Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Evenin' scrot!

Source 📝

182:, and this would generate a footnote with the same number as the original, and the footnote would have multiple links back (one to every time it was referenced). If you remove a reference, it is important to make sure you are not messing up other parts of the article that may refer to it again. If a reference is declared with a "name" as this one was, that just increases the chances that there could be other parts of the article that link to that reference (I hasten to add it was not the case here, but it is still an occupational hazard). That means that you should have been doubly careful when you removed that reference and replaced it with something else. In fact, since you were referencing the same thing and only objected to the positioning of the reference, the best solution would have been to simply cut-n-paste (move) the reference code to the location within the sentence that you believed appropriate. That is what I did eventually by replacing your citation code with the old one, at the new location. I hope that clarifies what I meant. PS Remember to sign your comments in talk pages (including User talk pages) with ~~~~. By the way, if you type that directly, you immediately get the signature; if you want a control sequence such as the four tildes to show up, you enclose it in <nowiki: --> 268:
doing, but somehow feel insecure about my edits and have arbitrarily chosen to do what feels comfortable for you. I can understand actions only as a misguided concern for the integrity of wikipedia, but remain confused as to why the burden has been placed so high on me to support what is expressly written in the Constitution and cited to in the opinions of the United States Supreme Court. In any case, I have responded, as you have asked, on the discussion page for the Associate Justice article. I hope it satisfies your inquiry. If it remains insufficient to meet your standards, then I really don't know how else to help you.
129: 409: 281: 494:
I demand to know why this username has been blocked. Since I have begun editing Knowledge (XXG), I have experienced nothing but negative interactions with the persons who claim to regulate it. First, over all matter of trivialities; now, over some bizarre idea, without any reasoning or support, that
257:
I am not really sure what your problem is or why you are picking on me with such random or trivial requests about banalities. With respect to the "address" on my page, which somehow bothers you: there is currently an affidavit on file at the Maricopa County Recorder's Office of which you may obtain
179:
The reference you removed was a web citation, linking to a copy of the text of the Constitution. You replaced it with a footnote that merely invoked the Constitution; surely you agree that the former is slightly better than the latter? As to the "name". If you look at the wikicode, the citation that
994:
have chosen to attribute is in fact the meaning attached to my name. This is severely undermining my lack of trust in Knowledge (XXG) as a community. I refuse to respond further until everyone has taken some time to cool off, step back, and evaluate exactly what is going on here. Also, I will be
989:
I did. How, exactly is my user name not neutral? I have just done some quick research to try and prove my case, but am exhausted from arguing with you all. Simply typing "scrot" into a search engine yields less than 20% of hits containing the slang meaning which you claim most people attribute.
510:
This isn't really a request for unblock, but for information. I am not aware of any meaning of the word 'scrot' which is not related to the English word 'scrotum,' and most readers would read it that way, as well. The use of a body part which is generally considered private, especially in a form
214:
is somewhat snarky. Please use more collegial edit summaries in future. Since you've reverted it back, please provide a specific cite for the "good behaviour" phrasing ("the constitution" is not specific enough). I've raised this issue on the talk of the article, probably best to address it there.
655:
am unhappy with the actions of others, not that others might have some "unhappy reaction" to me. Of course, I do not expect you to understand the difference, as I notice from your user page and history that your primary concern is filling some sort of quota of wikipedians you have kicked off or
576:
a software utility for screenshot applications, and one which I use extensively for cataloging movies and media from my linux-based machine (which I have built and am quite proud of). This is something of a hobby of mine (always has been when I have time off from work) as the image captures are
581:
be an equivocal term, and then claim your definition is the right one, tramples on my understanding of understanding and respect. I'm sure that I could claim your name has some ridiculous second meaning, and then further presume to know your intent and claimed you meant to use the term in that
267:
With respect to the Supreme Court article edit, I highly suggest that you stay out of matters you know nothing about. It is obvious from your revisions to the Associate Justice article, which lacks any reasoned consideration or support on the discussion page, that you have no idea what you are
900:
Evenin'... you're currently indef blocked. Don't remove content again, or your talk page may be locked so you can't use it. This material is not just for you, it's for the benefit of any admins who may be contemplating removing your block. You can archive if and when you are unblocked.
515:, which don't allow us to have names that would reasonably be interpreted as vulgar or insulting. As you say, one reason we don't allow such names is that the negative reactions they cause in other editors make it difficult to edit successfully while using names of this kind. — 569:
Quite incorrect, with respect to scrot. Of course, I should only have expected to receive this offensive response, given the current nature of thought that abounds here; and I hesitate further to question exactly what state of mind you are in with respect to it. Scrot is
656:
restrained from editing. Again, you fit neatly into the category of other wikipedians with authority, with the exception of a distinct few whom I now greatly admire for valuable insight, sound judgment or at least sound reasons before hastening to act.
237:... I have reverted this. Take this to the talk, as I suggested in April. Also, why are you adding an address to your user page. Unless you're prepared to prove it is actually where you live, it's probably not appropriate to be there... ++ 803:
That's true, but nevertheless, they're socks (I ran checks, and so did Jpgordon) and have been tagged as such. The appropriate way to seek a new name is to ask here for guidance, and then commit to a rename, followed by a trip to
352:. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page. 302:
A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved
605:
There is a consensus that your username is disruptive and you won't be able to argue away from that. You can pick a new, neutral username. Would you like to do this? If so, what would that name be?
495:
my username is offensive! This constant, arbitrary & negative harrassment is souring my opinion of Knowledge (XXG) and causing me to form similar opinions ofthe commmand structure within it. I
582:
fashion. This would be absurd and disrespectful, and may leave you feeling victimized by a wikipedian who took not the time to know you before endeavoring to tell the world who he thinks you are.
200: 212:("changed improper proletariat misconception that federal judges are appointed to office 'for life"; correct term, printed quite clearly in the constitution, is that of "good behavior".) 181:. When you do that, you give the citation a "name"; if you later want to make a footnote reference to the same item, then you would only need to do <ref name="constitution"/: --> 577:
ultimately designed for other collages and artistry which I have secured the appropriate copyrights to create. The fact that you supply your own definition for what
449: 1112:... which ES should feel free to continue using, as its name is just fine under our guidelines. There's no need to unblock this one. I'll retag the socks. ++ 555:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
1052:
Your username is not appropriate. I've protected this page from editing. Your contribution history is short, so if you wish to create a new account with a
783:
for the same reason. If you'd like to change your username, see if you can think of something that doesn't include any references to genitalia at all. -
142: 995:
contacting other "admins" who have actually demonstrated some reasoned judgment in the past to evaluate this situation. This is absolutely ridiculous.
1004: 966: 665: 697: 738: 930: 540: 691: 444: 91: 31: 1089: 732: 808:, rather than to sock to evade a block. Abandoning an account and starting over is fine but don't sock to do it. State your intentions. ++ 957:
According to Lar, I am not entitled to one. I have given up; I feel like my contributions or presence is not appreciated here on Wiki.
1083: 876: 835: 793: 525: 709: 632:
Indeed, if this editor has had unhappy reactions from others it could easily have had at least something to do with the username.
53: 750: 48: 160: 108: 367: 463: 1101: 422: 291: 58: 703: 416: 744: 421:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
1121: 1028: 984: 952: 910: 858: 817: 770: 246: 224: 38: 27: 1095: 312: 726: 685: 65: 1077: 366:
try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see
321: 69: 81: 73: 872: 831: 789: 521: 780: 512: 43: 996: 958: 922: 680: 657: 427: 298:
Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).
1061: 1024: 980: 948: 721: 637: 610: 398: 339: 761:(both of which have been blocked) is not likely to be viewed as a constructive approach either. ++ 258:
some "proof" of my ownership of the property, if you in fact require this for some strange reason.
157: 135: 128: 105: 85: 34:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: 286:
This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Knowledge (XXG) because your username,
80:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out 1072: 359: 189: 676: 304: 867: 826: 784: 549: 516: 382: 805: 388: 376: 326: 358:
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check
1057: 1020: 976: 944: 633: 606: 394: 349: 355:
