User talk:GTBacchus/Archive 10

3434:

of outing and attack sites, and their linking through wikipedia. You object to my entire point of view. To accuse me of supporting outing sites because I support blocking them? that's total doublespeak. You can try that all you want, but Up is up, not down. I continue to object to outing and linking to outing sites. You continue to object to any banned sites. Who supports outing sites, and who doesn't? reconsider your perspective. As for your self-outing, I really do hope you dont' get the blacklash I expect you will from it. I went through it, and it sucks. That's why your position is completely incomprehensible. Supporting the linking to outing sites while claiming you hate outing sites is hypocrisy and doublespeak.

3447:, in that they essentially put up a sign on a prominent policy page saying "DON'T LINK TO ATTACK SITES" to anyone visiting or warned, blocked or banned per NPA. It wasn't a reasonable approach to the issue, as the drama over people getting blocked for linking to these sites, in other than actual "harrassment" or "outing" instances, has lead to a lot more publicity for these sites than just letting non-directly offensive links be would have. Hence, the hard anti-links ideological position inadvertently but effectively turns into a pro-"attack sites" position in a functional sense, as it continually assists in perpetuating the controversy resulting in more attention to these sites.— 56:. He has posted over 300 times about this in about three days to a large number of project and user talk pages, the village pump, and AN, claiming he only wanted to make a copy edit and was prevented. It simply isn't true. He wanted to make very substantive changes to RS and V; if some copy edits fell by the wayside, they were collatoral damage, and he's aware of that. Take a look at the copy edits he's complaining about losing: they were minor and trivial. Then look at the substantive changes he tried to make: that unsourced material "will" be removed, rather than "may" be (citing Jimbo, who has said no such thing) 175:

for addressing the ban are not sufficient evidence of bad faith and disrespect for Knowledge (XXG), I don't know what would be. It makes me question why I bother sending abusive socks to checkuser and enforcing an ArbCom ruling if the user can, after scoffing at the ban for 60+ socks and ignoring the procedures in place for appealing it, decide to go to Plan Z and appeal to an admin and get a reception as if he were a good-faith contributor who was "forced into a life of sockpuppetry" by false accusations. It rings false, partly because of the thoroughly tendentious and non-constructive nature of his edits both

3171:

to that effect. Naturally, we can't tell what somebody's thinking, but we revert vandalism all the time, and we rely on each editor and admin to use their judgment to do so. In that sense, the rules are "all in the administrators' minds". This is even more true with blocking, which is an arena where admins are given wide latitude to apply a fairly simply blocking policy to a variety of situations. Despite these going on for all of Knowledge (XXG)'s history, neither the way we deal with vandalism, nor the way we deal with blocking, has led to any kind of dystopian nightmare. Both pop up regularly on

3755:. Although the outcome was clearly in favor of a page move and you did well in closing that way, I must say that I found your closing comments rather inappropriate, as they clearly denoted your personal position in favor of the move. I believe that administrators should present themselves as neutral as possible when closing discussions, and this was just not the case. I think that if it was your intention to provide personal arguments supporting the page move then you should perhaps have participated in the discussion rather than choosing to close it. Sorry, this is just my opinion. Best regards, 3394:(EC)Your edits were foolhardy. It won't be long till that's up on the attack sites. You should ask for oversight on those, going through the harrassment's no fun. My point was that people like PrivateMusings want attack site links left in, but he's not willing to go public, now is he? If you're not already outed or willing to do it, you shouldn't be arguing for outing sites. I'm impressed you're willing to, but you will be regretting it soon. Those folks watch this stuff like hawks, and the police won't care until it's way past 'bad'. Go ask for oversight on those edits. 3275:, set up to diminish the power of the police: a system of ranks among the police in a military junta, courts in judicial states, the pardon in a dictatorship, among others, or some mix thereof, like, as you suggest, wikipedia has. Written laws are the starting point of any such system. Such systems are expensive because they drain resources from society's other goals, and often how effective a police state can be at limiting police power is a factor of how much labor it can spare toward doing so balanced against the society's philosophy of justice. 2919:

manner. I am only responding to you repeatedly here, because you seem to be interested in making me out to be a chronic abusive editor, and expect some sort of contrite acknowledgment, similar to the Krimpet/MONGO situation yesterday. I suggest you examine my contribution history and my block log in full before you make such assumptions about me. Having your admin bit turned on does not automatically imbibe you with great wisdom, nor does it entitle you to be genuflected before. So I had a bad day. Big friggin' deal. -

2802:

expect an act of contrition from me toward them, I'm sorry but it's not likely to happen. If someone asks me if I still beat my wife, I'm not going to decrypt and psychoanalyze them, and then address their "points". I find it interesting that Miltopia got all handwringy and bent out of shape about comments that were not even directed at him, considering his overall history. I'm guessing my comments hit a little too close to home with him, so he assumed that I was attacking him. If I was a chronic abuser of

1044:

transportation has not yet become a social issue. Knowledge (XXG) could benefit from more of these types of articles, but may suffer partly from a lack of understanding the subject. I'm open for suggestions about re-writes, merges, or other methods of constructing encyclopedic articles on this subject. Understanding that Australia is the home of Knowledge (XXG), and that they currently have less concern for driver education may be an indicator of the success or failure of proposing these additions.

447:

no worries at all about having to remove it (when you're done, just press shut down, it will shut itself down and eject the CD for you, allowing you to restart the computer back to windows) I really hate to see people forcing themselves to use Windows out of fear of the unknown, without even getting a taste of what else is out there, especially when it could save them quite a bit of money. Keep in mind there are plenty of schools out there that run nothing but linux! --

3237:

control such-and-such admin who had power and was clearly entrenched and popular and untouchable. At the time, I argued against this myth of the all-powerful admin, and my arguments were poo-poohed as a naively optimistic failure to realize that the haves are in charge, and determined to hold the have-nots down, and that some kind of rule had to be written to rein them it. The wars were finally resolved elegantly, with no need for new policy (although some pages

1573: 875:). They separated these 2 articles as "Human sexuality" and "Human sexual behaviour" on the basis of psychological and physical aspects respectively. It is not proper. (reason for such things(dividing) is promotion of philosophies of homosexuality etc). Im waiting for earlier issues to be settle to start this new merger proposal, maybe i propose it after 2 weeks. Can you give some feedback on this issue? 2968: 1188:. It seems there's a lot of overlap between the two projects, and if we spent a few days merging the lists of articles, sharing ideas and collaborating on improving the same articles which both projects are focused on improving...we could really make some headway. Whether you're in favour, or against, the idea of a merger - I'd appreciate some feedback regardless. Much thanks. 2437:

deleting admin in question, and we have hit a dead point in the discussion. As I know I'm biased in this issue I'd appreciate it if you could spare a neutral look at the dispute. (Note: I've randomly pulled your name - along with 3 others - out of my hat. If I bothered you I deeply apologize - feel free to ignore & delete this comment in that case) Best wishes!

3214:

sometimes happening. When there's some kind of high-drama situation like that (whether brought about by an "outing" site incident or otherwise), people are breaking "rules" left and right. In that shitstorm, having a directly applicable sentence on the right policy page isn't going to change anything, except possibly which names the participants call each other.

2104: 809:, someone complained about my request for a 3O, saying that one had already been provided and accusing me of trying to "garner increased involvement". Did you officially respond to my 3O and simply forget to remove the request from the queue? Or did you offer the opinion outside of the 3O structure? Thank you. (Also thank you for responding at the 2787:

criticism, rather than as accusations with vulgarities attached? Even better, why not address the actual points being made, and show by example what it's like to have a mature discussion? I'm not saying their... banter was helpful or productive, but your reaction to it seems particularly inappropriate. The best reaction to immature behavior is to

3631:). I am a bit suspicious what was there, since one of the voters called it ""neologism". (in fact, it is a baseball term of 19 century). So I guess the previous article was about the political lingo. Can you check whether the contents of the deleted article are recyclable, e.g., contain interesting references, etc.? Thank you. 3113:. If the other Pope has an official vodka I will switch brands though. I (kind of) digress. Look, we need written rules for the same reason mathematics needs axioms. It's about the reality we want to create. If reality is something endlessly fungible in a given universe, like wikipedia, where there's an actual power structure, 1379:

do so at the risk of falling out of favor with certain crowds, and I'm glad there are still people like you who speak with rationality and fair-mindedness even when pressure would persuade them to do otherwise or keep quiet (and I don't mean in just the Knowledge (XXG) sense either, it seems that your breed is dying out in

3409:? Actually, looking at that page with my photo, my real name has been there for months, and it hasn't caused me any trouble yet. They could have listed me long ago, but despite watching "like hawks", they haven't. (Maybe I don't look to them like hawk-food?) I'm not listed on hivemind; and I'm not sure why. 1293:,) and opposed the merge on principle alone, which I know now is not a valid reason. I dont oppose the merge anymore, but I do think that he went about this all wrong this time as well in not informing me, yet informing all other former participants in discussion, and all other members of the two groups. ~ 76:

explained the problems with the edits, and I replied to his initial queries, but it wasn't good enough. Instead, I must devote entire days to responding to dozens of posts he has scattered all over the encyclopedia, and to friends of his drafted in to argue for him, and if I don't, I'm refusing to discuss.

3726:. I still think we're running from shadows like scared little wabbits by eliminating the link to the top page of Knowledge (XXG) Review. But I've conceded on the issue. Incidentally, I never did edit war on the link. I assumed good faith and discussed the matter on the talk page. And I've now given up. 3233:

intransigent users from time to time, no matter what we write anywhere. When those situations arise, we'll deal with them, and it won't be just a few people pulling strings, it will be all of us interacting in good faith, but with limited information, limited empathy, and limited communication skills.

3130:

wikipedia to be what it is supposed to be, we do need to be able to out such people. And it only makes sense that they will fight tooth and nail for such information to be suppressed. That's the reality of the situation. You need to help pick an axiom that helps keep that reality from coming forth. --

3415:. Your reading comprehension skills seem a bit off. Your arrogant insistence that you know my mind better than I know it myself is silly. I'm arguing for more effective protection than you're arguing for. As far as I can tell, you're more pro-outing sites than I am. To be very clear, I'm not aware of 3255:

If all else fails - and I'm definitely serious about that part - come get me. I can sometimes help, and I'll certainly try. Try not to worry too much about how potentially damaging links will be reviewed. It won't be entirely private, and it won't be entirely public, because we'll insist on both.

