User talk:Espresso Addict/archive2

884:

made at the first attempt at FAC. At peer review I was told that the lead should be longer and cover everything in the article, so I expanded it with necessarily bland sentences which were then criticised; the history section was too long, so I shortened it. Then I was advised to have it copy-edited so I found a retired professor of English (American) to do it. He shortened most of the sentences which has resulted in the choppy prose. Anyway with your recent suggestions I have made some more improvements (details on Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/Runcorn) but I'm not sure how to go about a sketchmap. Perhaps I ought to be content with GA status and the fact that it is a comprehensive article about the town for anyone who may come across it and read it (and a great improvement on what was there when I first saw it). Best wishes.

1447:(who, as you may know, is one of the project's strongest inclusionists) how he copes so well with so often being on the losing side of a discussion. He told me this "The method I like best for things I think worth the trouble is to bring things up again, calmly, not pressing very hard, at intervals of several months. WP works much faster than that, so people who do have a long range plan and patience enough not to get into uncooperative modes along the way, can accomplish a good deal for whatever it is they support." I've found that whatever the cause of stress, even after a few weeks of concentrating elsewhere I either 1) no longer am that worried about it or 2) have the energy to continue the good fight. 2211:

associate) vs established (full),( or in UK terms I suppose senior reader) but I am not sure it would be defensible in the current state of things at WP. As for subjects rather than people, I certainly dont think anything shown in one or two papers is notable unless acclaimed as such in a review or in a news item in Nature or confirmed by a substantial body of work and interest from other groups. Our first priority should be to build up the articles on the best people--check the list of members of the NAS, and see how many are missing--or even the royal Society. I want to build up the content as fast as possible and this is the place to do it.

919:

this is quite important in the context of the town and the article. I agree the railways are a bit complicated. Perhaps we could have the Liverpool–London line because it crosses Runcorn Gap parallel to the road bridge and this links up with the images. To the east of the town it is more complicated because the main branch of the West Coast Main line crosses the Manchester–Chester line. Perhaps it would be possible to include the latter (mainly because of Runcorn East station) and leave out the WCML. But don't bother if this is a lot of work as the map adds much as it stands.

1746:). I have been looking around the church titles both in GB and USA and the vast number use our preferred format (ie. there seems already to be a "consensus"). I'm not sure whether to raise it again (and maybe stir up a hornet's nest – or nothing at all again). I'm due to go on holiday later this week so I shall leave it until my return, unless someone else wants to have a go. The other point is whether to use "St" or "St.". There is no clear consensus that I can see and the variation messes up the automatic sorting for example in one's watchlist. 227:

personal biography about that user) and will never be salvageable, so I figure it's better to tag them and let the user focus on suitable articles that won't ultimately be deleted. What do you think about a newbie editor template for a failed first article, that's much more gentle, because I think you make a good point, but ultimately, not deleting bad articles could easily create a backlog of cleanup tagged articles that really won't ever be suitable. Thanks again! -

1462:

have perceived (rightly or wrongly) an element of aggro in it. But then I stood back and asked myself why I contribute. This is mainly because I enjoy it, especially in reading up and constructing new articles, and, as a side-effect, someone somewhere sometime might find it helpful, useful or interesting. I've experienced enough stress in life that I see no point in getting stressed now about what is, for me, a hobby and a means of keeping the mind active.

503: 2559: 1970: 1112: 1045: 989: 797: 314: 1728:(without changing the infobox, etc). As you have been involved in this article I should be grateful for your opinion on its title. I still think that the original title in this case is OK, but I would not fight strongly (in this case) to maintain it. If we use the "new" title, changes will have to be made to the infobox (I have already dealt with the cats). Best wishes. Peter. 2361:, which closed successfully with unanimous support. I appreciate you taking the time to stop by and vote and I can't wait to learn the new tools and further immerse myself into Knowledge (XXG)! Please don't hesitate to point out any errors I make so I can prevent them from occurring again. I'm always here to help, so if you ever need anything, just let me know. Also, thanks to 621:, there is one template you add to the articles, one template for the nominator, and one for the article creator (if it's different from the nominator). It's rather monotonous, and I'll get to it in a few hours if you don't. Feel free to contact me regarding updates or other admin tasks involving DYK in the future, and thanks again for your last notice. Keep up the good work.- 2044: 2061: 2078:, which closed successfully with 83 supports, 1 oppose, and 0 neutrals. No matter if you voted (I mean, "!voted") support or oppose, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm new, remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them, and if I do anything wrong, feel free to add to the permanent chorus of disapproval on 1951:

linked .. if you get the subtlety. As I understand it the Wiki has litte censorship and it would be censorship I think is we ignore the site ... which appears scholarly without some more evidence. Hope you agree. More than willing to change the url... but if a mistake has been made then surely we shouldn't compound it

1436:. It looks as if nobody ever answered your question about Wikistress. Maybe they did and I just missed it, but I'll nevertheless go ahead and offer my unsolicited advice: I notice we have similar interests -- both like article writing, I've also seen your comments at DYK where we both like to update 2487:

My bad on this call. I am sometimes a little too quick on the speedy deletes when going through the new pages. My nominating record for A7 is pretty good but at least 5% of the time I still mark articles I should have recognised as having potential for development with a little effort. I'm working on

883:

I had decided to call it a day and abandon going for FAC; in fact it's not going to get it this time and I'm not sure I shall bother again. This is mainly because most of the criticisms are of parts of the article I have changed, or actions I have taken, because of peer review and following comments

565:

Grateful for your views on this. PrimeHunter wants to delete it as trivial. He put on a prod notice that I removed. He's a specialist on prime numbers and what is trivial to him is surely not trivial to most people; anyway, if it's so obvious, how come he didn't know it already? I concede that it may

395:

The summary figure is in the Demographics section where it states that "Liberals were the most educated group with 49% being college graduates compared to 26.5% among conservatives." The 26.5% is for all conservatives, not just pro-business conservatives but also social conservatives. Thanks for your

385:

I like that hook a lot more (which probably says something about my political leanings), but I think the data might still a touch unclear -- 49% Liberal vs 46% for the subgroup 'Pro-business Conservatives'. Could the summary figure for all Conservatives be mentioned directly somewhere in the article?

226:

Thanks for the very good advice re: new editors. The only thing is that when I'm patrolling new articles if I go through each users' edit history, it will slow me down quite a bit. On the other hand, there are several new article patrollers. Also, a lot of the articles are patently unsuitable (i.e. a

1581:

Vandal fighting creates high edit counts, but in my experience people value quality more than the sheer weight of numbers that come from automated reversion tools. I'd be happy to nominate you if you wished to try, it isn't really a big deal, so if you think a few more functions would be useful - go

1380:

More changes. Beginning of restructuring. The lead and initial paragraphs comprise a general overview of his life, and then the Gunpowder Plot and later Life sections go into greater detail about the key points of his life. If you have any ideas about how I could better shift and rework the content,

899:

I'm glad the comments on Runcorn were useful. I do think it's worth keeping on trying to get the article to Featured, as it does seem to have a reasonable chance this time and it's among the best of the Cheshire Wikiproject's offerings. I like the images that you've added, they do improve the visual

616:

Thanks for the heads up on the DYK update. I recently went on holiday and I still haven't got back into my editing rhythm. Also, it's around my dinner time so I can't edit as much as I'd like. So, if you have the free time and have the desire to help out, it would be greatly appreciated if you could

2023:

Thanks for the heads up. I've updated and left messages. Thanks for the offer of doing the messages, but it isn't that bad with only 5 hooks, all self-noms. Anyway, as you know, you can come to me whenever for DYK updating. However, with the way things are going with your RfA, you won't need me (or

1505:

Hi Espresso Addict, I've seen you around and noticed your excellent and conscientious contributions, especially at places like AfD. I went through your contributions and my hunch was confirmed that you would be a great candidate for adminship. I'd be happy to nominate you, although I'm not an admin

1480:

And now I accidentally saw this myself. The other thing I mentioned is to work on a great number of different things--something is always working out right. Both these methods I learned in the RW, where my work has always been a matter of maintaining a consistent effort against against indifference

1461:

Eavesdropping on this page I came upon the above message. I must say that I've got a bit screwed up by some (minor) episodes on Knowledge (XXG) — mainly when I have asked for a review, followed the advice given and then being criticised by someone else for doing what was advised, especially when I

1450:

I don't know if that's helpful, but for some reason I found his two sentences deeply reassuring and thought I'd pass it along in hopes that it might help a possibly like-minded Wikipedian. Oh, and p.s., I saw you're interested in getting involved more with Featured Articles or Good Articles. I've

774:

You may find the conditions of this barnstar annoying; feel free ignore it if it cuts into your useful editing time. I got one of these a bit back and haven't paid it yet, but when I couldn't find any barnstars on your page, and saw that you seem to have made quite a few good contributions, both in

1921:

Hi -- Nice article, looks like a fantastic area. I noticed while investigating for DYK that the hook claim "more than California and Washington combined" doesn't actually seem to be covered in the reference? Being in the UK, I don't know anything about reference sources on US Wildlife Reserves and

1364:

Ok then. So it is. This afternoon, I will try and really rework it. Maybe find another source. However, you will find that I did do some changes. Honestly, it has to flow logically, and the flow of the source is really the only proper chronological flow of the life of Tessimond. I do have so ideas

848:

Yeah, I realized that a wee bit too late, but I suspect selecting other hooks will just delay the bias, and they are at least varied (2 bios, one history/folklore and one geo.). Feel free to change them, but I've already started updating talk pages (though not people, so if you want to change, I'd

444:

From the quick search I've just done clicking 'UK pages', I suspect many of the Rev. or Rev hits are in different senses: Rev./Rev can also stand for revolutions or for the gene product Rev, whereas Revd or Rev'd is pretty distinct. Both are certainly correct according to both Oxford and Chambers.

1950:

Hi I saw that the URL was outlawed and I couldn't work out why. I assumed that at some time in the past some enthusiastic person had tried to use wikipedia as part of a marketing campaign. Howeverr wiki has not really blacklisted the site only its url... I think... it has banned its url being hot

918:

Thanks for the sketchmap; it's brilliant and I've no idea how you do clever things like that. I guess it took you all night (and much Espresso). May I make some (constructive) comments? (If it is possible, when you have time, and when you fell like it.) Could the Old Town centre be indicated;

546:

RfA, which failed, with no consensus to promote me. However, I appreciate the concerns raised during the course of the discussion (most notably, a lack of experience, particularly in admin-heavy areas such as XfDs and policy discussions) and will attempt to address these before possibly standing

1699:

about whether the title of articles relating to churches should be of the format "St xxxxx's, Church, Somewhere" or "Church of St xxxxx, Somewhere". The (vast) majority of articles relating to churches, both in Britain and in USA, use the former format. Vox Humana 8' has been busy moving some

2210:

I'm a little concerned that you're extending it to far. As I see it, someone needs to make a reputation, not just publish a certain number of articles, and I think that citations relative to others in the field is a good measure. I can see lowering it to the level of a beginning reputation (eg

580:

if s/he wishes to delete it. This triggers a 5-day debate on whether or not to delete the article in which all community members can participate. If this happens, you can contest deletion by commenting at the specific AfD page (which will be linked from the article page if it is submitted to

633:

I'll give it a go in a minute. Thanks a lot for doing the update; it's frustrating when the suggestions page is bursting with good material that it's not possible to upload directly to the main page without involving an administrator, so your prompt assistance is much appreciated!

1313:

Ok then. I will have another look now, do some shifting. I will give you another shotu when I tihnk I have made some significant changes, and you let me know. Cheers (hey - by the way: you seem to frequent DYK; how many DYKs have you successfully submitted? You could qualify for

652:

Thanks for your comments on Makuleke. If you go to the site and click the refs, you will see that I have added the neccessary licence to the material in question - my article about the Makuleke for Wilderness. The license is longer than the original article but so be it!

1296:

Hi Espresso Addict, thanks for the comment. After you made a comment at DYK, I made some changes and tried to make it more different from the said site. Do you still feel that there is an issue there? If there is, the RFA disregarded, I'd be happy ot take a look. -- --

517:

Thank you for your comments on my recent unsuccsessful rfa, which concluded today with a final tally of 22/15/3. The comments and suggestions from this rfa, combined with the comments left during my first rfa, have given me a good idea of where I need improvement.

2179:

00:06, 21 September 2007 (UTC) PS Has your work in virology given you any hunches regarding the evolution of sexual reproductive systems providing selective advantages wrt disease resistance? What is your personal view on the state of understanding in this area?

2683:

I just came to thank you for your calming and moderating influence at this contentious article. I had no idea that Piotrus was already here. Anyway, thanks a lot. Hopefully, the article will be get enough editors and readers from being featured at the main page.

2385: 2414:

The Barnstar I gave you before was deleted (for good reason) but your fine work was not, so I'm giving you one that is unlikely to ever get removed. I guess I don't check RFA enough, I would have supported you there for sure. Congratulations!

1631:. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so. 1333:

Hey. I have tried to do some re-working of sentence structure. I have only done something fairly quick. Please tell me if you think the problem really does still persist, and I will give it my full attention until you are satisfied. --

754: 1275:

because it was one of the few hooks that could be considered non-Western in some way (it's about the ancient world) - I was aiming for diversity. Do dates trump diversity, because I know the DYK list tries to be as diverse as it can.

928:

Regarding the WikiProject, it does seem to be something of a curate's egg, but if it leads to even a degree of improvement for Cheshire, that must be a good thing. It seems highly unlikely for it to achieve all its "aims", I think.

1655: 145:

Thank you for your comments on my editor review. I appreciate the kind words. Per your remarks, I'll definitely be keeping eye on the peer review and request for feedback pages for opportunities to contribute there. Thanks again!

