User talk:ElinorD/Archive05

1445:. I'll let you two handle this, but really. This is exactly the sort of Wait and Bait that MONGO keeps getting in trouble for. You asked me to de-escalate, and I was already in the process. I got past a double edit conflict, and made the changes. Four hours later, MONGO comes around to hassle me on my talk page? I sincerely doubt that he didn't notice the edits to the AN/I thread. This is how he winds up in those threads. He demanded to be left alone. He demanded redaction of the insults. He got both. Then he comes around looking for a fight. This is why he needs a blocking, and I will leave it to you and Tom Harrison to talk to him about this. 2407:, but generally if you find an image on a website, you should assume that it isn't free, unless it explicitly says it is. And it's not enough for it to be "free to use". We want images that can be reused, modified, and sold by others, like our GFDL text contributions. So we don't want images where the copyright still belongs to the owner, but he gives permission for us to use it on Knowledge (XXG). We want public domain images, or images with a licence that allows anyone to use them for any purpose. However, you probably would be better off directing your questions to 1239:

talk page to be apologetic and cooperative. But as a general rule, I think if an administrator warns a user not to keep posting material as there are BLP issues, it's better to comply. Someone who feels very strongly that there are no BLP problems with the material could send it by private email to some uninvolved admins, asking for advice, if they doubt the judgment or neutrality of the original administrator.

2742:. Elinor, I had time to think and sleep on this issue. I understand your motivation. But please listen. You are going too far. You can justify the removal of a link to an attack site, you may be able to justify removal of gossip around a Knowledge (XXG) editor being attacked off site, but you can't justify removing discussion of people getting together to complain that their comments are being censored. 953: 1228:

have commented on that article's talk page recently that knew this but still felt that the information was credible and appropriate for the article. Also, Sparkzilla was allowed to participate in the discussion on the article's talk page in the past and now suddenly wasn't allowed to. Therefore, I'm not sure that there was a clear case for a block here.

896: 707: 1689:

gain rather than to crystal unit impedance. (Re copyright: I would imagine that the author generated the plot (either using Matlab or public-domain SPICE) rather than copying it from an unreferenced article. If the issue is that you do not know who owns the copyright, I would be happy to provide a "virgin" version.

1983:

Hello, The images as well as the content used by me in my contribution are absolutely mine, so no question arise about copyright violation. Further an image of Borracave has been taken by wikipedia.org itself, if there will be any problem, I'll also replace the same. However I'm the admin of the site

1845:

I saw you blocked Cheese Bacon and gave him an invite to try to plead his case with you. I speedied a few of his articles, and just wanted to give you some background. He isn't, so far as I can tell, a malicious vandal (except for those last couple edits, where he was pretty torqued). He's a kid that

1754:

Hi Elinor, I've looked at the plot. Although it looks plausible, once you look at the numbers it becomes apparent that the "crystal" would need to be of a material not known to man, and that the circuit would be completely non-standard. I will create something a bit more realistic when I have time.

1424:

Why do you keep protecting him? And for the record, While you were archiving it, I was busy replying and removing some of my vandalism.Because of the Edit Conflict, I went in after and readded, only to edit conflict with Tom Harrison, and then add it again. I am however, disappointed that once again,

602:

Nleobold, I did check for your reply, which was how I immediately realised that the subsequent article edits from the IP came from you. Please understand that a statement that positive unsourced material can be removed should not be seen as a blanket permission to remove any positive statements which

1688:

Assuming that it is accurate, I would regard it as clarification of the text (once the title is corrected), rather than adding new material. It should, incidentally, provide much the same information as John Vig's figure 4 (which is referenced), except that the information relates to oscillator loop

1238:

Thanks for your comments, Cla68. You'll notice that other administrators have commented in support of the block, and a previously uninvolved administrator (as far as I know) blocked the account indefinitely after his original, short block had expired. I imagine he'll be unblocked, as he seems on his

926:

Thanks for the smile, Vassyana. Good to see you around. I've been meaning to email you, but I have a whole list of people that I still have to email, so I hope you won't mind waiting. However, since we're talking to each other anyway, let me say again how much I appreciate the RfA nomination. I hope

789:

My sweet friend, all I can say is, thank you from my heart for your support, and your wise and kind words, in this moment of need. In your own words, I know you'll patiently wait for me to get back to you,s omething I'd love to right now; but even if days pass, and you know why - know that you'll be

1227:

A previous RfC on the Nick Baker article had accepted the text and sources that are at the core of this dispute that have resulted in Sparkzilla's block. Sparkzilla may have a close relationship with the source journal, but there are other editors (including me), that commented in the RfC and that

959:

For making such delicious bread on your userpage. I thought of an allegory with Knowledge (XXG) contributions, but I'll just give you the star. (I also thought about a technology barnstar since I'm fine at cooking but → usually happens when I try to bake—but I think just a plain star is best.) :) —

839:

Hi. I was curious why you reverted your blanking of User talk:TREYWiki. Given the user's stated intention to leave and all the circumstances, unless there is a serious reason not to I intend to delete both his userpage and talkpage, by request. The arbitrators are of course all administrators and

1795:

Hi, Rlest, I've read your post above, and your email. While I completely disagree with the admin who unblocked (after the unblock request had been turned down twice) saying that the evidence did not seem enough to prove sockpuppetry, I can't see that your evidence proves it. The IP you mention was

1454:

If you ever talk that way about me again on this website, I will file an Rfc on your commentary. It was some of the worst and most abusive language I have seen directed to me. I had not noticed you redacted the comments, but you did so only after being asked to. You expect me to be blocked and you

2517:

Well I hope you are fine with your comments being removed. I was writing you an explanatory note as to why I thought your thread was inappropriate before realising Elinor had beaten me to it. I think athere are serious issues but by posting them on a public wikipedia page we just make the problem

2321:

There are hundreds of pictures taken by the owner of computers at the OldComputerMuseum. He has given me freedom to use any of those images. Using these images should clear up the matter. Why you say that is is nearly impossible to get your hands on a freely-licensed image is confusing to me.

2286:, which means that it was a non-free image, but that no rationale had been written to show how its use was in accordance with our policies, that someone had tagged it to put it in a category of images missing a fair use rationale, and that it had remained in that category for at least seven days. 1919:

Giovanni, it's not your place to make someone else's heading or post neutral on a talk page. Please stop insisting on getting your own way the whole time. Administrators are beginning to find these constant petty battles quite tedious and irritating. I have a feeling you violated 3RR on Deskana's

1744:

Hi Elinor, Thanks. Also for your courtesy in messaging my talk page. Would it be practical to post the plot to my talk page, because my availability is patchy? What I would propose to do is check it out, and if I can't establish its provenance I will create (easy) and try to post (I will need to

1722:

because no source information was given, and therefore the copyright could not be checked. It was in a category for speedy deletions. I removed it from the article just before deleting, but once it was deleted, looking at a previous version from the article history wouldn't help you to see it. If

1171:

I fully agree, but being fond of Sharon doesn't justify preventing innocent people from editing just because they happen to be assigned an IP this Thursday which someone used last Saturday to abuse her from. You'll note that when a registered account posted the same abuse, I blocked indefinitely.

850:

Hi, Brad. I'm actually in the middle of emailing you right now, but just refreshed my watchlist in a separate window while in the middle of typing. I'll send it in about three minutes. For the record, I am personally very supportive of someone's right to vanish, unless it's a very disruptive user

2745:

Please pause for a little and think. How far should one go to "protect" the feelings of an editor? Don't your actions remind you of good old censorship, where the government controls information to "protect" its citizens? I don't believe your actions bode well for the future of the encyclopedia.

569:

I did respond, and followed the insturctions you gave me, when you said I could remove any un-sourced material. You didn't even care enough to check for my reply. You give Knowledge (XXG) a bad name. I have tried to contribute with quality material, and all of you are complete losers, liars, and

1194:

Thanks for being so quick - he seems ok and I found his "facts" fascinating - once I had checked them! I always hate to see a new contributor jumped on as it could encourage them to say "whatever" and vandalise instead of contribute. I will keep an eye on him and get back asap if there are real

538:. I've been trying to curb my impatience with his style and direct him to the policies and guidelines he needs to understand, but he appears to have no interest in doing so. The one-day block also failed to get his attention. Perhaps your block will convince him that he can't grind us down. 2007:

If you want Knowledge (XXG) to be able to use them, you'll need to release them under a free licence, either by updating your website to reflect that, and linking each individual image here to the relevant page on your website where it says the images are available under a free licence, or by

851:

with a history of sockpuppetry, so that there's a need to keep pages in the "sockpuppets of X" category. I don't believe in adding further distress to a blocked user, and I hope an arbitrator will undo what I did. Further details (though nothing very enlightening) will be in my email. Cheers.

493:

of the IP having edited an image uploaded by the registered user; that makes the case stronger, in my view. I don't think anyone regards that edit as "normal and acceptable". I think there's just a reluctance to block a registered user for something that an IP does, unless there's very strong

2533:

I was looking for the process on "right to disappear" but could not find it. I will leave this case be, and in your capable hands Elinor...thanks for noticing and stepping in. Oh...and could you send me the link for the process I mentioned. It is not readily found under policies, it seems.

1952:

I have updated the photo to include the URL and Fair Use argument. Since this case is still unsolved, it is EXTREMELY important we include this picture along with the article. Police, FBI, and family hope that it will either spark a memory for someone or compel the killer to come forward.

1684:

For some reason, I can no longer see this plot when working back through the history (maybe I've missed dome of the tools - if so, I apologise). The plot looked essentially accurate to me, although I would have to check that it corresponded to its title. I would like to be able to check.

1650:. I thought it was BS who has usually used IP's to circumvent his block, but the talk page post had the bitterness of HE's posts. It would be best if someone were to block these socks and protect the talk page of Muhammad so this banned editor cannot attempt to influence the project. 2303:

I doubt if the image you link to is acceptable, as you'd have to show that it would be impossible (or nearly impossible) for a Wikipedian to be able to get a freely-licensed image, and that the article can't be well understood without an image. The best place to ask about this is at

303:

I was wondering how that got removed from the history link and who removed it? It also got removed from my contributions. I thought I was experiencing deja vu. But I could of sworn I left that on there. I am sorry but that was wrong. Just hope she didn't see that. Have a nice day:)

909:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! I haven't talked to you much since your RfA. Just sending well-wishes and a smile.

739:

Thanks for that, Miranda. I hope it all works out. I'll probably email you, but don't be surprised if you have to wait a day or two. I'm very behind with emails. Thanks for supporting my RfA, by the way. And congratulations on the wonderful banner you made for 'zilla.

790:

with me at all times, holding my hand and helping me with a fond smile. You're special, important beyond words. I just can't find the proper way to say it - but I know I don't need to. You've seen inside of me, and you know exactly what I mean, my friend. Love you,

270:

Thanks for your message, Kyoko, and for warning the vandal before I got to the page. I would have semiprotected it if I had thought that the vandal was returning, but that didn't seem to be the case, and I think Riana came online herself fairly soon anyway. Cheers.

1105:

As mentioned above, I did read it. I am sure that you are perfectly well aware that I did not instruct you to remove whole chunks of uncontroversial material from articles. Except that it's more important for you to spend time familiarising yourself with

1846:

doesn't seem to understand the difference between Knowledge (XXG) and MySpace. He posts vanity articles about unpublished comic strips that he has created, and garage rock bands that he is in, and doesn't seem to grasp the meaning of "notability".

2332:

He'll have to release the images under a free licence, or into the public domain. Giving permission to use them isn't enough, as we're trying to build a free content encyclopaedia which can be freely copied, modified, reused, and sold by others.

2134:, and I just click on a special link at the left, which says "no source" or "no rationale", etc. The tool then does the rest, and leaves me no choice over the format. If it's something I can change without stopping using the tool (which is 2719:

I'm not really familiar with DreamGuy, but even if you're right about his behaviour, it's still unnecessarily inflammatory and patronising to slap on the talk page of an experienced user a template which says "Welcome to Knowledge (XXG)."

494:

evidence that it's the same person. I hope a checkuser will agree to investigate, but wouldn't be surprised if it's refused as an isolated incident. Sorry again for not responding sooner. I just wasn't sure what could be done, as I think

1576:

Thank you so much for your kind words, and the heads up, Eli! :) And don't worry about the "tone", silly - now go to bed, and with a little luck, something will be sitting at your mail when you wake up ;) Sweet dreams, dearie! Love you,

2685:

was to deny that he had removed it and to immediately accuse me of bad faith. After somebody responds like that, I use templates. I'm not going to waste my time talking to somebody who is always right, even when he's wrong, and whose

1542:

Didn't notice your comment on ANI until just now; very kind of you to say. And, while I'm here, thanks for deleting the draft page last night. Still not sure what the best way to formulate such a thing is, but that wasn't it.

1058:

Thanks for replying, Lord Yaksha. I'm afraid there's nothing on that site which suggests that the images have been released under a free licence, so, although the image is nicer than what we currently have, we can't use it.

2289:

Couldn't that be a type of vandalism? The image had been in the article for 3 months and I didn't view the article in that 7 day period. There had been attempted vandalism by anonymous users to remove that image before.

1876:

Can you instruct Giovanni to stop changing the header of the message I posted. It is confusing because I posted the first message underneath - it looks as if I'm asking for arbitration and mediation at the same time.

1909:

Yes, I did. The heading is now neutral, about the closing of mediation. Below that heading we can discuss the issue, both sides of it. There is no confusion this way. No point to start a new heading when one will

1920:

talk page as well. You seem to be heading for a long block unless you start trying to let go when something isn't important, and stop insisting on getting your own way the whole time. I notice you've been doing

1782:) is a blocked Molag Bal sockpuppet so its obviously him, he then removed it obviously realising he had given himself away. I will email you within the next few mins with a more detailed explanation. Regards, — 212:

Elinor, I'm sorry I haven't replied to your note; I probably won't give a longer reply—I've caught the wiki-blues—but I wanted to let you know that I appreciated your note and the Viennese biscuits and that

712:

Elinor, you are one of the most fair administrators on this project. Don't worry that you made a mistake. Nice to believe that we are all humans -- and not bots -- and that we all make mistakes.

486: 2008:

emailing permissions at wikimedia dot org, with evidence that you hold the copyright, and a statement that you release the images under a free licence. Otherwise, I'm afraid we can't use them.

1813:

I don't want to wheel war over this. If Newspaper guy resumes disruption, I'll certainly reblock. However, he hasn't edited since shortly after he was unblocked, so he's probably inactive now.

1702:

I wonder if you would consider replacing it - albeit with a corrected caption if necessary. If not, I believe the section entitled "Bode magnitude diagram" should be deleted in its entirety.

2130:

But you haven't told me which is "the page concerned", and a brief look through your contributions doesn't make me any wiser. :-) I'm sure I'd be happy to change the format, but I'm using

1455:

get to make comments like that? Are you kidding? I still don't appreciate the use of the word jerk and other abusiveness. Your entire argument was destroyed by your ridiculous rantings.--

514:

is almost certainly a registered user, but I doubt if a checkuser would be interested in trying to find out who it is, and it certainly doesn't prevent me from enjoying Knowledge (XXG)!

1924:

at AN/I. I really don't appreciate when I'm in the middle of working my way through a huge backlog of unsourced images to have to interrupt it over such a pointless and petty battle as

2507:

What Ludwig Braeckeleer said is a very serious accusation that need to be looked into. Note that I am not siding with anyone, and have never met her (correct me if I am wrong) before.

2117:

Seems I'm not the only one tagging :) Much appreciated however if you could follow the compressed format I've adopted in future, I've already amended the existing entries you made.

490: 580:

Thanks from this quarter for your good work on curbing this editor's uncivic discourse and actions. We have been patient with him and he is not engaging in a productive dialogue.

821:

There's never any hurry to reply to a friend, as friends will always understand if they have to wait. :-) Think of your dear little girl, and forget about answering my messages!

1092:

No doubt you are another Knowledge (XXG) Democrat. Haven't you realized yet that the Democrats are just as evil as the Republicans? (except for Ron Paul: www.RonPaul2008.com)

2764:

I don't think you do understand my motivation, which is purely not to increase the distress of someone who is probably already distressed. If you did, you simply wouldn't be

603:

common sense would see as sufficiently uncontroversial as not to need a source, simply because your unsourced negative statements have been removed. That can only be seen as

1745:

learn about tagging and how to post graphics) an equivalent new one. That would be based on a real oscillator, so there could be no copyright issues. Regards Fyz

2768:

to go around restarting discussion on a topic that encourages further speculation of the identity of a harassment victim, and gives delight to trolls and stalkers.

2380:

or another suitable tag which allows others to use the image for any purpose, and be sure to state explicitly on the image page that you took the photo yourself.

249:. I was going to do that myself, but sometimes the javascript I use runs slowly. I wonder if semi-protecting her page might not be a bad idea. Thanks again. -- 2836:

Things have got a little heated here and I know I'm not being much help. If you have time could you take a peak as I know you are a calming influence! Thanks

659:

Glad you have, and I'm sorry for not answering sooner. It wasn't something that I knew so well that I could quickly answer without looking it up. Cheers.

447:

I sent you did not mention discrimination; it mentioned vandalism. I believe most Wikipedians would regard your edits, quoted above, as vandalism, or as

1805: 1389:

because of that car accident, BLP no longer is in play. The source is a good one ... a news digest, linked from various local news organizations (

2138:

efficient), I'd be happy to oblige. If not, maybe you should take it up with Howcheng. To be honest, I haven't a clue what you're talking about!

1904: 1335:

Actually, I think you'll find I was merely bringing the image into the infobox's proper formatting. I am full aware of copyright policy, thanks.

1681:

I note that you recently deleted the bode diagram plot of a crystal oscillator gain (placed by Snlevasseur) from the "Crystal Oscillator" page.

1406:

The BLP concerns don't relate to someone who is dead, but could relate to poorly sourced claims about someone being responsible for his death.

2424:

Ack! Editing this one article has taken 18 to 26 hours so far and now I have another layer of verification. *sighs* Thanks for your help.

2408: 2404: 2305: 1999: 2172: 1801: 344: 945: 511: 1693: 2640: 1723:

you're online, and leave me a message, I'd be happy to undelete it temporarily so that you can take a look. I'm afraid I haven't got

2219:

I left a notice on the talk page asking that if they plan to put a photo on the article that it be done under wikipedia guidelines.

2042: 1971: 1050: 556:

Oh, I didn't block him a second time. I just left him a message urging him to read our policy pages. I hope he'll take it to heart.

546: 2131: 1881: 1321:

I'll tail onto this thank-you. I appreciate your apt choice of words, and your patience, which I will try to cultivate myself.

424: 47:

Please do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1896:

You haven't fixed anything. If you want make a formal request to Deskana, start a new heading or a sub-heading and actually

2696:. If somebody treats my first good faith effort to communicate as an attack, they get templates. Personally, I think that 2255:

was among the first microcomputers to be affordable by an individual, although it initially lacked peripherals and memory.

1773:

was me as commented on the checkuser, however he was unblocked as lack of evidence of a Molag Bal sockpuppet but doesn't

1441:, where I redacted some of my statement, and explained myself more fully, a change i notified you of. I've also notified 181:

Thanks! Those look so good I almost reached into the monitor... of course it also might be approaching dinnertime. :)

227:

Thanks for the reply. And sorry to hear about the wiki-blues. It was good to see your comments about Abu's ArbCom case.

840:

would still have access to the deleted material. Please let me know if you see any serious problem with this. Thanks,

1770: 97: 93: 89: 77: 73: 69: 65: 1719: 2830: 2357: 625:

I have no idea where to start or anything on making userboxes. I was hoping that maybe you could offer some help?

39: 1497: 113: 2786: 2754: 1995: 129: 125: 121: 117: 105: 101: 2356:

No, that would be fine, unless you're taking a photo of someone else's painting of sculpture, for example. See

2168: 1778:

prove that he is a Molag Bal sockpuppet, he was autoblocked because the IP address who was originally blocked (

469: 443:

I have no idea what you are referring to when you say that "a tag says discriminated against" Christians. The

340: 2156:

Please stop sending me threatening messages. If you continue I will be forced to stop reading your messages.

1731:. Let me know what you want me to do. But images can't be kept around without being correctly tagged. Cheers. 1914: 1891: 329:

You say I vandalized the christian page on April 8. How? A tag says I discriminated against christians. How?

2704:

attempts to communicate with him, then wonders why thy would rather template him than talk to him. Sheesh.

2562: 2160: 2030: 1987: 1959: 1038: 1025: 332: 1002: 444: 2164: 1779: 1756: 1746: 1708: 336: 2038: 1967: 1297: 1046: 970: 356: 906: 632:

PS. By the way, could you reply on my user talk page? That way, it will tell me when I get the reply.

589:

Interesting...I identify myself for the community, yet Dogru144 declines to. I guess he *IS* a vandal.

485:

Sorry, Proabivouac, for not replying sooner. I looked at the noticeboard a few times. I see it has now

2655:. I don't believe his reaction would have been any different if I'd customized my message. In fact, I 2034: 1963: 1042: 2782: 2750: 1991: 543: 312: 218: 2259:

It was a very appropriate picture for an article on the history of the home and personal computers.

2086: 1694:

http://www.omicron-lab.com/customer_examples/pdf/Measuring_equivalent_circuit_of_Quartz_crystal.pdf

1095: 590: 571: 535: 185: 2676: 2806: 2611: 2364: 1901: 1878: 1696: 1489: 214: 2652: 1111: 604: 2854: 2820: 2772: 2724: 2625: 2604:

You're right. I didn't really think that one through. Sometimes I assume too much good faith.

2486: 2415: 2384: 2337: 2312: 2231: 2220: 2142: 2103: 2012: 1932: 1870: 1860: 1829: 1817: 1735: 1664: 1630: 1562: 1548: 1525: 1509: 1501: 1475: 1442: 1410: 1365: 1322: 1312: 1271: 1243: 1213: 1176: 1152: 1118: 1063: 1015: 999: 984: 931: 876: 855: 825: 744: 663: 650: 640: 626: 611: 560: 518: 502: 455: 434:

Of course there is no evidence for this belief and it should be considered mythical in nature.

275: 231: 198: 158: 48: 17: 2693: 2096: 2052: 1340: 2374: 2245: 2205: 2071: 1286: 961: 864: 841: 498:

is not really a strong enough justification for a block — unless a pattern emerges. Cheers.

476: 2648: 2615: 2283: 1107: 2709: 2508: 2504:

I'd start it off by saying there is a difference between concerned editor and harassment.

2439: 2121: 1911: 1888: 1148:

I don't like to give long blocks to IPs unless I'm sure that they're static and unshared.

539: 305: 284: 257: 246: 2572: 2557: 2263: 2519: 2466: 2453: 2181:

Would it help if I sent them instead? Last time I checked, the Catholic Church was not

1578: 919: 791: 182: 1257:

It's no problem, and yeah, I have no intention of reblocking. Thanks for your note. --

2802: 2700:

needs an enforced Wikibreak to adjust his whole attitude. He snaps at other editor's

2697: 2644: 2606: 1651: 1343: 911: 902: 581: 403: 2346:

Do I need to go through the same procedure if the picture is one I personally took?

2851: 2817: 2769: 2721: 2622: 2483: 2425: 2412: 2394: 2381: 2347: 2334: 2323: 2309: 2291: 2269: 2228: 2139: 2100: 2009: 1929: 1857: 1826: 1814: 1732: 1661: 1627: 1559: 1544: 1522: 1472: 1446: 1426: 1407: 1362: 1309: 1268: 1240: 1210: 1173: 1162: 1160:

Good point, but I take a dim view on anyone who attacks any already stressed user.

1149: 1138: 1115: 1060: 1032: 1012: 981: 928: 873: 852: 822: 755: 741: 715: 680: 660: 637: 608: 557: 515: 499: 452: 377: 272: 228: 195: 155: 2857: 2844: 2823: 2809: 2790: 2775: 2758: 2727: 2713: 2628: 2591: 2566: 2550: 2522: 2511: 2489: 2469: 2456: 2446: 2428: 2418: 2397: 2387: 2350: 2340: 2326: 2315: 2294: 2272: 2234: 2208: 2145: 2124: 2106: 2089: 2074: 2015: 1935: 1863: 1850: 1832: 1820: 1788: 1759: 1749: 1738: 1711: 1667: 1654: 1633: 1620: 1602: 1565: 1552: 1528: 1521:

Sounds complicated. I don't have enough information to justify taking any action.

1515: 1478: 1459: 1449: 1429: 1413: 1400: 1368: 1347: 1325: 1315: 1302: 1274: 1261: 1246: 1232: 1216: 1203: 1179: 1166: 1155: 1142: 1121: 1098: 1066: 1018: 1005: 987: 975: 934: 914: 879: 867: 858: 844: 828: 815: 774: 747: 734: 699: 666: 653: 643: 629: 614: 593: 584: 574: 563: 550: 521: 505: 479: 458: 319: 290: 278: 264: 234: 221: 201: 188: 171: 161: 148: 2575:

as part of wikipedia itself. Man...I must be losing my mind. I thought we did. --

2837: 2576: 2535: 2252: 2190: 2056: 1613: 1493: 1395: 1258: 1196: 1089:

Knowledge (XXG) is a complete joke because of you and fellow losers you defend.

944: 597: 420: 1856:

Thanks for letting me know. I'll look out for any unblock request he may make.

2705: 2393:

How do I verify that any image is free to use? How do I verfy this image?

1783: 1456: 1229: 396: 250: 168: 145: 1727:

scientific knowledge that would help in this situation. The deletion log is

1467:

ThuranX, we don't use punitive blocks here, and your post immediately about

1383: 1376: 1357:

looks pretty much like reverting someone who has removed an unfree image to

428: 2244: 872:

I've just sent it. I'm afraid I took longer than the three minutes I said!

952: 1847: 1337: 55: 2438:

Thanks, Elinor, I'll take a look. Nice talk page color, by the way. :-)

2403:

I'm not an expert on this; you'd be better off taking your questions to

370:

crucified leader . . . Adherence to Christianity was declared illegal,

1825:

He has now been blocked indefinitely again as a Molag Bal sockpuppet.

2850:

I'll take a look, Sophia, although it's not in my line of expertise.

2266:

from a museum with the permission of the museum's owner acceptable?

1505: 1133: 392: 2120:

The compressed format should be evident from the page concerned. :)

1011:

Delighted to see someone so courteous and responsible on the board.

706: 951: 943: 895: 489:. However, I missed (until a few minutes ago) the evidence on the 388: 1083:

So, you didn't even read my response to your message on my page.

980:

Hey, thanks for that Springeragh. I've moved it to my user page.

1796:

never blocked as a Molag Bal sockpuppet; on the contrary it has

411: 468:

Hi ElinorD, I'd be curious to hear your opinion on this thread.

2556:

I don't know what you're talked about, but you're thinking of

1697:

http://www.k8iqy.com/testequipment/pvxo/Atlanticon2002V1R5.pdf

407: 399: 894: 705: 2816:

Saw it at the time, though it's now deleted. Thanks, Bish.

1769:

Hey Elinor, Just a quick note that the IP who was editing

863:

I'll look for the e-mail and proceed from there. Regards,

2360:. If you've taken the photo yourself, tag the image with 1035:

It's the site of a Catholic Youth Care center in Dublin.

2800: 2739: 2688: 2681: 2666: 2660: 2279: 2186: 2182: 2026:

It's not vandalism, it's the truth. Save your threats.

1925: 1921: 1797: 1775: 1728: 1648: 1645: 1468: 1439: 1436: 1354: 472: 438: 416:(despite the laundry list of hateful acts in the bible) 381: 1804:

removing checkuser requests related to Molag Bal, but

998:

Thank you for your message, and your support! Cheers,

1558:

You're welcome. Your work has been much appreciated.

1510: 1031:

Hey Elinor, about the picture - The original URL was

283:

Thanks for the revert. Crashed my browser, wow! :) ~

245:

Hello ElinorD, thanks for reverting the vandalism to

1496:

uploading Tons of non-free images , they could be a

1136:

myself - Sharon's got enough on her plate as it is.

475:

as a normal and acceptable event on Knowledge (XXG).

2781:I replied on my talk, under the "Support" heading. 2085:Abortion is murder, why did you remove my edit? -- 752:Yeah, I have to make three banners this week. Meh. 194:You're welcome. Nice to see someone so productive. 2679:. You will note that it was actually removed. His 1808:, and an administrator still overturned the block. 2051:Unfortunately, it's completely unsourced and not 25: 1033:http://www.wyd.ie/images/Pope%20Benedict%202.jpg 1928:. I think you've broken 3RR at that page, too. 1644:He's at it again, on talk pages this time. See 1612:It's very useful that I am on your watch list! 922:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. 1471:is only bound to increase sympathy for MONGO. 451:clueless. I hope that answers your question. 8: 2647:appears to have a serious problem with both 1394: 2241:Why was this image deleted from the server? 1285:For reverting the userpage vandalism. :) — 471:It would seem we are being asked to accept 1110:, I'd suggest that you spend time reading 605:disrupting Knowledge (XXG) to make a point 355:"Christians have frequently suffered from 2409:Knowledge (XXG):Media copyright questions 2405:Knowledge (XXG):Media copyright questions 2306:Knowledge (XXG):Media copyright questions 607:, and may lead to another block. Thanks. 419:, who at the end of his earthly life was 402:, who lived a life befitting that of the 1086:So much for responsible administrators. 58: 2643:. Even a regulars can be edit warring. 2452:You beat me to it re the admin thread, 2411:, where you'll get more input. Cheers. 364:. From its foundation at the feet of a 956:What happens when Springeragh bakes :P 2641:Knowledge (XXG):Template the regulars 1660:Dealt with by someone else, I think. 395:. Christians believe Jesus to be the 7: 1488:Good day Admin , i guess both users 636:Will reply on your talk page later. 1504:, they often vandalise the article 1438:, and then compare timestamps with 361:as a result of their absurd beliefs 2692:to most people is to whip out his 1692:Measured versions may be found at 905:has smiled at you! Smiles promote 24: 1887:I'll fix it so its not confusing. 1132:I think you were too soft on the 1720:Image:Bode Magnitude Diagram.png 649:Never mind, I figured it out =) 2132:User:Howcheng/quickimgdelete.js 1984:www.cave-biology.org. -Regards 768: 765: 762: 759: 756: 728: 725: 722: 719: 716: 693: 690: 687: 684: 681: 313: 306: 2838: 1784: 1614: 1197: 1080:I followed your instructions. 754: 714: 679: 387:"A Christian is a follower of 1: 2639:Actually, I believe I prefer 2322:They seem readily available. 1718:Hi PhysicistQuery, I deleted 1393:?). Please revert your edit. 423:, and then on the third day, 351:Here are the edits you made: 918:Smile at others by adding {{ 2621:Replied on your talk page. 1771:User talk:Newspaper guy 999 167:I sent you another one...-- 2879: 2831:Talk:Jesus myth hypothesis 2482:You're getting very slow! 2223:01:13 July 27, 2007 (UTC) 111: 87: 63: 2858:00:47, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 2845:15:17, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2824:00:47, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 2810:14:59, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2791:00:27, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 2776:00:47, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 2759:14:50, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2728:00:47, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 2714:14:14, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2629:01:21, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2616:16:23, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2592:14:22, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2567:14:01, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2551:13:41, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2523:00:39, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2512:00:33, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2490:01:21, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2470:21:19, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2465:You beat me to it again! 2457:00:13, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 2447:19:54, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 2429:00:59, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 2419:00:07, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 2398:23:46, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 2388:00:07, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 2351:23:39, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 2341:23:30, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 2327:23:27, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 2316:01:21, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2295:23:32, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 2273:20:04, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 2235:01:12, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2209:23:52, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 2146:18:03, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 2125:17:57, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 2107:01:12, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 2090:11:21, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 2075:23:53, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 2016:01:12, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 1956:Thank you. -James Renner 1936:00:37, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1915:23:59, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1905:23:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1892:23:56, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1882:23:45, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1864:20:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1851:20:55, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1833:00:47, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 1821:01:12, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 1789:14:02, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1760:08:40, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1750:21:15, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1739:20:16, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1712:10:40, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1668:00:18, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 1655:07:56, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1634:01:12, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 1621:21:49, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 1603:00:24, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 1566:00:18, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 1553:21:28, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 1529:00:18, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 1516:17:16, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 1479:00:18, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 1460:05:11, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 1450:04:39, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 1430:23:22, 18 July 2007 (UTC) 1414:00:18, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 1401:23:09, 18 July 2007 (UTC) 1369:00:18, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 1348:22:40, 18 July 2007 (UTC) 1326:22:53, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 1316:17:45, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 1303:21:37, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 1275:17:45, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 1262:20:37, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 1247:17:45, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 1233:11:39, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 1217:17:45, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 1209:Thanks for that, Sophia. 1204:11:29, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 1180:17:45, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 1167:00:48, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 1156:00:46, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 1143:00:44, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 1122:17:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 1099:08:24, 14 July 2007 (UTC) 1067:17:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 1019:17:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 1006:01:45, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 988:17:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 976:20:38, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 935:15:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 927:not to let you down. :-) 915:07:24, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 880:00:37, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 868:00:29, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 859:00:20, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 845:00:14, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 829:15:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 816:00:06, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 775:21:21, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 748:15:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 735:03:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 700:00:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 667:17:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 654:04:32, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 644:15:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 630:23:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 615:17:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 594:20:11, 16 July 2007 (UTC) 585:14:28, 14 July 2007 (UTC) 575:08:23, 14 July 2007 (UTC) 564:15:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 551:02:20, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 522:15:53, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 506:15:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 459:15:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 28: 2358:Commons:Derivative works 534:Thanks for the block of 480:07:40, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 320:09:21, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 291:06:54, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 279:00:32, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 265:10:58, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 235:00:32, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 222:00:49, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 208:Re: An overdue thank you 202:00:32, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 189:22:56, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 172:08:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 162:13:57, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 149:13:38, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 2796:Templating the regulars 1806:so did Newspaper guy 99 404:creator of the universe 2599: 2256: 2002:) 06:40, 24 July 2007. 1974:) 03:25, 24 July 2007. 1498:Sock puppetry accounts 1391:did you visit the link 1331:Image copyright policy 1077:What is your problem? 1053:) 00:50, 14 July 2007. 1026:Image:PopeBenedict.jpg 957: 949: 899: 710: 530:Your block of Nleobold 464:Abusive use of anon IP 217:. :) Again, thanks, 2571:So...we don't have a 2282:] I deleted it under 2250: 2097:neutral point of view 1990:comment was added by 1962:comment was added by 1900:her to do something. 1041:comment was added by 955: 947: 898: 709: 391:, referred to as the 347:) 03:47, 9 July 2007. 335:comment was added by 2749:You can reply here. 2560:in that first bit -- 1425:MONGO got off free. 215:someone else did too 2649:assuming good faith 2247:File:Altair8800.jpg 1674:Crystal Oscillators 677:Check your e-mail. 491:checkuser talk page 2734:Removal of comment 2529:Right to disappear 2257: 2215:Christina McKinney 1647:, which preceeded 1500:, along with User 1003:(spill your mind?) 958: 950: 900: 711: 425:rose from the dead 154:And I replied. :) 44: 2866: 2865: 2573:m:Right to vanish 2558:m:Right to vanish 2445: 2185:nor is "Bristol" 2183:founded by Hitler 2177: 2163:comment added by 2047: 2033:comment added by 2003: 1975: 1871:User talk:Deskana 1798:a clean block log 1508:by the same way. 1443:User:Tom harrison 1054: 596:Nicolas Leobold, 549: 473:this kind of edit 389:Jesus of Nazareth 348: 247:Riana's talk page 144:I sent you one.-- 137: 136: 59:My archived talk 49:current talk page 35: 18:User talk:ElinorD 2870: 2842: 2588: 2586: 2584: 2547: 2545: 2543: 2444: 2442: 2379: 2373: 2369: 2363: 2280:the deletion log 2248: 2203: 2200: 2198: 2176: 2157: 2069: 2066: 2064: 2046: 2027: 1985: 1957: 1791: 1786: 1755:Regards Fyz 1626:You're welcome! 1618: 1598: 1596: 1594: 1592: 1590: 1512: 1399: 1300: 1295: 1292: 1289: 1223:Sparkzilla block 1201: 1101:Nicolas Leobold 1036: 973: 968: 811: 809: 807: 805: 803: 772: 770: 767: 764: 761: 758: 732: 730: 727: 724: 721: 718: 697: 695: 692: 689: 686: 683: 577:Nicolas Leobold 542: 445:standard warning 330: 317: 310: 288: 262: 255: 56: 26: 2878: 2877: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2869: 2868: 2867: 2862: 2834: 2798: 2783:Oleg Alexandrov 2751:Oleg Alexandrov 2736: 2689:second response 2671:of the example 2637: 2602: 2582: 2580: 2578: 2565: 2541: 2539: 2537: 2531: 2502: 2440: 2436: 2377: 2371: 2367: 2361: 2246: 2243: 2217: 2196: 2194: 2191: 2187:home of the KKK 2158: 2154: 2115: 2095:Because of our 2083: 2062: 2060: 2057: 2028: 2024: 1992:Biospeleologist 1986:—The preceding 1981: 1979:Images of caves 1958:—The preceding 1950: 1874: 1843: 1774: 1767: 1676: 1642: 1610: 1588: 1586: 1584: 1582: 1580: 1574: 1537: 1486: 1435:Please see this 1422: 1420:Defending MONGO 1380: 1333: 1298: 1293: 1290: 1287: 1283: 1255: 1225: 1192: 1130: 1075: 1037:—The preceding 1029: 996: 971: 962: 942: 924: 892: 837: 801: 799: 797: 795: 793: 787: 675: 623: 532: 466: 373:as it should be 331:—The preceding 327: 301: 286: 258: 251: 243: 210: 179: 142: 54: 43: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2876: 2874: 2864: 2863: 2861: 2860: 2833: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2797: 2794: 2779: 2778: 2735: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2682:first response 2636: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2601: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2561: 2530: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2501: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2460: 2459: 2435: 2432: 2422: 2421: 2391: 2390: 2344: 2343: 2319: 2318: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2242: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2216: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2165:67.104.199.138 2153: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2114: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2087:Footballexpert 2082: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2023: 2022:George W. Bush 2020: 2019: 2018: 1980: 1977: 1949: 1948:Amy Mihaljevic 1946: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1922:the same thing 1873: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1842: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1810: 1809: 1780:217.43.214.178 1766: 1763: 1757:PhysicistQuery 1747:PhysicistQuery 1742: 1741: 1709:PhysicistQuery 1675: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1641: 1640:His excellency 1638: 1637: 1636: 1609: 1606: 1573: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1536: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1485: 1482: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1421: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1379: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1332: 1329: 1319: 1318: 1282: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1254: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1224: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1191: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1129: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1074: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1028: 1023: 1022: 1021: 995: 992: 991: 990: 941: 940:A star for you 938: 917: 893: 891: 888: 887: 886: 885: 884: 883: 882: 836: 833: 832: 831: 786: 785:My dear friend 783: 782: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 674: 671: 670: 669: 647: 646: 622: 619: 618: 617: 567: 566: 531: 528: 527: 526: 525: 524: 465: 462: 441: 440: 384: 383: 337:Criticalbill21 326: 323: 300: 297: 296: 295: 294: 293: 242: 239: 238: 237: 209: 206: 205: 204: 178: 175: 165: 164: 141: 138: 135: 134: 132: 128: 124: 120: 116: 110: 108: 104: 100: 96: 92: 86: 84: 80: 76: 72: 68: 61: 60: 53: 52: 36: 34: 33: 30: 29: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2875: 2859: 2856: 2853: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2843: 2841: 2832: 2829: 2825: 2822: 2819: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2811: 2808: 2804: 2801: 2795: 2793: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2777: 2774: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2747: 2743: 2741: 2733: 2729: 2726: 2723: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2711: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2691: 2690: 2684: 2683: 2678: 2675:section from 2674: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2662: 2658: 2654: 2650: 2646: 2642: 2634: 2630: 2627: 2624: 2620: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2613: 2609: 2608: 2593: 2590: 2589: 2574: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2564: 2559: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2549: 2548: 2528: 2524: 2521: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2510: 2505: 2499: 2491: 2488: 2485: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2471: 2468: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2458: 2455: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2443: 2433: 2431: 2430: 2427: 2420: 2417: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2396: 2389: 2386: 2383: 2376: 2366: 2359: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2349: 2342: 2339: 2336: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2325: 2317: 2314: 2311: 2307: 2302: 2301: 2296: 2293: 2288: 2287: 2285: 2281: 2278:According to 2277: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2271: 2267: 2265: 2260: 2254: 2249: 2240: 2236: 2233: 2230: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2222: 2214: 2210: 2207: 2204: 2202: 2188: 2184: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2174: 2170: 2166: 2162: 2151: 2147: 2144: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2123: 2118: 2112: 2108: 2105: 2102: 2098: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2088: 2080: 2076: 2073: 2070: 2068: 2054: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2021: 2017: 2014: 2011: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1978: 1976: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1954: 1947: 1937: 1934: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1913: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1890: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1880: 1872: 1869: 1865: 1862: 1859: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1849: 1840: 1834: 1831: 1828: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1819: 1816: 1812: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1802:it made edits 1799: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1790: 1787: 1781: 1777: 1772: 1764: 1762: 1761: 1758: 1752: 1751: 1748: 1740: 1737: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1721: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1713: 1710: 1706: 1703: 1700: 1699:, others at 1698: 1695: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1679: 1673: 1669: 1666: 1663: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1653: 1649: 1646: 1639: 1635: 1632: 1629: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1619: 1617: 1607: 1605: 1604: 1600: 1599: 1571: 1567: 1564: 1561: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1540: 1534: 1530: 1527: 1524: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1513: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1490:Faisal Saddiq 1483: 1481: 1480: 1477: 1474: 1470: 1461: 1458: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1437: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1428: 1419: 1415: 1412: 1409: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1397: 1392: 1388: 1385: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1367: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1346: 1345: 1342: 1339: 1330: 1328: 1327: 1324: 1317: 1314: 1311: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1301: 1296: 1280: 1276: 1273: 1270: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1260: 1252: 1248: 1245: 1242: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1231: 1222: 1218: 1215: 1212: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1202: 1200: 1189: 1181: 1178: 1175: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1165: 1164: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1154: 1151: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1141: 1140: 1135: 1127: 1123: 1120: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1100: 1097: 1093: 1090: 1087: 1084: 1081: 1078: 1072: 1068: 1065: 1062: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1034: 1027: 1024: 1020: 1017: 1014: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1004: 1001: 993: 989: 986: 983: 979: 978: 977: 974: 969: 967: 966: 954: 946: 939: 937: 936: 933: 930: 923: 921: 916: 913: 908: 904: 897: 889: 881: 878: 875: 871: 870: 869: 866: 862: 861: 860: 857: 854: 849: 848: 847: 846: 843: 834: 830: 827: 824: 820: 819: 818: 817: 813: 812: 784: 776: 773: 771: 751: 750: 749: 746: 743: 738: 737: 736: 733: 731: 708: 704: 703: 702: 701: 698: 696: 672: 668: 665: 662: 658: 657: 656: 655: 652: 645: 642: 639: 635: 634: 633: 631: 628: 620: 616: 613: 610: 606: 601: 600: 599: 598: 595: 592: 587: 586: 583: 578: 576: 573: 565: 562: 559: 555: 554: 553: 552: 548: 545: 541: 537: 536:User:Nleobold 529: 523: 520: 517: 513: 509: 508: 507: 504: 501: 497: 492: 488: 487:been archived 484: 483: 482: 481: 478: 474: 470: 463: 461: 460: 457: 454: 450: 446: 439: 436: 435: 431:into heaven. 430: 426: 422: 418: 417: 413: 409: 405: 401: 398: 394: 390: 386: 385: 382: 379: 376:, within the 375: 374: 369: 368: 363: 362: 358: 354: 353: 352: 349: 346: 342: 338: 334: 324: 322: 321: 318: 316: 311: 309: 298: 292: 289: 282: 281: 280: 277: 274: 269: 268: 267: 266: 263: 261: 256: 254: 248: 240: 236: 233: 230: 226: 225: 224: 223: 220: 216: 207: 203: 200: 197: 193: 192: 191: 190: 187: 184: 176: 174: 173: 170: 163: 160: 157: 153: 152: 151: 150: 147: 139: 133: 131: 127: 123: 119: 115: 109: 107: 103: 99: 95: 91: 85: 83: 79: 75: 71: 67: 62: 57: 50: 46: 45: 42: 41: 32: 31: 27: 19: 2839: 2835: 2799: 2780: 2765: 2748: 2744: 2737: 2701: 2687: 2680: 2672: 2665: 2664: 2656: 2638: 2605: 2603: 2600:You're right 2577: 2536: 2532: 2506: 2503: 2437: 2423: 2392: 2345: 2320: 2268: 2261: 2258: 2221:Robert Moore 2218: 2192: 2155: 2135: 2119: 2116: 2084: 2058: 2025: 1982: 1955: 1951: 1902:John Smith's 1897: 1879:John Smith's 1875: 1844: 1841:Cheese Bacon 1768: 1765:Hey there :) 1753: 1743: 1724: 1707: 1704: 1701: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1680: 1677: 1643: 1615: 1611: 1579: 1575: 1541: 1539:Hi ElinorD, 1538: 1502:Jiddah_Saudi 1487: 1466: 1423: 1390: 1386: 1381: 1358: 1336: 1334: 1323:Tom Harrison 1320: 1308:No problem. 1284: 1256: 1226: 1198: 1193: 1161: 1137: 1131: 1094: 1091: 1088: 1085: 1082: 1079: 1076: 1073:Nadler/Glick 1030: 997: 964: 963: 925: 901: 838: 792: 788: 753: 713: 678: 676: 651:Savie Kumara 648: 627:Savie Kumara 624: 588: 579: 568: 533: 495: 467: 448: 442: 433: 432: 427:, and later 415: 414: 410:and full of 378:Roman Empire 372: 371: 366: 365: 360: 359: 350: 328: 314: 307: 302: 259: 252: 244: 211: 180: 166: 143: 112: 88: 81: 64: 51:. Thank you. 37: 2659:attempt to 2653:being civil 2308:. Regards. 2253:Altair 8800 2227:Thank you. 2159:—Preceding 2035:Jtpwright11 2029:—Preceding 1964:JamesRenner 1800:. Granted, 1678:Hi ElinorD 1572:Thankee! :) 1043:Lord Yaksha 920:subst:Smile 865:Newyorkbrad 842:Newyorkbrad 496:probability 477:Proabivouac 357:persecution 38:This is an 2738:Regarding 2509:SYSS Mouse 2500:SlimVirgin 2441:SlimVirgin 2122:Sfan00 IMG 2113:Image tags 1912:Giovanni33 1889:Giovanni33 1608:Thank you! 1195:problems. 994:Thank you! 540:JamesMLane 406:, free of 219:Iamunknown 183:Antandrus 130:Archive 15 126:Archive 14 122:Archive 13 118:Archive 12 114:Archive 11 106:Archive 10 2677:WP:LAYOUT 2635:Your note 2520:SqueakBox 2467:SqueakBox 2454:SqueakBox 2434:Your note 2365:GFDL-self 2284:WP:CSD#I6 1384:Jack Shea 1377:Jack Shea 1134:ED reader 1000:Kat Walsh 621:userboxes 449:extremely 421:crucified 367:fictional 102:Archive 9 98:Archive 8 94:Archive 7 90:Archive 6 82:Archive 5 78:Archive 4 74:Archive 3 70:Archive 2 66:Archive 1 2803:Bishonen 2698:DreamGuy 2673:See also 2645:DreamGuy 2262:Is this 2173:contribs 2161:unsigned 2099:policy. 2081:Abortion 2043:contribs 2031:unsigned 2000:contribs 1988:unsigned 1972:contribs 1960:unsigned 1705:Regards 1652:Arrow740 1375:BLP and 1267:Thanks. 1112:WP:POINT 1096:Nleobold 1051:contribs 1039:unsigned 912:Vassyana 907:WikiLove 903:Vassyana 835:TREYWiki 591:Nleobold 582:Dogru144 572:Nleobold 570:trolls. 429:ascended 380:. . . ." 345:contribs 333:unsigned 2852:ElinorD 2818:ElinorD 2770:ElinorD 2722:ElinorD 2694:WP:DICK 2667:removal 2661:discuss 2623:ElinorD 2518:worse, 2484:ElinorD 2426:Alatari 2413:ElinorD 2395:Alatari 2382:ElinorD 2375:PD-self 2348:Alatari 2335:ElinorD 2324:Alatari 2310:ElinorD 2292:Alatari 2270:Alatari 2229:ElinorD 2140:ElinorD 2101:ElinorD 2053:neutral 2010:ElinorD 1930:ElinorD 1858:ElinorD 1827:ElinorD 1815:ElinorD 1733:ElinorD 1662:ElinorD 1628:ElinorD 1560:ElinorD 1545:barneca 1523:ElinorD 1473:ElinorD 1447:ThuranX 1427:ThuranX 1408:ElinorD 1363:ElinorD 1310:ElinorD 1269:ElinorD 1253:Unblock 1241:ElinorD 1211:ElinorD 1190:Unblock 1174:ElinorD 1150:ElinorD 1116:ElinorD 1061:ElinorD 1013:ElinorD 982:ElinorD 965:$ PЯING 929:ElinorD 874:ElinorD 853:ElinorD 823:ElinorD 742:ElinorD 661:ElinorD 638:ElinorD 609:ElinorD 558:ElinorD 516:ElinorD 500:ElinorD 453:ElinorD 273:ElinorD 229:ElinorD 196:ElinorD 156:ElinorD 40:archive 2855:(talk) 2840:Sophia 2821:(talk) 2773:(talk) 2725:(talk) 2626:(talk) 2487:(talk) 2416:(talk) 2385:(talk) 2338:(talk) 2313:(talk) 2232:(talk) 2143:(talk) 2104:(talk) 2013:(talk) 1933:(talk) 1861:(talk) 1830:(talk) 1818:(talk) 1736:(talk) 1714:(Fyz) 1665:(talk) 1631:(talk) 1616:Sophia 1563:(talk) 1535:Thanks 1526:(talk) 1514:( - ) 1506:Jeddah 1494:Unites 1484:notice 1476:(talk) 1411:(talk) 1396:Duke53 1382:Since 1366:(talk) 1353:Hmmm, 1313:(talk) 1281:Thanks 1272:(talk) 1259:Golbez 1244:(talk) 1214:(talk) 1199:Sophia 1177:(talk) 1153:(talk) 1119:(talk) 1108:WP:BLP 1064:(talk) 1016:(talk) 985:(talk) 932:(talk) 877:(talk) 856:(talk) 826:(talk) 745:(talk) 673:E-mail 664:(talk) 641:(talk) 612:(talk) 561:(talk) 519:(talk) 503:(talk) 456:(talk) 397:Son of 393:Christ 285:Riana 276:(talk) 241:thanks 232:(talk) 199:(talk) 186:(talk) 159:(talk) 2706:IPSOS 2702:first 2607:Andre 2264:image 2152:Hello 1785:Rlest 1511:Ammar 1457:MONGO 1230:Cla68 972:rαgђ 890:Hello 510:P.S. 325:What? 315:Lopez 299:Hello 169:MONGO 146:MONGO 140:email 16:< 2807:talk 2787:talk 2766:able 2755:talk 2740:this 2710:talk 2663:his 2651:and 2612:talk 2251:The 2189:. - 2169:talk 2039:talk 1996:talk 1968:talk 1926:this 1776:this 1729:here 1549:talk 1492:and 1469:mine 1387:died 1355:this 1163:Will 1139:Will 1047:talk 512:This 412:love 341:talk 308:King 253:Kyok 2657:did 2370:or 1910:do. 1898:ask 1848:Kww 1725:any 408:sin 400:God 177:Yum 2812:. 2805:| 2789:) 2757:) 2712:) 2614:) 2587:ni 2546:ni 2534:-- 2378:}} 2372:{{ 2368:}} 2362:{{ 2197:is 2175:) 2171:• 2136:so 2063:is 2055:- 2045:) 2041:• 1998:• 1970:• 1601:- 1551:) 1543:-- 1398:| 1361:. 1359:me 1128:70 1114:. 1049:• 948::) 814:- 769:da 757:Mi 729:da 717:Mi 694:da 682:Mi 343:• 2785:( 2753:( 2708:( 2610:( 2585:i 2583:k 2581:u 2579:K 2563:L 2544:i 2542:k 2540:u 2538:K 2206:☺ 2201:n 2199:o 2195:l 2193:A 2167:( 2072:☺ 2067:n 2065:o 2061:l 2059:A 2037:( 1994:( 1966:( 1597:l 1595:e 1593:i 1591:r 1589:d 1587:e 1585:a 1583:h 1581:P 1547:( 1344:D 1341:B 1338:D 1299:ε 1294:e 1291:o 1288:M 1045:( 810:l 808:e 806:i 804:r 802:d 800:e 798:a 796:h 794:P 766:n 763:a 760:r 726:n 723:a 720:r 691:n 688:a 685:r 547:c 544:t 437:" 339:( 287:⁂ 260:o

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index