713:! I'm truly impressed. I'm afraid, however, that my knowledge in this area is still quite limited, since I have only been taking Mandarin Chinese language classes for the past two years. Therefore, my review of the article might turn out to be shortsighted. I perhaps wouldn't catch everything that needs to be fixed in order to make the article FA material. However, to express my gratitude for your fine work, I will present you and Rjanag with an honorary barnstar for your efforts.--
321:
872:(sorry about the late response) I did see your comments about the article structure; nevertheless, per my responses there, I still believe the current structure is better, and that if any changes do need to be made they could be accomplished as effectively by just changing the titles of a few awkwardly-titled sections rather than doing a wholesale reshuffling.
290:
Thanks. Actually I'm very happy with the FAC since I got much more feedback than at peer review. Term will start soon and I have work to do. But when I get the time I'll study the stuff I don't know about, such as sheaf cohomology. I'll also read about the history of algebraic topology. Thanks again!
1074:
I thought the nomination would be at least another week, but as it turns out it was promoted today! Thanks for your invaluable comments and the herculean amount of time and scrutiny you put into this article; it has definitely paid off. As you suggested at the FAC, I'm sure the article will continue
646:
It's better than "it's easy to see", which is far less formal, and is subjective. Do remember that in replacing the content already there, you removed what represented "some amount of work" on my part. Some of your points were valid; others, as I have demonstrated above, were not. I've tried to find
277:
Naturally, my first comment on your talk page has to include a belated welcome from me, and my congratulations on your excellent choice of username. :-) Knowledge can be a funny place sometimes, but it has lots of great editors, who are friendly and want to help out. Good luck with your studies, and
821:
Do you have any thoughts? Personally, I feel the article is ready and I'm thinking of re-submitting it within the next couple weeks (I'm going to be busy in RL for a bit, but in my experience my FACs don't get any substantive responses until a week or so after the page has been transcluded). But I
269:
I hope you won't be discouraged by the unsuccessful FAC. The timescale for an FAC is typically 1-2 weeks, and the work needed on the article doesn't really fit into that. The good news is that you have lots of suggestions for improvements, and you can try again at FAC anytime you want. I'm still
731:
509:
The existence and definition of spherical wedges have nothing to do with the embedding in R^3 and the coordinate system endowed to it. The reference just builds an example. If you really stick to this then put it elsewhere than the second line of the introduction.
631:
Finally, please don't boldly revert what represented some amount of work. Why did you revert back, for example, to "The volume of a spherical wedge can be intuitively related to the AB definition". This really is not encyclopeadic, nor is it even good maths.
615:
I agree that some of those phrases could be reworded, but everything else is fine. Unless you have further objection substantiated by common practice or the style guides listed above, I'll restore the old version and make some of the wording less awkward.
134:
Thanks for the barnstar, that was very kind of you. You've done a great job with the Mayer-Vietoris sequence article by the way. It's your hard work on that article that gave me the motivation to try to make these graphics. So thanks for that, too!
239:.. about that "non-mathematicians can assess 1a" bit. Of course I know where you're coming from. But not in the rules. And a little impolite... too fine a point, and all that. But I'm sure you'll disagree. Good luck with the nom.
233:
1295:
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
415:
Firstly, the bolding of base and hemisphere (as terminologies particular to the article) is within standard for mathematical articles on
Knowledge – I can pull up a large list of them that use the same house style.
1344:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
40:
welcome to WP! Congrats and thanks for your nice work on Mayer-Vietoris. I have just reviewed the article. In case you have not noticed yet, there is also a discussion board for mathematics articles etc. at
1125:
You're closing/archiving threads too quickly. Give it some time to settle, it's not a live chat.... Asia is still sleeping. The
Chinese will be upset when they learn how you left them out of the loop :)).
983:
Nice attention to detail! Have addressed your comments and suggestions, most of which I agree with, and have requested clarification on how the annotation feature might be used for the article's pictures.
1012:
Thanks again for the careful reading, and the support! Please ping me if you ever need a copyedit or peer review for something you've written, or if you need comments at an FAC, I'd be glad to help out.
1191:
to let the directors know if you think the article meets FAC standards or not? It would be a shame for it to tank because of insufficient reviews. Thanks for your help in improving the article.
951:
60:
Hi again. Most probably I will not be able to keep my promise to help out on this article, at least not this year, sorry. However, one generalisation, namely MV sequence for (classical)
1188:
220:
I might have suggested that an A-class review might be the next step for this article. I think you'd be more likely to get useful feedback from WPM reviewers than from FAC ...
45:. In order to get more feedback on Peer Reviews etc. it is often helpful to post a message there (even if few people are inclined to do reviews). Hope you enjoy the place,
112:
1318:
679:
There are two principal reasons why the United States of North
America has been unable to change to a sensible measurement system that 200 / 203 countries use.
349:. Please rationalise your disagreement, because it is a mathematical fact that the additional lines here are mere re-arrangements of what was had before. —
64:
should be not too hard. (If you haven't learnt it yet, this is a good opportunity ;)). Most reasonable books about sheaves will contain such things, e.g.
969:
Done. Some of the comments are just personal preference. Hope it helps. Oh, BTW, I still haven't read the section
History and taxonomy, it scares me.
158:) the rightmost homology groups should be H_{n-1} (not H_{n+1}). Since you made the png, I figured it would just be easier for you to fix it. Cheers.
1141:
Oops, sorry. I just wanted to stop the flow of negative comments! My god, proposing something is a soldier's job. Might not want to do it again...
334:
822:
wanted to at least check with you, since I haven't gotten any messages from you in a while, and User:Dasani seems to have gone inactive (and his
42:
78:
1369:
954:. I've replied to your last set of comments; please let me know if there's anything else you think needs changing on the FAC page. Cheers,
1060:
778:
Sure, I'll try my best. The article is quite long, though, so it might be a long haul rolling it up there. But details always matter.
1300:
1187:
Hi GGirl, I think I've addressed all the points you made on the talk page. If you would be so kind, could you leave a note on the
1365:
579:
And there is nothing grammatically awkward about those phrases, though I'm not opposed to a reword. The "we" could be removed.
798:
No, I'm not fluent in
Chinese. I just know the very basics, having lived there a few years. Thanks for accepting the review!
1250:
655:
624:
604:
568:
525:
513:
You're correct. However, we were taking an example in the AB semidisk explanation. To complain about my choice to use the
484:
357:
1258:
1227:
1088:
915:
885:
839:
1379:
1356:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
271:
155:
1361:
453:
1266:
1235:
461:
496:
96:
50:
305:
That's the spirit! I'm familiar with sheaf cohomology, and will also try to read around the history a bit more.
649:
618:
598:
562:
537:
519:
478:
351:
1314:
1310:
899:
691:
1106:
Thank you for your message. I shall have to have read the proporal more carefully before leaving comments.
855:
675:
A disgusting comment has been placed on the
Metrication in the United States talk page. Can you remove it?
465:
433:
307:
280:
1262:
1231:
1111:
759:
746:
715:
858:. Also, do you think the structure of the article can be improved (cf my last post on the talk page)?
1390:
92:
46:
1357:
1289:
1276:
495:
Italicisation could probably be used instead, but I believe bolding is fine too. Also refer to the
814:
754:
710:
1333:
1324:
1207:
1169:
1142:
1028:
999:
970:
927:
859:
851:
799:
750:
633:
583:
544:
420:
402:
292:
250:
207:
174:
75:
582:
I didn't say grammatically awkward, I said awkward: it doesn't sound nice, it is not smooth.
1353:
1337:
1196:
1135:
1107:
1018:
989:
959:
823:
687:
163:
140:
120:
61:
1352:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
87:
1386:
1306:
926:
I have given my thoughts on the FAC page. You are doing a great job addressing my issues.
457:
437:
327:
320:
84:
71:
684:
2. The average
American lacks the intellect necessary to be able to handle such a change.
1349:
1341:
441:
221:
197:
730:
1345:
1131:
473:
240:
1165:
682:
1. The financial cost of such a change would probably cripple a weakening economy.
154:
Hey there, in the commutative diagram showing the naturality of the MV sequence (
1254:
1192:
1077:
1014:
985:
955:
943:
904:
874:
828:
785:
706:
159:
136:
116:
1059:
557:
445:
1299:
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for
536:
The year of publishing is, again, within house style for
Knowledge. Refer to
753:
with this
Barnstar of Diligence for her extraordinary contributions made to
449:
1394:
1373:
1270:
1239:
1215:
1200:
1173:
1150:
1115:
1093:
1036:
1022:
1007:
993:
978:
963:
935:
920:
890:
867:
844:
807:
793:
765:
721:
695:
657:
641:
626:
606:
591:
570:
552:
527:
517:-axis seems equivalent to complaining about my choice to use 'A' and 'B'. —
486:
428:
410:
359:
311:
300:
284:
258:
243:
224:
215:
200:
182:
167:
144:
124:
100:
54:
1180:
1127:
469:
1303:, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
111:
Hey GeometryGirl, I saw your request for graphics and I posted a reply
234:
Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Mayer–Vietoris sequence/archive1
1385:
Hi, just wanted to thank you for this excellent and clear article. --
1102:
Thank you for the message about the Knowledge: Village Pump Proposal
1340:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
826:
suggested that he wasn't going to review the article after all).
1075:
to develop and improve as time goes on and new eyes come to it.
757:, which is a Good and soon-to-be Featured article. Well done!
854:- a good copyeditor - said he would give the article a look,
898:
I've finished up addressing your comments at the bottom of
337:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
319:
596:
That's a valid point. I have since completed the rewords. —
506:-axis is as good as any, and was used by the reference.
346:
193:
998:
Replied. Great job! Should support the FAC tomorrow.
368:
why is 'base' in bold? why is 'hemisphere' in bold?
22:
Threads started here will usually be answered here.
950:Hi GeometryGirl, thanks much for commenting on my
1332:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
394:"if we extropolate the same principle" is awkward
850:Well go for it if you want. However two points:
709:have done an outstanding job on the article for
382:why is the year of publishing added in the text?
781:Are you fluent in Chinese and English as well?
450:Factorial#Factorial-like_products_and_functions
326:Hello, GeometryGirl. You have new messages at
1164:I have given you my answer on my talk page:)--
385:'we' (used several times) is not encyclopaedic
8:
150:Minor typo in naturality commutative diagram
1230:- much as before. We'd be glad to see you.
274:, and will try to be more help when I can.
1206:I've done a further review. Glad to help.
1057:
728:
647:a compromise between the two versions. —
388:"the AB definition" can be better stated
206:Thanks! Happy new year to you as well.
1305:If you have any questions, please see
43:Knowledge talk:Wikiproject Mathematics
1245:Cambridge meetup (Campus Ambassadors)
7:
1257:who while in the UK is looking for
1253:, not least for the chance to meet
1076:
903:
873:
827:
249:Sorry, I did not mean to be rude.
156:Mayer–Vietoris_sequence#Naturality
107:Candidate graphic for the 2-sphere
70:, Universitext, Berlin, New York:
14:
1358:review the candidates' statements
434:Function_(mathematics)#Vocabulary
1286:The media file you uploaded as:
1058:
729:
670:Metrication in the United States
543:Where exactly can I find that?
391:"Beman relates that" is awkward
1364:. For the Election committee,
1334:Arbitration Committee election
1325:ArbCom elections are now open!
1251:the Cambridge meetup on Sunday
1201:15:19, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
1174:14:07, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
1120:
278:with your contributions here.
1:
1374:13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
1271:19:03, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
1222:Meetup in Cambridge, 27 March
1151:18:01, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
1136:17:58, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
1116:20:44, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
1094:00:28, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
1037:16:36, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
1023:14:45, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
1008:21:49, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
994:21:34, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
979:19:47, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
964:16:46, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
936:11:44, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
921:23:16, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
216:12:13, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
201:22:19, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
183:13:02, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
168:04:50, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
145:23:29, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
125:19:54, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
101:14:24, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
1228:Knowledge:Meetup/Cambridge 6
760:
716:
312:21:17, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
301:20:35, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
285:20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
55:22:15, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
1360:and submit your choices on
1279:missing description details
1249:You might be interested in
1216:15:16, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
1121:Hold on, I'm still reading!
891:05:51, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
868:18:57, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
845:18:30, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
808:18:30, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
794:03:05, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
766:16:27, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
722:16:27, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
454:Cartesian coordinate system
375:-axis? why can't it be the
259:09:07, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
244:01:43, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
225:19:21, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
21:
18:
1410:
1395:05:48, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
1366:MediaWiki message delivery
1319:01:14, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
1240:19:38, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
462:Pushforward (differential)
1068:The Copyeditor's Barnstar
1064:
1027:That's very kind of you!
902:; sorry about the delay.
739:The Barnstar of Diligence
735:
696:11:06, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
658:10:44, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
642:09:53, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
627:02:45, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
607:10:42, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
592:09:53, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
571:10:42, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
553:09:53, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
528:10:41, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
487:10:39, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
446:Set theory#Basic concepts
429:09:53, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
411:02:30, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
360:02:23, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
347:To disagree is not enough
1211:
1146:
1032:
1003:
974:
931:
863:
803:
637:
587:
548:
538:Knowledge:Citing sources
424:
406:
379:-axis or any other axis?
364:Here are a few reasons:
296:
254:
211:
178:
66:Iversen, Birger (1986),
1380:Mayer–Vietoris sequence
900:Talk:Chinese classifier
824:message on my talk page
272:Mayer–Vietoris sequence
466:Interval (mathematics)
324:
1338:Arbitration Committee
323:
68:Cohomology of sheaves
1342:arbitration process
1290:File:Correction.JPG
1277:File:Correction.JPG
651:Anonymous Dissident
620:Anonymous Dissident
600:Anonymous Dissident
564:Anonymous Dissident
521:Anonymous Dissident
480:Anonymous Dissident
476:... need I go on? —
353:Anonymous Dissident
1354:arbitration policy
1259:Campus Ambassadors
815:Chinese classifier
764:
761:Pericles of Athens
755:Chinese classifier
747:Pericles of Athens
720:
717:Pericles of Athens
711:Chinese classifier
654:
623:
603:
567:
524:
497:WP:Manual of Style
483:
356:
335:remove this notice
325:
27:
1311:Theo's Little Bot
1099:
1098:
1092:
919:
889:
852:user:Brianboulton
843:
771:
770:
758:
714:
648:
617:
597:
561:
518:
477:
350:
328:Salih's talk page
80:978-3-540-16389-3
15:
1401:
1263:Charles Matthews
1232:Charles Matthews
1085:
1081:
1062:
1055:
1054:
912:
908:
882:
878:
836:
832:
792:
784:
762:
733:
726:
725:
718:
652:
621:
601:
565:
522:
481:
354:
338:
90:
62:sheaf cohomology
25:
19:
1409:
1408:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1383:
1362:the voting page
1328:
1321:
1307:Help:Image page
1281:
1247:
1224:
1185:
1162:
1123:
1104:
1091:
1079:
1053:
948:
918:
906:
888:
876:
842:
830:
819:
813:Second FAC for
790:
782:
776:
703:
672:
650:
619:
599:
563:
520:
479:
458:Vector calculus
438:Category theory
352:
344:
339:
332:
267:
237:
191:
189:Congratulations
152:
132:
109:
93:Jakob.scholbach
81:
72:Springer-Verlag
65:
47:Jakob.scholbach
35:
26:
12:
11:
5:
1407:
1405:
1382:
1377:
1331:
1327:
1322:
1293:
1292:
1284:Dear uploader:
1282:
1280:
1274:
1246:
1243:
1223:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1184:
1177:
1161:
1158:
1156:
1154:
1153:
1122:
1119:
1103:
1100:
1097:
1096:
1087:
1071:
1070:
1065:
1063:
1052:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
947:
940:
939:
938:
914:
896:
895:
894:
893:
884:
838:
818:
811:
775:
772:
769:
768:
742:
741:
736:
734:
702:
699:
683:
671:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
613:
612:
611:
610:
609:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
500:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
442:Exponentiation
419:Please do so.
399:
398:
395:
392:
389:
386:
383:
380:
369:
363:
362:
343:
340:
331:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
266:
263:
262:
261:
236:
231:
230:
229:
228:
227:
190:
187:
186:
185:
173:Well spotted!
151:
148:
131:
128:
108:
105:
104:
103:
79:
34:
31:
29:
16:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1406:
1397:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1381:
1378:
1376:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1326:
1323:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1309:. Thank you.
1308:
1304:
1302:
1297:
1291:
1288:
1287:
1285:
1278:
1275:
1273:
1272:
1268:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1244:
1242:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1183:
1182:
1178:
1176:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1159:
1157:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1118:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1101:
1095:
1090:
1084:
1083:
1073:
1072:
1069:
1066:
1061:
1056:
1050:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
996:
995:
991:
987:
982:
981:
980:
976:
972:
968:
967:
966:
965:
961:
957:
953:
946:
945:
941:
937:
933:
929:
925:
924:
923:
922:
917:
911:
910:
901:
892:
887:
881:
880:
871:
870:
869:
865:
861:
857:
853:
849:
848:
847:
846:
841:
835:
834:
825:
816:
812:
810:
809:
805:
801:
796:
795:
789:
788:
779:
773:
767:
763:
756:
752:
751:Geometry Girl
748:
744:
743:
740:
737:
732:
727:
724:
723:
719:
712:
708:
700:
698:
697:
693:
689:
685:
680:
677:
676:
669:
659:
656:
653:
645:
644:
643:
639:
635:
630:
629:
628:
625:
622:
614:
608:
605:
602:
595:
594:
593:
589:
585:
581:
580:
578:
572:
569:
566:
559:
556:
555:
554:
550:
546:
542:
541:
539:
535:
529:
526:
523:
516:
512:
511:
508:
507:
505:
501:
498:
494:
488:
485:
482:
475:
474:Homeomorphism
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
432:
431:
430:
426:
422:
418:
417:
414:
413:
412:
408:
404:
401:
400:
396:
393:
390:
387:
384:
381:
378:
374:
370:
367:
366:
365:
361:
358:
355:
348:
341:
336:
329:
322:
313:
310:
309:
304:
303:
302:
298:
294:
289:
288:
287:
286:
283:
282:
275:
273:
270:watchlisting
265:Encouragement
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
247:
246:
245:
242:
235:
232:
226:
223:
219:
218:
217:
213:
209:
205:
204:
203:
202:
199:
195:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
171:
170:
169:
165:
161:
157:
149:
147:
146:
142:
138:
129:
127:
126:
122:
118:
114:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
86:
82:
77:
73:
69:
63:
59:
58:
57:
56:
52:
48:
44:
38:
32:
30:
24:
20:
1384:
1329:
1298:
1294:
1283:
1248:
1225:
1208:GeometryGirl
1186:
1179:
1163:
1155:
1143:GeometryGirl
1124:
1105:
1067:
1029:GeometryGirl
1000:GeometryGirl
971:GeometryGirl
949:
942:
928:GeometryGirl
897:
860:GeometryGirl
820:
800:GeometryGirl
797:
786:
780:
777:
738:
704:
686:
681:
678:
674:
673:
634:GeometryGirl
584:GeometryGirl
545:GeometryGirl
514:
503:
421:GeometryGirl
403:GeometryGirl
376:
372:
345:
308:Geometry guy
306:
293:GeometryGirl
281:Geometry guy
279:
276:
268:
251:GeometryGirl
238:
208:GeometryGirl
192:
175:GeometryGirl
153:
133:
110:
67:
39:
36:
28:
23:
17:
1255:User:Sadads
1108:ACEOREVIVED
944:Polyozellus
774:August 2009
707:User:Rjanag
688:ILuvAmerica
371:why is the
33:MV sequence
1387:Erel Segal
1350:topic bans
342:"Disagree"
196:New Year!
115:. Cheers.
1346:site bans
1301:deletion
1181:Rhodotus
1089:contribs
916:contribs
886:contribs
840:contribs
749:, award
705:You and
470:Topology
333:You can
241:Ling.Nut
1189:FAC nom
1166:Judo112
88:0842190
1336:. The
1315:error?
1193:Sasata
1160:Answer
1051:Thanks
1015:Sasata
986:Sasata
956:Sasata
787:Dasani
222:Martin
198:Martin
160:RobHar
137:RobHar
130:Thanks
117:RobHar
194:Happy
113:there
1391:talk
1370:talk
1267:talk
1236:talk
1226:See
1212:talk
1197:talk
1170:talk
1147:talk
1132:talk
1112:talk
1082:anaɢ
1033:talk
1019:talk
1004:talk
990:talk
975:talk
960:talk
932:talk
909:anaɢ
879:anaɢ
864:talk
856:here
833:anaɢ
804:talk
701:Wow!
692:talk
638:talk
588:talk
558:Here
549:talk
502:The
425:talk
407:talk
397:etc.
297:talk
255:talk
212:talk
179:talk
164:talk
141:talk
121:talk
97:talk
76:ISBN
51:talk
37:Hi,
1330:Hi,
1128:NVO
952:FAC
745:I,
560:. —
1393:)
1372:)
1348:,
1317:)
1269:)
1261:.
1238:)
1214:)
1199:)
1172:)
1149:)
1134:)
1114:)
1035:)
1021:)
1006:)
992:)
977:)
962:)
934:)
866:)
806:)
694:)
640:)
590:)
551:)
540:.
472:,
468:,
464:,
460:,
456:,
452:,
448:,
444:,
440:,
436:,
427:)
409:)
299:)
257:)
214:)
181:)
166:)
143:)
123:)
99:)
91:.
85:MR
83:,
74:,
53:)
1389:(
1368:(
1313:(
1265:(
1234:(
1210:(
1195:(
1168:(
1145:(
1130:(
1110:(
1086:/
1080:ʨ
1078:r
1031:(
1017:(
1002:(
988:(
973:(
958:(
930:(
913:/
907:ʨ
905:r
883:/
877:ʨ
875:r
862:(
837:/
831:ʨ
829:r
817:?
802:(
791:★
783:★
690:(
636:(
616:—
586:(
547:(
515:z
504:z
499:.
423:(
405:(
377:x
373:z
330:.
295:(
253:(
210:(
177:(
162:(
139:(
119:(
95:(
49:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.