User talk:Fram/Archive 18 - Knowledge (XXG)

2723:, the quotes represent a historical view that delves into the reasoning behind the Dutch resistance in the Second World War. The film was clearly a propaganda tool and the quotes were limited to one exchange and was cited to a source. The original author of the article has now revised the "plot" to incorporate the "quotes." As a sop to the "deletionist" streak that this challenge represented with a broad statement such as "random quotes dont belong on Knowledge (XXG)" (sic), I had already moved the aforementioned quotes to Wikiquotes. The author that made the revisions is a well-known historian of the British writer-director-producer team of Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger which immediately aroused my attention as his work is impeccably researched and has led to a number of comprehensive articles in Knowledge (XXG) revolving around the legendary Powell/Pressburger team. Might I suggest that instead of one editor being the arbiter of the "quotes" conundrum, that a clearly defined style note be considered before more of the crusade stirs up similar contentious exchanges between established "regulars". FWiW 2757:. Unless I or other readers missed the very obvious statements embodied in the quotes, then a reasoning should and could be provided. However, quotes that are self-evident should not be summarily dismissed in a "broad brush" campaign to eliminate quotes. Having an "crusader" about (forgive the over-the-top hyperbole) is not conducive to editing, especially when the long-time editors involved have an impeccable track record of creating and developing articles. I reiterate that if the quotes section is to be a continuing controversial issue, then a clearly enunciated statement as to the use of quotes should be instituted. In looking at the rationale that was provided and efforts to engage others in the villagepump, only a few editors expressed interest in the subject. That alone indicates that continuing a campaign made be of dubious value. FWiW 452:

people in one faction are coming from a certain angle (in this case, from people with some connection to Greece), while hyperbolically stated the rest of the world thinks differently, then noting this is not a personal attack (or outing or harassment). If people would state that your opinion is invalid because you are a Greek, then that is a personal and/or racist attack. If they would demand that you declare whether you are a Greek or not, then you have every right to tell them to fuck off, since it is your own choice to give any info on your nationality, ethnicity, ... But to notice that, based on language used, editing patterns, or other info people willingly give, a pattern is visible which is relevant for the discussion, is not forbidden, racist, or otherwise actionable.

2430:, we don't delete the edit history. We don't make things harder for our editors to improve content that they believe can eventually be improved. This is as clear a case of a no consensus as we've had as of late and it shouldn't have to come to a DRV, but if you don't wish to discuss it here further, okay, but the fact that a few editors beyond me and who surely don't always comment when I challenge a questionable close should be indicative that delete and redirect really did lack consensus support in this particular case. I'll keep improving the userfied article for now, but this is an instant where I'm not the only one who can see we lacked a consensus to delete here. Anyway, I've said my peace for now. So, take care. Sincerely, -- 948:

not belong on a Wiki page. The policy you cited had nothing to do with quotes whatsoever. Additionally, the quotes weren't random but drawn specifically from the episodes the pages discuss, and ARE pertinent as they provide examples of the show's writing, character development/interaction and humor. I'd like to avoid escalating things and if you can cite a policy that supports deletion of the section in SPECIFIC terms I have no problem accepting it. But if you keep deleting them without being able to do so I'll have to refer this to the admins on grounds of an edit war. Rather than continuing to make and undo changes, I'm willing to discuss this through the episode talk pages FIRST so we can come to an agreement.

436:(I also posted this on the 'other' page :-)Fram, I truly agree with your sentiment and you find an ally in me; can you just as forecfully put a stop to editors labelling some users as 'Greeks' and using the term in a deragatory manner? As I keep stating, we should never give ethnic labels in a mostly anonymous site such as wikipedia. Otherwise, I think FPS might have a word to say before I take any reverting or proof-supplying action - it seems fair. Also, if that is a 'brutal attack', then how would you describe swearing (using the f word, etc) as FPS had done. I would say that swearing is bullying and my comment was objective under the circumstances. 2170:"This means that the delete opinions have more weight since the keep opinions have failed to substantiate their positive (the deletes can't prove a negative, of course). Fram (talk) 09:21, 6 May 2009 (UTC)" You then are setting up a higher bar for keeping an article: the deletes, not having anything to prove, don't have to prove anything, the keeps to. This is not in agreement with wither reason of deletion policy, which is that if nothing can be proven either way, the default is to keep. Further, citing a previous non-consensus and then arging that since nothing has changed this should not be a non-consensus as well, seems self-contradictory. 2196:

to keep it because the sources were supposed to be out there. Certainly for a Western, current, popular culture article, such sources, if they exist, are readily available to enough people (fans, but also interested editors). If in the longer run (as here) no such sources are actually presented, and the sources that are given in the AfD but not in the article turn out to be more or less randomly picked (with books like "Synthetic Worlds", present in the sources provided by two different keepers, which have no info at all on the vehicles), then the value of the keep arguments starts to become weaker, and the delete opinions gain in weight.

1849:

Easte Europe, not in Germany or France), but in the future it can be changed (because of European Union). So if a something is the biggest and the highest in Białowieża Forest it deserves for the article. Of course it was too short, but in that case it is possible too find more information. In every case it is not my subject and not field of my interest (I prefer ancient and medieval manuscripts of the Bible, of Aristotle and Plato treatises, and any other old manuscript - it must be old). Sometimes I only try to change subject of my articles, it is all.

967:, which has as it #1: "Lists or repositories of loosely associated topics such as (but not limited to) quotations, aphorisms, or persons (real or fictional). If you want to enter lists of quotations, put them into our sister project Wikiquote." To state that "The policy you cited had nothing to do with quotes whatsoever." seems rather at odds with the actual text of the policy. Furthermore, quotes are copyrighted material: to use them without embedding them in the text, without giving a good reason why these specific quotes are used, is a 2347:

delete. We only go with the minority opinion when there's some serious pressing issue like libel concerning a living person that necessitates a need to delete the edit history regardless if the majority wants it kept. We have nothing pressing here that justifies a deletion when there's no consensus for that. Here, there was no pressing need to do that and in fact doing so went against what the community actually wanted. Anyway, though, when you try some searches with names of specific ships from the game, such as

2956:. Your argument has no value, I have not deleted these pages because we are running out of space, but because they serve no purpose whatsoever. Could you please indicate what the possible benefit for Knowledge (XXG) can be in retaining these pages? I know and understand that talk pages need to be kept normally, if only because they contain contributions by other users. But I don't see anything in these pages that would merit keeping them and carrying out a request of a banned user for it. 2204:

point, then the article is deleted as unverifiable, even when the number of keeps and deletes is equal. The situation is different of course with notability discussions, when one side argues that the sources are sufficient, and the other side that they aren't: then a no consensus is the correct result. But that is not the case here: the discussion is whether sources about the subject exist or not, and for such claims, stating that they exist without any evidence is insufficient.

412:

this category too long": isn't it slightly more logical to start with these articles that ghave been tagged the longest, if that is your aim, instead of taking on a random letter? I don't mind anyone taking a letter and sourcing whatever they can (the more the better!), but to add a number of lines just to suggest this is overkill and serves no useful purpose, but only clutters the page. If you don't agree though, I suggest you discuss it on the category talk page, per

2394:

this, so all discussion of majority vs. minority is irrelevant (and you only have a majority when you include the merges, more people wanted to delete than to keep the article). I would prefer it if you either continued on your new version and posted that when it is finished (and sufficiently different from the old one), or started a DRV about the closure of the AfD and the article as it was back then. TO continue this discussion here seems rather pointless.

812: 295: 250: 205: 31: 2702:: "Brief quotations of copyrighted text may be used to illustrate a point, establish context, or attribute a point of view or idea." The article currently does not indicate which point is illustrated, the text does not establish context for anything, does not attribute anything. The short discussion was only a reaffirmation of my position on this, not the first, last and definitive discussion on the subject. 4551: 4483: 4181: 3532: 1037:

In your opinion, should I put the proposal on hold until the RfC is formally closed and is that something that I can even do? I've been watching the conversation closely and decided to bring up the proposal because the conversation has gone from the scope of ARS to canvassing (again) which to me are completely unrelated. Also, I don't see the conversation becoming stagnant before it's closed.

2260:, provide out of universe commentary that could be used for a development section: "We wanted all NPC and player ships to leave wrecks, and to add more ship variety. Shipwrecks will be salvageable for parts from which you can create new ship upgrades, called Rigs, and that should add new, mainly defensive, twists to your ships." Sifting through such extensive coverage of the game as found at 2422:

bolded text, even the nominator wasn't opposed to a merge as a compromise, which means the support for something other than deletion was clearly the majority stance with many of the delete positions being woefully off base. If anything, as the discussion progressed, the keep stance seemed to persuade more of those entering into the discussion later. In any event, when an article has

4779: 1478: 1198: 2442: 2507:

Czech cultural identity and this meant creating their own pop-cultural references. More recently, the Scots language dictionary based at Edinburgh University developed a word (Stoorums) in conjunction with an artistic group for an event celebrating Robert Burns' 250th anniversary. I believe they are also trying to re-instate this section.

1120:

because I listen to him every week at Lions games. So far its 4 keeps to only 1 delete." is unacceptable canvassing and focuses solely on the votes and not on the potential problems and solutions for the article. AfD's is about the article and how it relates to our policies and guidelines, not saving it by having more keeps than deletes.

2477: 4440:

Thanks for the article. I have removed the speedy (of course) and started a discussion with the nominator. In the future, you can always go to the talk page of the person that placed the speedy tag and (politely, of course :-) ) explain why the tag is wrong. Some taggers are pretty stubborn, but some

3823:

Please use I iso WE, others find info from Usenet a possible source. Just like Nifty itself there are also Wiki users that know the time without WWW. That you only rely on WWW doesn't say that everyone only relies on WWW. Usenet and Gopher used to be POSSIBLE reliable sources. Notabillity is not only

3663:

What specific evidence of the notability of the Nifty Archive can I provide that would convince you and the administrators of Knowledge (XXG) to reverse the deletion decision? No one operating the Nifty Archive site was contacted to provide any information or contribute to the discussion. The Nifty

2834:

Hi, I am still new to Wiki and still trying to figure all about it. I tried reposting the article, but as usual, someone comes along to bring it down. It would helpful if you could explain what is exactly wrong with what was posted. Or at least point me in the right direction. I need to know why, not

2738:

The new version of the article is not "needlessly contrived" but provides the essential info needed to inform the reader of the significance of these quotes. There was no indication at all why these quotes were selected and not any of the other possible ones. In my experience, in most cases no decent

2716:

I can see that your rationale is attributed to a variety of style guidelines, but as you have already determined that your position is intractable, albeit your slight concession to "discussion", there is very little that other editors can do other than provide a needlessly contrived statement to link

2697:

is a relevant guideline: "Fair use allows us to quote short sections from copyrighted primary sources, if relevant to explaining the topic of an article." The "if relevant" part is what is at stake here. IF you only give quotes, without context, they don't explain anything, they just illustrate. This

2668:

Hi Fram, point to me the policy that you are citing that relates to quotes. I cannot find any mention of it other than an interpretation of NOTDirectory, which again does not specify the elimination of quote sections. I checked your Villagepump discussion and saw very few participants. Does that even

2452:

There is an editor on the article's talk page(the same one who nominated the article) that seems to think that this closing requires a merge. To me I interpret "preferably merge whenever a good target is decided upon" to mean that consensus on the given article's talk page should decide how, when and

2240:

independent reliable sources, and as said in the deletion debate and with some more explanation above, the sources provided by e.g. Hobit were not relevant for the article at all, but reached through a simple Amazon search and not checked any further. If such poor sources is what all of you base your

2226:

The article had some references and other references were brought up in the discussion by Hobit among others, which is why a majority of participants aregued to either keep or merge and even some of the deletes were not opposed to a merge. Even the nominator responded to Ikip's strong keep asking if

1958:

You're apparently one of those folks whose opinion is so glorious you get to decide on everyone else's behalf if something is "notable" enough for us to read about here. The wikimedia foundation established wikipedias in the official languages and major languages of every nation around the globe and

1492:

from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under

411:

split in letters as well, there already is a navigation box where you can choose the letter you want (below the two blue boxes, the box labeled "content"). Another box suggesting which letter anyone could take today is overkill. And the "focus letter" gives as reason "So that articles don't remain in

3699:

Where should I report the references? Here? I do not have a clear understanding from the deletion discussion whether the problem was the type of notability or the sources? Do you want proof that Nifty was created in 1992 or its age is not considered notable? Do you want proof that Nifty has been

3642:

The Quran is no evidence, it is an indication of why you (or many people) believe him to be still alive and able to work miracles. The relevant encyclopedic fact (if theer are references for this) is that he is believed (or claimed) to be working miracles and curing diseases, not whether he is still

3484:

I have stopped account creation from this IP, but the last one was created before I did this. If new ones appear, a checkuser may be needed to see if some IP range block or somethiong similar may be needed. I don't know the actual IP address, only checkusers have that ability, not admins (to protect

3328:

Otmoor is a large area of open land with considerable historic and ecological interest, and its article should be developed with relevant content. Charlton-on-Otmoor is a village on one edge of that moor, the "Otmoor" article contains almost no content about the village, and it would be confusing to

3165:

Oh no, as long as the section makes clear what happened, I have no problem with it. It just came rather out of the blue, and whatever previous mistakes I may have made in this delete-undelete debacle, continuing after his FYI was not one of them, so I was unpleasantly surprised by it. But thanks for

2506:

A new development that we are particularly interested in is how new countries and autonomy-seeking regions are developing their own versions of the word. We were involved in symposium in Slovakia, where it was stated by several cultural figures that they were particularly keen to break away from the

2502:

We feel that this category is of high cultural importance. It was something we were researching before we even discovered it on Knowledge (XXG). The interesting thing is how different languages formulate the word for Smurf. eg The original French - Schtroumpfs was altered for the German market as it

2346:

I and the others consider the books that do mention spaceships in Eve online as reliable sources for this article and even so, when a majority of established editors, including a few admins, argue to keep or merge and even the nominator proposes a merge as a compromise, there is just no consensus to

2195:

No, those wanting to delete have to show that, as far as can be judged, the article fails some essential policy or guideline. However, it is obviously impossibleto prove that no sources whatsoever exist. In this case though, the previous discussions ended in no consensus partly because people wanted

2126:

Apart from that, I don't have "contentious views of the ARS", I have problems with the inability of some people active on the ARS talk page to act against or even recognise canvassing, and the habit of some people to use the ARS as a keep-vote gathering place. But many, probably most, editors in the

4120:

For Chinese there are standardized transliteration systems. The Wade-Giles system was formerly the standard system for transliterating Chinese into English. There were similar systems for transliterating into French, and other European languages. English language newspapers almost always use the

3927:

intro: "In general, each word in English titles of books, films, and other works takes an initial capital, except for articles ("a", "an", "the"), the word "to" as part of an infinitive, prepositions and coordinating conjunctions shorter than five letters (e.g., "on", "from", "and", "with"), unless

2990:

doesn't apply to userspace and it would be equally unapplicable. I have not deleted these pages for the reason you give in "remember of course that Knowledge (XXG) has no limit to the amount of pages it can store." If you can't be bothered to seriously discuss your edits on behalf of a banned user,

2421:

saying okay, well, maybe compromise as a merge, which leaves only the refuted claim of it being a game guide and the general disagreement about sourcing. Thirteen editors called to keep and another five to merge versus thirteen to delete and one to redirect, and even then when we get away from the

2268:

and merge to the main article then utilizing the sources on IGN and elsewhere. Given that this was not a unanimous delete or even a majority delete and that there's no issues of libel or anything nefarious involved, undeleting the history would be the right way to go, because we have everything to

1036:

Hey Fram. As I understand from your comment in the discussion, it's your belief that the RfC could still help people decide either way. I'm new to this sort of thing (discussing a project's scope and proposing a change) so, like I said in my proposal, I wasn't completely sure how to go about it.

947:

I appreciate that you're trying to keep the pages cleaned up. However if you can't cite a Wiki policy that specifically says in no uncertain terms the section is not allowed, please don't keep deleting it from those episode pages as it becomes a matter of your personal opinion of what does and does

451:

Swearing is not a comment on the editor, but on the frustration one feels about the situation. Saying "fuck" or "fuck off" may be uncivil (the latter is uncivil), but not a personal attack. As for the labeling of people as Greek: when in a dispute relating to Greece, the impression exists that most

382:

to have a focus letter on a large unwieldy category? I find that it helps me go through random areas of categories that are so big as to be daunting. Just that the category is split up into months doesnt mean that it shouldn't be split up into letters as well. Please rethink your removal of this

3768:

The Nifty Archive has received requests from faculty and students in sociology, psychology and library science departments at universities around the world for assistance with research. These have been private communications that often are not cited. Nifty is referenced in the proceedings from a

1437:

My intention was not that I would immediately block Jack if he ever made a reply to A Nobody again (just like I wouldn't block A Nobody for making his essay-reply on AfD's again), but that even minor transgressions could be warned for, and that continued behaviour would be blockable (and that goes

3831:

When I have all info available and controlable (and meeting WP guidelines) I'll republish the article. IMHO the site IS notable as it was one of the 1st sites of its kind (from the pre WWW era) and it was one of the reasons that in the US some laws were changed and later overthrown. If that's not

2009:

I agree 70.105.57.189, so let's be bold and revert all his sudden removals of all articles he decides are not to his satisfaction. There's something called a talk page where you can discuss this before just blasting in and removing articles! There's something called being reasonable where you can

1848:

it is only one forest in Europe in which some parts are the same like 10 000 years ago. It is only one forest in Europe of that meaning. It is more important forest in Europe. This forest has special status. Maybe not every people is aware how important this forest is for Europe (because it is in

2393:

presented during the AfD. It is not the job of the closing admin to check if there may be good sources anyway, the closing admin has to weigh the arguments provided, and those arguments, including the sources given by the keep proponents, were clearly insufficient. Votecounting has no bearing on

4653:

As you may have seen, I closed this as delete; besides the articles, I got rid of the template, the image, and an article on the entire family — I reasoned that, if none of these people were real, the family that they composed was surely a hoax as well. Have you begun a sock nomination for the

3835:

Some Wikipedians (not referring to you) want to have such articles removed because it is related to GAY, and Wiki is the last place where that should be a reason to ban the article. So when I have all info in place and checkable AND it meets the WP guidelines I'll reopen the lemma. Tks and bibi

2203:

Apart from that, I don't believe that deletion policy is like you describe it: if the keep arguments can not be proven, then the validity of the delete arguments is irrelevant. Imagine a case of verifiability: the keepers state that X existed, the deleters that X didn't. Neither can prove their

2122:

I don't base my closes on whether they are tagged by the ARS or not, as would be clear from my contributions. I closed the two last remaining debates from that day, and one of them happened to be ARS tagged, and the other (I think, I didn't really check) wasn't. The were the last remaining ones

1058:

For starters, it is a bit bizarre to propose a name change without indicating what the new name should be. But the impression thatI got was that the name change would indicate that the ARS was not alone for articles, but a more general rescue squadron. To have on one hand a discussion to decide

1119:

You don't think calling specific people "stupid deletionists" is a personal attack? And you already ask for help of the ARS by tagging it for rescue, putting an extra message on the project talk page with "Please help me save Dan Miller (sportscaster) from afd. I really care about this article

1040:

I've seen how you operate throughout Knowledge (XXG) and I respect your thoughts and opinions. That being said, I was a slightly offended when you said that my proposal was exactly the wrong way to go about it. I guess I'd just ask that you explain why to me and how to go about things in the

4134:

Arabic words are not transliterated consistently. There is no standardized transliteration system. Every time someone named Abdul Razak has his name transliterated into English it is likely it will be transliterated differently. So Abdul Razaq absolutely does require disambiguation.

2123:

because they weren't clear decisions, and someone, preferably an admin with some experience, has to decide one way or the other. I have also closed a number of relisted debates, some as keep, others as delete, and I haven't gotten the faintest idea if these were ARS tagged or not either.

1843:

According to me it is not enough for the article. It it very difficult to find a something about Belarus in internet. Not too much people use the internet there. What we can say about Polish oak. It was the highest oak in Białowieża Forest. Perhaps it is not enough for the article. But

1903:(located only 1,5 km), and access was very easy. Tsar Oak was located about 20 km from Białowieża, and access was difficult because of swamps and muds. Probably no writers or poets had ever visited this oak. So the article about Jagiełło Oak should remain, but not account of legends. 1963:

in anticipation of technilogical advances in the third world. Your actions have been seen as not only snooty in applying your subjective personal judgement on their "notibility' unilaterally and without consultation, but in fact positively backwards from the goals of this project.

546:

I've restored the page for now, but removed most of the text as unsourced advertising. Please add your sources and good info from it as soon as possible, or the page may be nominated for deletion again. Thanks for explaining the reason for the undeletion so clearly, it helps a lot.

2920:

Does a banned user exist? Perhaps, I interpreted it differently... Anyway, what's the benefit of undeleting these pages? They are not linked from anyweher, conatin no content, will never be of any use to anyone... Wasn't undeleting them not just a waste of time for policy sake?

3643:

alive according to the Quran. When you sue the same Quran verse three times in one article, it comes across as preaching, not as presenting a neutral, encyclopedic biography. Considering that it ius actually an article about a village, the Quran verses are even less relevant.

2448:

In your closing you said "The result was Keep but preferably merge whenever a good target is decided upon. This is a notable example of an interesting topic, but it would be better placed and avoid redundancy in a larger article about the topic with a number of examples".

1710:

You were warned when you created the article, since it showed a big pink box with "You are re-creating a page that was deleted" and a link to the deletion discussion. You continued to recreate the page despite this, so you shouldn't be surprised that it was deleted again.

1059:

whether the ARS is only for articles or also for other categories, and on the other hand a proposal to change the name to indicate the latter, gives the idea that the expansion of the ARS will be pushed through, no matter what people may decide, and mocks the whole RfC.

2025:

On the same topic, I'm wondering if you looked at the links I provided at the end of the AfD. There are clearly real sources, in electronic form and available now, that cover this material. From your close it looks like you either missed that or didn't look at them.

1219:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. Kittens must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

1534:

deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Knowledge (XXG) guidelines.

354:

I want to extend a personal thank you for nominating the baseball anniversary related lists for deletion. Back in November, I did the same thing for rail related anniversaries and I know how grueling of a task that had to be. I highly recommend you take a look at

2199:

To put it differently; despite the claims that there are sufficient sources, nothing has changed in the article since the previous AfDs, indicating that these sources are perhaps not so widespread: the article has not changed, so the arguments in favour are

2935:

No, because the user in question has asked for them to be restored. Regardless of whether he is banned or not it is not appropriate to simply delete his userspace - remember of course that Knowledge (XXG) has no limit to the amount of pages it can store.

2586: 844:

a few days ago). Emperor suggested that for Michel, someone needs to add more references to the overview and characters section (if only primary ones to show us what happened where), and Hiding suggested to expand the lead to conform with guidelines at

2385:(unindent) The page is in your userspace, perhaps there you can achieve what all thosepeople wanting to keep didn't do after the previous AfD's, i.e. find and add significant coverage from reliable independent sources to the article. This coverage was 2255:

If there wasn't edit warring going on with the article during the AfD, I would have been more encouraged to add some to the article as well. But anyway, it is not accurate to suspect that no reliable sources exist. Interviews, for example, such as

3329:

add any. Charlton is the largest of the "seven towns of Otmoor", most of the seven now have their own articles, and Charlton is the only one that has a redirect to "Otmoor" instead. Charlton deserves its own article like any other English village.

4740:

with the following edit summary '(This is described as a crustal tsunami and it explains what it is, thus making this article invalid for deletion (This is my opinion. You can restore the template if you think i was wrong, ok?))'. Please consider

2269:

gain and nothing to lose. The best case scenario is we either have some information worth merging or maybe a basis for an expansion based on the out of universe sources that multiple editors across four AfDs have asserted exist. Regards, --

1866:

The Polish oak is mentioned with some details in the Forest article anyway, so it's not as if it is hidden from view. As for the Belarussian one, if no more info is available, then it can't have an article, and I see no obvious merge target.

3233: 3226: 2174:

normally, i would prefer to go to deletion review with a stronger underlying article (I consider this borderline) In fact, I seem to always wait until other people take it to deletion review, so I know there will be some support there.

3325:. I propose that this redirect be deleted as it prevents the creation of a separate article about Charlton-on-Otmoor village. As you created the redirect I think you deserve to know about the proposal so that you can comment if you wish. 1812:

You shouldn't create articles about different things with the same name: each article should be about one topic, like Tsar Oak (Poland) and Tsar Oak (Belarus) or something similar. Furthermore, the Bialowieza one was already discussed at

2227:

a merge would be a fair compromise and both Randomran and Hapia Dragon who commented regularly against the keeps, both had "merge" as their main stances. Anyway, for that reason, I again request a history undeletion. Thanks! Best, --

1438:

for both of them). I'll have a look around the discussion and try to clarify my position if needed (it often turns out that in the morning, comments made yesterday are no longer very relevant, so I'll have to see what happened since).

4292:

I came across this image today, the uploader claims to released it under public domain but I am not sure about it, I believe that claim is false, however, I haven't found any source to verify that yet. The uploader of this image is

658:

I have never heard of her, but then again, she's Bulgarian, not Belgian :-) I have restored it anyway, Google News clearly indicates notability to me (but the article is weak on it), but someone mau still take it to AfD of course.

3269:, the merge/keep opinions were invalid because they assumed notability but did not show any. It's not a case of noeffort, it's a case of noevidence. This may have been due to noeffort, but that's only one possible explanation. 3385:

I am not redlinking "just one of the group", I have already also tagged 1650s and 1660s from the same series. I can not find your text in the CSD criteria, so your (templated?) text of "please review" is rather inappropriate.

905:

I am clearly confused then. This Scott Mac person places the notice for deletion on my talk page and I copied it to the talk page of the article but it seems he never actually placed the deletion notice on the article itself?

2351:, additional coverage in multiple reliable sources independent of the subject also comes up. One has to try a variety of searches to really get at all the stuff that's available and after all, it's not as if Google covers 1138:

Okay I'm sorry for saying that, you're right, I was out of line and maybe a little biased about the topic. But the article has been substantially expanded by several editors, and if you're an admin please close the afd for

4627: 3437:

Thanks, definitely same user, blocked as well (master account not yet indef blocked since this one was created before my final warning). If you notice any others, feel free to drop me a note. If I don't respond quickly,

3134:

Why dou you start a new section when I haven't done anything since your last post? You are giving the impression to any casual reader that I continued some behaviour since your previous post, whicc is clearly incorrect.

1063:

there will be a consensus that the ARS has a wider scope, then a namechange may be useful: but to start the namechange now is putting the cart before the horse, and is a form of forum shopping, but inside the same

2264:, there are enough comments with the various reviews, previews, and interviews to either build development and reception sections, or to at least justify a history undeletion so that we can use what was there per 1590:, it gave a big red warning for a stray character (sorry, I can't remember which one it was, and template errors can not be found in the history of course). It looks like it has been solved since, with this change 993:

My apologies, I didn't catch that part when I read through it. However since the issue has been raised I'm going to wait for the Wiki talk response first as I still think this is a valid use of the quotations.

472:

I unreservedly apologise to you for having hinted any such thing. It was my misreading of the situation entirely. Thanks for your patience. I will place this in the appropriate page and delete my comments.

3090:

He is indef blocked on the Dutch Knowledge (XXG) a well, and can hardly be blocked on Wikisage, which he created and maintains. Why should we keep a link to his own website around on every page he signed?

4455:

Thanks for removing the tag! I never quite understood why it was placed there, as the article, as you also says, from the very beginning quite explicitly stated why the biographed person is significant.

3809:, so not their own pages or people, not usenet postings, not something otherwise unknown, but things like the sources I provided: known newspapers, books by known publishers, peer reviewed journals, ... 1616:

Yep, that was the error. But then I can not have seen it on the September 2006 page, it must have been on one of the recent months. Luckily my bad memory did not send you on a wild goose chase here :-)

1895:) and they were inspired by it. Some of them described this oak in the articles. Some of them took image of this oak in their memory and used it for describing oaks used in their novels. Is it enough? 1374:

I presume I tagged him because he was added to the comics artists category: perhaps that category was incorrect, and then I have no objection to removing both the cat and the project banner of course.

640:

I just deleted this as a prod, but before I did I ran a google search and turned up an awful lot of hits. You're the only Belgian I know, so I thought I'd run the name past you and sound you out. See

3824:

measured because articles on WWW/http exist. Court rulings and likewise info exists but I'm still trying to get it online so people can use it as source. You also mention "known newspapers" - what is

1979:

My opinion is not more glorious than that of other people, e.g. those deciding "on everyone eles's behalf" that topic X or Y should have a separate article. We have guidelines and policies, e.g.

4793:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " 4745:

with Rascal the Peaceful before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to

356: 4111:. They are transliterations of the same original Arabic name. It is a mistake to treat them as distinct names. It is appropriate to treat them as if they were all transliterated identically. 2739:

explanation is possible, it is just personal preference for some quotes without any significance. In this particular case, there apparently was a reason to pick these quotes. Problem solved!

1356:

with the WikiProject Comics banner a few years ago. However, I'm not seeing the connection to comics. Can you explain? I'm tempted to remove the banner, but I wanted to check with you first.

2088:

Please see my reply below. I see no reason not to undelete the edit history in this instance. Given the strong support for a keep or merge, it would be a reasonable compromise. Best, --

2010:

give other contributers who've worked on and are continuing to work on the articles a chance to find evidence of notability that you may be satisfied! Jeez, talk about a nuclear approach!

3664:

Archive collection has been used for academic research studies about sexuality and for at least two theatrical productions. It has launched the careers of a number of published authors.

3714:

As far as the age, the site originally was hosted as an FTP site on nifty.andrew.cmu.edu. It was referenced in numerous USENET postings in the alt.sex.stories hierarchy. For instance,

528: 2532:

You can see all the different language versions by checking the bottom of the left sidebar on the Smrufs page, giving all the interwiki links. Apart from that , the section was mainly

1100:, I DID NOT, however, "tell them how to vote". I am offended when someone nominates an article that I care deeply about for deletion less than 12 hours after I created it without even 509: 4800:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at

3201:. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — 616: 4669:

No, I just indef blocked the two editors (or one sockmaster) involved. I have no evidence that another accounbt is involved as well, so any SPI will probably be refused anyway.

4085:. It was moved half a year ago, without any problems or complaints until now. It is great that you added a hatnote, but that solves the problems that may have existed. And the 3265:

There were enough participants, and enough time had passed (AfD was extended from 5 to 7 days recently). It wa closed not only per noeffort: the delete opinions were valid per

130:

Has anyone else of any fame composed a "Nocturnes Op. 48"? Disambiguation is only needed when there is anything to disambiguate between. Symphony #1 needs to be disambiguated,

4801: 712: 4051:, right? Have you ever considered placing the appropriate wikilink right in your edit summary? I am sure I am not the only participant who would appreciate this courtesy. 3903:

an idea I mentioned on the Comics project talk page. :) Feel free to have a go, do whatever you like to make it look better/more functional/whatever, or offer suggestions.

3583:

Didn't even realize there was an mfd. Just figured it's pretty common practice to delete a banned user's subpages. fter all, the user's banned, they're not gonna use them.

891:

The page is not up for deletion, someone placed a "hangon" tag to a page that had been proposed for deletion earlier, but where the proposed deletion was already removed.

2864: 3747: 1891:, but I see different reason. This oak, Jagiełło Oak, in the 1st half of 20th century was visited by several Polish writers (one of them received Nobel Prize in 1905 - 2454: 3081:

Knock it off. Unless Guido is also banned on the other Wikimedia projects linked on that page, it seems rather petty to delete it, since it is linked in Guido's sig.

3790:

newsletter references the production Nifty, which was a dramatic reading of gay erotic stories from the Nifty Archive at the Bailiwick Repertory Theater in Chicago.

920:

The Proposed Deletion Warning on your talk page is from April 5th, when it was indeed nominated for deletion. The page has since been sourced, and the ProD removed.

1887:. It was not merged because of legend. Believe me every of these merged oaks has legends (sometimes more than one). It does not mean I want merge this article with 1959:

has always sought to foster good relations and promote their growth. While some of these may not have grown as fast as English wikipedia, we also seek to counter

3805:

To put it bluntly (and oversimplified), we are not interested in what Nifty is, how old it is, and so on: we are only interested in the attention it received in

2510:

We hope that this section will be kept on, as it is forming the basis for a lot of critical discussion in the Art department at London Metropolitan University.

2423: 2540:

weight to a minor aspect of the Smurfs. But it is best if you take this up on the talk page of the article, where everyone interested can give their opinion.

3900: 2332:

Yes, there are people who consider books that don't even mention spaceships in Eve online as reliable sources for an article on spaceships in Eve online.

1814: 3508:

Sorry we couldn't get this one up to GA. I told another user about it, and he has been hard at work on the article - we may be able to re-nom very soon!

2100:

Given your contentious views of the Article Rescue Squad do you not see a bit of conflict in closing articles tagged by them that are rather borderline?

308: 263: 218: 1104:

to improve it, claiming its "un-notable". How would that make you feel? I don't see how I personally attacked him either, all I did was ask a question.

876:

article you contributed to is now up for deletion - unfairly I feel. Please check out its talk page and see what you think about it. Much appreciated.

529:

http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/bio/index.jsp?JSESSIONID=PYWQJW4Zy2FqZs103QpHYkjQ7y2H5F1WLd4s9b8rkJyG6ClpL0tT!-2024252470&pid=878714&aid=1101596

3863: 3555:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 2693:

relates to what quotes to include: why these quotes and not any others? What do they represent? Why are they significant, representative, noteworthy?

1392:

OK, thanks. As near as I can tell, he is a designer, one might even say sculptor, but not a comic book artist. I'll go ahead and remove the banner. --

1489: 3692: 2348: 2300:

modelled after one of the space ships from the game. Yes, some people even sort of got to "eat" one of the spaceships from the game! ;) Best, --

510:

http://www.undergroundhiphop.com/store/detail.asp?=Clutchy-Hopkins-Meets-Lord-Kenjamin-Music-Is-My-Medicine-Ubiquity-Recordings&UPC=UBIQ0244CD

3859: 748:

Doesn't help the fundamental size problem, so no reason to change my opinion, but thanks for the info and the attempts to do something about it.

4089:

is a policy, not a guideline. At the moment, Abdul Razaq is the only article with that spelling, so no need to have a further disambiguation.

1283: 3751: 3741: 1767: 1314:

only to find the page protected. Is the new article any different from the old? Does it need moving or deleting? Only you know the answers!

787:

Thanks for sharing this! As Drilnoth said, you deserve it for all the work on comics articles (and GA's especially), but it's nice to claim

4251: 3715: 972: 3737: 1263:

also should be renamed, official name is "Harleian Collection". Only in abbreviations in catalogues it is usually written "Harley" (e.g.

4631: 3638:

Hai, Thanks for editing the article Erwadi, and making it encylopedic. may i know why the refernces from Quran are being deleted there?

2323:

It is also different from the majority of participants in that discussion who wanted to either keep or merge the article. Sincerely, --

1965: 520:. Per WP policies non-English sources are acceptable when English language sources are not as good as ones available in other language. 395: 4356:

I am not good at images guidelines, therefore I wanted your help on this as you are an administrator. I hope you will look into this.

4304: 3603:

Go to the discussion page of Dutch people to see why i have changed your changes made to the list of Dutch people under the pictures.

2562: 2517: 725: 4771: 4158: 3948:

So under what category from that list does "is" fall? I say none, as "is" is a verb in word and context, and verbs are capitalized.

1607:

Ah, sorry. It would have given 'Expression error: Unrecognised punctuation character ","' on any cat with more than 1000 pages. --

1587: 3928:

they begin or end a title or subtitle. Examples: A New Kind of Science, Ghost in the Shell, To Be or Not to Be." So it looks as if

2296:

I would still rather you reconsider and close as "no consensus", as just today, even we have an article in a reliable source on a

4318: 2443:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher

1177:

as well. 7 keeps to 0 deletes except nominators, after substantial expansion by several editors. Notability HAS been proven IMO.

729: 2309:

My view of what are reliable sources and significant coverage differs from yours, as has been seen in previous debates as well.

1539: 496:

in 2007. While the identity of Clutchy Hopkins is definitely not clear or covered by RS, his CDs got a number of reviews in RS:

4574:, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page 4506:, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page 4350: 4204:, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page 641: 4048: 1502: 4586:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

4518:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

4232: 4216:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

2719: 1836:"(...)its height is 46 meters, his age more than 800 years", and "in 1963 it was nominated to the status monument of nature". 1452:

Thanks for your reply, I feel that I have a better understanding. I see that the discussion has been (mercifully) collapsed.

1332:

It's basically the same article, so I have protected this version as well. Let's hope they don't try any other variations...

517: 324: 279: 234: 4425:(sic!) deletion. I hope you could comment on the nomination, which shows nothing but a total ignorance about the subject! -- 3351:

Hello Fram, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of

2279: 819: 4742: 2851: 2600:

For having to put up with various users in the long-running battle between "it's interesting" and Knowledge (XXG) policy.

1294: 589: 584: 4790: 4557: 4489: 4187: 3538: 2986:

Well, you can call it a strawman instead of having no value, but the end result is the same. You could have claimed that

615:

for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at

4608: 4336: 4055: 2646:

That's probably better, I can imagine that I wouldn't really appreciate someone naming me in a similar barnstar either.

2409:

If we seriously went by the arguments, as I said in my initial comment in the AfD, the deletes ranged from over the top

1353: 593: 3194: 1899:

was inspired by this oak. Of course Tsar Oak was bigger and thicker, but Jagiełło Oak had this advantage that was near

4709: 1908: 1854: 1802: 1272: 1250: 2050:

Hello! Please undelete the edit history for the purpose of helping in the merge to the redirect location. Best, --

4620: 4587: 4577: 4519: 4509: 4217: 4207: 3556: 1678:

is fair in the sense that the reviewer thinks it looks like a fail, but is giving contributors a chance to fix it.

576: 38: 4811:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the

3244:. I understand your position, but the talk was about 50/50 so far and it looks as if it was basically closed per 3198: 3187: 1739: 1140: 108: 94: 86: 81: 69: 64: 59: 4077:

at all. Not even a redirect! At least now there is one, about a person with that name. The same as happens with

3149:

He's mistaken my re-deletions for yours. You can remove this thread if you feel it incorrectly victimises you.

964: 4737: 4255: 2788: 2044: 1526: 1397: 1364: 1290: 673:

Bulgarian ... Belgian... ah, yes. Um, it was late, that's all I can say. Apologies. Off to hunt a Bulgarian.

3684: 3114: 3060: 3059:

I have no idea what/why you guys are going on about, and don't have time to investigate, but I dropped a note

2410: 2297: 1969: 334:

I can't speak for Fram, but when I do this, I just replace the datestamp instead of re-adding the template.--

4298: 4238: 2637: 2605: 2566: 2521: 1888: 1675: 1497:, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please 1014:

Fair enough, and thanks for apologizing and for discussing it, it's always nice to meet reasonable editors.

911: 881: 390: 339: 120: 4697: 3407: 2839: 2558: 2513: 1498: 853:, and should adequately summarize the article. I'd be happy to help out with this, as time allows for me. 4550: 4482: 4390: 4362: 4180: 4043:

Yes, I see you cite a "manual of style: naming conventions". It took me a while to find the guidelin you

3885: 3871: 3531: 3468: 3421: 2888: 2689:

starts with "Lists or repositories of loosely associated topics such as (but not limited to) quotations".

1904: 1850: 1798: 1729:

Can you at least give me a copy of the deleted article so that I can put it in my sandbox for later use.--

1485: 1471: 1268: 1246: 721: 4754: 4639: 4562: 4494: 4192: 3543: 1238: 115:? The MOS seems pretty clear that composer names should be added to disambiguate generic piece titles.-- 4583: 4515: 4322: 4294: 4213: 3245: 3123: 3070: 2503:

seemed too much like their word for sock/stocking. The Italian language reasoning is also fascinating.

2427: 2265: 2074:

If i had thought that a merge was the outcome of the discussion, I would not have deleted the article.

1508:

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding

1216: 3623: 3608: 3039:

No, because that editor can unretire anytime he or she wants. A banned user doesn't have that option.

2970:

If my argument has no value then it is obvious I'm not going to dissuade you. Have a wonderific day.

4733: 4722: 4705: 4418: 4312: 3352: 3345: 3298: 3255: 2127:

ARS use it as it was intended, to tag and improve articles which are on AfD but have real potential.

1321: 1208: 1182: 1152: 1109: 131: 1984: 1311: 1304: 968: 733: 580: 383:

template as its nothing but a helpful navigational tool and provides no disservice to the category.

4816: 4815:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. --

4532: 4461: 4430: 4344: 4162: 3791: 3774: 3755: 3723: 3701: 3665: 3569: 3334: 1393: 1360: 2843: 2686: 497: 4820: 4226: 4140: 4063: 3841: 3795: 3778: 3759: 3727: 3705: 3669: 3619: 3604: 3318: 3311: 3082: 2142: 2101: 2015: 1457: 1427: 1422:? It's good advice delivered forcefully, but I'm not sure if it's an actionable warning. Thanks. 1310:

Can you have a look at this? I've been having a half-arsed go at cleanup and tried to move it to

999: 953: 907: 877: 385: 335: 320: 301: 294: 275: 256: 249: 230: 211: 204: 116: 4701: 3618:

I am sorry i confused the Dutch page with the English page. I have corrected my mistake. Cheers

2690: 2537: 2417:

part of a "too many articles campaign" that never considers the actual article under discussion

1884: 572: 564: 4786: 4690: 4659: 4414: 4325:. Latter has a history of violating copyright guidelines, his talk page is evidence for that. 4014: 3962: 3881: 3867: 3458: 3411: 3377: 2903:, and while Guido cannot edit the account still continues to exist. Please do not re-delete. 2868: 2847: 2458: 1892: 1260: 1237:

Thanks for nemoving "Textual Variants of..." into "Textual variants of..." Please remove also

716: 478: 441: 148:

I've now replied at the WP:CM as well, since I note that the move is discussed there as well.

4693:

one of my statemen in Kuwait. Couldn't find a good sources in English. I found many arabic.

3924: 3288: 3284: 2987: 1960: 1551: 1547: 1174: 1144: 850: 846: 737: 4750: 4729: 4635: 4330: 3212: 3151: 3026: 2972: 2938: 2905: 1928: 1896: 1559: 1289:

Hey there! You might be interested in this new venture! The fightback starts here! Yeah!

1170: 678: 648: 624: 536: 112: 4812: 4805: 4794: 4746: 3439: 3363: 3358: 3033: 2953: 2914: 2896: 2699: 2694: 1900: 1543: 1494: 1097: 413: 4308: 3550: 3293: 3250: 3166:

pointing it out, it is a nice gesture after I was rather abrupt with your previous posts.

2784: 2034: 1513: 1316: 1225: 1204: 1178: 1148: 1105: 1042: 837: 518:

http://www.theskinny.co.uk/article/43886-shawn-lee-and-clutchy-hopkins-clutch-of-the-tiger

501: 493: 365: 4086: 3806: 3680: 2533: 505: 4283: 811: 504:(CD review as published by Russia's most popular and reputable entertainment magazine), 4674: 4569: 4528: 4457: 4446: 4426: 4380: 4340: 4269: 4250:

Nice work, thank you. I hope you don't mind my having made a few small edits. Groeten,

4094: 3983: 3937: 3814: 3648: 3584: 3565: 3490: 3447: 3391: 3330: 3274: 3171: 3140: 3117: 3096: 3064: 3044: 2996: 2961: 2926: 2876: 2796: 2762: 2744: 2728: 2707: 2674: 2651: 2622: 2545: 2488: 2399: 2337: 2314: 2287: 2246: 2209: 2132: 2079: 2065: 2000: 1983:

and ], indicating when topics should have separate articles and when not. We also have

1943: 1872: 1822: 1771: 1747: 1730: 1716: 1701: 1665: 1642: 1622: 1608: 1598: 1577: 1443: 1379: 1337: 1125: 1074: 1019: 980: 925: 896: 841: 796: 753: 692: 664: 552: 457: 421: 153: 139: 47: 17: 3688: 3266: 2555:

Sorry, just worked out which Talk page you mean. Will continue the discussion there.

1980: 4763: 4501: 4136: 4059: 3908: 3837: 3513: 2863:

You have recreated the page Aspire for Life that was deleted after the discussion at

2819: 2804: 2431: 2356: 2324: 2301: 2270: 2261: 2257: 2228: 2182: 2089: 2051: 2011: 1683: 1650: 1538:

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria

1453: 1423: 1242: 995: 949: 858: 823: 777: 769: 316: 271: 226: 3828:, is that to you,to US readers or other English speaking people around (eg England). 1645:

has begun, but it looks like it's going to take some work to get this one promoted.

687:

No need to apologize, such mistakes are amusing (I make enough of them, and worse)!

4655: 4078: 4003: 3951: 3367: 3234:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Nicktoons Summer Beach House (2nd nomination)

3227:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Nicktoons Summer Beach House (2nd nomination)

2141:

Well I appreciate your response even if we must agree to disagree on other issues.

1554:. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 474: 437: 2585: 713:

Knowledge (XXG):Templates_for_deletion/Log/2009_April_6#Template:NYRepresentatives

610: 3754:

posting document the move from the original site to the initial webhosting site.

513: 4597: 4421:

myself. I was pretty surprised when someone managed to nominate the article for

4326: 4199: 4082: 4074: 3357:

redlinking just one of the whole group by speedy deletion is inappropriate; use

3202: 3017: 2633: 2601: 1924: 1555: 873: 674: 644: 620: 532: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4824: 4778: 4758: 4713: 4678: 4663: 4643: 4613: 4536: 4465: 4450: 4434: 4397: 4384: 4369: 4273: 4259: 4244: 4166: 4144: 4098: 4067: 4021: 3987: 3969: 3941: 3912: 3889: 3875: 3845: 3818: 3799: 3782: 3763: 3731: 3709: 3673: 3652: 3627: 3612: 3593: 3573: 3517: 3494: 3478: 3451: 3431: 3395: 3379: 3338: 3302: 3278: 3259: 3219: 3175: 3160: 3144: 3128: 3100: 3085: 3075: 3048: 3000: 2981: 2965: 2947: 2930: 2880: 2855: 2823: 2808: 2766: 2748: 2732: 2711: 2678: 2655: 2641: 2626: 2609: 2570: 2549: 2525: 2492: 2465: 2434: 2403: 2359: 2341: 2327: 2318: 2304: 2291: 2273: 2250: 2231: 2213: 2186: 2157: 2136: 2116: 2092: 2083: 2069: 2054: 2038: 2019: 2004: 1973: 1947: 1932: 1912: 1876: 1858: 1826: 1806: 1774: 1751: 1733: 1720: 1704: 1687: 1669: 1654: 1626: 1611: 1602: 1580: 1563: 1477: 1461: 1447: 1431: 1401: 1383: 1368: 1341: 1326: 1298: 1276: 1254: 1186: 1156: 1129: 1113: 1078: 1051: 1023: 1003: 984: 957: 929: 915: 900: 885: 862: 826: 800: 781: 757: 742: 696: 682: 668: 652: 628: 556: 540: 482: 461: 445: 425: 401: 368: 343: 328: 283: 238: 192: 178: 157: 143: 124: 3248:. Another week to accept some response from people would not have hurt here. 2030: 1790: 531:

He's notable for his records, not for his bio. So please restore the article.

361: 185: 171: 2899:

of the criteria for speedy deletion is explicitly for userpages of users who

849:. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on 4670: 4442: 4376: 4375:

I've passed this one to an administrator on Commons, I am not active there.

4265: 4090: 3979: 3933: 3810: 3770: 3719: 3644: 3486: 3443: 3387: 3270: 3167: 3136: 3092: 3040: 2992: 2957: 2922: 2872: 2758: 2740: 2724: 2703: 2670: 2647: 2618: 2541: 2484: 2395: 2333: 2310: 2283: 2242: 2205: 2128: 2075: 2061: 1996: 1939: 1868: 1818: 1766:

Thank you, and by the way I am going to create it and re-direct the page to

1743: 1712: 1661: 1618: 1594: 1501:. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the 1439: 1375: 1333: 1121: 1070: 1015: 976: 921: 892: 822:, I just wanted to wish my fellow Wikipedians a Happy Easter! Sincerely, -- 792: 749: 688: 660: 634: 548: 453: 417: 149: 135: 3366:

before tagging further pages. If you have any queries, please let me know.

1817:

and was merged then. I see nothing in the article to change that decision.

1700:

Thanks for deleting the article without a warning, thats real considerate--

1837: 1197: 3904: 3679:

If you have any evidence published in reliable, independent sources (see

3509: 2815: 2800: 2792: 2177: 1794: 1679: 1646: 1524:

the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on

854: 773: 524: 4630:. I have found some concerns with the referencing which you can see at 4125:

system. So Chinese words are almost always transliterated consistently.

3787: 3063:

to draw eyes. Please put down the tools for now, and discuss it there.

1923:

Thanks, and apologies, misunderstood the purpose of the ARS talk page.

527:, which is RS (and moreover, our primary source) on any music topics! 4634:. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. 4122: 4038:

moved Abdul Razaq (Taliban Deputy Minister of Defense) to Abdul Razaq

3322: 1770:, since that is what is done with minor league baseball players now-- 1212: 1041:

future. It's the only way I'm going to learn. Thanks for your time.

4626:

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the

4441:

are fairly reasonable and have no trouble correcting their mistake.

3457:

If you block his IP, he won't be able to create any more puppets.--

1987:

as one of our guiding principles. We don't create or keep articles

2476: 810: 2952:

So you are making edits on behalf of a banned user? Please check

3718:

thread from 1995 mentioning both the FTP and gopher access. Or

2426:

of any kind, even if there's just a redirect location, then per

1069:

I believe that your intention was good, but the result was bad.

840:

for GAN, based on your earlier suggestion. :) (I also nominated

498:

http://www.dr.dk/Musik/Anmeldelser/Anmeldt/2008/04/03143147.htm

357:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/July 29 in rail transport

2991:

then perhaps you shouldn't have done them in the first place.

2453:

if it is merged. Could you please clarify your position here:

25: 184:*sigh* someone got out of bed the wrong side this morning... 4777: 2282:, you are free to turn it into an acceptable article there. 1530:

explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for

1499:

see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

1476: 1196: 311:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

293: 266:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

248: 221:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

203: 3860:

List of films which share their name with a title of a song

3858:

I have responded to your proposed deletion of my article -

2867:. You can appeal that discussion with the closing admin at 2028:

I may be away for a while, sorry if I don't respond quickly

3722:

file from 1994 on textfiles.com mentioning the FTP site.

3880:

Thank you for your co-operation. See discussion again --

3283:

Well I am going to take your word for it just in case I

2455:

talk:Had_had_had_had_had_had_had_had_had_had_had#mergers

1147:(5 keeps to 2 deletes). Notability HAS been proven IMO. 500:(CD review as published by reputable Danish newsspapper 4802:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Cold Y Generation

4037: 1591: 1574: 1419: 1415: 606: 602: 598: 502:

http://www.afisha.ru/personalpage/191793/review/208381/

4789:, an article which you have created or worked on, for 4058:

surely a disambiguated name is absolutely essential?

2632:

I've amended this at the request of the user I named.

506:

http://www.urb.com/reviews/cd/feature.php?ReviewId=542

4649:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Fujiwara Manami

2865:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Aspire for Life

4159:

Talk:Political parties in Belgium#Naming conventions

3014:

If someone retired would you delete all their pages?

1832:

All we can find about Belarussian Tsar Oak is this:

3687:is one source which may contribute to establishing 3317:Almost three years ago you created a redirect from 2483:thank you for closing those AfDs. I appreciate it. 2241:keep on, then it is time to rethink your position. 1228:}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message! 4413:I see that you have earlier made an article about 2717:the quotes. In the article that was under review, 1954:Your redirection of articles on Wikimedia projects 1352:Hi Fram. I see that you tagged the talk page for 3287:, but it still felt a bit premature. I'll just 3213: 3203: 1883:It seems to be clear, but I see one exception - 3700:cited in academic work or that is not notable? 711:Please see notice of proposed technical fix at 4728:Hello Fram, this is an automated message from 4353:) are also suspected sock puppet of the same. 3683:for more info on this), then it has a chance. 2698:is not fair use. Similar text can be found in 1815:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Tsar Oak 1797:? The article is about two oaks of that name. 1588:Category:Unreferenced BLPs from September 2006 1245:(original French name of collection). Thanks. 973:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Copyright problems#Quotes 514:http://www.turntablelab.com/cds/0/0/57722.html 4732:to inform you the PROD template you added to 2669:come close to a consensus on the issue? FWiW 2355:reliable sources in existence. Sincerely, -- 8: 4107:Abdul Razak, Abdul Razzaq, Abdul Razak, are 3932:is the correct title, not the one you gave. 1224:Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{ 315:Is my repeated adding of these annoying? – 4545: 4477: 4175: 3526: 1576:, what error are you seeing and where? -- 4566:was updated with a fact from the article 4498:was updated with a fact from the article 4196:was updated with a fact from the article 4054:Given that there are literally dozens of 4000:No sweat. It's a common MOS "violation". 3547:was updated with a fact from the article 2583: 1284:Knowledge (XXG):Article Deletion Squadron 1660:I'll take a look and do whatever I can! 4307:), whom I suspect to be sock puppet of 4036:Could you please explain why you moved 3862:. If you wish to continue the argument 2830:Sorry. But do you mind to explain/help? 2791:. Hopefully this one will go more like 2060:this would be very helpful, thank you. 300:Hello, Fram. You have new messages at 255:Hello, Fram. You have new messages at 210:Hello, Fram. You have new messages at 4764:Learn how to opt out of these messages 3736:A few more references in USENET posts 2280:User:A Nobody/Spaceships of Eve Online 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4749:for community discussion. Thank you, 3695:is another. 06:48, 23 June 2009 (UTC) 1768:New York Yankees minor league players 7: 4736:has been removed. It was removed by 2835:"Don't do that again" etc. Cheers. 359:for past discussions on this topic. 4323:previously blocked for sockpuppetry 4032:Could you please explain further... 1503:guide to writing your first article 4596: 24: 4549: 4481: 4179: 3530: 3410:who may be another sockpuppet.-- 2584: 2475: 2441:Clarification on the closing of 1092:I have a right to ask for help 971:. I have raised the question at 29: 4774:nomination of Cold Y Generation 4417:. I just made an article about 3355:- a page you tagged - because: 3238:relisted for further discussion 2895:I've restored his userspace as 1738:Article with history is now at 3485:privacy as much as possible). 2720:One of Our Aircraft is Missing 1995:something has become notable. 1418:an accurate interpretation of 1169:Please also close the afd for 1: 4632:Talk:Jean-Claude Mézières/GA1 3832:notable what the heck is..... 3807:reliable, independent sources 3634:May i know the reason please? 3364:criteria for speedy deletion 3291:. See you around the wiki. 3199:User:Guido den Broeder/Visit 3188:User:Guido den Broeder/Visit 2753:As you say, problem solved, 1740:User:Yankees10/Austin Romine 1495:criteria for speedy deletion 1354:Donald Featherstone (artist) 1265:British Library, Harley 5776 4825:01:56, 28 August 2009 (UTC) 4795:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 4759:00:00, 25 August 2009 (UTC) 2887:Regarding your deletion of 1520:to the top of the article ( 170:Oh come on, lighten up! :P 4840: 3846:13:46, 2 August 2009 (UTC) 3344:Declined Speedy Deletion: 3285:might be missing something 3193:An editor has asked for a 1627:09:36, 29 April 2009 (UTC) 1612:09:31, 29 April 2009 (UTC) 1603:09:18, 29 April 2009 (UTC) 1581:09:14, 29 April 2009 (UTC) 1569:Template:MonthlyCleanupCat 1564:14:44, 28 April 2009 (UTC) 1462:04:15, 29 April 2009 (UTC) 1448:06:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC) 1432:03:28, 28 April 2009 (UTC) 1402:17:47, 28 April 2009 (UTC) 1384:06:52, 28 April 2009 (UTC) 1369:23:28, 27 April 2009 (UTC) 1342:06:54, 28 April 2009 (UTC) 1327:21:06, 27 April 2009 (UTC) 1299:23:07, 26 April 2009 (UTC) 1277:00:19, 22 April 2009 (UTC) 1255:07:42, 21 April 2009 (UTC) 1187:22:44, 17 April 2009 (UTC) 1157:22:38, 17 April 2009 (UTC) 1130:19:54, 17 April 2009 (UTC) 1114:19:43, 17 April 2009 (UTC) 1079:19:27, 17 April 2009 (UTC) 1052:15:31, 17 April 2009 (UTC) 1024:13:51, 17 April 2009 (UTC) 1004:13:47, 17 April 2009 (UTC) 985:06:58, 17 April 2009 (UTC) 958:15:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC) 930:08:43, 14 April 2009 (UTC) 916:08:42, 14 April 2009 (UTC) 901:08:38, 14 April 2009 (UTC) 886:08:35, 14 April 2009 (UTC) 863:03:54, 14 April 2009 (UTC) 827:07:55, 12 April 2009 (UTC) 801:19:57, 12 April 2009 (UTC) 782:16:14, 11 April 2009 (UTC) 758:18:51, 10 April 2009 (UTC) 707:Template:NYRepresentatives 125:17:06, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 4808:with four tildes (~~~~). 4714:19:31, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 4679:07:01, 17 July 2009 (UTC) 4664:20:42, 16 July 2009 (UTC) 4644:19:46, 16 July 2009 (UTC) 4614:03:36, 12 July 2009 (UTC) 4537:02:52, 10 July 2009 (UTC) 4145:21:16, 16 July 2009 (UTC) 4099:06:31, 30 June 2009 (UTC) 4068:00:09, 30 June 2009 (UTC) 4022:20:43, 30 June 2009 (UTC) 3988:06:32, 30 June 2009 (UTC) 3970:21:10, 29 June 2009 (UTC) 3942:06:48, 24 June 2009 (UTC) 3913:14:29, 28 June 2009 (UTC) 3895:Improvements notice board 3890:15:07, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 3876:14:30, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 3819:19:37, 23 June 2009 (UTC) 3800:17:52, 23 June 2009 (UTC) 3783:17:36, 23 June 2009 (UTC) 3764:17:01, 23 June 2009 (UTC) 3732:16:06, 23 June 2009 (UTC) 3710:15:49, 23 June 2009 (UTC) 3674:01:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC) 3653:12:55, 22 June 2009 (UTC) 3628:09:48, 22 June 2009 (UTC) 3613:09:45, 22 June 2009 (UTC) 3594:15:41, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 3574:02:35, 17 June 2009 (UTC) 3518:07:12, 14 June 2009 (UTC) 3495:09:57, 10 June 2009 (UTC) 3479:09:49, 10 June 2009 (UTC) 3452:09:46, 10 June 2009 (UTC) 3432:09:42, 10 June 2009 (UTC) 3402:Arsenal123456 Sockpuppets 2886: 2590: 2498:Smurfs in other languages 1484:A tag has been placed on 1141:Dan Miller (sportscaster) 768:Congrats! :) You deserve 743:15:00, 9 April 2009 (UTC) 697:09:47, 9 April 2009 (UTC) 683:09:40, 9 April 2009 (UTC) 669:06:52, 9 April 2009 (UTC) 653:22:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC) 629:07:13, 6 April 2009 (UTC) 557:19:56, 4 April 2009 (UTC) 541:16:31, 3 April 2009 (UTC) 492:I can see you've deleted 483:14:44, 3 April 2009 (UTC) 462:19:37, 2 April 2009 (UTC) 446:15:08, 2 April 2009 (UTC) 426:09:23, 2 April 2009 (UTC) 402:08:00, 2 April 2009 (UTC) 369:22:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 344:14:28, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 329:13:20, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 284:13:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 239:13:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 193:12:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 179:11:33, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 158:06:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 144:06:32, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 109:Nocturnes Op. 48 (Chopin) 4785:An editor has nominated 4743:discussing your concerns 4466:06:45, 9 July 2009 (UTC) 4451:06:36, 9 July 2009 (UTC) 4435:21:23, 8 July 2009 (UTC) 4398:13:25, 3 July 2009 (UTC) 4385:13:24, 3 July 2009 (UTC) 4370:13:10, 3 July 2009 (UTC) 4274:06:22, 3 July 2009 (UTC) 4260:18:48, 2 July 2009 (UTC) 4245:14:35, 2 July 2009 (UTC) 4167:03:00, 2 July 2009 (UTC) 4073:There was no article at 3978:I guess I misread it... 3396:11:11, 9 June 2009 (UTC) 3380:11:07, 9 June 2009 (UTC) 3339:12:07, 5 June 2009 (UTC) 3303:10:38, 5 June 2009 (UTC) 3279:10:18, 5 June 2009 (UTC) 3260:10:16, 5 June 2009 (UTC) 3220:15:15, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 3176:13:19, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 3161:13:16, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 3145:13:06, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 3129:13:03, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 3101:13:06, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 3086:13:02, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 3076:12:52, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 3049:06:55, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 3034:20:17, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 3001:12:52, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 2982:12:47, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 2966:12:30, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 2948:12:04, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 2931:11:29, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 2915:10:15, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 2881:08:48, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 2856:08:43, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 2824:00:30, 4 June 2009 (UTC) 2814:Got anything for it? :) 2809:20:01, 31 May 2009 (UTC) 2767:12:21, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 2749:11:58, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 2733:11:26, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 2712:08:24, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 2679:00:53, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 2656:10:14, 20 May 2009 (UTC) 2642:10:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC) 2627:13:44, 19 May 2009 (UTC) 2610:13:22, 19 May 2009 (UTC) 2571:11:49, 19 May 2009 (UTC) 2550:11:21, 19 May 2009 (UTC) 2526:10:53, 19 May 2009 (UTC) 2493:21:37, 15 May 2009 (UTC) 2045:Spaceships of Eve Online 1410:Clarification of comment 1032:ARS Name Change Proposal 4588:Did you know? talk page 4520:Did you know? talk page 4218:Did you know? talk page 3557:Did you know? talk page 3523:DYK for Jacques Brotchi 3153:weburiedoursecretsinthe 2974:weburiedoursecretsinthe 2940:weburiedoursecretsinthe 2907:weburiedoursecretsinthe 2466:23:34, 7 May 2009 (UTC) 2435:07:12, 7 May 2009 (UTC) 2404:06:56, 7 May 2009 (UTC) 2360:06:51, 7 May 2009 (UTC) 2342:06:33, 7 May 2009 (UTC) 2328:06:30, 7 May 2009 (UTC) 2319:06:29, 7 May 2009 (UTC) 2305:02:19, 7 May 2009 (UTC) 2292:19:28, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 2274:19:18, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 2251:19:07, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 2232:18:53, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 2214:18:50, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 2187:18:25, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 2158:12:51, 7 May 2009 (UTC) 2137:06:27, 7 May 2009 (UTC) 2117:20:45, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 2093:18:54, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 2084:18:52, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 2070:17:05, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 2055:16:31, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 2039:18:46, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 2020:21:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 2005:12:42, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 1985:Knowledge (XXG):Be bold 1974:12:36, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 1948:09:15, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 1933:09:14, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 1913:14:04, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 1877:12:38, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 1859:12:25, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 1827:06:31, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 1807:19:55, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 1775:13:57, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 1752:06:33, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 1734:22:26, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 1721:13:56, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 1705:13:51, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 1688:19:03, 2 May 2009 (UTC) 1670:12:16, 2 May 2009 (UTC) 1655:02:14, 2 May 2009 (UTC) 1527:the article's talk page 4804:and please be sure to 4782: 4689:Hi, I added source to 4542:DYK for Yang Guangxian 4389:Thanks For that!!! :) 4153:Political parties move 3659:Nifty Archive deletion 3240:rather than closed as 3232:Hello, I believe that 2594:The Resilient Barnstar 2278:I have userfied it to 2166:asymmetrical standards 1488:requesting that it be 1481: 1201: 1088:Re: NPA and canvassing 815: 523:He is even covered by 298: 253: 208: 4813:articles for deletion 4781: 4721:Removal of PROD from 4474:DYK for Roy McCardell 4049:WP:naming conventions 3501:Michel Vaillant redux 3408:User talk:Man u123456 2413:(even with swearing) 1480: 1239:Collectio Coisliniana 1200: 1094:expanding the article 820:the Kindness campaign 814: 791:third GA as well :-) 297: 252: 207: 42:of past discussions. 4621:Jean-Claude Mézières 4264:Not at all, thanks! 4157:Discussion moved to 3771:Sexuality on the Net 3353:1610s in archaeology 3346:1610s in archaeology 3186:Deletion review for 1486:Kate Bennett, D.D.S. 1472:Kate Bennett, D.D.S. 847:Knowledge (XXG):Lead 378:Is there any reason 350:A personal thank you 302:Drilnoth's talk page 257:Drilnoth's talk page 212:Drilnoth's talk page 132:Cavalleria rusticana 4738:Rascal the Peaceful 4619:GA reassessment of 4172:DYK for Paul Biegel 2389:in the article and 1991:, we have articles 1348:Donald Featherstone 1291:Wheelchair Epidemic 969:copyright violation 617:the discussion page 107:Why did you rename 4806:sign your comments 4783: 3362:Please review the 3319:Charlton-on-Otmoor 3312:Charlton-on-Otmoor 2780:Michel Vaillant GA 1482: 1215:! Kittens promote 1211:) has given you a 1202: 816: 563:RfD nomination of 309:remove this notice 299: 264:remove this notice 254: 219:remove this notice 209: 4787:Cold Y Generation 4767: 4717: 4700:comment added by 4691:Ibrahim Al-Mudhaf 4628:GA Sweeps process 4612: 4594: 4593: 4526: 4525: 4419:José Luis Munuera 4415:Jean-David Morvan 4409:José Luis Munuera 4224: 4223: 3769:conference about 3691:for the archive. 3563: 3562: 3375: 3236:should have been 2889:Guido den Broeder 2869:User talk:MBisanz 2859: 2842:comment added by 2615: 2614: 2561:comment added by 2516:comment added by 2029: 1889:Białowieża Forest 1846:Białowieża Forest 1261:Harley Collection 836:I have nominated 772:more than me. :) 741: 681: 651: 570:I have nominated 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 4831: 4761: 4716: 4694: 4605: 4601: 4553: 4546: 4485: 4478: 4395: 4367: 4241: 4235: 4229: 4183: 4176: 4109:transliterations 4020: 4017: 4011: 3968: 3965: 3959: 3930:The Moon is Blue 3918:The Moon is Blue 3591: 3579:Re: Gdb subpages 3534: 3527: 3475: 3472: 3465: 3462: 3428: 3425: 3418: 3415: 3374: 3371: 3370: 3217: 3211: 3207: 3157: 3154: 3126: 3120: 3073: 3067: 3032: 3029: 2978: 2975: 2944: 2941: 2911: 2908: 2858: 2836: 2588: 2581: 2580: 2573: 2528: 2479: 2463: 2236:The article had 2154: 2148: 2113: 2107: 2027: 1897:Eliza Orzeszkowa 1519: 1518: 1512: 1490:speedily deleted 1319: 1171:Jim Brandstatter 1048: 1047: 719: 677: 647: 614: 596: 398: 393: 388: 312: 267: 222: 190: 176: 113:Nocturnes Op. 48 103:Nocturnes rename 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4839: 4838: 4834: 4833: 4832: 4830: 4829: 4828: 4776: 4734:Crustal tsunami 4726: 4723:Crustal tsunami 4695: 4687: 4651: 4624: 4611: 4599: 4581: 4544: 4513: 4476: 4411: 4391: 4363: 4287: 4239: 4233: 4227: 4211: 4174: 4155: 4034: 4015: 4004: 4001: 3963: 3952: 3949: 3920: 3897: 3856: 3661: 3636: 3601: 3585: 3581: 3551:Jacques Brotchi 3525: 3503: 3473: 3470: 3463: 3460: 3442:may be faster. 3426: 3423: 3416: 3413: 3404: 3372: 3368: 3349: 3315: 3230: 3225:AfD closure of 3209: 3195:deletion review 3191: 3155: 3152: 3124: 3118: 3111: 3071: 3065: 3057: 3027: 3015: 2976: 2973: 2942: 2939: 2909: 2906: 2893: 2837: 2832: 2785:Michel Vaillant 2782: 2666: 2579: 2577:Barnstar notice 2556: 2511: 2500: 2473: 2459: 2446: 2168: 2152: 2146: 2111: 2105: 2048: 1989:in anticipation 1956: 1921: 1789:Can you rename 1787: 1698: 1641:The review for 1639: 1571: 1540:for biographies 1516: 1510: 1509: 1475: 1412: 1350: 1325: 1315: 1308: 1287: 1235: 1230: 1096:as a member of 1090: 1045: 1043: 1034: 965:WP:NOTDIRECTORY 945: 870: 838:Michel Vaillant 834: 832:Michel Vaillant 809: 766: 709: 638: 587: 571: 568: 494:Clutchy Hopkins 490: 488:Clutchy Hopkins 470: 434: 432:For convenience 396: 391: 386: 376: 352: 313: 306: 291: 268: 261: 246: 223: 216: 201: 186: 172: 168: 105: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4837: 4835: 4775: 4769: 4725: 4719: 4686: 4683: 4682: 4681: 4650: 4647: 4623: 4617: 4607: 4592: 4591: 4582:and add it to 4575: 4570:Yang Guangxian 4554: 4543: 4540: 4524: 4523: 4514:and add it to 4507: 4486: 4475: 4472: 4471: 4470: 4469: 4468: 4410: 4407: 4405: 4403: 4402: 4401: 4400: 4286: 4280: 4279: 4278: 4277: 4276: 4252:207.157.121.50 4222: 4221: 4212:and add it to 4205: 4184: 4173: 4170: 4154: 4151: 4150: 4149: 4148: 4147: 4129: 4128: 4127: 4126: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4102: 4101: 4033: 4030: 4029: 4028: 4027: 4026: 4025: 4024: 3993: 3992: 3991: 3990: 3973: 3972: 3919: 3916: 3899:OK, I finally 3896: 3893: 3866:. Thank you -- 3855: 3852: 3851: 3850: 3849: 3848: 3833: 3829: 3697: 3696: 3660: 3657: 3656: 3655: 3635: 3632: 3631: 3630: 3600: 3597: 3580: 3577: 3561: 3560: 3535: 3524: 3521: 3502: 3499: 3498: 3497: 3455: 3454: 3403: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3348: 3342: 3314: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3306: 3305: 3229: 3223: 3190: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3110: 3109:Stop right now 3107: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3056: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3012: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3003: 2892: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2831: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2797:Belgian comics 2795:and less like 2781: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2665: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2613: 2612: 2597: 2596: 2591: 2589: 2578: 2575: 2553: 2552: 2499: 2496: 2472: 2469: 2445: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2411:WP:IDONTLIKEIT 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2201: 2197: 2190: 2189: 2167: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2124: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2072: 2047: 2042: 2023: 2022: 2007: 1955: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1920: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1905:Leszek Jańczuk 1881: 1880: 1879: 1851:Leszek Jańczuk 1841: 1840: 1830: 1829: 1799:Leszek Jańczuk 1786: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1724: 1723: 1697: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1643:Belgian comics 1638: 1637:Belgian comics 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1570: 1567: 1474: 1470:Notability of 1468: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1411: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1394:GentlemanGhost 1387: 1386: 1361:GentlemanGhost 1349: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1320: 1312:Dong Hyun Choi 1307: 1305:Dong hyun choi 1302: 1286: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1269:Leszek Jańczuk 1247:Leszek Jańczuk 1234: 1231: 1221: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1133: 1132: 1089: 1086: 1084: 1082: 1081: 1066: 1065: 1033: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 988: 987: 944: 943:Episode Quotes 938: 937: 936: 935: 934: 933: 932: 869: 866: 842:Belgian comics 833: 830: 808: 805: 804: 803: 765: 762: 761: 760: 708: 705: 704: 703: 702: 701: 700: 699: 637: 632: 567: 561: 560: 559: 489: 486: 469: 466: 465: 464: 433: 430: 429: 428: 375: 372: 351: 348: 347: 346: 305: 292: 290: 287: 260: 247: 245: 242: 215: 202: 200: 197: 196: 195: 167: 164: 163: 162: 161: 160: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 18:User talk:Fram 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4836: 4827: 4826: 4822: 4818: 4814: 4809: 4807: 4803: 4798: 4796: 4792: 4788: 4780: 4773: 4770: 4768: 4765: 4760: 4756: 4752: 4748: 4744: 4739: 4735: 4731: 4724: 4720: 4718: 4715: 4711: 4707: 4703: 4699: 4692: 4685:Adding source 4684: 4680: 4676: 4672: 4668: 4667: 4666: 4665: 4661: 4657: 4648: 4646: 4645: 4641: 4637: 4633: 4629: 4622: 4618: 4616: 4615: 4610: 4604: 4603: 4589: 4585: 4579: 4573: 4572: 4571: 4565: 4564: 4563:Did you know? 4559: 4558:July 12, 2009 4555: 4552: 4548: 4547: 4541: 4539: 4538: 4534: 4530: 4521: 4517: 4511: 4505: 4504: 4503: 4502:Roy McCardell 4497: 4496: 4495:Did you know? 4491: 4490:July 10, 2009 4487: 4484: 4480: 4479: 4473: 4467: 4463: 4459: 4454: 4453: 4452: 4448: 4444: 4439: 4438: 4437: 4436: 4432: 4428: 4424: 4420: 4416: 4408: 4406: 4399: 4396: 4394: 4388: 4387: 4386: 4382: 4378: 4374: 4373: 4372: 4371: 4368: 4366: 4360: 4357: 4354: 4352: 4349: 4346: 4342: 4338: 4335: 4332: 4328: 4324: 4320: 4317: 4314: 4310: 4306: 4303: 4300: 4296: 4290: 4285: 4281: 4275: 4271: 4267: 4263: 4262: 4261: 4257: 4253: 4249: 4248: 4247: 4246: 4242: 4236: 4230: 4219: 4215: 4209: 4203: 4202: 4201: 4195: 4194: 4193:Did you know? 4189: 4185: 4182: 4178: 4177: 4171: 4169: 4168: 4165: 4160: 4152: 4146: 4142: 4138: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4130: 4124: 4119: 4118: 4117: 4116: 4110: 4106: 4105: 4104: 4103: 4100: 4096: 4092: 4088: 4084: 4080: 4076: 4072: 4071: 4070: 4069: 4065: 4061: 4057: 4052: 4050: 4046: 4041: 4039: 4031: 4023: 4018: 4012: 4010: 4008: 3999: 3998: 3997: 3996: 3995: 3994: 3989: 3985: 3981: 3977: 3976: 3975: 3974: 3971: 3966: 3960: 3958: 3956: 3947: 3946: 3945: 3944: 3943: 3939: 3935: 3929: 3926: 3917: 3915: 3914: 3910: 3906: 3902: 3894: 3892: 3891: 3887: 3883: 3878: 3877: 3873: 3869: 3865: 3861: 3853: 3847: 3843: 3839: 3834: 3830: 3827: 3822: 3821: 3820: 3816: 3812: 3808: 3804: 3803: 3802: 3801: 3797: 3793: 3789: 3785: 3784: 3780: 3776: 3772: 3766: 3765: 3761: 3757: 3753: 3749: 3745: 3743: 3739: 3734: 3733: 3729: 3725: 3721: 3717: 3712: 3711: 3707: 3703: 3694: 3690: 3686: 3682: 3678: 3677: 3676: 3675: 3671: 3667: 3658: 3654: 3650: 3646: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3633: 3629: 3625: 3621: 3617: 3616: 3615: 3614: 3610: 3606: 3598: 3596: 3595: 3592: 3590: 3589: 3578: 3576: 3575: 3571: 3567: 3558: 3554: 3553: 3552: 3546: 3545: 3544:Did you know? 3540: 3539:June 17, 2009 3536: 3533: 3529: 3528: 3522: 3520: 3519: 3515: 3511: 3506: 3500: 3496: 3492: 3488: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3477: 3476: 3467: 3466: 3453: 3449: 3445: 3441: 3436: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3430: 3429: 3420: 3419: 3409: 3401: 3397: 3393: 3389: 3384: 3383: 3382: 3381: 3378: 3376: 3365: 3361: 3360: 3354: 3347: 3343: 3341: 3340: 3336: 3332: 3326: 3324: 3320: 3313: 3310: 3304: 3301: 3300: 3296: 3295: 3290: 3286: 3282: 3281: 3280: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3264: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3258: 3257: 3253: 3252: 3247: 3243: 3239: 3235: 3228: 3224: 3222: 3221: 3218: 3216: 3208: 3206: 3200: 3196: 3189: 3185: 3177: 3173: 3169: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3159: 3158: 3148: 3147: 3146: 3142: 3138: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3127: 3121: 3115: 3108: 3102: 3098: 3094: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3084: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3074: 3068: 3062: 3054: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3035: 3030: 3024: 3023: 3021: 3002: 2998: 2994: 2989: 2985: 2984: 2983: 2980: 2979: 2969: 2968: 2967: 2963: 2959: 2955: 2951: 2950: 2949: 2946: 2945: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2928: 2924: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2913: 2912: 2902: 2898: 2890: 2882: 2878: 2874: 2870: 2866: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2857: 2853: 2849: 2845: 2841: 2829: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2806: 2802: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2789:up for review 2786: 2779: 2768: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2746: 2742: 2737: 2736: 2734: 2730: 2726: 2722: 2721: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2709: 2705: 2701: 2696: 2692: 2688: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2680: 2676: 2672: 2664:Use of Quotes 2663: 2657: 2653: 2649: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2639: 2635: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2624: 2620: 2611: 2607: 2603: 2599: 2598: 2595: 2592: 2587: 2582: 2576: 2574: 2572: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2527: 2523: 2519: 2515: 2508: 2504: 2497: 2495: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2478: 2470: 2468: 2467: 2464: 2462: 2457:? Thank you. 2456: 2450: 2444: 2440: 2436: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2420: 2416: 2412: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2401: 2397: 2392: 2388: 2361: 2358: 2354: 2350: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2326: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2303: 2299: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2272: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2248: 2244: 2239: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2230: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2202: 2198: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2188: 2184: 2180: 2179: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2165: 2159: 2156: 2155: 2149: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2125: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2115: 2114: 2108: 2094: 2091: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2053: 2046: 2043: 2041: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2021: 2017: 2013: 2008: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1966:70.105.57.189 1962: 1961:systemic bias 1953: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1847: 1838: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1792: 1784: 1776: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1732: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1703: 1696:Austin Romine 1695: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1674:Sounds good; 1673: 1672: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1636: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1610: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1589: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1579: 1575: 1568: 1566: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1552:for companies 1549: 1545: 1544:for web sites 1541: 1536: 1533: 1529: 1528: 1523: 1515: 1506: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1491: 1487: 1479: 1473: 1469: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1409: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1357: 1355: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1323: 1318: 1313: 1306: 1303: 1301: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1285: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1243:Fonds Coislin 1240: 1233:Fonds Coislin 1232: 1229: 1227: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1199: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1131: 1127: 1123: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1087: 1085: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1067: 1062: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1049: 1038: 1031: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1005: 1001: 997: 992: 991: 990: 989: 986: 982: 978: 974: 970: 966: 962: 961: 960: 959: 955: 951: 942: 939: 931: 927: 923: 919: 918: 917: 913: 909: 904: 903: 902: 898: 894: 890: 889: 888: 887: 883: 879: 875: 867: 865: 864: 860: 856: 852: 848: 843: 839: 831: 829: 828: 825: 821: 818:On behalf of 813: 807:Happy Easter! 806: 802: 798: 794: 790: 786: 785: 784: 783: 779: 775: 771: 763: 759: 755: 751: 747: 746: 745: 744: 739: 735: 731: 727: 723: 718: 714: 706: 698: 694: 690: 686: 685: 684: 680: 676: 672: 671: 670: 666: 662: 657: 656: 655: 654: 650: 646: 642: 636: 633: 631: 630: 626: 622: 619:. Thank you. 618: 612: 608: 604: 600: 595: 591: 586: 582: 578: 574: 566: 562: 558: 554: 550: 545: 544: 543: 542: 538: 534: 530: 526: 521: 519: 515: 511: 507: 503: 499: 495: 487: 485: 484: 480: 476: 467: 463: 459: 455: 450: 449: 448: 447: 443: 439: 431: 427: 423: 419: 415: 410: 406: 405: 404: 403: 400: 399: 394: 389: 381: 373: 371: 370: 367: 364: 363: 358: 349: 345: 341: 337: 336:SarekOfVulcan 333: 332: 331: 330: 326: 322: 318: 310: 303: 296: 288: 286: 285: 281: 277: 273: 265: 258: 251: 243: 241: 240: 236: 232: 228: 220: 213: 206: 198: 194: 191: 189: 183: 182: 181: 180: 177: 175: 165: 159: 155: 151: 147: 146: 145: 141: 137: 133: 129: 128: 127: 126: 122: 118: 117:SarekOfVulcan 114: 110: 102: 96: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4810: 4799: 4784: 4727: 4688: 4652: 4625: 4595: 4568: 4567: 4561: 4527: 4500: 4499: 4493: 4422: 4412: 4404: 4392: 4364: 4361: 4358: 4355: 4347: 4333: 4315: 4301: 4295:Unusualboi90 4291: 4288: 4225: 4198: 4197: 4191: 4188:July 2, 2009 4161:- Altenmann 4156: 4108: 4079:Abdul Razzaq 4056:Abdul Razaqs 4053: 4044: 4042: 4035: 4006: 4005: 3954: 3953: 3931: 3922: 3921: 3898: 3882:Feeling free 3879: 3868:Feeling free 3857: 3825: 3786: 3767: 3750:posting and 3746: 3735: 3713: 3698: 3662: 3637: 3602: 3587: 3586: 3582: 3564: 3549: 3548: 3542: 3507: 3504: 3469: 3459: 3456: 3422: 3412: 3405: 3356: 3350: 3327: 3316: 3297: 3292: 3254: 3249: 3241: 3237: 3231: 3214: 3204: 3192: 3150: 3112: 3058: 3019: 3018: 3013: 2971: 2937: 2904: 2901:do not exist 2900: 2894: 2891:'s userspace 2833: 2783: 2754: 2718: 2667: 2616: 2593: 2563:87.80.121.38 2554: 2518:87.80.121.38 2509: 2505: 2501: 2480: 2474: 2460: 2451: 2447: 2418: 2414: 2390: 2386: 2384: 2352: 2237: 2176: 2169: 2150: 2144: 2109: 2103: 2099: 2049: 2024: 1992: 1988: 1957: 1938:No problem! 1922: 1885:Jagiełło Oak 1845: 1842: 1831: 1788: 1699: 1640: 1572: 1537: 1531: 1525: 1521: 1507: 1483: 1420:your comment 1413: 1358: 1351: 1309: 1288: 1264: 1236: 1226:subst:Kitten 1223: 1203: 1101: 1093: 1091: 1083: 1060: 1050: 1039: 1035: 946: 940: 871: 835: 817: 788: 767: 717:TonyTheTiger 710: 639: 569: 522: 491: 471: 435: 408: 384: 379: 377: 374:Letter focus 360: 353: 314: 269: 224: 187: 173: 169: 106: 75: 43: 37: 4751:SDPatrolBot 4730:SDPatrolBot 4696:—Preceding 4654:creators? 4636:Jezhotwells 4284:this image. 4200:Paul Biegel 4083:Abdul Razak 4081:. And with 4075:Abdul Razaq 3505:Hey there, 3246:WP:NOEFFORT 2838:—Preceding 2557:—Preceding 2512:—Preceding 2428:WP:PRESERVE 2266:WP:PRESERVE 874:Teresa Wong 872:Hello. The 868:Teresa Wong 36:This is an 4578:here's how 4510:here's how 4359:Thank you 4309:NepaliBoy7 4282:Regarding 4208:here's how 3864:click here 3689:notability 3215:discussion 1901:Białowieża 1839:It is all. 1676:the review 1522:just below 1205:TomCat4680 1179:TomCat4680 1149:TomCat4680 1106:TomCat4680 734:WP:CHICAGO 95:Archive 25 87:Archive 20 82:Archive 19 76:Archive 18 70:Archive 17 65:Archive 16 60:Archive 15 4529:BorgQueen 4458:Oddeivind 4427:Oddeivind 4341:UserNepal 4289:Hello!!! 3588:Wizardman 3566:BorgQueen 3464:Legendary 3417:Legendary 3331:Motacilla 3289:let it go 3119:rootology 3066:rootology 2755:this time 2687:WP:NOTDIR 2536:and gave 2534:unsourced 2481:Thank you 2471:Thank you 2424:potential 2200:weakened. 1893:Quo Vadis 1772:Yankees10 1731:Yankees10 1702:Yankees10 1548:for bands 908:Cyclotron 878:Cyclotron 635:Oda Jaune 573:Zor, 1997 565:Zor, 1997 188:C.U.T.K.D 174:C.U.T.K.D 166:April 1st 4817:Law Lord 4791:deletion 4710:contribs 4698:unsigned 4609:contribs 4584:DYKSTATS 4516:DYKSTATS 4351:contribs 4337:contribs 4319:contribs 4305:contribs 4228:Giants27 4214:DYKSTATS 4137:Geo Swan 4060:Geo Swan 4047:meant. 4045:probably 3854:Response 3792:NiftyOrg 3775:NiftyOrg 3756:NiftyOrg 3724:NiftyOrg 3702:NiftyOrg 3666:NiftyOrg 3474:Attacker 3427:Attacker 3406:I found 3125:equality 3083:Thatcher 3072:equality 2852:contribs 2840:unsigned 2691:WP:UNDUE 2617:Thanks. 2559:unsigned 2538:WP:UNDUE 2514:unsigned 2432:A Nobody 2357:A Nobody 2325:A Nobody 2302:A Nobody 2271:A Nobody 2229:A Nobody 2090:A Nobody 2052:A Nobody 2012:Greenman 1795:Tsar Oak 1785:Tsar Oak 1454:Flatscan 1424:Flatscan 1359:Thanks, 1217:WikiLove 996:Ambaryer 963:I cited 950:Ambaryer 824:A Nobody 525:allmusic 317:Drilnoth 307:You can 289:Talkback 272:Drilnoth 262:You can 244:Talkback 227:Drilnoth 217:You can 199:Talkback 4656:Nyttend 3925:WP:CAPS 3901:started 3299:Milenko 3256:Milenko 3113:Go here 2988:WP:NPOV 2844:Chg1985 2787:is now 2461:Chillum 1791:Dąb Car 1414:Hi. Is 1175:WP:SNOW 1145:WP:SNOW 851:WP:LEAD 738:WP:LOTM 590:protect 585:history 475:Politis 438:Politis 407:But it 39:archive 4423:speedy 4339:) and 4327:FatDuy 4123:Pinyin 4009:dokter 3957:dokter 3620:MvdB21 3605:MvdB21 3599:Please 3440:WP:AIV 3373:le_Jrb 3359:WP:AFD 3323:Otmoor 3242:delete 3205:Aitias 3156:garden 2977:garden 2954:WP:BAN 2943:garden 2910:garden 2700:WP:NFC 2695:WP:NPS 2685:Well, 2634:Stifle 2602:Stifle 1925:JMalky 1609:Pascal 1578:Pascal 1573:In re 1556:tedder 1532:speedy 1514:hangon 1213:kitten 1102:trying 1098:WP:ARS 1064:forum. 1046:Yeller 764:Hergé‎ 675:Hiding 645:Hiding 621:Anshuk 594:delete 533:Netrat 414:WP:BRD 366:(talk) 4702:Xetad 4393:Hitro 4365:Hitro 4163:: --> 4087:WP:NC 3923:From 3826:known 3681:WP:RS 3022:levse 2799:. :) 2793:Hergé 2031:Hobit 1993:after 1793:into 1550:, or 1322:hablo 1317:pablo 1241:into 941:Chuck 611:views 603:watch 599:links 397:Space 362:Tavix 134:not. 16:< 4821:talk 4797:"). 4755:talk 4706:talk 4675:talk 4671:Fram 4660:talk 4640:talk 4602:anaɢ 4533:talk 4462:talk 4447:talk 4443:Fram 4431:talk 4381:talk 4377:Fram 4345:talk 4331:talk 4313:talk 4299:talk 4270:talk 4266:Fram 4256:talk 4141:talk 4095:talk 4091:Fram 4064:talk 4016:Talk 3984:talk 3980:Fram 3964:Talk 3938:talk 3934:Fram 3909:talk 3886:talk 3872:talk 3842:talk 3838:JanT 3815:talk 3811:Fram 3796:talk 3788:This 3779:talk 3760:talk 3752:this 3748:This 3742:here 3740:and 3738:here 3728:talk 3720:this 3716:this 3706:talk 3693:This 3685:this 3670:talk 3649:talk 3645:Fram 3624:talk 3609:talk 3570:talk 3514:talk 3491:talk 3487:Fram 3448:talk 3444:Fram 3392:talk 3388:Fram 3335:talk 3275:talk 3271:Fram 3267:WP:N 3172:talk 3168:Fram 3141:talk 3137:Fram 3097:talk 3093:Fram 3061:here 3045:talk 3041:Fram 3028:Talk 2997:talk 2993:Fram 2962:talk 2958:Fram 2927:talk 2923:Fram 2877:talk 2873:Fram 2848:talk 2820:talk 2805:talk 2763:talk 2759:Bzuk 2745:talk 2741:Fram 2729:talk 2725:Bzuk 2708:talk 2704:Fram 2675:talk 2671:Bzuk 2652:talk 2648:Fram 2638:talk 2623:talk 2619:Fram 2606:talk 2567:talk 2546:talk 2542:Fram 2522:talk 2489:talk 2485:Ikip 2400:talk 2396:Fram 2349:here 2338:talk 2334:Fram 2315:talk 2311:Fram 2298:cake 2288:talk 2284:Fram 2258:here 2247:talk 2243:Fram 2210:talk 2206:Fram 2183:talk 2145:Banj 2133:talk 2129:Fram 2104:Banj 2080:talk 2076:Fram 2066:talk 2062:Ikip 2035:talk 2016:talk 2001:talk 1997:Fram 1981:WP:N 1970:talk 1944:talk 1940:Fram 1929:talk 1919:GUST 1909:talk 1873:talk 1869:Fram 1855:talk 1823:talk 1819:Fram 1803:talk 1748:talk 1744:Fram 1717:talk 1713:Fram 1684:talk 1666:talk 1662:Fram 1651:talk 1623:talk 1619:Fram 1599:talk 1595:Fram 1560:talk 1493:the 1458:talk 1444:talk 1440:Fram 1428:talk 1416:this 1398:talk 1380:talk 1376:Fram 1365:talk 1338:talk 1334:Fram 1295:talk 1273:talk 1251:talk 1209:talk 1183:talk 1173:per 1153:talk 1143:per 1126:talk 1122:Fram 1110:talk 1075:talk 1071:Fram 1020:talk 1016:Fram 1000:talk 981:talk 977:Fram 954:talk 926:talk 922:Fram 912:talk 897:talk 893:Fram 882:talk 859:talk 797:talk 793:Fram 778:talk 770:this 754:talk 750:Fram 693:talk 689:Fram 665:talk 661:Fram 625:talk 607:logs 581:talk 577:edit 553:talk 549:Fram 537:talk 479:talk 458:talk 454:Fram 442:talk 422:talk 418:Fram 392:From 387:Them 340:talk 154:talk 150:Fram 140:talk 136:Fram 121:talk 4772:AfD 4747:AfD 4556:On 4488:On 4186:On 3905:BOZ 3537:On 3510:BOZ 3471:Sky 3461:The 3424:Sky 3414:The 3321:to 3294:Zab 3251:Zab 3210:// 3197:of 3055:FYI 2816:BOZ 2801:BOZ 2391:not 2387:not 2353:all 2262:IGN 2178:DGG 2143:-- 2102:-- 1680:BOZ 1647:BOZ 1586:On 1267:). 855:BOZ 774:BOZ 730:bio 715:.-- 380:not 111:to 4823:) 4757:) 4712:) 4708:• 4677:) 4662:) 4642:) 4590:. 4560:, 4535:) 4522:. 4492:, 4464:) 4456:-- 4449:) 4433:) 4383:) 4321:) 4272:) 4258:) 4243:) 4220:. 4190:, 4143:) 4097:) 4066:) 4040:? 4019:• 4013:• 4002:— 3986:) 3967:• 3961:• 3950:— 3940:) 3911:) 3888:) 3874:) 3844:) 3817:) 3798:) 3781:) 3773:. 3762:) 3744:. 3730:) 3708:) 3672:) 3651:) 3626:) 3611:) 3572:) 3559:. 3541:, 3516:) 3493:) 3450:) 3394:) 3337:) 3277:) 3174:) 3143:) 3116:. 3099:) 3047:) 3031:• 3025:• 3016:— 2999:) 2964:) 2929:) 2897:U2 2879:) 2871:. 2854:) 2850:• 2822:) 2807:) 2765:) 2747:) 2735:. 2731:) 2710:) 2681:. 2677:) 2654:) 2640:) 2625:) 2608:) 2569:) 2548:) 2524:) 2491:) 2419:to 2415:to 2402:) 2340:) 2317:) 2290:) 2249:) 2238:no 2212:) 2185:) 2153:oi 2135:) 2112:oi 2082:) 2068:) 2037:) 2018:) 2003:) 1972:) 1946:) 1931:) 1911:) 1875:) 1857:) 1825:) 1805:) 1750:) 1742:. 1719:) 1686:) 1668:) 1653:) 1625:) 1601:) 1593:. 1562:) 1546:, 1542:, 1517:}} 1511:{{ 1505:. 1460:) 1446:) 1430:) 1400:) 1382:) 1367:) 1340:) 1297:) 1275:) 1253:) 1185:) 1155:) 1128:) 1112:) 1077:) 1061:If 1044:Ol 1022:) 1002:) 983:) 975:. 956:) 928:) 914:) 899:) 884:) 861:) 799:) 789:my 780:) 756:) 740:) 695:) 667:) 643:. 627:) 609:| 605:| 601:| 597:| 592:| 588:| 583:| 579:| 555:) 539:) 516:, 512:, 508:, 481:) 468:OK 460:) 444:) 424:) 416:. 409:is 342:) 327:) 323:• 282:) 278:• 237:) 233:• 156:) 142:) 123:) 91:→ 4819:( 4766:) 4762:( 4753:( 4704:( 4673:( 4658:( 4638:( 4606:/ 4600:ʨ 4598:r 4580:) 4576:( 4531:( 4512:) 4508:( 4460:( 4445:( 4429:( 4379:( 4348:· 4343:( 4334:· 4329:( 4316:· 4311:( 4302:· 4297:( 4268:( 4254:( 4240:s 4237:| 4234:c 4231:( 4210:) 4206:( 4164:t 4139:( 4093:( 4062:( 4007:E 3982:( 3955:E 3936:( 3907:( 3884:( 3870:( 3840:( 3813:( 3794:( 3777:( 3758:( 3726:( 3704:( 3668:( 3647:( 3622:( 3607:( 3568:( 3512:( 3489:( 3446:( 3390:( 3369:A 3333:( 3273:( 3170:( 3139:( 3122:/ 3095:( 3069:/ 3043:( 3020:R 2995:( 2960:( 2925:( 2875:( 2846:( 2818:( 2803:( 2769:. 2761:( 2743:( 2727:( 2706:( 2673:( 2650:( 2636:( 2621:( 2604:( 2565:( 2544:( 2520:( 2487:( 2398:( 2336:( 2313:( 2286:( 2245:( 2208:( 2181:( 2151:b 2147:e 2131:( 2110:b 2106:e 2078:( 2064:( 2033:( 2014:( 1999:( 1968:( 1942:( 1927:( 1907:( 1871:( 1853:( 1821:( 1801:( 1746:( 1715:( 1682:( 1664:( 1649:( 1621:( 1597:( 1558:( 1456:( 1442:( 1426:( 1396:( 1378:( 1363:( 1336:( 1324:. 1293:( 1271:( 1249:( 1207:( 1181:( 1151:( 1124:( 1108:( 1073:( 1018:( 998:( 979:( 952:( 924:( 910:( 895:( 880:( 857:( 795:( 776:( 752:( 736:/ 732:/ 728:/ 726:c 724:/ 722:t 720:( 691:( 679:T 663:( 649:T 623:( 613:) 575:( 551:( 535:( 477:( 456:( 440:( 420:( 338:( 325:C 321:T 319:( 304:. 280:C 276:T 274:( 270:– 259:. 235:C 231:T 229:( 225:– 214:. 152:( 138:( 119:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index