447:, which was fair enough as it didn't include references (although I think it would have been better to just put a 'needs references' tag on there as it was pretty obvious from the text that was there that the article was notable). I then had a look at some of the other edits where you've added the prod template and it seems that you've been fairly indiscriminate - adding where articles do contain vaild references and are almost certainly notable judging by the content. I appreciate that clean ups are needed on Knowledge (XXG) and that it must be a pretty thankless task but I really do think that a message on the main contributors talk page and/or a 'needs references' tag is a far better way of going about things, particularly when you aren't an expert in the field. Hope this comment doesn't cause offence and you realise that it was made with the best of intentions
320:(edit conflict) I appreciate that there's a lot of articles that dont comply with policy. Thing is, most of our articles were created before the OOU perspective/sources rule was enforced. We are now struggling to get them to comply with policy, not because we cant find sources (there are loads), but because there are only about 2 editors who are willing to rewrite the articles. It just takes a long time to rewrite in OOU perspective, and most of the editors just add unsourced in-universe stuff, which doesnt help. It's a problem for soap articles in general, but it is our goal to make them better (similar to
648:
614:
299:
I have to agree. We are trying to clean up, but there are only two or three active members and it does take a lot of time. As I understand it, there is no deadline to get articles up to a certain standard. At the moment we have a featured article candidate that we're trying to pass, which is our main
276:
I realise it's your right to carry on doing AFDs on eastenders articles, but i'd really appreciate if you would discuss this with us first. We are one of the only soap opera projects trying to clean up these articles with references and OOU persepctive. It takes time to do, but if you look over some
423:
Just want to ask, the prod proposal is given to a RC car that wasn't a sales success and coming from a notable brand name, what does a Radio
Controlled car has to do to be notable, just saying that as I do remember seeing one of these when at model shops and advertised in RC car magazines at that
144:
Hello, Fee Fi Foe Fum; welcome to
Knowledge (XXG). Meanwhile, thanks for your comment on my talk page. I’ve attempted to address your concerns there, so please have a look. I hope what I’ve written is of use to you. And of course, if you have any further comments, please add them. Best regards,
681:
I found your recent comment to be entirely unhelpful in furthering the discussion about this article. In the future keep your allegations about the political stripes of other editors to yourself (especially when they are completely unfounded). They hinder the efficient improvement of wikipedia
236:
My protection to this article was administrative in nature, in doing a cleanup of articles that had their protection set to NEVER expire. Other then making it eventually expire, I'm not otherwise involved with this article. The last administrator working on protection for it was
194:
By the way - I had removed the repeated rfc tag - you had it in the age difference section where I left it and repeated in the logo section where it didn't belong. You might copy it into the "wording options" section, as there's more discussion of rfc people to look at.
110:
I personally wouldn't vote to kill the
Flintstones pinball game based on the current article. If you can find more info on the Superman pinball game and expand the article to be similar to the Flintstones one I'd gladly considering looking at the AFD again with an open
361:
and withdrawing the AFD. We've come across many editors who continue to try and have pages deleted on AFDs, even after we've proven notability and rewritten them (seemingly because they dislike the topic). So it's nice to see that this wasn't your intention :)
730:
In this case cspanjunkie is a secondary source. The official minutes of the gubernatorial debate would be a better source, but unless you doubt she actually said it you shouldn't have removed the quote, absent any other reason to remove it of course. See
900:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
394:
328:). Other soap projects are not even trying, and I just wanted to let you know that we are as I realise, based on the large number of unsourced articles, that it may look like we dont care about policy.
220:
Please note that the hoax tag should not be used for articles that are openly about fictional topics - unless, of course, it's about a subject that doesn't actually appear in the fiction in question.
397:
as the article, when you saw it, was in a poor way. However, since then it has been completely rewritten to meet the legitimate concerns expressed and now has the multiple sources so it fully meets
300:
focus at the moment. You can see therefore that there are notable characters and we can have well written, well sourced articles. If we had more active members it would be easier but we just don't.
