User talk:Evansjack1 - Knowledge (XXG)

1645:

their own merits absent really compelling (i.e. well nigh inescapable) evidence that they're advancing some unstated agenda. Largo is correct, further, to press the point that this episode may be a bigger deal than you portray (or even as Anthony and I have described it) - he has supplied another reliable source, and more context, and is in my view advancing the debate even as he slows resolution. Anthony, Largo and I are all arrayed along a continuum, and not really that far apart when you come down to it. (Largo has not complained about any of the other edits up to this point.) In the larger context of the way Knowledge (XXG) operates, this is a legitimate discussion. For my part, I'm still right where I said I was - content to remove this one bit, in light of the other edits to the article - but Largo has every right to be heard, and to have his concerns assuaged (if possible). If finally he is unconvinced, but the decision is made to remove the material anyhow, it will go down a lot more easily for him if he knows that all points of view were aired. (I know this from having been on the losing end of lots of discussions!)

1478:

point I was making earlier, which is that this was, however briefly, a legitimate area of concern (vs some of that City Paper nonsense); and, the fact that you believe you can explain or justify it, and that no one went to jail, does not make it a nullity. Ancient history is still history. Really the only issue is whether it is appropriate to include it in this article. I have said all along that it is, but, with the article now stripped down to essentials, I am content to let it go, but really only because the article is now as slender as it is (and I suppose so this can be laid to rest). Perhaps as Anthony suggested at the article Talk page, we should ask for additional eyes from the BLP project. As for your preferences - if you're editing off an iPad, you may be dealing with the mobile app, which omits all of that. Go to the bottom of any page and look for the option to select the Desktop version. You should see all the prefs etc. (in now pretty small type) at the top of any page, so long as you're logged in.

1565:

it. Secondly, you are dead wrong. The Washington post acknowledges in their article that it was 13 per cent of the total over 22 years. But more importantly for everyone, since the bio is so short, is the constituent services fund purchase of sports tickets the main issue that defines my 23 years of service. Bond ratings, financial recovery, bring baseball back, etc. this is why I don't want any part of Knowledge (XXG). So my suggestion is to delete the constituent services paragraph or add back the mayor Williams stuff and the tax parity act. Just please make it balanced. As for largo, I am very suspicious given my experience with Knowledge (XXG). Anthony and John have been fair. If largo wants to identify himself or herself, I may be less suspicious. Thank you all for your involvement. Now let's settle this one way or the other.

1092:

was nothing there. Your reference makes it seem like it was a big issue. Let me say this. When i looked at this page on vacation last week I was astonished. I always thought Knowledge (XXG) was an encyclopedia. In my case it had become a gossip column In essence every snarky city paper mention ended up on my page. I never delt with Knowledge (XXG) before and it has been a challenge as you have seen. I do appreciate all you have done. But at the same time, how did you let it get so bad. You all have set yourselves up as the guardians of the word. Yet you get annoyed when someone like myself points out such gross misuse. In any event, it has been a learning event for me. I would appreciate your addressing the last 2 issues not to placate me but to remain true to your mission of being an encyclopedia and not a gossip page. Thanks

3306:— I just saw this. I think agreeing not to edit war and not to edit your article directly are pretty reasonable conditions for unblock; I just wanted to ask one other thing: I see that twice now you've edited this page without logging in. If that's because you are worried you can't edit it because you're blocked, that's not the case—blocked users are still allowed to edit their own user talk pages so they can request unblock. I notice you've also edited without logging in a fair amount in the past—I'm not sure if this is because of technical difficulties or intentional, but would you consider it reasonable to include an agreement to only edit when you're logged in to this account as a part of your unblock conditions? 1402:

to clean an article up, further mischief is usually noticed very quickly. If in the future you see something that troubles you, Jack, the very best thing would be to raise the issue on the article Talk page rather than take things into your own hands - I emphasize that there is almost a presumption against changes made by persons who are editing an article about themselves. And with me, and probably Anthony too, keeping an eye on things here, matters are unlikely to get far out of hand going forward. I would also like to encourage you to find things on Knowledge (XXG) that might interest you for editing, or cleaning up; it's a good way to learn the rules of the road.

1224:

deleting the sentence as johnindc advocates would be great. Also, please read the wash post article on the constituent services fund sports tickets. The statement in my bio is just wrong. The amounts mentioned only cover the past 10 years. The posting says 22 years. When you go back 22 years sports tickets are only 13 per cent of the spending. That is why the article got no attention. Whoever posted it selectively took information to embarrass me during the election. Again thanks for you help. I think I finally have mastered this. And johnindc thanks for the link. I can finally find these things. Finally, I can't find the 4 Tilden on my I pad. Where do I look?

1100:), the concerns were taken up quickly. (it's a common thing for the subjects of articles to try to spin things in a way that favors them and, while your concerns were bona fide and correct, when editors are confronted with a contentious editor with COI issues, they tend at first not to look beyond the COI and behavioral issues.) To be clear, I am explaining, not blaming, and how things came to this place is all water under the bridge. As for the substantive issues, discussion continues on the article Talk page and eventually the editors (who I think it's clear have no particular interest in besmirching your reputation) will arrive at a consensus. 3032:

to fix my page. I’m not asking for special treatment, just fairness. Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia not a gossip page. So make it so. When you read John McCain’s introduction it doesn’t say he ran for president twice and lost. Just a small example. I respectfully ask all of you to use your best judgment. Ignore Band because we know where he/ she is coming from. It appears I’m done. And frankly, I have done all I can over the last 4 years. It’s now up to you. But as a layman to Knowledge (XXG), it is difficult to operate. Thanks for all you do. Signing off. Jack

1549:"And I have never tried. To obscure that we purchase tickets for constituents." I think one can make a good argument that "spoke of how donations helped people struggling to pay their rent and helped send local children to camps" involves a significant omission. And you say 13% but the Times article says the majority. And both Times articles as well as the Post article attach a higher degree of significance to the event than you do. I can't speak for the others participating in this discussion, but I'm more inclined to go by the newspapers' evaluation than by yours. 1164:

reporters Nikita Stuart and Tim whatever are both gone. They acknowledged that they found nothing. There was no investigation by the Ocf. Ask them. It was a routine audit which came out fine. There are so many other things to include if you want to be fair. Secondly, the GLAA sentence should be expande or deleted. I have gotten a perfect 10 for 20 years. Print that. As I previously stated, this has been quite an experience dealing with Knowledge (XXG). Thanks again for your efforts. Question, how do I find that editors page again?

3568:

but I don’t know how to spite so I don’t add much. I can easily find User talk:Evansjack1. Then I can find the other talk page. I do not know why there are two pages or who reads what. That’s it. Somehow, that approach doesn’t work for you all. So I will try to follow the instructions you have sent me but they are complicated. In the meantime, there is an ongoing war between John and Bone on one side and Bang and Largo on the other. I ask all of you to intervene and do what is best. Thanks. Jack

3542: 923: 618: 1096:

attention from but one or two editors, who may - mm, struggle - with maintaining a neutral point of view. When such concerns are raised more broadly, I think - by and large - the response is responsible and sound. In your case the problem wasn't that you were pointing out the problems but that you persisted in making the edits yourself; and indeed once you raised the matter where it might draw the attention of disinterested editors (

1693:

31per cent. For 20 years it was 13 per cent. It is right there. I don't even remember a wash times article. But as I said before, I just want a fair balanced bio. What happened during the mayors race and up to 10 days ago is not so. And forgive my earlier transgressions. I am brand new to Knowledge (XXG) and did the best I could. I did not know a talk page existed and still have trouble finding one I can type on. Thanks again.

3800: 2501: 586: 522: 1496:

started. I agree. Let's put this to bed. I just noticed that Anthony took out the tax parity act. That w as a significant piece of legislation which changed our tax structure. I authored it with David Catania. It is clearly more relevant than the constituent services fund and got broad coverage in the post and the times and even the wsj. Why not put it back. Because we compromised on having a barebones article.

92: 3653: 1597:. Because that's what it took to finally get you there. By then, Anthonyhcole and JohnInDC had matters well in hand and I agreed pretty much with everything they said, so I had no reason to contribute. But now, with you complaining about this one negative thing that they've left in the article, I decided to chime in with my opinion. So, seriously, kindly dispense with the drama and the accusations. 148: 3122: 2466: 1663:, which explains why the touchstone here is not what various editors perceive - or even know - to be the "truth", but what can be tied back to reliable, verifiable sources. From the point of view of Largo, and me, and I bet Anthony too, what you know or believe about the constituent fund issue, even by virtue of having lived through it, is not the point. Rather the point is what editors who 786: 352: 1543:, a thing that up till now you've professed to hate. I had nothing to do with the article until April, at which point I replaced material that spoke of your mayoral campaign in the future tense with updated material that summarized it in the past tense. After that, I reverted someone's removal of properly sourced content several times. And then you came along. You, sir, are off base. 3525: 2915: 2408: 201: 44: 1951: 1194: 1027:

issue" at the article Talk page.) I am however also troubled by the imperative tone, as well as the seeming expectation that the subject of an article can vet the thing and have it pared down to his or her liking. As I have said previously here, there may come a point where he's just going to have to live with something there that he doesn't like.

3415: 1539:. It is not a good idea to point fingers at particular editors and blame them for "problems" when it all may boil down to differing views of how Knowledge (XXG) is supposed to work." Your comment is quite reckless, given that the entire history of the article is right there for you to look at, leaving no room for speculation and, ironically, 1045:

readers who are aware of the innuendos are left in no doubt that there was no formal finding of impropriety or illegality. It's a question of walking the fine line between compounding the harm by repeating the innuendo and setting the record straight. Was this a massive scandal that most DC readers are likely to have heard about? --

2570:

reference to my election as Democratic National Committeeman, an election I just won by winning in all 8 wards. Yet you point out several times I lost running for Mayor. I co-chaired President Obama’s presidential campaign in DC in 2012. Yet you mention I was at Trumps inauguration parade. That’s what I’m talking about.

3532:

you are editing a page so that you do not accidentally violate the terms of your unblock conditions. You can also check that you're logged in by looking that your username is displayed in the top right corner of the page (on a desktop computer or a laptop) or in the menu I instructed you how to open above (on mobile).

418:. Other editors can evaluate your request and decide if the updates can be made while keeping a neutral and verifiable article. I'm not opposed to removing information about your nanny (that source is 8 years out of date). Regarding the name of your law firm, a reliable source for that name change would be nice. 3545:). Unfortunately on a phone or tablet device you will need to open the symbols view of your keyboard by hitting the button to open the numerical keyboard (usually "123" or "?123") and then the button to open the symbols keyboard (usually labeled "#+=" or "=/<") to get to where you can find the key for 804:. Despite the temporary block that has now ended, you continue to ignore all advice to bring your concerns to the Talk page and let disinterested editors sort them out rather than editing the page yourself. Your changes will continue to be reverted as often as necessary, for as long as you disregard the 3567:

Thanks everyone for your advice. I want to describe how I have been participating. I do all my edits on an I phone 6. Nothing else. I tap the pencil at the beginning of the section I wish to edit. This changes the text to an editable version. Then I delete what I find objectionable. I also add things

2569:

I’m talking about most of the gossipy stuff in the political positions section. You know exactly what I mean since you put a lot of it there. All I’m asking is a fair shake. Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia not a gossip page. You do it a disservice in you attempts to make me look bad. Again, why no

2076:

By the way, when you're responding to another's comment in a thread, add one more colon (:) before your post than they have put before their post. Each colon indents your comment by one space, so related comments go in an elegant left-to-right sweep. Above, where both John and I were replying to you,

1425:

reported on it: "When D.C. Council member Jack Evans gathered supporters earlier this year to raise money for his constituent-services fund, he spoke of how donations helped people struggling to pay their rent and helped send local children to camps. But the majority of the donations went for tickets

413:

Admittedly, the information in he article, based as it is on an eight-year-old source, is likely out of date, and is not highly relevant at this point. Since the article speaks in the present, the present state of affairs must be allowed to change. However, given your very real conflict of interest

3521:

I'm a little concerned that, although you seem to have agreed to only edit while logged in to your account, you haven't actually managed to log in yet to edit this talk page. I know that editing Knowledge (XXG) can be complicated and convoluted sometimes, but logging in to Knowledge (XXG) is no more

3359:

Can you elaborate what you mean about not knowing how to log in? It's obvious that you do know how to log in because you have a history of edits you made while logged in. That's how this whole user talk page of yours came to exist: all the conversation on here revolves around edits you've made while

3344:

I'm not criticizing you for not knowing how, I want to help. When you edit, check to see if your username appears at the very top right of the page. If you're logged in you'll see your user name and you're good to go; if you aren't you'll see "Not logged in" and a "Log in" link that will let you log

3031:

Look, I get it. I clearly know I shouldn’t edit my page. But it was impossible to get your attention. And by that I mean all of you. Bang has done a real disservice. I need all of the rest of you to look at the page and do the right thing. I am now barred from editing. So it is up to the rest of you

2783:

I've left some comments there. Feel free to address or reply to or expand on any of the things I have said, or simply let me know if I understand the issue correctly. As an uninvolved observer I think that content should be thinned to a couple sentences, but let's not rush into anything and just see

1738:

As far as the specific facts are concerned (a majority of the funds? 13%? 31%?), I have no problem with fresh eyes coming in and creating a fair representation of what was reported in the press. As for the fact that there was an inquiry, I've already expressed my feeling, for the reasons I've given,

1564:

No slight was intended. You came to the discussion at the last moment. You acknowledge making edits as far back as April. And you feel very passionate about keeping a negative inference to me in the bio. For the record, I have never in these discussions stated that it's ok because everyone else does

1429:

Given that tickets to sporting events don't help people pay their rent or send local children to camps, it seems that the use to buy tickets is significant enough that Evans obfuscated the matter then just as he wants to obfuscate it now. Going by later reports, it was significant enough that it was

1401:

It's likely that I'll be keeping the page on my watchlist henceforth, to make sure that it stays stationed down the middle and doesn't become captive to either advocates or opponents. While it is quite easy for articles to get out of hand on Knowledge (XXG), once an editor or two has taken the time

3531:

Furthermore, if you aren't logged in and you click to edit any page (whether on the desktop version of the website or on mobile), you will see a banner saying "You are not logged in" and offering you the link to log in. You should get in the habit of checking that this banner is not displaying when

3207:

I am requesting that the block be lifted. I fully recognize that my actions in deleting portions of my page were wrong. They were done out of a sense of frustration that my concerns were not being addressed. Regardless, I should not have erased the entire paragraph. If the block is lifted, I commit

1692:

Ok I have heard everyone. Largo, I apologize. I ask you Anthony and John to take one last shot at this. It is obviously important to me that it be fair and accurate. As far as the percentages are concerned, go to footnote 14 and read the wash post article. They did the research. For 10 years it was

1091:

as far as the gala rating, it was later increased to a 9. Even they realized they had made a mistake. Therefore I would delete the reference. Second, I am not operating thru anyone else. Third. The constituent services fund reference is like saying a plane took off and landed safely. So what. There

3522:

difficult than logging into any other service, like an email account or other online website. There is a "Log in" link on the upper right hand of any Knowledge (XXG) page, or if you are editing on a mobile device or tablet you'll need to tap the stack of three horizontal lines (it looks like this:

3321:

Yes. The reason I don’t is because I don’t know how. Listen, you guys do this all the time. I don’t. To criticize me for not knowing how is not fair. The general public has no idea how to deal with Knowledge (XXG). Just tell me how to do it and I will be glad to follow your instructions. And thank

2971:

Hi Jack. Sorry you got blocked, but you should not have been edit warring in your own article while people were discussing your concerns. You had multiple users trying to help you address your complaints, and it was not reasonable for you to try to force your preferred edits through. This does not

1580:

No, what I feel strongly about is leaving in the article something that seems significant (for the reasons I've already given) despite the fact that it bothers you. Don't you go calling me unfair: I have been fair all along, in that the reason I was trying to get you to stop improperly editing the

1495:

John, I agree one can make arguments on both sides. But a lot of compromises were made to get to where we are. And you are right. Given how slender it is, does it make sense to highlight this one piece of history. Why not then pick out all of my other accomplishments. And then we are back where we

1477:

Jack, Largo raises a fair point. Although the episode didn't amount to much finally, and the broader view you supply paints a more favorable picture of the numbers, the matter received specific and pointed coverage in both the Washington DC daily papers. The Times's coverage only underscores the

1068:

no. The Washington post ran one story about everyone's constituent services funds. That's it. These entries we're put on my page during the mayors race in an attempt to embarrass me. You all can see that. There was no scandal. The same is true of the gala rating. Vince gray got a 10, tommy wells a

1026:

I don't think that's an issue. The article is much, much better than it had been before, and, while I might not have cut the thing quite as far down as it has been now, I have no fundamental problem with any of what's been removed. (I have stated my concerns about removing this "constituent fund

859:

I agree with the foregoing and in all sincerity urge you to read up on that advice and follow it. The article has come to the attention of additional editors, who are working on bringing it better into line with Knowledge (XXG)'s tone and policies. The odds are good that they will continue to be

3593:

I have given what is perhaps the most detailed explanation I've ever given of how to log in to edit to someone who has managed to log in to edit in the past. I have included instructions for how to edit if you are editing from a mobile device or a tablet. You mention you are editing from a phone,

1186:

Evansjack1, if you paste here the GLAA text you'd like removed and follow it with what you'd like to replace it with, I'll consider doing it for you. (When you're chatting on talk pages like this, your post won't be automatically signed and dated. So, on talk pages, sign off with four tildes like

227:

content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about

2732:

Hi, can you please take your concerns to the article's talk page? I'll start a discussion there. It's not really appropriate for an article subject to be removing negative content on their own but we'll take your concerns into consideration and see what the appropriate course of action would be.

1644:

of other editors. A check of the records shows that Largo has been editing here since 2006 and has more than 32,000 edits to his credit. (I assume "his" because of the ending vowels.) In any event it is not good form to ask editors who they are; their edits and comments should be evaluated on

1072:

As I've indicated on the article Talk page, I have concerns about removing the constituent fund issue, which seems to be of a different nature than most of the other junk that was previously in the article. Discussion continues. But I do agree that if - if - that one GLAA (not gala) rating was

2349:

If you're curious, you may get some sense of their motivations, interests or character - and sometimes even who they are, if they've been careless - by looking at their contributions to other Knowledge (XXG) articles, or - if they use the same nickname elsewhere - a Google search might tell you

1095:

It can get bad because there are thousands and thousands of pages in Knowledge (XXG), overseen by editors who are all volunteers, and who by and large work on things that interest them. There is no one that looks at everything, and conversely there may be articles that don't get much editorial

560:

said you had a live-in nanny. A Knowledge (XXG) editor does not have the right to remove an assertion supported by a valid source based on the editor's own say-so. You really need to pay attention when you are told how matters like these are handled on Knowledge (XXG), and start discussing your

1893:

You can't. You can only see when they do. Whether the edits are appropriate or not is something that you had probably better leave up to the disinterested editors, and not try to amend yourself. Knowledge (XXG) articles are not static, anyone can edit them, and truth be told after a while a

1457:

Anthony, johnindc agrees with you to take out the constituent services reference. Largoplaza is from the past and is probably one of those creating mischief. For example to compare it to Abscam where congressmen went to jail makes my point. And I have never tried. To obscure that we purchase

1223:

Anthonyhcole. Thanks for your offer. I would recommend just deleting the last sentence and not adding anything. I have been the leading advocate for LGBT rights on the council for 23 years, long before it was popular. I was the first to call for gay marriage in 1998. But people know that. Just

1133:

I tried to add that we should take into account the basic human dignity of our biography subjects but was opposed by a few horses asses and - since there was no consensus favoring the change - the proposal failed. While an undoubted boon (on balance) some aspects of Knowledge (XXG) are morally

1044:

Evansjack1, I'll repeat here what I posted on the article's talk page about the constituent fund issue, in case you'd like to respond here. We don't usually report unsubstantiated insinuations of impropriety unless the claims reached a very high level of visibility. Then we report them only so

3080:

Hm. And I'd observe that not only now do you have our attention, but also that of the local blogs, which has resulted in at least one new editor determined to add back in material that hadn't been in it for a couple of years. It doesn't help you, and makes more work for the rest of us - the

2343:

If you go back in your article's history to the lead-up to the primaries, you can see who added what. Whoever turned your article into a hatchet job may have been a paid PR person working either for your political opponents or (sorry, but it needs to be considered) your political rivals. But,

2171:

Evansjack1, if you go to "Desktop" mode and click "View history" at the top of an article, you'll find on the next page a link, "Page view statistics". That will show you how many people visited the article on any given day, with monthly totals. Select a month in the box under the graph that

1163:

Thank you for you recent comments. I have had the opportunity to read other comment on a site I stumbled on. A discussion among editors. Johns dc. You have been helpful but I disagree with you constituent services analysis. Just because the post did the story doesn't mean it is credible. The

2865:

The Talk you set up doesn’t work when I touch it. Can you try again. Also, what’s left in the Digi section is wrong. As I have said many times, I did not “propose emergency legislation”, and “then withdraw it”. I circulated a letter of intent. There was no follow up so nothing happened. No

1946:

policy and others. Now, while other editors are watching the article, it's probably best (though not obligatory) that you just watch from the sidelines, rather than jumping into the fray. Dispassion is a virtue in these discussions, and that's hard to achieve when you're the subject.

3397:

One minor problem here - you should log in to your account and confirm that all of these IP comments and the unblock request were really made by you. I'm not doubting it's you, but we can't be sure otherwise, and we really do need to be careful in case of impersonation.

860:

responsive going forward. That being said, at some point you may just have to reconcile yourself to the presence of some material in the article that you'd rather not see there; but if it is well sourced and appropriately weighted it may just have to stay. Thanks.

446:

a genuine problem that prevails throughout Knowledge (XXG): the present tense. I've restored the nanny phrase and changed "currently" to reflect that this was the state of affairs reported in 2006. To replace this with up-to-date information, find and cite a

1672:

reliable source went on record as making that point. Anyhow, I mention this not to be snarky but to help you understand a bit better where others are coming from, so that discussions can focus on things that are likely to make a difference in the outcome.

887:

disagree. And I reiterate what I said at the Jack Evans page - you really should refrain from editing it. There are at least three editors working to make the article a bit more evenhanded, and it will be better if you let the process play out. Thanks.

3442:

located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it.

1128:

Hi Evansjack1. I endorse John's above comment, and add that in my opinion Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on biographies is woefully inadequate. However, turning our policies toward better care for our subjects is like turning an oil tanker with a paddle.

735:. Someone who is the subject of an article should not make extensive edits to it except in specific circumstances. Regardless, you should clearly disclose whether you are or are not the real person who is the subject of the article. Thanks. -- 1667:

know anything about the underlying facts can sensibly write up based on what reliable sources say. So to say (and I'm paraphrasing), "the Post / Times was wrong" is almost meaningless, unless the Post or Times printed a retraction, or some

3015:

and—for heaven's sake!—removing the name of your ex-wife three times in a row. By what principle do you think you're entitled to have her erased like that? This isn't your campaign website that you can tailor to read just as you like it.

2222:) 12:01, 8 October 2014 (UTC)Thanks. Maybe largo and bang are republicans!!! Which does bring up an interesting point. Who did add to my page all the comments that were deleted. Was it bang or someone else? How can one find out? 1198:. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. It can be a very satisfying hobby/public service and we need help in all domains - vandal patrol, article-writing, article-polishing, administration, governance and policy development. -- 3603:

Since you apparently still are not able to figure out how to log in (despite having done so repeatedly in the past, and despite the clear options when you're editing from your IPhone) I'm not sure an unblock makes sense here.

2077:

we both just added one colon, so it was clear I was addressing you, not John. When you want to change the subject within a thread or address everyone, start your comment without any colons and it will begin on the left margin.

1437:

might have been to embarrass Evans if Evans' activity was, in and of itself, embarrassing, as well as significant. As for the justification "other people were doing it too", I'm imagining each of the Congressmen caught in the

1003:

Even after you've been blocked, you're dictating to others what they "need to" and "should" do? Whom are you addressing? Councilmember Evans, is another one of the editors working on the article editing at your direction? See

2784:

where everyone's thoughts are. If we can't reach an agreement with the users on that page, we can easily request wider input from the community, as well as from users who specialize in dealing with this sort of thing.

2046:, but the vast majority of biography problems are not blatant libel, they involve undue weight given to negative or positive trivia, and these grey-area disputes can often take months of full-time arguing to resolve. 1069:

9.5 and I got a 9. It was the first time in 20 years I didn't get a 10. It is like the rest of the stuff in the mayors race. Please eliminate it or add that I have gotten a perfect score for 20 years. Thank you.

759: 998:

you need to delete the constituent services fund reference. Also that I received the third highest rating from gala. Actually you should include that I received the highest in the last 6 election cycles.

883:. It is not a good idea to point fingers at particular editors and blame them for "problems" when it all may boil down to differing views of how Knowledge (XXG) is supposed to work. Reasonable people 3549:. This is understandably a lot of steps to do on mobile, which is why myself and many others tend to prefer to edit Knowledge (XXG) and make posts on discussion pages from desktop or laptop computers. 1535:"... and is probably one of those creating mischief." Please go back and read what JohnInDC wrote to you a few days ago: "I think that you should review that material again, as well as the policies on 1532:"Largoplaza is from the past ..." Are you suggesting I came here via time travel? Or are you trying to wave away my comments with a vague comment in the absence of a substantive response to my remark? 3575: 3382: 3329: 3287: 2894: 2873: 2768: 1260:

John, now that Anthony took out the puff stuff, let's get rid of the constituent services paragraph and be done. This has been an interesting week and I have really learned about Knowledge (XXG).

2712: 23: 1375:

The watchlist is a list of pages you're interested in. Clicking the "watchlist" link at the top of a page generates a report listing all recent changes to pages on your list. Your talk page and

825:

It may be upsetting if there is content that you do not like in an article about you, but there are proper ways to deal with it. There is good advice in the autobiography guidelines, entitled "

2655: 2614: 2577: 2530: 2509: 2481: 3039: 1130: 2523:

I have repeatedly ask for a group of editors to rewrite my Knowledge (XXG) page. It is largely made up of gossip sourced to the City Paper. I hope this is being discussed. Thanks. Jack

328:

You are continuing to edit despite the warnings and explanations of how you should handle your concerns. This is not how this is done. Please stop or you may be blocked from editing.

205: 534: 526: 3594:

which means that any time you are not logged in and you tap the pencil to edit a page, you have also been tapping the "Edit without logging in" button and not the "Log in" button.

1073:

anomalous, the description in the article is misleading and the discussion should either be expanded or eliminated (I'm tending to favor the latter). Even the cited source (

3733:

l am again requesting that the block be lifted. I have committed to not editing my account, to not engage in editing wars and to sign in. Also, all prior IP edits were mine

3208:

that 1) I will not edit my own article and 2) that I will not engage in an edit war. I know that I don’t own my article. I apprecite your considering my request. Jack Evans

2630: 2505: 1815:

Thanks Anthony. I tried it. Hope it works. Any thoughts on the final edits to my bio? I would still appreciate your deleting the constituent services paragraph. Thanks.

1789:: If you're using Safari browser (you probably are) click "Desktop" or "Desktop view" at the bottom of the page. Then you should find the "Preferences" tab at the top. -- 1739:

that it is quite relevant, significant, and appropriate to include it, and I'm concerned about us being wheedled into acting as proxies in a forum shopping expedition.

1546:

As for Abscam, I was not likening your use of funds to that scandal, I was likening your "others did it too, therefore it's unfair to mention my having done it" logic.

2513: 2485: 1927:(While I was writing this, John posted the above - I've tagged my comment with "edit conflict", so everyone knows my comment doesn't take into account his comment. 565:

rather than making your own changes to the article. Even politicians (if you really are Jack Evans) aren't exempt from the policies and guidelines of this website.

414:

regarding this article, you should avoid editing it at all. If there are facts that are out of date, then address he matter by requesting the required updates at

3804: 494:, a forum on Knowledge (XXG) for new editors to ask questions about editing Knowledge (XXG), and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! 2980:. You can appeal as many times as you need to. I suspect all that you'll have to do is provide assurances that you will not edit your own article, you will not 590: 480: 3253:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

2261:" tab at the top of the page. That will show you a list of the 50 most recent changes to your article, and who made them. Using these buttons above the list 1707:

To john Anthony and Largo, I haven't heard anything in 24 hours. Please let me know where we stand concerning the constituent services paragraph. Thanks

1879:

Thanks. How do we keep anyone from adding things? Thank you all for your time and efforts. I have learned how to use Knowledge (XXG) and thank you all.

1458:

tickets for constituents. And as the post article points out it is 13 per cent of the total spending. Also thanks for the directions. I'm about to try.

2128: 1943: 833:". I urge you to read and heed these sections, as you are on the brink of a lengthier block if your editing behaviour doesn't improve. Remember that 3688: 3162: 3238: 2940: 963: 658: 3011:

However fair your quest for recourse concerning the overall balance of the article may be, you undermine yourself when you pull stunts like

1760: 2984:, and that you fully understand you do not "own" your article. Other admins may want to see more, but that would be a good starting point. 65:, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on 3539:

at the end of your comments, or if you are on a computer, click the signature icon at the top left of the edit box (it looks like this:

3579: 3438: 3432: 3386: 3333: 3291: 2898: 2877: 2772: 2203: 1427: 1074: 3463: 3266: 2976:

blocked. It does, however, mean that you'll have to address the problems that led to the block. For advice on how to do this, see the

2819: 2716: 2367: 2215: 2181: 2140: 2088: 1964: 1853: 1798: 1772: 1431: 1388: 1295: 1207: 1143: 1054: 771: 27: 2659: 2618: 2581: 2534: 1660: 277: 253: 224: 3043: 2834: 1838: 1169: 415: 311: 969: 664: 594: 217: 3433: 1379:

are both on my list, so when I click "watchlist" 2 or 3 times a day, I'll notice if there has been any activity on those pages. --

3683: 3439: 3157: 2450: 2438: 2416: 2344:

equally, it could just have been some obsessive homophobe, Republican or sports-hater. Or someone you annoyed at school. Anybody.

1228:

Hit the numbers modifier, then the little one with the crosshatch etc. - it's on that screen, about where the 'e' key would be.

209: 52: 249: 425: 2933: 977: 797: 672: 152: 3621:

I did it!!! I have officially figured out how to log in. Thanks for your help. And thanks for considering unblocking me. Jack

2371: 2219: 2185: 2144: 2092: 1997:

Ok thanks. I'll keep watching my page for any changes as well. Those who added all the negative info are still out there.

1968: 1857: 1802: 1776: 1392: 1299: 1211: 1147: 1058: 775: 1604:

article said that the majority of your funds were going to the sports tickets, so if it's false, don't go pinning it on me.

947: 642: 292: 3636:

Jack, I think you will have to ask for an unblock again. And while you’re at it, affirm that all those IP edits were you.

3489: 3403: 3224: 1763:(where we discuss technical issues) how to set up email alerts using an iPad. I'll let you know when we get a response. -- 684: 229: 3760: 2426: 2252: 1376: 1357: 1283: 801: 752: 363: 242:

articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.

213: 160: 96: 62: 3135: 2928: 2923: 2471: 981: 930: 791: 676: 625: 448: 357: 170: 2442: 2412: 3660: 3129: 758:

That biography does look unduly negative to me. I've left a note at the discussion board devoted to biography issues

118: 3134:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

1442:

scandal asking to have any mention of Abscam removed from their articles on the grounds that "others did it too".

830: 826: 732: 285: 281: 943: 939: 638: 634: 530: 3768: 3702: 3609: 3557: 3485: 3399: 3350: 3311: 3220: 3176: 2960: 2355: 680: 535:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Evansjack1 reported by User:Largoplazo (Result: )

1282:

Evansjack1, you can set your preferences (behind a link at the top of the page) so that whenever anyone edits

1360:

is on your watchlist. Go to the article and if there is a "watch" tab at the top, click it. If the tab says "

3571: 3459: 3423: 3378: 3325: 3283: 3262: 3035: 2890: 2869: 2815: 2764: 2708: 2705:

When I open that section it is just my Knowledge (XXG) page. No discussion. How do I find the discussion?

2651: 2610: 2573: 2526: 1009: 1005: 208:

your contributions to Knowledge (XXG), but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things

19: 3467: 3270: 2823: 2363: 2300: 2211: 2177: 2136: 2084: 1960: 1849: 1794: 1768: 1384: 1291: 1203: 1139: 1050: 767: 276:

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to

3759:

will only edit while logged into this account, will not edit war, and will not directly edit the article

3419: 2477: 973: 668: 291:

For information on how to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) when you have a conflict of interest, please see

156: 106: 3501: 3444: 1286:

you'll be notified by email. If you'd like to set that up, I can talk you through it. It's very easy. --

186: 138: 82: 66: 2670:

What did you see? It should have taken you directly to the discussion at the bottom of the ANI page.

2043:(about 3 minutes in) points out that scurrilous defamation can be removed immediately with an email to 1510:

I'm disappointed that it is still there. Now the bond rating info that I played a key role in is gone.

709: 491: 3500:

Yes. Is signing really so difficult? An alternative method is to add four tildes, like ~~~~ this. ----

525:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at

3780: 3756: 3734: 3666: 3622: 3516: 3365: 3303: 3140: 3110: 3071: 3021: 2695: 2557: 2385: 2316: 2223: 1998: 1880: 1816: 1744: 1708: 1694: 1631: 1609: 1566: 1554: 1527: 1511: 1497: 1459: 1447: 1310: 1261: 1017: 903: 813: 717: 602: 570: 542: 499: 456: 371: 333: 319: 300: 2430: 114: 3764: 3637: 3605: 3553: 3346: 3307: 3086: 2956: 2671: 2634: 2593: 1895: 1723: 1674: 1646: 1479: 1403: 1243: 1229: 1173: 1101: 1078: 1028: 889: 861: 2338:

you'll see my most recent edits to Knowledge (XXG) (and can look at all the edits I've ever made).

842: 3641: 3090: 2675: 2638: 2597: 2131:

a good read. It is the policy defining what is appropriate for a biography on Knowledge (XXG). --

1937: 1899: 1727: 1678: 1650: 1483: 1407: 1247: 1233: 1177: 1105: 1082: 1032: 893: 865: 1421:

I wouldn't remove the section on constituent services. It wasn't reported only in the Post. The

805: 362:

the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Knowledge (XXG), as you did at

228:

that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by

122: 2359: 2296: 2207: 2173: 2132: 2080: 1956: 1928: 1845: 1790: 1764: 1380: 1287: 1275: 1199: 1135: 1046: 763: 263: 3541: 3247: 3082: 2946: 2040: 1474:

Anthony, which page do I look for preferences. I can't find it on this page or the bio page

986: 953: 850: 740: 712:. You can be blocked for impersonating a real person. You might want to read it either way. 648: 404: 235:

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

176: 128: 72: 48: 3763:. Please understand that if you violate these conditions, your account will be re-blocked. 2977: 2761:

Yes, that would be great. Any help you can give me in fixing my page is appreciated. Jack

2687: 2592:

Jack, the place to talk about all that is at the ANI link above. It won't get seen here.

2334: 2305: 2243:: either indent with one or more colons (:::) or create a 2 line break (hit "enter" twice). 1844:

I've just made another minor edit to the article, so you should get an email alert soon. --

1641: 1536: 1097: 880: 838: 834: 3361: 3106: 3067: 3017: 3001: 2854: 2801: 2750: 2691: 2553: 2429:— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the 1740: 1627: 1605: 1550: 1443: 1013: 922: 809: 713: 617: 598: 566: 538: 495: 452: 367: 329: 315: 296: 2981: 2434: 390: 3528:) at the top left to open the side menu, where you can then click on the "Log in" link. 2311: 1242:

I took out the GLAA sentence; I think that Anthony and I are in agreement on that one.

1012:

about that. Using others as a subterfuge to evade Knowledge (XXG) policy is prohibited.

1955:

I'm watching this page (your talk page) and will notice if you leave a comment here. --

1077:) indicates that Evans ( with an 8, not 9) was rated fairly harshly in that go-round. 419: 110: 262:

to the Knowledge (XXG) article or website of your organization in other articles (see

3066:

the outcome of each?????? (Or that it would be a hell of an omission if it didn't?)

2384:

Thanks Anthony. This is very helpful. It may take me awhile to get through this.

837:

an article and no single user can dictate its content. Article content is formed by

389:

includes a live-in nanny among the household. Knowledge (XXG) articles are based on

1430:

the sort of activity that led to consideration of a tightening of the ethics rules.

95:

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Knowledge (XXG), as you did at

3430:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 2837:. For future reference, there's a tab at the top of the article that says "Talk". 479: 91: 3552:

Hopefully this is all the information you will need to surpass this last hurdle.

2319:) This is very mundane. Justify its inclusion on the article's talk page.) (undo) 589:

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at

3102: 3059: 2812:

Thanks. How do I find the talk page. Can you print “here” and I can tap on it?

2044: 846: 736: 399: 2465: 1345:

Tick the box next to: "Email me when a page or file on my watchlist is changed"

879:

I think that you should review that material again, as well as the policies on

785: 351: 147: 2985: 2838: 2785: 2734: 2036: 3524: 3375:

Ok. I will follow your directions and log in when I post anything. Thanks.

2914: 946:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 641:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 272:

so that you do not accidentally breach Knowledge (XXG)'s content policies.

2939:

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the

2607:

On my page, this is the ANI link. I’m doing my best to figure this out.

2194:

I I cant believe you are editing my page again after all we went through

1722:

Anthony? Largo? Should we enlist a editor or two to break the logjam?

731:

the real Jack Evans, you would be well-advised to read Knowledge (XXG)'s

689: 3788: 3772: 3742: 3645: 3630: 3613: 3583: 3561: 3508: 3493: 3471: 3451: 3407: 3390: 3369: 3354: 3337: 3315: 3295: 3274: 3228: 3114: 3094: 3075: 3047: 3025: 3006: 2964: 2943:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: 2902: 2881: 2859: 2827: 2806: 2776: 2755: 2720: 2699: 2663: 2642: 2622: 2601: 2585: 2561: 2538: 2517: 2489: 2454: 2407: 2393: 2375: 2276:

The top entry is currently a log of my last edit and it looks like this:

2266:(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500) 2231: 2189: 2148: 2096: 2006: 1972: 1903: 1888: 1861: 1824: 1806: 1780: 1748: 1731: 1716: 1702: 1682: 1654: 1635: 1613: 1574: 1558: 1519: 1505: 1487: 1467: 1451: 1411: 1396: 1327:

No. Things happen slowly on Knowledge (XXG) - time zones, day jobs, etc.

1318: 1303: 1269: 1251: 1237: 1215: 1181: 1151: 1109: 1086: 1062: 1036: 1021: 992: 911: 897: 869: 854: 817: 779: 744: 721: 693: 606: 574: 546: 503: 460: 429: 408: 375: 337: 323: 304: 200: 189: 141: 85: 43: 31: 3484:

and tell us when logged in, not just keep telling us while logged out.

256:, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors. 3807:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

3535:

To sign your posts, as has been requested of you, you can either type

3219:

Per total failure to follow simple instructions to log in, see below.

2271:

you can view a longer list and view the whole history of your article.

125:

users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.

1439: 3456:

All the IP comments and the Unblock request were made by me. Jack

1433:. It doesn't matter that the reason someone placed the information 3427: 1894:

different consensus about what is appropriate here could emerge.

2309:)‎ . . (18,833 bytes) (-1,426)‎ . . (Undid revision 628403092 by 1587:

was exactly so that exactly the kind of conversation could be had

1172:, but until your block expires you won't be able to edit there. 3422:

and Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion, you should

2433:. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the 529:

regarding a possible violation of Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on

3651: 3120: 2913: 2887:

What am I doing wrong? I can’t get back to the talk page.

1942:

We don't. They may, and we'll argue/discuss in light of the

921: 616: 113:

or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the

2508:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

708:

the D.C. Council member Jack Evans, you really should read

3101:

At least you didn't also lay a false claim on us that the

1659:

Also, while it will likely pain you to read it, check out

976:. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek 671:. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek 223:

All editors are required to comply with Knowledge (XXG)'s

3235:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

808:

to which your attention has now already been drawn twice

3418:

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to

3255:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2350:

something about what would lead them to do such a thing.

2332:

you'll see the change I made in that edit. If you click

527:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring

240:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating

3716: 3712: 3706: 3697: 3693: 3679: 3675: 3671: 3190: 3186: 3180: 3171: 3167: 3153: 3149: 3145: 3012: 2421: 2328: 2291: 2285: 2257: 1842: 1787: 1623: 382: 165: 101: 57: 3794:

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

1786:

They gave me the same advice that John gave you above

597:

incident in which you may be involved. Thank you.

16:

How do I get independent editors to review this bio?

2506:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

2251:: select "Desktop" at the bottom of any page. Go to 1366:

watch", leave it be - it's already on your watchlist.

980:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 675:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 580:

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

3659:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

3128:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

827:

If Knowledge (XXG) already has an article about you

471:

Welcome to Knowledge (XXG): check out the Teahouse!

248:. Everyone is welcome to provide information about 3013:deleting mention of two mayoral campaigns of yours 2415:. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of 1187:this ~~~~ and your post will be signed and dated.) 942:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to 637:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to 310:Sorry, but I've reverted your changes. Please see 3805:Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view/Noticeboard 1309:Yes. That would be great. Any word from johnindc? 2548:The material you removed was largely sourced to 950:by adding the following text below this notice: 645:by adding the following text below this notice: 591:Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of interest/Noticeboard 293:our frequently asked questions for organizations 3105:article doesn't mention his first wife's name. 51:. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of 2682:A list of topics. None of which applied to me 2249:To see who's been doing what to your biography 2172:presently says "201409" (September, 2014). -- 2129:Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons 1944:Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons 516:Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion 314:before taking any further action. Thank you. 232:and writing with as little bias as possible. 8: 1622:that you had reasonable points to make, see 2552:, a fact that you've conveniently omitted. 1585:and express your concerns on the Talk page 312:Talk:Jack Evans (D.C. politician)#COI edits 3569: 3457: 3376: 3323: 3281: 3260: 3033: 2888: 2867: 2813: 2762: 2706: 2649: 2608: 2571: 2524: 1339:Click "preferences" at the top of the page 968:During a dispute, you should first try to 663:During a dispute, you should first try to 17: 1426:to sporting events, public records show." 762:. Hopefully some fresh eyes will help. -- 1190:Welcome to Knowledge (XXG), by the way! 3576:2600:1003:B00D:2E8C:91D3:142A:A7E8:D4D9 3383:2600:1003:B00D:2E8C:3D8F:74BF:E365:A4F3 3330:2600:1003:B00D:2E8C:3D8F:74BF:E365:A4F3 3288:2600:1003:B00D:2E8C:3D8F:74BF:E365:A4F3 2895:2600:1003:B003:9239:603A:7BCC:32FF:75CE 2874:2600:1003:B003:9239:603A:7BCC:32FF:75CE 2769:2600:1003:B003:9239:603A:7BCC:32FF:75CE 2648:Thanks. I just did but can’t find it. 2713:2600:1000:B03A:464:55FB:7FC5:9B60:C7C4 246:Be cautious about deletion discussions 24:2601:191:4181:1870:D9E5:AF86:22D2:F8B5 2932:from editing for persistently making 2656:2601:191:417F:F5CC:9EB:50BA:A478:C196 2615:2601:191:417F:F5CC:9EB:50BA:A478:C196 2578:2601:191:417F:F5CC:9EB:50BA:A478:C196 2531:2601:191:417F:F5CC:9EB:50BA:A478:C196 2510:2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 2482:2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 7: 3040:2601:14F:4400:DDDD:138:AB1B:AFA7:898 2633:to be taken to the ANI discussion. 1948: 1191: 220:or close connection to the subject. 3803:There is currently a discussion at 2504:There is currently a discussion at 3062:covers both his presidential runs 1839:the article's talk page discussion 105:. Your edits appear to constitute 14: 3755:Unblock, with the agreement that 2686:You don't think a section titled 416:Talk:Jack Evans (D.C. politician) 3798: 3540: 3523: 3437: 3431: 3413: 2499: 2464: 2406: 1949: 1192: 831:Problems in an article about you 784: 584: 520: 478: 350: 199: 146: 90: 55:, such as the one you made with 42: 1583:over and over and over and over 962:. However, you should read the 657:. However, you should read the 195:Managing a conflict of interest 159:Knowledge (XXG), as you did to 2688:"Jack Evans (D.C. politician)" 2460:This has gone on too long, so: 2127:At some point you should give 1759:Evansjack1, I've asked at the 1: 2190:15:57, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 970:discuss controversial changes 934:from editing for a period of 733:guidelines on autobiographies 665:discuss controversial changes 629:from editing for a period of 3761:Jack Evans (D.C. politician) 3322:you for reaching out. Jack 2427:Jack Evans (D.C. politician) 2394:17:53, 13 October 2014 (UTC) 2376:23:49, 12 October 2014 (UTC) 2253:Jack Evans (D.C. politician) 1377:Jack Evans (D.C. politician) 1358:Jack Evans (D.C. politician) 1284:Jack Evans (D.C. politician) 802:Jack Evans (D.C. politician) 753:Jack Evans (D.C. politician) 442:I've fixed the problem that 364:Jack Evans (D.C. politician) 282:verifiability of information 214:Jack Evans (D.C. politician) 161:Jack Evans (D.C. politician) 97:Jack Evans (D.C. politician) 63:Jack Evans (D.C. politician) 3789:23:16, 30 August 2018 (UTC) 3773:21:53, 30 August 2018 (UTC) 3743:21:32, 30 August 2018 (UTC) 3663:, who accepted the request. 3646:20:39, 30 August 2018 (UTC) 3631:18:20, 30 August 2018 (UTC) 3614:07:34, 30 August 2018 (UTC) 3584:05:19, 30 August 2018 (UTC) 3562:23:22, 29 August 2018 (UTC) 3509:21:20, 29 August 2018 (UTC) 3494:21:22, 29 August 2018 (UTC) 3482:must log in to your account 3472:15:39, 29 August 2018 (UTC) 3452:12:55, 29 August 2018 (UTC) 3408:13:43, 29 August 2018 (UTC) 3391:11:55, 29 August 2018 (UTC) 3370:10:06, 29 August 2018 (UTC) 3355:05:53, 29 August 2018 (UTC) 3338:05:44, 29 August 2018 (UTC) 3316:22:45, 28 August 2018 (UTC) 3296:22:13, 28 August 2018 (UTC) 3275:18:59, 28 August 2018 (UTC) 3229:07:41, 30 August 2018 (UTC) 3132:, who declined the request. 3115:03:15, 28 August 2018 (UTC) 3095:02:32, 28 August 2018 (UTC) 3076:01:12, 28 August 2018 (UTC) 3048:00:41, 28 August 2018 (UTC) 3026:23:15, 27 August 2018 (UTC) 3007:22:49, 27 August 2018 (UTC) 2965:03:49, 27 August 2018 (UTC) 2903:02:52, 19 August 2018 (UTC) 2882:02:42, 19 August 2018 (UTC) 2860:02:17, 19 August 2018 (UTC) 2828:22:52, 18 August 2018 (UTC) 2807:22:40, 18 August 2018 (UTC) 2777:22:12, 18 August 2018 (UTC) 2756:21:35, 18 August 2018 (UTC) 2721:18:55, 14 August 2018 (UTC) 2700:18:27, 14 August 2018 (UTC) 2678:) 14:49, 14 August 2018 (UT 2664:13:41, 14 August 2018 (UTC) 2643:13:08, 14 August 2018 (UTC) 2623:11:54, 14 August 2018 (UTC) 2602:11:49, 14 August 2018 (UTC) 2586:11:32, 14 August 2018 (UTC) 2562:11:11, 14 August 2018 (UTC) 2539:10:38, 14 August 2018 (UTC) 2518:04:50, 14 August 2018 (UTC) 2490:04:34, 14 August 2018 (UTC) 2455:04:30, 14 August 2018 (UTC) 2232:02:43, 9 October 2014 (UTC) 2149:16:46, 30 August 2014 (UTC) 2097:03:00, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 2007:02:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 1973:01:35, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 1904:01:31, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 1889:01:23, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 1862:01:02, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 1825:00:39, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 1807:00:24, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 1781:14:44, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 1749:13:48, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 1732:11:34, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 1717:23:57, 25 August 2014 (UTC) 1703:23:09, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 1683:22:07, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 1655:21:49, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 1636:21:20, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 1618:If you need evidence of me 1614:21:11, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 1575:20:56, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 1559:19:11, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 1520:17:35, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 1506:15:59, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 1488:15:01, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 1468:14:03, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 1452:13:34, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 1412:13:15, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 1397:12:34, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 1319:11:20, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 1304:11:07, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 1270:00:49, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 1252:14:58, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 1238:14:39, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 1216:11:20, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 1182:23:54, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 1152:17:12, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 1110:13:39, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 1087:12:16, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 1063:10:56, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 1037:03:43, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 1022:03:13, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 993:21:53, 21 August 2014 (UTC) 912:15:20, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 898:22:30, 20 August 2014 (UTC) 870:02:11, 20 August 2014 (UTC) 855:20:45, 19 August 2014 (UTC) 818:19:29, 19 August 2014 (UTC) 780:02:39, 18 August 2014 (UTC) 745:20:43, 17 August 2014 (UTC) 722:22:16, 15 August 2014 (UTC) 694:21:49, 14 August 2014 (UTC) 607:14:12, 14 August 2014 (UTC) 575:14:05, 14 August 2014 (UTC) 547:03:29, 14 August 2014 (UTC) 504:22:39, 13 August 2014 (UTC) 461:22:32, 13 August 2014 (UTC) 430:22:25, 13 August 2014 (UTC) 409:21:25, 13 August 2014 (UTC) 376:21:08, 13 August 2014 (UTC) 338:21:07, 13 August 2014 (UTC) 324:20:48, 13 August 2014 (UTC) 305:20:14, 13 August 2014 (UTC) 190:19:45, 13 August 2014 (UTC) 142:19:39, 13 August 2014 (UTC) 86:19:34, 13 August 2014 (UTC) 32:03:08, 20 August 2020 (UTC) 3821: 3058:where the lead section of 1837:I did that yesterday, per 3239:guide to appealing blocks 2978:guide to appealing blocks 2941:guide to appealing blocks 2417:your recent contributions 2241:To create a new paragraph 2037:this recent BBC interview 964:guide to appealing blocks 944:make useful contributions 659:guide to appealing blocks 639:make useful contributions 490:, you are invited to the 53:your recent contributions 3784: 3738: 3626: 2727:Take it to the talk page 2389: 2227: 2002: 1884: 1820: 1712: 1698: 1661:WP:VERIFIABILITYNOTTRUTH 1570: 1515: 1501: 1463: 1314: 1265: 907: 700:About your real identity 2474:without further warning 1755:Setting up email alerts 1595:once you'd been blocked 1272:I can even sign now!!! 843:policies and guidelines 798:disrupt Knowledge (XXG) 794:without further warning 360:without further warning 3656: 3125: 2918: 2445:Abelmoschus Esculentus 2413:Abelmoschus Esculentus 2358:might interest you. -- 2292:23:09, 12 October 2014 2206:might interest you. -- 1761:Technical Village Pump 926: 704:If by some chance you 621: 270:Exercise great caution 210:you have written about 204:Hello, Evansjack1. We 3703:change block settings 3655: 3177:change block settings 3124: 2951:Your reason here ~~~~ 2917: 1642:assume the good faith 958:Your reason here ~~~~ 925: 690:Seal meat for supper? 653:Your reason here ~~~~ 620: 593:regarding a possible 278:neutral point of view 225:neutral point of view 155:. If you continue to 2472:blocked from editing 2167:Page view statistics 1342:Click "user profile" 792:blocked from editing 595:conflict of interest 358:blocked from editing 264:Knowledge (XXG):Spam 254:deletion discussions 218:conflict of interest 171:blocked from editing 121:have the ability to 3486:Boing! said Zebedee 3400:Boing! said Zebedee 3221:Boing! said Zebedee 2550:The Washington Post 1537:assuming good faith 1008:and, particularly, 881:assuming good faith 250:independent sources 3657: 3126: 3056:honestly don't see 2919: 2480:Knowledge (XXG). 2476:the next time you 978:dispute resolution 927: 796:the next time you 673:dispute resolution 622: 153:disruptive editing 3771: 3612: 3586: 3574:comment added by 3560: 3474: 3462:comment added by 3393: 3381:comment added by 3353: 3340: 3328:comment added by 3314: 3298: 3286:comment added by 3277: 3265:comment added by 3050: 3038:comment added by 2998: 2963: 2905: 2893:comment added by 2884: 2872:comment added by 2851: 2830: 2818:comment added by 2798: 2779: 2767:comment added by 2747: 2723: 2711:comment added by 2666: 2654:comment added by 2625: 2613:comment added by 2588: 2576:comment added by 2541: 2529:comment added by 2198:Editing the enemy 2078: 1941: 1932: 1589:that you finally 1581:article yourself 1279: 948:appeal this block 692: 643:appeal this block 510: 509: 216:, you may have a 151:Please stop your 34: 22:comment added by 3812: 3802: 3801: 3767: 3722: 3720: 3709: 3691: 3689:deleted contribs 3654: 3608: 3556: 3548: 3544: 3538: 3527: 3520: 3506: 3504:Anthony Bradbury 3449: 3447:Anthony Bradbury 3441: 3435: 3417: 3416: 3349: 3310: 3252: 3246: 3196: 3194: 3183: 3165: 3163:deleted contribs 3123: 3083:Streisand effect 3004: 2999: 2992: 2959: 2954: 2934:disruptive edits 2857: 2852: 2845: 2804: 2799: 2792: 2753: 2748: 2741: 2690:applies to you? 2503: 2502: 2468: 2447: 2424: 2410: 2337: 2331: 2314: 2308: 2294: 2288: 2260: 2255:and select the " 2202:Hi, Evensjack1. 2075: 2041:User:Jimmy Wales 1954: 1953: 1952: 1935: 1926: 1602:Washington Times 1531: 1423:Washington Times 1273: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1134:indefensible. -- 989: 961: 841:within the core 800:, as you did at 788: 688: 656: 588: 587: 533:. The thread is 524: 523: 482: 475: 474: 422: 391:reliable sources 354: 230:reliable sources 203: 184: 182: 181: 168: 150: 136: 134: 133: 104: 94: 80: 78: 77: 60: 46: 3820: 3819: 3815: 3814: 3813: 3811: 3810: 3809: 3799: 3796: 3777: 3776: 3746: 3710: 3700: 3686: 3669: 3652: 3546: 3536: 3514: 3502: 3445: 3426:by typing four 3424:sign your posts 3414: 3258: 3250: 3244: 3243:, then use the 3232: 3210: 3184: 3174: 3160: 3143: 3136:blocking policy 3121: 3002: 2991: 2986: 2968: 2967: 2944: 2937: 2911: 2855: 2844: 2839: 2802: 2791: 2786: 2751: 2740: 2735: 2729: 2500: 2497: 2443: 2441:. Thank you. ~ 2420: 2404: 2333: 2327: 2310: 2304: 2290: 2284: 2256: 2200: 2169: 1950: 1757: 1600:And it was the 1525: 1193: 996: 987: 982:page protection 951: 919: 756: 702: 697: 677:page protection 646: 614: 585: 582: 558:Washington Post 554: 537:. Thank you. 521: 518: 506: 473: 449:reliable source 428: 420: 387:Washington Post 348: 286:autobiographies 212:in the article 197: 179: 177: 175: 164: 131: 129: 127: 100: 75: 73: 71: 56: 40: 12: 11: 5: 3818: 3816: 3795: 3792: 3765:GorillaWarfare 3753: 3731: 3727:Request reason 3724: 3650: 3649: 3648: 3619: 3618: 3617: 3616: 3606:GorillaWarfare 3598: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3588: 3587: 3554:GorillaWarfare 3512: 3511: 3498: 3497: 3496: 3411: 3410: 3373: 3372: 3357: 3347:GorillaWarfare 3319: 3318: 3308:GorillaWarfare 3280:Thanks Largo 3233: 3217: 3213:Decline reason 3205: 3201:Request reason 3198: 3119: 3118: 3117: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3029: 3028: 3009: 2987: 2957:GorillaWarfare 2938: 2921:You have been 2920: 2912: 2910: 2907: 2863: 2862: 2840: 2810: 2809: 2787: 2759: 2758: 2736: 2728: 2725: 2703: 2702: 2680: 2679: 2646: 2645: 2605: 2604: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2543: 2542: 2496: 2493: 2462: 2461: 2419:—specifically 2403: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2379: 2378: 2352: 2351: 2346: 2345: 2340: 2339: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2278: 2277: 2273: 2272: 2268: 2267: 2263: 2262: 2245: 2244: 2238: 2199: 2196: 2168: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1933: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1810: 1809: 1756: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1735: 1734: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1616: 1598: 1562: 1561: 1547: 1544: 1533: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1471: 1470: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1343: 1340: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1322: 1321: 1259: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1188: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 928:You have been 920: 918: 915: 877: 876: 875: 874: 873: 872: 755: 749: 748: 747: 701: 698: 623:You have been 615: 613: 610: 581: 578: 553: 550: 517: 514: 512: 508: 507: 485: 483: 472: 469: 468: 467: 466: 465: 464: 463: 435: 434: 433: 432: 424: 347: 344: 343: 342: 341: 340: 274: 273: 267: 257: 243: 196: 193: 119:Administrators 109:and have been 39: 36: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3817: 3808: 3806: 3793: 3791: 3790: 3786: 3782: 3775: 3774: 3770: 3766: 3762: 3758: 3752: 3750: 3749:Accept reason 3745: 3744: 3740: 3736: 3730: 3728: 3723: 3718: 3714: 3708: 3704: 3699: 3695: 3690: 3685: 3681: 3680:global blocks 3677: 3676:active blocks 3673: 3668: 3664: 3662: 3661:administrator 3647: 3643: 3639: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3628: 3624: 3615: 3611: 3607: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3592: 3591: 3590: 3589: 3585: 3581: 3577: 3573: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3563: 3559: 3555: 3550: 3543: 3533: 3529: 3526: 3518: 3510: 3507: 3505: 3499: 3495: 3491: 3487: 3483: 3479: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3473: 3469: 3465: 3461: 3454: 3453: 3450: 3448: 3440: 3434: 3429: 3425: 3421: 3409: 3405: 3401: 3396: 3395: 3394: 3392: 3388: 3384: 3380: 3371: 3367: 3363: 3358: 3356: 3352: 3348: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3339: 3335: 3331: 3327: 3317: 3313: 3309: 3305: 3301: 3300: 3299: 3297: 3293: 3289: 3285: 3278: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3264: 3257: 3256: 3249: 3242: 3240: 3231: 3230: 3226: 3222: 3216: 3214: 3209: 3204: 3202: 3197: 3192: 3188: 3182: 3178: 3173: 3169: 3164: 3159: 3155: 3154:global blocks 3151: 3150:active blocks 3147: 3142: 3137: 3133: 3131: 3130:administrator 3116: 3112: 3108: 3104: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3084: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3073: 3069: 3065: 3061: 3057: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3037: 3027: 3023: 3019: 3014: 3010: 3008: 3005: 3000: 2997: 2996: 2990: 2983: 2979: 2975: 2970: 2969: 2966: 2962: 2958: 2952: 2948: 2942: 2935: 2931: 2930: 2926: 2925: 2916: 2908: 2906: 2904: 2900: 2896: 2892: 2885: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2866:withdrawal. 2861: 2858: 2853: 2850: 2849: 2843: 2836: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2829: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2808: 2805: 2800: 2797: 2796: 2790: 2782: 2781: 2780: 2778: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2757: 2754: 2749: 2746: 2745: 2739: 2731: 2730: 2726: 2724: 2722: 2718: 2714: 2710: 2701: 2697: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2653: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2624: 2620: 2616: 2612: 2603: 2599: 2595: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2494: 2492: 2491: 2487: 2483: 2479: 2475: 2473: 2467: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2452: 2448: 2446: 2440: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2423: 2418: 2414: 2409: 2401: 2395: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2377: 2373: 2369: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2354: 2353: 2348: 2347: 2342: 2341: 2336: 2330: 2326:If you click 2325: 2324: 2318: 2313: 2307: 2302: 2298: 2293: 2287: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2275: 2274: 2270: 2269: 2265: 2264: 2259: 2254: 2250: 2247: 2246: 2242: 2239: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2197: 2195: 2192: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2166: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2098: 2094: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2045: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1958: 1945: 1939: 1938:edit conflict 1934: 1930: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1905: 1901: 1897: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1863: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1840: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1737: 1736: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1705: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1684: 1680: 1676: 1671: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1643: 1640:Jack, please 1639: 1638: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1620:acknowledging 1617: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1545: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1529: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1508: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1489: 1485: 1481: 1476: 1475: 1473: 1472: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1365: 1364: 1359: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1344: 1341: 1338: 1337: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1280: 1277: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1189: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1132: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1094: 1093: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1071: 1070: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1010:WP:Meatpuppet 1007: 1006:WP:Sockpuppet 1002: 1001: 1000: 995: 994: 991: 990: 983: 979: 975: 971: 965: 959: 955: 949: 945: 941: 937: 933: 932: 924: 916: 914: 913: 909: 905: 900: 899: 895: 891: 886: 882: 871: 867: 863: 858: 857: 856: 852: 848: 844: 840: 836: 832: 828: 824: 823: 822: 821: 820: 819: 815: 811: 807: 803: 799: 795: 793: 787: 782: 781: 777: 773: 769: 765: 761: 754: 750: 746: 742: 738: 734: 730: 726: 725: 724: 723: 719: 715: 711: 707: 699: 696: 695: 691: 686: 682: 678: 674: 670: 666: 660: 654: 650: 644: 640: 636: 632: 628: 627: 619: 611: 609: 608: 604: 600: 596: 592: 579: 577: 576: 572: 568: 564: 559: 551: 549: 548: 544: 540: 536: 532: 528: 515: 513: 505: 501: 497: 493: 489: 484: 481: 477: 476: 470: 462: 458: 454: 450: 445: 441: 440: 439: 438: 437: 436: 431: 427: 423: 417: 412: 411: 410: 406: 402: 401: 396: 392: 388: 384: 380: 379: 378: 377: 373: 369: 365: 361: 359: 353: 345: 339: 335: 331: 327: 326: 325: 321: 317: 313: 309: 308: 307: 306: 302: 298: 295:. Thank you. 294: 289: 287: 283: 279: 271: 268: 265: 261: 260:Avoid linking 258: 255: 251: 247: 244: 241: 238: 237: 236: 233: 231: 226: 221: 219: 215: 211: 207: 202: 194: 192: 191: 188: 185: 183: 172: 169:, you may be 167: 162: 158: 154: 149: 144: 143: 140: 137: 135: 124: 120: 116: 112: 108: 103: 98: 93: 88: 87: 84: 81: 79: 68: 64: 59: 54: 50: 45: 37: 35: 33: 29: 25: 21: 3797: 3778: 3754: 3748: 3747: 3732: 3726: 3725: 3698:creation log 3665: 3658: 3620: 3570:— Preceding 3551: 3534: 3530: 3513: 3503: 3481: 3464:164.82.84.22 3458:— Preceding 3455: 3446: 3412: 3377:— Preceding 3374: 3324:— Preceding 3320: 3282:— Preceding 3279: 3267:164.82.84.20 3261:— Preceding 3259: 3254: 3236: 3234: 3218: 3212: 3211: 3206: 3200: 3199: 3172:creation log 3139: 3127: 3085:in action. 3063: 3055: 3034:— Preceding 3030: 2994: 2993: 2988: 2973: 2972:mean you're 2950: 2929:indefinitely 2927: 2922: 2889:— Preceding 2886: 2868:— Preceding 2864: 2847: 2846: 2841: 2820:164.82.84.20 2814:— Preceding 2811: 2794: 2793: 2788: 2763:— Preceding 2760: 2743: 2742: 2737: 2707:— Preceding 2704: 2681: 2650:— Preceding 2647: 2609:— Preceding 2606: 2572:— Preceding 2568: 2549: 2525:— Preceding 2498: 2470: 2463: 2444: 2439:my talk page 2405: 2360:Anthonyhcole 2297:Anthonyhcole 2258:View history 2248: 2240: 2208:Anthonyhcole 2201: 2193: 2174:Anthonyhcole 2170: 2133:Anthonyhcole 2081:Anthonyhcole 1957:Anthonyhcole 1929:Anthonyhcole 1846:Anthonyhcole 1791:Anthonyhcole 1765:Anthonyhcole 1758: 1741:—Largo Plazo 1706: 1691: 1669: 1664: 1628:—Largo Plazo 1619: 1606:—Largo Plazo 1601: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1563: 1551:—Largo Plazo 1540: 1509: 1494: 1444:—Largo Plazo 1434: 1422: 1420: 1381:Anthonyhcole 1362: 1361: 1288:Anthonyhcole 1281: 1276:Anthonyhcole 1258: 1222: 1200:Anthonyhcole 1162: 1136:Anthonyhcole 1047:Anthonyhcole 1043: 1014:—Largo Plazo 997: 985: 967: 957: 940:edit warring 935: 929: 901: 884: 878: 810:—Largo Plazo 790: 783: 764:Anthonyhcole 757: 728: 714:—Largo Plazo 705: 703: 662: 652: 635:edit warring 630: 624: 599:—Largo Plazo 583: 567:—Largo Plazo 562: 557: 555: 539:—Largo Plazo 531:edit warring 519: 511: 487: 453:—Largo Plazo 443: 398: 394: 386: 368:—Largo Plazo 356: 349: 330:—Largo Plazo 316:—Largo Plazo 297:—Largo Plazo 290: 275: 269: 259: 245: 239: 234: 222: 198: 174: 145: 126: 89: 70: 67:my talk page 41: 18:— Preceding 15: 3360:logged in. 3103:John McCain 3060:John McCain 2974:permanently 2909:August 2018 2469:You may be 2411:Hello, I'm 2402:August 2018 988:MusikAnimal 917:August 2014 835:no one owns 789:You may be 727:And if you 612:August 2014 355:You may be 346:August 2014 49:TheQ Editor 47:Hello, I'm 38:August 2014 3781:Evansjack1 3757:Evansjack1 3735:Evansjack1 3694:filter log 3667:Evansjack1 3623:Evansjack1 3517:Evansjack1 3420:talk pages 3362:Largoplazo 3304:Evansjack1 3168:filter log 3141:Evansjack1 3107:Largoplazo 3068:Largoplazo 3018:Largoplazo 2692:Largoplazo 2554:Largoplazo 2451:talk to me 2386:Evansjack1 2312:Largoplazo 2224:Evansjack1 2204:This story 1999:Evansjack1 1881:Evansjack1 1817:Evansjack1 1709:Evansjack1 1695:Evansjack1 1567:Evansjack1 1528:Evansjack1 1512:Evansjack1 1498:Evansjack1 1460:Evansjack1 1356:Make sure 1311:Evansjack1 1262:Evansjack1 904:Evansjack1 751:Regarding 496:BarsofGold 488:Evansjack1 381:Regarding 69:. Thanks. 3713:checkuser 3672:block log 3237:read the 3187:checkuser 3146:block log 2478:vandalize 2435:Help Desk 2422:this edit 1168:Probably 974:consensus 972:and seek 839:consensus 681:CBWeather 669:consensus 667:and seek 561:concerns 421:WikiDan61 393:like the 383:this edit 166:this edit 157:vandalize 107:vandalism 102:this edit 58:this edit 3684:contribs 3638:JohnInDC 3572:unsigned 3480:No, you 3460:unsigned 3379:unsigned 3326:unsigned 3284:unsigned 3263:unsigned 3158:contribs 3087:JohnInDC 3036:unsigned 2982:edit war 2949:|reason= 2891:unsigned 2870:unsigned 2816:unsigned 2765:unsigned 2709:unsigned 2672:JohnInDC 2652:unsigned 2635:JohnInDC 2611:unsigned 2594:JohnInDC 2574:unsigned 2527:unsigned 2368:contribs 2335:contribs 2306:contribs 2216:contribs 2182:contribs 2141:contribs 2089:contribs 1965:contribs 1896:JohnInDC 1854:contribs 1799:contribs 1773:contribs 1724:JohnInDC 1675:JohnInDC 1647:JohnInDC 1541:innuendo 1480:JohnInDC 1404:JohnInDC 1389:contribs 1296:contribs 1244:JohnInDC 1230:JohnInDC 1208:contribs 1174:JohnInDC 1144:contribs 1102:JohnInDC 1079:JohnInDC 1055:contribs 1029:JohnInDC 956:|reason= 936:60 hours 902:Thanks. 890:JohnInDC 862:JohnInDC 806:WP:POINT 772:contribs 651:|reason= 631:48 hours 492:Teahouse 451:for it. 426:ReadMe!! 111:reverted 20:unsigned 3707:unblock 3248:unblock 3181:unblock 2947:unblock 2924:blocked 2431:sandbox 2283:(cur | 954:unblock 931:blocked 829:" and " 649:unblock 626:blocked 486:Hello! 206:welcome 115:sandbox 3779:Thanks 3769:(talk) 3610:(talk) 3558:(talk) 3428:tildes 3351:(talk) 3312:(talk) 2961:(talk) 2629:Click 1440:Abscam 1274:(Yay! 1098:WP:EAR 966:first. 847:Drm310 737:Drm310 706:aren't 661:first. 400:C.Fred 385:: the 284:, and 187:(Talk) 180:Editor 139:(Talk) 132:Editor 83:(Talk) 76:Editor 3241:first 2372:email 2220:email 2186:email 2145:email 2093:email 1969:email 1858:email 1803:email 1777:email 1670:other 1665:don't 1593:have 1393:email 1300:email 1212:email 1148:email 1059:email 984:. — 776:email 552:Nanny 163:with 123:block 99:with 3785:talk 3739:talk 3642:talk 3627:talk 3580:talk 3537:~~~~ 3490:talk 3468:talk 3443:---- 3404:talk 3387:talk 3366:talk 3345:in. 3334:talk 3292:talk 3271:talk 3225:talk 3111:talk 3091:talk 3072:talk 3054:You 3044:talk 3022:talk 2995:warm 2936:. 2899:talk 2878:talk 2848:warm 2835:Here 2824:talk 2795:warm 2773:talk 2744:warm 2717:talk 2696:talk 2676:talk 2660:talk 2639:talk 2631:here 2619:talk 2598:talk 2582:talk 2558:talk 2535:talk 2514:talk 2486:talk 2390:talk 2364:talk 2356:This 2329:prev 2317:talk 2301:talk 2286:prev 2228:talk 2212:talk 2178:talk 2137:talk 2085:talk 2003:talk 1961:talk 1900:talk 1885:talk 1850:talk 1821:talk 1795:talk 1769:talk 1745:talk 1728:talk 1713:talk 1699:talk 1679:talk 1651:talk 1632:talk 1624:here 1610:talk 1571:talk 1555:talk 1516:talk 1502:talk 1484:talk 1464:talk 1448:talk 1435:here 1408:talk 1385:talk 1336:OK. 1315:talk 1292:talk 1266:talk 1248:talk 1234:talk 1204:talk 1178:talk 1170:here 1140:talk 1131:Here 1106:talk 1083:talk 1075:here 1051:talk 1033:talk 1018:talk 938:for 908:talk 894:talk 866:talk 851:talk 845:. -- 814:talk 768:talk 760:here 741:talk 718:talk 710:this 685:Talk 633:for 603:talk 571:talk 563:here 556:The 543:talk 500:talk 457:talk 405:talk 395:Post 372:talk 334:talk 320:talk 301:talk 178:TheQ 130:TheQ 74:TheQ 28:talk 3717:log 3436:or 3302:Hi 3191:log 3138:). 3064:and 2955:. 2495:ANI 2437:or 2425:to 2374:) 2237:Hi. 2188:) 2147:) 2095:) 2035:In 1971:) 1860:) 1805:) 1779:) 1591:did 1395:) 1302:) 1214:) 1150:) 1061:) 885:can 778:) 729:are 679:. 397:. — 366:. 252:in 61:to 3787:) 3751:: 3741:) 3729:: 3711:• 3705:• 3701:• 3696:• 3692:• 3687:• 3682:• 3678:• 3674:• 3644:) 3629:) 3582:) 3492:) 3470:) 3406:) 3389:) 3368:) 3336:) 3294:) 3273:) 3251:}} 3245:{{ 3227:) 3215:: 3203:: 3185:• 3179:• 3175:• 3170:• 3166:• 3161:• 3156:• 3152:• 3148:• 3113:) 3093:) 3074:) 3046:) 3024:) 2953:}} 2945:{{ 2901:) 2880:) 2826:) 2775:) 2719:) 2698:) 2662:) 2641:) 2621:) 2600:) 2584:) 2560:) 2537:) 2516:) 2488:) 2453:) 2392:) 2370:· 2366:· 2303:| 2295:‎ 2289:) 2230:) 2218:· 2214:· 2184:· 2180:· 2143:· 2139:· 2091:· 2087:· 2079:-- 2039:, 2005:) 1967:· 1963:· 1931:) 1902:) 1887:) 1856:· 1852:· 1841:. 1823:) 1801:· 1797:· 1775:· 1771:· 1747:) 1730:) 1715:) 1701:) 1681:) 1653:) 1634:) 1626:. 1612:) 1573:) 1557:) 1518:) 1504:) 1486:) 1466:) 1450:) 1410:) 1391:· 1387:· 1363:un 1317:) 1298:· 1294:· 1278:.) 1268:) 1250:) 1236:) 1210:· 1206:· 1180:) 1146:· 1142:· 1108:) 1085:) 1057:· 1053:· 1035:) 1020:) 960:}} 952:{{ 910:) 896:) 868:) 853:) 816:) 774:· 770:· 743:) 720:) 687:, 683:, 655:}} 647:{{ 605:) 573:) 545:) 502:) 459:) 444:is 407:) 374:) 336:) 322:) 303:) 288:. 280:, 266:). 173:. 117:. 30:) 3783:( 3737:( 3721:) 3719:) 3715:( 3670:( 3640:( 3625:( 3578:( 3547:~ 3519:: 3515:@ 3488:( 3466:( 3402:( 3385:( 3364:( 3332:( 3290:( 3269:( 3223:( 3195:) 3193:) 3189:( 3144:( 3109:( 3089:( 3070:( 3042:( 3020:( 3003:♠ 2989:S 2897:( 2876:( 2856:♠ 2842:S 2822:( 2803:♠ 2789:S 2771:( 2752:♠ 2738:S 2715:( 2694:( 2674:( 2658:( 2637:( 2617:( 2596:( 2580:( 2556:( 2533:( 2512:( 2484:( 2449:( 2388:( 2362:( 2315:( 2299:( 2226:( 2210:( 2176:( 2135:( 2083:( 2001:( 1959:( 1940:) 1936:( 1898:( 1883:( 1864:I 1848:( 1819:( 1793:( 1767:( 1743:( 1726:( 1711:( 1697:( 1677:( 1649:( 1630:( 1608:( 1569:( 1553:( 1530:: 1526:@ 1514:( 1500:( 1482:( 1462:( 1446:( 1406:( 1383:( 1313:( 1290:( 1264:( 1246:( 1232:( 1202:( 1176:( 1138:( 1104:( 1081:( 1049:( 1031:( 1016:( 906:( 892:( 864:( 849:( 812:( 766:( 739:( 716:( 601:( 569:( 541:( 498:( 455:( 403:( 370:( 332:( 318:( 299:( 26:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index