1434:. This is not going to be tolerated, and it's not about 3RR. New content should be discussed on the article talk page, particularly when it's a fairly trivial campaign detail that you are trying to add to a politician's biographical article. At the very least, if you add new content and it gets reverted, take that as a sign that there is not agreement and you need to talk it out and refrain from efforts to edit war it back in. Consider this your only warning on the matter.--
1609:
1029:
2251:
972:
865:
306:
252:
200:
2005:
his/her recent encounter with
Andyvphil. The only alleged sockpuppet incident is in an AfD vote back in March (which had absolutely zero chance of affecting the outcome) and FA may have simply forgotten that he had already voted. Despite Shem's careful scouring (I'm sure) of the edit histories of both FA and the IP address, he/she could find no repeat of this incident. It is now three months later.
1852:
1659:
1079:
1573:
1245:
1301:
824:
621:
421:, you decide that you'd like to make appropriate contributions to WP, then I'd invite to please stay and do so. You might want to change your username and stay away from Fovean related articles (including the AfD--it's not too late to recuse yourself, and strike your vote). I can help you do both these things if you don't know how.
1799:
it)? Based on the remarkable speed with which this block was begun and completed, I assert that jossi and shem got together and said, "Let's work together and remove this person so that we don't have to hear his counter-arguments." Clearly I was given absolutely no time to defend myself (exactly 1 hour).
565:
To follow up on the above, you indicated that this picture was public domain and taken from the drudge report. However, the original was a copyrighted photo taken by AP. As such, it's not public domain and we can't use it under that rationale. Images from the internet are rarely public domain; you
2147:
So, in a nutshell, josi, take your block and your forgiveness and shove it up your severely puckered rectum, if you can find room for it, and continue with your left wing cabal to maintain
Knowledge (XXG) as irrelevant and pointless as it curently is. Do nothing to prevent obvious Obama supporters
2066:
has shown zero willingness to contribute anything other than personal attacks and disruption to the project. Just look at Fovean Author's immediate response to being blocked -- he admits nothing whatsoever wrong with his behavior, opting to accuse you of persecuting him for his POV and engaging in
1798:
If I were trying to post under an IP and a user name as a sock puppet, why in God's name would I IMMEDIATELY post, after using the IP, "Whoops - sorry, forgot to log in" and identify myself? Isn't that specifically the effort of someone trying NOT to be considered a sock puppet (which is why I did
2139:
Persons like those who gathered here to engineer a block for me, and persons like 'slime,' could care less about the factual accuracy or integrity of the articles here, simply want to push their agenda, and they have the free-time resources to do so. Persons like myself, with jobs and lives, will
2004:
It seems to me that his behavior has been improving lately, although clearly there's still some work to do in that regard. No repeat of the vandalism on a User page on March 19. The circumstances here do suggest that action was taken with undue haste, and Jossi's judgment may have been affected by
1755:
A review of your block takes into consideration only your actions, not those of the blocking admin or others - and, in this case, you provide no reason whatsoever explaining why you should not be blocked for the abovenoted offense (sockpuppetry). The reason for the unblock template is partially to
1284:
and simply trying to provoke people. You are accusing Jossi, one of
Knowledge (XXG)'s most prominent administrators, of lack of integrity, and accusing another user of "harassment." I'm not sure that this is blockable behavior in itself, but in considering future blocks based on your pattern of
1487:
FA, I'm taking a 30-day
Wikibreak from the topic of Barack Obama, but I'd like to continue visiting you on your Talk page. Rely on moderators like Bigtimepeace. If there is breaking campaign news, I see no reason why it shouldn't be added to the article immediately, but be careful to do it using
1832:
Yes - it is an accusation of sock puppetry. Sock puppetry is an attempt to disguise myself as one ID. Disguise implies that I don't want you to know that I am both persons. Explain to me how I am doing that, if I say, "Whoops - sorry, didn't mean to post under the IP, here I am as the actual
1181:
Edit warring is not necessarily characterized by any single action; instead, it is characterized by any mindset that tolerates confrontational tactics to affect content disputes ... The 3RR metric is not intended as an exemption for all conduct that stays under the threshold. For instance, edit
1937:
No basis to call me a sock puppet. The block seeks to ban me for posting under my log in name, and my IP address. When I did this, per the accusation, it was because I posted under the IP address, noticed that I'd done it, then IMMEDIATELY logged in and posted my identity, in order not to be
1182:
warring could take the form of 4+ reverts on a page in a day, or three, or one per day for a protracted period of time, or one per page across many pages, or simply a pattern of isolated blind reverts as a first resort in response to disagreeable edits ... Edit warring is the underlying
1833:
person." The other accusation that I'm posting under the IP to insert negative material would imply that I behaved differently when logged in, which just isn't true. You, josi, clearly went to Shem, told him to enter the complain, then immediately (within an hour) approved it.
2168:
I'm glad to hear that you now regret vandalizing my user page and I accept your apology (as
Colbert would say), but are you now signaling your intention to engage in sock puppetry in the future, possibly by spoofing your IP address in an attempt to avoid a checkuser request? --
762:
The comment above was neither a threat nor a bullying tactic, but a reminder about a core
Knowledge (XXG) policy which Fovean Author seemed to have forgotten. If you have a problem with my edits or my administrative actions, please let me know on my talk page. Thank you.
542:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on
2275:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
2135:
After my experience here, I think that I can honestly say that I've lost any respect that I might have had for
Knowledge (XXG) as an information source and, should I ever decide I need to post here again, I'll simply do it under a different IP and user name.
1285:
edit warring, this attitude towards the project may come into play as indicating that you do not mean to edit constructively. If you have something constructive to contribute to the article, or the sockpuppetry allegations against you, please go ahead.
880:
prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
267:
prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
215:
prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
807:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!
2096:. This user doesn't see why his behavior is problematic, and seems to view WP as a battleground, even after being warned and blocked repeatedly. 6 months is justified—we can only be so patient and give people so much slack...
2143:
I do regret that I once, in a moment of pique, changed scjessey's user page - an action which was beneath me - but even that tells me of the potential of this 'community' to draw one in to its immature nature and irrelevancy.
25:. Knowledge (XXG) gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Knowledge (XXG), the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an
33:
indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
385:, I checked your edit history, and that's how found the Fovean article. So that's how I found it, but I would have AfDed it had a stumbled upon it some other way, and I would AfDed it even if we were friends. If I
2279:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
1462:," shows a clear misunderstanding of how consensus-building and Talk pages work on Knowledge (XXG). We don't insert controversial material via edit warring while demanding others argue with us on Talk; it's
112:, etc. If no one explains this, maybe I'll take it up, but I don't have time to right now. Maybe you could save everyone a little time by reading these policies yourself, and then reconsider your edits.
1488:
strictly neutral language. And be prepared to discuss and modify afterward. For any other addition of material that is not breaking news, always discuss it first on the Talk page and obtain consensus.
538:
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
2084:
and have had this talkpage watchlisted every since. His behavior was problematic them, and it seems to only have gotten worse now that he's moved on to Obama related pages. As far as I can tell, the
2272:
723:, I just wanted to point out in my capacity as an administrator that consensus is the backbone of Knowledge (XXG)'s collaborative editing process, and should be granted due respect. Of course,
320:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "
460:
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with
Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
1756:
give you a chance to defend yourself, and I recommend that you do so without making accusations against other editors or admins. Please discuss your conduct and why it does not merit a block.
1280:. By accusing people dealing with your misbehavior on the project as "Obama apologists" and "slavish attitude of admitted left-wing Knowledge (XXG) administrators who support them" you are
185:
policy. In addition, you've included editorial opinions slamming Reid in a strident, biased tone completely unsuitable for an encyclopedia. Please familiarize yourself with wikipedia's
1499:, and I can argue that he/she is headed for a topic ban. Please do not allow anyone to put you in the same category as LT. Sign on for the truce and let them be the ones who break it.
324:"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
2121:
Fovean Author makes a commitment not to persist with his past behavior, and with the understanding that of he does, he will be blocked permanently after the first re-occurrence.
325:
280:
among editors. You have repeatedly inserted POV wording that has been reverted by several editors. You do not have consensus and are well over the 3RR limit. Please stop now.
2045:
I am not volunteering for the job, but I would recommend getting a more neutral observer than
Kossack4Truth to comment on whether the other reasons for the block are valid.
76:
article you were citing. You either have to directly quote (as you did in the paragraph before) or write in your own words. As an author yourself, you should understand.
85:
150:
I suggest reading up on what wikipedia is and is not and consider changing your editing style accordingly. The articles I've linked above would be a good place to start.
2023:
Blocks are preventative, and not punitive. As such, I am willing to reduce this block to two weeks, with one caveat: Any further disruption, be that a personal attack,
1815:
1586:
1258:
727:, but that doesn't mean that reaching consensus isn't the ultimate goal. Please take some time to refamiliarize yourself with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies. Thank you. —
747:
Fovean, thanks for helping make
Jeremiah Wright more neutral. I see a biased editor is trying to bully and threaten you in his "capacity as an administrator".
1590:
1262:
2148:
to sanitize his appearance here, and then go on to your other liberal icons to do the same thing. My time actually has a value to it, and yours clearly does not.
1382:, and your recurring disruption, may only result in further blocks. Any further such disruption will result in one week block, escalating to one month and so on.
409:, hoping that you might realize the error of you ways, and change your editing. So far you have only proven me wrong. The bottom line is that wikipedia is not a
532:
1997:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
1791:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
1222:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
2262:
104:. I'm going to let someone else do that, and hopefully you'll see that your edits go against consensus. And hopefully someone will explain why they violate
2067:
fraudulent collusion. Fovean Author can take the election season off, and if he truly cares about the project, he'll be back to contribute in six months.
365:, but I assure that you it wouldn't get much traction, and in the end it will only draw more attention to your problematic editing, and in particular your
1892:
1699:
1119:
452:. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at
1364:
Vandalism is adding slander or something that's not true. Look up Obama Gaffes if you can figure out how - he said every single thing I quoted him on.
543:
464:
457:
1982:
1776:
1207:
547:
468:
357:: if you are accusing me and Hal of being the same person I can assure we are not. If you'd like persue this more, you could file a report at
57:
456:
carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at
1887:
1694:
1114:
539:
527:
but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge (XXG) constitutes fair use. Please go to
30:
1762:
1444:
715:
you said, "consensus isn't a Knowledge (XXG) criterion." I'm not sure where you got this idea from, but it is completely incorrect.
1960:
You are also blocked for disruption, personal attacks, incivility, and tendentious editing. You do not address these reasons here. —
186:
773:
737:
46:
26:
377:
have been roundly rejected by the WP community, so there is really nothing for me to feel vindictive about. The reason I've AfDed
804:
636:
may be offensive or unwelcome. If you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use
382:
370:
208:
172:
976:
463:
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
898:
719:
is a core policy of Knowledge (XXG), and has been since its founding. Without getting into the details of the discussions on
1634:
1054:
882:
877:
276:
from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
269:
264:
224:
from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
217:
212:
56:. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at
1348:
567:
453:
317:
41:
944:
There's a difference between not liking something, and deleting a bunch of unnecessary demographics used to try to push
2266:
1865:
1672:
1622:
1617:
1410:
1323:
1092:
1042:
1037:
988:
888:
273:
221:
1906:
1713:
1133:
801:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
332:
with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the
1859:
1666:
1086:
2257:
2241:
2081:
1864:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
1671:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
1091:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
381:
is because the article doesn't belong here on WP. The book is simply not notable enough yet. Seeing your edits to
1582:
528:
519:
511:
182:
2077:
752:
1630:
1050:
893:. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
641:
1561:
1254:
1233:
596:
Regarding your reversion of edits to this article, please be aware that you may be in or nearing violation of
417:
If that's all you've come here to do, then I'd invite you to leave. If on the other hand, after reviewing our
2013:
1551:
1529:
1511:
663:
794:
1440:
448:
374:
369:
And believe me, this in not a "vindictive effort." Why would I need vindication? After all, your edits to
260:
22:
1546:
but you must not alienate him with these accusations. Give him/her some time to show what he/she can do.
1405:" are unacceptable. Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at
1315:
894:
790:
716:
629:
625:
277:
225:
88:, where it belongs for now. If this turns out to be a story with legs, it can go into the main article.
2117:<< Tvoz, Shem, Yilloslime, I hear you. But I will still consider reducing the block to two weeks,
1290:
1193:
769:
733:
692:
605:
869:
524:
378:
313:
299:
256:
204:
124:
120:
490:
175:, for two reasons. First, the (unnecessarily) lengthy quote you inserted is not properly cited. The
2100:
2093:
748:
425:
340:
154:
840:
637:
394:
1744:
Clearly an effort to remove someone who's opinion the administrator and plaintiff don't agree with
1286:
472:
410:
336:
template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.
109:
2288:
2174:
2149:
2063:
2009:
2008:
I suggest that a six-month block is overkill, and that it should be reduced to one or two weeks.
1939:
1870:
1834:
1800:
1677:
1547:
1525:
1507:
1365:
1097:
673:
659:
649:
577:
77:
1277:
624:
Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the
494:
2068:
1594:
1521:
1471:
1414:
1757:
1539:
1435:
1406:
1338:
1186:, not a simple measure of the number of reverts on a single page in a specific period of time.
1020:
980:
832:
813:
2186:
1627:
6 months, for sockpuppetry, disruption, personal attacks, incivility, and tendentious editing
402:
398:
362:
105:
2227:
1991:
1785:
1216:
1189:
955:
926:
850:
764:
728:
688:
601:
555:
181:
article that is linked contains no such quote; please familiarize yourself with wikipedia's
1281:
724:
597:
414:
366:
358:
333:
329:
321:
136:
116:
2194:
2126:
2097:
2032:
1823:
1648:
1608:
1387:
1068:
1028:
828:
720:
712:
498:
422:
337:
190:
151:
2024:
1176:
418:
140:
128:
397:
Hal and other users that you've clashed with, and I also would have reported you to the
2053:
1963:
1496:
836:
827:
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Knowledge (XXG), as you did to
550:. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page.
288:
236:
53:
2185:
Fovean Author can edit under a new name or anon if wants, but he needs to be aware of
1495:. Please sign on as I have done. Right now the only edit warrior who hasn't signed is
971:
864:
305:
251:
199:
132:
80:
2284:
2170:
1413:
for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you.
1011:
996:
902:
645:
633:
572:
1543:
1491:
We have a truce based on an initiative started by Wikidemo. The truce agreement is
1481:
1431:
1330:
1309:
1015:
873:
809:
590:
177:
2216:
1572:
1244:
950:
921:
845:
551:
485:
Please do not add copyrighted content to articles on Knowledge (XXG) as you did
1300:
2190:
2122:
2028:
1819:
1644:
1383:
1064:
2292:
2234:
2198:
2178:
2157:
2130:
2107:
2071:
2057:
2047:
2036:
2017:
1972:
1947:
1842:
1827:
1808:
1766:
1652:
1597:
1555:
1533:
1515:
1474:
1448:
1417:
1391:
1373:
1358:
1294:
1197:
1072:
1022:
1000:
960:
934:
905:
858:
817:
778:
756:
742:
696:
681:
667:
653:
609:
583:
559:
501:
493:. If you continue to add copyrighted material to Knowledge (XXG) you may be
475:
432:
347:
292:
282:
240:
230:
193:
161:
916:
658:
Agreed. Editing someone else's user page like you did is a major no-no.
1506:
article and he deserves your consistent, calm and non-combative support.
1503:
1014:. Please use the {{unblock}} template if you wish to contest this block.
1308:
you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to
823:
620:
2076:
I agree with Tvoz and Shem, too. I encountered this user months ago at
803:
523:. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
86:
Hillary_Rodham_Clinton_presidential_campaign,_2008#Other_irregularities
68:
Please be more careful with your contributions. The last paragraph of
1492:
644:
to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. --
1010:- for 24 hours for edit warring across numerous articles including
2027:
or any other disruptive behavior, shall result in an indef block.
835:. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
798:
407:
I brought these various violations of wikipolicy to your attention
687:
That comment is an attack as well. You really should step back. →
2273:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Phony soldiers controversy
793:
and Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion, you should
1589:
for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with
1261:
for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with
316:, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for
37:
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
1816:
Knowledge (XXG):Suspected_sock_puppets/Fovean_Author#Evidence
831:, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the
1850:
1657:
1607:
1520:
I have a correction. The actual initiator of that truce was
1077:
1027:
304:
789:
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
2261:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
1979:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
1773:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
1204:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
131:, and unless the article is improved to demonstrated the
1999:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
1793:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
1403:
You need to let some honesty drip down onto your messiah
1328:
Edit warring,vandalism, and general disruptiveness,STOP!
1224:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
843:
if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
489:. The content you added seems to be a direct lift from
143:: "Usernames that match the name of a company or group,
2255:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
2210:
2089:
1920:
1916:
1910:
1901:
1897:
1883:
1879:
1875:
1727:
1723:
1717:
1708:
1704:
1690:
1686:
1682:
1538:
Please do not make accusations against admins lightly.
1459:
1428:
1402:
1379:
1274:
1147:
1143:
1137:
1128:
1124:
1110:
1106:
1102:
992:
708:
486:
406:
390:
354:
326:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Fovean_chronicles
101:
97:
69:
2164:"I'll simply do it under a different IP and user name"
1460:
If you don't like the information, discuss its removal
672:
Hey - I'm not the one who put that picture on there.
389:
on vindictive witch hunt against you, I wouldn't have
1633:. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may
1053:. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may
640:
for any tests you may want to do. Take a look at our
442:
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FoveanCover.jpg
1858:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
1665:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
1587:
Knowledge (XXG):Suspected sock puppets/Fovean Author
1259:
Knowledge (XXG):Suspected sock puppets/Kossack4Truth
1085:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
96:
I'm not going to revert your most recent reverts of
546:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
467:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
171:I have removed your most recent addition(s) to the
84:P.S. The material was cleaned up and relocated to
2187:Knowledge (XXG):SOCK#Clean_start_under_a_new_name
1629:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
1049:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
123:appears to run afoul of it. Also on the topic of
919:if you really think Obama didn't ask questions.
189:policy before continuing to edit on wikipedia.-
117:wikipedia's guideline on conflicts of interest
1502:JJB has an excellent initiative based on the
8:
2088:lasting content contribution he has made is
458:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use rationale guideline
872:according to the reverts you have made on
259:according to the reverts you have made on
207:according to the reverts you have made on
129:wikipedia's notability standards for books
2263:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
868:You currently appear to be engaged in an
707:Hi, Fovean Author. I noticed that in an
255:You currently appear to be engaged in an
203:You currently appear to be engaged in an
58:Knowledge (XXG):Media copyright questions
17:License tagging for Image:FoveanCover.jpg
1430:in an effort to add disputed content to
517:Thanks for uploading or contributing to
1470:of material, not the other way around.
127:, note that it does not appear to meet
1466:who carries the burden to discuss the
135:of the books, then it is liable to be
1542:could become part of the solution at
1276:was extremely unhelpful. It is very
7:
2140:NEVER be able to compete with them.
897:among editors. If necessary, pursue
47:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags
979:other editors, which you did here:
497:from editing on Knowledge (XXG). --
1593:before editing the evidence page.
1265:before editing the evidence page.
1229:It's 3 rr's to be a war, not two.
628:of another user may be considered
391:notified you of the AfD nomination
145:especially if the user promotes it
139:. Finally, your username might be
14:
2271:The article will be discussed at
1623:Knowledge (XXG)'s blocking policy
1043:Knowledge (XXG)'s blocking policy
72:was a copyright violation of the
2249:
2211:this closing of the socking case
1621:from editing in accordance with
1571:
1458:Your most recent edit summary, "
1299:
1243:
1041:from editing in accordance with
991:from editing Knowledge (XXG). (
970:
863:
822:
802:
619:
568:Knowledge (XXG):Image use policy
454:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content
399:Conflict-of-interest Noticeboard
383:Reid-Limbaugh letter controversy
371:Reid-Limbaugh letter controversy
250:
209:Reid-Limbaugh letter controversy
198:
173:Reid-Limbaugh letter controversy
167:Reid-Limbaugh letter controversy
60:. 05:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
42:Knowledge (XXG):Image use policy
1631:make constructive contributions
1164:Doesn't constitute an edit war
1051:make constructive contributions
52:This is an automated notice by
1177:the definition of edit warring
548:Media copyright questions page
469:media copyright questions page
272:. If you continue, you may be
220:. If you continue, you may be
147:" are considered inappriate.
1:
2293:16:34, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
1637:by adding the text {{unblock|
1567:
1239:
1057:by adding the text {{unblock|
632:. Specifically, your edit to
584:04:26, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
560:03:10, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
520:Image:HillaryDrudgeReport.jpg
512:Image:HillaryDrudgeReport.jpg
544:criteria for speedy deletion
502:02:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
476:18:09, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
465:criteria for speedy deletion
433:23:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
348:16:19, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
293:08:16, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
241:08:36, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
194:04:50, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
162:01:15, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
81:03:47, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
2062:I agree with Tvoz, Jossi.
1938:discerned as a sock puppet.
1862:, who declined the request.
1669:, who declined the request.
1318:Knowledge (XXG) again, you
1089:, who declined the request.
566:may want to take a look at
415:forum to promote your book.
322:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
2308:
2258:Phony soldiers controversy
2242:Phony soldiers controversy
2082:Phony soldiers controversy
1454:You have things backwards.
961:02:22, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
779:03:34, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
697:17:33, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
682:17:39, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
668:16:39, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
654:16:22, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
610:21:00, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
529:the image description page
2235:23:58, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
2199:16:47, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
2179:15:57, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
2158:15:41, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
2131:02:34, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
2108:19:12, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
2078:Media Matters for America
2072:18:38, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
2058:17:56, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
2037:17:44, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
2018:12:08, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1983:guide to appealing blocks
1973:05:46, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1948:02:57, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1843:02:54, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1828:02:46, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1809:02:38, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1777:guide to appealing blocks
1767:02:49, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
1653:03:20, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
1598:02:20, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
1581:You have been accused of
1556:13:29, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
1534:11:04, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
1516:11:00, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
1475:02:59, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
1449:02:45, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
1418:03:32, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
1253:You have been accused of
1208:guide to appealing blocks
935:04:20, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
906:04:15, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
859:00:34, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
839:. Please make use of the
818:01:56, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
757:16:37, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
743:16:31, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
531:and edit it to include a
2265:or whether it should be
2153:
1943:
1838:
1804:
1392:03:39, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
1374:03:04, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
1369:
1359:03:36, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
1295:03:32, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
1198:02:12, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
1073:00:31, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
1023:16:37, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
1001:23:07, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
915:You might want to watch
393:, I probably would have
312:An editor has nominated
2189:and what does it mean.
983:. If you continue, you
510:Fair use rationale for
115:I also suggest reading
63:
1855:
1662:
1612:
1082:
1032:
375:Hillary Rodham Clinton
328:and please be sure to
309:
261:Hillary Rodham Clinton
137:nominated for deletion
31:image description page
1907:change block settings
1854:
1714:change block settings
1661:
1611:
1591:notes for the suspect
1427:You are edit warring
1263:notes for the suspect
1134:change block settings
1081:
1031:
449:Image:FoveanCover.jpg
446:Thanks for uploading
367:conflict of interest.
363:request for checkuser
334:articles for deletion
308:
119:, as your editing of
23:Image:FoveanCover.jpg
21:Thanks for uploading
2205:Please read and heed
2094:USS Truxtun (CGN-35)
725:consensus can change
403:Username Noticeboard
98:Reid-Limabugh Letter
2025:tendentious editing
885:. If you continue,
481:Copyright violation
2064:User:Fovean Author
2050:
1856:
1663:
1613:
1585:. Please refer to
1282:assuming bad faith
1257:. Please refer to
1083:
1033:
911:Obama and Patraeus
899:dispute resolution
533:fair use rationale
330:sign your comments
310:
298:AfD nomination of
285:
233:
70:this edit of yours
2197:
2129:
2056:
2046:
2035:
1971:
1826:
1765:
1651:
1635:contest the block
1579:
1578:
1540:User:Bigtimepeace
1447:
1407:Talk:Barack Obama
1390:
1342:Vandals Beware!!!
1251:
1250:
1071:
1055:contest the block
981:Talk:Barack Obama
883:three-revert rule
878:three-revert rule
785:Your recent edits
777:
741:
642:introduction page
379:Fovean chronicles
314:Fovean chronicles
300:Fovean chronicles
291:
281:
270:three-revert rule
265:three-revert rule
239:
229:
218:three-revert rule
213:three-revert rule
125:Fovean chronicles
121:Fovean chronicles
2299:
2253:
2252:
2233:
2230:
2224:
2193:
2125:
2052:
2031:
1996:
1990:
1970:
1968:
1961:
1926:
1924:
1913:
1895:
1893:deleted contribs
1853:
1822:
1790:
1784:
1761:
1733:
1731:
1720:
1702:
1700:deleted contribs
1660:
1647:
1639:your reason here
1575:
1568:
1438:
1397:Personal attacks
1386:
1355:
1345:
1335:
1303:
1247:
1240:
1221:
1215:
1153:
1151:
1140:
1122:
1120:deleted contribs
1080:
1067:
1059:your reason here
1018:
974:
953:
930:
924:
876:. Note that the
867:
854:
848:
826:
806:
767:
731:
623:
582:
540:my contributions
287:
263:. Note that the
254:
235:
228:among editors.
211:. Note that the
202:
2307:
2306:
2302:
2301:
2300:
2298:
2297:
2296:
2282:
2254:
2250:
2246:
2228:
2217:
2214:
2207:
2002:
1994:
1988:
1987:, then use the
1976:
1964:
1962:
1951:
1914:
1904:
1890:
1873:
1866:blocking policy
1851:
1796:
1788:
1782:
1781:, then use the
1770:
1746:
1721:
1711:
1697:
1680:
1673:blocking policy
1658:
1642:
1605:
1566:
1485:
1456:
1425:
1401:Comments like "
1399:
1349:
1339:
1331:
1326:from editing.
1271:
1238:
1227:
1219:
1213:
1212:, then use the
1201:
1166:
1141:
1131:
1117:
1100:
1093:blocking policy
1078:
1062:
1016:
1008:
968:
951:
948:POV. Stop now.
942:
928:
922:
913:
852:
846:
829:Jeremiah Wright
797:by typing four
795:sign your posts
787:
749:CarlosRodriguez
721:Jeremiah Wright
713:Jeremiah Wright
705:
703:About consensus
617:
594:
571:
515:
483:
444:
303:
248:
169:
102:Hillary Clinton
94:
66:
29:applied to the
19:
12:
11:
5:
2305:
2303:
2248:
2247:
2245:
2240:Nomination of
2238:
2206:
2203:
2202:
2201:
2182:
2181:
2166:
2115:
2114:
2113:
2112:
2111:
2110:
2060:
2040:
2039:
1977:
1958:
1954:Decline reason
1935:
1931:Request reason
1928:
1849:
1848:
1847:
1846:
1845:
1771:
1753:
1749:Decline reason
1742:
1738:Request reason
1735:
1656:
1614:You have been
1606:
1604:
1601:
1577:
1576:
1565:
1559:
1497:User:Life.temp
1484:
1478:
1455:
1452:
1424:
1421:
1409:, you will be
1398:
1395:
1377:
1376:
1313:
1270:
1267:
1249:
1248:
1237:
1231:
1202:
1173:
1169:Decline reason
1162:
1158:Request reason
1155:
1076:
1034:You have been
1026:
1007:
1004:
967:
964:
941:
938:
912:
909:
786:
783:
782:
781:
704:
701:
700:
699:
616:
613:
593:
588:
587:
586:
514:
508:
506:
482:
479:
473:BetacommandBot
443:
440:
438:
436:
435:
302:
296:
247:
244:
168:
165:
93:
92:Your edits....
90:
83:
65:
62:
50:
49:
44:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2304:
2295:
2294:
2290:
2286:
2281:
2277:
2274:
2268:
2264:
2260:
2259:
2243:
2239:
2237:
2236:
2231:
2225:
2223:
2221:
2212:
2204:
2200:
2196:
2192:
2188:
2184:
2183:
2180:
2176:
2172:
2167:
2165:
2162:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2155:
2151:
2150:Fovean Author
2145:
2141:
2137:
2133:
2132:
2128:
2124:
2120:
2109:
2106:
2104:
2099:
2095:
2091:
2087:
2083:
2079:
2075:
2074:
2073:
2070:
2065:
2061:
2059:
2055:
2049:
2044:
2043:
2042:
2041:
2038:
2034:
2030:
2026:
2022:
2021:
2020:
2019:
2015:
2011:
2010:Kossack4Truth
2006:
2001:
2000:
1993:
1986:
1984:
1975:
1974:
1969:
1967:
1957:
1955:
1950:
1949:
1945:
1941:
1940:Fovean Author
1934:
1932:
1927:
1922:
1918:
1912:
1908:
1903:
1899:
1894:
1889:
1885:
1884:global blocks
1881:
1880:active blocks
1877:
1872:
1871:Fovean Author
1867:
1863:
1861:
1860:administrator
1844:
1840:
1836:
1835:Fovean Author
1831:
1830:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1817:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1806:
1802:
1801:Fovean Author
1795:
1794:
1787:
1780:
1778:
1769:
1768:
1764:
1759:
1752:
1750:
1745:
1741:
1739:
1734:
1729:
1725:
1719:
1715:
1710:
1706:
1701:
1696:
1692:
1691:global blocks
1688:
1687:active blocks
1684:
1679:
1678:Fovean Author
1674:
1670:
1668:
1667:administrator
1655:
1654:
1650:
1646:
1640:
1636:
1632:
1628:
1624:
1620:
1619:
1610:
1602:
1600:
1599:
1596:
1592:
1588:
1584:
1574:
1570:
1569:
1563:
1560:
1558:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1548:Kossack4Truth
1545:
1541:
1536:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1526:Kossack4Truth
1523:
1518:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1508:Kossack4Truth
1505:
1500:
1498:
1494:
1489:
1483:
1479:
1477:
1476:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1453:
1451:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1422:
1420:
1419:
1416:
1412:
1408:
1404:
1396:
1394:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1381:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1366:Fovean Author
1363:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1356:
1354:
1353:
1346:
1344:
1343:
1336:
1334:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1311:
1307:
1302:
1297:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1268:
1266:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1246:
1242:
1241:
1235:
1232:
1230:
1226:
1225:
1218:
1211:
1209:
1200:
1199:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1178:
1172:
1170:
1165:
1161:
1159:
1154:
1149:
1145:
1139:
1135:
1130:
1126:
1121:
1116:
1112:
1111:global blocks
1108:
1107:active blocks
1104:
1099:
1098:Fovean Author
1094:
1090:
1088:
1087:administrator
1075:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1039:
1030:
1025:
1024:
1021:
1019:
1013:
1012:Barrack Obama
1005:
1003:
1002:
999:
998:
993:
990:
986:
982:
978:
977:do not attack
973:
965:
963:
962:
959:
958:
957:
954:
947:
939:
937:
936:
933:
932:
931:
925:
918:
910:
908:
907:
904:
900:
896:
892:
890:
884:
879:
875:
871:
866:
861:
860:
857:
856:
855:
849:
842:
838:
834:
830:
825:
820:
819:
815:
811:
805:
800:
796:
792:
784:
780:
775:
771:
766:
761:
760:
759:
758:
754:
750:
745:
744:
739:
735:
730:
726:
722:
718:
714:
710:
702:
698:
694:
690:
686:
685:
684:
683:
679:
675:
674:Fovean Author
670:
669:
665:
661:
660:Wasted Time R
656:
655:
651:
647:
643:
639:
635:
634:User:Scjessey
631:
627:
622:
614:
612:
611:
607:
603:
599:
592:
589:
585:
581:
579:
574:
569:
564:
563:
562:
561:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
536:
534:
530:
526:
522:
521:
513:
509:
507:
504:
503:
500:
496:
492:
488:
480:
478:
477:
474:
470:
466:
461:
459:
455:
451:
450:
441:
439:
434:
431:
429:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
351:
350:
349:
346:
344:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
307:
301:
297:
295:
294:
290:
284:
279:
275:
271:
266:
262:
258:
253:
246:Well over 3RR
245:
243:
242:
238:
232:
227:
223:
219:
214:
210:
206:
201:
196:
195:
192:
188:
184:
183:verifiability
180:
179:
174:
166:
164:
163:
160:
158:
153:
148:
146:
142:
141:inappropriate
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
113:
111:
107:
103:
99:
91:
89:
87:
82:
79:
78:Wasted Time R
75:
71:
64:Don't copyvio
61:
59:
55:
48:
45:
43:
40:
39:
38:
35:
32:
28:
24:
16:
2283:
2278:
2270:
2256:
2244:for deletion
2219:
2218:
2208:
2163:
2146:
2142:
2138:
2134:
2118:
2116:
2102:
2085:
2007:
2003:
1998:
1980:
1978:
1965:
1959:
1953:
1952:
1936:
1930:
1929:
1902:creation log
1869:
1857:
1797:
1792:
1774:
1772:
1758:UltraExactZZ
1754:
1748:
1747:
1743:
1737:
1736:
1709:creation log
1676:
1664:
1643:
1638:
1626:
1616:temporarily
1615:
1583:sockpuppetry
1580:
1562:Sockpuppetry
1544:Barack Obama
1537:
1519:
1501:
1490:
1486:
1482:Barack Obama
1467:
1463:
1457:
1436:Bigtimepeace
1432:Barack Obama
1426:
1423:Edit warring
1400:
1380:This comment
1378:
1351:
1350:
1341:
1340:
1332:
1327:
1319:
1310:Barack Obama
1306:last warning
1305:
1304:This is the
1298:
1272:
1255:sockpuppetry
1252:
1234:Sockpuppetry
1228:
1223:
1205:
1203:
1185:
1180:
1174:
1168:
1167:
1163:
1157:
1156:
1129:creation log
1096:
1084:
1063:
1058:
1047:edit warring
1046:
1036:temporarily
1035:
1009:
995:
984:
969:
956:
949:
945:
943:
927:
920:
914:
891:from editing
886:
874:Barack Obama
862:
851:
844:
833:edit summary
821:
788:
746:
706:
677:
671:
657:
618:
595:
591:Barack Obama
575:
537:
518:
516:
505:
484:
471:. Thank you.
462:
447:
445:
437:
427:
419:five pillars
411:battleground
386:
342:
311:
249:
197:
178:Boston Globe
176:
170:
156:
149:
144:
114:
95:
73:
67:
51:
36:
20:
1190:Daniel Case
887:you may be
765:Josiah Rowe
729:Josiah Rowe
689:Wordbuilder
638:the sandbox
602:Wordbuilder
405:. Instead,
2098:Yilloslime
1966:Sandstein
1898:filter log
1705:filter log
1641:}} below.
1125:filter log
1061:}} below.
791:talk pages
615:March 2008
499:Bobblehead
423:Yilloslime
353:Regarding
338:Yilloslime
191:Hal Raglan
152:Yilloslime
133:notability
2191:≈ jossi ≈
2123:≈ jossi ≈
2090:this edit
2029:≈ jossi ≈
1981:read the
1917:checkuser
1876:block log
1820:≈ jossi ≈
1775:read the
1724:checkuser
1683:block log
1645:≈ jossi ≈
1522:User:Shem
1384:≈ jossi ≈
1316:vandalize
1273:This edit
1269:June 2008
1206:read the
1144:checkuser
1103:block log
1065:≈ jossi ≈
895:consensus
717:Consensus
630:vandalism
395:canvassed
355:this edit
278:consensus
226:consensus
110:WP:WEIGHT
54:OrphanBot
27:image tag
2285:MelanieN
2171:Scjessey
1888:contribs
1763:Evidence
1695:contribs
1504:Ron Paul
1468:addition
1445:contribs
1352:Contribs
1287:Wikidemo
1184:behavior
1115:contribs
997:MastCell
903:jpgordon
870:edit war
837:reverted
774:contribs
738:contribs
646:Scjessey
626:userpage
573:Kubigula
525:fair use
401:and the
318:deletion
257:edit war
205:edit war
74:LA Times
2267:deleted
1992:unblock
1911:unblock
1786:unblock
1718:unblock
1618:blocked
1603:Blocked
1411:blocked
1333:Xp54321
1324:blocked
1314:If you
1278:uncivil
1217:unblock
1138:unblock
1038:blocked
1017:Scarian
1006:Blocked
989:blocked
975:Please
966:Attacks
889:blocked
841:sandbox
810:SineBot
495:blocked
274:blocked
222:blocked
106:WP:NPOV
2195:(talk)
2127:(talk)
2033:(talk)
1824:(talk)
1649:(talk)
1388:(talk)
1069:(talk)
940:Wright
799:tildes
598:WP:3RR
552:STBotI
359:WP:SSP
2222:levse
1985:first
1779:first
1210:first
413:or a
361:or a
2289:talk
2229:Talk
2209:See
2175:talk
2154:talk
2086:only
2080:and
2069:Shem
2054:talk
2048:Tvoz
2014:talk
1944:talk
1839:talk
1814:See
1805:talk
1625:for
1595:Shem
1564:case
1552:talk
1530:talk
1512:talk
1493:here
1480:Re:
1472:Shem
1441:talk
1415:Shem
1370:talk
1320:will
1291:talk
1236:case
1194:talk
1188:" —
1175:See
1045:for
985:will
952:Grsz
946:your
923:Grsz
917:this
901:. --
847:Grsz
814:talk
770:talk
753:talk
734:talk
709:edit
693:talk
678:talk
664:talk
650:talk
606:talk
578:talk
556:talk
491:here
487:here
387:were
373:and
289:talk
283:Tvoz
237:talk
231:Tvoz
187:NPOV
100:and
2092:to
1921:log
1868:).
1728:log
1675:).
1464:you
1443:|
1322:be
1179:: "
1148:log
1095:).
994:).
987:be
711:to
600:. →
570:.--
2291:)
2269:.
2232:•
2226:•
2215:—
2213:.
2177:)
2156:)
2119:if
2016:)
1995:}}
1989:{{
1956::
1946:)
1933::
1915:•
1909:•
1905:•
1900:•
1896:•
1891:•
1886:•
1882:•
1878:•
1841:)
1818:.
1807:)
1789:}}
1783:{{
1751::
1740::
1722:•
1716:•
1712:•
1707:•
1703:•
1698:•
1693:•
1689:•
1685:•
1554:)
1532:)
1524:.
1514:)
1439:|
1372:)
1357:)
1312:.
1293:)
1220:}}
1214:{{
1196:)
1171::
1160::
1142:•
1136:•
1132:•
1127:•
1123:•
1118:•
1113:•
1109:•
1105:•
929:11
853:11
816:)
808:--
772:•
755:)
736:•
695:)
680:)
666:)
652:)
608:)
558:)
535:.
108:,
2287:(
2220:R
2173:(
2152:(
2105:)
2103:t
2101:(
2051:/
2012:(
1942:(
1925:)
1923:)
1919:(
1874:(
1837:(
1803:(
1760:~
1732:)
1730:)
1726:(
1681:(
1550:(
1528:(
1510:(
1368:(
1347:,
1337:(
1289:(
1192:(
1152:)
1150:)
1146:(
1101:(
812:(
776:)
768:(
763:—
751:(
740:)
732:(
691:(
676:(
662:(
648:(
604:(
580:)
576:(
554:(
430:)
428:t
426:(
345:)
343:t
341:(
286:|
234:|
159:)
157:t
155:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.