User talk:Flagrantedelicto

1371:

just educate them selves and build factories and industry and organise them selves to remove their corrupt rulers. If you look carefully at the Muawiyah article, and you look at the Roman text on Muawiyah, you will find that he was in a much worst position than people in your country, when Umar appointed him the governor. His elder brother Yazid ibn Abi Sufyan the previous governor of Syria, along with Abu Ubaidah ibn al-Jarrah the governor before him and 25,000 other people had died in a plague. The situation was so bad in Syria that Umar went over personally to Syria because the majority of his army had died and the Roman army was waiting on the border. The population in Syria at the time was not Muslim, so essentially Muawiyah was almost on his own. Had it been some one from your country, he would have carried on waiting for Moses. But Muawiyah with his creative imagination was not from your country and decided to go to the Christian population and ask them to help him build a Navy to take on the Romans. What many academics find amazing is that he managed to get the Monophysitise Christian, Coptic, and Jacobite Syrian Christian to build a navy and in 6 years defeat the Byzantine navy at the Battle of the Masts. Byzantine navy was the super power of the time. It was the roman navy with a history of hundreds of years. That is so extreme, its like you going to Canada and becoming its Prime Minister and then taking on the US navy. So rather than delete everything from the Muawiyah article why don't you look at how he managed to do such things. Why did the population in Syria help him, what did they gain. It appears he gave the population Justice, continued the welfare system for the poor and appointed the most talented people in the top positions, irrespective of their religion and aloud them to gain more knowledge. May be if the people in your country provided justice, had a welfare state for the poor, and appointed the most talented people irrespective of their religion in the top positions, rather than wait for Moses, they would not fall victim to a fake Moses. He has the other side to him too, that he did not back down, when Ali moved north. So that is like you taking on the US and then the people in the Middle East moving against you and the Canadians and you surviving. So you could see why the academics in the West look at Muawiyah. You were talking about Imperialist-Colonialist and I guess you were referring to my country. Here in the UK we have learnt from Muawiyah, and here in the UK there is justice, a welfare system for the poor and we appoint the most talented people in the top positions. --

2749:

is not a religious site and there are no rules stating that you have to be a certain religion to contribute on Knowledge. I can't recall any prophet saying that they were Salafi/Wahhabi or Sunni or Shia or Christian, Jew or Muslim. Even if you look at many of the early Muslim books they all said "Worship God, be just and kind to one another". Looking at the books, I was under the impressions that Muslims believed in one god and the religion of Abraham, the same religion as the rest of the Prophets, but if you look at Knowledge they appear to believe in all kinds of things. I do read old book. The early scholars in Madina were very close to that ideal and did not believe in sects. I read their books because there is great wisdom in all their books. What happens is that a Prophet talks about human equality, justice and asks people to be kind to one another. Then over time you get some people saying that they are the chosen people and some how better than every one else and use religion to justify their superiority and then you get things like Zionism. You also get casts like the Bramin in India. Then you get rulers who form sects to divide people to make them fight for them. Then you get so called religious leaders who love Money and will do anything for money. But if you read the early books you realize that many of the Prophets worked hard and suffered for righteousness to earn their place, they were not proud and did not say that they were better than everyone else because of their ancestry etc. I do not reject the works of the classical, early SUNNI Imams and Ulama. Their views are valid. I was going through the book "Stories of the Prophets by Ibn Kathir AD-Damishqa 700-774 H. It is an old book and appeared quite balanced and showed how hard these Prophets worked. The views of these early writers are very balanced where as on Knowledge where you get extreme views. My issues with Seyyed was that he kept on deleting the referenced material I added from some of these early books because be classes it as a primary source where as he added material from the same books. That is why I put a diagram up on some of the pages of the early scholars and books so that people could read the books them selves, I just want these old books up there as you do. That way people could research them selves. It also reduces arguments. I was talking to MezzoMezzo about this and he said:

1280:(Joseph): The ten (10) sons of Shaykh Yaqub Isra'eel (Elder Jacob Israel) were envious about their patriarchal father's affection for their younger brothers Yusuf and Binyamin. They squabbled over this which even led to enmity, but in the end they all came together and were united. This happened when the majority of the sons of Shaykh Isra'eel realized their unfairness toward Yusuf. Of course the sons of Shaykh Isra'eel all were united and lived together in prosperity in Egypt. Until a ruling dynasty which came to power oppressed them. This oppression in our contemporary times, as seen from many an Eastern-Mashriqi perspective is from Imperialist-Colonialist foreign powers. That is what the Islamic Ummah is (generally speaking) feeling right now: Cultural and political oppression from foreign powers. Consequently, the Islamic Ummah is awaiting their own Musa (Moses) to come and deliver them from this perceived Imperialist-Colonialist oppression. Many Muslims like to think that this Moses might be the Guide (Mahdi). Some contend that Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab thought of himself as this Guide. Others thought that it was Khomeini. And yet others thought it was Ghulam Ahmad. There is an old Arabian proverb: For every Pharaoh there is a Moses. I guess for those who are waiting, will probably have to wait and see what happens next. Part of my views on theology (in general) are of an agnostic approach, while another part is monotheist; it is a symbiotic approach. -- 1178:

be king might be a statement offensive to Mongolian people who are equally proud of their heritage as world conquerors. The Mongols themselves have been re-evaluated from an "Eastern" perspective by Western-Occidental scholars. The collective early Islamic historians (mostly Persian), in spite of the fact that Islamic culture and society was dealt its severest blow by the Mongol conquests, wrote surprisingly well-balanced historiography about the Mongols. It is these historical records which are being re-evaluated by Western-Occidental historians who once disdainfully panned the Mongols as scowling, essentially primitive savages. Genghis Khan is now acknowledged by Western-Occidental historians as a brilliant administrator; for instance, he is now acknowledged for personally designing the arrow-resistant battle garments which reduced the velocity and damage done by arrows in battle; he further came up with the idea of the "arrow" riders who were directly modeled by the Pony Express riders in the history of the American West. Well guess what, the Persian Muslim chroniclers had already made a similar assessment of Genghis Khan in some of their classical works. The mighty Khan wasn't painted as primarily a scowling, savage warlord in medieval Islamic historiography as he was in Western-Occidental chronicles.

1681:

polemical, essentially pseudo-revisionist authors), only POV conjecture (while REJECTING so much of the established medieval Islamic literature). When you ACCUSED me of some rather unpleasant and FALSE things which I cited above, it became evident to me that you need to go to Islamic websites and forums and engage people there, not here in WP. I would have been glad to have offered you references to literary material which would answer a lot of your questions. However, you have flatly rejected the classical (mostly) SUNNI Islamic works, so there is no point in even attempting to refer such long-established works to you. You have conveniently managed to enter well over a DOZEN paragraphs and sub-paragraphs in the Muawiyah I article page that are entirely UNCITED. The only further correspondence I am open to from you is your acknowledgment of CITING your sources (period) in your recent entries in the Muawiyah I article page. Other than that, I am not interested in corresponding with you because you clearly ACCUSED me of stating things which I have NEVER stated...Not just one thing, but a few things. To me this is really unacceptable and I found it quite offensive. Please understand this before a complaint to ANI is lodged against you by me. --

2497:

possible revert/convert to Islam, or someone who is headed in that direction. Only someone of SUNNI or SALAFI/WAHHABI persuasion would address Caliph Muawiyah I as HAZRAT. It is almost certain that NO NON-Muslim WP editor/user would have addressed Caliph Muawiyah I as HAZRAT MUAWIYAH. However, even among the vast SUNNI population, there is a half percentage who DO NOT address the Umayyad caliph Muawiyah I as HAZRAT. Among the SUNNI Muslim populace, there is a division of those who address Caliph Muawiyah I as HAZRAT, and those who DO NOT. The point of all this being that if Toddy1 is presenting herself/himself as possibly a NON-Muslim, entirely neutral WP editor, then this revealing documented information has to be brought to the forefront and acknowledged. Not that whatever Toddy1's theological affiliation may be makes any difference as a WP editor/user, but it does make a difference if Toddy1 is acting as a mediator in the Yazid I and Muawiyah I WP article pages. This could manifest itself in potential favoritism and partiality toward Salafi/Wahhabi influenced views of nearly half of the Sunni Muslim population. Then the objectivity and neutrality as a mediating WP editor/user is clearly jeopardized. --

1640:

book Hadhrat Ayesha Siddiqa by Allamah Syed Sulaiman Nadvi Page 39. What do you think of that.They say Ali, Aisha, Talhah and Zubayr did not want to fight. But others kicked off the fight. They Say Zubayr left after saying "What a tragedy that the Muslims who had acquired the strength of a rock are going to be smashed by colliding with one another" book Hadhrat Ayesha Siddiqa by Allamah Syed Sulaiman Nadvi Page 44. What do you think of that. Also what do you think about what the Shia and Sunni books say about Muhammad ibn Abu Bakr staring off some of these events. You talked about Hajjaj he was from Taif. As were many of the people who killed Hussein. People in Taif never liked Muhammad and then their city was later besieged. The Romans also did not like being challenged. So clearly there could have been many people manipulating the situation. Mukhtar who took on some of the people who killed Hussein was also from Taif. And many Shia also hold him in high regard. When you start looking at the individuals you see some have motives too.--

2793:

observing Islam-related articles on Knowledge for around six years now, I do agree with your statement that most Islam-related articles are either Muslims pushing a pro-Islam political agenda, Christian pushing an anti-Islam agenda or Muslim sects bickering among one another over who's right and who's wrong. Islam-related articles are sorely in need of some objective contributions which aim simply to provide the readers with information, not to convince them of a certain viewpoint.The difficult, of course, is how that should be done. These six years have also taught me that fighting against this lack of neutrality will make you the target of insults, slurs, stalking and reporting you falsely to moderators for things you didn't do. If you're willing to face all that then perhaps there is some kind of task force on Knowledge we could join and focus on improving articles one by one. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:26, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

1005:

novice like Aisha Bewley, who herself in her self-published website states that her husband Abdur Rahman Bewley corrects her Arabic translations from sounding like ARAB-LISH. You further stated earlier that Classical Islamic works are barely being translated into English and those which are translated are "interpreted". You do know that much of the classical works have been translated into other languages (Farsi, Urdu, Turkish, English, French, etc.), and are out of reach of that particular POV-pushing group which is on a mission to RE-EDIT and tamper with those Classical SUNNI Islamic works, so it will fit in with their aqeedah (religious conviction). The late Shaykh Albani being a prime example, who got caught red-handed for eliminating over 300 ahadith of Imam Bukhari in one of his books. The famous Hanafi SUNNI scholar Dr. Mohd. Tahir Ul Qadri exposed this publicly.

