User talk:FedderSL

1068: 930: 759: 575: 370: 302: 1329: 495: 712: 1251:

Many editors think this means they should search for and find more sources and just add them to what's already there. Unfortunately, simply throwing more search results at such an article tends not to help in such a case. The sourcing problems are not ones of quantity, but of quality. If there are

379:. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. 311:. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. 633:

Bring known in his career is not the same as satisfying our notability policies and examining this for a while and watching showed nothing in the relevant notability; he's not notable as an author or professor, and the listed awards are simply not convincing for notability

1239:

The sources you have added are lacking one or more of of three qualities. Either they are not independent (they are produced by the doctor or some institution he is associated with), or they are not significant (e.g., the

1235:

something, or some-one, notable by Knowledge standards. Notability is a quality of the subject, not the article. If a subject is notable, then the coverage is available. If there isn't coverage available, they aren't

452:, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. 886:, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the 1286:, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. 888: 395: 327: 1244:

notice about a case report he was one of the authors of (such case reports are not substantially about the doctor and are shared endeavors)) or they are not reliable (e.g., the

272:, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our 27: 1381:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

1124:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

986:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

815:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

636:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

1231:. I see five different editors have all said essentially the same things when declining its submission, so I may as well be the sixth. Simply put: you can't 876: 1039:

Do you have any recommendations for me on what exactly I should do to help me get this approved? I keep making edits but nothing seems to work. Thank you :)

1354:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply 1289:

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

455:

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

34: 195: 502: 488: 449: 437: 385: 317: 269: 49:

or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the

508:

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply

1105: 967: 796: 612: 219: 105: 1350:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

46: 786: 602: 283: 45: 39: 1259: 1074: 1055: 936: 917: 765: 746: 581: 562: 526:

code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

128: 40: 898:, a friendly space on Knowledge where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — 1208: 1158: 1020: 849: 670: 146: 100: 279: 265: 200: 533:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:

224: 151: 584:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

939:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

734: 688: 59: 1344: 1322: 1283: 1271: 1228: 1132: 1059: 994: 921: 823: 750: 718: 703: 644: 566: 1030: 421: 264:

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here:

1077:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eddie891 was:

175: 95: 90: 1299:

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

465:

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

1252:

sources that fit the criteria mentioned above, then this will probably be accepted. I hope this helps.

229: 768:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yash! was:

1382: 1311: 1300: 551: 477: 466: 180: 501:

Hello FedderSL. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled

1351: 1256: 1185: 1040: 722: 676: 527: 235: 185: 54: 1385:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 1168: 1079:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Knowledge requires

1026: 941:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Knowledge requires

894: 770:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Knowledge requires

586:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Knowledge requires

413: 241: 123: 1122:

sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Knowledge at this time.

984:

sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Knowledge at this time.

900: 857: 813:

sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Knowledge at this time.

629:

sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Knowledge at this time.

1200: 892:. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the 1403: 1340: 1293: 459: 50: 1307: 1279: 547: 473: 445: 399: 331: 274: 1253: 1336: 1212: 1164: 1099: 1095: 961: 957: 790: 717:

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

699: 606: 376: 362: 345: 308: 294: 190: 509: 1084: 946: 775: 591: 875: 543:, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission. 1390: 1115: 1111: 977: 973: 806: 802: 622: 618: 1067: 929: 758: 574: 369: 301: 53:. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! 535:{{subst:Refund/G13|Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Patrick W. Hitchon}} 384:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at

316:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at

1248:"Top Doctors" listing, a source that has serious methodological problems). 391:

To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

323:

To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

1335:

Hello, FedderSL. It has been over six months since you last edited the

1408: 1315: 1262: 1215: 1193: 1172: 1048: 1034: 906: 863: 739: 693: 555: 481: 428: 352: 287: 64: 711: 1131:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

993:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

822:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

643:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

1182:

Anyone have any advice to offer to help me get this accepted?

1388:

Thanks for your submission to Knowledge, and happy editing.

546:

Thanks for your submission to Knowledge, and happy editing.

1327: 1066: 928: 757: 710: 573: 493: 368: 300: 1118:

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional

980:

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional

809:

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional

625:

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional

1159:

Knowledge's real-time chat help from experienced editors

1138: