User talk:FunkMonk/Archive 7

1660:... but the Wiki article implies that a bifid tail is apparent in the sketch and does not mention anything about additional details in a written source. There appears to be an inconsistency between the drawing with shows a medium-sized pointed tail and a written source that describes a bifid tail. If this inconsistency exists, then is not covered well in the article. It is probably worth double checking the written source. Could historical documents be describing another bird? Is it possible that the bifid tail was more apparent when it was flying or perching in a tree? 2998: 2413:, and was once widespread in the forests of Mauritius. The bird was first mentioned in the 17th century and was described several times thereafter, but very few accounts describe the behaviour of living specimens. Several stuffed and at least one live specimen reached Europe in the 1700s and 1800s. Only three stuffed specimens exist today, and only one bird was ever depicted when alive. The species is thought to have become extinct in the 1830s due to 2122: 31: 1631:

considering my changes and making his or he own enhancements almost simultaneously to the same section without the need for a prolonged discussion on a talk page. Another editor has done some copy-editing in the interim and left a long message on my talk page. My main point is that you might be able to take something from the my edits to the article (including edit summaries) and the discussion on my talk page to improve the article.

2355: 2447: 3305:, was writing to a user, asking if he would change the license of some of his images to a Commons compatible one, so that they could be used on Knowledge (XXG). Such a goal seems noble enough for most people, and I haven't encountered anyone turning such a request down, only that didn't get an answer. You may have to create a Flickr profile to contact their users, but in that case, I can do it for you. 4604:. I consider the article is too lightweight and that it does not fulfil the criterion "broad in its scope". Some of the limited amount of information in the article is really repeating information already provided. Although the nominator dealt with a couple of brief matters, he has had 10 days to make further improvements along the lines I have suggested but has not done so. What do you think? 1571: 2046: 1945: 1067: 3515: 109: 4413: 1455: 4992: 4315: 5331:"The proof" has already been provided. Heretic and "extremist" are derogatory, POV terms. By certain POVs, any existing religious groups could be categorised as heretics. But it seems they aren't. And the reason should be clear. And no, you can not become an Alawite (or Druze for that matter) by simple conversion. 5459:

And your understanding of pejorative is incomplete. Heretic is an academic term, 'nigger' is not. Galileo was called a heretic by the church and put on trial but no one is going to censor that from his article because it is hate speech. Heretic has never to my knowledge been considered hate speech

1476:

is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us

3838:

Hi FunkMonk, thanks very much for the GA review, I'm glad you liked the article. I'm in the process of trying to get Camouflage through FA, a new experience... the whole area still needs a lot of work as there are some quite scrappy articles e.g. on underwater cam.... but very glad to know there are

1689:

Hi, I noticed why the description of the sketch is more detailed than the actual sketch (forgot it before for some reason), and I'll add this now. As for the toes, who knows, could be a reversal? An error? No toe bones are known as far as I can see. But maybe it's just something that was left out of

1674:

It is a little odd that the drawing in the infobox appears to show one toe backwards and three forwards, which is not a feature of a parrot's foot. However, it is not totally clear which toes are from which foot in the drawing. However, it we assume that the illustrator was not out to deceive anyone

2089:

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can

1988:

5483:

that some call them Ghulat. Categories are something else, they should be neutral. And Galileo is not categorised as a heretic, is he? If you make this same comment on other talk pages, I'll refrain from answering you here, it is a waste of time to repeat the same arguments three times every time.

5345:

So you are saying that Alawite is a religion and an ethnic group? Heretic is still not a pejorative along the lines of 'nigger' like you claim. 'Nigger' has no academic usage and is just mean-spirited. Ghulat is used in the actual sources for the article. It comes down to whether Alawites have

2204:

Hi FunkMonk. Just to let you know that I'm afraid I'm going to have to abandon this and take both the article and the FAC review off my watch list. I realise that Snowman knows a lot about the subject, but I'm getting truly fed up with defending against his careless introduction of grammar errors,

3684:

Hi, I've actually refrained from uploading it, because I recall that some of these maps have been used in other Plos articles and later uploaded here, only to be deleted. It appears that the maker of the maps has not released them under a commercial license, he has only "borrowed" them to various

3665:

article. However, in my insatiable iconic hunger, I have set my mind on one more: figure 16 showing the Cretaceous Earth map with the several pterosaur finds projected on it. It would also be very useful in various other pterosaur articles. Of course, it is quite possible you have already made it

1343:

I reported the IP to AN3 for edit warring. Though I think you should self-revert that last edit of yours, because depending on the admin assessing the request you might also be blocked for violating 3RR (which you technically did; as none of his edits constitute blatant vandalism - except for the

187:). The very nice lithographs in them are obviously free from copyright and would make for some valuable additions to the extensive range you have already made accessible to the general public. Likely you have been aware of this but I considered it wouldn't hurt to tell you anyway ;o). Greetings,-- 3089:

If you make a DYK for the article, there is some kind of label it would fall under, not sure what it's called... When an editor starts an article, gets it to GA, DYK, and FA. As for easy supports, I guess it's because they want each editor's FA review to be similar to a GA review in itself... I

559:

Upon reading up on it, it appears the description by Gosse is a second hand description, based on a recollection by a "Dr. Robertson", who had seen the now lost specimen at one time, and claimed it was very different form any other macaw he had ever seen. What this means is of course uncertain.

1630:

yesterday just before you went off-line. I made some changes and also offered some queries and suggestions in the edit summaries intended for you as the main editor. I sometimes find that progress can be made quickly to an article by editing it directly and with the main editor of an article

1240:

I deactivated the other book from the first page you listed and it downloaded. After the plants there are fishes. There are some pictures of animals, but not as many as plants. The parrots are on pages 207 and 208, I recall. There is one picture of a Blue-and-yellow Macaw and no other parrot

611:, a relative, that too is mounted with a hand on the ground, which is pronated, yet the very paper it was first described in specifically explains why this would be impossible (so I had to blur out the pronated hand to make the image usable). Some outdated ideas die slowly, even in museums. 4736:

Being anti-Salafist is not the same as being pro-Assad. Why are you wasting your time propagandising for the same people who are killing leftists in Tunisia and Egypt? Are you a Salafist yourself? Or is this just Sayerselle, who seems to be completely clueless in general?

5286:] is a category on Knowledge (XXG). Heretic itself is not a pejorative term as is calling me a honkey. You still haven't proven the emotional content of the term as it is being used in Jerusalem papers and historic texts that are sourced into the Alawite article. 5185:

article should at least have a source and information on how hateful a term it is and how it could cause a fight when used by one person to another. I can understand how being told you are not Muslim when you consider yourself one can be hateful but the article

2905:). If my argument has convinced you to change your mind, go ahead and remove the tag. Otherwise, please start a discussion section because I would like to give an opportunity to have this brought to everyone's attention. I will revisit the page in a few weeks. 1208:

An image would certainly be interesting. The two books on the same webpage load the RAM until the browser crashes. I might try on a friend's computer, which is new and has 6 Gbite RAM. Or try to inactivate downloading from the other book at the same time.

3854:

Yep, I find the topic fascinating, but I was a little hesitant in taking up the review, since I've mainly reviewed animal species articles so far, and was unsure if I could pull it off. But I just couldn't resist in the end, heheh. Keep up the nice work!

407:

So that means all of November? Darn, I'm very busy until the ninth, I hope I can get most of that stuff... At least I'll download the PDFs for now, then I can always upload later. I see there are a ton of Richard Owen papers, gotta catch them all!.

2920:

I wouldn't say it was "common practice", and the case of Ardi is a little different, because unlike the other species, very few specimens of Ardipithecus are known. But anyway, I don't really mind if you keep them separate, was just a suggestion.

124:, so it has been removed. Knowledge (XXG) needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on 3950:. Cott almost certainly sent Kerr the photos in 1940 as they both tried to persuade the authorities to use better camouflage. So unless the photos are actually stamped "W.D." on the back, Glasgow archives probably won't know more than we do. 3557:, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Knowledge (XXG) is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a 2205:

malformed citations, munging of sentence structures I took pains over, and his general failure to consult. Please understand that I have enjoyed working with you and that I love the article, but it's time to move on. Kind regards, Simon. --

1241:

pictures. There are pictures of other types of Brazilian birds. I do not know what language it is, but there is a suggestion that it is in old Latin on the Spix's Macaw GA page. You might like to contribute to the discussion again there.

2096:

to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with

1995:

1753:

None, and no toe bones are known, closest are several tarsometatarsals. The restoration has many inaccuracies (some quirks are due to Rothschild's own speculations, and errors in the tracing of the sketch), so it isn't authoritative.

4136:

Well, it's already there! I wrote it specifically forthis article, however, since I think a thorough disclaimer is needed to put it in the right context. Most sources treat them collectively, and they are kind of hard to separate.

5263: 4713:

Your Assad dictatorship propagandizing will fail at ARBCOM too. Go do something productive wih your time. Like reading a book. I recommend 'The Fall of the House of Assad'. Might actually adjust your misguided views (really).

3591:

Well i've just come across this page because it popped up on my screen, and looking at the history of the article, i issued you both with a note about edit warring. The IP has only reverted you 3 times with is not in breach of

2220:

My pleasure! Thanks for helping me out here and on other articles, and I appreciate you stayed for so long after your first copyedit. Hope it hasn't turned you off from working on other extinct bird articles in the future!

3629:

from different IP's. Ive asked those edits to be looked at, but to stop the edit war, the article has now been protected. I suggest discussions take place on the article's talk page to iron out the issues at hand. -

4208:

Hi FunkMonk, I'm beginning the copy-edit you requested to the above article at the GOCE Request page. Please feel free to contact me, or to correct or revert my edits if I'm doing something I shouldn't. Cheers,

4078:

544:

Remember, it appears the only person who classified Gossei' parrot as a macaw specifically is Rothschild, based on a vague description. So it could really had bee any kind of parrot. But I will add a source.

3333:

Keep me updated! And remember, it needs to be a commercial licence and the image should be allowed to be modified. Commons doesn't accept free images that cannot be used for commercial purposes or modified.

4423:

regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is

3931:

Hmmm, only unpromising because it doesn't really say anything about the original source... An archive doesn't obtain the copyright of what it archives. Maybe they could be asked where they got it from?

5460:

before on Knowledge (XXG). Moosa DOES categorize those sects as ghulat even in the title of his book. His academic knowledge and opinion carries great weight on Knowledge (XXG) and it is not fringe.

5090:

Hey FunkMonk, I've replied to your comments on the review, so if you could address them it would really help me. I've got more to say but I'll keep them till after I edit the article more. Thanks,

3090:

haven't reviewed many for that same reason, heh... FACs are way too nitpicky for my taste. I'm not really a sucker for wording either, which is why I find GARs more straightforward and enjoyable.

871:

Why do you think so? You don't have to include the long list, prose is always better. Long taxonomic sections are not a bad thing. Most of those species aren't considered part of the group anyway.

3071:

for GA. I may take it on to FA at some point because it would be satisfying to take an article the whole way from start to featured. I guess I would have to make it more comprehensive. We'll see.

3024: 2798:

Where does Lister disagree? His mammoth book from 2007 uses Palaeoloxodon, not Elephas. Li et al are far from the only authors who have reached the same conclusion, it's just the source I used.

2346: 3889:

Yes, I put it there in fear and trepidation. It is certainly an aerial photograph, and we know it was taken at Cott's request for the demonstration. How would we find out the exact status?

2092: 1991: 736:

Hi, FunkMonk. It's possible download "Avian Paleontology at the Close of the 20th Century: Proceedings of the 4th International Meeting of the Society of Avian Paleontology and Evolution"

5442:, he does not categorise himself. As for your last point, how is it relevant here? Some blacks amiably call each other "Niggas" too. But I don't think we should have a category for that. 4171:- feel free to contact me about any issues arising from the copy-edit; good luck with your planned nomination, though I recommend seeking a peer review before nominating from FA. Cheers, 4037:

Thanks for the review, I really appreciate it. I do have a few thoughts as to improvements, and I do think that it has FAC potential. One quick note- you forgot to add the article to a

4564: 3206: 3202: 965:, it has been suggested that the compilation image you created needs improvement. I wonder if you could help. Working with images and their sourcing and status is really not my thing. 3615:

three times, but if you look at earlier edits frõm today, he has reverted the very same edits when done by other users. Therefore he has reverted the same edit more than three times.

1180:

It causes my browser to crash. I can not get past the plants at the beginning of the book. I might try with a different computer later. It contains a lot of illustrations of plants.

4753:

I think we should keep the three issues separate next time, and focus on the most urgent problems, uninvolved editors get more confused than necessary, and it muddles up the issues.

1073:

I hope you're not upset about my challenging the copy-paste/merge thing. I reflexively freak on those, but I think you were right, and just boldly getting things done. Best wishes,

5222:

The article itself cites a source calling the Alawites a ghulat sect: # ^ a b c d Moosa, Matti (1987). Extremist Shiites: The Ghulat Sects. Syracuse University Press. pp. 282–283.

5007: 2837:

You've done good stuff over the years so I was initially surprised by the article move (prob shouldn't have been tagged "minor" tho'). Anyway, sorry to have wasted both our times!

2282: 1798: 2405:, a resemblance reflected in some of the bird's names. It was 30 cm (12 in) long and larger and more robust than any other blue pigeon species. It could raise its hackles into a 5181:

The article does not make it clear that it is a pejorative term along the lines of 'cracker' or 'honkey'. If that is true and you object to it as a WP category then maybe the

3110:

I'm rather busy at the moment; working with you and your articles is always a pleasure, so I certainly will find some time to take a look at these in the next couple of weeks.

2349:. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below: 2053: 2039: 1952: 1938: 2342: 4454: 3319:

Thanks. I managed to create a Flickr profile and have sent an email to the photographer. We'll see what happens. I now know what to do next time I need an image off Flickr.

2401:

around the head, neck and breast and blue plumage on the body, and it was red on the tail and the bare parts of the head. These colours were thought similar to those of the

1904: 3872:

may be in the public domain, if it was indeed produced by the British Army, and if what the British Army produces is considered "works of the government". See for example:

3700: 2086:

a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

1985:

a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

1675:

then the foot show most clearly in the drawing shows three toes forward and one toe backward, which would be consistent for a crow, raven, and many other sorts of birds.

1690:

the original pencil sketch, and therefore not added when it was finished with inks later. The paper doesn't mention it. Heres Hume's tracing of the underlying sketch:

4568: 4509:

It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy.

1725:

That's just a restoration based on the old sketch (or rather the tracing of the old sketch) with some modifications, so it doesn't provide any actual information.

2779:

I here what you say but I don't think we should be so quick to alter accepted taxonomy when experts such as Adrian Lister and Victoria Herridge disagree with Li

828:

Please reconsider your position on merging Elephantidae with elephant. I'm so close to prefecting the article for FA and a merge will further complicate things.

2139: 1148:

It is said to contain Marcgrave's 1638 description of the Spix's Macaw. I do not know what it contains, but it is probably interesting and potentially useful.

5418:

Heretic is derogatory term used by the mainstream but the people being called heretic might be proud to be called that term as in the case of the Free Zoners

5058: 4958: 4470:

discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction.

4005: 3413: 3168: 2964: 2534: 2174: 2164: 1873: 1544: 798: 658: 495: 4425: 4420: 4381: 3534:

another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Knowledge (XXG) this is usually seen as obstructing the

674: 5314:

I can become an Alawite if I wish but I can not change my skin color or my genes. This is the difference in the pejorative content of the ghulat term.

2954: 2885:

article should be merged into it. I would like to remove the tag because it is common practice to have a separate article for commonly named finds (eg:

2160: 4121:, as it's not specifically about the Lesser Antilles macaw and I think it belongs in the more general article. What are your thoughts on this? Cheers, 670: 2035: 1934: 3403: 2950: 5048: 4948: 143:

I'd say patronisation isn't particularly civil either. Anyway, it was in jest, which should be pretty clear. And nope, I don't need to "cool off".

3995: 3362:

Damn. Did you stress the importance of the photos? Perhaps he's more commercially minded? Are there no other such images on Commons or on Flickr?

2524: 1534: 4897:

General consensus is that users are allowed to revert content added to their own talk page. If nothing else, it's a sign that they've seen it...

306: 4777:

and realized that you added additional request. To me, it isn't clear which article you want (I actually have access to both). Can you specify?

3399: 485: 345: 311: 287: 273: 268: 263: 258: 253: 5044: 4944: 2278: 292: 3991: 3008: 2520: 2065: 1964: 1530: 788: 698: 5155:

retards. 2- it was a month ago, so yes, "a few hours" have already passed. And libellous claims disguised as fact should be fought with fire

5054: 4954: 4001: 3409: 3164: 2960: 2530: 2170: 1869: 1540: 794: 654: 491: 4985: 2685:

Actually, there is nothing wrong with the bot. JSTOR shut down the service. Really annoying of them. Makes the template almost useless.

481: 3553:. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the 2838: 2784: 3870: 1502: 784: 694: 128:. Thank you. Your comments were not on topic, and could be construed by some as an attack. I suggest you take a day or two and cool off. 4911:

Anyhow, it's a useless feud, which succeeded in distracting from the issue. So I'll just ignore it and move on with the actual content.

4358: 4186:

Thanks, and yup, I have some other GAs that I would probably nominate first in any case, and I'll give this one some more look troughs.

3215: 2699:

What? Shouldn't the page about the template mention this? And isn't it possible to make a bot which gathers this information by itself?

3012: 1792: 1285:

Perhaps, but in any case, it must certainly be one of the first Western depictions of the species (same for the rest of the images)...

647:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

5205:

First off, you may know that Knowledge (XXG) articles are sometimes incomplete. Ghulat is a derogatory term. And for your information:

4721: 2235:

Far from it. Your articles are outstanding, and I've enjoyed both those I've worked on. Have a great Christmas, and see you soon :) --

1863: 1646:

Oh, seems to be a long discussion, I'll have a look. As for the bifurcated tail, it puzzled me too, but that's what the source says.

5226: 2338: 903:

which is up for FAC, and pretty much glosses over the extinct branches when it gets past the evolution and classification sections.

4503: 4224:

Thanks! It's pretty short, so shouldn't take too long! Not sure if it can get to FAC, though, very little is known about the bird.

1131: 5346:

been called heretics/ghulat by several, notable and reliable sources. If it is derogatory or not Knowledge (XXG) is not censored

2476:, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! 1859: 529:

is interesting, but it does not look like a macaw to me. Its tail is not long enough. Note that it has a pale beak. Any comments?

1809: 592:

was a dated one. I believe it has been at the ROM for many years and is currently in their "From Our Vaults" display. Cheers.

3158: 5300:

Maybe the category ] would be more appropriate as this is an English language encyclopedia as opposed the Arabic term ghulat.

4862:

the closed discussion would be more appropriate, but modifying what's within a "closed discussion" box is generally poor form.

2902: 607:

Cool, as for Camptosaurus, the weird thing is it has the updated skull, so it might not be so old. If you look at the image of

5051:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4951:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4550: 3998:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3725:

I see. Indeed the map seems not to be free of copyright, and you were completely right in not uploading it. A pity though...--

3406:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3161:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2957:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2527:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2167:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1866:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1537:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 791:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 488:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 319:

Of course this is just a selection of some authors and subjects that I personally found interesting. Many more can be found!--

2324: 2310: 651:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3154: 2713:

The template page does mention this, and you right that somehow a new bot needs to be created before the backlog gets crazy

2409:, which it used for display. Its call sounded like "barf barf" and it also made a cooing noise. It fed on fruits, nuts, and 1046:

To be honest, I think it should be deleted. It was uploaded by mistake, and there is a replacement already in the article.

5136:

article is causing you so much distress that you are losing your temper then step away for a few hours before responding.

2296: 843:

Well, my position probably won't change, but I can remove the merge tag, which is the only thing that would hinder a FAC.

94: 2098: 2069: 2061: 1997: 1968: 1960: 3702: 2783:

s conclusions. Especially when they're based on interpretations of art and low-res photos. David Peters would be proud!

2285:. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director 2106: 2005: 1112: 962: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 3558: 3550: 1130:

I think I've stumbled across the front piece before while searching for a Dodo image, but haven't read it. Yes, here:

4314:

itself existed, but there is no indication that the uprising happened. Kunta Kinte is a fictional character. See also

3535: 648: 5206: 5035:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

4935:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3982:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3487: 3390:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3145:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2941:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2511:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2151:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2076: 1975: 1850:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1517:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1406: 775:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

472:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

38: 4038: 2671:

Well, then there's no point in using them. A bot is supposed to fill them out, so it's the bot that needs fixing.

5023: 4293:

the Roots series was founded in fact, and this was a real ship. Needs referencing to make clear how much is fact.

3946:

Nearly sure I know the answer to that - papers of Cott's mentor, regius professor of natural history at Glasgow,

3272:

You seem to be skilled at getting images from the web. I'm currently writing an article on the Furry Coral Crab (

1589: 1300: 1256: 3523: 3519: 3303: 1739:

I know, but it shows someone has changed (probably deliberately) the toes. Is there any literature on the toes?

1224: 1194:

I can't get past the first pages either... Would be interesting if there was an image of the bird we could use.

4247: 4214: 4176: 4156: 4126: 4084: 2890: 2752: 2721: 2690: 2661: 2589: 1908: 1115:

published in 1648, when I was browsing the Wiki for anything on Spix's Macaw. Are you familiar with this book.

1080: 1028: 625:

Yes indeed. Of course, it is probably due too lack of funding. It must be quite expensive to rebuild a model.

2842: 2788: 2354: 307:

http://rstl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/173/1035.full.pdf+html?sid=a668e4e6-40ce-487e-857e-391323592717

346:

http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/178/169.full.pdf+html?sid=a8a1c7b3-1652-4680-89e1-2fee7fb6cd48

312:

http://rstl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/172/653.full.pdf+html?sid=a668e4e6-40ce-487e-857e-391323592717

288:

http://rstl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/149/161.full.pdf+html?sid=6f650bc1-3192-4c34-99ae-bc3712a802e3

274:

http://rstl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/131/131.full.pdf+html?sid=3ce6a54e-aaea-45a2-90de-d54ca303ab33

269:

http://rstl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/115/179.full.pdf+html?sid=3ce6a54e-aaea-45a2-90de-d54ca303ab33

264:

http://rstl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/140/391.full.pdf+html?sid=3ce6a54e-aaea-45a2-90de-d54ca303ab33

259:

http://rstl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/138/183.full.pdf+html?sid=3ce6a54e-aaea-45a2-90de-d54ca303ab33

254:

http://rstl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/139/271.full.pdf+html?sid=3ce6a54e-aaea-45a2-90de-d54ca303ab33

5419: 4999: 4341: 4334: 4288: 4281: 3955: 3922: 3894: 3844: 2886: 2773: 2714: 2128: 2121: 2102: 2001: 1708: 1481:

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.

1299:

I haven't read Latin since high school, but it seems that the last thing here is some kind of monster fowl:

293:

http://rstl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/153/33.full.pdf+html?sid=cd5c7555-c9c8-4344-8274-604fba4f3d2e

163:

Hallo, FunkMonk! As you probably already know, several magazines this month have free access. Among them is

4717: 5365: 5266: 5084: 4725: 4072: 3477: 3448: 3035: 2397:. It has two extinct relatives from the Mascarenes and three extant ones from other islands. It had white 1744: 1716: 1680: 1665: 1636: 1501:

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see

1276: 1246: 1214: 1185: 1153: 1120: 534: 4636:

Thanks. As you say, there is no hurry, but I get the impression the nominator may have given up on this.

4492: 3756:

The exact same map is among those images already on Commons it seems, so I've now uploaded the new image.

3685:

researchers. But I'll double check the issue, good call! If I'm wrong, I'll upload the image afterwards.

3539: 2472:

and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a

4821: 4783: 4467: 4377: 4353: 3638: 3604: 3569: 3210: 3020: 2851:

Ah, no problem, yeah, that new Chinese elephant paper seems to be a bit iffy, kind of cryptozoologyish.

2419: 2362: 2332: 2274: 924: 890: 862: 833: 117: 5402: 4520: 4110: 2469: 248: 121: 5124:

Find scholarly sources or forget it. Many such rumours have been created over the centuries, and some

3074:

I have just been "told off" for too easily "supporting" articles at FA. See my talk page for details.

5011: 4674:

Wow.. even DRN is looking like it might fail. We may really have to take this all the way to ARBCOM.

4641: 4609: 3353: 3324: 3292: 3079: 1820: 1612: 999: 980:

Yup, I'll make a new one later today, I didn't create that image actually, just found it on Commons.

970: 745: 5347: 1484:

If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

393:

Last week was Open Access Week and they decided to extend it to a full month. Very commendable :o)--

4902: 4867: 4543: 4373: 4243: 4210: 4172: 4152: 4122: 4080: 4046: 3242: 3115: 2748: 2717: 2686: 2657: 2585: 2578: 2568: 2458: 2431: 2152: 1627: 1579:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

1076: 5489: 5447: 5385: 5336: 5273: 5212: 5164: 5105: 4916: 4888: 4835: 4798: 4758: 4742: 4703: 4684: 4655: 4627: 4394: 4322: 4263: 4229: 4191: 4142: 4099: 4061: 4031: 3951: 3937: 3918: 3908: 3890: 3880: 3860: 3840: 3811: 3763: 3747: 3708: 3690: 3620: 3582: 3494: 3463: 3367: 3339: 3310: 3257: 3130: 3095: 3052: 2926: 2910: 2856: 2803: 2738: 2704: 2676: 2645: 2604: 2496: 2318: 2304: 2254: 2226: 2024: 1920: 1835: 1759: 1730: 1698: 1651: 1427: 1396: 1364: 1306: 1290: 1262: 1231: 1199: 1171: 1139: 1096: 1051: 1035: 1013: 985: 938: 908: 876: 848: 760: 666: 616: 565: 550: 413: 372: 207: 148: 47: 17: 5129: 4567:, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located 3538:, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a 3023:

back to the "life" of our attention with scientific precision, and for GA reviews, - you are an

2997: 1802: 1784: 1374: 1132:

https://www.rijksmuseum.nl/nl/search/objecten?q=brasiliae&p=1&ps=12#/RP-P-1890-A-15567,0

857:

But if it does pass FAC. Adding in the info from the Elephantidae could degrade its FA status.

5465: 5426: 5409: 5355: 5319: 5305: 5291: 5252: 5234: 5223: 5195: 5141: 5128:

keep believing them today." Umm, calling other users 'retard' is quite a serious violation of

5074: 4974: 4880:

I even tried to add to his talk page, but was reverted. I tried again, and this is what I got:

4858:

to a closed discussion. If it really needs to be said, a note on the user's talk page or even

4021: 3473: 3444: 3429: 3184: 3031: 2980: 2942: 2878: 2550: 2290: 2190: 1889: 1740: 1712: 1676: 1661: 1632: 1560: 1477:

in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

1413: 1382: 1349: 1272: 1242: 1210: 1181: 1149: 1116: 814: 722: 530: 511: 133: 125: 4528: 4524: 3917:

Forbes's book. He attributes it to Glasgow University Archive Services - sounds unpromising!

4816: 4778: 4300: 3947: 3631: 3597: 3562: 3125:

No problem, I won't be able to nominate one for FAC in the immediate future anyway. Thanks!

3068: 2637: 2614: 2328: 1359:

Adding unsourced, slanderous content is vandalism. But just to be sure, I'll do it, thanks.

920: 886: 885:

Wouldn't we have to add in more information on the mammoths though the rest of the article?

858: 829: 4536: 4347: 3593: 3554: 2057: 1956: 1473: 1166:

But my Portuguese is a little, well, non-existent! Apart from the little Spanish I know...

5091: 4637: 4605: 4480:

It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about

3543: 3391: 3349: 3320: 3288: 3075: 1816: 1797:

You are receiving this message because you rename is on the list of interested parties at

1608: 995: 966: 919:

Well there still will be reorganizations in the taxonomy section. Will you try a sandbox?

741: 737: 681: 5036: 4936: 4774: 4539:. Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion. 4496: 3281: 1391:

Heh, well, let's hope my "good intentions" are considered more worthy than the IPs then.

4419:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at

3596:, however I've asked for the page to be protected for now until it can be sorted out. - 2345:. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you can change it—following the instructions at 4898: 4863: 4581: 4202: 4042: 3983: 3797: 3730: 3674: 3531: 3238: 3111: 2512: 2482: 2454: 2427: 2240: 2210: 1518: 630: 597: 447: 398: 358: 324: 192: 3792:

Thanks! And many thanks to Ron Blakey, of course, for making his maps available :o).--

3277: 3207:

Knowledge (XXG):Templates for discussion/Log/2013 January 7#Template:Parliament (band)

2446: 2072:, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the 2056:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

1971:, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the 1955:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

1805:! Pleasfeel free to join in discussion on the project's talk page, and be sure to add 1163: 5485: 5443: 5381: 5332: 5269: 5208: 5160: 5101: 5065: