User talk:Eve Hall - Knowledge (XXG)

421:

blatantly factitious information listed on that page. I assumed that leaving references that more than supported my rebuttal would be sufficient. However, I was shocked to see that correcting Knowledge (XXG)'s errors was considered "vandalism." Moreover, although I realize that you were trying to be constructive in your comments about "assuming good faith" and "not being confrontational," I encourage you to investigate the individual you are defending. His comments addressed to me consisted of a warning not to add "nonsense" and then labeled my work as vandalism. Did Pupster21 demonstrate "good faith" and was he "non-confrontational?" I think not. With a little research, you will see that he prides himself on reverting such edits. On his page he states, "I am mostly active whacking vandals." What concerns me, however, is that he failed to even give a reason for removing the edit, other than his own opinion. These were the things I pointed out to him, and I did so quite respectfully. In my profession there is a very strict code of ethics, and very rigid standards of accuracy and professionalism, especially since the work we do has, in many cases, direct legal implications. I sincerely hope that the issue with persons such as Pupster21 is resolved, if nothing more than to enhance Knowledge (XXG)'s credibility. Unfortunately, I don't have the time to entangle myself in a full-blown edit of the psychotherapy page. I had hoped my insight would be helpful, but instead it was rejected and I was insulted. Regardless, I am writing this to thank you for a response that was much better received than previous ones. Good luck in your efforts.

1145:

let you become a member temporarily verify our legitimacy. There is NO OTHER GROUP quite like CFPA in the country. The reason that articles are limited is because we are still a young organization. We are trendsetting. Why can't your administrators THINK OUTSIDE of the box and left me show you who we are instead of sticking to ONLY Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and rules. It irritates me when people act like they can't think and act for themselves. Policies are not law. They are only meant to be guidelines. Where's the leadership? I'm so pissed off at this process at this point that I am practically ready to call it quits on Knowledge (XXG) and instruct 85 producers not to use your site. We might even make a movie about how silly this is process is. Maybe that will make us notable in your eyes? It will surely bring more attention to this inflexible process. I'm completely disgusted at this point.--

716:

today and no one had access to my computer. Is it possible to find out what was "added" from my IP? The note said that what was added was not saved as being irrelevant, but my concern lies in (a) discovering what was attempted to be added; and (b) investigating if someone (somehow) covered their IP with my IP in the process? Is this possible? If so, what is wikipedia doing about it? My fear is not that someone will add some odd item about depression, but that a more malicious type of "editorial," ostensibly from my IP, could cause me misdirected headache or problems. So what do you suggest?

1435: 1262:

wikipedia works as a new editor, the sheer volume of policies and guidelines and procedures can be petty baffling, so it can be helpful for a more experienced editor to help out. Quite a few people (myself included) have offered to help you now, we mean it as a friendly welcome rather than a slur on your capabilities, you might want to take us up on it. We really are trying to help.

791:

anything that is possible to clear up this mess and catch that vandal. I use Knowledge (XXG) as an easy resource for many things and I rarely make edits. How can I clear this up and should I be concerned that someone is using or sharing my IP address? I am a dial up user and I am worried that it may be easy to use my connection, it has happened before. Thanks for any help!

984: 1001: 492:) that lists a lot of different templates to use - remember to always assume good faith and go for the lowest level warning, unless they have recently been given a higher warning, in which case you can go up a level. Should you see that someone has vandalised after a recent final warning, you can report it to the administrators ( 771:. That means you always have access to your edit history and messages, even if your IP address changes or you use different computers. It also hides your IP, giving you more privacy, and removes a couple of editing restrictions imposed on unregistered IP users. Incidentally I've replied to your message both here and on your 790:

Excuse me, I have had a similar problem. I just got a message ("You have a message.") saying that I made some inappropriate edits to the 1999 İzmit earthquake, however I have never been to that page and certainly never made those horrible edits. I was shocked by what the person wrote and I want to do

1144:

Eve, this is a copy of the reply pasted on my talkback page. This is truly ridiculous. You need a third party to write a detailed article about us before you consider us "notable"? How about simply checking with some of our 85 members in the group yourself? Yes, we are private. But, I am willinng to

715:

Hello Eve, I was looking up something on wikipedia when I saw that it said "You have a message." To my amazement, the message was that there was something added to wikipedia from my IP (85.159.49.243), and that it happened in April 2008. I know this is impossible, as I was away from my place until

484:

Thanks for your help in reverting vandalism. Could I ask a favour though, please? In addition to reverting the vandalism, can you please post a warning on the user's talk page as well? The more warnings a vandal accumulates, the quicker they get themselves blocked. With some vandals, a warning is

849:

Hi, thanks for letting me know. I have the page on my watchlist, so I'll see any comments you leave there. But just a quick piece of advice, you might want to keep the tone just a little calmer over there, eh? I can see you care passionately about the topic, but don't let that inadvertently get you

795:

Hiya, I think the advice I gave to the other user just above your post still applies - if you are on dial-up you will probably be allocated a new IP address every time you connect. So it isn't that someone has used your connection, merely that they had previously been allocated an IP that was later

240:

Yes thats exactly what I'm getting. I hadn't realised it was a browser related thing, but I'm using the latest version of Firefox so if it doesn't work for me then it won't for lots of other users too. It's perhaps not broken, but certainly defective, so I'm not sure it's a good idea to link to it?

1352:

I can assure you I did not mean any of what I said as a slight, and I apologise if I caused offence. I was under the impression you were new (or unfamiliar with the policies), and was merely trying to help. If you understand and are familiar with the relevant policies and still disagree with them,

1288:

Calling me a "newbie" is not a compliment. It is an indirect slight to communicate that I am not aware of the way Knowledge (XXG) functions. The truth is that I have used Knowledge (XXG) for years and am not new to it at all. So, the comment is inappropriate and based on limited knowledge about me

1261:

You are not being talked down to by anyone, that I've seen. MichaelQSchmidt is trying to help you, and was merely letting me know as a courtesy since I was involved in the previous discussions. In fact, I read his comment above as a defence of you, rather than an attack! It is hard working out how

206:

lots of feedback. I'm also after more holistic comments and edits too, as well as nitpicks and formatting - is it too long? Are any sections confusing? Have I pitched the level of detail right or is it too academic? I would be really grateful to anyone who can spare some time to have a look at it.

401:

Hiya, thanks for getting back to me. The page was deleted due to the copyright problems - basically most of the article consisted of copied and pasted bits from the references. Anything from a sentence up to a whole paragraph. I think I might have a text file of the old page on my other computer,

205:

page now. It isn't by any means finished, it needs some additions and a lot of polish. But I think its reached the stage where it makes enough sense as it stands for people who happen upon it not to get completely confused, and where more input from other editors is needed. In particular lots and

145:

article. Thanks for inviting me to look at what you are developing in your sandbox. I myself have very little knowledge of this subject, though I have a technical background and may be able to contribute some copyediting once the article is assembled. I have InSAR under watch, so once you post

104:

Thanks for editing the suicide entry on my behalf -- I actually coudn't edit it myself because Wik wouldn't let me sign in, as I was on my laptop. I find lots of annoying problems like this on Knowledge (XXG) -- for instance, right now, I don't know how to use a talk page -- there's no field for

90:

I know it's very frustrating when a page gets nonsense added to it three or four times in an hour, but well done on reverting the changes. The problem with semi protection is that anonymous editors sometimes (often, really) make very good edits, and it's considered a matter of policy to wear the

420:

First, let me thank you for the tasteful response I received from you concerning the edit. To be honest, I had nearly lost all faith in Knowledge (XXG) and was about to avoid it, warning others to do so as well. The only reason I left the edit, and then later defended it, was because of the

184:

much a work in progress at the moment, as I'm sure is obvious from the sandbox page. But I'm adding bits to it as and when I get round to it. Unfortunately I've seen a reasonable amount of vandalism on some of my watchlisted pages right from the beginning, although I have to admit with the

1229:

My apologies. I was interpreting your seeming understanding of Knowledge (XXG) policies in the kindest way possible and was trying to be supportive. Since you are not a newcomer, and know all there is to know about Knowledge (XXG), then I can only presumethat assistance is not required.

385:

I would be happy to help with the volcanic margins page, but not sure where to start. It would help if i knew what the problems vis a vis copyright. is there a way you could send me former page with copied stuff flagged, so i can get a feel for how much needs to be changed?

1174:

and I hope it helps. As a newbie he just does not understand. I hope I made him aware that Wiki works by its own set of rules... and that these rules can work for him if he works with them. I have the sense that he just does not realize how many of us are willing to help.

227:, and for checking the new link that appeared on that page. After repeated testing (yesterday and today), I find that the link really does work (isn't broken) -- but the link does have a problem, and I wondered if you're seeing what I'm seeing. Specifically, the page 874:? It has been added to the article a couple of times and I've reverted because it was unsourced and I mistook it for a random IP making a random nationality change, but the IP has now made an effort to add a source. Sadly it's a forum post in Turkish, so probably not 325:. These are still fairly short and lack references, so Start is probably better than B until some more expansion and referencing is done. But as I said earlier, it's no big deal being off a bit on the initial rating, as it can always be adjusted later. Thanks. -- 435:

I have a log-in, but keep forgetting to use - so I have been lurking the last few months. My log is secisek, but almost all my work has been done off my IP address. My wiki intrests include music, history, religion, and fixing vandalism when it is clearly such.

1389:. So far, I've beutified the head page and moved a lot of the stuff to subpages of the project, so as not to bulk the main page. As an active member of the project, this is just a notice about what's going on. Comments go on the talk page. Happy holidays, 354: 156:

I agree, your proposed verison of the article is well done. I think it strikes a good balance between technical incomprehensiblity and over simplification. It's a balance beam on which it's hard to stay. Thanks for it, on behalf of our

164:. I also have left a message at the user's talk page. I'm an admin, so I can actually carry out such promises to block, though I've not yet done so. Leave me a message if more of this happens, and I'll take the trouble to learn how. 105:

discussion, no "email me here," -- most confusing. So I am putting yet another improper comment under "anonymous vandalism" and I won't reveal my name (which you know anyway) so as to at least be in keeping with the above subject.

1011:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing! Thanks for general

230:, when viewed in certain browsers, displays the HTML source, not a properly rendered webpage. Is that what you were seeing? I assume it's happening because the URL doesn't end in .html or .htm (dot-anything might work). -- 489: 1486: 312:

is largely my own work, I think A-class is too generous and B-class is more appropriate. Some of the other articles you've rated as B-class would probably be better off listed as Start-class for the time being, e.g.

307:

Hi Eve, thanks for helping out with assessments. Most of yours look spot-on, especially the importance ratings which are often difficult to judge, but your quality ratings are a bit too high in some cases. Although

1428: 1530:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1424: 878:

and I can't read it, and I've reverted for now. But since the IP has made an effort, it would be good if we could confirm whether there was a Pakistani contribution and help find a source to cite. Any ideas?

125:

for ages... Did you really mean me? Unless you're the anon editor I left the message for about the Islam edit? If so, then no problem, although you could have done it yourself even without being signed in.

675:

My guess on the userboxes is that you previewed the page but didn't save it - your user page doesn't have any edits in the history. The problem with the small text was due to an unmatched <small: -->

1493: 894:

Hmm. I'll see what I can do. However, this article reminds me of what Editorofthewiki keeps stating, these articles could be short and comprehensive, and still be FAs. Well, I'll get to work. ~~

167:

Welcome to Knowledge (XXG), and sorry you've had to encounter one of the more unfortunate aspects so quickly. I edited for months before having to, though admittedly that was quite a while ago.

754:. In terms of how the edit could be done from your computer, bear in mind that your IP address may not be fixed permanently to your computer. You may share it with other users from the same 493: 357:, which lists all articles assessed thus far, sorted in order of quality and importance. It's a good way to get a quick overview of what articles with various ratings look like. -- 656:

I noticed that when I saved my page after putting on some userboxes and then putting them in a no wiki and then turning off the computer, I could not find them. Any ideas? Also, on

1305:

My apologies. Your actions, reactions, and comments seemed identical in type to how some inexperienced newcomers react when an article they had authored is sent to AfD. Looking

1353:

then discussing it further with me probably isn't going to be productive (although I'm still willing to offer help if you would like it). In which case, I suggest you try

1313:

I saw an anonymous IP that had been editing since December 29, 2008. That you have been contributing to Knowledge (XXG) for years was not apparent. Again, my apologies.

1118:

I wasn't desperately convinced either, but they could have been and I gave the IP the benefit of the doubt since it was a new editor. Thanks for the heads-up though.

762:

article. If you're sure you have a static IP address but you use an unsecured wireless network it may also be possible for someone to use your internet connection.

340:

Great, thanks for the feedback! Will bear in mind the quality ratings, do keep an eye on my ratings and shout if I'm still missing. I won't be at all offended.

402:

will look for you when I get home. It would be quite a big project to resurrect it, the entire thing would need to be rewritten. But maybe its worth a try.

65: 496:). It is a lovely feeling when you know that someone who has been really annoying you with their vandalism gets themselves indefinitely blocked :-) 25:

to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

108:

Anyway, thanks for making that edit. That's just what I wanted to do, but couldn't. Hopefully I will someday navigate this all a bit better.

1163: 1013: 1555: 838: 767:

If you're at all worried about people confusing your wikipedia edits with other people using the same IP address, the easy solution is to

499:

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to drop me a line on my talk page. Once again, thanks for the anti-vandalism attitude!

747: 731: 717: 1386: 1423:(DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are 1289:

other than that I just created a new account. It was a slight that came at my expense, even in your apparent spirit of good will.--

49: 1551: 1077: 1354: 34: 22: 599:

I am not really involved in much, mainly typo correction and making redirects, so I was wondering whether I could help in a

68:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out

1195:

Thanks, that looks a great idea, and I hope ATurner takes up your offer of help. I'll chip in too, when I can. Cheers,

1542:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

54: 1547: 1213:

Schmidt, I can hear you. I have an engineering and a law degree and don't appreciate being talked down to or about.--

1434: 1322: 1239: 1184: 29: 1396: 560: 871: 834: 61: 772: 758:, or you may be allotted a different one every time you connect to the internet. It's explained more in the 735: 721: 537: 504: 362: 330: 251: 1065: 920:

well, I've added 2 citations, You should really use the first one, its really interesting and reliable. ~~

826: 727: 625: 1026: 1023: 309: 112: 1543: 1073: 830: 69: 422: 281:

You're welcome! I'm still fairly new here so it wasn't necessarily very definitive, but hope it helped.

1008: 44: 1315: 1294: 1290: 1232: 1218: 1214: 1177: 1150: 1146: 966: 928: 902: 1519: 1510: 1069: 660:

this text renders smaller than other comments, although it renders normally on the preview. Thanks,

389:

this could take some time because i'm facing 1 june deadline at work, can't do much till mid june.

1391: 701: 556: 224: 1539: 1523: 870:

Does anyone have any good sources confirming a Pakistani contribution to the aid effort after the

533: 500: 358: 326: 1310: 1020: 665: 657: 641: 633: 608: 585: 439:

Still learning the ropes, so thanks for the heads up. 67.186.79.211 20:43, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

255: 231: 1535: 1527: 466: 455: 1538:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1531: 797: 768: 1108: 983: 921: 895: 1420: 750:. The material I removed from the depression page added from this IP can be seen in this 450:

Hi, Why has "List of Reading University Societies" been deleted while I was away? Thanks

1306: 1036: 697: 1358: 1263: 1196: 1119: 1047: 959: 880: 851: 801: 776: 677: 515: 470: 403: 341: 322: 318: 282: 242: 209: 190: 127: 39: 355:

Knowledge (XXG):Version 1.0 Editorial Team/WikiProject Volcanoes articles by quality

1427:, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to 1103:- you really needed some expertise to find if it's a vandal or not... what a pain! 1017: 661: 637: 629: 604: 581: 514:

Yeah I do sometimes, but I've been getting lazy about it... will pull my socks up!

314: 291: 272: 147: 92: 578:

Thank you for your advice on the deletion of my articles; I've got it sorted now.

201:

Its now vaguely assembled together as an article, so I've posted it to the proper

1154: 600: 451: 392: 186: 161: 77: 1104: 759: 746:

Hi, yes it is possible to see what was added from your IP address, just go to

228: 189:

stuff I was killing time by stalking the recent changes looking for trouble.

822:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Suicide_methods#I_strongly_dislike_this_article

1385:

Hello. If you haven't noticed, I've started a structural reorganization of

948:. i was wondering if you wanted to join my newly founded Volcanoes Wikia? 490:

Knowledge (XXG):Template messages/User talk namespace/Multi-level templates

775:, just in case your IP address changes. Any questions, feel free to ask. 1099:. They are in fact malicious. He/She also tried to do subtle editing to 821: 1526:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

1309:

I saw an username that had been editing since January 1, 2009. Looking

168: 122: 1559: 1402: 1366: 1327: 1298: 1271: 1244: 1222: 1204: 1189: 1127: 1112: 1081: 1055: 1029: 973: 933: 907: 888: 859: 842: 809: 784: 739: 705: 685: 669: 645: 612: 589: 565: 541: 523: 508: 473: 459: 425: 406: 395: 366: 344: 334: 294: 285: 275: 258: 245: 234: 212: 193: 171: 150: 130: 115: 95: 80: 850:

into personal rows with people, even if they're provoking you first.

796:

given to you. If you're worried about it, the easiest solution is to

1419:. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in 1096:

The edits of 65.95.27.147 are not good faith at all, as you say in

1433: 1000: 353:

Hi, I just thought of one more suggestion: you could look through

202: 142: 1473:: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August 875: 76:

on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

1100: 755: 676:

tag in the signature bit of the comment above. I've fixed it.

954: 999: 982: 494:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrator intervention against vandalism

91:

vandalism rather than losing that avenue of contribution.

1487:

Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard

271:

Thanks for the feedback on the cerebral hypoxia article!

382:

Just checked in after long absence. busy time of year.

160:

And thanks also for policing the recurrent vandalism at

1479:: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate 1171: 1164:

User:ATurnerIII/sandbox/Chicago Film Producers Alliance

1097: 951:

If so, please click here to find out more information:

751: 1467:: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums 223:

Dear Ms. Hall, Thank you for checking on the article

696:

Hi Eve, I've replied to your comment on my talkpage.

1461:: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey 622:I would like to know where the color pallete is. 121:Slightly bemused by this one, as I haven't edited 1518:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 1039:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. 8: 1411:: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1) 1007:Ainlina has smiled at you! Smiles promote 60:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 101:ARGH! I don't know where this should go! 1137:Disgusted with Knowledge (XXG)'s Process 1449:: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem. 550:reply to your comment on my talk page 290:Two minds are always better than one 141:I applaud your effort to improve the 7: 446:List of Reading University Societies 1438:Steven Zhang's Fellowship Slideshow 748:Special:Contributions/85.159.49.243 72:, ask me on my talk page, or place 30:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 1355:Knowledge (XXG):Dispute_resolution 14: 1544:review the candidates' statements 1494:Read the entire first edition of 146:changes to it I'll see them. -- 1415:Welcome to the first edition of 465:Hi, have answered this on your 1550:. For the Election committee, 1520:Arbitration Committee election 1511:ArbCom elections are now open! 1506:19:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 991:For helping me with templates 554:No prob; I figured as much. - 1: 1560:16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 1403:14:08, 25 December 2009 (UTC) 1128:18:47, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 1113:16:25, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 724:) 00:17, 17 April 2008 (UTC) 460:10:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC) 431:RE: Greeting and back at you. 1082:18:10, 27 October 2008 (UTC) 1035:Smile at others by adding {{ 542:17:41, 29 January 2008 (UTC) 524:17:32, 29 January 2008 (UTC) 509:17:30, 29 January 2008 (UTC) 480:Reverting vandalism - thanks 474:09:28, 1 December 2007 (UTC) 96:00:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 81:00:22, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 50:How to write a great article 1546:and submit your choices on 1367:20:22, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 1328:01:25, 3 January 2009 (UTC) 1299:20:00, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 1272:18:48, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 1245:01:25, 3 January 2009 (UTC) 1223:18:38, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 1205:10:14, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 1190:04:13, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 1155:03:44, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 1056:15:16, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 1030:15:17, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 820:You have a new reply from: 180:Cheers! The InSAR stuff is 1575: 1552:MediaWiki message delivery 785:10:37, 17 April 2008 (UTC) 740:00:14, 17 April 2008 (UTC) 706:21:35, 12 April 2008 (UTC) 686:09:56, 10 April 2008 (UTC) 670:08:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC) 566:22:14, 31 March 2008 (UTC) 295:17:06, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 286:15:35, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 276:15:33, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 259:17:33, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 246:22:15, 24 March 2007 (UTC) 235:21:55, 24 March 2007 (UTC) 213:18:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 194:09:33, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 172:00:04, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 1485:: It's time to close the 1471:DR Noticeboard comparison 1455:: The most recent DR data 974:12:06, 23 July 2008 (UTC) 934:23:10, 21 June 2008 (UTC) 908:22:45, 21 June 2008 (UTC) 889:08:52, 18 June 2008 (UTC) 646:12:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC) 613:09:07, 9 April 2008 (UTC) 590:17:45, 6 April 2008 (UTC) 485:sufficient to stop them. 426:14:05, 10 June 2007 (UTC) 151:20:28, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 70:Knowledge (XXG):Questions 1362: 1267: 1200: 1123: 1051: 860:16:20, 27 May 2008 (UTC) 855: 843:15:45, 27 May 2008 (UTC) 810:17:11, 19 May 2008 (UTC) 805: 780: 681: 519: 407:11:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC) 396:04:55, 22 May 2007 (UTC) 131:19:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC) 116:15:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC) 1136: 940:Joining Volcanoes Wikia 367:07:41, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 345:10:22, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 335:23:41, 7 May 2007 (UTC) 250:A good point. I'll ask 1439: 1004: 988: 310:Volcanic Seven Summits 1524:Arbitration Committee 1489:. Agree or disagree? 1437: 1387:WikiProject Volcanoes 1089:Edits of 65.95.27.147 1003: 986: 872:1999 İzmit earthquake 866:1999 Izmit earthquake 21:Hello, Eve Hall, and 1528:arbitration process 225:Milankovitch cycles 219:Milankovitch cycles 86:Anonymous vandalism 1540:arbitration policy 1440: 1421:dispute resolution 1005: 989: 252:User 64.163.110.26 35:How to edit a page 1477:Discussion update 1465:Activity analysis 1442:In this issue: 1085: 1068:comment added by 1041: 845: 829:comment added by 798:create an account 769:create an account 742: 730:comment added by 648: 628:comment added by 488:There is a page ( 1566: 1504:The Olive Branch 1496:The Olive Branch 1417:The Olive Branch 1409:The Olive Branch 1401: 1399: 1357:for more ideas. 1318: 1235: 1180: 1084: 1062: 1061:Thank you too! 1046:Cheers Ainlina! 1033: 971: 964: 931: 926: 905: 900: 824: 725: 623: 618:Another question 564: 375:volcanic margins 365: 333: 75: 1574: 1573: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1548:the voting page 1514: 1500: 1413: 1397: 1390: 1383: 1316: 1233: 1178: 1168: 1139: 1091: 1063: 1043: 997: 981: 967: 960: 942: 929: 922: 903: 896: 868: 818: 713: 694: 654: 620: 597: 576: 563: 557:CobaltBlueTony™ 555: 552: 482: 448: 433: 415: 377: 361: 329: 305: 269: 221: 139: 113:Blondjamesblond 88: 73: 55:Manual of Style 12: 11: 5: 1572: 1570: 1517: 1513: 1508: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1480: 1474: 1468: 1462: 1459:Survey results 1456: 1450: 1412: 1406: 1382: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1208: 1207: 1167: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1138: 1135: 1133: 1131: 1130: 1090: 1087: 1059: 1058: 1032: 1012:helpfulness!-- 998: 996: 993: 980: 977: 941: 938: 937: 936: 916: 913: 911: 910: 867: 864: 863: 862: 831:Prowikipedians 817: 814: 813: 812: 788: 787: 764: 763: 712: 709: 693: 690: 689: 688: 653: 650: 619: 616: 596: 593: 575: 572: 570: 559: 551: 548: 547: 546: 545: 544: 527: 526: 481: 478: 477: 476: 447: 444: 442: 432: 429: 414: 411: 410: 409: 376: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 348: 347: 304: 301: 300: 299: 298: 297: 268: 265: 264: 263: 262: 261: 254:to fix it. -- 220: 217: 207: 199: 198: 197: 196: 175: 174: 165: 158: 138: 135: 134: 133: 100: 87: 84: 66:sign your name 58: 57: 52: 47: 42: 37: 32: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1571: 1562: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1512: 1509: 1507: 1505: 1499: 1497: 1488: 1484: 1481: 1478: 1475: 1472: 1469: 1466: 1463: 1460: 1457: 1454: 1451: 1448: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1436: 1432: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1410: 1407: 1405: 1404: 1400: 1395: 1394: 1388: 1380: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1329: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1320: 1319: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1246: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1237: 1236: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1182: 1181: 1173: 1165: 1162: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1134: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1088: 1086: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1044: 1042: 1040: 1038: 1031: 1028: 1025: 1022: 1019: 1015: 1010: 1002: 994: 992: 985: 978: 976: 975: 972: 970: 969:(§peak to me) 965: 963: 956: 955: 952: 949: 947: 939: 935: 932: 927: 925: 919: 918: 917: 914: 909: 906: 901: 899: 893: 892: 891: 890: 886: 882: 877: 873: 865: 861: 857: 853: 848: 847: 846: 844: 840: 836: 832: 828: 823: 815: 811: 807: 803: 799: 794: 793: 792: 786: 782: 778: 774: 770: 766: 765: 761: 757: 753: 749: 745: 744: 743: 741: 737: 733: 732:85.159.49.243 729: 723: 719: 718:85.159.49.243 710: 708: 707: 703: 699: 691: 687: 683: 679: 674: 673: 672: 671: 667: 663: 659: 651: 649: 647: 643: 639: 635: 631: 627: 617: 615: 614: 610: 606: 602: 594: 592: 591: 587: 583: 579: 573: 571: 568: 567: 562: 558: 549: 543: 539: 535: 534:StephenBuxton 531: 530: 529: 528: 525: 521: 517: 513: 512: 511: 510: 506: 502: 501:StephenBuxton 497: 495: 491: 486: 479: 475: 472: 468: 464: 463: 462: 461: 457: 453: 445: 443: 440: 437: 430: 428: 427: 424: 423:Shrp2edgeswrd 418: 412: 408: 405: 400: 399: 398: 397: 394: 390: 387: 383: 380: 374: 368: 364: 360: 359:Seattle Skier 356: 352: 351: 350: 349: 346: 343: 339: 338: 337: 336: 332: 328: 327:Seattle Skier 324: 323:Volcanic cone 320: 319:Volcanic bomb 316: 311: 302: 296: 293: 289: 288: 287: 284: 280: 279: 278: 277: 274: 266: 260: 257: 253: 249: 248: 247: 244: 239: 238: 237: 236: 233: 229: 226: 218: 216: 214: 211: 204: 195: 192: 188: 183: 179: 178: 177: 176: 173: 170: 166: 163: 159: 155: 154: 153: 152: 149: 144: 136: 132: 129: 124: 120: 119: 118: 117: 114: 111:David (oops) 109: 106: 102: 98: 97: 94: 85: 83: 82: 79: 71: 67: 63: 56: 53: 51: 48: 46: 43: 41: 38: 36: 33: 31: 28: 27: 26: 24: 19: 18: 1515: 1503: 1501: 1495: 1482: 1476: 1470: 1464: 1458: 1452: 1446: 1441: 1425:active in DR 1416: 1414: 1408: 1392: 1384: 1381:WP Volcanoes 1323: 1321: 1314: 1240: 1238: 1231: 1185: 1183: 1176: 1169: 1132: 1095: 1092: 1060: 1034: 1006: 990: 968: 961: 957: 953: 950: 945: 943: 923: 915: 912: 897: 884: 869: 819: 789: 714: 695: 655: 621: 598: 580: 577: 569: 553: 498: 487: 483: 449: 441: 438: 434: 419: 416: 391: 388: 384: 381: 378: 315:Volcanic ash 306: 270: 256:JEBrown87544 232:JEBrown87544 222: 200: 181: 140: 110: 107: 103: 99: 89: 59: 20: 16: 15: 1064:—Preceding 1037:subst:Smile 825:—Preceding 726:—Preceding 711:Quick Point 624:—Preceding 601:WikiProject 595:Can I help? 417:Hello Eve, 303:Assessments 187:Loudspeaker 162:Loudspeaker 1536:topic bans 1447:Background 1291:ATurnerIII 1215:ATurnerIII 1170:I've done 1147:ATurnerIII 987:WikiThanks 958:Thanks, -- 924:Meldshal42 898:Meldshal42 760:IP address 74:{{helpme}} 62:Wikipedian 40:Help pages 1532:site bans 1429:this page 1070:Wheels188 816:New reply 773:talk page 698:Dutch Eve 574:Thank you 413:Greetings 208:Cheers. 64:! Please 1483:Proposal 1453:Research 1359:Eve Hall 1317:Schmidt, 1264:Eve Hall 1234:Schmidt, 1197:Eve Hall 1179:Schmidt, 1120:Eve Hall 1078:contribs 1066:unsigned 1048:Eve Hall 1009:WikiLove 962:Meldshal 946:Eve Hall 881:Eve Hall 876:reliable 852:Eve Hall 839:contribs 827:unsigned 802:Eve Hall 777:Eve Hall 728:unsigned 626:unsigned 532:Thanks! 45:Tutorial 17:Welcome! 1498:--: --> 662:Ainlina 638:Ainlina 630:Ainlina 605:Ainlina 582:Fwooper 292:Egfrank 273:Egfrank 267:Thanks. 157:Reader. 148:Brianhe 123:Suicide 93:Orpheus 23:welcome 1522:. The 1014:Thanks 979:Thanks 930:(talk) 904:(talk) 469:page. 452:Pebkac 393:Geodoc 379:Eve, 363:(talk) 331:(talk) 321:, and 78:Prolog 1105:Msoos 1024:(box) 995:Smile 692:2Eves 203:InSAR 143:InSAR 137:InSAR 1556:talk 1363:talk 1311:HERE 1307:HERE 1295:talk 1268:talk 1219:talk 1201:talk 1172:this 1151:talk 1124:talk 1109:talk 1093:Hi! 1074:talk 1052:talk 1021:lina 885:talk 856:talk 835:talk 806:talk 781:talk 752:link 736:talk 722:talk 702:talk 682:talk 666:talk 642:talk 634:talk 609:talk 586:talk 561:talk 538:talk 520:talk 505:talk 467:talk 456:talk 182:very 1516:Hi, 1398:Mar 1393:Res 1101:AES 1018:Ain 944:Hi 756:ISP 678:Eve 652:Bug 603:.-- 516:Eve 471:Eve 404:Eve 342:Eve 283:Eve 243:Eve 210:Eve 191:Eve 128:Eve 1558:) 1534:, 1502:-- 1431:. 1365:) 1297:) 1270:) 1221:) 1203:) 1153:) 1126:) 1111:) 1080:) 1076:• 1054:) 1016:, 887:) 858:) 841:) 837:• 808:) 800:! 783:) 738:) 704:) 684:) 668:) 658:IE 644:) 636:-- 611:) 588:) 540:) 522:) 507:) 458:) 317:, 215:. 169:ww 1554:( 1361:( 1293:( 1266:( 1217:( 1199:( 1166:. 1149:( 1122:( 1107:( 1072:( 1050:( 1027:? 883:( 854:( 833:( 804:( 779:( 734:( 720:( 700:( 680:( 664:( 640:( 632:( 607:( 584:( 536:( 518:( 503:( 454:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index