1329:"The Shias & Salafis despise each other to an extent that is anti-Quranic, to say the least. The Shi'ite self-professed, self-righteous claimed ownership of the Ahl Al Bayt Muhammadi (People of the House of Muhammad) is as much an obstacle to Islamic unity, as the Salafi/Wahhabi frenzy or witch-hunt to label anyone as Kuffar (Ingrates) and anything as Takfir (Attributing Ingratitude) which is even remotely perceived as Bidah (Innovation). Neither of these two polaric opposites have earned the right to impose such values upon Islam (as defined in the Qur'an). And btw, from most all the occurrences of the Arabic words Kufr and Kuffar stated in the Qur'an, their contextual definitions are more accurately Ingratitude (for Kufr) and Ingrates (for Kuffar), more so than Disbelief / Unbelief / Infidelity (for Kufr) and Disbelievers / Unbelievers / 2191:

UNCITED. And yet, you are requesting of me already CITED information. These citations were acceptable to Edward321 and yourself before. Conveniently, now you are suddenly asking for more details. This gives me the impression that you are applying preferential treatment of one WP editor/user over another and not applying a fair, impartial requisition. When in the Muawiyah I article there were nearly a DOZEN improperly cited sources (NO BOOKS were cited, only the authors), you didn't seem to be aware of it. These sources cited entirely without book titles, were also relatively recent, but that didn't seem to concern you until I brought attention to it. And as for all those UNCITED entries by johnleeds1, you are surprisingly flexible and appear to be almost nonchalant about them. --

1034:

ended up wasting time with you on the Muawiyah page. Flagrantedelicto I do share some of your views but some times one has to be open minded too. Muawiyah is a very complex character and for some reason there is a big difference between what the later Muslim books say about Muawiyah and what the roman books written during the time of Muawiyah say about him. He appears to have caused the Romans a lot of trouble but at the same time they respected him because of the way he built up his Navy. He is a very complex character. Only God knows what he was really like. Away from this articles may be we could work together on improving other articles on Knowledge. There is a lot of false information on there as you must have seen --

3570:

way this particular issue is being approached is counter-productive. And the WP Admin will most probably see right through such tactics. There has been no concern (or perception) of bullying by me to any WP user/editor in the current issue with the Muawiyah I article. It appears that both of you WP editors (MezzoMezzo and Toddy1) give the impression that you two are collaborating in a campaign of unfair accusations (and/or concerns) toward me. The question that should be sincerely asked by the two of you is whether such a practice is ethical (?) The reason why I include the both of you is because it is obvious that you two are almost precisely echoing or mirroring each other’s concerns. --

1200:

Christianity or Judaism also did. You cannot expect to white-wash and reinvent these facts. There were heroic, villainous, and anti-heroic figures in early Islamic history, just as in Judaism and Christianity. Sure, there is no doubt that the Islamo-Arab conquests left the world a legacy of monotheism, but you are forgetting that CHRISTIANITY (and on a smaller scale JUDAISM) left the world a legacy of monotheism BEFORE standard Islamic culture. One important point to make here is that the roots of Judaism, Christianity, and standard Islam are ALL MIDDLE or NEAR EASTERN. The fact that the Western-Occidental world has taken virtual

3451:

being applied. This MezzoMezzo said and did NOTHING when his friend Johnleeds1 inundated the article with dozens of UNCITED paragraphs/sub-paragraphs. And may never had done so until I had brought attention to it to Toddy1 (and Toddy1's own double standards toward me). The reason being an obvious shared pro-Muawiyah bias. Toddy1 (who gave the impression of being a non-Muslim) titled a new section header in Johnleeds1 personal Talk Page HAZRAT MUAWIYAH--Which almost no non-Muslim WP editor would have used. This reveals a Muslim affiliation, not to mention Toddy1's own admission of having a copy of Aisha Bewley's book

2605:

to Madina the author, the closer their views. But it has to be the actual book written by that person, not some one else writing hundreds of years later saying that these were the views of that person. So now I have put a diagram there so that people could read the books them selves. If you look at the old books especially written by the scholars in Madina their views are very close. There should be academic standards, and objective, factual information, not abusive language on Knowledge. A lot of the old books are more academic in nature. --

1559:

which is your prerogative, but you are also rejecting all the early classical literature of SUNNI MUSLIM Imams and Ulama regarding him. The literature is ambivalent as he was undeniably a controversial figure in standard Islam. It is the Salafi/Wahhabi ideology which unanimously regard Caliph Muawiyah as a Muslim hero, NOT traditional SUNNI. A certain percentage of the majority Islamic population (which is SUNNI) have a more ambivalent view of Caliph Muawiyah, which is based purely on the literature of the classical Sunni Imams and Ulama.

2057:

felt that it will be good to stop the arguments. Rather than say Sunnis say this and Shia say this, and then the Sunnis can't even agree on what their views are and the Shias can't even agree what their views and every one is arguing, you could then also say this early books says this and that one says this. And people could read the books them selves. I also put the dates and the locations on too. I am still adding books to it. The earlier the better. It's on:

3831: 3596: 22: 3903: 766:; it's quite simply none of your business, and is completely irrelevant to a content discussion on this wiki, even if you choose to first reveal information about your own health. Please focus your comments strictly on the content discussion, not on the other editors, their motivations, their health, or their level of intelligence. This is not an exhaustive list. Further violations of our 260: 2235:, while all the others were directly linked to Bewley's self-published website blog, and not the cited book; if anything, this appeared to be a clear-cut case of a WP user/editor not having read the cited book. These edits were deleted by WP editor Kansas Bear; the one entry he forgot, I deleted. We both left alone the one entry which (at that time) actually cited a page number. 3256: 1015:

Restore of the Muslim Faith by linking it to Bewley's self-published website blog, while nothing of the actual book was cited (except for one properly cited info which myself and another WP editor left alone). It would be proper to discuss in the Muawiyah I Talk Page before making further unsourced edits. Wa Salaam. Flagrantedelicto (talk) 22:01, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

1087:

acceptable in any academic circle. You are coming across like someone who is on a mission to rewrite standard Islamic history as you (and others who share your views) see fit. This is POV-pushing. Even historians and scholars of Christianity have not tried to REWRITE and white-wash some of the horrors and brutality associated with the Inquisitions in Europe.

28: 3179: 3117: 1337:

were very close to Ali and Hussein. Abd Allah ibn al-Zubayr later took on Yazid after Hussein was killed. And Abu Bakr's grandson Qasim was raised by Aisha and was the grandfather of Jafar Sadiq. So they have limits because Jafar Sadiq said don't speak badly about my great grandfather. Rather than arguing it will be best if you also adopt a middle ground.

791: 391: 364: 337: 225: 194: 159: 124: 976:

you or Sayom, what I put on YOUR or MY talk page in direct correspondence between us is really none of Sayom's business. That I will stand by so there is no reason to go back and forth on this issue. However, I will heed to your advice about writing to you privately. I always have appreciated your support and assistance and I value your thoughts.

3392:

MezzoMezzo, as well as Toddy1. Both of whom are essentially voicing the same positions. As for Johnleeds1, we did come to a mutual understanding which has common ground after differences of perspectives and some attrition. MezzoMezzo and Toddy1 (whom I get the strong feeling are together on this), appear to be a different matter.

2666:

being a SUNNI myself. What has been happening in WP Islamic articles is that Salafi/Wahhabi POV has been represented as SUNNI POV, while SUNNI POV has been represented as Shi'ite POV; for example, the VAST majority of sources cited in the Shi'ite POV sections are ALL SUNNI; this is clear misrepresentation of academic facts.

3743:, please apply them with caution and ensure that anyone looking at your edits will come to the same conclusion. If you are uncertain, seek clarification before continuing. Quite a few editors have found themselves blocked for misunderstanding and/or misapplying these exceptions. Often times, requesting 2665:

article page in the Legacy section. There is nothing wrong with having Salafi/Wahhabi POV (for those who are Salafi/Wahhabi), just so long as one acknowledges it and does not misrepresent it as mainstream SUNNI POV; many SUNNIS have serious differences with Salafi/Wahhabi POV. That is my main concern

2660:

from some of your POV pushing. Your views do not appear to reflect traditional SUNNI views simply by the very comments you have made in your responses. No mainstream SUNNI-oriented WP editor/user would (essentially) REJECT all of the classical, medieval SUNNI Imams and Ulama the way you have done so.

2604:

Flagrantedelicto talking about the old books, I also got a lot of resistance when I tried to use them as references. People said that they do not allow Hadith or primary sources, but there is lot of material from some of these books already on there. I realized that the older the books and the closer

2469:

I also have one quibble. You have a paragraph that starts: "Sunni scholars interpret..." This is weasel-like. Please either give citations to a secondary source that says this, or amend to "Sunni scholars, such as X, Y and Z, interpret...", which would also need citing.--Toddy1 (talk) 19:04, 21 April

2441:

Thank you for the improvements you have made to the article on Muawiyah I. The new section has some citations, which is great. Would it be possible for you to add some more citations please. You must have some sources for the information you amended, and and also for the new paragraphs you added that

1902:

49. The best of people after the Messengers of Allah, alayhem assalatu wassalam, are Abu Bakr as-Siddeeq, then 'Umar bin al-Khattab Al-Faruq; then 'Uthman bin 'Affan Thu-Nurayn ; then 'Ali bin Abi Taleb Al-Murtada , may Allah be pleased with them all. They were all worshippers, steadfast on the true

1639:

Sorry about the abu bark bit I was talking to some one else about Abu Bakr some time ago and got confused when you wrote "Ali gets attacked by all his fellow Muslims (Aisha, Talhah, Zubayr, Marwan, Muawiyah, and the Secessionists)." Many Sunni books also talk about Ibn Saba creating trouble, like the

1177:

I wanted to add a couple thoughts on some of your comments expressed. Your statement that Islam is getting a bad impression when early Muslim history is being (essentially) portrayed the way it probably happened. To state that early Muslim leaders were not like the Mongolians fighting over who should

1086:

What gives a bad impression of Islam (or any religion or creed) is when Islamic advocates or adherents don't own up to the fact that there are flawed figures in Islamic history as well. Trying to apply what is clearly the trademark of POV-pushing pseudo-revisionists of standard Islamic history is not

4165:

Are you free to work on the Muawiyah I page now. I have been collecting everything together in one place on the temporary page set up by Faiz. It is not finished and still under construction I have left the sections that you usually contribute to for you. It will be changed a lot over the next month

3481:@MezzoMezzo. Your Stephen Jay Gould adage to Faiz Haider certainly sounds profound. It would be nice if you applied it to yourself. Especially, since you displayed little fairness when you deleted the ENTIRE Shia View section (which was amply cited with references) in the Muawiyah I WP article page. 3028:

I have communicated with you all that I wish to communicate. I would greatly appreciate it if you NO LONGER inundate my personal WP Talk Page with what comes across as unnecessary diatribe. If you continue to flood my Talk Page with unwelcome communication, you leave me little option but to go ahead

2896:

I see, it's starting to dawn on you now. "It" being the early connections between all the Muslim schools of though, "it" being that thing which hasn't dawned on most Muslims. I remember when I discovered that too; realizing "it" is like a blind man suddenly being able to see. It's fascinating, isn't

2190:

while the source was linked to her self-published (essentially) website blog (of her speech), and NOT her book. In your correspondence with him in the Talk Pages, you show surprising flexibility at the known fact that johnleeds1 had added well over a DOZEN paragraphs/sub-paragraphs that are entirely

2175:

First of all, you are undeniably applying a double standard here. In the Yazid I and Muawiyah I article pages there are entries that are UNCITED. In the Muawiyah I page most of the UNCITED entries were rather recent and you are clearly aware of them. We are talking about well over a DOZEN paragraphs

2056:

Because every one has their own views, I have put a diagram of the early scholars and the books on the Talk section of the Islam page. It is a cut down version of the chain of narration of hadith diagrams. So that people could click on the early books and the author and read the books them selves. I

1592:

Point six: I think it is better to limit correspondence with you in theological discussions, as you clearly imagine things which were NEVER stated by people and accuse them of things that were NEVER stated or implied. Besides, you have mentioned that you have wasted your time with me on the Muawiyah

1108:

Just stop and think of what happened in the early days of the Caliphate: Abu Bakr Quhafah bin Uthman al-Taymi, Umar ibn al-Khattab al-Adiyy, and Uthman bin al-Affan al-Umawwi became Caliphs. Abu Bakr was ELECTED by the Muslim Council after heavy lobbying by himself and the Meccans who supported him.

582:

I see your point. Such responses from anyone does come across as threatening. I guess I need to not miss taking my High BP prescriptions in a timely manner (seriously, no humour intended). I will ease off. But keep in mind (for the record), it was fellow WP editor Cynwolfe who initiated the personal

289:

on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit

4091:

That is your opinion. And it is hardly an accurate one. If you or anyone that has properly read the Talk Pages in Muawiyah I from a neutral position, and has not been able to grasp what has really been transpiring from A to Z, then it is likey hopeless to request to do so. Another WP Admin who does

2942:

Anyway, yes, what you're saying is true. There is a lot of misinformation about Islam on Knowledge, but that is in part due to misinformation on Islam both in the West and in Muslim countries, and even Western societies and Muslim societies. The most objective research you will find is usually from

2748:

The bit I added saying "There has been ample testimony to Mu'awiya's abilities. Ibn Taymiyya said," was what Aisha Bewley wrote. I did not go through the works of Ibn Taymiyya and add this. I have never read his books. I am no Salafi/Wahhabi or Sunni or Shia or Christian or Jew or Muslim. Knowledge

2574:

Then you look at the comments and people appear to be swearing at Tahir ul Qadri for having the title of the video Hazrat Ameer Muawiya r.a & Moula Ali (r.a). Is this the type of uncivilized language you want on Knowledge. Because without administration that is what it would become. There needs

2347:

Hi Flagrantedelicto, Toddy also asked me to add reference on 21 April 2013 like he asked you. I have just been extremely busy at work and will have more time soon and will update the article. Flagrantedelicto I don't mind if my changes are removed, I will re-adding them when I get some time and add

2185:

have no option but to lodge a serious concern of double standard requisitions from you to the WP Administrators. I considered you a friend/co-editor here on WP who in the past has been encouraging of my efforts. As of lately, you have been interjecting (while appearing critical) in nearly all of my

2180:

UNCITED entries. If you do not request the particular user to either add sources (period) to these citations and request PRECISELY every single item that which you are requesting of me (very conveniently, only recently), and in the exact same itemized manner in which you have requested of me, which

1520:

Point four: And I did not specify any particular country or nation when I stated about the perceived feelings of foreign Imperialism-Colonialism in some Islamic countries. I never ONCE mentioned the UK. So now you have come down to the level of putting words in my mouth which I have never stated or

1336:

But then some of your views on Abu Bakr are even more anti Abu Bakr than some Shia's, many Shia have limits because Abu Bakr was the great grandfather of Jafar Sadiq. And Abu Bakr's son Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr was raised by Ali and his grandson Abd Allah ibn al-Zubayr and daughter Asmā' bint Abu Bakr

1204:

of Christianity and Judaism from its SARACEN/ARAB roots is another topic of discussion entirely. In the Near Eastern-Oriental world, the people are very well aware that the great monotheist leaders (whether real or mythogenic) like Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus, etc., have been culturally depicted by

1064:

There is no real POV pushing from my end, if anyone carefully analyzes it. What I don't agree with is the REINVENTION of Caliph Muawiyah I from the already established Islamic works. And that went for Caliph Yazid I as well (in the case of that article, there is still clear FALSE info which has yet

1028:

I have been busy at work and will be making changes on that page when I get some time. Flagrantedelicto I think all this point of view pushing is giving a bad impression of Islam, that is not correct. Many of these events are political in nature. But all this point of view pushing is making it seem

1014:

You have entered a substantial amount of paragraphs/sub-paragraphs that have still NOT been cited whatsoever. Essentially, you already have your work cut out for you in CITING all of your remaining UNCITED additions to the article. You also falsely represented (while citing) Bewley's book Muawiyah,

975:

Toddy1, I don't want to get into to an unnecessary session of lecturing or being lectured here. Sayom may respond as there is no way to stop Sayom, obviously. It is Sayom's right of free thought and speech. But it is also my right to react with my opinion regarding Sayom's response. And I repeat to

907:

I do not hate Saudi Arabia or its people. I just stated a legislative fact. Saudi Arabia has laws that are not exactly fair to all members of its society. The United Nations and Amnesty International also have problems with inequity in several countries worldwide, one of whom is Saudi Arabia (which

3569:

That is your perception. And it appears to be a false one. There is no instance of bullying at all. Furthermore, researching someone’s past editorial conflict, and then applying some of the differences from that particular conflict to a current situation which is not at all related in terms of the

3068:

I guess most people looking at the Islam pages on Knowledge want to see what Islam is all about and compare it with the other religions. They want to know what Islam is and what Islam says about why people exist and what Islam has to offer during this day and age. But currently the Islam pages are

1680:

I am going to make this straight to the point: If you want to continue to write (essentially) blogs as an argument in the Talk Pages, WP is not the place to do them. And I am not engaging you any further in them, since you are rambling on without providing any real evidence (except the more recent

1558:

Byzantine records regarding Muawiyah (of which you cannot provide any genuinely cited medieval sources). You keep bringing up the so-called "Roman" view of the Caliphate of Muawiyah. And then you keep going into these dissertations about Caliph Muawiyah. You seem to be a big fan of Caliph Muawiyah

1113:

Ali was ELECTED Caliph by the Islamic Council, he gets attacked by all his fellow Muslims (Aisha, Talhah, Zubayr, Marwan, Muawiyah, and the Secessionists). The pretexts were that Ali did not apprehend Uthman's killers. Well, all the early chronicles state that it was a large mob of Muslim citizens

1033:

page and other such articles because they have a lot of false information. Many of the people these articles say were Muhammads slaves were actually slaves Muhammad bought and freed and later became great scholars. Now I come across them when I look at the chains of narration of some hadith. But I

871:

For me to go to any government agency or to the court to buy or sell property, as a woman I am obligated to bring two men as witnesses to testify to my identity, and four male witnesses to testify that the first two are credible witnesses, and actually know me. Where is any woman going to find six

866:

is really not abusive...It is certainly not flattering, but it is not abusive or profane. It is more of an unfavourable criticism, if anything else. I also would appreciate it if you would re-evaluate lecturing fellow WP editors such as myself. You have probably never even been to Saudi Arabia. If

429:

You wrote "With all due respect, please don't place me in the category of the people you have come across here on Knowledge edit history and its ceaseless POV-pushing vandals." This remark is uncalled for. I have not made any personal attack on you. I treat you with respect. Please do the same

3311:

You requested for my mediation, but involving me will be more problamatic for you as I'm known openly for my POV regaridng Islamic articles, I'm a declared Shia and MezzoMezzo & Johnleads are well aware of my POV. Lets see how I can be of any help at the article but please don't rely on me in

2839:

Ha ha, yes, everything you've found is true. If you go far back enough, you will ultimately find the leaders of madhhabs having studied with the same chain of teachers going back to Sahaba. It's a startling revelation, especially considering that hundreds of years later, people claiming to follow

1452:

Point two: What country are you talking about when you say "your country" ?? I am a U.S. citizen and have been living in America for four decades (I might be old enough to be your father, lol). However, I have kept in touch with my South Asian heritage and have studied Arabic, Farsi, and (native)

1418:

There are few points which you have brought up which I shall attempt to address: Where did you get my views of Caliph Abu Bakr from (??) lol I have not expressed ANY VIEWS specifically about Caliph Abu Bakr ANYWHERE. You are clearly imagining things. And then you accuse me of having ANTI-ABU BAKR

1370:

You talked about some perceived Imperialist-Colonialist oppression and that the people in your country are waiting for a Moses. Just because Aisha Bewley is white does not make her an Imperialist-Colonialist. Why are people in your country waiting for a Moses. Why don't the people in your country

3450:

Thanks. I welcome any help I can get from the unfairness and partiality I have been experiencing from Toddy1 and (now all of sudden) MezzoMezzo. If you have read the exchanges in the Muawiyah Talk Page, then it becomes obvious to the most casual observer that there is undeniable double standards

1778:

Abu Bakr was ELECTED by the Muslim Council after heavy lobbying by himself and the Meccans who supported him. Umar was APPOINTED by Abu Bakr. Uthman was APPOINTED by Umar. Not once did Ali ibn Abi Talib start a civil war against their Caliphate. To the contrary, he was sought by Caliph Umar as a

1486:

Point three: What does my analogy of some of the ideology of the Muslim Ummah awaiting a Guide or leader have to do with Aisha Bewley being Caucasian (?) (Fyi, my spouse is Caucasian, while my off-srpring are half-Caucasian). And I made absolutely NO connection to Aisha Bewley with the perceived

1114:

who stormed Caliph Uthman's palace. Who was Ali going to arrest ? An angry mob of Muslim citizenry ? There is ample early records which state that Caliph Uthman made a lot of enemies. Caliph Umar was assassinated by a lone assassin (as was Ali) in contrast. Besides, Aisha bint Abu Bakr has a few

1004:

You made a comment in your last (essentially vandalism), unsourced edit in the Muawiyah I article which states that books were written hundreds of years later...You are referring to literature written by prominent classical Islamic scholars read across a millennium...And yet you quote a relative

2496:

Only Muslims address a historical or religious figure of Islam with the honorific title of HAZRAT. When Toddy1 did this on Johnleeds1 Talk Page, this gives a strong indication of possible Islamic affiliation by WP user-editor Toddy1. This affiliation, from speculation, could be that Toddy1 is a

2262:

I suspect that some of the vague citations are to books that the editors have never read, which is why the editors cannot give the edition and page number. it is easy to do that - you read in some magazine or web-page that some book says something, and you add the information to Knowledge and a

1199:

Another statement of yours which I wanted to address was that you seem to be on a crusade of vindication of early Islamic history from what (increasingly) appears to be, a theological perspective rather than a more academic, scholarly one. Standard Islamic history had its flawed figures just as

1118:

attributed to her in which she clearly condemned Caliph Uthman and some of the policies of his rule. Now you couldn't possibly be like that MEDICAL DOCTOR turned self-claimed Islamic scholar (Shabbir Ahmed) who wrote books claiming that the historical battles of Jamal, Siffin, and Karbala NEVER

3528:

There is nothing demeaning in what I have stated except maybe in your own perception. Furthermore, you need to re-evaluate what is and what is not a personal attack. YOU launched a personal attack when flagrantly accusing me of copy-pasting my contributions to the Muawiyah I article. Don't get

2699:

Regrettably, your false accusation of me likening Aisha Bewley (because she's "white") to colonialists-imperialists, as well as falsely implying that I meant the UK as a colonialist-imperialist nation, was enough for me to lose total respect for your editorial ethics. I mean just step back and

686:

the text " (the calculation is described as including "room for judicious interpretation")" with an edit summary saying "Deleted entry as the recalculated date does have attribution: Classical scholar Max Georg Gerhard Radke; please see Talk Page for explanation." As the text that I added said

236:

which would allow someone to check that the information you added is valid and so they can find more information. Web sites, (preferably English, but other languages are acceptable), books, newspaper articles and such. You can see how the other citations on that page were added they begin with

3391:

I am a declared SUNNI. And I would like if you could carefully read through the Muawiyah I Talk Page of the current archive. I know it is a lot of material, but it is essential for you to fully understand the nature of the obvious double standard and partiality being applied by both the above

1279:

Well, that is a monumental question which cannot be done justice here in the WP Talk Pages. At least SIX separate biographies would have to be written about them cited from ALL the earliest possible chronicles available. However, I could summarize in an analogy from the Quranic Surah of Yusuf

2792:

I agree with your latest comment wholeheartedly, but since it isn't directly related to Sunni Islam I thought I would respond here. Yes, the views of early jurists concur quite a bit and they were less prone to being influence by political movements than modern Muslim clerics. And yes, after

4196:

I really don't see what contributions he ever made. He would only dispute material in reliable sources, edit war to defend questionable ones and never actually made a positive contribution via reliably sourced material to any of the...what was it, only four articles he ever actually edited.

2661:

And that too in favor of a relative novice (like an Aisha Bewley) in comparison. We are talking about some of the most PROMINENT and EMINENT names of the SUNNI creed (Imam Hanbal, Imam Suyuti, etc., etc.). You quoted Ibn Taymiyyah which is almost a trademark for Salafi/Wahhabi POV in the

858:

Show IPA Slang. noun 1. a person who poses as a customer in order to decoy others into participating, as at a gambling house, auction, confidence game, etc. 2. a person who publicizes or praises something or someone for reasons of self-interest, personal profit, or friendship or loyalty.

3455:

Toddy1 further referred to Husayn ibn Ali as the Rebel when objecting to Johnleeds1 adding Husayn's name to the Wiki Talk Islam Page on WP--While openly objecting as to why Johnleeds1 did not add Muawiyah's name to that list. I brought this up in the Muawiyah Talk Page in detail. See

3885:

Let me be clear; it's a week because it's intended to offer you a chance to reflect, think through what's happened, and take the multiple pieces of advice you've been given to calm down and approach things in a more constructive manner. Next time this happens, it will be indefinite.

1977:

51. We do not declare any Muslim a blasphemer because of a sin, however grave, unless that Muslim considers the sin permissible. Nor do we revoke the status of belief from him; and we continue to call him a believer, genuinely. It is possible to be a sinful believer without being a

4072:

The fact that you're bemoaning the block because people who disagree with you might do things to the article in the meantime is...a pretty good demonstration of precisely why you're blocked - a total failure to get that there is an issue with your conduct, not with your content.

537:

No I don't really see a need to discuss this. I made an unintentional error. I just didn't like the way you informed me of my accidental, unintentional revelation. Let's drop the matter here and now. My contributions on WP outweigh any undesired conflict. Is that understood (?)

3342:: Everybody has their biases and opinions; it's human. As Stephen Jay Gould said, objectivity isn't to deny having bias; it's to be fair in despite of one's natural bias. I'm sure Johnleads will be ok with the addition as well. Nobody can fault a mediator for trying his best. 3988:

There is no real reason to block me as I have made my contributions to the article. In the week's time, the other WP editors in question who did not make any effort to clean up the state this article was in can delete material which took hours of effort to construct.

2700:

reflect on your efforts here on WP...You cannot seem to even remember with whom you are debating. You mistook your debate with me for a debate with some other WP editor/user and accused me of something I never stated regarding the first Rashidun Khalifah Abu Bakr. --

3414:

Before responding to your request I had already read the Talk page of the article. I have tried to rope in neutral editors to look into the issue at page but their response may take some time due to time-zone difference. As I said, I'll try to be of any help at the

3728:

is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and edit wars may be slow-moving, spanning weeks or months. Edit wars are not limited to 24 hours.

3271:, but it has not been removed. Knowledge needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have a complaint about other editors, the right place to make it is 3503:

You've sought mediation and brother Faiz is working on it. Why are you still commenting here in such a demeaning way? What is your goal? And how would it not constitute a personal attack? I didn't even say anything to you here, now you're just being rude.

1593:

I aricle...If you consider it a waste of time, then corresponding with me is also a waste of your time. What you should be concerned with is CITING sources to all the entries you made in the Muawiyah I article. Doing this will not be wasting your time. --

710:

and can see some ongoing problems with the way you are handling the discussion there. Some examples of recent problematic edits, though virtually every edit you made on that page has contained veiled insults of some sort. This violates our policy of

2511:

Hi Flagrantedelicto, you have to admit that people call this man Muawiyah everything under that sun. Good and bad. Some of the things they call him are very abusive. So it would be very hard to administer any such article and keep the foul language

3029:

and lodge a complaint with ANI. This will be my final cautioning to you. If you want to exchange in ongoing theological dissertations or debates, please feel free to do so in the various Islamic forum websites where such communications are held. --

2117:

section that I added in response to a request for clarification that you made on one of the talk pages. You know exactly what the books you are citing are, so this will be very easy for you. The information other readers really need to know are:

2230:

My statement was in response to what appeared to be an allegation (by you) of WP editors/users who may or may not have read material they have cited. Which is interesting since johnleeds1 (up to that time) only cited one entry to Bewley's book

3621:

Flagrant, I'm going to make this really simple. Unless you want to take a forced break from Knowledge, stop speculating about other editors' personal lives, and restrict yourself to commenting on content. This warning will be repeated on ANI.

2181:

you have not apparently done so (as of yet) as is evident in the johnleeds1 WP Talk Page (so it does not give me the impression that you are applying favoritism and partiality toward another WP user/editor in preference to me), then I will

1029:

as if the early Muslims were just like the Mongolians fighting over who should be king. Which is not true, as they left behind a legacy where millions of people now believe in one god. I was hoping to go through the other articles like the

4180:

I was away from Knowledge for a while and just realized that Flagrantedelicto is blocked. It may be worth letting Flagrantedelicto come back now and give him a second chance. I know he argues a lot but he also makes a contribution.

3736:. You are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus. 2647:

First of all, Toddy1 can speak for herself/himself. You don't need to speak for Toddy1. Secondly, I have analyzed some of your efforts in the ALI WP article and Talk Page and you seem to have been put in check by fellow WP editors

2273:

from WP editors/users. Now I couldn't quite figure out was it in reference to ALL WP editors/users in general or me specifically. Either way, such a statement could be perceived as almost accusatory of WP editors/users and rather

1144:

You still should be far more concerned about CITING the sources of all of those entries you made in the Caliph Muawiyah I article. Instead of doing that, you are changing CITED entries which are from traditional Islamic sources.

891:

Be polite, If you hate Saudi Arabia, and it's people IT'S YOUR PROBLEM. (as a woman I am obligated to bring two men as witnesses) not only women, even men do this, So no one can LIE. Don't use my country low to justify your bad

2227:

Speaking of vague citations to books the editors may have never read, how do you feel about page numbers being cited in this article along with the last name of the authors (and the year of publication)--but NO BOOKS are cited

3082:

Flagrantedelicto I know you are busy now, but it will be good if we could put all the very old books in a diagram, with the authors and when they lived and where. I have put them in a diagram on the talk section of the Islam

1109:

Umar was APPOINTED by Abu Bakr. Uthman was APPOINTED by Umar. Not once did Ali ibn Abi Talib start a civil war against their Caliphate. To the contrary, he was sought by Caliph Umar as a senior Council member. Now when a

2840:

those madhhabs would later persecute one another. Have you considered putting this diagram in your sandbox and seeing how it would work and where it would be appropriate? MezzoMezzo (talk) 08:40, 5 February 2013 (UTC) --

867:

you had, then you would know that it is Saudi law that a woman cannot even drive a car there by herself and has no individual legislative rights. I have been there a few times. Here is a clip from a WP article itself:

2018:

On the Ali page you said to me "The sheer level of animosity and hostility of Muslims toward each other is sadly pathetic. The Shias & Salafis despise each other to an extent that is anti-Quranic, to say the

4000:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

454: 4092:

not share your obvious, now apparent bias would be welcomed to handle this issue. Not you. You have totally failed to perceive that there is an issue with the conduct of Toddy1 and MezzoMezzo as well. --

1820:

But then on the Ali article you said: "The Shi'ite self-professed, self-righteous claimed ownership of the Ahl Al Bayt Muhammadi (People of the House of Muhammad) is as much an obstacle to Islamic unity"

3069:

more about politics than about Islam. It will be good to shift them more towards what Islam says. Recently some one added "Part of a series on Qur'an" on the Islam page and that improved the article.

449:

January 14 is the most widely accepted date for Antony's birth. There is at least one alternative date or time frame, but the way you're inserting the information is confusing: you're placing it

503:

Try to reveal another editor's real name again, and you'll be blocked so fast your head will spin. This is not a matter for discussion. Email me or the oversight team if you have any questions.

3785:. And another tip be discreet, gentle and put your point in as less words as possible and in one go and only reply when someone contests your claims or put new claims against you. Good-luck!-- 1857:

Many of the old books I have been going through are very much in the middle ground. They appear to respect Muhammad's family and his companions. In AL-FIQH AL-AKBAR by Abu Hanifa on Page 11

3782: 3600: 706:

Hello Flagrantedelicto. I am Diannaa and I am an administrator on this wiki. I have been reviewing your contributions on the Mark Anthony talk page as a result of the report posted at

958:

Sayom has a right to respond to anything anyone writes on a talk page. If you want to write to me privately, use a fountain pen. (You cannot be sure who reads Knowledge emails.)--

2144:

If you are not actually looking at the book you are citing, but doing second-hand citations, then please make this clear in citations - for if for example you read an article in

908:

is very high up on their list). I was responding to Toddy1, not you. So you have no business responding to my correspondence with Toddy1. I hope you understand this point well.

687:

nothing about attribution but was a comment (from Donna Hurley) on the recalculated date, your edit summary was clearly misleading. Please don't let this happen again. Thanks.

730:

Is that all you are hung up on (?) ... And you keep running circles ... For some reason it eludes you ... for some inexplicable reason you even tried to convince yourself ...

174:

seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. In addition it was uncited If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on

752:

I am the one who suffers from a High BP medical condition...I hope no one else here (as in this particular discussion) also does. It is not a pleasant condition by any means

816:

If you believe that there is something wrong with being a citizen of Saudi Arabia, or with being a Salafi, then please be careful not to express these views on Knowledge.--

583:

attacks by calling me "ignorant". This is a matter of open record which anyone can view in the Mark Anthony Talk Page section. And I forgot to add, me being warned that I

34: 3810:

W.A.S. Thank you. I shall do so. I really appreciate your assistance. I think you are aware of what is going on with this issue. And thanks for getting CBW to mediate. --

3272: 656: 637: 2225:

Furthermore, I did not request for clarification of those nearly dozen incompletely cited sources (eg., no book titles were cited). What I specifically stated was:

938:

In case you are under the impression that I am making up my citation from a Saudi citizen whose views were cited right here on WP, here is the link to the article:

2575:

to be civilized behavior on an encyclopedia. Kids read it too for their homework. Toddy didn't just ask you to add references, he also asked me to add references.

3943: 4064:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

1783:

Ali was ELECTED Caliph by the Islamic Council, he gets attacked by all his fellow Muslims (Aisha, Talhah, Zubayr, Marwan, Muawiyah, and the Secessionists).

738:

You tried to get fresh over this. Once again, there you go embellishing...You are really displaying some type of inability to comprehend what you read. LOL

1205:

the Western world as "white" Europeans, when they were obviously Middle or Near Easterners (Saracens). But then again, that is another topic entirely. --

3091:

Then people could click on the links and read the books them selves. Many of these old books are in the center ground and are a snapshot of the time. --

842:

WAS a Saudi-Salafi shill. Please make note of the syntax and semantics of the English language. Also, the Merriam-Webster/Dictionary.com definition of

872:

men to go with her to the court?! It’s hard for me to get my legal rights...the solution is to use one’s connections, pay a bribe or be sharp-tongued.

345: 96: 2186:

efforts in editing the WP articles. As you are very well aware of, johnleeds1 falsely represented his cited sources when he listed Bewley's book

3938: 38: 852:

noun Definition of SHILL 1 a : one who acts as a decoy (as for a pitchman or gambler) b : one who makes a sales pitch or serves as a promoter

367:

Please do not put a level 2 heading in front of all your posts - when it is clear that they are just a continuation of previous discussions.--

2541:

You were talking about that gentleman Tahir ul Qadri, so I looked on the internet for this man and Muawiya and came across the youtube video

1065:

to be omitted); what I did there was COUNTER that false UNCITED info with info that has been established over a period of a thousand years.

4049: 4027: 3867: 1419:

views (??) Where in the world do you get that from (??) With this accusatory comment by you, you have lost a whole lot of credibility.

561:- "Is that understood" and "I am the last person you want to talk to that way, got it" could easily be taken as threats, and that is 813:

We could all be abusive to people we disagree with on some points. On the whole life works better if we treat each other politely.

2267:

way is state what you are doing (and there are proper formats on Knowledge for doing this).--Toddy1 (talk) 21:13, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

3795: 3425: 3370: 3322: 99:

using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

722:

What part of this do you not understand (?) LOL ... You are not also Black Sword by any chance are you (?) LOL ... Just kidding

206: 167: 3688:

First of all, do you have the authorization to do this (?) And also I'm going to make this even simpler: Don't threaten me. --

3957: 3800: 3783:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Three solid days of bullying, insults and incivility by User:Flagrantedelicto

3430: 3375: 3327: 457:

fails verification; these pages don't say anything about the date of Antony's birth. Please participate in the discussion at

198: 2299:

The clarification for which I actually requested from you was for this comment you made to me in the Muawiyah I Talk Page:

1119:

HAPPENED (!?) There was conflict in the early history of Islam and trying to white-wash and rewrite it to suit this pseudo-

241:

This would show up as something like . Clicking on that would take you to the references section and you would see "Smith,

4149: 712: 85: 806:

Sayom, should we all laugh now or wait till what you wrote starts to sound funny (?) You sound like a Saudi-Salafi shill.

139:

and re-add it, please do so! If you think he made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on

1030: 587:

could also be perceived as a threat (especially to someone with High BP medical condition). Keep that in mind, as well.

314: 75: 2122:

Title of the book (if it is not in English, please quote the title both in the language of the book and in translation)

3851: 1554:

Point five: You virtually reject all the literature of the classical Sunni Imams and Ulama and keep citing the rather

602:

I'm sorry I used such strong words. I was just trying to make absolutely sure you knew how serious a matter this was.

318: 166:. Knowledge is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a 838:

is not being abusive. First of all, I stated that he sounded like a Saudi-Salafi shill...I didn't openly state that

3915:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

1701:

Flagrantedelicto sorry if I offended you. It was not my intension to offend you. The Abu Bakr thing was a mistake.

3916: 3838: 45:

and I have been editing Knowledge for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on

4145: 3910: 570: 557:(which is a policy) might be worth a read. If you don't want to be blocked, I suggest you change your attitude 480:

Please could we discuss the issue of whether Muawiyah was the first or second Caliph of the Umayyad Dynasty at

136: 3202:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

3140:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

3847: 310: 70: 65: 4093: 3921: 3811: 3689: 3671: 3641: 3627: 3571: 3530: 3482: 3460: 3393: 3290: 3030: 2701: 2498: 2308: 2192: 2065:

It will be good to work with you to improve the content on Knowledge, sorry about my comments earlier --

1682: 1594: 1281: 1206: 1146: 1123:

agenda of a particular POV-pushing pseudo-revisionist group is unacceptable in any academic environment.

977: 942: 909: 877: 618: 607: 588: 539: 527: 508: 100: 2137:

If the language the edition of the book you are citing from is not English, please state the language.

1738:

Flagrantedelicto I was confused of your views. I did not know what to make of them or where you stood.

135:, but you didn't provide a reliable source. The other editor removed it for now, but if you'd like to 4202: 4186: 4171: 4114:

Personally I am saddened by recent events. I valued your contributions to the articles you edited.--

4035: 3608: 3509: 3347: 3240: 3168: 3096: 2987: 2845: 2610: 2353: 2070: 1645: 1376: 1244: 1039: 692: 245:, 2nd edition, p21-2.". You could then add some more details about the book to the list of sources.-- 4078: 3891: 3875: 3543:

I share the perception that your mocking and bullying comments about other editors are demeaning.--

3231:; secondly, for the breaking of the treaty he made with Hasan ibn Ali, after the death of Hasan ibn 3159:; secondly, for the breaking of the treaty he made with Hasan ibn Ali, after the death of Hasan ibn 1487:

Imperialist-Colonialist views of some people in the Muslim Ummah (!) You are really losing it...lol

566: 341: 302: 92: 50: 3268: 745:

anyone...can openly observe a slight propensity for embellishment and/or inaccuracy (by Cynwolfe)

664: 645: 466: 415: 326: 3222:

Gibbon, Edward. ''The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire''. Ch. L, Page 98. New

2307:

I never did get a reply from you as to what "lot" you were referring to in regards to me (?) --

4141: 3766: 2442:

lack citations. It is much easier for you to add the citations for this than for other people.

775: 553:

No, they don't. Contributions make no difference when it comes to violations in policy. Also,

407: 399: 271: 4119: 4058: 3857: 3667: 3623: 3548: 3280: 2157: 2102: 963: 821: 603: 523: 504: 489: 458: 435: 372: 353: 286: 250: 214: 183: 175: 148: 140: 810:

This was abusive. Please could you delete these words from your otherwise useful posting.

470: 4198: 4182: 4167: 4031: 3830: 3788: 3778: 3740: 3663: 3604: 3505: 3418: 3363: 3343: 3339: 3315: 3264: 3236: 3183: 3164: 3121: 3092: 2983: 2841: 2606: 2349: 2066: 1641: 1372: 1240: 1035: 928: 897: 688: 554: 481: 277: 56: 1940:

50. We do not mention any of the Companions of the Messenger of Allah except righteously.

939: 4074: 3887: 3871: 3744: 2545:

The title also says Hazrat Ameer Muawiya r.a & Moula Ali (r.a) by Dr Tahir ul Qadri

403: 298: 233: 108: 46: 21: 3748: 3725: 2148:

that is citing Tabari, then you need to say the citation they made, and say cited in

2113:, etc. please could you add a list of books that you are citing from rather like the 1860: 767: 759: 707: 660: 641: 462: 411: 322: 306: 282: 80: 2982:

MezzoMezzo was right. May be I should start looking at the Christianity articles. --

3761: 3733: 3714: 1903:

path, remained with the truth, and we declare our loyalty and love to all of them.

795: 771: 229: 758:

Questioning people's intelligence and motivation is a bad idea, and violates our

394:

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Knowledge, as you did to

297:

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's

294:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 4206: 4190: 4175: 4153: 4123: 4115: 4101: 4082: 4039: 3895: 3879: 3819: 3805: 3771: 3697: 3675: 3649: 3631: 3612: 3579: 3552: 3544: 3538: 3513: 3490: 3468: 3435: 3401: 3380: 3351: 3332: 3298: 3284: 3276: 3260: 3244: 3172: 3100: 3038: 2991: 2849: 2709: 2614: 2506: 2357: 2316: 2200: 2161: 2153: 2074: 1690: 1649: 1602: 1380: 1289: 1248: 1214: 1154: 1043: 985: 967: 959: 950: 932: 917: 901: 885: 825: 817: 779: 696: 680: 668: 649: 626: 611: 596: 576: 547: 531: 512: 493: 485: 439: 431: 419: 376: 368: 357: 349: 330: 254: 246: 218: 210: 187: 179: 163: 152: 144: 128: 112: 3781:

in your defence will be of more help if you put them on the ANI against you @

3756: 3718: 3707: 3191: 3129: 2542: 2114: 2106: 924: 893: 61:

at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

1239:

So what are your views on Abu Bark, Umar, Uthman, Aisha, Talhah and Zubayr.--

239:. For example, if you were citing a book the way to do it would <ref: --> 104: 42: 3850:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 3215:

Ali's forces lost 25,000, while Muawiyah's forces lost 45,000.<ref: -->

2152:

together with the name of the article, author of the article, date, etc.--

4005:

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Knowledge,

1324:

Flagrantedelicto the last time I talked to you on the Ali page you said:

830:

I would have to somewhat disagree with your assessment of my response to

3846:

for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to

3759:

or any other article may cause you to be blocked without further notice.

3603:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

3255: 228:

I do not think you understand the concept of citations. You should add

2110: 267: 209:

and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.--

202: 171: 132: 27: 2388:

This New Section heading from Johnleeds1 Talk Page entered by Toddy1 :

3289:

I have no clue as to what alleged "ad hominem" you are referring to.

3195: 3133: 565:

the sort of behavior that is permitted, or allowed, on Knowledge. -

309:

for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant

2943:

non-Muslim institutions like Brill Publishers or McGill University.

770:

policy could result in your account being blocked from editing. --

2348:

the references. Flagrantedelicto sorry if I upset you earlier. --

2141:

Remember we want the information for the edition you are citing.

402:. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been 3732:

If you are unclear how to resolve a content dispute, please see

285:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three 131:. Another editor noticed that you made a change to an article, 2301:

As far as I can tell, your objection to Bewley is that she is

395: 383: 4140:

Being blocked does not mean that you can then edit with your

482:

Talk:Muawiyah I#First or second Caliph of the Umayyad Dynasty

3901: 3829: 258: 3457: 3086: 2060: 923:

You mentioned my name, and my country so i will response.__

410:

if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --

4046:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

4066:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2263:

citation to the book - if you are going to do this, the

940:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Women%27s_rights_in_Saudi_Arabia

518:

You're making it worse. If you want to talk about this,

3971: 3967: 3961: 3952: 3948: 3934: 3930: 3926: 3203: 3199: 3187: 3141: 3137: 3125: 799: 762:

policy. And asking them about their physical health is

751: 744: 737: 729: 721: 684: 398:, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the 276:

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being

240:

Smith, ''Book title'', 2nd edition, p21-2.</ref: -->

3198:

by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just

3136:

by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just

4017:

will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and

3909:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

317:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary 2269:--Is an allegation or even a virtual indictment of 1861:http://www.central-mosque.com/aqeedah/fiqakbar.pdf 2131:Date of publication of the edition you are citing 3854:by adding the following text below this notice: 3263:. I noticed that you made a comment on the page 3225:against Ali, whom the Shia Muslims believe was ] 3210:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: 3153:against Ali, whom the Shia Muslims believe was ] 3148:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: 998:You left the following message on my talk page: 301:to work toward making a version that represents 3777:Salam! I think the comments you are putting on 3739:If you feel your edits might qualify as one of 3601:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 3273:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 2832:When I put up the diagram and MezzoMezzo said: 2176:worth of UNCITED entries. And those are rather 292:even if you don't violate the three-revert rule 1453:Urdu. I have only cultural ties with Pakistan. 585:will be blocked so fast that my head will spin 4011:the block is no longer necessary because you 476:First or second Caliph of the Umayyad Dynasty 8: 522:. This is not to be discussed on Knowledge. 3275:, not the article talk page. Thank you. -- 270:shows that you are currently engaged in an 4014:understand what you have been blocked for, 3599:Hello. There is currently a discussion at 2543:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5zjJlpbXCM 874:--Loulwa al-Saidan, real estate investor 3640:What do you mean by a forced break (?) -- 197:Please do not add commentary or your own 636:Hello. I'm required to inform you about 20: 4020:will make useful contributions instead. 3713:Hello. You appear to be involved in an 3453:Muawiyah, Restorer of the Muslim Faith. 453:the footnote that verifies January 14. 2233:Muawiyah, Restorer of the Muslim Faith 2188:Muawiyah, Restorer of the Muslim Faith 382:Warning for you disruptive editing on 3304:Re: Requesting Your Mediation, Please 3186:. I have automatically detected that 3124:. I have automatically detected that 201:to Knowledge articles, as you did to 7: 3360:MezzoMezzo: thanks for your words.-- 2015:I agree with many of your statements 3751:is a much better course of action. 3250:Ad hominem attacks on other editors 862:Consequentially, the definition of 3458:http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Islam 3087:http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Islam 2061:http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Islam 1779:senior Council member. Now when a 617:I appreciate the apology. Thanks. 37:, Flagrantedelicto! Thank you for 14: 785:Abusive language to other editors 3594: 3254: 3177: 3115: 789: 389: 362: 335: 223: 205:. Doing so violates Knowledge's 192: 157: 122: 26: 3866:. However, you should read the 281:—especially if you violate the 266:Your recent editing history at 520:email me or the oversight team 1: 3842:from editing for a period of 2260:Also, this statement by you: 713:Knowledge:No personal attacks 440:08:01, 24 December 2012 (UTC) 420:13:40, 14 December 2012 (UTC) 71:The five pillars of Knowledge 25:Some cookies to welcome you! 3741:the small list of exceptions 3216:name="files.libertyfund.org" 846:are the following excerpts: 780:04:50, 27 January 2013 (UTC) 697:08:34, 26 January 2013 (UTC) 669:00:17, 27 January 2013 (UTC) 650:02:15, 25 January 2013 (UTC) 627:00:55, 27 January 2013 (UTC) 612:04:58, 25 January 2013 (UTC) 597:03:32, 25 January 2013 (UTC) 577:03:11, 25 January 2013 (UTC) 548:02:29, 25 January 2013 (UTC) 532:02:19, 25 January 2013 (UTC) 513:02:07, 25 January 2013 (UTC) 494:07:21, 23 January 2013 (UTC) 471:02:52, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 377:21:42, 28 October 2012 (UTC) 358:21:42, 28 October 2012 (UTC) 331:16:27, 28 October 2012 (UTC) 255:11:46, 28 October 2012 (UTC) 219:10:50, 28 October 2012 (UTC) 207:neutral point of view policy 188:08:18, 28 October 2012 (UTC) 153:08:18, 28 October 2012 (UTC) 113:22:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC) 86:How to write a great article 3913:, who declined the request. 3749:a sockppuppet investigation 1031:Muhammad's views on slavery 715:. These are examples only: 4223: 3789:Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider 3755:Continued edit warring on 3419:Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider 3364:Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider 3316:Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider 238:and end with </ref: --> 4207:10:32, 30 July 2013 (UTC) 4191:22:12, 26 July 2013 (UTC) 4176:11:07, 26 July 2013 (UTC) 4154:05:40, 25 June 2013 (UTC) 4124:23:21, 23 June 2013 (UTC) 4102:02:22, 23 June 2013 (UTC) 4083:23:15, 22 June 2013 (UTC) 4050:guide to appealing blocks 4040:23:26, 22 June 2013 (UTC) 4028:guide to appealing blocks 3896:18:21, 22 June 2013 (UTC) 3880:18:20, 22 June 2013 (UTC) 3868:guide to appealing blocks 3848:make useful contributions 3820:18:50, 21 June 2013 (UTC) 3806:16:27, 21 June 2013 (UTC) 3772:15:20, 19 June 2013 (UTC) 3698:04:32, 22 June 2013 (UTC) 3676:04:24, 22 June 2013 (UTC) 3650:04:12, 22 June 2013 (UTC) 3632:04:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC) 3613:08:03, 19 June 2013 (UTC) 3580:16:29, 18 June 2013 (UTC) 3553:05:59, 18 June 2013 (UTC) 3539:23:25, 17 June 2013 (UTC) 3514:12:03, 17 June 2013 (UTC) 3491:11:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC) 3469:11:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC) 3436:10:20, 17 June 2013 (UTC) 3402:09:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC) 3381:10:20, 17 June 2013 (UTC) 3352:07:10, 17 June 2013 (UTC) 3333:06:36, 17 June 2013 (UTC) 3299:05:13, 17 June 2013 (UTC) 3285:05:02, 17 June 2013 (UTC) 3245:05:02, 17 June 2013 (UTC) 3173:12:56, 16 June 2013 (UTC) 459:Talk:Mark Antony#Birthday 406:. Please make use of the 348:using four tildes ~~~~.-- 49:. You can also check out 4097: 3815: 3693: 3645: 3575: 3534: 3486: 3464: 3397: 3294: 3101:20:46, 8 June 2013 (UTC) 3039:15:54, 28 May 2013 (UTC) 3034: 2992:21:58, 27 May 2013 (UTC) 2850:21:58, 27 May 2013 (UTC) 2710:17:46, 27 May 2013 (UTC) 2705: 2615:17:11, 27 May 2013 (UTC) 2507:00:30, 27 May 2013 (UTC) 2502: 2358:23:05, 26 May 2013 (UTC) 2317:20:46, 26 May 2013 (UTC) 2312: 2201:16:12, 26 May 2013 (UTC) 2196: 2162:06:04, 26 May 2013 (UTC) 2075:23:05, 26 May 2013 (UTC) 1691:16:30, 26 May 2013 (UTC) 1686: 1650:14:12, 26 May 2013 (UTC) 1603:01:02, 26 May 2013 (UTC) 1598: 1381:21:59, 25 May 2013 (UTC) 1290:12:10, 25 May 2013 (UTC) 1285: 1249:11:53, 25 May 2013 (UTC) 1215:11:38, 25 May 2013 (UTC) 1210: 1155:00:12, 25 May 2013 (UTC) 1150: 1044:23:13, 24 May 2013 (UTC) 981: 946: 913: 881: 622: 592: 543: 444: 3204:my operator's talk page 3142:my operator's talk page 994:Muawiyah I Article Page 986:22:08, 1 May 2013 (UTC) 968:21:54, 1 May 2013 (UTC) 951:22:25, 1 May 2013 (UTC) 933:21:34, 1 May 2013 (UTC) 918:21:16, 1 May 2013 (UTC) 902:20:12, 1 May 2013 (UTC) 886:10:18, 1 May 2013 (UTC) 834:. Being described as a 826:07:29, 1 May 2013 (UTC) 675:Misleading edit summary 91:Also, when you post on 4030:for more information. 3906: 3834: 3267:that didn't seem very 445:Mark Antony's birthday 263: 170:. Your recent edit to 31: 3958:change block settings 3905: 3862:Your reason here ~~~~ 3833: 3726:the three-revert rule 262: 168:neutral point of view 24: 3194:may have broken the 3132:may have broken the 2134:ISBN number (if any) 499:Personal information 278:blocked from editing 35:Welcome to Knowledge 4146:CambridgeBayWeather 2303:not one of your lot 657:my complaint at ANI 425:Uncalled for remark 305:among editors. See 51:Knowledge:Questions 3907: 3835: 3734:dispute resolution 3662:I'm talking about 2658:eh bien mon prince 2115:Muawiyah I#Sources 315:dispute resolution 264: 137:include a citation 76:How to edit a page 39:your contributions 32: 3852:appeal this block 3798: 3770: 3529:confused here. -- 3428: 3373: 3325: 2101:In your edits to 800:00:50, 1 May 2013 340:When you post on 283:three-revert rule 199:personal analysis 4214: 4094:Flagrantedelicto 4063: 4057: 4026:Please read the 3977: 3975: 3964: 3946: 3944:deleted contribs 3922:Flagrantedelicto 3904: 3865: 3812:Flagrantedelicto 3794: 3791: 3764: 3690:Flagrantedelicto 3642:Flagrantedelicto 3598: 3597: 3572:Flagrantedelicto 3531:Flagrantedelicto 3483:Flagrantedelicto 3461:Flagrantedelicto 3424: 3421: 3394:Flagrantedelicto 3369: 3366: 3321: 3318: 3291:Flagrantedelicto 3265:Talk:Muawiyah I‎ 3258: 3230: 3221: 3181: 3180: 3158: 3119: 3118: 3031:Flagrantedelicto 2702:Flagrantedelicto 2499:Flagrantedelicto 2309:Flagrantedelicto 2228:whatsoever...(?) 2193:Flagrantedelicto 2150:Mechanics Weekly 2146:Mechanics Weekly 2103:Battle of Siffin 1683:Flagrantedelicto 1595:Flagrantedelicto 1282:Flagrantedelicto 1207:Flagrantedelicto 1147:Flagrantedelicto 978:Flagrantedelicto 943:Flagrantedelicto 910:Flagrantedelicto 878:Flagrantedelicto 794:In your post on 793: 792: 754: 747: 740: 732: 724: 655:I have reopened 619:Flagrantedelicto 589:Flagrantedelicto 573: 540:Flagrantedelicto 393: 392: 366: 365: 339: 338: 261: 230:reliable sources 227: 226: 196: 195: 161: 160: 126: 125: 60: 30: 4222: 4221: 4217: 4216: 4215: 4213: 4212: 4211: 4069: 4061: 4055: 4054:, then use the 4043: 3991: 3965: 3955: 3941: 3924: 3917:blocking policy 3902: 3882: 3855: 3827: 3803: 3787: 3779:Talk:Muawiyah I 3745:page protection 3711: 3595: 3592: 3433: 3417: 3378: 3362: 3340:User:Faizhaider 3330: 3314: 3308:Walekum'Salam, 3306: 3252: 3226: 3217: 3178: 3154: 3116: 3113: 2414:Hazrat Muawiyah 2099: 996: 790: 787: 750: 743: 736: 728: 720: 704: 677: 640:I made at ANI. 634: 575: 571: 501: 478: 455:Huzar pp. 10–11 447: 427: 390: 387: 363: 336: 319:page protection 259: 224: 193: 178:. Thank you. -- 158: 143:. Thank you. -- 123: 120: 54: 19: 12: 11: 5: 4220: 4218: 4210: 4209: 4163: 4162: 4161: 4160: 4159: 4158: 4157: 4156: 4131: 4130: 4129: 4128: 4127: 4126: 4107: 4106: 4105: 4104: 4086: 4085: 4044: 4024: 4023: 4022: 4021: 4018: 4015: 4009: 3998: 3994:Decline reason 3986: 3982:Request reason 3979: 3900: 3899: 3898: 3836:You have been 3828: 3826: 3823: 3799: 3776: 3710: 3704: 3703: 3702: 3701: 3700: 3683: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3666:your account. 3655: 3654: 3653: 3652: 3635: 3634: 3617: 3591: 3588: 3587: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3562: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3555: 3521: 3520: 3519: 3518: 3517: 3516: 3496: 3495: 3494: 3493: 3476: 3475: 3474: 3473: 3472: 3471: 3443: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3429: 3407: 3406: 3405: 3404: 3386: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3374: 3355: 3354: 3326: 3305: 3302: 3251: 3248: 3233: 3232: 3223: 3212: 3211: 3161: 3160: 3150: 3149: 3112: 3109: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3089: 3084: 3075: 3074: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3060: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3044: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3009: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3003: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2954: 2953: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2868: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2139: 2138: 2135: 2132: 2129: 2126: 2123: 2098: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2063: 2058: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2016: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1863: 1858: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1776: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1400: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 995: 992: 990: 973: 972: 971: 970: 936: 935: 905: 904: 808: 807: 786: 783: 756: 755: 748: 741: 733: 725: 703: 700: 676: 673: 672: 671: 633: 630: 615: 614: 580: 579: 569: 567:The Bushranger 535: 534: 500: 497: 477: 474: 446: 443: 426: 423: 386: 380: 346:sign your name 119: 116: 97:sign your name 89: 88: 83: 78: 73: 68: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4219: 4208: 4204: 4200: 4195: 4194: 4193: 4192: 4188: 4184: 4178: 4177: 4173: 4169: 4155: 4151: 4147: 4143: 4139: 4138: 4137: 4136: 4135: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4125: 4121: 4117: 4113: 4112: 4111: 4110: 4109: 4108: 4103: 4099: 4095: 4090: 4089: 4088: 4087: 4084: 4080: 4076: 4071: 4070: 4068: 4067: 4060: 4053: 4051: 4042: 4041: 4037: 4033: 4029: 4019: 4016: 4013: 4012: 4010: 4008: 4004: 4003: 4002: 3997: 3995: 3990: 3985: 3983: 3978: 3973: 3969: 3963: 3959: 3954: 3950: 3945: 3940: 3936: 3935:global blocks 3932: 3931:active blocks 3928: 3923: 3918: 3914: 3912: 3911:administrator 3897: 3893: 3889: 3884: 3883: 3881: 3877: 3873: 3869: 3863: 3859: 3853: 3849: 3845: 3841: 3840: 3832: 3824: 3822: 3821: 3817: 3813: 3808: 3807: 3804: 3802: 3797: 3792: 3790: 3784: 3780: 3774: 3773: 3768: 3763: 3760: 3758: 3752: 3750: 3746: 3742: 3737: 3735: 3730: 3727: 3722: 3720: 3716: 3709: 3705: 3699: 3695: 3691: 3687: 3686: 3685: 3684: 3677: 3673: 3669: 3665: 3661: 3660: 3659: 3658: 3657: 3656: 3651: 3647: 3643: 3639: 3638: 3637: 3636: 3633: 3629: 3625: 3620: 3619: 3618: 3615: 3614: 3610: 3606: 3602: 3589: 3581: 3577: 3573: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3563: 3554: 3550: 3546: 3542: 3541: 3540: 3536: 3532: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3515: 3511: 3507: 3502: 3501: 3500: 3499: 3498: 3497: 3492: 3488: 3484: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3477: 3470: 3466: 3462: 3459: 3454: 3449: 3448: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3444: 3437: 3434: 3432: 3427: 3422: 3420: 3413: 3412: 3411: 3410: 3409: 3408: 3403: 3399: 3395: 3390: 3389: 3388: 3387: 3382: 3379: 3377: 3372: 3367: 3365: 3359: 3358: 3357: 3356: 3353: 3349: 3345: 3341: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3331: 3329: 3324: 3319: 3317: 3309: 3303: 3301: 3300: 3296: 3292: 3287: 3286: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3266: 3262: 3257: 3249: 3247: 3246: 3242: 3238: 3229: 3224: 3220: 3214: 3213: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3205: 3201: 3200:edit the page 3197: 3193: 3189: 3185: 3175: 3174: 3170: 3166: 3157: 3152: 3151: 3147: 3146: 3145: 3143: 3139: 3138:edit the page 3135: 3131: 3127: 3123: 3110: 3102: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3088: 3085: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3076: 3067: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3040: 3036: 3032: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3013: 3012: 3011: 3010: 2993: 2989: 2985: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2851: 2847: 2843: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2711: 2707: 2703: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2664: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2616: 2612: 2608: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2544: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2504: 2500: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2471: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2443: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2415: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2304: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2272: 2268: 2266: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2234: 2229: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2202: 2198: 2194: 2189: 2184: 2179: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2159: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2142: 2136: 2133: 2130: 2127: 2124: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2104: 2096: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2062: 2059: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2017: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1864: 1862: 1859: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1782: 1777: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1557: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1335: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1203: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1122: 1117: 1112: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1032: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 993: 991: 988: 987: 983: 979: 969: 965: 961: 957: 956: 955: 954: 953: 952: 948: 944: 941: 934: 930: 926: 922: 921: 920: 919: 915: 911: 903: 899: 895: 890: 889: 888: 887: 883: 879: 875: 873: 868: 865: 860: 857: 853: 851: 847: 845: 841: 837: 833: 828: 827: 823: 819: 814: 811: 805: 804: 803: 801: 797: 784: 782: 781: 777: 773: 769: 765: 761: 753: 749: 746: 742: 739: 734: 731: 726: 723: 718: 717: 716: 714: 709: 701: 699: 698: 694: 690: 685: 682: 674: 670: 666: 662: 658: 654: 653: 652: 651: 647: 643: 639: 631: 629: 628: 624: 620: 613: 609: 605: 601: 600: 599: 598: 594: 590: 586: 578: 574: 572:One ping only 568: 564: 560: 556: 552: 551: 550: 549: 545: 541: 533: 529: 525: 521: 517: 516: 515: 514: 510: 506: 498: 496: 495: 491: 487: 483: 475: 473: 472: 468: 464: 460: 456: 452: 442: 441: 437: 433: 424: 422: 421: 417: 413: 409: 405: 401: 397: 385: 381: 379: 378: 374: 370: 360: 359: 355: 351: 347: 343: 333: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 295: 293: 288: 284: 280: 279: 273: 269: 257: 256: 252: 248: 244: 235: 231: 221: 220: 216: 212: 208: 204: 200: 190: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 155: 154: 150: 146: 142: 138: 134: 130: 117: 115: 114: 110: 106: 102: 98: 94: 87: 84: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 62: 58: 52: 48: 44: 40: 36: 29: 23: 16: 4179: 4164: 4065: 4047: 4045: 4025: 4006: 3999: 3993: 3992: 3987: 3981: 3980: 3953:creation log 3920: 3908: 3861: 3843: 3837: 3809: 3793: 3786: 3775: 3754: 3753: 3738: 3731: 3723: 3712: 3706:Edit war on 3616: 3593: 3452: 3423: 3416: 3368: 3361: 3320: 3313: 3312:this case.-- 3310: 3307: 3288: 3253: 3234: 3227: 3218: 3176: 3162: 3155: 3114: 3059: 2662: 2657: 2653: 2649: 2468: 2440: 2413: 2302: 2300: 2270: 2264: 2261: 2232: 2226: 2187: 2182: 2177: 2149: 2145: 2143: 2140: 2100: 2097:Citing books 1780: 1555: 1399: 1201: 1120: 1115: 1110: 997: 989: 974: 937: 906: 876: 870: 869: 863: 861: 855: 854: 849: 848: 843: 839: 835: 831: 829: 815: 812: 809: 802:, you said: 796:Talk:Yazid I 788: 763: 757: 705: 702:January 2013 678: 635: 616: 584: 581: 562: 558: 536: 519: 502: 479: 450: 448: 428: 400:edit summary 388: 361: 334: 296: 291: 275: 265: 242: 237:<ref: --> 222: 191: 176:my talk page 156: 141:my talk page 121: 118:October 2012 90: 66:Introduction 47:my talk page 33: 3668:Someguy1221 3624:Someguy1221 3259:Hello, I'm 3182:Hello, I'm 3120:Hello, I'm 2183:regrettably 1978:blasphemer. 1121:unification 683:you deleted 681:Mark Antony 638:this report 604:Someguy1221 524:Someguy1221 505:Someguy1221 344:you should 311:noticeboard 162:Hello, I'm 127:Hello, I'm 95:you should 4199:MezzoMezzo 4183:Johnleeds1 4168:Johnleeds1 4166:or so. -- 4032:Beeblebrox 3949:filter log 3757:Muawiyah I 3719:Muawiyah I 3708:Muawiyah I 3605:MezzoMezzo 3590:ANI thread 3506:MezzoMezzo 3415:article.-- 3344:MezzoMezzo 3237:BracketBot 3192:Muawiyah I 3184:BracketBot 3165:BracketBot 3130:Muawiyah I 3122:BracketBot 3093:Johnleeds1 2984:Johnleeds1 2842:Johnleeds1 2663:Muawiyah I 2607:Johnleeds1 2470:2013 (UTC) 2350:Johnleeds1 2274:offensive. 2271:dishonesty 2107:Muawiyah I 2067:Johnleeds1 1642:Johnleeds1 1373:Johnleeds1 1241:Johnleeds1 1036:Johnleeds1 689:Dougweller 342:talk pages 243:Book title 101:Wikipedian 93:talk pages 81:Help pages 4075:Ironholds 4048:read the 3968:checkuser 3927:block log 3888:Ironholds 3872:Ironholds 3188:your edit 3126:your edit 3111:June 2013 2128:Publisher 1781:reluctant 1775:You said: 1202:ownership 1111:reluctant 430:for me.-- 303:consensus 299:talk page 234:citations 3939:contribs 3870:first. 3860:|reason= 3715:edit war 3664:blocking 3235:Thanks, 3163:Thanks, 2654:Qwyrxian 1865:It says: 1521:implied. 764:not done 735:Jan 23: 727:Jan 23: 719:Jan 22: 661:Cynwolfe 642:Cynwolfe 555:WP:CIVIL 463:Cynwolfe 412:SpidErxD 404:reverted 323:Favonian 313:or seek 290:warring— 272:edit war 53:or type 17:Welcome! 4059:unblock 3962:unblock 3858:unblock 3839:blocked 3825:Blocked 3762:Toddst1 2111:Yazid I 2019:least." 1556:minimal 892:talk.__ 408:sandbox 287:reverts 268:Yazid I 203:Yazid I 172:Yazid I 133:Yazid I 41:. I am 4116:Toddy1 3844:1 week 3724:While 3545:Toddy1 3277:Toddy1 3261:Toddy1 3196:syntax 3134:syntax 2656:, and 2650:Seyyed 2265:honest 2178:recent 2154:Toddy1 2125:Author 1116:hadith 960:Toddy1 818:Toddy1 772:Dianna 768:WP:NPA 760:WP:NPA 708:WP:ANI 486:Toddy1 451:before 432:Toddy1 369:Toddy1 350:Toddy1 247:Toddy1 211:Toddy1 180:Toddy1 164:Toddy1 145:Toddy1 129:Toddy1 57:helpme 4052:first 3269:civil 3219:: --> 3083:page. 925:Sayom 894:Sayom 864:shill 856:shill 850:shill 844:shill 840:Sayom 836:shill 832:Sayom 4203:talk 4187:talk 4172:talk 4150:talk 4120:talk 4098:talk 4079:talk 4036:talk 3892:talk 3876:talk 3816:talk 3767:talk 3694:talk 3672:talk 3646:talk 3628:talk 3609:talk 3576:talk 3549:talk 3535:talk 3510:talk 3487:talk 3465:talk 3398:talk 3348:talk 3295:talk 3281:talk 3241:talk 3169:talk 3097:talk 3035:talk 2988:talk 2846:talk 2706:talk 2611:talk 2512:off. 2503:talk 2354:talk 2313:talk 2197:talk 2158:talk 2071:talk 1687:talk 1646:talk 1599:talk 1377:talk 1286:talk 1245:talk 1211:talk 1151:talk 1040:talk 982:talk 964:talk 947:talk 929:talk 914:talk 898:talk 882:talk 822:talk 776:talk 693:talk 665:talk 646:talk 623:talk 608:talk 593:talk 544:talk 528:talk 509:talk 490:talk 467:talk 436:talk 416:talk 373:talk 354:talk 327:talk 251:talk 215:talk 184:talk 149:talk 109:talk 105:Gigs 43:Gigs 3972:log 3919:). 3747:or 3717:on 3190:to 3128:to 2897:it? 798:at 679:At 632:ANI 563:not 559:now 484:.-- 396:Ali 384:Ali 321:. 307:BRD 232:as 103:! 4205:) 4189:) 4181:-- 4174:) 4152:) 4144:. 4142:IP 4122:) 4100:) 4081:) 4062:}} 4056:{{ 4038:) 4007:or 3996:: 3984:: 3966:• 3960:• 3956:• 3951:• 3947:• 3942:• 3937:• 3933:• 3929:• 3894:) 3878:) 3864:}} 3856:{{ 3818:) 3721:. 3696:) 3674:) 3648:) 3630:) 3611:) 3578:) 3551:) 3537:) 3512:) 3489:) 3467:) 3400:) 3350:) 3297:) 3283:) 3243:) 3206:. 3171:) 3144:. 3099:) 3037:) 2990:) 2848:) 2708:) 2652:, 2613:) 2505:) 2356:) 2315:) 2199:) 2160:) 2109:, 2105:, 2073:) 1689:) 1648:) 1601:) 1379:) 1288:) 1247:) 1213:) 1153:) 1145:-- 1042:) 984:) 966:) 949:) 931:) 916:) 900:) 884:) 824:) 778:) 695:) 667:) 659:. 648:) 625:) 610:) 595:) 546:) 530:) 511:) 492:) 469:) 461:. 438:) 418:) 375:) 356:) 329:) 274:. 253:) 217:) 186:) 151:) 111:) 59:}} 55:{{ 4201:( 4185:( 4170:( 4148:( 4118:( 4096:( 4077:( 4034:( 3976:) 3974:) 3970:( 3925:( 3890:( 3874:( 3814:( 3801:s 3796:c 3769:) 3765:( 3692:( 3670:( 3644:( 3626:( 3607:( 3574:( 3547:( 3533:( 3508:( 3485:( 3463:( 3431:s 3426:c 3396:( 3376:s 3371:c 3346:( 3338:@ 3328:s 3323:c 3293:( 3279:( 3239:( 3228:) 3167:( 3156:) 3095:( 3033:( 2986:( 2844:( 2704:( 2609:( 2501:( 2352:( 2311:( 2305:. 2195:( 2156:( 2069:( 1685:( 1644:( 1597:( 1375:( 1284:( 1243:( 1209:( 1149:( 1038:( 980:( 962:( 945:( 927:( 912:( 896:( 880:( 820:( 774:( 691:( 663:( 644:( 621:( 606:( 591:( 542:( 526:( 507:( 488:( 465:( 434:( 414:( 371:( 352:( 325:( 249:( 213:( 182:( 147:( 107:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index