User talk:FunkMonk/Archive 8

2828:

image to be anatomically correct. It shows the typical mistake of making the torso profile much too curved or domed. In reality it was very flat. To maintain proportions, the limbs are then made much too long. Now it seems as if the forelimbs and the hindlimbs were close when in fact they stood well apart. Between them the belly should protrude to an extreme degree. The belly sides were more than twice as far removed from the midline as the limbs were. So the animal looked like a gigantic pillbox on stumpy legs positioned at the extreme front and rear. Very bizarre. Paul has a revealing picture of it in his Field Guide on page 235. Minor mistakes in our image include: a too short neck; the cervical half-rings being made continuous with the body plates and not covering the lower neck sides; body plates forming an continuous shield over the total length (in fact there were interstitial bands between and below the main segments, as shown by the

2790:! It is in this context I'd like to make a special request of you. Figure 6 of the Arbour 2013 study combines a lot of images. In the Dutch article I've written separate sections about the back of the head, the palate and the lower jaw. Therein lies my difficulty, for to illustrate them I am in need of images F, D and I of figure 6 being made separate pictures. I understand this is a lot of trouble for what might not be the most spectacular parts of the skeleton (then again, there is a certain rarity value), but if you might find the time, I would be much obliged. 4642:. New users have an interface that makes suggestions on articles to edit, and this was about the only random article that wasn't a battleship, a storm, or an obscure financial term offered in dozens of suggestions. I did a google scholar search and found some sources (not rocket science), but I am not knowledgeable on rhinos,or mammals in general, and I think this article should be redirected to a higher taxon, with the information about it and a couple of closely related species/genera, as the genus is poorly defined, and relatively unknown. 3765: 2501:, it only states what it might be related to, or that it might be on some step of domestication. That does not warrant a taxobox (only for valid taxa), and hardly even an article separate from the "parent" article. The text is so ambiguous that it could mean anything, but it does not make any attempt to conclude what it actually was. If the article is kept, it needs to be rewritten, so it doesn't indicate that this is a valid species. No taxobox, and the wording must be changed. 31: 771: 4420: 2884:;o). The Tamura drawing is better, but shares the usual mistakes: the torso should be much flatter (with the highest point on the anterior sacral shield, not the shoulders); the limbs are much too long; the belly does not protrude between them; the shoulder osteoderm is too tall (in reality base length would have exceeded its height); and the neck rings should be made of six instead of four sections (the 2634: 4332: 1607:'s appearance and how she would have been raised should be included in the article? There aren't citations for her specifically, but they are present in the Passenger Pigeon article. Once I've wrapped up the Passenger Pigeon draft, I'm going to add a section at the beginning explaining the decline in wild Passenger Pigeons with a link to the main article. Thanks. 4184: 3897: 1958:: after our discussion above, I found out by reading Mortimer's website that the original left thighbone, today specimen GSM 109560, was of a theropod also (I should have remembered that from reading Benson, but had quite forgotten). It is the bone pictured in Tabula I of the Owen 1861 paper. It might be a nice addition to the 1804:(obviously, it would better to categorise it as such). Another rare illustration might be the juvenile or Philpot specimen. Lastly, I think the foot would be a great addition, if only for its aesthetic appeal. But, of course, any image is welcome. If necessary, I'll provide a full osteology to accommodate them all ;o). 4660:

Hey, that is really good work actually! Exactly what we need more of! All valid genera are entitled to their own articles, so if you are interested in doing more like these, you're welcome! They will not be redirected. There is a much larger chance of an article growing and becoming informative if it

442:

article, although I have not posted the "After the protests" section yet. I would really appreciate any suggestions you could give me about the content I've posted thus far or things you think I should add. I've had some trouble finding information specific to women in the Syrian civil war, so if you

4947:

You removed my request for a citation on the statement that "It is presumed that the Dodo became flightless because of the ready availability of abundant food sources and a relative absence of predators on Mauritius." You said that "It is in the article". I couldn't find the part of the article that

4359:

remains show the Dodo was about one 1 metre (3.3 feet) tall and may have weighed 10–18 kg (22–40 lb). It is presumed that the Dodo became flightless because of the ready availability of abundant food sources and a relative absence of predators on Mauritius. The first recorded mention of the Dodo was

1144:

Looks good to me. As for sources, I have quite a few books about extinct birds, and there is also a website which collects a lot of PDFs of old papers about extinct birds, so it was easy to obtain (which is also why extinct birds is what I've mostly been working on recently). I think it'll be harder

3781:

So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught

3315:

over whether to move "Han solo (trilobite)" to "Han (trilobite)". We mostly agree (i.e., per Knowledge (XXG) policy concerning monotypic genus articles), though, I think we might be better served if we had another point of view in the discussion, perhaps as a much-need Devil's Advocate? Thank you

2808:

No problem, I was almost going to ask you what images were needed myself, because there is so much stuff jumbled together in that paper that it's hard to keep track. Could I perhaps combine more than one picture, so that we get more included? For example, i and j show the same specimen in different

1905:

Well, Owen had a theropod claw pictured next to the knee joint. Both were apparently part of the collection of Henry Norris and might well have come from the same individual, so they can be presented as a whole, with the caption explaining the situation. While admiring your new additions, it struck

1129:

Well its not set in stone but if we did decide to do it, I was thinking that it would be divided into Taxonomy/etymology (including evolution), Biology (including physical description, behavior and ecology), History/extinction and Possible de-extinction. Would be able to find more info like you did

561:

Monk, First, thanks for your edits and improvements of my contributions on the Dilophosaurus, Cryolophosaurus, and Coelophysis pages. Second, my friend has original paleoart (e.g. life reconstructions and fossil sketches) and I'm wondering if you can direct me to the guidelines for introducing and

505:

The problem is that even on that page, it is original research, not what the sources actually say. The same sources are used in the Dodo article, and they do not state anything about problems with the position, someone has added that to Knowledge (XXG) because that is their own interpretation. Read

486:

are the sources). At present, the Dodo article glosses over the fact that scientists are not completely agreed that the Nicobar pigeon is the closest living relative to the dodo. This is laid out well on the pigeon's page. Either this needs to be explained fully on the dodo page (which would affect

3809:

is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your

4590:

Hey I was wondering if you could help me, I'm trying to write a paper on the Great Auk and want to use the quotation I think you added to that page about the slaughter of the last Great Auks. I was wondering where you found the quotation, as I can't find the text of Garefowl Books by John Wolley

2827:

Combining I and J is an excellent proposal! It might also be worthwhile to make C a separate image because it shows a very informative anterior view. Indeed you correctly noticed that — though I appreciate its artistic merit — I did not consider the "Euplocephalus size comparison with human.png"

1822:

Yes, I was searching for the knee in vain, but couldn't find it. Could you link to the location of those images? In general, if you find images of interesting specimens on those sites (especially animals we don't have images of yet), feel free to ask me to upload them, because half of the time I

3833:

If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your

928:

You're very welcome! It just occurred to me I've never expressed appreciation for all the great people I've been rubbing shoulders with the most for all these years, if you guys weren't here, it wouldn't be fun! As for what I've been working on here, mainly recently extinct birds, but also gave

3818:

The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed,

3110:

It has far less than the infoboxes of the Spanish, Greeks, Romans, Germans, Italians, Russians and British. Controversial? How so? A Saudi King is just as important to the history of a culture as a Spanish Conquistador, a Greek soldier, a Roman general, a German Nazi regime rocket scientist, a

2832:

holotype); the squamosal horn being larger than the quadratojugal horn; insufficient musculature of the arm; too small upper osteoderm on the upper arm; too high osteoderms on the back; osteoderms that are conical instead of keeled; impossible protraction of the left leg (the belly would have

152:

Heheh, "stuff" er bare for sjov... Kan godt lide når tingene er lidt labyrintiske (og så kan folk heller ikke se når jeg redigerer siden på deres watchlist). Og ja, jeg synes hele tiden folk beklager sig over der mangler reviewers, så det her kunne i det mindste løse lidt af problemet. Har du

3719:

Thank you, that's good. I was stimulated to work on the article by finding a book, "The Puffin" by Boag and Alexander, in my local library. It is a most interesting bird and as a result I am completely reorganising the article. Fortunately, it does not seem to have persistent vandalism nor a

3001: 1539:

Yes please. Hopefully the article will grow long enough to support both pictures, and I like the stuffed bird more than the picture in the article. What year is that picture from (pre-early 1950s?)? Also, I dropped a note on the WP:Birds talk page I'd like you to look at. Thank you so much.

1489: 1686:

Either yes, or he never left: What I do remember of "megafauna man" is that his IPs were centered in Indonesia, and this new(er) vandal, who's IPs are also centered in Indonesia, has a similar MO, though mostly putting in nonexistent or inappropriate categories of "Extinct animals of

1484:

I can upload it if it is interesting. As for the colour image, there seems to be very little info on the authorship, so I'm not sure, but I'll see if I can find something comparable. On Whitman's bird, there are a couple more images, but they are undated, apart from the year

2104:

Yeah, working on the mammoth articles, I've learned that general descriptions are more often found in "popular" works, such as books, not in scientific papers. I think there's a good book about extinct large cats by Alan Turner and Mauricio Anton (Big Cats and their Fossil

1795:

image! As you pointed out, there are quite a number of other images from Owen that could be added, so I gave this a little thought. One of the most interesting would, paradoxically, be the knee joint that was the original lectotype, precisely because it is actually not of

4257:

on July 6, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director

3770:

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and

4054:

Well again, since it is a mere style issue, not about content, it doesn't have much bearing on the GA process. If it had been a FAC, it would had been another story. Also, it should had been discussed on the talk page (which is empty), not scattered across the history.

1486: 1642:

Do you remember a super annoying anonymous editor who drove everyone to distraction by tacking on various iterations of "megafauna" categories onto articles about any animal over 2 pounds, while refusing to communicate in any way? Nicknamed "megafauna man," I

1906:

me that they are of a better quality than the image of the skull you once uploaded. I think the publication then used as a source, itself was based on some old photocopy. This might be the ideal occasion to replace it with an image directly taken from Owen!--

1482: 138:

Ja det ville spare mange reviewer-kræfter hvis vi havde en simpel integreret kvalitetsevalueringsproces. Jeg brugte denne her i tilfølde af at du ville frabede dig danske hilsner på din rigtige talkpage, nu du kun skriver din nationalitet her under "stuff".

4372:

introduced during that time. The last widely accepted sighting of a Dodo was in 1662. Its extinction within only about a century of its discovery called attention to the previously unrecognised problem of human involvement in the disappearance of entire

1725:

I remember we were able to stem his unconstructive editing by range-blocking the current set of IPs he was using. In the meantime, I put a request to have Largest Organisms permanently semi-protected in the hopes of putting at least one crimp in his

3574: 5139: 2745:

I have noticed a lot of anti-syria, pro-terrorist editors there, but they hardly get away with any propaganda due to your watch and a few others that have balanced the article. its still far from truth, but it could be worse. keep it up my friend.

2942:

Success with your exams! I too would say that the null hypothesis for dromaeosaurids is four full length wings :o). But with just two teeth to go on, you can let your fantasy run free. Being a Danish dinosaur it must have had an underside in

1022:

Hi Funk, standard practice is that parentheses are only used if the name is not the original name or combination used by the original author, for example if the genus and species were named by different people. So in the taxobox, it would be

4009:

Hello, I was just wondering in regards to your recent approval of Pornography as a good article: doesn't the green logo usually appear on the article page as well as the talk page, or have you simply you got around to adding it yet? Thanks.

3157:. You recently moved the DAB page, but your edit summary suggested you wanted to reserve 'Koreanosaurus' for the animal itself: "The name should be used for the proper name". In response to the technical move request, I went ahead and moved 279:

Thanks for the edit. I completely agree and understand that D. breedorum is now considered to be a synonym for D. wetherilli. I tried to make the change myself but I destroyed the table twice, so I gave up. I appreciate the help.

3802: 2525:

If you want to talk about the involvement of Israel please do so in the section created about Israel. Your comments about Israel on the discussion about Iraq and Turkey are irrelevant to that topic.Pug6666 21:28, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

3835: 3806: 3798: 3790: 3165:. I hope this is what you had in mind. It looks like the ornithopod is formally named and the other animal is not. That would be a reason to make the ornithopod be the primary meaning. If this needs fixing let me know. Thanks, 2084:

article. I can't find very many RS that give a straightforward description of the animal's body plan. It's mostly functional anatomy. I plan on separating Descriptions from Paleobiology. Would you be interesting in working on

3838:. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. 5171:

Ok cool, I figured you would know or at least easily find, whether the specimen was the same as one in the article, where I would have spent a good hour before I could be 'fairly sure'. I'll forget this for now then. Cheers

1001:

I thought about it, but the caption says "after Mutterlose J (1997); modified).", so I'm not sure if the figure is merely based on that, or if it is modified directly from it? If the latter, I'm not sure the license fits...

3220: 3582: 3850:

A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit

850: 367:

No problem! We had many interesting images lying around for years which there wasn't room for until you expanded the articles. Now I think it looks really good, with relevant images illustrating each section.

3557: 2967:, it is it ok? I'm not sure what the plates under the neck looks like, do you know of a photo? And I've uploaded the photos from the Plos paper, with a few related images included. 11:27, 26 May 2013 (UTC) 4355:. Its external appearance is evidenced only by 17th-century paintings and written accounts that vary considerably, so its exact appearance is a mystery. Little is certain about its habitat and behaviour. 1299:

Heh, I hope it won't affect my actual assignment as much as my conduct here. Perhaps I've unconsciously written about yetis and mokele-mbembe instead of design-driven innovation and experience economy...

4661:

already exists, because most people with useful knowledge who are unfamiliar with Knowledge (XXG) may not know how to start a new one, so the fact that it is already there makes it easier to add to.

4323: 3455:

I have some books that discuss its appearance, behavior, which is what I'll start with (a biology section). Maybe you can do its taxonomy/evolution. Google scholar yields many papers on that.

2809:

views. I'll upload soon. Also, I see you've written about inaccuracies in the captions of the life restorations in the Dutch wiki, could you elaborate on them her,e so I can fix those images?

688: 2418:

Heheh, thanks, that explains it! There are a lot of nice images on Flickr, too bad most of the photographers know nothing about dinosaurs, leaving us to figure out what they photographed...

1525:, and almost uploaded it, but I didn't know it was Martha. It is quite grizzly, but I think it would be interesting to show. Should I upload it, and perhaps the other image of her stuffed? 121:

Haha, hej! Ja, og jeg synes ligefrem at den "almindelige" FAC proces kunne have sådan en mulighed; i stedet for "oppose" kunne man for eksempel sige "promote to GA". Og forresten er det her

3221:

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1502-3885.2012.00267.x/abstract;jsessionid=64743C68F06DC1CE760401C9EB1E3D07.d02t02?deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=&userIsAuthenticated=false

4488:

Heheh, yeah, scavenging the net for free palaeontology images has become a bit of an unhealthy obsession for me... I used to cut out dinosaur images from magazines when I was a kid. OCD?

482:, if you read what I put, I'm not "referring to a Knowledge (XXG) page as a source", I'm simply noting that a fuller explanation is given on the other page. Which it is, with references ( 2666:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1101:

Would be cool, I don't have any books about it, but I guess Google Scholar could help us out. I've uploaded some nice contemporary paintings and photos of it the last couple of years.

5157:

Hi, the specimen already is mentioned last under the frozen specimens section. The blood thing is a bit overhyped, and needs actual scientific study before anything can be concluded.

4909: 2906:), so it's fun... Niels Bonde, one of the describers, likes the drawings! But he even thinks the one I've used in the Wiki article is too underfeathered, and preferred this version: 107:

Jeg har set dig rundt omkring på wikien men aldrig opdaget at du var Dansker. Jeg er glad for at du er enig med mig i at FAR og GAN ligesågodt kan klares i en proces. Hav det godt!

4675:

I didn't create it, just added the sources and reworded it a bit. So, it should remain as its own article? Okay. I don't really know mammals, and I probably won't edit any more. --

4109:

Thanks! And thanks for your GA review. Took a while before I got myself together and nominated it, but was waiting for a paper that perhaps didn't exist/won't be published soon...

244:

Thank you for doing the GA review of Brolga. For some reason I didn't see it mentioned on my watchlist and I didn't know it had been concluded, so I am a bit late in thanking you!

889:

I was thinking of GA maybe, but I'm not too comfortable with working on articles that are basically written already (I prefer writing them from scratch). So I'll probably pass.

487:

the balance of the article) or linked to at the pigeon's page (as I did) - or the dodo's article cannot be considered accurate to the standard expected from a featured article.

986:

images! Which reminds me ;o), did you also upload the map of Lower Cretaceous Europe shown in the PLoS ONE article? It would be very useful for quite a few dinosaur subjects.--

418:

Two passages under Gold Edition and downloadable content end without citations. Marketing and PlayStation Home also end without citations. That is a problem for verifiability.

4315: 3989:

That is Linnaeus original abbreviated version. It is not the full name. He abbreviated many of his names, but they are not spelled that way today. I will make a note of this.

2662:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

4322:. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at 4717:

and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

4689:

I know, but you improved it a lot. And you didn't make any mistakes, so if you're bored some day and stumble over anything else you think needs fixing, you now know how to.

4319: 400: 2833:

blocked the forward movement); and the handle of the tail club being too fat and not differentiated from the tail base. So, quite a few things would have to be adapted...--

3558:

http://books.google.dk/books?id=iqwEYkTDZf4C&pg=PA537&dq=quagga&hl=da&sa=X&ei=EJGvUbrtNuzriQLdtIDwCw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=quagga&f=false

1257:

For whatever reason, I didn't see you had already reverted him, so I ended up reverting you... Twice. Mistake, didn't get much sleep, have an assignment due for tomorrow.

3789:

The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet

1115:

There appears to be quite a bit of information on its taxonomy, genetics and the quagga project. However, I can't find to much on its history/extinction and behavior.

2450:). Further as I see the article is well sourced. If you don't think so its your duty to point out its flaws and avoid statements like "Read the source and find out." 1415: 3782:

how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers:

2651:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1058:

Thanks a lot, seems I'll have to go and fix some articles I've worked on accordingly... What if the new combination is accepted as valid, what is shown then? See

1043:

is not generally cited unless for clarification in the text, I guess to avoid people getting their names attached to species just by shuffling the genera around.

1459:

article, do you know of any available photographs that are definitely Martha (or definitely of Whitman's first birds)? Also, do you know if the color picture at

4825: 1411: 5142:

all related to the same thread. Presumably the blood sample stuff is new (but maybe that's just the hype?) and ought to find a place somewhere in the article.

2731:

Well, it is too frustrating to post there more than a few times a week, yikes... I'm pretty baffled by the amount of POV-warring westerners the page attracts.

2551:

Nope, the point is very relevant. Israel has killed more Syrian soldiers than either Turkey or Jordan, more than both together even. Context is important, no?

1672:

Is he back? I'm not sure if I remember him specifically, there have been so many weirdo IPs with ridiculous agendas that they all blend together in my head...

4948:

said who presumed this nor indeed anything supporting the reason for it becoming flightless. Perhaps you can point me to the appropriate part of the article.

3805:. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the 2655:

if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

4835: 4821: 4560: 4152: 3793:. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre 3374: 3281: 1425: 1194: 736: 610:. Like to drop in? I feel it is hardly concerned with the article, more likely about some problems in the given file data. Would be good to have you there. 356: 296: 3364: 3095:

It is too much, and we need to discuss every single choice. Many of the choices are too controversial. Saudi Kings? Why on Earth would we want one there?

2591: 3180:

There is only one animal officially named this, therefore I moved it to make way for a future move, when the other animal gets a proper scientific name.

2370:

Yup, I fixed it on Commons after I saw your edit summary, nice catch! Also, there are other images of that skull on the web, with correct identification:

4645:

Is this something you are capable of doing? I saw your name in a discussion at the mammals project about Knowledge (XXG) prehistoric mammals. Thanks. --

4142: 3691:

And nice to see this article get attention, my mother is Faroese (they love that bird, it also tastes nice), and I have a stuffed specimen on my shelf.

2902:

Cool, I'll fix these things in a few days, I'm quite busy right now, I have an exam on thursday, but luckily my project is about designing a dinosaur (

2467:

There is no indication that this is a valid species or even separate breed, not even the source used, therefore there is no reason the article exists.

1508:

has a picture of Martha mid-skinning. Do you think a picture of her complete internal makeup is of interest, or too out there for the article? Thanks.

3360: 3271: 2671: 4138: 726: 2106: 814:

Thanks for the barnstar, it was a pleasure working on it. And yes, despite some of his serious mistakes/miscalculations, I think so too. Cheers! --

4550: 3267: 2109: 1184: 722: 652:

It's quick work, for many editors are visiting the FAC. Anyway, thanks for your fast response. I believe this issue would soon be resolved now.

4254: 2847:

Ouch, I'm pretty sure I can save the drawing, but the 3D rendering will be harder (if possible at all) to fix. Do they have the same problems?

4546: 3776: 1180: 4831: 4556: 4148: 3370: 3277: 1421: 1190: 732: 5186:

That one in your link is not the one with the blood, but a juvenile found a few years ago, it is also mentioned in the article, as "Yuka".

3846:. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. 5135: 4977:

Thanks for the citation. I'll continue the discussion on the article's talk page to make it easier for others to join in if they want to.

393: 1859:

Tabula II is the knee joint and Tabula III the Philpot specimen. They are pages 214 and 216 of the pdf, if you upload the colour version.

401:

Inline citations are not decorative elements, and GA does not have any "one citation per sentence" or "one citation per paragraph" rules.

2112:, also by Alan Turner and Mauricio Anton, which gives short description of many extinct mammals. I'll see if I can help with anything. 2648: 308:

No problem, and now that I think of it, it should actually be listed as a synonym... I will do that now. And great work, by the way!

4379: 4311: 2192:

I looked at it after your last message, and there really isn't much there. I can scan it for you, if you like, it's only two pages.

4721: 4714: 1612: 1578: 1545: 1513: 1467: 3331:

I think you should announce this on the paleo project, the talk page is predictably attracting more fanboys than science types.

4598: 2371: 567: 352: 328: 292: 4828:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4553:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4145:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3367:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3274:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1842: 1418:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1187:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 729:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4297: 4283: 2663: 1920:

Yeah, it was from Kenneth Carpenter's old site, which is down now, so I'm not really sure what paper it was originally from.

776:

Thanks for your review! Let me know if you would like another opinion on your current FAC, I'd be happy to help out. Cheers,

4727: 4269: 4096: 4040:

Hello, normally, as this point has been going on for two months, you should have seen it in the history of the article...

3441:

Never done a collaboration before, how do we obtain the same unfree sources? One gets them, and emails them to the other?

2542: 94: 86: 3111:

Italian "explorer", a Russian tsar, and a British king and queen. There should be no tarry in including Arabic history.

2656: 4917: 4523: 1759: 1339: 81: 69: 64: 59: 2947:, with a parasagittal white band on the midline combined with similar bands on the ventral surfaces of the forelimbs.-- 3672:

so that it highlights the rhinoceros auklet and the three puffins at the bottom instead of the auklets in the middle?

3080:

What is the problem with displaying a larger file that shows prominent people of arab ancestry from each arab nation?

2355:(the label is for a skull outside of the photo). I thought I'd let you know first before trying to fix it on Commons. 2127: 1710:. Hopefully, we should be able to somehow make clear to this Indonesian guy that this behaviour is not acceptable. -- 1608: 1574: 1541: 1509: 1463: 388:"Several unsourced sentences" has nothing to do with "be quick-failed" whatsoever (or with GA for that matter, at all) 2643:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 4808:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

4537:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

4129:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3764: 3351:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3258:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3158: 2344: 2334: 1402:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1171:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

713:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

563: 348: 324: 288: 38: 5134:

Hi FunkMonk, I know you know the mammoth articles far better than I, so I thought I'd best just point you at this

5045: 5016: 4982: 4953: 4469: 4437: 1604: 1456: 1145:

for the Quagga, and we may perhaps have to use older sources on Google books an such, for the biology sections.

1368: 439: 2693:

Sorry it took me so long to respond. I fixed the issue that was hanging up the review. How does it look now?--

1962:

article as that name was based on this specimen too — and I'd also like to illustrate it in the Dutch article.

5058: 4913: 4791: 4758: 4519: 4515: 4207:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

3920:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

3116: 3085: 1755: 1403: 443:

know any sources or have recommendations about where to look that would be fantastic. Thanks for your help!

4594: 4432:

For your amazing work on dinosaur images. You have this star already but you can never have to many stars.

2962: 2530: 2177:

I found some useful information in "Big Cats and their Fossil Relatives" but I think NatGeo would be good.

2001:

Heheh, good that you said it before I uploaded it under a wrong name! it is now in the Merosaurus article.

1877: 1082:

Hello. Since you seem to have in interest in recently extinct animals and was thinking we work on bringing

638:

As far as I can see, the issue has already been fixed? The date of death has been added to the image page.

344: 284: 5041: 5012: 4465: 4433: 3321: 1731: 1715: 1692: 1663: 1648: 1290: 1233: 819: 209:

Hey Funk, thanks for the Barnstar! I still visit most days, it just takes a lot of time to edit anything.

4602: 2639: 2130: 1285:

You must be coming down with what the Devilbot's holophone teacher described as "stupid hand syndrome."--

4809: 4305: 3590: 3516: 3502: 3474: 3460: 3417: 3241: 3209: 2566:

I'm taking this to the dispute Resolution board because I have tried to explain but it hasn't worked. :

2283: 2225: 2211: 2182: 2165: 2151: 2094: 1135: 1120: 1091: 1059: 578: 340:

Image placement on all the pages looks much better now. Thanks for double checking my contributions!!

3834:

nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of

1460: 5177: 5147: 4978: 4949: 4235: 3948: 3877: 3725: 3710: 3677: 3170: 2679: 2409: 2360: 949: 607: 249: 214: 5115: 4739: 4676: 4646: 4401: 3979: 2700: 2599: 1523: 1364: 1176: 781: 448: 857:? A support, oppose, or any other comment would be appreciated. If not, no need to reply to this. 5191: 5162: 5097: 5078: 5031: 4968: 4932: 4787: 4773: 4754: 4694: 4680: 4666: 4650: 4621: 4493: 4455: 4291: 4277: 4114: 4060: 4027: 4012: 3994: 3739: 3696: 3647: 3564: 3547: 3533: 3488: 3446: 3432: 3352: 3336: 3227: 3185: 3133: 3112: 3100: 3081: 3065: 2972: 2913: 2852: 2814: 2765: 2736: 2613: 2581: 2556: 2506: 2472: 2423: 2381: 2374: 2311: 2297: 2257: 2239: 2197: 2137: 2117: 2006: 1925: 1884: 1828: 1774: 1677: 1627: 1564: 1530: 1496: 1385: 1353: 1305: 1276: 1262: 1248: 1150: 1106: 1067: 1048: 1007: 964: 934: 894: 877: 834: 799: 643: 587: 542: 526: 511: 493: 463: 423: 373: 313: 264: 229: 179: 158: 129: 47: 17: 4022:

It will be added automatically by a bot soon, when it is also removed from the nomination list.

858: 4851: 4576: 4263: 4168: 4130: 4092: 3578: 3390: 3317: 3297: 2538: 2490: 2459: 1727: 1711: 1688: 1659: 1644: 1478: 1477:

I think that is the only photo I have seen of Martha in life, but I know of a life drawing by

1441: 1286: 1229: 1210: 918: 854: 815: 752: 3427:

Yeah, I can't work on Dromaeosauroides just yet either, missing a paper, so I'm about ready.

2652: 1707: 4888: 4369: 4301: 4045: 3967: 3862: 3843: 3810:

name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available".

3622: 3586: 3512: 3498: 3470: 3456: 3413: 3259: 3237: 3205: 3000: 2903: 2751: 2721: 2447: 2279: 2221: 2207: 2178: 2161: 2147: 2090: 1334: 1131: 1116: 1087: 770: 698: 668: 626: 408: 193: 144: 112: 4713:

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at

4331: 4100: 3819:

answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact

2160:

I'll probably be able to handle the rest of the article myself but you're free to join in.

1843:

http://www.lib.utexas.edu/books/britfossils/html/txu-oclc-13370987-4-dinosauria-plate58.php

5173: 5143: 4344: 4231: 4188: 3944: 3901: 3873: 3721: 3706: 3673: 3665: 3166: 2675: 2405: 2356: 1622:

Hmmm, perhaps briefly, starting with "as a Passenger Pigeon, Martha was..." or some such?

945: 862: 714: 259:

Heheh, no problem, and well, you should really thank yourself for writing a good article!

245: 210: 4613:

It (along with most other quotes) is also found in the book "Great Auk" by Errol Fuller:

4084: 2644: 1854: 5066: 172: 5108: 4905: 4873: 4735: 4538: 4397: 3975: 3573:

Yeah but the page that you can access seems to give plenty of taxonomy information and

3526: 3016: 2952: 2893: 2838: 2798: 2695: 2595: 2048: 1992: 1911: 1867: 1812: 1751: 1172: 991: 777: 444: 4464:

Your welcome. I just noticed how so many photos have been updated and uploaded by you.

4419: 4383:, and it has become a fixture in popular culture, often as a symbol of extinction and 689:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject_Resource_Exchange/Resource_Request#Extinct_Mascarene_birds

5187: 5158: 5093: 5071: 5027: 4964: 4928: 4842: