User talk:GTBacchus/Archive 9

1703:, however, by nominating so many. I don't think that just because a majority of them don't now, we should let any and every nonsensical user category be created and kept. Change is a slow process, and I believe I and the others at UCFD have slowly but surely helped make the user category system much more useful than it ever was, and will continue to do so until people start seeing categories as a means of collaboration instead of a myspace variant. I highly encourage you to help us with this process by nominating any categories you deem to not facilitate collaboration. Saying keep for categories being harmless, however, certainly will not improve the system, and I will discount any such !votes on sight, as I would suspect every other UCFD regular would do as well. 2311:

designed to "reduce process" that always seem to explode into a free-for-all, I doubt the arbcom will be so perceptive. Normally I wouldn't care more than enjoying a hearty laugh at their expense, but it bothers me to see Jeff take so much crap because of other editors' resentment over "the past", especially since I no doubt added to that resentment. Anyway, the reason I'm saying all this is because if arbcom deliberates for a month and a half over this and still can't come up with what you saw probably only minutes after reading over the RfC, maybe there's a niche for you there.

1769:, but as I said, change is a slow process and I doubt there would be consensus to change to this as of now, so I have to take baby steps by nominating the obviously non-useful categories and nominating categories for more collaborative naming conventions. Eventually I think the user category system could be quite useful, as I have been extremely sucessful in getting hundreds of categories changed or deleted to date, many of which have been recent that I know for a fact would not have had a consensus to change just a few months ago, so I do believe I am making progress. 1747:

expertise on an issue that pertains to an article (such as seeking out someone who speaks a particular language in order to translate something, or seeking out someone of a particular profession to clarify something in an article about the profession). Stuff like this is the key goal for user categories, hence my comment of "unencyclopedic" as justification to delete many categories. For instance, you aren't going to have a reason to go looking through

3248:

kindness), I've always remained deeply impressed by your insistence that Chooserr was to be treated with respect by others — and I knew that it wasn't exactly because you shared his POV! I just mentioned you in the context of a few friendly admins who would not want someone to feel frustrated by the reactions of others to his edits and posts. Don't worry if you haven't time. I've also given him Phaedriel's name (though I've urged him

2797: 2689: 2661:

some strange tactics to convince people ("OMG - If we don't get rid of the h, anti-americans will take over!!!!!!"). Uhh, I wish I could get what the big deal was, I'm actually from the US, and I've never had difficulty with the article, just as I'm sure most British haven't had difficulty with American articles. But again, to sum it up, I just saw the diffs, and you made some really great points.--

113:. Basically, we look for information that's appeared in publications with reputations for academic rigor, or at least fact-checking. In this case, one would consult respected reference books about religion (many exist), and find out how they define Christianity. Then we can just state their definition and tell where it comes from. If sources disagree, we can report that. Then everything's 1850: 163:

to try to find the right kind of stub, but I don't have time for either at the moment. Obviously, I wouldn't want to ask you to spend hours going through the list of stubs to find an appropriate one either, but it might be something that you'd already know and that you'd be able to tell me quickly. When I get a bit more familiar with stubs, I think I'd like to join that WikiProject. Cheers.

2866: 1823:(what the hell is so funny about putting a penis on it?). Anyway, these anti-vandalism reverts also led to four edits within 24 hours on my part and since I've already requested the speedy deletion of the manipulated image, I'd like to be on the safe side, 3RR-wise and have an admin who knows me perform the deletion or at least confirm that it was indeed vandalism. - 2522: 1635:

If somebody contributes to the encyclopedia, and wants to put themself into a silly category, then that category's making them happy. That's the point of keeping it - it does no harm, and somebody enjoys it, and it's not messing anything up, because user categories are unrelated to the project anyway, so why stop people from making themselves happy?

2244: 1392:

that they're running a "vendetta" against those sites that give real names, by not wanting to allow links to them. Someone in my family was stalked. I won't give details, but it was sexually motivated, and was quite severe. Probably most of the stalking that happens as a result of Knowledge (XXG) involvement is of a different nature. I don't think

2037:, despite the fact that among those who study Echinoderms, the latter is more common. The principle at work is what some Wikipedians call the "principle of least astonishment" - the idea that we want to surprise readers as little as possible, when it comes to which article appears when they click on a link or search for something. 1416:. I don't mean by that that you should be a better administrator, but that Knowledge (XXG) should do a better job — a MUCH better job — of making sure that people do know about it, since you strike me as someone who knows his way around Knowledge (XXG) pretty well (probably far better than I do), and if 3422:

My impression of you is only that you were inexperienced with policy editing, tried to make a few edits, and were surprised at the hornet's nest that WP policy editing is. I'm really not fussed about details like where you set up a straw poll, and with what particular intention. Much more important

3374:

and then using his admin status to show up to threaten to block *me* for "edit warring" when he was completely involved himself and improperly making threats, and then further threatening to block me for "incivility" solely for responding to his improper threats by pointing out that they were further

1948:

Again: I am fully against linking to what you call "attack websites". I note that your calling them that is hurting your position. You don't have to care, but I'd think you would. You don't have to put effective protection in place, but I'd think you would. You can undermine our security, but I'd

1736:

It just seems really weird to me now, that we're deleting the ha-ha-funny categories, but keeping the potentially destructive ideological categories, which are no more encyclopedic. What kind of goal have we got in mind for user categories, and how are we supposed to get there? I'm willing to help,

1713:

Thanks for dropping by. Also, though I'm not worried about my "!vote" "counting", thanks for the heads-up on that point. :) I dove into UCFD without lurking, and got some answers pretty quickly. I hope I haven't been disruptive; I was seeking discussion, not to win, nor to upset anybody. I'll stop

1586:

Then you misunderstand my argument. Let me ask you directly - how does restricting others' use of user categories help build the encyclopedia? Have you got an shortcut to throw back at me for that, too? That last one wasn't applicable, by the way, because I'm making a substantive argument, and not

567:

is about whether should continue discouraging polls. Note how the main proponents of the "split" are the same people who want PNSD deprecated. The idea behind the split is not to explain polling (because we do that already) but to create a page that does not discourage polling. However, as in article

530:

That's about as much sense as it all makes to me. My suggestion is just to copy his user page wholesale and then make small changes until it becomes your user page, being sure not to break any of the mysterious code. If you need someone to look over your code, I could maybe proofread it, but like I

162:

at the end of it, but I'm sure there must be an appropriate kind of stub for such an organisation. I followed the link from your page to the Stub sorting WikiProject, but found no immediate answer to my question. In fact, I felt it would probably be quicker to change the stub into a full article than

3183:

hi there , thanks for your contribution in adding information on the page. I am from china, and recently I am writing an essay about her, but in china there are very few articles talking about the similarity between her and the western god mothers, I am just wondering, if by any chance you have such

3161:

Is this an appropriate use of administrative priveledges? I think not and I hope you agree, hence I'm sending you my appeal for an immediate unblock. While I do not plan to re-engage into that particular dispute or even general editing for a little while (as you can imagine, I'm a little steamed and

2310:

I get the feeling this case is going to end up making me roll my eyes hard enough to yelp in pain. Your outside view on the RFC seems pretty much right on, but due to the committee's past inability to recognize long-term disruption sometimes caused by these sorts of early closures and other actions

1746:

I don't think that's a terribly bad idea, although I'd think some people prefer user categories to Wikiprojects because they are less formal, and don't necessarily want WikiProject-based messages left on their talk page all the time. Categories are also used when looking for someone with particular

1441:

The best response is to get quickly to a forum where admins are certainly available around the clock. The first thing to come to mind was AN/I, but as you pointed out, that's fatally flawed. I think a batch of emails or a visit to irc would be a good next step. Revert warring without the power to

1404:

Anyway, I just dropped by to say that my purpose was not to jump on you for suggesting going to AN/I (and I hope you didn't read it that way), but to stress that I think we really, really, really shouldn't do that. I don't think it's a dumb thing to have suggested, since I've seen several people who

1391:

I hope you didn't think I was taking a shot at you. I have seen some comments at that page that worried me — insinuations that stalking victims deserve what they get, accusations that those who want to protect the identities of their fellow Wikipedians are trying to "stifle legitimate criticism", or

1290:

You're welcome to the clarification. And in hindsight perhaps I was a bit more "something" in my response than I might have been. The discussion has just barely fallen short (and sometimes not even falling short) of calling myself and others quite a few things, and I think too much of the discussion

1233:

for that ANI discussion to be closed by the archive bots, so I'm trying my best to limit my responses to only those comments I find so objectionable that I can't resist. I largely agree with what you're saying there now, so I'll just reply here, and thank you for your comments. Your observation that

1634:

Normally, I would be in favor of deleting any user category that isn't clearly project-oriented. That's a lot more than UCFD is deleting now. Since we're already keeping so many unencyclopedic categories, deleting some unencyclopedic categories just seems inconsistent, and prone to upset people.

2660:

Hey, I just wanted to commend you for the great points you were making on the yoghurt talk page. I frankly don't see anything happening, as a discussion already occured and people that voted for yogurt said they wouldn't vote again, and as the yogurt side seems pretty desperate - and they're using

2120:

Sorry if I deleted some good conversations between you and Jeff, but it's clear to me that it wasn't going to do either me or him any good simply going back and forth as we were. We just fundamentally disagree over the purpose and policy of this project and we'll have to leave it at that. If you'd

1945:

security, without even responding to the suggestion that it will do so. I don't think you've addressed the argument that I've made, and I do think you're pursuing a goal that will turn around and bite you in the ass. It's because I don't want that to happen that I oppose the policy in question.

1563:

allowing people to do what they want with user categories is if they're hurting the project in some way. If we're going to disallow some, then we ought to disallow them all. There's no excuse for standing anywhere in the middle, choosing to approve some people's unencyclopedic categories and not

1321:

Thanks for your help in rewording this section. I feel that expanding on the rule would reduce controversy, since there have been many reported incidents where IAR has been used wrongly. I was hoping that elaboration would clear a lot of the misconceptions people take about this policy by giving

1760:

and could collaborate on that article and other articles related to them. I personally don't like this naming convention, my reasoning being that just because someone listens to them does not necessarily mean they know anything about them, and I'd prefer if the naming convention for this type of

1994:

Hi. When deciding what the most common name is we always look at what the most common name is among a subset of English-speakers. It can be academics, journalists, etc., depending on what the appropriate subset to look at is. Usually, we want knowledgeable people, people who care about accuracy.

1915:

Would you care to point out where I attacked you? Is it a personal attack to point out that you have failed to respond to a particular argument? I certainly don't wish to make any claims about you as a person, and I don't believe I have. I hope you'll point out to me what was uncivil about my

1729:

If we did that, then UCFD could delete categories as unencyclopedic for perfectly concrete reasons - there has to be a WikiProject to sponsor each user category. By raising the bar for the creation of a user category, the whole MySpace issue is avoided, because MySpace relies on being extremely

1437:

I've replied at the talk page, but here's a thought. Lots of people patrol "Recent changes". If somebody is inserting a link you don't want seen, and you remove it repeatedly without the ability to control the person re-inserting it (i.e., the blocking button), then you are helping to pass the

1163:

People. Love. Rules. The idea that there aren't well-defined lines to stay between is terrifying to most people. There's actually a picture of Hammurabi's code on WP:PI, because that's what most people want. It reminds me of the film Harold and Maude, when Maude says, "Zoos are full, prisons are

495:

Hi. The secret to getting tricks from other people's user pages is to click "edit", and then look through the code for the part you like. You can copy that out (don't save any changes to their page! (unless you're reverting vandalism)), and paste it into a sandbox or on your own page to tinker

3247:

who was blocked, brought a misguided (in my view) RfC against the blocking admin, and was further humiliated when it effectively turned into an RfC against him. Despite the disagreements I've had with you in recent months (which have not in any way lessened my trust for you or my belief in your

1555:

Well, it makes sense for us to tell people what they can and can't do with the actual encyclopedia, because that's the project we're here working on. None of us has any authority to tell others what to do, except insofar as it affects the project. User categories don't affect the project, and

1164:

overflowing... oh my, how the world still dearly loves a cage." I don't mean to say that's necessarily a bad thing, just that it's true. The idea that knowledge should be made freely accessible to everybody is a radical one, but even more radical is the idea that it's ok to dubya-pee aye-ay-are.

1611:

does no harm and is a bit of fun, doesn't mean we need to keep it. Despite how different articles and categories are, there is still the essence that ultimately, Knowledge (XXG) has a purpose. If we go against a policy because of a...shall I say....typographical error, the purpose is gone. ~

857:

Do I have to point out that he blanked my page 4 times? That he blanked the Video journalism entry 3 times, a couple of weeks after you had warned him not to blank my userpage? This user is not interested in improving this article. Could you please consider taking your threats into action and

3386:

conflict. He is again threatening to block me for "edit warring" (for undoing his blind reverts periodically) and "incivility" (for my pointing out that he is breaking policy and, because of his history of personal conflict with me, should not be trying to act like a neutral admin). I would

1725:

Wait a minute... why not merge the user category system with the WikiProject system? Does that sound crazy? If we want people to use categories for collaboration, just have the categories connect to WikiProjects. Then we could delete categories that haven't got a place to dock up to the

1721:

What I find striking, though, is that the idea of using categories for collaboration is almost entirely redundant with the existing WikiProject structure. Why don't we just encourage people to join the relevant WikiProjects, which also come with userboxes, and which really do facilitate

1189:

Mackan continues to add small and inaccurate edits to the video journalism article, embellishing the article instead of leaving it at its original meaning. He is adding descriptors that are not consistent with the referenced material and that change the face-value of the entry itself.

1556:

deleting the ones that aren't sufficiently "encyclopedic" is just an arbitrary exercise in telling others what to do. If we're telling people they can't play with categories, when they're not harming the project, we're stepping beyond our bounds, and we're alienating contributors.

3098:

Today, an editor who apparently was not previously involved in the controversy ignored the recently failed move request, an open RfC discussion and current guideline text and just went ahead to move the article - three times in a row. His edit summaries actually went like this:

1946:

I'm trying to protect Wikipedians and not to set out pots of beans. Why, why, why won't you even address this point? Why do you shoot yourself in the foot? Why? I don't imagine it's intentional, but will you even consider that I might be making a point worth thinking about?

1409:. I joined Knowledge (XXG) in January, and I've already learnt the names of several people through well meaning editors who publicised something still further in their efforts to get rid of it. (Of course, I don't know if those names are accurate, but that's beside the point.) 2294:

I'm pretty familiar with the warning templates; thanks. A cursory glance at my history would reveal that I've used several this evening. I don't always use them. When an IP with no prior history blanks a page, I'm pretty likely to skip it. Anyway, thanks for being alert.

807:

on who's talkpage you warned him not to make any further personal attacks). He's back from his slumber and calls me "an incredible idiot". A a temporary block or at least a stern warning would be much appreciated! (I also posed about this on the AN/I but nobody responded

1590:

What I see is people telling others what to do with no project-based reason. Knowledge (XXG) is not an exercise in governance, and UCFD's attempts at governance are upsetting contributors. So what's it's excuse? Where's the benefit that outweighs that disadvantage?

3406:"Tim Vickers posted a note on the village pump about conducting a straw poll to force the scholarly edit into WP:V. This is not how policy is made, ever, and these forest fire posts are extremely inappropriate, and make it increasingly difficult to assume good faith." 1833:

The image with the penis is deleted. I wouldn't worry about the 3RR; reverting vandalism is certainly an exception, and that image was definitely vandalism. If the image reappears, or if you need any more assistance, please let me know. Thanks for helping out!

219:. I hope not to leave it as a stub for too long, and it will probably be quite easy to get reliable information about it in the next few weeks, because Dr Billings died a few days ago, so his work is being reported in the media more than it usually is. 821:

I've left him a note regarding the personal attacks. Regarding the article, I suggest you stop reverting him. If you have to revert the same edit more than once, it's a very good idea to get more people involved. I would suggest visiting

514:

The first, long section of code inside the {{double curly braces}} seems to set up the border around the box, and the last line, {{/End Border}} indicates where the border ends. In between are two parts. The "div" in <angle brackets:

1347:

Can you please move the Reggaeton article back to its proper place? Some guy moved it to the accented version without even looking at the talk page and the consensus that was arrived at a long time ago. I don't know how to move it back

3188:

I'm sorry, I don't know of any material about the Queen Mother of the West. My only contribution to the page was to complete a move request, changing its title from Pinyin to English, and I did that because I was helping out with

1301:

Anyway, that aside, as you've clarified that your comments were well-intended, if mistaken, on your part, I'll be more than happy to apologise and retract my comment, which I made as I was starting to disbelieve or at least doubt

1396:

are at all unconcerned, but I have been shocked at some of the remarks from others, which seem to indicate that it's high-handed for an administrator to delete a link to a site that gives someone's personal details — we should

2017:

as a standard. In general, it's the most neutral choice we can make, because doing otherwise involves taking sides in too many disputes. Also, considering that the discussion was focused around deciding whether to move from

2340:

and wanted to inform you that the user was reported for 3RR violation and was blocked for 31 hours on both the IP address and the account name. The issue has been happening for a few weeks and it sadly had to come to that.

1751:

for any reason that could help the encyclopedia, like there usually is for other categories. Most existing categories have been agreed to support collaboration, although I think that many need to be renamed. For instance,

928:

using misinformation and assumption not included in referenced texts. Despite my numerous attempts to point out the "fluffing up" of this article, Mackan refuses to abide by the rules of citing only what actually exists.

387:

much more thoroughly later this afternoon. I can imagine arguments for and against merging PNSD and STRAW. We'll hash those out, and come to some sort of consensus, I'm confident. For now, I must get back to work.

867:

The editing conflict is over since I posted on 3rd opinion. However, Mister-jones finds new reasons for being incivil, after I moved a new section he made on the video journalism talkpage to the bottom of the page

1295:

as a misdirection of the discussion, sidestepping the actual issue. If anyone involved still thinks that things involving user pages can not be disruptive, they should read through the archives of MfD sometime :

3382:. He is a very active edit warrior there blind reverting to an old version of the article, and in fact first went to that page back when he was following me around to try to get back at me for winning in the 3269:

Although I appreciate Musical Linguist's kind intentions, I'm not sure that I really appreciate her going around saying that I've been "humiliated." I have responded to that contention of Musical Linguist

3137:

and a few additional ones easily found via Google showed that this person's name also appears to be subjected to standard capitalization in outside sources, among them Amazon.com and the New York Times no

2643:

for WikiProject Abortion. Please feel free to nominate an article you believe could use improvement. I think this might be a good way to help motivate and organise work on our project's articles. Thanks!

2201:

When it comes to IP addresses, it's hard to tag them as socks, because they don't necessarily stick to the same computer, and then we get collateral damage. I notice that the IP in question is currently

1638:

It's a totally arbitrary exercise is telling others what to do. Deleting frivilous user categories doesn't help the project, and it bugs people who work on the project, therefore it seems harmful to me.

568:

space, a disagreement over a page is not resolved by giving each "party" its own page, or fork. First, that results in two contradictory pages, and second, rather than resolving the dispute, it gives us

509:

I'm not the best person to translate this, because I don't know much about it (I didn't even design my own user page!), but I'll tell you what I see there. I put some spacing in to help parse the code.

1169:

First, you didn't say Not For Stealing, so consider your thoughts stolen. Second, I think the idea that knowledge should be free and the idea that it's ok to ... you know... are not totally unrelated.

839:

Mr Jones has personally attacked me for the umpteenth time. I gave after to removing the "heavily invested" he ferociously opposed, and I gave a reference for the other statement. This is his response.

525:

inside of double curly braces, is what's inside of the box. In this case, it's a user subpage, and part of the code near the top sets up the little plus sign (+) that allows people to edit that page.

1600:

And what is the purpose in contributing to that governance? I understand you may support the categories (wrongly I believe, see a bit further down), but does that require repeated support consensus?

681:

Well through discussion of course... lol... do you think Radiant! would ever participate in a poll? Of course polling on a page that's a guideline on polling is logical (if seemingly a bit silly).

420: 3453:

SlimVirgin reverted all the copy-edits. I did not revert, but asked her to engage on the talk page. She did not respond further and has not commented in my attempt to produce a consensus wording

1061:

Your recent edit of the Tom Leykis entry has the comment "rm stray header". However, when I compare your edits to the previous version of the page, I don't see that you removed a stray header.

2767:'s edit history, he also seems to have made several strange punctuation edits on articles relating to episodes of The Simpsons. It just looks like a simple case of disruptive editing to me... -- 3387:

appreciate it if you could possibly go speak with him again, and maybe be around to talk to others should this admin once again abuse his admin status to try to prevail in a personal conflict.

1765:, as at least random people who happen to have heard songs by them a few times wouldn't be tempted to join the category. My ultimate goal is to get the naming conventions to be something like 1280:. I just wanted to clarify that it was certainly a misconception, and not misdirection that I was mistaken about the genesis of UCFD. I appreciate the clarification you provided; thank you. - 893:

You left me a message about what i left----could i verify the sources, which you say doesn't matter if i can or not. I got the information from The History channel: The Secret History of LSD.

2640: 31:

Believe it or not, I tried it in that place originally. But it reads awfully, and I see no reason to sacrifice legibility for the sake of having a paragraph's first word being the subject. --

2160:

That's taken care of; thanks for the heads-up. I've blocked the account as apparently used only for vandalism, and deleted all the spurious image uploads. Now it looks as if the user made

2762:(whom appears to be the same person, judging from the IP info) was doing the exact same thing on the same set of articles last night and had already been warned about changing British : --> 1886: 2009:

You know, our policy of going with the most common name among English-speaking sources is probably our most controversial naming convention. I can see the argument for moving the page to

1699:

I think that we may agree on more user category issues than you would suspect. I agree with you that the majority of user categories, as is, probably don't help facilitate collaboration.

140:

and that you're "happy to help new users". So I'm coming to you with my question, because even though I'm not a new user, I still find occasionally that there's something I don't know and

3445:. Two other editors agreed with the change and SV did not offer any explanation for her revert. I therefore made the change again. I asked repeatedly on her talk page for an explanation 3148:

This is when the fun began. Turns out the guy is an admin and I'm blocked for 24 hours, because Mr. I-have-overruled-the-debate considers my edits to the Yronwode article a violation of

2847:

Just as above, I have nothing to do with this image. I reverted a piece of vandalism on the page months ago, and I know nor care nothing about its fair use rationale, or lack thereof. -

1406: 616: 383:

It wouldn't matter much if you slandered Radiant to me; I wouldn't believe you. I already know he's one of the Good Guys, as are you, Netscott. On point, I will be checking out

3010: 1905:

You need to reread the policy on civility. You continuously attack the messenger rather than the message. You defintiely should know better so I won't remind you again. Thanks.--

149: 522: 366:

Where am I attacking you? I am talking about actions...always actions... not about you personally... have you not understood this? Review our talks you'll see what I mean.

1262:

Thanks for combining them into one request. I wasn't planning on finding so many in that one sitting, and wasn't really sure how to combine them all anyway. Thanks again!

2252: 2492:

Please visit the request page to indicate your acceptance of mediation. I urge you to accept, as it doesn't seem like we're getting anywhere arguing on the talk page. —

2255:

useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the

1999:

English speakers, the most common name was San Sebastián, but that probably wasn't the case among toponymists. Why are toponymists not the experts we should look to?

3120:, even though this particular passage clearly suggests to follow the majority of outside sources. He also names a few examples, one of them being beside the point ( 2818:. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at 2710:. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at 826:

and getting an uninvolved voice to weigh in over the edits in question. Simply reverting the user again and again makes it look as if you're both edit warriors. -

1142:

wow I mean, I completely understood what you were talking about...thanks for taking the time. I wish you had been my maths teacher that last year in High School.

2903:, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at 1766: 1941:

For the umpteenth time, neither can I. I'm against linking to attack sites. I do find it frustrating that you seem incredibly eager to do something that will

468:

I saw on Can't sleep, clown will eat me's page that he had a box with a scrolling option, i was wondering how to make such a box, your help will be appreciated

1424:

a diff which needs to be oversighted. Of course, it's sometimes oversighted within ten minutes, but how many people have seen it in the meantime?) Regards.

450: 2150:]. I've been fighting with a new user and an anonymous user (whom I suspect are the same person) over this useless article. Help is needed! Thanks. --- 1420:

weren't aware of it, there must be many others who aren't. (And yes, I've also seen people going to talk pages of admins who have oversight, and posting

1073: 471: 41:

I think there's at least one good way to word it with the first word being "Discordianism". At the very least, "Discordianism" should be capitalized. -

3139: 1175:

That is all for now. Consider yourself lucky. ("If we're unlucky", says Ford Prefect, "the captain might want to read us some of his poetry first.") --

2758:

Apologies for the rapid-fire reverts. If it appears that I was acting hastily WRT to warning/reporting the IP in question it was due to the fact that

279: 274: 2980:, and I know you're experienced in closing discussions there. If you have any extra time, can you help us kill some of the backlog? Happy editing... 2893: 2618:

section. I don't blame you at all, as the page was very active, and could have fifty new posts if you left and came back a few hours later. See also

90:

I don't get your point. What makes a source reliable? On definitions-Wow! I just really realized that we are argueing over the definition of a word.

2321:

Maybe next year. I think I'm not particularly trusted in some circles here, and I'd be surprised to make it, but running would be... educational. -

1176: 283: 3037:. You may be seeing more in the future, unfortunately, as I continue to go through and check every callsign registered with the FCC. Thanks again! 2173:

That is just fine by me! Thank you for the quick action. Though, one suspects that a person who had that much fun vandalizing will return... ---

3375:

violations of policy. You stepped in at that time to tell him to back off and to stop reverting the page while also threatening me and so forth.

3437:

you can see very clearly where the problem came from. I made a set of copy-edits with descriptive edit summaries. SlimVirgin reverted this edit

1714:

saying "keep" on everything. Before you dropped by, I had begun to get the impression that there's an understanding that user categories don't

3162:

need a break), I'm also not going to stand aside and let this happen to me or my record as an editor. Thanks for taking the time to read this.

2373: 643:

See, nobody seems to actually oppose this idea, is it just a matter of somebody taking the initiative and refactoring the two pages into one? -

270: 3454: 3450: 3442: 2947:

is suffering from extensive revert warring, and discussion is heading nowhere. A RfC was filed, but was only able to get one outside commentor

2834: 2726: 2013:. I tried to close the move request in keeping with consensus, judging both by the discussion on the talk page, and the consensus supporting 2029:

As for why toponymists should not be the experts to whom we look... I wouldn't necessarily say that. However, I think of precedents such as

1236:

making rules about how others may use user categories is even further removed from our project than using those categories in the first place

2619: 2615: 1401:

be allowed to see that link, so that we can judge if it really does give their details, rather than having to take the admin's word for it!

453:. I saw it a few weeks ago, but kind of forgot about it. It hasn't received a lot of consensus, yet FictionH added the screenshots anyways. 190:, for an appropriate sub-category. If a good sub-category doesn't jump out at you, then the general org-stub is fine. I hope that helps. - 137: 3449:, to see if I was missing something. She replied a day later and I placed her comments on the talk page. While these were being discussed, 2453: 2215:

This seems like a sound course of action. I will keep an eye on it as well, and we will see what happens. Thanks again for your time. ---

2075: 1762: 1753: 2421: 1118: 1077: 3143: 750:) I can't see evidence of anyone being notified of the problem. *coughs embarrassedly, nods head in direction of GTBacchus' sysmop...* 2389: 2534: 2356: 1405:

seem sensible actually doing that when they are concerned about personal information having been posted. I wrote about that problem

965: 559:

to be about whether we should give suggestions on how to poll. But that's not actually the case - nobody denies that we should, and

1500:

Actually, that's inaccurate. I've never responded that way in an AfD, and I never would. I've responded that way at UCFD, which

1136: 317:

have been trying to get the page in shape as an actual guideline for how to conduct a poll... without much success at this point.

1015:

ever give you the blues, Miltopia? I work early in the morning, and have no business online right now. Take it easy, slugger. -

701:

It appears the opposition is coming from Grace Note and Guy, actually. I think a poll would be rather unhelpful at this point. -

3243:

Hi, GTBacchus, I'm finishing some papers (as I think I've already mentioned), and I've taken the liberty of giving your name to

2829:

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

2721:

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

932:

I'm not doing it to be annoying -- I'm doing it because the misinformation he's constantly adding is just that: misinformation.

2485: 2405: 1193:

I would appreciate you throwing a warning his way, as these "little" embellishments are teetering into the ideal of vandalism.

572:

disputes. The actual solution would be to fix the wording on PNSD, and centralize discussion on one talk page rather than two.

136:

Hello, GTBacchus. I see you around from time to time, and I've been looking at your user page and see that you're a member of

2337: 1726:

WikiProject system, and encourage people to start a WikiProject, if feasible, for any encyclopedic category they want to use.

735: 483: 1385: 1748: 809: 3304: 3297: 3252:

to contact her unless he's sure from her user page that her baby is better) and ElinorD's. I hope everything works out at

2951: 2944: 2437: 3312: 3308: 2885: 2819: 2739:

This seems to be an error. I clearly am not the one who uploaded that image. I've left a note at the bot's talk page. -

2711: 2533:

to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage,

110: 3404:

Hi there, I thought that I should let you know that SlimVirgin was not being at all accurate when she said to you that

3190: 501:[http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Can't_sleep,_clown_will_eat_me/User/Clownbox&action=edit <span: --> 1035:

I mostly agree with that, except in situations where the odds are really really against something being good faith...

213: 187: 1782: 3260: 2469: 2367: 2188:

and I were talking about this user, and wondering if it might be advisable to open a sockpuppet investigation into

1819: 606:, with sections covering what's now covered in PNSD and STRAW? I'm not sure I see anybody opposing such a merge. - 2910: 2900: 2889: 2877: 2859: 2823: 2814: 2041: 2010: 977: 784: 1574: 998: 240: 2920: 2873: 2447: 266: 2415: 2916: 2259:. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. 1112: 1081: 780: 2796: 2688: 2014: 2759: 2668: 2383: 1722:

collaboration? Heck, that could be a actionable reason for deletion: "obsoleted by existing WikiProject".

1332:

I think that purpose is served, to some extent, by IAR's talk page. I look forward to seeing you there. -

1143: 309:'s editing there. At every turn he's taken to anti-polling soapbox editing there (essentially duplicating 2274: 1473:

I'm not sure if it's been brought to your attention yet (and if it has, I wonder why you continue?), but

1361: 1349: 3257: 2764: 2411: 2363: 1108: 1001:- I'm thinking you'll get a kick out of this. WE HATE ED, LET'S GIVE THEM SOME ATTENTION TO PROVE IT. 959: 731: 203: 3253: 3218:

I just wish you hadn't run and made a complaint, even for a wrong comment, what I said wasn't even bad

3170: 2909:

Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate

2663: 2379: 2206:

for 48 hours; maybe that will suffice. I've watchlisted the talk page, too. Let's see what happens. -

1604: 1587:

simply an all-or-nothing ultimatum. I'd prefer you respond to my thoughts in kind - with some thought.

1522: 1501: 1474: 3441:, the addition of the single word "new". I did not replace it but asked for guidance on the talk page 3349: 3348:

about the accuracy of the first paragraph of the abortion article, and you're invited to participate.

3287: 3244: 2778: 2768: 2216: 2193: 2174: 2151: 1882: 1875: 747: 3412:. Sorry to drag this onto your talk page, but I didn't want you taking away a bad impression of me. 3367: 3279: 3219: 3216:

I was going to say something about cannabis, believe me the other person was as confused as you were

3207: 2592: 2256: 620: 603: 3075: 3017: 2838: 2730: 2479: 2443: 2399: 2189: 1970: 1206:

I would appreciate some sort of response on this matter. Mackan continues to embellish the article.

454: 436: 337:

Scott, would you mind not making personal attacks against me on other people's talk pages? Thanks.

76: 63: 17: 3214:

Sorry I had two pages open and gave your comment to someone else and someone else's comment to you

3117: 2281: 2142: 3129: 2999: 2984: 1323: 1247: 1230: 875: 874:. This is getting ridiculous, Mister-jones seems happy for any excuse to make personal attacks. 859: 812: 684: 655: 626: 573: 479: 416: 369: 338: 320: 246: 3149: 1899: 1442:

win quickly and decisively is actively harmful, because of RC. Revert wars attract attention. -

920:

Hi GTBacchus: I've started taking Wiki more seriously. However, I'm running into a problem with

384: 310: 62:

onto his userpage. I think it's a GFDL violation, but I forget how that could violate the GFDL.

787:. This way takes a little longer than just using the mop, but it's worth it in the long run. - 243:

your application of logic and your excellent explanation are very refreshing. Thanks for that!

3363: 2626: 2584: 2502: 2431: 2345: 2248: 2235: 2104: 2082: 1814: 1428: 1216: 1197: 938: 935:

I know you've got better things to do. If you get a chance, would you point that out? Thanks!

798: 223: 180: 167: 100: 91: 1292: 1277: 560: 103: 94: 2881: 2649: 2342: 2023: 1865: 1757: 1040: 952: 925: 906: 805: 314: 58: 3398: 2904: 2830: 2722: 2530: 1718:

help with collaboration, but that's just code for the categories that... potentially might?

1413: 1303: 1170: 258: 118: 3458: 3413: 3166: 3095:, regarding whether to follow the subject's personal preference of capitalization or not. 3092: 2961: 2929:

I don't know why I received this message, but I've deleted the redirect in question now. -

2267: 1824: 1623: 1536: 1488: 3034: 2977: 2588: 1858: 1603:

Besides, I really don't see the point of keeping the categories, for a reason based upon

823: 763: 516:

is a mystery to me, but it must set up the box somehow. Color #ffffff is black, I think.

148:

stub when I start a new but very short article. I have just started an article about the

3316: 1881:

GTBacchus, I just wanted to let you know that an article you recently pariticipated in,

3424: 3383: 3371: 3330: 3320: 3229: 3196: 3121: 3014: 2930: 2848: 2740: 2715: 2706: 2475: 2463: 2395: 2322: 2296: 2207: 2165: 2132: 2122: 2092: 2071: 2045: 1980: 1950: 1917: 1835: 1799: 1789: 1756:

is justified as the users in the category are likely to be able to answer questions on

1738: 1685: 1640: 1592: 1565: 1509: 1466: 1443: 1370: 1333: 1281: 1122: 1016: 827: 788: 702: 673: 644: 607: 532: 496:

with. In this case, I grabbed the code for the first scrolling box I saw. This is it:

389: 191: 176:

Nobody can keep up with all the stub types. I generally pick a nice general one, like

122: 42: 3275: 2148:

Please, when you have a moment, come over and look at the nonsense going on over here

734:

has decided to unilaterally undo the decision of the recent discussion with regard to

114: 3388: 3379: 2996: 2981: 2899:

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting

2312: 2185: 1890: 1770: 1704: 1675: 1241: 1067:

In fact, it looks like all you did was delete some legitimate content from the page.

1002: 743: 689: 660: 631: 542: 475: 412: 405: 374: 325: 306: 251: 156: 32: 3461: 3427: 3416: 3391: 3352: 3345: 3333: 3323: 3290: 3263: 3232: 3228:

I didn't "run and make a complaint"; I still don't know what you're talking about. -

3222: 3199: 3173: 3078: 3064: 3041: 3020: 3004: 2989: 2933: 2923: 2851: 2841: 2781: 2771: 2743: 2733: 2674: 2629: 2507: 2325: 2315: 2299: 2288: 2219: 2210: 2196: 2177: 2168: 2154: 2135: 2125: 2121:

like to retrieve any of your discussions, let me know and I'll dig 'em out for you.

2107: 2095: 2085: 2057: 2048: 2003: 1983: 1973: 1953: 1936: 1920: 1909: 1893: 1868: 1838: 1827: 1802: 1792: 1773: 1741: 1707: 1688: 1678: 1643: 1629: 1595: 1581: 1568: 1542: 1512: 1494: 1446: 1431: 1373: 1364: 1352: 1336: 1326: 1310: 1284: 1266: 1252: 1219: 1200: 1179: 1148: 1125: 1085: 1043: 1019: 1005: 988: 941: 910: 878: 862: 830: 815: 791: 772: 756: 705: 696: 676: 667: 647: 638: 610: 596: 545: 535: 487: 457: 439: 392: 361: 332: 226: 194: 170: 125: 79: 66: 45: 35: 3058: 3053: 2623: 2560: 2494: 2427: 2192:. What are your thoughts? Is it worthwhile to tag that IP address as a sock? --- 2101: 2079: 1578: 1425: 769: 753: 220: 164: 2131:

It's ok; I can see deleted pages, too. If I need 'em, I know where to find 'em. -

1063:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Tom_Leykis&diff=next&oldid=121535857

500:{{/Border| width=100%| header=clown around <span class="db-cGxhaW5saW5rcw": --> 300: 3184:

materials ,would you please send me some? thanks in advance and have a nice day!

415:" was ranked #1.5. He provides no sources for it, except for where he lives (see 3133: 3038: 3033:

Thanks for taking care of those radio station article moves that I requested at

2888:

from Knowledge (XXG). The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because

2751: 2645: 2054: 2000: 1849: 1306:

in the face such accusations. As always, I hope you're having a great day : ) -

1263: 1121:), which looks indeed to be a removal of content. It wasn't I who removed it. - 902: 2865: 2777:

Point taken and understood, mate. Thanks. Gotta save the Columbiformes... :) --

563:

already covers that (although admittedly this could use some work). The debate

2260: 2074:. (You just beat me to it.) Perhaps you could do whatever is appropriate with 1933: 1906: 1885:, has been nominated for deletion. I ask for your input on the matter at the " 1613: 1526: 1478: 3358:

Problem admin still abusing his position to try to carry on personal conflict

1979:

No problem - I'm always especially happy to help out with Beatles articles! -

1932:...I have thought about it. I can see no reason to link to attack websites.-- 1521:

My bad, I was referring to UCFD. Yes, they aren't specifically mentioned in

419:). The user has had a reputation of being an unreliable source (referring to 3125: 2955: 2459: 1854: 1438:

re-insertion of the link, and its re-removal, across RC over and over again.

1307: 1096:, where you can see I removed a stray header. The one your link points to ( 852: 2995:

Mostly fixed now, so don't worry about it. Someone deserves a barnstar....

1767:

Category:Wikipedians interested in collaborating on A Perfect Circle topics

2763:

American English and given the full set of vandalism warnings. Looking at

2026:, it was difficult to gauge the consensus for a move to the compound name. 1674:

and even more importantly trying to spread the understanding to others. --

3116:

On the article talk page and my own, he went on to base his rationale on

2591:

to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please

2034: 2030: 2019: 3271: 2243: 1238:" is particularly lucid, and not something that had yet occurred to me. 1135: 742:

mean the move now can't be undone without admin assistance, but despite

3141: 3135: 1012: 951:

Thanks for moving Chabad-Lubavitch. And for fixing all the redirects!

2968:

to facilitate dispute resolution. Thank you. 08:49, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

2919:

if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --

2521: 505:{{User:Can't sleep, clown will eat me/User/Clownbox}} {{/End Border}} 3284:

having been improperly reverted by her without explanation on 15 June

921: 3101:

I am ruling that, as her legal name is uncapitalized So mote it be.

1158:

Just wandering back through the snowball discussion and came across

451:

discussion about whether to include both title cards and screenshots

3274:. As for Phaedriel, I have no plans to say anything to her, after 2355:

A request for mediation has been filed about the article "Yoghurt"

3378:

That same admin is up to the exact same thing again, this time on

3152:. No warning or word of advice beforehand and of course, this has 1848: 1038:... which just possibly misfired today... didn't it. <hmph: --> 1011:

A "kick". Yeah... that's what I'm gonna start calling it. Does

844:

Can I just remind you of the numerous times you have warned him?

3457:. I can't see how I could have been more courteous or cautious. 3074:

Thanks for the clarification. I support your continued efforts.

521:

The third bit of code there, which is just the name of the page

421:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Dan (South Park character)

3132:) was new and a quick look at the sources used for the article 3009:

Yea, I'd vote for that, too. Thank you, GTBacchus, for fixing

1788:

This user is a return abusive sock. Please lock the talk page.

3276:

having made a futile attempt to communicate with her on 31 May

739: 724: 2976:

We've gotten a bit behind over the last four or five days at

2614:

Hi, I think you missed my answer, which was at the bottom of

2053:

Okay, I accept that this case is analogous to species names.

1857:, where it is an uphill battle trying to get compliance with 1504:

does not address. That guideline refers quite explicitly to

2864: 1457:

I've noticed that you respond to a lot of AfD debates with;

1134: 804:

Problematic user you've dealt with before (see also this IP

2247:

Hello. I'm in agreement with the recent revert you made to

1928:

Is it more fun to shoot yourself in the foot than to think?

623:

I essentially was demonstrating support for such thinking.

617:

Knowledge (XXG):Polling is not a substitute for discussion

1525:, but I hardly see how there's that big a difference. ~ 1477:

contains an exact copy of this quote...just a thought.~

602:

How do you feel about the idea of making a single page,

3446: 3438: 3434: 3409: 3283: 3157: 3111: 3106:

and on the subject's user talk page, he proclaimed to "

3104: 2966: 2964: 2958: 2948: 2892:

is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (

2203: 1925: 1667: 1097: 1093: 1062: 983: 971: 872: 869: 849: 847: 845: 840: 446: 433: 430: 427: 424: 296: 292: 288: 99:

And as this is not a dictionary, im gonna shut up now.

3423:

is whether people are learning from this experience. -

3329:

Thanks for the heads-up. I've commented at the Tfd. -

3280:

having been accused by her of vindictiveness on 5 June

2884:, another Knowledge (XXG) user, requesting that it be 2251:. You may already know about them, but you might find 3011:

American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers

2253:

Knowledge (XXG):Template messages/User talk namespace

1670:

and your comment right above: Thank you for actually

2788:

Non-free use disputed for Image:Darkest redcover.jpg

2076:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Terersa jones

1185:

Continued embellishment of video journalism article.

901:

Thank you for moving Cinematic genre to Film genre.

2833:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 2725:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 2359:. The following have been listed as participants: 2234:Please warn vandals after reverting their edits on 1763:

Category:Wikipedians interested in A Perfect Circle

1754:

Category:Wikipedians who listen to A Perfect Circle

1276:Jc37, hi. I'm replying here to what you posted at 239:Thank you so much for joing the discussion over on 150:

World Organisation of the Ovulation Method Billings

523:User:Can't sleep, clown will eat me/User/Clownbox 3091:You might or might not be aware of a dispute at 2604:This message delivered: 04:17, 26 May 2007 (UTC) 2040:All that said, if you want to propose a move to 449:his edit. I didn't even notice that there was a 3319:. Please help reach a consensus on this issue. 3145:Of course, I changed that article accordingly. 2826:and clarify why you think the image qualifies. 2718:and clarify why you think the image qualifies. 2164:contributions, which I guess is just as well. - 411:FictionH keeps trying to add that the episode " 3315:on TfD(Template for Deletion) for POV forking 2535:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for mediation/Yoghurt 652:Indeed, once there is a consensus to do that. 144:. I'd like to know more about how to find the 132:Question about finding the right stub template 73:The article has been removed from his userpage 2091:I've deleted that; thanks for the heads-up. - 762:Update: scratch that. Someone's listed it at 186:in this case, and then look in the category, 8: 3124:), one of them being already MoS compliant ( 2950:. Please provide a third opinion on whether 52:FictionH copied an article onto his userpage 2587:, an automated bot account operated by the 1733:I don't know, maybe that's a terrible idea. 685: 656: 627: 370: 321: 247: 2516: 1684:You're welcome. :) Thanks for your note. - 690: 661: 632: 531:said, I'm no expert. I hope that helps. - 375: 326: 252: 3408:I have dealt with this misrepresentation 2680:Non-free use disputed for Image:Adair.jpg 1412:It concerns me that you weren't aware of 766:'s uncontroversial section. Ignore me... 504:}} <div class="db-cGxhaW5saW5rcw": --> 2593:contact the Mediation Committee directly 1701:That's exactly what I'm trying to change 138:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Stub sorting 3362:Hi, in the past you were involved when 1969:Thanks for fixing my newbie mistake! -- 423:). Here are his revisions on the page. 3303:Wiki pokemon is now trying to replace 2639:Hi, GTBacchus. I have just started an 1861:. I hope you will watchlist the page. 1465:- Does no harm, no reason to delete. - 3118:WP:MOS-CL#Mixed or non-capitalization 1749:Category:Wikipedians and Potato Skins 953: 109:On what makes a source reliable, see 7: 3193:, and not because of any expertise. 2915:Feel free to leave a message on the 2100:And thanks for your quick response! 1737:but at this point, I don't get it. - 3313:template:History of Northeast China 3309:template:History of Northeast China 1258:Uncontroversial Radio article moves 1177:Abu-Fool Danyal ibn Amir al-Makhiri 924:constantly rewriting the entry for 3433:If you look at the history of NOR 3366:was involved in edit warring over 3179:about the Queen mother of the west 1916:message; otherwise, I'm puzzled. - 24: 2622:for some other comments. Cheers. 1508:, and there's a big difference. - 1386:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Attack sites 3397:Discussion of Revert-warring at 2820:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content 2795: 2712:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content 2687: 2520: 2242: 1453:AfD Debates - Just some thoughts 417:User_talk:FictionH#Best_Day_Ever 199:Thank you very much. I've added 111:Knowledge (XXG):Reliable sources 2791: 2683: 1783:User talk:-oM-R-O-O-M-P-A-P-Ao- 1291:has been about the validity of 746:'s interim fix (redirecting to 3013:and the tangled redirects! — 2872:Hello, this is a message from 2835:Media copyright questions page 2727:Media copyright questions page 1817:of the cover art of the album 1559:The only reason I can see for 736:Total Nonstop Action Wrestling 1: 3305:template:History of Manchuria 3298:template:History of Manchuria 2952:template:History of Manchuria 2945:template:History of Manchuria 2338:Talk:St. John's College, U.S. 2282: 2261: 1949:think you wouldn't want to. - 1813:I had to repeatedly unlink a 1614: 1527: 1479: 3156:to do with the Boyd dispute. 3070:NPA talkpage & mediation 2954:should be titled History of 2911:Golden Years ((TV programme) 2901:Golden Years ((TV programme) 2890:Golden Years ((TV programme) 2878:Golden Years ((TV programme) 2860:Golden Years ((TV programme) 2831:Criteria for speedy deletion 2723:Criteria for speedy deletion 2602: 2555:For the Mediation Committee, 2275: 1853:Thank you for chiming in on 1107:my version, to a version by 1048:goes off to consider my sins 999:Knowledge (XXG):Attack sites 672:And that's determined how? - 241:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Polling 2876:. A tag has been placed on 2268: 1624: 1537: 1489: 267:Knowledge (XXG):Straw polls 188:Category:Organization stubs 3477: 2824:the image description page 2815:Image:Darkest redcover.jpg 2716:the image description page 2583:This message delivered by 2044:, I wouldn't oppose you. - 1995:People agreed that taking 1820:Wake Up! Wake Up! Wake Up! 1803:19:00, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 1793:18:59, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 1774:03:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 1742:03:04, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 1708:02:24, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 1689:03:08, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 1679:20:41, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 1644:12:54, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 1630:06:01, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 1596:00:23, 25 April 2007 (UTC) 1582:23:29, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 1569:22:19, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 1543:06:37, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 1513:04:18, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 1495:04:16, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 1469:00:19, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 1447:04:23, 24 April 2007 (UTC) 1432:16:18, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 1374:07:18, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 1365:07:14, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 1353:07:02, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 1337:00:50, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 1327:00:44, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 1311:12:13, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 1285:03:25, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 1267:07:45, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 1253:23:28, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 1220:04:56, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 1201:04:57, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 1180:15:26, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 1149:02:35, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 1126:05:18, 17 April 2007 (UTC) 1086:03:29, 17 April 2007 (UTC) 1044:20:17, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 1020:06:23, 17 April 2007 (UTC) 1006:00:06, 14 April 2007 (UTC) 989:19:27, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 942:12:42, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 911:11:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 863:08:07, 21 April 2007 (UTC) 445:He called me an idiot for 235:Wow! logic shows it's face 3462:22:14, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 3428:21:17, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 3417:19:10, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 3392:03:48, 26 June 2007 (UTC) 3353:19:46, 24 June 2007 (UTC) 3334:21:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 3324:20:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 3291:00:08, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 3264:18:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 3233:19:44, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 3223:17:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 3210:05:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 3200:05:26, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 3174:05:16, 17 June 2007 (UTC) 3108:have overruled the debate 3079:19:28, 14 June 2007 (UTC) 3065:23:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC) 3042:06:01, 12 June 2007 (UTC) 3021:08:57, 10 June 2007 (UTC) 2940:Request for Third Opinion 2641:Article Improvement Drive 2635:Article improvement drive 2033:, which was not moved to 1031:Not calling spades spades 1024:slugger? I just met 'er! 831:15:35, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 816:08:24, 9 April 2007 (UTC) 792:21:22, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 785:Talk:TNA (disambiguation) 773:20:05, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 757:19:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 706:21:45, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 697:21:13, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 677:20:54, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 668:20:53, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 648:20:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 639:20:43, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 611:20:18, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 597:08:02, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 546:01:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 536:03:25, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 488:01:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 458:21:09, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 440:20:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 393:17:53, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 362:16:06, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 333:16:03, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 259:15:07, 5 April 2007 (UTC) 227:20:33, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 195:20:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 171:17:31, 4 April 2007 (UTC) 126:16:48, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 104:15:56, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 95:15:55, 3 April 2007 (UTC) 80:16:53, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 67:16:05, 2 April 2007 (UTC) 46:00:46, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 36:00:36, 1 April 2007 (UTC) 3344:There's some discussion 3005:11:59, 6 June 2007 (UTC) 2990:07:16, 6 June 2007 (UTC) 2934:20:16, 3 June 2007 (UTC) 2924:19:16, 3 June 2007 (UTC) 2917:bot operator's talk page 2852:08:40, 3 June 2007 (UTC) 2842:01:03, 3 June 2007 (UTC) 2782:13:47, 3 June 2007 (UTC) 2772:23:32, 2 June 2007 (UTC) 2744:17:51, 31 May 2007 (UTC) 2734:16:13, 31 May 2007 (UTC) 2675:01:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC) 2630:22:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC) 2508:02:48, 26 May 2007 (UTC) 2346:05:36, 25 May 2007 (UTC) 2326:08:28, 27 May 2007 (UTC) 2316:23:44, 23 May 2007 (UTC) 2300:05:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC) 2289:04:58, 22 May 2007 (UTC) 2220:16:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC) 2211:15:25, 21 May 2007 (UTC) 2197:15:09, 21 May 2007 (UTC) 2182:Hello again. Over here 2178:04:43, 21 May 2007 (UTC) 2169:04:30, 21 May 2007 (UTC) 2155:04:24, 21 May 2007 (UTC) 2136:05:22, 14 May 2007 (UTC) 2126:05:17, 14 May 2007 (UTC) 2108:17:46, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 2096:17:39, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 2086:17:37, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 2070:Thanks for reverting at 2058:02:11, 14 May 2007 (UTC) 2049:09:48, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 2004:03:26, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 1984:09:49, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 1974:02:13, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 1954:22:29, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 1937:21:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 1921:21:22, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 1910:20:22, 10 May 2007 (UTC) 1360:Much appreciated, amigo 2336:I noticed your post at 2331: 1894:01:23, 5 May 2007 (UTC) 1869:23:40, 4 May 2007 (UTC) 1839:19:57, 3 May 2007 (UTC) 1828:19:38, 3 May 2007 (UTC) 1103:edit, showing a change 916:Video Journalism entry. 879:19:16, 2 May 2007 (UTC) 781:User talk:OrbitComplete 621:Knowledge (XXG):Polling 604:Knowledge (XXG):Polling 3311:, so I have nominated 3113:Neat choice of words. 2869: 2042:Donostia-San Sebastián 2011:Donostia-San Sebastián 1862: 1573:And now you move onto 1471: 1322:them more to look at. 1139: 85: 56:He copied the article 2868: 2812:Thanks for uploading 2704:Thanks for uploading 2652:) 01:17, 29 May 2007 2531:Request for Mediation 2513:Request for Mediation 1852: 1459: 1138: 1076:comment was added by 474:comment was added by 3272:here at my talk page 2760:User:141.149.110.220 2610:You missed my answer 1883:House Resolution 333 1876:House Resolution 333 1845:You deserve a cookie 1154:dubya-pee aye-ay-are 748:TNA (disambiguation) 615:When I did the move 234: 3029:Radio station moves 2921:Android Mouse Bot 2 2589:Mediation Committee 1965:Yesterday and Today 1815:manipulated variant 1092:The edit I did was 779:I've left notes at 551:The problem is this 18:User talk:GTBacchus 3195:I wish you luck. - 3130:catherine yronwode 2870: 2765:User:71.246.186.25 2596: 1863: 1798:Already done. :) - 1607:. Just because a 1140: 1054:"rm stray header"? 994:For your amusement 732:User:OrbitComplete 214:Australia-org-stub 3364:User:Arthur Rubin 3088:Hello GTBacchus, 2810: 2809: 2802:This file may be 2702: 2701: 2694:This file may be 2673: 2601: 2600: 2597: 2582: 2498: 2332:St John's College 2249:Talk:Homelessness 2236:Talk:Homelessness 2066:Admin help needed 1625:Talk (reply here) 1089: 1050: 1026: 909: 799:User:Mister-jones 502:(+)</span: --> 491: 264:You might reveiw 152:, and I just put 119:original research 3468: 3340:Abortion article 3061: 3056: 3002: 2987: 2886:speedily deleted 2874:an automated bot 2799: 2792: 2691: 2684: 2671: 2666: 2662: 2581: 2563: 2559: 2524: 2517: 2506: 2496: 2364:Cultural Freedom 2286: 2279: 2272: 2265: 2246: 2116:Subpage deletion 1758:A Perfect Circle 1626: 1620: 1539: 1533: 1491: 1485: 1250: 1245: 1071: 1070:Please explain. 1046: 1022: 986: 926:video journalism 905: 692: 687: 663: 658: 634: 629: 593: 591: 589: 587: 585: 469: 377: 372: 358: 356: 354: 352: 350: 328: 323: 315:User:Kim Bruning 304: 286: 254: 249: 218: 212: 208: 202: 185: 179: 161: 155: 117:, and nothing's 59:Crash Nitro Kart 3476: 3475: 3471: 3470: 3469: 3467: 3466: 3465: 3402: 3360: 3342: 3301: 3241: 3212: 3191:requested moves 3181: 3093:Talk:Danah Boyd 3086: 3072: 3059: 3054: 3049: 3031: 3000: 2985: 2974: 2972:Requested moves 2962:Northeast China 2942: 2863: 2822:and then go to 2790: 2779:Kurt Shaped Box 2769:Kurt Shaped Box 2756: 2714:and then go to 2707:Image:Adair.jpg 2682: 2669: 2664: 2658: 2637: 2612: 2607: 2561: 2557: 2515: 2493: 2353: 2334: 2308: 2240: 2146: 2118: 2068: 1992: 1967: 1903: 1889:. Thank you. -- 1879: 1847: 1811: 1809:Image vandalism 1786: 1730:accessible..... 1697: 1695:User categories 1664: 1628: 1575:WP:ALLORNOTHING 1541: 1493: 1455: 1389: 1345: 1319: 1274: 1260: 1243: 1239: 1228: 1187: 1156: 1133: 1072:—The preceding 1056: 1033: 996: 958: 949: 918: 899: 891: 858:block/ban him? 802: 738:. His edits to 729: 583: 581: 579: 577: 575: 553: 506: 503:]</span: --> 470:—The preceding 466: 409: 348: 346: 344: 342: 340: 277: 265: 237: 216: 210: 206: 200: 183: 177: 159: 153: 134: 88: 54: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3474: 3472: 3431: 3430: 3401: 3395: 3384:domain tasting 3372:domain tasting 3368:domain kitting 3359: 3356: 3341: 3338: 3337: 3336: 3300: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3240: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3217: 3215: 3211: 3205: 3204: 3203: 3180: 3177: 3128:); the third ( 3122:e. e. cummings 3085: 3082: 3076:LessHeard vanU 3071: 3068: 3048: 3045: 3030: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3023: 2973: 2970: 2960:or History of 2941: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2898: 2897: 2862: 2858:Typo redirect 2856: 2855: 2854: 2839:BetacommandBot 2808: 2807: 2800: 2789: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2755: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2731:BetacommandBot 2700: 2699: 2692: 2681: 2678: 2657: 2654: 2636: 2633: 2611: 2608: 2599: 2598: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2527: 2525: 2514: 2511: 2490: 2489: 2473: 2457: 2444:SchmuckyTheCat 2441: 2425: 2409: 2393: 2377: 2352: 2349: 2333: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2307: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2239: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2145: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2117: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2072:George W. Bush 2067: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2038: 2027: 1991: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1971:GentlemanGhost 1966: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1902: 1897: 1878: 1872: 1846: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1810: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1785: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1734: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1696: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1663: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1636: 1622: 1601: 1588: 1557: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1535: 1516: 1515: 1487: 1454: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1439: 1388: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1362:68.155.122.113 1350:68.155.122.113 1344: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1318: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1298: 1297: 1273: 1270: 1259: 1256: 1227: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1213: 1212: 1208: 1207: 1186: 1183: 1167: 1166: 1155: 1152: 1132: 1129: 1055: 1052: 1032: 1029: 1028: 1027: 995: 992: 955: 948: 945: 917: 914: 898: 895: 890: 887: 886: 885: 884: 883: 882: 881: 855: 842: 834: 833: 801: 796: 795: 794: 728: 722: 721: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 552: 549: 539: 538: 527: 526: 518: 517: 511: 510: 499: 498: 497: 465: 462: 461: 460: 455:Squirepants101 437:Squirepants101 408: 403: 402: 401: 400: 399: 398: 397: 396: 395: 313:). Myself and 236: 233: 232: 231: 230: 229: 133: 130: 129: 128: 87: 84: 83: 82: 77:Squirepants101 64:Squirepants101 53: 50: 49: 48: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3473: 3464: 3463: 3460: 3456: 3452: 3448: 3444: 3440: 3436: 3429: 3426: 3421: 3420: 3419: 3418: 3415: 3411: 3407: 3400: 3396: 3394: 3393: 3390: 3385: 3381: 3380:photo editing 3376: 3373: 3369: 3365: 3357: 3355: 3354: 3351: 3347: 3339: 3335: 3332: 3328: 3327: 3326: 3325: 3322: 3318: 3314: 3310: 3306: 3299: 3296: 3292: 3289: 3285: 3281: 3277: 3273: 3268: 3267: 3266: 3265: 3262: 3259: 3255: 3251: 3246: 3238: 3234: 3231: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3221: 3209: 3206: 3202: 3201: 3198: 3192: 3187: 3186: 3185: 3178: 3176: 3175: 3172: 3168: 3163: 3159: 3158: 3155: 3151: 3146: 3144: 3142: 3140: 3136: 3134: 3131: 3127: 3123: 3119: 3114: 3112: 3109: 3105: 3102: 3096: 3094: 3089: 3083: 3081: 3080: 3077: 3069: 3067: 3066: 3063: 3062: 3057: 3051:Thanks mate! 3047:Corporate law 3046: 3044: 3043: 3040: 3036: 3028: 3022: 3019: 3016: 3012: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3003: 2998: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2988: 2983: 2979: 2971: 2969: 2967: 2965: 2963: 2959: 2957: 2953: 2949: 2946: 2939: 2935: 2932: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2922: 2918: 2914: 2912: 2906: 2902: 2895: 2891: 2887: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2867: 2861: 2857: 2853: 2850: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2840: 2836: 2832: 2827: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2816: 2805: 2801: 2798: 2794: 2793: 2787: 2783: 2780: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2770: 2766: 2761: 2753: 2749: 2745: 2742: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2735: 2732: 2728: 2724: 2719: 2717: 2713: 2709: 2708: 2697: 2693: 2690: 2686: 2685: 2679: 2677: 2676: 2672: 2667: 2655: 2653: 2651: 2647: 2642: 2634: 2632: 2631: 2628: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2609: 2605: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2564: 2556: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2526: 2523: 2519: 2518: 2512: 2510: 2509: 2504: 2500: 2487: 2484: 2481: 2477: 2474: 2471: 2468: 2465: 2461: 2458: 2455: 2452: 2449: 2445: 2442: 2439: 2436: 2433: 2429: 2426: 2423: 2420: 2417: 2413: 2412:Serge Issakov 2410: 2407: 2404: 2401: 2397: 2394: 2391: 2388: 2385: 2381: 2378: 2375: 2372: 2369: 2365: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2358: 2350: 2348: 2347: 2344: 2339: 2327: 2324: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2314: 2313:Milto LOL pia 2305: 2301: 2298: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2287: 2285: 2280: 2278: 2273: 2271: 2266: 2264: 2258: 2254: 2250: 2245: 2237: 2233: 2221: 2218: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2209: 2205: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2195: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2176: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2153: 2149: 2144: 2141: 2137: 2134: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2124: 2115: 2109: 2106: 2103: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2094: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2084: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2065: 2059: 2056: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2036: 2032: 2028: 2025: 2024:San Sebastián 2021: 2016: 2015:WP:COMMONNAME 2012: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2002: 1998: 1990:San Sebastián 1989: 1985: 1982: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1972: 1964: 1956: 1955: 1952: 1944: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1935: 1931: 1929: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1919: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1908: 1901: 1898: 1896: 1895: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1877: 1873: 1871: 1870: 1867: 1860: 1856: 1851: 1844: 1840: 1837: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1826: 1822: 1821: 1816: 1808: 1804: 1801: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1791: 1784: 1781: 1775: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1761:category was 1759: 1755: 1750: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1740: 1735: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1717: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1706: 1702: 1694: 1690: 1687: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1661: 1645: 1642: 1637: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1627: 1621: 1619: 1618: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1594: 1589: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1567: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1544: 1540: 1534: 1532: 1531: 1524: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1514: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1492: 1486: 1484: 1483: 1476: 1470: 1468: 1464: 1458: 1452: 1448: 1445: 1440: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1430: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1410: 1408: 1402: 1400: 1395: 1387: 1383: 1375: 1372: 1369:De nada. :) - 1368: 1367: 1366: 1363: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1351: 1342: 1338: 1335: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1325: 1324:IBeatAnorexia 1316: 1312: 1309: 1305: 1300: 1299: 1294: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1283: 1279: 1271: 1269: 1268: 1265: 1257: 1255: 1254: 1249: 1246: 1237: 1232: 1225: 1221: 1218: 1215: 1214: 1210: 1209: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1199: 1194: 1191: 1184: 1182: 1181: 1178: 1173: 1171: 1165: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1153: 1151: 1150: 1147: 1146: 1137: 1130: 1128: 1127: 1124: 1120: 1117: 1114: 1110: 1109:170.20.96.116 1106: 1102: 1098: 1095: 1090: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1078:24.80.117.217 1075: 1068: 1065: 1064: 1059: 1053: 1051: 1049: 1045: 1042: 1036: 1030: 1025: 1021: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1004: 1003:Milto LOL pia 1000: 993: 991: 990: 985: 982: 979: 976: 973: 970: 967: 964: 961: 956: 946: 944: 943: 940: 936: 933: 930: 927: 923: 915: 913: 912: 908: 904: 896: 894: 888: 880: 877: 873: 870: 866: 865: 864: 861: 856: 853: 850: 848: 846: 843: 841: 838: 837: 836: 835: 832: 829: 825: 820: 819: 818: 817: 814: 810: 806: 800: 797: 793: 790: 786: 782: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 771: 765: 760: 759: 758: 755: 749: 745: 744:User:JHunterJ 741: 737: 733: 726: 723: 707: 704: 700: 699: 698: 695: 693: 688: 680: 679: 678: 675: 671: 670: 669: 666: 664: 659: 651: 650: 649: 646: 642: 641: 640: 637: 635: 630: 622: 618: 614: 613: 612: 609: 605: 601: 600: 599: 598: 595: 594: 571: 566: 562: 558: 550: 548: 547: 544: 537: 534: 529: 528: 524: 520: 519: 513: 512: 508: 507: 494: 493: 492: 489: 485: 481: 477: 473: 464:good question 463: 459: 456: 452: 448: 444: 443: 442: 441: 438: 434: 431: 428: 425: 422: 418: 414: 413:Best Day Ever 407: 406:User:FictionH 404: 394: 391: 386: 382: 381: 380: 378: 373: 365: 364: 363: 360: 359: 336: 335: 334: 331: 329: 324: 316: 312: 308: 307:User:Radiant! 302: 298: 294: 290: 285: 281: 276: 272: 268: 263: 262: 261: 260: 257: 255: 250: 242: 228: 225: 222: 215: 205: 198: 197: 196: 193: 189: 182: 175: 174: 173: 172: 169: 166: 158: 151: 147: 143: 139: 131: 127: 124: 120: 116: 112: 108: 107: 106: 105: 102: 97: 96: 93: 81: 78: 74: 71: 70: 69: 68: 65: 61: 60: 51: 47: 44: 40: 39: 38: 37: 34: 27:Discordianism 26: 19: 3432: 3405: 3403: 3377: 3361: 3343: 3302: 3249: 3242: 3213: 3194: 3182: 3171:87.122.9.230 3165:Take care - 3164: 3160: 3153: 3147: 3115: 3107: 3100: 3097: 3090: 3087: 3073: 3052: 3050: 3032: 2975: 2943: 2908: 2871: 2837:. Thank you. 2828: 2813: 2811: 2803: 2757: 2729:. Thank you. 2720: 2705: 2703: 2695: 2659: 2638: 2613: 2603: 2585:MediationBot 2554: 2491: 2482: 2466: 2450: 2434: 2418: 2402: 2386: 2380:Danielfolsom 2370: 2354: 2335: 2309: 2283: 2276: 2269: 2262: 2241: 2161: 2147: 2143:Franz Krauth 2119: 2069: 1996: 1993: 1968: 1947: 1942: 1927: 1904: 1887:debate page" 1880: 1864: 1818: 1812: 1787: 1715: 1700: 1698: 1671: 1665: 1616: 1615: 1608: 1560: 1529: 1528: 1505: 1481: 1480: 1472: 1462: 1460: 1456: 1421: 1417: 1411: 1403: 1398: 1393: 1390: 1384:My posts at 1346: 1320: 1275: 1272:UCFD history 1261: 1235: 1229: 1217:Mister-jones 1198:Mister-jones 1195: 1192: 1188: 1174: 1168: 1162: 1157: 1144: 1141: 1115: 1104: 1100: 1091: 1069: 1066: 1060: 1057: 1047: 1037: 1034: 1023: 997: 980: 974: 968: 962: 950: 939:Mister-jones 937: 934: 931: 919: 900: 892: 851:(and others 803: 767: 761: 751: 730: 682: 653: 624: 574: 569: 564: 556: 554: 540: 467: 410: 367: 339: 318: 244: 238: 204:med-org-stub 145: 141: 135: 101:Zantaggerung 98: 92:Zantaggerung 89: 86:Don't get it 72: 57: 55: 30: 3459:Tim Vickers 3414:Tim Vickers 3282:, and then 3278:, and then 2882:Masaruemoto 2754:edit war... 2752:Rock Pigeon 2750:WRT to the 2343:SanchiTachi 2306:arbcom jeff 1866:Buddhipriya 1605:WP:HARMLESS 1523:WP:HARMLESS 1502:WP:HARMLESS 1475:WP:HARMLESS 1231:I'm waiting 1226:ucfd on ani 1196:Thank you. 1041:Kim Bruning 954:David Spart 555:The debate 3350:Ferrylodge 3288:Ferrylodge 3256:. Cheers. 3239:Ferrylodge 3167:Cyrus XIII 2078:? Cheers. 1825:Cyrus XIII 1672:getting it 1666:Regarding 1662:Thank you. 1564:others'. - 1304:good faith 1211:Thank you. 978:block user 727:(again...) 115:verifiable 3425:GTBacchus 3331:GTBacchus 3321:Cydevil38 3258:Musical L 3230:GTBacchus 3220:Haelstrom 3208:Haelstrom 3197:GTBacchus 3126:k.d. lang 3015:Athaenara 2956:Manchuria 2931:GTBacchus 2849:GTBacchus 2741:GTBacchus 2476:Antonrojo 2396:GTBacchus 2351:Mediation 2323:GTBacchus 2297:GTBacchus 2208:GTBacchus 2166:GTBacchus 2133:GTBacchus 2123:FCYTravis 2093:GTBacchus 2046:GTBacchus 1981:GTBacchus 1951:GTBacchus 1918:GTBacchus 1855:Kundalini 1836:GTBacchus 1800:GTBacchus 1790:Part Deux 1739:GTBacchus 1686:GTBacchus 1668:this edit 1641:GTBacchus 1593:GTBacchus 1566:GTBacchus 1510:GTBacchus 1467:GTBacchus 1444:GTBacchus 1371:GTBacchus 1343:Reggaeton 1334:GTBacchus 1282:GTBacchus 1123:GTBacchus 1099:) is the 1017:GTBacchus 984:block log 897:Thank you 828:GTBacchus 789:GTBacchus 703:GTBacchus 674:GTBacchus 645:GTBacchus 608:GTBacchus 533:GTBacchus 447:reverting 390:GTBacchus 192:GTBacchus 123:GTBacchus 43:GTBacchus 3389:DreamGuy 3150:WP:POINT 2997:Dekimasu 2982:Dekimasu 2486:contribs 2470:contribs 2454:contribs 2438:contribs 2422:contribs 2406:contribs 2390:contribs 2374:contribs 2190:Zuberdam 2186:Dynaflow 2035:Sea star 2031:Starfish 2020:Donostia 1900:WP:CIVIL 1891:OtisTDog 1874:AfD for 1771:VegaDark 1716:actually 1705:VegaDark 1676:Gmaxwell 1609:category 1506:articles 1119:contribs 1094:this one 1074:unsigned 966:contribs 691:Netscott 662:Netscott 633:Netscott 565:actually 543:Wikizeta 541:thanks-- 484:contribs 476:Wikizeta 472:unsigned 385:WP:STRAW 376:Netscott 327:Netscott 311:WP:!VOTE 305:and see 253:Netscott 181:org-stub 33:Belg4mit 3261:inguist 3154:nothing 2913:itself. 2804:deleted 2696:deleted 2656:Yoghurt 2624:ElinorD 2428:Mets501 2257:sandbox 2204:blocked 2102:ElinorD 2080:ElinorD 1579:WaltCip 1426:ElinorD 1317:Re: IAR 1293:WP:UCFD 1131:Gracias 1058:Hello, 1013:entropy 770:DeLarge 754:DeLarge 561:WP:PNSD 280:protect 275:history 221:ElinorD 165:ElinorD 146:correct 3399:WP:NOR 3254:WT:NPA 3245:a user 3084:Appeal 3039:JPG-GR 2905:WP:WMD 2894:CSD R3 2670:folsom 2665:daniel 2646:Severa 2627:(talk) 2217:Cathal 2194:Cathal 2175:Cathal 2152:Cathal 2105:(talk) 2083:(talk) 2055:Joeldl 2001:Joeldl 1943:reduce 1617:Giggy! 1530:Giggy! 1482:Giggy! 1429:(talk) 1414:WP:RFO 1264:JPG-GR 947:Chabad 922:Mackan 903:Cott12 876:Mackan 860:Mackan 813:Mackan 284:delete 273:| ] | 224:(talk) 168:(talk) 142:should 3307:with 3138:less. 3035:WP:RM 2978:WP:RM 2880:, by 2562:demon 1934:MONGO 1907:MONGO 1859:WP:RS 1422:there 824:WP:3O 764:WP:RM 576:: --> 557:seems 341:: --> 301:views 293:watch 289:links 16:< 3455:here 3451:here 3447:here 3443:here 3439:diff 3435:here 3410:here 3370:aka 3346:here 3317:here 3060:idea 2620:here 2616:this 2503:talk 2480:talk 2464:talk 2460:Mark 2448:talk 2432:talk 2416:talk 2400:talk 2384:talk 2368:talk 2357:here 1538:Talk 1490:Talk 1463:Keep 1407:here 1308:jc37 1278:AN/I 1248:acan 1145:Rosa 1113:talk 1105:from 1101:next 1082:talk 972:logs 960:talk 907:Talk 783:and 592:< 480:talk 357:< 297:logs 271:edit 209:and 157:stub 3250:not 3055:Wik 2896:). 2650:!!! 2499:501 2497:ETS 2184:], 2022:to 1997:all 1577:.-- 1561:not 1418:you 1399:all 1394:you 1242:coe 889:LSD 871:): 740:TNA 725:TNA 570:two 515:--> 121:. - 3169:/ 3110:". 3103:", 3001:よ! 2986:よ! 2907:. 2806:. 2698:. 2537:. 2529:A 2270:gg 2263:G1 2162:no 1251:— 1240:— 1172:. 1084:) 1039:-- 987:) 768:-- 752:-- 619:→ 486:) 482:• 435:. 432:, 429:, 426:, 299:| 295:| 291:| 287:| 282:| 278:| 217:}} 211:{{ 207:}} 201:{{ 184:}} 178:{{ 160:}} 154:{{ 75:. 3286:. 3099:" 3018:✉ 2648:( 2644:- 2606:. 2595:. 2558:^ 2505:) 2501:( 2495:M 2488:) 2483:· 2478:( 2472:) 2467:· 2462:( 2456:) 2451:· 2446:( 2440:) 2435:· 2430:( 2424:) 2419:· 2414:( 2408:) 2403:· 2398:( 2392:) 2387:· 2382:( 2376:) 2371:· 2366:( 2295:- 2284:! 2277:y 2238:. 1930:" 1926:" 1834:- 1639:- 1591:- 1461:* 1296:) 1244:l 1234:" 1116:· 1111:( 1088:. 1080:( 981:· 975:· 969:· 963:· 957:( 868:( 854:) 811:) 694:) 686:→ 683:( 665:) 657:→ 654:( 636:) 628:→ 625:( 590:t 588:n 586:a 584:i 582:d 580:a 578:R 490:. 478:( 388:- 379:) 371:→ 368:( 355:t 353:n 351:a 349:i 347:d 345:a 343:R 330:) 322:→ 319:( 303:) 269:( 256:) 248:→ 245:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index