1839:

Personally I think you are mad! But the wishes are sincere and yes it looks ok to me (some rfas are just weird here). Among other things I'm working on regional photos on Commons so shout if I can help with anything - all the best

281: 257:

which closed successfully. I am honored and truly more than a little humbled by the support of so many members of the community. It's more than a bit of a lift to see comments on my behalf by so many people that I respect.

714:

article and that you have included some material about the church. You will probably realise that I have been writing articles and stubs on the Grade I listed churches in Cheshire — in an attempt to populate the Category of

2510:, which closed at 63 supports and 1 opposed. I appreciate it and hope to do my best. I really liked your comment about my "Prolific, sensible contributions", but you put me to shame! Anyway, I especially want to thank 733:

Sorry I beat you to it (I'm not in any sort of competition). The screen and tympanum sound fascinating, but may be difficult to photograph. I guess you could make an interesting gallery of photos. Good luck. Peter.

261:

I know that it's not easy to !vote neutral on those things, and I respect that you did it with a great deal of consideration. Thank you for that consideration. I'll do my best to not disappoint you or the community. -

1098:

Thanks for correcting the mistakes I made in typing that entry: I was getting pretty tired when i did it, and it showed! Hopefully, I won't make so many so long as I pace myself more. 13:09, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

1169: 2309:

Congratulations too from me! Sorry you did not get a "support" from me but I was away on holiday and by the time I discovered you had been nominated, you'd got it. Hope you will still have time for the

2439:, which passed with 50 supports, 1 neutral, and 1 oppose. My goal is to keep earning your trust every time I grab the "mop". (And I'm always open to constructive criticism and advice!) Again, thanks. -- 1874:

Hello Espresso Addict! How are you? I am RS1900. I looked at your contributions and I think you have done a great job. You created over 100 articles. That's great! I supported your RfA. All the best!

1765:

This might be a bit on the late side, but I noticed your comment on thinking about trying for more more GA/FA articles. This is something I can certainly help with. Did you have any articles in mind?

2232:

Congratulations, I have closed your RfA as successful and you are now a sysop! If you have any questions about adminship, feel free to ask me. Please consider messaging me on IRC for access to the

1932:

Thanks. Somehow the cite for that statistic didn't make it in. I looked at it, and was sure it was on the list. Must have been too late at night or something. I've added it now. It points to

2280:

Woo-hoo! Congratulations, and I hope you won't get too caught up in the dramas of adminship to leave articlespace behind ;) If I can be of any assistance, please feel free to get in touch.

1506:

and haven't nominated before, but I think you'd be great at it. Let me know what you think! :) (p.s.:i accidentally posted this in your talk archive first... i was going through. my bad!)

1781:

Thanks for your support of my article. I only went and di something stupid by adding it back to the DYK suggestions page because I didn't know where it had gone (it's my first time lol)

696:

yesterday? Thanks for your expansion which probably made it viable for Did you know? The "Doom" references are fascinating and I had also overlooked Thornber. Best wishes. Peter.

894:

Thanks! It's in no small part your exertions in creating new Cheshire articles that made me decide it was worth joining, even though I disagree with some of the aims of the project.

411:

That looks good to me, but unfortunately it looks as if another editor doesn't think the new hook is sufficiently neutral! Sorry! You probably need to check out the discussion at

106: 99: 1627: 209: 83:

Thank you for your input at my recent RfA. It unfortunately did not succeed, but I'll try to make improvements on the concerns your brought up. Hope to see you around.

900:

impact, as well as giving more of an idea of what the town is like. Even if it doesn't get it, you have definitely done a great job in producing a very useful article.

1467:

Keep up your own good work. I don't know how you get the energy to do all you do. And especial congratulations on the succession of DYKs you produce. Best wishes.

768:

For making a difference! This Barnstar isn't free, this is a chain barnstar, as payment please give this star to at least 3-5 others with 500+ edits but no barnstar.

543: 1451:

done a handful of each, and if there's any particular projects you'd like to work on I'd be happy to do what I can to help out. Cheers and keep up the good work! --

386:

I might be missing it, but it doesn't seem to be in at the moment. (PS I'll copy this conversation to the Template talk:Did you know page for transparency.) Cheers,

2436: 2357: 1922:

can't find the comparative figures, so I wondered if you would be able to dig out references for them? Alternatively, the hook could perhaps be rephrased. Thanks,

1739: 483:

One of your suggestions sounds good but is significantly over the character limit. I've suggested a pruned version, but I don't know if it fits within the rules.

2071: 938:

Thanks -- largely Photoshop and lots of patience! I have uploaded a revised version now, will put the details on the talk page rather than here, for reference.

2233: 186: 434:

Hi I think using the full Reverend is the normal thing on Knowledge (XXG) anyway. Regarding Revd vs Rev Google hits are 5 vs 65 and Google Books 24 vs 246.

254: 2507: 1429: 1670: 1411: 1997:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1139:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1072:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1016:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 824:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 467: 341:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 689: 113:. I'm not expecting to sway your vote with one more stub, but I wanted you to know that I am taking your views seriously. Thanks for your input! -- 1913: 1796:

Hello -- I note that one of the editors you are coaching is currently at RfA, and wondered if you'd have time to take on another person? Regards,

128: 1725: 723:

which rather cuts across what you're doing, but I think the church merits a separate article. Hope you agree. Please edit it as you see fit.

1721: 1560:

I'd support you if you chose to do this, but being an admin is more work and more hassle, so don't think I'm recommending it from experience!

905:

I can have a go at a sketchmap if you'd like, though it might take a while as it's considerably more complex than anything I've tried before.

2195: 1724:. Vox Humana 8' and I seem to have reached a degree of agreement, but since then s/he has moved "St James' and St Paul's Church, Marton" to 1410:

Hi, due to a spat of recent discussions relating to journals, and a fifth name added to my old proposal, I have moved the proposal page to

872:. It's good to see your name added; you are one of the few who seem to be doing anything much to improve the lot of the Cheshire articles. 1433: 587: 2536:

Ok. The article looks great, lots of references, I think I'll withdraw the AfD (if I can figure out how), as it obviously is notable. --

876: 473:

I would like for this article to put on the DYK but I am having difficulty coming up with a hook that everybody likes. Any suggestions?--

2457: 2290: 1618: 1349:

Haha! No, I hold you in high esteem. You are a regular at DYK. And it was you who raised the issue. So what are your thoughts now? --

2659:

Ah, as long as you are here, could you take a look at the talk page - bottom - we are discussing whether to include or not a link to

577: 2639:

Thank you for your interest in this DYK; I think we have solved the issues of references. Do you think the article is DYKable now?--

2621: 618: 2311: 869: 2488:

this flaw in my judgment. Thanks for catching it and particularly for adding the references, my personal bugbear on WP. Cheers,

566:

not really be by Bell, but surely that's grounds for a rename, not deletion? How do I contest a deletion vote if he moves one?--

2580: 455: 435: 2626: 2471: 720: 1197:

I have fixed the ref problem, and I'd insist on the more recent number, which is less than half a million. See my answer at

599:

It was deleted and I've started a DRV. I know you're not a mathematician, but if you can look at the DRV I'd be grateful.--

365:

Hi, I used the current DYK question because it is the best I could think of. I have, however, revisted the issue. Perhaps,

2091: 1389: 1373: 1357: 1342: 1326: 1305: 415:

and see if you can sort that out, as it's not permitted to load it to DYK until all problems raised have been cleared up.

700: 1512: 2663:. For such a trivial issue it has generated a long thread, and we are deadlocked and could use some outside opinions.-- 1775: 586:

Sorry I can't be of any more specific help, as I'm not a mathematician. You might consider asking at the talk page of

1853:

Meant to say the mention of commons was not a dig at your contribs more an "ask if I can do anything" one! Cheers --

189:. I appreciate the trust you and the WP community have in me; however, this time around things just didn't work out. 2701:

I see you made the comment "Nice article, but is it possible to add an inline citation for the missing article" re.

1902:

I appreciate it. I will also remember in the future if I have more than one source to start doing inline citations.

2606: 1998: 1198: 1140: 1073: 1017: 825: 693: 412: 342: 570: 369:

would be better. Here the data is clear: 26% of conservatives have college degrees, vs. 49% of liberals. Regards,

41: 2481: 2191: 2147: 1443:

So anyways... I've found that for me stress starts to build mostly at contentious places like AFD. I once asked

1165: 559: 30: 17: 2616: 2088: 1705: 1696: 1383: 1367: 1351: 1336: 1320: 1299: 1692:

Hope you have had a good holiday. Mine comes soon!! While you have been away I have been in discussion with

727: 2365:

for nominating me and for guiding many other editors to become admins. Again, thank you and happy editing! --

2702: 2286: 1239: 1067: 2300:

Yes congrats! Don't forget about the little editors like me now that you're a great and powerful admin! --

2183: 2558: 2141: 1969: 1213:

Heyyyyy! Did it expire? Did I fail to do it right? What happened? I can't see it on the nom page anymore.

1111: 1044: 988: 796: 313: 2605:. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 2660: 2565: 2537: 1985: 1149: 1127: 1060: 1011: 1004: 812: 454:

Hi sorry I should have stated the search I did was for "Rev William Gaskell" vs "Revd William Gaskell".

403: 398: 376: 371: 329: 228: 445:

But I'm completely happy to go with 'The Reverend', especially if that's the usual wiki style. Cheers,

352: 45: 2187: 2176: 2114: 2079: 1923: 1797: 1622: 1540: 1258: 939: 906: 838: 635: 591: 576:

If you've contested the prod by removing the tag, then the other editor must take the article to the

484: 446: 416: 387: 295: 171: 69: 2338: 2315: 2269: 1751: 1743: 1729: 1716: 1693: 1468: 964: 930: 885: 735: 724: 697: 525: 474: 213: 194: 122: 1522:

I, too, am impressed by your contributions. Please consider standing for adminship. Best of luck.

93: 2511: 2489: 2465: 2419: 2403: 2281: 2028: 1875: 1281: 819: 779: 625: 367:

Did you know that among Political ideological groups in the U.S., liberals are the most educated?

267: 1164:

Hi there, I was wondering if you wanted to get back into FA reviewing. I've put the article on

2670: 2646: 2241: 1903: 1893: 1738:

Welcome back; your support is always appreciated. In fact the question has been asked before

1245:

I found 2 citations but if you want to add it back without directly alluding to names such as

1225: 1214: 1202: 1134: 668: 549: 294:

I found myself changing my mind as I read the article, and couldn't withstand the silly joke.

116: 719:, as requested (and I'm interested in churches). My last effort has been a short article on 105:

Hi, I just wanted to let you know I was inspired by comments made by you and a few others at

2706: 2494: 2440: 2366: 2347: 1952: 1889: 1782: 1742:

and it received absolutely zero response (the user raising it had also been messed about by

1523: 1510: 147: 2709: 2688: 2677: 2653: 2629: 2544: 2526: 2496: 2475: 2443: 2422: 2406: 2369: 2341: 2318: 2304: 2295: 2274: 2255: 2245: 2222: 2199: 2125: 2030: 2013: 1955: 1940: 1926: 1906: 1896: 1878: 1861: 1848: 1833: 1810: 1800: 1785: 1769: 1754: 1747: 1732: 1678: 1639: 1603: 1586: 1564: 1543: 1526: 1514: 1492: 1471: 1455: 1418: 1391: 1375: 1359: 1344: 1328: 1315: 1307: 1286: 1261: 1230: 1219: 1207: 1186: 1176: 1154: 1086: 1030: 967: 942: 933: 909: 888: 853: 782: 738: 678: 662: 638: 627: 603: 594: 553: 529: 487: 477: 458: 449: 438: 419: 406: 390: 379: 355: 298: 288: 270: 243: 216: 198: 174: 164: 150: 135: 72: 62: 48: 2519: 2252: 2106: 2083: 1854: 1841: 1826: 1766: 1636: 1612: 1600: 1583: 1561: 1183: 1173: 659: 502: 336: 161: 59: 2362: 2334: 2262: 1992: 1807: 1709: 521: 190: 2461: 2416: 2400: 2301: 2218: 2025: 1701: 1488: 1452: 1277: 1272: 776: 622: 600: 567: 263: 44:- I've taken on board your comments, so thank you for taking the time to contribute. 1933: 1625:

to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at

2666: 2642: 2570: 2523: 2237: 1976: 1937: 1250: 1182:

I'm very grateful for that excellent copy-edit. Absolutely superb work. Thank you.

960: 850: 835: 675: 285: 859:

Oops, sorry about that comment then. I hadn't noticed. 23:24, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

542:

Thank you for taking the time to add your thoughts to the discussion at my recent

2384: 2009: 1822: 1675: 1507: 1415: 2685: 2251:

Congratulations! Now pick up your mop and bucket and get ready for the abuse.

880: 1936:. Look on page 6 (of 13)—at the bottom of the "Did You Know?" :-) Thanks, — 1700:

Cheshire churches from the former to the latter. Comments have been made by

2602: 2043: 1118: 1051: 995: 803: 85: 1673:, which ended with 60 supports, no opposes, no neutrals, and one abstain. 753: 282:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Schrödinger's cat in popular culture

2515: 2213: 1483: 1444: 1253:.Also added an academic book to cite all generally known facts about the 1092: 1083: 1027: 711: 2060: 68:

Thanks, Tim! I hope I can deal with the stress better this time around.

1654: 1437: 1428:

I happened to be prowling around Knowledge (XXG) and I stumbled across

320: 1168:

up as a FAC nomination. Any comments or suggestions you might have at

109:

to contribute what I hope is useful article content. I talk about it

2453: 1414:

to kick off a more central discussion. The wait is finally over :-)

1170:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/Oxidative phosphorylation

2705:

on DYK noms ... bit confused as its bristling with inline citations

29:

This is an archive of past discussions. Current discussions are at

2574: 1980: 1122: 1055: 999: 807: 324: 212:. I appreciate the trust you and the WP community have in me. 1254: 1806:

I'm sorry, but no. If something changes I'll let you know. --

1247:

that people allegedly involved are now backing the government

775:

the mainspace and wikipediaspace, I thought you deserve it.

2175:, I'm signing up at WikiProject Academic Journals. Cheers. 2024:

any other admin) for much longer. How exciting. Good luck.-

959:

Brilliant again! I like it as it is — see my comments on

875:

Also thanks for your helpful and constructive comments on

849:

leave it to you b/c I was going to get off the computer).

1821:

And in case you are puzzled you may remember me another

1199:

Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created_on_August_21

617:

work on the Credit templates from the last update. See

110: 2333:

Is there a reason I'm not on the "Current" RfAs list?

1628:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Espresso Addict

1615:

would like to nominate you to become an administrator.

413:

Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created_on_July_24

40:

Just a quick note to thank you for contributing to my

2698:

Hi EA - seen the tag,but I don't think we've spoken.

2399:

For consistently good work all over Knowledge (XXG).

2449:

Hey, you should comment on this, given yer name.....

877:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/Runcorn

590:, where you might find a suitable expert. Regards, 544:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Angus Lepper

710:I see that you have been working recently on the 1934:http://library.fws.gov/Refuges/oregoncoast00.pdf 1892:article getting a DYK! I greatly appreciate it! 160:I've left some comments at your editor review. 2167:Thanks from the Israel Exploration Journal guy 1430:Knowledge (XXG):Editor review/Espresso Addict2 1224:Oh! Sorry. I discovered the update page. Wow! 185:Thank you for your support in my unsuccessful 2146:'s RFA Thanks, which in turn was inspired by 1412:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Academic Journals 879:. After the rather aggressive comments from 222:AfD nominations for articles from new editors 8: 1750:does not help; it says both are OK. Cheers. 1539:Yeah why not ? You seem to have it together 208:Thank you for your support in my successful 1635:Gender corrected. The things you learn.... 1621:to see what this process entails, and then 683: 2553: 1964: 1271:I do have one question about DYK. I added 1106: 1039: 983: 791: 308: 2382: 1989:was updated with a fact from the article 1652: 1131:was updated with a fact from the article 1064:was updated with a fact from the article 1008:was updated with a fact from the article 816:was updated with a fact from the article 619:Template:Did you know/Next update#Credits 500: 468:Duncan Hunter presidential campaign, 2008 333:was updated with a fact from the article 674:Hi I fixed it I hope its well thanks. -- 1914:Oregon Islands National Wildlife Refuge 1434:Knowledge (XXG):Admin_coaching/Requests 2667:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 2643:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 2601:, was featured in that section on the 1726:Church of St James and St Paul, Marton 1619:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship 751: 690:St James' and St Paul's Church, Marton 684:St James' and St Paul's Church, Marton 2314:; it needs you. Best wishes. Peter. 7: 2532:RE: Action Research (charity) at AfD 2355:Thank you for your participation in 2312:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Cheshire 2070:Thank you for your participation in 1172:would be very welcome. All the best 717:Grade I listed buildings in Cheshire 558: 84: 2105: 1671:my successful request for adminship 2036:The now-traditional RFA thank-spam 1381:I w0ould be most appreciative. -- 24: 2171:Thanks for keeping the stub, and 1776:The Encyclopædia of Ball Juggling 1669:I thank you for participating in 762:The Chain Barnstar of Recognition 2557: 2383: 2261:Well done, and congratulations! 2059: 2042: 1968: 1653: 1432:and from there saw your post at 1110: 1043: 987: 963:. Many thanks, again. Peter. 795: 752: 705: 692:appeared on the main page under 501: 312: 2581:Electricity sector in Argentina 2116: 2110: 2107: 253:Thank you for participating in 2710:19:28, 30 September 2007 (UTC) 2689:04:30, 30 September 2007 (UTC) 2678:03:34, 30 September 2007 (UTC) 2654:03:05, 30 September 2007 (UTC) 2630:00:37, 29 September 2007 (UTC) 2587:wrote or substantially updated 2545:20:37, 28 September 2007 (UTC) 2527:13:20, 28 September 2007 (UTC) 2497:15:42, 26 September 2007 (UTC) 2476:23:43, 25 September 2007 (UTC) 2444:15:30, 25 September 2007 (UTC) 2423:17:48, 24 September 2007 (UTC) 2407:17:48, 24 September 2007 (UTC) 2370:07:04, 24 September 2007 (UTC) 2342:16:13, 23 September 2007 (UTC) 2319:10:28, 24 September 2007 (UTC) 2305:03:29, 24 September 2007 (UTC) 2296:15:59, 23 September 2007 (UTC) 2275:14:33, 23 September 2007 (UTC) 2256:13:44, 23 September 2007 (UTC) 2246:09:05, 23 September 2007 (UTC) 2223:07:28, 23 September 2007 (UTC) 2200:00:11, 21 September 2007 (UTC) 2126:20:50, 20 September 2007 (UTC) 2053:Click there to open your card! 2031:02:05, 20 September 2007 (UTC) 2014:13:40, 19 September 2007 (UTC) 1956:07:33, 19 September 2007 (UTC) 1941:02:30, 19 September 2007 (UTC) 1927:01:57, 19 September 2007 (UTC) 1907:01:27, 19 September 2007 (UTC) 1897:00:46, 19 September 2007 (UTC) 1879:10:15, 17 September 2007 (UTC) 1862:17:09, 17 September 2007 (UTC) 1849:16:05, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 1834:08:59, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 1811:13:27, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 1801:20:33, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 1786:01:03, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 1770:00:38, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 1761:Comment on admin coaching page 1755:16:24, 10 September 2007 (UTC) 1640:04:05, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 1604:03:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 1587:00:20, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 1565:23:57, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 1493:02:47, 20 September 2007 (UTC) 547:again in several months time. 361:Political ideologies in the US 1: 2148: 1733:20:14, 8 September 2007 (UTC) 1679:14:41, 7 September 2007 (UTC) 1599:Stay on line, back in a min. 721:St Michael's Church, Baddiley 706:St Michael's Church, Baddiley 129: 123: 117: 58:Good to see you. All my best 1888:Thanks for your help on the 2518:for the encouragement, and 1544:22:31, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 1527:02:16, 30 August 2007 (UTC) 1515:19:39, 29 August 2007 (UTC) 1472:12:11, 25 August 2007 (UTC) 1456:05:28, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 1419:15:27, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 1392:10:31, 30 August 2007 (UTC) 1376:03:31, 30 August 2007 (UTC) 1360:21:26, 28 August 2007 (UTC) 1345:14:23, 28 August 2007 (UTC) 1329:13:54, 28 August 2007 (UTC) 1308:13:18, 28 August 2007 (UTC) 1287:15:43, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 1262:13:41, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 1231:16:21, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 1220:16:19, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 1208:13:23, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 1187:15:28, 29 August 2007 (UTC) 1177:20:27, 25 August 2007 (UTC) 1155:19:36, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 1087:23:31, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 1031:03:16, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 968:08:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 943:00:19, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 934:08:01, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 910:22:32, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 889:21:23, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 854:23:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 839:02:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 560:Bell's prime number theorem 2725: 2577:, a fact from the article 783:17:40, 7 August 2007 (UTC) 739:17:22, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 728:15:34, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 701:08:27, 3 August 2007 (UTC) 679:08:08, 3 August 2007 (UTC) 663:05:09, 2 August 2007 (UTC) 604:08:24, 5 August 2007 (UTC) 456:Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 436:Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 2482:Little Angels (TV series) 2389: 1659: 1406:Academic Journals project 1166:Oxidative phosphorylation 758: 639:00:07, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 628:23:59, 30 July 2007 (UTC) 595:22:00, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 571:21:16, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 554:16:09, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 530:05:33, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 507: 488:12:13, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 478:01:50, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 459:13:11, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 450:21:05, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 439:20:52, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 420:21:43, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 407:21:24, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 391:18:06, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 380:17:44, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 356:16:39, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 299:22:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 289:22:38, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 280:I loved your comments at 271:06:50, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 244:17:20, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 217:22:00, 16 July 2007 (UTC) 199:21:50, 16 July 2007 (UTC) 175:19:09, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 165:18:14, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 151:16:58, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 136:03:17, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 73:13:06, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 31:User talk:Espresso Addict 18:User talk:Espresso Addict 2104: 2101: 2064: 94:15:42, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 63:17:21, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 49:15:53, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 2703:Samuel Iperusz Wiselius 2607:Did you know? talk page 2435:for your support in my 2228:Your RFA was successful 1999:Did you know? talk page 1240:Sooriyakanda mass grave 1141:Did you know? talk page 1074:Did you know? talk page 1068:John Partridge (artist) 1018:Did you know? talk page 826:Did you know? talk page 788:DYK - Churche's Mansion 787: 588:WikiProject Mathematics 343:Did you know? talk page 2506:Thanks for supporting 2236:channel. Good luck! -- 2206:criteria for academics 2151:Phaedriel's RFA thanks 1292:Hey - the RFA aside... 1257:insurrection. Thanks 864:Cheshire & Runcorn 656:Thanks for your help! 2661:Soviet historiography 2585:, which you recently 2437:Request for Adminship 2393:The Original Barnstar 2067:Dear Espresso Addict, 1012:Eleanor Davies-Colley 170:Many thanks, Walton. 2617:Jeffrey O. Gustafson 2514:for the nomination, 2376:Replacement barnstar 2234:#wikipedia-en-admins 2138:brazenly stolen from 2082:. Special thanks to 1884:Thanks for your help 1365:though... Cheers -- 1249:is also appropriate 870:WikiProject Cheshire 688:Did you notice that 78: 2635:Adam Lazarowicz DYK 2540:θnce θn this island 1481:and a bureaucracy. 1385:Anonymous Dissident 1369:Anonymous Dissident 1353:Anonymous Dissident 1338:Anonymous Dissident 1322:Anonymous Dissident 1301:Anonymous Dissident 648:copyright violation 2522:for welcoming me. 2372: 2160: 2159: 2097:for nominating me. 2048: 1744:User:Vox Humana 8' 1694:User:Vox Humana 8' 1688:Titles of churches 1623:contact TimVickers 1388: 1372: 1356: 1341: 1325: 1304: 2613: 2612: 2508:my successful RfA 2412: 2411: 2354: 2294: 2244: 2202: 2186:comment added by 2157: 2143:Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor 2128: 2121: 2103: 2054: 2040: 2005: 2004: 1916:suggestion at DYK 1685: 1684: 1382: 1366: 1350: 1335: 1319: 1298: 1284: 1147: 1146: 1135:Richard Partridge 1080: 1079: 1024: 1023: 832: 831: 820:Churche's Mansion 772: 771: 669:Jacques de Morgan 535: 534: 349: 348: 2716: 2675: 2673: 2651: 2649: 2569:was updated. On 2561: 2554: 2542: 2387: 2380: 2379: 2284: 2272: 2267: 2266: 2240: 2181: 2154: 2144: 2136:This design was 2135: 2124: 2123: 2120: 2115: 2112: 2109: 2102: 2099: 2063: 2052: 2046: 1972: 1965: 1890:Alexandru Papana 1857: 1844: 1829: 1719: 1714: 1713: 1704:on my talk page 1657: 1650: 1649: 1386: 1370: 1354: 1339: 1323: 1302: 1282: 1228: 1217: 1205: 1152: 1114: 1107: 1047: 1040: 991: 984: 799: 792: 756: 749: 748: 505: 498: 497: 401: 374: 316: 309: 241: 236: 233: 133: 131: 125: 119: 92: 90: 2724: 2723: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2696: 2676: 2671: 2665: 2652: 2647: 2641: 2637: 2552: 2538: 2534: 2504: 2485: 2451: 2430: 2428:Fabrictramp RFA 2378: 2373: 2352: 2331: 2270: 2264: 2263: 2230: 2208: 2188:Alastair Haines 2177:Alastair Haines 2169: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2142: 2133: 2056: 2047: 2038: 2021: 1963: 1948: 1946:Blacklisted URL 1924:Espresso Addict 1918: 1886: 1872: 1855: 1842: 1827: 1819: 1798:Espresso Addict 1794: 1792:Admin coaching? 1779: 1763: 1717: 1711: 1710: 1690: 1648: 1632: 1503: 1426: 1416:John Vandenberg 1408: 1384: 1368: 1352: 1337: 1321: 1300: 1294: 1269: 1243: 1226: 1215: 1203: 1195: 1162: 1150: 1105: 1103:DYK (24 August) 1096: 1038: 982: 940:Espresso Addict 907:Espresso Addict 866: 846: 790: 747: 708: 686: 672: 650: 636:Espresso Addict 614: 592:Espresso Addict 563: 540: 496: 485:Espresso Addict 471: 447:Espresso Addict 432: 417:Espresso Addict 399: 396:help! Regards, 388:Espresso Addict 372: 363: 337:William Gaskell 307: 296:Espresso Addict 278: 251: 237: 234: 229: 224: 206: 183: 172:Espresso Addict 158: 143: 115: 103: 86: 81: 79:My (Kwsn's) RfA 70:Espresso Addict 56: 38: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2722: 2720: 2695: 2692: 2681: 2680: 2664: 2640: 2636: 2633: 2611: 2610: 2562: 2551: 2548: 2533: 2530: 2503: 2500: 2484: 2479: 2450: 2447: 2429: 2426: 2410: 2409: 2396: 2395: 2390: 2388: 2377: 2374: 2353: 2351: 2345: 2330: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2316:Peter I. Vardy 2259: 2258: 2229: 2226: 2207: 2204: 2168: 2165: 2132: 2129: 2098: 2069: 2068: 2066: 2065: 2057: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2041: 2039: 2037: 2034: 2020: 2017: 2003: 2002: 1993:Berlie Doherty 1973: 1962: 1959: 1947: 1944: 1930: 1929: 1917: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1885: 1882: 1871: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1818: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1793: 1790: 1778: 1773: 1762: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1752:Peter I. Vardy 1730:Peter I. Vardy 1689: 1686: 1683: 1682: 1666: 1665: 1660: 1658: 1647: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1502: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1475: 1474: 1469:Peter I. Vardy 1464: 1463: 1425: 1422: 1407: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1293: 1290: 1268: 1265: 1242: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1194: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1161: 1158: 1145: 1144: 1115: 1104: 1101: 1095: 1090: 1078: 1077: 1048: 1037: 1034: 1022: 1021: 992: 981: 978: 977: 976: 975: 974: 973: 972: 971: 970: 965:Peter I. Vardy 950: 949: 948: 947: 946: 945: 931:Peter I. Vardy 923: 922: 921: 920: 913: 912: 902: 901: 896: 895: 886:Peter I. Vardy 865: 862: 861: 860: 845: 842: 830: 829: 800: 789: 786: 770: 769: 765: 764: 759: 757: 746: 745:Chain barnstar 743: 742: 741: 736:Peter I. Vardy 725:Peter I. Vardy 707: 704: 698:Peter I. Vardy 685: 682: 671: 666: 649: 646: 644: 642: 641: 613: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 583: 582: 562: 557: 539: 536: 533: 532: 519: 514: 513: 508: 506: 495: 492: 491: 490: 475:Southern Texas 470: 465: 464: 463: 462: 461: 431: 428: 427: 426: 425: 424: 423: 422: 362: 359: 347: 346: 317: 306: 303: 302: 301: 277: 274: 250: 247: 223: 220: 214:Carlossuarez46 205: 202: 182: 179: 178: 177: 157: 154: 142: 139: 102: 97: 80: 77: 76: 75: 55: 52: 37: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2721: 2712: 2711: 2708: 2704: 2699: 2693: 2691: 2690: 2687: 2679: 2674: 2668: 2662: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2650: 2644: 2634: 2632: 2631: 2628: 2624: 2623: 2618: 2608: 2604: 2600: 2598: 2592: 2588: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2576: 2572: 2568: 2567: 2566:Did you know? 2563: 2560: 2556: 2555: 2549: 2547: 2546: 2543: 2541: 2531: 2529: 2528: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2501: 2499: 2498: 2495: 2493: 2492: 2483: 2480: 2478: 2477: 2473: 2470: 2467: 2463: 2459: 2455: 2448: 2446: 2445: 2442: 2438: 2434: 2427: 2425: 2424: 2421: 2418: 2408: 2405: 2402: 2398: 2397: 2394: 2391: 2386: 2381: 2375: 2371: 2368: 2364: 2360: 2359: 2349: 2346: 2344: 2343: 2340: 2336: 2328: 2320: 2317: 2313: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2303: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2292: 2288: 2283: 2282:Fvasconcellos 2279: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2273: 2268: 2257: 2254: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2243: 2239: 2235: 2227: 2225: 2224: 2220: 2216: 2215: 2205: 2203: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2178: 2174: 2166: 2158: 2155: 2153: 2152: 2145: 2139: 2130: 2127: 2122: 2119: 2118:(talk to me!) 2113: 2100: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2090: 2085: 2081: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2062: 2045: 2035: 2033: 2032: 2029: 2027: 2018: 2016: 2015: 2012: 2011: 2000: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1988: 1987: 1986:Did you know? 1982: 1978: 1974: 1971: 1967: 1966: 1960: 1958: 1957: 1954: 1945: 1943: 1942: 1939: 1935: 1928: 1925: 1920: 1919: 1915: 1912: 1908: 1905: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1895: 1891: 1883: 1881: 1880: 1877: 1869: 1863: 1860: 1858: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1847: 1845: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1832: 1830: 1824: 1816: 1812: 1809: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1799: 1791: 1789: 1787: 1784: 1777: 1774: 1772: 1771: 1768: 1760: 1756: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1720: 1715: 1707: 1703: 1702:User:Carbonix 1698: 1695: 1687: 1681: 1680: 1677: 1672: 1668: 1667: 1664: 1661: 1656: 1651: 1645: 1641: 1638: 1634: 1633: 1630: 1629: 1624: 1620: 1617:Please visit 1616: 1614: 1605: 1602: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1588: 1585: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1566: 1563: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1545: 1542: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1528: 1525: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1513: 1511: 1509: 1500: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1485: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1473: 1470: 1466: 1465: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1454: 1448: 1446: 1441: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1424:On Wikistress 1423: 1421: 1420: 1417: 1413: 1405: 1393: 1390: 1387: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1374: 1371: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1358: 1355: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1343: 1340: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1327: 1324: 1317: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1306: 1303: 1291: 1289: 1288: 1285: 1279: 1274: 1273:Wicked Priest 1266: 1264: 1263: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1241: 1238: 1232: 1229: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1218: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1206: 1200: 1192: 1188: 1185: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1159: 1157: 1156: 1153: 1142: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1130: 1129: 1128:Did you know? 1124: 1120: 1116: 1113: 1109: 1108: 1102: 1100: 1094: 1091: 1089: 1088: 1085: 1075: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1063: 1062: 1061:Did you know? 1057: 1053: 1049: 1046: 1042: 1041: 1035: 1033: 1032: 1029: 1019: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1007: 1006: 1005:Did you know? 1001: 997: 993: 990: 986: 985: 979: 969: 966: 962: 958: 957: 956: 955: 954: 953: 952: 951: 944: 941: 937: 936: 935: 932: 927: 926: 925: 924: 917: 916: 915: 914: 911: 908: 904: 903: 898: 897: 893: 892: 891: 890: 887: 882: 878: 873: 871: 863: 858: 857: 856: 855: 852: 843: 841: 840: 837: 827: 823: 822: 821: 815: 814: 813:Did you know? 809: 805: 801: 798: 794: 793: 785: 784: 781: 778: 767: 766: 763: 760: 755: 750: 744: 740: 737: 732: 731: 730: 729: 726: 722: 718: 713: 703: 702: 699: 695: 694:Did you know? 691: 681: 680: 677: 670: 667: 665: 664: 661: 657: 654: 647: 645: 640: 637: 632: 631: 630: 629: 626: 624: 620: 611: 605: 602: 598: 597: 596: 593: 589: 585: 584: 579: 575: 574: 573: 572: 569: 561: 556: 555: 552: 551: 545: 537: 531: 527: 523: 516: 515: 512: 509: 504: 499: 493: 489: 486: 482: 481: 480: 479: 476: 469: 466: 460: 457: 453: 452: 451: 448: 443: 442: 441: 440: 437: 429: 421: 418: 414: 410: 409: 408: 405: 404: 402: 394: 393: 392: 389: 384: 383: 382: 381: 378: 377: 375: 368: 360: 358: 357: 354: 344: 340: 339: 338: 332: 331: 330:Did you know? 326: 322: 318: 315: 311: 310: 304: 300: 297: 293: 292: 291: 290: 287: 283: 275: 273: 272: 269: 265: 259: 256: 248: 246: 245: 242: 240: 232: 221: 219: 218: 215: 211: 203: 201: 200: 196: 192: 188: 180: 176: 173: 169: 168: 167: 166: 163: 156:Editor review 155: 153: 152: 149: 140: 138: 137: 134: 132: 126: 120: 112: 108: 101: 98: 96: 95: 91: 89: 74: 71: 67: 66: 65: 64: 61: 53: 51: 50: 47: 46:Giles Bennett 43: 42:editor review 35: 33: 32: 28: 19: 2700: 2697: 2682: 2638: 2620: 2614: 2596: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2579: 2578: 2571:28 September 2564: 2550:DYK ... hook 2539: 2535: 2505: 2490: 2486: 2468: 2460:...cheers, 2452: 2432: 2431: 2413: 2392: 2356: 2332: 2329:RfA question 2260: 2231: 2212: 2209: 2172: 2170: 2150: 2149: 2140:inspired by 2137: 2134: 2117: 2092: 2087: 2080:my talk page 2073: 2072: 2058: 2022: 2008: 2006: 1991: 1990: 1984: 1977:19 September 1961:Did you know 1949: 1931: 1887: 1873: 1859: 1846: 1831: 1825:! Cheers -- 1820: 1795: 1788:Icosahedron 1780: 1764: 1691: 1674: 1662: 1626: 1611: 1504: 1482: 1449: 1442: 1427: 1409: 1295: 1270: 1246: 1244: 1196: 1163: 1148: 1133: 1132: 1126: 1097: 1081: 1066: 1065: 1059: 1025: 1010: 1009: 1003: 961:Talk:Runcorn 874: 867: 847: 833: 818: 817: 811: 773: 761: 716: 709: 687: 673: 658: 655: 651: 643: 615: 564: 550:Angus Lepper 548: 541: 510: 472: 433: 397: 370: 366: 364: 350: 335: 334: 328: 279: 260: 252: 238: 230: 225: 207: 184: 159: 144: 114: 104: 87: 82: 57: 39: 26: 25: 2707:Victuallers 2441:Fabrictramp 2367:Nehrams2020 2348:Nehrams2020 2253:Tim Vickers 2182:—Preceding 2019:DYK updated 1953:Victuallers 1783:Icosahedron 1767:Tim Vickers 1637:Tim Vickers 1601:Tim Vickers 1584:Tim Vickers 1562:Tim Vickers 1524:Majoreditor 1184:Tim Vickers 1174:Tim Vickers 868:Welcome to 578:AfD process 148:Chunky Rice 60:Tim Vickers 2627:<*: --> 2595:WROTE THE 2520:Jokestress 2350:RfA Thanks 2339:Talk to me 2265:DDStretch 2089:Dihydrogen 1712:DDStretch 1613:TimVickers 1541:Taprobanus 1259:Taprobanus 1201:. Cheers. 660:Profberger 612:DYK update 2603:Main Page 2591:nominated 2456:is up at 2433:Thank you 2417:Rigadoun 2401:Rigadoun 2363:Wizardman 2335:Lazylaces 1817:Good luck 1808:Fang Aili 1708:, and by 1119:24 August 1052:23 August 996:23 August 804:10 August 777:Rigadoun 538:Thank you 522:TomStar81 511:Thank you 494:Thank you 400:Signature 373:Signature 191:TomStar81 124:seriously 36:Thank you 2622:Shazaam! 2472:contribs 2462:Casliber 2302:JayHenry 2196:contribs 2184:unsigned 2093:Monoxide 2026:Andrew c 1582:for it. 1453:JayHenry 1445:User:DGG 1318:...) -- 1278:Awadewit 1251:See here 1193:Sholakia 1160:Hi there 1093:Brereton 844:DYK bias 712:Baddiley 623:Andrew c 601:Bedivere 568:Bedivere 264:Philippe 54:Hi there 2524:Bearian 2238:Deskana 2131:Credits 1938:EncMstr 1646:Thanks! 1438:T:DYK/N 851:Circeus 836:Circeus 676:Vonones 430:Gaskell 353:W.marsh 321:27 July 286:Bearian 2593:, uh, 2512:Shalom 2502:My AfD 2454:Coffee 2420:(talk) 2404:(talk) 2358:my RfA 2271:(talk) 2242:(talk) 2084:Walton 2074:my RFA 2010:Allen3 1876:RS1900 1870:RS1900 1748:WP:ABB 1718:(talk) 1676:Edison 1663:My RFA 1508:Eliz81 1501:Admin? 1227:Aditya 1216:Aditya 1204:Aditya 780:(talk) 255:My RfA 249:My RfA 204:My RfA 181:My RfA 162:Walton 141:Thanks 107:my RfA 100:My RfA 2686:Irpen 2672:talk 2648:talk 2589:, uh 2111:scent 2108:iride 2055:→ → → 1904:Chris 1894:Chris 1856:Herby 1843:Herby 1828:Herby 1151:Laïka 581:AfD). 231:super 130:folks 27:Note: 16:< 2599:FOR! 2597:HOOK 2575:2007 2466:talk 2219:talk 2192:talk 2086:and 1981:2007 1740:here 1722:here 1706:here 1697:here 1489:talk 1316:this 1283:talk 1123:2007 1084:Peta 1056:2007 1028:Peta 1000:2007 881:Tony 808:2007 526:Talk 325:2007 268:Talk 195:Talk 111:here 88:Kwsn 2694:DYK 2516:DGG 2491:Pig 2458:FAC 2214:DGG 2173:yes 1975:On 1823:way 1484:DGG 1267:DYK 1255:JVP 1117:On 1050:On 1036:DYK 994:On 980:DYK 802:On 319:On 305:DYK 276:AfD 239:cat 235:βεε 210:RfA 187:RfA 118:But 2684:-- 2625:- 2619:- 2615:-- 2609:. 2573:, 2474:) 2221:) 2198:) 2194:• 2007:-- 2001:. 1983:, 1979:, 1840:-- 1491:) 1440:. 1280:| 1143:. 1125:, 1121:, 1082:-- 1076:. 1058:, 1054:, 1026:-- 1020:. 1002:, 998:, 834:-- 828:. 810:, 806:, 528:) 351:-- 345:. 327:, 323:, 284:. 266:| 197:) 2669:| 2645:| 2469:· 2464:( 2337:( 2293:) 2291:c 2289:· 2287:t 2285:( 2217:( 2190:( 2156:. 1487:( 524:( 520:— 193:( 146:- 127:| 121:|

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index