1378:

I know this is late being as I've been too busy to make my planned dramatic comeback, but I wanted to give you a big thanks for offering your perpetual voice of reason at my mini-arbcom ordeal. I know that every time you pipe up to bring sanity into situations involving, um, editors like myself, you

1043:

that it belongs in a broader article; one that does not exist as of now. Being still under construction, this and proposed articles for other related non-profit organizations intend to improve public awareness: a good thing. Opposition to the construction of these articles exists world wide, where

446:

to burn it to a CD, then try it out. Trying linux no longer requires a physical install, you can simply put it in your CD drive, reboot, and your computer will boot to the CD- which though it is slower than the hard drive, allows you to try linux with no risk at all of erasing your existing data, and

3433:

You argue that any restriction on what sites can be linked via wikipedia is objectionable, regardless of the reasoning. As for me blocking others, that's a total bullshit argument, as you know full well I'm not an admin, and thus can't block. And I never will be an admin. I object to crass promotion

3381:, where my real name has been posted for years. I'm really not worried about it. The point you make about encouraging others to do the same is more of a concern, but I don't really see how my name being posted is a suggestion that anybody else do the same. Maybe I'll add footnote to that effect. - 3205:

A nice thing about that is that admins bring a wide variety of perspectives, attitudes, beliefs, etc. They won't all agree that something is a deletable link except in cases where it clearly is. The gray area cases will be few and far between, and we would have to deal with those on a case-by-case

3129:

is a real issue. Believe it or not, there are people -- governmental agents not too surprisingly -- who have risen through our ranks and are working hard to make wikipedia conform to what those in power want reality to be. But these people don't control the whole world wide web... yet. So if we want

2929:

I sure as hell haven't assumed that you're any kind of scum, ever. I don't think there exist people who are anything other than children of God, with all that such a position entails. Did I accuse you of edit warring? No. Did I accuse you of being chronically uncivil? No. Do I believe that you

2872:

Yeah, I'm going to stick with my usual position, of trying to convince everyone to treat each other excellently, to choose peace over retaliation, and to stop assuming that other people are some kind of scum or idiots just because they disagree with someone. It's a dirty job, but someone's gotta do

2779:

What kind of hair is this to split? Is it really the point whether your incivility was a 4 or a 7 on a scale of 1 to Dick? I consider blatantly disrespectful statements to be an act of violence against the dignity and decorum that we try to maintain. "Going off" on someone like that is aggressive

1019:

Yeah, I'm a big fan of the old-school comics; web comics just aren't the same. As far as Knowledge (XXG) rules, I find that I'm happier when I don't expect them to be consistent. They're more like adages: "Haste makes waste," but, "He who hesitates is lost". They contradict each other, but people

550:

Sorry, you're right; those weren't questions. I was referring to your statements, "you won't even give it a shot," and, "disprove that by trying it and telling me what is so difficult about it". The first claim is simply false. The second statement presupposes that I said installing a free OS was

465:

The problem is that we're dealing with technophobic people, and with their comfort zones. You don't get those people to listen to you by telling them that it's silly for them to be technophobic and suspicious of changes that they don't understand. Now, we've got computers that were changed, from a

462:

I appreciate your effort, but I think you don't understand my objection. I use quite a bit of free software. I'm aware that Windows is a terrible OS, and that there are better free ones out there. I've used some of them. We're not talking about my thinking that something is "difficult", or "fear

3337:

is an important consideration; no one can claim the be the victim of an elaborate conspiracy when an admin can just provide a link to an actual policy, and newbies, who don't have our experience with the justice system around here, find that comforting. I have seen only passing mention of the "user

3190:

Now what we're really talking about is how to handle links to possible harassment, and I think you're putting a lot of weight on something I said about emailing particularly sensitive links to ArbCom or someone for private review. I guess the idea is that we could get potentially damaging material

3170:

I don't want to dismiss your concerns, and we do seem to be coming from very different places, so let's take it slowly. Let's talk about vandalism. We haven't got an acid test for it. Vandalism is "any edit made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the quality of the encyclopedia," or something

3056:

That sounds awesome, being able to teach individual kids privately... I'm actually going to school to teach math, have been since before "Miltopia" even came into being :-O And I'm torn between teaching pre-college so I can maybe "get to" the kids before they go to college and fail everything, and

2818:

99 out of the last 100 times, then I could understand your desire to play drill instructor with me. I've eaten untold buckets of shit in the past few months, and done it with a smile on my face, so I think I have invested enough time and effort into acknowledging my current sin, and the warning you

2801:

I don't think that I've disputed that I was uncivil with those two. Are they deserving of an apology? Probably about as much as I am deserving of one from them. But since no one seems to be crawling up their asses about their behavior, my expectations for apologies all around are pretty low. If you

2782:

The point is whether or not you're treating others excellently. If you wish to quibble, then I will cheerfully retract the word "violent", even though I don't really think that throwing accusations and insults around is less unacceptable than throwing fists around. But let's take it away; perhaps

2436:

Hi GTBacchus, I'd like to ask for your input on a userbox issue I've encountered, regarding the speedy deletion of several userfied userboxes that expressed negative stance toward a thing or concept (e.g. hate/despise/dislike/loathe/choosing one over something else). I've held a discussion with the

437:

Just because it's different doesn't mean it's difficult! The jump between XP and Linux is generally smaller than the jump between XP and Mac, but plenty of people make that just fine. While it would help if you explained exactly what you need these computers for (For example, programming .NET would

238:

MastCell, I don't want you to think I'm assuming good faith to the point of foolishness. I'm looking carefully at the evidence (there's a bit, and I haven't seen it all yet), and I'm not going to unblock the account if things don't add up right. I actually had some dealings with RJII in the past,

69:

I've been maintaining and writing the sourcing policies for two-and-a-half years. In that time, I've made 456 edits to NOR talk; 466 to V talk; 498 to ATT talk; and 323 to Reliable sources talk, so no one can accuse me of not discussing my edits; I'm also active in explaining the policies to people

3579:

ThuranX, might you not have perspective on GTBacchus' self-outing here? I mean do you really expect him to return and panic, rushing off to oversight and screaming "WHAT HAVE I DONE???", or were your comments directed at someone else? Maybe I just missed the sarcasm... anyway I don't think there

3487:(Note to self - start referring to competing points of view as "irrelevant doublespeak" - mustn't miss a chance to complete a self-reference loop like that! It's like drinking a glass of water while peeing - one of those moments when things line up and the true nature of reality shines through.) - 3363:

Also, more pertinently, I'm not sure encouraging this sort of thing is a good idea. There are editors who would genuinely suffer if they're editing were traced back to them. I'm aware of at least one person who edited here for a while who could have been in serious trouble if the government of the

3178:

Now, what you say about people trying to control Knowledge (XXG)'s content is true. Anyone with an agenda to push would be a fool not to push it here. However, there are people here representing every agenda on the planet. They're all here, so no particular one is dominant. There are certainly

3078:

Would I mind? I'm pretty sure I insist! You can't out me though; I beat you to it. I've already admitted I'm a furr- oops, I just took care of sexual humiliation, too. If you ask ArbCom what that means, they could answer you with a link to ED, except they really couldn't... you know, post that

2724:

I've found our recent interactions around the external link debate to be quite useful - and have just this minute replied to your post on the talk page of NPA - there's quite a conversation to be had around some the issues both you and I mention, but perhaps it would be better to contain it here /

2522:

We are considering a revamping of the entire set of articles on election methods, and having these various loose ends sticking out is probably not good, but at the time this article was deleted, it was nearly impossible to get anything about tactical voting in IRV (which is widely understood to be

834:

Oh dear. I guess I supplied a third opinion without removing the request from the queue. I didn't mean to cause any disruption, or get you yelled at. Garnering increased involvement is a funny thing to be "accused" of, because I generally think of that as a Good Thing. If somebody doesn't like

174:

I respect and admire your willingness to assume good faith. However, I can only assume good faith until provided strong evidence to the contrary. If running an acknowledged sock farm, scheming to evade checkuser, abusing a dynamic IP and also open proxies, and refusing to pursue legitimate avenues

118:. However, I think the controversy has died down now, hopefully for good. I've added a section to the "discussion" on ANI where I have called for all involved to add their honest analysis of what they might have done wrong, so people can focus on how to avoid such a acrimonious mess in the future. 75:

What I don't appreciate is people who aren't familiar with the policies rushing in to add new material without discussion, and revert-warring when it's removed. If they had been honest mistakes from an editor who didn't realize how policy development works, I'd have been very happy to help him. I

35:

to deal with the issue of sources being rejected because not peer-reviewed. I wondered if you could take a look at it, because it borrows some words of yours from a recent AN post: "Where there is disagreement between scholarly and non-scholarly sources, the views should be clearly attributed: the

3266:

Knowledge (XXG) is a type of society that, like many others, has police and laws. In these societies, a new policeperson is given a badge and a list of these laws and told they may go out and remove from society, perhaps only temporarily, anyone they suspect has broken them. The laws are there to

3067:

is closed and it's taking all of my willpower to keep from posting a request for clarification asking for detailed elaboration on what constitutes "humiliating a person sexually". Hopefully the results of the case will bring a little harmony to NPA and DONTLINKTOHARASSMENT and their talk pages.

2851:

Thanks for your input; I'll take that under advisement. Maybe I'll start throwing my weight around and acting like more of an asshole. Heavy-handedness is so much better than diplomacy (which I admit I fail at regularly, but keep trying). I've not observed that more blocking leads to less talk

1288:

as it deals with the merger of the terrorism Wikiprojects. I was never informed that discussion was occuring by him, and only discovered it after the fact when he had declared a consensus was reached and was removing the templates from pages. Similarly, he did this last October, though before any

2933:

that?" Rather than simply saying, "yeah, that was out of line," you chose to cavil over it. That pushed a button on me, it turns out, because I, being human, have got buttons. Somehow between the two of us, we managed to keep escalating, and I ended up being a dick. I'm sorry. I screwed up.

2932:

What I saw was you responding to one isolated situation in a way that was rude and out of proportion, on a page that really needs de-escalation, and not escalation. I left a very politely worded warning on your talk page, and I said on the page in question, "can we please not make comments like

2918:

constituted edit warring. As soon as I started discussing my edit in talk, I had my good faith questioned immediatelyh by multiple editors. After my less than civil comment on the talk page, I immediately went into the next section and began participating as I usually do, in a reasoned and civil

410:

Duke's comments on that talk page will probably never be seen by the anonymous editor in question. That IP has only made two edits to Knowledge (XXG), both 10 days ago, and Duke left a note today. That anon is long gone, and probably connected to a different IP address by now. I'd let it lie.

3236:

Whatever administrator pissed in your cornflakes the other day has limited power, and if they really do abuse their power, they may very well be de-sysoped. It's not so rare. During the userbox wars I had conversations with people in which they were insisting about the need for clear rules to

156:

In my conversations with Anarcho-capitalism, I've already suggested some more appropriate strategies for handling content disputes. I agree that sock farms and sleeper accounts are a bad way to go about editing Knowledge (XXG), and I'm not trying to unblock anybody who's going to use them. My

3217:

Those are situations that involve personalities, and part of what we're blessed with here at Knowledge (XXG) is a menagerie of personalities. I assume we're all mostly insane (except, of course, anybody who would take offense if I said that about them). Some personalities and combinations of

3213:

obviate the possibility of some admin or small group of admins getting it into their head that they're right about something, that no one else understands, and that they're going to wheel war over it. However, that sort of thing, like shit, happens. No amount of planning will stop those from

2768:

It is possible that my temper is affected, having smoked my last cigarette on Saturday night last, after 35 years on and off smoking. But those two editors were mocking me, and slapping each other on the back about it. "Jerking each other off" figuratively describes what they were doing quite

1426:

Hello. It appears there is a very important problem with the name change. Every single sub-article and template is named ".... war on terrorism", it's totally confusing for the reader. We cannot agree this situation to stay like that. I mean that one (or more) of the editors who supported the

3232:

The only power our rules derive is that of being backed by consensus, because what's written on the policy page isn't a magic formula that forces our hands, preventing us from doing things we might later regret. We do stupid things anyway. We're simply going to have to handle gray areas and

2386:

Thanks for explaining that. I see now that I missed it because there aren't any deleted edits there, so I assumed it had not been deleted. I also have no opinion on the page's existence; I'll look into the subject's notability, and if it seems appropriate, I'll send it back to AfD, or just

469:

If you want to sell an idea to someone who's been dragged out of their comfort zone, you don't lecture to them in a language they don't understand. You don't move the goalposts still further, to something more removed from their comfort zone, and explain to them that it's better there. You

3320:

I agree that things at wikipedia seem to constantly work out amazingly well, at least for those of us who are still here; the resources we can devote to ensuring a functioning system of justice are so nearly limitless that we can get away with cutting corners on which rules are spelled out.

2786:

There remains the fact that your reaction to being called out for incivility is to argue with the criticism rather than trying to set anything right. Am I supposed to be impressed by that? If you have an issue with what those two were saying, why not present it as a rational, constructive

997:, during my talk topic that WP:IAR was amended to make it mean "ignore one rule at a time", which does not contradict itself like earlier "ignore all rules". My problem was about consistency of rules which no longer exists now, me fine with it. Thanks for your comments there. Best regards. 2936:

As far as I know, that one incident was the only time you've ever been uncivil with anyone. I don't think you reacted well to my initial comments, and I didn't react well to your reaction. We're both human. I will endeavor to learn from this experience, so I thank you for the lesson.

500:

I don't see what you're talking about, except that you obviously haven't tried it. I don't know what you mean by "hacker's backgrounds", but linux is generally far more stable than Windows, as long as you make it work in the first place (which is usually not a problem nowadays), and

3786:

I'm sorry you thought my comments were inappropriate. Although it may have come across as my personal opinion, I was actually just trying to restate the arguments in favor of the move. I don't personally have any feelings on the matter; I didn't mean to come across that way.

463:

of the unknown" here. We're talking about a separate sociological problem, which is traditionally invisible to free software supporters, and which is why so many people think that you guys sound like you've been drinking the kool-aid. It's good to know about, so read on.

3364:

country he was in found out about it. In general, there's not much need to give in to demands for combining anonymity for the EL issue when they are almost completely orthogonal matters. And speaking from experience, once you give up anonymity you never, ever get it back.

962:

You seem to know :) but im not much into formal philosophy. To be frank, i found so much work to be done in top level articles (of my interest) in wikipedia, of 5 years old. So much that i avoided community or admins and even edit summary wherever possible to save time :)

505:, both from companies that do it, and forums which will help. Like I said, your problem isn't that you can't use it, it's that you won't even give it a shot. You're perfectly welcome to disprove that by actually trying it and telling me what is so difficult about it -- 307:

I apologize; I feel like I've been a little quick to snip at you during the AN debate on this topic. I do feel pretty strongly about it, as you've no doubt noticed, but that's no excuse for giving you a hard time when you're trying to do the right thing. Apologies.

466:

familiar but suboptimal status quo, to something that is better in some ways (faster), but worse in others (some hacker's backgrounds, general stability questions, no possibility of customer support). That change dragged some people out of their comfort zones.

81:

His edits speak for themselves and they are all that matter: he and Marskell were trying to make fundamental changes to core policies, one of which would have been a serious violation of the NPOV policy, and they were prevented from doing so. Hence the wrath.

488:

In the most crassly pragmatic sense, I'm unlikely to get approval to switch to a new OS right now, but if I can "fix" the computers, and then introduce something new when we can see it in a better light, it's likely to be easy. Salesman, know thy customer.

3338:

box wars"; there are probably a thousand new wikipedians since I began typing this who will never have heard of the "attack site wars." You make many good points that a rule here might not stop the next war, but it could stop the next capricious threat. --

3186:

have one. We're kind of a combination of dictatorship, anarchy, democracy, oligarchy, meritocracy and commune. Nobody's in charge of this asylum but the inmates. Jimbo's smart enough (or maybe just busy enough) to stay the hell away most of the time.

1212:. To me it seems highly improbable, and not just because of the fact that they say they're from opposite seaboards of the United States. There doesn't seem to be any basis for this, although it is ultimately irrelevant as Miltopia has left WP anyways. -- 1289:

discussion had occured. That was the reason I originally objected - because he basically blanked the Wikiproject before anyone decided it would be the right thing to do. I reacted angrilly and unjustifiably then (due to some of the things outlined in

2740:

I replied to that one post at NPA, in the interest of not breaking up the train of thought. If my reply seems inappropriate there, or if it seems desirable to develop that angle any further, you're certainly welcome to be refactor it to this page.

3419:

where it would be appropriate to link to any outing site from Knowledge (XXG), and I'm prepared to put my money where my mouth is. Have you ever blocked a troll or harasser for posting personal information, and deleted that information? I have.

3081:

I too hope that ArbCom's decision will help with the current drama. It's interesting, what they said and what they didn't say. I've not yet suggested any solutions of my own, only tried to reassure people that we're all cool, we're all little

395:

and because of its redundancy, but due to a history of less-than-ideal interactions with Duke53 over various matters, I think it's best to get a neutral third party's opinion before I take such a potentially provocative action. I've discussed

268:

No problem. I do trust your judgement, and I'll stop bugging you now. I'm sure I'm starting to sound like a broken record. If you have any questions for me or concerns about what I've sent you, feel free to leave a message or email me.

1113:. I'm having trouble identifying the species. If someone can help me figure out which type of pine it is, I'd be happy to add the images to that species' article. Any tips on photographing trees would also be appreciated. Thanks. - 2708:

Okay, I moved it back to Gabrielle Solis. But those alternative names for her definitely need to be locked. Otherwise the back-and-forth moving of this article won't stop...at least not until she's officially Gabrielle Solis again.

3316:

hand-waving to suggest that since those of us, in the good graces of the administration, can ignore all the rules, that no rules are needed. The rules are there to protect editors who aren't breaking them, not to punish those who

243:

user. The communication I've had with Anarcho-capitalism indicates that he has some willingness to change his approach, but that has to be weighed against the evidence you're bringing up. Stay tuned; we'll figure something out.

854:

This comment is not directly related to our discussion in talk page of sexual intercourse, where i feel only cleanup of "sexual intercourse" is left. This issue remotely related, but i dint wish to add to mess there. issue is:

2646:

No, due to other additions to my talk page, I actually didn't notice this section until now. Please give me a few hours to sleep and deal with this issue tomorrow. I'm sorry for the delay, and I thank you for your patience.

2616:, and since you know how this article has been moved to more than one or two uncommon names for her and took part in the discussion with us about this, I was wondering if you would take care of the matter further addressed 1222:

I think it's absurd. I've been in IRC with both of them at once. They're different people with different personalities, different priorities, etc. I'd like to see what evidence there is for them being one and the same.

551:

difficult; I did not. Additionally, I never claimed that linux had no customer support, which you seem to think I said. I was talking about the weird version of Windows that somebody installed on the computers at work. -

1479:

too. There is currently a RfC whether "Potsdamer Platz" or "Potsdam Square" should be used as the article name. There are arguments given for each option, so, if you have a minute or three, we'd appreciate your comments.

2582:

I noticed your one of the people that wished there to be a list of Japanese games online for Knowledge (XXG) which I tried to make for the Nintendo 64 a few months ago, but just like when they where added to the orginal

3166:

Hi. My talk page has been busy this evening, and I missed this for a while. I'm sorry for going off on you like that; I try not to jump to conclusions about people. When I do jump, I tend to be wrong; go figure.

2592: 3376:

Joshua, thanks for your advice. However, I gave up my anonymity long ago. I posted my name in our facebook quite a while back (see below), and for quite some time, my user page linked back to my old userpage at

2406:

I just reversed your move of this page. Please note that all similar page titles (which are linked to at the bottom of the page, even) are in the singular, and singular 'good' is completely standard in economics.

2780:

and, in a way, violent. Slander (referring to an "anti-MONGO agenda"... what?) is also a form of violence against someone's good name. However, this is so far from being the point I feel silly talking about it.

3660:

Okay so if you want to upload a picture of a real person, the license says something about comferming the picture. How do you not get the picture deleted, every time i do that it gets deleted in about a week or

3202:. That makes the process of making a decision transparent, without revealing all of the (presumably dangerous) information under the link. That's actually not too far from the status quo, come to think of it. 3041:

I teach at a little private school; we work with different ages. My youngest student is a seventh grader doing prealgebra, and I've got a handful on Seniors learning calculus. I used to teach at university;

3779:

I feel that my job in closing moves is to read consensus. That includes taking into account comments made in that particular discussion, as well as larger-scale consensus for established guidelines such as

1386:

I'd like to say that I'll see you around since I plan on unretiring long enough to justify my fuss at arbcom, but I actually plan on doing articles exclusively, and probably just one - I'm trying to feature

2547:, using massive reverts to get rid of anything from a critic. Those got cleaned out by admin action and the article partially frozen against anonymous editing and new accounts, but it's still difficult.... 517:

Interesting. I said (a) that it isn't difficult, and (b) that I'm going to try out some free OS's. Both of your questions are based on either not reading, not understanding, or not believing what I said.

194:, or some of the other longtime contributors to those pages who have been dealing with AC socks, as they might be able to provide some context for how constructive his input, if unblocked, is likely to be. 2636:

If you feel that I should have asked another administrator about this, I will. It's just that you were involved with this issue, and I felt that you would be the best option to come to about this matter.

3225:. It was a controversial wiki-drama, involving some very strong personalities, lots of venom, and mostly situations for which we already had applicable rules. People just ignored them, because we have 2372:, I deleted the article after the AfD, it was recreated, then deleted by another admin, and the article got recreated again. I don't have an opinion about what should be done with the article right now. 159:

Assuming we decide that Regulations is a separate person, I think it would be fair to leave that account blocked until we get some kind of agreement to edit according to good Knowledge (XXG) practices.

3704: 3784:. When I closed the discussion, I could not claim that a clear consensus was displayed in the conversation, so I felt is was appropriate to cite the consensus-supported precedents that are relevant. 2840:

You could have blocked all these guys for engaging in the revert war in the first place, GT. Then incivil talk page postings would not have been a problem. You are too kind, it seems. Best Regards,—

1039:

Hi! Difficulty in writing about need for commercial driver education comes in part from the lack of categories in this new area of education. You can see from the history of the article added on

3267:

make sure the police aren't just casting people out on a whim, and so that a policeperson could conceivably be held responsible by their fellow police for doing so. Any such society is a type of "

1176: 947:

A sadist considers enjoying the pain of others to be a good; otherwise they wouldn't pursue it. Everyone pursues their understanding of the good. Plato made this clear, I believe it was in the

485:

to be installed on the other machines. Meanwhile, we've got three out of three machines screwed up, and we'd like to be able to revert to status quo before introducing more fundamental changes.

3277:

Another type of society has police and no laws. This is the most dystopian. There can no accountability for police actions when no one, not even the police themselves, know what the rules are.

2355: 1261:, too, while we're at it.) I do recall interacting with Samsara at ED in the past. He seemed to be an interesting chap, but I don't think we saw eye to eye. Maybe he's Spartacus, too. - 144:

as a sockpuppet of Billy Ego. That's one reason (of many) that I'm skeptical of his promises to behave, and of the argument that the only impetus for his sockpuppetry was an unjust ban.

3194:

As I think about it now, it occurs to me that a good way to review a link would be to delete, but not oversight it, so the admins can see it, and then let them discuss what they see on

2861:

Well, you never know until you try it! Seems to work for some people. (But then, i guess, you'd probably get an article at ED or someplace, so maybe that wouldn't be such a good idea.)—

2295: 2564:

for a while. Please let me know when you've seen what you need to see, or if you'd like to see more of its history. It has 20 versions in the history, going back to April 2006. -

3443:

Not to butt in (again!), but as I understand GTBacchus's origional point of view, he objected to some earlier versions of the proposal on the basis that they opened a huge can of

3241:

get written, including some good ones!). The most reckless admins involved are no longer admins, and the reckless ones who are still admins have changed their tune considerably.

3300:

doesn't really apply. Sure a banned editor can just ignore the sixth pillar and return to the community under another name, but we have an elaborate system, part technological (

628:

Yeah, I thought you mean 'background' as in a history, as in either Linux came from a bunch of hackers, or it lead to people becoming hackers :p How about in the future, we use

3671:

I really don't know much about uploading pictures, but I can try to find the answer to your question. I probably won't get to it tonight, though, because I'm about to go out

1129:. Tips on photos - top one is rather grainy and burnt out; not easy to get a good pic with such a bright sky behind. One of the menaces of getting good tree pics, I fear. - 3191:

off-wiki while reviewing it. It was certainly a one-off comment, that I had put very little weight on, so please don't think that it's somehow representative of my views.

2748:, insofar as it involves proposals for new policy, and to our user talk pages, insofar as it involves more personal subjects, such as our various avatars and intentions. 3620: 3245: 3064: 3063:

Also, would you mind terribly if I used this info for the purposes of "cyber-stalking, offline stalking, outing you without your consent, and humiliating you sexually"?

1440:

Moving the other articles and templates doesn't sound like so much trouble. Of course they'll need to move to follow the main article. I'll start working on that now. -

438:

definitely make buying XP the only option, but just for writing documents or doing research on the internet could be easier in linux), I highly recommend you check out

3309: 2222:

I'd have thought that whatever appeared on the original Record Label woukd be correct. My copy got lost several house moves ago but someone out there must have one.

1405:

Hello, may I ask for your participation in an RFC established for user Bluemarine/Matt Sanchez? The reason for the Request for Comment is set out in the RFC summary

3288:, is there's actually a sixth pillar no one really talks about. Knowledge (XXG) is the encyclopedia anyone can edit, unless they are blocked or banned, and you can 2914:

Have you been treating me excellently, and not assuming that I am some sort of wiki scum? Was I edit warring on the NPA policy page? I was not aware that making a

3179:

cliques that control particular articles, but they're small, and Knowledge (XXG) is vast. They also don't last forever, and in the long run, that's a sure bet.

3001:, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at 2930:

are an edit warrior or a chronically uncivil editor? No. Don't you dare tell me what kind of assumptions I've made about you - you have no idea what I assume.

691:

I'm semi-new and i don't have that much time to read how to add pictures to wikipedia, plus i don't really understand what it syas (too much to consume at once).

3312:

at how many have been caught. I agree that the sixth pillar is essential to the functioning of our community, but we can't pretend it doesn't exist and perform

3248:

should set a tone, and we'll get to see how the melody unfurls from there. It's inevitable that neither side will get everything they want, and that the sheer

2149:

article after a vote, and that's fine. However, we still have it linked to on this important and very visible template. Could you possibly fix that? Thanks. --

1391:- so our paths may not cross. If you have any suggestions on that article though, I'm all ears of course, but otherwise thanks again and happy editing 2 u. 1406: 3117:

is perhaps the best artistic suggestion of what such a reality is like. Maybe not right away, but ultimately. What we do here isn't too far departed from

2698:

Someone got around it and renamed it Gabrielle Lang. Can you take care of this? I definitely feel that those alternative names for her need to be locked.

36:

scholarly view is presented as the scholarly view, and a strong and reliable dissenting view as a strong and reliable dissenting view." The suggestion is

572:

Ah, I see. You meant to say that the loss of a comfort zone was installing a modified version of Windows, not trying linux. Simple miscommunication.--

3530:. PM's refusal to be open about who he is annoying, and I have some suspicions about that, but it doesn't change the force of his arguments at all. 3144:

with a new user name after they are exposed. The important thing is that they at least reboot. I truly believe it's the only chance we have for the

2358:. You closed the AfD as a delete, but it doesn't seem the page was ever deleted (unless I'm missing something). Do you know what happened there? - 1240:

locally), this probably has something to do with the rumors that he spreads. I hope it's just that Fred got tricked by this user's persistent lies.

1241: 387:) patrols that article and frequently leaves brusque "Knowledge (XXG) is not censored" warnings for users who remove that text. He just now added 179:

the ban, and partly because of the evidence, some of which I emailed you, that these are in fact the same account conducting a social experiment.

3221:

You know, I was here during the userbox wars. Do you know about those? It was the first half of '06, and a lot of it took place on and around

2830:

I was happy enough just to say, "hey, let's not make comments like that," but you want to go seven rounds over it. Fine. You win. Enjoy it. -

2828:

Ok, keep arguing then. You're right to reply to immaturity with immaturity. If two wrongs don't make a right, then maybe seven or eight will.

2539:

staff, but who registered an SPA account and immediately dove into an edit war, and an anonymous IP editor who turned out to be the director of

3057:

teaching at some prestigious university... I probably won't have the grades to be a professor though. One last decision I'll have to make :- (

2408: 3105:

I'm really not trying to push your buttons here with my last edit, but it's like we are from different universes. Oh, and have you ever tried

3086:. Tonight, I've surprised myself by maybe thinking of something; I'll try to post it tomorrow when I'm not falling asleep at the keyboard. 584: 337: 2132: 219:

to Billy/AC's protestations of innocence suggests that even the technical evidence is quite a bit stronger than AC would have you believe.

295:, an anarchy/libertarianism regular who's interacted extensively with Anarcho-capitalism and friends (note: I asked him if he'd comment). 2267:

Hi, I've seen in the google cache that there was a page about the "fight fire with fire" song, by Metallica, but you deleted it, why? :)

481:

of the work computers, and when I find one that will be easy to transition to, I start introducing it to people, and eventually they'll

400:

with Duke53 before but we do not see eye-to-eye on the matter. Do you mind having a look and sharing your thoughts? Much appreciated,

3256:

Even better, we'll insist on a whole continuum, and we'll keep our eyes on each other all along it. That is the way the wiki works. -

2588: 111: 2508: 2279: 938:. I had addressed your queries, you might have overlook, as discussion got distracted. I could not gather any support there though. 835:

the 3O listing, then I guess a content RfC might be a better venue, as well as a few relevant talk pages (not user talk pages, per

2458: 983:, I think i cant help any more about this. My wikipedia voyage is in last phase, not much work i can do. Thanks for support. Bye. 1739: 1597: 1181: 3325:

is certainly a good candidate as any for a rule we could conceivably just not have, though if this were to just be crammed into

1020:

don't really worry about it. It's not like mathematics or logic, where consistency is a big priority. Anyway, happy editing! -

619:

put there by whoever put the Windows installation together. Those are a liability of the new "improved" Windows installation. -

354:

Hi GTBacchus, I wonder if you could provide a (hopefully) quick third opinion on a matter I'm involved in. I found you through

2192: 3011:

this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself.

1157:

Hi! This is Icarus!, being non-Wiki (I'm not logged in...), saying thanx for the work on the Discordianism page! Keep it up!

287:

OK, I know I promised not to bug you anymore, but two things I wanted to mention (granted you've probably already seen them):

37: 3723: 2237: 2204: 59:; and that non-scholarly sources may be used only if scholarly ones aren't available, which is a violation of V and NPOV. 3218:

personalities tend to create and/or facilitate some ridiculous situations, and this is one of them. This too will pass.

2983: 2519:, and found that he had proposed and voted on this deletion. I have not seen the article, I'd like to. Is there any way? 1933: 1331: 391:

to the one I left, although the user has not made any edits since my note. I am tempted to remove Duke53's warning per

384: 355: 3222: 2343: 291:

regarding the accuracy of initial checkuser, which pegged Anarcho-capitalism, Regulations, etc as Billy Ego socks, and

1749: 1617: 1612: 587:

at the reference desk, which provides context. Sorry if I jumped on you unfairly for not knowing what was going on. -

2317:. Your aid is appreciated. I am expressing my gratitude because I was the original one who asked for that move. -- 1343: 884:

I'll have a look at the articles and let you know what I think. It's likely to be a day or two before I have time. -

1952: 1327: 921:

Thanks for dropping me a note. I've been very busy, and not logged on much lately, but I've made some comments at

2745: 1475:

Hi GTBacchus, I saw your comment on Johann van Beethoven, and I thought we could use another neutral view over at

2584: 1853: 1622: 1347: 1335: 1323: 1319: 1110: 3305: 3285: 1339: 1106: 2125: 2080: 1754: 1672: 1607: 1103: 366: 1427:

namechange have to modify every sub-article and template including their links to avoid double redirections.

70:

who turn up with questions. I've possibly discussed sourcing issues more than anyone else on Knowledge (XXG).

3693:

This article was volted to be deleted, but is still up. It appears to be written by a band member with POV.

2369: 2347: 2050: 823: 3781: 2283: 2275: 2248:

I gotta say, I'm not sure what you're saying, nor why you're saying it to me. I don't seem to have edited

2225: 2180: 1460:

I think they're all moved; please let me know if there are any we missed that need admin buttons to move. -

1185: 3642: 2561: 2481: 2441: 2015: 1659: 1629: 1602: 976: 860: 3339: 3157: 3131: 2146: 1430:

If they don't, on purpuse, assume their theory idea. I think that we'll have to change the name back. :(

1249: 1213: 761:

Hello GT, I would like to talk with you sometime. Please contact me with the best way to do that. Best,

604::p I know what's going on, your statement just lead me down a different road than I was thinking about.-- 3762: 3662: 2524: 1744: 1734: 1727: 1704: 1491: 1481: 1081: 1045: 710: 692: 3406: 3322: 2749: 2233: 1838: 1158: 994: 922: 2318: 911:

policy, while going through your contributions. Give a look to my comment in talk page there. Thanks.

867:, i feel former should be merged into later. (I have not gone through articles, you also see articles 634: 606: 574: 533: 507: 3628: 3114: 2418: 2065: 2030: 1774: 1709: 1639: 1476: 791: 781: 442:, and try a LiveCD for yourself. Once you've downloaded the .iso file from the edubuntu site, follow 86: 44: 2656:

I understand. And thank you. I should be getting to bed myself, though for most people over here in

836: 3468: 3448: 3141: 3140:

And by the way, wikipedia is the encyclopedia any one can edit. I have no problem with such agents

2889: 2862: 2841: 2729: 2613: 2377: 2188: 2145:

I'm active in the Knowledge (XXG) Shia Islam group, and needed your help. You recently deleted the

2118: 2045: 1982: 1843: 1654: 1634: 1555: 1490:

Thanks alot for your comments, mate. I really appreciate it that you spared the time. Best wishes!

1080:

what does a piture need to not get deleated? It says i need a free license or something like that.

749: 667: 157:

suggestion of unblocking Anarcho-capitalism is based on his agreeing to take a different approach.

17: 3354:

You may also wish to update the time of the last update since your userpage lists it as Feb 2007.

2229: 664: 246:

I thank you for the effort you've put into gathering and presenting evidence; it's very helpful. -

3260: 3134: 2657: 2421:

suggesting that anybody supporting the other title give some reasons. Thanks for the heads-up. -

1887: 1592: 1410: 1388: 1301: 814: 810: 191: 3554:

lot about JoshuaZ. Yeah. The more you talk, the less you annoy me and the more you amuse me. -

3444: 3330: 3293: 601: 183: 53: 3539:

Blah blah blah policy blah blah blah NPA blah blah blah. We all know what you think of policy.

3122: 2621: 2617: 2491: 2474: 2451: 2314: 2108: 2075: 2040: 1972: 1769: 1534:

You're welcome - I remember being quite puzzled when I first came across similar situations. -

1451: 1431: 935: 211:

Regarding the issue of a checkuser error or collateral damage, I don't want to put words into

3334: 3301: 1504: 1330:. Apparently due to a previous redirect blocking the move, the article took several detours ( 397: 392: 3767: 3727: 3405:

ThuranX, I'm not worried about those attack sites listing me. What if they post my name and

3149: 2883: 2596: 2085: 2060: 1977: 1525: 948: 868: 378: 134: 3326: 3313: 3297: 3289: 3281: 3226: 3199: 3172: 3002: 2991: 2811: 2807: 2803: 1290: 908: 3752: 3624: 3467:

Well, you are the one going around saying JoshZ supports Brandt, so I kind of doubt that.—

3249: 3110: 3013: 3006: 2975: 2606: 2532: 2400: 2025: 1870: 1799: 1361: 1351: 980: 872: 864: 762: 341: 187: 119: 83: 41: 3195: 3009:

if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that

115: 52:

Hi GT, I won't be commenting on that section, because I feel Tim Vickers is engaged in a

3175:, sometimes due to bad judgment by admins, and we deal with it, every time, as a group. 3043: 2550:

Upshot, I don't know if I'd ask for the article to be restored, but I'd like to see it!

1350:, restoring its proper talk page and maybe delete a few of the nonsensical redirects? - 1258: 719:

I've replied on your user page. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. -

3788: 3737: 3708: 3676: 3646: 3555: 3488: 3479: 3424: 3382: 3272: 3257: 3109:? I don't know why the Queen of England needs an official vodka. She's the pope of the 3090: 3047: 2948: 2938: 2920: 2874: 2853: 2831: 2820: 2792: 2770: 2753: 2679: 2648: 2565: 2465: 2422: 2388: 2373: 2359: 2351: 2328: 2299: 2253: 2208: 2184: 2175: 2160: 2090: 1992: 1928: 1860: 1535: 1508: 1461: 1441: 1262: 1224: 1189: 1139: 1114: 1021: 1011: 998: 984: 964: 952: 939: 926: 912: 894: 885: 876: 840: 740: 720: 677: 620: 588: 552: 519: 490: 449: 412: 320: 247: 212: 161: 98: 3791: 3773: 3740: 3730: 3711: 3697: 3679: 3665: 3649: 3635: 3609: 3588: 3558: 3543: 3534: 3491: 3482: 3473: 3462: 3453: 3438: 3427: 3398: 3385: 3368: 3358: 3342: 3160: 3093: 3072: 3050: 3033: 3016: 2951: 2941: 2923: 2894: 2877: 2867: 2856: 2846: 2834: 2823: 2795: 2773: 2756: 2732: 2713: 2702: 2682: 2673: 2664: 2651: 2641: 2628: 2599: 2568: 2554: 2498: 2468: 2425: 2411: 2391: 2381: 2362: 2354:. After moving the page, I noticed that the article had gone through an AfD in June, 2331: 2321: 2302: 2287: 2256: 2241: 2211: 2196: 2163: 2153: 1538: 1528: 1524:

Thanks for fixing those - it took me a while to realise what was wrong with them :-))

1511: 1494: 1484: 1464: 1454: 1444: 1434: 1413: 1395: 1364: 1354: 1308: 1265: 1252: 1227: 1216: 1192: 1161: 1142: 1133: 1117: 1098: 1084: 1062: 1048: 1024: 1014: 1001: 987: 967: 955: 942: 929: 915: 897: 888: 879: 843: 828: 794: 784: 751: 723: 713: 695: 680: 670: 638: 623: 610: 591: 578: 555: 537: 522: 511: 493: 456: 424: 415: 404: 344: 323: 314: 301: 275: 250: 225: 200: 164: 150: 122: 101: 88: 64:

These are not innocent copy edits, no matter how loudly and often he claims they were.

46: 32: 3585: 3153: 3118: 3106: 3069: 3030: 2997:

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting

1987: 1848: 1779: 1419: 1392: 1295: 1203: 310: 297: 271: 221: 196: 146: 443: 3606: 3540: 3531: 3459: 3435: 3395: 3365: 3355: 3268: 2947:

I left you a reply on my talk page. I think we understand each other. Moving on. -

2710: 2699: 2670: 2661: 2638: 2625: 2478: 2438: 2035: 1865: 1764: 421: 401: 370: 2523:

theoretically possible and some research shows that it actually happens) into the

2174:

Hi, can you please provide me with a copy of the deleted code of Social Parking? -

1572: 3271:', though there may be whole systems that more advanced versions, believing that 1833: 3757: 3736:

You didn't assume good faith; you assumed I was on a mass link deletion spree. -

3687: 3632: 2986:

from Knowledge (XXG). The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because

2527:

article due to massive sock puppetry including that by BenB4 and his next sock,

2249: 2150: 1965: 1880: 1875: 1826: 1759: 1714: 1699: 1694: 1649: 1007: 374: 3329:

in shortened form anyway, which seems inevitable, I'm not sure that solves the

2967: 3694: 3627:

and accidentally noticed that the article was deleted only two weeks ago (see

3517: 2998: 2987: 2979: 2961: 2544: 2528: 2516: 2020: 1792: 1563: 1237: 813:

talk page. I don't have the energy for it now but I appreciate your words.)

777: 1383:

as well). All the more reason for me not to cause any trouble I suppose ;-)

3521: 3206:

basis no matter what rule we write down - there will always be a gray area.

3126: 2055: 1940: 1814: 1684: 1380: 453: 319:

Thanks for dropping by to say that. There's no hard feelings from my end. -

97:

Thank you for that explanation. I hope the controversy dies down quickly. -

1257:

Like I said at ArbCom, if Miltopia is Blu Aardvark, then so am I. (Maybe

738:, and the discussion is now re-opened, if you feel like chiming in again. 2551: 2540: 2536: 1945: 1918: 1904: 1644: 1130: 1095: 2593:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of Japanese Nintendo 64 games

2270: 2103: 369:

on June 25th because they removed text about LDS undergarments from the

3672: 3526: 1821: 1809: 1804: 1342:) and in the process got separated from its talk page, now located at 1281: 1059: 3707:; let's see what the community decides about this rewritten version. - 1285: 3296:

or banned for ignoring the rules. And for blocked and banned editors

3244:

We'll get past this one, too. ArbCom's rulings in the current case,

3083: 2070: 2010: 1913: 1894: 1689: 1679: 1587: 1409:. Whether you support or oppose it, your input would be appreciated. 1202:

Hi GTBacchus, as an administrator who had interacted frequently with

706: 629: 597: 1109:

I've taken a couple of pictures of a pine tree near where I work in

114:

that ran before I tried to add the unanimously-supported wording to

1072:

Hi, I missed you email, please email me - www.MarkDilley.info - tx

3145: 1923: 1899: 975:

As for original topic of this section, i moved some sections from

735: 734:

You once commented on a proposal regarding the moving the page to

531:

I'm not sure who you're talking to. I don't have any questions. --

3645:; please let me know when you've got whatever you need from it. - 615:

Ah, by "hacker's backgrounds", I was referring to the background

3378: 1040: 502: 1401:

Request for Comment on User Conduct - Matt Sanchez / Bluemarine

1035:

PTDI & other US commercial driver educational organizations

893:

Thanks. Even i have to go through thoroughly, me taking break.

3252:

of countless edits will nudge us to some place in the middle.

1326:, disregarding the Manual of Style and a related consensus at 773: 420:

Thanks for the opinion. I'll take no action, as you suggest.

3458:

More irrelevant doublespeak, and the Arbcom sees it my way.

3029:

You're a math teacher, right? May I ask what grade level?

2966: 2535:

who is at least a real person and somewhat of an expert, on

1248:

of being both Miltopia and Blu Aardvark at various times. --

1006:

I noticed Blondie on your userpage, checkout my another fav

336:

Hi there, I was wondering if you might have any comments at

3751:

Hello GTBacchus. I noticed you closed the move proposal at

439: 3413:

I'm not arguing for outing sites in any way, shape or form

2982:, by another Knowledge (XXG) user, requesting that it be 2298:. Please let me know if you have any further questions. - 2296:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Fight Fire with Fire

2669:

As I stated on the Gabrielle Solis talk page, thank you.

2431: 1244:

of the stuff he churns out. Incidentally, he has accused

3584:

GTBacchus so you probably need not worry for his sake.

2725:

not clutter up the NPA page, should you wish to engage.

780:. It seems that both "lede" and "lead" are okay, right? 3229:, or for what ever reason they thought of at the time. 1210: 1207: 934:

Not every man wants for good, you seem not to know the

806: 388: 362: 292: 288: 216: 138: 62: 60: 57: 2852:

page incivility, but I'm sure you're right. Thanks! -

3621:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Inside baseball

3246:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Attack sites

2752:

has seen enough turmoil for a few months, I reckon. -

2342:

Hi, Akhilleus. I was just working on the backlog at

182:

As a side note, anarcho-capitalism related pages are

3182:

You mention Knowledge (XXG)'s power structure... we

3039:

I dunno, that's kind of a personal question.... ;)

2769:

accurately. Uncivil, crass, perhaps. Violent? No. -

1174:

I was hoping I could get some input from you, about

477:

I'm perfectly happy to try out various free OS's on

2515:I've been reviewing the activity of a banned sock, 1280:You might be interested in the discussion going on 3304:) and part argumentative to find these people and 1346:. Could you assist in moving the article back to 2744:I'm quite happy for the conversation to move to 2595:to the discussion, how about giving your view. ( 2159:That's fixed now. Thanks for pointing it out. - 705:Okay lets say i want to upload a picture of the 3722:I've made an admittedly grudging concession at 993:Your talk page doesn't seem to roll. Regarding 3478:You guys are welcome to take this elsewhere. - 2660:, they would have already been asleep by now. 2509:Tactical manipulation of instant-runoff voting 1360:Nevermind, it got taken care of already. :) – 2432:I'd appreciate your input on an userbox issue 2126: 632:to avoid these types of misunderstandings? -- 8: 2271:http://en.wikipedia.org/Fight_Fire_With_Fire 3550:ThuranX, keep digging. You clearly know a 1182:WikiProject:Terrorism and counter-terrorism 139:running numerous socks and sleeper accounts 2614:that her article should be under that name 2473:Woops, sorry forgot. ^^; it's right on my 2252:, or any of the pages linked from there. - 2133: 2119: 1548: 1206:(RIP), I wonder what you thought of this: 709:symbol onto my UserPage, hoe do i do that? 474:, and you talk to them when they're calm. 2368:Hi GTBacchus, if you look at the logs of 1232:I know. If you remember the problem user 3308:for daring to violate the sixth pillar. 338:Knowledge (XXG):Editor review/TimVickers 239:and I'm certainly not trying to unblock 40:if you have time to look at it. Cheers, 3423:Thanks for your concern all the same. - 2587:they are trying to delete the new page 2560:Sure, I could undelete a version to my 1551: 133:You've probably already seen this, but 2990:is a redirect to a non-existent page ( 2531:, a meat puppet recruited to come in, 472:let them go back to their comfort zone 31:Hi GT, I've suggested some wording at 3516:Thuranx, you may wish to learn about 2783:my view is off-kilter or just wrong. 7: 110:You might also be interested in the 2309:Thanks for moving Political realism 2294:I deleted it per the discussion at 186:; I'd ask that you touch base with 137:admitted (bragged, actually) about 2589:List of Japanese Nintendo 64 games 1332:NiGHTS: Journey of Dreams (change) 772:Hi, thanks for your message. See 356:Category:Third opinion Wikipedians 184:once again coming up before ArbCom 24: 3724:Talk:Criticism of Knowledge (XXG) 2409:The way, the truth, and the light 2313:Thanks for moving the article on 1471:We could also use your input here 583:Yeah, this thread continues from 3641:I have restored the material to 2102: 1571: 1058:I just wanted to say thank you. 2344:Knowledge (XXG):Requested moves 2203:You seem to already have it at 1545:Deleting the Shia Views article 1344:Talk:NiGHTS: Journey of Dreamss 3718:"This user assumes good faith" 3148:rising to the top. This is an 2974:Hello, this is a message from 2387:re-delete it. Thanks again. - 2164:22:58, 30 September 2007 (UTC) 2154:22:55, 30 September 2007 (UTC) 1539:01:29, 30 September 2007 (UTC) 1529:00:43, 30 September 2007 (UTC) 1512:01:27, 30 September 2007 (UTC) 1495:01:21, 30 September 2007 (UTC) 1485:00:38, 30 September 2007 (UTC) 1465:01:30, 30 September 2007 (UTC) 1455:20:38, 25 September 2007 (UTC) 1445:20:35, 25 September 2007 (UTC) 1435:16:37, 25 September 2007 (UTC) 1414:18:15, 18 September 2007 (UTC) 1396:17:15, 18 September 2007 (UTC) 1365:15:19, 19 September 2007 (UTC) 1355:16:15, 18 September 2007 (UTC) 1: 3605:FYI, I've sent you an email. 3580:are attack sites that target 3227:a rule saying you can do that 2417:Ok. I've added a comment to 2205:User:IDNexpert/Social Parking 1309:08:17, 8 September 2007 (UTC) 3792:16:59, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 3774:15:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 3741:19:47, 22 October 2007 (UTC) 3731:13:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC) 3712:21:33, 21 October 2007 (UTC) 3698:05:38, 21 October 2007 (UTC) 3680:02:51, 21 October 2007 (UTC) 3666:19:52, 20 October 2007 (UTC) 3650:01:10, 21 October 2007 (UTC) 3636:00:53, 19 October 2007 (UTC) 3610:14:52, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 3589:05:30, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 3559:05:33, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 3544:04:31, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 3535:04:12, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 3492:02:58, 21 October 2007 (UTC) 3483:05:58, 19 October 2007 (UTC) 3474:04:58, 19 October 2007 (UTC) 3463:04:44, 19 October 2007 (UTC) 3454:02:51, 19 October 2007 (UTC) 3439:02:17, 19 October 2007 (UTC) 3428:05:33, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 3399:04:08, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 3386:05:33, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 3369:04:05, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 3359:04:02, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 3343:21:36, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 3261:07:52, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 3161:04:09, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 3135:03:50, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 3094:08:23, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 3073:06:56, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 3051:06:38, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 3034:03:38, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 3017:09:10, 16 October 2007 (UTC) 2952:23:10, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 2942:21:51, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 2924:21:29, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 2895:21:20, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 2878:21:13, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 2868:21:10, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 2857:21:04, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 2847:20:51, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 2835:20:36, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 2824:16:22, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 2796:01:53, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 2774:01:24, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 2764:Moving conversation from NPA 2757:06:06, 16 October 2007 (UTC) 2733:05:07, 16 October 2007 (UTC) 2714:10:56, 21 October 2007 (UTC) 2703:10:32, 21 October 2007 (UTC) 2683:01:54, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 2674:23:11, 17 October 2007 (UTC) 2665:09:33, 17 October 2007 (UTC) 2652:08:23, 17 October 2007 (UTC) 2642:06:52, 17 October 2007 (UTC) 2629:08:14, 14 October 2007 (UTC) 2327:No problem; happy editing! - 1934:Bektashism and folk religion 1507:manner; that always helps. - 1450:"ok ask if you need help ;) 774:this Knowledge (XXG) article 340:. Thanks, if you have time. 3209:Now, a plan like this does 3005:. Feel free to contact the 2978:. A tag has been placed on 2600:16:38, 9 October 2007 (UTC) 2569:05:03, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 2555:04:59, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 2499:00:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 2469:00:21, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 2459:00:19, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 2426:08:06, 7 October 2007 (UTC) 2412:08:01, 7 October 2007 (UTC) 2392:00:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC) 2382:22:18, 6 October 2007 (UTC) 2363:19:32, 6 October 2007 (UTC) 2332:00:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC) 2322:17:35, 5 October 2007 (UTC) 2303:23:03, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 2288:20:16, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 2257:00:50, 7 October 2007 (UTC) 2242:16:10, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 2212:00:53, 2 October 2007 (UTC) 2197:00:49, 2 October 2007 (UTC) 1336:NiGHTS: Journey of Dreams - 1266:03:05, 28 August 2007 (UTC) 1253:02:59, 28 August 2007 (UTC) 1228:02:30, 28 August 2007 (UTC) 1217:01:08, 28 August 2007 (UTC) 1193:21:26, 27 August 2007 (UTC) 1162:16:17, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 1143:21:54, 30 August 2007 (UTC) 1134:19:32, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 1107:Image:Pine tree closeup.jpg 1099:19:32, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 1085:17:59, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 1025:16:49, 4 October 2007 (UTC) 1015:15:12, 4 October 2007 (UTC) 1002:15:03, 4 October 2007 (UTC) 988:06:54, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 968:10:41, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 350:Need informal third opinion 3809: 3333:problem. If nothing else, 3280:The problem with invoking 2578:List of Japanese N64 games 1340:NiGHTS: Journey of Dreamss 1328:Talk:Nights into Dreams... 1104:Image:Pine tree branch.jpg 956:15:13, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 943:10:15, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 930:05:48, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 916:10:34, 4 August 2007 (UTC) 778:this dictionary definition 142:even before he was blocked 2585:List of Nintendo 64 games 1348:Nights: Journey of Dreams 1324:NiGHTS: Journey of Dreams 1320:Nights: Journey of Dreams 1111:Mercer Island, Washington 1063:08:07, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 1049:16:02, 16 July 2007 (UTC) 898:04:39, 16 July 2007 (UTC) 889:04:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC) 880:04:34, 16 July 2007 (UTC) 844:19:38, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 829:15:20, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 795:05:52, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 785:05:30, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 752:21:17, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 724:05:52, 13 July 2007 (UTC) 714:18:22, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 696:17:33, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 503:there is customer support 293:a comment from Libertatia 47:23:15, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 3156:at getting it right. -- 3100: 2738:Thanks for dropping by. 2612:Consensus is definitely 2081:Umm Farwah bint al-Qasim 1499:It's no problem. Thank 1118:04:43, 23 May 2007 (UTC) 681:21:10, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 671:21:09, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 663:Thanks you for blocking 639:04:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 624:04:07, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 611:04:04, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 592:03:55, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 579:03:48, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 556:03:42, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 538:02:35, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 523:02:18, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 512:23:00, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 494:21:25, 7 July 2007 (UTC) 457:20:45, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 433:Concerning free software 425:03:57, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 416:22:14, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 405:18:59, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 367:User talk:208.124.55.149 345:22:47, 3 July 2007 (UTC) 