Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Gbradt

Source 📝

220: 328: 38: 401:
George, I agree with you that this is someone using the article as an excuse to promote their consultation services. I have no objection to summarizing it in the same one-sentence manner as other systems (their framework is 3 C's and a D) and removing the direct link to Kaiser Associates or whatever
277:
Thanks for the kind words. I wish that I had more time to work on it. I think that most employers make it up as they go along, with the trial-and-error method (or more accurately, the trial-and-error-and-repair method) of bringing in new employees. I'd say that you've prevented more disasters than
21:
I most certainly have a vested interest in the field of onboarding having written three books on the subject. At the same time, having written three books on the subject, I have a lot of knowledge about it. Certainly plan to continue to be part of the discussion, exercising great caution to base my
148:
which it would be reasonable to assume from your Username you are closely connected to. Please reread the guidelines which have been linked to above and seek advice if required. Failure to follow these guidelines and continue to edit as you have today will result in further and more formal warnings
49:
policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should
233:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " 240:
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
190:
during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
179: 241: 332: 331:
Welcome to Knowledge (XXG). Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added such as to the page
352: 340: 351:
tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the
208: 94: 46: 300:
I deleted your addition because it appeared to be information guiding a reader on the best way to conduct/construct an interview.
113: 42: 22:
comments on published sources in the public domain. Would urge others to push back if I go to far. Look forward to the debate.
109: 314: 41:
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Knowledge (XXG), you may have a
230: 69:
articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
76: 336: 251:
You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the
102: 98: 144:. Despite this I and others have tonight reversed several of your edits where you have added a reference to a 260: 178:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 301: 108:
For information on how to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) when you have conflict of interest, please see
366: 197: 356: 386: 283: 347:
or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Knowledge (XXG) uses
93:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to
256: 255:
template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.
312: 121: 344: 305: 140:
I see you have already received advice on how to conduct your editing where there is a clear
86: 154: 252: 245: 234: 183: 175: 141: 131: 381:
I looked at the article and it hasn't been retagged. I also wasn't the closer of the AfD.
360: 191: 149:
and/or to you being blocked from editing Knowledge (XXG). Please heed this polite advice.
403: 382: 279: 112:. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see 85:
to the Knowledge (XXG) article or website of your organization in other articles (see
294: 309: 226: 212: 117: 187: 171: 165: 150: 23: 304:, and your reference to guidance from a specific self-help book may constitute 219: 270: 348: 327: 37: 359:
to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --
406: 390: 371: 316: 287: 264: 202: 158: 125: 79:
about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
31: 174:, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for 308:. Please discuss any concerns at the article's talk page. -- 186:
with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
145: 229:, an article which you have created or worked on, for 180:
Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/User:Gbradt
242:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/George Bradt 355:before reinserting it. Please take a look at the 333:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Onboarding 110:our frequently asked questions for organizations 8: 341:Knowledge (XXG) is not a collection of links 343:; nor should it be used as a platform for 146:book by George Bradt and Mary Vonnegut 302:Knowledge (XXG) is not a how-to guide 45:. In keeping with Knowledge (XXG)'s 7: 114:our conflict of interest guidelines 14: 326: 218: 36: 1: 391:16:58, 24 December 2009 (UTC) 372:18:11, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 337:guidelines for external links 317:16:37, 24 November 2009 (UTC) 288:19:41, 23 November 2009 (UTC) 265:01:30, 19 November 2009 (UTC) 203:00:04, 19 November 2009 (UTC) 159:23:06, 18 November 2009 (UTC) 322:Inappropriate external links 126:17:34, 28 October 2009 (UTC) 99:verifiability of information 32:14:01, 29 October 2009 (UTC) 235:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 423: 248:with four tildes (~~~~). 407:14:58, 30 May 2010 (UTC) 225:An editor has nominated 27: 339:and have been removed. 335:do not comply with our 244:and please be sure to 182:and please be sure to 56:exercise great caution 253:articles for deletion 95:neutral point of view 47:neutral point of view 142:Conflict of Interest 132:Conflict of Interest 87:Knowledge (XXG):Spam 77:deletion discussions 43:conflict of interest 353:article's talk page 278:you'll ever know. 246:sign your comments 184:sign your comments 164:MfD nomination of 414: 369: 363: 330: 222: 200: 194: 40: 422: 421: 417: 416: 415: 413: 412: 411: 398: 379: 367: 361: 324: 298: 274: 223: 216: 198: 192: 169: 135: 103:autobiographies 19: 12: 11: 5: 420: 418: 410: 409: 397: 394: 378: 375: 323: 320: 297: 292: 291: 290: 273: 268: 217: 215: 211:nomination of 206: 168: 162: 134: 129: 116:. Thank you. 91: 90: 80: 70: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 419: 408: 405: 402:it's called. 400: 399: 395: 393: 392: 388: 384: 376: 374: 373: 370: 364: 358: 354: 350: 346: 342: 338: 334: 329: 321: 319: 318: 315: 313: 311: 307: 303: 296: 295:Job interview 293: 289: 285: 281: 276: 275: 272: 269: 267: 266: 262: 258: 257:hamiltonstone 254: 249: 247: 243: 238: 236: 232: 228: 221: 214: 210: 207: 205: 204: 201: 195: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 167: 163: 161: 160: 156: 152: 147: 143: 138: 133: 130: 128: 127: 123: 119: 115: 111: 106: 104: 100: 96: 88: 84: 81: 78: 74: 73:participating 71: 68: 64: 61: 60: 59: 57: 53: 48: 44: 39: 34: 33: 29: 25: 16: 380: 357:welcome page 325: 299: 250: 239: 227:George Bradt 224: 213:George Bradt 170: 139: 136: 107: 92: 82: 72: 66: 62: 55: 51: 35: 20: 17:October 2009 362:Orange Mike 345:advertising 193:Orange Mike 188:User:Gbradt 172:User:Gbradt 166:User:Gbradt 137:Hi Gbradt, 396:Onboarding 271:Onboarding 404:Mandsford 383:Joe Chill 280:Mandsford 349:nofollow 231:deletion 176:deletion 67:creating 377:Article 310:SquidSK 118:MrOllie 83:linking 63:editing 151:Tmol42 101:, and 58:when: 24:Gbradt 52:avoid 387:talk 368:Talk 306:spam 284:talk 261:talk 237:"). 199:Talk 155:talk 122:talk 28:talk 365:| 209:AfD 196:| 75:in 65:or 54:or 389:) 286:) 263:) 157:) 124:) 105:. 97:, 89:). 30:) 385:( 282:( 259:( 153:( 120:( 26:(

Index

Gbradt
talk
14:01, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

conflict of interest
neutral point of view
deletion discussions
Knowledge (XXG):Spam
neutral point of view
verifiability of information
autobiographies
our frequently asked questions for organizations
our conflict of interest guidelines
MrOllie
talk
17:34, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Conflict of Interest
Conflict of Interest
book by George Bradt and Mary Vonnegut
Tmol42
talk
23:06, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
User:Gbradt
User:Gbradt
deletion
Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/User:Gbradt
sign your comments
User:Gbradt
Orange Mike
Talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.