666:(3) Since the beginning, on the first day of the current Chinese Year of the Rabbit, I did my best to put it clear that I am the author of that proof of FLT: thatâs why I adopted the username FerrMATtos. What is the problem about that? Forty years of a permanent fight against the almighty math publishing industry coupled with the IMU establishment have told me that nobody else is willing to let this most disagreeable truth for some VIP flourish in the fresh air of the freedom of speech. So, I beg to ask: is it not considering situations like this one that Knowledge promptes their Fifth pillar: no rules carved in stone? Is this not a remarkable exception?
607:(2) But, of course, the problem here is not the fact of Jasper Deng, a software engineer, not being sufficiently qualified to referee math papers, just because Knowledge is not the proper field for a discussion on the validity of any proof in the realm of number theory or else and, what is much more important, I did not mean that at all. As a matter of fact, what my (censored) edit means is to let the free world currently informed and taught by Knowledge know that:
604:), in which he definitely proves the irrationality of the reasoning that others before Jasper and as wrongly as he have carried out. In fact, prominent math professors exhibiting a sound pedagogical background consider that one to be a «great», «perfect» proof of FLT. Let me quote just two scholars: an American, Douglas Clements, in October 2017 (attachment 1), and an European, Bruno DâAmore, in December 2015 (attachment 2);
773:
23:
588:
I divide Jasper Dengâ message, for which I thank him, in three main parts: (i) «Elementary profs of FLT are typical crank mathematics things» and, worst, he has read the proof at issue and concludes that,  in short,  it «implies nothing about FLT»; (2) I «didnât cite a single source for that
742:
The truth is that you also donât know what «ad hominem» means. I didnât attack you, but your explicit demonstration of incapacity to understand a logico-mathematical proof⊠You are not a Paulo
Ribenboim! Iâve had enough from you⊠It seems to be that you make a living out of«this», so long!
614:â, an elementary proof of FLT, which the renowned Canadian Brazilian number theorist considered should be presented to the Göttingen Mathematical Society, in view of the Wolfskehl Prize», and this information has the most genuine source possible: âFLT -
566:
595:(1) Jasper Deng didnât understand the proof he claims to have «read», not (duly) interpreted. However, he is not the first person to whom that happens: for some reason the author of such proof has published in 2013 a paper containing his â
640:(c) and that «âamateurâ mathematician published in September 2013 on the Academia.edu platform a work telling the sad story of the practical impossibility of the publication of his proof in a major  math journal, titled âFLT -
625:(b) but «that German Academy had adapted Paul Wolfskehlâs will and replied, in a circular letter, that only published proofs would be examined», and this information has the most genuine sources possible: âFLT -
41:, which is against Knowledge's policies. Original research refers to materialâsuch as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiencesâfor which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
300:
367:
90:
197:, such as a perceived wrongful rejection of the proof (which I just read and, despite not knowing about elliptic curves, can debunk straight away because it wrongly asserts that
663:
It is therefore admissible, I do franklyadmit, that the edit at issue should have been posted in the section âMathematical historyâ, instead of âPrizes and incorrect proofsâ;
50:
372:
713:
648:â, in which, forty years post factum, he regrets the refusal of both Andrew Wiles and the International Mathematical Union to acknowledge the validity of his â
610:(a)  «In September 1981, an under-40 Portuguese economist specializing in financial mathematics, Carlos C. de Matos, sent to Paulo Ribenboim, then the â
791:
722:
Since you have explicitly said you do not wish to play by
Knowledgeâs policies, despite copious links that you clearly did not read, you are
798:
568:, neither of which follow at all) âin simpler terms, this polynomial division result implies nothing about FLT). Please do not continue
94:
200:
30:
42:
38:
305:
46:
147:(1) Why the papers titled âFLT â The Mathemafiaâ and âFLT â Quadragesimo Annoâ lack «reliable, published sources»?
115:(1) Why the papers titled âFLT â The Mathemafiaâ and âFLT â Quadragesimo Annoâ lack «reliable, published sources»?
80:(1) Why the papers titled âFLT â The Mathemafiaâ and âFLT â Quadragesimo Annoâ lack «reliable, published sources»?
813:
786:
781:
683:
I also happen to have a degree in mathematics. But I donât need one to debunk the proof, which only shows that
58:
150:(2) How and why my edit combines «published sources implying something that none of those two explicitly say»?
118:(2) How and why my edit combines «published sources implying something that none of those two explicitly say»?
83:(2) How and why my edit combines «published sources implying something that none of those two explicitly say»?
34:
734:
716:
580:
561:{\displaystyle (x+y)\Vert z\implies (x^{n}-z^{n})/(x-(x+y))=\sum _{i=0}^{n-1}x^{n-i-1}(-1)^{i}(x+y)^{i}}
171:
175:
808:
26:
744:
670:
154:
122:
183:
54:
569:
302:
when it is missing the necessary alternation of signs on the right and also wrongly asserts that
589:
claim»; and (3) «given my username», I am asked to «disclose any relationship with the author».
178:
things. We donât give such things any weight here, due to their lack of reliable sourcing, see
723:
686:
731:
577:
174:. You didnât cite a single source for that claim, and elementary proofs of FLT are typical
573:
43:
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say
193:
that you disclose any relationship you might have with the author, and inform you that
62:
727:
194:
190:
179:
772:
797:
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
801:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:
22:
817:
752:
737:
678:
583:
162:
130:
98:
726:
to build an encyclopedia. I am therefore referring this situation to
619:
600:
652:â, prior proof», and this is a thoroughly documented information: â
634:
669:
I would like to have an answer to these observations of mine.
771:
295:{\displaystyle x^{n}+y^{n}=(x+y)\sum _{i=0}^{n}x^{n-i}y^{i}}
49:
for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
689:
375:
308:
203:
172:
Exceptional claims require exceptionally good sources
362:{\displaystyle (x+y)\Vert z^{n}\implies x+y\Vert z}
707:
644:; and in December 2021 he posted the paper âFLT -
560:
361:
294:
195:Knowledge is not the place to right great wrongs
790:from editing because it appears that you are
8:
391:
353:
324:
141:However, I can hardly understand your views.
109:However, I can hardly understand your views.
74:However, I can hardly understand your views.
189:Given your username, I must demand per the
688:
612:greatest authority on the Fermat theorems
552:
530:
499:
483:
472:
433:
424:
411:
374:
331:
307:
286:
270:
260:
249:
221:
208:
202:
803:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
402:
397:
342:
337:
91:2001:8A0:BB80:5200:4CF7:7974:4862:7968
33:, but in one of your recent edits to
7:
592:I now reply to all these questions.
620:https://www.academia.edu/62129006/
186:source, not the authorâs own word.
14:
792:not here to build an encyclopedia
601:https://www.academia.edu/5252071/
572:this on Knowledge, or you may be
37:, it appears that you have added
635:http://www.academia.edu/4241888/
21:
715:and nothing else. Resorting to
144:Could you, please, let me know:
112:Could you, please, let me know:
77:Could you, please, let me know:
45:. Please be prepared to cite a
549:
536:
527:
517:
462:
459:
447:
438:
430:
404:
399:
388:
376:
339:
321:
309:
242:
230:
191:conflict of interest guideline
1:
818:10:58, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
753:22:16, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
738:21:16, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
679:18:57, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
599:â on the subject (link: <
584:08:32, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
163:17:52, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
131:17:47, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
99:17:02, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
63:01:02, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
16:
834:
51:tutorial on citing sources
799:guide to appealing blocks
708:{\displaystyle z\neq x+y}
748:
674:
656:â, pp. 2-23, 41-44, and
158:
138:Thank you for your mail.
126:
106:Thank you for your mail.
71:Thank you for your mail.
776:
709:
576:from further editing.â
562:
494:
363:
296:
265:
775:
719:wonât help your case.
717:argumentum ad hominem
710:
563:
468:
364:
297:
245:
182:. Besides, we need a
35:Fermat's Last Theorem
17:Fermat's Last Theorem
687:
629:â, p. 5, and âFLT -
373:
306:
201:
27:Welcome to Knowledge
777:
705:
558:
403:
398:
359:
343:
338:
292:
31:your contributions
660:â, pp. 47-48, 40.
654:Quadragesimo Anno
646:Quadragesimo Anno
627:Quadragesimo Anno
616:Quadragesimo Anno
176:crank mathematics
39:original research
825:
816:
804:
714:
712:
711:
706:
650:truly marvellous
597:Closing argument
567:
565:
564:
559:
557:
556:
535:
534:
516:
515:
493:
482:
437:
429:
428:
416:
415:
368:
366:
365:
360:
336:
335:
301:
299:
298:
293:
291:
290:
281:
280:
264:
259:
226:
225:
213:
212:
29:. We appreciate
25:
833:
832:
828:
827:
826:
824:
823:
822:
821:
820:
806:
802:
795:
769:
685:
684:
658:âThe Mathemafia
642:The Mathemafiaâ
631:The Mathemafiaâ
548:
526:
495:
420:
407:
371:
370:
327:
304:
303:
282:
266:
217:
204:
199:
198:
47:reliable source
19:
12:
11:
5:
831:
829:
796:
779:You have been
778:
770:
768:
765:
764:
763:
762:
761:
760:
759:
758:
757:
756:
755:
720:
704:
701:
698:
695:
692:
667:
664:
661:
638:
623:
608:
605:
593:
590:
555:
551:
547:
544:
541:
538:
533:
529:
525:
522:
519:
514:
511:
508:
505:
502:
498:
492:
489:
486:
481:
478:
475:
471:
467:
464:
461:
458:
455:
452:
449:
446:
443:
440:
436:
432:
427:
423:
419:
414:
410:
406:
401:
396:
393:
390:
387:
384:
381:
378:
358:
355:
352:
349:
346:
341:
334:
330:
326:
323:
320:
317:
314:
311:
289:
285:
279:
276:
273:
269:
263:
258:
255:
252:
248:
244:
241:
238:
235:
232:
229:
224:
220:
216:
211:
207:
187:
166:
165:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
119:
116:
113:
110:
107:
104:
101:
87:
84:
81:
78:
75:
72:
69:
55:David Eppstein
53:. Thank you. â
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
830:
819:
815:
814:
811:
810:
800:
793:
789:
788:
784:
783:
774:
766:
754:
750:
746:
741:
740:
739:
736:
733:
729:
725:
721:
718:
702:
699:
696:
693:
690:
682:
681:
680:
676:
672:
668:
665:
662:
659:
655:
651:
647:
643:
639:
636:
632:
628:
624:
622:), pp. 29-30;
621:
617:
613:
609:
606:
602:
598:
594:
591:
587:
586:
585:
582:
579:
575:
571:
553:
545:
542:
539:
531:
523:
520:
512:
509:
506:
503:
500:
496:
490:
487:
484:
479:
476:
473:
469:
465:
456:
453:
450:
444:
441:
434:
425:
421:
417:
412:
408:
394:
385:
382:
379:
356:
350:
347:
344:
332:
328:
318:
315:
312:
287:
283:
277:
274:
271:
267:
261:
256:
253:
250:
246:
239:
236:
233:
227:
222:
218:
214:
209:
205:
196:
192:
188:
185:
181:
177:
173:
170:
169:
168:
167:
164:
160:
156:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
132:
128:
124:
120:
117:
114:
111:
108:
105:
102:
100:
96:
92:
88:
85:
82:
79:
76:
73:
70:
67:
66:
65:
64:
60:
56:
52:
48:
44:
40:
36:
32:
28:
24:
812:
807:
787:indefinitely
785:
780:
767:January 2023
657:
653:
649:
645:
641:
630:
626:
615:
611:
596:
184:WP:SECONDARY
20:
732:Jasper Deng
578:Jasper Deng
153:Thank you.
121:Thank you.
724:WP:NOTHERE
570:advocating
89:FerMATtos
86:Thank you.
745:FerMATtos
671:FerMATtos
637:), p. 81;
618:â (link:
155:FerMATtos
123:FerMATtos
782:blocked
633:(link:
574:blocked
809:Salvio
735:(talk)
728:WP:ANI
581:(talk)
180:WP:DUE
135:Hello,
103:Hello,
68:Hello,
603:: -->
794:.
749:talk
675:talk
369:and
159:talk
127:talk
95:talk
59:talk
805:.
751:)
730:.â
694:â
677:)
521:â
510:â
504:â
488:â
470:â
445:â
418:â
400:âč
392:â
354:â
340:âč
325:â
275:â
247:â
161:)
129:)
97:)
61:)
747:(
703:y
700:+
697:x
691:z
673:(
554:i
550:)
546:y
543:+
540:x
537:(
532:i
528:)
524:1
518:(
513:1
507:i
501:n
497:x
491:1
485:n
480:0
477:=
474:i
466:=
463:)
460:)
457:y
454:+
451:x
448:(
442:x
439:(
435:/
431:)
426:n
422:z
413:n
409:x
405:(
395:z
389:)
386:y
383:+
380:x
377:(
357:z
351:y
348:+
345:x
333:n
329:z
322:)
319:y
316:+
313:x
310:(
288:i
284:y
278:i
272:n
268:x
262:n
257:0
254:=
251:i
243:)
240:y
237:+
234:x
231:(
228:=
223:n
219:y
215:+
210:n
206:x
157:(
125:(
93:(
57:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