324:20:34, 3 July 2007 (UTC) 315:19:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC) 302:23:33, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 276:21:36, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 251:21:30, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 226:21:15, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 201:21:12, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 165:20:27, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 151:19:07, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 123:03:43, 1 July 2007 (UTC) 102:00:58, 1 July 2007 (UTC) 89:00:00, 1 July 2007 (UTC) 3656:Pictures of real people 2370:Paula Campbell (singer) 2348:Paula Campbell (singer) 1090:Images, species unknown 444:these easy instructions 289:A comment from Dmcdevit 3643:User:GTBacchus/sandbox 2971: 2016:Khadija bint Khuwaylid 1603:Succession to Muhammad 1322:was recently moved to 1242:This is a good example 1138:Thank you very much! - 1094:Only just seen this - 977:Human sexual behaviour 907:Hi, i had came across 861:Human sexual behaviour 3705:second AfD nomination 2970: 2525:Instant Runoff Voting 1735:Verse of purification 1582:Beliefs and practices 1520:Souplantation/Potluck 1186:Wikiproject:Terrorism 1167:Wikiproject:Terrorism 3629:Talk:Inside Baseball 3115:Nineteen Eighty-Four 2419:Talk:Positional good 2031:Umm Kulthum bint Ali 1710:Mourning of Muharram 1640:Mourning of Muharram 1477:Talk:Potsdamer_Platz 1314:Undoing a rogue move 1125:European Black Pine 440:the edubuntu website 365:for an anon user at 3703:I've completed its 3411:More to the point, 2728:best all the same, 2147:Views on Shia Islam 2046:Ruqayya bint Husayn 1953:Extinct Shi'a sects 1673:Days of remembrance 1660:Arbaʽeen Pilgrimage 1655:The Four Companions 1177:the proposed merger 805:Hi, GTBacchus. In 18:User talk:GTBacchus 3772: 3623:. I've just wrote 2972: 2658:Pensacola, Florida 2263:Deletion of a page 1866:Atba-i-Malak Bohra 1793:Branches and sects 1740:Two weighty things 1503:for engaging in a 1389:30 Seconds to Mars 811:Sexual intercourse 192:User:Full Shunyata 129:Anarcho-capitalism 3756: 3350:Updating userpage 3154:only get one shot 3123:Ministry of Truth 2315:Political realism 2290: 2278:comment added by 2244: 2228:comment added by 2199: 2183:comment added by 2143: 2142: 2109:Shia Islam portal 2076:Fatimah bint Asad 2041:Fatima bint Hasan 1770:Battle of Karbala 936:sadistic pleasure 596:Who do you think 3800: 3770: 3765: 3760: 3663:Ultimaterasengan 3524:. They are both 3292:, until you are 3290:ignore all rules 3150:inflection point 3121:'s job with the 2984:speedily deleted 2976:an automated bot 2678:No problem. :) - 2486: 2446: 2273: 2223: 2218:Johnny Kidd etc. 2178: 2135: 2128: 2121: 2107: 2106: 2086:Ruqayya bint Ali 2061:Fatima bint Musa 1575: 1566: 1560: 1559: 1549: 1371:Heartfelt thanks 1304: 1298: 1082:Ultimaterasengan 1046:StationNT5Bmedia 869:Animal sexuality 826: 821: 819: 746: 745: 711:Ultimaterasengan 693:Ultimaterasengan 177:before and after 135:User:Regulations 3808: 3807: 3803: 3802: 3801: 3799: 3798: 3797: 3768: 3763: 3758: 3753:Talk:Iao Valley 3749: 3720: 3691: 3658: 3625:Inside Baseball 3617: 3615:Inside baseball 3603: 3352: 3250:Brownian motion 3223:deletion review 3111:Anglican Church 3103: 3024: 2965: 2884:The Dude abides 2766: 2722: 2610: 2607:Gabrielle Solis 2580: 2533:User:Tbouricius 2513: 2482: 2442: 2434: 2404: 2401:Positional good 2340: 2311: 2265: 2220: 2172: 2139: 2101: 2096: 2095: 2026:Zaynab bint Ali 2006: 1998: 1997: 1968: 1958: 1957: 1871:Sulaymani Bohra 1795: 1785: 1784: 1755:Fatimah's house 1730: 1720: 1719: 1675: 1665: 1664: 1583: 1562: 1553: 1552: 1547: 1522: 1473: 1424: 1403: 1373: 1316: 1302: 1296: 1278: 1200: 1169: 1155: 1092: 1078: 1070: 1056: 1037: 981:Human sexuality 873:Plant sexuality 865:Human sexuality 852: 850:Human sexuality 824: 817: 815: 803: 770: 759: 743: 741: 732: 730:DARPA page move 703: 689: 661: 637: 609: 577: 536: 510: 452: 435: 389:his own warning 352: 334: 188:User:Libertatia 131: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3806: 3804: 3796: 3795: 3748: 3745: 3744: 3743: 3719: 3716: 3715: 3714: 3690: 3684: 3683: 3682: 3657: 3654: 3653: 3652: 3616: 3613: 3602: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3594: 3593: 3592: 3591: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3563: 3562: 3561: 3511: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3507: 3506: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3502: 3501: 3500: 3499: 3498: 3497: 3496: 3495: 3494: 3391: 3390: 3389: 3388: 3351: 3348: 3347: 3346: 3340:146.115.58.152 3273:power corrupts 3164: 3163: 3158:146.115.58.152 3132:146.115.58.152 3107:Gordon's vodka 3102: 3101:Don't kill me! 3099: 3098: 3097: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3023: 3020: 2996: 2995: 2964: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2954: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2814:, and did not 2765: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2730:Privatemusings 2721: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2609: 2604: 2591:here's a link 2579: 2576: 2574: 2572: 2571: 2512: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2433: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2403: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2352:Paula Campbell 2346:, and I moved 2339: 2338:Paula Campbell 2336: 2335: 2334: 2310: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2264: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2219: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2171: 2170:Social Parking 2168: 2167: 2166: 2141: 2140: 2138: 2137: 2130: 2123: 2115: 2112: 2111: 2098: 2097: 2094: 2093: 2091:Sayyida Nafisa 2088: 2083: 2078: 2073: 2068: 2066:Hakimah Khātūn 2063: 2058: 2053: 2048: 2043: 2038: 2033: 2028: 2023: 2018: 2013: 2007: 2004: 2003: 2000: 1999: 1996: 1995: 1990: 1985: 1980: 1975: 1969: 1964: 1963: 1960: 1959: 1956: 1955: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1943: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1926: 1921: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1902: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1878: 1873: 1868: 1863: 1861:Hebtiahs Bohra 1858: 1857: 1856: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1812: 1807: 1796: 1791: 1790: 1787: 1786: 1783: 1782: 1777: 1772: 1767: 1762: 1757: 1752: 1747: 1742: 1737: 1731: 1726: 1725: 1722: 1721: 1718: 1717: 1712: 1707: 1702: 1697: 1692: 1687: 1682: 1676: 1671: 1670: 1667: 1666: 1663: 1662: 1657: 1652: 1647: 1642: 1637: 1632: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1620: 1615: 1605: 1600: 1595: 1590: 1584: 1581: 1580: 1577: 1576: 1568: 1567: 1561: 1546: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1521: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1472: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1448: 1447: 1423: 1417: 1402: 1399: 1372: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1315: 1312: 1277: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1250:MichaelLinnear 1214:MichaelLinnear 1199: 1196: 1168: 1165: 1154: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1091: 1088: 1077: 1074: 1069: 1066: 1055: 1052: 1036: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 973: 972: 971: 970: 960: 959: 958: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 851: 848: 847: 846: 802: 799: 798: 797: 769: 766: 758: 755: 731: 728: 727: 726: 702: 699: 688: 685: 684: 683: 668:HappiestCamper 660: 657: 656: 655: 654: 653: 652: 651: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 645: 644: 643: 642: 641: 633: 605: 573: 563: 562: 561: 560: 559: 558: 543: 542: 541: 540: 532: 526: 525: 506: 498: 497: 448: 434: 431: 430: 429: 428: 427: 351: 348: 333: 330: 329: 328: 327: 326: 285: 284: 283: 282: 281: 280: 279: 278: 259: 258: 257: 256: 255: 254: 231: 230: 229: 228: 215:'s mouth, but 213:User:Mackensen 206: 205: 204: 203: 180: 169: 168: 130: 127: 126: 125: 107: 106: 105: 104: 92: 91: 78: 77: 72: 71: 66: 65: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3805: 3794: 3793: 3790: 3783: 3782:WP:COMMONNAME 3778: 3777: 3776: 3775: 3771: 3766: 3761: 3754: 3746: 3742: 3739: 3735: 3734: 3733: 3732: 3729: 3725: 3717: 3713: 3710: 3706: 3702: 3701: 3700: 3699: 3696: 3689: 3685: 3681: 3678: 3674: 3670: 3669: 3668: 3667: 3664: 3655: 3651: 3648: 3644: 3640: 3639: 3638: 3637: 3634: 3630: 3626: 3622: 3614: 3612: 3611: 3608: 3600: 3590: 3587: 3586:Milto LOL pia 3583: 3578: 3577: 3576: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3560: 3557: 3553: 3549: 3548: 3547: 3546: 3545: 3542: 3538: 3537: 3536: 3533: 3529: 3528: 3523: 3519: 3515: 3514: 3513: 3512: 3493: 3490: 3486: 3485: 3484: 3481: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3472: 3471: 3466: 3465: 3464: 3461: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3452: 3451: 3446: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3437: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3429: 3426: 3421: 3418: 3417:any situation 3414: 3408: 3404: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3397: 3393: 3392: 3387: 3384: 3380: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3371: 3370: 3367: 3361: 3360: 3357: 3349: 3345: 3344: 3341: 3336: 3332: 3328: 3324: 3318: 3315: 3311: 3307: 3303: 3299: 3295: 3291: 3287: 3283: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3265: 3264: 3263: 3262: 3259: 3253: 3251: 3247: 3242: 3240: 3234: 3230: 3228: 3224: 3219: 3215: 3212: 3207: 3203: 3201: 3197: 3192: 3188: 3185: 3180: 3176: 3174: 3168: 3162: 3159: 3155: 3151: 3147: 3143: 3139: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3133: 3128: 3124: 3120: 3119:Winston Smith 3116: 3112: 3108: 3096: 3095: 3092: 3087: 3085: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3074: 3071: 3070:Milto LOL pia 3066: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3049: 3045: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3035: 3032: 3031:Milto LOL pia 3027: 3026:'sup Tony :3 3022:lol Powerword 3021: 3019: 3018: 3015: 3012: 3008: 3004: 3000: 2993: 2989: 2985: 2981: 2977: 2969: 2963: 2959: 2953: 2950: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2940: 2934: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2922: 2917: 2896: 2893: 2892: 2887: 2885: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2876: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2866: 2865: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2855: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2845: 2844: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2833: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2822: 2817: 2816:rise above it 2813: 2809: 2805: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2794: 2790: 2789:rise above it 2784: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2772: 2763: 2759: 2758: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2742: 2737: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2731: 2726: 2719: 2715: 2712: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2701: 2684: 2681: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2672: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2663: 2659: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2650: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2640: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2608: 2605: 2603: 2601: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2577: 2575: 2570: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2553: 2548: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2520: 2518: 2510: 2507:Deletion of " 2506: 2500: 2497: 2496: 2494: 2489: 2488: 2485: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2467: 2464:Got a link? - 2463: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2457: 2456: 2454: 2449: 2448: 2445: 2440: 2427: 2424: 2420: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2410: 2402: 2399: 2393: 2390: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2361: 2357: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2337: 2333: 2330: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2320: 2316: 2308: 2304: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2277: 2272: 2268: 2262: 2258: 2255: 2251: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2243: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2227: 2217: 2213: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2198: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2177: 2169: 2165: 2162: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2152: 2148: 2136: 2131: 2129: 2124: 2122: 2117: 2116: 2114: 2113: 2110: 2105: 2100: 2099: 2092: 2089: 2087: 2084: 2082: 2079: 2077: 2074: 2072: 2069: 2067: 2064: 2062: 2059: 2057: 2054: 2052: 2049: 2047: 2044: 2042: 2039: 2037: 2034: 2032: 2029: 2027: 2024: 2022: 2019: 2017: 2014: 2012: 2009: 2008: 2002: 2001: 1994: 1991: 1989: 1986: 1984: 1981: 1979: 1976: 1974: 1971: 1970: 1967: 1962: 1961: 1954: 1951: 1947: 1944: 1942: 1939: 1935: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1927: 1925: 1922: 1920: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1912: 1906: 1903: 1901: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1893: 1889: 1886: 1882: 1879: 1877: 1874: 1872: 1869: 1867: 1864: 1862: 1859: 1855: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1849:Dawoodi Bohra 1847: 1846: 1845: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1832: 1828: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1820: 1816: 1813: 1811: 1808: 1806: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1798: 1797: 1794: 1789: 1788: 1781: 1778: 1776: 1773: 1771: 1768: 1766: 1763: 1761: 1758: 1756: 1753: 1751: 1748: 1746: 1743: 1741: 1738: 1736: 1733: 1732: 1729: 1724: 1723: 1716: 1713: 1711: 1708: 1706: 1705:Eid al-Ghadir 1703: 1701: 1698: 1696: 1693: 1691: 1688: 1686: 1683: 1681: 1678: 1677: 1674: 1669: 1668: 1661: 1658: 1656: 1653: 1651: 1648: 1646: 1643: 1641: 1638: 1636: 1633: 1631: 1628: 1624: 1621: 1619: 1616: 1614: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1606: 1604: 1601: 1599: 1596: 1594: 1591: 1589: 1586: 1585: 1579: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1569: 1565: 1557: 1550: 1544: 1540: 1537: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1527: 1519: 1513: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1493: 1492:84.145.195.64 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1483: 1482:84.145.195.64 1478: 1470: 1466: 1463: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1453: 1446: 1443: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1433: 1428: 1421: 1420:War on Terror 1418: 1416: 1415: 1412: 1411:Typing monkey 1408: 1400: 1398: 1397: 1394: 1393:Milto LOL pia 1390: 1384: 1382: 1376: 1370: 1366: 1363: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1313: 1311: 1310: 1307: 1305: 1299: 1292: 1287: 1283: 1275: 1267: 1264: 1260: 1259:I'm Spartacus 1256: 1255: 1254: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1226: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1215: 1211: 1208: 1205: 1204:User:Miltopia 1197: 1195: 1194: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1178: 1172: 1166: 1164: 1163: 1160: 1152: 1144: 1141: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1105: 1101: 1100: 1097: 1089: 1087: 1086: 1083: 1075: 1073: 1067: 1065: 1064: 1061: 1053: 1051: 1050: 1047: 1042: 1034: 1026: 1023: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1000: 996: 992: 991: 990: 989: 986: 982: 978: 969: 966: 961: 957: 954: 950: 946: 945: 944: 941: 937: 933: 932: 931: 928: 924: 920: 919: 918: 917: 914: 910: 899: 896: 892: 891: 890: 887: 883: 882: 881: 878: 874: 870: 866: 862: 858: 857: 856: 849: 845: 842: 838: 833: 832: 831: 830: 827: 822: 812: 808: 800: 796: 793: 789: 788: 787: 786: 783: 779: 775: 767: 765: 764: 756: 754: 753: 750: 748: 747: 737: 729: 725: 722: 718: 717: 716: 715: 712: 708: 700: 698: 697: 694: 686: 682: 679: 676:No problem. - 675: 674: 673: 672: 669: 666: 658: 640: 636: 631: 627: 626: 625: 622: 618: 614: 613: 612: 608: 603: 599: 595: 594: 593: 590: 586: 582: 581: 580: 576: 571: 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 565: 564: 557: 554: 549: 548: 547: 546: 545: 544: 539: 535: 530: 529: 528: 527: 524: 521: 516: 515: 514: 513: 509: 504: 496: 495: 492: 486: 484: 480: 475: 473: 467: 461: 460: 459: 458: 455: 451: 445: 441: 432: 426: 423: 419: 418: 417: 414: 409: 408: 407: 406: 403: 399: 394: 390: 386: 383: 380: 376: 372: 368: 364: 359: 357: 349: 347: 346: 343: 339: 332:Editor review 331: 325: 322: 318: 317: 316: 313: 312: 306: 305: 304: 303: 300: 299: 294: 290: 277: 274: 273: 267: 266: 265: 264: 263: 262: 261: 260: 253: 252: 249: 242: 237: 236: 235: 234: 233: 232: 227: 224: 223: 218: 214: 210: 209: 208: 207: 202: 199: 198: 193: 189: 185: 181: 178: 173: 172: 171: 170: 167: 166: 163: 155: 154: 153: 152: 149: 148: 143: 140: 136: 128: 124: 121: 117: 113: 109: 108: 103: 100: 96: 95: 94: 93: 90: 87: 85: 80: 79: 74: 73: 68: 67: 63: 61: 58: 55: 51: 50: 49: 48: 45: 43: 39: 34: 26: 19: 3785: 3750: 3721: 3692: 3659: 3618: 3604: 3581: 3551: 3525: 3469: 3449: 3422: 3416: 3412: 3410: 3362: 3353: 3319: 3286:fifth pillar 3279: 3276: 3269:police state 3254: 3243: 3238: 3235: 3231: 3220: 3216: 3210: 3208: 3204: 3193: 3189: 3183: 3181: 3177: 3169: 3165: 3104: 3088: 3080: 3062: 3044:check it out 3040: 3028: 3025: 3010: 3007:bot operator 2973: 2960:Redirect of 2935: 2931: 2915: 2913: 2890: 2882: 2863: 2842: 2829: 2819:gave me. - 2815: 2788: 2785: 2781: 2767: 2743: 2739: 2727: 2723: 2697: 2618:in this link 2611: 2581: 2573: 2549: 2521: 2514: 2495: 2492: 2487: 2483: 2455: 2452: 2447: 2443: 2435: 2405: 2341: 2312: 2269: 2266: 2221: 2173: 2144: 2036:Umm al-Banin 1765:Second Fitna 1645:Intercession 1635:Judgment Day 1523: 1500: 1474: 1452:Mrpouetpouet 1449: 1432:Mrpouetpouet 1429: 1425: 1404: 1385: 1377: 1374: 1318:The article 1317: 1294: 1279: 1245: 1233: 1201: 1198:Your opinion 1175: 1173: 1170: 1159:24.176.20.60 1156: 1126: 1102: 1093: 1079: 1071: 1057: 1038: 974: 906: 863:comes under 853: 804: 771: 760: 739: 733: 704: 690: 665:200.88.134.9 662: 616: 499: 487: 482: 478: 476: 471: 468: 464: 436: 381: 371:Undergarment 361:In short, I 360: 353: 335: 309: 296: 286: 270: 245: 240: 220: 195: 176: 158: 145: 141: 132: 30: 3728:Casey Abell 3688:Black Merda 3323:WP:BADLINKS 3306:re-ban them 2916:single edit 2746:WT:BADLINKS 2597:Floppydog66 2374:--Akhilleus 2280:84.18.21.51 2274:—Preceding 2250:Johnny Kidd 2224:—Preceding 2179:—Preceding 1966:Ahl al-Kisa 1881:Qutbi Bohra 1876:Alavi Bohra 1854:Progressive 1780:Persecution 1760:First Fitna 1715:Omar Koshan 1700:Eid al-Adha 1695:Eid al-Fitr 1598:Prophethood 1526:FlagSteward 1422:name change 1171:Greetings, 1127:Pinus nigra 1008:Hi and Lois 820:ie de Vivre 790:No problem. 363:left a note 342:Tim Vickers 120:Tim Vickers 3747:Iao Valley 3619:Hi, about 3518:ad hominem 3407:photograph 3014:CSDWarnBot 2999:Peter Boyd 2988:Peter Boyd 2980:Peter Boyd 2962:Peter Boyd 2624:about it. 2545:Rob Richie 2529:User:Acct4 2517:User:BenB4 2021:Umm Salama 2005:Holy women 1593:Holy Books 1588:Monotheism 1564:Shia Islam 1362:Cyrus XIII 1352:Cyrus XIII 1238:User:Anomo 1054:Cerdo move 837:WP:CANVASS 792:Ferrylodge 782:Ferrylodge 763:MarkDilley 701:Uchiha Fan 483:ask for it 373:article. 217:this reply 112:Straw poll 84:SlimVirgin 42:SlimVirgin 3789:GTBacchus 3738:GTBacchus 3709:GTBacchus 3677:GTBacchus 3647:GTBacchus 3556:GTBacchus 3527:fallacies 3522:tu quoque 3489:GTBacchus 3480:GTBacchus 3425:GTBacchus 3383:GTBacchus 3258:GTBacchus 3152:, and we 3142:rebooting 3127:Wikiality 3091:GTBacchus 3089:See ya. - 3048:GTBacchus 2949:Crockspot 2939:GTBacchus 2921:Crockspot 2875:GTBacchus 2854:GTBacchus 2832:GTBacchus 2821:Crockspot 2793:GTBacchus 2771:Crockspot 2754:GTBacchus 2680:GTBacchus 2649:GTBacchus 2622:this link 2566:GTBacchus 2466:GTBacchus 2423:GTBacchus 2389:GTBacchus 2360:GTBacchus 2329:GTBacchus 2319:Lucretius 2300:GTBacchus 2254:GTBacchus 2209:GTBacchus 2185:IDNexpert 2176:IDNexpert 2161:GTBacchus 2056:Shahrbanu 1941:Qizilbash 1536:GTBacchus 1509:GTBacchus 1462:GTBacchus 1442:GTBacchus 1381:meatspace 1276:Sherurcij 1263:GTBacchus 1225:GTBacchus 1190:Sherurcij 1140:GTBacchus 1115:GTBacchus 1068:missed it 1022:GTBacchus 1012:Lara_bran 999:Lara_bran 985:Lara_bran 965:Lara_bran 953:GTBacchus 940:Lara_bran 927:GTBacchus 913:Lara_bran 895:Lara bran 886:GTBacchus 877:Lara bran 841:GTBacchus 807:this diff 721:GTBacchus 678:GTBacchus 621:GTBacchus 589:GTBacchus 553:GTBacchus 520:GTBacchus 491:GTBacchus 413:GTBacchus 321:GTBacchus 248:GTBacchus 162:GTBacchus 99:GTBacchus 3445:WP:BEANS 3331:WP:BEANS 3065:BADSITES 2541:FairVote 2537:FairVote 2475:talkpage 2276:unsigned 2238:contribs 2226:unsigned 2193:contribs 2181:unsigned 1973:Muhammad 1929:Bektashi 1905:Satpanth 1839:Musta'li 1834:Isma'ili 1745:Mubahala 1685:Arba'een 1556:a series 1554:Part of 1297:Rangeley 1236:at ED, ( 1076:Licenese 949:Phaedrus 859:Article 801:Told off 757:connect? 687:Pictures 602:WP:CHU/U 585:a thread 385:contribs 311:MastCell 298:MastCell 272:MastCell 222:MastCell 197:MastCell 147:MastCell 54:WP:POINT 3673:bowling 3607:JoshuaZ 3541:ThuranX 3532:JoshuaZ 3460:ThuranX 3436:ThuranX 3396:ThuranX 3366:JoshuaZ 3356:JoshuaZ 3335:WP:BITE 3302:WP:RFCU 3294:blocked 3184:kind of 3084:Fonzies 2711:Flyer22 2700:Flyer22 2671:Flyer22 2662:Flyer22 2639:Flyer22 2626:Flyer22 2562:sandbox 2230:Pcranny 1844:Tayyibi 1815:Shaykhi 1805:Akhbari 1800:Ja'fari 1728:History 1618:Twelver 1613:Ismaili 1608:Imamate 1234:Samsara 744:Radecki 450:ʇuǝɯɯoɔ 422:alanyst 402:alanyst 398:WP:BITE 393:WP:BITE 3686:AfD: 3633:Laudak 3327:WP:NPA 3314:WP:IAR 3298:WP:IAR 3284:, the 3282:WP:IAR 3079:link. 3003:WP:WMD 2992:CSD R1 2812:WP:AGF 2810:, and 2808:WP:NPA 2804:WP:CIV 2750:WT:NPA 2720:Hi GTB 2479:Charon 2439:Charon 2151:Enzuru 2071:Narjis 2011:Fatima 1993:Husayn 1983:Fatima 1946:Ishiki 1914:Ghulat 1895:Nizari 1888:Hafizi 1827:Houthi 1775:Origin 1690:Mawlid 1680:Ashura 1650:Clergy 1630:Angels 1291:WP:OWN 995:WT:IAR 923:WT:IAR 909:WP:IAR 871:, and 776:, and 707:Uchiha 659:Thanks 630:Lojban 617:images 598:User:L 375:Duke53 3695:Vytal 3601:Email 3552:whole 3146:cream 2873:it. - 2051:Rubab 1988:Hasan 1924:Alevi 1919:Alawi 1900:Khoja 1822:Zaydi 1810:Usuli 1750:Khumm 1623:Zaydi 1375:Hey, 1184:with 1153:FNORD 736:DARPA 116:WP:RS 16:< 3582:Tony 3520:and 3379:h2g2 3317:are. 3310:Look 2620:and 2493:talk 2453:talk 2378:talk 2356:here 2284:talk 2234:talk 2189:talk 1505:calm 1407:here 1303:talk 1286:here 1284:and 1282:here 1209:and 1041:PTDI 839:). - 768:lede 600:is? 454:ɐqǝɟ 379:talk 241:that 38:here 33:WP:V 27:WP:V 3759:Hús 3675:. - 3661:so. 3239:did 3211:not 3200:ANI 3198:or 3173:ANI 3046:. - 2994:). 2791:. - 2552:Abd 2350:to 2207:. - 1978:Ali 1501:you 1180:of 1131:MPF 1096:MPF 979:to 951:. - 925:. - 479:one 3769:nd 3470:AL 3450:AL 3196:AN 3125:. 2891:AL 2864:AL 2843:AL 2806:, 2602:) 2543:, 2477:. 2380:) 2286:) 2240:) 2236:• 2195:) 2191:• 1558:on 1338:, 1334:, 1246:me 1060:Rl 1010:. 742:AK 358:. 190:, 3787:- 3764:ö 2937:- 2888:— 2886:. 2647:- 2511:" 2490:/ 2484:X 2450:/ 2444:X 2376:( 2282:( 2232:( 2187:( 2134:e 2127:t 2120:v 1306:) 1300:( 1223:- 825:° 818:o 816:J 635:L 607:L 575:L 534:L 518:- 508:L 489:- 411:- 382:· 377:( 160:-

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index