247:
correcting grievous omissions that were tantamount to NPOV violation. Facts are facts, and I disagree that they must be truncated to suit the emotional reactions of certain people. Unless you're prepared to radically edit pages depicting a round Earth to suit the "controversy" of the Flat Earth
Society's contentions, then you must accept certain facts as clearly established wrt the subjects in question: (1)The Republican Party is a fascist organization by definitions included in Knowledge (XXG), a criminal organization by the same virtue, and a great number of its prominent members are Christian fudamentalists as also defined by the community. These are not my opinions, they are facts, and my edits are not bad-faith defacing or vandalism. Neutrality does not mean settling exactly between the opposite extremes of every subject, it means representing the facts in an unbiased manner. By deleting facts because some group objects to them, you are taking a side. I've undone your removals, but I appreciate your input.
274:
exclusionary. bring me another one. who has academic credentials to judge moot court programs? would that be a ph. D in mootcourt-ology? brian koppen is about as credible as they get. final four in 176 team moot court competition administered by who? yeah, the american bar association. regional best brief winner in same competition. regional champion in same. who is more qualified? i'm guessing that the person who removed it from the "moot court" entry (i added it this time, someone else did previously) was not in the top five or so of the contest.
655:- and has asked me to help out under the Adopt-A-User program. I'm an experienced editor (8000+ edits, two featured articles) and under the adoption system, I'll keep a really close eye on what happens with this article - I take this kind of thing very seriously. However, it would be useful to see the last known state of the thing so I can advise my adoptee on what went wrong. I'm not an admin - so I can't pull it back from the grave - but I guess you can. Would it be possible to copy the last known content into
302:
island boats are a fleet in NY that are over 60 years old and were not listed for sail anywere. By deleting facts because you think "This page is about
Charles Mower. It is not here for you to tout business for your yachts" You are right Yet the historical significance of these boats must also be recognized. This reason is why they are listed so please consider the fact that thease boats are extreamly rear and only exist thanks to wood boat enthisiast.
31:
995:
799:
805:
320:. What do you think of seeing this kind of IP in the corporation's articleĀ ?. I love wikipedia and spend also time to edit my own articles in English, French and Russian about History, Art, etc. (with a loginĀ !). I just wish that users be conscious of the situation, that's all. Have you got an idea to do it in the best way (be serious please)Ā ?
1218:
evidence being articles, pictures, and other materials). My understanding of the general
Knowledge (XXG) policy on this type of thing is that, if there is evidence strongly suggesting that a relationship has taken place, as long as it is stressed that the information is unconfirmed, it is generally acceptable. I was looking at
617:. I'm not sure what occurred, but it would appear that at some point since the AfD the page had been deleted, and the talk page remained (as it does now). The page I proposed for speedy deletion had significant problems; notability not established, no cites or references, read like a press release. I've explained this to
443:
781:
Hello, my name is
Isucheme and I am currently writing my first Knowledge (XXG) article on the Churchill-Bernstein Equation. The equation is used to find an average (convection) heat transfer coefficient to use in Newtonās Law of cooling for a cylinder in cross flow, and the mass transfer analogy, as
676:
the next time, could you please ask me to remove the things myself before you use your scissors?Ā :) It took me some time to pull it all together and sometimes it's just the case that i don't backup my writings. I don't know what you were expecting from the entry, but i think you could have allowed me
438:
Hi there. I see you proposed Batley
Bulldogs 2007 for deletion...I personally agree with your reasoning. However, what I have done is created 2007 pages for all NRL and super league teams specifically to place these rather pointless crystal ball predictions on. They used to appear on the main article
301:
On the mower page is examples of his boats. Some or the boats listed may be for sail but it most also be noted that thease boats belong in museums. Topps O cotten for example is the oldest boat in
Chichago and the only know surviving Legendary not even the plans survive to this day. And the Fishers
1222:
just earlier, and that contained information of Kidman's rumoured relationships between her marriages to Tom Cruise and Keith Urban - none of have ever been confirmed, but they were nevertheless included, with a note stressing that they were unconfirmed. Therefore, I can't see why the same shouldn't
952:
Because I didn't think it added anything to the page. The article covers the subject of smoking legislation. People know what
Smoking Bans are. They don't need an irrelevant list of trivial mentions of Smoking bans in the Simpsons or other comedy tv programmes to illustrate them or validate their
263:
per
Knowledge (XXG) policy. In fact, the registrant of the website (Brian Koppen) is a 2007 (yes, just 2 months ago) of Chicago-Kent School of Law. That alone raises an air of stink around his findings. Additionally, the author is not credible per se (as he had no academic credentials in which to
1217:
I believe the rumoured relationships information to be notable. There's credible evidence suggesting that something MAY have happened between
Sharapova and all the people mentioned, therefore, I consider it a valid entry to state these rumoured relationships which all have evidence behind them (the
868:
Please allow the laborer page to remain as is in its current condition. The difficulty in obtaining properly cited sources for a subject such as construction which is historically nonacademic and or undocumented is obvious. In the construction field knowledge is passed down through generations from
255:
The ranking at bestmootcourtprograms.com has been cited by the law schools at George Mason
University and Mississippi College, and has been footnoted as an authority in the UC-Hastings' wikipedia article. Although it is merely touting a web site, that web site is THE authority on how American moot
872:
Unfortunately Knowledge (XXG) has a very good policy to edit uncited information. Please allow an exception in this case and in other construction pages in recognition of the special nature of the field. I assure you the information presented on the laborers page is accurate, precise, relevant and
582:
I was wondering why you speedy-deleted an article that had already passed a proper AfD review with 'Keep'? I'm supposed to explain these procedures to this new user (I'm a part of the 'Adopt-a-user' program) - and to be honest, what you did seems entirely wrong...regardless of your regard for the
273:
the ranking is so transparent that the "stink" of previous affiliation is neutralized. you bring me one moot court competition with 24 or more teams that has not been included and i'll tell you why it hasn't. Frederick Douglass moot court competition hasn't. this is because it may or may not be
231:
Thanks for your helpful reply and guidance. Although I had looked at the main guidlines I had missed the one about organisations so that was useful. Hopefully there is a bit of time allowed to produce an improved entry. I wonder if other societies have been deleted on notablity since there are not
880:
My personal experience, research and education in the construction field is not sufficient to provide cited sources as these are few and often created for inconsistent purposes. I assure you that if possible I will generate some cited sources myself if only for the reason of preserving content on
246:
Thanks for the heads-up on my edits. NPOV is clearly a very important principle, and I support the mission of Knowledge (XXG) to be as comprehensive and objective as possible. However, I disagree with your assertion that my edits fail to meet this standard, and in fact I think it's clear I was
216:
I need some advice about how to make the entry more notable. Looking at entries for fellow UK family history societies the entry is in essence the same as some of the existing ones. In particular the Suffolk FHS entry is virtually identical. The entry can be expanded if necessary but it would be
173:
This was my original rational for including cigreviews.com on the wikipedia pages in question. As no professional reviewer of cigarettes exists, and the external link policy is vague at best when it comes to reviews, the summarization of consumer reviews would be be a benefit to the users of the
345:
Thnx for allawin it 2 be in existence. Although it's a real breed with a farfeched (can't spell it, 1st time) name, like the Yorkipoo or the Labradoodle... I only know one in my neighbourhood, luckily she's mine (but she doesn't like 2 sound inferior so we have to retend she's of primate decent
1082:
article. I think it has been made clear to all of the editors involved (who might well be one person), that the claims require sources. I have made friendly suggestions as to sourcing the claim and have applied warnings where they have not been followed. Please keep an eye out for any future
876:
It is your good judgment to allow this content since you have the authority to decide if information is to be preserved or censored. The link to the Laborers' International Union of North America (LIUNA) you deemed irrelevant is the organization representing nearly one million laborers
160:
Knowledge (XXG) is not a directory. External links should really only be used if they contribute information that could not otherwise be included in Knowledge (XXG) (e.g. due to copyright). Cigreviews doesn't appear to offer any further useful factual information that isn't already
145:
You are placing the link on a number of pages of specific brands, but the link doesn't go directly to information about that brand. This makes it look like you are concerned more with driving traffic to the site than offering further useful information relevant to the
532:
850:
went back and put back in all the "back of cover" capsule descriptions of each one of his books and deleted a whole lot of the discussions on the Talk page. I undid his additions to the main page, but I guess I don't have permission to unmodify the talk page.
92:
Thank you for your assistance in editing the article about Jobing.com; I am new to the Wiki and a student doing this for a class project. I am going to find more third party references to add and correctly cite them. Thanks much for your help!!!
439:
page for every team. Unfortunately it seems that no one can accept that these shouldn't form a part of wikipedia in any way, and they insist on having them somewhere. I figured may as well hide them on a 2007 page rather than the actual page!
1346:
is used exclusively except in quotes. There have been dozens of discussions dating back at least to 2002 concerning this, and the consensus is overwhelmingly in favor of this spelling. One of the more recent discussions can be found in the
417:
I've put a prod tag on it. This is the kind of indiscriminate and potentially unmanageable list that has routinely failed AfD votes from what I have seen. If someone contests it, I'll put it up for AfD. Thanks for your understanding.
710:
I have a problem. I want to give a link to the word "Tarkan" as referring to a series of historical adventure movies produced in Turkey during the 1960s and 70s. However the name is already given away to the turkish pop-star Tarkan.
587:- it should be kept - or at the very least re-nominated for debate after the author has had a chance to clean up the rough spots. Unfortunately, I can't now even read the article to advise this new author on how to fix it.
1304:
Hello Escape Orbit, I have granted rollback rights to your account. The reason for this is that, after a review of some of your contributions, I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended use of
305:
I would love help rewording the boat text so they do not read as adds and yes most information was just cut and paseded from the respected sites The site looks great thank you for your help wikiifing the site
150:
I see your point on this, originally when I added the links to Knowledge (XXG) I had a generic link that I copy and pasted on to all the web pages. Your right, links to specific pages would be more relevant.
613:. The AfD review was over a year ago, where as the article I read was created that day and indeed had already had a csd attached by another editor, which was then removed (perhaps inadvertently) by
1152:
Considering some of the bright lights that do have long-standing Knowledge (XXG) entries (high school football coaches that are no longer employed?) I'd say that Krasnow definitely merits an entry.
1149:
entry for speedy deletion. He is a major force in the recording industry, and has been for more than fifty years. He has a detailed list of accomplishments, achievements, innovations and accolades.
484:
782:
described in the article, can be employed to find a mass transfer coefficient. I would appreciate any feed back you can give me on my article so I can make it a great article. Thank you.
869:
journeyman to apprentice. It is only today with the advent of Knowledge (XXG) that this knowledge can be widely shared across regions without the need to physically work with someone.
199:
Why would you recommend to delete "Greater Jerusalem" article? It is about a top Israeli swimming club and does not hurt anyone by being published. Is there a reason for it to be deleted?
509:
I just made a few changes to make this article a little clearer about the subject. I added an opening sentence making it perfectly clear that he is a ficitonal character from
877:
internationally, I believe this link is very relevant. The other information on the page though seemingly inconsequential is also very relevant to the field of laboring.
141:
I have no affliation with the owners/moderators of that site, my only connection is that about 20 of the reviews on that site are mine, and I am a regular user of the site.
495:
during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
1010:
966:
Good move. Contemporary U.S. popular culture is killing Knowledge (XXG). Referring to action movies and rap "songs" does not provide information about a topic.
1042:
page. He keeps adding links to swift.drivers-central.com to a number of Wiki pages. Can you warn him and remove his spammy links from the following pages:
696:
I decided to release this image into the public domain, admitting that I forgot about the guidelines. Sorry for that. Please don't undo my previous edit.
677:
to progress a bit more. Citations and references were ready, but i think i just don't know any longer if it is worth the effort to write anything at all.
597:
1340:"foetus vs fetus: In American English, foetus is usually not used. In British English usage is divided. In academic literature, fetus is preferred."
1335:
1313:
1285:
Thanks for your helpful edits to this article. I was having trouble putting my finger on what was wrong, and your changes did improve it. -
476:
177:
Having said that I was wondering is a wikipedia page that more closely spells out the guidelines and definitions for reviews on wikipedia?
1223:
happen here. For now, I will not re-add the information to the page, but I am genuinely interested to here your further thoughts on this.
1197:
Oops. I rewrote a paragraph which I found awkwardly phrased, but then forgot to remove the original version. Thanks for spotting it. --
1342:
which has been in place since at least 2005, and has been followed for consistency throughout the 'pedia. As this is an academic venue,
1131:
917:
737:
Was probably just a normal mistake that happens to most everyone, but just FYI/FFR do please take care when messing with references;
468:
256:
court programs stack up against each other. To my knowledge, the "moot court" wikipedia article cannot be edited. User: Jimdugan
1063:
79:
71:
66:
169:
Sites with other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article, such as reviews and interviews.
289:
122:
1116:
as per my note. I have the page on watch but I'm more used to people putting this in. Apologies for calling you a vandal. --
854:
Anywho, you might want to consider locking this page, or locking that user from that page; he's being a wee bit obnoxious.
137:
To be honest, you should avoid linking to any site you have a stake in. It makes your contribution a conflict of interests.
765:
395:
370:
1317:
155:
The site is a customer review site, so really just a collection of opinions from people of no verifiable qualifications.
1006:
480:
1312:: I do not believe you will abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see
553:
165:
When I was reading Knowledge (XXG)'s external links policy I came upon this under the "What should be linked section"
385:
Yup. I would have reverted it myself if it didn't sound like a reasonable response. True, a source is needed. ---
346:
sometimes (she doesn't like to be different)). So, to continue adding 2 da page, we need someone who also has one.
38:
1104:
Hi, I reverted your reversion without noting that it was, in fact, correct. I have now removed this per policies
1079:
492:
472:
464:
458:
444:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Rugby league/Discussions forums/Putting up weekly run on sides on team articles
411:
483:). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
1228:
1187:
1127:
510:
475:
satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "
232:
many of the links on the list of family history societies that have any entries attached to them. Regards
1234:
1051:
913:
277:
110:
921:
656:
47:
17:
1308:
943:
885:
205:
358:
332:
1356:
1348:
1159:
1059:
1055:
264:
judge a program nor any practical experience). Knowledge (XXG) is not intended to be a commercial.
889:
1176:
1009:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at
783:
281:
202:
114:
94:
1002:
988:
1334:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant parts of the MoS prior to making sweeping changes. See
1290:
1224:
1183:
1118:
1088:
971:
937:
847:
697:
496:
426:
285:
265:
118:
636:
Oh - I see. Can we find the version that was considered acceptable at the previous AfD review?
233:
218:
1238:
1191:
1198:
954:
768:
622:
391:
366:
618:
448:
1105:
547:
488:
399:
374:
1264:
1250:
1155:
811:
660:
637:
600:
588:
560:
514:
260:
1359:
1324:
1294:
1271:
1257:
1203:
1163:
1135:
1092:
1067:
1027:
1017:
975:
959:
946:
925:
892:
858:
836:
819:
786:
771:
751:
727:
718:
700:
686:
663:
640:
627:
603:
591:
569:
517:
499:
451:
428:
404:
379:
335:
268:
236:
221:
126:
97:
1321:
1045:
en.wikipedia.org/Trucker en.wikipedia.org/Truck_driving en.wikipedia.org/Truck_drivers
816:
531:
1113:
1109:
1286:
1219:
1098:
1084:
1024:
1014:
967:
610:
419:
180:
or if a external link set up in this fashion, say for marlboro, would be acceptable.
994:
833:
583:
merits of the article, if it was nominated for AfD and the result was a non-speedy
386:
361:
347:
184:
1320:. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck.
1146:
855:
748:
724:
715:
683:
648:
614:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
471:. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that
107:
In what way does Cigreviews.com violate wikipedia's external link policy?
832:
WWWWWWW? OOOOOO? man you are really fast on those reverts, good job =p --
652:
1039:
798:
804:
936:
Excuse me but, why did you remove the "popular culture" part of the
764:
Thanks. Seriously, I was getting tired of removing that picture. --
1352:
907:
757:
1249:
Thanks - someone doesn't like me blacklisting their websites! --
485:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of left handed people
321:
174:
wikicommunity containing both relevant, and meaningful content.
903:
491:
with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
25:
1336:
Knowledge (XXG):Manual_of_Style_(spelling)#Preferred_variants
993:
651:
is now genuinely trying to put together a decent article on
217:
useful to understand the weakness in the content. Thanks
133:
Hi. Thanks for responding. You made a number of points..
442:
You can see the debate, and add your opinion too, here:
739:
317:
1214:(also posted on the Sharapova page discussion thread)
1182:
Hi. I reverted this: was it a cut-and-paste error? --
1001:An article that you have been involved in editing,
714:How can I give a link that opens to an empty page?
1011:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Nicolas Rost
596:Sorry - I should have left you a link to the AfD:
1038:You did a great job scaring off a spammer on the
467:, an article you created, has been nominated for
1023:You previously nominated for speedy deletion. --
259:Jimdugan - "bestmootcourtprograms.com" is not a
1263:And thanks for your continuing help - cheers --
884:Once again, please preserve the laborers page.
609:I flagged this very thing as a concern on the
598:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Expatica
743:broke some other refs that utilized the same
8:
1040:http://en.wikipedia.org/Swift_Transportation
802:But a little angel came along and fixed it!
1314:Knowledge (XXG):New admin school/Rollback
529:
1083:reinsertions of the unsourced claims.
326:I would be happy to read your answer.
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
932:Smoking ban popular culture section
902:Religion and homosexuality is like
251:Removal of Best Moot Court Programs
103:!!!Updated!!! External Links Policy
24:
1078:Thanks for keeping an eye on the
796:Someone vandalized my Userspace!
540:The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
1318:Knowledge (XXG):Rollback feature
810:You can thank others by using {{
803:
797:
530:
212:East Surrey FHS notability query
29:
481:Knowledge (XXG) deletion policy
185:User submitted Marlboro reviews
772:21:58, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
752:17:20, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
728:12:08, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
719:20:50, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
701:22:48, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
687:15:37, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
664:13:31, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
641:21:59, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
628:16:57, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
604:22:58, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
592:22:55, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
1204:18:54, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
1192:18:27, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
1093:22:22, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
1068:18:40, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
1028:10:39, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
1018:10:39, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
976:11:57, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
888:01:38, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
570:18:30, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
518:14:44, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
500:12:33, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
322:http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/
1360:21:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
1325:17:42, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
1295:04:40, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
1272:08:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
1258:17:42, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
1164:07:37, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
1136:22:05, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
1074:re New York Military Academy
960:22:08, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
947:21:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
926:13:59, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
893:01:39, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
859:20:35, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
837:00:11, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
820:15:36, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
787:20:06, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
723:Hey, thanks for the aidĀ :)
227:East Surrey notability issue
1239:20:44, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
477:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
452:09:50, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
429:20:16, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
405:20:46, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
380:20:36, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
336:02:07, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
269:19:28, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
242:Republican politician edits
237:16:50, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
222:18:22, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
127:20:44, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
98:00:05, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
1375:
493:List of left handed people
473:List of left handed people
465:List of left handed people
459:List of left handed people
412:List of left handed people
1080:New York Military Academy
536:
692:"Image:Burning hand.jpg"
297:Removal of Charles Mower
910:.So I am right anyway
511:Mobile Suit Zeta Gundam
201:Commented was added by
1210:Maria Sharapova's page
1005:, has been listed for
998:
659:? Thanks in advance.
487:and please be sure to
191:Thanks for your time-
18:User talk:Escape Orbit
997:
777:Welcome some feedback
280:comment was added by
42:of past discussions.
1220:Nicole Kidman's page
1209:
1048:Thanks Wiki Po-Po!
881:Knowledge (XXG).
657:User:Salion/Expatica
546:For your reports at
434:Batley Bulldogs 2007
353:Leggett & Plattā
842:Ronald Kessler page
314:Dear Escape Orbit,
1177:Shakespeare's life
1145:You nominated the
999:
987:AfD nomination of
848:User:KesslerRonald
489:sign your comments
457:AfD nomination of
88:Jobing.com article
1241:
1128:please reply here
1070:
1054:comment added by
953:significance. --
928:
916:comment added by
815:
575:
574:
565:
505:Paptimus Scirocco
403:
378:
329:Sincerely yours,
293:
208:
203:<CapeLand: -->
195:Greater Jeruselam
129:
113:comment added by
85:
84:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1366:
1338:, specifically,
1267:
1253:
1232:
1201:
1172:
1123:
1049:
957:
911:
809:
807:
801:
742:
669:cinema of turkey
625:
567:
563:
559:
556:
534:
527:
526:
424:
389:
364:
275:
200:
108:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1374:
1373:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1357:KillerChihuahua
1351:of the article
1332:
1302:
1283:
1265:
1251:
1247:
1212:
1199:
1180:
1174:
1143:
1119:
1102:
1076:
1036:
992:
955:
934:
900:
866:
844:
830:
794:
779:
762:
738:
735:
725:Ego sum cui sum
716:Ego sum cui sum
708:
694:
684:Ego sum cui sum
671:
623:
580:
566:
561:
554:
552:
525:
507:
462:
436:
420:
415:
355:
343:
312:
299:
276:āThe preceding
261:reliable source
253:
244:
229:
214:
197:
105:
90:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1372:
1370:
1331:
1328:
1301:
1298:
1282:
1279:
1277:
1275:
1274:
1246:
1243:
1211:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1179:
1171:
1170:
1168:
1142:
1139:
1101:
1096:
1075:
1072:
1035:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1013:. Thank you.
991:
985:
984:
983:
982:
981:
980:
979:
944:83.203.227.147
933:
930:
899:
896:
886:128.12.170.194
865:
862:
843:
840:
829:
826:
824:
793:
790:
778:
775:
761:
755:
734:
731:
707:
704:
693:
690:
673:Escape Orbit,
670:
667:
646:
645:
644:
643:
631:
630:
579:
576:
573:
572:
558:
543:
542:
537:
535:
524:
521:
506:
503:
461:
455:
435:
432:
414:
409:
408:
407:
354:
351:
342:
339:
311:
308:
298:
295:
252:
249:
243:
240:
228:
225:
213:
210:
196:
193:
190:
188:
187:
171:
170:
163:
162:
157:
156:
148:
147:
139:
138:
132:
104:
101:
89:
86:
83:
82:
77:
74:
69:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1371:
1362:
1361:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1329:
1327:
1326:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1310:
1299:
1297:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1280:
1278:
1273:
1270:
1268:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1256:
1254:
1244:
1242:
1240:
1237:was added at
1236:
1230:
1226:
1225:Musiclover565
1221:
1215:
1205:
1202:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1184:Old Moonraker
1178:
1175:Your edit to
1169:
1166:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1153:
1150:
1148:
1140:
1138:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1124:
1122:
1121:Rodhullandemu
1115:
1111:
1107:
1100:
1099:John Travolta
1097:
1095:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1081:
1073:
1071:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1046:
1043:
1041:
1033:
1029:
1026:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1004:
996:
990:
986:
977:
973:
969:
965:
964:
963:
962:
961:
958:
951:
950:
949:
948:
945:
941:
939:
931:
929:
927:
923:
919:
915:
909:
905:
897:
895:
894:
891:
887:
882:
878:
874:
870:
863:
861:
860:
857:
852:
849:
841:
839:
838:
835:
827:
825:
822:
821:
818:
813:
806:
800:
791:
789:
788:
785:
776:
774:
773:
770:
767:
759:
756:
754:
753:
750:
746:
741:
733:Deleting refs
732:
730:
729:
726:
721:
720:
717:
712:
705:
703:
702:
699:
698:Jonghyunchung
691:
689:
688:
685:
681:
678:
674:
668:
666:
665:
662:
658:
654:
650:
642:
639:
635:
634:
633:
632:
629:
626:
620:
616:
612:
608:
607:
606:
605:
602:
599:
594:
593:
590:
586:
577:
571:
568:
564:
557:
549:
545:
544:
541:
538:
533:
528:
522:
520:
519:
516:
512:
504:
502:
501:
498:
497:Pascal.Tesson
494:
490:
486:
482:
478:
474:
470:
466:
460:
456:
454:
453:
450:
446:
445:
440:
433:
431:
430:
427:
425:
423:
413:
410:
406:
401:
397:
393:
388:
384:
383:
382:
381:
376:
372:
368:
363:
359:
352:
350:
349:
340:
338:
337:
334:
330:
327:
324:
323:
319:
315:
309:
307:
303:
296:
294:
291:
287:
283:
279:
271:
270:
267:
262:
257:
250:
248:
241:
239:
238:
235:
226:
224:
223:
220:
211:
209:
207:
206:<Talk: -->
204:
194:
192:
186:
183:
182:
181:
178:
175:
168:
167:
166:
159:
158:
154:
153:
152:
144:
143:
142:
136:
135:
134:
130:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
102:
100:
99:
96:
87:
81:
78:
75:
73:
70:
68:
65:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1343:
1339:
1333:
1306:
1303:
1284:
1276:
1269:
1255:
1248:
1245:Talk page rv
1216:
1213:
1200:Escape Orbit
1181:
1167:
1154:
1151:
1144:
1120:
1117:
1103:
1077:
1047:
1044:
1037:
1034:Link Spammer
1003:Nicolas Rost
1000:
989:Nicolas Rost
956:Escape Orbit
942:
935:
918:82.71.120.62
901:
883:
879:
875:
873:correct.
871:
867:
853:
845:
831:
823:
812:subst:Vangel
795:
780:
763:
744:
736:
722:
713:
709:
695:
682:
679:
675:
672:
647:
624:Escape Orbit
595:
584:
581:
551:
539:
508:
463:
447:
441:
437:
421:
416:
356:
344:
333:80.32.246.17
331:
328:
325:
316:
313:
304:
300:
272:
258:
254:
245:
230:
215:
198:
189:
179:
176:
172:
164:
149:
140:
131:
106:
91:
60:
43:
37:
1233:āPreceding
1147:Bob Krasnow
1141:Bob Krasnow
1050:āPreceding
938:Smoking Ban
912:āPreceding
808:Thank you!
680:Thank you.
649:User:Salion
449:Nouse4aname
341:Springerdor
109:āPreceding
36:This is an
1307:reverting
1156:BayRadioDJ
1056:Lukebenson
940:articleĀ ?
706:a question
661:SteveBaker
638:SteveBaker
601:SteveBaker
589:SteveBaker
523:Barnstar!\
515:Shaneymike
479:" and the
1322:Acalamari
1309:vandalism
890:Granite07
817:Gscshoyru
740:this edit
611:talk page
80:ArchiveĀ 5
72:ArchiveĀ 3
67:ArchiveĀ 2
61:ArchiveĀ 1
1355:itself.
1330:Spelling
1300:Rollback
1287:Lciaccio
1173:Thanks =
1132:contribs
1085:Alansohn
1064:contribs
1052:unsigned
1025:Edcolins
1015:Edcolins
1007:deletion
978:Lestrade
968:Lestrade
914:unsigned
864:Dear Sir
792:Thanks!!
784:Isucheme
653:Expatica
578:Expatica
469:deletion
422:Finngall
318:Monsanto
290:contribs
282:Jimdugan
278:unsigned
123:contribs
115:Afro3429
111:unsigned
95:Phanavan
1349:archive
1281:Ask.com
1235:comment
834:Diaboli
550:today.
39:archive
1112:&
1106:WP:BLP
856:Dougom
749:Reisio
619:Salion
615:Salion
562:(talk)
548:WP:AIV
310:Delete
266:Aeh5a2
234:BrianH
219:BrianH
161:there.
1353:Fetus
1344:fetus
1266:Herby
1252:Herby
908:devil
846:User
760:image
758:Gnome
621:. --
555:Maxim
357:FYI:
146:page.
16:<
1316:and
1291:talk
1229:talk
1188:talk
1160:talk
1114:WP:V
1110:WP:N
1089:talk
1060:talk
972:talk
922:talk
906:and
828:SODA
747:. Ā¦
745:name
585:keep
286:talk
119:talk
1231:)
904:God
814:}}!
769:Raw
766:Old
400:WRE
387:J.S
375:WRE
362:J.S
360:---
1293:)
1190:)
1162:)
1134:)
1130:-
1108:,
1091:)
1066:)
1062:ā¢
974:)
924:)
898:Hi
513:.
418:--
348:OV
292:).
288:ā¢
125:)
121:ā¢
93:--
76:ā
1289:(
1227:(
1186:(
1158:(
1126:(
1087:(
1058:(
970:(
920:(
402:)
398:/
396:C
394:/
392:T
390:(
377:)
373:/
371:C
369:/
367:T
365:(
284:(
117:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.