User talk:ElinorD/Archive05#Your block of Nleobold 2813:by William Jewett Tucker (1898) attributes it to 535:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:207.224.145.254 511:Incivility does not license further incivility. - 366:An invalid RfC that has been hanging over someone 40: 2746:Nothing is ever settled till it is settled right 2523:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free use rationale guideline 2475:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free use rationale guideline 2424:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free use rationale guideline 1759:Looks this is not the first time. Just an FYI. 3469:. Until December 30, you can file a request at 2877:Sir, nothing can be settled which is not right. 2844:Brilliant. See how useful Wikipedians are? :-) 2391:This newsletter was automatically delivered by 1670:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review/Log/2008 June 8 1627:, could you check if it is a larger version of 1337:Piling more work on your overburdened shoulders 2131:which is covered under our Novels WikiProject. 1957:WikiProject Novels Newsletter - September 2008 1737: 1675:I started a deletion review on the history of 508:on his recent incivility toward OrangeMarlin. 376:Knowledge (XXG):Requests_for_comment/Mattisse 226:The above named Arbitration case has closed. 8: 3579:Wikipedians who opt out of template messages 3522: 3465:in the future; you would need to seek a new 790:I wish to thank you for being supportive of 418:Image of Dr. von Braun is (was) an official 3574:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery 3302:Wishing you the very best for the season. 3158:among them that Lar checkusered my sock on 2811:The Making and the Unmaking of the Preacher 2798:I found "Nothing is ever settled ..." in a 2097:. If you still consider yourself an active 2067:appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s Main Page as 920:Hello little Elinor! 'Zilla finally admin! 659:Wishing you the very best for the season - 3528: 3521: 2941:-esque and therefore not easy to describe. 1960: 1849:crushed value of the end-user experience. 1341:Last summer you were involved in blocking 1070:The project's long-time lead coordinator, 605:An image used in the article on the first 415:Like you, I'm busy in Real Life, too. ;-) 188:Licence for Image:AltafHussainSmallPic.jpg 3409:Thanks for contributing to the site! :) 2306:has been selected by popular vote and is 2101:editor, please add your name back to the 1987: 1963: 1904:list. Also feel free to join any of our 1852:What do you think, and what is going on? 1608:Yay! I'm also glad to see you, Elinor! -- 1255:has been selected by popular vote and is 995: 625:. You may be interested to take a look. 575: 31:. ElinorD has not edited Knowledge (XXG) 2807:History of the Oberlin-Wellington Rescue 103: 88:The design of this talk page (and of my 3395:Stanford Prison Experiment - vandalism? 2154:("writing as Ian Fleming"), has become 28:This user may have left Knowledge (XXG) 2373: 2079:reached Good Article status on July 1. 1310: 3331:Tom beat me to it...Happy New Year!-- 3322:Hoping 2009 is a great year for you, 2129:WikiProject Novels/Fantasy task force 2057:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for creation 407:deleted "Image:Vonbraun-portrait.jpg" 7: 3473:for review by the crats. Thank you. 2989:of some of these on FT2's talk page. 1568: 1159:The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao 926: 812:Image:WOIO CBS 19 Cleveland logo.png 805:Image:WOIO CBS 19 Cleveland logo.png 529:207.224.145.254: continued vandalism 243:Thanks for the revert on my userpage 3507:Knowledge (XXG):Missing Wikipedians 2997:principles of justice but ignoring 1292:'s 2008 PEN/Faulkner award winner 1168:National Book Critics Circle Award 14: 2920:. The search failed at the word 1974:The WikiProject Novels Newsletter 1910:and take a look at the project's 617:, the cover of the DVD that made 232:For the Arbitration Committee, - 2519:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content 2471:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content 2420:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content 2334:Our last newsletter's challenge 1808:Allegations of Chinese apartheid 792:my effort to regain my adminship 19: 2180:the Chimp who is listed in the 2076:I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings 1582: 1521:Image:Fairey Gannet RAN 882.jpg 1123:Chronicles of Narnia task force 1088:were both recently promoted to 940: 2565:) 15:54, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 2550:13:59, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 2538:media copyright questions page 2502:13:58, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 2490:media copyright questions page 2453:13:56, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 2441:media copyright questions page 2401:14:43, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 2237:discussing a naming convention 1: 3369:16:58, 14 February 2010 (UTC) 3312:02:11, 25 December 2008 (UTC) 3286:20:58, 29 November 2008 (UTC) 3266:18:18, 29 November 2008 (UTC) 3245:04:45, 29 November 2008 (UTC) 3221:03:14, 29 November 2008 (UTC) 3193:01:08, 29 November 2008 (UTC) 3176:00:38, 29 November 2008 (UTC) 3112:16:13, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 3089:10:05, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 3074:09:23, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 3060:09:09, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 3043:08:46, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 3021:07:59, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 2980:07:05, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 2931:05:44, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 2888:07:10, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 2871:06:50, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 2853:06:42, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 2840:06:32, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 2826:05:58, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 2793:00:49, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 2780:00:34, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 2767:00:12, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 2734:05:25, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 2715:18:13, 27 November 2008 (UTC) 2699:18:07, 27 November 2008 (UTC) 2684:18:04, 27 November 2008 (UTC) 2671:18:02, 27 November 2008 (UTC) 2645:14:58, 11 November 2008 (UTC) 1948:18:26, 8 September 2008 (UTC) 1922:Next month we will begin the 883:05:26, 15 February 2008 (UTC) 855:20:37, 11 February 2008 (UTC) 831:20:32, 11 February 2008 (UTC) 664:03:50, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 645:21:45, 16 December 2007 (UTC) 596:04:51, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 565:10:17, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 546:21:58, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 537:) has continued to vandalize 523:04:35, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 461:00:32, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 322:Talk:Robert_Black_(professor) 3494:22:35, 3 December 2012 (UTC) 3482:04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC) 2632:15:06, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 2596:15:54, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 2579:15:54, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 2534:criteria for speedy deletion 2486:criteria for speedy deletion 2466:Image:Fontaninifigurines.jpg 2437:criteria for speedy deletion 2342:was completed by our member 2233:WikiProject Media franchises 2170:Me Cheeta: the Autobiography 2166:'s birthday on May 28, 1908. 2020:Issue XXVI - September 2008 1880:WikiProject Novels Roll Call 1569: 1562:Little Elinor back at last?! 1284:with a nice starting stub. 927: 799:06:05, 27 January 2008 (UTC) 780:01:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC) 767:22:28, 13 January 2008 (UTC) 752:01:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC) 677:01:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC) 427:02:03, 2 November 2007 (UTC) 402:19:17, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 387:19:39, 31 October 2007 (UTC) 361:21:35, 28 October 2007 (UTC) 338:03:00, 28 October 2007 (UTC) 329:01:15, 28 October 2007 (UTC) 311:20:56, 27 October 2007 (UTC) 293:15:19, 24 October 2007 (UTC) 271:19:59, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 252:13:02, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 238:20:38, 17 October 2007 (UTC) 213:13:20, 16 October 2007 (UTC) 3518:16:10, 3 January 2013 (UTC) 3505:You have been mentioned at 3446:10:01, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 3336:15:10, 1 January 2009 (UTC) 3327:14:08, 1 January 2009 (UTC) 1978:Issue XXVI - September 2008 1878: 1755:Hi I left a db-spam tag on 1150:The science fiction author 1099:It has been suggested that 615:Image:WorshipThisBitch3.jpg 3595: 3390:07:15, 23 April 2010 (UTC) 3129:didn't substantiate them, 2327: 2297:Collaboration of the Month 2294: 2251: 2214: 2176:, is the autobiography of 2137: 2115: 2029: 2025: 2024: 1986: 1983: 1629:Image:Wstillphotosmall.jpg 1382:07:12, 17 April 2008 (UTC) 1332:19:21, 10 April 2008 (UTC) 1280:) was completed by member 1267: 1246:Collaboration of the Month 1243: 1204: 1180: 1172:Pulitzer Prize for Fiction 1142: 1113: 1107:, perhaps as a task force. 1101:WikiProject Sword of Truth 1037: 1033: 1032: 994: 984:10:13, 10 April 2008 (UTC) 960:22:30, 21 March 2008 (UTC) 911:04:47, 21 March 2008 (UTC) 682:Leeds International School 156: 132: 108: 3527: 2223:Categories for Discussion 2190:Guardian First Book Award 1864:19:30, 29 July 2008 (UTC) 1836:18:00, 12 July 2008 (UTC) 1746:00:28, 21 June 2008 (UTC) 1154:died on 19 March aged 90. 1127:Lemony Snicket task force 1092:status. This brings the 1028:Issue XXIII - April 2008 762:Hope all is well. :) -- 43: 3555:08:53, 24 May 2017 (UTC) 3425:04:25, 16 May 2011 (UTC) 2511:Thank you for uploading 2463:Thank you for uploading 2412:Thank you for uploading 2069:Today's featured article 2053:Today's featured article 1820:Allegations of apartheid 1812:Allegations of apartheid 1800:Allegations of apartheid 1793:11:53, 8 July 2008 (UTC) 1769:11:38, 8 July 2008 (UTC) 1719:19:14, 8 June 2008 (UTC) 1689:18:30, 8 June 2008 (UTC) 1664:15:31, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 1641:22:25, 3 June 2008 (UTC) 1613:05:55, 4 June 2008 (UTC) 1602:21:12, 1 June 2008 (UTC) 1556:22:30, 23 May 2008 (UTC) 1540:22:24, 23 May 2008 (UTC) 1514:17:06, 23 May 2008 (UTC) 1500:17:04, 23 May 2008 (UTC) 1470:16:35, 23 May 2008 (UTC) 1458:16:34, 23 May 2008 (UTC) 1444:16:23, 23 May 2008 (UTC) 1431:16:20, 23 May 2008 (UTC) 1408:07:57, 10 May 2008 (UTC) 1274:Last month's challenge ( 70:Welcome to my Talk Page! 3105:your dialog elsewhere? 2904:Regarding your concerns 2514:Image:Fontaninicrib.jpg 2049:Featured Article status 1694:pic on susham bedi page 1448:Thanks added rationale 1417:Can you please restore 966:Request for arbitration 705:) 18:02, 9 January 2008 3314: 2182:Guinness World Records 2008: 1969: 1888: 1816:nominated for deletion 1502: 1419:Image:New_York_GAA.jpg 1016: 666: 601:Would you take a look? 320:I've popped a note on 300:Image:Japanese3vil.jpg 282:Model military vehicle 3301: 2800:North American Review 2569:Accused of Vandalism 2064:To Kill a Mockingbird 2007: 1968: 1887: 1802:deletion notification 1625:Image:Wstillphoto.jpg 1619:Image:Wstillphoto.jpg 1487: 1079:To Kill a Mockingbird 1015: 888:Fresh baked bread! :) 658: 485:Talk:African American 33:since 9 December 2008 3501:Just to let you know 3462:administrator policy 3379:Please comment here. 2817:, who died in 1874. 2330:Newsletter challenge 2311:Look Homeward, Angel 1924:coordinator election 1677:User talk:SlimVirgin 1270:Newsletter challenge 3524: 3344:GA reassessment of 3271:calls it, probably 2939:Alice in Wonderland 2614:Image:Timewarp.jpeg 2610:Image:Timewarp.jpeg 2603:Image:Timewarp.jpeg 2527:image copyright tag 2479:image copyright tag 2428:image copyright tag 2198:, who is listed by 2107:Project Task Forces 2103:Active Members List 2059:to become Featured. 1869:Calling all active 1757:Ultra DJ Management 1237:, Initiating Editor 1085:El Señor Presidente 298:Correct PD tag for 257:AfD needing closing 3315: 3125:made accusations, 2963:there could not be 2860:it is; it is even 2758:Abraham R. Howbert 2355:Griffin's Daughter 2140:Novel-related news 2125:Fantasy Literature 2014:Novels WikiProject 2009: 1970: 1954: 1892:WikiProject Novels 1889: 1503: 1258:A Farewell to Arms 1145:Novel related news 1022:Novels WikiProject 1017: 916:Fresh baked admin! 871:Grand View College 667: 578:File:Apo-crest.jpg 481:Talk:Terri Schiavo 92:) was a gift from 73: 3562: 3561: 3543: 3542: 3497: 3492: 3436:comment added by 3415:comment added by 3353:GA Sweeps process 3072: 3041: 2978: 2886: 2851: 2824: 2732: 2403: 2388: 2387: 2384: 2383: 2369: 2368: 2245: 2244: 2095:Project Roll Call 1946: 1876: 1795: 1779:comment added by 1721: 1705:comment added by 1586: 1380: 1321: 1320: 1306: 1305: 1198: 1197: 1136: 944: 867:Healthcare reform 706: 693:comment added by 647: 631:comment added by 520: 459: 215: 199:comment added by 182: 181: 104:My archived talk 67: 39: 38: 3586: 3532: 3525: 3488: 3486: 3478: 3452:Notice of change 3448: 3427: 3382:MisterE2123Five3 3218: 3109: 3071: 3069: 3040: 3038: 2977: 2975: 2928: 2885: 2883: 2869: 2850: 2848: 2838: 2823: 2821: 2765: 2728: 2415:Image:Lladro.jpg 2390: 2249: 2248: 2152:Sebastian Faulks 2093:and are doing a 2027: 2026: 1985: 1984: 1961: 1943: 1937: 1932: 1931: 1916:to get involved! 1774: 1744: 1700: 1598: 1584: 1578: 1577: 1497: 1492: 1373: 1290:Kate Christensen 1235: 1224: 1202: 1201: 1152:Arthur C. Clarke 1130: 1090:Featured Article 1035: 1034: 993: 992: 956: 942: 936: 935: 906: 899: 853: 829: 742: 736: 731: 725: 720: 714: 688: 626: 581: 579: 560: 516: 458: 456: 451: 194: 101: 58: 41: 23: 16: 3594: 3593: 3589: 3588: 3587: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3564: 3563: 3558: 3503: 3476: 3454: 3431: 3410: 3397: 3376: 3349: 3320: 3318:Happy new year! 3296: 3294:Merry Christmas 3216: 3107: 3067: 3036: 2973: 2926: 2906: 2881: 2867:John Vandenberg 2865: 2846: 2836:John Vandenberg 2834: 2819: 2763:John Vandenberg 2761: 2748: 2656: 2606: 2601:please restore 2567: 2509: 2461: 2409: 2217:Current debates 2196:Stephenie Meyer 2172:, written by a 2118:Task force news 2039:Margaret Atwood 2018: 2002: 1979: 1959: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1941: 1935: 1927: 1881: 1875: 1843: 1814:, was recently 1804: 1753: 1732:June 2008 issue 1727: 1696: 1673: 1648: 1621: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1587: 1574: 1564: 1524: 1482: 1415: 1400:SteveCrossinBot 1389: 1339: 1234: 1231: 1222: 1183:Current debates 1133:Wassupwestcoast 1116:Task force news 1103:be merged into 1026: 1010: 991: 968: 955: 954: 953: 945: 932: 918: 902: 895: 890: 863: 839: 815: 808: 788: 760: 740: 734: 729: 723: 718: 712: 684: 653: 651:Merry Christmas 603: 577: 572: 558: 553: 531: 452: 447: 434: 409: 394: 370:Hi I know that 368: 345: 318: 303: 278: 259: 245: 224: 190: 99: 72: 60: 59: 55: 12: 11: 5: 3592: 3590: 3582: 3581: 3576: 3566: 3565: 3560: 3559: 3541: 3540: 3534: 3533: 3502: 3499: 3487:(delivered by 3453: 3450: 3396: 3393: 3375: 3374:Please comment 3372: 3357:Talk:Yeast/GA1 3348: 3342: 3340: 3319: 3316: 3295: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3288: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3223: 3211: 3207: 3203: 3199: 3165: 3164: 3154: 3153: 3149:NOT SLIMVIRGIN 3143: 3142: 3116: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3005: 3004: 3003: 3002: 2983: 2982: 2968: 2967: 2953: 2952: 2943: 2942: 2905: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2815:Charles Sumner 2796: 2747: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2655: 2652: 2650: 2648: 2647: 2622:Thank you. -- 2605: 2599: 2566: 2556: 2508: 2505: 2460: 2457: 2408: 2405: 2393:TinucherianBot 2386: 2385: 2382: 2381: 2371: 2370: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2360: 2332: 2331: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2316: 2307: 2299: 2298: 2292: 2291: 2289: 2259: 2258: 2246: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2230: 2227:eidetic memory 2219: 2218: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2193: 2167: 2147:Devil May Care 2142: 2141: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2120: 2119: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2091:Incumbent List 2086: 2085: 2081: 2080: 2072: 2060: 2044:The Penelopiad 2034: 2033: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2019: 2010: 1988: 1981: 1980: 1977: 1971: 1958: 1955: 1901:Active Members 1890: 1882: 1879: 1877: 1874: 1867: 1842: 1839: 1803: 1797: 1752: 1749: 1726: 1723: 1695: 1692: 1672: 1667: 1647: 1644: 1620: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1593: 1591: 1589: 1583: 1572: 1563: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1523: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1481: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1414: 1413:Restore please 1411: 1394:May 2008 issue 1388: 1385: 1351:Jerrold Nadler 1338: 1335: 1319: 1318: 1308: 1307: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1282:User:Blathnaid 1272: 1271: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1248: 1247: 1241: 1240: 1238: 1232: 1212: 1211: 1199: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1185: 1184: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1155: 1147: 1146: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1118: 1117: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1097: 1075: 1067: 1066: 1062: 1061: 1057: 1056: 1052: 1051: 1042: 1041: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1027: 1018: 996: 990: 987: 967: 964: 951: 949: 947: 941: 930: 917: 914: 889: 886: 862: 859: 858: 857: 807: 802: 787: 784: 783: 782: 759: 756: 755: 754: 683: 680: 652: 649: 602: 599: 571: 568: 552: 549: 530: 527: 526: 525: 502: 468: 433: 430: 408: 405: 393: 390: 367: 364: 344: 341: 335:Privatemusings 326:Privatemusings 317: 314: 302: 296: 277: 276:Image deletion 274: 258: 255: 244: 241: 223: 217: 189: 186: 184: 180: 179: 177: 173: 169: 165: 161: 155: 153: 149: 145: 141: 137: 131: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 106: 105: 98: 97: 86: 83: 80: 77: 68: 66: 65: 62: 61: 56: 53: 49: 48: 45: 44: 37: 36: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3591: 3580: 3577: 3575: 3572: 3571: 3569: 3557: 3556: 3552: 3548: 3539: 3535: 3531: 3526: 3520: 3519: 3515: 3511: 3508: 3500: 3498: 3495: 3491: 3484: 3483: 3480: 3479: 3472: 3468: 3463: 3459: 3458:recent change 3451: 3449: 3447: 3443: 3439: 3435: 3428: 3426: 3422: 3418: 3414: 3407: 3404: 3400: 3394: 3392: 3391: 3387: 3383: 3380: 3373: 3371: 3370: 3366: 3362: 3358: 3354: 3347: 3343: 3341: 3338: 3337: 3334: 3329: 3328: 3325: 3317: 3313: 3309: 3305: 3300: 3293: 3287: 3283: 3279: 3274: 3269: 3268: 3267: 3264: 3263: 3259: 3258: 3252: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3246: 3242: 3238: 3232: 3222: 3219: 3212: 3208: 3204: 3200: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3191: 3190: 3186: 3185: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3174: 3171: 3167: 3166: 3161: 3156: 3155: 3150: 3145: 3144: 3140: 3136: 3132: 3128: 3124: 3119: 3118: 3117: 3114: 3113: 3110: 3090: 3086: 3082: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3070: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3057: 3053: 3050: 3046: 3045: 3044: 3039: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3009: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3000: 2996: 2991: 2987: 2986: 2985: 2984: 2981: 2976: 2970: 2969: 2964: 2960: 2955: 2954: 2949: 2945: 2944: 2940: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2929: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2910: 2903: 2889: 2884: 2878: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2868: 2863: 2859: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2849: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2837: 2832: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2822: 2816: 2812: 2808: 2804: 2801: 2797: 2794: 2791: 2787: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2778: 2775: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2764: 2759: 2755: 2752: 2745: 2735: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2713: 2710: 2706: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2696: 2692: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2682: 2679: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2653: 2651: 2646: 2643: 2640: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2629: 2625: 2620: 2615: 2611: 2604: 2600: 2598: 2597: 2593: 2589: 2584: 2581: 2580: 2576: 2572: 2564: 2560: 2557: 2555: 2552: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2540:. Thank you. 2539: 2535: 2530: 2528: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2515: 2506: 2504: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2492:. Thank you. 2491: 2487: 2482: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2467: 2458: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2450: 2446: 2443:. Thank you. 2442: 2438: 2432: 2431: 2429: 2425: 2421: 2417: 2416: 2406: 2404: 2402: 2398: 2394: 2380: 2378: 2372: 2363: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2345: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2338:The Pure Land 2329: 2328: 2326: 2320: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2305: 2304:Collaboration 2302:This month's 2301: 2300: 2296: 2295: 2293: 2290: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2277: 2272: 2270: 2269: 2263: 2257: 2253: 2252: 2250: 2247: 2238: 2234: 2231: 2228: 2224: 2221: 2220: 2216: 2215: 2213: 2207: 2206: 2201: 2200:Time magazine 2197: 2194: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2168: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2156:Penguin Books 2153: 2150:, written by 2149: 2148: 2144: 2143: 2139: 2138: 2136: 2130: 2126: 2122: 2121: 2117: 2116: 2114: 2108: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2087: 2083: 2082: 2078: 2077: 2073: 2070: 2066: 2065: 2061: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2045: 2040: 2036: 2035: 2031: 2030: 2028: 2017: 2015: 2006: 2001: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1982: 1976: 1975: 1967: 1962: 1956: 1950: 1949: 1944: 1938: 1930: 1925: 1920: 1918: 1915: 1914: 1909: 1908: 1903: 1902: 1897: 1893: 1886: 1872: 1868: 1866: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1850: 1846: 1840: 1838: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1801: 1798: 1796: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1781:Absolutpiracy 1778: 1771: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1751:Spam Tag Left 1750: 1748: 1747: 1743: 1740: 1734: 1733: 1724: 1722: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1693: 1691: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1671: 1668: 1666: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1645: 1643: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1618: 1614: 1611: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1603: 1600: 1599: 1579: 1576: 1575: 1561: 1557: 1554: 1551: 1547: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1528:Fairey Gannet 1522: 1519: 1515: 1512: 1509: 1505: 1504: 1501: 1498: 1493: 1486: 1479: 1471: 1468: 1465: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1442: 1439: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1412: 1410: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1396: 1395: 1386: 1384: 1383: 1379: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1367:User:Dogru144 1364: 1360: 1359:Deborah Glick 1356: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1343:User:Nleobold 1336: 1334: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1317: 1315: 1309: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296:The Great Man 1291: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1283: 1279: 1278: 1269: 1268: 1266: 1260: 1259: 1254: 1253:Collaboration 1251:This month's 1250: 1249: 1245: 1244: 1242: 1239: 1236: 1228: 1225: 1219: 1216: 1210: 1206: 1205: 1203: 1200: 1191: 1187: 1186: 1182: 1181: 1179: 1173: 1169: 1166:won both the 1165: 1161: 1160: 1156: 1153: 1149: 1148: 1144: 1143: 1141: 1134: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1119: 1115: 1114: 1112: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1086: 1081: 1080: 1076: 1073: 1069: 1068: 1064: 1063: 1059: 1058: 1054: 1053: 1049: 1044: 1043: 1039: 1038: 1036: 1025: 1023: 1014: 1009: 1008: 1004: 1000: 988: 986: 985: 981: 977: 974:. Thank you. 973: 965: 963: 961: 958: 957: 937: 934: 933: 922: 915: 913: 912: 909: 907: 905: 900: 898: 887: 885: 884: 880: 876: 872: 868: 861:Repeat vandal 860: 856: 852: 851: 847: 843: 842:RingtailedFox 838: 835: 834: 833: 832: 828: 827: 823: 819: 818:RingtailedFox 813: 806: 803: 801: 800: 797: 793: 785: 781: 778: 775: 771: 770: 769: 768: 765: 757: 753: 750: 747: 739: 738:Non-free logo 728: 717: 709: 708: 707: 704: 700: 696: 692: 681: 679: 678: 675: 672: 665: 662: 657: 650: 648: 646: 642: 638: 634: 630: 624: 620: 616: 612: 608: 600: 598: 597: 593: 589: 583: 580: 569: 567: 566: 563: 561: 550: 548: 547: 544: 540: 536: 528: 524: 519: 514: 510: 507: 503: 500: 496: 493: 490: 486: 482: 477: 475: 469: 465: 464: 463: 462: 457: 455: 450: 443: 439: 436:I found this 431: 429: 428: 425: 421: 416: 413: 406: 404: 403: 400: 391: 389: 388: 385: 381: 377: 373: 372:User:Mattisse 365: 363: 362: 359: 354: 351: 348: 342: 340: 339: 336: 331: 330: 327: 323: 315: 313: 312: 309: 301: 297: 295: 294: 291: 286: 283: 275: 273: 272: 269: 264: 256: 254: 253: 250: 242: 240: 239: 235: 230: 227: 221: 218: 216: 214: 210: 206: 202: 198: 187: 185: 178: 176: 172: 168: 164: 160: 154: 152: 148: 144: 140: 136: 130: 128: 124: 120: 116: 112: 107: 102: 95: 91: 87: 84: 81: 78: 75: 74: 71: 64: 63: 47: 46: 42: 34: 30: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 3547:Gerda Arendt 3544: 3510:Ottawahitech 3504: 3485: 3474: 3455: 3438:80.42.131.61 3432:— Preceding 3429: 3417:71.35.143.87 3408: 3405: 3401: 3399:Hi there - 3398: 3377: 3350: 3339: 3330: 3324:Tom Harrison 3321: 3272: 3261: 3256: 3250: 3233: 3229: 3188: 3183: 3172: 3159: 3148: 3138: 3134: 3130: 3126: 3122: 3115: 3103: 2962: 2958: 2947: 2938: 2921: 2913: 2911: 2907: 2876: 2861: 2810: 2806: 2799: 2776: 2749: 2721: 2711: 2704: 2680: 2657: 2649: 2641: 2621: 2608:You deleted 2607: 2588:86.136.40.11 2585: 2582: 2571:86.136.40.11 2568: 2559:86.136.40.11 2553: 2531: 2512: 2510: 2483: 2464: 2462: 2434: 2433: 2413: 2411: 2410: 2389: 2374: 2361: 2353: 2352: 2336: 2335: 2333: 2309: 2308: 2280: 2273: 2266: 2264: 2260: 2205:Midnight Sun 2203: 2169: 2145: 2094: 2074: 2062: 2042: 2032:Project news 2011: 1989: 1972: 1921: 1919: 1917: 1911: 1906: 1900: 1896:members list 1854: 1851: 1847: 1844: 1805: 1772: 1754: 1730: 1728: 1697: 1674: 1649: 1646:Talk history 1623:You deleted 1622: 1580: 1571: 1570: 1565: 1552: 1525: 1510: 1466: 1440: 1416: 1392: 1390: 1340: 1322: 1311: 1294: 1293: 1275: 1273: 1256: 1220: 1217: 1213: 1157: 1135:for the tip) 1096:count to 14! 1083: 1077: 1040:Project news 1019: 997: 969: 938: 929: 928: 919: 903: 896: 891: 875:Kevinsanders 864: 840: 816: 809: 789: 776: 761: 748: 685: 673: 668: 633:Aditya Kabir 618: 604: 584: 573: 562: 554: 532: 488: 473: 453: 448: 435: 417: 414: 410: 395: 380:User:Ekajati 369: 355: 352: 349: 347:Hi ElinorD: 346: 332: 319: 308:John Smith's 304: 287: 279: 260: 246: 231: 228: 225: 201:Shehzadashiq 191: 183: 157: 133: 109: 69: 32: 26: 3411:—Preceding 3361:Jezhotwells 2922:unwarranted 2802:from 1884, 2654:Slim Virgin 2174:ghostwriter 2164:Ian Fleming 2084:Member news 2071:on July 11. 1907:task forces 1775:—Preceding 1701:—Preceding 1506:Thank you. 1324:John Carter 1223:Kevinalewis 1072:Kevinalewis 1055:Member news 695:Felixgrey88 689:—Preceding 627:—Preceding 607:Bangladeshi 539:Black death 195:—Preceding 3568:Categories 3538:Ten years! 3068:SlimVirgin 3037:SlimVirgin 2974:SlimVirgin 2966:protected. 2959:informally 2882:SlimVirgin 2862:italicised 2847:SlimVirgin 2820:SlimVirgin 2658:Well said 2542:Sfan00 IMG 2494:Sfan00 IMG 2445:Sfan00 IMG 2268:Job Centre 2160:James Bond 2016:Newsletter 1913:Job Centre 1610:Iamunknown 1480:Wikicookie 1371:JamesMLane 1277:South Wind 1164:Junot Díaz 1131:(Thank to 1065:Other news 1024:Newsletter 873:. Thanks. 764:Iamunknown 424:WSpaceport 384:Merkinsmum 358:Wanderer57 268:Merkinsmum 175:Archive 15 171:Archive 14 167:Archive 13 163:Archive 12 159:Archive 11 151:Archive 10 3304:Guettarda 2344:Maclean25 2288:), Editor 2254:From the 2099:WP:NOVELS 1871:WP:NOVELS 1633:BlueAzure 1573:bishzilla 1532:Nigel Ish 1462:Welcome. 1207:From the 1174:for 2007. 1105:WP:NOVELS 931:bishzilla 722:have the 661:Guettarda 609:pornstar 489:yesterday 472:anything 316:Hi Elinor 290:DMorpheus 249:Isotope23 147:Archive 9 143:Archive 8 139:Archive 7 135:Archive 6 127:Archive 5 123:Archive 4 119:Archive 3 115:Archive 2 111:Archive 1 94:Phaedriel 90:user page 3434:unsigned 3413:unsigned 3278:Mackan79 3237:Mackan79 3081:Mackan79 3052:Mackan79 3013:Mackan79 2809:, 1859. 2786:Bishonen 2624:Eastmain 2262:issue. 2047:reached 1995:Tip Line 1991:Archives 1856:Jmanooch 1789:contribs 1777:unsigned 1739:SteveBot 1715:contribs 1703:unsigned 1656:Mackan79 1170:and the 1094:novel FA 1003:Tip Line 999:Archives 850:Contribs 826:Contribs 727:untagged 716:untagged 703:contribs 691:unsigned 641:contribs 629:unsigned 588:Dr. Cash 506:Sbowers3 399:DreamGuy 356:Cheers, 288:Thanks. 234:Penwhale 209:contribs 197:unsigned 3523:Awesome 3477:MBisanz 3460:to the 3170:ElinorD 2948:allowed 2774:ElinorD 2726:Deskana 2709:ElinorD 2678:ElinorD 2639:ElinorD 2256:Members 1999:Editors 1873:members 1761:BustOut 1742:(owner) 1681:Yechiel 1550:ElinorD 1508:ElinorD 1464:ElinorD 1438:ElinorD 1209:Members 1007:Editors 774:ElinorD 746:ElinorD 687:Thanks 671:ElinorD 543:JRDarby 498:critic. 438:warning 3490:mabdul 3467:WP:RFA 3262:Parkin 3257:Sticky 3217:Durova 3189:Parkin 3184:Sticky 3173:(talk) 3135:Slim's 3108:Durova 2999:others 2927:Durova 2831:Bingo! 2777:(talk) 2730:(talk) 2712:(talk) 2681:(talk) 2642:(talk) 2186:Tarzan 2178:Cheeta 2041:novel 1841:Images 1828:ChrisO 1685:Shalom 1553:(talk) 1511:(talk) 1467:(talk) 1450:Gnevin 1441:(talk) 1423:Gnevin 1357:) and 1233:(Desk) 976:Stifle 786:My Rfa 777:(talk) 749:(talk) 674:(talk) 611:Jazmin 513:Severa 467:fall." 454:Marlin 449:Orange 343:Thanks 222:Closed 3471:WP:BN 3346:Yeast 3333:MONGO 2691:Giano 2663:Giano 2282:Boylo 2276:Maria 1936:habla 1929:María 1826:. -- 1707:Jak68 796:MONGO 559:Herby 476:civil 432:Reply 3551:talk 3514:talk 3442:talk 3421:talk 3386:talk 3365:talk 3308:talk 3282:talk 3241:talk 3160:very 3131:Slim 3127:Slim 3123:Slim 3085:talk 3056:talk 3017:talk 2995:some 2858:Here 2790:talk 2695:talk 2667:talk 2628:talk 2592:talk 2575:talk 2563:talk 2554:Hai 2546:talk 2498:talk 2449:talk 2397:talk 2377:here 2319:vote 2286:talk 2037:The 2012:The 1942:migo 1860:talk 1845:Hi, 1832:talk 1785:talk 1765:talk 1729:The 1711:talk 1660:talk 1652:here 1637:talk 1536:talk 1454:talk 1427:talk 1404:talk 1391:The 1363:edit 1355:edit 1328:talk 1314:here 1190:here 1125:and 1082:and 1048:here 1020:The 980:talk 897:Eliz 879:talk 869:and 846:Talk 822:Talk 699:talk 637:talk 623:here 592:talk 483:and 442:this 420:NASA 266:can. 205:talk 3273:did 3139:may 2722:why 2705:not 1997:| 1993:| 1939:con 1496:Fan 1491:LAA 1162:by 1005:| 1001:| 758:Hey 619:her 551:RfA 518:!!! 474:but 236:| 3570:: 3553:) 3545:-- 3516:) 3444:) 3423:) 3388:) 3367:) 3310:) 3284:) 3251:If 3243:) 3087:) 3058:) 3019:) 2788:| 2697:) 2669:) 2661:. 2630:) 2594:) 2577:) 2548:) 2500:) 2451:) 2399:) 2379:. 2359:. 2315:. 2123:A 1862:) 1834:) 1791:) 1787:• 1767:) 1717:) 1713:• 1687:) 1679:. 1662:) 1639:) 1604:. 1592:R! 1588:OA 1538:) 1456:) 1429:) 1406:) 1330:) 1316:. 1226:: 982:) 962:. 950:R! 946:OA 904:81 881:) 848:• 844:• 824:• 820:• 741:}} 735:{{ 730:}} 724:{{ 719:}} 713:{{ 701:• 643:) 639:• 613:, 594:) 556:-- 521:) 211:) 207:• 3549:( 3512:( 3496:) 3440:( 3419:( 3384:( 3363:( 3306:( 3280:( 3239:( 3083:( 3054:( 3015:( 3001:. 2875:" 2795:. 2693:( 2665:( 2626:( 2590:( 2573:( 2561:( 2544:( 2496:( 2447:( 2395:( 2321:. 2284:( 2109:. 1945:) 1933:( 1858:( 1830:( 1783:( 1763:( 1709:( 1683:( 1658:( 1635:( 1594:! 1590:R 1585:R 1534:( 1452:( 1425:( 1402:( 1378:c 1375:t 1361:( 1353:( 1326:( 1300:. 1261:. 1229:/ 1192:. 1050:. 978:( 952:! 948:R 943:R 893:~ 877:( 697:( 635:( 590:( 515:( 491:, 203:( 96:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index