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
317: 1117: 906: 854: 813: 766: 242: 220: 151: 99: 320:
guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your
362:
for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus
185: 511:
which seems to address the reader by that word, wouldn't be appropriate under our
990:
Yet I am being assailed under the theory that some strange vulgar meaning, which
1124: 1065: 913: 881: 861: 840: 820: 798: 773: 641: 614: 530: 402: 249: 227: 193: 169: 117: 1113: 902: 850: 809: 762: 238: 216: 1056:
username, please do. Accounts with inappropriate names will be blocked.
180:
you had removed was declared by writing <ref name="constitution": -->
77: 407: 279: 145:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
127: 201:
Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
537:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
96:
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
557:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
1107: 756: 715: 477: 473: 467: 458: 454: 440: 436: 432: 234: 207: 943:
Please wait. Would you like another user name or not?
206:
Hi. I reverted your edit because the edit summary for
971:
You're mistaken about what Lar said. You can pick a
651:
Actually, my complaint was quite the converse, that
415:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
375:
If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may
1071:Actually, as it turns out, ES has one already... 134:Hello, Evenin' scrot!. You have new messages at 845:... :) meanwhile, I thought I was agreeing with 8: 921:No thank you. I prefer to remove it now. 499:to know why my user name has been blocked. 64:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 324:under a new name, then you may request a 825:Um, I thought I was agreeing with you? - 866:Hooray! I guess that means we agree! - 88:, or ask your question and then place 779:No, those would be violations of the 379:by adding below this notice the text 7: 39:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 30:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for 14: 368:Knowledge (XXG):Changing username 1: 1125:20:49, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 1066:20:26, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 1029:20:22, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 1015:You've already been told why 1005:20:17, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 985:20:04, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 967:20:04, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 953:19:58, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 931:19:57, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 914:19:55, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 882:19:55, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 862:19:54, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 841:19:45, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 821:19:44, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 799:19:36, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 774:19:31, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 666:19:57, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 642:19:20, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 615:20:02, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 531:19:02, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 403:11:07, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 250:04:52, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 170:07:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 118:19:26, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 184:so it is not "interpreted". 54:How to write a great article 419:, who declined the request. 26:Hello, Evenin' scrot!, and 1141: 675:Note also that setting up 387:, but you should read our 228:01:58, 18 April 2008 (UTC) 541:guide to appealing blocks 389:guide to appealing blocks 313:choose a new account name 194:02:30, 7 March 2008 (UTC) 82:Knowledge (XXG):Questions 1000: 962: 926: 661: 412: 344:your new username here 322:existing contributions 310:You are encouraged to 284: 132: 464:change block settings 411: 283: 131: 290:, does not meet our 136:Addshore's talk page 896:Removal of material 385:|Your reason here}} 350:your user talk page 183:...</nowiki: --> 413: 327:change in username 285: 175:Supreme Court edit 143:remove this notice 133: 49:How to edit a page 32:your contributions 377:appeal this block 165: 113: 72:your messages on 1132: 1111: 880: 839: 797: 760: 719: 554: 548: 529: 483: 481: 470: 452: 450:deleted contribs 410: 386: 347: 282: 168: 163: 154: 146: 116: 111: 102: 95: 74:discussion pages 1140: 1139: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1075: 1019:is disruptive. 898: 870: 829: 787: 724: 683: 560: 552: 546: 545:, then use the 534: 519: 501: 471: 461: 447: 430: 423:blocking policy 408: 392: 380: 337: 316:that meets our 292:username policy 280: 277: 204: 177: 166: 152: 149: 147: 140: 125: 114: 100: 97: 89: 59:Manual of Style 19: 12: 11: 5: 1138: 1136: 1128: 1127: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 997:Evenin' scrot! 959:Evenin' scrot! 936: 935: 934: 933: 923:Evenin' scrot! 897: 894: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 888: 887: 886: 885: 884: 781:username rules 722:Harry Balzagna 681:Mornin' scrot! 673: 672: 671: 670: 669: 668: 658:Evenin' scrot! 630: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 617: 590: 589: 588: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 535: 513:username rules 508: 504:Decline reason 492: 488:Request reason 485: 428:Evenin' scrot! 406: 374: 373: 372: 371: 356: 353: 295: 288:Evenin' scrot! 278: 276: 275:username block 273: 272: 271: 270: 269: 262: 261: 260: 259: 255: 203: 199:Your edits to 197: 176: 173: 161: 139: 126: 124: 121: 109: 62: 61: 56: 51: 46: 41: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1137: 1126: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1109: 1106: 1103: 1100: 1097: 1094: 1091: 1088: 1085: 1082: 1079: 1074: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1002: 998: 993: 988: 987: 986: 982: 978: 974: 970: 969: 968: 964: 960: 956: 955: 954: 950: 946: 942: 941: 940: 939: 938: 937: 932: 928: 924: 920: 919: 918: 917: 916: 915: 912: 908: 904: 895: 883: 878: 874: 869: 865: 864: 863: 860: 856: 852: 848: 844: 843: 842: 837: 833: 828: 824: 823: 822: 819: 815: 811: 807: 802: 801: 800: 795: 791: 786: 782: 778: 777: 776: 775: 772: 768: 764: 758: 755: 752: 749: 746: 743: 740: 737: 734: 731: 728: 723: 717: 714: 711: 708: 705: 702: 699: 696: 693: 690: 687: 682: 678: 667: 663: 659: 654: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 645: 644: 643: 639: 635: 616: 612: 608: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 597: 596: 595: 594: 593: 592: 591: 580: 575: 574: 568: 567: 566: 565: 564: 563: 562: 561: 559: 558: 551: 544: 542: 533: 532: 527: 523: 518: 514: 507: 505: 500: 498: 491: 489: 484: 479: 475: 469: 465: 460: 456: 451: 446: 442: 441:global blocks 438: 437:active blocks 434: 429: 424: 420: 418: 417:administrator 405: 404: 400: 396: 390: 384: 378: 369: 365: 361: 357: 354: 351: 345: 341: 335: 334: 333: 332: 331: 329: 328: 323: 319: 315: 314: 308: 306: 300: 299: 293: 289: 274: 266: 265: 264: 263: 256: 253: 252: 251: 248: 244: 240: 236: 232: 231: 230: 229: 226: 222: 218: 213: 209: 202: 198: 196: 195: 191: 187: 174: 172: 171: 167: 158: 156: 155: 144: 137: 130: 122: 120: 119: 115: 106: 104: 103: 93: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 67: 60: 57: 55: 52: 50: 47: 45: 42: 40: 37: 36: 35: 33: 29: 24: 23: 16: 1104: 1098: 1092: 1086: 1080: 1073:Supervox2113 1053: 1051: 1016: 991: 972: 899: 846: 753: 747: 741: 735: 729: 712: 706: 700: 694: 688: 674: 652: 631: 578: 572: 571: 556: 538: 536: 509: 503: 502: 496: 493: 487: 486: 459:creation log 426: 414: 393: 363: 343: 325: 311: 309: 301: 297: 296: 287: 235:did it again 211: 205: 178: 150: 148: 98: 86:my talk page 84:, ask me on 63: 25: 21: 20: 975:user name. 868:FisherQueen 827:FisherQueen 785:FisherQueen 517:FisherQueen 305:bot account 123:New Message 76:using four 1102:page moves 751:page moves 710:page moves 455:filter log 340:unblock-un 233:I see you 153:·Add§hore· 101:·Add§hore· 66:Wikipedian 1108:block log 1058:Gwen Gale 1021:Gwen Gale 977:Gwen Gale 945:Gwen Gale 757:block log 716:block log 634:Gwen Gale 607:Gwen Gale 539:read the 474:checkuser 433:block log 395:Gwen Gale 68:! Please 1084:contribs 877:contribs 849:. :) ++ 836:contribs 794:contribs 733:contribs 692:contribs 677:WP:SOCKs 526:contribs 445:contribs 141:You can 44:Tutorial 22:Welcome! 1054:neutral 973:neutral 679:called 573:in fact 550:unblock 468:unblock 391:first. 383:unblock 336:Adding 186:Magidin 28:welcome 17:Welcome 806:WP:CHU 497:demand 364:do not 318:policy 92:helpme 78:tildes 1090:count 1017:scrot 739:count 698:count 579:might 543:first 210:edit 1096:logs 1078:talk 1062:talk 1025:talk 1001:talk 981:talk 963:talk 949:talk 927:talk 873:talk 832:talk 790:talk 745:logs 727:talk 720:and 704:logs 686:talk 662:talk 638:talk 611:talk 522:talk 399:talk 360:here 330:by: 254:Lar, 208:this 190:talk 70:sign 1114:Lar 992:you 903:Lar 851:Lar 847:you 810:Lar 763:Lar 478:log 425:). 348:on 239:Lar 217:Lar 164:ont 112:ont 1116:: 1064:) 1027:) 1003:) 983:) 965:) 951:) 929:) 905:: 901:++ 875:· 853:: 834:· 812:: 792:· 765:: 664:) 640:) 613:) 553:}} 547:{{ 524:· 506:: 490:: 472:• 466:• 462:• 457:• 453:• 448:• 443:• 439:• 435:• 401:) 381:{{ 346:}} 338:{{ 307:. 241:: 219:: 215:++ 192:) 94:}} 90:{{ 1122:c 1120:/ 1118:t 1110:) 1105:· 1099:· 1093:· 1087:· 1081:· 1076:( 1060:( 1023:( 999:( 979:( 961:( 947:( 925:( 911:c 909:/ 907:t 879:) 871:( 859:c 857:/ 855:t 838:) 830:( 818:c 816:/ 814:t 796:) 788:( 771:c 769:/ 767:t 759:) 754:· 748:· 742:· 736:· 730:· 725:( 718:) 713:· 707:· 701:· 695:· 689:· 684:( 660:( 653:I 636:( 609:( 528:) 520:( 482:) 480:) 476:( 431:( 397:( 370:. 342:| 294:. 247:c 245:/ 243:t 225:c 223:/ 221:t 188:( 162:C 159:/ 138:. 110:C 107:/

Index

welcome
your contributions
The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
Tutorial
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Wikipedian
sign
discussion pages
tildes
Knowledge (XXG):Questions
my talk page
helpme
·Add§hore·

Cont
19:26, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Addshore's talk page
remove this notice
·Add§hore·

Cont
07:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Magidin
talk
02:30, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
this

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.