500:
serve 300 clients every year. The max is 25 clients and that too by stretching my imagination. It is easy in a third world country like
Pakistan to get something printed in a cheesy newspaper and then cite it on wikipedia. the company doesnot have 12 offices around the world, are they dreaming. It is absolutely un true. Will they please provide addresses and telephone numbers of those 12 offices around the world. Knowledge (XXG) is trusted for its information for hundreds of millions of people, scam companies from third world countries try and use this resource to spread their pretentious marketing material. AbacusConsulting should be advised to stick to factual content ONLY! Hello. I do admit that I have a COI as I am an employee for the company. However, I must mention that we spent hours upon hours trying to refine the content of the page, make it as 'un-promotional' as possible, and trying adhering to the guidelines of Knowledge (XXG). Please point out the sections which had problems, and what needs to be added/removed to bring them to the level on Knowledge (XXG). Also, please do let know what were the issues with the 'History' section? How does that come under to banner of promotional to begin with, seeing that it was very objectvie. (
624:) and it is written from a neutral point of view. My suggestion is to either request the addition of information on the article's talk page, or add less content to the article by cutting out anything that would seem promotional in accordance with the guidelines I previously presented to you. I do feel that even though people have conflicts of interest, they can still contribute to the topic as long as their remain neutral. Ask yourself what you would expect to read about if they were listed in a print encyclopedia. Then go back and make the changes accordingly. I will keep an eye on the talk page of the article as well and take a look at any information you request to add. I would suggest doing it in smaller sections as no one is likely to look through the entire article like you had posted. --
561:
suggest that the plausible way to take this forward will be that I start uploading information on my user talk page section by section, and you can let me know if it is acceptable or not. Is this arrangement workable for the two of us? I can request information as well but I seriously doubt there will be anyone out there willing to contribute to thus particular article.Second, There are hardly any online sources narrating the initial 10-15 years of Abacus. You can find plenty on the net about C&L and PWC, but I have been searching about Abacus and I have not been able to come across distinct sources other than our company website. How can this be helped? (
765:). I basically created the article as the article about the author was being expanded way beyond a biography and read more like an article about the book. With that aside, I am glad that you took the time to add additional information to the article along with references as that is what Knowledge (XXG) is about (continuously improving the content within the site). You made a great effort to improve the article and the only comment I would have is to make sure you stay away from using terms that are considered puffery (see
120:
250:
the short ads where she had worked so i added them as supporting references. But you will find at least few strong references. I am adding more referencing. I am interlinking my articles. When the interlinking will be done, I will add more references. Thank you for your time and assisting me with Wiki policies. I really appreciate that i am thankful to you. Dr Adil 17:51, 19 April 2013 (UTC)comment added by
846:
167:
526:). You cannot just write anything in a Knowledge (XXG) article, even if objective, unless you can verify it with a source. That doesn't mean that everything must have a source in the article, but information you put in must be verifiable. I checked and found a few reliable sources, but the majority of what you used did not conform to the guidelines for
668:. Even if I could, this still is not evidence that the article is about teh same person. Not quite sure how we can say that the article is about Surendranath as opposed to Gupta who is the title of the article. I am confused at this point, but either way there isn't anything that I can see that would lead either to passing notability guidelines. --
430:
Exactly my point. Many people "assume" the significant coverage or do not understand significant coverage or reliable sources. They go straight to the MMA guidelines. Or, others "want" or believe in their mind that the person has significant coverage and then use MMA to support their contention. Good
347:
Unfortunately, I have seen what you have lived for 2 years which is why I rarely vote on MMA discussions (good luck to you if you decide to continue as it looks like a full-time job for those who want to do it). The issue that I have is that MMA discussions have become so contentious that many people
560:
Okay I do agree with most of what you are saying but the problem is that you removed the entire page! There was a lot of verifiable content in there as well including sources such as cnn, bbc, SAP, economist, local newspapers etc. Why did you remove the entire thing? Okay so how do we solve this? I
499:
Hi there
Knowledge (XXG)!! I must say that the company is using wikipedia as a marketing tool to propagate false information about the company. First of all the company doesnot have 2500 employees, not even close to that. the actual figure is 300. Secondly the company does not and I repeat doesnot
415:
I think NMMA gets used because there is coverage by reliable sources, it's just not significant (i.e., it's routine sports reporting). Therefore, since GNG isn't met, the question becomes whether they've done something notable in their field and that's where NMMA comes into play. Always happy to
249:
Yeah i have created numerous new pages. Yea i accept that few links are not very reputable like imdb but these are just supporting. There are few other reputable links. Atleast 3-4 links are reputable. One article has youtube links, it's about the model and actress
Vibhinta verma. These videos are
619:
Asking me for permission to do something is not the best angle here as I do not own
Knowledge (XXG) or any of the articles within. I understand what you are trying to accomplish and that is to have your company article listed in Knowledge (XXG). I have no issue with that as long as the company is
931:
I tried to edit and was informed that my account was blocked as being a multiple account of User:MooshiePorkFace. Not sure what you need for an appeal in order to prove that I am not that person. I currently edit from one of two locations and can provide you with the IP addresses associated with
364:
to go any further with a discussion at that point). Many people who vote to keep or delete go directly to one of the two criteria for MMA and fail to see if they even have significant coverage or if the sources are reliable. I agree that many of the sources are simply snippets about a fight they
266:
Yes, I thought I'd seen that before - thanks for the link. I've put both versions on my watchlist, and if it reappears I'll very seriously consider salting. A lot of the outfits posting stuff like this use throwaway accounts, so I'm not worrying about an SPI.
542:, it would be better for you to use the talk page of the article to request the addition of any information that you would like to see. If you do not get any help on the talk page with editors willing to introduce content you request, you can also go to the
365:
fought or fight records on a site that anyone can publish to. This does NOT raise to a level of significant or reliable sources. So basically, it disturbs me when I see people saying delete or keep based on the 2 criteria without even addressing the
943:
Having reviewed the relevant history, and consulted the blocking administrator, I am confident that this account is a sockpuppet. In addition, you have had a week to respond to the request for further information below, and have not done so.
348:
seem to make their decision to keep or delete an article, and THEN go to the guidelines to pull up something that they feel will support their position. This is completely backwards. Prior to even saying the person meets ANYTHING under
742:
Hello FoolMeOnce2Times, This is just a courtesy visit to inform you that I did a little expansion to your article with supporting referencess. Hope you'd like my effort. I'd truly appreciate receiving your say on this. Best regards.
590:
Haven't stopped responding, but I don't live on
Knowledge (XXG). If you have not received a response, sorry. Also, just because I may be absent does not mean that your article suddenly meets Knowledge (XXG) guidelines.
95:
518:
Thank you for reaching out. Although you say it was "very objective," I would have to disagree. It was promotional as it read like an advertisement for the company. You can read more about the policy
546:
and I believe you can request the addition of information to the article there (only after you are unsuccessful with the talk page of the article). Please let me know if I can assist any further. --
306:
Thought I'd take you up on your offer to discuss this topic further. As a survivor of the MMA wars that have raged on WP for the past two years or so, I thought I'd fill you in a bit on why
643:
In case you are using
Internet Explorer, direct search link may not work for that browser, either try from another browser (tested in Firefox, Chrome) or search with "Aarti Surendranath" -
761:
Thanks for taking the time to improve the article. First, please make sure that you realize that this article is not "mine." No one can actually claim an article as their own (see
322:. It's a somewhat tougher requirement that many sports use, where any top level appearance confers automatic notability, but somewhat less strict than the standards for boxing (
314:
is met, then notability is achieved and that's that. The problem is that the coverage for most MMA fighters consists solely of routine sports reporting and thus doesn't meet
1007:
576:
Okay since you've completely stopped responding, what I will do is, after two working days I shall revert to the old page and content. Hope that does not bother you.
886:
978:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
814:
137:
986:
In order to expedite this unblock request, the reviewing administrator should e-mail me. In the mean time, please list all the accounts you have used.
373:(which I believe that you and I are on the same page about significant coverage and reliable sources). EVERYTHING dealing with notability starts with
804:
53:
800:
881:
22:
963:
810:
284:
Thanks. I absolutely HATE salting, but sometimes it must be done. I actually tried to save the article but couldn't find anything of use. --
562:
501:
401:
before you even go to the MMA guidelines, as without reliable and significant coverage, they are NOT notable. Just my opinion. --
43:
807:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
479:
I did. However, you will need to request userfication from the deleting admin as I do not have the ability to do so. Sorry. --
48:
900:
594:
Right then, coming back to the original point; I gave a bit of an action plan in the previous post. What do you think of it?
683:
859:
853:
700:
Looks like it is her. Thanks for the link. Unfortunately for here, even the article states that she is not notable.--
858:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
791:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
599:
581:
431:
luck with future AfD. I only !vote on them if they happen to be in the same batch I am voting on for the day. --
34:
29:
566:
748:
595:
577:
505:
228:
181:
60:
949:
72:
864:
770:
714:
Check other articles from Google search now. It seems she has done other works too other tnan acting! --
701:
669:
625:
547:
480:
432:
416:
see a new contributor to the discussions, especially since things have calmed down the past few months.
402:
285:
200:
64:
393:
for (fill in reason here)." My comments were my way of saying "wake up" to everyone and take a look at
792:
766:
719:
691:
648:
255:
103:
84:
661:
394:
382:
366:
357:
327:
315:
991:
744:
469:
421:
335:
223:
176:
148:
126:
119:
25:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
543:
377:, everything! So, it would be better to state in a deletion recommendation that a person "fails
71:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
1015:
945:
830:
522:. In addition, there was little of anything that could be verified through a reliable source (
272:
539:
390:
349:
323:
319:
307:
972:
762:
621:
535:
531:
530:. For starters, I would recommend familiarizing yourself with what Knowledge (XXG) is NOT (
378:
374:
353:
311:
932:
those locations if needed. Please let me know and I will provide the information for you.
665:
660:
Thanks, but I did that already. Nothing I find amounts to anything that I would consider
527:
523:
398:
386:
370:
361:
715:
687:
644:
360:
which is what I pointed out at the deletion discussion (there certainly are not enough
251:
99:
80:
987:
821:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
465:
417:
331:
144:
682:
There are multiple articles in that page which mention both person are same, please
1011:
826:
822:
458:
268:
39:
1019:
995:
953:
834:
778:
752:
723:
709:
695:
677:
652:
633:
603:
585:
570:
555:
509:
488:
473:
440:
425:
410:
339:
293:
276:
234:
208:
187:
152:
133:
107:
88:
1008:
Knowledge (XXG):Possibly unfree files/2013 November 15#OTRS pending since July
519:
534:). Also, I would suggest that even though there is nothing wrong with have a
318:. Therefore, a consensus of MMA editors agreed upon the standard you see at
199:
So you want me to go from 220 to 240? OK, you don't have to convince me! --
75:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place
166:
796:
21:
Hello, FoolMeOnce2Times, and welcome to
Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for
639:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Aarti Gupta (2nd nomination)
68:
844:
140:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
118:
960:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
980:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
914:
910:
904:
895:
891:
877:
873:
869:
795:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
852:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
125:Hello, FoolMeOnce2Times. You have new messages at
310:is so often quoted in these AfD discussions. If
8:
787:Disambiguation link notification for May 31
356:. As you state above, many fighters fail
172:You can haz cheezburger! Just because...
1006:Some of your uploads may be unfree. See
79:before the question. Again, welcome! ~
495:Changes in the Abacus Consulting page
352:, it must be determined if they meet
7:
457:You placed a speedy dleetion tag on
35:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
620:notable (which it appears to meet
14:
174:Thanks for being a page curator.
464:I've requiested userification.
165:
49:How to create your first article
389:and subject also fails to meet
30:Introduction to Knowledge (XXG)
1:
1020:22:31, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
856:, who declined the request.
538:as long as you edit from a
1035:
54:Simplified Manual of Style
996:06:28, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
964:guide to appealing blocks
235:17:05, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
209:18:17, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
188:17:10, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
153:16:25, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
134:16:25, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
108:17:39, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
89:17:39, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
73:Knowledge (XXG):Questions
954:09:34, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
835:11:10, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
779:15:18, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
774:
753:14:58, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
724:18:13, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
710:18:07, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
705:
696:17:57, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
678:17:30, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
673:
653:15:25, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
634:14:21, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
629:
604:09:38, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
586:06:21, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
571:17:16, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
556:15:13, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
551:
510:10:21, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
489:02:18, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
484:
474:02:07, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
436:
406:
289:
204:
441:21:01, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
426:20:10, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
411:13:39, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
340:20:30, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
294:15:06, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
277:14:03, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
158:A cheeseburger for you!
44:How to develop articles
849:
123:
1002:Possibly unfree files
901:change block settings
848:
122:
823:opt-out instructions
326:) and martial arts (
127:Dodger67's talk page
94:And thanks for your
805:fix with Dab solver
59:Please remember to
850:
813:• Join us at the
138:remove this notice
124:
40:How to edit a page
23:your contributions
818:
596:Abacus Consulting
578:Abacus Consulting
194:
193:
63:your messages on
1026:
977:
971:
920:
918:
907:
889:
887:deleted contribs
865:FoolMeOnce2Times
847:
808:
801:check to confirm
771:FoolMeOnce2Times
702:FoolMeOnce2Times
670:FoolMeOnce2Times
626:FoolMeOnce2Times
548:FoolMeOnce2Times
481:FoolMeOnce2Times
433:FoolMeOnce2Times
403:FoolMeOnce2Times
286:FoolMeOnce2Times
231:
226:
201:FoolMeOnce2Times
184:
179:
169:
162:
161:
141:
78:
1034:
1033:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1004:
983:
975:
969:
968:, then use the
957:
934:
908:
898:
884:
867:
860:blocking policy
845:
842:
815:DPL WikiProject
793:Laurie McCallum
789:
740:
641:
497:
455:
381:as there is no
304:
264:
247:
229:
224:
182:
177:
160:
142:
131:
116:
76:
67:by typing four
19:
12:
11:
5:
1032:
1030:
1003:
1000:
999:
998:
958:
941:
937:Decline reason
929:
925:Request reason
922:
843:
841:
838:
788:
785:
784:
783:
782:
781:
739:
738:India Becoming
736:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
640:
637:
617:
616:
615:
614:
613:
612:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
496:
493:
492:
491:
454:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
303:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
263:
260:
246:
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
238:
237:
214:
213:
212:
211:
192:
191:
170:
159:
156:
132:Message added
130:
117:
115:
112:
111:
110:
57:
56:
51:
46:
37:
32:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1031:
1022:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1001:
997:
993:
989:
985:
984:
982:
981:
974:
967:
965:
956:
955:
951:
947:
940:
938:
933:
928:
926:
921:
916:
912:
906:
902:
897:
893:
888:
883:
879:
878:global blocks
875:
874:active blocks
871:
866:
861:
857:
855:
854:administrator
839:
837:
836:
832:
828:
824:
819:
816:
812:
806:
802:
798:
794:
786:
780:
776:
772:
768:
764:
760:
759:
758:
757:
756:
754:
750:
746:
745:MrNiceGuy1113
737:
725:
721:
717:
713:
712:
711:
707:
703:
699:
698:
697:
693:
689:
685:
681:
680:
679:
675:
671:
667:
663:
659:
658:
657:
656:
655:
654:
650:
646:
638:
636:
635:
631:
627:
623:
605:
601:
597:
593:
592:
589:
588:
587:
583:
579:
575:
574:
572:
568:
564:
563:58.27.159.152
559:
558:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
511:
507:
503:
502:116.58.48.100
494:
490:
486:
482:
478:
477:
476:
475:
471:
467:
462:
460:
452:
442:
438:
434:
429:
428:
427:
423:
419:
414:
413:
412:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
363:
359:
355:
351:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
301:
295:
291:
287:
283:
282:
281:
280:
279:
278:
274:
270:
261:
259:
257:
253:
244:
236:
233:
232:
227:
225:Fylbecatulous
220:
219:
218:
217:
216:
215:
210:
206:
202:
198:
197:
196:
195:
190:
189:
186:
185:
180:
178:Fylbecatulous
171:
168:
164:
163:
157:
155:
154:
150:
146:
139:
135:
128:
121:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
93:
92:
91:
90:
86:
82:
74:
70:
66:
62:
55:
52:
50:
47:
45:
41:
38:
36:
33:
31:
28:
27:
26:
24:
16:
1005:
979:
961:
959:
946:JamesBWatson
942:
936:
935:
930:
924:
923:
896:creation log
863:
851:
820:
790:
741:
642:
618:
498:
463:
459:Bashir Ahmed
456:
305:
265:
248:
245:RE-New Pages
222:
175:
173:
143:
98:. Cheers! ~
58:
20:
684:have a look
77:{{help me}}
892:filter log
825:. Thanks,
767:WP:PEACOCK
716:Tito Dutta
688:Tito Dutta
645:Tito Dutta
136:. You can
65:talk pages
962:read the
911:checkuser
870:block log
809:Read the
662:WP:SIGCOV
395:WP:SIGCOV
383:WP:SIGCOV
367:WP:SIGCOV
358:WP:SIGCOV
328:WP:MANOTE
316:WP:SIGCOV
252:Candicell
100:DanielTom
81:DanielTom
988:WilliamH
882:contribs
797:Attorney
544:WP:COINB
466:Geo Swan
418:Papaursa
332:Papaursa
302:MMA AfDs
262:Alliance
114:Talkback
17:Welcome!
1012:Stefan2
973:unblock
905:unblock
827:DPL bot
720:contact
692:contact
649:contact
540:WP:NPOV
391:WP:NMMA
350:WP:NMMA
324:WP:NBOX
320:WP:NMMA
308:WP:NMMA
269:Peridon
763:WP:OWN
622:WP:GNG
536:WP:COI
532:WP:NOT
379:WP:GNG
375:WP:GNG
354:WP:GNG
312:WP:GNG
69:tildes
966:first
769:). --
666:WP:RS
528:WP:RS
524:WP:RS
399:WP:RS
387:WP:RS
385:from
371:WP:RS
362:WP:RS
145:Roger
1016:talk
1010:. --
992:talk
950:talk
840:Help
831:talk
775:talk
749:talk
706:talk
674:talk
630:talk
600:talk
582:talk
567:talk
552:talk
520:here
506:talk
485:talk
470:talk
453:fiyi
437:talk
422:talk
407:talk
397:and
336:talk
290:talk
273:talk
256:talk
230:talk
205:talk
183:talk
149:talk
104:talk
96:vote
85:talk
61:sign
42:and
915:log
862:).
811:FAQ
664:in
369:or
330:).
221:ツ
1018:)
994:)
976:}}
970:{{
952:)
939::
927::
909:•
903:•
899:•
894:•
890:•
885:•
880:•
876:•
872:•
833:)
803:|
777:)
755:)
751:)
722:)
708:)
694:)
686:--
676:)
651:)
632:)
602:)
584:)
573:)
569:)
554:)
512:)
508:)
487:)
472:)
461:.
439:)
424:)
409:)
338:)
292:)
275:)
258:•
207:)
151:)
106:)
87:)
1014:(
990:(
948:(
919:)
917:)
913:(
868:(
829:(
817:.
799:(
773:(
747:(
743:(
718:(
704:(
690:(
672:(
647:(
628:(
598:(
580:(
565:(
550:(
504:(
483:(
468:(
435:(
420:(
405:(
334:(
288:(
271:(
254:(
203:(
147:(
129:.
102:(
83:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