19:
thank you for your reply. I'm still having a problem with my second contribution, I will adhere to the 5 pillars. I will again redo it entirely. Can I erase it and start a new 2nd contribution?
663:
prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for
629:
prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for
592:. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
424:
time (1989). Not to mention if this is given to a (full-sized) car article, people would be scrapping over this argument. For this time being I removed the prod for that reason.
159:
I'm not sure if we are at the point for an Rfc on this, but in any case wouldn't it be better at Rfc-biographies than community? Those are the folks who focus on BLP issues.
760:
125:
Sorry, I must've grabbed the wrong username. I'm also a big fan of cleanups and consolidates, so I hope that there are some good things that can come from this.--
177:
Well, yeah - this is at least the third or even fourth time this has been argued, maybe more. Still think rfc-biographies is a better place for it though.
671:. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.
637:. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.
256:
776:
reported Rayan had received a phone message from the
Israeli armed forces saying they were going to blow up his house but he refused to leave.
91:
925:
38:
732:
862:
819:
277:
of our character articles you will notice that we are getting there slowly. Why have you decided to target eastenders like this?
65:
921:
589:
578:
712:
say. If no news organizations noticed the statement, we should not include it, even though we have it from the horse's mouth.
50:
373:
339:
288:
668:
660:
634:
626:
548:
84:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
805:
778:
799:
769:
912:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
656:
622:
585:
70:
917:
306:
519:
Many place names in
Britain end in "bury" which means "hill fort" from back in the stone/bronze/iron age. Check out
470:
463:
473:
because it has "no sources" even though there is clearly a source in the article. And how exactly does it violate
443:
Please can you be a bit more careful when tagging articles with the prod template? You tagged one of my articles,
358:
261:
238:
45:
34:
597:
520:
221:
855:
as well. This encyclopedia is built by the collaboration of editors. Thus, such language has no place here. --
509:
77:
787:
735:: "Primary sources that have been published by a reliable source may be used in Knowledge (XXG) ". Regards,
444:
527:, which has stone monuments older than Stonehenge and a "modern" town inside it, check its satellite view.
81:
482:
417:
301:
913:
85:
687:
429:
406:
664:
630:
255:
I'm not unprotecting it; if you want to get another admin's take on it file an unprotection request at
60:
867:
824:
736:
24:
889:
880:
474:
838:
713:
593:
562:
528:
909:
893:
368:
334:
283:
247:
41:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
852:
803:
Leibovich said she could not give details or specify whether Rayyan's family had been warned.
709:
478:
452:
126:
112:
905:
897:
683:
675:
425:
402:
908:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
901:
857:
814:
146:
20:
655:
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be
621:
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be
321:
203:
185:
167:
97:
647:
613:
398:
748:
552:
363:
329:
325:
278:
242:
230:
55:
837:
can be true, read the article on it. Don't ever try to contact or correct me again.
448:
357:
Hi, I forgot to say the other day, thankyou for acknowledging the improvement on
929:
871:
846:
834:
828:
739:
733:
Knowledge (XXG):No_original_research#Primary.2C_secondary_and_tertiary_sources
721:
691:
601:
570:
555:
536:
513:
486:
456:
433:
410:
378:
344:
315:
293:
265:
257:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for page protection#Current requests for unprotection
249:
224:
207:
189:
171:
149:
129:
115:
100:
28:
197:
179:
161:
812:
So you might want to re-check the factual basis for your claims. Best, --
896:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Knowledge (XXG)
524:
708:
People say many things. But on
Knowledge (XXG), we only report what
523:
and click the coordinates to look at a satellite view. Also cool is
395:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Coombabah State
Primary School
389:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Coombabah State
Primary School
547:
Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors. See
796:
766:
641:
607:
88:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place
758:
that "roof knocking" is Israeli propoganda. According to the
704:
I don't understand your grounds for objecting? Regards, Ben
646:
612:
401:. Perhaps you would revisit your recommendation, please?
140:
Thanks for your comment: Holocaust denial and Karl Plagge
241:, who can be reached via their talk page. Thank you, —
96:
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
755:
701:
497:
785:(emphasis added). Not only that, but according to the
888:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
393:Hi, I agree entirely with your delete !vote at
667:, even if they do not technically violate the
633:, even if they do not technically violate the
8:
659:from editing Knowledge (XXG). Note that the
625:from editing Knowledge (XXG). Note that the
76:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
500:my curiosity, what's special about bury?
7:
469:You put a proposal for deletion on
46:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
37:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for
14:
914:review the candidates' statements
549:Knowledge (XXG):Assume good faith
851:Your talk page must comply with
590:March 19, 2008 anti-war protest
579:March 19, 2008 anti-war protest
920:. For the Election committee,
890:Arbitration Committee election
881:ArbCom elections are now open!
471:Hard as a Rock (Steve-O album)
464:Hard as a Rock (Steve-O album)
150:09:00, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
130:17:50, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
116:07:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
101:10:51, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
930:13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
457:19:19, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
434:21:34, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
411:19:23, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
788:International Herald Tribune
551:for the guidelines on this.
379:21:09, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
345:00:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
316:00:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
294:23:52, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
266:22:26, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
250:17:01, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
225:13:59, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
208:19:29, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
190:18:49, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
172:03:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
66:How to write a great article
29:17:53, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
916:and submit your choices on
872:17:48, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
847:15:33, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
829:04:01, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
740:11:18, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
722:07:04, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
692:05:04, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
33:Hello, Fee Fi Foe Fum, and
945:
922:MediaWiki message delivery
584:An editor has asked for a
561:Calling it like I see it.
537:22:56, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
514:03:54, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
487:02:28, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
602:18:57, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
359:Kelly Taylor (EastEnders)
86:Knowledge (XXG):Questions
842:
717:
566:
532:
521:Cadbury Castle, Somerset
571:23:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
556:23:29, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
445:Valentine (Delays song)
652:
618:
894:Arbitration Committee
650:
616:
577:Deletion review for
418:Double Dare (Kyosho)
898:arbitration process
754:Hi Fee. I saw your
682:articles. Thanks.--
239:User:Jéské Couriano
910:arbitration policy
653:
619:
305:
200:
182:
164:
51:How to edit a page
39:your contributions
810:
809:
783:
782:
710:secondary sources
669:three-revert rule
661:three-revert rule
635:three-revert rule
627:three-revert rule
505:
303:
206:
196:
188:
178:
170:
160:
936:
865:
860:
822:
817:
797:
767:
676:Talk:Sarah Palin
501:
376:
371:
366:
342:
337:
332:
313:
311:
291:
286:
281:
245:
202:
184:
166:
95:
944:
943:
939:
938:
937:
935:
934:
933:
918:the voting page
884:
863:
858:
820:
815:
761:Daily Telegraph
752:
699:
679:
645:
611:
586:deletion review
582:
545:
512:
494:
467:
441:
421:
391:
374:
369:
364:
340:
335:
330:
312:
309:
307:
289:
284:
279:
274:
243:
234:
218:
157:
155:Rfc on Thompson
142:
108:
89:
71:Manual of Style
12:
11:
5:
942:
940:
887:
883:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
839:Fee Fi Foe Fum
808:
807:
804:
801:
794:
781:
780:
777:
771:
751:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
725:
724:
714:Fee Fi Foe Fum
698:
695:
678:
673:
644:
639:
610:
605:
594:Myheartinchile
581:
575:
574:
573:
563:Fee Fi Foe Fum
544:
541:
540:
539:
529:Fee Fi Foe Fum
508:
503:TRAVELLINGCARI
493:
490:
466:
460:
440:
439:Prod proposals
437:
420:
414:
390:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
350:
349:
348:
347:
308:
273:
270:
269:
268:
233:
228:
217:
214:
213:
212:
211:
210:
156:
153:
141:
138:
137:
136:
135:
134:
133:
132:
127:Torchwood Who?
113:Torchwood Who?
107:
104:
82:sign your name
74:
73:
68:
63:
58:
53:
48:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
941:
932:
931:
927:
923:
919:
915:
911:
907:
903:
899:
895:
891:
882:
879:
873:
870:
869:
866:
861:
854:
850:
849:
848:
844:
840:
836:
833:
832:
831:
830:
827:
826:
823:
818:
802:
798:
795:
792:
790:
789:
775:
772:
768:
765:
763:
762:
757:
750:
749:Roof knocking
747:
741:
738:
734:
729:
728:
727:
726:
723:
719:
715:
711:
707:
706:
705:
703:
696:
694:
693:
689:
685:
677:
674:
672:
670:
666:
662:
658:
649:
643:
640:
638:
636:
632:
628:
624:
615:
609:
606:
604:
603:
599:
595:
591:
587:
580:
576:
572:
568:
564:
560:
559:
558:
557:
554:
550:
542:
538:
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
517:
516:
515:
511:
510:Tell me yours
507:
504:
499:
491:
489:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
465:
461:
459:
458:
454:
450:
446:
438:
436:
435:
431:
427:
419:
415:
413:
412:
408:
404:
400:
396:
388:
380:
377:
372:
367:
360:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
351:
346:
343:
338:
333:
327:
323:
319:
318:
317:
314:
302:
298:
297:
296:
295:
292:
287:
282:
271:
267:
264:
263:
258:
254:
253:
252:
251:
248:
246:
240:
232:
231:Fred Thompson
229:
227:
226:
223:
215:
209:
205:
199:
193:
192:
191:
187:
181:
176:
175:
174:
173:
169:
163:
154:
152:
151:
148:
139:
131:
128:
124:
123:
122:
121:
120:
119:
118:
117:
114:
105:
103:
102:
99:
93:
87:
83:
79:
72:
69:
67:
64:
62:
59:
57:
54:
52:
49:
47:
44:
43:
42:
40:
36:
31:
30:
26:
22:
18:
885:
868:(yada, yada)
856:
825:(yada, yada)
813:
811:
793:
786:
784:
773:
759:
753:
700:
680:
665:edit warring
654:
631:edit warring
620:
583:
546:
506:
502:
495:
479:Coasttocoast
468:
442:
422:
392:
275:
260:
235:
219:
158:
147:Jim_Lockhart
143:
109:
106:Pinball AFD=
75:
32:
16:
15:
774:Hamas radio
737:Ben Aveling
697:Palin again
684:Cdogsimmons
426:Willirennen
403:TerriersFan
906:topic bans
835:Propaganda
702:this edit.
543:Good Faith
475:WP:CRYSTAL
310:projectors
78:Wikipedian
56:Help pages
21:Roserobert
902:site bans
462:Prod for
416:Prod for
98:J Milburn
80:! Please
853:WP:CIVIL
553:GreenJoe
244:xaosflux
61:Tutorial
17:Welcome!
756:comment
657:blocked
651:Warning
623:blocked
617:Warning
525:Avebury
496:You've
449:Cavie78
272:Request
111:mind.--
35:welcome
892:. The
864:crewer
821:crewer
498:piqued
216:Hoaxes
92:helpme
492:Bury?
477:? --
262:Jéské
926:talk
859:brew
843:talk
816:brew
718:talk
688:talk
598:talk
567:talk
533:talk
483:talk
453:talk
430:talk
407:talk
399:WP:N
370:adin
365:Gung
336:adin
331:Gung
326:this
322:this
285:adin
280:Gung
204:talk
198:Tvoz
186:talk
180:Tvoz
168:talk
162:Tvoz
25:talk
886:Hi,
642:3RR
608:3RR
588:of
324:or
259:. -
928:)
904:,
845:)
806:”
800:“
791::
779:”
770:“
764::
720:)
690:)
600:)
569:)
535:)
485:)
455:)
432:)
409:)
222:DS
94:}}
90:{{
27:)
924:(
841:(
716:(
686:(
596:(
565:(
531:(
481:(
451:(
428:(
405:(
375:♦
341:♦
304:I
290:♦
201:|
183:|
165:|
23:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.