User talk:Enriquecardova - Knowledge (XXG)

944:

of the Sahara as under the old Dynastic Race Theory. That is why they tried desperately to keep the information out of the article. Unable to make their case intellectually, they tried bogus sockpuppet names, bogus requests for deletion, bogus claims of "consensus", and multiple reverts and changes under the sockpuppet names they are hiding under. It is all deception from people who can't be intellectually honest. They were even loading up my personal page with harrassment tags using various user names, which I've reported and will open RFCs on soon. This is what these people are. Check out the web link below for one of the best statements of what current scholarship in the field is saying. Well take it easy and keep up the good work!

938:

user names essentially want to a "Mediterranean" type approach. It is disguised but that is why they still have in King Tut's picture even though it is a copyright violation, and that is why they have done everything to keep out even what the mainstream scholars are saying. The game is to water down any hard scholarship or protray everything else as a "crazy fringe" while appearing as "non racial" But if they were honest they would include the mainstream scholars who also argue for a non-racial approach. The desperate attempts to keep them out show their true motives.

1117:

disagreements on the origin of the Egyptians. You would know this if you read the writings of Keita, Hassan, et al. For example, the notion of tropical types in the "deep" south is totally inaccurate. In fact, Hassan 1988, Yurco 1986, Verncoutter 1974 show they strong around al Badari and Abydos, among other places- hardly "deep" south. This is another example of how you (or others) are trying to blatantly slant the article to push the Irish/Brace "Mediterranean" approach. The long quote is a further example, as well as a number of other points I will mention later.

1132:

also present in the deep south. The mixture of these influences varied over the course of Egyptian history Some scholars hold that when Lower and Upper Egypt were unified c. 3150 BC, the distinction began to blur, resulting in a more "homogeneous" population in Egypt, though the distinction remains true to some degree to this day. Others maintain that there was a significant range of variability between the northern and southern populations that was primarily indigenous in scope and not necessarily a significant mingling of widely divergent physical types.

823:

agree with you that Celtic cavalry was superior to Rome on some counts. I saw a writing somewhere that backed up what you say. The Celts pulled up their chariots ans sent out assault forces on foot, while the chariot drivers massed in reserve a distance away, ready to ride up in support, or to collect their assault troops if the engagement was going badly. It may well indeed have been Polybius. I think this is an excellent example and in fact will add a new paragraph using what you have written.

1121:

without pretense. This matter can be quickly settled along the lines agreed to earlier. (a)Remove the long dental study quote which slants the article. (you can keep a simple sentence referencing it. (b) Insert a line or two showing reference to what the other scholars say, in particular fixing the slant re the notion of the "deep" south and failing to mention the Nubians who as Yurco notes are the closest foreign group ethnically to the Egyptians, and (c) end of story, we all move on.

1169:

scholarly data, but at all the evidence, including what was removed from 'Ancient Egypt', then reinserted in 'Egytians'. As I say you do not appear to fit the standard Knowledge (XXG) profile and appear to be more sensitive and capable in terms of looking at the data in a balanced way, versus and more extreme types here and there. All I ask for is greater balance, and I beleive this matter can be quickly settled in the true Knowledge (XXG) spirit without any arbitration panel.

1229:. However, people are being incredibly reticent about remarking on it either positively or negatively, I think a lot of people lack the specific subject knowledge to confidently support or oppose the nomination. Since you I belive have a sound knowledge of ancient Rome, would it be possible for you to post your own comments on whether or not you believe the article is of featured article quality, and any improvements to the article that you think are called for. Many Thanks - 322:

merely points readers to the Fanon page, and the mention of Fanon in the text, does not specifically cite the Gibson reference, nor the specific influences on Biko, hence it does not meet the standard you propose as well. Also these arguments mentioned were the same given to Biko and others, and they replied to them, as noted in the quotation by Biko. In fact the references given explicitly set forth such arguments at the time, and are hereby noted in the body of the text.

3611: 3503: 3395: 305:

say that "it was argued that..." this could be misconstrued as a straw man, unless you can cite who argued that. Continue finding sources, and you will improve the section you have added. However, don't be alarmed if what you've added is moved to "talk," as it may be more appropriate to put it there and make changes to it until other editors watching the article are comfortable with the additions.

1952:. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Knowledge (XXG), but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Knowledge (XXG), in this case: ]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- 3040: 3274: 1073:

there are no essential disagreements between Irish, Brace or Keita. Of course, you have not actually read Brace or Irish, so misunderstanding is bound to happen. I don't have an issue with Yurco obviously since I pointed him out in the first place (one of my favorite Egyptologists actually). But this will have to wait until tomorrow. I will leave a response below your message. —

1152:

well." A number of scholars note this continuity as including a range of types in situ, including a southern tropical modal cranial metric phentoype in the well-known Badarian group, and consider this an indigenous development based on microevolutionary principles (climate adaption, drift and selection) and not the movement of large numbers of outside peoples into Egypt.

841:

them on their talk page). To answer your questions, if you're still wondering, you can move pages to new names through the "move" tab at the top of the wikipedia screen. If you have any other queries about wikipedia editing, I will be happy to try to help if I can (I have a moderate level of wikipedia experience). Keep on the great work you're doing.

3713: 3350: 3229: 2184: 2867: 2763: 2671: 2571: 2471: 2371: 2271: 2083: 1983: 394:

I have time, I might edit your references (gosh, the article has at least three very different referencing styles now) and sectioning to fit with the style of references in the article, but to me it now looks a lot better. I'm not the best WP-editor, though, so it may take a while before I get a chance to address the issues you pointed to.

596: 244:. I was wondering if what you've written is a result of your own analysis, or if it is a compilation of ideas that can be cited. Generally sections such as that one are not left in tact, being deleted as either being not sufficiently of a neutral point of view, or in this case being considered to be original research. 1161:

Genetic analysis of modern Egyptians reveals that they have paternal lineages common to indigenous North Africans/Berber populations primarily, and to Near Eastern peoples to a lesser extent. These lineages would have spread during the Neolithic and maintained by the predynastic period. Studies based

943:

Ironically, the mainstream folks are now moving somewhat towards Diop's position, generally saying that the Egyptians were their own brand, which includes all skin colors, face shapes etc. A Nile Valley brand. Diop held that blacks varied in physical appearance and could not all be confined far south

927:

recent mainstream instead of refuted. You finally brought some much needed objectivity and analysis into the article that had been missing since the days of deecevoice, yom, and of course, me. You look like Dr. Spock in a sea of pissing three year olds!!! Keep up the good work. Get back at me. Peace.

926:

Dear sir, I would like to thank you for your (great) contributions to the controversy over race of the Ancient Egyptians article, but why were you blocked from editing it? I liked how you showed to these vandalizing trolls that Diop's basic thesis (his work did have some flaws) has been proven by the

805:

I feel really honored if it is only for me that you delet POV issues, but on the other hand some readers might also object. I think I figured out a possible reason why Delbrück liked the Celts: They used strategic reserves of chariots and cavalry according to Polybius (when trapped between the Romans

393:

removed on sight, or sent to talk to be discussed and added back when they are sourced. Sourcing it, as you have, obviously precludes that need. I, personally, would be more likely to see my additions removed suddenly than to remove someone elses. But, let me say, I am happy with what I see. When

331:

Without yet moving to conflicting edits or arbitration, I do not think the section should be arbitrarily moved to talk. If so, then many other sections need to go as well in the interests of consistency. Let it stay and let others see what they can do with it, or if they can improve references, then

304:

The reason for all of this is that we want our work to be an encyclopedia, a collection of organized, readily-verifiable facts. It is a fact that Nigel Gibson believes Fanon to be an influence on the BCM, so Gibson's work (along with Ramphela, etc) is cited when we talk about Fanon. Thus, when you

196:

link on each page. It might point to other pages that need attention, or at least adding to your watchlist. Other language pages (German, French wikipedias, links found at the top of the page) can also be a good source of information, though writers there often refer to the English wikipedia. Thanks

3056:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original

1168:

I will shortly put neutrality dispute tags on the page and open an RFC. We can debate and edit for the next 6 weeks but since it is easy to round up friends to fill the Talk pages, a Dispute Resolution before a neutral panel is probably the likely outcome. They would be able to look not only at the

1141:

A 2006 bioanthropological study on the dental morphology of ancient Egyptians by Prof. Joel Irish shows dental traits characteristic of indigenous North Africans and to a lesser extent Southwest Asian populations. Among the samples included in the study is skeletal material from the Hawara tombs of

1112:

As for the "mess" made of the "racial" article it hardly was that, only a number of users too intellectually dishonest to debate the issues and who had to resort to continual edit warring to keep out scholarship. You know that too. It was a mess to begin with, and it remains so, because many do not

1072:

changes to this particular section made without discussion. I also don't have time to address your contentions at the moment, I'm not even supposed to be here today. Suffice for now to say that you continue to show misunderstanding of some of the studies; e.g., saying that "others maintain..." when

840:

Hi there - I just noticed the query you had above about moving and renaming articles. I'm sure the person you were trying to ask would have helped if they had seen your message, but as the wikiproject welcome message was probably automated, they probably didn't (to get someone's attention, write to

277:

Thanks for looking at those additions. Your sections still need some work. Its true that the article has some uncited opinions, and their "hidden" nature in the body of the article has slowed attempts to ferret them out. Where found, they should be pointed to, and if not cited, posibly removed.

3322:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

1329:

Hey, thank you for copy editing the article and giving your support in its FAC. I didn't take out the 'see also' section, but from past FACs I've noticed that most editors prefer these sections to be eliminated. Some of those links are already wikilinked in the text, and perhaps it's possible to

761:

I think your organization of the Cavalry tactics article is sound. I cannot do much to the cattle section save to add a small example. According to Adrian Goldsworthy, when Hannibal was passing through the Alps, and found his route blocked by hostile tribesmen, he utilized cattle as a shock force,

542:

Glad to chip in. The tactics article is valuable, and the pictures I think add visual interest. Much good work had been done. Most other articles on the military deal with a simple record of events, or like the Legion article is mostly on structure. But this article has opened up an "intermediate"

1151:

A group of noted physical anthropologists conducted similar studies and concluded that "the Egyptians have been in place since back in the Pleistocene and have been largely unaffected by either invasions or migrations. As others have noted, Egyptians are Egyptians, and they were so in the past as

1131:

Beginning in the predynastic period, some differences between the populations of Upper and Lower Egypt have been ascertained through their skeletal remains, suggesting a gradual clinal pattern north to south. Mediterranean influences were present in the north, while a tropical African pattern was

937:

Thanks for what you say. The block came from reverting the changes that were were making to the page. More than 3 reverts in 24 hours and Knowledge (XXG) gives you a automatic block. To find out more how Knowledge (XXG) works on this end, click the help page on the left. The clique with the bogus

822:

I actually agree with some of your suggestions and have modified writing to make more neutral statements and added more references. Dont think I am just objecting to what yous ay. Some of the issues you raise are legitimate. I think you have done good work on many of these articles and actually I

260:

Fair enough. Most of the edit is drawn from research on the Movement as shown below. I have reorganized and included more information. The article as it is now has a number of statements unsupported by citations and/or supporting detail. For example:" "And it seemed to some that the key goals of

1120:

You are an intelligent person. Let's clear the air and get down to business. It is obvious to me you or various allies wanted to reinsert the Brace/Irish POV that I challenged earlier on Ancient Egypt. It was removed there, but then quietly recycled in 'Egyptians'. We know this. Let's be candid

321:

A lot of the entire article has opinion buried in the text, as in the 2 examples given above. Such similar sections should likewise be removed into talk, since they do not meet the standard you propose either. If such is to be applied, then let it be across the board. The Fanon example you give

220:

Thanks. As a new user, I have checked into what you say and understand a little bit more about some of the features and functions of Knowledge (XXG), although there is still some way to go. You are also doing much interesting work in bringing Internet access to the poor of South Africa via open

407:

If you have the patience, you could pick out the things that need citing and mention them at talk. I can't think of a good source for the statement that the goals had been attained, but the second statement about the broad legacy could easily be sourced to the Brewer book, or even Ramphela's

247:

I am hoping that there are sources that we can cite along with your analysis, as what you have written is very good as it adds closure to the article as an article, while allowing the reader to see how the movements actions are a part of the living history of greater negritude and black/brown

341:

As regards replacing problematic terminology such as "it should be argued" to something better like "it was said" this is fine, and I am happy to do it and add more detail. But what is set forth in the new section is well supported, indeed explicitly set forth in references like Gerhart and

369:

Based on what you write, it seems to me then that the edit is useful, and rather than simply been moved to talk, others should have the opportunity to add to it and improve it. Indeed I agree with you when you say: "what you have written is very good as it adds closure to the article as an

3112:

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the

1116:

As for "misunderstanding" the different approaches I have the full text before me of Irish, et al, avaialable on the web from the wysinger site, and can clearly see where the writing is being distorted and slanted. There are a number of clear disagreements between the scholars- fundamental

360:"what you have written is very good as it adds closure to the article as an article, while allowing the reader to see how the movements actions are a part of the living history of greater negritude and black/brown consciousness philosophies. Smmurphy(Talk) 02:43, 27 February 2006 (UTC)" 342:

Columbia. Indeed, it does so more than many other areas of the article. Let several persons or a set of neutral arbitrators take an objective look, rather than one person, and let them apply the SAME standard across the board to ALL sections of the entire article, without favoritism.

2728: 2636: 2536: 2436: 2336: 2225: 2148: 2048: 429:

No problem. I have made some adjustments based on the comments you made. Improvements can be further incorporated into what I have written no doubt, and I am open to suggestions. You have done an impressive amount of work yourself on a variety of Knowledge (XXG) articles.

3108:

or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

1067:

in order to reach consensus, which will surely not come about by engaging in obnoxious behavior. If the mess that became of the "racial" controversy article as a result of this behavior is any indication, it's a sure way of getting your edits reveted. I am reverting

775:

I know this story about Hannibal from Polybius. He says it was in Campania (a valley in Italy where he was trapped by the Romans under Fabius) and it was used to irritate the enemy and not for an attack. Anything about Khoikhoi or Xhosa using cattle in battle?

2932: 2828: 579:

Just wanted to say thanks for your work on this article in the last day or so - I had to correct a couple of links (typos) but other than that it was great - I really think that article needs some more work so good on you for having a stab at it! Cheers

750:

hi enriqueverda, Would you be interested in giving the cavalry tactics a new structure? A small subsection concerns African use of cattle as a kind of shock cavalry, perhaps you can also help expand that section and improve citation. Greetings

3295:, and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Knowledge (XXG) under one of the 985:

Hello. By all means, if you have other data or information on the topic your contribution is welcome. I am taking a break from this particular article having neglected several others, but will return in a week or two. Thanks for your input.

1226: 1215: 1043:

of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

730:

298:

for the very end. This is, in effect, what your additions (and others including, probably, myself) amount to. While the research is still fresh in your mind, you should try to cite some of the particular opinions in the text you have

1849:

1819:

1789:

1759:

1729:

1600:

1446:

1385:

1355:

1283:

1596: 1845: 1785: 1755: 1039: 726: 1815: 1725: 2390: 2202: 2102: 1442: 1162:

on maternal lineages also link Egyptians with people from modern Eritrea/Ethiopia such as the Tigre.Linkages in the northeast African region are part of a broad Nilotic pattern and also include Nubians, Somalis and others.

2290: 2002: 706:

Thanks. One quick question- maybe you can point me to the right HELP page. How do I (a) rename an article and (b) move an article. I have seen a page discussing these topics but can't recall it saying HOW to do it. Thanks

2414: 2214: 2126: 1381: 1351: 83:. As you may have noticed, Knowledge (XXG) is always in need of more Africa editors. I don't know if this is a continued area of interest for you, but if it is, here's some other links that you may want to check out: 868: 2590: 2490: 2314: 2026: 1279: 2902: 2886: 2798: 2782: 2398: 2210: 2110: 1506: 1414: 3327:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request 2690: 2614: 2514: 2406: 2298: 2206: 2118: 2010: 1475: 1250: 1191: 2306: 2018: 879:

If you like, I can paste an easier-to-use help guide and tip of the day function onto your user page (you can of course remove this if you prefer not to have it, or move it to a new page within your userspace)

3303:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.

2706: 2598: 2498: 2894: 2790: 2606: 2506: 1003:

Hi there - I noticed that there have been concerns about sockpuppets around the Egypt racial characteristics article. If this continues to be a significant problem, here is the place to report this issue:

867:. Quick tip - while it is possible to set the Knowledge (XXG) search bar to look through policy pages, I find it usually quicker and much more straightforward just to google within the wikipedia site e.g. 2698: 853:

Thanks. I'll check it out. When you have time, let me ask: I know the 3-revert rule but what's the general policy on moving pages? Some names just seem to change overnight to new names without warning.

1125:

The final product might look something like that below. You appear to be an intelligent and reasonable person. Make your own changes, and if fair and balanced this matter will be quickly put to rest:

2910: 2806: 955: 519:

I have checked it and it appears a fair addition. Will modify as needed. Keep up the good work on the History of the Military. None can say that all contributors are not passionate about history!

1142:

Fayum, which was found to be virtually identical to that of the Badarian series of the predynastic period. Biological continuity was found intact from the dynastic to the post-pharaonic periods.

87: 785:

Quite possibly Fabius. I'll have to relook at the Goldsworthy example. Can't recally anything on the local tribesman using cattle in battle as regards Africa, besides the usual logistical use.

3288:, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of 1699: 1666: 1633: 455:

and I just wanted to drop by and say what a pleasure it is to see good constructive work being done on that article, especially since it's usually just a morass of vandalism. Thanks! --

278:

In this article, we have taken care to place most of our citations directly next to the fact that is cited. So, the proper way to place an opinion into an article is to write, "Person

2229: 661: 529: 2936: 2832: 2724: 2632: 2532: 2432: 2332: 2144: 2044: 1502: 1410: 1246: 1187: 690: 3733:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

3370:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

3249:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

3210:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

657: 653: 108:

Good luck, and happy editing! If you ever have any questions, feel free to leave a note on my talk page; lots of folks helped me when I first got here and I'm always glad to

3175: 102: 762:

tying torches to some of them, and driving them towards the enemy. In the resulting confusion, his main force slipped away. Will throw in this example, for what its worth.

408:

autobiography. Sorry to be telling you all this while I'm not doing anything to the article myself. I'll get to it eventually, I'm sure. Anyway, great work, keep it up.

332:

let them give it a shot and improve on it. Or let disclaimers and requests for citation be added to the article, like some others in Knowledge (XXG) such as "Afrocentrism."

3129: 675: 1063:

I just read the note you left me, but already I can see that you are anonymously edit warring over the origins section in the Egyptians article. Please learn to respect

3077:

to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Knowledge (XXG). Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a

2928: 2824: 2968: 1482:. I would invite you to add your comment to this review, as soon as possible, as the article is in danger of failing through insufficient commentators. Best wishes 3728: 1917: 1106:

However I must also note that you seem to have no problems with the anonymous insertion of the POV you earlier agreed to remove from the Ancient Egyptian article.

3365: 3205: 2998: 2866: 2762: 2670: 2570: 2470: 2370: 2270: 2183: 2082: 1982: 1886: 642: 483:

Hi, I've put some comments about your contributions on the talk page. It's good stuff, but I have some reservations. I'd be interested to hear your thoughts.

3170:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

1881:

because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the

3244: 3151: 1555: 1545: 1307:

hey thanks for hitting me up! i saw ur work on the anglo-asante war. GREAT WORK! i moved ur comment to my discussion page so u can hit me up there. holla :)

543:

zone of inquiry between the two. It also fills a missing gap in analyzing Roman tactics and strategy, as well as the factors that made the infantry effective.

1413:

selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up

261:

Black Consciousness had been attained.." OR "And beyond these groups and media outlets, the Black Consciousness Movement had an extremely broad legacy.."

1695: 1662: 1629: 97: 65: 3672: 3564: 3456: 3263: 2973:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

2874: 2770: 2678: 2578: 2478: 2378: 2278: 2193: 2090: 1990: 1922:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

1704:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

1671:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

1638:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

1190:

selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please

682: 668: 49: 389:

Umm, ok, cool. All I meant was that it was sudden to see a long addendum on the article which wasn't originally well sourced. Such things are

1222: 1211: 3082: 1572: 3064:

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a

127: 25:

to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

1478:(Wandalstouring acted as my advisor on Wiki standards). I'm consulting you because you contributed to the review on another of my articles, 864: 3057:

copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the

509:

is a very detailed article on the Roman military. A detailed discussion of the apparaisal of the Roman military could be better off there.

3065: 606:! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of topics related to military history. 69: 1113:

want a balanced approach or scholarship, and prefer a weak article so certain things are kept out. I am not fooled. We all know the game.

3139:, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! 1505:

election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please

1249:

election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please

3167: 1878: 693:, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! 3724: 3676: 3568: 3460: 3361: 3307: 3296: 3240: 264:

Since similar issues arise with greater negritude and black/brown consciousness philosophies, it is good to address them clearly.

632: 621: 134:, including some much needed citations in a previously unreferenced article, I hereby award Enriquecardova this pretty butterfly/ 3146: 3124: 3114: 3201: 2964: 1913: 34: 22: 3136: 3664: 3622: 3600: 3556: 3514: 3492: 3448: 3406: 3384: 68:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out

1103:

No anonymous edit warring, just a server that logged me out. If I was going anonymous I would not be leaving you a message.

3754:

F. J. Yurco, 'Were the ancient Egyptians black or white?', Biblical Archeology Review (Vol 15, no. 5, 1989), pp. 24-9, 58.

614: 135: 3668: 3560: 3452: 3324: 3289: 3105: 241: 54: 3319: 3281: 3267: 3651: 3236: 3058: 3048: 1949: 3543: 3171: 3163: 1109:

You mention Consensus, but fail to note the consensus earlier agreed to earlier on these issues re Ancient Egypt

29: 3720: 3357: 963: 1533: 61: 3618: 3604: 3197: 3142: 3120: 1625: 3435: 1941: 1709: 1691: 1676: 1658: 1643: 452: 3510: 3496: 1882: 1874: 685:

for article structure and content, template use, categorization, and other issues that you may find useful.

2978: 1487: 573: 3680: 3572: 3464: 3023: 2960: 1909: 1894: 3402: 3388: 3052:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 2993: 44: 3698: 3590: 3482: 3090: 1957: 1580: 3027: 3003: 1179: 603: 1927: 1231: 1170: 1021: 987: 945: 890: 855: 824: 811: 786: 777: 763: 752: 708: 694: 581: 510: 431: 376: 268: 227: 202: 176: 2944: 2840: 2736: 2644: 2544: 2444: 2344: 2237: 2156: 2056: 1858: 1828: 1798: 1768: 1738: 1705: 1672: 1639: 1609: 1517: 1455: 1425: 1394: 1364: 1312: 1292: 495:

Agree with much of what you say and have worked in some suggestions as explained on the Talk age.

459: 1548:

linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

76:

on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

3688: 3647: 3580: 3539: 3472: 3431: 2996:" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so 2974: 1945: 1483: 1479: 1335: 807: 3328: 1541: 967:

so we can work on them in private until they're ready to be added. Feel free to edit them. ==

3738: 3011: 2723:

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

1890: 1083: 970: 3634: 3526: 3418: 3285: 3073: 1537: 1064: 1005: 3694: 3586: 3478: 3086: 1953: 1576: 1568: 1471: 898:

Cool. Check out your user page (tab at the top) now. Hope its handy and useful for you!

2103:

From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report

1923: 1260: 1201: 1049: 736: 198: 172: 3633:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be

3525:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be

3417:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be

3293: 3284:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

3015: 2940: 2836: 2732: 2640: 2540: 2440: 2340: 2233: 2152: 2052: 1854: 1824: 1794: 1764: 1734: 1605: 1513: 1451: 1421: 1390: 1360: 1308: 1288: 456: 409: 306: 249: 92: 39: 961:

Hey. Sorry to see your edits to this article were taken away. I'm going to put them

126: 2631: